THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => CHATTER => Topic started by: Trollstormur on 11 Nov 2010, 12:44

Title: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Trollstormur on 11 Nov 2010, 12:44
post ITT so I can ban you
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Tom on 11 Nov 2010, 13:06
Ambitious, brilliant next-level moderating. Good luck.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Blue Kitty on 11 Nov 2010, 13:08
Don't we have a thread to be angry at random people? :mrgreen:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Buttfranklin on 11 Nov 2010, 14:12
Not for banning purposes, though.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 11 Nov 2010, 15:28
I like where this thread is going
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Trollstormur on 11 Nov 2010, 15:29
No I saw someone on this forum in my class
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: scarred on 11 Nov 2010, 17:49
you should've looked for their avatar
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Trollstormur on 11 Nov 2010, 22:38
i saw it calling them out is more fun
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 12 Nov 2010, 01:33
You sure it wasn't a comic discussion person? Idaho tends to get the weird people.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: jhocking on 12 Nov 2010, 03:53
I had to look at a map to remember where Idaho is. I had no idea.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 12 Nov 2010, 05:24
I had to look at a map to remember where Idaho is. Idunno.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Radical AC on 12 Nov 2010, 07:27
The only Anthro class I ever took was taught by Dr. House. (Not the cool, sardonic TV personality either)  Sorry.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dimmukane on 12 Nov 2010, 17:51
My only anthro professor was this spindly lady whose name I forgot and reminded me vaguely of some actress I'd seen in a 70's movie somewhere.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Allybee on 12 Nov 2010, 18:09
my (http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&bookkey=6002261) anthro professor is peruvian, stylish and brilliant. she's awesome.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Blue Kitty on 12 Nov 2010, 18:59
My anthro professor was a white woman of average build who had a co-worker that was a cross dresser
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Thomas Edison on 12 Nov 2010, 19:23
My anthro professor was nonexistant.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Wasteroo on 12 Nov 2010, 20:07
my anthro professor is a butch lady with frizzy hair who wears mom jeans and khaki button ups and loves talking about her visits to the Congo to study monkeys (she's also the biological anthropology professor)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Tom on 12 Nov 2010, 23:14
My zoology/evolutionary biology lecturer was pretty musch the same.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Liz on 13 Nov 2010, 07:46
My anthropology professor was in a National Geographic special.

WHAT NOW.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: messeduplilkid on 13 Nov 2010, 10:51
The more posts we have, the more suspense builds...  But then some little old Idaho post will come as a "me" and we'll all miss it.

My anthropology was an apologist.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: snalin on 13 Nov 2010, 11:52
Wait, have I been reading a forum filled with only anthropology majors these last three years? :psyduck:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: snalin on 13 Nov 2010, 11:53
Shhhhhhhiiiii..
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 13 Nov 2010, 11:54
Yeah dudes what is up with that, people taking anthropology? Like, I have spent four years at uni not meeting anyone who does anthropology and suddenly everybody and their dog does anthropology.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Liz on 13 Nov 2010, 12:24
I have a degree in anthropology!

So far it has got me some hugs and high fives.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: A Wet Helmet on 13 Nov 2010, 12:57
I would hug anyone who a) told me they had a degree in anthropology and b) wished to be hugged.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lines on 13 Nov 2010, 12:58
I do not have a degree in anthropology nor did I ever take a class in it. I feel left out now.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 13 Nov 2010, 13:09
I would hug Liz
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Metope on 13 Nov 2010, 13:11
I hugged Liz before she even had her degree.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Allybee on 13 Nov 2010, 13:36
Yeah dudes what is up with that, people taking anthropology? Like, I have spent four years at uni not meeting anyone who does anthropology and suddenly everybody and their dog does anthropology.

I'm just taking one class to try it out. I love the professor and I find some of the material interesting but overall I do not like anthropology as a discipline. not really that down to talk about the other.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dazed on 13 Nov 2010, 14:35
I took an anthro class once. It was with a French-Algerian woman and an Indian woman teaching it. It was pretty good, also incredibly depressing.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 13 Nov 2010, 14:42
Suddenly my brother is thinking of switching his degree to anthropology.

But more importantly, this thread made me realise that there is a new Community episode out, so yeah. Thanks dude in dr zikers anthro class!
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: LeeC on 13 Nov 2010, 15:56
Im an anthro major so i have 3

my cultural anthro professor- Is like a slightly toned down Teddy Roosevelt.

my archaeology prof: looks like the lead singer from flogging molly

and my bio anthro prof: is a black lady with dreadlocks.

I love UMD.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 13 Nov 2010, 16:17
sorry to break it to you all but every single one of you fucked up massively by not majoring in criminology aka obviously the best social science ever

try to enjoy your lame cultural shit anyway i guess, i'll be over here learning about crimes
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Barmymoo on 13 Nov 2010, 16:48
I don't even know what anthropology is (I know what it means but how do you study it?) but I am/was taking a criminology class.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Radical AC on 13 Nov 2010, 17:28
One of my majors is political science.  So, I get to study how to get the people you worked so hard to gather evidence against off on a technicality for vastly more money and prestige.  (My other major is biochemistry because I hate those people I just described and would rather be a doctor)

The more posts we have, the more suspense builds...  But then some little old Idaho post will come as a "me" and we'll all miss it.

I go to the same uni as Troll and know the prof he is talking about.  But, it isn't me.  Kind of curious if I know them, though...
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 13 Nov 2010, 21:12
social science

Social what now? What-science?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Liz on 13 Nov 2010, 21:30
I would hug Liz

yayyyy
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: LittleKey on 14 Nov 2010, 00:03
I don't even know what anthropology is (I know what it means but how do you study it?) but I am/was taking a criminology class.

I would also like to know more about anthropology; it sounds pretty interesting.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Buttfranklin on 14 Nov 2010, 07:26
This thread has made me want to take an anthropology course!

Too bad it wouldn't count toward my major.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Drill King on 14 Nov 2010, 07:59
I read books about that sorta stuff something?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Slick on 14 Nov 2010, 08:06
PEI is kind of an odd, socially conservative place. My mom was working with a younger nurse at the hospital, probably around my age, who was telling her how she took a course in university that she "didn't believe in but thought it was interesting anyways".
She was talking about an anthropology course.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: LeeC on 14 Nov 2010, 21:02
I don't even know what anthropology is (I know what it means but how do you study it?) but I am/was taking a criminology class.

I would also like to know more about anthropology; it sounds pretty interesting.

anthropology is the study of humans.

its broken down into 3/4 mediums

cultural anthropology - you study different cultures (like living with tribal people in africa)

archeology - indiana jones or GTFO

bio anthropology - study human remains/evolution (also hunts bigfoot)

and arguably linguistics.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 15 Nov 2010, 00:40
My anthropology teacher was unremarkable, but my TA was a large goatee'd man who wore punk rock beanies and devoted the majority of the class time to opening our minds to the potentials of lucid dreaming.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 15 Nov 2010, 01:36
So, which one of you is Bones?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 15 Nov 2010, 09:08
None of them. They're all too engulfed in pop-culture.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: calenlass on 15 Nov 2010, 11:25
I am sort of double majoring in Anthropology and Modern Languages and Culture, since my uni doesn't have a Linguistics degree. This means I am basically majoring in cultural anthropology and Spanish, with a minor in German and possibly another in Japanese.

Also I am minoring in Dance, because otherwise I cannot take dance classes at my school.

Next semester my anthro classes will be Forensic Anthropology, the FA lab, and Linguistic Anthropology II. Woo!
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 15 Nov 2010, 13:26
punk rock beanies

I think I know what you mean by this but please feel free to explain further
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: öde on 16 Nov 2010, 03:32
Starting in January I am doing a certificate in social sciences and then hopefully studying anthropology at Southampton uni.

What is up with this forum  :psyduck:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Barmymoo on 16 Nov 2010, 04:57
Perhaps, in all seriousness, people are more likely to be on a forum like this one due to a genuine interest in people as an amorphous mass and as individuals. Most of what we talk about is daily life and aspects of personality (like what makes us laugh, what we wear, who we hang out with and date). So maybe it is a statistical bias created by the nature of the forum itself? Other forums probably have more natural scientists and mathematicians.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: calenlass on 16 Nov 2010, 12:06
Well, I am actually only doing Linguistics because it is easy, I am more than 75% finished with my degree, and because I couldn't pass Organic Chem. Otherwise I would be a lab rat somewhere staring at fishies all day, dreaming of deep sea submersibles and Dumbo (http://www.superfunpatrol.net/images/dumboOctopus.jpg).
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 16 Nov 2010, 12:22
i'll probably keep doing this crime shit until i get a phd but only because i can't hold down a real job and i have like zero life skills at all tbh
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 16 Nov 2010, 12:33
I think I know what you mean by this but please feel free to explain further

I guess that was kind of a stupid term. But stuff like this:

(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:NTnQzzhDSmuW3M:http://www.headbangersmall.com/ekmps/shops/therockasylum/images/rage-against-the-machine-army-green-cadit-knit-beanie-hat-13272-p.jpg&t=1)

(http://www.8ball.co.uk/tshirts/ramones-rolledbillbeanie_1_109834_black_l.jpg)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 16 Nov 2010, 14:46
man i was totally imaging military beanie babies. that was way cooler.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 16 Nov 2010, 14:54
There are military themed beanie baby bears. I find them kinda depressing and jingoistic, really.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 16 Nov 2010, 15:43
I guess that was kind of a stupid term. But stuff like this:

Oh that was not what I was thinking. Those are ugly as shit and really dumb.

I thought more like:

(http://www.kink.se/wp-content/2007/10/ian-mackaye.jpg)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 16 Nov 2010, 16:46
I can't believe we've got to two pages and we still haven't found this guy.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 16 Nov 2010, 16:46
I mean this is the lamest witch hunt in history.

History.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: schimmy on 16 Nov 2010, 16:51
That's because your doing it wrong. Every single person who has posted in this thread, by the mere act of posting in it, has implicitly suggested that they are the dude.
Burn them all.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 16 Nov 2010, 23:15
The man is fond of his forehead.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Cire27 on 16 Nov 2010, 23:18
Why you gotta mess with a guy's hat like that.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Wasteroo on 16 Nov 2010, 23:40
I-is that Ian MacKaye and Thurston Moore?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: McTaggart on 16 Nov 2010, 23:59
Wow I never noticed before that Thurston Moore and John Carmack are just alternate reality versions of each other.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 17 Nov 2010, 06:29
There are military themed beanie baby bears. I find them kinda depressing and jingoistic, really.

I don't know if you were there when I was linking this shit in meebo but fucking check this out:

http://www.bradford.co.uk/product_info.php/products_id/852/XTCsid/463b4aa9b9d8104ac0bd5c1290004065 (http://www.bradford.co.uk/product_info.php/products_id/852/XTCsid/463b4aa9b9d8104ac0bd5c1290004065)

'Inspired by the sought-after Defenders of Our Li'Bear'ty collection'
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lines on 17 Nov 2010, 06:50
I can't believe we've got to two pages and we still haven't found this guy.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Patrick on 17 Nov 2010, 12:15
I can't believe we've got to two pages and we still haven't found this guy.

Dude maybe Graham should look more closely at the guy's username and not wait for him to damn himself

I mean seriously who's dumb enough to do that
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 17 Nov 2010, 13:02

'Inspired by the sought-after Defenders of Our Li'Bear'ty collection'


That must be like the British version of NASCAR commemorative plates.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 17 Nov 2010, 13:19
I still hold there is nothing more American than this:


(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a207/Xyljin/DaleJrPlate.png)

Advertisements within advertisements. It's like an Xzibit meme played straight.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Eris on 17 Nov 2010, 14:36
I thought that mods couldn't ban people, only admins?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Metope on 17 Nov 2010, 14:38
Yeah but the dude in Dr. Ziker's anthro class probably doesn't know.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 17 Nov 2010, 14:40
I still hold there is nothing more American than this:

What is an energy plate, how does it differ from a normal plate and WHERE DO I BUY ONE?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 17 Nov 2010, 14:42
(preferably without the image of a cube-headed American motorsports figure on it. Also I am quite poor so I wonder if you can buy Energy Plates with reproduction platinum?)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2010, 14:43
It's a plate in the shape of a pyramid. You put your food underneath it.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 17 Nov 2010, 19:52
i actually do kind of want that plate in an entirely unironic way, it is just really fun to look at for a variety of reasons
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 17 Nov 2010, 20:10
I'm thinking it's gonna be my new av in some form or another. It really is something. The best part is the shine around the edges. I think the designer just said "Fuck it" and outsourced the job to blingee.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Blue Kitty on 17 Nov 2010, 20:13
It's kind of sad, but I think I know a few people that own that plate.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 17 Nov 2010, 20:49
My favourite part is putting the black and white version of the same drawing behind the foreground portrait.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2010, 22:10
Dude looks disconcertingly like Paul Vautin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Vautin):

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a207/Xyljin/DaleJrPlate.png) (http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2009/05/14/paul_vautin_narrowweb__300x495,0.jpg)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 17 Nov 2010, 22:12
My favourite part is putting the black and white version of the same drawing behind the foreground portrait.

my favourite part is how the car on its side kind of looks like it is actually really small and perched precariously on the dude's shoulder, about to teeter and fall off at any moment
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Trollstormur on 17 Nov 2010, 22:28
where is this motherfucker
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 17 Nov 2010, 22:33
Maybe he is one of the Comic Discussion weirdos.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2010, 22:39
I've heard if you say "Comic discussion weirdo" three times in a row one of them appears and starts posting in the good part of the forum.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dazed on 17 Nov 2010, 22:56
Comic discussion weirdo comic discussion weirdo comic discussion weirdo klaatu verata nictu ahahahahahaha your world is DOOMED. :evil:  :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 18 Nov 2010, 07:04
I still hold there is nothing more American than this:

What is an energy plate, how does it differ from a normal plate and WHERE DO I BUY ONE?

It's not actually an "energy plate". The sponsor of his race car is Amp energy drink. NASCAR drivers refer to their sponsors in scary amounts during interviews.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lines on 18 Nov 2010, 07:41
That's because that's how they get paid. It's advertising on a very fast car that just goes in circles for a very long time.

Am I unamerican if I can't stand NASCAR and american football? I mean, I still like baseball, but not enough to pay much attention to it.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 18 Nov 2010, 09:12
You forgot "soccer's a sport for them pretty boy eye-talians that fall over all the time". That'll cement your American status.

Honestly, I do a terrible job of not liking American football. I own jerseys for New England players, watch their games, and went to a game this year (and enjoyed the fuck out of it).

Really, I don't like it that much. It's very low on my list of favorite sports. But after my dad moved out, we only really saw each other on weekends, so we hung out and watched football. It's a big part of why we're closer now than we were when we lived in the same house.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 18 Nov 2010, 10:07
is american football actually that huge a deal in america? about half my program consists of americans and they talk about football all the goddamn time. nobody can ever make plans to get together or study on sundays because it's football night. i hate stereotyping as much as the next guy which is part of the reason why this is so bewildering to me. at no point in my life had i ever met literally a single person at all who ever gave a shit about football until now and now it's everywhere. i think it is a ridiculous sport almost beyond comprehension.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 18 Nov 2010, 10:10
american football is a religion in america
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 18 Nov 2010, 10:19
is american football actually that huge a deal in america? about half my program consists of americans and they talk about football all the goddamn time. nobody can ever make plans to get together or study on sundays because it's football night.

It's a minor religion, Tania.

Btw, American Football the band? Love 'em.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 18 Nov 2010, 10:59
It partially depends on the demographic you're dealing with. With plenty of people it's just this thing that is sometimes on TV, like Law and Order or Cash Cab. Then there are those like my suite-mates, who, using only basic cable, somehow manage to make sure there is American Football on the TV 24/7. I personally enjoy it more than baseball, simply because it seems like the whole team is needed for a great play.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 18 Nov 2010, 11:33
Dogg you have never seen a finely executed 5-4-3 double play.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 18 Nov 2010, 11:35
Ahhh american advertisement. When visiting the US we had a (what we thought was) a all-american day sitting in the hotel room eating twinkies (my god, WHY!) saltwater taffee and watching american televisionshows about pagent-kiddies, which was interrupted with more fabulous american commercials. Its so far from what we're used to, its entertainment in itself.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 18 Nov 2010, 14:10
American Football is indeed retarded but actual Football is the greatest sport ever created.
Sure, if you are a chronic insomniac and the maximum legal dose of ambien isn't doing it for you.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Elizzybeth on 18 Nov 2010, 14:24
we had a (what we thought was) a all-american day sitting in the hotel room eating twinkies (my god, WHY!)

I'm pretty sure I haven't ever had a Twinkie.  (Ding Dongs, OTOH, were a not insignificant part of my childhood...)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: BlahBlah on 18 Nov 2010, 15:07
American Football is indeed retarded but actual Football is the greatest sport ever created.
Sure, if you are a chronic insomniac and the maximum legal dose of ambien isn't doing it for you.

ban tbh
try and play football for a local 5-a-side team/uni team/whatever, it's brilliant
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 18 Nov 2010, 15:31
we had a (what we thought was) a all-american day sitting in the hotel room eating twinkies (my god, WHY!)

I'm pretty sure I haven't ever had a Twinkie.  (Ding Dongs, OTOH, were a not insignificant part of my childhood...)

Not worth the calories. Its not much food I'd utter those foods for, tbh.
But... Twinkies was the way I lured my boyfriend to the US. Twinkies and Dunkin Donuts.

He doesn't ask for much.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 18 Nov 2010, 19:16
American Football is indeed retarded but actual Football is the greatest sport ever created.
Sure, if you are a chronic insomniac and the maximum legal dose of ambien isn't doing it for you.

ban tbh
try and play football for a local 5-a-side team/uni team/whatever, it's brilliant
Oh, it isn't bad to play, but the same can be said for golf. Still boring as hell to watch.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Johnny C on 18 Nov 2010, 20:40
football owns tania, watch a rider game this weekend
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dimmukane on 18 Nov 2010, 20:49
try and play football for a local 5-a-side team/uni team/whatever, it's brilliant
Oh, it isn't bad to play, but the same can be said for golf. Still boring as hell to watch.

Eh, I prefer watching a ball that is always moving to a ball that stops every 15 seconds. 
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 18 Nov 2010, 21:14
I'd rather watch something that isn't boring.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 18 Nov 2010, 21:19
god damnit we already have a sports thread for this, you fucks
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 18 Nov 2010, 21:20
you fucks
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 18 Nov 2010, 21:43
actual Football is the greatest sport ever created.

Looks like somebody's forgotten about a little game called sepak (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXmjOMUdsPY) takraw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4qmPP7LcAg).
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dimmukane on 18 Nov 2010, 22:11
I'd rather watch something that isn't boring.

man the only reason nfl isn't a total snoozefest is cuz everyone knows those guys go to the bathroom in their trousers

i guess some people have a scat fetish where the actors are on steroids and in skintight leggings

it's fascinating how a culture of millions has arisen from what is essentially a bunch of dudes wrestlin' in their own feces and urea for an hour

there is a system of rules that must be followed involving people who watch where players stand, which means their intelligence is just high enough to prove the existence of a missing link between primates and humans

this is a phenomenon that would normally be discussed in ANTHROPOLOGY CLASS



 :mrgreen:

okay so I'm kinda tired. don't actually give two shits about watching any kind of sporting event on television, just sick of hearing 'I'd like it if it wasn't boring' when that phrase can be applied to literally anything ever as a substitute for admitting ignorance when it comes to a specific topic
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 19 Nov 2010, 16:02
I'd take an anthropology class if it wasn't so BORING
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 19 Nov 2010, 16:19
I'm not defending NFL as fun to watch, although I would rather watch NFL than soccer. Probably because I understand the details of the game better.

Does anyone in here know how American football is different than rugby, rules-wise? People can get pretty badly hurt in football, so I'm wondering how it is that people playing what appears to be football minus pads don't get killed or crippled for life.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 19 Nov 2010, 16:31
I don't know much about the rules of either game (enough to follow if I'm watching, not much more) so I don't know if there's anything helping there, but I'd say the main thing is the lack of hyper-specialisation in rugby. Everybody on the team has to be able to run hard for a long time, so you don't get 300-pound gorillas who exist solely to plow dudes into the ground.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 19 Nov 2010, 16:52
As much as I generally agree with you (and don't know a ton about rugby)...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WciQVqEc8r0&feature=related

Some of those hits are apparently similar in feeling to running into a brick wall which is running back at you.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Liz on 19 Nov 2010, 17:05
I'd take an anthropology class if it wasn't so BORING

I will fight you. And I will win.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 19 Nov 2010, 17:41
In rugby there's a lot of technique that goes into how to hit people safely, for yourself, while in football it's about getting the other guy to the ground. There's also a lot more scrumming and such which looks intense but is basically just pushing into other guys. I think the ball is actually in play for a total of 20 minutes during a 60 minute game or something like that? The rest it's on the ground while a scrum is happening. That's 20 minutes of running, during which a real tackles only happen once in a while.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 19 Nov 2010, 22:27
Staedler and Dovey have it right. As I've mentioned before in the Sports thread, the difference really lies in the blocking. The blocking rules changes everything and makes the NFL game as much about raw mass and power as it is about coordination and quickness. As Dovey already pointed out, it leads to specialization. When half the game is about pushing eachother down, it can pay to have huge men on the field. It is a virtual lock that at any given time half of the men on the playing field will weigh in excess of 240 pounds. Anyone under 210 is considered undersized even at the "small" positions. The sheer momentum involved can lead to a helluva lot of injuries. And more than anything else, any player on the field can expect contact whether or not they are a ball carrier, so the sheer volume of hits on a given play significantly ups the potential for injury.

Here's an example. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbzwbtR5sbs) A defensive player gets hit so hard that the announcers don't bother talking about the ball carrier, a man who is hit by at least 2 people and is subsequently piled on.


As much as I generally agree with you (and don't know a ton about rugby)...
Some of those hits are apparently similar in feeling to running into a brick wall which is running back at you.

I don't mean to sound like a pig-headed American here, but a lot of those aren't as nasty as they look. Most of those were wrap ups-- the tackler slows down, opens his hips, and redirects the ball carrier, causing him to lose balance or lifts him off the ground. They can definitely hurt, especially without pads. But it's not as painful as when you get stopped with sheer momentum. In the NFL, for better or worse, you get more stuff like many of the hits seen here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82VbyzWef80&feature=related), in which the players do not make contact with their arms first or otherwise redirect prior to full contact. They just meet shoulder to chest and both get dropped like they'd been shot. Maximum energy transfer. When a guy hits you so hard that you leave the ground and continue to fly backwards through the air, it can really hurt like hell, pads or no pads.

Anyway, with that said, rugby is a rugged sport. After all, despite the rules and tackling style those shoulder-meets-chest plays that are so common in the NFL still happen in rugby, and when they do there's nothing there to mitigate it but a shirt. From what I've seen, however, those hits do not happen at the same frequency as in grid iron. Combine that with the difference in blocking rules and the size issue and I kinda have to laugh when people imply that the NFL is really any less dangerous to play.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: JD on 19 Nov 2010, 22:29
you fucks
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 19 Nov 2010, 22:34
When explained like that (I know barely anything about gridiron or any other kind of football) it makes a lot of sense. But when you put the two games next to each other, Rugby looks to be about as violent as Americal Football (in that they are both games heavily featuring large men running into each other) but without protective gear.

I still prefer to think of football (Australian versions) in a more friendly way: Everyone tries to hug the guy with the ball. The team with the most hugs at the end of the game wins. Extra points for group hugs.
Friendliest. Sport. Ever.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 19 Nov 2010, 23:02
I still prefer to think of football (Australian versions) in a more friendly way: Everyone tries to hug the guy with the ball. The team with the most hugs at the end of the game wins. Extra points for group hugs.
Friendliest. Sport. Ever.

Aaaaaand new sigquote.

Well-informed words about sports

See that does make a lot of sense. For the record, I'm an American as well and have more experience with football than rugby. In those videos I mostly refer to the hits when a rugby player catches a pitch from a teammate (I honestly don't know the technical terms) and doesn't see the defender until he barrels into him shoulder-first at top speed and the guy with the ball is promptly STOPPED.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: schimmy on 19 Nov 2010, 23:08
There's also a lot more scrumming and such which looks intense but is basically just pushing into other guys.

Not true at all. The one fact I do know about Rugby (other than it is easily the funnest sport to watch) is that a scrum does the same damage to your spine as a mid-speed car crash.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 19 Nov 2010, 23:33
The major major MAJOR difference between Rugby (both kinds) and American football is that in Rugby you're not allowed to pass the ball forwards. Ever. EVER.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: JD on 19 Nov 2010, 23:36
I thought everyone already knew that?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 19 Nov 2010, 23:41
Yeah well I've got a whole load of freshly baked ensaïmadas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensa%C3%AFmada) so there.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: JD on 19 Nov 2010, 23:43
Those look pretty tasty
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 20 Nov 2010, 01:23
I thought everyone already knew that?
I didn't. That is a pretty huge difference.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 20 Nov 2010, 06:18
In those videos I mostly refer to the hits when a rugby player catches a pitch from a teammate (I honestly don't know the technical terms) and doesn't see the defender until he barrels into him shoulder-first at top speed and the guy with the ball is promptly STOPPED.

Yeah, I made a face when I saw a couple of those. I'm sure there's plenty of days where those guys look like one continuous bruise. Still, I think the pads thing is a double edged sword. Yeah, a lot of collisions will hurt less. But the net result seems to be that the grid iron players act like they're invincible and launch themselves like human missiles.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 06:56
I'm wondering how it is that people playing what appears to be football minus pads don't get killed or crippled for life.

I know several people who have been crippled for life in rugby-related accidents; compound fractures, broken backs, legs and even hips, and one guy who got eye-gouged and now one of his eyes is just a scarred up white orb. Plus, have you ever seen what old rugby players noses and ears look like? It's like something out of Brueghel.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 20 Nov 2010, 07:30
I'm not defending NFL as fun to watch, although I would rather watch NFL than soccer. Probably because I understand the details of the game better.

?!

THE BALL GOES IN THE NET.
What's not to understand?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 07:37
Every time one of my 'friends' induces me to try and play some shitty wank-arse football game on the X-Box or whatever ("It's fun lighten up jeez") I can never score, ever, because I am offside, a rule which makes no sense at all on any level which I can even begin to think of, and seems to bear no relation to the apparently simple rules of the game I used to play occasionally in the playground at school.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 20 Nov 2010, 07:40
Offsides: The ball is played. When your teammate kicks the ball, you're behind the furthest-back defender.

Guy on the sideline points a flag at you.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 07:43
See, that doesn't make any sense.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: valley_parade on 20 Nov 2010, 07:44
It prevents a team from sticking a striker in front of the goal at all times and just launching longballs to him.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: snalin on 20 Nov 2010, 08:04
Looks like somebody's forgotten about a little game called sepak (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXmjOMUdsPY) takraw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4qmPP7LcAg).

Okay, I will never be impressed with the skills of anyone doing any other sport ever again.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 20 Nov 2010, 08:10
Offside is a rule that often those who've played football (soccer) for years often don't understand either. Often footballclubs don't start teaching the offside rule and tournaments don't start using them until the kids are 15-16 years old, and around here you often start when you're 5-6. Which makes it helluvalot more confusing since the way you were used to playing for the last 10 years suddenly does not compute.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 20 Nov 2010, 08:26
Looks like somebody's forgotten about a little game called sepak (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXmjOMUdsPY) takraw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4qmPP7LcAg).

Okay, I will never be impressed with the skills of anyone doing any other sport ever again.

so basically someone made hackey sack into a competitive team game?
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Ptommydski on 20 Nov 2010, 08:31
Football is played in probably every country, certainly on every continent in the world.

All you need is a spherical object, doesn't even have to be a football. Some of the greatest footballers ever learned using other objects such as fruit.

You can't sensibly compare it to any other sport, any argument doesn't stand up to closer scrutiny.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 20 Nov 2010, 08:40
By football do you mean american football or soccer?

I have a hard time seeing someone play soccer with a tomato or melon...
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 20 Nov 2010, 08:44
I know several people who have been crippled for life in rugby-related accidents; compound fractures, broken backs, legs and even hips, and one guy who got eye-gouged and now one of his eyes is just a scarred up white orb. Plus, have you ever seen what old rugby players noses and ears look like? It's like something out of Brueghel.

my sister played rugby in university and quit after she took a really bad knee to the face which broke her jaw and smashed about eight of her front teeth into crumbs. she has a whole bunch of fancy fake teeth now but at the time i was really young and this was like the scariest nightmare imaginable for me. i guess i should be glad it wasn't worse.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Ptommydski on 20 Nov 2010, 08:46
By football do you mean american football or soccer?

By football I mean football.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 20 Nov 2010, 10:40
By football do you mean american football or soccer?

I have a hard time seeing someone play soccer with a tomato or melon...

Do you have an easier time seeing someone play american football with a tomato or melon?

Also, Tommy, soccer is originally a British term to differentiate all games played on foot and with a ball from the game that is now thought of as football. So soccer isn't an incorrect term. </pedant>
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 10:54
There is a hierarchy of ‘metatexts’ which deeply inform how we look at art. The most obvious of these is the title. All formal works of art have a title, without exception. If the artist does not give it one, then it is automatically called ‘untitled’. This is arguably a function of the gallery system, of art criticism, art-history etc.: If works of art did not have titles, they could not be catalogued, talked about, referenced or organised conceptually. The anonymous quotation that something is art “if it's signed and you can't piss in it” (referring to Duchamp’s Fountain) should perhaps be “if it’s got a title and you can’t piss in it”, though in fact the capacity of a work to receive urine is theoretically irrelevant. This granting of a title could be said to actually transform an object into an artwork, in at least as much as we think of art as being something distinct from design, craft, etc.; or at the very least to be a definite mark that such a transformation has taken place. The matter of titles, being pieces of text, is obviously relevant to our discussion in some ways. Lawrence Weiner said that “all artist’s work has a title, titles are my work”, stripping art down to simply the titles, blown up massively on a wall; but even his work has titles, which exist separately to the pieces themselves. Titles are, however, fundamentally different to text actually incorporated into the work. The title of a work of art is separate from it, in the same way that the caption of a photograph in a newspaper is not the photograph itself, or even part of it.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 20 Nov 2010, 11:02
Do you have an easier time seeing someone play american football with a tomato or melon?

Considering I've never played american football or rugby but spent 10 years playing football/soccer/fotboll/fotball/whatever, yes I do. I suppose its because of the act of throwing something and catching it with your hands is a much softer motion then kicking it. 
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 20 Nov 2010, 11:56
But it doesn't have a prefix like Rugby, American or Australian.

It's just football on its own, for a reason.

It does. It's association football.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 11:58
Tommy has a lot of pretty charming and adorable but essentially insensate ideas about football and what it means for the world.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 20 Nov 2010, 12:49
Sorry, come back here when bicycle kicks are a necessity for every single play, rather than just showing off. Sepak Takraw is far more interesting than soc football.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 20 Nov 2010, 12:55
I don't think it's of any particular importance to the world but I do think it's a fuckload better than any other sport out there.

why?

(Tommy I am openly inviting you to do one of those long posts you like doing where you explain the appeal of things you are passionate about (for what it's worth, you changed my mind about Fugazi and Silkworm with those previously))
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 20 Nov 2010, 13:55
in chicago he forced his so-called best friends into a tgi fridays where we had to eat their shitty food and remain for over two hours so that he could watch football
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: tania on 20 Nov 2010, 13:56
johnny c attempted suicide by drinking a pink martini made from melted cotton candy for fuck's sake
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 15:02
I've often wondered to what extent following sport can be thought of as an addiction. It can obviously have pretty bad consequences for relationships, family life and also financially. It can even lead to criminal activity.

The curious thing is that more than any other thing you might regard as an addiction, the compulsive need to consume sports matches seems to be permissable and even lauded in many societies.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dliessmgg on 20 Nov 2010, 15:47
It's because sport is a substitute for war and fan worship is a substitute for religious worship. Totally tuer dogg, I read about it on the internet.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: snalin on 20 Nov 2010, 16:26
You might be right (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdMCAV6Yd0Y).
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Dliessmgg on 20 Nov 2010, 16:30
What worries me more is that I reread my previous post before posting and saw that I misspelled true and corrected it, but now it's even more wrong.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: squawk on 20 Nov 2010, 16:35
normally i don't like american football but today was big game cal vs stanford and i was very shouty

when i think about it, i shout about a whole fuckload of sports, really

i thought i denounced sports watching but man i just like shouting

sports!!!

it's also nice to confuse people when i know my shit and they don't expect me to
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Alex C on 20 Nov 2010, 16:52
I've often wondered to what extent following sport can be thought of as an addiction. It can obviously have pretty bad consequences for relationships, family life and also financially. It can even lead to criminal activity.

The curious thing is that more than any other thing you might regard as an addiction, the compulsive need to consume sports matches seems to be permissable and even lauded in many societies.

You don't really need a group of people to shoot heroin, but you need a group of people to play soccer and once you have a group it's easy to suck people into getting into it as well since people like being in groups and consensus is a really powerful thing.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 20 Nov 2010, 18:16
Do you know what else can be considered an addiction with risks of serious damage to friends+family and possibly leading to criminal activity? Posting regularly on an internet forum
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: StaedlerMars on 20 Nov 2010, 18:31
squawk's post pretty much sums up my opinion of watching sport. I don't do it often but damn it is fun to shout at people over whom you have no control.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Spluff on 20 Nov 2010, 18:33
Do you know what else can be considered an addiction with risks of serious damage to friends+family and possibly leading to criminal activity? Posting regularly on an internet forum

yeah I should really stop going to stormfront so much
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 20 Nov 2010, 19:07
Do you know what else can be considered an addiction with risks of serious damage to friends+family and possibly leading to criminal activity? Posting regularly on an internet forum

Character of the proposer has no bearing on the quality or truthfulness of the proposal.

Basic rhetorical logic: learn it.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 21 Nov 2010, 06:35
Just an observation, man. Sorry if I blew yr mind
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: snalin on 21 Nov 2010, 07:54
Do you know what else can be considered an addiction with risks of serious damage to friends+family and possibly leading to criminal activity? Posting regularly on an internet forum

also, (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,20726.2550.html)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 21 Nov 2010, 09:40
blew yr mind

You shouldn't have to hedge your bets over whether it's 'your' or 'you're'. It's such a simple rule! You're is a contraction of 'You Are'. You wouldn't say, 'I blew you are mind', so in this case it's 'your'.

'I blew your mind'.

See?

Any time you need any help with any other points of basic english grammar just drop me a line, I'm always fine to help.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Metope on 21 Nov 2010, 12:05
right

I believe the word you're looking for is 'ræit'
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: SirJuggles on 21 Nov 2010, 12:07
Silly Norwegians. Those aren't even real letters!
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Nodaisho on 21 Nov 2010, 16:21
Please tell me that isn't real Norwegian. If it is, I started learning the wrong language.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Metope on 21 Nov 2010, 16:27
It's something we like to call 'Norwenglish', or english spoken/written in a riddikulus Nårvedjæn aksent.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Snuffletrout on 21 Nov 2010, 18:13
its håo Heyerdahl vudd hæv vritten iff he vræits laik he spåok.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lines on 21 Nov 2010, 19:50
 :psyduck:








:psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Ballard on 22 Nov 2010, 00:15
It's because sport is a substitute for war and fan worship is a substitute for religious worship. Totally tuer dogg, I read about it on the internet.

Funny how we keep unwittingly returning to the original topic of anthropology.

P.S. psyduck is the best thing to happen to this forum in a long time
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Jimor on 22 Nov 2010, 03:18
I was here first, goddamnit! RAWR!
    /
 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 22 Nov 2010, 03:19
:psyduck:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             :mrgreen:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lunchbox on 22 Nov 2010, 03:23
Quote
SON, I AM DISAPPOINT
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/jcemoticon.png)


(http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9596/fkntgrws0.png)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 22 Nov 2010, 03:44
Oh my god I'd forgotten about those!
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Inlander on 22 Nov 2010, 03:45
        Have ye ever been to sea, Billy?
       /
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/jcemoticon.png)


 :psyduck:
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Lines on 22 Nov 2010, 05:48
I still say that is the best photo of Johnny ever.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: David_Dovey on 22 Nov 2010, 08:13
This is handy, cos I've been looking for an excuse to post this again

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/johnny.jpg)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Christophe on 22 Nov 2010, 08:15
This is actually the best photo of Johnny.

(http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i318/tommydski/photo-19.jpg)
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: Barmymoo on 25 Nov 2010, 12:38
This thread has just become my favourite ever.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: calenlass on 08 Dec 2010, 09:11
Hey dudes, here is a mnemonic device my friend and I came up with for my Intro to Human Origins class to help keep track of the order of the geological epochs:

Pale Emus Offered Mother Pliers. Please Help!

(Paleocene Eocene Oligocene Miocene Pliocene Pleistocene Holocene)


Hope this is useful to someone.
Title: Re: dear dude in dr zikers anthro class
Post by: KharBevNor on 08 Dec 2010, 11:03
Holocene 4 lyfe yo.