Jeph Jacques's comics discussion forums

Fun Stuff => CHATTER => Topic started by: Tyler on 08 Jun 2009, 21:02

Title: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Tyler on 08 Jun 2009, 21:02
Brought to you by meebo comparing percentages:

The 1000 Question Purity test (http://www.armory.com/tests/sex1000.html)


34.8
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Eris on 08 Jun 2009, 21:03
88.8% woooo

I am the most pure in meebo.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Drill King on 08 Jun 2009, 21:03
To clarify the percentage you should post is the amount of purity you are, not the corruption.

46.7
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Lines on 08 Jun 2009, 21:04
82.6

High fives for 80s, Hanners! o/
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Eris on 08 Jun 2009, 21:05
\o
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Liz on 08 Jun 2009, 21:36
79%

I've got plenty of time to change this.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: BrittanyMarie on 08 Jun 2009, 21:50
I got 72.7.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Wolf on 08 Jun 2009, 21:52
That shit is to loooong I got to number 45 and quit. Sorry QC I will never know how pure I am.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 08 Jun 2009, 22:01
Never say never, chief
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: J-cob9000 on 08 Jun 2009, 22:02
90%.
Yeah!

Is this good or bad?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 08 Jun 2009, 22:03
55.4%.  I expected lower but I guess I haven't had sex in too many public places (that seemed to be quite the theme for a while).
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: iamiam on 08 Jun 2009, 22:11
66.3

drug free is the way to be!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Johnny C on 08 Jun 2009, 22:18
i am so pure

me too :evil:
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: JimmyJazz on 08 Jun 2009, 22:19
70.4% sexually pure. Seems about right.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Liz on 08 Jun 2009, 22:31
Johnnyyyyyyyyy I want to know what you got, post your score.

Silly goose.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Christophe on 08 Jun 2009, 22:32
86.6% pure. Hmm.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Dazed on 08 Jun 2009, 22:36
71.2%

*shrugs*
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: BrittanyMarie on 08 Jun 2009, 22:42
Tyler, only because you're the "least pure" I am imagining you now as a dude who has had sex with several animals in the presence of some people but have never ever taken any drug.

(PS I kind of feel totally boring now) (more than usual)
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Tyler on 08 Jun 2009, 22:44
They call me the zookeeper.


(but really. ew.)
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 08 Jun 2009, 22:46
This is something that I have been wanting to do for awhile but never got around to.

Time to get to it.

Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: ackblom12 on 08 Jun 2009, 22:51
51.6%

So many things on the to-do list.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tommydski on 08 Jun 2009, 22:57
Someone invent a program that ticks 1000 boxes and get back to me please?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Spluff on 08 Jun 2009, 22:59
I refuse to answer these on the grounds that they may incriminate me.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tommydski on 08 Jun 2009, 23:01
I am informed that only 800 or so boxes are to be ticked.

Regardless.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 08 Jun 2009, 23:59
I've had sex only once.

You answered "yes" to 372 of 1000 questions, making you 62.8% sexually pure (37.2% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 62.8% pure in the sex domain.

All those ones about location...damn.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: est on 09 Jun 2009, 00:02
Yeah, I was looking at the thing earlier and gave up because I was sick of ticking boxes.  They should supply two different versions, one where you say the things you've done and another where you tick the ones you haven't, or at the very least give a way to tick all boxes in a certain subsection at once and un-tick the ones you haven't gotten around to yet.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Something Witty on 09 Jun 2009, 00:09
67.8% pure. Some of those things.. I just.. no way.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Vendetagainst on 09 Jun 2009, 00:43
90%.
Yeah!

Is this good or bad?
Yes.

I scored 81%, boring. I am committed to changing this.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Elizzybeth on 09 Jun 2009, 00:52
78.0%

I am okay with this.  For now.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Thaes on 09 Jun 2009, 01:59
95.1% sexually pure. Yay!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Jun 2009, 02:09
70%.  Average.  Well, well.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: KharBevNor on 09 Jun 2009, 02:11
I am informed that only 800 or so boxes are to be ticked.

Regardless.

I dunno Tommy. Have you ever fellated a corpse?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Masterbainter on 09 Jun 2009, 02:49
67.4% purity...


with a weirdness of 20%?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: CardinalFang on 09 Jun 2009, 03:27
87.2% Pure!

I'm a little Goody Two Shoes (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhvqVqLAdLI&feature=related).
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Barmymoo on 09 Jun 2009, 03:29
89.9% pure, 6% weird, 80% sick of ticking boxes.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: redglasscurls on 09 Jun 2009, 03:51
70.6% pure, I guess I ought to get on the whole "sex in churches for the purposes of people seeing me" thing
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Gemmwah on 09 Jun 2009, 04:08
72.2%

I'm still young yet.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: David_Dovey on 09 Jun 2009, 04:19
You answered "yes" to 348 of 1000 questions, making you 65.2% sexually pure (34.8% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 65.2% pure in the sex domain.
Your Weirdness Factor (AKA Uniqueness Factor) is 16%, based on a comparison of your test results with 62460 other submissions for this test.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 09 Jun 2009, 04:25
76.1%.

I'm cool with it!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: David_Dovey on 09 Jun 2009, 04:27
I thought I would be way dirtier  :cry:
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Lunchbox on 09 Jun 2009, 04:31
60.6%


I have a lot of work to do.
Also I am ashamed of myself.
Oh well.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: pen on 09 Jun 2009, 05:09
I only had time for the first 368 questions since I'm working, but here's what that got me.

76.6% sexually pure
The average purity for this test is 72.2%.
weirdness factor of 10%

I'm kind of curious, so I may finish it later if I remember.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Sox on 09 Jun 2009, 05:13
that's an awful lot of questions to work out something you already know and probably doesn't matter anyway unless you hang out with the kind of people who care about this kind of thing, but those people are usually kinda lame anyway so who cares I guess.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Drill King on 09 Jun 2009, 05:21
QC hates fun QC hates fun
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Cartilage Head on 09 Jun 2009, 06:00
76.1% purity WOOOO.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Inlander on 09 Jun 2009, 06:25
I'm going to stick to reading the archives of Text From Last Night instead. It's like this questionnaire only with considerably more laughs and considerably fewer tick-boxes.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: David_Dovey on 09 Jun 2009, 06:49
QC hates fun QC hates fun

ANDY IS A PERVERT ANDY IS A PERVERT
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Sox on 09 Jun 2009, 08:46
qc hates fun? well I guess they would have to in order to take part in this quiz. it's a pretty long quiz with pretty dull results. if this was less than 500 questions, it'd be a little less silly. honestly now.
you don't tick 800 boxes to determine whether or not you like the colour blue so why would you tick 800 boxes to see how sexually experienced you are?
what this quiz essentially boils down to is 'are you adventurous: y/n'. the first post could be 'have you tried any of the following?' and everybody could say yes or no and talk about the weird shit they've done, it'd be the same thread pretty much. except people would complain because that version would be a lot more explicit. that thread has been turned into this boring safe thread by instead using a percentage score generated by a quiz.
I don't care about percentages and spreadsheets or whatever, they're just not fun. I want creative writing and graphic illustrations.

can't we have a 1000 question strong quiz to determine something useful that we couldn't otherwise work out? something like which pokemon I am?
really, this quiz is boring, come back with a better quiz.
people tell me I hate fun because I am not interested in what they're doing, but usually what those people are doing is BOOOORING.

Challenge: Explain why this is a fun quiz because I do not think any of you can. This entire thread is the old thread we had about sex. Except it's now in spreadsheet format where the results are largely anonymous. Way to have fun, you guys.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 08:55
I feel like people with a score lower than sixty or so have had to satisfy one of the following, just because of the way the test read:

1. Be into scat play
2. Be into scat play in public
3. Be into scat play whilst swinging both ways
3. Be into scat play in a bunch of really unsexy places (on horseback, in the closet)
4. Be into scat play whilst doing a lot of drugs
5. Be into scat play, scatologically speaking
6. "coprophilia"
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: iamiam on 09 Jun 2009, 09:02
hey darryl you are just just jealous because you have never had sex on top of a horse and then had sex with it and then killed it and then had sex with it some more and then cooked it and had sex with it again and then eaten it and then pooped it out into your diaper and then eaten it again.

just because your life is VANILLA and BORING doesn't mean you have to ruin our fun!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tania on 09 Jun 2009, 09:12
47.3% pure.

i don't have any tattoos and i have never been interested in or had sex with any ladies. i think this test is trying to tell me i am a pervert.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Jun 2009, 09:23
I didn't go through 1000 questions - that would be approaching weird - I extrapolated my score from one section after seeing that the others were all similarly structured.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Sox on 09 Jun 2009, 09:42
I did that EXACT same thing to work out an average annual profit margin on a spreadsheet last week!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: snalin on 09 Jun 2009, 10:10
profit margin and scat sex: surprisingly similar!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: redglasscurls on 09 Jun 2009, 10:17
Mai, I just spit water across my laptop reading that  :lol:
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: MrBlu on 09 Jun 2009, 10:47
I'm actually quite surprised about how many of the first 20 I answered "yes" to.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: calenlass on 09 Jun 2009, 18:04
58.8% corrupt41.2% pure.


Things I am sad I have not done earlier, and which are now on my To Do list this summer are:

skinny dipping [with others is optional]
join the mile high club


Also I am kind of sad none of my band camp stuff was eligible under anything other than "had sex with a dude" or whatever.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Ozymandias on 09 Jun 2009, 18:29
You answered "yes" to 476 of 1000 questions, making you 52.4% sexually pure (47.6% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 52.4% pure in the sex domain.

Higher than I expected!

I need some group sex and drugs.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Ozymandias on 09 Jun 2009, 18:38
And I need to fuck a dude on a boat.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 09 Jun 2009, 18:50
Why hello there Ozy
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tania on 09 Jun 2009, 18:52
don't try pcp ozy, it is the worst
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Eris on 09 Jun 2009, 18:55
Try pcp then bit a small boy's eye out! I hear that is the done thing. Also after that, go and try to chop your legs off with an axe.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 09 Jun 2009, 18:56
And then replace your legs with guns.

Works well against zombies.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tania on 09 Jun 2009, 18:59
but how would you run away from the zombies?... or is this one of those things where you wouldn't need to run away because your legs are guns and you can just shoot them. i always really sucked at the zombie threads.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Eris on 09 Jun 2009, 19:01
A man really did bite out his son's eye (http://www.news.com.au/story/0,,25506653-1702,00.html) while on pcp. It is pretty scary.

It seems I like to read about terrible things people do in the news, which then makes me sad about how awful people are.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Reed on 09 Jun 2009, 19:03
Tania, it's a Rose McGowen thing:

(http://i422.photobucket.com/albums/pp309/direbacterium/Random/planetterror.jpg)
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 19:48
Guys I just buttfucked a lesbian meatloaf with an inanimate object (ie fountain pen, Coke bottle) in an antique telephone booth with the knowledge that someone was watching with my hands tied behind my back. 

Am I part of The Gang now?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 19:50
Oh, high on qualudes.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Lines on 09 Jun 2009, 20:16
Ok, so have any of you had sex/oral sex on horseback? I am still very confused about where that question even came from. Is this some sort of fetish that just isn't talked about? I mean, I've heard of sex, etc on a motorcycle (that is parked), but not while on top of a horse. Wouldn't the thing buck you off or something?

I know if I were a horse, I'd be all, "Excuse me, people having sex on my back, you can have sex on the ground, ok?" and then stomp on them.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 20:21
post/av
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: LittleKey on 09 Jun 2009, 20:47
You answered "yes" to 50 of 1000 questions, making you 95.0% sexually pure (5.0% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 95.0% pure in the sex domain.

And my weirdness factor is seven percent.



I expected even higher than that, honestly. I need to go outside more. But oh my god there were so many strange questions; I feel like a bad person just READING that test.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Inlander on 09 Jun 2009, 21:03
I need to go outside more.

I'd wait a while: right now there's some people fucking on your lawn.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: LittleKey on 09 Jun 2009, 21:40
I need to go outside more.

I'd wait a while: right now there's some people fucking on your lawn.
That would be uncomfortable. It's pretty cold out there and the ground's hard. I wish them luck.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: phooey on 09 Jun 2009, 21:43
If it's cold enough, they get another point!
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Inlander on 09 Jun 2009, 21:49
Have you ever:

1001 [ ] suffered from frostbite as a consequence of having sex outside in winter?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: 20 jazz funk greats on 09 Jun 2009, 22:05
oh hey, 69.8% pure.  i don't think that's entirely accurate.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: 0bsessions on 09 Jun 2009, 22:33
I only had time for the first 368 questions since I'm working, but here's what that got me.

76.6% sexually pure
The average purity for this test is 72.2%.
weirdness factor of 10%

I'm kind of curious, so I may finish it later if I remember.

No, no, finish. They get to you later. You big freaky freak.

hey darryl you are just just jealous because you have never had sex on top of a horse and then had sex with it and then killed it and then had sex with it some more and then cooked it and had sex with it again and then eaten it and then pooped it out into your diaper and then eaten it again.

just because your life is VANILLA and BORING doesn't mean you have to ruin our fun!

The law of averages dictates that there is probably at least one person in the world who would tick off every single one of them.

i don't have any tattoos and i have never been interested in or had sex with any ladies. i think this test is trying to tell me i am a pervert.

Man. Tommy talks about it so much I'd honestly forgotten you weren't gay. Who's the worse person in this, me or Tommy?


Oh hey, and I got a 62.8% with a 19% weirdness. Go me.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tommydski on 09 Jun 2009, 23:06
Man. Tommy talks about it so much I'd honestly forgotten you weren't gay. Who's the worse person in this, me or Tommy?

You're just confused. Tania is a little boy. Boys like girls.

Stop muddying the issue.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: MrBlu on 09 Jun 2009, 23:34
Ok, so have any of you had sex/oral sex on horseback? I am still very confused about where that question even came from. Is this some sort of fetish that just isn't talked about? I mean, I've heard of sex, etc on a motorcycle (that is parked), but not while on top of a horse. Wouldn't the thing buck you off or something?

I know if I were a horse, I'd be all, "Excuse me, people having sex on my back, you can have sex on the ground, ok?" and then stomp on them.
More than likely, multiple people have done this, in order to warrant that question, thus, if you search hard enough, there is probably a community of people that are interested, or find pleasure in committing said act, and if you spend a couple more seconds searching, you will find videos of said act.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tania on 10 Jun 2009, 16:36
horse humpers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf3p1mXHfqY)
not porn, just very weird indeed, although headphones might be a good idea if you're around people who don't want to hear about horse penis.

i've probably shared this video before, and okay so it's not quite people having sex on horseback but holy moley.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: SilentJ on 13 Jun 2009, 00:47
Man some of the things in that first section are rather disturbing.  Plus I'm kind of troubled by the writers of the test implying that a person will most likely commit murder, plot sedition and/or treason, or used the black market before they have sex for the first time.

65.3% pure, 15% weird.  I was on a roll until the beastiality and drugs sections came up, dammit.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: pen on 13 Jun 2009, 08:35
"You answered "yes" to 567 of 1000 questions, making you 43.3% sexually pure (56.7% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 43.3% pure in the sex domain.
Your Weirdness Factor (AKA Uniqueness Factor) is 31%, based on a comparison of your test results with 62460 other submissions for this test."

Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: HellStorm on 13 Jun 2009, 08:35
horse humpers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf3p1mXHfqY)
not porn, just very weird indeed, although headphones might be a good idea if you're around people who don't want to hear about horse penis.

i've probably shared this video before, and okay so it's not quite people having sex on horseback but holy moley.

Oh dear.
I feel sorry for the camera crew. They must have felt soo awkward.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: 0bsessions on 13 Jun 2009, 08:56
Oh hey, and I got a 62.8% with a 19% weirdness. Go me.

"You answered "yes" to 567 of 1000 questions, making you 43.3% sexually pure (56.7% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 43.3% pure in the sex domain.
Your Weirdness Factor (AKA Uniqueness Factor) is 31%, based on a comparison of your test results with 62460 other submissions for this test."

Me and you....we need to talk.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: All_Ľour_Bass on 04 Jul 2009, 00:45
You answered "yes" to 116 of 1000 questions, making you

88.4% sexually pure (11.6% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 88.4% pure in the sex domain.

Your Weirdness Factor (AKA Uniqueness Factor) is 6%, based on a comparison of your test results with 62460 other submissions for this test.

The average purity for this test is 72.2%.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Radical AC on 04 Jul 2009, 03:43
84.7% pure

I guess I'm kind of boring.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Josefbugman on 04 Jul 2009, 04:48
97.6% pure... I am so tempted to step in front of a bus after seeing that.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: ledhendrix on 04 Jul 2009, 05:56
74.1% sexually pure

Weirdness Factor 13%


I've got a lot of sexin in different places to do.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: NeverQuiteGoth on 04 Jul 2009, 10:38
Quote
You answered "yes" to 159 of 1000 questions, making you 84.1% sexually pure (15.9% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 84.1% pure in the sex domain.
Your Weirdness Factor (AKA Uniqueness Factor) is 12%, based on a comparison of your test results with 62460 other submissions for this test.
The average purity for this test is 72.2%.
The first submission for this test was received March 5, 1996.

 :-D
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tinysmidgen on 04 Jul 2009, 20:59
65.2%

I've only slept with three people =\
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: ackblom12 on 04 Jul 2009, 21:10
I've slept with one. No excuses
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 04 Jul 2009, 22:06
I've slept with one. No excuses
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: ibrahimdelil on 06 Jul 2009, 06:20
Quote
You answered "yes" to 714 of 1000 questions, making you 28.6% sexually pure (71.4% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 28.6% pure in the sex domain.

uhh ._.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: bainidhe_dub on 09 Jul 2009, 11:22
82.4% pure, 7% weird
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: calenlass on 09 Jul 2009, 12:26
aren't you like married now, bain

you should really get on that
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: scarred on 09 Jul 2009, 13:24
76.8% pure.

9% weird.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: bainidhe_dub on 09 Jul 2009, 15:17
yeah, but apartment complexes frown on farm animals, and also there's the security deposit to think about, so the meth lab idea is out. which is unfortunate, cos it would really help with rent..
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tinysmidgen on 09 Jul 2009, 22:00
Quote
You answered "yes" to 714 of 1000 questions, making you 28.6% sexually pure (71.4% sexually corrupt); that is, you are 28.6% pure in the sex domain.

uhh ._.

what the hell are you doing in your spare time sir?
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Zingoleb on 09 Jul 2009, 22:04
(Tyler is interested)
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: tania on 10 Jul 2009, 07:01
being bisexual and/or doing drugs bumps your score up a pretty substantial amount. i'm sure the folks who like to shit on animals before they have sex with them and then eat them are here somewhere, they're just camouflaged in the 60-80% pure crowd cos they are probably straight and don't do drugs. but i'm on to you.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: ibrahimdelil on 10 Jul 2009, 15:16
yeah i'm bisexual and i used drugs in the past, i think that's why my purity level is low. i'm not into weird stuff more than anybody else around.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: Professor Snuggles on 12 Jul 2009, 14:25
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU GUYS ACTUALLY TOOK A 1000 QUESTION TEST ON THE INTERNET ABOUT HOW MUCH FUCCIN' YOU DO.
Title: Re: Because tests aren't just for Livejournal
Post by: iamiam on 12 Jul 2009, 15:31
caps lock is so 2005