THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => CHATTER => Topic started by: Tyler on 07 May 2009, 15:48

Title: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 07 May 2009, 15:48
In the theme of Werewolves,

I present to you: West Side Story: Gang Wars! Tension has been building between the Sharks and Jets for some time, and it seems that the entire neighborhood is about to be pulled into all out gang warfare. Can the justice system work fast enough to protect its citizens, or will this end in tragedy.

Roles:
Sharks - Objective is to wipe out the Jets and enough citizens to guarantee supremacy. Identities are secret to anyone but other Sharks.
Jets - Objective is to wipe out the Sharks and enough citizens to guarantee supremacy. Identities are secret to anyone but other Jets
Citizens - Objective is to find and execute the entirety of both gangs.
The Lovers - One in each gang. May not reveal their roles to anyone but eachother. Objective is to be the last two standing. If one is killed, the other dies. May share opposing gang identities with each other, but not directly with other gang members.

Depending on the number of sign ups, possibly more specialty roles (Detective, etc)

Gameplay:
Each night session, each gang chooses a target for a hit. In the day session, the victims are revealed, and everyone (citizens, jets, sharks) nominates two people to prosecute. The two chosen are put to death, and their true allegiances are shown. Continues til we have a winner.

Victory Conditions:
Citizens - all Sharks and Jets put to death
Jets - all Sharks killed and as many Jets still alive as citizens
Sharks - all Jets killed and as many Sharks still alive as citizens
The Lovers - No other remaining Jets or Sharks, and only 2 other citizens left

Feel free to throw some suggestions my way on improvements and such. Otherwise, sign up if you are game, and prepare for carnage to the lovely tunes of Leonard Bernstein.

Participants:
Sam
Objects Inside Clouds
allison
onewheelwizard
blue kitty
staedlermars
professor snuggles
dazed
kvp
ackblom12
avec
rallymonkey
zombiedude
the pied piper
negative creep
ironoxide
phooey
ledhendrix
kickthatbathprof
will
david dovey
dollface
snalin
look out! ninjas!
thomas edison
axerton
linds
a wet helmet
christophe
calenlass
mctaggart
scarred
patrick
kharbevnor
sirjuggles
yayniall
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 07 May 2009, 15:53
oh fkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

werewolves on crack! count me in!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 07 May 2009, 15:54
i am so in. i have a role that i want, but i am not sure i am supposed to mention that here.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 07 May 2009, 15:59
I'm down.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 07 May 2009, 16:01
I want in
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 07 May 2009, 16:03
I am down.

I am soooo down.

Why just two citizens remaining for the lovers?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 07 May 2009, 16:11
In.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 07 May 2009, 16:12
If sam and I are on the same team we will dress up in costume and change our avatars to 1950's gang members.

FYI.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 07 May 2009, 16:28
I'll play!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 07 May 2009, 16:34
Quote from: StaedlerMars on 07 May 2009, 16:03
I am down.

I am soooo down.

Why just two citizens remaining for the lovers?

Because if there are more, they will still have enough power to vote either lover dead.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 07 May 2009, 16:38
It is probably the hardest role, but potentially the most fun to play.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: KvP on 07 May 2009, 16:55
YEah okay.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 07 May 2009, 17:04
I'm in
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 07 May 2009, 17:09
Can we snap our fingers and dance in sync? If so, I'm in.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: RallyMonkey on 07 May 2009, 17:10
I want in on this.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 07 May 2009, 17:11
(http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/6593/78789458.png) (http://img412.imageshack.us/my.php?image=78789458.png)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 07 May 2009, 17:21
I'm in.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 07 May 2009, 17:36
Count me in.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 07 May 2009, 17:45
Well yeah fuck that shit, I'm in, whatever that means.

(I mean please tell me what that means. I'm in)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: IronOxide on 07 May 2009, 17:58
bring it
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 07 May 2009, 18:43
Yes please.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 07 May 2009, 19:24
Go on then
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 07 May 2009, 20:50
Oh hell yes I am in
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 07 May 2009, 21:00
Werewolves was fun! I'm so down for this.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 07 May 2009, 21:11
I've never done any of these kind of things before but heck if this ain't the one for me then I don't know what is.

I'm down like brown.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 07 May 2009, 23:42
Count me in daddy'o.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 08 May 2009, 00:20
Yup, I'm in.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 08 May 2009, 04:30
What they all said
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 08 May 2009, 06:03
I'm in.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 08 May 2009, 06:17
hiyo!

(in)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 08 May 2009, 06:23
I'm in!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 09 May 2009, 09:05
More people sign up! I'd like to get this going sometime towards the end of the weekend.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 09 May 2009, 09:12
Hell, if you still need more folks... I'm down.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 09 May 2009, 09:47
I am up for it!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 09 May 2009, 11:36
me me me pick me pick me
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: McTaggart on 09 May 2009, 11:45
fo sho
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 09 May 2009, 16:45
calenlass, remember when we played Werewolves a while back, we were totally like, flirting and stuff? OMIGOSH GUYS, CALENLASS IS SOO A WEREWOLF! HURR!!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 09 May 2009, 16:46
Intriguing. I'm game.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Patrick on 09 May 2009, 19:11
I am intrigued, but I am wondering what kind of time commitment (if any) it involves. Still, intrigued!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 11 May 2009, 15:35
Small time commitment, Patrick. Basically checking the forums once or twice a day usually suffices for these.

Also, last call for this. I will be assigning roles very soon!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: KharBevNor on 12 May 2009, 16:32
I want in!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Patrick on 12 May 2009, 17:21
Man Tyler if my life keeps going like it is going I can't even promise that.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 12 May 2009, 17:22
I am going to assign shit tonight. After that, will probably run about 2-3 weeks tops
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 12 May 2009, 23:55
Oh man please tell me I am not too late.  This looks like massive fun and I promise I'll play nice.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 13 May 2009, 01:49
i'm down like a clown charlie brown.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 13 May 2009, 11:57
Too late methinks.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 14 May 2009, 01:59
Much like a fat Puerto Rican George Clooney, this is a neat concept
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 14 May 2009, 05:29
Oh shush. You will be getting you PMs today
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 14 May 2009, 19:21
Roles have now been assigned. If you did not get a message, you are a citizen. Jets and Sharks please decide amongst yourselves who you want to kill tonight. Action begins once we get our first deaths.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 14 May 2009, 19:27
Guys, calenlass is the werewolf...I'm sure of it
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 14 May 2009, 23:36
I totally am
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 15 May 2009, 01:22
You might want to give a list of everyone that's playing.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 15 May 2009, 02:26
There's a list in the first post.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 15 May 2009, 12:13
Are the lovers simply known as the lovers, or are they actually an individual male and female on opposing sides?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 15 May 2009, 12:16
Or are they gay?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 15 May 2009, 12:24
well, calenlass and I are certainly not the lovers...not at all.
Tyler and I are a different story, but THAT'S NOT A PART OF THE GAME!!!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 15 May 2009, 12:26
Well, we still could be, but we'd have to keep it a secret from Tyler. He might have jealous fits.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 15 May 2009, 14:16
Now I have to go actually read the rules.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 15 May 2009, 21:50
Quote from: Wikipedia
AIDS was first recognized by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1981 and its cause, HIV, identified in the early 1980s.

Damn it if there were aids in 1955 it would got rid of all those queer-o-sexuals.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 16 May 2009, 16:49
Gangs, let me know who you are killing. ASAP
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 16 May 2009, 23:53
Gee I wonder who is in a gang.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 17 May 2009, 08:48
Everybody.

*Hides under the stairs.*
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 17 May 2009, 11:21
I'm not the fucking werewolf.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 17 May 2009, 11:24
This is boring.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 17 May 2009, 11:36
I vote Kieffer because he's a big ol' moody pants.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 12:04
Gangs are slow. People are going to be dead this evening one way or another.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 17 May 2009, 12:12
KHAR!!!!

gods wants his blood!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 19:16
In the sweet spring air, clamor was heard in the night. Coordinated rhythmic footwork and snapping only meant trouble in the city. Two woodwind shrills in music could only mean there would be hell to find in the morning. The first rays of the sun revealed the body of Patrick in a dumpster, stabbed repeatedly. A few hours later, the corpse of Khar was seen floating in the East River. Someone has to pay for these crimes, but who?


Everyone, it is time to put two people to justice. Name your suspects! The two with the highest accusations against them will be dealt with swiftly.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 17 May 2009, 19:26
look out! ninjas! and axerton are criminal types.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 17 May 2009, 19:32
The name professor snuggles reeks of deception.  Down with professor snuggles
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 17 May 2009, 19:33
I say hang Thomas Edison. And that professor guy, he's up to something. Evil science, probably.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 May 2009, 19:47
Avec must die. He thinks we haven't noticed his prepositionally apt nickname but some of us have.

Zombiedude aswell. Gotta keep those zombies away.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 17 May 2009, 20:08
I must say, Avec seems to be of the finger-snapping sort.

Also, just to clear it up, I would think we only get one vote?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 May 2009, 20:12
Well, I know for sure it wouldn't be professor snuggles...he's too cutely named for such a thing as murder...

However, Avec seems French.And we know how those French are...HANG HIM, I SAY! HANG THE FROG-EATING BASTARD!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 17 May 2009, 20:22
Man, I almost kinda feel bad about killing off Avec first every time.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 17 May 2009, 20:35
(http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/1014/2294221146d5d6912acc.jpg) (http://img43.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2294221146d5d6912acc.jpg)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 17 May 2009, 20:37
Oh now I feel bad.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Inlander on 17 May 2009, 20:39
On the other hand, cats are known killers.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 17 May 2009, 20:42
Send Avec to the guillotine, please. Off with his head, the murderous bastard.

Also, ninjas! is suspicious. As a pirate, I can not condone his presence any longer. Walk the plank, ye blackguard.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 17 May 2009, 20:44
(http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/7809/saddpn.jpg) (http://img43.imageshack.us/my.php?image=saddpn.jpg)

You guys are nazis if that didn't work.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 17 May 2009, 20:47
What did you do to that poor dog??

JERK.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 17 May 2009, 20:48
Sorry man, you gots to go
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 17 May 2009, 20:50
Avec is a total prick. Execute him.

Kill Yayniall as well.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 17 May 2009, 20:51
(http://s2.buzzfeed.com/static/imagebuzz/2008/7/8/11/c9661cd8e2fbf52f00d543efea36a56b.jpg)

Good night, gentlemen.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 17 May 2009, 20:55
I find it hilarious that the dog is wearing a sweater, yet it still has the dong on full display.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Inlander on 17 May 2009, 20:59
That's because dog nipples are the filthiest nipples in the animal kingdom.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 May 2009, 21:02
My fellow citizens...

You will notice that through the course of these accusations, Avec has done NOTHING to prove his innocence. Be not swayed, gentle villagers, by his callous and cynical plays on your heartstrings. Any man who would plead his cause by exploiting the very real, very tragic suffering of those poor doggies is a ruthless bastard indeed.

Already there is a movement calling for his blood...those of you who are undecided, I urge you...for the good of our town...let not this ruffian, this filth plague our streets any longer. Avec must pay for his crimes. Hang him, burn him at the stake, have him drawn and quartered if we must, but DO NOT SPARE HIM HIS LIFE!

If we are to rid ourselves of this cancerous infiltration of...I shudder to say it...gangsters...then we must be swift and unwavering in our weilding the sword of justice.

I remain but a humble servant,


Will
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 17 May 2009, 21:24
Sir!

I can not believe that a gentleman of your standing could level such preposterous accusations against oh fuck it KILL AVEC

 (http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/mob-angry.gif)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 21:34
Guys. A reminder. You get to kill two people.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 17 May 2009, 21:36
OK KILL AVEC AND SNALIN

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 17 May 2009, 21:55
Guess Avec can go, seems like he isn't in fact with it at all.

Second vote goes dollface. He might be the best new boarder, but he's also the only one who was calling for the death of someone who actually died in the thread ahead of time.

Quote from: Dollface on 17 May 2009, 12:12
KHAR!!!!

gods wants his blood!

Seems pretty damning.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 May 2009, 22:07
That does seem a bit suspect. In fact, I'd say almost damning evidence. Let him swing as well, I say! Spare no expense in cleansing our town of these ruffians!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 17 May 2009, 22:17
Kill Avec! He finds sad pictures of puppies. People who deserve to live have pictures of happy puppies.

(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d158/dream_loud/happypuppy.jpg)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 17 May 2009, 22:53
Ah. It seems I misunderstood the voting system. Well since I only voted once I shall put my other vote toward Dollface. At first I hesitated, thinking perhaps his adventures in the realms of inebriation had granted him some rudimentary precognitive abilities. Still, his preternatural accuracy damns him. Let us not hesitate to show these rhythmically-inclined menaces that our community will not tolerate their taint.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 17 May 2009, 22:56
Dollface and Avec, meet the business end of an angry mob!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 17 May 2009, 22:57
I am part of the angry mob! Rowrrrr! I hoist my pitchfork in the air, wave my torch wildly, and ask God to smite Dollface! Because, Avec said nice things to me in the mediaf!re thread.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 17 May 2009, 22:59
Well if you going to kill me and i accept that, i dont blame you for doing so but i have one wish and that is that i want to chose how i'm being killed.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 17 May 2009, 23:11
Quote from: David_Dovey on 17 May 2009, 21:36
OK KILL AVEC AND SNALIN

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE

OH YES?

WELL THEN COME HERE AND GET ME, YOU MOBSTER SCUM! MY VOTE GOES FOR YOU, David Dovey, FILTHY MONGREL!


And since it's such a popular thing, I'll vote for Avec.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 17 May 2009, 23:20
Avec & Zombiedude
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 17 May 2009, 23:43
Avec and Phooey.  The former because it's popular, the latter because a little bit of self promotion goes a long way, and I really like myself a lot.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 18 May 2009, 00:47
I find Dovey's fanaticism unsettling and suspicious. It is as if he has something to cover up!

And I too thought Dollface's uncanny prediction of the death of one of our most esteemed citizens was fishy.

I say let it be up to St. Peter decide whether they are guilty or not, by bringing them to heaven's doorstep!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: McTaggart on 18 May 2009, 02:37
Dollface. It might have been coincidence, but it's the only real lead we've got to go on.

I will hold on to my other vote for now.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Patrick on 18 May 2009, 03:23
Quote from: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 19:16
The first rays of the sun revealed the body of Patrick in a dumpster, stabbed repeatedly.

Oh come on I couldn't be stabbed repeatedly AND horribly mangled in a garbage compactor?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 18 May 2009, 03:27
Quote from: Patrick on 18 May 2009, 03:23
Quote from: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 19:16
The first rays of the sun revealed the body of Patrick in a dumpster, stabbed repeatedly.

Oh come on I couldn't be stabbed repeatedly AND horribly mangled in a garbage compactor?

um that was me... sorry. *giggles*
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 18 May 2009, 03:52
I vote Avec for his dealings with the French. I also vote Allison, under that cute outer shell lies the inner workings of a killer.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 18 May 2009, 03:58
The mob makes such a good argument. Ok, they don't make a good argument so much as they make an argument really loudly and stare threateningly at anyone who dares oppose them. Dollface and Avec to die please.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 18 May 2009, 04:13
Quote from: look out! Ninjas! on 18 May 2009, 03:58
die please.

That is some gay/werewolf talk there.

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: IronOxide on 18 May 2009, 05:05
I'll throw in another vote for Avec and Dollface.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: RallyMonkey on 18 May 2009, 05:21
Same here. Avec and Dollface.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 18 May 2009, 06:09
Quote from: Dollface on 18 May 2009, 03:27
Quote from: Patrick on 18 May 2009, 03:23
Quote from: Tyler on 17 May 2009, 19:16
The first rays of the sun revealed the body of Patrick in a dumpster, stabbed repeatedly.

Oh come on I couldn't be stabbed repeatedly AND horribly mangled in a garbage compactor?

um that was me... sorry. *giggles*

In case any of you didn't catch this, let me bold it for you...
Quote from: Dollface on 18 May 2009, 03:27
um that was me... sorry. *giggles*

What is that, my friends? That is an admission of guilt...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 18 May 2009, 06:13
Yeah, I change my vote from Avec and ninjas! to Avec and Dollface. That confession is just too much to ignore.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 18 May 2009, 08:32
Avec and Dollface.

Dollface because he has all but admitted his guilt, and Avec cause... welll

HANG THEM BOTH
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 18 May 2009, 10:16
The trial was just for show, passion ruling the day. The people wanted blood, and blood they got. Dollface and Avec were sent to the chair, and fried like baked potatoes. However, it seems Avec was quite innocent. An alibi that came too late exonerated him. A citizen was killed. Dollface, however, was a Shark through and through. Some justice was served in the end.

Tonight, its certain there will be evil deeds done. No good deed goes unpunished.

(Gangs, decide who you want dead next)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 18 May 2009, 11:43
Hold my hand Avec i will show where is you final stage (heavens gate) its this far  i can go...
ST *someone* "who is that?"
DF: "i want his soul to be in peace"
ST: "NO"
DF: "i know how things are done!"
ST: "okay let Avec in"
DF: good job
ST: "but why you didnt want come in here? (heaven)
DF: im winning in this poker round and hell got bars and booze!!!
ST: Oh please
DF: do you got strip joint in there? huh? no? welll dang... booze no!! well we got'em here
SaT: Dolly lets go for some damage!! car is ready it got some booze and guns!!! LETS GO!!!




ST = SainT
DF = DollFace
SaT = SaTan
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 18 May 2009, 12:01
I am so mad at you guys for killing him already.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 18 May 2009, 13:07
Quote from: ledhendrix on 18 May 2009, 03:52
I vote Avec for his dealings with the French. I also vote Allison, under that cute outer shell lies the inner workings of a killer.

You have got to be kidding me. One picture of a puppy and all of a sudden I'm a killer?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 18 May 2009, 13:07
Its why we have italics dude.

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 18 May 2009, 13:11
I hate you guys.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 18 May 2009, 13:21
Dollface and Avec!

I missed out on the voting? Balls.

Balls, I say.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 18 May 2009, 14:29
Quote from: Avec on 18 May 2009, 13:11
I hate you guys.

italics man

italics
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 20 May 2009, 01:04
Italics are the thinking man's smiley.

 :-P
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 20 May 2009, 13:19
Quote from: Avec on 18 May 2009, 13:11
I hate you guys.

Don't worry slugger, maybe next time.  Cheer up, we'll go get ice cream or play some catch, but don't tell your mother or she might have a fit.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 20 May 2009, 19:17
NEAT-O!!!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 20 May 2009, 19:29
Use italics if you're gonna haunt us. Everyone knows dead people can't speak like the living.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 20 May 2009, 21:09
Blue Kitty was up late. He knew he should be off the streets by now, but his 'meetings' took longer than expected. Then he heard drawing near the clarion call of his doom:

"When you're a Jet,
You're a Jet all the way
From your first cigarette
To your last dyin' day.
When you're a Jet,
Let 'em do what they can.
You got brothers around,
You're a family man! "

He was found the next morning downtown. And uptown. The Jets have made clear they will not be trifled with. But they were not alone last night. It was not until Sir Juggles failed to show for work that someone checked his apartment. It took six officers to finally clear the dogs off what remained of the body.

Two more dead. Justice needs to be done, swiftly, before the bloodbath continues. Citizens of New York, name your next two suspects.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 20 May 2009, 21:55
Dang dogs. I swear, you show a bit of understated eloquence and the goons come out of the woodwork. I hope you nancy-boys trip over your converse.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: IronOxide on 20 May 2009, 23:12
Yayniall  and Ledhendrix did not vote for Dollface last round. I'm just sayin'.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 21 May 2009, 00:18
the pied piper and phooey because I feel like it.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 21 May 2009, 00:59
Man it is like impossible to get some illicit kisses from people of unknown affiliations around here with everyone dying off so quickly.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 21 May 2009, 01:19
Some people's silence is a little unnerving!

Sam and onewheelwizard have just been standing quietly on the side line, observing us.

Suspicious behavior if you ask me!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 21 May 2009, 01:30
Man don't be hatin' on Sam. I am pretty sure that, aside from anything else, Sam is a member of the local mafia.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 21 May 2009, 05:41
StaedlerMars clearly doesn't understand that one is innocent until proven guilty. His quickness to violence suggests he's in one of those gangs.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 21 May 2009, 05:44
As the quiet type, I agree that I don't like the selection methodology used by StaedlerMars.   I'm going to reserve my remaining ballot for the day to observe who else acts suspicious to me.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 21 May 2009, 06:17
thepiedpiper and ledhendrix
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 21 May 2009, 06:24
Furthermore to StaedlerMars, all this talk about ledhendrix is making me nervous...I put in my vote against him as well.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 21 May 2009, 06:29
Allison and A Wet Helmet are guilty, guilty, guilty.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 21 May 2009, 06:30
ledhendrix and thepiedpiper, report to the gallows.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 21 May 2009, 07:13
Quote from: allison on 21 May 2009, 05:41
StaedlerMars clearly doesn't understand that one is innocent until proven guilty. His quickness to violence suggests he's in one of those gangs.

This coming from one of the mob who cried for Avec's innocent blood!

And Sam, why, if I may ask, was your leg broken? It may be an alibi for last night's murder, but hardly one that covers the murder of Patrick, or of Khar - who was found floating in the East River. And how does the East River flow? From uptown to downtown I tell you! I am not convinced by this feeble attempt at an excuse.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 21 May 2009, 07:15
Quote from: Dazed on 21 May 2009, 06:29
Allison and A Wet Helmet are guilty, guilty, guilty.

Oh yes, I'm guilty of many things.  But not this! Never this... abomination.

 It's a set-up I tell you!  Someone is trying to frame me, and I will find out who...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 21 May 2009, 07:25
Mob rule Staedlermars it is.

Nervous Allison? You should be.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 May 2009, 08:31
Quote from: IronOxide on 20 May 2009, 23:12
Yayniall  and Ledhendrix did not vote for Dollface last round. I'm just sayin'.

Hrm. This post says a lot, doesn't it.

Why is Iron Oxide calling out against two people who didn't vote for Dollface? Dollface, in death, was revealed to be a Shark. So, looking at this logically, I believe Iron Oxide is trying to point out to us that it is likely for them to be Sharks as well. After all, why would anyone but his fellow gang members not vote against him, right? He had obviously done something.

My point here is this. Iron Oxide, in his outright desire to destroy as many sharks as possible, is making me suspicious. Who wants the Sharks dead more than a Jet? What other reason would he be basing his decision on, aside from killing as many sharks as possible? There are already two dead sharks. No Jet blood has been spilled yet. The greater this division becomes, the more likely it is that the Jets will triumph over their Sharky rivals and subjugate the peace loving people of New York City to a life of gang ruled streets. Lets shoot this jet down, people. We can't afford to let their advantage grow any more.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 May 2009, 08:35
Okay so new yorkers aren't exactly peace loving but you know what I mean
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 21 May 2009, 08:42
The Professor's got a point there. IronOxide and StaedlerMars it is!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 21 May 2009, 08:46
2 things, 1 who's the second shark? secondly it would be no bad thing to kill off either group first as that would mean we would only have one murder per night.
On that note should there only be one gang remaining do we still get two votes and two hangings per day?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 21 May 2009, 08:49
Quote from: Professor Snuggles on 21 May 2009, 08:31
There are already two dead sharks. No Jet blood has been spilled yet.

As far as I recall only Dollface has been proven to have any concrete gang affiliation. Who but one of the sharks would know the amount of Shark blood already spilled? I think I will be changing my vote from onewheelwizard to Professor Snuggles

EDIT: axerton beat me to the punch.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 21 May 2009, 08:54
Quote from: ledhendrix on 21 May 2009, 07:25
Nervous Allison? You should be.

I'm a target because I'm worried for my own safety? You're just a bully!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 May 2009, 09:07
Quote from: Tyler on 20 May 2009, 21:09
Blue Kitty was up late. He knew he should be off the streets by now, but his 'meetings' took longer than expected. Then he heard drawing near the clarion call of his doom:

"When you're a Jet,
You're a Jet all the way
From your first cigarette
To your last dyin' day.
When you're a Jet,
Let 'em do what they can.
You got brothers around,
You're a family man! "

He was found the next morning downtown. And uptown. The Jets have made clear they will not be trifled with. But they were not alone last night. It was not until Sir Juggles failed to show for work that someone checked his apartment. It took six officers to finally clear the dogs off what remained of the body.

Two more dead. Justice needs to be done, swiftly, before the bloodbath continues. Citizens of New York, name your next two suspects.

I guess I was doing the reason thing again? The "meetings" thing made me think he was being implied as sketchy. And the fact that there is a whole thing about Blue Kitty, and the specifics of which gang killed him, whereas Sir Juggles just wakes up dead in his apartment, in the same way Khar and Patrick just died, makes me think he's not just a dude. It's not concrete, but I know tyler and his flair for the theatric pretty well, and as far as I can tell, my logic is sound.

But you know, you can totally kill me off if you want. Obviously, I used my knowledge of my own gang, the shark's, roster to make sure I could get one of our own members killed in the first turn. That is definitely the thing that I would be doing to support the success of my gang over the Jets.

It's a valiant attempt to save yourself, doggie, but your logic is flawed, and your life is over.

Second vote goes to StaedlerMars
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 May 2009, 09:08
I mean I was gonna leave you alone too, but you mess with the bull, you get fucced.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 21 May 2009, 09:25
Dang mang, cut down in my prime, while walking home after looking after the elderly no less
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 21 May 2009, 09:29
Quote from: Blue Kitty on 21 May 2009, 09:25
Dang mang, cut down in my prime, while walking home after looking after the elderly no less

come'ere im dealing and grap beer from the fridge after that we are going to boobie bar and satan is paying. (because it owns me)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 21 May 2009, 10:15
Flawed logic does not a gang member make. Trying to get people to think before they blindly follow the mob is not the act of a criminal.

You're all mistaken if you think I am in one of the gangs, but if this is how you feel, I assume that you will find my innocence out the hard way.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 21 May 2009, 10:32
I have no problem whatsoever allowing the mob to take StaedlerMars.  I do not take kindly to being needlessly accused.

My second vote, since I must make it, goes to IronOxide.  I think Professor Snuggles may be on to something.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 21 May 2009, 12:15
StaedlerMars because mob mentality is cool.

Professor Snuggles makes sense, get IronOxide.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 21 May 2009, 12:46
Quote from: Zombiedude on 21 May 2009, 12:15
Professor Snuggles makes sense, get IronOxide.

I am in much agreement with this...please cast my vote thusly;

StaedlerMars and IronOxide.

It is with a heavy heart that I cast this vote, my fellow citizens. I care not for the spilling of blood, be it friend OR foe, but our fair city weeps beneath the massacre. We can tolerate this senseless gang violence no more. Take note, all ye malcontents! Be ye Jet, or be ye Shark, New York will suffer your misdeeds no longer! Justice will be swift, and sound.

For New York, citizens! For New York...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 21 May 2009, 13:25
StaedlerMars and IronOxide. People have made very interesting points against both of these characters. Allison seems a bit fishy at times, but I have decided to get rid of the two major evils. If she makes one more sketchy move, she's getting my vote next round...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 21 May 2009, 15:10
As a scientist, I can only follow the strong evidence put forth by Professor Snuggles.

IronOxide.

For my second vote...


Screw it. StaedlerMars

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: RallyMonkey on 21 May 2009, 17:16
StaedlerMars, IronOxide
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 21 May 2009, 17:35
I too will vote for IronOxide and StaedlerMars.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: KvP on 21 May 2009, 17:36
I vote for peace! Peace among nations!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 21 May 2009, 18:17
Quote from: axerton on 21 May 2009, 08:46
.
On that note should there only be one gang remaining do we still get two votes and two hangings per day?

That is an important question!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 21 May 2009, 19:12
StaedlerMars and....


and....

ZOMBIEDUDE!

Because I can.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 21 May 2009, 19:18
StaedlerMars and ZombieDude

Mars is just incredibly obvious to me and ZombieDude seems to be a little too eager to vote with the crowd when it seems convenient...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 21 May 2009, 19:20
I'm hurt. I am merely agreeing with the mind of the public.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 21 May 2009, 19:36
"It is truly a shame" he whispered, as his name was carried through the crowd to the gallows.

Someday they will learn.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 21 May 2009, 19:41
*cut to a scene with a tear running down a zombie's face*
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 21 May 2009, 19:47
Sorry, all I see is:

(http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/2456/linkportraitbymastafuu.jpg)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 21 May 2009, 19:51
What on earth are you talking about?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 21 May 2009, 19:53
You are a cheat and a liar.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: IronOxide on 21 May 2009, 21:43
Though it is perhaps too late, I was just going to insist that those folks are the only people who have any kind of leads towards any gang affiliation, and it is better to get some than none at all.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: IronOxide on 22 May 2009, 12:33
Oh whatever, you guys can suck a dick until it's revealed that Kiff's a Shark.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 22 May 2009, 12:46
I really don't appreciate all of these accusations against my character.

For the record though, I am not completely convinced that Mars is a gang member. My vote for him is based not on logic or deductive reasoning, but rather the fact that he came after me, unprovoked. I do not appreciate such unfounded aggression.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 22 May 2009, 15:35
Well it didn't take long for the mob to decide. Iron Oxide and StaedlerMars were taken out by the angry crowd before they even made it up the courtroom steps. A true shame, as there was evidence exonerating both suspects as truly upstanding members of the community inside. It seems the mobs have successfully swayed public opinion again. Their reign of terror will most assuredly continue tonight. Lock your doors, citizens. Not that it will keep you safe.

(Mobs, choose your victims)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 22 May 2009, 18:08
Awful quiet in here tonight.

Too quiet, methinks.   I'm going back into my house and hiding until all this madness is over.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 22 May 2009, 22:57
Hide while you can friend, lest the reaper come for you
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 24 May 2009, 11:37
Cmon you lazy gangs. Hurry it up!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 24 May 2009, 14:37
The night found Negative Creep wandering the streets. He had strayed from his usual turf. Once he heard the approaching footsteps, he knew it was too late. "What the hell am I doing here? I don't belong here." He would not speak again. Later that night, a woman walked hurriedly towards home from a late night rendezvous. From a darkened alley rang out three shots. Unfortunately for Allison, their aim was true.

Sun rose the same brilliant red that was pooling around the victims of the evenings work. Citizens, claim your retribution.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 24 May 2009, 14:50
Zombiedude and Professor Snuggles must die.


EDIT: The Great Satan commands it.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 24 May 2009, 15:02
Excellent 666th post.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 24 May 2009, 15:08
Because they posted, Dazed and Sam NEEDZ TO DIE
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 24 May 2009, 15:43
jerks
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 24 May 2009, 15:58
Quote from: phooey on 17 May 2009, 23:43
Phooey because a little bit of self promotion goes a long way, and I really like myself a lot.

Guys how has no one jumped on this before now?
This is the exact reverse psycology of a gangster. He thinks if I accuse myself everyone else will think I'm not a ganster and wont kill me. Dont let it fool you.
Phooey
and
David Dovey cos I want to see how he reacts.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 24 May 2009, 16:31
Dazed for being the devil.

Axerton for trying to make someone squirm. What a gangster tactic.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 24 May 2009, 17:17
Zombiedude for being a member of the undead.

David Dovey because i too would like to see his reaction.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 24 May 2009, 18:11
The undead aren't bad, just misunderstood.

I'm calling out Linds for calling me a liar.

Phooey cause he's(or she's) a goofball.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 24 May 2009, 18:37
guys im pretty sure linds and zombiedude is probably a good guess

i mean its as good as any
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 24 May 2009, 19:20
Look at that innocent face, would you you stab it to death?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Avec on 24 May 2009, 19:27
I've tried that technique, it still doesn't come to people that I'm never the bad guy.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 24 May 2009, 19:52
You are a liar, Zombiedude. You changed your avatar to make me look like it was I who was being sneaky! So I'm calling you out, you lying jerk.

Sam, what did I ever do to you? I do not think you're part of the gangs, you're just an oblivious citizen. Laziness doesn't equal guilt, however.

My second vote is going to have to go to Professor Snuggles, because he is turning us against our own people. He is very good at making us question ourselves. So far we have only killed one gang member and it was purely because he admitted his guilt. Don't you all see what they are trying to do to us? I say hang the so called "Professor" and let us see what happens!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 24 May 2009, 19:57
And I changed my avatar again, your point is?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 24 May 2009, 20:00
That you're a tricksy little poster and I see through your shenanigans.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 24 May 2009, 20:02
Paranoid
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 24 May 2009, 20:10
Really? Because I couldn't tell. No one here is paranoid.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 24 May 2009, 23:09
I am a little apprehensive about killing zombiedude because there is a good chance we won't get the headshot right, and he will return to gnaw our necks all ferociously before devouring our brains. Plus, I feel like he seems like he has a lot to lose, you know? Like, these efforts to persuade us that he is actually an okay guy and not desirous of our delicious flesh and gray matter seem a little bit too clean for my liking. As they say, no one eats that much apple pie. Especially not gang members.

My second vote is going to go at Linds. I am not sure she is in a gang, but I do not appreciate her tone, I do not appreciate her accusation, and I definitely do not appreciate the implication that I don't have New York's best interests at heart.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 24 May 2009, 23:14
It is my estimation that Zombiedude should die...

Also, Linds levies some heavy accusations against Professor Snuggles, but in doing so casts a shadow of suspicion upon herself, in my humble opinion. In this time of crisis, we citizens must be ever so careful to consider all possibilities. Could it be that Linds' finger-pointing is but a panicked and desperate attempt to cast suspicion away from her own evil deeds? To that end, I say this - Linds must die.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 25 May 2009, 00:11
Axerton and Linds.

Die now.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: McTaggart on 25 May 2009, 00:19
Quote from: Professor Snuggles on 24 May 2009, 23:09
and I definitely do not appreciate the implication that I don't have New York's best interests at heart.

Professor Snuggles is talking a little too much like a politician. No-one who's clearly got New York's best interests at heart is ever concerned with anyone's but theirselve's.

My other vote goes to Will, he may just be singing the party line but these gangs have too much sway over the good folk already.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 25 May 2009, 00:43
Quote from: axerton on 24 May 2009, 15:58
David Dovey cos I want to see how he reacts.

Me too!

Phooey and Zombiedude
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 25 May 2009, 07:50
Fine, if I die, you people better be smart and take the Professor or Zombie with me. I'm no gang member, but I've got a good feeling that both of them are. And since there's really no use at trying to save myself, I mean, look at our track record, you can at least do me a favor next round and not jump on the bandwagon of silly accusations. Stop being stupid. Jeeze.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 25 May 2009, 08:15
These accusations aren't silly. The fact you are trying to pass them off as such seems a little suspect.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 25 May 2009, 12:59
Zombiedude is actually freaking me out a little bit.   I can't be around him anymore.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 25 May 2009, 16:51
David_Dovey & Zombiedude
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 25 May 2009, 17:01
Quote from: Zombiedude on 24 May 2009, 18:11
Phooey cause he's(or she's) a goofball.

Good save!

No, it's not me, I'm just real lonely.

David Dovey and Axerton
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 25 May 2009, 17:15
Zombiedude and Axerton.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 25 May 2009, 21:27
It would seem that in our current climate of fear denying you are a gang member is tantamount to confession so in my defence I will only state that I am totally a gang member.

or am I?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Inlander on 25 May 2009, 22:29
Quote from: Tyler on 24 May 2009, 14:37
Negative Creep . . . "What the hell am I doing here? I don't belong here."

Nice.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 26 May 2009, 12:05
He actually got the wrong song, but still nice one, Tyler.

I hope I get a perfect body in the after-life, though.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 26 May 2009, 13:03
The court system completely abandoned, this time the mob went directly to the homes of Linds and Zombiedude. Brutally beaten, the two die slowly and painfully. After searching the apartments, it becomes evident that Linds was in fact innocent as claimed. However, Zombiedude was in fact a Jet til the day he died. Tonight the Jets will be looking for vengeance, as the Sharks will look to further put their stranglehold on the city.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: McTaggart on 26 May 2009, 14:11
Man callin' Zombiedude you fucks just got lucky.  There ain't no probable cause and ain't none of that other shit you'd need for real but we don'd get in this game.

Lind's was alright, we knew that. Or rather, we didn't know that she wasn't and that's tantamount to the same. I eagerly await who dies tonight but that's only because it puts further constraints on who the motherfuckers are.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 26 May 2009, 14:46
Well, at least I took her with me.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 26 May 2009, 16:41
I fucking told you, but nooooooo. So in return I will haunt each and every one of you until you die horrible deaths. I may pop up, scare the ever living shit out of you, and "accidentally" make you trip into a barrel of acid.

No, still not in a gang.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 26 May 2009, 17:58
Does this mean we need to classify her as "malevolently deceased"?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 26 May 2009, 18:44
Pretty much.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 26 May 2009, 20:37
In heaven they have an endless supply of beef jerky so it is not so bad.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dollface on 27 May 2009, 01:39
but hell got bacon.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 27 May 2009, 05:19
Code: [Select]
[/i]
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 29 May 2009, 10:50
Gangs, get your shit together already.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 30 May 2009, 01:25
Nothing ever happens in this town! /zzzzzzzz
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 30 May 2009, 09:20
Bitches be dyin yo. Too hungover to write a good backstory. Will, Mr. the_pied_piper, you guys are so dead right now. So dead. And it was totally gang violence. Sucks to be youuuu.

Angry mob, do your shit
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 30 May 2009, 09:35
Phooey and Professor Snuggles to the lynching platform please.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 30 May 2009, 10:41
Shit ass cockin' sons of motherlovin bastards! I'm dead!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 30 May 2009, 11:11
Okay, I did some checking around. Three have been wanting to kill the_pied_piper; axerton, David Dovey and Christophe. I'm guessing that at least one of these personally wanted TPP dead, and used the mob accusation to shield their true, evil intentions. The interesting part is that TPP must have seen through this brilliant ruse, and tried to call out against the one that he perceived as the culprit: David Dovey
Quote from: the_pied_piper on 24 May 2009, 17:17
David Dovey

David Dovey was suddenly accused of being a mobster; someone saw though his innocent disguise, into his inner, evil soul. In desperation, he had his fellow Jets or Sharks kill TPP before anything drastic to prove David's evil.

First vote goes to David Dovey

But who wanted to kill Will? There's only one person that ever voted for him, and that's McTaggart, even though Will voted for no less then five people, all whom he wanted dead. I think that to find the culprit behind his murder; or rather the one that got his gang along on the whole "Kill Will"-deal (who knows, the evildoers might even have used this name for their operation of hate and evil), we have to look over to another feeling than hate. This is a feeling that is just as strong as hate, and just as often leads to murder. I am of course talking about love. Have you ever been rejected? Do you know how that feels? Well, if you do, imagine the outrage in your inner soul, if such a fine man as Will rejected you! If you already were a gang member, rough and not afraid of violence, you might just get to the point of murder.

Who has Will ever rejected?
Quote from: Will on 15 May 2009, 12:24
well, calenlass and I are certainly not the lovers...not at all.
So, Calenlass was the one that out of jealousy and anger got one of the gangs to take out Will.

My second vote goes to Calenlass.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 30 May 2009, 11:15
I'm not sure if I buy that argument for Calenlass, but I'll definitely take the Dovey one.

I'm also definitely suspicious of Kieff so he gets a vote too.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 30 May 2009, 11:29
I'm incredibly suspicious of Christophe myself. His accusations definitely seem a bit suspect.

Zombiedude backed her and he was a a mobster, so it only stands to reason to vote Calenlass.


Christophe and Calenlass
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 30 May 2009, 11:34
Don't kill calenlass, she has the best avatar.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 30 May 2009, 11:38
Ok, with Zombiedude backing calenlass, I'm going to have to change my vote.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 30 May 2009, 13:33
katie, nothing personal but i'm hoping they go ahead and kill you so we can finally be together again...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 30 May 2009, 14:54
uh what
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 30 May 2009, 14:55
You bitches are all getting haunted so bad.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 30 May 2009, 15:09
Guys I am really not ok with this. Why would you want to kill me? I haven't, like, done anything. And while Will said we weren't the lovers, we weren't The Lovers. Who said anything about rejection?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: McTaggart on 30 May 2009, 15:09
Keepin' on this lead right: Professor Snuggs and Will. Same reasoning as before, 'cept this time they biding they're time.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 30 May 2009, 15:19
Will is already dead.  Only a sick, sick bastard would try to kill someone again.   Corpse mutilation?  Necrophilia?  Cannibalism?  WTF??   I bet he's got a bunch of overdue library books too.  That makes McTaggart my primary vote.  David Dovey gets my next.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 30 May 2009, 15:35
Y'alls stupid. DIE BITCHES.

'Cept don't kill Katie, she's good peoples.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 30 May 2009, 15:56
Quote from: Dazed on 30 May 2009, 09:35
Phooey

But I'm such an unimposing nonentity on the boards, why would you suspect me?

Dazed and Prof. Snuggles
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 30 May 2009, 20:30
Snalin used lots of words so he must be right. David Dovey and Calenlass
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 31 May 2009, 14:13
Fine. ackblom12 and look out! Ninjas!. And snalin. Fuckers.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 31 May 2009, 16:36
Quote from: McTaggart on 30 May 2009, 15:09
Keepin' on this lead right: Professor Snuggs and Will. Same reasoning as before, 'cept this time they biding they're time.

I'm already dead, ya bastard! You can't kill me anymore...AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 31 May 2009, 17:11
David Dovey and Calenlass
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: StaedlerMars on 31 May 2009, 17:12
Fools! all of ye are fools!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 31 May 2009, 20:04
Well, shit. Will, wherever you are, I'll see you soon. Kisses.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 31 May 2009, 20:24
Actually Will, if you were a zombie, the could kill you repeatedly because you'd keep coming back. So don't go getting buried where you shouldn't be or injected with some crazy ass virus. And don't focus on how delicious the brains are, just stay put in your coffin and you'll be ok.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 31 May 2009, 21:44
Linds, I ain't no zombie...even in death, this still applies
(http://a315.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/97/l_d128a0ba44dbddd5120a56f9ee0008f2.jpg)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 31 May 2009, 23:06
phooey again - hes fucking with our heads
onewheelwizard something just seems suss.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 31 May 2009, 23:14
Death to axerton and David Dovey!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 01 Jun 2009, 00:40
I've got no grand reasons for this one. I am trying to save my own ass.

Calenlass, I am sorry. It's nothing personal, I don't think you did anything wrong :/

I don't know who else I'm gonna vote for yet. Maybe McTaggart since he's out to get me so hard.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 01 Jun 2009, 02:28
I think it's time for Professor Snuggles to leave this fair city.

Snalin is being far to clever. We don't like clever around these parts.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 01 Jun 2009, 07:24
Snalin is already dead, dude.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 01 Jun 2009, 12:07
axerton, this is in self-defense.  I hope you understand.  I'm not a scumbag.

Also, ledhendrix seems to be a bit too keen on removing "clever" people ... this bodes ill.  Everyone knows street gangs are made up of big dumb brutes with no sense of subtlety.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 01 Jun 2009, 20:08
I want results Tyler
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 01 Jun 2009, 20:46
I guess my second vote goes to Dovey.

I am going to be pretty happy if I don't die. I'm not going to speak on my own behalf at this point. My actions are visible in the thread. I'm just hoping I don't get gatted.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 01 Jun 2009, 21:07
Quote from: Zombiedude on 01 Jun 2009, 20:08
I want results BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAINSTyler

FTFY
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 02 Jun 2009, 05:14
Tyler, watch out. Disgruntled zombies are headed your way. Try to make your head look less delicious or something.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 02 Jun 2009, 05:31
Aw you guys suck.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 02 Jun 2009, 06:03
Man, Dovey, you and me, together. We can take it. Let's go.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 03 Jun 2009, 05:26
Quote from: Professor Snuggles on 01 Jun 2009, 07:24
Snalin is already dead, dude.

huh?

Man, this is an insult to my face. I'll report this to the authorities. Unlike you lawless scum who would get your gang to back up your threats.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 03 Jun 2009, 09:52
Wait Avec is already dead.

Sorry, Snalin.

You are A-Oh-Kay in my book, I have just been distracted from this whole gang warfare thing recently.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 03 Jun 2009, 10:52
Cmon, someone else vote! I need a tie broken
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 03 Jun 2009, 11:10
to break the tie I'll change my vote from OWW to Calenlass
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 03 Jun 2009, 15:52
The citizenry, embarrassed and ashamed of their recent rash of killing innocents carefully weighed evidence in judgment. Policework had shown David Dovey and Calenlass both had numerous mob contacts. The trials were swift and merciless. Both were sentenced to death, clearly proven as criminals. One Shark and one Jet have been put to ultimate justice. The mobs will be reeling from their losses, but also looking for blood. It seems the citizens are finally pushing back.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 03 Jun 2009, 18:11
Wait, calenlass, you were in a gang all along? the sharks say that we're true till death, but there's no mention of what we do in the afterdeath...so..like..y'know...i'm totally cool with you being a jet, i guess is what i'm try'na'say...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 03 Jun 2009, 18:30
Man, Katie, I thought you were good peoples. Then again you didn't vote to kill me.

Yeah, you're still good peoples.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 03 Jun 2009, 22:10
I don't suppose my voting for the deaths of two gang members is going to get people off my back at all, is it. :/
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 04 Jun 2009, 00:15
You can, from now on, name me SIR LOGIC of DETECTIVEVILLE!

 :police:
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 04 Jun 2009, 00:16
Oh shit they are going to kill me now, right?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 04 Jun 2009, 02:48
Wooo It's over wooooo
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 04 Jun 2009, 06:53
Quote from: snalin on 04 Jun 2009, 00:16
Oh shit they are going to kill me now, right?
Yes. Yes we are. You and the one above you.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 04 Jun 2009, 11:18
I was referring to the mafia.

And so were you? Ah, okay, that's okay.

Mobster scum!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 05 Jun 2009, 21:06
Will I was the one who suggested we be the makos, remember.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 07 Jun 2009, 17:34
Gangs, get a move on.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 08 Jun 2009, 04:30
Have they gotten so afraid of the power of democracy, honesty and decency that they have fled town?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 09 Jun 2009, 07:46
Well the gangs seem to have disappeared. If I dont get replied by this evening, thatll be that
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 09 Jun 2009, 11:38
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 09 Jun 2009, 12:12
Guys seriously, what is going on? Where is everyone?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: negative creep on 09 Jun 2009, 12:14
Who is even still alive?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 09 Jun 2009, 12:19
I win by default
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 09 Jun 2009, 13:12
well since the game is going to end shortly by the look of things (yet more proof that we suck at games) I'm going to post this now, one night a while ago I had some insomnia and so spent the morning doing some looking at trends and stuff so as not to just be guess voting - not that that hadn't been going too badly.

A wet helmet – voted zombie and dovey statistically innocent

Ackblom12 – voted zombie and Katie, potential shark

Axerton – voted dovey and Katie, statistically innocent

Christophe – voted dollface, potential jet

Dazed – voted zombie, potential shark

Kickthatbathprof – only voted once, suspicious

KVP – hasn’t voted at all, suspicious

Ledhendrix – none of his votes have been for confirmed gang members, suspicious – however dovey voted for him, unlikely shark.

Look out ninjas -  voted dollface dovey zombie and Katie statistically innocent

Mctaggart – voted dollface and will, potential jet

Objects inside clouds – voted dollface dovey and zombie, statistically innocent

Onewheelwizard – none of his votes have been for confirmed gang members, suspicious

Phooey – voted dovey, voted for by members of both gangs, statistically innocent

Kieffer – voted dovey dollface zombie and Katie, statistically innocent

Rallymonkey – voted dollface, potential jet

Sam – voted zombie, only voted in one round, potential shark

Scarred – voted dollface, dovey and zombie, statistically innocent

Snalin – voted dovey (twice) and Katie, statistically innocent

Thomas Edison – none of his votes have been for confirmed gang members, suspicious

Yayniall – voted zombie (twice) Katie and dovey (twice) statistically innocent


Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: SirJuggles on 09 Jun 2009, 13:49
And what about yourself hm?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 09 Jun 2009, 13:53
Quote from: axerton on 09 Jun 2009, 13:12

Axerton – voted dovey and Katie, statistically innocent

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 09 Jun 2009, 15:24
I vote for Tyler.

That guy knows way too much about what's happening in this city.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 09 Jun 2009, 15:28
Rocks fall. Thomas Edison dies.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 09 Jun 2009, 15:47
Thomas is not actually dead.

However, no such luck for Snalin or Christophe! The mobs got back from seeing their in-laws in New Jersey and caused a bit of havok. Innocent Snalin had been too accurate in his moral calls. Christophe, however, was found dead with a tommy gun in his hand. Not exactly the crime scene of an innocent citizen.

Citizens, your turn
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 09 Jun 2009, 16:07
Hey assholes, you got blood on my tommy gun.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 09 Jun 2009, 16:19
Sam and KVP
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 09 Jun 2009, 18:25
KvP hasn't voted at all. Where I come from, that's an offence and you get fined.
Also,
Quote from: Tyler on 09 Jun 2009, 15:28
Rocks fall. Thomas Edison dies.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 09 Jun 2009, 19:14
KvP because yes, he's being suspiciously quiet and One Wheel Wizard
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 09 Jun 2009, 21:17
Sam and OWW report to the gallows please.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 09 Jun 2009, 21:42
Going by the logic provided above Thomas Edison and OWW
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 09 Jun 2009, 21:48
See, up until now, I've just minded my own business and only accused people willing to volunteer me for the chopping block.  But now there are more than two of you.

axerton and ackblom12, you've gone too far.  Dazed, watch your back.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 22:11
Sam and KvP

I am too cool for rationale
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 10 Jun 2009, 08:01
Man, Sam is going to have his family come and hunt you down like you owe them money or something. Careful.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 10 Jun 2009, 09:04
Dazed because he's voted for me before and I'm petty like that.  Axerton for taking this waaaaay too seriously and presenting me with all that well thought out justification has ruined all my fun at totally randomly guessing. 

Next he'll be telling me the Easter Bunny doesn't really sneak into my house and shit jelly beans once a year. 
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 10 Jun 2009, 09:59
goddammit!

I see that axerton has taken up my inheritance. Good jobb, axyboy!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 10 Jun 2009, 16:10
You all are going to die.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA...ah...agh....cough.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: RallyMonkey on 11 Jun 2009, 10:45
Dazed and Axerton.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 12 Jun 2009, 05:58
Hey guys if I were you I'[d probably wanna do something about those Thomas Edison and KvP guys

I mean, I'm just a ghost so what do I know

Oh yeah, I know everything, I'm a freakin ghost
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 12 Jun 2009, 07:25
Man, you guys really suck at killin' people. On the other hand, that does make being a ghost kind of a special exclusive club, so...cool!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 12 Jun 2009, 16:01
Man, Dovey, do not make me get out the handheld hoover on your ectoplasmic ass.


I vote for Axerton.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 12 Jun 2009, 20:10
Changing my vote from Thomas Eddison To Sam in hopes of saving my own arse
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 12 Jun 2009, 21:23
The excitement in this thread is almost stifling.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 12 Jun 2009, 23:30
KVP and Axerton. Can't bold due to iPhone. But kill those dudes.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: axerton on 12 Jun 2009, 23:34
What the hell dude, I saved you last round by voting for katie.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 13 Jun 2009, 06:37
I'm also gonna go for KVP for general suspiciousness in not posting and Axerton since that post was straaaaaaaaaange.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 14 Jun 2009, 17:42
Quote from: axerton on 12 Jun 2009, 23:34
What the hell dude, I saved you last round by voting for katie.

Aww, shmookie. I don't give a fucc.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 15 Jun 2009, 05:59
KvP and Axerton, you have been tried and found guilty. Unfortunately, KvP, being quite actually guilty and knowing his fate sealed, convinced the court that the vert innocent Axerton was also a member of the Sharks. And thus, one innocent man dies with one criminal.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 15 Jun 2009, 06:03
16 Citizens remain, of which 5 are in street gangs. The two lovers also persist.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 15 Jun 2009, 06:27
What are the chances that I will come back from the dead
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 15 Jun 2009, 06:54
yr chances? ha! they're pretty much nil....might as well enjoy yrself some hauntin's.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 15 Jun 2009, 07:27
ghoooost seeex!!!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 15 Jun 2009, 08:39
anyone got some chains i can rattle

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 15 Jun 2009, 09:37
will fluffy handcuffs do?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 15 Jun 2009, 10:22
is this going to lead to the ghost sex snalin was talking about
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 15 Jun 2009, 10:26
I've got my potter's wheel
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 15 Jun 2009, 10:32
awesome, i'll bring a large canvas dufflebag, a wooden duck figurine, and a small cherry tomato...this is turning into a party!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Tyler on 15 Jun 2009, 10:37
The gangs in their infinite wisdom have killed the narrator. Tyler is now quite dead. Rob (the_pied_piper) will now be doing my job as I shall be vacationing in Seattle for the next two weeks. Gangs, he is your new contact, and it is your turn to kill folks, so let him know.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 15 Jun 2009, 10:43
no furries allowed jsyk
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 15 Jun 2009, 10:54
Tyler, that cover story will never stand now that your widespread political corruption is finally over.

The real truth of the matter is that under the ever increasing heat of public speculation Don Tyler was smuggled out of the city by members of both gangs to keep him from being killed. He is now residing in an undisclosed location surrounded by many armed guards.

Free elections were held and a new Mayor of New York was appointed by the true and honest civilians. Thank you all for your support.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 15 Jun 2009, 11:39
I'm bringing the ghost beer to the ghost party

It's made from the souls of kittens
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 15 Jun 2009, 11:47
bone that. everybody knows the best ghost beer is taken from the souls of reindeer.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 15 Jun 2009, 13:25
Updated list of players current status:

Participants:
Sam
Objects Inside Clouds
allison
onewheelwizard
blue kitty
staedlermars
professor snuggles
dazed
kvp
ackblom12
avec
rallymonkey
zombiedude
the pied piper
negative creep
ironoxide
phooey
ledhendrix
kickthatbathprof
will
david dovey
dollface
snalin
look out! ninjas!
thomas edison
axerton
linds
a wet helmet
christophe
calenlass
mctaggart
scarred
patrick
kharbevnor
sirjuggles
yayniall
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 15 Jun 2009, 16:50
Quote from: the_pied_piper on 15 Jun 2009, 10:54
The real truth of the matter is that under the ever increasing heat of public speculation Don Tyler was smuggled out of the city by members of both gangs to keep him from being killed. He is now residing in an undisclosed location surrounded by many armed guards.

Quote from: Tyler on 15 Jun 2009, 10:37
I shall be vacationing in Seattle for the next two weeks.

Now that's not very undisclosed now is it.

Also, ghost party? Yay! I make excellent dip. Cream cheese, chives, puppy livers, bunny ears, and souls from people killed in boating accidents. It's quite delicious.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 15 Jun 2009, 18:04
Add a layer of mushrooms and I'll take a stab at it. You know, like the stab wound currently in my former Earth-bound body.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 15 Jun 2009, 19:06
Come on gangs, who are you going to kill? The suspense is riling up the citizenry.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 16 Jun 2009, 06:06
The_pied_piper, Christophe and Zombiedude... God, those avatars. Now I'll have to read your names to see who you are, a quick glance at the avatar won't do anymore. Dammit.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 16 Jun 2009, 06:31
I am the deejay at ghost party. We only listen to dead baroque composers' works.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: snalin on 16 Jun 2009, 06:47
It's recent dead baroque composer's work, you know.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 16 Jun 2009, 11:33
Gangs, you have 1 hour to give me a final consensus.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 16 Jun 2009, 11:40
EVERYONE GETS HIT BY A BUS
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 16 Jun 2009, 11:46
it is the on the way to ghost party
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 16 Jun 2009, 12:21
I TOLD YOU GUYS THE CAKE WASN'T A LIE!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 16 Jun 2009, 12:50
The gangs have chosen and the citizens wake up from their first night's sleep under the protection of the new mayor. Or supposed protection as it turns out.

Thomas Edison woke up as a spirit as his body was brutally beaten by several blunt objects and was fished out of the Hudson river by leisurely sailors. Meanwhile, on the other side of town McTaggart is found hanging from several meat hooks in a warehouse after what the police suspect was "an interrogation gone awry".

Ok, citizens, time for you to seek vengeance on these horrible beasts of men.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 16 Jun 2009, 13:01
Man, that dip really is delicious Linds. The bunny ears really bring out the lost souls.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 16 Jun 2009, 13:13
these new guys better bring something to the party...damned freeloaders, thinkin' just because they're newly dead they can automatically join in the fun.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 16 Jun 2009, 13:19
Hey guys, I brought some Ghost Rock Band for the party, you know, with all the songs written by ghosts and stuff. Should be ghost rad.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 16 Jun 2009, 15:06
Objects inside clouds and A wet helmet
Villainous knaves the two of them.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 16 Jun 2009, 15:39
Oh I see, hating on the DC kids. Is that how we are going to play today?

May I inquire as to why you are voting for me? I am simply curious.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 16 Jun 2009, 16:25
I need not a formula for I am rabble.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 16 Jun 2009, 22:31
A Wet Helmet

look out! ninjas! - His silence on the matter lately is causing some suspicion
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: RallyMonkey on 16 Jun 2009, 23:09
Objects Inside Clouds

Look out! Ninjas!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 17 Jun 2009, 02:41
You know what? Screw you both.
Rally Monkey
ackblom12
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 17 Jun 2009, 03:32
Man, fuck.


Why I gotta die?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 17 Jun 2009, 03:39
As I have never been one to be bullied, my choices are easy....


Yayniall and ackbloom12.   Whatcha think about that?  Uh-huh, I fight back you big bullies.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 17 Jun 2009, 06:11
I'm gonna go with ackblom12 and Rally Monkey as well. To the gallows with ye.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 17 Jun 2009, 06:20
Don't sweat dying, Thomas Edison. Ghost party is awesome.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 Jun 2009, 07:32
Yeah man, dying ain't so bad...you got ghost parties, some hauntin's to do...and of course lots and lots of ghostly bonin'! It's all cool, really!

Now did you bring cupcakes?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 17 Jun 2009, 07:39
I guess Look Out! Ninjas! and Objects inside clouds.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 17 Jun 2009, 08:47
Did I bring cupcakes?

Did I bring cupcakes?

Of course I brought the motherfucking cupcakes.

They're all iced up and sprinkly and shit, man.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 Jun 2009, 08:47
Aye, lad, that's the way to be a ghost! Welcome, welcome...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 17 Jun 2009, 08:55
But, I thought we had taken all of your cupcakes in the cupcake war!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Thomas Edison on 17 Jun 2009, 10:12
The Cupcake War was 1901-1915ish.

It's 1955 now, man, get with the times.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 Jun 2009, 10:17
Come on citizens, you were going to kill Don Tyler for corruption, surely you are more angry about murder?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: allison on 17 Jun 2009, 10:26
sprinkled with the ashes of deceased world leaders! tastes powerful.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 Jun 2009, 14:45
The courts need 1 more sets of votes from the remaining live citizens who have so far shirked their duty to properly administer judgement.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 17 Jun 2009, 15:07
Everyone's guilty, I say! If we guilty and innocent alike had to perish, so must ALL.

I mean come on, I baked you fuckers cookies. Get a move on before they start rotting.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 17 Jun 2009, 15:20
They must taste horrible if they rot.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 17 Jun 2009, 17:39
I demand an immediate scourgifying of these meddlesome spectres.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 17 Jun 2009, 17:47
ackblom12 and Dazed.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 Jun 2009, 18:14
The scene was set for the first set of public executions under new leadership but unlike at the polls the crowd couldn't reach an agreement. Many names were bandied around but only one stuck. That person was ackblom12.

From the rest of the crowd came four names who couldn't be separated, Objects Inside Clouds, A Wet Helmet, Look Out! Ninjas and RallyMonkey. By law only one of these men can be executed at this stage. Who will it be?

Please choose one of the four to be executed.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 17 Jun 2009, 18:41
Shit... I'm booking for the hills. 
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 17 Jun 2009, 18:55
A Wet Helmet
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 17 Jun 2009, 19:00
a wet helmet
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 17 Jun 2009, 19:27
Quote from: ackblom12 on 17 Jun 2009, 18:55
A Wet Helmet

You're already dead.  That shit don't count
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 17 Jun 2009, 19:30
Nah, no execution yet, he's on death row.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 Jun 2009, 19:32
The accused and the awaiting execution can still vote. You have the right to vote until you are dead and gone.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 17 Jun 2009, 20:49
Quote from: scarred on 17 Jun 2009, 17:39
I demand an immediate scourgifying of these meddlesome spectres.

I will haunt you til the day you die. Mostly because I have nothing better to do. Who's with me?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 17 Jun 2009, 21:38
A Wet Helmet. 'Cos bandwagons suuuure are comfy!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 17 Jun 2009, 22:12
With ackblom12 already in position to be the first person to try out the new guillotine the new administration had decided was more humane to use he realised there was nothing to lose and loudly exclaimed "A Wet Helmet is a Jet!". This immediately led to rumblings in the crowd until one voice shouted "Kill the Jet" and the whole crowd picked up the chant.

Although halfway through the crowd on his way to the hills to avoid almost certain punishment he was muscled back to the stage proclaiming his innocence all the way. "For the charge of murder and of treason to his own kind ackblom12 must suffer to watch his kin die and look him in the eyes during his final breath" announced the executioner. A Wet Helmet was then forced into the guillotine and ackblom12 forced to his knees to look him in the eye. Only the two of them noticed the gleam in ackblom12's eyes and the slight grin on his lips but it was too late for a cry of mercy as A Wet Helmet's head landed eyes up in the basket never leaving the other's gaze.

The ceremony was repeated for ackblom12 almost immediately after to cheers from the crowd. However, these cheers soon turned to dismay as it was revealed from the Jet tattoo on ackblom12's arm that he was in fact a gangster yet there was no trace of ink at all on the body of A Wet Helmet.

So, one more Jet gangster down yet another civilian cruelly dragged along with him. Who will the gangs remove from the streets next? Night falls once again and it is time for some good old fashioned gang violence. As before, PM me your choices.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 17 Jun 2009, 22:40
Hey, is that Salsa?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 17 Jun 2009, 22:48
Nope, just some chopped tomatoes with chili and lime juice

and blooooooood

Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 17 Jun 2009, 23:28
no, no...the tomatoes have braaaaaiiiiiiiins....it's the punch that has the blooooooood in it.

and also rum, i'm pretty sure.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 18 Jun 2009, 03:38
You bastards
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 18 Jun 2009, 05:01
Here, have a cookie!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 18 Jun 2009, 05:06
Well, now it's all better.   Thanks!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 18 Jun 2009, 06:07
The cookie is made from kiiiiiiiittennnnsssss
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 18 Jun 2009, 06:59
Then it is really all better!   Love me some minced kitten meat.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 18 Jun 2009, 08:59
The toppingskittens contain potassium benzoate.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 18 Jun 2009, 18:11
Come on gangs, you haven't got all night. You need time to get back to your hideouts aswell.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 18 Jun 2009, 18:29
Man kittens are delicious!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 18 Jun 2009, 18:29
The second night of new leadership was come to pass and the clouds had failed to provide ample cover for movement without shadow. RallyMonkey was tottering home from a bar after the guilt of helping to execute another innocent civilian had made him turn to hard liquor. Approached by masked men in the darkness he tried to scream but found his mouth couldn't open and when he tried to run all he could do was stumble. The next morning he was found hanging from a lamppost with a note pinned to his jacket. "We will leave this town when we decide".

As the night started to fade several blocks away ledhendrix was walking home himself and whistling nonchalantly, not knowing that all the time he was being followed. As he approached the door of his apartment he saw the shadow behind him and turned quickly. "Oh, its you". "Yes, its me". Later that morning his body was found sitting at his kitchen table with a single bullet hole through the forehead.

Two more deaths have continued this plague on the city, who will be held responsible? Citizens, it is time to get up in arms again and cast your votes.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 18 Jun 2009, 20:44
Kickthatbathprof and Dazed
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 18 Jun 2009, 21:27
Yayniall didn't vote for ackblom12 last round, and did vote for the innocent A Wet Helmet. And is now voting for the innocent me. off with his/her/its head.

and scarred.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 18 Jun 2009, 23:38
Dazed, you just bought yrself a death vote!

Also, because I have no idea who is still alive at this point, Yayniall!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 18 Jun 2009, 23:44
Yayinall always seems to cast the first stone, which makes me really doubt he is without sin. Guilty dog, barking first, etc etc.

Don't have a second vote yet.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 19 Jun 2009, 09:03
I agree with Yayniall. Too suspicious.

And yeah could we get a list of those not at the ghost party?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 19 Jun 2009, 09:11
It's one page back, but I'll just delete the dead folks.

Quote from: the_pied_piper on 15 Jun 2009, 13:25
Updated list of players current status:

Participants:
Sam
Objects Inside Clouds
onewheelwizard
professor snuggles
dazed
phooey
kickthatbathprof
look out! ninjas!
scarred
yayniall
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 19 Jun 2009, 09:13
Damn guys, the only thing I'm guilty of is being innocent.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 19 Jun 2009, 09:26
Exactly what a mobster would say
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 19 Jun 2009, 09:47
Yayniall

Yeah it's personal
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 19 Jun 2009, 09:50
2 votes each, people. Exercise your democratic rights to the fullest degree.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 19 Jun 2009, 09:51
Can I vote for him again
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 19 Jun 2009, 09:54
Well, from the vote count it looks like he is dead anyway so why not try to kill someone else aswell?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 19 Jun 2009, 09:57
Totally arbitrarily, Professor Snuggles
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 19 Jun 2009, 14:07
Quote from: phooey on 19 Jun 2009, 09:57
Totally arbitrarily, Professor Snuggles

Phooey
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 19 Jun 2009, 15:45
Once again the courts require the votes of 1 more citizen to properly adjudicate a majority decision.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 19 Jun 2009, 16:14
Dazed and Yayinall
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 19 Jun 2009, 16:17
Man that was just totally uncalled for.

Not cool.

I realize that I'm probably totally dead already, but I'm totally innocent and you non-mob types who may or may not be voting for me are going to be quite sad when I am deaded.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 19 Jun 2009, 17:00
Afternoon arrives and the citizenry once again assembles around the town gallows. "Who committed these horrible murders and deserves righteous punishment?" was the cry from the judge. Once again Yayniall was the first to answer; "Kickthatbathprof" and "Dazed" was the cry from the crowd. However, mumblings began when the other civilians realised who had given their opinion first once more and suspicion was cast upon him. "Yayniall is always trying to push us away from him, it is him who is a gangster", came an anonymous shout. "I agree", came another and soon the whole crowd had picked up the name of Yayniall.

"No, no, i am innocent. No, please, what about Dazed? He casts suspicions too, just like i do. He tries to lead you on, what about him?" "Bring Dazed to be questioned" cried the executioner. Bundled up to the stage by other citizens preventing his escape Dazed is forced to his knees and asked for proof of his innocence. "I, I, I..." is all the voice he can produce under such pressure. "He is just as guilty as Yayniall", proclaimed the judge. "Execute them both".

"Now to prove their guilt from the ink that they hide so cleverly during the day".

Sadly, yet again the civilians had been turned upon each other as the arms of both Yayniall and Dazed were bare and the survivors started shuffling agitatedly upon the knowledge that there were still gangsters in their midst.

Night falls and the citizens stay restless. Who is an easy target for the gangs? PMs for the victims again please.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 19 Jun 2009, 17:09
Updated Survivors list:

Sam
professor snuggles
phooey
kickthatbathprof
Look Out! Ninjas!
scarred
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Dazed on 19 Jun 2009, 17:25
You fuuuuuuuuuuuucks
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 19 Jun 2009, 18:14
I just liked accusing people. sob
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 19 Jun 2009, 19:52
Dang, being a ghost has gone all mainstream yo. I was a ghost before it was cool.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 19 Jun 2009, 19:58
Wait, ghosts? So you're all dead?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: David_Dovey on 19 Jun 2009, 20:02
Well, only for the purposes of this thread.

Booga booga booga
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 19 Jun 2009, 20:09
Avec was a ghost before it was cool.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ackblom12 on 19 Jun 2009, 20:26
But if you're ghosts, and dead then what am I? I'm pretty certain I'm too alive to be dead.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Lines on 20 Jun 2009, 05:38
ZOMBIE! AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 20 Jun 2009, 05:42
You rang?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Will on 20 Jun 2009, 09:15
Man, screw this ghost thing...the scene has sold out, man. Too many new kids are just getting into it for the fashion, THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT MEANS TO BE GHOST!

I'm going post-ghost, guys...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: JD on 20 Jun 2009, 10:42
Oh crap ghost hipsters.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 20 Jun 2009, 11:13
We're all boned
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 20 Jun 2009, 11:50
I have the perfect album to for this ghost party, guys!

(http://i.listentokrs.com/catalog/150/KRS413.jpg)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 20 Jun 2009, 12:20
Quote
I'm going post-ghost, guys...

Honestly, I preferred being pre-ghost a whole lot more.  The scene was just more alive back then, you know?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 20 Jun 2009, 16:33
Once again the sky turns dark and the stars come out to signal nightfall yet some citizens still fail to heed the warnings to protect themselves and decide to venture outside. Objects Inside Clouds was on his way to a friends house when a hooded stranger stopped him. "You're Objects Inside Clouds, right?", inquired the hooded man. "I am, yes", came the reply. "I have a package for you", the hooded man said, "but be careful, its quite fragile. I would recommend you put it down before opening it."

After receiving the eerily unmarked and decidedly weighty package Objects Inside Clouds continued on to his friend's house. The more wary onewheelwizzard had insisted on staying inside and had only allowed his friend to come over after much persistence. "I got a package on the way here", said Objects Inside Clouds. "Mind if i open it?"

"Sure, go ahead.... NO, WAIT!" but the cry came too late from onewheelwizzard as the explosion ripped through everything in its path and both he and Objects Inside Clouds were identified the next day by their dental records amidst what was described as, "The most horrific dismemberment of body parts i have ever seen", by the coroner.

So, once again the gangs have successfully picked off two more targets but who is left to be prosecuted? Citizens, your voting time has arrived once again. Choose wisely lest you be the next to go.

(Survivors list at top of page)
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 20 Jun 2009, 16:37
aw man i'm dead. oh well.

hey will wanna start a post-ghost band? we can re-vitalize the scene.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 20 Jun 2009, 17:23
Quote from: Objects inside Clouds on 20 Jun 2009, 16:37
aw man i'm dead. oh well.

hey will wanna start a post-ghost band? we can re-vitalize the scene.

Something about this thread makes me really want to record something and put out a pretentious as hell review under a fake name declaring whatever crap it is that I record is the finest example of post-ghost music yet.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 20 Jun 2009, 18:05
Holy crap, are the lovers still alive?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 20 Jun 2009, 18:16
Well, dammit.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 20 Jun 2009, 19:35
Same-sex lovers are pretty forward-thinking  for 1955, no wonder they're keeping it a secret.  Voting Sam and Look out, Ninjas or however you spell it.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: ledhendrix on 21 Jun 2009, 03:26
Take those romantic bastards out
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 21 Jun 2009, 13:46
Two more sets of votes still needed for a majority decision.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 21 Jun 2009, 14:22
Guys look at me there is no fucking way that I am a mobster.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Yayniall on 21 Jun 2009, 14:27
He's telling the truth
The trruuuuuuuth
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 Jun 2009, 15:20
Gonna have to go Phooey because he voted for me last time and I've seen his av on hpn, and look out! ninjas because that seems to be what's up.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 21 Jun 2009, 17:40
Look Out! Ninjas!, Scarred, kickthatbathprof its up to one of you to have the final say here.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 21 Jun 2009, 17:50
Quote from: Professor Snuggles on 21 Jun 2009, 15:20
I've seen his av on hpn

Broccoli Dog is famous, swear to god I'm just a bumbling citizen
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 21 Jun 2009, 18:49
phooey and Sam.


Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: the_pied_piper on 21 Jun 2009, 19:14
The remaining 6 citizens congregated at the gallows at midday eager to dole out punishment to those worthy of it. There was no talking, no eye contact and very little emotion shown by all, including the executioner who looked more worried about executing more innocent people than doing his job. Finally, the shout rang out, "Who shall today be held responsible for the brutal and gruesome murders of last night?". Sam and Look Out! Ninjas! came the first shout, Phooey and Look Out! Ninjas! came the next, Phooey and Look Out! Ninjas! rang out again for the third vote and the majority vote came out as Sam and Phooey.

"By democratic elections it has been determined that Phooey and Look Out! Ninjas! were the culprits behind the brutal murders of the last night. What do you have to say for yourselves?" asked the executioner. "I swear, i'm just a bumbling citizen" insisted Phooey while Look Out! Ninjas! had already resigned himself to his fate and said nothing.

"Well, lets get this done with then shall we?" "No, i'm innocent, i'm innocent, i say" cried Phooey. Finally, Look Out! Ninjas! spoke up, "I know I am innocent of these crimes but what we say doesn't matter, two more citizens are going to be murdered tonight and it is their own fault for executing the innocent once again. I for one am happy to finally be done with this."

The sound of the guillotine blade singing as it fell and squelching as it chopped through the necks of the two accused rang out twice, each time just as loud as the other and the crowd was thinned to four. Suddenly, laughter escaped the lips of two citizens that were left as Sam and Professor Snuggles held each other and turned to kickthatbathprof and scarred. "Hahaha, you listened to us and executed as we told you to" scoffed Sam. "You're next though" gasped Professor Sunggles as he tried to hold back the laughter from inside. "You did just as you were told and now this town is ours and ours alone" exclaimed Sam as he drew the knife from his pocket. "Time for the last two obstacles to be removed" said Professor Snuggles as he drew his own dagger and in the pools of blood that poured from the bodies of kickthatbathprof and Scarred, Sam and Professor Snuggles embraced and contemplated the life that they had left together.


So, game over for citizens, Sharks and Jets and well done to the lovers. Sam and Professor Snuggles successfully avoided the executioner and the majority public vote all through the game and ended as the last two surviving players.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 21 Jun 2009, 19:21
damnit i shouldn't of let up on killing kieff.

i thought he was suspicious!
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Christophe on 21 Jun 2009, 19:32
I KNEW IT! I FUCKIN' KNEW IT!

So, anyone up for ghost shuffleboard? I have the keys to the ghost retirement home and there isn't any security after 9pm...
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: phooey on 21 Jun 2009, 19:34
Tyler sucks for living vicariously through a mafia game by titling Sam and Kieffer the lovers

OTP
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Blue Kitty on 21 Jun 2009, 19:38
I had a sneaking suspicion Sam and Snuggles were the lovers
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 Jun 2009, 21:21
Haha, of fuccin course we were the lovers. I feel like Axerton won this game for us, btdubs. I made myself "statistically innocent" by killing dovey to save myself and even out the numbers.

Then me and sam hella made out.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: scarred on 21 Jun 2009, 21:54
I voted for Sam! Bitchezzzzz
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: sean on 21 Jun 2009, 22:32
so uh who wants to play again?
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 Jun 2009, 22:43
Naw I am going out on top.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 21 Jun 2009, 22:44
of sam
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: look out! Ninjas! on 22 Jun 2009, 02:45
You guys are diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicks
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: calenlass on 24 Jun 2009, 10:15
Hahahahahahahaha Sam and Kieffer are totally gay



Guys, seriously, I laughed so hard. See when I decided not to vote for Sam because he would prolly pop a cap in my ass and also because he is a pretty alright dude, I should have known that Tyler was not going to have been unbiased either.

What I am saying is that phooey is kind of right in that Tyler just wants a super spicy threesome.
Title: Re: Manhattan: 1955
Post by: Barmymoo on 03 Jul 2009, 07:20
This thread has been the best thing on these forums for a while. Nice going, guys!