THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => BAND => Topic started by: Method of Madness on 17 Mar 2011, 12:34

Title: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Mar 2011, 12:34
Nate Dogg died on Tuesday.  He hadn't been active since his first stroke a few years back, but still, he was far too young :-(
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 17 Mar 2011, 14:54
who?
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: KvP on 17 Mar 2011, 15:01
classy
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: David_Dovey on 17 Mar 2011, 20:43
He'd already had a stroke? Fuckin' hell.
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: De_El on 17 Mar 2011, 20:48
Two, actually. One doesn't like to bandy around accusations or rumors, but dang, unless he had some rare health problems he might've been doing some serious shit.
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Johnny C on 17 Mar 2011, 20:51
 :-(
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Mar 2011, 00:02
Quote from: TheFuriousWombat on 17 Mar 2011, 14:54
who?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1plPyJdXKIY

Modifier: Odd, there's a flash option, but it just showed it as a link.  What gives?
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: KharBevNor on 19 Mar 2011, 05:24
DER EMBEDDEN IST VERBOTEN.

I always feel these threads go off smoother if you write or at least link to a short description of the deceased's accomplishments etc. in the first post so that everyone has some idea what you're talking about and might perhaps find a new appreciation for someone they never knew in life.
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Mar 2011, 10:50
Quote from: KharBevNor on 19 Mar 2011, 05:24
DER EMBEDDEN IST VERBOTEN.
Well, that's lame.
Quote from: KharBevNor on 19 Mar 2011, 05:24
I always feel these threads go off smoother if you write or at least link to a short description of the deceased's accomplishments etc. in the first post so that everyone has some idea what you're talking about and might perhaps find a new appreciation for someone they never knew in life.
That's reasonable.  Although I'm not really sure what kind of thing to say about him.
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Melodic on 19 Mar 2011, 10:56
dang dude, the psyduck image gets a billion times more lame every time you post
Title: Re: RIP Nate Dogg, 1969-2011
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Mar 2011, 11:05
It was always lame.  I just can't think of anything better at the moment.

Edit: This'll have to do for now.