THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => ENJOY => Topic started by: Lines on 04 Dec 2014, 20:36

Title: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Lines on 04 Dec 2014, 20:36
My husband and I scored passes to a small preview of this and holy crap, it was awesome. The only spoiler I'm giving is that Dain has the best entrance.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: SubaruStephen on 04 Dec 2014, 20:52
How does compare to the other two Hobbit films?
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Kugai on 04 Dec 2014, 22:34
I'm hoping to be able to go see this on the Big Screen sometime over Christmas. 

Looks frakin' good.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Lines on 05 Dec 2014, 03:39
How does compare to the other two Hobbit films?

I think it's on par with the other two. I need to rewatch the first two movies before we see the third one again before I can give a more detailed critique of that, though.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Edguy on 05 Dec 2014, 03:58
The second one was significantly better than the first tho.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: LeeC on 05 Dec 2014, 07:57
Meh, my thoughts: Desolation of Smaug (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,29575.msg1216447.html#msg1216447)
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Lines on 05 Dec 2014, 11:34
The second one was significantly better than the first tho.

I haven't seen since they were in theaters, so I really mean it when I say I need to rewatch the first two.

Also Lee, your speculation definitely does not happen.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Edguy on 05 Dec 2014, 11:44
Second one was definitively not without flaws, but it had significantly less ridiculous slapstick and stupid humor (the river scene is somewhat excused since it was actually sort of cool). That stuff totally took me out of the story. How can I possibly be expected to care about the characters' welfare after seeing them fall a hundred feet down sharp rocks without as much as a bruise or a sprained wrist. Or that whole goblin chase scene. That, and the fact that the second one had Smaug. Dragons are always +1.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: LeeC on 05 Dec 2014, 12:06
Also Lee, your speculation definitely does not happen.
Oh thank god!
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: LeeC on 12 Dec 2014, 07:47
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Aimless on 12 Dec 2014, 12:05
This is the first of Peter Jackson's LotR movies with which I've been WHOLLY satisfied, from the beginning right through to the closing credits.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Kugai on 12 Dec 2014, 12:07
LeeC, we've got a  'Video not available due to Copyright Infringement' message on that Vid.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Lines on 12 Dec 2014, 12:27
This is the first of Peter Jackson's LotR movies with which I've been WHOLLY satisfied, from the beginning right through to the closing credits.

That's how I felt. Also I really enjoy how the closing credits song is sung by Billy Boyd. (Also I think it's one of my favorite closing songs from the whole series now.)
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Masterpiece on 15 Dec 2014, 09:54
I've watched the first Hobbit movie and despite absolutely hating the third LoTR movie, the Hobbit was surprisingly not bad. It helped that I had read the book.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Dec 2014, 19:24
Did you actually hate the whole RotK movie or just its thirty-seven endings?
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Masterpiece on 15 Dec 2014, 22:16
I hated the SLOW MO FOR DRAMA that the entire movie is based on. God, it gets boring quick.

The story wasn't that good either.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Kugai on 15 Dec 2014, 22:19
I think if PJ had thought about it, he could have distilled those multiple endings down into one.

Have Sam, perhaps now older, adding in the 'Endings' in The Red Book with Astin doing a Voice-over of what he's writing.  Might have taken five or ten minutes of time at the end, but if he'd done it that way, you wouldn't have had all those confusing multiple endings.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Dec 2014, 11:17
But the book had multiple endings anyway.  When I finished up my Evangelion fanfic a couple of weeks ago, a reader commented of the penultimate chapter that it was "like a Tolkien ending the way it wrapped up each inner story in turn - but it didn't go on for so long".
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Lines on 18 Dec 2014, 03:36
RotK is entirely made up of endings. That wasn't PJ's fault, that was Tolkien's.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Edguy on 18 Dec 2014, 10:02
For all his great world building and attention to detail, Tolkien was perhaps not the best at crafting good dramatic arcs.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: GarandMarine on 21 Jan 2015, 00:46
For someone who disliked some of the Jackson edits, there's a new "Tolkein" cut you can try that covers the whole trilogy. https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: ThePerilsOfDan on 01 Feb 2016, 15:51
How does compare to the other two Hobbit films?

I watched the first one and went "Eh, well, they had to tie into the Trilogy somehow."  i watched the second one and was like "Oh, come on.  Orcs along the river during the barrel ride?  Orcs in Laketown?  Puh-lease."  It was just far too egregious a trangression that Peter Jackson committed against a book that I've first read as an 8-year old, long before I discovered the Trilogy.  I still have not seen Battle of the Five Armies and will only do so when/if it is on television during a non-election year so I don't have to watch any goddam political commercials during it.
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Kugai on 01 Feb 2016, 19:25
Still, there were some things that should have been left in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_nloHPklfM
Title: Re: Battle of the Five Armies
Post by: Tova on 02 Feb 2016, 11:41
For mine, it's not so much the thirty-seven endings (which, as already pointed out, are in the book anyway). It's more that, in the film, the character of those endings cross that fine line from sentimental firmly into mawkish.

I found the second film has the same problem, albeit to a lesser extent.

FotR is the only film I really enjoyed. Yes, I realise that I'm in a tiny minority.

It's kind of gratifying that people are no longer entirely uncritical of everything that Peter Jackson does.