THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)
Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: MandiOLP on 25 Nov 2008, 19:09
-
The idea that someone would intentionally write a book about a time traveling viking becoming a Navy SEAL got me curious, so I looked it up. In the process, I came across a hilarious blog/community that had a few choice words for the comic.
http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/its-all-about-the-subtext/ (http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/its-all-about-the-subtext/)
My favorite quote from the blog: "So a slap on the wrist for Questionable Content for the girl porn/shitty romance double-punch."
Don't we all just feel so bad now? :-P
-
I have no idea what their fucking problem is.
-
Note the title of the page.
-
Speaking from personal experience, bees in one's bonnet can be a very serious problem.
-
Not to put too fine a point on it, but housewife pornos are girl porn. And many of them are truly lurid, tawdry affairs with little to no redeeming literary value. The same is true of much guy porn.
-
i find this ridiculously funny...
some people have way too much on their hands... i think someone searched 'girl porn' and came up with QC, sad really thats what they came up with.... :laugh:
-
the world will not end until people become retarded in every way imaginable.... this is simply another step in the process.
-
Not to put too fine a point on it, but housewife pornos are girl porn. And many of them are truly lurid, tawdry affairs with little to no redeeming literary value. The same is true of much guy porn.
"much" guy porn?
Don't you mean ALL of it?
Besides, there is no literature form of guy porn.
-
Not to put too fine a point on it, but housewife pornos are girl porn. And many of them are truly lurid, tawdry affairs with little to no redeeming literary value. The same is true of much guy porn.
"much" guy porn?
Don't you mean ALL of it?
Besides, there is no literature form of guy porn.
Oh, there is. I was watching this program on the victorians they used to read tonnes of it.
-
Besides, there is no literature form of guy porn.
I beg to differ! (http://oblimo.pbwiki.com/IAT-Cover-Page)
:laugh:
-
sorry, I meant GOOD porn.
...wait, crap. Contradiction.
-
You obviously haven't looked very hard.
-
I almost want to post over there, but it would really just boil down to telling them that this really ain't no thing.
-
I lol'd at the comments in the post though. Heheh
Bottom line: let's face it, if someone wants porn in written word format they're not gonna go for the best-written thing around are they? They're gonna grab the ones with words like "bulging" "engorged" and so on. no one wants Tolkien porn... or do they?
-
I'm too lazy to find proof of this, but I can virtually guarantee there is more Frodo/Sam slashfic out there than I have room on my hard drive for.
-
:-o they're all lit up about phrases like "girl porn" and "shitty romance novel" and they're own blog is called "smart bitches"!! :? I mean, WTF? not that smart, I'd say...
but that picture and the "pull my finger" line almost made me pee my pants laughing... if you stare at the guy long enough his heads starts to shrink. Seriously!
-
but that picture and the "pull my finger" line almost made me pee my pants laughing... if you stare at the guy long enough his heads starts to shrink. Seriously!
Please explain. I'm definitely missing out.
-
Not to put too fine a point on it
Well played reference, good sir.
Also, "trashy romance novel" is redundant.
-
but that picture and the "pull my finger" line almost made me pee my pants laughing... if you stare at the guy long enough his heads starts to shrink. Seriously!
Please explain. I'm definitely missing out.
The "Viking" has his finger up so the line is totally becoming... It's a lame joke if you say it, but in print and with that ridiculous picture it is hilarious.
...and the head... you really have to stare at the picture long enough :evil: