THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: BenRG on 07 Aug 2016, 11:01

Title: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 07 Aug 2016, 11:01
Okay, so I'm shooting in the dark for a topic here. However, I think that Brun's eventual job is going to be a significant aspect of how she interacts with the rest of the cast.

My vote goes for 'Delivery-person' although various other options also appeal. I think that what is necessary is something that gives a realistic cause for her to interact with other members of the cast in a non-contrived way. Having something like Dale's old delivery job gives plenty of reason for her to turn up literally anywhere in the QC world and start interacting with the cast on both a business and personal level. I guess I also like the idea of Brun zipping around Northampton on a scooter. :wink:

How would you handle this development? Do you have a better idea of how to secure Brun's place in the core cast?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: jheartney on 07 Aug 2016, 17:19
I don't really see a delivery job working for someone like Brun who lives by her set routines. Doing Pizza deliveries means navigating to endless new addresses, and constant interactions with new strangers in new environments. Brun was so thrown by her sudden new habitations that she forgot something simple like taking a shower. I think making deliveries would be hellish for her, never being able to inhabit her comfort zone.

Theoretically, Brun's job at the Whale will eventually open back up. Meantime, she'll want another situation involving set routines, I'm thinking. Not sure what it would be, though. Now, if she were to become a US Mail carrier (as opposed to delivering pizzas), there's lots of routine in that; always going back to the same addresses, and less need to deal with humans. But those kinds of jobs tend to be hard to get, I think.

WRT integrating Brun into the main cast, I think the path is fairly clear. She'll encounter Clinton again (maybe at COD), and there'll be a conflict between Renee and Clinton (probably played for laughs). Perhaps Brun will eventually became a COD regular.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: celticgeek on 07 Aug 2016, 18:20
Well, a bow is certainly a good start, as well as an under-the-table-paying job.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Aug 2016, 18:24
I don't really see a delivery job working for someone like Brun who lives by her set routines. Doing Pizza deliveries means navigating to endless new addresses, and constant interactions with new strangers in new environments. Brun was so thrown by her sudden new habitations that she forgot something simple like taking a shower. I think making deliveries would be hellish for her, never being able to inhabit her comfort zone.

Theoretically, Brun's job at the Whale will eventually open back up. Meantime, she'll want another situation involving set routines, I'm thinking. Not sure what it would be, though. Now, if she were to become a US Mail carrier (as opposed to delivering pizzas), there's lots of routine in that; always going back to the same addresses, and less need to deal with humans. But those kinds of jobs tend to be hard to get, I think.

WRT integrating Brun into the main cast, I think the path is fairly clear. She'll encounter Clinton again (maybe at COD), and there'll be a conflict between Renee and Clinton (probably played for laughs). Perhaps Brun will eventually became a COD regular.

Then again, I could see Brun working at The Secret Bakery. While Jim has said that there needs to be passion in baking, there is also a high degree of precision needed with the ingredients, making sure all the bread and other baked goods are consistent. The set routine and the recipes would be perfect for Brun. Now, if she could handle the god-awful hours, that could be a good step for her. (I dated a baker for a couple of months, free bread and stuff, but she was up when I was getting ready to go to sleep).

Anyway, Brun and Clinton could probably meet as she delivers a batch of muffins or the like to Coffee of Doom. And then, hilarity ensues.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Spiritz on 07 Aug 2016, 18:26
I hope I'm not the only one who immediately thought of the "bow and arrow" variety of a bow at first.  Hell, it took me until the last panel to realize what she meant...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Stoutfellow on 07 Aug 2016, 18:30
Is this the first time we've seen Brun looking even vaguely happy?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: celticgeek on 07 Aug 2016, 18:31
I thought of a "bow and arrow" and figured she was looking for a replacement for the harpoon. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: retrosteve on 07 Aug 2016, 18:33
Am I the only one who thinks Brun meeting Clinton again might not be such a big deal?  Yeah, Jeph is playing it up big with foreshadowing and suspense of all kinds. But really, aside from having shared a traumatic experience, and both being single, what do they have in common? Do we have any indication of attraction on either part? Any indication of what they would talk about together, or how their personalities are complementary?

What if she meets him again, she's happy to see him, he asks her out, and she can't be bothered?  Or vice versa?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: wlewisiii on 07 Aug 2016, 18:48
I think there are a couple of things that point to his interest - giving her his phone number and then talking about her rather wistfully to his sister.  I have no doubt that he is interested in seeing more of her in a way we've not seen previously in his character.
We have less evidence of her interest though I would point to her staring at the number even into the shower as something that was unusual but slipping inside her routine defenses (if you'll excuse the expression). 

Jeph has laid a certain amount of groundwork that I think he'll at least show an attempt at a real relationship. Whether it is like Marten & Dora or Marten & Claire remains to be seen. Either way would be a good character building arc for both characters.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: jheartney on 07 Aug 2016, 18:56
As usual, Jeph comes up with a natural, funny way to pull Brun into the main cast that isn't what anyone expected. Now I may have to go rewatch Kiki's Delivery Service.

Am I the only one who thinks Brun meeting Clinton again might not be such a big deal?  Yeah, Jeph is playing it up big with foreshadowing and suspense of all kinds. But really, aside from having shared a traumatic experience, and both being single, what do they have in common? Do we have any indication of attraction on either part? Any indication of what they would talk about together, or how their personalities are complementary?

What if she meets him again, she's happy to see him, he asks her out, and she can't be bothered?  Or vice versa?

Part of the point is that he doesn't ask her out. Instead they form a friendship organically, through familiarity and continuing contact. For Clinton, the whole dating business was so artificial that he never actually got to know Emily (other than as a virtual girlfriend-that-never-was). It would probably be much better for both Clinton and Brun if they didn't ever date.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: osaka on 07 Aug 2016, 19:05
( -v-)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Mordhaus on 07 Aug 2016, 19:19
I require your muffins, a bow, and your motorcycle - Bruninator
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: jheartney on 07 Aug 2016, 19:42
The plot of Kiki's Delivery Service is about budding young witch Kiki striking out on her own. Perhaps it's time for Brun to strike out on her own.

Too on-the-nose?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 07 Aug 2016, 20:30
Makes perfect sense, actually.  Will Mieville escape and start following her?  That, for me, is the important one.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: St.Clair on 07 Aug 2016, 20:38
And just like that, she is in her happy place.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BlueFatima on 07 Aug 2016, 21:05
Bow Brun is super cute!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: mikmaxs on 07 Aug 2016, 22:15
I had totally forgotten that Renee worked at the Secret Bakery. Dang.
Unfortunately, this means that my previous rejoicing that we finally had a new QC character with a pre-existing, not-already-part-of-the-cast friend has to be retroactively canceled out.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 07 Aug 2016, 23:14
It's clear that Brun requires little from this life to be truly happy. Day-old muffins and an animé-esque hair bow go a long way to reassuring her that all is right with the world!

This does open an interesting possible insight into Brun's inner world, though. Does she base all of her assumptions about the correct modes of behaviour, dress codes and the like on animé coming-of-age films? If so, this may lead to her having some pretty weird ideas about some careers and some people, especially if she's an affectionado of Miyazaki!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Akima on 08 Aug 2016, 02:01
The bow, or thoughts of daughters, apparently have a rejuvenating effect. Jim's temples lost their grey in the last panel.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Case on 08 Aug 2016, 02:09
The bow, or thoughts of daughters, apparently have a rejuvenating effect. Jim's temples lost their grey in the last panel.

Methinks it's Brun's content-cat-smile in the last panel, but I'll go with that explanation ...

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: DSL on 08 Aug 2016, 03:41
Sam doesn't strike me as the bow-in-hair type.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Aug 2016, 04:03
Maybe the point is that Jim (or maybe his ex-wife) are the bow-in-hair type. The bow has been kept in reserve just in case Sam decides to conform to a gender stereotype (possibly for the first time in her life).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 08 Aug 2016, 04:47
I voted that Brun could be the Secret Bakery's alt Hannelore, but if she likes large bows she might consider getting a job at The Horrible Revelation.  Big bows were in during the Victorian Era. 

We're getting a little more insight into Brun, she's a Miyazaki fan.  I'm not sure if she would get along with Marigold or not since you never know with anime fans. 

Most definitely she is going to meet someone from Coffee of Doom, but it remains to be seen as to who. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Jakk Frost on 08 Aug 2016, 05:28
The bow, or thoughts of daughters, apparently have a rejuvenating effect. Jim's temples lost their grey in the last panel.

Methinks it's Brun's content-cat-smile in the last panel, but I'll go with that explanation ...

Funny, I came here myself to post that with that bow and smile as the final indicator, Brun totally reminds me of a cat in her attitudes and behaviours.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Milayna on 08 Aug 2016, 05:34
Brun equipped the bow of +3 adorableness.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gyrre on 08 Aug 2016, 06:01
It's clear that Brun requires little from this life to be truly happy. Day-old muffins and an animé-esque hair bow go a long way to reassuring her that all is right with the world!

This does open an interesting possible insight into Brun's inner world, though. Does she base all of her assumptions about the correct modes of behaviour, dress codes and the like on animé coming-of-age films? If so, this may lead to her having some pretty weird ideas about some careers and some people, especially if she's an affectionado of Miyazaki!

People in general take up a lot of scial ques from the media they watch and read, especially what they watch and read as kids.

As an aspie, that might be why I preferred stuff with more realistic characters over the stuff with vapid-brain-dead-character-A interacts with vapid-brain-dead-character-B. Batman Beyond over Spongebob Squarepants. I can't think of any particularly stupid characters from books, but I was reading stuff like 'The Ear, The Eye, and The Arm' in 5th grade.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Thrillho on 08 Aug 2016, 06:33
My immediate thought after today's comic
(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/itsalwayssunny/images/4/47/Mrs.Mac.png/revision/latest?cb=20100222222008)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Method of Madness on 08 Aug 2016, 06:54
Yay happy Brun.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: rayadoman on 08 Aug 2016, 09:01
I thought of a "bow and arrow" and figured she was looking for a replacement for the harpoon.

I also thought it would have been an archery bow which would have made Jim's comment about having a daughter more accurate.  That is the thing I would expect Sam to keep lying around in her dad's office.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 08 Aug 2016, 09:40
It is entirely possible that Sam has one of those as well.  Though she might not be the sort of girl who generally goes for frills and such, Sam quite possibly would be drawn to some of the various Miyazaki heroines.  Given her current interests, though, San seems the most likely.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 08 Aug 2016, 10:35
I'd guess that delivery for a pizza place is very different from delivery for a wholesale bakery or coffee place. Wholesale would be more about "deliver these boxes to that store at this time every day" and therefore better suited for a Brun-type personality.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: blt on 08 Aug 2016, 11:07
Sam doesn't strike me as the bow-in-hair type.

And it certainly wouldn't go with her skull helmet.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Aug 2016, 11:08
I'm pretty sure that the skull-and-bow motif would work fine in a Tim Burton animation!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gyrre on 08 Aug 2016, 11:34
I'm pretty sure that the skull-and-bow motif would work fine in a Tim Burton animation!

If memory serves, 'The Book of Life' (movie) has a few deceased characters with bows.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Kugai on 08 Aug 2016, 15:11
i wonder what Sam is going to say when she sees Brun wearing her Bow


And happy Brun is happy Brun
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Case on 08 Aug 2016, 16:09
The bow, or thoughts of daughters, apparently have a rejuvenating effect. Jim's temples lost their grey in the last panel.

Methinks it's Brun's content-cat-smile in the last panel, but I'll go with that explanation ...

Funny, I came here myself to post that with that bow and smile as the final indicator, Brun totally reminds me of a cat in her attitudes and behaviours.

(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/aliceinwonderland/images/b/b8/Alice2010-cheshirecat.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090725041018)


I'm pretty sure that the skull-and-bow motif would work fine in a Tim Burton animation!

(http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=7811197)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: think_tomorrow on 08 Aug 2016, 17:06
I think we need to make a chart showing how all of the characters are now connected, because as soon as I saw this I had to figure out exactly how Clinton is now connected to Brun:  He is her friend's employer's girlfriend's son's girlfriend's brother.

edit: "So what does that make us?"  "Absolutely nothing!"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 08 Aug 2016, 18:03
I hope I'm not the only one who immediately thought of the "bow and arrow" variety of a bow at first.  Hell, it took me until the last panel to realize what she meant...


I thought of a "bow and arrow" and figured she was looking for a replacement for the harpoon.

I also thought it would have been an archery bow which would have made Jim's comment about having a daughter more accurate.  That is the thing I would expect Sam to keep lying around in her dad's office.

And here I was all set to be happy to see Brun have a second weapon discipline.

Glad I'm not the only one who was disappointed by that...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: chaospersonified on 08 Aug 2016, 20:47
"Too late, Renee," I LOVE IT
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Penquin47 on 08 Aug 2016, 20:52
ELLIOT!  (Elliott?)  (Edgar and my mind is messing with me?)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Method of Madness on 08 Aug 2016, 20:53
"Too late, Renee," I LOVE IT
She should probably just walk away.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: explicit on 08 Aug 2016, 21:05
Has Brun always been that short or is Elliot just very tall? Slouching, the other character (I forget her name, don't hit me) is taller.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Method of Madness on 08 Aug 2016, 21:05
Elliot probably pushes seven feet. I'm not sure if we've seen him standing next to Bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Spiritz on 08 Aug 2016, 21:31
Pretty sure there was a question or it was discussed at some point, but are there two Renee's or is it just the one?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: cesium133 on 08 Aug 2016, 21:35
There are an infinite number of Renees, all arranged in a row. It is an array of Renees.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Zog on 08 Aug 2016, 21:38
Yay! Elliott!!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Aug 2016, 22:18
Doesn't Elliott bounce at the Horrible Revelation?  Gets off work there at 3 am, shows up at the bakery at 4:30...

Doesn't get much sleep, does he?  Maybe a good afternoon nap helps.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: celticgeek on 08 Aug 2016, 22:21
Sounds a little like your hours, Carl-E.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 08 Aug 2016, 22:24
Doesn't Elliott bounce at the Horrible Revelation?  Gets off work there at 3 am, shows up at the bakery at 4:30...

Doesn't get much sleep, does he?  Maybe a good afternoon nap helps.

Probably explains both the yawn and the plaster on his nose.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Aug 2016, 23:22
Renee may not want to live in an animé but Elliot is clearly overjoyed at the prospect! I believe that, if nothing else, Brun can go through this day safe in the knowledge that she has made at least one geek happy; so happy that he has stars in his eyes! :wink:

Now... Has Elliott been in a fight or is that one of those 'nasal passage strips' that some people wear when exercising because it's supposed to increase the amount of oxygen you can inhale with every breath?

P.S.:
I do not believe in coincidences in Jeph's art. Open Mic night at Harry's is going to be significant somehow.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gladstone on 08 Aug 2016, 23:44
Pretty sure there was a question or it was discussed at some point, but are there two Renee's or is it just the one?

Yes.

(That is to say, there is either one Renee, or many--no one is quite sure, but no one can really explain how, just like Kirk from Gilmore Girls, she manages to hold down so many jobs in so many little shops around town simultaneously--or, if there is indeed more than one, how they somehow manage to never be seen together in the same place.  And nobody ever discusses the matter around Coffee of Doom, especially not around Dora or Faye, and all those rumors about a certain corpse found in the ruins of Faye's old place with positively-identified dental markings are just hearsay, you see, because Renee''s fine, really, she just works across the street now, and at the bookstore two blocks that way, and over in that other bakery/coffee shop, and that one too, really, go into any one and ask her, she's fine, just GET. OUT.)

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Martin on 09 Aug 2016, 00:02
Elliot is best dude  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: freeman on 09 Aug 2016, 01:14
Attention! All vessels assemble into shipping formation!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 09 Aug 2016, 01:48
P.S.:
I do not believe in coincidences in Jeph's art. Open Mic night at Harry's is going to be significant somehow.

"Coincidence" isn't quite the right word, otherwise yes, I agree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov%27s_gun
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 09 Aug 2016, 03:30
Not all that surprised by this.  Elliot is a gentle giant. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Welu on 09 Aug 2016, 05:01
EEEEEEEEEElliott!!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: rayadoman on 09 Aug 2016, 05:09
Possible plot twist: Brun falls in love with Elliott.  This makes Clinton so jealous that he challenges Elliott to a duel to the death with either the swords or foam pool noodles.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: prime_pm on 09 Aug 2016, 05:40
This week's comics are a great lead-in to Otakon.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 09 Aug 2016, 05:46
*Does a Google image search*

Oh my god! Brun even looks like an older Kiki! She's even got a sidekick that could pass for Clinton! Jeph, what are you planning?!? :-o

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Akima on 09 Aug 2016, 05:47
Now... Has Elliott been in a fight or is that one of those 'nasal passage strips' that some people wear when exercising because it's supposed to increase the amount of oxygen you can inhale with every breath?
Well, he does work as a bouncer (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2937), and that does look like a Band-Aid®. I imagine he has a "mighty glacier" fighting style, so he might cop a few nicks from faster opponents before the wall falls on them. In Soviet Northamption, wall lean on you!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 09 Aug 2016, 07:52
Immediately, I uttered
(http://ati1lnbob3rvynvja2v0lmnvbq00.g00.photobucket.com/g00/TU9SRVBIRVVTMiRodHRwOi8vaTI1LnBob3RvYnVja2V0LmNvbS9hbGJ1bXMvYzgxL1JhdG1hblByb2R1Y3Rpb25zL0dyZWVuUGxhbmV0LmpwZw%3D%3D/$/$/$/$)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 09 Aug 2016, 10:16
Calling it now:
Elliot will meet Bubbles at COD during Emily's shift. They will have a conversation and the last panel will be just speech bubbles from below.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: WareWolf on 09 Aug 2016, 11:22
Not all that surprised by this.  Elliot is a gentle giant.

IME, most RL  giants are.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gyrre on 09 Aug 2016, 11:23
Renee may not want to live in an animé but Elliot is clearly overjoyed at the prospect! I believe that, if nothing else, Brun can go through this day safe in the knowledge that she has made at least one geek happy; so happy that he has stars in his eyes! :wink:

Now... Has Elliott been in a fight or is that one of those 'nasal passage strips' that some people wear when exercising because it's supposed to increase the amount of oxygen you can inhale with every breath?

P.S.:
I do not believe in coincidences in Jeph's art. Open Mic night at Harry's is going to be significant somehow.
She does have experience as a surly bar tender.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: WareWolf on 09 Aug 2016, 12:00
Now... Has Elliott been in a fight or is that one of those 'nasal passage strips' that some people wear when exercising because it's supposed to increase the amount of oxygen you can inhale with every breath?



They're also supposed to stop snoring, if you can keep the damn things on while you sleep.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 09 Aug 2016, 12:37
This makes Clinton so jealous that he challenges Elliott to a duel to the death with either the swords or foam pool noodles.
This is Clin-ton we're talking about.[1]  If he falls for Brun and Challenges Elliot (who wouldn't fight, regardless), he'd find a way to impale himself on a foam pool noodle.

[1] Hopefully such a thing will *not* happen, otherwise things would stray in the territory of "can't deal with women who aren't relatives or otherwise unavailable".  The only Brun-Clin-ton ship I'm willing to support is the friend-ship.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Kugai on 09 Aug 2016, 17:06
Brun has made Elliotts day  :)

It all depends on the Anime Renee
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: mad hands murphy on 09 Aug 2016, 20:19
(http://imgur.com/mLOoyPe.png)

how can one girl even be this perfect, bros?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 09 Aug 2016, 20:29
Last panel - Dora, its not very nice mocking Hanners' inability to bite food via imitating her. :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 09 Aug 2016, 20:37
So Sam has worn that bow at some point? I wanna see!

And I'd be happy to live in an anime. (A Miazaki anime. Light years away from the Dirty Pair.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 09 Aug 2016, 20:54
Just as long as there's a cat bus.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: theMarc on 09 Aug 2016, 21:00
When eating don't think, do.

(I am an ingestion zen master.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Penquin47 on 09 Aug 2016, 21:17
Poor Hanners!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: chaospersonified on 09 Aug 2016, 21:21
(I am an ingestion zen master.)

Isn't that just called 'zengestion?'
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 09 Aug 2016, 21:32
So Hannelore has an eating disorder?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 09 Aug 2016, 21:44
More like a case of the Centipede's Dilemma.  She overthinks the process of eating to the point where she has difficulty  performing the otherwise simple task. 

Edit:  And in the pseudo-alt-text, Jeph mentions having the same thing happening to him.  IIRC, poor Hanners' various anxieties and situations surrounding them are things that Jeph deals with, but turned to 11.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Mordhaus on 09 Aug 2016, 22:22
Easily solved. Add liquid and blend.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: celticgeek on 09 Aug 2016, 22:28
Where's the smoothie hammer?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Y on 09 Aug 2016, 22:58
So Hannelore has an eating disorder?

I have a drinking problem. When I drink there is slight possibility I spill the liquid from the side of my lips. Luckily that mostly happened with water but sometimes I still need to get from the kitchen to my office without seeing anyone.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 09 Aug 2016, 23:09
I was going to say that Hanners has problems somewhat unlike anything others go through. However, that isn't entirely true, is it?

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/2953647/drinking-problem-o.gif)

Meanwhile, Dora is having one of those moments that seems to be quite common for the saner characters in QC where they realise that they are living in an elaborate and incredibly bizarre acid trip.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Kugai on 09 Aug 2016, 23:48
NINJAED

I had Ted Stryker in mind the minute I saw the Comic


But surely she can get professional help for that



And I love Doras 'WTF???' face in the last Panel.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 10 Aug 2016, 00:43
She's getting the best professional help money can buy. ASCMS.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Thrillho on 10 Aug 2016, 00:51
I was going to say that Hanners has problems somewhat unlike anything others go through. However, that isn't entirely true, is it?

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/2953647/drinking-problem-o.gif)

Goddamn you! Soon as I saw the comic I was going to post this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: oeoek on 10 Aug 2016, 01:26
It is why I prefer to cut food to nice bite-sized blocks if possible. A muffing with no soft filling cuts up perfectly into nice and interesting segments to eat. If need be add fork.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Case on 10 Aug 2016, 04:35
Easily solved. Add liquid and blend.

Oh no ... absolutely no.


More like a case of the Centipede's Dilemma.  She overthinks the process of eating to the point where she has difficulty  performing the otherwise simple task. 

Edit:  And in the pseudo-alt-text, Jeph mentions having the same thing happening to him.  IIRC, poor Hanners' various anxieties and situations surrounding them are things that Jeph deals with, but turned to 11.

OCD ... at least it never gets boring ...  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: rayadoman on 10 Aug 2016, 05:34
Hanners seems to be doing so well recently.  I almost thought that she had gotten over all her fears of things like germs.  I guess she just replaced them with food.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BlueFatima on 10 Aug 2016, 05:49
That's some serious duckface Hanners has going on there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Aug 2016, 06:14
Striker. Striker? Striker! (WHACK!)

Sent from my Nextbook

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 10 Aug 2016, 07:36
Hanners seems to be doing so well recently.  I almost thought that she had gotten over all her fears of things like germs.  I guess she just replaced them with food.

In this instance its not a fear of food, but that Hanners is overthinking the simple act of eating. Its one of those things that we really shouldn't have to think about, but in Hanners' case, her OCD has her thinking "The brain sends an impulse that the body is hungry, so it sends an impulse to the gland in the mouth to produce saliva, while also commanding the hand to bring food to the mouth. At the same time, the muscles in and around the jaw expand and contract to lever the mouth open" and it goes on like that. She's over-complicating something that many of us take for granted and in doing those mental gymnastics, Hanners is tripping over herself.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: themacnut on 10 Aug 2016, 08:12
It is why I prefer to cut food to nice bite-sized blocks if possible. A muffing with no soft filling cuts up perfectly into nice and interesting segments to eat. If need be add fork.

With soft food like muffins no cutting is necessary. Use the fingers to pull off a bite-sized piece, pop in the mouth, chew and swallow. Repeat 'till food is gone.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Aug 2016, 09:49
Easily solved. Add liquid and blend.

Oh no ... absolutely no.


Oh, yes!

A little story...

on Nov 6th, 1986, whilst biking to class, I came around a sharp blind curve to find a truck parked illegally.  The end result was a shattered jaw (4 pieces, and a pulverized chin) that had me wired shut for two months

Right through the holidays. 


That blender was my closest friend.  I was singing "Turkey through a straw" at Thanksgiving, and discovered that a Steak and Shake burger blends perfectly as-is, and tastes no different.  The oral surgeon was amazed, I was the only patient he'd ever had that actually put 5 pounds on by the time the wires came off. 




I'm still fond of drinking my pasta, but I haven't done so in years.  It turns other people off a bit.   :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: St.Clair on 10 Aug 2016, 11:21
the Hannelore's Dilemma.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Case on 10 Aug 2016, 15:22
Easily solved. Add liquid and blend.

Oh no ... absolutely no.


Oh, yes!

A little story...

on Nov 6th, 1986, whilst biking to class, I came around a sharp blind curve to find a truck parked illegally.  The end result was a shattered jaw (4 pieces, and a pulverized chin) that had me wired shut for two months

Right through the holidays. 


That blender was my closest friend.  I was singing "Turkey through a straw" at Thanksgiving, and discovered that a Steak and Shake burger blends perfectly as-is, and tastes no different.  The oral surgeon was amazed, I was the only patient he'd ever had that actually put 5 pounds on by the time the wires came off. 


I'm still fond of drinking my pasta, but I haven't done so in years.  It turns other people off a bit.   :roll:

That is ... oddly fascinating, in a slightly horrible way.  :oops:

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Morituri on 10 Aug 2016, 15:36
Not all that surprised by this.  Elliot is a gentle giant.

IME, most RL  giants are.

It's true.  When you're a 2-meter tall 320-pound weightlifter, you absolutely never have to resort to violence.  Mostly because people are afraid you'd be too damn good at it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 10 Aug 2016, 18:36
OCD ... at least it never gets boring ...  :-\

Tell me about it.  I went on a bike ride today and four odd (and hilly) miles later, I was locking up my bike and I could have sworn that I had forgotten to lock the door.  So back I go, in a near panic the entire time only to find that I had indeed locked it.  All in all, after I went back out, added eight miles to my planned journey.  Fuck OCD.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 10 Aug 2016, 20:10
In this strip I love all the girls
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 10 Aug 2016, 20:19
So the alternative of cutting up her food has crossed her mind.  Wonder if this applies to solid foods or if she can have soup.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: DSL on 10 Aug 2016, 20:55
What's the number of the Internet Rule that states that whatever it is, someone's doing an academic paper on it?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Penquin47 on 10 Aug 2016, 21:14
Not sure, but I'm doing an academic paper exploring various possibilities to determine the ideal number for that law.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 10 Aug 2016, 21:17
While all this is going on in the comic, a bunch of my friends on Facebook are having a discussion on how vitally important it is, at the end of a run, to keep running in little circles outside the front of your home until your GPS watch indicates that you have run a pleasingly round number of kilometres (as opposed to, for instance, 9.89 kilometres, which would simply be too awful to contemplate).

Don't ask me why, but while I find the in-comic shenanigans amusing, I find this particular quirk to be mildly exasperating.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: themacnut on 10 Aug 2016, 21:19
So the alternative of cutting up her food has crossed her mind.  Wonder if this applies to solid foods or if she can have soup.

She said foods she has to "take a bite out of", so I'm guessing soup is not a problem. Probably not food that gets eaten with a knife and fork either. So her problem would likely be with stuff like sandwiches, muffins, doughnuts, and other baked goods and finger foods.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: cesium133 on 10 Aug 2016, 21:25
Hopefully those watches don't work like the eggs in Pokemon Go, where I walk 5 km and it only registers 2 km...  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 10 Aug 2016, 21:25
What's the number of the Internet Rule that states that whatever it is, someone's doing an academic paper on it?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say its Rule 3.14.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: MrNumbers on 10 Aug 2016, 21:52
This is the exact reason you have a hammer behind the counter!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 10 Aug 2016, 22:30
So the alternative of cutting up her food has crossed her mind.  Wonder if this applies to solid foods or if she can have soup.

She said foods she has to "take a bite out of", so I'm guessing soup is not a problem. Probably not food that gets eaten with a knife and fork either. So her problem would likely be with stuff like sandwiches, muffins, doughnuts, and other baked goods and finger foods.

She also ended her statement by saying she thinks which means she's not entirely sure.  This seems like a problem she's suddenly having so she probably hasn't tested her hypothesis yet. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 10 Aug 2016, 23:13
Am I the only one who noted the otherworldly nature of Emily and Hannelore's conversation here? Both the problem and the proposed solution are just not something that you would normally expect to see come up in everyday conversation between work colleagues! Is this a college town thing? Or maybe this is just what you get when you put two minds like theirs together on a subject that has lots of technical and mathematical implications!

It's easy to forget just how crippling Hannelore's OCD can be sometimes. Having to ensure you cut your food into equal-sized pieces (because I imagine that she'd be unable to enjoy it otherwise)? Enough to give me a shiver when I think how this might turn mealtimes into a torture for her.

I've just got to add that I am going to spend today looking for a reason to use the phrase 'catastrophic muffin wastage'! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 10 Aug 2016, 23:16
Solution: eat mini cupcakes instead.

BenRG... thatsthejoke.jpg
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Aug 2016, 00:30
Make as many Banach-Tarski copies as the number of bites you need, then crush each one to fit in your mouth. Emily should have thought of this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: pwhodges on 11 Aug 2016, 00:40
keep running in little circles outside the front of your home until your GPS watch indicates that you have run a pleasingly round number of kilometres (as opposed to, for instance, 9.89 kilometres, which would simply be too awful to contemplate).

When one of my cars came up to 100,000 miles on the 5.1-digit odometer, I drove a couple of times round the block to park it outside my house displaying 00000.0  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 11 Aug 2016, 00:44
Make as many Banach-Tarski copies as the number of bites you need, then crush each one to fit in your mouth. Emily should have thought of this.

That sounds like something Dirk Gently would have come up with.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: rodinio2000 on 11 Aug 2016, 01:25
"Someone somewhere is working on a paper on this"

Exhibit A: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.03794v1.pdf
"Infinite families of monohedral disk tilings" - Essentially how to cut pizza into equal pieces using curved lines.
 :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 11 Aug 2016, 01:39
I'm betting that pizza cuttling one was funded by a fast food chain who want to create a totally automatice pizza cooking system including robotically cutting perfectly equal portions.. Expect to see the 'Curly-Cut Pizza Pie' to be a thing some day soon!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Near Lurker on 11 Aug 2016, 02:15
...she's not this way with everything you have to cut, is she?  Because assuming she eats things besides muffins, that seems problematic.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Nepiophage on 11 Aug 2016, 02:35
While all this is going on in the comic, a bunch of my friends on Facebook are having a discussion on how vitally important it is, at the end of a run, to keep running in little circles outside the front of your home until your GPS watch indicates that you have run a pleasingly round number of kilometres (as opposed to, for instance, 9.89 kilometres, which would simply be too awful to contemplate).
I find it hard to decide whether these people should be mocked or pitied.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: JimC on 11 Aug 2016, 04:06
I find it hard to decide whether these people should be mocked or pitied.
Congratulated.
Taking pleasure in small, essentially pointless activities, is surely a life enhancing exercise.
As is, for example, spending time on commenting on the fictional activities of cartoon characters in an invented universe.
The former are scarcely more ridiculous than the latter.

I've certainly indulged in cutting Pizza into different patterns instead of simple radial slices before serving it. If it causes a smile on the face of the recipient then its surely a good thing.
I was disappointed, though, to see all the patterns in the piece having a common centre point. I wonder if its possible to slice a pizza with a pattern of identical tiles in which there is no central point?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: gopher on 11 Aug 2016, 04:23
Wish a plot , any plot, would be pursued. The jumping around is very disengaging.
Though it would be a great opportunity to see how Raven or Steve are doing.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 11 Aug 2016, 04:24
I wonder if its possible to slice a pizza with a pattern of identical tiles in which there is no central point?

(http://slice.seriouseats.com/images/20110427-large-slice-small-pie-3.jpg)

(For some reason this just feels wrong to me)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: oddtail on 11 Aug 2016, 04:31
I wonder if its possible to slice a pizza with a pattern of identical tiles in which there is no central point?

Identical as in, having the exact same shape? Unlikely, unless I'm missing something. The outer edge of the pizza is a circle, so for the pieces to be identical, they would each have to contain the same section of the edge. This implies a radial symmetry, and the pieces have to meet somewhere. If they don't, the central piece will not have a section of its edge that corresponds, shape-wise, to the pizza's edge.

If you make allowances for very similar shapes rather than completely identical, that's more doable.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: rayadoman on 11 Aug 2016, 05:08
She could always make mini-muffins. The ones that are 1 bite size.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 11 Aug 2016, 05:32
Taking pleasure in small, essentially pointless activities, is surely a life enhancing exercise.

Thank you for changing my perpsective. That is a very nice way of looking at it.

Your next challenge, if you choose to accept it, is to defend their habit of delightfully describing this habit as "so OCD."  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gyrre on 11 Aug 2016, 06:04
Hell, someone's probably trying to get government grant money to research this. It's amazing what "research" governments squander money on.
*crosses arms and let's out a grumpy old man harumph*
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Gyrre on 11 Aug 2016, 06:16
Not all that surprised by this.  Elliot is a gentle giant.

IME, most RL  giants are.

It's true.  When you're a 2-meter tall 320-pound weightlifter, you absolutely never have to resort to violence.  Mostly because people are afraid you'd be too damn good at it.
You've never met a 'chihuahua', have you? Not the dog or some one from the state of Chihuahua,  one of those people (almost always male) that's an extremely arrogant shit with a fragile ego. They constantly pick fights they can't win to try to prove themselves.  They're quite irritating to deal with, and often have a glass jaw.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: JimC on 11 Aug 2016, 08:13
Your next challenge, if you choose to accept it, is to defend their habit of delightfully describing this habit as "so OCD."  :roll:
Hmm, that sounds like a bit of a minefield to me, and I've always felt the best thing to do with minefields, if you lack professional expertise and equipment, is to walk around them...

Perhaps a more approachable question is why they feel the need to use the phrase, which sounds as if its being used defensively. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 11 Aug 2016, 11:10
Hmm.  It *has* been some time since I've had the opportunity to make the joke about "being too busy washing my hands" to be offended.[1]

[1] Disclaimer: I actually *do* have OCD.  Yeah, it sucks and even Hanners[2] can't make it adorable.  But I have to at least be able to laugh at myself.
[2] Hitherto now, I had thought it impossible for anything Hanners related to *not* be endearing.  But strips like this one, and looking back at the other times that her anxieties hit her this hard not only hits a little close to home, but makes the character in most need of a hug be the one who would panic at the attempt.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Loki on 11 Aug 2016, 14:18
...I completely missed the two Secret Bakery comics somehow.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 11 Aug 2016, 14:29
Your next challenge, if you choose to accept it, is to defend their habit of delightfully describing this habit as "so OCD."  :roll:
Hmm, that sounds like a bit of a minefield to me, and I've always felt the best thing to do with minefields, if you lack professional expertise and equipment, is to walk around them...

Perhaps a more approachable question is why they feel the need to use the phrase, which sounds as if its being used defensively. 

It's actually very common for runners to joke that they "are OCD." It's not remotely defensive. They're showing off, if anything.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Kugai on 11 Aug 2016, 15:54
This is a Coffee Shop, not a Research Lab
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 11 Aug 2016, 16:14
It's actually very common for runners to joke that they "are OCD." It's not remotely defensive. They're showing off, if anything.

Yeah.  In all seriousness, if there aren't intrusive thoughts that provoke possibly debilitating anxiety and doing such odd things isn't to make it go away, it's not OCD[1] and just someone being a fuckwit.  A while back I was talking to a former cow-orker[2] and she told me that she went off on someone who pulled the "I'm so OCD" shit because knowing me, she knew how it actually fucks with people.

[1]Let alone OCDelightful
[2]Which reminds me.  I should text her, since she's awesome and we haven't talked in ages.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 11 Aug 2016, 20:20
What's the problem? It's a barn. That farts.

Where is Captain Obvious when you need him?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: cesium133 on 11 Aug 2016, 20:25
So that's the smell that I notice every time I walk past the Dairy Barn... I always assumed it was manure.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Squiddlywinx on 11 Aug 2016, 20:47
Work doing what?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: FacelessDeviant on 11 Aug 2016, 21:11
Uh oh. I think CoD is starting to feel the consequences for not having Faye around as a middle manager (miniboss).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 11 Aug 2016, 21:45
I think it's all of those things, plus the type of fart emitted by a sufferer of butts disease.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 11 Aug 2016, 21:57
I'm thinking Dora's already changing the roster around so that Emily and Hanners will never work the same shift ever again.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 11 Aug 2016, 22:10
"work"  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 11 Aug 2016, 23:02
WARNING! - Reading this comic strip is hazardous to your brain!

I'd be really interested to see Dora try to explain this shift to Tai in a way that actually makes sense... and makes her seem sane.

Seriously, we always knew that putting Emily and Hannelore in CoD at the same time was a calculated risk. :-P
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 11 Aug 2016, 23:10
Uh oh. I think CoD is starting to feel the consequences for not having Faye around as a middle manager (miniboss).

Maybe Dora is working Penny's normal shift. 

Wish a plot , any plot, would be pursued. The jumping around is very disengaging.
Though it would be a great opportunity to see how Raven or Steve are doing.

I would love to see what Raven would make of her replacement. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 11 Aug 2016, 23:20
"work"  8-)

Well, we don't know how busy it is and what there is that needs to be done.  It's quite possible that they're in the "dead" period that happens after everyone has already obtained their morning fix, but before lunch, or the one that can occur in the afternoon.  For all we know, they could have stocked everything, cleaned it twice, and done inventory so many times that even Hanners got sick of counting.  There *are* bosses who insist that there's "always something to do", but it's really not true.  Someone I used to work with and I were so damned efficient, there was about 1 1/2 hour of any given shift together where we were either messing with each other or playing hockey with brooms and expired baked goods.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: oeoek on 12 Aug 2016, 00:38
Hanners and Emily working together; this is how real science happens!
You know, not the papers publishing kind, but the steam engine building and computer programming kind of science...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 12 Aug 2016, 03:09
"work"  8-)

Well, we don't know how busy it is and what there is that needs to be done.  It's quite possible that they're in the "dead" period that happens after everyone has already obtained their morning fix, but before lunch, or the one that can occur in the afternoon.  For all we know, they could have stocked everything, cleaned it twice, and done inventory so many times that even Hanners got sick of counting.  There *are* bosses who insist that there's "always something to do", but it's really not true.  Someone I used to work with and I were so damned efficient, there was about 1 1/2 hour of any given shift together where we were either messing with each other or playing hockey with brooms and expired baked goods.

That is possible.

It's also possible that there really is work to be done, and Dora wants them to do it. And is telling them so.

BenRG-levels of wild speculation, I know.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Aug 2016, 03:21
Dora knows the big problem she has with some of her employees: They're also personal friends. Given the opportunity, some of them will just stand there and chat rather than get the shop ready for the breakfast rush.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: mad hands murphy on 12 Aug 2016, 08:55
Taking pleasure in small, essentially pointless activities, is surely a life enhancing exercise.

Thank you for changing my perpsective. That is a very nice way of looking at it.

Your next challenge, if you choose to accept it, is to defend their habit of delightfully describing this habit as "so OCD."  :roll:

By getting over it, and realizing you know and understand exactly what they mean by OCD so getting torqued that it isn't the exactly precise definition is actually just embarassing for you.

Also - recognizing that they're out running six miles a day while you're sitting on the internet complaining about their trivial word choices.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 12 Aug 2016, 09:52
Thing is that it's *not* trivial for those of us who actually deal with OCD on a constant basis.  I'll certainly joke about it, and I do expect constant shit from my friends[1] about it.  But it doesn't help anyone to describe some silliness as an OCD trait.  I'll indulge in odd things on a whim[2] and it can be fun.  It's still a vast difference between harmless indulgence and a serious anxiety disorder.

[1] Hell, I wouldn't respect them if they thought that they couldn't tease me.  Of course, they would never in the lifetime of our sun do anything to trigger an anxiety attack.
[2] Due to co-morbidity, I also have impulse-control issues
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: theMarc on 12 Aug 2016, 10:48
Argh, this happens to me all the time. There's always, at any given moment, some word/phrase or another bouncing around the inside of my skull.

Right now it's "the most powerful". I don't even know what that's in reference to.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 12 Aug 2016, 11:49
Thing is that it's *not* trivial for those of us who actually deal with OCD on a constant basis.  I'll certainly joke about it, and I do expect constant shit from my friends[1] about it.  But it doesn't help anyone to describe some silliness as an OCD trait.  I'll indulge in odd things on a whim[2] and it can be fun.  It's still a vast difference between harmless indulgence and a serious anxiety disorder.

People make exaggerations all the time.  When someone compares a busy afternoon to a battlefield are they being insensitive to veterans?  Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 12 Aug 2016, 12:04
True enough, and I do often wish that the rest of the Anglosphere could adopt the British penchant for understatement rather than the hyperbole that we engage in now.

Edit:  Addendum:  Here out of all places, I'm more inclined to vent than I am in everyday life, since basic decorum typically requires that I keep my mouth shut.  The thing is that it *is* bothersome on some level when people (through ignorance most likely, and not malice) say that they're "so OCD" when they're not the ones who have flailed and nearly fallen off a barstool (whilst sober) because a young lady kissed them on the cheek for buying her a drink[1] or required expensive[2] therapy to even hug their own mother.  How I ever managed physical intimacy with former girlfriends is a matter best left to theologians.

[1] We knew each other, and she wasn't going to have enough to meet the credit card minimum.  She got me a round in days later.
[2] After initially clearing it, the insurance[3] decided to refuse to pay, so I was on the hook for about $19 000 USD
[3] Incidentally, fuck you private health care in the US
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: WareWolf on 12 Aug 2016, 13:07
Not all that surprised by this.  Elliot is a gentle giant.

IME, most RL  giants are.

It's true.  When you're a 2-meter tall 320-pound weightlifter, you absolutely never have to resort to violence.  Mostly because people are afraid you'd be too damn good at it.

Best bouncer I ever knew was a guy who once played fullback for the University of North Carolina. He was one of the sweetest people you could ever hope to meet, but when he swept through the place after closing time chanting  "Get the fuck OUT! Get the fuck OUT!" , people got the fuck out. Not even the most clueless drunk would attempt to fight him.

Worst bouncer I ever knew was my roommate. Black belt in Karate, but he looked like a miniature Ray Liotta. He had to fight ALL THE TIME.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: JohnTheWysard on 12 Aug 2016, 13:47
Well, a barn fart would actually be an extremely small one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_(unit)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Welu on 12 Aug 2016, 13:52
By getting over it, and realizing you know and understand exactly what they mean by OCD so getting torqued that it isn't the exactly precise definition is actually just embarassing for you.

It's pretty bad form to tell someone that being concerned or bothered with how some people choose to regularly belittle their disorder, intentionally or not, is "embarrassing".

Quote
Also - recognizing that they're out running six miles a day while you're sitting on the internet complaining about their trivial word choices.
I'm not sure how these things are mutually exclusive. Do people who run never complain on the internet? Does a person's exercise habits really change what they are saying and the meaning behind it? You're talking to people on a forum. The, "You're on the internet," argument is a bit flawed.

Thing is that it's *not* trivial for those of us who actually deal with OCD on a constant basis.  I'll certainly joke about it, and I do expect constant shit from my friends[1] about it.  But it doesn't help anyone to describe some silliness as an OCD trait.  I'll indulge in odd things on a whim[2] and it can be fun.  It's still a vast difference between harmless indulgence and a serious anxiety disorder.

People make exaggerations all the time.  When someone compares a busy afternoon to a battlefield are they being insensitive to veterans?  Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down. 

"It bothers me when you use the name of a disorder that has a huge impact on the daily life of many people to facetiously describe a part of your personality."
"Stop lashing out and scolding me."

Ignorance might not always be malicious but that does not mean it is not harmful. When someone is then informed of how their actions are having a negative impact and they choose to not listen and continue, that is malicious. Although sometimes people listen and consider how their words and actions affect others and change their behaviour out of thoughtfulness and compassion. So that is a favour someone can possibly do themselves by choosing to mention their concerns.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Oenone on 12 Aug 2016, 14:12
Plus language like that...

1. Minimizes the impact those disorders have on people's lives. For example, I have ADHD, and I take meds. Sometimes people say, oh we all have ADHD moments of I'm being so ADHD. Well actually you aren't? It's a pervasive issue with executive function that short circuits basic organizational hacks like setting SMART goals? It's not fun for me or quirky? I wish I didn't have to spend time reminding myself to stay on task for things like eating or getting dressed?

2. Delays diagnosis. If you think OCD or ADHD looks like the exaggerated version of what ppl describe them as, you don't connect the myriad of ways your disorder impacts your life. For example: adhd impacts memory, and women with ADHD are more likely to stay in abusive relationships... Why? Because the way we build memories doesn't fall into a neat chain, so it takes yearssssss to realize that, oh shit, there's a pattern to your partners madness. That's as much a part of ADHD as lol shiny!!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 12 Aug 2016, 14:30
By getting over it, and realizing you know and understand exactly what they mean by OCD so getting torqued that it isn't the exactly precise definition is actually just embarassing for you.

It's pretty bad form to tell someone that being concerned or bothered with how some people choose to regularly belittle their disorder, intentionally or not, is "embarrassing".

Quote
Also - recognizing that they're out running six miles a day while you're sitting on the internet complaining about their trivial word choices.
I'm not sure how these things are mutually exclusive. Do people who run never complain on the internet? Does a person's exercise habits really change what they are saying and the meaning behind it? You're talking to people on a forum. The, "You're on the internet," argument is a bit flawed.

Thing is that it's *not* trivial for those of us who actually deal with OCD on a constant basis.  I'll certainly joke about it, and I do expect constant shit from my friends[1] about it.  But it doesn't help anyone to describe some silliness as an OCD trait.  I'll indulge in odd things on a whim[2] and it can be fun.  It's still a vast difference between harmless indulgence and a serious anxiety disorder.

People make exaggerations all the time.  When someone compares a busy afternoon to a battlefield are they being insensitive to veterans?  Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down. 

"It bothers me when you use the name of a disorder that has a huge impact on the daily life of many people to facetiously describe a part of your personality."
"Stop lashing out and scolding me."

Ignorance might not always be malicious but that does not mean it is not harmful. When someone is then informed of how their actions are having a negative impact and they choose to not listen and continue, that is malicious. Although sometimes people listen and consider how their words and actions affect others and change their behaviour out of thoughtfulness and compassion. So that is a favour someone can possibly do themselves by choosing to mention their concerns.

If someone is informed of how their actions have a negative impact and choose not to listen that is malicious, but I would suggest not lashing out.  When people feel like they are being scolded like children they might avoid the person who takes issue altogether so as never to risk upsetting them again or willfully misuse the terms that offend because they stop caring about hurting people's feelings since they get tired of walking on egg shells. 

You spelled behaviour with a u so I'm going to assume you're not from the states, but there is a growing backlash against political correctness here in America and I think it's in large part by how people have gone about correcting others. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Welu on 12 Aug 2016, 14:55
A person wishing to not have their mental health reduced and basically mocked is not lashing out or scolding. Consider that if a person has reached the point of talking about it, they've probably been quiet about it a lot more often. So by the time they talked about it, they might be blunt to be clear, which I would say has not happened here in the relevant posts. Asking to have feelings considered is not the same as being immediately raging and attacking someone, which is how you're making it sound.

Remember this is intended to be a welcoming forum for many types of people who feel the world around them doesn't have any desire to listen to or understand them based on things about themselves that are out of their control. This forum tries to be more sensitive than the average community. What you might call political correctness, we tend to call basic respect.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 12 Aug 2016, 14:58
Some people need to be corrected.  I certainly have been, and likely will as long as I live.  People who complain about "political correctness" are generally more thin-skinned than those who they accuse of it.  It's called being fucking respectful and doing one's best to understand others.  And no, one doesn't get a cookie/biscuit for doing it, it's basic fucking decency.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Kugai on 12 Aug 2016, 15:06
I wasn't even aware that Barns could fart!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: brasca on 12 Aug 2016, 15:25
A person wishing to not have their mental health reduced and basically mocked is not lashing out or scolding. Consider that if a person has reached the point of talking about it, they've probably been quiet about it a lot more often. So by the time they talked about it, they might be blunt to be clear, which I would say has not happened here in the relevant posts. Asking to have feelings considered is not the same as being immediately raging and attacking someone, which is how you're making it sound.

Remember this is intended to be a welcoming forum for many types of people who feel the world around them doesn't have any desire to listen to or understand them based on things about themselves that are out of their control. This forum tries to be more sensitive than the average community. What you might call political correctness, we tend to call basic respect.

Well it's just a suggestion.  I've seen too many discussions devolve into name calling and mutual loathing because everyone assumes the other person is ignorant and thin skinned.  There are people with actual OCD and there are also people who are very self conscious and don't handle criticism very well.  Should their neurosis be so easily dismissed?  For the sake of peace it's best to handle these matters in a civil matter. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Aug 2016, 16:26
Remember this is intended to be a welcoming forum for many types of people who feel the world around them doesn't have any desire to listen to or understand them based on things about themselves that are out of their control. This forum tries to be more sensitive than the average community. What you might call political correctness, we tend to call basic respect.

Administrator Comment I endorse what Welu has said and want to amplify that it's part of the goal of inclusiveness and is a core value here. "Basic respect" is one way to describe what we insist on, as is "Decent human being". Mutual listening is a vital ingredient.

Anyway it's part of old and traditional decorum to be ready to say "Oh, so sorry, I didn't know it was like that" when you discover you have inadvertently given offense.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Oenone on 12 Aug 2016, 18:19
A person wishing to not have their mental health reduced and basically mocked is not lashing out or scolding. Consider that if a person has reached the point of talking about it, they've probably been quiet about it a lot more often. So by the time they talked about it, they might be blunt to be clear, which I would say has not happened here in the relevant posts. Asking to have feelings considered is not the same as being immediately raging and attacking someone, which is how you're making it sound.

Remember this is intended to be a welcoming forum for many types of people who feel the world around them doesn't have any desire to listen to or understand them based on things about themselves that are out of their control. This forum tries to be more sensitive than the average community. What you might call political correctness, we tend to call basic respect.

Well it's just a suggestion.  I've seen too many discussions devolve into name calling and mutual loathing because everyone assumes the other person is ignorant and thin skinned.  There are people with actual OCD and there are also people who are very self conscious and don't handle criticism very well.  Should their neurosis be so easily dismissed?  For the sake of peace it's best to handle these matters in a civil matter.

Seriously? There's a difference between feeling awkward when someone asks you not to do something and having a psychiatric disorder... For example, the former is not a neurosis.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 12 Aug 2016, 19:28
Taking pleasure in small, essentially pointless activities, is surely a life enhancing exercise.

Thank you for changing my perpsective. That is a very nice way of looking at it.

Your next challenge, if you choose to accept it, is to defend their habit of delightfully describing this habit as "so OCD."  :roll:

By getting over it, and realizing you know and understand exactly what they mean by OCD so getting torqued that it isn't the exactly precise definition is actually just embarassing for you.

Also - recognizing that they're out running six miles a day while you're sitting on the internet complaining about their trivial word choices.

There's already plenty of response to this, so rather than repeat it, I will just add the following. We are friends. They are aware that I am critical of that term, but that is fine - just because we're friends, doesn't mean we agree on absolutely everything. I personally am not a sufferer, so my criticism always been mild, as it was on this forum. But I am very sympathetic to those who are negatively affected by it. You may think it's fine, but that doesn't make it definitively so.

To address your final cheap shot. I'm happy they're out there running. It's a very positive activity. That's why I'm out there running too. With some of them, usually.

I let them run their loops at the end on their own, though. To each their own.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Thrudd on 12 Aug 2016, 19:48
I wasn't even aware that Barns could fart!
If a Gazebo can then why not a Barn?
(click to show/hide)
Please note that there has been no documented evidence of jogging gazebos.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 12 Aug 2016, 19:49
... or playing hockey with brooms and expired baked goods.

Muffin puck!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Thrudd on 12 Aug 2016, 20:03
... or playing hockey with brooms and expired baked goods.
Muffin puck!
If it is starbucks then it is Bagels. Those things are classified as lethal weapons even before they go stale. Building matereals once folly set though.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 12 Aug 2016, 20:49
Coming back to read up on the forum.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/fDO2Nk0ImzvvW/giphy.gif)

I'll come back later.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 13 Aug 2016, 00:54
Barn fart = zoo smell

(https://web.archive.org/web/20121221064855/http://www.andrewhussie.com/archive/Blurbs/blurbs/00105-zs.gif)

(https://web.archive.org/web/20121221064911/http://www.andrewhussie.com/archive/Blurbs/blurbs/00111-zs.gif)

(https://web.archive.org/web/20121221065029/http://www.andrewhussie.com/archive/Blurbs/blurbs/00142-zs.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 13 Aug 2016, 03:58
... or playing hockey with brooms and expired baked goods.
Muffin puck!
If it is starbucks then it is Bagels. Those things are classified as lethal weapons even before they go stale. Building matereals once folly set though.

Bagels are only good the morning that they are made.  Otherwise they turn into something deadly.  The worst, though, and the things that make the best pucks are the vegan oat cakes that seem to inhabit every coffee shop in California.  When fresh, they're the sort of thing that one can gnaw on all day in order to keep fed.  When they go bad they cause concussions.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Akima on 13 Aug 2016, 05:54
Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down.
I don't think there is such a thing as benign ignorance. That would mean that the ignorance is positively good.
You spelled behaviour with a u so I'm going to assume you're not from the states, but there is a growing backlash against political correctness here in America and I think it's in large part by how people have gone about correcting others.
Because it's perfectly OK to resent being corrected without sufficient forelock-tugging and kowtowing, while entirely wrong to resent being addressed or talked about in a trivialising, insulting, excluding or otherwise unpleasant manner without a shred of courtesy...  :roll:

I hope Emily has never put a bat in a microwave...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 13 Aug 2016, 08:13
Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down.
I don't think there is such a thing as benign ignorance. That would mean that the ignorance is positively good.

Oh I don't know. I kind of see benign ignorance as being similar to a benign tumour. Its not spreading like a malignant tumour, but its still a threat to the body because of the pressure on blood vessels or nerves. Just because its benign doesn't mean its not dangerous, just like ignorance.

Wilful ignorance, now that's what I see as being the more dangerous. Continuing to ignore what people are saying and their explanations as to why its hurtful and harmful to remain ignorant is, well, ignorant.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: MooskiNet on 13 Aug 2016, 08:33
Lashing out at people for their benign ignorance doesn't really you do any favors because either they will avoid you because they don't want you to take it the wrong way or they'll resent being scolded like a child and double down.
I don't think there is such a thing as benign ignorance. That would mean that the ignorance is positively good.

Ignorance is neither bad nor good; it is indifferent.  It's the empty space where you place knowledge if you're wise, and dogmatism if you're not.

As to it being harmful, pretty much anything can cause harm if used incorrectly.  If you hurt someone, you can apologize and try to do better (regardless of whether the apology is accepted), or you can double down and defend your right to hurt someone.  I've done both, and option one works much better.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Morituri on 13 Aug 2016, 10:53
It is damned annoying to read pages and pages devoted to people who annoy other people and people who are annoyed by them.

Most places would be a heck of a lot better if people just made an effort not to annoy other people.  Way back in the wayback, there was an early internetwork post-forwarding system called FIDOnet, whose rules required that people "Be neither excessively annoying, nor too easily annoyed."  That is an ideal for which, IMO, we should strive.  Some of us need others to shut up about certain things in order to feel safe, and one of the things that needs to be safe is the ability to express those needs.  Some of us (including me, apparently) have opinions that can offend other people, and need to remember that we lose little or nothing by shutting up about those opinions.  I don't have to convince anyone else to think what I think.  They can think what they want and that's fine.  More than once I've written a post, decided it would create offense, and just not hit the "Post" button.

There are places and times to do something deliberately even when you know that someone will be upset;  As John Adams said, "You can't have a revolution without offending somebody."  Adams was trying to do something good for the world.  There are times and places to challenge people's safety and make them confront issues and think;  as Margaret Mitchell said "You should be offended, and often, by someone who knows how."   She was explaining why she sought out people who would force her to examine and expand her own worldview; she was trying to broaden understanding.   And there are times and places when the need to avoid offense becomes absolute; therapy for example cannot proceed if there isn't a completely nonjudgmental environment where people feel safe to express whatever they need to.  It's a judgment call.

As far as I'm concerned the proper criteria to use is to always be trying to do as much good as possible while doing as little harm as required.  Saying what you need in order to feel safe is a request among friends and fine.  Trying to assert dominance over the form of communication used by others is stroking your own damn ego and worthless.  Complaining about others making such requests while ignorant about the reality of their needs is, bluntly speaking, damned rude and should be actively avoided.  Remember, the objective is to do good.  Balance your needs against others' needs and try to find the way that's best.

So anyway, that's my opinion, but I'll loan it out to you if you like it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: hedgie on 13 Aug 2016, 11:03
So anyway, that's my opinion, but I'll loan it out to you if you like it.

Is it under the GPL?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Aug 2016, 17:03
Quote from: erin houdini
If you make a mistake, accept being corrected gracefully, and move on.

You don't have to be terrified of accidentally offending someone. That just makes things awkward. If you make a mistake and dwell on it, that's even more awkward. Even worse is starting an argument defending ignorance or assuming you know better than someone with obviously more education and experience on an issue. Being corrected is ok, and it doesn't make you stupid or insensitive. Just learn, and move on.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Storel on 13 Aug 2016, 22:07
Anyway, back to discussing the comic.

"Barn fart" looks to me like a typo for or mishearing of the phrase "brain fart". What do you think?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: BenRG on 13 Aug 2016, 23:23
Poll Results!

1. Alt-Hanners at The Secret Bakery - 17 (37%)
2. Barmaid at The Horrible Revelation (Victorian Brun FTW) - 11 (23.9%)
=3. Delivery-person (maybe for TSB or CoD, if Dora wants to go in that direction) - 7 (15.2%)
=3. Concession stand clerk at The Fighting Arena - 7 (15.2%)
5. Dormitory night receptionist at the dorm used by both Clinton and Emily at UMass - 2 (4.3%)
=6. Freelance House-cleaner - 1 (2.2%)
=6. Emily's new apprentice at Coffee of Doom - 1 (2.2%)
X Counter Staff at Smif College canteen - Interaction with Marten, Tai and Claire - 0 (0%)
X Other (Please Specify) - 0 (0%)

A pretty clear result this week. However, I can't help wonder if some readers may have missed a clue. Brun wishes to emulate Kiki, but Kiki didn't work behind a counter! Hers was a delivery service! :wink:

((New Policy: Any result that gets no votes in my polls is scrubbed from the list as shown above))
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Morituri on 14 Aug 2016, 08:07
"Barn Fart" looks like a variation on "Brain Fart", yeah.  Not necessarily a mishearing, but if not, then an amusing phrase that "Brain Fart" can remind her of.

I do this all the time.  Whenever I hear "Ghost in the machine" I think "Goats in the machine" and smile.  Whenever I hear "Deus Ex Machina" I think "Deus Sex Machina" and that would be a really cool name for a line of religious-themed adult toys. Whenever I hear "Cowboy" or "Cowgirl", I repunctuate it in my mind with a comma after "Cow," and it's surprising how often the sentence still makes sense.  I'm always alert for these near-misses, because sometimes they're very amusing thoughts that I wouldn't have thought otherwise.  It's all part of a grand language game I play inside my mind. 

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: MooskiNet on 14 Aug 2016, 11:06
Anyway, back to discussing the comic.

"Barn fart" looks to me like a typo for or mishearing of the phrase "brain fart". What do you think?

In all truth, I can never hear an expletive with the word 'barn' in it without thinking of May (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2720) saying 'fuckbarn.'  I've loved the word since I first read it, so much I've considered asking Jeph for permission to use it in things I write.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Method of Madness on 16 Aug 2016, 09:08
My favorite expletive is fuckpants. I think Will Ferrell said it in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, but I'm not sure. He might have said fuck beans.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Morituri on 16 Aug 2016, 13:05
My favorite expletive is "slubberdegullion," but hardly anyone knows what it actually means because it's mostly been dropped from the English language. 

Seriously, how can you lose a beautiful word like that?  I bet no other language in the world even has a word for someone who tries to curry favor by performing oral sex but is so horrifically bad at it that they just make the recipient angry.   Can anything else express that in one word?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 16 Aug 2016, 18:31
You'll probably be unsurprised to hear that my dictionary does contain the word "slubberdegullion," but not with that definition.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Akima on 17 Aug 2016, 01:55
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/slubberdegullion
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Aug 2016, 02:04
Interestingly, the etymology given is "slubber + the British dialectal term gullion ‎(“wretch”)".  But how British is "gullion" I wonder, when I find it is in none of my British dictionaries, only in the American Merriam-Webster.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 17 Aug 2016, 19:54
A lot of the old English dialects died after the introduction of printed books; the printers all used the principal dialect of London and the older regional ones fell into disuse as a result. As for how "English" a word like "gullion" is, consider that the Royal Navy once recorded that its sailors, beached in heavy weather on the coast of Cornwall, not more than 150 miles from their home port, were unable to purchase eggs from a local farmer as they could not make her understand what they wanted, she having never heard of "egges" in her life – they went away disappointed while she got back to tending her chickens and their fresh-laid eyeren…
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Tova on 17 Aug 2016, 20:04
Curiously, Chambers has "slubber" and "slubberdegullion," but not "gullion."

Morituri, what on earth is the source for your claimed definition?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: QuestionableIntentions on 18 Aug 2016, 09:06
Is Renee really equating being pissed at her mom with someone's home burning down?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: sitnspin on 18 Aug 2016, 09:33
Is Renee really equating being pissed at her mom with someone's home burning down?
No, she's simply making a point that he is crushing on Brun and won't admit it to himself.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3281 to 3285 (8-12 August 2016)
Post by: Storel on 18 Aug 2016, 22:35
Is Renee really equating being pissed at her mom with someone's home burning down?
No, she's simply making a point that he is crushing on Brun and won't admit it to himself.
This is last week's thread, guys.