THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => ENJOY => Topic started by: KvP on 12 Aug 2009, 14:49

Title: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: KvP on 12 Aug 2009, 14:49
David "Brass Balls" Mamet is writing and directing an Anne Frank movie for Disney. (http://weblogs.variety.com/bfdealmemo/2009/08/mamet-disney-team-on-frank-tale.html)

I'm trying to think of how this is going to work and I just can't wrap my head around it.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: JD on 12 Aug 2009, 14:49
.....what
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: JD on 12 Aug 2009, 14:50
I notice they didn't mention whether it would be cartoon or not.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: mberan42 on 12 Aug 2009, 14:54
"Despite everything, I believe that people are really good at heart, those fucks"
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: KvP on 12 Aug 2009, 15:01
Joe Montegna is bound to appear, but in what role?
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: LTK on 12 Aug 2009, 16:30
Quote
Mamet brings his own original take on the material that could re-frame the story as a young girl’s rite of passage.

A rite of passage? Into what?
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Inlander on 12 Aug 2009, 16:59
Don't forget, David Mamet also wrote and directed the Spanish Prisoner, in which the only thing that even approached a curse word was when Rebbecca Pigeon said "Crikey!" after being kissed.

Good moment, that.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: KharBevNor on 12 Aug 2009, 18:37
THEEEEE ONLYYYYY GIIIIIIRL IIIII EVEEEEER LOOOOOVED
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Blue Kitty on 12 Aug 2009, 18:47
Oh lord (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDvq7XMESas)
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Yayniall on 12 Aug 2009, 19:26
Jonas Bros. confirmed as singing nazis.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: David_Dovey on 12 Aug 2009, 20:14
Jesus I hate the writing style in Variety.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: scarred on 12 Aug 2009, 23:43
(http://s2.buzzfeed.com/static/imagebuzz/web03/2009/7/8/4/--8662-1247040499-6.jpg)
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: KharBevNor on 13 Aug 2009, 05:23
HOLLYWOOD PICTURES PRESENTS: THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xJq1f_8bw4)

"This one's for president Churchill!"
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Reed on 13 Aug 2009, 09:31
This was posted by an AV club writer in the comment thread for this movie and I just had to re-post it:

Quote from: Zack Handlen
Anne: Okay, so-
Peter: Yeah. Right. I mean, that's what I was saying.
Anne: What were you saying, though? I couldn't, I mean, I just couldn't. What you were saying.
Peter: Look. Just--look. There's just two people here. There's just us two.
Mrs. Petronella Van Daan: You kids! You kids, be quiet. You kids don't understand what this is. It wouldn't be hiding if we went around _talking_.
Peter: Bitch.
Mrs. PVD: What?
Anne: It's okay. What you were saying before, let's just-
Mrs. PVD: Did you call me that word?
Anne: He didn't. Peter. It is what it is, and what you were saying, let's have it be that. Let's have it _be_ that.
Peter: Because what else are we doing here?
Anne: Because--exactly. Exactly that. What else is this, but two people talking, just two people, and it doesn't have to be anything. It doesn't have to _matter_. Ah god. God, why is this happening?
Peter: Fuck.
Anne: Because you wake up one morning and you look at that window and you think. You can't, fuck, you can't do anything but think. And that smell, everywhere. Your skin, it's like your skin is made of that smell and the light through the window, and that's you. It's always this, it's always been this. It always been this. And it can just be us two, and it can just be that, but always behind that is the window, and the smell, and the light. I can't even _cough_. I can't even _cough_, and you can hear me.
Peter: Bitch.
Mrs. PVD: What did you call me?
Anne: I don't know. Maybe I should write this down.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 16 Aug 2009, 08:52
(http://s2.buzzfeed.com/static/imagebuzz/web03/2009/7/8/4/--8662-1247040499-6.jpg)

Damn... I was about to post that one.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: LucyStag on 31 Aug 2009, 00:35
Quote
Mamet brings his own original take on the material that could re-frame the story as a young girl’s rite of passage.

A rite of passage? Into what?

Eventually every young woman...

Hides from Nazis?

Dies of typhus?
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Tom on 31 Aug 2009, 01:24
Eventually every young woman...

Hides from Nazis?

Yes, beware of men with a Mein Kampf look.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: est on 31 Aug 2009, 01:35
and a love of the rack & screw?
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Jace on 02 Sep 2009, 11:19
Quote
Mamet brings his own original take on the material that could re-frame the story as a young girl’s rite of passage.

A rite of passage? Into what?

An oven
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: LucyStag on 02 Sep 2009, 16:55
Quote
Mamet brings his own original take on the material that could re-frame the story as a young girl’s rite of passage.

A rite of passage? Into what?

An oven

1) Ew. That just made me wince.

2) See above, she died of typhus.

3) I have yet to hear a funny Holocaust joke. I don't know if they exist (making fun of Hitler, Mel Brooks style is another thing.)
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Bastardous Bassist on 03 Sep 2009, 08:11
I've heard one, but I won't post it here because it's all about the inflection.

I'm glad other people caught the rite of passage.  As soon as I read that, I shouted "SHE DIED!"
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Kugai on 10 Sep 2009, 23:52
No! . . . . . .


Just No!



"Smithers - Release the Hounds."
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Hat on 12 Sep 2009, 15:46
I've heard one, but I won't post it here because it's all about the inflection.

I know one that I consider to be legitimately funny but I am not particularly sensitive so I don't know what kind of standard to hold it to.

Also Dovey, what about Variety's writing style is so annoying? Apart from the fact that ever paragraph seems to start with a persons name I guess, that is ridiculous
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: David_Dovey on 14 Sep 2009, 03:38
I must have clicked through to some other article on that site because on review that isn't particularly offensive at all. I seem to remember the other article using the term "starrer" to refer to a film's relationship to it's lead actor, and basically a lot of other jargonistic bullshit as well.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Joseph on 29 Sep 2009, 08:08
http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/mamets-anne-frank-turnaround-disney_7659
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: a pack of wolves on 29 Sep 2009, 08:21
Based on the slim amount of detail in that, if this does ever get made it sounds like it will either be quite interesting or massively sketchy.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 06 Oct 2009, 12:59
"Second prize is a set of steak knives.  Third prize is The Holocaust."
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: kraemandrummer on 20 Oct 2009, 23:02
THEEEEE ONLYYYYY GIIIIIIRL IIIII EVEEEEER LOOOOOVED

I guess one person needed to post this
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Darkbluerabbit on 27 Oct 2009, 21:48
And I am glad he did, because I about spat out my scotch.  I actually like that album, but the wankery surrounding it is really, really hilarious.
Title: Re: Anne Frank gets vulgar, perhaps funky
Post by: Theriandros on 01 Nov 2009, 09:38
Jonas Bros. confirmed as singing nazis.

There is no amount of facepalm pictures that can accurately convey my reaction to this.