THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Empyrean on 20 Aug 2009, 23:49

Title: Momo.
Post by: Empyrean on 20 Aug 2009, 23:49
So this is quite a bit of a stretch, as far as observations go.

Marigold plays World of Warcraft.
World of Warcraft is an MMORPG.
Marigold has an AnthroPC named Momo.
MMO could be pronounced as "Momo".

Therefor, Momo is named in relation to World of Warcraft, the MMORPG.
Thank you for your time, turn in your 3D glasses in the bins at the exit.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Delirium on 21 Aug 2009, 00:02
This is nothing that could not have gone in this week's thread.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Eris on 21 Aug 2009, 00:47
MARIGOLD AND MOMO SHOULD TOTALLY MAKE OUT

MARIMO 4 LIEF
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Dliessmgg on 21 Aug 2009, 03:19
Marimo? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marimo)
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Empyrean on 21 Aug 2009, 05:18
This is nothing that could not have gone in this week's thread.

I apologize, I hardly post here and I had overlooked the weekly comic discussion thread.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: mustang6172 on 21 Aug 2009, 19:22
Momo is my robotic Hanners.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Heavyoak on 23 Aug 2009, 23:15
Momo is my robotic Hanners.

so your a Lolicon.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: JD on 23 Aug 2009, 23:21
Nothing sexual was said there oak. So shut up
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Dliessmgg on 23 Aug 2009, 23:40
Or he's an AnthroPC.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Delirium on 24 Aug 2009, 00:59
Nothing sexual was said there oak. So shut up
Nothing sexual? Are you aware of what forum you're on? Deep down, we're ALL the Bear-Hat Guy.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Jace on 24 Aug 2009, 01:41
Woah buddy, lets just take a step back here. I think you should define "all" for us. I'm not bear-hat guy, that guy is creepy.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: JD on 24 Aug 2009, 07:28
Quote from: Wikipedia
Lolicon (ロリコン?), also romanized as rorikon, is a Japanese portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex".In Japan, the term describes an attraction to young girls, or an individual with such an attraction. Outside Japan, the term is less common and most often refers to a genre of manga and anime wherein childlike female characters are depicted in an erotic manner. The phrase is a reference to Vladimir Nabokov's book, Lolita, in which a middle-aged man becomes sexually obsessed with a 12-year-old girl. The equivalent term for attraction to (or art pertaining to erotic portrayal of) young boys is shotacon.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Surgoshan on 24 Aug 2009, 09:12
I'm curious, who is bear-hat guy?  Will I, on learning about him, want to stab out my eyeballs?
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Random832 on 24 Aug 2009, 11:57
I'm curious, who is bear-hat guy?  Will I, on learning about him, want to stab out my eyeballs?
http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,19315.msg775105.html#msg775105
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: LeeC on 24 Aug 2009, 12:07
Woah buddy, lets just take a step back here. I think you should define "all" for us. I'm not bear-hat guy, that guy is creepy.

I concur.  I am not a bear-hat guy
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: maddness on 24 Aug 2009, 12:11
<--- not a guy ... do not have/never have had a bear hat ... not prone to pondering fictional nipples ...
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Merrick on 24 Aug 2009, 12:12
I'm curious, who is bear-hat guy?  Will I, on learning about him, want to stab out my eyeballs?
http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,19315.msg775105.html#msg775105

Dear god.  :|
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Surgoshan on 24 Aug 2009, 12:34
Oh, THAT guy.  Yeah, don't be that guy.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Delirium on 24 Aug 2009, 15:57
We all have those feelings, and it's ok to have them, but we hide them, and for good reason.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: LeeC on 24 Aug 2009, 17:57
We all have those feelings, and it's ok to have them, but we hide them, and for good reason.
:-o what?!
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Dliessmgg on 25 Aug 2009, 01:15
Freud tells you to admit it.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Delirium on 25 Aug 2009, 04:26
Freud tells you to admit it.
to who? my psychiatrist banned me for being creepy
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Dliessmgg on 25 Aug 2009, 04:44
To yourself, so you can be your own psychiatrist and tell yourself about your mother.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: H0b0K!n9 on 25 Aug 2009, 12:52
To yourself, so you can be your own psychiatrist and tell yourself about your mother.

What if your mother banned you for being creepy?
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: maddness on 25 Aug 2009, 12:55
My grandma' banned me for being creepy, but she's creepy too so that hardly seems fair.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Surgoshan on 25 Aug 2009, 20:34
Just ban grandma from the train.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Heavyoak on 25 Aug 2009, 22:45
Nothing sexual was said there oak. So shut up
Nothing sexual? Are you aware of what forum you're on? Deep down, we're ALL the Bear-Hat Guy.

quite true.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: jonarus_drakus on 25 Aug 2009, 23:25
The 'bear hat guy' is the the 'bear hat guy' because he tells everyone about his creepyness. Simply thinking it doesnt make you the 'bear hat guy'
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Eris on 25 Aug 2009, 23:48
Yes it does.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Heavyoak on 26 Aug 2009, 00:04
The 'bear hat guy' is the the 'bear hat guy' because he tells everyone about his creepyness. Simply thinking it doesnt make you the 'bear hat guy'

I can be classified as " bear hat guy"
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: jonarus_drakus on 26 Aug 2009, 03:54
Yes it does.

Well ya betta go skin a Grizzly, coz i wants mah bearhat!

I mean really! So i think a cartoon character is "cute", shocker! Doesn't mean I think they're real, or that i have some wierd shrine to them, or have trouble telling the difference between reality and fantasy, or any of a thousand other ACTUALY creepy things like that!

This is an important difference in my mind. You can think certain characters are cute, thats fine. You CANT go inserting yourself into imaginary situations with them, THATS creepy (and serious sign of a level of delusion that may well require institutionalisation).
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Dliessmgg on 26 Aug 2009, 06:04
I love my pseudoscience!

Everybody has a bear hat guy score bhgs. bhgs is a complex number (Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number)): bhgs=a+b*i. a is how much you act like bear hat guy, b is how much you think like him. I define:
a=1 -> I want to fuck X
a=0.5 -> X is cute
a=0 -> Yeah, X is an interesting character, so what?
a=-0.5 -> What's wrong with you, bear hat guy?
a=-1 -> Burn the witch bear hat guy!
And:
sqrt(a^2+b^2)<=1

Now you can exactly show your like bear hat guy score! *ta-daaa*

I think mine is around 0.25+0.5*i.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Sep 2009, 15:56
How about beer hat guy instead? 

(http://www.schallstailgate.com/BeerHatGuy2.jpg)
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Surgoshan on 18 Sep 2009, 16:28
Man, what a dingus; you're supposed to use cans or bottles.
Title: Re: Momo.
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Sep 2009, 16:32
Can't bring cans or bottles into the stadium with you. 

CAN bring the hat...