THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: scarred on 03 Mar 2010, 17:04

Title: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 03 Mar 2010, 17:04
ANSWER NOW
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Delirium on 03 Mar 2010, 17:07
wat

also, learn to pronounce Jacques.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 03 Mar 2010, 17:08
PLEASE SEE REFERENCES (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24563.100.html)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: westrim on 03 Mar 2010, 17:17
PLEASE SEE REFERENCES (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24563.100.html)

HI THERE I'M RANDY

FUCK YOU I'M YELLING BIRD.

Geez, lighten up on the caps.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 18:10
PLEASE SEE REFERENCES (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24563.100.html)

Please see being banned by the mods for trolling.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 18:12
Scarred aint a troll bro
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: The Duke on 03 Mar 2010, 18:18
Yeah, it seems to me like he's just trying to get a bearing of who likes Jeph's art and who doesn't. 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Delirium on 03 Mar 2010, 18:19
please lock this thread. it's flat-out unnecessary.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 18:19
Sure looks like one to me.  "Ooh, I'm scarred, and I'm such an original wit on teh intartubewebzorz!  Waah waah, 'Jacks' art is no gud anymoar, waah waah it luks liek anime even though it totally doesn't. Waah waah, I'ma start a whole new thread to insult the cartoonist some moar rather than just not reading the strip if I don't like it anymore. Oops, time for a diaper change."

In short, if I were a mod, he'd be banned so hard it'd reach back in time and make it so that he'd never joined in the first place.  :-D
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Tuitsuro on 03 Mar 2010, 18:33
I'ma start a whole new thread to insult the cartoonist some moar

Err... ethical quandary, do I tell him his mistake or watch as someone else lambastes him? 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 18:47
Hey, I love QC, it's one of my favorite internet comicky things. I also think there are comics with better art.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 18:48
It's possible to feel both ways y'see
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Mar 2010, 18:55
Agreed, and agreed. 

But there are ways of saying that (you did so quite nicely and succinctly), and then there's what Scarred's doing...  I'm not sure what it is he's doing, but it ain't workin'! 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Tuitsuro on 03 Mar 2010, 18:57
I get what he's doing; mostly because I did the same thing in another forum once.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 19:07
Zagraf seems a little butthurt.

Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Mar 2010, 19:13
Yeah, well, it probably hurt your first time, too...

 :laugh:
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Wiregeek on 03 Mar 2010, 19:35
I've had bowel movements that made more sense than this shit.

"why..  why is it FIZZILING. WHY DO I HAVE CARBONATED POOP"
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 03 Mar 2010, 19:42
Scarred aint a troll bro
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Jace on 03 Mar 2010, 20:18
"Ooh, I'm scarred, and I'm such an original wit on teh intartubewebzorz!  Waah waah, 'Jacks' art is no gud anymoar, waah waah it luks liek anime even though it totally doesn't. Waah waah, I'ma start a whole new thread to insult the cartoonist some moar rather than just not reading the strip if I don't like it anymore. Oops, time for a diaper change."

Cordelia, there is a little thing that we in the business like to call "jumping to conclusions." See, it is when you make assumptions based loosely on vague facts. This is what you have done Cordelia, and it is bad. I hope you've learned your lesson about jumping to conclusions.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 20:29
Ahahahahaha you guys actually thought I was seriously "butthurt"

Ahahahahahaha

How could I be butthurt, I'm not the cartoonist

Ahahahahahaha sounds like YOU guys are the butthurted ones who can't tell when someone's just bored out of their skull and messin' around a bit

Ahahahahahaha
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Jace on 03 Mar 2010, 20:32
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

Cordelia, this is exactly what I am talking about. This precisely is what jumping to conclusions is.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 20:34
Zagraf is a troll :o
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: KharBevNor on 03 Mar 2010, 20:34
Ahahahahahaha

 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 03 Mar 2010, 20:38
Ahahahahaha
Ahahahahahaha
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


METHINKS THE LADY DOTH SWEAT TOO MUCH
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 20:41
Hey now, I resemble that last remark, er, "quote." I would never make the use of a horizontal scroll bar necessary. Even evil has standards.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 20:44
And I may be female (or...am I, you sexually deprived boys you?), but I ain't no lady. *scratches hairy armpit and spits on the floor*
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Delirium on 03 Mar 2010, 20:45
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

Cordelia, this is exactly what I am talking about. This precisely is what jumping to conclusions is.
quoting Buffy = OHLY SHIT YOU OWNED HER
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 20:52
I see no ownage, as that post existed for all of two seconds before I decided the masquerade had gone far enough. Replying to a barely-existent post = / = ownage.

Also, Cordelia of Lear was all dead and shit. I'm still here.

Also, Ahahahahahaha
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 03 Mar 2010, 20:59
And I can't believe this stupid thread is still open after all this stupid shit, including mine. Guess I could make a creepy comment about wanting to know who Marten's couch is based on IRL, but it's not worth getting banninated over.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: I Am Not Amused on 03 Mar 2010, 21:05
There is only one way to settle this dispute.

Bikini Jello wrestling.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 03 Mar 2010, 21:23
I am now picturing a pair of jello cups wearing bikinis and one of the saying "LETS WRASTLE"
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 03 Mar 2010, 21:43
ANSWER NOW

Hellooooooooo Daffy Duck
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Jimor on 03 Mar 2010, 21:54
ANSWER NOW

I HATE CROW'S NEW VOICE!!!

Wait, what was the question?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BeoPuppy on 04 Mar 2010, 01:02
Hey, I love QC, it's one of my favorite internet comicky things. I also think there are comics with better art.

I've always thought that Sinfest had amazing art. And Dresden Codak. Girl Genius, too.

But what is true, undeniably, is that the art of QC has shown the biggest possible improvement over the span of its existance. This is one artist who really, really works hard at his craft ad you have to admire that.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 04 Mar 2010, 01:54
I've always thought that Sinfest had amazing art.
Too bad it's like a politically incorrect newspaper comic.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BeoPuppy on 04 Mar 2010, 02:16
What's bad about that?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 04 Mar 2010, 04:38
What's bad about that?
newspaper comic.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BeoPuppy on 04 Mar 2010, 04:52
That's not really an answer, is it? Newspaper comics aren't bad per se.

Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BeoPuppy on 04 Mar 2010, 04:55
Well, Calvin and Hobbes, Peanuts ...

I think those two alone should be enough proof that newspaper comics aren't always bad.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 04 Mar 2010, 05:21
The last new Calvin and Hobbes appeared December 31st, 1995. That was fourteen years ago. The Far Side ended a year before that.

Not since Charles Schulz died and the last original Peanuts was published over ten years ago (February 13, 2000) has anything worth looking at appeared on the comics page of any major newspaper.

Dilbert hates his job. Garfield loves lasagna. Cathy thinks she's fat. Nobody understands Doonesbury. God only knows why Rex Morgan and Mary Worth are still running. The Lockhorns hate each other and Crankshaft hates everyone and everything, we get it.

The concepts are flat and repetitive, the jokes are hackneyed and predictable, and the format kills any and all artistic expression, experimentation, or innovation.

Not only is the product not worth going out of your way for, but to see it you have to pay around a dollar a day to have a pile of the lowest grade paper known to man delivered to you, the handling of which gets your hands and clothes filthy, and when your done with it, you have a seven pounds of garbage to dispose of.

Don't even get me started on the 'editorial' cartoons, which for the last year (at least in the States) have been nothing more than racist depictions of Obama and three thousand variations of 'It snowed this winter so Global Warming's not real.'

But no, newspaper comics aren't bad per se.

It's just that, like the newspapers themselves, they are only a shadow of their former glory, kept going at this point by the sheer force of inertia.

This is the Twenty-first Century. Why do people insist on clinging to what is essentially a seventeenth century medium?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 04 Mar 2010, 06:10
Cartoons however were quite widespread (in Germany that I know of and especially political ones) since printing was invented, so yeah.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Mar 2010, 06:12
...Nobody understands Doonesbury.

Speak for yerself.  (well, I guess you did).  I've been following Doonsbury since it started, with a 4 year gap between my local paper dropping it and it showing up online.  

But yeah, most newspaper comics are like LICD without the sex.  And the paper... oh, god, the trees...

And I think you meant 18th/19th century medium, there were very few papers in the 1600's - they were still using troubadours to disseminate information!  

Internet killed the newspaper (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSJ27TgBvJE&feature=related), but like radio it's taking its time to die.  
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 04 Mar 2010, 06:49
when was the last time you saw a good newspaper comic though?

(Exluding Calvin and Hobbes, obviously)

Lio and Pearls before Swine come to mind
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: smack that isaiah on 04 Mar 2010, 08:38
when was the last time you saw a good newspaper comic though?

(Exluding Calvin and Hobbes, obviously)

Two really great comics from my newspaper back home (I think it was the Star Ledger?) were Frazz  (http://comics.com/frazz/) and Heart of the City (http://www.gocomics.com/heartofthecity/)
I loved each of them because they reminded me of Calvin and Hobbes, actually.
Frazz is this really smart, young janitor at an elementary school, and he reminds a lot of people of a grown up Calvin--although the author has stated that was not his intention--and the strip is about his interactions and influence with the students
Heart of the City is about a young girl and her nerdy best friend living in a big city, dealing with school and junk.  It was great.

(Note: all in past tense b/c it's been ~2 years since i've read comics from my newspaper back home.  I don't know if they're still funny or still running)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 04 Mar 2010, 09:48
when was the last time you saw a good newspaper comic though?

(Exluding Calvin and Hobbes, obviously)

Lio and Pearls before Swine come to mind

I don't know Lio at all, but Pearls before Swine has some good moments but it's pretty much three strips:  rat is a terrible person, pig is nieve, or that one crocodile and his friends are really dumb
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Theriandros on 04 Mar 2010, 09:57
Lio is worse, as it's pretty much a one-trick pony.

A small child wordlessly does weird and fantastical things. It is more boring than it sounds.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Tuitsuro on 04 Mar 2010, 10:49
When's the last time I read a good newspaper comic?

When's the last time I read a good newspaper ?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Theriandros on 04 Mar 2010, 11:03
Newspapers: Dead as the trees they're printed on.

'Course if they can keep vilifying New Media long enough, they might still believe that there's some legitimacy to what they're selling.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: TheKingOfFuzz on 04 Mar 2010, 11:17
Ooh, a question thread.

Here's mine: can we get some rising action sometime soon, preez?

Art is art, and it was fine, and it is fine, and it's been fine.

What I like about this strip (besides its thoughtful comparison of "New Helmet" and "Classic Helmet:" http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=245 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=245)) is the drama.

Maybe Hannelore's non-consensual blood draw will break the holding pattern . . .
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 13:27
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/2006-05-17-1.gif)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Mar 2010, 14:53
Numbers to go with that?

A New York Times stock price chart over the last ten years is a convincing sight.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 04 Mar 2010, 15:58
Lio is worse, as it's pretty much a one-trick pony.

A small child wordlessly does weird and fantastical things. It is more boring than it sounds.

Still better than Garfield
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 16:04
ALOT THINGS IS BETTER OF THE GARFIELDS.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 04 Mar 2010, 16:18
It obviously states that they are already dead, which simply isn't true!

Dead in the sense of "Dead man[tree?] walkin'!"

They're still around, but their fate is sealed and it's only a matter of time.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 04 Mar 2010, 17:03
No, TV caused radio to find a new venue, the car rather than the living room, they also found new programming, music and talk, rather than comedy and drama.

The advantage that big media outlets enjoyed through most of the twentieth century, i. e. that to reach a large audience, a large and expensive distribution apparatus is necessary, is gone. Thanks to the internet, an artist can deliver his work, (graphic, written, musical, audiovisual or even interactive) directly to the audience. There is no need for an army of editors, proofreaders, copywriters, typesetters, advertising agents, press operators, delivery people, and the office and administrative staff to support them to get the product to the reader. These roles are now superfluous.

Likewise, the advantage that a large distribution system gives, i. e. a super large audience, is much less necessary to support the artist. Without the big media taking its cut, a more modest audience can support an artist and his/her staff. This allows the artist to take more risks, he can now afford to tailor his message to a smaller but more loyal audience.

What has killed/is killing print, radio, telephone and televison as we know them is the internet, especially mobile internet.

If the people/companies who run these media wish to survive and stay relevant, they will have to adapt to new niches. If they try to cling to their old business model and content streams, either through oppressive intellectual property policies, or monopolistic business practices, they will lose.

Remember kids, like gravity,Darwinian selection is not just a good idea, It's the law.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: schmeeble on 04 Mar 2010, 17:08
Here's mine: can we get some rising action sometime soon, preez?

Amen. Also can we lose the anime vibes? Or develop the plot involving the characters moving to Japan, if we're going to stay on this anime page.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 04 Mar 2010, 17:18
What do you have against anime?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 17:19
ANIMES IS NOT AMERICAN DUH
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Malek on 04 Mar 2010, 19:30
TL;DR Thread = Not about pancakes.


I came for pancakes and didn't find any.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Zingoleb on 04 Mar 2010, 20:03
No one likes Get Fuzzy?

Seriously?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: schmeeble on 04 Mar 2010, 20:52
ANIMES IS NOT AMERICAN DUH

Nothing! If I wanted to read an anime comic I would! My problem is that this didn't use to be a blatant wanna-be anime comic and now it is.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 04 Mar 2010, 20:58
No it isn't
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 21:49
OHNOZ JEFF JACKS USES ANIMES EXPERSION IN COMIC HES IS ANIMES NOW
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Mar 2010, 22:18
I trhink I'm starting to appreciate the way scared scarred flips  so easily from one side of an argument to the other. 

It's like an autpilot with a broken gyroscope...
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 04 Mar 2010, 22:59
ANIMES IS NOT AMERICAN DUH

Build a bridge and get over it.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 23:08
ITS SARACASAM DUH
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 04 Mar 2010, 23:23
And your point being?

*Blinks and smiles*
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 23:29
WHY YOU BLINK MANY OFTEN?

YOU HAVE SAME DISEASE BELLA SWAN?

BLINK BLINK BLINK

YOU HAVE TOOTH OF BUCK ALSO?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 04 Mar 2010, 23:34
Could you please stop shouting

Thank you
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 04 Mar 2010, 23:47
Could you please stop shouting

Thank you

YOUR ARE WELCOMES
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Mar 2010, 23:54
c) Darwinian selection is a theory, not a law. A strong theory, yeah, and certainly a probable one, but let's stick to correct terminology, yes?

Evolution is a theory supported by all the evidence.  There is nothing outthere that actually goes against it. 

Gravity is also "just a theory".  It has a bit more evidence on its side than evolution, but it is, nevertheless, a theory

"Laws" are made by legislators, "rules" are made by your parents.  There is no room in real science for either. 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 05 Mar 2010, 00:08
Except for the second law of thermodynamics.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Patrick on 05 Mar 2010, 01:02
SEE WHAT YOU PUNK KIDDIE NO UNDERSTAND IS IN ALBANIA, IN COMMUNIST TIME, IS NO PAPER MADE FOR ALBANIA YET, WE SEND NEWS TO PEOPLE WITH PAINT DRAWINGS ON COW'S ASS AND DRAG THROUGH MOUNTAIN

OUR 'FUNNY PAPER' IS COW TRYING TO FUCKED HORSE AND GET KICKED IN BONER AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA BRAVO BRAVO SI E KALOVA BRAVO
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Malek on 05 Mar 2010, 01:07
Capital Assertive Punishment Spam. Also known as Caps.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Patrick on 05 Mar 2010, 01:12
I really really wish the gods would strike people down with vicious hangovers as punishment for being dumb
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 05 Mar 2010, 02:57
this thread needs to curl up in a corner and DIE
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 05 Mar 2010, 03:14
I really really wish the gods would strike people down with vicious hangovers as punishment for being dumb

AN AGREEMENT IS MIEN
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Barmymoo on 05 Mar 2010, 05:00
This is like watching a gang of highschoolers invade a kindergarten: it is messy and unkind, and really guys get another hobby.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 05 Mar 2010, 05:03
Don't listen to her and carry on. This thread is entertaining.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 05 Mar 2010, 05:19
This thread is not constructive at all. I mean, even the pointless thread has a point; to be pointless.
This thread has no point.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 05 Mar 2010, 07:03
c) Darwinian selection is a theory, not a law. A strong theory, yeah, and certainly a probable one, but let's stick to correct terminology, yes?
http://www.notjustatheory.com/
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 05 Mar 2010, 08:15
Why do you even use internet on a cellphone? Isn't the screen a bit small?

Edit: Oh, I get it, it's THE FUTURE!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BillyxRansom on 05 Mar 2010, 11:25
please lock this thread. it's flat-out unnecessary.

fukken sig'd
your fucking picture underneath your username is about to be sig'd by me.

what an incredible album.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 05 Mar 2010, 14:21
Science is just so darn finicky sometimes.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 05 Mar 2010, 15:18
Clearly there is only one way to get this thread locked, so here goes:

HUH HUH I TOTALLY WANT TO HAVE SEXXORZ WITH HANNERS AND TAI AND MOMO HUH HUH IN FACT I PRINTED OUT QC PR0N FROM RULE34.PAHEAL.NET AND AM WHACKING OFF TO IT RIGHT NOW HUH HUH LOOKIT THAT JIZZ GO ALL OVER MOMO'S TITTIES HUH HUH DEER JEFF JACKS PLZ GIVE ME THE HOME ADDRESSES OF THE GURLZ THEIR BASED ON SO I CAN FUCK THEM HUH HUH

You're welcome. Happy to take a bullet for the team.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 05 Mar 2010, 15:32
Oh please, you can do better than that.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 05 Mar 2010, 16:08
For Jeans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cd36WJ79z4
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 05 Mar 2010, 17:43
CORDELIA STOP YOU ARE DOUCHE NOZZLE I WOULD SECKS YOU IN THE BUTT BUT YOU MIGHT ENJOY IT
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 05 Mar 2010, 18:15
CORDELIA STOP YOU ARE DOUCHE NOZZLE I WOULD SECKS YOU IN THE BUTT BUT YOU MIGHT ENJOY IT

Sorry, Lear,1 I don't bottom. But get yourself nicely lubed up and I'll do the pitchin'.

1Because if I gotta be Cordelia, then by fuck, boy, you're gonna be Lear, not only for the mad old decrepit jerkass bit but also so I can taint you with the shame of incest like Lot's daughters did to him. Only unlike them I won't let you get drunk first.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 05 Mar 2010, 18:17
Dude what are you talking about it is a completely different Cordelia
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Mar 2010, 18:18
How many could there be? 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: The Duke on 05 Mar 2010, 21:05
There's a Tragically Hip song called Cordelia, I believe...


No one likes Get Fuzzy?

Seriously?

Maybe it's just me, but in years and years of reading the comics in the newspaper, I can count all the Get Fuzzy strips that I found funny on one hand.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 05 Mar 2010, 21:09
I like some of them. Not hugely memorable though.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Patrick on 05 Mar 2010, 22:11
Eh, at least it's not the same shit every day

Sometimes Bucky's a dick to Rob and Satchel
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BillyxRansom on 06 Mar 2010, 09:37
i thought the last option said

"why is questioning contents"

so?

why is questioning contents



why is it
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Mar 2010, 10:20
Because it can!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 06 Mar 2010, 21:58
"And so can you!"
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 07 Mar 2010, 05:16
I'll write proper about it when i get home and have access to a proper keyboard.

http://www.notjustatheory.com/

Roight.

The Shape of Things -

-ackronnick says: "Darwinism is a law."
-I say (fully explained here, having relied perhaps too much on people getting my point in the original post - read it again afterwards, you'll see!): "No it ain't, it is a theory - a very solid one, but even theories that are practically proven aren't laws, they are theories." (I worded this poorly in my original post, making it sound like I was saying that if the theory was strong enough, it would be a law - which is not the case.)
-Carl-E says: "It's not a law, it's a theory. Scientific laws do not exist."
-I say in a rather dickish manner: "That's right, it's a theory, and you're wrong, scientific laws do exist."

Summa summarum: Evolution is pretty much a proven theory, it is not a law, although those do exist.

Everyone on the same page? Sweet.

Actually I said:

Remember kids, like gravity,Darwinian selection is not just a good idea, It's the law.

By which I meant that Darwinian selection is just as much a force of nature as gravity.

And you are completely correct, Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural selection is not strictly speaking a scientific law.
Usually I am the biggest stickler about such things.

BUT.

I was talking about the state of mass media in the Twentieth Century, not biology, and after making a long and detailed post on the matter, I thought it would be cute to end it with a little zinger. Had I been debating evolution with a creationist (which I usually refrain from, it's like trying to teach a dog to ride a bicycle, they aren't properly equipped and you both end up looking stupid) , I would have been very careful with my words, because "just a theory" is a favorite barb of those who wish to reject knowledge and reason in favor of an antiquated interpretation of a bronze age creation myth of a insignificant tribe of desert nomads. (the quotes are because that's what creationists, not anything anyone here had said.)*

So. What have we learned?

First: everyone was right, it's just that evolution is such hot button topic in some circles that if it is mentioned even in passing and the speaker doesn't use the exact orthodox terminology, people jump to all sorts of conclusions resulting in misunderstandings aplenty.

Second: We're all pedants. We love being pedantic. Pedantry is in our very nature, for some of us [meekly raises hand] it is a way of life. Long live the pedants!**

Third: We're all assholes! I'm an asshole, (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-o30wacwdoc) you're an asshole, he's an asshole, everybody's an asshole! This thread has more assholes than the bridge of Spaceball 1! [YO!] KEEP FIRING ASSHOLES!!!!!!11!!1!11! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZNPxxRU4Wc)***

*Dayumn that's a long sentence!

**That's "pedant." Not "pederast", you idiots!

*** I love each and every one of you Motherfuckers!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Mar 2010, 21:21
TL, DR
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 07 Mar 2010, 22:21
QFT
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 07 Mar 2010, 23:34
WTF


STFU
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 08 Mar 2010, 00:08
ROFCASRTAMYDHSWD
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Christophe on 08 Mar 2010, 00:09
AHHHH C'MON FUCK A GUY
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Exar_Kun on 08 Mar 2010, 02:01
When the hell did all these jack-asses from 4chan invade?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 02:07
YOU HAVE A STRONG HEART. NO FEAR.

BUT STUPID! LIKE A CHILD! YOU HAVE MUCH TO LEARN, JAKESOOLEE.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Exar_Kun on 08 Mar 2010, 02:08
^Exhibit: A^
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 02:10
^XZIBIT: B^
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 08 Mar 2010, 02:11
^DAWG: C^
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 02:12
^DOGG: D^
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: RallyMonkey on 08 Mar 2010, 02:12
(http://streetknowledge.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/xzibit.jpg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 02:14
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y139/poringhugger/Xzibit.jpg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: RallyMonkey on 08 Mar 2010, 02:15
(http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/spotlight/bet-blog/assets/2009/03/xzibit.jpg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 02:17
(http://www.yodawgyo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/xzibit-yo-dawg-i-herd-you-like-tommy-lee-jones.jpg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: RallyMonkey on 08 Mar 2010, 02:21
(http://cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/76/16/xzibit.0.0.0x0.328x475.jpeg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Malek on 08 Mar 2010, 03:02
What has this thread become?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 08 Mar 2010, 04:00
It's ... it's ALIVE! *muahaha*
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 08 Mar 2010, 04:07
Only in the stupid copies.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Mar 2010, 07:13
(http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/updoug-440x247.jpg)

SQUIRREL!!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: BeoPuppy on 08 Mar 2010, 07:32
Can we have a lock on this thread, please?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Mr_Rose on 08 Mar 2010, 07:35
Nooo!
If you strike it down now, it will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.


Or possibly turn into a space ghost, whichever.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 08 Mar 2010, 09:53
(http://www.bettercomics.com/images/gallery/GALLERYspaceghost1.jpg)

?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 08 Mar 2010, 14:30
Welp, I took my best trolling shots (as have others) and this is still open. At this point, I don't think anything short of illegal porn or  copypasting content from the Stormfront site could get this thread locked.

THOSE ARE NOT SUGGESTIONS, PEOPLE
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 08 Mar 2010, 14:51
Dear Contents (by Jeff Jacks);
What... is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
 
My friends and I have been going mad trying to figure this out.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: JD on 08 Mar 2010, 14:52
Well, just (legal)porn will get you banned, soooo
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Eris on 08 Mar 2010, 14:52
maybe people could just stop posting in the thread and let it fall onto the second page where no one looks? Then people will forget about it and it will go away. Sometimes you don't need to get a lock on a thread, and if no mods have been in here then repeatedly asking for something to be locked isn't going to do anything other than get the thread bumped back up to the top.


Just ignore this thread and move on with your lives, people.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 08 Mar 2010, 15:52
Dear Contents (by Jeff Jacks);
What... is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
 
My friends and I have been going mad trying to figure this out.

African or European?

maybe people could just stop posting in the thread and let it fall onto the second page where no one looks? Then people will forget about it and it will go away. Sometimes you don't need to get a lock on a thread, and if no mods have been in here then repeatedly asking for something to be locked isn't going to do anything other than get the thread bumped back up to the top.


Just ignore this thread and move on with your lives, people.

Now that's just crazy talk!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Mar 2010, 16:24
THOSE ARE NOT SUGGESTIONS, PEOPLE

Oh, but now it's been said...
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 08 Mar 2010, 16:26
Welp, I took my best trolling shots (as have others) and this is still open. At this point, I don't think anything short of illegal porn or  copypasting content from the Stormfront site could get this thread locked.

THOSE ARE NOT SUGGESTIONS, PEOPLE

I RULE 34 YOU, CORDELIA
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: schmeeble on 08 Mar 2010, 16:47
OHNOZ JEFF JACKS USES ANIMES EXPERSION IN COMIC HES IS ANIMES NOW

I mean the style his art has taken.  :roll:
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 09 Mar 2010, 00:18
African or European?
An answer regarding either is acceptable.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 09 Mar 2010, 00:39
OHNOZ JEFF JACKS USES ANIMES EXPERSION IN COMIC HES IS ANIMES NOW

I mean the style his art has taken.  :roll:

You mean more realistic?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Shadic on 09 Mar 2010, 01:02
I frequently question content.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 09 Mar 2010, 02:45
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a24/phyrexianmeatdog/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.gif)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 09 Mar 2010, 02:48
(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)
(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)
(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)
(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: RallyMonkey on 09 Mar 2010, 03:03
(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)(http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/1431/sam3810.gif)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Mr_Rose on 09 Mar 2010, 03:09
I would like to thank the academy you all for posting those as multiple duplicates of the same hilarious/obnoxious gif, rather than one giant page-sized version which would have taken a distressingly long time to load. Your consideration is noted and your inevitable demise has been upgraded from "prolonged" to merely "painful" - congratulations!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 09 Mar 2010, 03:15
I RULE 34 YOU, CORDELIA

That's...*sniff* ...that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me, Lear. I'm flattered.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 09 Mar 2010, 03:16
CORDELIA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordelia_Chase)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: zagraf on 09 Mar 2010, 03:18
And now I'm doubly flattered. I'm beginning to think you like me. Take me, you mad, wonderful fool.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 09 Mar 2010, 03:21
THIS THREADS IS JUST ELABIAT ATEMPET TO ATTARCT Y0U

Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Malek on 09 Mar 2010, 04:52
I LIEK PIE
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 09 Mar 2010, 05:09
An answer regarding either is acceptable.

In that case the average wind speed velocity of an unladen European swallow is approximately 11 meters per second (http://www.style.org/unladenswallow/)

Was that so hard? (http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+is+the+average+wind+speed+velocity+of+an+unladen+swallow%3F)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 09 Mar 2010, 09:28
Holy Shit. It's... it's a question with an answer.
OK, here's another question; how many licks does it take, Mr. Owl?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: scarred on 09 Mar 2010, 09:34
DO NOT TARY TO LIKC TEH SPOON OLNY REEL EYEZ THESE:

THERE ARE NO SPOON
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 09 Mar 2010, 09:47
I microwaved a frog, found out it was safe in there, then woundered...is bats? (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlUzEkrJp4yLkLeagGDWRcpFzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20081222214834AAxYzbc)

I am not the poster there. But it never ceases to amaze me how frikkin' EASY it is to troll people.
I mean, seriously? Would you have thought that the poster was actually putting animals in their microwave?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Mar 2010, 11:39
Only if they had licked it (http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070312120653AARo4bF) first. 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: akronnick on 09 Mar 2010, 14:29
Holy Shit. It's... it's a question with an answer.
OK, here's another question; how many licks does it take, Mr. Owl?

Three.

Next question.

I mean, come on! Everyone knows that one!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: KharBevNor on 10 Mar 2010, 11:56
(http://files.sharenator.com/FFFFFUUUUU_Strip_Tease-s358x315-30180-580.jpg)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 10 Mar 2010, 14:49
How many roads must a man walk down, before they call him a man?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Mr_Rose on 10 Mar 2010, 15:55
Trick question: None; if he's already a man, he's clearly walked down enough roads already.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 10 Mar 2010, 18:20
OK, here's a tougher one;
How many seas must a white dove sail, before she sleeps in the sand?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Mar 2010, 19:22
One.  There's sand at the end of every sea voyage...

Well, except maybe in Antarctica.  there's probably sand under the ice somewhere, though. 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: jeph on 10 Mar 2010, 20:34
worst thread, posted in ugliest subforum
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: KharBevNor on 10 Mar 2010, 21:05
This is a perfectly acceptable thread that I have just sold to a stranger.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: jeph on 10 Mar 2010, 21:45
please, please somebody drive it away and set fire to it in a ditch
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Malek on 10 Mar 2010, 21:53
Kill it with a slightly warm rag that is kinda wet but not realy, you know in that way you can tell it is wet but it isn't dripping, ya know?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Tuitsuro on 10 Mar 2010, 22:10
We tried nuking it in a microwave, that only seemed to make it angry.  We might be able to burn it, if someone has access to thermite.  Or a bunch of lithium batteries.  
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 10 Mar 2010, 22:25
Even the Klingon Empire looks askance at trying to destroy this Thread




The Borg took one look and ran.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Mar 2010, 22:28
"Assimilate this??

Hell no. 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Kugai on 10 Mar 2010, 22:29
"We are The Borg - We are not stupid.  Especially under One of Many, Queen Seven of Nine."
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 11 Mar 2010, 00:25
Maybe if I get a 25 kill streak, we can purge this thread.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 11 Mar 2010, 00:29
This thread would jsut revive itself. We have to chop the head off and replace the eyes with garlic, then bury the head and the body at  exactly opposing points of the earth during full moon on a friday 13th.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 11 Mar 2010, 00:58
But... if we nuke it, there won't be anything left! Tactical nuke!

Tactical nuke!
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 11 Mar 2010, 01:24
How tactful.
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Tuitsuro on 11 Mar 2010, 08:22
We need some sci-fi weaponry... like a nova bomb, or a death star...
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Dliessmgg on 11 Mar 2010, 13:20
How do we do that?
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: syrupykeyboard on 11 Mar 2010, 15:52
(http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/408321705b.jpg) (http://www.freeimagehosting.net/)
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Patrick on 11 Mar 2010, 19:38
I really want to post shitting dicknipples in here

I really really want to
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Mar 2010, 20:42
Patrick, you go, dude.  Can't be worse than anything else in here! 
Title: Re: QUESTIONING CONTENTS by JEFF JACKS
Post by: jeph on 15 Mar 2010, 22:09
welp