Jeph Jacques's comics discussion forums

Fun Stuff => ENJOY => Topic started by: squawk on 30 May 2009, 00:25

Title: Up
Post by: squawk on 30 May 2009, 00:25
New Pixar movie.

You guys it's really fucking good.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: scarred on 30 May 2009, 01:03
Glowing review from my local rag:

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-fantastical-weirdness-of-up/Content?oid=1601623
Title: Re: Up
Post by: squawk on 30 May 2009, 01:36
Okay I just learned that showings of this were supposed to have the Toy Story 3 trailer and the one I went to didn't and now I'm pissed

Anyway!

I absolutely loved Up. It excelled amazingly in pretty much every way, but the thing that struck me most was how goddamn funny it was--that was totally unexpected on my part. The writing was superb--a whole lot of subtlety and every single element introduced, even the tiniest of details, played a key role in the whole plot and the ultimate tie-ins just completed the whole film. That was something Pixar did with the Toy Stories and Finding Nemo that's been missing in their more recent movies. Animation was top-notch as usual, the score was perfect, and did I mention how fucking hilarious it was because man this shit's a riot. To me it just felt like a truly creative and unique film and a wonderful work of art. Also there are talking dogs. The talking dogs are fucking awesome.

The movie is also really adorable
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Dollface on 30 May 2009, 01:41
UP! (Russ meyers style)
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 30 May 2009, 11:06
The fact that even a Pixar film where Larry the Cable Guy was one of the lead voiceovers couldn't fail basically leads me to believe that there's no way this won't be great. I should be seeing it sometime this week, I can't wait.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 30 May 2009, 13:53
Rachel and I are probably taking Faye to this one tomorrow.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Dimmukane on 30 May 2009, 14:44
Seeing this TOMORROW.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Lines on 30 May 2009, 15:48
I want to see this soooo much. I giggle like a little girl every time I see the big bird waving its wings at the main guy.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 30 May 2009, 16:41
Oh man is this movie terrific! It's so gorgeous and heartfelt and thrilling and whimsical and...well amazing. Stunning animation, great characters, a wonderful plot with twists and turns and action and romance. It's funny and often quite sad but more than anything it's totally absorbing and compelling. Like the first half hour of Wall-E where the robot is trundling around that spectacular city all on his own, the shots of Carl piloting his house through the sky are mesmerizing. The villain is dastardly and Carl is a grumpy old man and Russel is, well, a little kid but all of the characters are really among the more complex Disney has ever crafted. This is the best movie I think I've seen all year. Really recommended!
Title: Re: Up
Post by: pen on 30 May 2009, 17:18
Rachel and I are probably taking Faye to this one tomorrow.

Probably nothing.  We ARE taking faye to this tomorrow.  I can't wait!
Title: Re: Up
Post by: knives on 30 May 2009, 22:48
Rachel and I are probably taking Faye to this one tomorrow.

Probably nothing.  We ARE taking faye to this tomorrow.  I can't wait!
If you're kid is young you should be a tad cautious. The opening ten minutes makes Bambi's mum dying look like small stuff.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: LTK on 31 May 2009, 03:19
Damn, that looks fantastic in every sense of the word. When and where?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 31 May 2009, 07:33
If you're kid is young you should be a tad cautious. The opening ten minutes makes Bambi's mum dying look like small stuff.

I have my guess as to how it opens, judging by the lonely old man. If I'm right, she's seen worse.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: LTK on 31 May 2009, 08:49
If you're kid is young you should be a tad cautious. The opening ten minutes makes Bambi's mum dying look like small stuff.

I have my guess as to how it opens, judging by the lonely old man. If I'm right, she's seen worse.

You can read in the first paragraph of the review posted up there what happens.

Come on, when is it coming to Europe? ...July 29th?! You're kidding.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 31 May 2009, 12:17
Well, that was pretty great. "Tents are hard" was probably my favorite line. And Faye didn't have any trouble, though I think she's a bit young to have fully understood the point of the opening, which I guess is good.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: RobbieOC on 01 Jun 2009, 10:49
This was actually the Pixar movie I was least excited about seeing ("least excited" being an extremely relative term, of course), but dang if it wasn't one of the best of them. It's just incredible how much they can make you connect to these characters using humor and sadness and little details (did anyone but me notice the slight growth of Carl's facial hair? what kind of animation studio does that?)

Also, how awesome was the cartoon before the actual movie? So good.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: pen on 01 Jun 2009, 10:53
I loved the short before the movie.  it was so sweet!  Overall, this was a fantastic trip to the theater.  My kid liked it and I just loved it. 
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 01 Jun 2009, 11:00
did anyone but me notice the slight growth of Carl's facial hair? what kind of animation studio does that?)

I noticed that too and was quite impressed by it.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: LittleKey on 01 Jun 2009, 16:25
I also really enjoyed it! My only regret is that I didn't see it in 3d.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: squawk on 01 Jun 2009, 17:21
Honestly, I don't think this movie really needed to be in 3D
Title: Re: Up
Post by: LittleKey on 01 Jun 2009, 17:58
I agree that it didn't really need to be in 3D, but I think it would have still made it even better.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: RobbieOC on 01 Jun 2009, 20:40
It was really awesome in 3D, you guys.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 01 Jun 2009, 21:18
I just got back from seeing this. It was absolutely wonderful. I continue to be in love with every single thing Pixar does. I'll agree, the opening is fairly brutal as far as Disney/kids' movies go, but I don't think it was nearly as traumatizing as Bambi.

*SPOILER*
The brutal part of Up still followed a fairly natural progression and you could more or less see it coming; in Bambi it pretty much came out HOLY SHIT WTF sudden.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Catacombs on 01 Jun 2009, 22:32
I absolutely loved this movie.  First off, Toy Story was my favorite movie as a kid, and is still definitely in my top three, so Pixar set the bar very very high from the start.  The story and progression in this movie just had something that the last few Pixar movies didn't (the last movie I truly enjoyed was the Incredibles).

I wanted to see it in 3D, just for the added coolness, but I couldn't make that show tonight.  Because I saw it so late, I got to sit right smack in the middle of the theater, which was nice too.  First off, the short before the movie was great.  Then the movie itself, was obviously beautifully animated, and just really good.  Some of the things in it were legitimately, laugh out loud, f*cking funny!  I'd most likely see this again in a theater.

It was nice, I really needed something to cheer me up today, and I'm so happy I went.  Some of the parts were a little rough (the beginning is DEFINITELY not as bad as Bambi), but it was still a great movie.  Highly recommended!
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Blue Kitty on 02 Jun 2009, 19:05
I liked it, but my mom thought it was kind of scary
Title: Re: Up
Post by: knives on 02 Jun 2009, 22:08
I may be in the minority, but Up beats Bambi. Probably because I never liked the kid to begin with.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 02 Jun 2009, 22:47
SPOILER!!

I'd say while the death itself may have been more startling in Bambi, Up's opening montage leading to Ellie's death was sadder and had more emotional heft. The movie as a whole was the scariest, saddest Disney movie I can think of to be honest. There's a heck of a lot of sadness throughout, the occasional rough-by-Disney-standards violence (Doug being tossed around the cabin by the Alpha dog was borderline brutal) and some fairly frightening moments to boot (the whole final chase/fight scene was really intense, for example, even if some humor was mixed in.)
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Victorinia on 03 Jun 2009, 01:07
I thought it was wonderful. I accidentally saw it in 3D, and while it wasn't always perfect, it was pretty cool. I jumped when a digital piece of shrapnel flew at me. It's not something I'd intentionally pay more for, though.

None of the emotional moments felt contrived, and the opening scenes were some of the best visual storytelling I'd ever seen. I also thought it was pretty neat that the kid was Asian - I can't think of another kid's movie offhand with an Asian lead.

Pixar has yet to disappoint me. Other studios could learn a thing or two from their storyboard team. The animation was great, but the movie would still have been wonderful if it had been drawn with wax crayons, because the story was just perfect.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: RobbieOC on 03 Jun 2009, 15:01
...I didn't get that the kid was supposed to be Asian. Hm. That is cool, though.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: squawk on 03 Jun 2009, 17:29
he was totally asian! he didn't have eyelid folds
Title: Re: Up
Post by: RobbieOC on 03 Jun 2009, 18:19
Hey, I wasn't arguing, I just didn't really notice it. Or think about it, I guess. It is disturbing it didn't even occur to me that he might not be white.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Blue Kitty on 03 Jun 2009, 20:30
I think that the villains defeat in this was pretty damn dark.  I can't think of a worse one since Clayton hanging himself in Tarzan.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Victorinia on 03 Jun 2009, 20:34
It's ok, I didn't realize he was Asian until about halfway through when I noticed the shape of his eyes. But his mom/not-mom/whatever at the end was the big tip-off.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Sox on 04 Jun 2009, 11:51
story and progression in this movie just had something that the last few Pixar movies didn't (the last movie I truly enjoyed was the Incredibles).

Toy Story: Incredible!
A Bug's Life: Good!
Toy Story 2: Incredible!
Monster's Inc: Incredible!
Finding Nemo: Incredible!
The Incredibles:...Amazing!
Cars: Bunk.
Ratatouille: Incredible!
WALL-E: Incredible!
Up: Incredible!

I think one 'eh' movie is acceptable with a track record like that one. Whenever I ask people to name Pixar films that weren't great (with the exception of Cars...) they usually name a computer animated film by another company like Dreamworks or something.
'Pixar ain't that great, Shark Tale sucked, remember?'
It's pretty telling that Pixar have become synonymous with computer animated movies.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 04 Jun 2009, 12:53
Toy Story: Incredible!
A Bug's Life: Good!
Toy Story 2: Incredible!Ever-So-Slightly-Less-Than-Incredible! (Not as good as TS1, so has to be lowered, but still it was awesome)
Monster's Inc: Incredible!Beyond Words Amazing!
Finding Nemo: Incredible!
The Incredibles:...Amazing!
Cars: Bunk.
Ratatouille: Incredible!Really Good, but not as amazing as the others.
WALL-E: Incredible!
Up: Incredible!Left Me Almost Speechless

Weak boarding to quote the post right above you, I know, but I had to fix your list for ya ;-)
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 04 Jun 2009, 13:13
Ratatouille is at least as good as Wall-E. At the very least, I'd actually rewatch it whereas I think I could go without seeing Wall-E again without a second thought.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 04 Jun 2009, 14:08
Yeah, I agree. I think Ratatouille is one of the best things they've made. Close to it anyway. Like...top 5 or so?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Babpacih on 04 Jun 2009, 18:19
up was amazing. it covered all it all.  it actually made me feel conflicted over wall-e being my fav pixar movie (and maybe favorite movie).
pixar is an amazing thing. i wonder if they're gonna make up for the WALL-E best picture fuck up by having it at LEAST nominated?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: KvP on 04 Jun 2009, 19:20
Pixar will not get best picture as long as Best Animated Feature exists. It's in the same ghetto as foreign films, only one of which ever won best picture (and that movie sucked pretty hard)
Title: Re: Up
Post by: JD on 13 Jun 2009, 11:23
I watched today, the most awesome part was the dogs in the airplanes.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Be My Head on 13 Jun 2009, 19:41
I've yet to see this.

But I got a real "Miyazaki" vibe from the trailer, and wish to see it very much.

Can anyone who has seen it confirm Disney is being influenced by Hayao Miyazaki films a lot more now?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: est on 13 Jun 2009, 20:50
Ok yeah, just watched the trailer.  It does look really cool.  I might have to see if Han wants to watch it soon.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: JD on 13 Jun 2009, 21:20
Dear Pixar (http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2009/06/dear_pixar_from_all_the_girls.html?ft=1&f=93568166)
Title: Re: Up
Post by: knives on 13 Jun 2009, 22:14
I've yet to see this.

But I got a real "Miyazaki" vibe from the trailer, and wish to see it very much.

Can anyone who has seen it confirm Disney is being influenced by Hayao Miyazaki films a lot more now?
Very much so. If you liked Castle in the Sky, this is basically the same thing.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: axerton on 13 Jun 2009, 22:22
Well Ben if you're wanting to see it in a cinema then you'll have to wait because this great country has decided not to realease it until september. You know what I have to say to that - FUCK THAT NOISE. but as angry as it makes me I can sort of see the reason for it, it's a kids movie so delay it until the school holidays, what really pisses me off though is 'Moon' which looks amazing is getting the same treatment. Delaying a kids movie I can almost forgive but seriously fuck that.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 15 Jun 2009, 15:04
Saw it today and I can't believe people put Up and Wall-E in the same class, to be honest.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 15 Jun 2009, 17:31
A little clarification on this Alex? I'm not sure which, if either, of these movies you're slagging?

I though they were both really good films; although Up easily is the better of the two, Wall-E isn't far behind IMO.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 15 Jun 2009, 18:12
Definitely slagging Wall-E.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Ozymandias on 15 Jun 2009, 19:00
I loved Wall-E.
I loved Up.

Why we gotta fight about which one is better?

I actually really really loved Dug as a counterpoint to Wall-E, though. Whereas you have Wall-E as no dialogue and having to convey the emotion visually(and beautifully done, mind you), Dug (and the other dogs) was hilarious with every emotion being overly described. I don't know why but "POINT!" tickled me pink every time.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Dimmukane on 16 Jun 2009, 06:29
This was REALLY FUCKING GOOD.  My favorite one so far.  There was one little kid in the audience who kept saying whatever was on his mind, though. 

"Uh oh, the balloons are gone!"
"Puppies!"
"The birdie is funny!"

Ad Nauseum.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: pen on 16 Jun 2009, 06:50
Hate to break it to you, but it's a kid's movie.  That's what they do. 
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Ozymandias on 16 Jun 2009, 07:08
If a kid is incapable of shutting up during the movie, don't take them to the movie?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Dimmukane on 16 Jun 2009, 07:26
Well, I thought it was cute, and it was only the one kid, but the Girl (who ironically is an early childhood edumacator) was starting to get annoyed.  Maybe it was a bad idea to sneak beer in?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: rynne on 16 Jun 2009, 07:27
Interesting to see the different reactions to the Pixar films here.  Ratatouille is my favorite Pixar film, I thought WALL-E was pretty much standard-level Pixar (i.e., still better than just about every other animation company), and Up is between those levels.

You know what really impressed me about the story?  The way it tread lightly on the relationships of loss.  Like, I kept waiting for an apparition or vision of Ellie to show up at an important turning point---sitting in the chair next to Carl over the falls, or maybe a Lion King-style cloud cameo---but Pixar didn't stoop to that cliche.  Or that Russell's parents' divorce was just ever-so-slightly hinted at.  I could easily imagine a different studio playing that up for maximum pathos.

Also, good lord were the dogs and Kevin funny.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 16 Jun 2009, 08:17
I thought they were actually pretty heavy handed with that stuff, really, but it was so central to the theme that it was justifiable, particularly since as you said they kept away from a lot of the more annoying animated cliches. Besides, I think if anything too many stories feature it as a plot point but don't really deal with it honestly or give it the weight it deserves. Video games and anime in particular are often repeat offenders on this count; many characters either carry a deliriously over-sized chip on their shoulder over loss or else they go about their business as usual aside from the fact that they'll spout a few monologues about why they must carry on. Basically, they're jam packed with bathos. Even worse, this empty headed devotion is often further devalued by being aimed squarely at a character we never get a chance to know. Up! stayed away from that and was a far more evocative movie for it; they really nailed the "Show, don't tell" maxim.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: rynne on 16 Jun 2009, 08:41
Up! stayed away from that and was a far more evocative movie for it; they really nailed the "Show, don't tell" maxim

Exactly, I think you said what I was aiming for better than I did.

I was thinking that in most family movies, that part of the story would've been more clunky and explicit, either because the writers didn't have enough craft to do it well (I can't imagine Russell's family life being explained any more poignantly than his simple, "Phyllis isn't my mom") or because they thought kids wouldn't understand if a character didn't literally speak his feelings.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 16 Jun 2009, 11:10
If a kid is incapable of shutting up during the movie, don't take them to the movie?

While I'd normally agree with this in the instance of anything above a PG rating, I think you're way off base in this situation. Adult Pixar fans are starting to get the same kind of elitist attitude that adult video game fans have developed. A kind of justification that since adults can enjoy it too, everything should be targeted directly at them since they have all the money, usually at the expense of children (As exhibited in the constant bitching about Nintendo's all ages mentality). The fact of the matter is that this is a clear and obvious kids movie that's beautifully made in a manner that the parents won't be ripping their hair out if they take their kid to see it (Much as they would were they forced to drag their kid out to the Hannah Montana movie).

Kids talk. Kids talk a lot. People who can't deal with kids spouting pointless crap during a movie shouldn't be going to see kids' movies. It's like going to France and bitching about all the people who don't speak English.

Instead of people bitching about kids shitting up their experience, they should be thankful that Pixar even goes out of their way to make sure adults will enjoy it too.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 16 Jun 2009, 11:13
Nah, fuck kids.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 16 Jun 2009, 11:17
As a disclaimer, I will say that people shouldn't take kids to more teen to adult oriented movies if they can't shut up. A kid yelling "OMG PUPPY!" during something like Up isn't going to kill the experience, but a screaming baby at Incredible Hulk and some kid yelling every time something happened in X2 were annoying.

In terms of the Hulk experience, though, I'll concede that crying babies should be removed from theaters ASAP. I don't give a shit if you want to see the movie, if your kid is screaming their lungs out, they're clearly not enjoying the flick and you're ruining the other kids' experience.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 16 Jun 2009, 11:46
I'm mostly joking anyway; the only time I really got upset over kids being in a theater was when I ended up with half of an ice cold soda tossed on me as two children behind me started a screaming match. Of course, the real key point there is parenting, particularly since the movie in question was 300 and neither of those kids could have been older than 7. I bet once the film was over that family went to Blockbuster and rented Deliverance and Silence of the Lambs in order to bag the bad parenting hat trick.

Anyway, whenever I want to see a Pixar movie with a minimum of screaming I just shoot for a weekday matinee or a late show near the end of the film's run (only really applicable in the 'burbs or small towns). If you're really unlucky you might end up sharing the theater with an entire class of school children, but it'll be practically empty just as often. It'd be nice to be able to get a perfect experience every time, but going to a kids movie on opening weekend and expecting silence is roughly as likely as successfully telling the tide to pack that shit in.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: rynne on 16 Jun 2009, 11:56
What he said^^^

When I saw Up last night it was all adult couples.  Literally not a single child in the theater.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 16 Jun 2009, 12:13
This was REALLY FUCKING GOOD.  My favorite one so far.  There was one little kid in the audience who kept saying whatever was on his mind, though. 

"Uh oh, the balloons are gone!"
"Puppies!"
"The birdie is funny!"

Ad Nauseum.

In the context of it being a movie primarily intended for kids of that age, I would have found such a thing to have enhanced the movie. Sure, I'm a rose-lensed idealist, but I figure that the average human being has roughly 80% of their lifespan devoted to having all sense of wonder and magic and other childish  things bludgeoned the fuck out of them...so I'm not going to bitch about a kid still clinging to a few remaining lifelines of being, well...a kid.

It always bums me out whenever I see a kid acting amazed at something they see, or wanting to show everyone within earshot something incredible they found, only to be told to shut up and sit still. I'd never say anything to the parents because it's not my right to tell them how to raise their kid, but it always depresses me when I see it happen.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Dimmukane on 16 Jun 2009, 12:21
It would have been cuter if all the other kids had said anything.  There were at least 30 children present, and he was the only one talking, with an outside voice.  Like I said, it wasn't bothering me all that much, because he didn't do it very often, but it was getting on other peoples' nerves.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 16 Jun 2009, 12:24
I have an extraordinary amount of patience with kids, which is weird because I generally don't like people and have a low tolerance for what I percieve to be stupidity or bullshit. For some reason, kids from around the age of 2-10 don't annoy me though.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 16 Jun 2009, 12:30
I don't really believe in treating kids much different from adults. I like kids, and oddly enough, I'm pretty good with them, but I don't think they (or anyone) needs to prattle on to appreciate the world around them. Showing regard for others isn't the same as having to swallow your dreams. Granted, I've been told that I'm actually just plain pretty patient in general, so maybe that has more to do with my view point than anything else.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 16 Jun 2009, 12:42
I don't think it's a necessity to prattle on about everything, and of course like all other aspects of life there's the fact that moderation is key. But I don't think it's right of me or any other adult to get pissed off at a 5 year old just because he says "Look, Mommy! A flower!"

To preface my next point, this isn't directed at you, because I don't think you meant it this way, but in regards to this:
Showing regard for others isn't the same as having to swallow your dreams.

 I see a lot of adults who think that '"regard for others" is a one-way street that actually means "regard for me," and expect that everything in the world should operate tailored to suit their tastes. If your at a church service, or in a business meeting, or some other "adult" function, that's one thing, but again I see no reason why a child for whom a movie like Up was made should have to sit in utter silence to cater to my personal movie-watching preferences.

Again, I quote your post without meaning to insinuate that's how I think you were trying to come across. I'm just explaining a little more what I was saying earlier.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 16 Jun 2009, 13:08
I mean exactly what I said. If you are harming the experience of others than you should consider the possibility that you should refrain from that. You can look at that as having unreasonable expectations or you can look at it as believing that accountability is a virtue. It's not about children knowing their place, it's about learning how to act in public places under various circumstances. I dunno, maybe it's the private schooling and having a drill sergeant for a grandfather talking, but it never really bothered me much to get shushed occasionally.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Ozymandias on 16 Jun 2009, 15:20
If a kid is incapable of shutting up during the movie, don't take them to the movie?

While I'd normally agree with this in the instance of anything above a PG rating, I think you're way off base in this situation. Adult Pixar fans are starting to get the same kind of elitist attitude that adult video game fans have developed. A kind of justification that since adults can enjoy it too, everything should be targeted directly at them since they have all the money, usually at the expense of children (As exhibited in the constant bitching about Nintendo's all ages mentality). The fact of the matter is that this is a clear and obvious kids movie that's beautifully made in a manner that the parents won't be ripping their hair out if they take their kid to see it (Much as they would were they forced to drag their kid out to the Hannah Montana movie).

Kids talk. Kids talk a lot. People who can't deal with kids spouting pointless crap during a movie shouldn't be going to see kids' movies. It's like going to France and bitching about all the people who don't speak English.

Instead of people bitching about kids shitting up their experience, they should be thankful that Pixar even goes out of their way to make sure adults will enjoy it too.

No, I have this opinion on any movie made by anyone targetted at anyone. There should not be three year olds in a theater. Period. They're not going to remember seeing the movie in the theater. They're not going to care about having seen the movie in the theater. They're fucking three years old. Rent a dang movie and hire a babysitter if you want to go see the movie, but don't bring a kid whose sole fascination with the movie is talking about the fact that there's a dog on the screen. They can do that at home.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: 0bsessions on 16 Jun 2009, 15:32
ITT: Jordan expresses his distaste for fun.

I saw Empire Strikes Back for the first time when I was three and I'll always remember. The first movie I saw in theaters was Snow White and, while I did not really enjoy it, I can vaguely remember it and it's about the only thing I can remember from that far back. I didn't make it back to a theater until I was thirteen and the original Star Wars movies were being re-released and I feel as if I missed out big time.

It's not just the movie, it's the experience of going to a theater when you're before that age where you become jaded about dealing with the crowds and the prices and all that.

Not to mention Faye is three and she seemed to enjoy the experience. We often have at least vaguely similar opinions, Jordan, but on this one I think you're way out of line. The movie was made for kids. If you don't like dealing with kids and their mannerisms, maybe you should see something made for adults instead. Maybe consider taking in Wolverine next time.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: pen on 16 Jun 2009, 16:22
I can see where it could bother people if kids are noisy.  See a later showing when you know they're mostly in bed, I guess. 

When I took Faye, she loved it and most of the people in the theater were children... a lot of them in booster seats and most of them laughing at the dogs and pointing out the balloons.  It made them all  love it more and for the $6 I paid to see it, it made me smile that they were all having fun.  It's not about remembering they were in the theater.  It's about the experience and seeing something new.  I mean, if I only took her to things she'd remember, I'd never take her anywhere until she was 5 and she would never have fun. 
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 19 Jun 2009, 07:50
Bump for amazing story (http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pixar-up-movie-2468059-home-show.htm)

Basically, Pixar gave a private screening of Up for a 10 year old girl who was dying of cancer, whose wanted to see the movie but was too sick to go anywhere.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I do believe I must have gotten something in my eye...
Title: Re: Up
Post by: pen on 19 Jun 2009, 09:21
I'm not sure it's appropriate to weep at work, but man.  That's... wow.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Ozymandias on 19 Jun 2009, 09:33
Oh goddammit now I am all teared up at work too what the fuck
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Surgoshan on 19 Jun 2009, 09:35
I'm not crying.  These are manly tears, tears of pure manliness.  They make hair grow when you slather them on stuff.  I need a tissue.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: phooey on 19 Jun 2009, 09:42
I too have something in my eye, but I think that this synopsis leaves a little bit to be desired...

Quote
After losing his wife in old age, the now grumpy man deals with his loss by attaching thousands of balloons to his house, flying into the sky, and going on an adventure with a little boy.

:<
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Will on 19 Jun 2009, 11:24
I find it fortunate that I've never carried a ManCard in my wallet, because I'm pretty sure after reading that story, I would have had to turn in in for a period of 1000 years.

The fact that Pixar officially responded with "No comment" is amazing..."Yeah, we did let the girl watch the movie, but let's not make a big deal out of it." What other company would actually do that, and not jump at the chance for the good PR?
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Surgoshan on 19 Jun 2009, 11:25
Seriously.  You know who's big on milking good deeds for PR points?  God.

Pixar: More Classy than God.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Catacombs on 19 Jun 2009, 12:38
Wow, that's a really great story.

Getting back to the movie, I still really liked it.  I think I liked it a little bit more because I went to a 10:50 p.m. showing, and there was barely anyone there, and it put me in a good mood after having a really shitty week.  But some of the things were really damn funny, like when he's coming down the stairs in his house and the chair stops.  Also, Dug & all the dogs were great, mostly because I could absolutely see my own dog doing any of those things, if he was able to speak.

I still feel like it's one of the best Pixar movies.  Cars was pretty meh, I saw (at least the second half, if not more) of Ratatoulle, and thought that was meh, and admittedly never saw WALL-E.  Trust me, this is still on my 'must see soon' list.  But this was beautifully done and well handled.

And it probably was just me but the little kid in the abandoned house at the very beginning of the movie-I totally did not make the connection she was even a GIRL.  Not until Carl was looking back at old photos, and one was the kid with a bow in her hair (which she did not have on in the first scene) did I realize she was Ellie.  But it's probably just me.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Be My Head on 19 Jun 2009, 14:45
 :cry:

That is a pretty awesome thing for Pixar to do.


On the movie: I thought it was really amazing (especially in 3D), my only complaints are that sometimes the slapstick got a bit too out of hand, and it felt really fast paced and could've been a little longer.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Alex C on 19 Jun 2009, 19:41
Nah, shorter is almost always better.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: Surgoshan on 19 Jun 2009, 21:34
Nah, shorter is almost always better.

She didn't say that.
Title: Re: Up
Post by: ptfreak on 27 Jun 2009, 23:07
Nah, shorter is almost always better.

Length is better when it's deserved. Dark Knight deserved it's time. Superman Returns did not (I thought it made good use of the couple of hours, but then it ended abruptly and violating it's own precedents.) As for Up, I don't see it needing any more time to tell it's story. The Ellie story at the beginning was absolutely perfect and anything more or less probably would have ruined it. The story wasn't rushed, but it didn't drag on either. Also, Pixar is developing a trend of making good use of its credits time. Both Wall-E and Up continued the story in the credits, but it wasn't anything you needed to know, just showing where the story went from there.