THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Method of Madness on 17 May 2015, 09:44

Title: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 May 2015, 09:44

Quote from: Jeph's Twitter
Well that's the next week's comics written. This is 100% a case of "write what you know"


I'm guessing we'll be seeing more Faye this week.


Either that or five days of Yelling Bird and Shebly. Either's good.


Or butts. Lots of butts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 17 May 2015, 10:08
I'm surprised there's no option for the continuation of May's 'day in the life of' (and possibly moving on to Winslow and/or Pintsize) story. But I suppose that would be too obvious a choice.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 17 May 2015, 10:13
I think a continuation of May's 'day in the life of' would count as a subset of "Something involving Butts."
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 May 2015, 10:14
You can think of "something involving butts" as the "other (write in thread)" option :parrot:

Damn it, Cesium redtexted me to it
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 17 May 2015, 10:39
Five days of Shelby sniffing Faye's butt.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 17 May 2015, 10:51
Another twitter clue from yesterday.

Quote
the google image reference photos I need for monday's comic are seriously grossing me out D:

So score one point for butts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 May 2015, 11:05
False logic. Why would butts gross him out?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 17 May 2015, 11:06
Unless it's going to be a peek inside "Prolapse Monthly." I think that would gross just about anyone out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 17 May 2015, 12:06
Jeph Tweeted (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/599649666502897665) that the reference images for Monday's comic are 'grossing me out'. In a later Tweet (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/599975912642387969) he added that this coming week's comics will be him writing 'from what you know'.

I'm thinking that Faye is going to go to her doctor's office and is going to be told just what years of hiding in a bottle has done to her body. It's going to be another step on her road to realising just how serious this matter is and to what degree she's going to have to change the way that she lives her life.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 12:22
Unless it's going to be a peek inside "Prolapse Monthly." I think that would gross just about anyone out.

Considering Jeph has said this is a "write what you know" week, I feel this would be a disturbing bit of oversharing...
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 17 May 2015, 12:42
Maybe we will see butts next week, but I donīt think May or prolapses will be involved. The small May-episode is an epilogue to the Momo-arc and I think this arc ist finished.
But there are plenty of possibilities for butts in QC. Maybe the Godfather Of Butts (Pintsize) will have an appearance.

But seriously Iīd like to know what will happen to Faye and the relationships in the group now her friendship with Dora has taken a severe blow. That friendship existed from Doras first appearance in the early days and I do not think that the web of relationships in QC will remain unaltered by this blow.

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 17 May 2015, 15:05
Time shall tell.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 17 May 2015, 19:07
Listen to the bunny!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 17 May 2015, 19:17
What in the heck would she have picked to cause a scab like that to bleed?  :psyduck:

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 17 May 2015, 19:22
Oddly enough, I had something similar happen a couple of days ago. It was my arm, not my side, but still.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 17 May 2015, 19:34
Are we going to get a week of hypochondria? Or maybe some other non-cancerous illness? Hanners is too young for shingles, and I don't think she's been anywhere to get poison ivy. Vampire bats in the apartment? Bleeding diathesis? (This would explain Jeph's foray into disgusting parts of Google Imageland.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Truec on 17 May 2015, 19:43
I guess this means Hanners probably isn't a secret robot.  Or else she has a very advanced synthetic covering.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 17 May 2015, 19:44
So, who will flail around in panic more this week, Hanners, or the regulars here?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 17 May 2015, 19:57
What in the heck would she have picked to cause a scab like that to bleed?  :psyduck:

Scratching at a mosquito bite in her sleep.

I've done that quite a lot, gotten bit, went to sleep, unconsciously scratched at it till it bled, then it scabs over in the night and then I wake up and freak out at the blood on the sheets.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: DSL on 17 May 2015, 20:10
A visit is indicated to You'reGonnaDie.com, known in real life as WebMD.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 17 May 2015, 20:17
I do this all of the time, it looks like Hanners might have skin picking disorder.

I have a mild case, if there is anything on my skin, scab, wart, pimple, etc... I will scratch at it and try to remove it. This isn't always a conscious thing, it's like running your hand over your body and scratching at any irregularities that you find.

This kind of behavior makes perfect sense with Hanners other compulsions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Near Lurker on 17 May 2015, 20:25
The thing is that in the third panel, it looks very much like her finger is inside her skin, which makes me think that she cut herself in bed.  Or there's something wrong with her skin, but this would be a weird way to introduce that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 20:28
Familiar with this kinda shit, though that's only because of weeks in the wilderness, specifically four each year, six years in a row.

Unfortunately, my response to each of these was to man up, so I am unfamiliar with what might be causing this, especially since Hanners is NOT a staff member at a boy scout camp in the depths of a hardcore, humid-as-fuck Louisiana summertime.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 20:31
In any case, this leads me to suspect that we won't get any Faye-resolution this week, unless Dora and Faye show up at the same time to wish Hanners well, WHICH SHOULD, FOR THE LOVE OF FUCK, HAPPEN!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 17 May 2015, 20:56
No, she scratched at something on her skin until it began to bleed, then she looked at it and discovered that it was a mole, or something. (Omg CANCER!!)

This is thought to be an ocd/anxiety related disorder. It is relatively common, and only is classified as a disorder for people who scratch at their skin excessively. It isn't something that has a specific cause (although picking at skin can increase when the person is stressed.) Its not a case of "I moved to Louisiana and now I have skin picking disease".

I do this all of the time. I have learned how to stop myself from seriously damage my skin, but I struggle with scratching/picking/worrying at imperfections on my skin all of the time. It looks like Hanners (and maybe, by extension Jeph) might be similar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Tova on 17 May 2015, 21:00
My completely unscientific from-what-I-know guess is that it's a seborrheic keratosis. My only source of doubt is that it's more of an older person's thing. But it's not cancerous, and images on the internet are kind of gross, especially when you introduce bleeding into your search terms.

The guess that it's anxiety related is probably more on the money (the scratching at it thing rather than the thing itself).
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 17 May 2015, 21:10
*Inside Hanners Brain*

ALL HANDS TO PANIC STATIONS!!
ALL HANDS TO PANIC STATIONS!!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 21:30
Its not a case of "I moved to Louisiana and now I have skin picking disease

I am taking this as directed at me and concluding you, sir, have never spent a month living in the sometimes soaked, always humd summers of the Louisiana summers. It ain't about 'picking at your skin,' it's about trenchfoot, which is the term given to the condition by fucking world war 1 soldiers, and mosquitoes, and poison ivy, and poison sumac, and a host of other potential allergens floating on the winds.

Im any case, Hanners ain't IN Louisiana, so we can forget all of this. Tis irrelevant.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 17 May 2015, 21:35
You know, if Jeph had thrown "The End" in there in the final panel, that might have been the most dark and twisted ending not involving an eldritch abomination.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 21:38
You know, if Jeph had thrown "The End" in there in the final panel, that might have been the most dark and twisted ending not involving an eldritch abomination.

Does it make me evil that if I were Jeph, I would have done exactly this, only to post another, entirely irrelevant strip the next day, as if I hadn't claimed the last to be a finale?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 17 May 2015, 21:40
You know, if Jeph had thrown "The End" in there in the final panel, that might have been the most dark and twisted ending not involving an eldritch abomination.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 17 May 2015, 21:43
You know, if Jeph had thrown "The End" in there in the final panel, that might have been the most dark and twisted ending not involving an eldritch abomination.

Does it make me evil that if I were Jeph, I would have done exactly this, only to post another, entirely irrelevant strip the next day, as if I hadn't claimed the last to be a finale?

Evil, no. Diabolical, maybe. I think we can all respect and admire that, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 17 May 2015, 21:46
I've worked my whole life to be called diabolical, and the closest I've come 'till now is 'asshole,' and 'drunk fucker.'
Tonight is a landmark occasion. Goodnight, everybody.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Satan on 17 May 2015, 22:45
IT'S NODDA TOOMAH
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 17 May 2015, 22:58
I'd go see a doc.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 17 May 2015, 23:02
Good morning,

Todays episode sent me through a whole turmoil of emotions.

Panel 1: "Yay, Hanners!"  :laugh:
Panel 3&4: "Ugh, cancer?"  :-o
Panel 5: "Fuck, cancer!!!!"   :cry:
Jephs commentary: "OK, no cancer."  :angel:

But I donīt know what this will be about. Maybe Hanners gets a severe anexity attac (no wonder) and the friends (including Faye and Dora) have to team up to help her out of that. I donīt know. Everything is possible from here on.

Weīll see. :-)
TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 17 May 2015, 23:24
My reaction is probably slightly different because my mother had this experience and the mole in question was precancerous. She ended up having a few lymph nodes removed because of it.

Anyway, we know that Hannelore's anxiety and hypochondria can combine to serious effect. Remember the 'meningitis' mild stress headache? Trying to convince her that she doesn't have The Big C will be difficult. Jeph hasn't really written Hannelore focus for a long time (the space arc was the last, IIRC). It will be interesting to see how he thinks the character has changed since then.

I'd go see a doc.

That would be the sensible thing to do, yes. This is Hannelore we're dealing with and, when she's on full-power anxiety, she's not always as sensible as she could be.

[Edit]
FWIW, I'm wondering if, rather than focus on maybe being sick, Jeph will focus on how this brush with mortality affects Hannelore's thinking. Maybe she starts brooding about all the things that she hasn't done yet because she is letting her fears paralyse her. So she writes a "things to do before I die" list. Some are sweet ('Have a first kiss'), some are silly ('Eat a fantastically unhealthy but delicious meal') and some show her wilder side ('Learn to pole dance').

At one point she tells Marten and Faye that one of her undone things is to have a threesome with them roleplaying as her slaves. There is a panel of Marten and Faye doing their 'freak-out' faces before Hanners flees, weeping with laughter. The last panel is her ticking 'Prank Marten and Faye' on her list.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 18 May 2015, 00:23
Yay, Hanners! This is going to be a very good week. My guess is that Hanners has scratched a mole, causing it to bleed. It should be enough to cause a full panic attack. What about Winslow, will he be able to help? Will Hanners run down to Faye and Marten's apartment, or to Marigold and Momo? In both cases, she might accidentally surprise someone performing sexy shenanigans. How will Claire react if Hanners comes screaming, half-naked, into Marten's room?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 May 2015, 01:41
How will Claire react if Hanners comes screaming, half-naked, into Marten's room?

Probably mostly the same way anyone else would: Surprise, outrage and embarrassment (and, likely, a thrown pillow and/or Pintsize). Then, after a tearful Hannelore tells her story, she'll end up in the middle of a three-way group hug (four-way, if Faye is awake) in the middle of which she sobs about them touching her 'unclean flesh'.

FWIW, Claire not being used to frantic friends charging in at inopportune moments is the penalty of her likely having never lived in the dorms.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: KOK on 18 May 2015, 01:47
Read your poster, Hannelore.

That looks more like a scab than a mole to me. Maybe she got a very small wound without noticing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Energia on 18 May 2015, 02:22
Read your poster, Hannelore.

That looks more like a scab than a mole to me. Maybe she got a very small wound without noticing.

So what has some unscrupulous miscreant inserted under her skin in the hopes that she wouldn't notice?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 18 May 2015, 03:29
Possibly a psychic clone-baby (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1119)?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 18 May 2015, 04:12
Nice flashback to #1206 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1206) (see also #1207 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1207) and #1209 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1209)). Hanners is very frightened by blood.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Doc on 18 May 2015, 04:35
It's not a wound. It's a wormhole. On the other end there's a leaking ketchup plant.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: lummo on 18 May 2015, 04:47
Morgellons could be good for a laugh and a tear.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 18 May 2015, 05:00
I am not a MD, but Hanners' condition looks like Seborrheic Keratoses (http://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/tc/seborrheic-keratoses-topic-overview). Initially, I would think Hanners is too young to have this condition, but according to WebMD, it can happen also with younger people.

As an old fart, I have had this condition several times. It is harmless, and can be removed relatively painless with cryotherapy. But if you worry about melanomas, they can look scary, and your MD should have a look at them.

Anyway, back to Hanners. She now has a beginning panic attack, and needs help. I would guess the rest of the week is needed to calm Hanners down.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 18 May 2015, 05:44
FWIW, I'm wondering if, rather than focus on maybe being sick, Jeph will focus on how this brush with mortality affects Hannelore's thinking. Maybe she starts brooding about all the things that she hasn't done yet because she is letting her fears paralyse her. So she writes a "things to do before I die" list. Some are sweet ('Have a first kiss'), some are silly ('Eat a fantastically unhealthy but delicious meal') and some show her wilder side ('Learn to pole dance').
This is a very good and plausible theory. Although Hanners has progressed a lot throughout the series, there are a lot of phobias still remaining. My opinion is that Hanners will not be cured before she finally gets laid. A lot of hygienic phobias can be cured by irresistible libido. She may need this scare to finally break out of her shell.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: anahata on 18 May 2015, 06:25
Hanners will not be cured before she finally gets laid
Catch-22, surely?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: CM_albion on 18 May 2015, 06:36
That looks more like a scab than a mole to me. Maybe she got a very small wound without noticing.

I hate it when that happens. you go to scratch an itch, and your fingers come out coated in dry blood and you think "sonnuvabitch, when did that happen?"
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 18 May 2015, 06:51
NilsO, OCD and mental health in general is not something that has an easy cure. People live with their mental health issues their whole lives and often only manage to find coping mechanisms that make it easier to function in daily life. Saying someone can just be "cured", especially with something as condescending as "loosen up and get laid", is ableist and ridiculously ignorant.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Near Lurker on 18 May 2015, 07:42
My guess would be this storyline will lead to Hannelore adjusting her medication... I'm wondering whether we might get a closer look at what the heck was going on when we first met her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 May 2015, 07:59
FWIW, I'm wondering if, rather than focus on maybe being sick, Jeph will focus on how this brush with mortality affects Hannelore's thinking. Maybe she starts brooding about all the things that she hasn't done yet because she is letting her fears paralyse her. So she writes a "things to do before I die" list. Some are sweet ('Have a first kiss'), some are silly ('Eat a fantastically unhealthy but delicious meal') and some show her wilder side ('Learn to pole dance').
This is a very good and plausible theory. Although Hanners has progressed a lot throughout the series, there are a lot of phobias still remaining. My opinion is that Hanners will not be cured before she finally gets laid. A lot of hygienic phobias can be cured by irresistible libido. She may need this scare to finally break out of her shell.

Global Moderator Comment We're deliberately open to mentally ill members here and something like this is jumping on an open wound to them. Please don't. Also don't take any more steps down to the road to advocating a sex life for Hannelore: creepiness lies at the end of it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 18 May 2015, 08:10
NilsO, OCD and mental health in general is not something that has an easy cure. People live with their mental health issues their whole lives and often only manage to find coping mechanisms that make it easier to function in daily life. Saying someone can just be "cured", especially with something as condescending as "loosen up and get laid", is ableist and ridiculously ignorant.
Think of it as a variant of exposure therapy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposure_therapy). It might work. But my main argument was that your deeper instincts may overcome phobias, rational thinking, and learned behavior. Countless sex scandals support this theory.

Relax, it is just a comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 18 May 2015, 08:10
I know there's a like button on this part of the forum but I feel a click of a button can't express how much I agree with Welu and IICIH.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 18 May 2015, 08:16
NilsO, OCD and mental health in general is not something that has an easy cure. People live with their mental health issues their whole lives and often only manage to find coping mechanisms that make it easier to function in daily life. Saying someone can just be "cured", especially with something as condescending as "loosen up and get laid", is ableist and ridiculously ignorant.
Think of it as a variant of exposure therapy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposure_therapy). It might work. But my main argument was that your deeper instincts may overcome phobias, rational thinking, and learned behavior. Countless sex scandals support this theory.

Relax, it is just a comic.

Two mods have requested you stop this line of discussion, and I'm a third telling you not to. And being patronising towards one such mod is not going to help matters.

Global Moderator Comment This discussion is over.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 18 May 2015, 08:32
Global Moderator Comment While this thread may be about a comic and its characters, as IICIH said, this is a supportive place for those with mental health issues and the mod team works to ensure that.

You wouldn't (or at least really shouldn't) tell a person that getting laid will cure them of their mental health issues so don't say that about a fictional character in a place where it will be seen by people dealing with similar issues (or preferably don't say it at all). It's gross, over-simplifies the problems, and is incredibly insulting.

That is my final comment on this.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 18 May 2015, 08:43
Back to the comic.

She scratched a spot, or a mole, and it bled. That shit happens to me all the time. I assumed this comic was an indication of 'Hannelore freaks out over something, perhaps unnecessarily' rather than 'THERE IS SOMETHING MEDICALLY WRONG WITH HER'.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 May 2015, 08:47
She scratched a spot, or a mole, and it bled. That shit happens to me all the time. I assumed this comic was an indication of 'Hannelore freaks out over something, perhaps unnecessarily' rather than 'THERE IS SOMETHING MEDICALLY WRONG WITH HER'.

As I posted yesterday, Jeph said that this week's strips are very much something from his own life. We know that Jeph on occasion has near-disabling anxiety attacks and Hannelore who, if anything else, has even more serious anxiety issues, must suffer in the same manner sometimes. So, yes, this week is going to be about there being something medically wrong with Hannelore but not any kind of dermatological complaint. Instead, I suspect that we're going to see just how destructive anxiety can sometimes be to a sufferer and how a very good set of friends can help her at least confront it if not cure it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 18 May 2015, 08:54
Probably a poor choice of phrasing on my part, I didn't mean to imply that anxiety is not also a medical issue. I get anxiety attacks also, I just - I dunno, I never considered them medical, more mental health... but then your brain is in your body...

[Lex Luger]I DON'T KNOW[/Lex Luger]
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 18 May 2015, 09:53
I only hope for Hannelore that she will not freak out completely and get herself in danger of any kind. I think of the old episode when she hit her head on the cupboard door (wearing the worry-hat) and recieved a bleeding headwound.
She panicked and ran only half-dressed through the city to CoD to get help.
She has come a long way since then, but mortal fear of cancer may lead to completely irrational behaviour.

Keep calm, Hanners. Everything will be fine.

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Verteiron on 18 May 2015, 10:04
Oddly, my first thought was that it was a staph cyst that had gone unnoticed and drained overnight. I've never had one, but a friend of mine did, in almost that same spot, and it left a massive (for lack of a better word) crater in her skin. She had no indication it was there until the night before, when it itched a little, no redness. She thought it was a bug bite. By morning it had left an unspeakably nasty mess in her sheets and turned into an enormous scab, after which it healed up on its own without further intervention (which was good, because she had no health insurance).

Apparently cleanliness isn't the issue, it's just a Thing That Happens.

If it was a cyst, though, I can see where it would be particularly traumatic for poor Hanners. Staph are bacteria, and she's (at least) OCD and germaphobic. This might set off a whole series of self-destructive neuroses she previously had under control :(

The Staph thing would certainly match up with Jeph's comment about gross pictures, as they can turn quite nasty.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 18 May 2015, 10:31

The Staph thing would certainly match up with Jeph's comment about gross pictures, as they can turn quite nasty.

My dear, sweet god, this checks out. I mean, most of them were okay, but at least a few were... Yeah.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 18 May 2015, 10:52
I would like to second the scratched mole theory. I have peeled of a mole before(Do Not Do This) and it looked like Hannelore's sore.

Though my first thought was that Pintsize somehow punched a hole in her skin, but that seemed a bit violent for him.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 18 May 2015, 11:00
If this is not a cancer story...

Is it Lupus?  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 18 May 2015, 11:04
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 18 May 2015, 13:53
By the way, can I get a copy of that poster on Hannelore's wall?

Except with a tiger instead of a bunny. Because being told not to worry every morning by a tiger would be totally badass.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 May 2015, 14:28
ketchup
Shame on you, that's disgusting.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: DSL on 18 May 2015, 17:59
Bunny bite. See that critter in the lower left of Panel 1? Little bastard's not to be trusted. He probably put up the poster, too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 18 May 2015, 19:01
Comic. FAYE! HANNERS! PANIC!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 18 May 2015, 19:21
Worry Hat engage!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 18 May 2015, 19:24
WebMD results: You are going to die. In fifty years, give or take fifty years.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 18 May 2015, 20:00
You know, I've looked up my symptoms on the internet a lot.  Only twice have I come to the conclusion that I was gonna die.

Once I was right about the diagnosis but wrong about the prognosis.  The other time I have no idea, the symptoms went away on their own within a few hours so I figured meh, can't have been that bad.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 18 May 2015, 20:04
What's worrysome about this is that she didn't know it was there previously. I'd expect someone like Hanners to know every inch of her skin -- using mirrors and cameras as necessary. Then again, OCD doesn't necessarily make you a hypochondriac. But it wouldn't help...
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: aliensporebomb on 18 May 2015, 20:17
Faye will help!  Faye might seem like she's just barely recovering from her recent scare but she seems like she's the like of person with a level head on her shoulders and if you asked her a serious question she would be able to detect if Hanners was overreacting or if she should get it checked out.

She will probably recommend she get it looked at just to be sure.  Just thinking.  This way even if it's probably nothing that's the way to be sure and also a way of not pooh-poohing her friend when she's genuinely in distress over this.



Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 May 2015, 21:16
We've seen short bursts of possible hypochondria from Hannelore.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 18 May 2015, 21:27
Called it

Now it's up to Faye to be the level headed one



*Crosses fingers and toes*
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 18 May 2015, 21:52
Well. If Hanners looked it up on the internet, it must be true.  :roll:


ummm.. Can someone find my eyes? I think I rolled them to hard and they fell out... What does WebMD say about that?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 18 May 2015, 21:53
She looked up her symptoms on the Internet?

Yep, she's a goner, going to cease to be, soon to bring down the curtain and join the choir invisible, she'll be an ex-Hanners.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Tova on 18 May 2015, 21:58
My take on this is that it is perfectly normal to become concerned about something like this, but for someone with anxiety issues, concern could boil over into something quite traumatic.

I still got a laugh over panels one and two. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Y on 18 May 2015, 22:50
I always worry if such a thing is a tick, perhaps a tiny hard to see tick, hearing all the chronic diseases you get from it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 18 May 2015, 23:24
Absolutely everything people write in the internet is true !!!  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 May 2015, 23:46
Ah! Internet medical diagnosis tools, otherwise known as "the hypochondriac's enabler". For someone like Hannelore, that was pprobably the worst thing imaginable to do! The problem is that it is too easy to give worst case descriptions of your symptoms (because it always looks and feels worse to the patient) and fool the system.

Still, at least she was sensible enough to go to a friend. Nonetheless, convincing Hanners that she isn't dying will probably be a full-day job for poor Faye!

We've seen short bursts of possible hypochondria from Hannelore.

More importantly, it has only started recently, in-universe. It could be a sign that Hannelore's psychiatrist will have to adjust her medication.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Nepiophage on 18 May 2015, 23:48
Absolutely everything people write in the internet is true !!!  :evil:


For sufficiently small values of "true"
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 May 2015, 00:31
Seriously though, if you can't trust Doctor Google, who can you trust?!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: osaka on 19 May 2015, 00:49
You can trust Doctor Dude and his eXcellent ray.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Doc on 19 May 2015, 01:32
Doctor Google is scary.
I asked him: How many diseases do I have (https://www.google.nl/search?q=how+many+diseases+do+i+have)? and he gave me 338.000.000 results!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 19 May 2015, 01:50
Ya gotta be careful with dem Inernets!

Especially when you look up your symptoms and the top Google result is: "How the Fszk are you even ALIVE?"

Followed by:
WebMD results: You are going to die. In fifty years, give or take fifty years.

Except mine is: "You are going to die.  Yesterday.  You should not be alive.  You should be working on a good rigor mortis."

And I'm thinking, "And today looked so good from this morning..."
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 19 May 2015, 01:55
My take on this is that it is perfectly normal to become concerned about something like this, but for someone with anxiety issues, concern could boil over into something quite traumatic.

Exactly.
See a doc.
If all-clear given (spoiler says it will be) then can treat any remaining anxiety with cognitive therapy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Mlle Germain on 19 May 2015, 07:04
I can relate to Hanners a lot in this arc.

I do not have any other anxiety issues, but I am a hypochondriac (with actual illnesses more often than the average person, which does not make that any better) and have to stop myself from googling symptoms more or less on a weekly basis.
I would probably not worry about a scratched mole so much (except if it was this size and I really didn't know it was there before), because I have mine checked by a dermatologist pretty regularly. But just one evening last week I suddenly had a weird, 1x2x0.5cm red bump under one eye and pretty much did exactly what Hanners did; one of my housemates heard me freak out and came to ask what was wrong. That was actually quite embarrassing, because I don't know him that well and had to tell him that I was scared I would have to run around with the bump for the rest of my life and never have a normal face again. When I said it out loud, this sounded a lot less reasonable than in my head.
It turns out the bump came from an allergic reaction and was gone by the time I got to see a doctor the next afternoon.

How do you stop yourself from being a hypochondriac when you know too much about all the illnesses that exist? I'm just happy I didn't choose to study medicine.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: CM_albion on 19 May 2015, 07:53
Hanners lis..Han...Hallelore will you please....calm dow...hanners..you're not....eugh, fuckit. better to wait this one out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: DSL on 19 May 2015, 08:50
Doctor Google is scary.
I asked him: How many diseases do I have (https://www.google.nl/search?q=how+many+diseases+do+i+have)? and he gave me 338.000.000 results!

And then there are the ever-popular "flu-like symptoms" which mean either that your head will collapse and skin start sloughing off while your bones turn to powder. Or, you know, you have a cold.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Cattus on 19 May 2015, 09:00
I predict a visit to Dad's space station for some experimental testing/treatment will be in order for Hanners.  Faye will go with her and will strike up a convo with the head of security (I forget her name)  Faye will open up to her (strangers are easier to talk to, often, than friends) and the visit will end with a promise of future visits for "therapy".  After that, time travel, because, 30 years since.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 May 2015, 09:07
Jeph has Tweeted (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/600421468598599680) that the reference photos for an upcoming strip 'horrified' his girlfriend. I can't imagine anything for this Friday's Alice Grove having that effect so...

Possibility:
Hannelore persuades Faye to examine less-visible parts of her body for more signs of the cancer that only exists in her terrified, anxiety-stricken imagination. Hoping to help ease her fears, Faye agrees. Marten and Claire come in to witness the resulting scene without any context. Marten insists that Hannelore and Faye are adults and he is therefore 'cool' with whatever they want to do. However, he does insist that the bedroom and sock-on-handle rules be respected.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 19 May 2015, 09:22
The first two panels of Faye were just perfect. Best Fayeface ever in panel 1. Thatīs exactly how I look like in the morning before I take my first sip of coffee. :-D
A litte detail: she is using a CoD-mug. *sigh*

I donīt think weīll travel to space anytime soon. Weīd rather see a holographic projection of Station or Hannersī dad visiting her on earth. Anyway, this actual anexity attack of hypochondria has to be dealt with. Faye has proven to be able to calm Hanners down more than once. So I think she ist the right counterpart right now. But I am courious how she will treat Hanners and if maybe this will have an effect on Faye and her personal problems. Maybe helping Hanners will do her good too. :-)

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 19 May 2015, 09:25
Hanner's eyes in the third panel make me think she's been crying. :(
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 19 May 2015, 09:31
Hoping to help ease her fears, Faye agrees. Marten and Claire come in to witness the resulting scene without any context. Marten insists that Hannelore and Faye are adults and he is therefore 'cool' with whatever they want to do. However, he does insist that the bedroom and sock-on-handle rules be respected.

Tsk!
This is perilously close to a forbidden level of shipping (e.g. any involving Hanners), and I cannot imagine that Jeph would go this route either.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 May 2015, 09:38
Hoping to help ease her fears, Faye agrees. Marten and Claire come in to witness the resulting scene without any context. Marten insists that Hannelore and Faye are adults and he is therefore 'cool' with whatever they want to do. However, he does insist that the bedroom and sock-on-handle rules be respected.

Tsk!
This is perilously close to a forbidden level of shipping (e.g. any involving Hanners), and I cannot imagine that Jeph would go this route either.

Come on, it's a joke, not advocating shipping. The whole point of it would be for Faye and Hannelore to have a splutter-fest whilst they try to persuade Marten that he has things entirely wrong. Oh... and for us to have a free laugh at Marten and Claire's expense, based entirely on their freaked-out facial expressions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 19 May 2015, 10:11
Come on, it's a joke,

I got that; but I still feel it's going to places that are inappropriate given the rules we follow in this forum.  We try to second-guess Jeph's views here, as this is his space, and we are here by his leave.  If you think we are wrong, ask him.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 19 May 2015, 11:51
 At least she doesn't have Network connectivity problems (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LinpRhB4aWU).
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 May 2015, 13:53
I've heard that line was ad-libbed. Chris Pratt's the fucking best.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 19 May 2015, 20:06
Comic!  Shouting!  Angry!

I wonder if this won't  turn out to be foreshadowing of Faye deciding to become a doctor.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: DSL on 19 May 2015, 20:12
FAYE: "Burn that sucker right off. Lemme get my gear."
HANNERS: "Oh, OK ... Wait. Your WHAT gear?! ... oh god ..."
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 19 May 2015, 20:24
Scary Faye is frightening Hanners, but it's okay because Hanners is... Why is it okay? I mean, I feel like we need the next strip's context to know if it's okay. I think it's okay.

I don't know. I'm very, very tired right now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 19 May 2015, 20:44
Damn it Hanners!  I'm a sculptor, not a doctor.  :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 May 2015, 20:51
Jeph likes having his characters say "oh gosh/god" lately :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Random Wanderer on 19 May 2015, 21:11
Hanners, relax. Your dad's got cancer handled. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1904)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 19 May 2015, 21:19
I wonder if this won't  turn out to be foreshadowing of Faye deciding to become a doctor.

Worse than Dr Cox.

Worse than House.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 May 2015, 21:55
The comic cropped out weird, so I just got Hanners leaning back screaming "Oh god!" and the top of Faye's head at crotch height.

I must admit, I flinched hard. Took me a moment to scroll down.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 19 May 2015, 22:15
An allergic reaction to an implanted RFID chip? Given her parents, security concerns etc it would make sense.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 19 May 2015, 23:09
Good morning,

Todays comic is nice and the panicking Hannelore is kinda sweet in her own weird way. But Fayes reaction in the last panel appears to me a bit too strong. I know of cause that she would never actually use violence on Hanners. There is no question about that. But did she really have to go so far to get Hanners to snap out of her panic?
Maybe a more timid reaction would have sufficed. Although on the other hand it would have been less for the readers. And this is Faye Iīm talking about... ;-)

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 May 2015, 23:13
Faye fails at sympathetic empathy. Mostly because she's Faye and Hannelore is Hannelore. In many ways, it's a relief that all the troubles that Faye has gone through hasn't altered her basically impatient and unpleasant personality.

Prediction: Doctor Faye will prescribe a Band-Aid for Hanners' boo-boo.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 20 May 2015, 00:32
I wonder if this won't  turn out to be foreshadowing of Faye deciding to become a doctor.

Worse than Dr Cox.

Worse than House.

'I tried to remove the tumour surgically, but it didn't work, so I'm going to punch it out of you.'
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Geographus on 20 May 2015, 00:39
'I tried to remove the tumour surgically, but it didn't work, so I'm going to punch it out of you.'
'But ... but why would you punch it?'
'Because I don't have my blowtorch here right now.'
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 20 May 2015, 00:53
Quote
    I remember going to the British Museum one day to read up the treatment for some slight ailment of which I had a touch—hay fever, I fancy it was. I got down the book, and read all I came to read; and then, in an unthinking moment, I idly turned the leaves, and began to indolently study diseases, generally. I forget which was the first distemper I plunged into—some fearful, devastating scourge, I know—and, before I had glanced half down the list of "premonitory symptoms," it was borne in upon me that I had fairly got it.

    I sat for awhile, frozen with horror; and then, in the listlessness of despair, I again turned over the pages. I came to typhoid fever--read the symptoms--discovered that I had typhoid fever, must have had it for months without knowing it--wondered what else I had got; turned up St. Vitus's Dance--found, as I expected, that I had that too,--began to get interested in my case, and determined to sift it to the bottom, and so started alphabetically--read up ague, and learnt that I was sickening for it, and that the acute stage would commence in about another fortnight. Bright's disease, I was relieved to find, I had only in a modified form, and, so far as that was concerned, I might live for years. Cholera I had, with severe complications; and diphtheria I seemed to have been born with. I plodded conscientiously through the twenty-six letters, and the only malady I could conclude I had not got was housemaid's knee.

Jerome K Jerome, Three Men in a Boat, 1889

We can't blame the internet for this.

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 May 2015, 05:52
'I tried to remove the tumour surgically, but it didn't work, so I'm going to punch it out of you.'
'But ... but why would you punch it?'
'Because I don't have my blowtorch here right now.'
'Ordinarily I'd use booze as a disinfectant, but I'm not allowed to have booze anymore, so you'll have to hope it doesn't get infected.'
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 20 May 2015, 06:19
"A combination of booze and blowtorch would be best, because then you'd have flames shooting out of your side, and that would be awesome."
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 20 May 2015, 06:42
[...] But Fayes reaction in the last panel appears to me a bit too strong. [...]
How so ? Its a perfectly natural Faye reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 20 May 2015, 08:27
Also she's probably going through some withdrawal which would add to the cranky.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 May 2015, 08:49
A perfectly natural Faye reaction is too strong.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 20 May 2015, 11:49
Comic strip 2963 guest starring Dick Van Dyke as Faye :D

Did Hanners charge to Faye's apartment in the kit she went to bed in?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 14:05
It would appear so. Also..."kit"? That usage is unfamiliar to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 May 2015, 14:21
"Kit" for clothes - is that not widespread?  Games kit?  Fit kit?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 20 May 2015, 14:26
I gotta say I've heard it in the 'football kit' sense, but not in the sense of just clothes generally, except in the 'get your kit off' sense.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 May 2015, 14:27
Kit bag?

I suppose the word kit relates more commonly to sports or uniform clothing than everyday clothing; but Hanners' shorts would come in as fitness clothing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 20 May 2015, 14:29
That too, but again I'd expect sports clothing to be in there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 May 2015, 14:35
It would appear so. Also..."kit"? That usage is unfamiliar to me.
You see, Hanners skinned some kittens to make her clothing. Thus, her clothing is her 'kit'.  :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 14:47
Hanners is Mr. Burns?

Also, I thought a kit was a baby fox.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 May 2015, 14:48
There's no better than authentic Irish Setter!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 20 May 2015, 15:43
Faye is more Gunny Hartman at this point

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0wycVPR_nI
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 May 2015, 16:40
"Kit" is a British term. We use "clothes" or "uniform" or "outfit" in the states.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 16:52
Ahh, like how they call pants "trousers".
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 20 May 2015, 17:29
Oh, those wacky Brits. Giving us a language to destroy, recreate, and then, letting us look back and judge the original...
Crazy stuff...
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 20 May 2015, 19:03
Ahh, like how they call pants "trousers".

And as I recall, 'pants' is underwear over there. Could be remembering wrong, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 19:04
Right, and they call underpants "pants". How wonderfully absurd. Of course I could be called the same for calling pants "underpants" and trousers "pants". Language is fun.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 20 May 2015, 19:51
Comic's up. EYES ON THE ROAD, FAYE! HANDS AT TEN AND TWO!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 20 May 2015, 19:52
The UK and the US are two countries divided by a common tongue.  Also, when did Faye get a car?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 May 2015, 20:02
Part of me is actually surprised that Faye has a license since her episode after her dad died - but I think we saw her driving at least one other time in the strip.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 20 May 2015, 20:05
I wonder if this won't  turn out to be foreshadowing of Faye deciding to become a doctor.

Worse than Dr Cox.

Worse than House.

'I tried to remove the tumour surgically, but it didn't work, so I'm going to punch it out of you.'

The most JoJo of comic strips.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 20:27
I have no idea what that means.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Toe on 20 May 2015, 20:29
She takes auto safety very seriously, but she wears her seatbelt shoulder strap under her armpit? Except she wears it right in panel 3, and then goes back to wearing it wrong in #4. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 20 May 2015, 20:41
I have no idea what that means.

Oh, just that a lot of stuff is solved by punching in JoJo. >_>

Example: dealing with suspicious food. (http://40.media.tumblr.com/41c38342eb60fb07a9070bd7f5468812/tumblr_msk2u9vzm71rqpxlvo2_500.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 May 2015, 20:43
What is "in JoJo"?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 20 May 2015, 20:48
The UK and the US are two countries divided by a common tongue.  Also, when did Faye get a car?

I too am unable to account for Faye's vehicle.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 20 May 2015, 20:50
Typical Jojo tumor.

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: QuestionableIntentions on 20 May 2015, 21:20
So the QC universe has sentient toasters but not self driving cars?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 20 May 2015, 21:20
Also, when did Faye get a car?

 I think that's Hannelore's car. It was implied on 2376 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2376)-2377 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2377) that she was gonna be driving.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: lolbutts on 20 May 2015, 21:27
Do people ever get tired of presuming the worst about Faye? It's like a hobby for so many regulars and one of the main reasons I perpetually lurk. Sorry for derail, it just baffles me sometimes.

Faye fails at sympathetic empathy. Mostly because she's Faye and Hannelore is Hannelore. In many ways, it's a relief that all the troubles that Faye has gone through hasn't altered her basically impatient and unpleasant personality.

Prediction: Doctor Faye will prescribe a Band-Aid for Hanners' boo-boo.
Title: Whose car is that
Post by: Deadcoder on 20 May 2015, 21:32
We see Faye and Hannelore in a car in 2964; yet we know Marten doesn't own a car, and given how Faye walks everywhere, she probably doesn't own one either, so whose car is that? Hannelore never mentioned owning one, but she might, given that her parents have what is probably trillions of dollars. Whose car is that?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 May 2015, 21:39
At least in 581 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=581) and 621 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=621) it's implied Faye doesn't have a car.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 20 May 2015, 21:45
...Faye doesn't have a car.

 Not since the (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=307) accident (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=454).
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 20 May 2015, 21:46
I'm pretty sure Hanners' car flies and has a cloaking device.

Edit-I keep refreshing for K1dmor's magic avatar!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 May 2015, 22:12
Every car-owning character I can think of is either at Coffee of Doom or is Tai. Steve has a truck.

It would be awkward to approach anyone from CoD right now. Archive masters, does it look like Tai's car?

Jeph's Twitter says he'll be editing out the misplaced seat belt.
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 May 2015, 22:15
I'm wondering that too. No matter who she's borrowing it from, there is an interesting story.

If it were Hannelore's car, wouldn't she be driving?

BTW, any objection to merging this thread with the WCDT?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Indicible on 20 May 2015, 22:17
Quote
HANDS AT TEN AND TWO!

Don't say that! This could trigger a depressive episode for Faye.

What are the odds Faye finds work in this arc?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 20 May 2015, 22:33
Every car-owning character I can think of is either at Coffee of Doom or is Tai. Steve has a truck.

 Angus has a blue car (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2292), and Dale has a gray one (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2496).

 The only one with a white car seems to be Marigold (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1996). But it's unlikely that she let them use her car, instead of driving herself.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 May 2015, 23:03
There's always the possibility of Hour Car or Zip Car (http://www.zipcar.com/northampton) (hourly car rental services)...
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 May 2015, 23:16
Oh, those wacky Brits. Giving us a language to destroy, recreate, and then, letting us look back and judge the original...

Typically, we are the ones who have changed it, while the older version is preserved in the US, actually.  The classic example is Fall for Autumn; Fall was the word in Dr Johnson's dictionary.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 May 2015, 23:21
Whoever's car that is, it seems to have a disproportionately large steering wheel! Closer to truck-sized!

Now, this may be just me. However, am I the only one who, when they read Hannelore say 'What if they misdiagnose me?', they also felt that there was a subtext? Basically, Hanners isn't sure what scares her more - if the clinic were to confirm her fears or if they were to give her the all-clear. It's a strange thing about people who suffer from hypochondria that, on a certain level, they don't want to know that they are well.

I'm also glad to see I'm not alone in repeatedly just wanting to hug Hanners. If Faye has that urge, then no-one is immune!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 20 May 2015, 23:55
It would appear so. Also..."kit"? That usage is unfamiliar to me.

I'm sorry, that was too British for you? How about we get a spot of tea and have a chinwag about the cricket, what what? :p

I'll go for "loud mouth American" and not "cheeky chappy Brit" next time :D

Anyway, back on topic Claire has a green car (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2378) If anyone was wondering if Faye might have GTA'd hers.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: TinPenguin on 21 May 2015, 00:01
She takes auto safety very seriously, but she wears her seatbelt shoulder strap under her armpit? Except she wears it right in panel 3, and then goes back to wearing it wrong in #4. :psyduck:

Faye could do with adjusting hers, too. But from the apparent slack in Hannelore's strap, it could well be broken.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 21 May 2015, 00:13
A little late to the draw, but:
I bet Hannelore has Lupus.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 21 May 2015, 01:08
Ahh, like how they call pants "trousers".

And as I recall, 'pants' is underwear over there. Could be remembering wrong, though.

Yep. Except in the north, where depending on what dialect you're speaking, 'pants' can also mean trousers.
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: Thrillho on 21 May 2015, 01:08
Mine. It's my car.

Mysery solved.
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: Mlle Germain on 21 May 2015, 01:31
Hah, I came to the forum to see if anyone new about the car; and right away there's this handy thread!  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: swapna on 21 May 2015, 02:31
I think it's Hanners' car - she did offer to drive Marten. (White is also very much Hanners' colour, since it's easy to clean) And she wouldn't be safe to drive, all worried and everything, so I think Faye would offer.

As for Faye still having her license: Why wouldn't she? She had one accident we know of, and it didn't hurt anybody else, and she wasn't driving under the influence.

I must say, I enjoy the Faye and Hanners interacting - they're so different, but trust and depend on each other. And they are emotionally honest, which is rare at least for Faye.

(Also, what's with that HUGE-ass wheel? IS IT SECRETLY A TRUCK??)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Akima on 21 May 2015, 02:38
Here, trousers can be "trousers", "pants", "strides" or "daks" (originally a brand name). Underpants (for men) can be known as underdaks.

The seat-belts in that car seriously need adjusting.
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: hedgie on 21 May 2015, 02:41
If it were Hannelore's car, wouldn't she be driving?

Having anxiety problems, including germophobia myself, I know that even if I owned a car, I'd have someone else drive if I was in panic-mode. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 May 2015, 02:49
White cars get the dirtiest - fastest.

Jeph "fixed the seatbelt issue.

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: osaka on 21 May 2015, 03:36
So the QC universe has sentient toasters but not self driving cars?

For some reason, at least in this world, most people don't trust a means of transport that drives itself. Probably happens in the QC-Verse too.
White cars get the dirtiest - fastest.

They also retain their white look even if they're super-dirty. So it might depend on your perception.
Red cars. Now those are extremely critical about getting dirty and even sunlight for their look.

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 May 2015, 04:19
I live in the land of dirt roads, bad pavement and worse winter driving.

White cars get VERY dirty.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: osaka on 21 May 2015, 05:28
And I didn't wash my car in about 6 years. It kept raining. I also know what a dirty car is.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 21 May 2015, 05:33
Oh, those wacky Brits. Giving us a language to destroy, recreate, and then, letting us look back and judge the original...

Typically, we are the ones who have changed it, while the older version is preserved in the US, actually.  The classic example is Fall for Autumn; Fall was the word in Dr Johnson's dictionary.

Language experts have said that the British accents have evolved more in the last three hundred years than the American so theoretically we Americans are saying everything correctly. Lol
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 21 May 2015, 06:34
There was a dialect spoken on the Outer Banks of North Carolina that linguists claimed was virtually identical to the way English was spoken (at least in the south of England) in Shakespeare's time. Alas, this dialect is rapidly dying out, but it was still common among older Outer Banks natives 30 years ago.

Now, the New England dialect is another thing altogether. Nobody claims that this is the way anyone else has spoken anywhere, ever.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 May 2015, 07:45
Whoa, I never realized K1dmor had a hodgatar.
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: bhtooefr on 21 May 2015, 07:50
It's not a car we've seen before:

The cars of Questionable Content:

Amanda's rental car: Probably a 2000-2005 Ford Taurus (http://www.carfolio.com/images/dbimages/zgas/models/id/10624/2001%20ford%20taurus%20rear%20%C2%BE.jpg) (well, 2000-2007, but the comic was from 2004), shown in 175 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=175)
Amanda: 1999.5-2005.0 Volkswagen Jetta (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Volkswagen-Jetta-MK4-1.8T-Wolfsburg.jpg) (VW used to be bad about introducing a new model while the old one was still in production and part-way through a model year, and that's how the enthusiast community deals with it, half model years), shown and stated to be a Jetta in 609 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=609)
Angus: 2011-2013 Ford Fiesta hatch (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/2011_Ford_Fiesta_SES_hatchback_--_02-18-2011.jpg), shown in 2292 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2292)
Claire: 2011-2014 Mazda2 (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FoXyvaPSnVk/Ss5HxkUVkHI/AAAAAAACIqA/OmSAsTGHqUA/s1600/2010-MAZDA2-Facelift-3.jpg), shown in 2378 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2378)
Dale: Another Ford Fiesta hatch, we don't see enough details to tell whether it's a 2011-2013 or 2014-2015, shown in 2496 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2496)
Raven: 1998-2005 Volkswagen New Beetle TDI (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/1998-2005_Volkswagen_New_Beetle_--_03-24-2012.JPG), shown in 423 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=423), stated as a Bug (not that it was necessary) in 451 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=451), implied to be a TDI in 621 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=621)
Tai: 2003-2005 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/%2701-%2703_Volkswagen_Jetta_1.8T_Wagon_%28Front%29.JPG) (and an interior shot (http://images.gtcarlot.com/pictures/47303827.jpg), and the sunglass holder (http://fsjbrutus.com/jetta/images/sunglassholder2.jpg) that gives it away as at least a 2003), shown in 1916 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1916)

I suspect Jeph owns a Fiesta, really, and uses it as his reference for when he needs a car in QC, because this looks like yet another Fiesta.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 21 May 2015, 07:57
"kit" means "equipment" in military jargon.
As in "yet another useless bit of kit we're stuck with".
"good kit that"
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: jwhouk on 21 May 2015, 08:13
A point I made in the WCDT, but I think it might be of interest here:

ZipCar (http://www.zipcar.com/northampton) - a short-term rental car ("car-sharing") company - has a franchise in Northampton. It's entirely possible that Hanners and/or Faye may use the service for things like this.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 21 May 2015, 08:13
Whoa, I never realized K1dmor had a hodgatar.

Heh, nor me!  In the past I set one up for one or two people and ran them for a while, but this is not one of mine.  It's coded differently, because it's not serving the various pictures itself (which mine does), but redirecting to multiple pictures on imgur.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 21 May 2015, 09:51
Poor Hanners, I want to hug her too.
No, bad idea. Shame on you, Timemaster. ;-)

I only hope she is really looking for a diagnosis (and treatment if necessary). But people who suffer from hypochondrosis are often enough not looking for a independent diagnosis or poper information. Instead they are looking for comfirmation of their allready made-up oppinion: that they are sick and that their selfmade diagnosis is right. A diagnosis that they are not sick is often not accepted, but instead rejected as proof that the doctor is incapable and the diagnosis is wrong. So another doctor is consultated in the hope that he makes the "right" diagnosis.

This is a complicated topic and the psychological mechanisms and implications are complex. So Iīm not gonna take this any further.
Letīs just hope that Hanners has enought trust in her doctors and in Faye to accept a negative diagnosis: that her bleeding mole is not malignant.

Keeping my fingers crossed:
TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: amykathleen on 21 May 2015, 10:33
As for Faye still having her license: Why wouldn't she? She had one accident we know of, and it didn't hurt anybody else, and she wasn't driving under the influence.

As far as I know, if you move to another state you need to get a driver's license or state ID for the new state within 30 or 90 days or something like that.  She must have gotten some form of ID after she moved, or she would likely have encountered issues in buying alcohol at least once, but there's no guarantee she got a driver's license instead of just a state ID.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 21 May 2015, 13:13
Is it just me or does Hanners look at bout 13 years old here? Is the car out of proportion?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 21 May 2015, 14:04
Is it just me or does Hanners look at bout 13 years old here? Is the car out of proportion?

I mean, we've established that the steering wheel clearly belongs to a truck; I wouldn't be surprised if it was out of proportion in other ways.

That being said, I don't see what you're talking about. Hanners is small and skinny, that's just how she is.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 21 May 2015, 14:25
Which is the actual answer... Faye cobbled together the car out of spare parts as a project to keep from drinking... So everything is all out of proportion to another being from random vehicles.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 21 May 2015, 14:28
They get out and we see it's one of these

(http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/bmw-suv-car-12848588.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 21 May 2015, 14:29
Which is the actual answer... Faye cobbled together the car out of spare parts as a project to keep from drinking... So everything is all out of proportion to another being from random vehicles.
Every car in Northampton is now missing one random part. It's going to be a bad day for the driver of the car with no brake rotors.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 21 May 2015, 15:41
Which is the actual answer... Faye cobbled together the car out of spare parts as a project to keep from drinking... So everything is all out of proportion to another being from random vehicles.
Every car in Northampton is now missing one random part. It's going to be a bad day for the driver of the car with no brake rotors.

I'd imagine it was a bad hair day for whoever's windshield went missing. Probably multiple in a row, depending on who they knew
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 May 2015, 17:20
Some artists can't draw feet or hands. Jeph has issues with car interiors.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 21 May 2015, 19:35
If Hanners has a white car, it'd be this:
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.motorward.com%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2F2014%2F10%2Ftesla_model_s.jpg&f=1)

After all, it's the Magic Space Car
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla_model_s (http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla_model_s)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: neurocase on 21 May 2015, 19:51
Comiiiic!

Good to see Hanners is okay, as if there was any doubt. She's being very brave, I have to say. Few years ago (real time, not comic time) she would have been practically catatonic.

Also are they freezing it off? Yow. I had a friend have that done, and apparently it hurts like blazes.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 May 2015, 20:12
...and a Google search spike for "seborrheic keratoma" suddenly has Google wondering WTH is happening...
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 21 May 2015, 20:12
Aww, poor Hanners, in pain and regretting past decisions... Sounds like me on certain mornings
Title: Re: Whose car is that
Post by: Deadcoder on 21 May 2015, 21:25
I'm wondering that too. No matter who she's borrowing it from, there is an interesting story.

If it were Hannelore's car, wouldn't she be driving?

BTW, any objection to merging this thread with the WCDT?

Feel free to merge. Gosh, that sounds dirty.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 21 May 2015, 22:29
Brave Hanners, she seems to accept the diagnosis. Iīm kinda relieved here. :-)

I suppose Iīm wrong, but it seems to me that she is running around in her sleepware the whole time. Skimpy shirt, very short pants. Faye surely wouldnīt let her leave the house like that (I hope), but that was my first thought on todays comic. And Hanners doesnīt strike me as the hotpants-type. ;-)

Now I am curious if this arc is finished here or if we will see more about this thing next week. Maybe some talk about internet diagnostics or painful suffering from her severe chestwound. Or comforting her in the group. Maybe even all of it.

Or maybe butts.
Yes definitely butts. And Pintsize. :-D

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 21 May 2015, 23:02
I suppose Iīm wrong, but it seems to me that she is running around in her sleepware the whole time. Skimpy shirt, very short pants. Faye surely wouldnīt let her leave the house like that (I hope), but that was my first thought on todays comic. And Hanners doesnīt strike me as the hotpants-type. ;-)

This isn't the first time (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1203) she's left the house in shorts that short.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 21 May 2015, 23:20
If that hurts as much as people say, that Hannelore is willing to endure this reminds us of just how tough she is under that goofy, neurotic exterior. Now, I find myself wondering if Faye will buy her a lollipop for being brave.  :wink:

This has been an interesting short story. It reminded us of the role that Marten and Faye have (Faye especially in this case) in Hannelore's emotional life. Those two have sort of become Hanners' carers, when she needs it, especially in helping her respond usefully to her anxieties rather than get locked into a fear and indecision loop. She really owes a lot of her current functioning to their friendship.

Now, question: Is that the same doctor who cared for Faye when she was recently hospitalised? If so, then as with its equivalent in House. M.D., we can assume that the walk-i n clinic is part of the hospital.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 22 May 2015, 00:28
Medical question!
Quote
You might want to have it removed, since it's already broken once...
What are the implications that it has been broken once? Is there a risk for growth or what?


And yeah, glad that Hannelore is calmer now, even though that looks like it hurts!
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 May 2015, 01:25
Medical question!
Quote
You might want to have it removed, since it's already broken once...

What are the implications that it has been broken once? Is there a risk for growth or what?

I'm no doctor but even I know that a break in the skin is bad news. You can get serious blood and tissue infections that way, especially if the break can happen without you being aware of it. The problem is that, now it's broken once, it's likely to do so again.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: osaka on 22 May 2015, 02:01
And here I was, thinking Hanners was immune to cold. Oh well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Geographus on 22 May 2015, 03:06
Medical question!
Quote
You might want to have it removed, since it's already broken once...

What are the implications that it has been broken once? Is there a risk for growth or what?

I'm no doctor but even I know that a break in the skin is bad news. You can get serious blood and tissue infections that way, especially if the break can happen without you being aware of it. The problem is that, now it's broken once, it's likely to do so again.
Yep, that is the case.

I had something similar like Hanners on my leg a few years ago. It was also benign but the doctor
said that if it causes me problems I should think about removing it. I finally let it remove because
it was at the exact place where the legs of my sport pants would end so while I was doing
workouts they would constantly rub against it which was quite unplesant.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 22 May 2015, 04:42
Brave Hanners, she seems to accept the diagnosis. Iīm kinda relieved here. :-)

I suppose Iīm wrong, but it seems to me that she is running around in her sleepware the whole time. Skimpy shirt, very short pants. Faye surely wouldnīt let her leave the house like that (I hope), but that was my first thought on todays comic. And Hanners doesnīt strike me as the hotpants-type. ;-)

For someone as germophobic as Hannelore, she tends to walk around with surprisingly little clothing to block the germs. The skimpy-shirt-and-shorts look seems to be her default summer wardrobe (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2920).

Claire (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2948) seems to have adopted the skimpy shirts as well recently. Wonder what made that happen.  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 May 2015, 04:44
Clothes might block germs, but they also carry them around, don't they?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 22 May 2015, 04:49
The same is true of skin. So the question is, would Hannelore rather be carrying the germs around on her clothing or on her skin?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Tova on 22 May 2015, 05:09
I don't want to brag, but...

ahhhh screw it.

My completely unscientific from-what-I-know guess is that it's a seborrheic keratosis. My only source of doubt is that it's more of an older person's thing. But it's not cancerous, and images on the internet are kind of gross, especially when you introduce bleeding into your search terms.

Now all she has to deal with is the couple of days wait for the thing to actually fall off.
(Source: I've had a few frozen off myself)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: prime_pm on 22 May 2015, 06:19
You know, this case reminds me of the time I got this pyogenic granuloma.

...on my sack.

I didn't know what the hell it was.  Thought it might have been a venereal disease because apparently I'm an idiot, so I went to a VD clinic to get checked out because it was free and I'm also cheap.  After I came out clean, I registered to see a doctor, and since I'd just moved downtown and had yet to register with a regular physician I had to wait about two months or so for an available appointment.  I go in, she don't know what the hell it is, so she points me to the direction of a dermatologist.  And that's another two or three months of waiting.  And keep in mind, this whole time I'm dealing with
(click to show/hide)
.  Think I went through five boxes of band-aids.  Finally I see the dermatologist, she identifies what the hell it is and offers to snip it off for me.  I had to get two locals into my nuts beforehand.  As she scraped it off and cauterized/welded the wound, I felt nothing below the waist.  Also got checked for cancer while I was there; nothing.

Lesson learned: see a doctor regularly.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: aliensporebomb on 22 May 2015, 07:13
Poor Hanners.  In some ways she's kind of like a little kid.  She's an adult but maybe spending all those years aboard station has some areas still yet to be developed.  Glad to see she'll be fine.  Maybe Faye will take her out for ice cream afterwards?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Nepiophage on 22 May 2015, 07:15

For someone as germophobic as Hannelore, she tends to walk around with surprisingly little clothing to block the germs. The skimpy-shirt-and-shorts look seems to be her default summer wardrobe (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2920).

INdeed, yes. Here's another example. http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2886
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 22 May 2015, 08:28
Skin's easier to clean than clothes I guess?
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Timemaster on 22 May 2015, 08:54
INdeed, yes. Here's another example. http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2886

OK, I completely forgot about that one. So I was wrong about the hotpants.

By the way, according to the timeline-thread we should be about middle or end of september. Iīm not familiar with the weather in New England. Is it usually very warm there at that time?

TM
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 22 May 2015, 09:17
Something to consider is that more clothing equals more sweat trapped and held against the body in hot weather. And, let's face it, that'll make Hannelore feel dirty.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 22 May 2015, 10:44
I don't think Jeph follows April's timeline - April has spent a lot of time trying to rationalize the passage of time in QC to a real-world calendar and it's becoming progressively more difficult. But yes, it is possible for it to be that warm in Massachusetts well into September.

Also New Englanders tend to wear shorts and t-shirts in weather that most people would find too cool. For example, it's currently, 72°F, which I (a Southerner by birth) consider too cool for shorts, but Massachusetts natives think it's more than warm enough.

Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Welu on 22 May 2015, 12:28
Skin's easier to clean than clothes I guess?

Hardwood floors are much easier to keep clean than carpeting. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=633)
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 May 2015, 15:25
Better than Cautery
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 May 2015, 21:54
If that hurts as much as people say, that Hannelore is willing to endure this reminds us of just how tough she is under that goofy, neurotic exterior. Now, I find myself wondering if Faye will buy her a lollipop for being brave.  :wink:

Absolutely. I don't think most bullfighters would be brave enough to face up to what Hannelore deals with daily.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 23 May 2015, 16:44
Absolutely. I don't think most bullfighters would be brave enough to face up to what Hannelore deals with daily.

Agreed.  It's humbling how many people have to play the game of life in Nightmare Mode, and make it look easy in spite of it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Radium_Coyote on 23 May 2015, 19:44
Impressive, but not quite as impressive as cutting pieces of your own body off.  Which, honestly, sounds about as icky as it is.  Nobody ever wants to be the guy that NEEDS to take scissors to his own body...  And yet, there is also the FAR SIDE of the problem, when you've done the deed
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Near Lurker on 24 May 2015, 13:27
Also New Englanders tend to wear shorts and t-shirts in weather that most people would find too cool. For example, it's currently, 72°F, which I (a Southerner by birth) consider too cool for shorts, but Massachusetts natives think it's more than warm enough.

72?  Yeah, the idea of thinking of 72 as anything but "warm" is pretty alien to me.  When I was younger, I remember my t-shirt threshold if it wasn't humid was 30 or a bit below.  That I grew out of, but I don't think it cleared 65 until I stopped wearing short sleeves entirely.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 May 2015, 13:34
Shorts weather starts around 50 for me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 24 May 2015, 14:10
72 is warm. Also a Southerner, and dude, if 70 is too cold, then you're kinda wimpy. BELOW 70, okay then you have a point, it's teetering on cold, but above? That's shorts weather. It's cool shorts weather, but it's not uncomfortable
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 24 May 2015, 14:35
I have been known to wear short sleeves in 19 F/-7.2 C. I didn't notice that it was particularly cold.

In my defense, it was after a cold snap of below 0 F/-18 C for a couple weeks or so.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 May 2015, 17:56
I just run warm in general. I'm basically a space heater, I can literally warm people up by standing near them if it's cold enough out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2961-2965 (18-22 May 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 25 May 2015, 05:29
I don't like wearing shorts, or not wearing my coat/jacket. I just prefer how I look with them on, so I avoid summer clothing as much as possible.