THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 10 Oct 2010, 15:58

Title: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010 (1771-1775)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Oct 2010, 15:58
Now, for the aftermath and post-game discussion. Boy, I hope no one had Sven on your Fantasy Webcomic team this week; you lost some serious Lothario points with how the date with Hanners ended.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Oct 2010, 17:03
Who says? 

The best tactic is often getting them comfortable with you first...

 :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 10 Oct 2010, 18:09
...you lost some serious Lothario points with how the date with Hanners ended.


Are you kidding? He got a voluntary HUG from Hannelore, with NO hyperventalation or recriminations!

That's like having any other girl begging you to let her and her hotter twin sister to have a three-way with you!

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 10 Oct 2010, 21:45
Tai will start dating Megan Fox

The world will end.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 10 Oct 2010, 21:53
Tai and Megan Fox?



errr....

I'll be in my bunk!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: ysth on 10 Oct 2010, 22:12
Quote from: twitter.com/jephjacques
also this weekend I had a nightmare that I ran out of ideas for QC. worst nightmare in a long time.
He could just start using ideas from the forums!

On second thought, I guess that would count as "worst nightmare".
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 11 Oct 2010, 00:26
...you lost some serious Lothario points with how the date with Hanners ended.


Are you kidding? He got a voluntary HUG from Hannelore, with NO hyperventalation or recriminations!

That's like having any other girl begging you to let her and her hotter twin sister to have a three-way with you!



Err ... she hugged Marten before and no hyperventilating either.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Oct 2010, 00:27
My point exactly. :mrgreen:









also...



Dale!!!!



...that is all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 11 Oct 2010, 01:39
Dale!!!!
Chip!!!!

Cold, Marigold, cold...

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 11 Oct 2010, 01:44
I wholeheartedly approve of Dalegold.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 11 Oct 2010, 01:47
Hmm, creepy-stalker much Dale? I know she's cute and all, but you're turning into That Guy­™...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Arancaytar on 11 Oct 2010, 01:47
The MariDale / DaleGold ship is slow and lumbering, but its progress seems inexorable.

Secondly, Marigold's facial expressions are second only to Hannelore's. The one in panel two is particularly awesome.

Also, where does Dale get those glasses? Do they have some kind of built-in LED lighting in the rims?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 11 Oct 2010, 01:49
If you're going to be Macavity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macavity_%28character%29), lesson #1 is always have your exit planned, Dale.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 11 Oct 2010, 01:54
The fourth panel is awesome, gotta love his creepy posture and also in that specific panel he like one of my best friends.

Although my friend is not black, but everything is almost the same.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Oct 2010, 02:15
Point of order, Mr. Chairman:

How do people in the various regions of meatspace that the denizens of this fair forum pronounce the species name of the North American nocturnal rat-like marsupial that Marigold is refering to in todays QC?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 11 Oct 2010, 02:21
The obvious way?

Wikipedia says:
Quote
Opossums have more teeth than any other land mammal
Just thought you should know.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Oct 2010, 02:25
The obvious way?

Which would be?

Actually I don't really mean the scientific name of the species, I would like to know what the various regional colloquial terms for the animal are.

I'm actually serious here, sorta...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: amandathehunter on 11 Oct 2010, 02:26
This pleases me.

GREATLY.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Arancaytar on 11 Oct 2010, 03:25
I say "oh POSS um".
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Somebody on 11 Oct 2010, 03:29
Sheesh, Dale's crazier than a bag of ferrets. How'd he get so weird just from MG not tipping him?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Oct 2010, 03:31
He found out that she plays the opposite faction in WoW.

The lack of tip has nothing to do with it.

WoW is Serious Business.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: IlGreven on 11 Oct 2010, 04:19
The last line was very Carnak-esque.  I'm betting Dale was a Carson fan.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 11 Oct 2010, 04:47
Hmm, creepy-stalker much Dale? I know she's cute and all, but you're turning into That Guy­™...
His entrance line implies it's a random encounter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Tergon on 11 Oct 2010, 05:27
I've seen pictures of Opossums.  Freaky-arse looking lil' bastards.  In fact, I do believe that Possums are the one animal where Australia is actually less horrifying than its competitors.  We just have Possoms, noticably lacking the O- at the start, but, well.  These are the two kinds of possums that I see quite regularly in trees all around where I live now, and also saw where I grew up.

BRUSHTAIL POSSUM:
(http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Nature/Mammals/BrushTailedPossum.jpg)

RINGTAIL POSSUM:
(http://lh6.ggpht.com/_OV9QICon5o4/Szvo5I0yYNI/AAAAAAAAGvY/yvkLQ5On5Uw/LMG_5214_lr.jpg)

Australia, where possums are less horrifying.

Also yay Dale.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: tomart on 11 Oct 2010, 05:46
We here in southern NJ USA also say "possums" in casual conversation. 
I dimly recall that maybe schoolteachers might insist upon the "o"...

Also, Yay Marigold!  Staying in character (although that actually would've meant finishing him off..?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Oct 2010, 06:22
Point of order, Mr. Chairman:

How do people in the various regions of meatspace that the denizens of this fair forum pronounce the species name of the North American nocturnal rat-like marsupial that Marigold is refering to in todays QC?

Oh-PAH-suhms.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Oct 2010, 06:23
The last line was very Carnak-esque.  I'm betting Dale was a Carson fan.
Actually, it was Marigold's line. And I bet she got it from late-night TV infomercials selling "Best of Carson" DVD's.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: perilouspuppet on 11 Oct 2010, 07:31
I can't quite remember this far back, but Dale used to be with Natasha right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: St.Clair on 11 Oct 2010, 07:51
He's obviously not specced Subtlety.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heranje on 11 Oct 2010, 08:00
I can't quite remember this far back, but Dale used to be with Natasha right?
No, that would be Amir, who was (is? we haven't seen Deathmøle for a while) in a band with Marten, Hannelore and Natasha.

Dale is a (presumably) african-american pizza delivery guy (+2 other jobs, I think he's said)/COD regular who everyone likes (except Marigold), who knows the COD secret menu and who also plays WoW as an Alliance Rogue determined to kill Marigold's character. Amir is a (presumably) middle-eastern heavy metal guy who got kicked in the face by Natasha at a concert and subsequently dated her for a while. I don't think he plays WoW.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 11 Oct 2010, 08:14
Not sure if a video game'll build yur stealth skills in RL, I've always found that physically scouting the escape route for fallen branches, garbage cans, etc. is the best way to avoid becoming a snack for the squirrels, but who am I to judge the power of video game?

I was thinking that given Dale's speech, Marigold's reaction was perfect.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 11 Oct 2010, 09:03
Not sure if a video game'll build yur stealth skills in RL
It depends if you know Mortal Kombat (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IKnowMortalKombat).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 11 Oct 2010, 09:56
BAHAHAHA!  Awesome -- love the Dale/Marigold interplay.  The expressions and body postures in panel 3 are great!  I couldn't decide which I found funnier, Dale's glowing glasses in panel 5, Dale getting stuck in a trashcan while trying to make an intimidating exit (smooooooth), or Marigold's last line -- but then I saw that Marigold's cup (presumably similar to a 7-11 Big Gulp) says "U HAZ BUKKET" on it, and for me, that wins.  ^_^

Opossums are ugly as hell -- they make sewer rats look adorable.  As for me, I pronounce it "uh-POSS-um".
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 11 Oct 2010, 11:06
The obvious way?

Which would be?

Actually I don't really mean the scientific name of the species, I would like to know what the various regional colloquial terms for the animal are.

I'm actually serious here, sorta...
In the deep South, we say POSS'um (somewhat like 'book 'em' ala Jack Lord without 'Danno'). Actually, it's usually 'damn POSS'um,' but not always. Don't know if anyone here still eats them or not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Oct 2010, 12:01
The O is silent. 

Eatin' possum's like eatin' catfish - you can't think too much about what THEY'VE eaten (et?). 

Just saw O Brother, Where ArtThou?  the other day, now all I can think of is the one guy offering Clooney a gopher on a stick when they're on the run...

Tergon, your guy's possums are a lot cuter.  Ours is the only marsupial we've got, though.  They have a nasty habit of staggering onto roadways at inopportune moments, too.  The only good possum's a flat possum. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 11 Oct 2010, 12:28
Hm, that star on Mari's sweatshirt really is lucky :evil:

And Mari plays a warrior.  Warrior is the only class worth playing (and maybe shamans).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: laizeohbeets on 11 Oct 2010, 12:59
The obvious way?

Which would be?

Actually I don't really mean the scientific name of the species, I would like to know what the various regional colloquial terms for the animal are.

I'm actually serious here, sorta...
In the deep South, we say POSS'um (somewhat like 'book 'em' ala Jack Lord without 'Danno'). Actually, it's usually 'damn POSS'um,' but not always. Don't know if anyone here still eats them or not.

I say it "PAW-sum," but I'm also from the Verruh Deep South.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Promethean Sky on 11 Oct 2010, 13:01
Here in Michigan (for non-americans, that's the bit of the US that looks like a mitten) everyone calls them POSS-ums. Naturally, I call them oh-POSS-ums just to be contrary. Same reason I call pop soda.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: The Duke on 11 Oct 2010, 13:02
Hmm, creepy-stalker much Dale? I know she's cute and all, but you're turning into That Guy­™...
His entrance line implies it's a random encounter.

His pose implies it was not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 11 Oct 2010, 13:11
Hmm, creepy-stalker much Dale? I know she's cute and all, but you're turning into That Guy­™...
His entrance line implies it's a random encounter.
His pose implies it was not.
I don't see how. It implies he saw her coming, maybe, but having maybe two seconds notice in advance doesn't count as stalking (or did I miss a memo again?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: SJCrew on 11 Oct 2010, 13:20
Dale is a pretty cool guy, Jeph should be proud. I think he can play this whole WoW alliance thing for a few more laughs, but I'd rather this "creepy stalker" thing be a one-time-only joke.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 11 Oct 2010, 15:15
Dale, Dale, Dale,  Karma is a bitch when it comes to stalkers.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: tomart on 11 Oct 2010, 15:37
Hmm, creepy-stalker much Dale? I know she's cute and all, but you're turning into That Guy­™...
His entrance line implies it's a random encounter.
His pose implies it was not.

And the shiny glasses?  He  can't  walk around town like that (i 'spect it's at least part of the reason he tripped up...)
Ok, just  MAYBE  he keeps em in a pocket for just such an encounter, so...
how about a semi-random encounter he was prepared for...?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 11 Oct 2010, 15:58
How do people in the various regions of meatspace that the denizens of this fair forum pronounce the species name of the North American nocturnal rat-like marsupial that Marigold is refering to in todays QC?
I would say o-PO-s'm with both the Os pronounced "short" like the O at the beginning of "optimum" or "opportunity". But in Australia we talk funny, and our possums are much cuter.

And yeah, I hope this was a "random encounter". If Dale was lurking in ambush, I think it's time for the restraining order. :police:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Oct 2010, 17:49
Here in Michigan (for non-americans, that's the bit of the US that looks like a mitten) everyone calls them POSS-ums. Naturally, I call them oh-POSS-ums just to be contrary. Same reason I call pop soda.

No, I'M from the part of the US that looks like a mitten! Y'all look like a boxing glove!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: vettechinohio on 11 Oct 2010, 18:14
And I'm from the state below the mitten/boxing glove that looks like a wonky heart! Michigan people please don't hate, as I don't follow sports. My best friend is from Michigan, I support blue as much as anyone else (:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 11 Oct 2010, 18:22
I thought the Mass. lotto opened at 7.

...should I be ashamed to know that?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: questionable_purpose on 11 Oct 2010, 18:27
I saw that Marigold's cup (presumably similar to a 7-11 Big Gulp) says "U HAZ BUKKET" on it, and for me, that wins.  ^_^

Ah. QC Forum delivers once again. I saw 'BUKK' and immediately thought Bukkake - the internetz have pervaded my mind. I'll be staying off milkshakes for a while.
Then I thought it was probably a variant of Buck as in a dollar drink.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: perilouspuppet on 11 Oct 2010, 20:05
I can't quite remember this far back, but Dale used to be with Natasha right?
No, that would be Amir, who was (is? we haven't seen Deathmøle for a while) in a band with Marten, Hannelore and Natasha.

Dale is a (presumably) african-american pizza delivery guy (+2 other jobs, I think he's said)/COD regular who everyone likes (except Marigold), who knows the COD secret menu and who also plays WoW as an Alliance Rogue determined to kill Marigold's character. Amir is a (presumably) middle-eastern heavy metal guy who got kicked in the face by Natasha at a concert and subsequently dated her for a while. I don't think he plays WoW.

Ugh, thanks for the answer.  I feel pretty ignorant about that one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Oct 2010, 22:25
Just another day at the McPharmer residence...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 11 Oct 2010, 22:27
Better than the Soaps huh Angus.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: amandathehunter on 11 Oct 2010, 22:32
And Mari plays a warrior.  Warrior is the only class worth playing.

AGREED.

As a Warrior myself in the world where we craft war, I was VERY EXCITED to see that marigold is a warrior!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 11 Oct 2010, 22:45
Hanners has had the pretend date, the pretend being snooty (indignant, at the least) to the 'rents, and now the pretend jealous fallout with her girlfriend .

What's next, the pretend I missed my period? WHAT WILL ROUND OUT THIS IMAGINARY LIFE EXPERIENCE?!?

I surely don't know. Glad to see Angus and Momo are taking 'teasy, though. Because, you know… (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEIFP9RgjBs)*




*Couldn't find a good clip of Conway Twitty's version
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 11 Oct 2010, 23:36
Hanners has had the pretend date, the pretend being snooty (indignant, at the least) to the 'rents, and now the pretend jealous fallout with her girlfriend.
Hee, hee... :-D Ah, so that was the reason for Hanners' amateur dramatics! Angus and Momo earn cool points (I wonder which sports Momo follows; we've only seen her kendo skills).

Quote
Couldn't find a good clip of Conway Twitty's version.
A blind link to a Country & Western song... I've been hickrolled!  :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: no one special on 12 Oct 2010, 00:27
SO WHAT HAPPENED TO ANGUS VISITING COFFEE OF DOOM???

He said he'd come by the next day.  Apparently he forgot?  Now he's just reading the paper? 

And is this the next day already, or the same night? 

Also, Hanners looks way too melodramatic to be serious!  But apparently she is? 


SO confused.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 12 Oct 2010, 00:30
I dont get todays Comic.

And what IS with Deathmole, anyway ?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Blackjoker on 12 Oct 2010, 01:12
Quite enjoyed the comic for today, especially with how nonplussed Angus seems to be about the whole matter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 12 Oct 2010, 04:26
Angus and Momo's reactions could not have been better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 12 Oct 2010, 04:49
The UST is just dripping off this one. Or it would be if either of them were in any way aware of the alternate implications of their words and deeds...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 12 Oct 2010, 05:18
Really, I'm not getting any of that from either Angus or Momo
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 12 Oct 2010, 05:37
The newspaper is a metaphor for his manparts.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Somebody on 12 Oct 2010, 06:09
Momo's shrunk *again*, hasn't she? At this rate, she'll fit on Mari's palm before too long...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Oct 2010, 06:17
So what should Jeph do for Columbus Day/Thanksgiving Day (Canada, eh?)

Ship Hannergold.    - 3 (6.8%)
Ship Pintslow.    - 3 (6.8%)
Ship DoraFaye.    - 4 (9.1%)
Sail that ship.    - 12 (27.3%)
Asps. Very Dangerous.    - 6 (13.6%)
Celebrate with turkey-flavored waffles.    - 5 (11.4%)
I've got nothin'. It's been a long week.    - 11 (25%)

Total Voters: 44
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Oct 2010, 06:25
Oh, and it is IMNSHO that Momo is probably into the box scores from the MLB playoffs.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zagraf on 12 Oct 2010, 06:34
I wouldn't have figured Momo to be a sports fan. Would've thought she'd be more interested in the Technology section. Or in Marigold's yaoi collection.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Oct 2010, 06:40
I saw the "NO" on Angus' coffee mug, and immediately had the impression that, wrapped around the other side, was the word "DRAMA". 

'cause, you know, it's really too early for that sort of thing. 

And I think Jeph's lost his continuity - the Fangus date?  Back-burnered by Svennelore!?

You got some 'splainin' to do! 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mojo on 12 Oct 2010, 09:00
Hanners is just so Scarlett O'Hara in this one...
 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: amandathehunter on 12 Oct 2010, 09:08
My prediction for Fangus. He didn't show, but called telling faye whatever it was that came up. They have plans to go on another date as soon as the Maridale story arc is over.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Oct 2010, 10:02
Hanners is just so Scarlett O'Hara in this one...
 :-D

OMG, you're right - her shirt's made from the missing window blind! 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 12 Oct 2010, 10:21
I saw the "NO" on Angus' coffee mug, and immediately had the impression that, wrapped around the other side, was the word "DRAMA". 

I think the "DRAMA" is implied.  ^_^  I loved Angus and Momo's non-reaction reactions to Hanners and Marigold's antics today.  It kind of says 'yep, this is standard around here.'  Though if Momo's into basketball, I wonder which team she favors . . .

Angus probably did stop by CoD and talk to Faye, but we didn't get to see it due to the Hannesven arc.  Hopefully we'll see a bit more of how that's progressing soon.  I also wonder if we'll see Sven conversing with Wil about the pretend date.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Oct 2010, 11:23
Probably not about the date per se, but I think he needs a good chat with his barkeep/friend about his meltdown during said date.  Talking to Hanners about Faye probably just cracked the dam - now it's time to open the floodgates and let the bullshit out. 

And there's a lot  of pent up bullshit in there! 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 12 Oct 2010, 11:36
I'm not cleaning up after that flood - Aid to the Civil Power be damned.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Oct 2010, 13:14
Little thing I just noticed:

Take a look at Hanners in panel 2A (or the first panel, second row, where she's asking if Marigold is jealous).

Then look back at when we first meet Hanners in the 515-520 "post-talk" arc, especially the third panel of this strip (517) (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=517).

Same Hanners, same (essential) look, but a LOT better drawn.

Jeph, dude, you're getting better every time you draw this comic.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 12 Oct 2010, 13:33
Probably not about the date per se, but I think he needs a good chat with his barkeep/friend about his meltdown during said date.  Talking to Hanners about Faye probably just cracked the dam - now it's time to open the floodgates and let the bullshit out. 

And there's a lot  of pent up bullshit in there! 
I keep telling you people a lot doesn't mean anything. A tremendous amount, an astounding load, etc. but not a lot.

Wait, wrong group of people…

ahem

Bullshit is incorrect. Frankly, I'd say no bull on earth could manage the throughput . You mean elephant shit. And, yes, Wil would need waders, or perhaps a waterproof coverall. Actually, Sven'd be better off taking this to a similarly equipped Marten, if said could refrain from grabbing Sven's ass. Which, btw, should be an off-limits subject between him and Dora, much like Veronica's professional 'triumphs.' Dora's not the only one with sore subjects.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Oct 2010, 17:37
A lot.  I never really though about the phrase. 

Enough to cover a city lot?  Would you prefer a lot full? 

Bulls DO shit a lot huge amount, especially that grain-fed beef.  Disagrees with their digestive system, they were meant to eat grass.  Have to feed 'em antibiotics just to keep the stuff down.  Burgers, anyone? 

Martin may make a better sounding board, but Sven's known Wil longer.  He also knows that Wil may be smug in his elationship with Penny, and generally unhelpful as a flighty poet, but Sven may be more comfortable around him.  And it'd be funny.

Edit: I decided to leave it as elationship.  I like it.  It describes them well, at least the last time we really saw them.  The pie party, I believe. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Oct 2010, 18:48
I have added "elationship" to my vocabulary.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Oct 2010, 19:33
I have added "elationship" to my vocabulary.
And to the poll.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: no one special on 12 Oct 2010, 21:01
OMG, you're right - her shirt's made from the missing window blind! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6bOpJ5elW8

"I saw it in the window and just couldn't resist it."

(http://threadforthought.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Carol-Burnett-Show-Went-with-the-Wind-drape-dress-1976.jpg)

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 12 Oct 2010, 21:38
Momo's shrunk *again*, hasn't she? At this rate, she'll fit on Mari's palm before too long...

Momo's a shapeshifting robot from Planet X
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: diablo_man on 12 Oct 2010, 21:41
Like Faye's shirt. Cant help but wonder if the "the sword" reference is because their drummer quit the band like yesterday, or if its just coincidental. good band regardless.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Oct 2010, 21:42
Pennelope was allowed to make out with Wil during work hours.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Oct 2010, 21:44
Extenuating circumstances, that.  After all the letters and several months apart - and even then, Dora wound up taking her off the clock and insisting they take it elsewhere (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1433)!  

Also, thought "the Sword" was just a reference to the task at hand...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 12 Oct 2010, 21:56
Ahhh, phallic symbolism, don't you just love it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 12 Oct 2010, 22:18
She's a sake-sipping recluse, only recently venturing out to see the sun.

He's a beer-swilling romantic who spends his days people-watching, never shaving, everyone underestimating him.

Tonight, they meet over Pocky with Gallo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 12 Oct 2010, 22:34
Continuity integrity reestablished. Angus did come by the next day—we simply didn't see it. We were too busy watching Sven screw up murdering Hanners.

Yes, a lot simply means a quantity. It sometimes has a specific meaning, but said meaning is always circumstantial to what's being measured. Example: a lot of tiles and a lot of wood at a building supply store don't necessarily have anything to do with one another beyond the term itself.  And if you'd read some limited-vocabulary schmoo writing it fifteen to twenty times in a thousand words when the bedamned wretch means many, you'd notice it, too.

<pauses to clean foam from mouth>

Even more fun, of course, is when they use alot, which isn't a word at all, or allot, which has an entirely different meaning.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 13 Oct 2010, 00:13
I'm still amazed nothing happends during Sven and Hanners, btw.

I think Marigold will END UP dating Dale ... in a couple douzen, hundred or even thousand strips ... but she wont ask for it herself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Hawthorne on 13 Oct 2010, 01:38
Am I the only one who thought "wow, they even have a whetstone for their sword,"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heranje on 13 Oct 2010, 01:45
Even more fun, of course, is when they use alot
Alot no understand why sharing feelings with it. (http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 13 Oct 2010, 01:46
If Faye holds the stone like that, she'll have the end off her thumb in the first swipe of the sword...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 13 Oct 2010, 02:01
Am I the only one who thought "wow, they even have a whetstone for their sword,"?
Not really. If I had a sword, I'd make damn sure I kept it sharp and oiled.

@pwhodges; depends if she's sharpening along the edge or across it really.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 13 Oct 2010, 02:39
Continuity integrity reestablished. Angus did come by the next day—we simply didn't see it.

Methinks Faye hasn't seen it too, then - seeing as to how she says "Hey, haven't seen you in a few days".
The awkwardness in panels three onward suggests that this is indeed their first time together after their First Date.

I concur with your dissection of the phrase "a lot". I do, however, see how languages that are actively used in everyday life, evolve.
And yes, sometimes in ways that hurt me too. But it's not something I think I can stop.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Dickbutt on 13 Oct 2010, 02:39
I can only imagine Faye saying "Yes" during the last panel in perfect Kim Pine monotone
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: squishything on 13 Oct 2010, 02:49
Just stoppin' my lurkin' to say:

In New Zealand, Possums are a native-wildlife-killing pest.

We slaughter them mercilessly and put them in pies.

The more you know!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 13 Oct 2010, 04:30
Well, this strip took stones.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Jesus DeSaad on 13 Oct 2010, 06:21
Just logged in for this. Seriously, dude.
(http://img816.imageshack.us/img816/9068/swordnotunderpants.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 13 Oct 2010, 06:35
Pennelope was allowed to make out with Wil during work hours.
Extenuating circumstances, that.  After all the letters and several months apart - and even then, Dora wound up taking her off the clock and insisting they take it elsewhere (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1433)!
Or maybe Dora added a rule after that incident.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 13 Oct 2010, 07:04
Dora is about two steps away from going Nuclear. First came the drama at the "party", then the  hiring of Cosette and Hanners, then the Faye-Marten fiasco, then the "faux date" with Sven, and now this...

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 13 Oct 2010, 07:50
How long do we have to reach minimum safe distance?

Failing that, get into a trench cover yourself with something, and preferably cower against the side of the trench closest to the blast.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 13 Oct 2010, 09:31
Bahaha!  Cute.  ^_^  It's not really clear if Angus stopped in that day or not -- since Faye says she hasn't seen him "in a few days" it means we've leapt forward a bit in time, comic-wise (it went Faye/Angus date night, then Hanners/Sven date night, followed by Hanners/Marigold chat morning, right?).  Granted, it's more likely that I was wrong in my prior speculation, since that's standard, and the context does suggest this might be their first face-to-face meeting since OMGMAKEOUTS.

What I want to know is, did Faye just embed the sword into the floor?  O_o  If so, there may be gouges all behind that counter.  Unless Faye just impaled her own foot and hasn't noticed yet . . .
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 13 Oct 2010, 10:48
Continuity integrity reestablished. Angus did come by the next day—we simply didn't see it.

Methinks Faye hasn't seen it too, then - seeing as to how she says "Hey, haven't seen you in a few days".
The awkwardness in panels three onward suggests that this is indeed their first time together after their First Date.

I concur with your dissection of the phrase "a lot". I do, however, see how languages that are actively used in everyday life, evolve.
And yes, sometimes in ways that hurt me too. But it's not something I think I can stop.
I dunno— I think Angus and Faye each seem perfectly capable of awkwardness that lasts for days. Who knows how long, or over how many meetings they can keep it going when their powers combine. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpXM9bj-WPU)

Actually, my issue comes not so much from wanting to stop the world as a lust for variety. One alot would not trouble me much. But what the delightful blog Heranje linked fails to mention is that alots apparently prefer to roam across essays in thundering herds.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 13 Oct 2010, 11:03
when their powers combine. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpXM9bj-WPU)

I stand flummoxed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 13 Oct 2010, 11:09
Gee, I thought that was going to link to a clip of the wonder twins there...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 13 Oct 2010, 13:48
I stand flummoxed.

Better sit down, then!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: tomart on 13 Oct 2010, 13:50
One alot would not trouble me much. But what the delightful blog Heranje linked fails to mention is that alots apparently prefer to roam across essays in thundering herds.

 I had a writing teacher who said, "It isn't a lot unless you can put a house on it."

Note: that "delightful blog" hyperboleandahalf, is one of those top 5 nerdygirl comics (along with QC) mentioned in a recent thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 13 Oct 2010, 14:14
Gee, I thought that was going to link to a clip of the wonder twins there...
Nah, I'm bringing out the rough stuff.

Angus, from an elite education, with the power to needlessly encourage arguments
Faye, from the Deep South, with the power of insecurity-driven bitchiness

When their powers combine, they form: Captain Awkward! A strange being with the ability to make any social interaction unbearably uncomfortable.

(You know, I love how they screwed the southern hemisphere on that show. Sure, Africa got the Earth guy, but South America got the little weasel with the awesome power of—Heart! When all else failed, I suppose he [or she—that's how definite an impression the character made on me] could hug, hug, hug the trouble away. And Australia, of course, got a kick in the crotch—no heroes, but as best I recall from the few times I watched, some of the villains sounded like they were Aussie.)

And the more I look at the strip, the less certain I am we can rule out they haven't met up at the shop before this—Angus could be referring to continuing awkwardness that he's just not worked himself up to comment on, simply because of, well, you know.

Such is the power of Captain Awkward.

I stand flummoxed.
Carl's right—sit down, maybe with a towel or newspapers under you. The flummox can loose the torrents at any time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 13 Oct 2010, 14:25
I stand flummoxed.
Better sit down, then!
I sit flummoxed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 13 Oct 2010, 14:34
RE: Captain Planet: I can't be the only one that thought Gaia was kinda hot, can I?

...I guess I was into older women even back then. Huh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 13 Oct 2010, 14:57
Dictionaries are intended primarily to record current usage, not original meaning.  So I looked up "lot" in: the Shorter Oxford - which gave the meaning "a great deal" in 11th position out of 11; Chambers - which gave that meaning 12th out of 18; and the Oxford Dictionary of English (their most recent large one-volume dictionary) - which gave that meaning in first position.  Me, I've used it that way all my life, and never been misunderstood.

You're fighting a losing battle, guys!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Stijn on 13 Oct 2010, 14:58
Captain Awkward
Surely not Dr. Awkward (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1u6As2FNgY)?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 13 Oct 2010, 15:33
You know, I love how they screwed the southern hemisphere on that show. Sure, Africa got the Earth guy, but South America got the little weasel with the awesome power of—Heart! When all else failed, I suppose he [or she—that's how definite an impression the character made on me] could hug, hug, hug the trouble away. And Australia, of course, got a kick in the crotch—no heroes, but as best I recall from the few times I watched, some of the villains sounded like they were Aussie.
While America gets two heroes of course. I guess Ted Turner doesn't think that Australia* exists,  or is a continent, or has an environment (it's just a desert filled with crazed bikers, right?), or something. Or maybe he just hates Aussies, which would be quite understandable since he had to fend off Alan Bond (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bond_(businessman)), a fairly wretched specimen, and a bunch of our yachties during the 1977 America's Cup defence. And the tiresome crims wouldn't take no for an answer, but kept coming back until they could tuck the cup in their swag.

*Or Antarctica for that matter, if the Planeteers were supposed to represent the continents.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 13 Oct 2010, 18:36
Marigold will react to the date by doing the following:

Trying to date Dale.    - 17 (25.8%)
Trying to date Sven.    - 15 (22.7%)
Trying to date Marten.    - 1 (1.5%)
Trying to date Jimbo.    - 4 (6.1%)
Keep chasing Hanners around her apartment.    - 13 (19.7%)
Asking for the sports section from Momo.    - 3 (4.5%)
Feed waffles to the asps.    - 3 (4.5%)
Having an elationship!    - 10 (15.2%)

Total Voters: 66
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Penquin47 on 13 Oct 2010, 19:50
There's five planeteers so you can have a Five-Man Band.  Two continents were going to get screwed because no one wants the Sixth Ranger.

Nobody lives full-time in Antarctica, much less is native to Antarctica.

North and South America are two completely separate continents.  You had to have an American in there (couldn't use a Native American, the American kid had to be the one everyone related to most because it's an American show), and since this was end-of-the-cold-war you had to have a Russian.  For racial diversity, you don't want a third white kid from Australia, and no American kid has even HEARD of Aboriginals, right?  So you have the Hispanic chick from South America, the black dude from Africa, and the Asian dude from... um, Asia.
(Is there a reason South American chick can't be from, say, Peru, and Asian dude from Japan or China, and African dude from, oh, Nigeria?)

*Note: opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily held by the poster.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: reeners on 13 Oct 2010, 20:03
I just love how it's common knowledge that when you see someone yell in all caps and bolded outside of the panel, it's definitely Dora.

Also, today's comic reminded me of this one: http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1663

yay first post! ~reeners
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Oct 2010, 21:43
Well, that's ONE way out of an awkward conversation.

I laughed hard.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 13 Oct 2010, 21:48
Faye defeats awkwardness with the power of Boobs (way stronger than Heart)!

Nobody lives full-time in Antarctica, much less is native to Antarctica.
Penguins. Antartica should have been represented by a penguin. With the power of eating fish. Kind of like Scooby-Doo, only environmentally conscious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: laizeohbeets on 13 Oct 2010, 21:51
Gee, I thought that was going to link to a clip of the wonder twins there...

Pretty sure any time I hear "With their powers combined," I instantly think of Captain Planet. I vaguely remember watching it and feeling indoctrinated when I was about 6 or 7. I think I just wanted to watch Chip & Dale Rescue Rangers instead.

Re: the comic: If boob-touching suggestions don't work, I find kissing the person to work just as well. Shuts 'em up and you get some nice makeout time in there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: MrDorman on 13 Oct 2010, 21:52
Is it just me or has Faye gotten a bit thiner lately?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Oct 2010, 21:55
According to her Twitter feed, she's been working out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 13 Oct 2010, 22:03
Goooooo, Angus! 

Mr. I'm-so-desperate-to-make-things-works-out-I'll-screw-it-up-worse. 

I still do that. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Magravan on 13 Oct 2010, 22:20
So... if Angus talks to much he gets to feel boobs? For some reason, I think that his text boxes are going to get pretty huge in the future :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 14 Oct 2010, 01:39
I think Cosette burning down CoD is both the most likely and the most Dora-angering catastrophe right now.




So... if Angus talks to much he gets to feel boobs? For some reason, I think that his text boxes are going to get pretty huge in the future :)
I fail to find a counterargument.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: no one special on 14 Oct 2010, 01:54
Angus: take the deal. 

Feel up, then shut up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 14 Oct 2010, 02:52
And the more I look at the strip, the less certain I am we can rule out they haven't met up at the shop before this—Angus could be referring to continuing awkwardness that he's just not worked himself up to comment on, simply because of, well, you know.

This was a possibility. But today, we learn that apparently, they haven't met since the Dora Incident.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mad Cat on 14 Oct 2010, 03:29
Better 4th panel:

Faye: What do I have to do to keep your mouth from talking?
Angus: ...

4.5th panel: [Faye and Angus in  passionate embrace, fervently face sucking]
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: bhtooefr on 14 Oct 2010, 04:39
What's next, the pretend I missed my period? WHAT WILL ROUND OUT THIS IMAGINARY LIFE EXPERIENCE?!?

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1119
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 14 Oct 2010, 05:29
I'll take that deal, or if my wife is reading, I will agree to talk about feelings etc if I get the opportunity to .....
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: tut21 on 14 Oct 2010, 06:17
It's not nice of Pintsize to eavesdrop on their conversation.  :-)
(http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/8840/pintsize.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 14 Oct 2010, 07:54
For once, a QC strip that features something that has actually happened to me. Only not in an alleyway. Still, I can attest it's a very effective ploy.

What's next, the pretend I missed my period? WHAT WILL ROUND OUT THIS IMAGINARY LIFE EXPERIENCE?!?

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1119

By George, I'd forgotten about that. Since Jeph doesn't repeat gags not involving flatulence, that's out, I suppose. Maybe Hanners will activate the bfbot and program it to go threaten to beat Sven up for messing with its girl. (Or maybe Winslow will hijack the thing and do it for real. It's possible he'd got some trigger, just like the C'thuloid thing, to 'defend' Hannelore from the crusty gender. You know, us.)

There's five planeteers so you can have a Five-Man Band.  Two continents were going to get screwed because no one wants the Sixth Ranger.

Nobody lives full-time in Antarctica, much less is native to Antarctica.

North and South America are two completely separate continents.  You had to have an American in there (couldn't use a Native American, the American kid had to be the one everyone related to most because it's an American show), and since this was end-of-the-cold-war you had to have a Russian.  For racial diversity, you don't want a third white kid from Australia, and no American kid has even HEARD of Aboriginals, right?  So you have the Hispanic chick from South America, the black dude from Africa, and the Asian dude from... um, Asia.
(Is there a reason South American chick can't be from, say, Peru, and Asian dude from Japan or China, and African dude from, oh, Nigeria?)

*Note: opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily held by the poster.
Dude. I'm not a fan by any means, but even I know the Asian GIRL was from Asia. That's why the South American whatsit's gender is unclear to me; two guys, two girls and HEART! I suppose it's possible the character was supposed to be transgender.

Don't remember them playing in a band, either. (You may be joking, but there was a time that it seemed nearly every group of animated kids had a band, no matter how ludicrous the idea seemed, so I can't rule it out.)

And the more I look at the strip, the less certain I am we can rule out they haven't met up at the shop before this—Angus could be referring to continuing awkwardness that he's just not worked himself up to comment on, simply because of, well, you know.

This was a possibility. But today, we learn that apparently, they haven't met since the Dora Incident.
No, today we learn that they haven't discussed Dora's meltdown until now. I'm not saying you're wrong, just that there's nothing really conclusive. Faye perhaps couldn't leave the counter on Angus's last visit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Blyss on 14 Oct 2010, 08:33
*Couldn't find a good clip of Conway Twitty's version


**is somewhat embarrassed that I know there IS a Conway Twitty version...

So... if Angus talks to much he gets to feel boobs? For some reason, I think that his text boxes are going to get pretty huge in the future :)

Do we go with the idea that they'll get the size in proper proportion to the amount of boob he gets to feel?  Because in the case of Faye's boobs, the text boxes will cover the comic completely.




Just sayin...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 14 Oct 2010, 08:46
No, today we learn that they haven't discussed Dora's meltdown until now. I'm not saying you're wrong, just that there's nothing really conclusive. Faye perhaps couldn't leave the counter on Angus's last visit.

Again, this is technically possible. But it IS becoming more far-fetched each minute.
Er, each comic.
Which means each day.
Well.

Anyway, it's not important enough to loose sleep over.

In other news, I wonder if Faye considers this winning in both ways: she gets Angus to fondle her boobs, and to shut him up.
I doubt if it's going to work, though... methinks Angus is a trifle too anxious for that right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 14 Oct 2010, 09:13
The last panel today (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1774) reminds me of Marten's complaint at the end of this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=416).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 14 Oct 2010, 09:21
I dunno!  Have you known many guys too anxious to fondle boobs when invited to?  Never a problem I've observed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 14 Oct 2010, 09:36
I dunno!  Have you known many guys too anxious to fondle boobs when invited to?  Never a problem I've observed.

Not many, but definitely more than one (which, according to a recently discussed definition, is 'a lot').
I'd have been one.
It depends on the occasion and the situation, but when, in a situation like this, it is offered as "a way to shut one up", as in "I am willing to let you fondle my boobs if that is what it takes to shut you up", I'd definitely have been too anxious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 14 Oct 2010, 09:48
Bahaha!  Excellent punchline.  I like that in panel 5, Angus' hands, raised in a gesture of capitulation, are in approximately the position they'd be in for boob grabbage.  ^_^  It's kind of a coin toss whether he'll go for it or be all "Are you sure?  I mean, I want to touch them, but I don't want you to feel like you have to offer yourself --" at which point Faye would bonk him on the head.

I kind of want next strip to conclude with someone walking in (out?  since they're in the alley) on them with Angus still latched onto Faye's boobs.  Of course, now that I've typed that out, IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.  >_>

I just love how it's common knowledge that when you see someone yell in all caps and bolded outside of the panel, it's definitely Dora.

Also, today's comic reminded me of this one: http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1663

yay first post! ~reeners

Dora is definitely the first culprit who springs to mind, but it helps that the context is that they're in CoD and she's the boss.  Also, welcome!

Faye defeats awkwardness with the power of Boobs (way stronger than Heart)!

Behold, the power of Boobs.  Certainly sounds more fun than the power of cheese.  And if Faye's are as epic as Sven says -- oh Angus, they say the first taste is free . . .  Although, if actual tasting is involved, they might want to find an alternate location since the alley is a teeny bit public and Faye doesn't even have the broadsword to fend off other would-be boob enthusiasts.  Aaaaand now I'm picturing a zombie apocalypse, except instead of brains, the zombies crave -- yeah, I'm just going away now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: AsinineAxioms on 14 Oct 2010, 11:39
Faye's certainly loosened up a bit. Maybe she finally give in and bought one of these (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1380).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: srpilha on 14 Oct 2010, 12:32
It's not nice of Pintsize to eavesdrop on their conversation.  :-)

shocked meter is shocked  :-P

also it somehow went up during the strip, so heavens know what's going on inside.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 14 Oct 2010, 13:18
Faye's certainly loosened up a bit. Maybe she finally give in and bought one of these (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1380).
Wait, what's the first thing in the Home Bondage Kit?
I can make out "includes sl***, cuffs and crop!" but I can't figure out the mystery word; is it sling?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 14 Oct 2010, 13:21
Faye's certainly loosened up a bit. Maybe she finally give in and bought one of these (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1380).

Not on her  salary. 

Besides, she's expecting Angus to fill that position...

... and I'll apologize now, right before you groan. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Coco on 14 Oct 2010, 13:34
Quote
Don't remember them playing in a band, either. (You may be joking, but there was a time that it seemed nearly every group of animated kids had a band, no matter how ludicrous the idea seemed, so I can't rule it out.)

I believe he may have been talking about this kind of five man band.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FiveManBand

also this
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FiveTokenBand

"The cast of Captain Planet And The Planeteers takes this to its most logical extreme — every member of the band is from a different continent. But no Aussies. Or penguins, for that matter.
Also, subtle Fridge Brilliance. For Europe, they had a large portion of the continent that was on good terms with America to choose from. Instead, they went with the Soviet Union (tagline later changed to "Former Soviet Union" and then simply to "Eastern Europe")."

Not sure if this is appropriate for my first post, but I couldn't let this continue to go uncorrected. Heart was a boy and he had a pet monkey. I think he could communicate with animals somehow? I guess the power of heart makes you an empath. I watched that show all the time, though I clearly can't remember much about it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 14 Oct 2010, 13:46
OK, to set the record straight: Heart was pretty much straight up mind control. You basically have to give that to a naive kid or it could get way out of hand. Seriously, the resolution to almost every conflict could easily have been "the four 'cool' Planeteers blaze away with their flashy elemental powers, doing almost nothing, until Ma-ti turns up and mind-rapes the 'bad guys' into submission."
Summoning the embodiment of nature's raw power to just blow shit up was the soft option.

Imagine that kind of power in the hands of the fire guy and his endless attempts to get into the water girl's pants.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: AsinineAxioms on 14 Oct 2010, 13:55
Not on her  salary. 

Besides, she's expecting Angus to fill that position...

... and I'll apologize now, right before you groan. 
It does not matter how good Angus is in bed; he cannot possibly compete with non-Euclidean geometry. (http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/stu/media/geometry_hyperbolic.jpg) :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 14 Oct 2010, 14:43
OK, to set the record straight: Heart was pretty much straight up mind control. You basically have to give that to a naive kid or it could get way out of hand. Seriously, the resolution to almost every conflict could easily have been "the four 'cool' Planeteers blaze away with their flashy elemental powers, doing almost nothing, until Ma-ti turns up and mind-rapes the 'bad guys' into submission."
Summoning the embodiment of nature's raw power to just blow shit up was the soft option.

Imagine that kind of power in the hands of the fire guy and his endless attempts to get into the water girl's pants.
That last comment tells me you clearly paid better attention than I did to the show. I can go with the rest of it, though. Somewhat like Power Pack when Katie Power was the nuclear option of the team, more or less,
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: The Duke on 14 Oct 2010, 14:58
It's not nice of Pintsize to eavesdrop on their conversation.  :-)

<pic>


Mind.  Blown.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 14 Oct 2010, 15:44
Imagine that kind of power in the hands of the fire guy and his endless attempts to get into the water girl's pants.
Actually the Wheeler (the white American fire guy) was always trying to get into Linka's (the white Russian wind girl) pants. The girl with the power of water was "Asian" after all...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 14 Oct 2010, 16:08
*checks forum*

*thinks:are they stillgoing on about Captain Planet?*

*scrolls down*

*thinks: Yep, sure are.*

*navigates away from page*











God I hated that show...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 14 Oct 2010, 16:09
I didn't watch Captain Planet. I was too busy being an adult. And wondering why they were editing my old Warner Brothers cartoons.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 14 Oct 2010, 16:19
Imagine that kind of power in the hands of the fire guy and his endless attempts to get into the water girl's pants.
Actually the Wheeler (the white American fire guy) was always trying to get into Linka's (the white Russian wind girl) pants. The girl with the power of water was "Asian" after all...
Eh. I knew it was the Russian girl, I just got their elements mixed up, mostly because they mostly did exactly the same shit (look, a water spout! Look, a whirlwind!), only one was coloured "cartoon water blue" in places.
On another topic, I sense, uh...tension, behind the scare quotes around Asian up there...

I didn't watch Captain Planet. I was too busy being an adult. And wondering why they were editing my old Warner Brothers cartoons.
Oh man, I miss the good old stuff. Stupid moral panic dweebs killed the fine art of cartoon slapstick. I mean, have you seen the new stuff? All they do is chase each other now, no frying pans to the face or explosives in the food any more. :(
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Graphite on 14 Oct 2010, 16:22
And while there was an element of "mind control" there, I always got the impression that Ma'ti's power was just mind-to-mind communication with nonverbal animals. It was never made entirely clear whether they would always do what he asked them to, because of his being a representative of the goodness of Gaia or whatever, but it always came off to me like his power enabled him to ask favours of the animal folk, who were likely to comply because he just needed them so much and asked so gosh darn nicely. Probably the most dastardly thing you could do with a power like that would be convincing the villains they had schizophrenia.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: I.Ron Nickerson on 14 Oct 2010, 16:34
*checks forum*

*thinks:are they stillgoing on about Captain Planet?*

*scrolls down*

*thinks: Yep, sure are.*

*navigates away from page*

God I hated that show...

Worst show ever.   
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 14 Oct 2010, 17:03
*checks forum*

*thinks:are they stillgoing on about Captain Planet?*

*scrolls down*

*thinks: Yep, sure are.*

*navigates away from page*

God I hated that show...

Worst show ever.   

I'm sorry to do this, but it's completely the truth:

THIS.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 14 Oct 2010, 17:29
I didn't watch Captain Planet. I was too busy being an adult. And wondering why they were editing my old Warner Brothers cartoons.

I was in High school when CP was on the air, so I didn't watch it very much, but my younger brothers always watched the damned thing, mainly because they knew I hated it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mad Cat on 14 Oct 2010, 19:19
Quote
Marten squeezing Sven's butt.      - 15 (31.3%)

Oh, come ON! Likelihood, people! Think about the likelihood! The first option is much more likely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 14 Oct 2010, 20:01
I didn't watch Captain Planet. I was too busy being an adult. And wondering why they were editing my old Warner Brothers cartoons.

guys, nostalgia aside - most cartoons from the 70s sucked.  Although I've always had a soft spot for Velma, even before I understood why.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: foolsguinea on 14 Oct 2010, 20:18
He said, "Warner Brothers cartoons." Like Bugs & Daffy. Not the 1970's Hanna-Barbera crud.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: ysth on 14 Oct 2010, 20:56
Angus: take the deal. 

Feel up, then shut up.
Not the correct choice.  Not taking the deal is also not the correct choice.  He's screwed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 14 Oct 2010, 21:13
Personally, I was a fan of the old Popeye cartoons that were done by Segar, before the 40's.  When they started the cheap animation tricks and introduced the nephews (peepeye, pipeye, pupeye, and yes, poopeye) it really went downhill.  And anything with Betty Boop.  The Disney Silly Symphonies were pretty good, too.  

What? I grew up near a revival theatre, they showed black and white cartoon reels before the features, which were usually the Marx Brothers, Abbot & Costello, Topper, the Nick and Nora mysteries, and a lot great deal of film noir.  I'm pretty sure I was the only person under 12 in the theatre.  

Besides, even my baby brother was too old for Captain Planet.  It sounds really bad.  Environmental morality doesn't belong in cartoons.  

More giant hammers. less saving the earth.  
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 14 Oct 2010, 21:15
I thought Faye was taking a photo at first.

Also, I wouldn't expect Angus of all people to take an offer like that seriously... or Faye to actually follow through with the not-murdering.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zagraf on 14 Oct 2010, 21:15
My gut reaction to tonight's comic was "Creeeeeeepy," but Faye was the one who suggested this, so.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: celticgeek on 14 Oct 2010, 21:16
But Angus did shut up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 14 Oct 2010, 21:18
Angus is in Heaven   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 14 Oct 2010, 21:19
Sorry to double post, but the comic updated while I was posting. 

Glassy eyed Angus!  Time dilation (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1494) is now in effect. 

But it worked, he can't think of anything to say...

And yeah, I thought Faye was taking a photo for proof (or to update her facebook status)!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 14 Oct 2010, 21:25
Smooth Angus, real, real smooth.


Somebody get that man a Colt 45!





And yes, what happened here is still MUCH less awkward than what would have happened if She had told him what she told Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: bicostp on 14 Oct 2010, 21:31
Every time I look at that electric meter all I see is this:

(http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7541/meter.png) = (http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/4930/mmmmmmeterface.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Ferahgo the Assassin on 14 Oct 2010, 22:22
...As a representative of straight female readers, I was very disappointed that the panels ended at Angus's waist in this strip.

Sigh... pants boners > boobs. More pandering to female readers and less to males, c'mon Jeph!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 14 Oct 2010, 22:33
I thought Faye was taking a photo at first.

Ha!  I kinda hope she accidentally took one . . .

...As a representative of straight female readers, I was very disappointed that the panels ended at Angus's waist in this strip.

Sigh... pants boners > boobs. More pandering to female readers and less to males, c'mon Jeph!

This makes me envision a sign to be posted by Dora in the alley: No TENT-PITCHING.

I particularly liked that Faye was blushing at first and then just acclimated.  Angus' reverence is hilarious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 14 Oct 2010, 22:53
I guess Faye uses her cellphone as a pocket-watch (she certainly doesn't wear a wristwatch)? Or maybe she uses its countdown timer function to time her lunchbreak? I use mine all the time, to time all sorts of things.

I think Angus is having a religious experience. But... A slightly feeble end of the week strip?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 14 Oct 2010, 23:00
Ah, a man who knows how to savor the priceless moments. The second time is wonderful, and every one she allows you afterward a privilege and a joy—but there's just no recapturing that first touch o' boob.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 14 Oct 2010, 23:01
<insert sound of hysterical laughter, brought about by today's comic>

The comic title is truly the cherry on the cake.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 14 Oct 2010, 23:05
I guess Faye uses her cellphone as a pocket-watch (she certainly doesn't wear a wristwatch)?

Evidently so.
See, we folks who grew up in the pre-cell phone era (in case you wonder: yes, there WAS such a thing as the pre-cell phone era), are all too accustomed to glancing at our left wrist. Apparently, people under thirty do not have that left-wrist reflex anymore.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 14 Oct 2010, 23:07
Faye's not breaking down into Panic Attack Mode.  I'm impressed.

Though the way Angus is just standing there, you'd think he's never touched a boob before.  
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: no one special on 14 Oct 2010, 23:23
Somewhat like Power Pack when Katie Power was the nuclear option of the team, more or less,
hahaha this.  If she'd actually realized what she could really do, the consequences might have been... extremely bloody.

I was in High school when CP was on the air
This could be taken in a really, really, really disturbing way.


re: today's comic:
WOW.  Faye must really be into Angus, especailly considering how protective she is of her boobs.  No freaking out, no punching - it's almost like she...trusts...him.  CRAZY!

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: lts on 14 Oct 2010, 23:36
I've found that this comic works just as well in backwards as it does forwards

(http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/7264/angusfaye.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: no one special on 14 Oct 2010, 23:42
WHOA, it totally does!!  Nice find  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 15 Oct 2010, 00:12
How weird !

I never thought that its possible that touching a womans breast could feel like a medical exam.

Here it actually does !


@lts: Hey, the inverse version is BETTER than the original ! :D



Though the way Angus is just standing there, you'd think he's never touched a boob before. 
I think its because Faye has such a great rack.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: westrim on 15 Oct 2010, 00:20
It's weird how she took out her phone and I instantly recognized that she was checking time, not making a call. What an interesting world we live in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: squishything on 15 Oct 2010, 00:36
Wow, that was oddly... hot. the inverted version even more so. Groping while making out is all good, but by making it into just-groping, it seems even hotter. Must convince the SO to let me do this...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 00:54
It's weird how she took out her phone and I instantly recognized that she was checking time, not making a call. What an interesting world we live in.
'
This has me wondering... if you'd show a movie to a group of teens in which someone looks at his left wrist and then says "God, it's 9:30 already! we gotta go..." or something of that ilk, how many of the teens would think "why the bleep is he looking at his left wrist, and how does he suddenly realize it's 9:30??!?"

:D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: keeperoflore on 15 Oct 2010, 01:05
looking at the time isnt the first thing i would think of if i saw someone look at their wrist, mostly because i use a pocketwatch instead of a wristwatch
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: J on 15 Oct 2010, 01:40
as do i. every time i have ever had a wrist watch i'v ended up carrying it in my pocket most of the time, so it just made sense.

though incidentally, when i did wear one, it was always on my right wrist. which i attribute to being right handed. however all ya'll specifying the left is making me wonder if that was unusual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 01:45
I've been the only one mentioning the left wrist up to now. But yes, it is usual to wear your watch on the left wrist. The only two people I know who wear it on the right wrist are lefties...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Olymander on 15 Oct 2010, 02:55
And yes, what happened here is still MUCH less awkward than what would have happened if She had told him what she told Marten.

Um, what did she tell Marten?

And I wear my watch on my right wrist, but that's because I fence(d) left handed.  You don't really want a watch out there where a sword can catch on it.  I also wear my watch in that odd girly inside-of-the-wrist position for double the out-of-the-ordinary fun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 03:01
And yes, what happened here is still MUCH less awkward than what would have happened if She had told him what she told Marten.

Um, what did she tell Marten?
I think akronnick is referring to Boxergate (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1740)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 15 Oct 2010, 03:17
Yes, "A funny thing happened to me after our date—I had a panic attack over it" is probably not a relationship builder. Unless, of course, the second party has a peculiar sort of ego.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Olymander on 15 Oct 2010, 03:35
Mmm.  I don't know.  Given where things were going in panel 4 or 5 of #1774 (http://"http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1774"), it might have turned out ok.  Well, maybe if Faye was feeling a bit more confident and proactive.  It would have been Angus going, "Wow, ok, I'll give you a bit more space and time" and then Faye going "shut up and kiss me" or something like that.  Then again, since her whole conversation with Marten was about being scared about screwing it up... I dunno.  I guess the question is if she's been scared out of being aggressive... although the whole "letting you touch my boobs if you'll shut up" would seem to imply a certain aggressiveness in and of itself.  I'm not nearly as good at analyzing people as you guys are.  I'm more of an "understanding where you're coming from" person myself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Somebody on 15 Oct 2010, 03:40
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOBOOBS!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 15 Oct 2010, 03:52
I think akronnick is referring to Boxergate (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1740)

You are correct, sir.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Nontoxic on 15 Oct 2010, 05:18
I've been the only one mentioning the left wrist up to now. But yes, it is usual to wear your watch on the left wrist. The only two people I know who wear it on the right wrist are lefties...

Not sure how I know this, but the reason to wear your watch on your non-dominant wrist is so you can write and look at your watch at the same time.

I lost my left-wrist reflex when I started working at my first job. I was always catching my watch on things and trying to tear my hand off, so I started with the cellphone trick.

Regarding the comic: Does Faye look bored after about panel 2?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 05:25
I've been the only one mentioning the left wrist up to now. But yes, it is usual to wear your watch on the left wrist. The only two people I know who wear it on the right wrist are lefties...
Not sure how I know this, but the reason to wear your watch on your non-dominant wrist is so you can write and look at your watch at the same time.
I think the idea is, you do so many more things with your dominant hand, chances are that, if you wear your watch on that hand, you'd catch things with your watch a lot several lots** more than when you wear it on your non-dominant* hand

*) I don't think I'd get away with calling that 'your submissive hand', but as a stoopit forrinner, I couldn't come up with anything better than non-dominant.
**) Sorry, Raoul.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 15 Oct 2010, 05:34
Regarding the comic: Does Faye look bored after about panel 2?
Well ... she loses the red in her face.

So she's no longer super embarrassed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Nontoxic on 15 Oct 2010, 05:34
It was mostly from carrying things, which I use both hands for. I'm sure if it were on my right wrist (which is a concept that is utterly unnatural), I would no longer have my right (write?) hand.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 05:38
looking at the time isnt the first thing i would think of if i saw someone look at their wrist, mostly because i use a pocketwatch instead of a wristwatch

Are you secretly Wil? If not, are you employed at The Horrible Revelation? If not, you should be!

I have a pocket watch too. It's just that I don't have the proper attire to wear it with.

My wife says I collect watches. She''s probably right. I say she collects shoes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 05:40
right (write?) hand.

Haha. "Amirite?" "Yes, you're write."
Welcome to the Land where left is right, and right is wrong.
(with apologies to Kaz Lux)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Oct 2010, 06:13
Wow, that was oddly... hot. the inverted version even more so. Groping while making out is all good, but by making it into just-groping, it seems even hotter. Must convince the SO to let me do this...



...You mean you guys don't do this all the time?


Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Oct 2010, 06:16
What will push Dora over the edge?

Hannelore going out on a "real date" with Sven.    - 12 (18.8%)
Sven making out with Marigold.    - 9 (14.1%)
Cosette burning down CoD.    - 11 (17.2%)
Marten squeezing Sven's butt.    - 18 (28.1%)
Faye and Angus making out on the counter.    - 4 (6.3%)
Penelope discovering she really IS Pizza Girl.    - 1 (1.6%)
Getting into an Elationship with Tai.    - 4 (6.3%)
Jimbo throwing up on the counter.    - 0 (0%)
Waffle House.    - 5 (7.8%)

Total Voters: 64
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 15 Oct 2010, 06:39
And I wear my watch on my right wrist, but that's because I fence(d) left handed.  You don't really want a watch out there where a sword can catch on it.  I also wear my watch in that odd girly inside-of-the-wrist position for double the out-of-the-ordinary fun.

Unless you fence sabre, wouldn't your watch be safer under the cuff of your glove?

Left wrist for me, except for several years when I wore a watch that hung from my belt.  It was "upside down" so if you were sitting all you had to do was glance down to see the time, no hands involved.  When I was a kid, all New York City bus drivers had watches like that.  Alas, I am now too corpulent.

And, for you less-young folks, have you ever encountered young people who cannot read an analog clock face?  Or are flummoxed when you give them the time as "a quarter to..."?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 15 Oct 2010, 06:47
I am surprised I seem to be the only one so far who thinks the actual boob touching was much funnier than the proclamation of her before that she would allow him doing it (at which time I tought it was only a figure of speech) or her complaint she would soon need to return to work (which, to me, was just an added joke to round up the strip) ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 15 Oct 2010, 06:49
I am not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: J on 15 Oct 2010, 08:49
And I wear my watch on my right wrist, but that's because I fence(d) left handed.  You don't really want a watch out there where a sword can catch on it.  I also wear my watch in that odd girly inside-of-the-wrist position for double the out-of-the-ordinary fun.

as i understand it, infantry soldiers wear it like that to avoid night flashes off the reflective surface of the face.

also, one would think that it would be a good idea to take the watch off entirely for fencing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Oct 2010, 08:54
My son takes his off for playing the piano.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: celticgeek on 15 Oct 2010, 09:00
I no longer wear a watch, depending on my cell phone and the ubiquity of clocks for timekeeping purposes, but when I did wear one, I wore it with the dial on the inside of my wrist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Jerein on 15 Oct 2010, 09:18
I don't see what's so hot about just putting your hands on her boobs.  A huge part of my enjoyment about touching a girl's breasts is bringing her pleasure at doing so, and there's nothing really pleasurable about just putting your hands lightly there.  C'mon Angus, you're in a back alley, knead those suckers!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: The Duke on 15 Oct 2010, 09:45
When I used to have a watch, I had to switch it to my left wrist to play guitar.

Faye's not breaking down into Panic Attack Mode.  I'm impressed.

Though the way Angus is just standing there, you'd think he's never touched a boob before.  

Dude.  They're Faye's boobs.  Even if he has, with Faye's it would seem like the first time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 15 Oct 2010, 10:11
And if it (or anything, really) doesn't feel like the first time all over again with a new person, chances are you're doing it wrong.

Left wrist for the watch, and the face on the inside of the wrist. Don't ask me why I do that, because I actually can't remember. ANd if possible, the watch comes off for serious typing.

I think the idea is, you do so many more things with your dominant hand, chances are that, if you wear your watch on that hand, you'd catch things with your watch much more often than when you wear it on your non-dominant* hand
No charge. :-) And, so far as I know, (see below) non-dominant is the correct term. Makes more sense than secondary, anyway, given there isn't (hopefully) a tertiary.
(Also, welcome to the Borg of languages. If English sees another language and likes something it has, it attacks, subdues, takes the 'good' part and assimilates, something at which it's often less than successful—for example, even after all these years, it's still chewing on a vowel shift. A joy to all who attempt to learn it as a second, third, or whathaveyou language, and the reason some of us try not to stop this, but to put on the brakes a bit so we English speakers can at least pretend to understand one another when we write.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: ems on 15 Oct 2010, 10:16
I'm one of those oddities who wear watches on their right wrist and write with their right hand. I don't wear them anymore, due to having a tiny wrist and wanting a small watch face with a leather strap instead of metal (I'm allergic to most of the metals that come with watches). I also keep the watch face on the outside, not the inside, so I guess I'm masculine that way? *shrug* I also used to wear watches when I didn't feel like it was weighing me down (wow, I am weird if I think a simple 2 oz watch will weigh me down) and I'm of the cell phone era. So I guess I'm just an oddity. Not that I care or anything, it's kinda funny.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 15 Oct 2010, 10:56
Raoul I believe you are mistaken - the English language is EXTREMELY successful at beating other languages up and taking what it wants - witness such commonplace terms as "Thug".  English being the unholy mating of a Latin-based language and a germanic based language it is somewhat understandable that it may still have a few issues to work through, but with love, patience and a little extra work...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: bunnyThor on 15 Oct 2010, 11:53
I think Angus is having a religious experience. But... A slightly feeble end of the week strip?

Would you expect better from Angus McPheeble?  :|
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 15 Oct 2010, 12:22
Left hand facing out, and the watch face lights up so I can tell the time when I wake up in an absolute panic in the dark.  I'm too nearsighted to see the alarm clock. 

This is actually unususal since I'm left handed. 

Except for writing, which is why it's totally illegible. 

No, it's not digital.  I collect actual wind-up clocks, it's bad enough I can't afford a winding watch that would last.  I miss the watch I had with an accurate moon-phase - I still have it, but it's unreparable. 

BunnyThor, this is for you;

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4124/5084010071_709880d95c_m.jpg)

And I agree with Jerein, this really shouldn't be such a one-sisded experience, although Faye was  somewhat flushed at first.  I think that's why I agree, the reversed version is better! 

Someone mail that to Jeph, will you? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 15 Oct 2010, 13:15
Raoul I believe you are mistaken - the English language is EXTREMELY successful at beating other languages up and taking what it wants - witness such commonplace terms as "Thug".  English being the unholy mating of a Latin-based language and a germanic based language it is somewhat understandable that it may still have a few issues to work through, but with love, patience and a little extra work...
Sometimes English doesn't have to take.  If you've ever worked with South Asian people with imperfect English, you would learn all kinds of expressions you never learned in school.  My favorite is the opposite of "postpone" - "prepone" meaning to perform a task ahead of schedule.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 15 Oct 2010, 15:57
If you live in the U.S., you don't have to travel nearly that far to find people who speak imperfect English, or to hear them use invented words you'll never hear in school.

And Border, I simply meant English isn't always the best at the assimilation part. Does make for really intense spelling bees, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Team Venture on 15 Oct 2010, 16:25
I don't see what's so hot about just putting your hands on her boobs.  A huge part of my enjoyment about touching a girl's breasts is bringing her pleasure at doing so, and there's nothing really pleasurable about just putting your hands lightly there.  C'mon Angus, you're in a back alley, knead those suckers!

No! No kneading, for the love of god. Nothing more uncomfortable than a guy kneading your boobs. God, the bad memories (or should I say mammories - ba dum psh!). It's not pleasurable, it feels a friggin' breast exam or something. They're delicate, okay? Although to be fair, it may just be me who hates it (any other girls want to weigh in?).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Oct 2010, 16:34
If you live in the U.S., you don't have to travel nearly that far to find people who speak imperfect English, or to hear them use invented words you'll never hear in school.

Yah dere hey, ain'a?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Olymander on 15 Oct 2010, 16:45

Unless you fence sabre, wouldn't your watch be safer under the cuff of your glove?

Left wrist for me, except for several years when I wore a watch that hung from my belt.  It was "upside down" so if you were sitting all you had to do was glance down to see the time, no hands involved.  When I was a kid, all New York City bus drivers had watches like that.  Alas, I am now too corpulent.

And, for you less-young folks, have you ever encountered young people who cannot read an analog clock face?  Or are flummoxed when you give them the time as "a quarter to..."?

I mostly fenced epee and foil, and the problem with putting it under your glove is that it will still raise as a bump for a tip to catch on.  Well, at least with my watch, which has a metal band.  I suppose a thinner leather or resin band might be better in that respect, although if I wore it conventionally with the face outwards, then you'd have to worry about the tip catching on the body.

As for people unable to read an analog clock face, I've met a few, but most of them were tolerably old, as in twenty to thirty year-olds.

as i understand it, infantry soldiers wear it like that to avoid night flashes off the reflective surface of the face.

also, one would think that it would be a good idea to take the watch off entirely for fencing.

A surprising number of the places I fenced didn't have ready access to timepieces, so if you wanted to know what time it was, you'd have to ask someone who kept their watch, or be forever running back to your gear to check on the time.  Your offhand is generally fairly safe, at least when it comes to formal fencing.  Now, if you do SCA or Ampguard style fighting, it's a completely different story...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 15 Oct 2010, 17:07
Random trivia: in France, for some reason, the practice of wearing a watch with the display inside is strongly associated with nurses. It probably has some basis in reality, because if you think about it, it's convenient for checking a patient's pulse using just one hand.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 15 Oct 2010, 21:12
Left wrist for the watch, and the face on the inside of the wrist. Don't ask me why I do that, because I actually can't remember. And if possible, the watch comes off for serious typing.
I wear a wristwatch, on the left wrist, with the face on the outside. I've never thought of wearing a watch on the inside of the wrist as "girly", and indeed I don't think I've ever met a female who did wear her watch that way. I do own more than one watch, to suit different outfits, which is probably more common among girls. Like Raoul, I take my watch off to work at a computer, because the buckle/clasp scrapes and catches on the edge of the desk.

I suspect the idea that "young people" can't read analogue clock dials (or would be puzzled by a wristwatch) is just an ephebophobic urban legend. Dial clocks are still pretty common, and the toy-shops here are all well-stocked with those teaching-clocks on which we probably all learned to tell time. One thing I do find irritating is people who can't (or at least won't) understand time in 24-hour format. Twelve-hour format is fine for everyday, casual use, but not when scheduling events across multiple countries, in several time-zones, with various daylight-saving rules, in hemispheres with reversed seasons so that daylight-saving-time changes go in opposite directions. Frankly, I'd prefer to use a single fixed time reference like Zulu time, so everyone only has to worry about their own single local offset, but no... Instead I'd get e-mails from colleagues in America telling me that some system was going down for maintenance at "12pm EST". In July. And they'd get all butt-hurt when I replied asking: "Do you really mean EST, or would that be EDT seeing as it's your summer? And by the way, is that 12pm noon or midnight?" I mean OK, some of these systems only processed transactions worth millions of dollars an hour, and kept factories running (and workers in jobs) on five continents, so it's not like they were important or anything! EEE-HAH EEE-HAH! (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=755) No, I'm not bitter! But I don't work for that branch of Global Despoilation Inc. any more either.
 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 15 Oct 2010, 22:07
Breathe, Akima, breathe...






In throught the nose...







And out the mouth...
















Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 15 Oct 2010, 22:56
I suspect the idea that "young people" can't read analogue clock dials (or would be puzzled by a wristwatch) is just an ephebophobic urban legend. Dial clocks are still pretty common, and the toy-shops here are all well-stocked with those teaching-clocks on which we probably all learned to tell time.

Think that all you like, but it's true. Certainly not for all 'young people,' but for some, yes. Colleagues of mine report that when the local high (secondary) school's schedule is disrupted in any way, some students students get completely disoriented. If, for example, a 'pep-rally' (if you don't know what this is, you ain't missing much) is scheduled in the middle of the day instead of at the end as is usual, at every bell that rings after the disruption these students express the joyous belief* that it's time to go home, despite the fact that every room and most of the hallways are fitted with large, analog clocks, and they're well aware it's not a 'short' day. Of course, cell phones are banned at this school, which may be part of the problem.

I'll hazard a guess that with some, the real problem is that a glance at an analog clock yields no information—concentrated study is required, since they rarely use the skill. But there are others who have little to no sense of time, period. Friends and I call them 'the timeless people.' If you've hired one of them to do some yardwork, etc., it's well to know this, as 'show up at four' is not likely to produce good results. "Come by right after school" works better. Summers can be trying.

*No, they're not just playing the odds that the teacher will buy it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 15 Oct 2010, 23:11
These kids today with their boogie-woogie music and their digital watches...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Kugai on 15 Oct 2010, 23:41
I no longer wear a watch simply because in recent years I have found my wrist gets irritated and itchy regardless what type of strap I use.  I've gotten used to using my mobile whenever I want to know what time it is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 15 Oct 2010, 23:41
Quote
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 16 Oct 2010, 00:00
Quote
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Claim your internet, sir!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 16 Oct 2010, 00:05
Why, thank you! 

I don't see what's so hot about just putting your hands on her boobs.  A huge part of my enjoyment about touching a girl's breasts is bringing her pleasure at doing so, and there's nothing really pleasurable about just putting your hands lightly there.  C'mon Angus, you're in a back alley, knead those suckers!

No! No kneading, for the love of god. Nothing more uncomfortable than a guy kneading your boobs. God, the bad memories (or should I say mammories - ba dum psh!). It's not pleasurable, it feels a friggin' breast exam or something. They're delicate, okay? Although to be fair, it may just be me who hates it (any other girls want to weigh in?).

Not a girl (last I checked), but I'll weigh in. 

No kneading.  Doesn't seem like it's be comfortable.  Stroking, yes; perhaps tracing intricate designs with the tips of one's fingernails; or a few other gentler things that will be left to your imagination...

but kneading is to fondling like motorboating is to a well-placed kiss - it's overkill, and at best breaks the mood. 

So is this second base (http://xkcd.com/540/)? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 16 Oct 2010, 00:14
One thing I do find irritating is people who can't (or at least won't) understand time in 24-hour format. Twelve-hour format is fine for everyday, casual use, but not when scheduling events across multiple countries, in several time-zones, with various daylight-saving rules, in hemispheres with reversed seasons so that daylight-saving-time changes go in opposite directions. Frankly, I'd prefer to use a single fixed time reference like Zulu time, so everyone only has to worry about their own single local offset, but no... Instead I'd get e-mails from colleagues in America telling me that some system was going down for maintenance at "12pm EST". In July. And they'd get all butt-hurt when I replied asking: "Do you really mean EST, or would that be EDT seeing as it's your summer? And by the way, is that 12pm noon or midnight?" I mean OK, some of these systems only processed transactions worth millions of dollars an hour, and kept factories running (and workers in jobs) on five continents, so it's not like they were important or anything!

I work for a global company that standardizes to US Eastern Time because that is where the corporate headquarters and primary data center are.  I gave up the EDT / EST battle long ago, and just use ET.  I am stubborn and surly about distinguishing between 12 PM (=noon) and 12 AM (=midnight). 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 16 Oct 2010, 00:18
I suspect the idea that "young people" can't read analogue clock dials (or would be puzzled by a wristwatch) is just an ephebophobic urban legend. Dial clocks are still pretty common, and the toy-shops here are all well-stocked with those teaching-clocks on which we probably all learned to tell time. One thing I do find irritating is people who can't (or at least won't) understand time in 24-hour format. Twelve-hour format is fine for everyday, casual use, but not when scheduling events across multiple countries, in several time-zones, with various daylight-saving rules, in hemispheres with reversed seasons so that daylight-saving-time changes go in opposite directions. Frankly, I'd prefer to use a single fixed time reference like Zulu time, so everyone only has to worry about their own single local offset, but no... Instead I'd get e-mails from colleagues in America telling me that some system was going down for maintenance at "12pm EST". In July. And they'd get all butt-hurt when I replied asking: "Do you really mean EST, or would that be EDT seeing as it's your summer? And by the way, is that 12pm noon or midnight?" I mean OK, some of these systems only processed transactions worth millions of dollars an hour, and kept factories running (and workers in jobs) on five continents, so it's not like they were important or anything! EEE-HAH EEE-HAH! (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=755) No, I'm not bitter! But I don't work for that branch of Global Despoilation Inc. any more either.

I don't know; born in the late eighties, I can certainly read a mechanical clock, but it takes me tens of seconds, as opposed to the moment it takes me to read a digital readout, and I find occasionally that when I've looked too quickly, I've been wrong, either because of the "write red in green" effect of the numbers or by confusing the hands.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 16 Oct 2010, 01:08
...because of the "write red in green" effect of the numbers...

Sorry, what's this effect? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 16 Oct 2010, 01:21
Sorry, what's this effect? 

Quick, what color is this word?

GREEN
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2010, 02:22
I have to say that I am dumbfounded by the idea that a significant number of people are growing up unable to read a clockface.  It had never occurred to me as a possibility, as analogue clocks are so ubiquitous (and indeed can be read much quicker in most circumstances than digital ones). 

Is this a US phenomenon, or worldwide?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Jimor on 16 Oct 2010, 04:47
I've seen the inability to read analog very occasionally here in the U.S. A somewhat related phenomenon (if also rare) is the inability to translate approximate times. It's always 9:43, not "a quarter 'til ten".
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Switchblade on 16 Oct 2010, 04:51
Random trivia: in France, for some reason, the practice of wearing a watch with the display inside is strongly associated with nurses. It probably has some basis in reality, because if you think about it, it's convenient for checking a patient's pulse using just one hand.

funny thing - in the UK, nurses wear watches with upside-down faces on a strap from their left breast pocket. That way from their perspective all they need to do is look down.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Jerein on 16 Oct 2010, 06:58
I don't see what's so hot about just putting your hands on her boobs.  A huge part of my enjoyment about touching a girl's breasts is bringing her pleasure at doing so, and there's nothing really pleasurable about just putting your hands lightly there.  C'mon Angus, you're in a back alley, knead those suckers!

No! No kneading, for the love of god. Nothing more uncomfortable than a guy kneading your boobs. God, the bad memories (or should I say mammories - ba dum psh!). It's not pleasurable, it feels a friggin' breast exam or something. They're delicate, okay? Although to be fair, it may just be me who hates it (any other girls want to weigh in?).

I don't mean kneading in the breast exam fashion.  My wording was poor.  I mean fondling.  Caressing.  Some sort of action instead of just mere hand placement.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 07:17
I have to say that I am dumbfounded by the idea that a significant number of people are growing up unable to read a clockface.  It had never occurred to me as a possibility, as analogue clocks are so ubiquitous (and indeed can be read much quicker in most circumstances than digital ones). 

Is this a US phenomenon, or worldwide?

I'm from the Continent, and we've NEVER heard of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 07:43
Let's dig into this a bit more.

While back in the '80's (the time Douglas Adams phrased his statement), digital watches were fairly popular. These days, they're considered quite out of style - at least here.
On top of that, as Paul points out, it is much easier to quickly read the time (or any other value) from an analog dial than from a digital readout.

Anecdote:
Decades ago, I got into an army helicopter to take some photographs of camouflaged tanks from above. In the cockpit, there was a cluster of something like 15 dials grouped together. From the manufacturer names and the numbers on the dials, you could see that they were all in at some odd angle... as if someone had put them in, but hadn't bothered about the correct orientation. I made a remark of this, to which the pilot said "that's done on purpose... under normal flight conditions, all the needles should point upward. So, if something is wrong, you can see it in one quick glance."

Imagine having to read several digital readouts...
That is also why I firmly believe that analog clock faces on a car dashboard are a much better idea.

I can see how, in a society where, in primary school, digital timepieces are the norm, children could have trouble reading the time on a conventional clock.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 16 Oct 2010, 09:44
There's a condition called dyscalculia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyscalculia) (compare with dyslexia) where people are unable to do the mental calculations necessary to do things like count change or read a clock for variaous reasons (brain damage or development issues, or genetics can all be involved). 

However, like counting change, reading an analog clock requires practice.  It also probably requires you to learn how to do it at an early enough age that it becomes second nature. 

You know, like learning your times tables.  Another thing no one does because they don't need to...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: osidiusxemphatic on 16 Oct 2010, 11:10
I'll just leave this here...

(http://i51.tinypic.com/2r6gt2g.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 11:13
Wait a sec, maybe I wasn't clear enough.

I said that quickly reading the time on a traditional dial (as "in a glance", or "faster than it takes to read four numbers and interpret them") was easier than reading the time on a digital watch. I did not factor in that you have to learn it first... sorry Carl.

edit: and this was a response to Carl-E, not to the hydropneumatic squeezotron above. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Millennium on 16 Oct 2010, 11:36
I don't see what's so hot about just putting your hands on her boobs.  A huge part of my enjoyment about touching a girl's breasts is bringing her pleasure at doing so, and there's nothing really pleasurable about just putting your hands lightly there.  C'mon Angus, you're in a back alley, knead those suckers!

No! No kneading, for the love of god. Nothing more uncomfortable than a guy kneading your boobs. God, the bad memories (or should I say mammories - ba dum psh!). It's not pleasurable, it feels a friggin' breast exam or something. They're delicate, okay? Although to be fair, it may just be me who hates it (any other girls want to weigh in?).
Another way to go: learn massage. Many colleges, including community colleges, have a class that teaches the basics in a semester, and although the law doesn't let them cover this exact topic, the principles are easy to apply once you know them. These things are held up by muscles. Those muscles can get tired and sore, especially for the well-endowed, but it's not really possible to put the weight down. Learn how to relieve this, and watch your skillz level up like mad.

Better yet, both of you can take the class as a series of dates. This will give you a whole new appreciation for the concept of homework. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 16 Oct 2010, 14:28
I have to say that I am dumbfounded by the idea that a significant number of people are growing up unable to read a clockface.  It had never occurred to me as a possibility, as analogue clocks are so ubiquitous (and indeed can be read much quicker in most circumstances than digital ones).
Yeah, I'm sceptical too. It sounds to me like one of those "Dang kids today!" type things. Of course there will always be those who have difficulty learning to do anything, but otherwise? I'm in my twenties, and I'm forever amazed by all the things that, for example, conservative newspaper* columnists tell me "my generation" can't do, with which my friends, co-workers, and I have no difficulty at all.

*Yeah, that's right, I read print media! OMG! And I learned my multiplication tables too!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 15:14
I'm in my twenties

My mind, it is shattered.
I would have *sworn* you were at least twice as mature.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 16 Oct 2010, 15:37
I would have *sworn* you were at least twice as mature.
Should I be flattered or insulted? :lol:  Perhaps my Chinese self is flattered, but my Australian insulted... I sometimes imagine myself as a cartoon character with miniature versions of myself perched on my shoulders, but instead of being dressed as an angel and a devil, one is in a tee-shirt and jeans, and the other wearing a qipao.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2010, 15:45
People in their 20s are adults, and should be treated as mature.  People in their 60s, like me, have typically more experience of life; however, I believe it is important to realise that experience is not in itself wisdom.  Wisdom is perhaps more to do with the ability to make appropriate use of experience - and can potentially be found at almost any age.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 16 Oct 2010, 15:46
*Yeah, that's right, I read print media! OMG! And I learned my multiplication tables too!
Yes, my daughter is 22 and she and her friends know their multiplication tables, read print media (she has hundreds of books), and send text messages that are capitalized, grammatical, and punctuated properly.

I have also worked with a 19-year-old college student who could not read an analog clock face (a 25-year-old co-worker taught him).  Even worse, last night I was in a store, and a young sales clerk informed me the goods were "60%".  I inquired if they were "60%" or "60% off" and got a blank stare.  So I asked, "If the price were $100 dollars, would I pay $60 or $40?" and she said "I'm not a mathematician."  I had to hold my tongue at that point.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 15:50
That is for you to decide. But I like you.



Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 16 Oct 2010, 15:51
People in their 20s are adults, and should be treated as mature.  People in their 60s, like me, have typically more experience of life; however, I believe it is important to realise that experience is not in itself wisdom.  Wisdom is perhaps more to do with the ability to make appropriate use of experience - and can potentially be found at almost any age.
Wisdom is the application of intelligence to experience.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 16 Oct 2010, 15:52
Yeah...I grew up with mobile telephony and I send correctly spelled and punctuated SMS missives. It''s my parents that use txt-spk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2010, 15:59
Wisdom is the application of intelligence to experience.

I'll go with that.  But remember that with age, as well as experience increasing, intelligence commonly falls off in some respects; I do not believe that I could now do again the programming I was doing in my 20s, for instance.  So it is not fair to assume (or imply) a simple superiority of age over youth, any more than it is to worship youth for its own sake.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2010, 16:03
she said "I'm not a mathematician."

I remember trying to explain to a supermarket manager the inherent absurdity of selling fire alarms for £3.99 each, £7.99 for a 2-pack, or £12.99 for a 3-pack.  I got nowhere.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 16 Oct 2010, 16:04
Yeah, I'm sceptical too. It sounds to me like one of those "Dang kids today!" type things. Of course there will always be those who have difficulty learning to do anything, but otherwise? I'm in my twenties, and I'm forever amazed by all the things that, for example, conservative newspaper* columnists tell me "my generation" can't do, with which my friends, co-workers, and I have no difficulty at all.

*Yeah, that's right, I read print media! OMG! And I learned my multiplication tables too!
I'm sure you can. And there are certainly numerous young people in my neck of the woods who can, too. But what I really see in this statement is you attempting to preserve a cake intact whilst stuffing a chunk of it in your gob. "Of course there will always be those who have difficulty learning to do anything," means, by definition, this condition exists. Furthermore, if they have such difficulty, and the simpler means (even if it 'takes longer') of rattling off the numbers on a digital display exists, it stands to reason which way they will go. After all, that only requires numbers be learned, killing two 'learning birds' with one stone. (This is the approach taken, apparently, by some Special Ed teachers)

One thing I find that some folks on the 'nets, particularly in as educated, erudite a crowd as seems to be present on this forum, is a lack of understanding that there exists those who will not learn if they are not made to, no matter their actual capability. These folks have always been with us, and may always be. There are various reasons for this, some cultural, some religious (if you prefer not to lump that in with cultural), some from apathy, and some for a variety of reasons that vary wildly from person to person. If we could ever find a way to encourage everyone to use the brain their body has made so many sacrifices to support and to rejoice in the use, I suspect we'd be at least a little closer to some of these utopias we see from time to time in fiction.

Or, of course, it could be hell on earth.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2010, 16:05
Most utopias have turned out that way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 16 Oct 2010, 16:53
But what I really see in this statement is you attempting to preserve a cake intact whilst stuffing a chunk of it in your gob. "Of course there will always be those who have difficulty learning to do anything," means, by definition, this condition exists.
I take your point, but what I was objecting to was the implication that age, or generation, was the key factor. I'd say that failure to learn something is determined by a combination of ability and motivation, rather than the decade in which one was born. The idea that "today's youth" is somehow stupider or lazier than the commentator's generation at the same age is a classic "Dang kids!" reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: zadojla on 16 Oct 2010, 17:25
I remember trying to explain to a supermarket manager the inherent absurdity of selling fire alarms for £3.99 each, £7.99 for a 2-pack, or £12.99 for a 3-pack.  I got nowhere.

I used to work for a supermarket chain (now-defunct Grand Union, for those in the NE USA).  That is a supermarket trick, deliberately done.  Most people assume that the price-per-unit improves as the size of the package increases.  Not true at all; usually the second-largest package has the best price-per-unit.  They assume most people have neither the skill nor will to actually calculate it for themselves.

That is for you to decide...

I live in Texas.  Anyone can carry a gun.  Best be polite.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 16 Oct 2010, 17:35
And then there are those young'uns (plus those trying to pass as younger than they are) who seem to make a point of spelling like shit when communicating on the Internet. I try to explain to them that it's a lack of respect for those who'll try to read their prose. I try to talk to them about the Netiquette (yes, I'm old enough to know this word). But my ultimate impression is that they spell like shit on the Internet because "all the cool kids do it!"

And as a disclaimer: out of experience, I'm able to make the difference (at least in French and English) between dyslectic people and people who don't give a shit or even use deliberately bad spelling. Come to think of it, I wonder how the former view the latter. I suspect they might find them offensive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 16 Oct 2010, 17:41
I remember trying to explain to a supermarket manager the inherent absurdity of selling fire alarms for £3.99 each, £7.99 for a 2-pack, or £12.99 for a 3-pack.  I got nowhere.
I used to work for a supermarket chain (now-defunct Grand Union, for those in the NE USA).  That is a supermarket trick, deliberately done.  Most people assume that the price-per-unit improves as the size of the package increases.  Not true at all; usually the second-largest package has the best price-per-unit.  They assume most people have neither the skill nor will to actually calculate it for themselves.
It happens in France too, even though displaying price-per-unit is required by law here. They assume enough people won't double-check said price-per-unit for it to be worthwile. Sadly, they seem to be right, because I see it here and there. Hell, I can't affirm I didn't fall into this trap sometimes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 16 Oct 2010, 17:57
And as a disclaimer: out of experience, I'm able to make the difference (at least in French and English) between dyslectic people and people who don't give a shit or even use deliberately bad spelling. Come to think of it, I wonder how the former view the latter. I suspect they might find them offensive.
As a dyslexic who, by means of the magic of spell-checkers can in fact get things right most of the time, I have less than zero respect for the whiny little turds (and they always are) that just don't bother.
I also tend to get irate at those dyslexics who use their condition as an excuse to not bother. But that's slightly less socially acceptable.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Omega on 16 Oct 2010, 18:01
I joined specifically to say this: I was never taught how to read an analogue clock during my childhood. I'm 15- I grew up with digital clocks, and it wasn't until I encountered the analogue format in eighth grade that my parents realized this and quickly corrected my absence of knowledge. It still takes me a while to read analogue clocks, and I wear a digital one for the sake of clarity. So, no, I wouldn't say it's motivation or ability- I and the majority of my immediate peers just didn't learn how to read them during "learning" stages of our lives, and, like the problem of studying a language after the part of our lives where we are most receptive to that kind of thing, we still have trouble doing so (not that reading a clock is really comparable to learning a language).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: brew on 16 Oct 2010, 18:16

The idea that "today's youth" is somehow stupider or lazier than the commentator's generation at the same age is a classic "Dang kids!" reaction.

Who presented it in that way?  How is not being able to read an analog clock in a generation where analog clocks will no longer be common some horrible thing?  It was just brought up as an interesting difference.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 16 Oct 2010, 18:50
It really is a generational difference.  The first digital clocks were a Bauhaus experiment in the late 20's / early 30's., but digital clocks (usually on clock radios and stoves, where the numbers were turned by a motor like an old odometer) weren't common until the 60's, and then digital watches became ubiquitous in the 70's. 

But there was a backlash to those...

It was very uncommon for people my age and older to see digital clocks when growing up.  We learned analog (or analogue, depending on who taught you to spell).  Our 15 year old friend Omega has it right - there's a window of opportunity for things like this, and more people are missing it nowadays than ever before.  As soon as cash registers could calculate correct change, counting up change became a lost art, unless you worked with a simple cash drawer.  You only learn what you really need to know to get the job done, after all.  We adapt to our surroundings, and as they change, so do we. 

Generationally (http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/tones.png). 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 16 Oct 2010, 19:06
People who are 20-something are children to me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 16 Oct 2010, 19:16
Wow, have you been busy.

And then there are those young'uns (plus those trying to pass as younger than they are) who seem to make a point of spelling like shit when communicating on the Internet. I try to explain to them that it's a lack of respect for those who'll try to read their prose. I try to talk to them about the Netiquette (yes, I'm old enough to know this word). But my ultimate impression is that they spell like shit on the Internet because "all the cool kids do it!"

And as a disclaimer: out of experience, I'm able to make the difference (at least in French and English) between dyslectic people and people who don't give a shit or even use deliberately bad spelling. Come to think of it, I wonder how the former view the latter. I suspect they might find them offensive.
I do wonder if this is actually born of the same impulse that sold 'decoder rings' and 'invisible ink' back when we were dodging T-rex's. Could be wrong, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: celticgeek on 16 Oct 2010, 20:21
Get off my lawn, you damn kids!
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 16 Oct 2010, 21:52
YOUR  lawn?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 16 Oct 2010, 22:30
Two subscribers to the Louis Black Fountain o' Gripe theory of longevity, I see.

To wit:
The good die young, but pricks live forever
So be sure, next time you see the neighborhood kid,
To yell at him to stay the hell off your lawn
And it'll be just like taking Vitamin C.

    Hey, the dino-smile's back!
    /
:mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 16 Oct 2010, 23:19
   Hey, the dino-smile's back!
    /
:mrgreen:
Awww... The afro guy is gone, and it messes up my old post (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,23831.msg856170.html#msg856170). :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Oct 2010, 00:14
That is a supermarket trick, deliberately done.

I'm not aware of ever seeing it done in this country (unless that one instance was deliberate).
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 17 Oct 2010, 00:35
I'd say that failure to learn something is determined by a combination of ability and motivation, rather than the decade in which one was born.

Spot-on!

What we do see is that motivation tends to increase with age, up to a point. But that is of all times.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Exar_Kun on 17 Oct 2010, 03:22
My dad likes to bitch non-stop about how "young people these days don't know half the things he did when he was half their age." Of course my dad grew up on a FARM of all places. I try to explain to my dad that not everybody grew up on a farm, and that this is no longer the 50s/60s, and that people can only be expected to learn as much as they need to learn to get the job done and that he was no different.

Its like talking to a particularly stubborn brick wall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 17 Oct 2010, 04:49
Well, he was right, of course! ;)

Seriously, it does not make any sense, not does it provide you with a particularly satisfying sense of accomplishment, to master the art of saddling a horse, driving a tractor, or milding a cow when you live on the nth store of an apartment building.

How good is you dad at modern technology?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 17 Oct 2010, 06:06
THE MOMENT OF THE WEEK:

Marigold and Dale - WOW Stalking!    - 2 (4%)
"May the Oppossums grow fat on your flesh."    - 5 (10%)
Are you jealous I went on a date?    - 0 (0%)
"I'm sorry! I'll always cherish the time we had together!"    - 6 (12%)
"You want the paper?" "Just the sports section, please."    - 7 (14%)
"How the hell are things MORE awkward?"    - 0 (0%)
NOT DURING WORK HOURS.    - 3 (6%)
Seriously. It's OK. Let it go.    - 0 (0%)
I WILL LET YOU TOUCH MY BOOBS IF YOU'LL SHUT UP.    - 9 (18%)
Boob touching!    - 8 (16%)
"I hate to interrupt your reverie, but..." SHHHH!    - 10 (20%)


Total Voters: 50

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 17 Oct 2010, 06:19
My dad likes to bitch non-stop about how "young people these days don't know half the things he did when he was half their age." Of course my dad grew up on a FARM of all places. I try to explain to my dad that not everybody grew up on a farm, and that this is no longer the 50s/60s, and that people can only be expected to learn as much as they need to learn to get the job done and that he was no different.

Its like talking to a particularly stubborn brick wall.
Er, a farm is the place, dude. It's as basic as life gets, outside of being a hunter-gatherer, which can be a chancy way to make a living.

Here's the thing, Exar_Kun. Unless he grew up on some sort of factory farm, what your father likely sees is this: if all of civilization went to hell, he would know, basically, how to feed himself (especially if he every helped with any slaughtering. Trust me, killing the critter's the easy part). The people he's seeing wouldn't, or that's how it seems to him. That makes them vulnerable.

One of the things we tend to forget as nations is that each country's viability is really based on food production. If your country can't feed itself, it's a rotten log waiting to fall, no matter how advanced its tech or what fancy services it offers (Good luck eating a web page). Too many people don't stop to think where the food they buy at the supermarket comes from, and that in turn plays out in many ways that can be harmful in the long run.

Your father is seeing that from a personal perspective. I agree with him to this extent: while mastering such skills isn't necessary, I think it would do every child who lives in a large city or even a suburb an enormous amount of good to spend at least one summer (or longer) of his or her life on a farm learning where food comes from in a hands-on way. No, we can't all live on farms, but when we forget what feeds us, we're heading for trouble.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Mad Cat on 17 Oct 2010, 07:16
Age and experience beat youth and guile every time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 17 Oct 2010, 12:03
Here's the thing, Exar_Kun. Unless he grew up on some sort of factory farm, what your father likely sees is this: if all of civilization went to hell, he would know, basically, how to feed himself (especially if he every helped with any slaughtering. Trust me, killing the critter's the easy part). The people he's seeing wouldn't, or that's how it seems to him. That makes them vulnerable.

True, to a point.

Quote
I think it would do every child who lives in a large city or even a suburb an enormous amount of good to spend at least one summer (or longer) of his or her life on a farm learning where food comes from in a hands-on way. No, we can't all live on farms, but when we forget what feeds us, we're heading for trouble.
Not only does it do them good, they also think it's tremendous fun. Our grandchildren love to come here (and do on quite a regular basis), and they want to be involved with all the "farmy things" (except the killing bit... they're still a bit too young for that).
It's now slowly dawning on the oldest that, no, it is NOT normal that if you want an apple or a prune or strawberries, or beans for dinner, you just go out and get them from your lot, rather than from the shop.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 17 Oct 2010, 13:59
Age and experience beat youth and guile every time.

Actually, it's "Old age and treachery  will overcome youth and skill". 

And yes, they will. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Rimwolf on 17 Oct 2010, 14:10
John Kenneth Galbraith grew up on a farm. He's said that one advantage of that background is that after that, nothing else really seemed like work.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Oct 2010, 14:26
"people can only be expected to learn as much as they need to learn to get the job done"

If you only learn what you need, you are never ready at the moment a new skill is needed, and others who have learnt things they didn't immediately need will pass you again and again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Akima on 17 Oct 2010, 16:08
One of the things we tend to forget as nations is that each country's viability is really based on food production. If your country can't feed itself, it's a rotten log waiting to fall, no matter how advanced its tech or what fancy services it offers (Good luck eating a web page).
Yes, because specialisation is bad. Every nation should only consume what it produces domestically, and trade is a source of weakness. Why stop at nations? Cities within a nation rely on trade to bring in food, so they're obviously rotten logs too. Individuals providing "fancy services", like judges, doctors, teachers and engineers for example, rely on others to grow their food. Rotten logs all of them! Send them to the countryside to grow food! Trade and specialisation are bad! Subsistence agriculture is the way to go!

I'm sorry about the sarcasm, and of course Raoul was not advocating that sort of primitivism, but I'm sensitive on this point. Within living memory, in the land where I was born, the idea that trade and specialisation were bad, and a source of national weakness, while regional autarky was good, led to... unfortunate results.

Any form of agriculture much above the level of a bronze-age village ceases to be self-supporting in any event. Even in the bronze-age, long-distance trade was often needed to bring in rare tin to alloy with copper. Later, iron tools relied on the "fancy services" supplied by the smith, and the smith relied on the iron-smelter, who relied on the charcoal-burner. Farmers routinely pat themselves on the back about how self-sustaining they are, and how much city-dwellers depend on them, but the modern high-yield agriculture even relatively self-supporting-for-food countries rely on to feed themselves is heavily dependent on city-based manufacturing and "fancy services" like higher education, engineering, communications, chemistry, biology and meteorology, and a good deal of it comes from overseas. International trade is just another step along the chain from trade between regions within a nation, and, I hope, binds countries together as once it bound villages into counties, and counties into nations.

people can only be expected to learn as much as they need to learn to get the job done
I hope, and believe, that this is not so:

We travel not for trafficking alone.
By hotter winds our fiery hearts are fanned.
For lust of knowing what should not be known,
We make the Golden Journey to Samarkand.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 17 Oct 2010, 18:12
Of course I don't beleive that, Akima.

But in the U.S., it often seems to me we go the other way. To work on a farm is to be a hick; it's a fate to be avoided at all costs, something for people who 'can't do anything else' to do. That doesn't work too well, either.

Mike Rowe makes this point pretty often on his show (Dirty Jobs): we need to value the folks that do all jobs that make civilization possible. A farmer is certainly not more important than a judge, doctor, teacher or engineer. But he's not less important, either. We need them all.

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Oct 2010, 19:24
It's not just a contemporary US thing. Look up the etymologies of "churl" and "villain".
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: badbum61 on 17 Oct 2010, 20:56
My favorite is the opposite of "postpone" - "prepone" meaning to perform a task ahead of schedule.

My wife (who is a remedial English teacher, BTW) seems to think that the correct terminology is not exclude or preclude, but disclude....and she wonders why I get upset with her when she says it! Honestly, the younger generation....

edit: yes, point taken, akronnick. "opposite" was not actually what I meant....

Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: akronnick on 17 Oct 2010, 21:06
umm... exclude?
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 17 Oct 2010, 22:42
Gesundheidt.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: snubnose on 18 Oct 2010, 01:59
[...] A farmer is certainly not more important than a judge, doctor, teacher or engineer. But he's not less important, either. We need them all.
Hehe.

Actually I'm fairly certain you will miss farmers more than judges if they would suddenly be gone.

After all, Criminals on the rampage are fairly unimportant if you're starving to death for sure.


Gesundheidt.
Almost.

Its "Gesundheit".

Unless they changed the word while it traveled to the english language, anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Oct 2010, 09:04
Thanks.  My tiny amount of German's over 20 years old, and extraordinarily rusty. 

...and I didn't bother asking my spellchacker - I just assumed it didn't recognize the word...
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: peterh on 18 Oct 2010, 14:08
Gesundheidt.
Almost.

Its "Gesundheit".

While we're at nitpicking, we might at that it's not "its Gesundheit" rather than "It's Gesundheit".

Jeez, Snubnose, if you're going to correct Carl-E on his German, you might as well do so in correct English.

Blergh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: pwhodges on 18 Oct 2010, 15:01
s/at/add/

 :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Oct 2010, 15:12
This is one reason I don't post spelling flames, even though some spelling errors are almost physically painful for me to read. There's some unbreakable law of the Internet which forces all spelling flames to have at least one spelling or grammar error.

If I ever make fun of ESL speakers, I will feel very bad about doing it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 18 Oct 2010, 16:02
WEEL OF CURSE THAT WILL MAKE IT AAL OAKY.







(Sorry, I couldn't resist.  :-D)
Title: Re: WCDT: 11-15 October 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Oct 2010, 17:09
Bad enough I have to read broken English every night. Sheesh.