THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 28 Nov 2010, 14:50

Title: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Nov 2010, 14:50
Here we go. Standard text messaging rates apply. Your mileage may vary. Void in Massachusetts or wherever prohibited by law.
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: Tergon on 28 Nov 2010, 14:57
I pick Jimbo.  And no, not because of the Turkeys.  I just think that Marten needs a drink and a chance to clear his head, which usually involves meeting up with ol' Jimbo.  It just depends if, when Marten told Sven that he was "Just heading out now," he was actually going to work or not.  If he wasn't off to the library my guess is he'll wind up in a pub.
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: nockiemommy on 28 Nov 2010, 15:12
I pick Angus. Hellooo.

They're at CoD ... And Angus will doubtless come in for some snarky coffee and some barrista makeouts with Faye. I was in total toss-up between Cosette ... and WHERE is the PENNY option?? I haven't seen her in CoD for a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 28 Nov 2010, 15:22
I picked Marten's mom. I can just imagine Veronica ringing Marten as he goes out for his walk, asking him how things are between him and Dora. And just as he finishes telling her they broke up, theres just the sound of a phone dropping and Veronica on her way to the airport, getting ready to raise holy hell. Last panel would just be Marten looking at the phone, uttering "Oh shi...."
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: tomart on 28 Nov 2010, 16:07
Let's distinguish between "next" to react and critical reactors;  I voted for Tai, her reaction(s) could be critical, as could Ms Vance's... but they might not be in the next panels. 

I picture Marten drunken hijinks w Steve and/or Jimbo, leading to erudite analyses of women, perhaps in the vein of Sigmund Freud, "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: Border Reiver on 28 Nov 2010, 16:18
I'm going fer Angus.  Faye'll want to get away from the drama - sort out her own feelings and at the moment that involves Angus as a non-partisan sounding board.  Of course, when she heads on over to Angus' there is a strong possibility of meeting up with Marigold (eagerly awaiting the next iteration of WOW), or maybe I'm just taking a wildarse stab in the dark about what'll happen next.
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Nov 2010, 16:30
A few thoughts as we open the week:
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 28 Nov 2010, 16:49
  • If Ma Vance gets word of the breakup, Dora might sell the shop to Hanners and move to Kathmandu. Now that I think back, I don't think Faye ever mentioned to Dora what Veronica threatened her with when they went to dinner...

She did. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=467) Dora might not remember though; that was quote awhile ago now.

If she did forget, I'm sure she'll get a sound reminder when she wakes up hanging by rusty chains from a dungeon ceiling.
Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
Post by: flamingo on 28 Nov 2010, 16:55
    • If Ma Vance gets word of the breakup, Dora might sell the shop to Hanners and move to Kathmandu. Now that I think back, I don't think Faye ever mentioned to Dora what Veronica threatened her with when they went to dinner...

    She did. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=467) Dora might not remember though; that was quote awhile ago now.

    If she did forget, I'm sure she'll get a sound reminder when she wakes up hanging by rusty chains from a dungeon ceiling.


    Except that would just be fulfilling Dora's fantasies...[/list]
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 28 Nov 2010, 17:20
    See, I think Veronica knows that. Which is why she didn't threaten her with bodily harm when they went out to lunch with Marten.

    This, of course, begs the question of what exactly Marty's mom would do to her.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 28 Nov 2010, 17:31
    I spend many a night wondering what Veronica Vance would do to Dora  :evil:

    *badum-tsh*
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: O8h7w on 28 Nov 2010, 18:31
    Steve, obviously. Marten may not be acting exactly like he normally does, but that won't change. Of course, there is the possibility of someone walking into the coffee shop first... but I doubt it.

    Anybody else who is still waiting for the backstory on Dora, and maybe a talk? I think therein lies the possibility for the main cast to remain friends, and I do think that is a must.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: The Duke on 28 Nov 2010, 18:32
    I meant to vote for Dale instead of Tai.  Whoever totals up the poll, keep that in mind.  

    If that still happens.  Don't matter none.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Yellowstone on 28 Nov 2010, 19:03

    Steve, obviously.


    Anyone want to count what fraction of Steve's appearances don't involve the two of them getting drunk and commiserating about girl trouble?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 28 Nov 2010, 20:43
    I'm kinda looking forward to Penny's annoyed face
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 28 Nov 2010, 20:50
    ... and WHERE is the PENNY option?? I haven't seen her in CoD for a long time.

    I'm kinda looking forward to Penny's annoyed face

    Sadly, I fear that Penelope may have booked a bus tour of the local allosaurus preserve...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 28 Nov 2010, 20:58
    Tai

    That's when the real fun'll begin.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 28 Nov 2010, 21:05
    I think Marten's either going to work, or going in to ask for the day (or a couple of days) off. 

    So I voted Tai, although I also think she's too much of a friend to Marten to go chasing after Dora... 


    ...immediately. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 28 Nov 2010, 21:12
    ...Yeah, she'll wait three days!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Nov 2010, 21:12
    Pressing F5 over and over does not make Jeph draw faster.

    However AS SOON AS I GO TO BED he will post.   Happens every time.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Boomslang on 28 Nov 2010, 21:18
    Actually, Tai might be almost as pissed as Faye was.

    Yeah, she thinks Dora is hot, but she's (I would say) a pretty close friend of Marten's. She's going to be a bit protective of him, given her introduction to the situation, and her frustration at not having a close monogamous relationship, when Dora's just throwing one away, might boil over into petite rage.

    Won't know until Jeph decides to reveal, but I'm looking forward to it either way.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 28 Nov 2010, 21:25
    Pressing F5 over and over does not make Jeph draw faster.

    However AS SOON AS I GO TO BED he will post.   Happens every time.

    I don't think he's started yet, something about a bear (http://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/9107560997064706)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Nov 2010, 21:47
    Hopefully it is a metaphorical bear  and not a real one,  because I will be very sad if my favorite comic artist gets all eaten up.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Yellowstone on 28 Nov 2010, 22:02

    Sadly, I fear that Penelope may have booked a bus tour of the local allosaurus preserve...


    Really?  She was at CoD in strip 1716, which was the day before the Underpants Incident - not too long ago, in QCtime.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 28 Nov 2010, 22:26
    Sadly, I fear that Penelope may have booked a bus tour of the local allosaurus preserve...

    Just as long as she takes Wil with her...  :wink:

    It's hasn't even been 100 strips (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1718) since we last saw her. Steve goes that long without showing his face all the time.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 28 Nov 2010, 22:52
    A few thoughts as we open the week:
    • I still contend that Marten is going to be celibate for a while, for two good reasons: first, after the relationship roller coaster he's been on with Faye and Dora, I don't think he's going to want to be going back to Six Flags Dating Adventure anytime soon; second, it's better for Teh Funny in the strip.
    Just for clarity's sake, do you mean "celibate" in a purely sexual sense, or for the sake of romantic relationships as well?  I mean, I can't see either one working out unless Marten gets horrifically drunk and wakes up in some random lady's apartment, and even that would be massively, massively out-of-character for him.  So I guess I agree with you either way?  I just thought your comment kind of blurs the line there, and I wasn't quite sure which way you meant it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Yellowstone on 28 Nov 2010, 23:03
    Kind of a tangential question, but what's the protocol about mentioning things from Jeph's live broadcast of drawing the comic?  Do we avoid any spoilers until the comic is posted?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 28 Nov 2010, 23:06
    Hell no.  Spoil away.  He's drawing the Library last I looked, so I called it. 

    Protocol?  We don't need no stinkin' protocol...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 28 Nov 2010, 23:19
    You really can't tell all that much about the plot from just the drawings, sure you see the action and the characters reaction to it, but without the dialogue, it's kinda like watching a movie without the sound. You can tell basically whats going on, but you're not going to get the jokes.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 28 Nov 2010, 23:24
    True.  And by what I'm seeing now, I retract my "I called it".  Jeph will do what Jeph will do...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Nov 2010, 23:30
    If we see Tai riding a Bibliodon out the door, we can draw some conclusions about her reaction.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 28 Nov 2010, 23:32
    I'm just pissed that I can't watch the stream at work. It's nice to check in every now and again to tell how far along the comic is, but I don't watch the entire thing (anymore.)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Somniloquence on 28 Nov 2010, 23:47
    You know, it's strange. So far everyone has been pretty understanding (or at least sympathetic) to both sides.

    I predict some pretty soon here is gonna be a total jack-ass about the situation. I mean, not everyone can be understanding and nice, right?

    Edit: Because I feel I was unclear. I don't mean taking sides, so much as, "Good! I'm glad you guys are broken up!" or something similar. At least I hope so. I kind of wanna see someone get bitched out.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skewbrow on 28 Nov 2010, 23:52
    Library scene, you say? Ook.

    I won't watch Jeph's show (unless I reeeeally need to get a few minutes head start). More often than not there is no need for me to do that. This is one of the advantages of my time zone - IIRC 7 hours ahead of Eastern US. Wake up, switch on the broadband and the laptop, start the drip machine, shave, brush teeth,... At this point XP may have started up, and it's time to enjoy a fresh strip of QC together with a fresh dose of caffeine.

    Of course, sometimes Jeph's movie night ran real late, and I need to go to work first.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 28 Nov 2010, 23:58
    ...I don't mean taking sides, so much as, "Good! I'm glad you guys are broken up!" or something similar...

    If anyone says anything along those lines, it'll probably be one of the foot-in-mouth brigade - either Angus (hard to tell what he thinks of Marten/Dora) or Marigold, who in a moment of unusual clarity says something about them obviously being unsuitable for each other.  

    Maybe Penney,  that's a hard one to judge as well.  The whole "crazy girlfriend" thing leaves her pretty biased...

    I think most other cast members were pretty well behind the relationship.  Several were using the couple as a yardstik of happy relations (Steve, Tai, Hanners(?)) so I don't see it happening from any of the central cast.  (is Steve central?)  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Nov 2010, 00:11
    Ooh, good point about Pennelope. Dora was all but calling herself crazy. Faye, well, remember what she said to Dora. Marten is actually the least likely to call Dora a crazy ex, but whoever does it will set Pennelope off like a Roman candle.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 00:15
    I'm actually kind of thinking Marten, not Dora, is going to get the "Crazy Ex" label applied.  No idea what's going on in the man's head, but he's angry and bitter and worked up as hell.  I find myself wondering if he's going to do, or say, something that he'll regret later.  He's been supernaturally tolerant of all the shit that gets dumped on him over the course of the entire strip... maybe the girl he loves breaking up with him for a reason as retarded (as acknowledged in canon) as this will be the straw that breaks his back.

    Maybe I'm just projecting a little, but the way he's been looking in his appearances lately?  I keep thinking he looks like he's on the edge of his tolerance.  Doesn't take much to make someone in that position snap.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 00:26
    Oh he's going to snap.

    He was like mid-snap when Dora walked out in strip #1797 and he squelched it.

    That shit is going to have to release at some point.

    The only question is who will be the target/victim.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 29 Nov 2010, 00:55
    Okay guys, now you got me super excited to see Marten FLIP. HIS. SHIT.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Arky on 29 Nov 2010, 01:09
    QC is late, I'm whacked out on Benadryl, Penny & Aggie does a frigging on-screen *censored for spoiler reasons* (thus surpassing QC for the Biggest Dramatic Moment in a Good Webcomic award for 2010), Gunnerkrigg Court does a *censored for spoiler reasons* scene, Randall is back in the chair at XKCD, and Leslie Nielsen died.  I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 01:12
    Aww, man! Marten looks rough. Poor bastard is haggard.

    Has he even showered?

    Has he even slept?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 01:12
    I shall indeed say it with him.

    D'awww.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Arky on 29 Nov 2010, 01:14
    Aww, man! Marten looks rough. Poor bastard is haggard.

    Has he even showered?

    Has he even slept?

    Probably not.


    OHMYGOD THE STRIP TITLE IS I'LL BE BY YOUR SIDE IS JEPH SAYING THAT HANNERS AND MARTEN WILL GET TOGETHER AND HAVE BABBIES?!?!?!?!


    (no, but he is totally trolling us.  again.)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: redragon5000 on 29 Nov 2010, 01:19
    Marten is adorable with the Worry Hat on.  :laugh:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Fenriswolf on 29 Nov 2010, 01:19
    *sigh* I don't understaaaand what the deal is with Hanners. I don't especially like or dislike her, but I find the lolcat-esque cuteness somewhat painful. Since when does OCD, and yeah, more than a little lack of life experience, make you act like a child?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tom103 on 29 Nov 2010, 01:20
    OHMYGOD THE STRIP TITLE IS I'LL BE BY YOUR SIDE IS JEPH SAYING THAT HANNERS AND MARTEN WILL GET TOGETHER AND HAVE BABBIES?!?!?!?!
    Perhaps it would be a good thing... I think they'd make a nice couple, if Hanners can overcome her OCD
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: musicalsoul on 29 Nov 2010, 01:22
    *sigh* I don't understaaaand what the deal is with Hanners. I don't especially like or dislike her, but I find the lolcat-esque cuteness somewhat painful. Since when does OCD, and yeah, more than a little lack of life experience, make you act like a child?

    What's funny about Hanners is how different she is now in comparison to when she first showed up. I know it was explained that she was on some super heavy medication back then, but she was definitely less childlike.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: musicalsoul on 29 Nov 2010, 01:23
    Oh and I also think Hanners is absolutely adorable here. And Marty looks adorable in the worry hat also.  And also:  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 29 Nov 2010, 01:23
    Haha. Kudos to those who predicted "The Return of the Worry Hat!"

    And as quick as I am to jump on the Marten/Hanners bandwagon, I would not expect to see it for months. (Both in-comic time and IRL.)

     
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 29 Nov 2010, 01:28
    Friggin' d'awwwwwwww  :cry:

    Watch as the rest of the week is heeeeeeellllla hella dramatic to make up for this.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 29 Nov 2010, 01:32
    Raven.

    Just because it was a very unlikely option so it was fun.

    The other options are all about equal in chances, so meh.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TheMan on 29 Nov 2010, 01:45
    Been watching all of this, for like months....

    Seriously?  None of you saw the Dora treating the Marten as getting stale? None of you saw the "mental troubles are the new indie rock" infecting this like it has everything else?

    No one?

    And really, on average, a weeks worth of comics equals maybe a day, so Dora and Marten had been dating what, 5-6 months?  You buffoons are suggesting couples counseling? for a 5 (at best) month old relationship?

    Gah!  Seriously, can we get back to a storyline that doesn't stink of pussy Jeph?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 29 Nov 2010, 01:51
    Been watching all of this, for like months....

    Seriously?  None of you saw the Dora treating the Marten as getting stale? None of you saw the "mental troubles are the new indie rock" infecting this like it has everything else?

    No one?

    And really, on average, a weeks worth of comics equals maybe a day, so Dora and Marten had been dating what, 5-6 months?  You buffoons are suggesting couples counseling? for a 5 (at best) month old relationship?

    Gah!  Seriously, can we get back to a storyline that doesn't stink of pussy Jeph?

    they been dating for a year dogg

    niiiiice haterade you're drinkin' though
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 02:06
    QC hasn't been about Indie Rock for a while now.

    And it can't be anymore. Would Indie rock references about music that came out in 2005 be funny in 2010? And would music from 2010 fit with the strip's continuity, given that only a few months ago in comic time they were ripping on albums that came out in 2004?

    Instead, QC is about how twenty somethings with emotional problems adjust to ever changing societal expectations. and AnthroPCs
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 02:09
    Been watching all of this, for like months....

    Seriously?  None of you saw the Dora treating the Marten as getting stale? None of you saw the "mental troubles are the new indie rock" infecting this like it has everything else?

    No one?

    And really, on average, a weeks worth of comics equals maybe a day, so Dora and Marten had been dating what, 5-6 months?  You buffoons are suggesting couples counseling? for a 5 (at best) month old relationship?

    Gah!  Seriously, can we get back to a storyline that doesn't stink of pussy Jeph?
    Uh, actually, like two dozen people registered last week to scream the exact same thing at high volume.  It started such a huge pissing war that the thread got locked.  Rather than start another flamewar, I'll just say three things.

    1:  Jeph has said multiple times that they've been dating for longer than it seems IRL due to large time jumps in the strip's continuity.
    2:  Relationship Drama is a major recurring theme in the comic, so while your "stinks of pussy" remark was probably hilarious to you, please stop trolling and let Jeph tell his story.
    3:  If you have really "Been watching all of this, for like months..." then you already knew both of those things so I'm not sure why anyone had to say it.

    Thank you, come again.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: melly21 on 29 Nov 2010, 02:15
    *sigh* I don't understaaaand what the deal is with Hanners. I don't especially like or dislike her, but I find the lolcat-esque cuteness somewhat painful. Since when does OCD, and yeah, more than a little lack of life experience, make you act like a child?

    I don't think Jeph is trying to make it sound like OCD means a person acts like a child. This is just another part of Hannelore's character, she acts like child not because of her OCD or lack of life experience, it's just how she is.

    I thought today's comic was cute, I think this is what Marten needed just a little pick me up with no big discussion about how he feels and what happened, all that can come later. Hanners was the perfect person to see Marten right now I think.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 02:24
    I think Hannelore's OCD stems from the social anxiety that her sheltered upbringing has caused.

    It's not that Hanners is Child-like because she has OCD, it's that she has OCD for the same reason that she is child-like.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Exar_Kun on 29 Nov 2010, 02:43
    I know people already realize this, but it must be said anyway:

    Martin wearing the worry-hat looks fukkin metal
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pendrake on 29 Nov 2010, 02:52
    For comic #1806...

    1. Considering today's strip, Tai would be the obvious choice for next cast-member up for the aftermath of The Break-Up.  Regardless of who is next, I hope each (active) QC cast-member will get their turn.

    2. I will also chime in to say it with Jeph: D\'Awww.  (though I am not certain why it includes "\"... :? )

    3. Interesting marketing idea for the personalized QC Book, vol. 1.  As tempting as a Hanners cover would be, it just does not feel appropriate for strips #1-300.  Definitely for vol. 2 (301-600, I assume), though.  [And because I am certain someone will wonder, Hannelore's first appearance was strip #515.  How different things were back then!]

    4. Seeing the Worry Hat always reminds me of another famous hat:

    (http://www.craftycrafty.tv/Jayne_cap_edited.jpg)

    "A man walks down the street in that hat, people know he's not afraid of anything."  

    And I do feel an urge to fiddle with the pom-pom when wearing, or even seeing, such hats... :psyduck:


    5. While I would also approve of a Hanners+Marten romantic relationship, as I also would approve of Hanners+Sven too (either/or would definitely be interesting reading), I doubt either will really happen overall.  As for the short-term development, I would rather see Marten and Dora spend some time (at least 40-80 strips, I suppose) just living QC-Life before any new developments in their love-lives.

    6. As for Leslie Nielson's passing: "I just want to tell you both: Good luck, we're all counting on you." :cry:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Odal on 29 Nov 2010, 03:02
    Guys, I totally saw this situation happening for like 7 years.  Did you all really not see it coming ever since comic #75?!  YOU ALL ARE BUFFOONS!

    /end sarcasm

    The Hanners distraction is fine for now, but I'm expectin' some Tai and Marten combat this week!  Perhaps even get Hanners involved.  I'll have to come up with another one of my ridiculous predictions, since my other ones were deleted from history along with the 60-something page thread.

    EDIT - Hmm, I guess that thread wasn't deleted.  Though it was locked.  And I guess I exaggerated about the size of it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Akima on 29 Nov 2010, 03:03
    Reading today's strip, I had this strange flash of Patrick Stewart putting on the Worry Hat (http://www.entertonement.com/clips/jgkbnwjhyd--EngageStar-Trek-Patrick-Stewart-Captain-Picard-geek-)...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Arky on 29 Nov 2010, 03:06
    Yelling Bird needs to be an option for the personalized book.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 29 Nov 2010, 03:25
    Oh man Marten must really be feeling like shit...if I were him Hanners' actions would make me tear up or want to hug her or both. My prediction: Dora sees Marten walking home wearing the worry hat and loses it all over again.

    I wouldn't call Hannelore's nature necessarily child-like; more like just ultra-naive and innocent. Which I guess is a lot like a child. Shut up, I just woke up. Either way, growing up very sheltered like she was I wouldn't expect too much less. I think it's actually kinda refreshing to see a character like Hanners in a cast full of otherwise somewhat cynical, sarcastic, 20-somethings. 

    Meanwhile, one of the Mystery-Solving Teens looks suspiciously like our protagonist (http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=289).
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skewbrow on 29 Nov 2010, 03:35
    Just learned about Leslie Nielsen. R.I.P. They showed Airplane here on national TV just last week. If only I had known :cry:
    Didn't watch it this time as nobody else in my social circle would get the Gipper jokes. In grad school we watched it together with my Slovenian housemate and ended up ROTFL.

    I agree with all those who think that Marten snapping is long overdue. It is unrealistic to think that he could handle the break up with a meh attitude. He could still be numb, of course, but a valve is breaking soon, soon, soon.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: AnAverageWriter on 29 Nov 2010, 03:52
    I don't think Jeph is trying to make it sound like OCD means a person acts like a child. This is just another part of Hannelore's character, she acts like child not because of her OCD or lack of life experience, it's just how she is.
    I thought today's comic was cute, I think this is what Marten needed just a little pick me up with no big discussion about how he feels and what happened, all that can come later. Hanners was the perfect person to see Marten right now I think.

    I totally agree with you. We needed some Hanners-inspired D'awww for the comic; it was getting so depressing lately. I think Jeph did a brilliant thing, as he is apt to do.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 29 Nov 2010, 04:43
    Marten doesn't look really silly....he looks slightly ridiculous.  :-D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 04:57
    Yes, but not ridiculous enough to defeat The Awkward Zone (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1425)!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 29 Nov 2010, 04:59
    yes, because when you've got a smile on your face because of your own ridiculousness, the awkward zone isn't even able to fire back.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 05:20
    Marten's smile seems someone guarded, he's not letting himself go.

    He's holding something back.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: O8h7w on 29 Nov 2010, 05:56
    Marten's smile seems someone guarded, he's not letting himself go.

    He's holding something back.

    Couldn't agree more. And I somewhat hope for Hanners to be out of the library before Tai shows up, since I'm guessing that's when whatever Marten is about to do happens... but he could break down in tears, I guess, and if so it would be good for Marten if Hanners was still around. But somehow I think rage is the more likely option.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: AnAverageWriter on 29 Nov 2010, 05:59
    Why do you folks keep insisting that all of a sudden Marten is going to morph into this violent, raging, screaming, everyone-get-away kind of beast and start tearing into people?

    Have we ever, EVER seen him do anything remotely like that at all, in the history of the strip?

    Yeah, he had a breakup. It was the end of a long relationship. But people do that all the time without raging, taking it out on their friends, or in general becoming an asswipe to be around.

    Marten had his cry, in private. He's dealing with it in his own way.

    Sheesh, people.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 29 Nov 2010, 06:05
    Why do you folks keep insisting that all of a sudden Marten is going to morph into this violent, raging, screaming, everyone-get-away kind of beast and start tearing into people?

    Have we ever, EVER seen him do anything remotely like that at all, in the history of the strip?

    Yeah, he had a breakup. It was the end of a long relationship. But people do that all the time without raging, taking it out on their friends, or in general becoming an asswipe to be around.

    Marten had his cry, in private. He's dealing with it in his own way.

    Sheesh, people.
    Not only it would be interesting, i personally think Marten NEEDS to get angry.... It's healthy sometimes you know?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 29 Nov 2010, 06:15
    Why do you folks keep insisting that all of a sudden Marten is going to morph into this violent, raging, screaming, everyone-get-away kind of beast and start tearing into people?

    Have we ever, EVER seen him do anything remotely like that at all, in the history of the strip?

    Yeah, he had a breakup. It was the end of a long relationship. But people do that all the time without raging, taking it out on their friends, or in general becoming an asswipe to be around.

    Marten had his cry, in private. He's dealing with it in his own way.

    Sheesh, people.

    We're not saying he's gonna go on a killing spree or anything; just that he tends to bottle in his anger and whether you like it or not, negative emotions have a way of coming out. It already happened when Dora looked at his porn; he blew up at her and revealed his resentment for her behavior in general. I am in no way, shape, or form saying the breakup was his fault because of this; it wasn't. But I can see Marten partly blaming himself for how things turned out. My point is, he's feeling a lot of negative emotions right now, and chances are someone will say the wrong thing and he'll lash out with an unrelated angry tirade.

    Also, we don't know Marten cried after he went to bed. I mean, he could have, or he might have been too numb from how sudden it was. I can see him just getting into bed and laying there for hours thinking (i'm willing to bet he didn't sleep).
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Takerial on 29 Nov 2010, 06:50
    While an outlet for negative emotions such as anger is good. Actually expressing it to "relieve" some of it is one of the worse things you can do with it. Because in the end, it only makes someone more likely to become angry more often. - This is proven in Psychological studies.

    A constructive outlet, like what Hannelore is doing right now with him and the hat, is the best thing for it.

    Granted it would be more dramatic, but yeah.

    In another note. This scene with Hannelore reminded me of something I've been thinking awhile. Mostly that it seems that her and Marten seem to be have some sort of possibility going on. I figured I was just over-thinking things. But with the break-up between him and Dora, it's causing me to reevaluate that perception.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 07:14
    Healthy or no, it's clear to see that Marten's feeling like hell right now, and if someone triggers him I do believe he's going to lose his temper.  I don't want to see that because I think it'll be psychologically healthy, or because I think it'd be funny, or because I want him to make Hannelore cry, or anything like that.  I want to see it because I think Marten's a great character with one gap in his personality - the fact that he always has this mask up of being a calm, cheerful, easygoing guy.  Right now that mask is more strained than it ever has been, and purely for the sake of the story, I want a look underneath it.

    Every now and then we all lose our temper.  It's never pretty, and it never helps things in the long run, and psychological studies may show that it has bad effects if you do it too much... but as much as I accept all that, I also know how it feels to be under a gigantic pile of shit when your world turns on you.  And I know that sometimes, just for a few shining moments, getting it all off your chest does make you feel a little bit better.  Marten needs to let out his emotions, and if Hannelore can't manage to get him to do it by being adorable, then maybe a good old-fashioned yell session might at least help him a little.

    Plus, from a purely storytelling perspective, I just really do want to see Marten with his mask off.  I've been saying so for ages and I still mean it.  He's an interesting character, and this is the one part of him we've never gotten to see... it'd be great if we got the chance.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 07:51
    Let's distinguish between "next" to react and critical reactors;  I voted for Tai, her reaction(s) could be critical, as could Ms Vance's... but they might not be in the next panels. 

    I picture Marten drunken hijinks w Steve and/or Jimbo, leading to erudite analyses of women, perhaps in the vein of Sigmund Freud, "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"

    a 12 inch chocolate penis that ejaculates money.

    http://instantrimshot.com (http://instantrimshot.com)

    I'll be here all week, folks (except for wednesday), try the waitress!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 08:14
    Healthy or no, it's clear to see that Marten's feeling like hell right now, and if someone triggers him I do believe he's going to lose his temper. 

    While that would certainly be something to see (and what I'd like to see, to be honest), I don't think Jeph will go for that - I think we're going to see more "d'aww", really the lighter side of reaction to the breakup.

    Not neccesarily a bad thing. Man can not live by incandescent rage alone.

    Hanners is officially Awesome. A good friend is about the most valuable thing that Marten could have, right now or ever.

     :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 29 Nov 2010, 08:49
    I don't think we're going to see rage. 

    Frustration, yes.  When Tai shows up and asks, or when he goes to get Steve.  Roght now, he's going through the motions, even with Hanners.  He's not going to let his guard down at work, not in front of library patrons, because he's a very private person.  Nor will he when people come up to him and say "I heard what happened, are you OK?"  He'll sigh, shrug, and say "Yeah, I'll be fine". 

    There will be moments, but they're going to be moments of crazy, not moments of anger.  Because that's his relief valve. 

    Of course, that's just MHO, worth all of $.02.  Your mileage may vary, and Jeph's development of Marten will probably go in a completely different direction. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: LeeC on 29 Nov 2010, 08:53
    nah, I agree with your carl-e  sounds about right.  I kind of want to see Tai's take on this.  They have been there for each other when it comes to venting/talking about relationships.  Same with Steve...I sense a possible jimbo cameo when steve tai and marten go to the bar.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: cyro on 29 Nov 2010, 09:52
    People shipping Marten with the worry hat in 5... 4...

     :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: O8h7w on 29 Nov 2010, 10:01
    People shipping Marten with the worry hat in 5... 4...

     :psyduck:

    If there was any danger, don't you think it should've shown up by now?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mustakyy on 29 Nov 2010, 10:04
    Hmm, we're off to a quite interesting start for a week. Seems that the visit from Hanners cheered Marten quite a bit (yes, definitely a "D'awwwwwww"-moment there, way to go Hanners!), but still, DAMN he looks rough. And haggard. Seriously. I'd say, no sleep or shovering, just straight to work from the eye of the shitstorm.

    Every now and then we all lose our temper.  It's never pretty, and it never helps things in the long run, and psychological studies may show that it has bad effects if you do it too much... but as much as I accept all that, I also know how it feels to be under a gigantic pile of shit when your world turns on you.  And I know that sometimes, just for a few shining moments, getting it all off your chest does make you feel a little bit better.  Marten needs to let out his emotions, and if Hannelore can't manage to get him to do it by being adorable, then maybe a good old-fashioned yell session might at least help him a little.

    This. Alltogether, even if we've seen Marten to possess the calm of a zen-master, there is a certain amount of crap a person can take. And somehow i get the feeling that he's gone waaay past it. Even when you know it itsn't really wise, healthy or even rational to have an outburst of rage, sometimes you just have to let it out. And in this case, mixture of bottled up emotions (mix of anger, (misplaced) guilt and sadness) and sleep deprivation (or atleast it seems like that) could send Marten having a fit of rage of epic proportion. If that actually happens, I pity the fool who happens to push him over the edge..

    So, what im thinking, shall we see in the near future...     

    an explosion in which Marten lashes out to someone, with possibility of quite nasty consequences
    or....
    an implosion where he keeps his cool appearance and continues to mourn and suffer privately

    Somehow i have the feeling that something big is going to happen, as if there hasnt been enough drama yet..  :roll:     but still.. All work and no play makes marten a dull boy  :evil:


    But, on the other hand, this is just my guesses and speculations, we'll just have to wait and see what Jeph has in store for us...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: carg1 on 29 Nov 2010, 10:42
    The reality of it would probably be epically horrendous, but dammit I need a Hanners around.  In an ideal world I'd have a dedicated but naive and neurotic friend.  In reality, she'd see how messy any space I occupy becomes and ban me from seeing her anywhere that wasn't a wide open public space.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 29 Nov 2010, 11:37
    He does look cute in the hat.   :-D

    1) Dora will get injured in a holdup (Shot/Clubbed/Stabbed) or mugging

    2) Marten will go on a bender with Faye.

    3) There wil be sex.  There will be awkwardness and guilt

    4) Faye will join a Nunnery



    Or more likely Tai will make some off the cuff statement or a clumsy pass at Dora in front of Marten

    Martenpocolipse will occur.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 29 Nov 2010, 11:43
    You guys do realize that you can release frustration in ways that do not involve explosive anger?  If we couldn't release anger and frustration in anything outbursts then there would be alot more "person grabs firearm and shoots up..." headlines (actually, that situation would be so common that it might not even make the papers).  And as an aside it's been less than 24 hours (comic time) since it happened, give the man a chance.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 29 Nov 2010, 11:53
    Or more likely Tai will make some off the cuff statement or a clumsy pass at Dora in front of Marten

    I really don't think something like that will happen, although i'd certanly think like that if i haven't read this: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1792

    She is fond to joke around, but she is really mature, more than she seems to be.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: daryljfontaine on 29 Nov 2010, 12:48
    MARTEN!HULK MUST RAEG!

    "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"

    a 12 inch chocolate penis that ejaculates money.

    Chocolate penis, if edible, is an unfortunately non-renewable resource.

    Cashjaculate just sounds painful, if not unsanitary, causing UTIs all up in the lady's hoohah or whatever.  Some gals do a ping pong ball trick; this little filly pays off like a slot machine!

    D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 29 Nov 2010, 12:53
    MARTEN!HULK MUST RAEG!

    "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"

    a 12 inch chocolate penis that ejaculates money.

    Chocolate penis, if edible, is an unfortunately non-renewable resource.

    Cashjaculate just sounds painful, if not unsanitary, causing UTIs all up in the lady's hoohah or whatever.  Some gals do a ping pong ball trick; this little filly pays off like a slot machine!

    D

    How about a 12 inch cash penis that ejaculates chocolate???
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 13:05
    Later this week when we're wondering why this thread got locked, we can point to the last two posts as the point were the thread went off the rails.

    Anyhoo...

    As part of the "Marten Will Snap" faction, I think I need to clarify that I don't think Marten will do anything particularly violent or destructive (although he may have already destroyed items that remind him of Dora.)  I think it's most likely that Marten will just say something without thinking that will be unintentionally hurtful.

    While it's possible that the target/victim might be Hanners, Tai or possibly even Dora if he runs into her for some reason, I think the most likely target will be Faye. I think he'll say something about the situation in such a manner that it makes Faye feel like he blames her, and she'll take it wrong, or something, I'mm not the writer.

    Anyhow, it will lead to more tension in the comic, which will lead to more dramalulz on the QCD forum, which will lead to...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Nov 2010, 13:19
    This is very plausible since Marten is capable of an awful faux pas even when he's not under emotional stress.

    I don't think Marten is obligated to snap, but it would be good character development at this point.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 13:30
    MARTEN!HULK MUST RAEG!

    "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"

    a 12 inch chocolate penis that ejaculates money.

    Chocolate penis, if edible, is an unfortunately non-renewable resource.

    Cashjaculate just sounds painful, if not unsanitary, causing UTIs all up in the lady's hoohah or whatever.  Some gals do a ping pong ball trick; this little filly pays off like a slot machine!

    D

    How about a 12 inch cash penis that ejaculates chocolate???

    Same nonrenewable resource problem as before, though chocolate ejaculate would be marginally less likely to cause actual physical injury.

    And while the initial joke doesn't go into it, lets take a moment to consider the various forms 'money' can take, and the horror of them appearing in that particular place.

    Now, Marten needs a top hat and an electric guitar..  camera zooms in tight on the tears dropping through his lanky emo hair, crack of thunder in the background as he plays a wailing solo in front of a church in a desert...

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: LeeC on 29 Nov 2010, 13:40
    to all those Tai/Dora shipper
    I present to you exhibit 1778 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1778)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: peterh on 29 Nov 2010, 14:27
    D'awwwww.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: flamingo on 29 Nov 2010, 14:49
    to all those Tai/Dora shipper
    I present to you exhibit 1778 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1778)


    Tai says that she wouldnt want to lick something Marten has jizzed in before.
    +
    When Marten met Dora's parents, he told her father (through code) that he is using protection with Dora.
    +
    The most common form of contraception is condoms (assuming, I didnt factcheck)
    =
    Technically, Marten hasn't jizzed in Dora.
    =
    possible Dora/Tai (but I'm not necessarily shipping it)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 29 Nov 2010, 14:53
    Fallback position;  she does value Marten's friendship that much, too. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 14:54
    to all those Tai/Dora shipper
    I present to you exhibit 1778 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1778)


    Tai says that she wouldnt want to lick something Marten has jizzed in before (1778)
    +
    When Marten met Dora's parents, he told her father (through code) that he is using protection with Dora (1034)
    +
    The most common form of contraception is condoms (assuming, I didnt factcheck)
    =
    Technically, Marten hasn't jizzed in Dora.
    =
    possible Dora/Tai (but I'm not necessarily shipping it)


    Interesting self-reply.

    I would think, that in one sense, Tai would see that as irrelevant, it's more of a 'meta-jizz' than the actual physical possibility of presence of semen.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 29 Nov 2010, 14:59
    "yeah, but you're the one who actualized it!" 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 15:01
    "yeah, but you're the one who actualized it!" 

    To you, Carl-E, I hoist a brew, to a man so true, as to ref on the forum in the sprriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: AnAverageWriter on 29 Nov 2010, 15:10
    As part of the "Marten Will Snap" faction, I think I need to clarify that I don't think Marten will do anything particularly violent or destructive (although he may have already destroyed items that remind him of Dora.)  I think it's most likely that Marten will just say something without thinking that will be unintentionally hurtful.

    See, that's the whole thing- you've assumed that Marten is still furious-angry at Dora, or that Marten is capable of destroying things in a fit of rage, or yelling at innocent friends.

    Except that it's totally out of character for him. He has anger- we've seen him very angry before. Yet, even when angry, we've never seen him give the slightest indication that his personality lends itself to that type of behavior.

    Some of us deal with anger in a way other than rage. Some of us get very depressed, very introverted, or just... very... very... quiet.

    You're also making the assumption that he's harboring a great deal of anger towards Dora, when in reality, as was mentioned, he knew this was coming. He hadn't been happy in a long, long time. Chances are high that while he was in his room last night not sleeping, he came to that realization.

    Did the forum erase my last post?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Nov 2010, 15:55
    I think it was Freud who defined depression as "anger without enthusiasm".

    The only time I can remember Marten being enthusiastic is when he bought a guitar.

    It would be consistent with all we've seen before if he had a "friggin' women" vent with someone.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Heliphyneau on 29 Nov 2010, 16:39
    Aww, yay worryhat!  I forsee random college girls flirting with Marten while he's wearing it, and he will not notice.  (Not an actual prediction for the comic.)

    Healthy or no, it's clear to see that Marten's feeling like hell right now, and if someone triggers him I do believe he's going to lose his temper.  I don't want to see that because I think it'll be psychologically healthy, or because I think it'd be funny, or because I want him to make Hannelore cry, or anything like that.  I want to see it because I think Marten's a great character with one gap in his personality - the fact that he always has this mask up of being a calm, cheerful, easygoing guy.  Right now that mask is more strained than it ever has been, and purely for the sake of the story, I want a look underneath it.

    I want a peek as well.  Marten's so often a source of comfort for others -- it'd be nice to see a balance where he needs comforting.  And no, I don't mean with sex.   :roll:  It's possible that he's heading to some sort of emotional explosion, but he looks way to exhausted to explode at this point.  I have a feeling that his bitterness is going to fester awhile.  We shall see.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Takerial on 29 Nov 2010, 17:39
    I think it was Freud who defined depression as "anger without enthusiasm".

    The only time I can remember Marten being enthusiastic is when he bought a guitar.

    It would be consistent with all we've seen before if he had a "friggin' women" vent with someone.


    Freud also talked about babies and little kids having larges amounts of sexual thoughts and tendencies. There's a reason most of his stuff was discredited.

    While "anger without enthusiasm" could work with certain areas of depression and why some people are depressed, it doesn't cover a good chunk of the rest of it. But they are definitely related, mostly because they are negative-type emotions like sadness and grief.

    And Marten has been enthusiastic about stuff. He's just not a loud type. Like the time when he joined the band, he was really into that. Him getting his new job had some enthusiasm in it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: cuzsis on 29 Nov 2010, 17:40
    Oh he's going to snap.

    He was like mid-snap when Dora walked out in strip #1797 and he squelched it.

    That shit is going to have to release at some point.

    The only question is who will be the target/victim.

     Faye.

     She and Marten vent to each other a lot. She'll attempt to be understanding, but at some point biatch him out about something irrational he's doing in his distraught state. Marten will still be pissed, yell back and she'll give it to him again (with style). Marten calms down, takes another look at things. Thanks Faye for whatever they worked out. Everyone's pretty happy. Then Angus walks in and gets...confused.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: electricumbrellas on 29 Nov 2010, 17:56
    MARTEN!HULK MUST RAEG!

    "What the fuck do women WANT, already??"

    a 12 inch chocolate penis that ejaculates money.

    Chocolate penis, if edible, is an unfortunately non-renewable resource.

    Cashjaculate just sounds painful, if not unsanitary, causing UTIs all up in the lady's hoohah or whatever.  Some gals do a ping pong ball trick; this little filly pays off like a slot machine!

    D

    How about a 12 inch cash penis that ejaculates chocolate???

    Hel-lo yeast infection.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 29 Nov 2010, 18:36
    ...and now I'm craving malted chocolate cake for some reason. :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TheEvilDog on 29 Nov 2010, 18:50
    I sometimes wonder if I've gone insane.

    Then I realise, I'm on the internet.

    Sanity left the building a looooooong time ago.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 20:17
    I feel like I should clarify, given some of the comments here - I don't think Marten has pent-up rage at Dora in specific.  I wholeheartedly agree that it would be out of character for him to hold a grudge against her, even after everything.  So when I say that I think Marten's boiling up to an explosion, I don't believe it's because he's genuinely angry at any one thing.

    I think he's just sick of, well, everything.

    Freud may have had a point - depression is anger without enthusiasm.  That fits Marten at the moment.  But if something gives him enthusiasm, if something triggers him, then it'll be anger with direction.  It won't happen as easily as someone greeting him with the wrong tone, but it's so very easy for something to rub you up the wrong way far enough.  Like, for example, if you've ever felt really, really depressed?  And someone keeps asking you if you're feeling okay and if you're still depressed?  There's pretty much nothing more annoying than that.  And it doesn't even have to be one person!  Ten different people could do it, and you'll snap at the eleventh.  That's how it works, and if you've been in that situation before, you'll understand.

    I don't want to watch Marten roast someone because I wanna see the fallout.  I don't want to see him get violent and screaming and throwing shit around the room.  I don't want to see him have a fit.  I just... want to see that mask slip, just once, and let us see him when he's not rigidly controlling his bitterness and his feelings the way he's so obviously been doing since the breakup.  And I want to see it because I love the character and this is a new facet of that character.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: DonInKansas on 29 Nov 2010, 20:29
    Vespavenger shows up, and Marten recovers his +3 Stop Sign of Kicking Ass and smashes her into a bloody pulp, unloading all of his girl troubles in the process.



    Or not.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: sterlingdragon on 29 Nov 2010, 20:49
    Hmmm...I think somebody might catch Marten on the rebound. Who, you might ask?
    The very first person to openly have a crush on Marten.
    And no, It's not Pintsize, Faye or Steve.

    It is, of course, Sara! This seriously seems like a great time for her to come back and reveal that she's Pizza Girl hook up with Marten!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 29 Nov 2010, 21:16
    Ummm....

    No.

    Just no.

    Sara hasn't been in the comic in over 1500 strips, or six years of real life time. She hasn't been seen since CoD dropped the apron requirement for the barristas

    I doubt Jeph would even know how to draw her in the current style, nor would we recognize her if he did. He may as well create a completely new character.

    She's the Tasha Yar of  the QC Universe, she ain't comin' back.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 29 Nov 2010, 22:02
    Quote from: tergon
    I don't want to watch Marten roast someone because I wanna see the fallout.  I don't want to see him get violent and screaming and throwing shit around the room.  I don't want to see him have a fit.

    Oh, I do, I do! The fallout would be delicious. :evil: :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: AnAverageWriter on 29 Nov 2010, 22:04
    She's the Tasha Yar of  the QC Universe, she ain't comin' back.

    Tasha Yar, eh?
    So she'll reappear as the alternate-reality spawned alien half-human descendant of... herself?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 29 Nov 2010, 22:16
    Basically, yes.  It would take something along those (completely whacked) lines for her to show back up. 

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Blackjoker on 29 Nov 2010, 22:25
    If Marten does snap I have hopes of one of the following happening

    1) What happens is not described in any real detail, other than Pinstize either telling Marten that he is a god, or muttering "the horror, the horror"
    Or
    2) I want it to involve duct tape and a midget
    Or
    3) A series of Memento style comics starting at the end where they try to piece together just what Marten did
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Boomslang on 29 Nov 2010, 22:40
    3) A series of Memento style comics starting at the end where they try to piece together just what Marten did

    I, personally, would really dig this.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 29 Nov 2010, 22:42
    If Marten does snap I have hopes of one of the following happening *snip* I want it to involve duct tape and a midget

    Throw in Tai with the duct tape and the midget and I'm with you, man. Yes, I like her better after the Marigold thing, but not that much better. I could stand to see Marten put the naked fear of …something in her. Just because.

    Really, though, if Marten blows up around anyone, it will probably be Steve.

    Reading today's strip, I had this strange flash of Patrick Stewart putting on the Worry Hat (http://www.entertonement.com/clips/jgkbnwjhyd--EngageStar-Trek-Patrick-Stewart-Captain-Picard-geek-)...
    Oh dear god. That is indeed a strange flash. And yet…I can see it. Not as Picard, though, but as Xavier.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 29 Nov 2010, 22:56
    I prefer seeing him do this as Ahab (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3JHuxh2awU&feature=related). 

    Just for the pure visual silliness.  And that's definitely someone who could've used a worry hat. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 29 Nov 2010, 23:19
    I'm hoping that Marten's "moment" occurs at work and gets him fired. Neither the moment nor the firing have to be related to Tai in any way, but they likely would.

    Regardless, it would present a lot of interesting options for both character and story.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: ysth on 29 Nov 2010, 23:24
    Do you see the tension in his shoulders go away just after engaging the Worry Hat?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 29 Nov 2010, 23:40
    Even if Marten snapped at work, I don't think Tai would fire him.  She'd probably chew him a new asshole if he snapped at her, but I think she's more the type to confront him at the time, and forgive him later.  Not the sort to just fire him because he stepped out of line.
    Now, if Marten snapped within range of a member of the College board... that might be another story.

    Still, like I said, I don't care much about the fallout if Marten does snap.  I just wanna see it happen!  Like, watching a monster truck go over a cliff is cool?  But you just don't wanna think about the driver afterwards.  :P
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 30 Nov 2010, 00:01
    I just realized ... Marten could now be employed by Dora ! :-D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 00:07
    Oh yeah, that's a great idea!  :roll:

    Maybe Faye should apply for a job as Sven's business manager while we're at it, and Tai can get an internship with the Family Research Council, she'd fit right in there...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Nov 2010, 00:22
    The Principle of Maximum Awkwardness must have its due.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 30 Nov 2010, 00:38
    But... the Principle of Maximum Awkwardness would require Maximum Ridiculosity in order to overcome it.  And we already applied Maximum Ridiculosity to Marten's love-life in The Thread That Dare Not Speak Its Name.  It died.

    So Maximum Awkwardness would run rampant here.  We can't allow that!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: J on 30 Nov 2010, 00:41
    I think it was Freud who defined depression as "anger without enthusiasm".

    The only time I can remember Marten being enthusiastic is when he bought a guitar.

    It would be consistent with all we've seen before if he had a "friggin' women" vent with someone.


    Freud also talked about babies and little kids having larges amounts of sexual thoughts and tendencies. There's a reason most of his stuff was discredited.

    (http://www.blipcomic.com/istrip_files/strips/20091118.gif) (http://blipcomic.com/379/)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Arky on 30 Nov 2010, 01:17
    Ummm....

    No.

    Just no.

    Sara hasn't been in the comic in over 1500 strips, or six years of real life time. She hasn't been seen since CoD dropped the apron requirement for the barristas

    I doubt Jeph would even know how to draw her in the current style, nor would we recognize her if he did. He may as well create a completely new character.

    She's the Tasha Yar of  the QC Universe, she ain't comin' back.

    Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing Marten's old girlfriend return (and with her, you can't use the excuse that Jeph doesn't know how to draw her in his current style, since he did for the book!  Mwaha!).

    This is a girl for whom Marten MOVED ACROSS THE COUNTRY.  He wouldn't f'n move to a different apartment for Dora.  This is a side of him we haven't seen, a part of his life we've hardly heard about.  Much more potential than bringing back a random girl for Marten to hook up with.


    Ooh, comic!  Um... meh.  Sorry.  Can't all be winners.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 01:19
    The Legend lives on from the Chippewa on down,
    Of the big lake they call Gitchee-Gumi.
    The Lake it is said never gives up her dead
    When the skies of November turn Gloomy!


    Faye:
    Quote
    Ten million YouTube views, minimum

    ...and 60 pages on the WCDT!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 30 Nov 2010, 01:22
    Wooooooooooooooooooo ! Comic !


    The Legend lives on from the Chippewa on down,
    Of the big lake they call Gitchee-Gumi.
    The Lake it is said never gives up her dead
    When the skies of November turn Gloomy!


    Faye:
    Quote
    Ten million YouTube views, minimum

    ...and 60 pages on the WCDT!
    Proof ?

    SCNR
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 01:25
    Can anyone identify the cameo figures?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 01:27
    SCNR?  :?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Yellowstone on 30 Nov 2010, 01:37
    Can anyone identify the cameo figures?
    He made some reference in the justin.tv livechat to looking something up on Facebook, so presumably they're friends of his.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Akima on 30 Nov 2010, 01:46
    I love how expressive Faye's shoulders are in today's comic. But, in the last panel, Faye's nose looks very... er... Western.  :-D

    As for the couple in the background, maybe Nappy McTurtleneck (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=324) has found a partner (and perhaps a teaching position, judging by his fashion choices...).
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Daris on 30 Nov 2010, 01:58
    Then Marten boards a plane, and never looks back, thus leaving the comic forever, and spawning a side comic about his new life back with his Mom, where much more hilarity ensues.  Pintsize+Customers=Fun.

    And nobody seems to notice.  

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 30 Nov 2010, 02:05
    Kudos to akronnick for getting a Gordo quote in.

    I'll hang, so long as these lyrics aren't used:
    Near, far, wherever you are
    I believe that the heart does go on


    I knew Angus was going to be next.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TRVA123 on 30 Nov 2010, 02:05
    Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing Marten's old girlfriend return (and with her, you can't use the excuse that Jeph doesn't know how to draw her in his current style, since he did for the book!  Mwaha!).

    This is a girl for whom Marten MOVED ACROSS THE COUNTRY.  He wouldn't f'n move to a different apartment for Dora.  This is a side of him we haven't seen, a part of his life we've hardly heard about.  Much more potential than bringing back a random girl for Marten to hook up with.

    How long was Martin dating her? In my opinion length of a relationship directly correlates to moving across country potential. Also the fact that they were younger. How long has Martin been in the Smif are prior to QC?

    I think that Martin is a bit more guarded now than he was when he was younger.

    Personally I'd like to see job related character development. Martin really pursuing his music career or something. He needs to change the direction of his life if he's ever going to be happy with it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Soluzar on 30 Nov 2010, 03:02
    Well, that's about it for me. It was a good 1600 strips, and about 600 or so really awesome strips, but there's nothing for me here now. I don't watch soap operas anyway, so it's about time. After preparing myself for a couple weeks I don't even feel so bad about kicking the habit. These aren't the characters I used to like anyway. They just have a passing resemblance.

    Thanks for the meories. Thanks for the good times. Questionable Content, I'm breaking up with you. You changed, and we want different things.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: sidpatt on 30 Nov 2010, 03:07
    Well, that's about it for me. It was a good 1600 strips, and about 600 or so really awesome strips, but there's nothing for me here now. I don't watch soap operas anyway, so it's about time. After preparing myself for a couple weeks I don't even feel so bad about kicking the habit. These aren't the characters I used to like anyway. They just have a passing resemblance.

    Thanks for the meories. Thanks for the good times. Questionable Content, I'm breaking up with you. You changed, and we want different things.

    (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PmxExJ1vXtg/TBBDGvmcxkI/AAAAAAAAAJI/dFkN1txzSmw/s400/wellbye.jpg)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 03:22
    Faye seems to be fond of saying "I know, right?" (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1774) I personally think it's a little annoying when other people say it yet I say it pretty often myself. Just one of the many reasons I suck.

    Anyway, I had a feeling that would be Angus' response to this dilemma - "but you don't have feelings for him, right?" It's really only natural that he'd say that; I probably would too. But I really hope Angus doesn't turn into Dora II; letting jealousy wreck something great. No matter how hilariously tragic the S.S. Fangus Paddlesteamer disaster would be, I don't want to see it!!

    Well, that's about it for me. It was a good 1600 strips, and about 600 or so really awesome strips, but there's nothing for me here now. I don't watch soap operas anyway, so it's about time. After preparing myself for a couple weeks I don't even feel so bad about kicking the habit. These aren't the characters I used to like anyway. They just have a passing resemblance.

    Thanks for the meories. Thanks for the good times. Questionable Content, I'm breaking up with you. You changed, and we want different things.

    Please, let the door hit you on the way out.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 30 Nov 2010, 03:34
    Well, that's about it for me. It was a good 1600 strips, and about 600 or so really awesome strips, but there's nothing for me here now. I don't watch soap operas anyway, so it's about time. After preparing myself for a couple weeks I don't even feel so bad about kicking the habit. These aren't the characters I used to like anyway. They just have a passing resemblance.

    Thanks for the meories. Thanks for the good times. Questionable Content, I'm breaking up with you. You changed, and we want different things.
    Whatever shall we do?
     :cry:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 03:38

    Anyway, I had a feeling that would be Angus' response to this dilemma - "but you don't have feelings for him, right?" It's really only natural that he'd say that; I probably would too. But I really hope Angus doesn't turn into Dora II; letting jealousy wreck something great. No matter how hilariously tragic the S.S. Fangus Paddlesteamer disaster would be, I don't want to see it!!



    I don't think Angus is really all that bothered by it.

    He has just the right mixture of confidence and lack of self-awareness to be able to negotiate those kinds of treacherous waters.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Soluzar on 30 Nov 2010, 03:45
    Please, let the door hit you on the way out.
    At what point did I inadvertently shit in your cereal? I don't expect anyone to give a damn about my personal choice, but this is just a tad more hostile than I'd expect.

    Whatever shall we do?
     :cry:
    Keep on reading a comic that you still enjoy? I dunno, maybe I'm drawing a faulty conclusion.... I'm not enjoying it anymore, haven't really been for a while. I dare say I'll get by without it. Just posting here because... well, why not?

    I'm kinda sad that the comic isn'tworking for me anymore. When it was good, it was a very satisfying read. Assuming all the strips are redrawn in an updated art style, the book would probably still be worth buying for me.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dliessmgg on 30 Nov 2010, 04:06
    HERP HERP I DON'T LIKE THE COMIC ANYMORE THE WHOLE WORLD HAS TO KNOW HERP DERP


    Just stop reading if you don't like it anymore.  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 30 Nov 2010, 04:26
    Cute comic that confirmed my love for Faye/Angus, and all we comment on is a flounce?

    C'mon!

    Relationships with nautical metaphors! It's like he's trying to set up the eventual sex scene set to The Decemberists.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 30 Nov 2010, 04:36

    Anyway, I had a feeling that would be Angus' response to this dilemma - "but you don't have feelings for him, right?" It's really only natural that he'd say that; I probably would too. But I really hope Angus doesn't turn into Dora II; letting jealousy wreck something great. No matter how hilariously tragic the S.S. Fangus Paddlesteamer disaster would be, I don't want to see it!!



    I don't think Angus is really all that bothered by it.

    He has just the right mixture of confidence and lack of self-awareness to be able to negotiate those kinds of treacherous waters.

    Well the Maid of the Mist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maid_of_the_Mist) has been running since 1846 with no serious accidents there is a precedent for boats surving the experience.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Soluzar on 30 Nov 2010, 04:46
    HERP HERP I DON'T LIKE THE COMIC ANYMORE THE WHOLE WORLD HAS TO KNOW HERP DERP


    Just stop reading if you don't like it anymore.  :psyduck:
    What I posted isn't comic discussion. Clearly.

    ITT: People too thin-skinned to hear a negative view on their favourite webcomic.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dliessmgg on 30 Nov 2010, 04:53
    Do you really think it adds anything to the discussion if you say you won't read the comic anymore? You can have your opinion, but you don't have to talk about in here. Just stop reading and be done with it. Anything else you did is mindless self-importance.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 04:56
    I'd like to add that the general abrasiveness of your previous posts really set the tone. 

    You shouldn't be surprised by the minor celebratory stance people are taking. 

    And if you didn't care what we thought, why announce the departure?  Just leave, already!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 30 Nov 2010, 05:01
    For what it's worth, Soluzar:  Sorry to hear that QC has lost a fan in you.  If it's no longer to your taste, that's fine.  As stories change, people lose interest.  Speaking for myself, you're one of the folks who I enjoyed a bit of discussion with when we disagreed, and although we didn't see eye-to-eye on some topics, I do wish you well if you're leaving.  In the words of Master Alchemist Lysander, "I'm sorry things didn't turn out as you had hoped. Go, and remember us fondly. You know, you bothered me far less than most."  ;)


    AND NOW FOR A RETURN TO THE TOPIC OF THE THREAD


    Glad to see Faye and Angus are treating this in a sane manner.  Angus was perfectly valid in asking that question - it needed to be asked, if only once, just so that the idea wouldn't fester in him the way it did to Dora.  Faye has pretty conclusively shut it down, and Angus has recovered impressively.  Plus, nautical metaphors in a dating context is obviously a sign of deep affection.  Just look at Moby Dick.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Olymander on 30 Nov 2010, 05:13
    On a previous topic, while I can empathize with all the people who want Marten to vent his feelings in some sort of rage-fit, I think it is unlikely to happen.  Given what I can glean from his last known breakup (that would be Vicky, of Got (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=258) Milk (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1781) fame), he seems to have just "sucked it up", as it were, given his mentions of how he never saw her again (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=257), and that he didn't really need closure (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=259).  Admittedly, we don't know how much of this is after the fact rationalization, and he may have done some raging about it, but you'd think that if there had been any real anger behind it, considering how the situation left him (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=55), there would have been more reaction to seeing her again.  Then again, Faye had just creamed her with a carton of milk, so...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 30 Nov 2010, 05:39
    SCNR?  :?
    Sorry, Could Not Resist.
    And for further internet acronyms check out: http://www.urbandictionary.com !

    now to for the Comic Discussion...

    See the background in panels 4 and 5? isn't a recurrent place jeph likes to use? i think i remember that's were marten's dad had propoused to his boyfriend, but i really can't find the comic....
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: warningfromspace on 30 Nov 2010, 05:44
    Marten has been looking pretty rough since the break but that worry had did the trick. He looks much better with it. Also I'm very glad Hanners was able to cheer him up, this might be the start of something good :wink: :wink:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 05:56
    See the background in panels 4 and 5? isn't a recurrent place jeph likes to use? i think i remember that's were marten's dad had propoused to his boyfriend, but i really can't find the comic....

    Well spotted (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1515); and outside (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1517) matches, too.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 06:26
    Relationships with nautical metaphors! It's like he's trying to set up the eventual sex scene set to The Decemberists.

    Wait - Mariner's revenge?  Good tune, and an accelerating beat, with a climactic whale attack, but those lyrics...

    Find him,
    bind him,
    tie him to a pole
    and smash his fingers
    to splinters
    drag him to a hole
    until he wakes up,
    screaming,
    clawing at the ceiling of his grave!


    That's serious  hate-fuck music, right there. 

    Course, this is Faye we're talking about.  Those aggressive tendencies need to be channeled somewhere...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 06:27
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 30 Nov 2010, 06:37
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!
    I spoted that too, but isn't she refering to the boat? Is it wrong like that?


    Course, this is Faye we're talking about.  Those aggressive tendencies need to be channeled somewhere...
    Oh god, i won't we surprised if Angus gets a lot of broken bones after they get it on!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 06:49
    Or more likely Tai will make some off the cuff statement or a clumsy pass at Dora in front of Marten

    I really don't think something like that will happen, although i'd certanly think like that if i haven't read this: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1792

    She is fond to joke around, but she is really mature, more than she seems to be.

    It probably has something to do with BAC, I'm thinking... What was that line Penny said about her former college roommates?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 30 Nov 2010, 07:12
    Relationships with nautical metaphors! It's like he's trying to set up the eventual sex scene set to The Decemberists.

    Wait - Mariner's revenge?  Good tune, and an accelerating beat, with a climactic whale attack, but those lyrics...

    Find him,
    bind him,
    tie him to a pole
    and smash his fingers
    to splinters
    drag him to a hole
    until he wakes up,
    screaming,
    clawing at the ceiling of his grave!


    That's serious  hate-fuck music, right there. 

    Course, this is Faye we're talking about.  Those aggressive tendencies need to be channeled somewhere...

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 07:16
    Who's next on the "Reaction to the Breakup" list?

    Marigold    - 5 (4%)
    Angus    - 7 (5.6%) <check>
    Tai (watch out!)    - 67 (53.2%)
    Raven    - 3 (2.4%)
    Steve    - 11 (8.7%)
    Cosette    - 1 (0.8%)
    Jimbo    - 4 (3.2%)
    Ms. Vance    - 9 (7.1%)
    Mr. Reed    - 0 (0%)
    The Bianchis    - 2 (1.6%)
    Penelope    - 8 (6.3%)
    Dale (Daaaaangg.)    - 9 (7.1%)

    Total Voters: 126

    ---

    We'll just keep this up through the week to see who all gets "talked to" about the breakup.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: innermoppet on 30 Nov 2010, 07:19
    I like that Jeph has systematically difused all the people who were freaking out, "FAYE IS GONNA DUMP ANGUS AND SLEEP WITH MARTEN" and "OMG HANNERS AND MARTEN 4EVA".

    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat? Why don't I know which way is correct? I don't care if Jeph made an error or not so much as I want to know for my own personal edification how the sentence "should" be structured. Are there any english majors here that clarify?

    *edited to correct my atrocious spelling of the word difused. Now I'm wondering if I spelled atrocious right. Damn it!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Araethuiel on 30 Nov 2010, 07:25
    I like that Jeph has systematically difused all the people who were freaking out, "FAYE IS GONNA DUMP ANGUS AND SLEEP WITH MARTEN" and "OMG HANNERS AND MARTEN 4EVA".

    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat? Why don't I know which way is correct? I don't care if Jeph made an error or not so much as I want to know for my own personal edification how the sentence "should" be structured. Are there any english majors here that clarify?

    *edited to correct my atrocious spelling of the word difused. Now I'm wondering if I spelled atrocious right. Damn it!

    It should be "were a speedboat"
    You don't get engaged to someone with a masters-degree in English without picking up things like this :P
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 07:48

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Soluzar on 30 Nov 2010, 07:54
    I'd like to add that the general abrasiveness of your previous posts really set the tone.  
    Abrasiveness is what it's called when you don't agree with someone. As for why I announced my departure... well honestly I wanted to voice my displeasure with the direction of the comic. I've done so previously, and today's comic could be taken almost as an answer to all the questions I've posed. I don't imagine it was intended as such, since I am no egotist. I just recognise an authorial statement of intent when I see one.

    For what it's worth, Soluzar:  Sorry to hear that QC has lost a fan in you.  If it's no longer to your taste, that's fine.  As stories change, people lose interest.  Speaking for myself, you're one of the folks who I enjoyed a bit of discussion with when we disagreed, and although we didn't see eye-to-eye on some topics, I do wish you well if you're leaving.  In the words of Master Alchemist Lysander, "I'm sorry things didn't turn out as you had hoped. Go, and remember us fondly. You know, you bothered me far less than most."  ;)
    I would expect such conduct from the proud wielder of the original dickbroom, sir. It was an honour to disagree with such as you, and I genuinely can't understand why others have such an odd response to me. I made my initial post in this thread not in the mistaken belief that my disinterest in future QC is a matter of importance to others, but simply becuase I wonder if anyone else shares my views, even to a limited extent. I assumed it would be obvious why the current comic prompted me to write what I did, and honestly I find it slighly shocking that I'm apparently the only one who still thinks that when the comic was at its best when it was about Marten and Faye.

    If Marigold manages to end up in a (preferably loving, but...) relationship with someone, that is pretty much the only foreseeable future development I could regret missing out on. I can take or leave the other plotlines which are either ongoing or in prospect.  Hannelore is of course always adorable, but she reached her pinnacle of loveliness in the recent story arc and I'm leaving her personal story behind on a relative high.

    For those who find posts undesirable, I give you my word that you will find them in no future topics, although I reserve the right to reply in this one as I please.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 08:01
    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat?

    Was  is correct; the antecedent is not each of Sven and Faye (which would require were ), but the (singular) combination of the two of them.  Of course, the next bit should then be "You and me is " to match.  On the whole I would argue that the variation between the two forms is acceptable as Fowler's "elegant variation", and the whole is idiomatically fine.

    Quote
    my atrocious spelling of the word difused.

    Defused (removed the fuse); diffuse (vague, fuzzy).
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 08:27
    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat?

    Was  is correct; the antecedent is not each of Sven and Faye (which would require were ), but the (singular) combination of the two of them.  Of course, the next bit should then be "You and me is " to match.  On the whole I would argue that the variation between the two forms is acceptable as Fowler's "elegant variation", and the whole is idiomatically fine.

    Quote
    my atrocious spelling of the word difused.

    Defused (removed the fuse); diffuse (vague, fuzzy).


    ...in a display of complete linguistic pedantry on my part, this also sparked me to wonder whether "Me and Sven was" would not also be Faye's general use of the form, due to her Southern origins and the fact that she does seem to have Southern American English dialect artifacts from time to time. Not as often as one'd think, but...

    ...of course then I remember that I am analyzing the linguistics of a comic character :mrgreen:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 08:42
    Also, diffused (spread thinly).  

    One defuses a bomb.  When one fails at that task, one is diffused.  

    I'd like to add that the general abrasiveness of your previous posts really set the tone.  
    Abrasiveness is what it's called when you don't agree with someone. As for why I announced my departure... well honestly I wanted to voice my displeasure with the direction of the comic. I've done so previously, and today's comic could be taken almost as an answer to all the questions I've posed. I don't imagine it was intended as such, since I am no egotist. I just recognise an authorial statement of intent when I see one.

    For what it's worth, Soluzar:  Sorry to hear that QC has lost a fan in you.  If it's no longer to your taste, that's fine.  As stories change, people lose interest.  Speaking for myself, you're one of the folks who I enjoyed a bit of discussion with when we disagreed, and although we didn't see eye-to-eye on some topics, I do wish you well if you're leaving.  In the words of Master Alchemist Lysander, "I'm sorry things didn't turn out as you had hoped. Go, and remember us fondly. You know, you bothered me far less than most."  ;)
    I would expect such conduct from the proud wielder of the original dickbroom, sir. It was an honour to disagree with such as you, and I genuinely can't understand why others have such an odd response to me. I made my initial post in this thread not in the mistaken belief that my disinterest in future QC is a matter of importance to others, but simply becuase I wonder if anyone else shares my views, even to a limited extent. I assumed it would be obvious why the current comic prompted me to write what I did, and honestly I find it slighly shocking that I'm apparently the only one who still thinks that when the comic was at its best when it was about Marten and Faye.

    If Marigold manages to end up in a (preferably loving, but...) relationship with someone, that is pretty much the only foreseeable future development I could regret missing out on. I can take or leave the other plotlines which are either ongoing or in prospect.  Hannelore is of course always adorable, but she reached her pinnacle of loveliness in the recent story arc and I'm leaving her personal story behind on a relative high.

    For those who find posts undesirable, I give you my word that you will find them in no future topics, although I reserve the right to reply in this one as I please.

    Soluzar, may I offer my apologies.  I was speaking towards first impressions; abrasiveness is not merely disagreeing, but the tone with which it is done.  One can even agree in an abrasive fashion.  

    Tergon said it much better than I could.  You eventually came around to being quite pleasant to have around in that you offered your opinions in a non-abrasive way, but first impressions tend to last.  

    I do think you're cheating yourself out of something by giving up on the comic, though.  It's evolved quite a bit from the Marten and Faye show, but that's not a bad thing.  Whatever may come, it will not be stagnant, and will have surprises, drama, and pretty good punchlines - that's not getting lost.  Evolution is just that; what doesn't work well gets discarded, what does work well (or what doesn't get in the way) stays.  None of us can tell where it's going, though, and I think we're all in for a good ride.  

    Of course, it's your choice whether to jump ship (pardon the expression) at this point.  Personal taste is what it is.  I know that there's a good chance, sometime down he road, you'll take a peek to see what's up (perhaps with Marigold), and may well get hooked again, digging through the archives to get caught back up.  

    And I hope to see you again when that happens.  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 08:47

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )

    OK, I need to hear more of their stuff.  The CD my daughter compiled for me is woefully lacking...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 30 Nov 2010, 08:58
    Great scott Carl-E! that thing you do with words and respect with humility and askdljasjedhladewaeskldm_  :psyduck:

    I mean... it may sound really silly, but geez you really are a nice guy!!! How the hell can you acomplish being so nice!??! :psyduck:

    EDIT:
    *NOT sarcasm!!*
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 09:04
    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat?

    Was  is correct; the antecedent is not each of Sven and Faye (which would require were ), but the (singular) combination of the two of them.  Of course, the next bit should then be "You and me is " to match.  On the whole I would argue that the variation between the two forms is acceptable as Fowler's "elegant variation", and the whole is idiomatically fine.

    Quote
    my atrocious spelling of the word difused.

    Defused (removed the fuse); diffuse (vague, fuzzy).


    Really? But that sounds terrible! I mean it doesn't sound like it's proper English! It makes it sound like Faye is drunk and her southern accent is going out of control.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 09:31

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )

    OK, I need to hear more of their stuff.  The CD my daughter compiled for me is woefully lacking...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvGwY4tEJQM <-- "Yankee Bayonet (I Will Be Home Then)".

    I can totally see Faye and Angus singing this, or it being the anthem of their FIRST NIGHT OMGOMGOMGBBQ, or whatever. It's also just a lovely Goddamn song in general. Ask your daughter to lend you "The Crane Wife". Good album.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Nov 2010, 09:33
    What was that line Penny said about her former college roommates?
    http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1037
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 30 Nov 2010, 09:46
    HERP HERP I DON'T LIKE THE COMIC ANYMORE THE WHOLE WORLD HAS TO KNOW HERP DERP


    Just stop reading if you don't like it anymore.  :psyduck:
    What I posted isn't comic discussion. Clearly.

    ITT: People too thin-skinned to hear a negative view on their favourite webcomic.

    ITT, a) you're wrong, and b) you're actually seeing people who don't like you and want you to go away.

    I'm certain that that is what you're seeing when you're looking at my comment, anyway.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 09:51
    Really? But that sounds terrible! I mean it doesn't sound like it's proper English

    Well it depends how you say it or read/hear it...  Also, try imagining the implied extra words:
    Quote
    [The combination of] Sven and me was a speedboat...
    You and I are [the constituent parts of] a paddle steamer...

    If you are to have "were" in the first, you need to have "I" as well; reading the "me" makes my mind parse it as I suggest, making the "was" correct.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: zadojla on 30 Nov 2010, 10:37
    Regarding grammer:

    My daughter, who is studying liguistics in graduate school, would say there is no right or wrong, just what people use.  To me, the compound subject with the plural verb sounds more natural than with the singular verb, even though the predicate nominative is singular.  It's gonna disagree either way, and Jeph is emulating spoken conversation, which is much more grammatically loosey-goosey than most people realize.  Just my $0.02...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 10:46
    hmm I actually tried saying "Sven and me was a speedboat" out loud and yer right, it doesn't sound as terrible as I thought. huh. I would take this as a cue to take that grammar class available at my school if I wasn't 90% sure it would put me to sleep.

    I'm not saying grammar isn't interesting! I just know an 1.5 hour class on it wouldn't be able to hold my 2nd-grade attention span.




    EDIT: Tai has 69 votes now hurr hurr   


    (sorry, I also have a 2nd grade sense of humor)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 10:49
    As someone who was born and spent the first 14 years of my life in Georgia and then moved to the Godless North, (Ohio in my case) I can attest that Faye's grammatical structure in today's comic, while in no way, shape or for form grammatically correct, (at least to a prescriptivist) is completely natural given Faye's linguistic history.

    As a matter of fact, until I read this:
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!

    I didn't notice anything unusual or out of the ordinary about Faye's sentence, and I'm willing to bet even iduguphergrave knew exactly what she was talking about, but because of decades of prescriptivist brainwashing, has been obsessing about her so-called 'error' for hours.

    The problem isn't "Why can't the English* teach their children how to speak?" It's "Why can't the English teachers* of the Wolrd let the children speak their own languange?"

    *by which I mean the entire Anglophone world.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 10:55
    As someone who was born and spent the first 14 years of my life in Georgia and then moved to the Godless North, (Ohio in my case) I can attest that Faye's grammatical structure in today's comic, while in no way, shape or for form grammatically correct, (at least to a prescriptivist) is completely natural given Faye's linguistic history.

    As a matter of fact, until I read this:
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!

    I didn't notice anything unusual or out of the ordinary about Faye's sentence, and I'm willing to bet even iduguphergrave knew exactly what she was talking about, but because of decades of prescriptivist brainwashing, has been obsessing about her so-called 'error' for hours.

    The problem isn't "Why can't the English* teach their children how to speak?" It's "Why can't the English teachers* of the Wolrd let the children speak their own languange?"

    *by which I mean the entire Anglophone world.

    Cause English teachers are generally people who are paid to hate dialects and get hell of obsessive over the supposed Goddamn perfection of Standard American English (which is not the Queen's English, fucking thank you, British English actually has quite a bit of difference), it seems like.

    I think it's good to know SAE as the lingua franca of the West, but I am always happy when I see a dialect get practiced. They're little and they're beautiful and I love them all.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: FadedLB on 30 Nov 2010, 11:02
    I just have to add...

    Jeph, I LOVE today's comic title. Perfect use of a great Gordon Lightfoot song. :-D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Heliphyneau on 30 Nov 2010, 11:07
    Hey look, a sensible conversation between Faye and Angus about Marten and Dora's breakup that leads into silly relationship metaphors!  If they are best represented by a paddle steamer near Niagara Falls, that fits with the awkwardness-defusing garb at the Horrible Revelation.  (I don't know if we're ever going to see the cast in Victorian dress again, but I would dearly love to see the entire cast, including Dale, in a Merry Christmas from the Horrible Revelation poster.)

    Also, doesn't Jeph hate the Decemberists?  Or am I mixing them up with another band?

    Also, try imagining the implied extra words:
    Quote
    [The combination of] Sven and me was a speedboat...
    You and I are [the constituent parts of] a paddle steamer...

    If you are to have "were" in the first, you need to have "I" as well; reading the "me" makes my mind parse it as I suggest, making the "was" correct.

    I would have imagined the unspoken extra words as "the relationship between" in that first sentence, which would still make the verb "was."  Faye using "I" instead of "me" in the next sentence does change that, so I agree with your interpretation.  Of course, she probably should have had both sentences structured the same way for better balance, but colloquial speech does tend to be spooled out without significant re-examination, unlike the written word.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pendrake on 30 Nov 2010, 11:09
    For comic #1807...

    1. Good funny on the nautical metaphors on romantic relationships, just as funny as the Goldilocks & The Three Bears one with porridge.  Though the Classical Literature & Boobs gag is still my favorite.

    2. The Faye + Sven metaphor is accurate.  Glad it was not a Titanic movie reference (ugh).

    3. Makes me more than a little sad to hear Faye's metaphor-description of her and Marten's stillborn romance :-( , considering how much it has been a defining part, and seed-of-growth, for her character and development.

    4. As for the Angus & Faye paddle steamer to Niagara Falls...  Will it be:

    (http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/Maid_of_the_Mist_and_rainbow2.jpg/300px-Maid_of_the_Mist_and_rainbow2.jpg)

    OR

    (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Destruction_of_the_American_steamboat_Caroline.JPG)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 11:10
    As a matter of fact, until I read this:
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!

    I didn't notice anything unusual or out of the ordinary about Faye's sentence, and I'm willing to bet even iduguphergrave knew exactly what she was talking about, but because of decades of prescriptivist brainwashing, has been obsessing about her so-called 'error' for hours.

    Of course I knew what Faye was talking about; she still got her point across just fine, but your only half-right about the brainwashing part. Another reason I was obsessing over it because I'm just a liiiiittle OCD about certain things and that set it off. Like I said, I wasn't even sure if it was or wasn't grammatically correct, it just didn't sound right to me. So really it's my own problem; if I see something like that, until I give voice to it, it'll really bug me. For another example, I also feel an incessant need to correct Dr. ROFLPWN's signature, because Hannelore's actual line is "My name is DJ Phalliz," not MC. But I know if I just came right out and did that, I'd look like a total dick, so I'd have to find a more subtle way of correcting him without looking like a nit-picky pedant.


     :-D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 11:18
    I see what you did there! :mrgreen: :-D :-o :-D :mrgreen:

    For me it's symmetry. If something is almost, but not quite, symmetrical it causes my brain to buzz something fierce!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 11:36
    not the Queen's English, fucking thank you

    You're welcome :wink:

    In the case under discussion, I see no difference anyway.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 12:01
    For comic #1807...
    3. Makes me more than a little sad to hear Faye's metaphor-description of her and Marten's stillborn romance :-( , considering how much it has been a defining part, and seed-of-growth, for her character and development.

    You posted this while I was typing my last post so I didn't get a chance to say before, but I just wanted to compliment you on your hauntingly poetic term for Marten and Faye's former situation; I like it and it's pretty accurate  :-)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 30 Nov 2010, 12:24
    Makes me more than a little sad to hear Faye's metaphor-description of her and Marten's stillborn romance :-( , considering how much it has been a defining part, and seed-of-growth, for her character and development.
    That's as may be, but it's the cold truth. I don't think it was so much that Faye really wanted a romance with Marten as she wanted the option of having one. That is what's driven her growth—she realized she didn't have it. If you go back and read through, it becomes pretty clear that's what was really the problem. I truly wonder if Faye and Marten would have lasted as lovers for as long as Marten and Dora did if they'd started at, say, The Talk.

    Don't let that observation spoil any Marten-Faye die-hards good times, though. It may very well be, somewhere down the line, that, having been friends for a nice long time, they can form a relationship that will work. You know, after Angus gets killed in a debate over frankenfish that turns riot and Tai, having converted to hetero to give Martinizing a try, gets her to a nunnery.

    You know, at some point, I think I started posting to the wrong thread. Anyway, hit it, Celine!
    Near, far, wherever you are
    I believe that the heart does go on
    Once more you open the door
    And you're here in my heart
    And my heart will go on and on


    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: lolbutts on 30 Nov 2010, 12:45
    OH HAI GUYS I'M TOTALLY DONE WITH THIS COMIC, BUT I'M GOING TO CONTINUE TO HANG AROUND ON THE MESSAGEBOARD TO MAKE SURE YOU ALL KNOW JUST. HOW. BIG. A. DEAL. THIS. IS.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: zadojla on 30 Nov 2010, 12:55
    I just know an 1.5 hour class on it wouldn't be able to hold my 2nd-grade attention span.
    Then you would love my daughter's Tuesday class: " Pedagogical English Grammer", three hours of how to teach it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: daryljfontaine on 30 Nov 2010, 13:14
    You know, at some point, I think I started posting to the wrong thread. Anyway, hit it, Celine!
    Near, far, wherever you are
    I believe that the heart does go on
    Once more you open the door
    And you're here in my heart
    And my heart will go on and on


    Marten!Hulk SMASH!  WHARRGARBL!

    D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 13:15
    not the Queen's English, fucking thank you

    You're welcome :wink:

    In the case under discussion, I see no difference anyway.

    True, true, in this case there's no difference. That's just my own pedantry, again.



    Of course I knew what Faye was talking about; she still got her point across just fine, but your only half-right about the brainwashing part. Another reason I was obsessing over it because I'm just a liiiiittle OCD about certain things and that set it off. Like I said, I wasn't even sure if it was or wasn't grammatically correct, it just didn't sound right to me. So really it's my own problem; if I see something like that, until I give voice to it, it'll really bug me. For another example, I also feel an incessant need to correct Dr. ROFLPWN's signature, because Hannelore's actual line is "My name is DJ Phalliz," not MC. But I know if I just came right out and did that, I'd look like a total dick, so I'd have to find a more subtle way of correcting him without looking like a nit-picky pedant.


     :-D

    Damn it it's DJ? BUT THAT GOES AGAINST CONVENTIONS OF--oh fuck it I'll change it for canonicity D:


    Hey look, a sensible conversation between Faye and Angus about Marten and Dora's breakup that leads into silly relationship metaphors!  If they are best represented by a paddle steamer near Niagara Falls, that fits with the awkwardness-defusing garb at the Horrible Revelation.  (I don't know if we're ever going to see the cast in Victorian dress again, but I would dearly love to see the entire cast, including Dale, in a Merry Christmas from the Horrible Revelation poster.)

    Also, doesn't Jeph hate the Decemberists?  Or am I mixing them up with another band?

    I hope Jeph doesn't hate the Decemberists? I mean I know they're not the hella cool thing right now in the scene but I like my overly wordy 19th Century sea-shanty-based rockers

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 13:23
    Great scott Carl-E! that thing you do with words and respect with humility and askdljasjedhladewaeskldm_  :psyduck:

    I mean... it may sound really silly, but geez you really are a nice guy!!! How the hell can you acomplish being so nice!??! :psyduck:

    EDIT:
    *NOT sarcasm!!*

    Well, thanks.  However, I could introduce you to a few individuals who would disagree with you.  Whole classrooms full, in fact.  

    Not to mention the ones I live with...  

    It's nice to be able to present a fresh face.  

    “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.”  --Marc Antony, in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 30 Nov 2010, 13:37
    Am I wrong in being annoyed with "grammar" misspellings? Did it change since my 4th grade spelling bee?

    The was I can forgive, but correcting grammar with spelling errors seems contradictory.

    That being said, I love the artwork today. I also wonder if Marten would agree with a complete collapse.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 13:50

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )

    OK, I need to hear more of their stuff.  The CD my daughter compiled for me is woefully lacking...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvGwY4tEJQM <-- "Yankee Bayonet (I Will Be Home Then)".

    I can totally see Faye and Angus singing this, or it being the anthem of their FIRST NIGHT OMGOMGOMGBBQ, or whatever. It's also just a lovely Goddamn song in general. Ask your daughter to lend you "The Crane Wife". Good album.

    Damn, now you've got me going. 

    But I think We both go down together (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExTsO_q19II&feature=related) may be more appropriate? 

    As for an "our song", I'm afraid they already have one (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1735). 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: The Duke on 30 Nov 2010, 14:06
    As someone who was born and spent the first 14 years of my life in Georgia and then moved to the Godless North, (OHIO IN MY CASE)...

    <snip>

    (emphasis mine)


    On behalf of the Canadians of this thread, I cordially invite you to quit your whining.  :-P
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 30 Nov 2010, 14:19
    Great scott Carl-E! that thing you do with words and respect with humility and askdljasjedhladewaeskldm_  :psyduck:

    I mean... it may sound really silly, but geez you really are a nice guy!!! How the hell can you acomplish being so nice!??! :psyduck:

    EDIT:
    *NOT sarcasm!!*

    Well, thanks.  However, I could introduce you to a few individuals who would disagree with you.  Whole classrooms full, in fact. 

    Not to mention the ones I live with... 

    It's nice to be able to present a fresh face. 

    “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.”  --Marc Antony, in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
    Translation: He's not a nice guy*. He just plays one on teh forums.

    *For crissakes, he teaches math! Never met a math teacher who wasn't a sadist that would make the Marquis himself hide under the bed.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 30 Nov 2010, 14:29
    ...in a display of complete linguistic pedantry on my part, this also sparked me to wonder whether "Me and Sven was" would not also be Faye's general use of the form, due to her Southern origins and the fact that she does seem to have Southern American English dialect artifacts from time to time. Not as often as one'd think, but...

    ...of course then I remember that I am analyzing the linguistics of a comic character :mrgreen:

    Doubtful. I grew up in a long line of Southerners, in the South, and if I used "me and Sven," I would've been corrected in five seconds flat. Geography is no excuse for less-than-stellar grammar.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Teletheus on 30 Nov 2010, 14:53
    That grammer issue is bothering me though. Was a speedboat? Were a speedboat?

    Was  is correct; the antecedent is not each of Sven and Faye (which would require were ), but the (singular) combination of the two of them.  Of course, the next bit should then be "You and me is " to match.  On the whole I would argue that the variation between the two forms is acceptable as Fowler's "elegant variation", and the whole is idiomatically fine.

    The combination of Sven and Faye would be "we," which is definitely not singular.  You wouldn't say "We was a speedboat."  Well, you could, but you wouldn't be correct.  You'd say "We were a speedboat," or "Our relationship was a speedboat;" you can't conflate the two without using incorrect grammar.  Now, this is a fairly emotional conversation they're having, despite the humor -- who would have guessed that Faye would resort to humor in an emotionally charged conversation? -- so it's not like the poor grammar doesn't fit the situation (as also evidenced by the "me and Sven" instead of "Sven and I").

    Also, on a side note -- I just happened to notice that this is not the first time that nautical metaphors were used to describe relationships in QC.

    http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=514 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=514)

    Toto, anyone?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Akima on 30 Nov 2010, 15:05
    Was  is correct; the antecedent is not each of Sven and Faye (which would require were ), but the (singular) combination of the two of them.  Of course, the next bit should then be "You and me is " to match.  On the whole I would argue that the variation between the two forms is acceptable as Fowler's "elegant variation", and the whole is idiomatically fine.

    I normally write this sort of thing off as being a comic, and written in a foreign dialect anyway, but "Sven and I were a speedboat" would be how I'd express the idea. Would anyone really say "Jack and Jill was a cute couple", treating Jack and Jill as a singular combination? There is a variation between AmEng and Br/AuEng, where Br/AuEng treats collective nouns as plurals ("The Clash were a great band" not "The Clash was a great band"), but I don't think that is in play here.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 15:10
    Would anyone really say "Jack and Jill was a cute couple", treating Jack and Jill as a singular combination?

    In some contexts, possibly; but it's clearly less natural than what Faye said, because her use of "me" defined the case - which the proper names do not, making this example ambiguous.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 15:22
    But "Sven and me" didn't even sound right to me either. In fact I've always been confused on when you say "John and I" or "John and Me" or "Me and John." As a kid I was taught that is was always "John and I" no matter what but I've heard different since then. Anyway wouldn't it be "Sven and I?" After all later in the same speech bubble she says "You and I." Why is it different?  :?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 15:26
    Great scott Carl-E! that thing you do with words and respect with humility and askdljasjedhladewaeskldm_  :psyduck:

    I mean... it may sound really silly, but geez you really are a nice guy!!! How the hell can you acomplish being so nice!??! :psyduck:

    EDIT:
    *NOT sarcasm!!*

    Well, thanks.  However, I could introduce you to a few individuals who would disagree with you.  Whole classrooms full, in fact. 

    Not to mention the ones I live with... 

    It's nice to be able to present a fresh face. 

    “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.”  --Marc Antony, in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
    Translation: He's not a nice guy*. He just plays one on teh forums.

    *For crissakes, he teaches math! Never met a math teacher who wasn't a sadist that would make the Marquis himself hide under the bed.

    Actually, all I've been teaching lately is sadistics statistics. 

     :angel:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2010, 15:27
    As a kid I was taught that is was always "John and I" no matter what

    Which is wrong, because "I" and "me" are different cases, and should be used according to which is required.  In this case, we observe the choice of word, and then parse the sentence to match the case of the word, so:
    Why is it different?  :?

    Because it can be.  You can either take Faye's "me" as incorrect (in which case "was" is also incorrect), or you can parse the sentence assuming "me" and "was" are correct and intended.  If that parsing is so unnatural that no-one would use it, then that is a bad idea; but I contend that in this case it is not - not least because I might say it that way!  As I wrote before:
    try imagining the implied extra words:
    Quote
    [The combination of] Sven and me was a speedboat...
    You and I are [the constituent parts of] a paddle steamer...

    If you are to have "were" in the first, you need to have "I" as well; reading the "me" makes my mind parse it as I suggest, making the "was" correct.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: PaxCeciliaPwns on 30 Nov 2010, 16:27
    I've always been taught saying "Me and Sven" is grammatically incorrect.

    Good comic though. I've always been a Marten-Faye guy, but she clearly wants things to work with Angus.
    Not gonna stop reading though, talk about dramatic.  :-P
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: maxh on 30 Nov 2010, 16:34
    But "Sven and me" didn't even sound right to me either. In fact I've always been confused on when you say "John and I" or "John and Me" or "Me and John." As a kid I was taught that is was always "John and I" no matter what but I've heard different since then. Anyway wouldn't it be "Sven and I?" After all later in the same speech bubble she says "You and I." Why is it different?  :?
    You use "I" or "me" the same as if the other person weren't in the sentence.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 16:48
    I'm claiming Hodgson's Law RIGHT NOW.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 16:58
    Had to look it up (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MST3KMantra)...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 17:10
    But "Sven and me" didn't even sound right to me either. In fact I've always been confused on when you say "John and I" or "John and Me" or "Me and John." As a kid I was taught that is was always "John and I" no matter what but I've heard different since then. Anyway wouldn't it be "Sven and I?" After all later in the same speech bubble she says "You and I." Why is it different?  :?
    You use "I" or "me" the same as if the other person weren't in the sentence.

    So "I" and "me" are interchangeable?

    I'm claiming Hodgson's Law RIGHT NOW.

    hehe I know, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to create a monster  :angel: Luckily I doubt this can snowball into 30+ pages of arguing about grammar
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Nov 2010, 17:11
    Nautical metaphors for relationship are a recurring theme:
    http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=172
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 30 Nov 2010, 17:12
    hehe I know, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to create a monster  :angel: Luckily I doubt this can snowball into 30+ pages of arguing about grammar

    Technically, it's possible that it could.  So I don't think that "I doubt this can snowball..." is correct.  You should have said, "I doubt that this will snowball..."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 17:26
    (throws a snowball at Tergon)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 17:29
    Damn you beat me to it! *drops her snowball* Whatever, neither of you are allowed in my snow fort.  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 30 Nov 2010, 17:31
    Oh come on, I just had to.  You'd have done the same to me.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 17:39
    I did indeed set myself up for it  :-P  :laugh:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 30 Nov 2010, 18:03

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )

    OK, I need to hear more of their stuff.  The CD my daughter compiled for me is woefully lacking...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvGwY4tEJQM <-- "Yankee Bayonet (I Will Be Home Then)".

    I can totally see Faye and Angus singing this, or it being the anthem of their FIRST NIGHT OMGOMGOMGBBQ, or whatever. It's also just a lovely Goddamn song in general. Ask your daughter to lend you "The Crane Wife". Good album.

    Damn, now you've got me going. 

    But I think We both go down together (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExTsO_q19II&feature=related) may be more appropriate? 

    As for an "our song", I'm afraid they already have one (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1735). 


    Hmm, well Angus has been compared to Colin Meloy on a few occasions, it has my approval all right.  :-D
    But if Faye has Angels in Her Angles (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JQZrFgDHqs), then what else does she have? Cupids in Her Curves? Demons in Her Drawl? I sure as Hell think so.

    And tangentially, I posit that Tai's "first" song would be Digital Love. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjli3hj0ZkM) (DOHOHO)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 18:09

    Considering that a lot of their music has to do with sea shanty type stuff, it doesn't have to be Mariner's Revenge. They've got others.

    Or maybe the Rogue's Gallery compilation.

    If your significant other ever puts on Mariner's Revenge as a prelude to being intimate, that is probably a Bad Sign.

    I would hope Faye went for "Yankee Bayonet" just for the humor value. Angus'd appreciate it, I'm sure.

    ( :psyduck: now I've gone and done it. please, please, please no innuendo about 'Yankee bayonets hur hur' I still feel bad for being the originator of That )

    OK, I need to hear more of their stuff.  The CD my daughter compiled for me is woefully lacking...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvGwY4tEJQM <-- "Yankee Bayonet (I Will Be Home Then)".

    I can totally see Faye and Angus singing this, or it being the anthem of their FIRST NIGHT OMGOMGOMGBBQ, or whatever. It's also just a lovely Goddamn song in general. Ask your daughter to lend you "The Crane Wife". Good album.

    Damn, now you've got me going.  

    But I think We both go down together (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExTsO_q19II&feature=related) may be more appropriate?  

    As for an "our song", I'm afraid they already have one (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1735).  

    Well of COURSE 'Africa' is Their Song, yeah. But out of the Decemberists' milieu...

    Ooh, "We Both Go Down Together!" Okay, that would be more a song about Faye and Angus. "Yankee Bayonet" would be more a karaoke night duet.

    EDIT: HEARTILY AGREEING WITH SHARP'S ASSESSMENT ABOVE
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: maxh on 30 Nov 2010, 18:15
    But "Sven and me" didn't even sound right to me either. In fact I've always been confused on when you say "John and I" or "John and Me" or "Me and John." As a kid I was taught that is was always "John and I" no matter what but I've heard different since then. Anyway wouldn't it be "Sven and I?" After all later in the same speech bubble she says "You and I." Why is it different?  :?
    You use "I" or "me" the same as if the other person weren't in the sentence.

    So "I" and "me" are interchangeable?
    No; you use either "I" or "me" based upon which you would use without the other person.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 30 Nov 2010, 18:28
    EDIT: HEARTILY AGREEING WITH SHARP'S ASSESSMENT ABOVE

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/brograbs.jpg)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 18:54
    OMG, we're still arguing about Faye's Grammar!?!?!?! :-o :? :roll:

    There are three 'rules' she's breaking in that sentence, I'll list them:

    1: Always list "I" or "me" last in a pair or list. "Sven and me" rather than "Me and Sven"

    2: Choose "I" or "Me" in a list or pair as if it were not in a list or pair. "I was a speedboat" rather than "Me was a speedboat;" therefore "Sven and I was a speedboat" rather than "Sven and me was a speedboat"

    3: Conjugate the verb acting on a list or pair as if it were plural, i. e. substitute the collective pronoun and then conjugate. "We were a speedboat" rather than "We was a speedboat;" therefore "Sven and I were a speedboat" rather than "Sven and I was a speedboat"

    **BUT**

    You'll notice that above I put " 'rules' " in scare quotes. The reason I did this, and what prescriptivist teachers forget, is that they are not rules, but merely recommendations.

    Grammar is not physics, nor is it mathematics.

    There is no such thing as "correct" grammar.

    There is standard grammar, formal grammar, or recommended grammar, but it is important to remember that these standards are entirely arbitrary.

    The only thing that makes one form more correct than another is that someone somewhere wrote it down in a book that that was "the rule."

    In Physics, E=mc2 because E=mc2. Einstein didn't decide that, he derived it, and it's the same whether you're in England, Wales, New England or New South Wales. That's not what happens with grammar. "The rule" in grammar is made up, and it may be different depending on where you live and what standard you use.

    This is why we've been going 'round and 'round about this. There is no right answer, just different standards.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skelepunk on 30 Nov 2010, 19:22
    Me is the object of a preposition. Or to put it simply, the subject of a verb. I would be the person performing the verb.
    "I went to the store."
    "That person stabbed John and me."
    Won't lie, I like grammar, and this is more interesting than my English essay.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 19:49
    OMG, we're still arguing about Faye's Grammar!?!?!?! :-o :? :roll:

    There are three 'rules' she's breaking in that sentence, I'll list them:

    1: Always list "I" or "me" last in a pair or list. "Sven and me" rather than "Me and Sven"

    2: Choose "I" or "Me" in a list or pair as if it were not in a list or pair. "I was a speedboat" rather than "Me was a speedboat;" therefore "Sven and I was a speedboat" rather than "Sven and me was a speedboat"

    3: Conjugate the verb acting on a list or pair as if it were plural, i. e. substitute the collective pronoun and then conjugate. "We were a speedboat" rather than "We was a speedboat;" therefore "Sven and I were a speedboat" rather than "Sven and I was a speedboat"

    **BUT**

    You'll notice that above I put " 'rules' " in scare quotes. The reason I did this, and what prescriptivist teachers forget, is that they are not rules, but merely recommendations.

    Grammar is not physics, nor is it mathematics.

    There is no such thing as "correct" grammar.

    There is standard grammar, formal grammar, or recommended grammar, but it is important to remember that these standards are entirely arbitrary.

    The only thing that makes one form more correct than another is that someone somewhere wrote it down in a book that that was "the rule."

    In Physics, E=mc2 because E=mc2. Einstein didn't decide that, he derived it, and it's the same whether you're in England, Wales, New England or New South Wales. That's not what happens with grammar. "The rule" in grammar is made up, and it may be different depending on where you live and what standard you use.

    This is why we've been going 'round and 'round about this. There is no right answer, just different standards.



    I'll amend this: linguistically, there is, indeed, no right answer except within the confines of your dialect. In Standard American English's rules, Faye is wrong. Faye, however, does not necessarily use Standard American English. Likely, she uses a variant of Southern American English, where the rules are completely different and her wording is totally correct.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: leahneedsanap on 30 Nov 2010, 20:35
    Wasting my first post on grammar??? For shame.

    But, in the sentence, Faye was using "Me and Sven" to refer to the relationship itself, as a singular thing, (Faye and Sven: THE EVENT) not to the two people in it.  If she had said Faven was like a speedboat, the verb would have been properly conjugated, and she is using "me and Sven" much in the same way.  Of course, she turns around and does the opposite in the next sentence.  What can I say, they don't teach us real English in the South.

    And now, I will jump into the "grammar is rules, not laws" boat and sail into Niagara Falls.

    Oh, and also, this whole strip was kind of adorable.  The best way to defeat an awkward situation is still to stare it in the face and savor it until it becomes totally hilarious.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Shadic on 30 Nov 2010, 20:55
    How about if one's grammar is able to be heavily debated, it really doesn't matter if it's correct or not.  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 21:00
    Only if you want some poor prescriptivist bastard's head to explode...

     :psyduck: :mrgreen: :psyduck: :police: :evil: :angel:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 21:08
    Going from slashfic to "who's a biatch" to pop psych to MORE slashfic to arguing over grammar...

    I feel like I need someone to say, "Please keep your hands, arms and legs inside the ride at all times" over the loudspeaker.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 30 Nov 2010, 21:24
    if its any consolation, my biggest problem with the vast majority of slashfic _is_ the horrible grammar.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 30 Nov 2010, 21:45
    But would the wreck of the Faye Whittaker get a song written about it?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: zadojla on 30 Nov 2010, 21:51
    Likely, she uses a variant of Southern American English, where the rules are completely different and her wording is totally correct.
    I just spoke to my daughter the linguist about this, and here is the deal according to her:
    A compound subject ("Sven and me") would take a plural verb ("were"), but in some dialects (American Southern!) there is something called "was-leveling".  You've all heard it, it's when all tenses of a verb become the same as the third-person singular.  "Officer, we was just headin' down to the general store."
    I am now done boring you all with grammar.  Seriously, two pages worth?  What next?  Can we, shall we, might we, talk about modal auxiliaries?  They use double modals in Kentucky.  "You might should go to the doctor."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: musicalsoul on 30 Nov 2010, 22:00
    Likely, she uses a variant of Southern American English, where the rules are completely different and her wording is totally correct.
    I just spoke to my daughter the linguist about this, and here is the deal according to her:
    A compound subject ("Sven and me") would take a plural verb ("were"), but in some dialects (American Southern!) there is something called "was-leveling".  You've all heard it, it's when all tenses of a verb become the same as the third-person singular.  "Officer, we was just headin' down to the general store."
    I am now done boring you all with grammar.  Seriously, two pages worth?  What next?  Can we, shall we, might we, talk about modal auxiliaries?  They use double modals in Kentucky.  "You might should go to the doctor."

    I know that using grammar that way is common here in the south, but it would be a cold day in hell before you ever heard me say "We was fixin' to do ::insert arbitrary stereotypical southern action here::" Now I do use the word fixin' in that manner, but that's about as southern as I get with my grammar.... most of the time.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Boomslang on 30 Nov 2010, 22:13
    But would the wreck of the Faye Whittaker get a song written about it?

    10 minutes of postmodern, retro thrashmetal, remixed with one of the creepy child voices from a number station.

    That or a Sven-esque cowboy ballad. But I like to think the former.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 30 Nov 2010, 22:14
    (http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f50/Kugai2/GrammarPolice.png)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 30 Nov 2010, 22:21
    oh god, i just read through this entire thread, and it was interesting untill faye's grammar got brought up. IT'S JUST A DAMN COMIC THERE IS NO NEED FOR 20+ POSTS ARGUING OVER 1 SENTENCE A MADE UP CHARACTER SAID. that said i'm eagerly awaiting tonights comic
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Shadic on 30 Nov 2010, 22:30
    So. Faye can make the room darken. Cool talent.

    WITH RAGE.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MightionNY on 30 Nov 2010, 22:31
    Nice that Faye could make the room darken, but the light from her eyes wasn't all that bright.  Maybe Cosette could give her Death Stare lessons. :)  But, there's potential there. :D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 22:35
    Likely, she uses a variant of Southern American English, where the rules are completely different and her wording is totally correct.
    I just spoke to my daughter the linguist about this, and here is the deal according to her:
    A compound subject ("Sven and me") would take a plural verb ("were"), but in some dialects (American Southern!) there is something called "was-leveling".  You've all heard it, it's when all tenses of a verb become the same as the third-person singular.  "Officer, we was just headin' down to the general store."
    I am now done boring you all with grammar.  Seriously, two pages worth?  What next?  Can we, shall we, might we, talk about modal auxiliaries?  They use double modals in Kentucky.  "You might should go to the doctor."

    As the holder of a linguistics degree m'self (only bachelor's though) I am completely totally all about modal auxiliaries, hell yyyyyeeeeesssss

    EDIT: HEARTILY AGREEING WITH SHARP'S ASSESSMENT ABOVE

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/brograbs.jpg)

    Much bro grabs are returned sir and also fuck yeah Professor Brothers

    If I was not on my iPhone like a tool I would post glorious Washington, destroyer of enemies
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 30 Nov 2010, 22:42
    while god cannot stand the north because of the cold, evidently satan loves it (http://www.smiley-faces.org/smiley-faces/smiley-face-blink.gif)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 22:42
    Nice that Faye could make the room darken, but the light from her eyes wasn't all that bright.  Maybe Cosette could give her Death Stare lessons. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1547) :)  But, there's potential there. :D

    FTFY.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 30 Nov 2010, 22:46
    Likely, she uses a variant of Southern American English, where the rules are completely different and her wording is totally correct.
    I just spoke to my daughter the linguist about this, and here is the deal according to her:
    A compound subject ("Sven and me") would take a plural verb ("were"), but in some dialects (American Southern!) there is something called "was-leveling".  You've all heard it, it's when all tenses of a verb become the same as the third-person singular.  "Officer, we was just headin' down to the general store."
    I am now done boring you all with grammar.  Seriously, two pages worth?  What next?  Can we, shall we, might we, talk about modal auxiliaries?  They use double modals in Kentucky.  "You might should go to the doctor."

    As the holder of a linguistics degree m'self (only bachelor's though) I am completely totally all about modal auxiliaries, hell yyyyyeeeeesssss

    EDIT: HEARTILY AGREEING WITH SHARP'S ASSESSMENT ABOVE

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/brograbs.jpg)

    Much bro grabs are returned sir and also fuck yeah Professor Brothers

    If I was not on my iPhone like a tool I would post glorious Washington, destroyer of enemies

    I dunno if the forum allows embedding video, so this is the best I can provide ATM.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbRom1Rz8OA

    "He's coming, he's coming, he's coming..."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: bicostp on 30 Nov 2010, 22:50
    Dora can't run from her issues anymore, but she's going to give in kicking and screaming.

    The next couple weeks will be good. :mrgreen:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 30 Nov 2010, 22:57
    DORA, IF YOU GOT BEEF THAN BRING THA RUCKUS
    FAYE WHITAKER AIN'T NOTHIN' TA FUCK WITH
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 22:57
    Faye must not have been talking to Dr. Corrine much as of late, or she'd know to say, "I prefer to think of this more as an intervention by any means necessary."

    And, on a different note, I'd love to see Luna make a reappearance in the comic.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 22:58
    oh god, i just read through this entire thread, and it was interesting untill faye's grammar got brought up. IT'S JUST A DAMN COMIC THERE IS NO NEED FOR 20+ POSTS ARGUING OVER 1 SENTENCE A MADE UP CHARACTER SAID. that said i'm eagerly awaiting tonights comic

    You're new here, aren't you...

    Anyhooo...

    Faye is absolutely right here.

    Dora is trying to stall hoping that she'll be able to find some excuse not to do it until tomorrow, and then there will be another excuse, and so on, etc.

    I know this because this is my favorite way of (not) dealing with stuff I don't want to deal with.

    Do it now or don't do it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 30 Nov 2010, 22:59
    "Dora Bianchi!!  Do not mistake me for some cheap conjuror of tricks!  I'm trying not to hurt you, I'm trying to get you help."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 23:01
    "Dora Bianchi!!  Do not mistake me for some cheap conjuror of tricks!  I'm trying not to hurt you, I'm trying to get you help."

    I'm gonna kick myself for not recognizing where that's from...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 23:02
    Please, let me kick you for you!  :-o

    *applauds Kugai* Very nice, sir. :lol:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TRVA123 on 30 Nov 2010, 23:02
    GAH, Dora!

    If I were in Faye's position Dora would have been hit with a rolled up newspaper.

    I generally like Dora, but she likes to call other people on their shit all the time. TIME FOR PAYBACK!

    "Dora Bianchi!!  Do not mistake me for some cheap conjuror of tricks!  I'm trying not to hurt you, I'm trying to get you help."

    I'm gonna kick myself for not recognizing where that's from...
    LOTR: the fellowship of the ring
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 30 Nov 2010, 23:07
    Thank you, Dora.  Thank you for calling.  I'm pretty sure it's in everyone's best interest that I'M A FIRIN' MAH LAZERRR (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSVNbxjdvv8)

    ...I can't be the only one who thinks that whenever Faye's eyes go red.

    ...am I?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 30 Nov 2010, 23:07
    The only problem with this approach is if Dora arrives at therapist's office, then starts in with "I don't know why I'm here really…I don't need help…"

    Reading over that, though, I gotta admit that anyone who's any good at all will very likely get his/her net out at that point. Nor will the purple hair help anything, since it doesn't exactly scream "Look! Good decision maker here! Plus, I look in the mirror every damn morning and assure myself that nothing's wrong, even though I clearly have purple hair."

    Hell, Dora may get shipped straight to a, ah, holding facility.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TRVA123 on 30 Nov 2010, 23:11
    The only problem with this approach is if Dora arrives at therapist's office, then starts in with "I don't know why I'm here really…I don't need help…"

    Reading over that, though, I gotta admit that anyone who's any good at all will very likely get his/her net out at that point. Nor will the purple hair help anything, since it doesn't exactly scream "Look! Good decision maker here! Plus, I look in the mirror every damn morning and assure myself that nothing's wrong, even though I clearly have purple hair."

    Hell, Dora may get shipped straight to a, ah, holding facility.

    Somehow I doubt that the therapists around Smif are going to see purple hair as an indicator of Dora's insanity. Maybe in a more conservative area...

    It would be funny if the therapist began blaming all of Dora's problems on her hair color..
    "Insecure? well that's a common trait among those with purple hair, dear."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 23:14
    Thank you, Dora.  Thank you for calling.  I'm pretty sure it's in everyone's best interest that I'M A FIRIN' MAH LAZERRR (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSVNbxjdvv8)

    ...I can't be the only one who thinks that whenever Faye's eyes go red.

    ...am I?

    Not any more, no.   

    Thanks so much! 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 23:15
    It would be funny if the therapist began blaming all of Dora's problems on her hair color..
    "Insecure? well that's a common trait among those with purple hair, dear."

    Now who the hell would make such a...

    Oh, wait (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,25342.0.html)...

    Nevermind.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Somniloquence on 30 Nov 2010, 23:18
    Faye should have said "Sven and I were a speedboat that caught fire and exploded." That's the correct grammar, right?

    I was trying not to point out her grammatical error earlier but it's been driving me crazy. English major and all that. Sorry!
    I feel slightly better than I'm not the only one who noticed that.

    Anyway, I'm rather excited to possibly see a new character in the future—Dora's therapist.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 23:21
    I'm betting on a male who was trained at the Albert Ellis Institute and has five papers on Overcoming Self-Esteem.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 30 Nov 2010, 23:30
    I'm betting on a male who was trained at the Albert Ellis Institute and has five papers on Overcoming Self-Esteem.

    You mean too much of it?  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: daryljfontaine on 30 Nov 2010, 23:31
    I like how it's just a low growl and a dimming of the lights, just warning signs.  "IGNORE ME AT YOUR PERIL, DORA BIANCHI."  (Warnings always sound more dire when delivered with the target's full name.  Must be related to how you know your mother is really pissed by how much of your name they use to yell at you.)

    Lazor!Faye, Eldritch!Dora (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1754), and KALI-MAAAAA!Cosette (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1547)... there is a trend here.

    And that trend will inevitably lead to MARTEN!HULK.

    D

    (Butter me, I'm on a roll.)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 30 Nov 2010, 23:37
    The only problem with this approach is if Dora arrives at therapist's office, then starts in with "I don't know why I'm here really…I don't need help…"

    She wouldn't be the first person to say that upon the start their first therapy session. Even when people schedule it themselves, if they've never done it before they might get nervous at the last second and try to prove to the shrink (and themselves) that they're fine. I'm sure therapists are trained to have appropriate responses to "I don't know why I'm here really" and "I don't need help."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 30 Nov 2010, 23:41
    That brings up an interesting side-point: What would Dora's middle name be?

    Given the (approximate) time frame of the strip and of her parents' state of mind, I'd almost bet on "Summer", "Farrah" or (dread) "Amy".
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 30 Nov 2010, 23:49
    It's either Lynn, Elizabeth or Marie.


    I'm betting on Elizabeth.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 30 Nov 2010, 23:55
    I'm remembering Faye's half-joking remarks that what she's needed all along is "Someone to kick her in the ass and tell her to deal with her [expletive] problems."  It's a comment she's made about herself a few different times.

    She's being that person for Dora now.  And she is absolutely fantastic for doing it.

    I said before that Faye hugging Dora was one of my favourite "Character" moments for the strip.  Now Faye is still rolling along on that high, being incredibly awesome just as before, and teh funnie is peeking back into the comic as well.

    Bravo, Jeph.  Much as the breakup week was angsty and sad, the writing of this follow-up arc is some of the best you've done.  Keep up the fantastic work.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: daryljfontaine on 30 Nov 2010, 23:57
    That brings up an interesting side-point: What would Dora's middle name be?

    Given the (approximate) time frame of the strip and of her parents' state of mind, I'd almost bet on "Summer", "Farrah" or (dread) "Amy".

    akronnick is betting on the safe trends (and yeah, every other girl I knew in high school or college had the middle name of "Marie").  Dora's not a Southern belle, so Lynn is probably not the case.

    If I were to construct a mellifluous name, her middle name would be something like "Annabella."  But I'd be more willing to bet the Bianchis saddled their little girl with the name of a grandmother or spinster aunt.  "Dora Agnes Bianchi, get your butt in here now!"

    D
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Boomslang on 01 Dec 2010, 00:06
    I want Dora's middle name to be Safina.

    It fits with the family naming scheme, and it makes a nice sound.

    Dora Safina Bianchi.

    I bet her mother would love to yell that sort of musical full name when Dora really fucked up.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mojo on 01 Dec 2010, 00:45
    The only problem with this approach is if Dora arrives at therapist's office, then starts in with "I don't know why I'm here really…I don't need help…"

    She wouldn't be the first person to say that upon the start their first therapy session. Even when people schedule it themselves, if they've never done it before they might get nervous at the last second and try to prove to the shrink (and themselves) that they're fine. I'm sure therapists are trained to have appropriate responses to "I don't know why I'm here really" and "I don't need help."

    It's true, therapists are trained how to respond to that (I know, I've been training to be a therapist myself...).  Usually something as simple as, "Well, why did your friends (family) think you should come see a therapist?"
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: ecstaticjoy on 01 Dec 2010, 00:47
    It's either Lynn, Elizabeth or Marie.


    I'm betting on Elizabeth.

    Weird, I thought of Marie, too. I liked
    Dora Safina Bianchi.
    but then my immediate thought was, "yeah, but it's probably just Marie."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 01 Dec 2010, 00:49
    In the spirit of complete speculative bullshit I wonder if her therapy will leave Dora thinking she can salvage the relationship and Marten rounding on her and spittin' venom? Not that I necessarily want to see that, but...'twas something that came to mind.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Doc on 01 Dec 2010, 01:08
    That's not physical threat.
    It's just the demonic red glare of soul eating.
    Doomy, but not touchy.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: muffin_of_chaos on 01 Dec 2010, 01:22
    In the spirit of complete speculative bullshit I wonder if her therapy will leave Dora thinking she can salvage the relationship and Marten rounding on her and spittin' venom? Not that I necessarily want to see that, but...'twas something that came to mind.

    Out of the heat of a moment prior to breaking point, that does not sound likely.  (Marten having never vented frustration in an aggressive or even passive-aggressive way without a similarly aggressive or hurtful prompt that I can think of.  Correct me if anyone remembers such an event.)

    And if the therapy (even the act of going to a session) triggers anything real, Dora's gonna be tapping into usually-buried self-loathing about her actions and personal philosophy before she can accept what happened and why, which by most projected-to-be-similar examples will then take a while.

    Though if therapy doesn't trigger anything real, I can see Dora using it as prosthetic confidence and initiating such a salvaging attempt.  Which might then happen.  And who knows how that would turn out, the precedents there are unreliable.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skewbrow on 01 Dec 2010, 02:12
    It's either Lynn, Elizabeth or Marie.


    I'm betting on Elizabeth.

    Not a bad choice for daughter of Elssa. Then again, Dora was raised something that passes for catholic, so I'm betting on Maria.
    That's one of the both Swedish and Italian versions of Mary/Marie.

    As one of the professors at Notre Dame math department pointed out: "Mary is just catholic for Miss!"
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: sidpatt on 01 Dec 2010, 02:29
    I'm a little uncomfortable with the immediate assumption on Faye's part (and Dora's relatively blind acceptance) that the only solution here for her is therapy. I will admit to never having been, but I consider myself relatively well-adjusted, and for the most part I think I am that way by having a solid support group amongst my friends, plenty of opportunities to vent or otherwise let loose of my frustrations, and a small amount of understanding of psychology from a Psych 101 course. I realize I might be offending some here, and if that's the case, you're more than free to educate me. But to me, therapy when triggered by something like a breakup or other "common" occurrences is an easy or lazy way out. It's saying, hey, none of us want to help you work through this, go talk about it with someone else.

    Sure, Dora has "issues." I guess this is my own way of saying, I still don't really buy that line of reasoning, as I don't think we've seen a lot more than Dora's insecurities with Marten, and maybe we'll see more if we go in to therapy with her, and it might be a really good piece of character development on Jeph's part (or maybe she'll just bang her therapist). I'm just saying, there really should be someone she can turn to (not sure if Faye's right as she's a mutual friend) BEFORE the immediate "here's a card, go talk to this anonymous person because none of your friends want to deal with your shit." I guess the ideal person in this scenario is her brother, considering he's probably the closest to her and farthest from Marten, relatively speaking, and I'm sure there'd be a whole great big can o' worms there.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 01 Dec 2010, 03:08
    Ummm, yeah...

    The therapy isn't for the break up, it's for the insecurity that caused the break up. Marten never, ever mistreated Dora, but she was never able to accept that he wouldn't, she was always expecting the other shoe to drop, as it were.

    Who will she be able to open up to? Marten was the person she was insecure about, and she would never accept any of the re-assurances he could give her, nor could she talk to him about whatever caused her insecurity, because in her reptile-brain, Marten would reject or use it to hurt her in some way if he found out about it. Faye was also a threat because she was tightly wound up in her insecurity about Marten because of their history. Sven is her brother and she has resentment issues about him (which aren't really his fault) that prevent her from trusting him.

    Who does that leave? Hannelore? shyeah, as if. Tai? She'd probably just try to get into her pants. Penelope? Is she really that close to Penelope? Raven? She's off at school (and knid of a ditz.)

    What Dora needs is a trustworthy disinterested party to offer insight and advice. That kind of person is called a therapist. It's not that Marten or Faye (who would both move mountains to help Dora if they could) won't help her, it's that they can't, because the are too close. Dora's problem is that she can't trust people, not because they aren't trustworthy, it's because she's been hurt (presumably) by people she has been trusted, so she's guarded, and she can't open up to work out these issues. A therapist is trained to help people open up in a non-threatening way, but it's the very opening up that threatens her, so whoever she see's has their work cut out for them.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 01 Dec 2010, 03:22
    There's a rule in therapy that your best friend should never, ever be your psychiatrist. My best friend is amazing at it, but that's because we're very rarely at odds. And both of us knows the other will get over our frustration in a few minutes. However, one person cannot rely on just one friend for therapy, because then you feel like you're burdening your friend, and your friend may resent you. This is why it's better to use a professional who only has to speak to you an hour once a month, not someone you see every day. An unbiased outsider who does not have a say in the situation at hand.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 01 Dec 2010, 05:02
    The only problem with this approach is if Dora arrives at therapist's office, then starts in with "I don't know why I'm here really…I don't need help…"

    Reading over that, though, I gotta admit that anyone who's any good at all will very likely get his/her net out at that point. Nor will the purple hair help anything, since it doesn't exactly scream "Look! Good decision maker here! Plus, I look in the mirror every damn morning and assure myself that nothing's wrong, even though I clearly have purple hair."

    Hell, Dora may get shipped straight to a, ah, holding facility.

    Somehow I doubt that the therapists around Smif are going to see purple hair as an indicator of Dora's insanity. Maybe in a more conservative area...

    It would be funny if the therapist began blaming all of Dora's problems on her hair color..
    "Insecure? well that's a common trait among those with purple hair, dear."
    That's my point, really. Yes, New whatsis probably abounds with people who're perfectly capable of wearing strangely colored hair with aplomb, but if Dora ever was one of them, I'm willing to bet she isn't now.

    Edit: In other, better words, if Dora can actually be gotten into a therapist's office, there's some chance she'll actually get help without further threats from Faye.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 01 Dec 2010, 05:12
    Is it a bad sign that I was looking for a therapist's number whent Faye's eyes flashed red?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 05:21
    The thing with Dora is that therapy isn't the automatic reaction for her.  In fact, it's literally the last resort.
    Dora tried to bury her issues with relationships.  Then she actually did discuss them once or twice with her friends.  Then she finally opened up about them to Marten.  Then she tried openly dealing with them after they caused huge stress in the relationship.  Now, Dora's ended a relationship, shaken up her social circle, and she's a sobbing and stressed wreck.

    Therapy is, I agree, not necessary as a knee-jerk response.  The vast majority of people are able to deal with their issues and function perfectly well despite whatever minor neurosis they have.  But Dora is displaying clearly that she cannot function properly.  As cruel as that phrasing sounds, it's accurate.  She's unable to have a relationship, she can't stop sabotaging her own happiness, and she's miserable.  After repeated and varied attempts to deal with this by herself have utterly failed, she's now seeking help, and only because her best friend is making her do it.

    In this case, not only is Dora not choosing therapy as her salvation at all prematurely, she's doing it a little late.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 01 Dec 2010, 05:30
    *For crissakes, he teaches math!

    Oh god, and i'm studying computer science! NOW i get it! all the math teachers, they always seems so very nice people! but since a fellow student asked where he could get the list of ALL the Fibonacci numbers, the terror plagues my dreams!!! :psyduck:


    AHEM
    as for todays comic:

    The face faye is making is not THAT scary. But giving the threat she swore to do, and the power to REDUCE THE LIGHT OF THE ROOM, i'll be pretty shiting my pants if i was Dora.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 01 Dec 2010, 06:08
    Nah, that wasn't a number two look.

    Number ONE, however...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 01 Dec 2010, 06:26
    Nah, that wasn't a number two look.

    Number ONE, however...
    maybe it is, maybe not.... maybe both?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 01 Dec 2010, 06:35
    I like how in the second-to-last panel Faye's teeth aren't bared, implying that that "rrrrRRR" sound is coming from deep in her throat, which is way scarier. I imagine that sound to be something like a wolverine, or a Tasmanian devil.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: kent_eh on 01 Dec 2010, 06:43
    I'm sure therapists are trained to have appropriate responses to "I don't know why I'm here really" and "I don't need help."
    Yeah, that, and often the more a person demands that they don't need therapy, the more they really do.
    Denial is powerful bad magic.

    I've been getting therapy for over a year dealing with living with my wife's depression, delusional disorder, and a failed suicide attempt.

    She, on the other hand believes there are conspiracies planning to act against her (and us), and that most of the psyc profession are in some way linked to it/controlled by it.
    Ergo: she can't go to thherapy, and doesn't need it anyway. She's the only one who recognizes the very real dangers for what they are...


    Counciling sessions every 2 weeks for me.

    And before someone says it, involuntary treatment seldom works well  (and we've already been thru that. 2 months worth, last year.)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 01 Dec 2010, 06:47
    Tasmanian devil's growl: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU44KwIfBXM

    Wolverine's growl: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2JUv9QsE6o  <- seconds 2 to 5 :P

    Boy youtube has a video of everything!!!

    ...well everthing besides porn :/
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 01 Dec 2010, 07:08
    Quote
    "IGNORE ME AT YOUR PERIL, DORA BIANCHI."

    I read that as 'Ignore meat at your peril', which has a whole different connotation.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Teletheus on 01 Dec 2010, 07:11
    I realize I might be offending some here, and if that's the case, you're more than free to educate me. But to me, therapy when triggered by something like a breakup or other "common" occurrences is an easy or lazy way out. It's saying, hey, none of us want to help you work through this, go talk about it with someone else.

    I'm really, really having trouble figuring out how someone could say that seeing a therapist is an "easy or lazy way out."  I just can't wrap my head around it.

    When you're sick, you don't go to your friend who's an amateur nutritionist/physical trainer (i.e., s/he eats well and works out regularly).  When you're building a house, you don't go to your friend who put together a table from Ikea last weekend.

    If you're only dealing with minor problems, then sure, maybe talking things through with your friends can be enough -- but even then, you shouldn't be faulted for going to someone who's a professional and has specialized training in how to work through them.  Dora isn't dealing with minor problems, either.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: DJRubberducky on 01 Dec 2010, 09:00
    But to me, therapy when triggered by something like a breakup or other "common" occurrences is an easy or lazy way out. It's saying, hey, none of us want to help you work through this, go talk about it with someone else.

    Sure, Dora has "issues." I guess this is my own way of saying, I still don't really buy that line of reasoning, as I don't think we've seen a lot more than Dora's insecurities with Marten, and maybe we'll see more if we go in to therapy with her, and it might be a really good piece of character development on Jeph's part (or maybe she'll just bang her therapist).

    In my opinion, one of the main reasons that you "don't get it" is that you *are* relatively well-adjusted.  I'm not offended by your remarks, as you apparently feared, but they are to me indicative of someone who has never been in Dora's or my position.  This is not a bad thing; I envy you.  But since you wanted education, here ya go.  :laugh:

    Okay, I'll be nice - the TL; DR version is that IMO Dora is too insecure for her friends to be any effective help.

    I've read ahead in the thread before coming back to this, so I know some of this will be an echo or rhyme of what has already been said, but I offer the following analysis and speculation anyway because it's unique in that it's based on my own experiences:


    I feel the need to say again that I can understand why you would be confused by the whole "go see a shrink already!" attitude.  And frankly, if I had someone recommend therapy to me who had never themselves been for any reason, I would be similarly wary.  But I have benefited from therapy, I still *am*, and I've even found that I benefit from low-dose medication - something to which I was EXTREMELY resistant for YEARS.  So, speaking as someone who's been there, and as someone who's had to have the friends (figuratively) shove her kicking and screaming to get professional assistance...sometimes it's not just the best way to get through your issues; it's sometimes the only way.

    By the way, hi.  Long-time reader, first-time poster.  Sorry to start my Serious Pony career with such a wall of text.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: The Duke on 01 Dec 2010, 09:19
    I like how in the second-to-last panel Faye's teeth aren't bared, implying that that "rrrrRRR" sound is coming from deep in her throat, which is way scarier. I imagine that sound to be something like a wolverine, or a Tasmanian devil.

    Or like Adam Baldwin does as John Casey from Chuck.

    That show has totally jumped the shark but damn can that guy do a hell of a menacing growl.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 01 Dec 2010, 09:34
    The short version of Dora's problems is that she is so scared of people doing stuff to hurt her that she can't handle the thought of giving them ANYTHING they could possibly use against her. So she can't talk to her friends, and honestly i'm thinking she's gonna have real trouble talking to the shrink, at least at first
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 01 Dec 2010, 11:29
    And unless it happens after the therapy has started to work, she'd probably bolt/change therapists if she ever saw them outside of the context of therapy; the realisation that they are an actual person with an actual life and possibly a desire for the occasional coffee would be too much.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Dec 2010, 12:10
    I want to see the Dora backstory: this provides Jeph a way to work it into the comic without being too much like The Talk.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 01 Dec 2010, 12:15
    By the way, hi.  Long-time reader, first-time poster.  Sorry to start my Serious Pony career with such a wall of text.


    That was a glorious wall of text. I agree with you on all counts, except that I'm still hoping Dora gets put under a bus.

    ON, ON a bus, jeez.

    Oh, no. Under. OK.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: O8h7w on 01 Dec 2010, 14:37
    I want to see the Dora backstory: this provides Jeph a way to work it into the comic without being too much like The Talk.

    Seconded, as I've always wanted to see said backstory and my guess for the outcome of the breakup arc was that we would see something much like the talk. I never said it would be good for the comic to repeat itself, though.



    On a completely unrelated and now exhausted topic, I'm sad that I missed out on the grammar debate. :cry: I love those! And I'll warn you while I'm at it; I'm a physics student.  :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pwhodges on 01 Dec 2010, 14:54
    So you'll have us engineers to watch out for!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 01 Dec 2010, 15:30
    What if you grew up with someone who got his undergrad and physics and post-grad in engineering?

    Pfft, y'all would probably just try to kill each other with grammar-related puns.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Heliphyneau on 01 Dec 2010, 15:45
    Hey look, a sensible conversation between Faye and Angus about Marten and Dora's breakup that leads into silly relationship metaphors!  If they are best represented by a paddle steamer near Niagara Falls, that fits with the awkwardness-defusing garb at the Horrible Revelation.  (I don't know if we're ever going to see the cast in Victorian dress again, but I would dearly love to see the entire cast, including Dale, in a Merry Christmas from the Horrible Revelation poster.)

    Also, doesn't Jeph hate the Decemberists?  Or am I mixing them up with another band?

    I hope Jeph doesn't hate the Decemberists? I mean I know they're not the hella cool thing right now in the scene but I like my overly wordy 19th Century sea-shanty-based rockers

    Might not be them -- I honestly can't remember.  It was a band some of the boardies liked and kept recommending to him, but it was awhile ago.  And now that I think of it, he had Penelope wear a Decemberists t-shirt at some point, so it seems he would reference them in the strip, which was the only reason I wondered.  The relative coolth of a band is essentially irrelevant to me.   :wink:

    Am I wrong in being annoyed with "grammar" misspellings? Did it change since my 4th grade spelling bee?

    The was I can forgive, but correcting grammar with spelling errors seems contradictory.

    If by "contradictory" you mean "hilarious," then yes.   :-D

    As to today's strip, Faye's dim-the-lights-powers are impressive, but I don't think that's her full-strength Death Stare.  I have a feeling that she'd more than out-stare Cosette, and possibly the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse while she was at it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Loki on 01 Dec 2010, 15:51
    So what if Sven's Look Of Ultimate Seduction (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1078) hits her Death Stare?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 01 Dec 2010, 16:01
    So what if Sven's Look Of Ultimate Seduction (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1078) hits her Death Stare?
    i don't think they would cancel out completley, but the resulting shockwave would probably cause damage on a massive scale to the surrounding area
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 01 Dec 2010, 16:02
    TL
    Did read, but I'm not going to reproduce it. I agree though, that Dora has to talk to someone completely univolved if she'd going to have a prayer of digging her way out of this. I do hope she doesn't start suspecting therapists, though, since that really could end with her being put away (not in and of itself, but because of the possible snowball).

    I want to see the Dora backstory: this provides Jeph a way to work it into the comic without being too much like The Talk.
    The thing with that is that I'm now wondering if we need to see two or three versions of it, or more, to get it. One from Dora, who's clearly an unreliable narrator; one from Sven, who's a liar; one from the 'rents, who either are or at least seem to be oblivious; and one from duh da DAAAA!

    Raven

    even though she doesn't have all the goods, since we have her backstory (some of it) from Dora, in the eternal words of Miss Loonette, "It's only fair."

    Damn, Jeph could spend a year on this.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 01 Dec 2010, 16:04
    ? Since when is Sven a liar? I admit he probably wasn't honest to all the girls he might have hurt in the past, but he's not really the same person anymore. Have we ever seen him lie to any of the main QC cast?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Dec 2010, 16:58
    The closest I can think of, which isn't very close, is that has first impulse was to conceal Gina Riversmith from Faye. That was at the very most a contemplated lie by omission.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 01 Dec 2010, 17:20
    I don't think I'd accuse Sven of lying.  Dishonesty, maybe, and I know at least someone's going to say that's just arguing semantics but...it really isn't.  The only reason I'd even agree that Sven was ever dishonest was because he himself felt guilty about concealing Gina from Faye, and he's been a little dishonest with himself about his feelings towards Faye until fairly recently.

    ...Wait, how'd we get onto Sven anyway?

    So you'll have us engineers to watch out for!

    Muahahahahahaaaaa
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: cuzsis on 01 Dec 2010, 18:04
     Dang I was really hoping Faye would smack Dora in today's strip. Of all the people to deserve a beating (especially the one's we've seen) few ones top today.

     And just to sum it up (cuz I need to vent).

     Faye goes out of her way to avoid whopping Dora after she does something incredibly stupid which ends up hurting Martin pretty badly. Faye manages to hold it together and do something constructive (getting therapy lined up.) that should actually help Dora, instead of just punishing her.

     Dora, the cause of all this, then gets biatchy about it and blows Faye off when she gets her the info. She seems to feel that Faye has a lot of nerve ordering her around in this.

     Faye, through super human effort I would guess, manages to just give Dora the evil eye and not actually kill her for this second round of self important stupidity.

     Hm...of course, would love also to see Martin chew her a new one over this bit here. Her reaction would be priceless and Martin would get to come out on top even after taking the high road. Be a nice twist and some good development.

    /yeah...Dora's kinda pissing me off right now.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 18:13
    Yeah, for all Sven's failings, we've actually seen him to be unusually truthful.  He's never denied his man-whore status, he openly admits he hates the music he writes, he doesn't hesitate to admit to Faye that he's shallow in pursuing only his "Type" of woman, he tells Faye he slept with Gina Riversmith, he opens up to Marten during his fancy-pants walk...

    The only times we've seen Sven openly lie were when he wanted to avoid Death By Ex-Girlfriend (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=676#) at the horrible revelation; when he wanted to avoid temptation with his bendy blonde friend (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=795) after lunch with Faye; and when he contemplated lying about sleeping with Gina Riversmith (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1338), but ultimately told the truth (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1341).

    That being said, he would give a very... slanted perspective on Dora's issues.  And given that Dora's issues involve trouble in past relationships, she might feel extremely awkward opening up to her brother about it.  A neutral ear is best, and the obvious choice for that is a therapist who can then offer professional advice on how she can overcome the issues, rather than just an awkward pat on the shoulder.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: zadojla on 01 Dec 2010, 19:26
    What if you grew up with someone who got his undergrad and physics and post-grad in engineering?

    Pfft, y'all would probably just try to kill each other with grammar-related puns.
    Does this mean we have to start a grammar-related pun thread?  To avoid pissing off everyone around us?  Oh wait! Engineers don't care!  :-D

    I actually like engineers.  I went to an engineering college and most of my friends were engineering and physics majors.  I have a BS in Anthropology, so I am an IT manager.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 01 Dec 2010, 19:37
    Who's next on the "Reaction to the Breakup" list?

    Marigold    - 12 (7.7%)
    Angus (CHECK)    - 7 (4.5%)
    Tai (watch out!)    - 74 (47.7%)
    Raven    - 3 (1.9%)
    Steve    - 16 (10.3%)
    Cosette    - 1 (0.6%)
    Jimbo    - 7 (4.5%)
    Ms. Vance    - 12 (7.7%)
    Mr. Reed    - 0 (0%)
    The Bianchis    - 2 (1.3%)
    Penelope    - 10 (6.5%)
    Dale (Daaaaangg.)    - 11 (7.1%)

    Total Voters: 155
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 01 Dec 2010, 19:49
    Quote
      Oh wait! Engineers don't care!  :-D

    Damn right.    :-D

      Real Engineers consider themselves well dressed if their socks match.
    · Real Engineers buy their spouses a set of matched screwdrivers for their birthday.
    · Real Engineers wear mustaches or beards for "efficiency". Not because they're lazy.
    · Real engineers have a non-technical vocabulary of 800 words.
    · Real Engineers think a "biting wit" is their fox terrier.
    · Real Engineers know the second law of thermodynamics - but not their own shirt size.
    · Real Engineers repair their own cameras, telephones, televisions, watches, and automatic transmissions.
    · Real Engineers say "It's 70 degrees Fahrenheit, 25 degrees Celsius, and 298 degrees Kelvin" and all you say is "Isn't it a nice day"
    · Real Engineers give you the feeling you're having a conversation with a dial tone or busy signal.
    · Real Engineers wear badges so they don't forget who they are. Sometimes a note is attached saying "Don't offer me a ride today. I drove my own car".
    · Real Engineers' politics run towards acquiring a parking space with their name on it and an office with a window.
    · Real Engineers know the "ABC's of Infrared" from A to B.
    · Real Engineers rotate their tires for laughs.
    · Real Engineers will make four sets of drawings (with seven revisions) before making a bird bath.
    · Real Engineers' briefcases contain a Phillips screwdriver, a copy of "Quantum Physics", and a half of a peanut butter sandwich.
    · Real Engineers don't find the above at all funny.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 01 Dec 2010, 20:23
    The only times we've seen Sven openly lie were when he wanted to avoid Death By Ex-Girlfriend (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=676#) at the horrible revelation; when he wanted to avoid temptation with his bendy blonde friend (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=795) after lunch with Faye; and when he contemplated lying about sleeping with Gina Riversmith (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1338), but ultimately told the truth (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1341).

    That being said, he would give a very... slanted perspective on Dora's issues.  And given that Dora's issues involve trouble in past relationships, she might feel extremely awkward opening up to her brother about it.  A neutral ear is best, and the obvious choice for that is a therapist who can then offer professional advice on how she can overcome the issues, rather than just an awkward pat on the shoulder.
    Only. Heh. So because he only lies some of the time, Sven's not a liar? You don't think, if telling the tale of Dora and his childhood and including the role he played, he wouldn't shade the truth to favor himself or at least to let himself off easy?

    Because I think he would. Epiphany or not, Sven's not exactly hard on himself most of the time. That may change, may have changed, and hell, Sven may have all sorts of good reasons for acting the way he does. But so far, he's been a self-serving putz much more than he's been a paragon of truth.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 20:29
    ...I said that I agree with you, and that he'd not make a good substitute-therapist for Dora...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 01 Dec 2010, 21:05
    Only. Heh. So because he only lies some of the time, Sven's not a liar? You don't think, if telling the tale of Dora and his childhood and including the role he played, he wouldn't shade the truth to favor himself or at least to let himself off easy?

    Because I think he would. Epiphany or not, Sven's not exactly hard on himself most of the time. That may change, may have changed, and hell, Sven may have all sorts of good reasons for acting the way he does. But so far, he's been a self-serving putz much more than he's been a paragon of truth.

    That has changed, as evidenced here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1747) and here. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1782) Nobody said he was a paragon of truth, but, especially recently, he's really realizing what a douche he's been. Not to mention if he really did trend towards trying to make himself not look like the bad guy, he wouldn't have been so apologetic in this strip (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1481) (despite the fact that he didn't actually apologize, which I'm aware of). Sven's made mistakes, and he's quickly realizing that fact, and it's already changed him.

    I think he's just oblivious to the fact that his actions growing up had a negative effect on Dora. It's not that he's in denial there; it probably hasn't even occurred to him. If Dora were to confront him about it at some point, I think he'd be surprised, and might deny it at first, but after thinking about it for a bit, realize she's got a point.

    You should give Sven a little more credit; it takes awhile for someone to change for the better (see how long its taken Faye?), but he IS making progress.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 01 Dec 2010, 21:21
    Only. Heh. So because he only lies some of the time, Sven's not a liar? You don't think, if telling the tale of Dora and his childhood and including the role he played, he wouldn't shade the truth to favor himself or at least to let himself off easy?

    Because I think he would. Epiphany or not, Sven's not exactly hard on himself most of the time. That may change, may have changed, and hell, Sven may have all sorts of good reasons for acting the way he does. But so far, he's been a self-serving putz much more than he's been a paragon of truth.

    That has changed, as evidenced here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1747) and here. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1782) Nobody said he was a paragon of truth, but, especially recently, he's really realizing what a douche he's been. Not to mention if he really did trend towards trying to make himself not look like the bad guy, he wouldn't have been so apologetic in this strip (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1481) (despite the fact that he didn't actually apologize, which I'm aware of). Sven's made mistakes, and he's quickly realizing that fact, and it's already changed him.

    I think he's just oblivious to the fact that his actions growing up had a negative effect on Dora. It's not that he's in denial there; it probably hasn't even occurred to him. If Dora were to confront him about it at some point, I think he'd be surprised, and might deny it at first, but after thinking about it for a bit, realize she's got a point.

    You should give Sven a little more credit; it takes awhile for someone to change for the better (see how long its taken Faye?), but he IS making progress.

    You and Tergon must remember, raoullefere is a deep, deep loather of cads and defender of chivalry (I mean this in a complimentary fashion, sir), and Sven being the Patron Saint of Dudes Who Are Not Nice to Ladies All the Time, he and Sven would fistfight if Sven was not so fictional. He is not measuring Sven with the same stick as we are, and I would not want him to.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 01 Dec 2010, 21:33
    You never know what you have until it's gone.

    Poor Marten.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 01 Dec 2010, 21:36
    "But it was FREE..."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 01 Dec 2010, 21:38
    Wait, he's clearly told Tai, and her reaction is...

    "...poor emo Marten..."

    Gah.  Her stock just dropped by several points in my portfolio. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 21:40
    Nor am I claiming he's a saint.  He's been an incredible asshat.  The difference is, he owns up to it without the slightest attempt to justify or defend it.  And he does indeed care about his sister.  The examples I gave, the only ones given of him actually lying... they're lies for self-preservation, not self-gain.  He doesn't want to get hurt by his ex, he doesn't want to be tempted by a night of sex with an old flame, and he doesn't want Faye to be upset and angry with him.  He's not trying to get anything out of these lies except to avoid an unpleasant situation.

    Maybe I'm only splitting hairs with the difference here, but I think there is one.  He doesn't walk up to a lady and make her impossible promises in order to get laid, he doesn't lead women on and trick them, and he doesn't just tell women what they want to hear to make himself look good.  On the contrary, he seems to go out of his way to make sure they know what kind of fellow he is and that there are no illusions between them of something significant when he thinks it's just about sex.
    He uses women, and he is indeed unchivalrous, but whatever his other faults, he's honest.  And I think, especially when it comes to his little sister, he'd maintain that honesty.  The only problem is, as I first said in full agreement with others, is that his perspective of Dora's issues would not take in the full picture.  Not to mention that since it's about (amongst other things) his little sister's sex life, he couldn't really be of much use if confronted with a full perspective.

    Sven has done some things that make him a bit of an asshole, but he's not the devil incarnate.  He has feelings, and emotions, and a conscience, and he's really pretty open about most things.  That just doesn't mean he's a good choice for Dora to talk to about her issues, is all.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 01 Dec 2010, 21:42
    (Nudges Tergon) Uh, while you were posting that, Jeph put up the new strip.

    "But it was FREE..."  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tobimaro on 01 Dec 2010, 21:42
    Just a couple of musings on the last two comics.  First, it's good that Faye is doing her best to get Dora some help.  And it's good for Faye to admit that she has some anger issues to work on.   :lol:

    And second, it might do Marten to get out and see what else is available.  Yeah, the snacks at CoD were free, but the hidden costs are now becoming apparent.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 01 Dec 2010, 21:43
    Free Coffee > Psycho Girlfriend?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 01 Dec 2010, 21:44
    Wait, he's clearly told Tai, and her reaction is...

    "...poor emo Marten..."

    Gah.  Her stock just dropped by several points in my portfolio. 

    That's only her reaction to his lamenting that he can't go to CoD anymore. We didn't see her initial reaction to the breakup news (which disappoints me a little).

    The mental image of Marten foraging for acorns in a park while wearing the worry hat amuses me.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 21:44
    (Nudges jwhouk)  So he did!

    Looks like Tai knows.  I don't think she's being especially cruel to Marten here... when she's talked to him about her own relationship drama before, he responded in much the same way - gentle humour, a bit of teasing, and a few practical observations.  While I suppose I could see Tai being the sort to give Marten a hug and a cup of hot cocoa, I don't think this is out of character for her either.

    More to the point, now I want a free muffin.  :(
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Near Lurker on 01 Dec 2010, 21:45
    Now she gets her revenge for "happy batter."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 01 Dec 2010, 21:47
    "But it was FREE..."

     :cry: Oh Marten. YOUR SORROW IS MY SORROW, YOU POOR BEHATTED BOY

    Also, way to not be a best bro, Tai. You do NOT get bro grabs.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 01 Dec 2010, 21:49
    Now she gets her revenge for "happy batter."

    If Tai really wanted to get back at him for that, when he said he had to pay for food at other places, she could have suggested that he go home and make himself some "happy pancakes."

    Also, you'd think a college student would be a little more sympathetic to someone who's disappointed about losing a free meal.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 01 Dec 2010, 21:53
    Ahh, the perils of NOT banging the Coffee Shop owner.     :-D


    But seriously, Marten is going to have to face Dora again at some stage, I think it would be best if it happens sooner than later.  The longer he leaves it, the more difficult and awkward is't going to be when it happens.

    After all, they were friends before they were partners, and it's only going to make things more difficult since they both move in the same circles.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 21:55
    Piffle and tommyrot, sez I, sez I.  Tai's not being nasty to Marten, this is how they talk to each other.  Tai's making a few little jokes to cheer Marten up while offering some practical observations.

    Heck, y'wanna see Marten being equally harsh to Tai on the subject of relationships?  Try this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=727).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=728).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=765).  Or hey, how about this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=815).  That's just a handful of comics that are all within just a couple of QC "days".  They talk about relationships, and when they do, they tease each other a bit, let each other vent, and then help each other get on with things.

    So I shall give you bro-grabs, Tai.  All the bro-grabs you wish.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 01 Dec 2010, 22:11
    aww man, i was all hoping to see crazyness ensue, oh well, funny snarky bit's are good too i guess
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: vforvancouver on 01 Dec 2010, 22:12
    Wow, the tattoo is back! I remember seeing the tattoo in Tai's elbow when she wrapped her boobs. Then, when she suddenly looked feminine, the tattoo vanished. But now it's back and Tai still looks like a girl!

    Details, details.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 01 Dec 2010, 22:17
    Ahh, the perils of NOT banging the Coffee Shop owner.     :-D

    Yeah losing access to free food, and ESPECIALLY free lattes, is something not to be taken lightly. Lattes alone are expensive, for an underemployed slacker like Marten those are gonna add up elsewhere ;).

    But seriously, Marten is going to have to face Dora again at some stage, I think it would be best if it happens sooner than later.  The longer he leaves it, the more difficult and awkward is't going to be when it happens.

    After all, they were friends before they were partners, and it's only going to make things more difficult since they both move in the same circles.

    Don't think either of them is gonna be ready for that for a good long time I think. Sure exes can become friends again, but it usually takes awhile for any lingering bad feelings over the breakup to fade first, which usually means them not seeing each other for a time. Sucks that they aren't going to be able to just "hang out" for awhile, but that tends to be the nature of all but the friendliest breakups, and Marten and Dora's breakup may have been mutual (more on Dora's part than Marten's I suspect) but it was NOT friendly. Sure there have been uglier breakups, but there have been nicer ones too.  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 22:25
    Sure they can.  Just watch a little Friends and you can see they'll get together and break up six times per episode, and still hang out together.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 01 Dec 2010, 22:30
    Aaaaaand you just summed up why, exactly, I hate Friends.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 01 Dec 2010, 22:31
    I'd say that was a TV show, but since we're talking about a webcomic, I say meh whatever.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: redragon5000 on 01 Dec 2010, 22:34
    He'll need new equipment if he's gonna take on the squirrels. The Worry Hat doesn't add to defense...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Emperor Norton on 01 Dec 2010, 22:38
    Don't think either of them is gonna be ready for that for a good long time I think. Sure exes can become friends again, but it usually takes awhile for any lingering bad feelings over the breakup to fade first, which usually means them not seeing each other for a time. Sucks that they aren't going to be able to just "hang out" for awhile, but that tends to be the nature of all but the friendliest breakups, and Marten and Dora's breakup may have been mutual (more on Dora's part than Marten's I suspect) but it was NOT friendly. Sure there have been uglier breakups, but there have been nicer ones too.  

    Actually, with Marten's personality... I don't think it would be as hard for him to adjust to good friends in a short (but somewhat painful) manner. Dora... probably not so much. But then again, that might be me projecting because I find myself to be a lot like a mix between him and Angus...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: melly21 on 01 Dec 2010, 22:50
    I would be disappointed if I lost free muffins too :(

    The coffee I couldn't care less about, I hate coffee.

    He should go hook up with a chick that works at a burger joint or something. Not quality food but hey it's free!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: lts on 01 Dec 2010, 22:53
    Nice comic today. But in the back of my mind, this is all I saw:

    (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/lmlyp/squirrels.png)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 01 Dec 2010, 22:59
    Poor poor Marten.

    "The best things in life are free!" No no no Barrett Strong.

    The best things in life are MUFFINS that are free!  :mrgreen:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Akima on 01 Dec 2010, 23:02
    "But it was FREE..."
    No Grasshopper, the coffee and baked goods were not free. They were actually very expensive; you just did not pay for them with money. This is so of all the "best things in life" that the song mendaciously claims are free.

    I loved Tai in this, even more than red-glowing-eyed Faye in yesterday's comic.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 01 Dec 2010, 23:05
    As far as Marten being friends with Dora again goes, let's not forget his previous ex who he moved across the country to be with. When she showed up in the coffee shop, Marten didn't even want to talk to her. Far as I could tell from Marten's description, that breakup wasn't particularly nasty either, but Marten wanted nothing to do with the girl when he had the chance to talk to her.

    Now part of that could be embarrassment over having put so much effort into trying to be with someone then learning she didn't want to be with him, but just wanted to put that out there to show Marten doesn't exactly have a history of maintaining friendships with exes. And no, Faye doesn't count IMO. She was never even his girlfriend, never mind his ex-girlfriend...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 01 Dec 2010, 23:11
    I think people are jumping on the "friendship" wagon way too quick. It's only been a day since they split! Hell, it's probably been less than 12 hours! When they got together Marten was too nervous to see Dora until the next night, and that was a happy Marten. Give them time to awkward this out.

    Yeah, I just used "awkward" as a verb.
     8-) Deal with it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 01 Dec 2010, 23:15
    The awkward, it, well it doesn't exactly burn but it's definitely uncomfortable.


    And I just used awkward as a noun!

     :evil: Suck it, grammar Nazis!  :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 01 Dec 2010, 23:28
    Given that he may indeed want to be friends with Dora in the future, I think Marten's wise to avoid her for now, and maybe for a month or so, or at least until that blow-up that we were talking about earlier occurs. It could be Marten, too, knows it's coming, and tearing into Dora before she gets her feet under  some therapist's desk and seems willing to keep them there is just going to give her more bricks for Mount Denial.

    I wonder if Faye's going to let him know about bullying Dora into therapy?

    Anyway, Marten, if you're that strapped, it's time to start brown-bagging. And does this mean that we're going to see less of ye CoD?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: lts on 01 Dec 2010, 23:31
    I loved Tai in this, even more than red-glowing-eyed Faye in yesterday's comic.

    Hmmm...

    (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/lmlyp/squirrels2.png)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 01 Dec 2010, 23:32
    We didn't see her initial reaction to the breakup news (which disappoints me a little).

    Well, lets look at it for a second...

    The Drama Bomb (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1799), and the Follow Up (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1800)

    Clearly there was more conversation after 1799...but all we hear of it is that the breakup was "mutual"

    The Hug (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1802)

    Again, there's probably a good conversation taking place afterwards, but we don't see it, as it's off-panel.

    Sven (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1803)

    Clearly he and Dora spoke about things, at least to the point of him going and picking up some of her stuff...but again, the conversation is off panel.

    Hanners (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1805)

    Not sure just how far into her reaction we are, but clearly we're jumping in somewhere in the middle. We don't actually see Dora (or Faye) tell Hanners what happened.

    ...and today, where clearly Tai knows, but again, we didn't actually see the news being conveyed.

    I love this comic, I really do...but the vast majority of the dramatic resolution to these latest developments is happening off-panel, and we're not getting much in the way of actual details. The other characters have been informed, and we're just supposed to accept that and move on.

    This is somewhat disappointing,as there was a lot of potential there...Dora/Sven, Marten//Dora, Dora/Faye, Hanners, Marten/Tai. Some of that might still happen, but it won't be the immedeate reaction, it'll be follow-up. Which is fine...but I just feel like a good opportunity for characterization has simply been ignored.

    ...or we're just getting a weeks worth of punchlines before another bomb drops?  :psyduck:

    Heck, y'wanna see Marten being equally harsh to Tai on the subject of relationships? Try this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=727).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=728).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=765).  Or hey, how about this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=815).

    Equally harsh??

    Yeah...not seeing it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Near Lurker on 01 Dec 2010, 23:33
    The fact is, Dora is Faye's boss and friend. Marten is Faye's roommate and, right now, and honestly for quite a long time, closest friend.  Marten and Dora can't keep apart forever, any more than they could back at comic 75-100.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 01 Dec 2010, 23:36
    Well, from the perspective that I don't think Tai is being at all harsh, it works.  I mean in those links, Tai explains her relationship drama, and Marten's response is pretty much to make a joke.  He's also kind and understanding, but he's trying to cheer her up with a bit of laughter.  That's what it strikes me Tai is doing here, too.  Maybe she's not being as tactful as possible, but then that's just her.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: lts on 01 Dec 2010, 23:50
    Heck, y'wanna see Marten being equally harsh to Tai on the subject of relationships?  Try this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=727).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=728).  Or this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=765).  Or hey, how about this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=815).

    Or this.

    (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/lmlyp/squirrels3.png)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 01 Dec 2010, 23:56
    Its the little things that remind you of your loss, isnt it ? :wink:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skelepunk on 02 Dec 2010, 00:01
    The awkward, it, well it doesn't exactly burn but it's definitely uncomfortable.


    And I just used awkward as a noun!

     :evil: Suck it, grammar Nazis!  :evil:
    Awkward could be used as a substantial adjective. I think it'd still be correct.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 02 Dec 2010, 00:04
    The fact is, Dora is Faye's boss and friend. Marten is Faye's roommate and, right now, and honestly for quite a long time, closest friend.  Marten and Dora can't keep apart forever, any more than they could back at comic 75-100.

    Sure they can. All it takes is for Marten to stay out of Coffee of Doom, and Dora to not go anywhere near Marten and Faye's apartment. It would be like Faye never introduced them.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TRVA123 on 02 Dec 2010, 00:10
    As far as Marten being friends with Dora again goes, let's not forget his previous ex who he moved across the country to be with. When she showed up in the coffee shop, Marten didn't even want to talk to her. Far as I could tell from Marten's description, that breakup wasn't particularly nasty either, but Marten wanted nothing to do with the girl when he had the chance to talk to her.

    I think that Martin's breakup w/ previous ex was nasty. Even though it may not have involved tons of friends and a shared living situation, he MOVED ACROSS THE COUNTRY for her. It sounds like the relationship tanked not long after that. Martin had to be head over heels for that girl to do something like that, and I imagine that he was crushed.

    Just because Martin's got a pretty philosophical way of dealing with everything doesn't mean that it wasn't nasty for him. I can completely understand why  he would want to avoid her now. At the same time, it doesn't seem as though they have a shared friend group on this coast, so there's no motivation to keep the friendship going.

    With Dora there's a shared friend group and a break up that I don't see being half as bad as Martin's previous one. We, the readers, took it pretty hard, and it's the biggest breakup there's been on QC, but in terms of real-world breakups this isn't that bad. I think there's a good chance that Martin and Dora will rekindle their friendship after they give each other some space to grow and move on.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 02 Dec 2010, 00:13
    i wnat a degree in squirrel fighting! WHERE CAN I GET ONE?!!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Justin Alexander on 02 Dec 2010, 00:15
    I love this comic, I really do...but the vast majority of the dramatic resolution to these latest developments is happening off-panel, and we're not getting much in the way of actual details. The other characters have been informed, and we're just supposed to accept that and move on.

    This is somewhat disappointing,as there was a lot of potential there...Dora/Sven, Marten//Dora, Dora/Faye, Hanners, Marten/Tai. Some of that might still happen, but it won't be the immedeate reaction, it'll be follow-up. Which is fine...but I just feel like a good opportunity for characterization has simply been ignored.

    Rookie storytelling mistake: You think there's a bunch of character development to be found there, but there really isn't because that conversation can only tell you two things. (1) Is the friend supportive? (2) Is the friend a douche?

    It is, in fact, the follow-up conversations that allow characters to start giving their opinions on what's happening and in which we can see how Dora and Marten are being affected by it.

    Now, there's a lot of pathos to be found in those moments. But those are empty calories in the fiction writer's diet, and I'm glad Jeph is smart enough to step over them and get to the interesting stuff sooner rather than later.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 00:30
    i wnat a degree in squirrel fighting! WHERE CAN I GET ONE?!!

    I hear ITT Tech is doing those these days!

    Also: Its, you are the hero of this thread.

    QUESTIONABLE COMBAT (with squirrels)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: teddybeer on 02 Dec 2010, 00:35
    Quote
    I think there's a good chance that Martin and Dora will rekindle their friendship after they give each other some space to grow and move on.

    I sure hope you're right. I'd be gutted if Marten really never went to CoD again or if we wouldn't even see him in the same comic as Dora again.  :cry:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 02 Dec 2010, 00:39
    Eh, why? Happens all the time in Real Life(TM); couples break up, and never want to see each other again. Circle of life, that is.




    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Dec 2010, 00:44
    There's a character who could mentor you in squirrel fighting.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Y on 02 Dec 2010, 00:50
    Unless it are Willy Wonka's squirrels you're fighting with.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 00:57
    There's a character who could mentor you in squirrel fighting.

    (http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e280/Selexor/QC/SquirrelTai.png)

    Coincidence?  I think not.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 01:17
    There's a character who could mentor you in squirrel fighting.

    (http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e280/Selexor/QC/SquirrelTai.png)

    Coincidence?  I think not.

    Oh my God Tai you, you traitor

    You aren't fighting the squirrels at all...you're on their side
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 01:24
    I was just going to put up two pictures and leave no explanation and call it a joke.

    But then those pictures popped up completely randomly on Google Image Search.  I honestly was not prepared for them to look so much alike.

    I'm kind of a little scared now.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Olymander on 02 Dec 2010, 03:07
    He'll need new equipment if he's gonna take on the squirrels. The Worry Hat doesn't add to defense...

    Nah.  I think he could take all the squirrels in the park; they'd all just fall over laughing when they see him in it! Remember, the best defense is a good offense.  Or some such.

    As for a mentor in squirrel fighting, I vote Momo (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485).
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 02 Dec 2010, 03:17
    The truth is, Jeph doesn't like drawing Teh Drama - and thus that's why we get reaction shots and not the Tell about the breakup.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 02 Dec 2010, 03:24
    Also the tell is redundant. What really matters is how the characters react.

    The only tell strip we've seen is the only one that's actually needed, the one where Marten tells Faye. But that wasn't even completely about the break up, it was mostly about Marten's reaction too it. The next two strips are Faye's, then Hanners. It would have been a waste of time for Jeph to show every single character telling the tale. We no what happened, and whe we see a character's reaction, we can assume that they now know as well.

    If we needed to see every single word, we'd be stuck on this one story until OMG Turkeys, 2016.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Ghanima Atreides on 02 Dec 2010, 04:11
    There is only one thing I have to say to Marten: Tanstaafl!  :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: azurefirem on 02 Dec 2010, 04:51
    The twitter post seriously made the comic for me.
    "Unarmed. It has to be a fair fight."

    *grabs pom-poms*
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Dec 2010, 05:17
    I had no idea that Squirrel Girl looked so...nice.

    I've either just creeped myself out, or I need to get back into comics.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Melauren on 02 Dec 2010, 05:25
    Anyone else irritated by Marten's attitude here?  Dude, the coffee/lattes/muffins weren't free, it just wasn't you who paid for them.  Pretty sure your ex-girlfriend, the struggling small business owner, had to pay for all those "free" goods you were scarfing.  And lunch EVERY DAY?  I'd actually be super annoyed if I were in Dora's shoes.  Coffee, whatever.  Lattes... ennnnh depends how many he's having, those buggers are expensive in part because milk and espresso are expensive.  Muffins?  For lunch, every day of the week?  How many would that be, anyway? 

    Yeah, I'd have told him to stop mooching, I think.

    </taking the comic too seriously>
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Dec 2010, 05:35
    I had no idea that Squirrel Girl looked so...nice.

    I've either just creeped myself out, or I need to get back into comics.
    Squirrel-girls you say? Grace here (http://www.egscomics.com/sketchbook/?date=2007-11-12) is part-squirrel. Apparently it's a thing now.

    EDIT: Changed to better link.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Skewbrow on 02 Dec 2010, 05:56
    Anyone else irritated by Marten's attitude here? 

    Don't know about irritated, but the following did occur to me. Say Marten shows up at CoD (after due time, so not for quite some while) and ...... Dora hands him a bill for muffins and lattes consumed at lunch breaks during the past year. Then she says: "It's been wonderful, sweetie. It really has. But there are no free lunches!" She did learn a few things at that econ course. Also our Dora is a bitch crowd would have a field day.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 06:04
    Well, Marten's skinny as hell, so if it's any consolation I don't think he'd eat much.


    Also now I cannot stop thinking about other superheroes the rest of QC would look like (Please nobody be lame enough to make a Pizza Girl joke).  Like, Marten?  He's totally Dick Grayson.  If Raven had dyed the front of her hair white instead of hot pink she could be Rogue... and Dora could be Triplicate Girl with her black hair...

    O NO HALP I AM CAUGHT IN ENDLESS NERD-LOOP
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 06:06
    Reboot yourself, you'll be fine. 

    I reassess and retcon my initial reaction; Tai is being disarmingly charming, as usual. 

    I imagine the initial reaction was somewhat subdued, anyway.  In Tai's world, you get knocked down, you get back up again...

     :angel:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Dec 2010, 06:11
    She drinks a whiskey drink, she drinks a lager drink... :angel:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 02 Dec 2010, 06:22
    Of course, we do recall that Faye was chucking leftover baked goods at hobos, don't we? If she had them left over anyway, I don't think the muffins Marten scarfed were cutting too much into Dora's bottom line. The lattes, I don't know about, having never had one in my life entire, much less paid for or made one.

    As crass as Marten may seem, this is a normal thing to fixate on, and, I suspect, much easier than dealing directly with "I can't go hang out at CoD any more." and, worse, "I'm sleeping alone again tonight." At least it would be for me. Time enough to turn and face the (real) strain later.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 06:42
    Well, Marten's skinny as hell, so if it's any consolation I don't think he'd eat much.


    Also now I cannot stop thinking about other superheroes the rest of QC would look like (Please nobody be lame enough to make a Pizza Girl joke).  Like, Marten?  He's totally Dick Grayson.  If Raven had dyed the front of her hair white instead of hot pink she could be Rogue... and Dora could be Triplicate Girl with her black hair...

    O NO HALP I AM CAUGHT IN ENDLESS NERD-LOOP

    YOUR WRONG FAYE IS TEH ONLY CANDIDATE FOR ROGUE

    ...O SHIT I AM IN LOOP NOW TOO

    WAT HAS SCIENC DONE!!!!!111eleven
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Dec 2010, 06:50
    That mean we can have Penny as the White Queen?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 06:54
    She drinks a whiskey drink, she drinks a lager drink... :angel:

    NOOOOOOOOOO 90'S FLASHBACKS MAKE IT STOOOOOPPPPPPPPPP  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Dec 2010, 07:04
    That mean we can have Penny as the White Queen?
    If you can get Pene-lope into the costume, more power to ya.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 07:10
    Ms. Reed is the Baroness from G.I. Joe.  I will not accept arguments on this.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Cammy on 02 Dec 2010, 07:33
    So I've been absent from the comic for almost a year, so a few hundred comics later over the past two days, and I'm caught up. I could start to see to problems between Marten and Dora progress, and in a way I'm happy they've split, because it feels real. Plus now I can't wait to see what future storylines will entail!

    On a lighter note, it cool to see Jeph has the first volume collected. I'm totally going to buy one for myself! Screw my friends who also read QC! They can buy their own this Christmas!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 07:38
    Ms. Reed is the Baroness from G.I. Joe.  I will not accept arguments on this.
    Yes. Absolutely. I will cut a fool who argues with that.

    Sven is Gambit, this is completely assured. Steve is... Wolverine? He's got the sideburns for it.

    OH SHIT MARTEN'S DAD WOULD BE THE BEST MAGNETO :O

    Also fuck now I will hear Ian McKellen's voice when he appears in the comic
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Dec 2010, 07:43
    Ms. Reed is the Baroness from G.I. Joe.  I will not accept arguments on this.
    You shall receive none from me!

    But who does that make Destro?

    And if Marten's dad is Magneto, that must mean Marten is Quicksilver; he just needs to bleach his hair to activate his powers and become the greatest rock guitarist since Eddie van Halen.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: J on 02 Dec 2010, 08:01
    this strip reminds me of when my dog died. after awhile i wasn't thinking about it anymore, but then i dropped some egg salad on the floor and my first instinct was to whistle for him so i wouldn't have to clean it up. and then i remembered he was gone.

    shit always comes back to hit you when you're not expecting it.

     :cry:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 08:03
    aurghoo;rhzrhjeg

    Sorry, my only superhero bacground was the 50's superman TV show and the campy 60's batman.  I never saw any of the movies - not Chrs Reeve, not any of the batman incarnations, and I don't read comics.  

    So I guess I'm posting to say I have nothing to post.  

    asdfkjhi

    Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.  

    J, so true.  We'll see Marten get hit by this again, I think.  You cope when you can, and break down when you can't. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 02 Dec 2010, 08:36
    I suppose if Faye dyed her hair, she could be Power Girl. I guess she could do justice to the window. (PG still has that costume doesn't she?)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jordinyc on 02 Dec 2010, 08:47
    yes Tai but HAVE YOU SEEN THE FUCKING SQUIRRELS in this town!?!

    (http://i52.tinypic.com/2qvunic.jpg)
    http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 02 Dec 2010, 08:52
    Ms. Reed is the Baroness from G.I. Joe.  I will not accept arguments on this.

    Even I can't argue with this, and the last time I tied one on, I had the dog nearly convinced that she was actually a developmentally disabled human.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 09:35
    Good thing he didn't report you to the ASPCA! 

    Wait, I guess if you had  convinced him, he wouldn't report you, since he wouldn't believe he was an animal... and since you didn't convince him, he can't report you 'cause he can't make the call...

    nevermind. 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 02 Dec 2010, 09:44
    her, actually. I'll throw up a pic tomorrow or some shit.

    She is the most wonderful dog. 94.1 pounds of the dumbest pitbull you've ever met. Terrified of hats.

    I re-read today's comic when I got up, and I noticed that Marten was still wearing the worry hat..  so cute, so desperate to not hurt..  poor Marten!

    I'll send Jeph ten bux and a springer spaniel puppy if we can have a week of Sweet-tits/Yelling Bird*.







    *No actual puppy.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: foolsguinea on 02 Dec 2010, 10:22
    Tai curves! Reminded me of this fanart: http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,4954.msg976066.html#msg976066
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Melauren on 02 Dec 2010, 10:25
    Of course, we do recall that Faye was chucking leftover baked goods at hobos, don't we? If she had them left over anyway, I don't think the muffins Marten scarfed were cutting too much into Dora's bottom line. The lattes, I don't know about, having never had one in my life entire, much less paid for or made one.

    As crass as Marten may seem, this is a normal thing to fixate on, and, I suspect, much easier than dealing directly with "I can't go hang out at CoD any more." and, worse, "I'm sleeping alone again tonight." At least it would be for me. Time enough to turn and face the (real) strain later.

    You're probably right that his mopeyness has more to do with "my life has changed immeasurably" than "aw man now I have to pay $1.25 for a muffin".  Also yeah, they have leftovers... but that doesn't really make him any less of a moocher, in my opinion, if he never offered to pay for them.  Although maybe he did and Dora refused?  Eh.  Anyway, I guess I just dislike that attitude in general.  Like, "oh hey I'm going to take advantage of my friend's hospitality, permanently and continuously, because they are too nice to call me on it.  SCORE!" 

    I mean, when I was younger I never understood why Kramer was everyone's favourite character on Seinfeld... the way he took advantage of Jerry's apartment/belongings actually made me so irritated I couldn't even watch the show.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: shengokai on 02 Dec 2010, 10:31
    Marten vs. The Squirrels. STAT. I DEMAND THIS!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 02 Dec 2010, 10:44
    Tai curves! Reminded me of this fanart: http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,4954.msg976066.html#msg976066

    hotcha hotcha!

    That is one gorgeous piece of fanart there!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: machzel08 on 02 Dec 2010, 11:24
    WILL MARTEN JUST FREAK OUT ALREADY!!!!!


    i'm just waiting for him to snap and break something or break down and cry.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Dec 2010, 11:46
    Ms. Reed is the Baroness from G.I. Joe.  I will not accept arguments on this.
    You shall receive none from me!

    But who does that make Destro?

    And if Marten's dad is Magneto, that must mean Marten is Quicksilver; he just needs to bleach his hair to activate his powers and become the greatest rock guitarist since Eddie van Halen.

    Then we need to figure out Scarlet Witch..

    And Raoul - Faye would definitely do justice to PG's outfit.

    Then again, with the right glasses, longer hair and a C96 she could be  the Baroness (http://www.beyondhollywood.com/stillsx/2007/11/sienna-miller-as-baroness-gi-joe.jpg) as well.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: laizeohbeets on 02 Dec 2010, 11:59
    I think Faye's attitude suits PG more.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 02 Dec 2010, 12:16
    If Raven is anything, she's Zatanna.
    Tai strikes me as a cool Barbara Gordon.
     Hanners as Kitty Pryde.
    Marten seems like the closest superperson to him would be Spiderman.
    If Dora gets better, Sue Storm, if she spirals into self doubt, Catwoman.
    Steve seems Hal Jordan-esque.
    Faye to me seems more like Tulip O'Hare but she isn't superpowered so what am I gonna doooooooo?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Emperor Norton on 02 Dec 2010, 12:46
    this strip reminds me of when my dog died. after awhile i wasn't thinking about it anymore, but then i dropped some egg salad on the floor and my first instinct was to whistle for him so i wouldn't have to clean it up. and then i remembered he was gone.

    shit always comes back to hit you when you're not expecting it.

     :cry:

    I had a work accident that made me blind in my right eye. (nail ricocheted when someone else hit it and it caught me right in the eye.). Everyone said I was remarkably well adjusted about it. Everyone else seemed more concerned about it than I was.

    Then a few months later, while still going through surgeries to get it fixed as best I could... I say a magic eye photo, and realised without two eyes I couldn't do it. And that was the first time I was sad about my loss of vision in my right eye.

    Its weird the things that actually really make it hit home sometimes.

    Also, on the Marten is a mooch thing... I have a friend who runs a coffee shop. He gets pissed at me if I try to pay for anything. Just from Marten's personality throughout the comic... and Dora's, I think it more likely that she gave it to him without letting him pay, than for him to take advantage of her not calling him out.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: maxh on 02 Dec 2010, 13:22
    Anyone else irritated by Marten's attitude here?  Dude, the coffee/lattes/muffins weren't free, it just wasn't you who paid for them.  Pretty sure your ex-girlfriend, the struggling small business owner, had to pay for all those "free" goods you were scarfing.  And lunch EVERY DAY?  I'd actually be super annoyed if I were in Dora's shoes.  Coffee, whatever.  Lattes... ennnnh depends how many he's having, those buggers are expensive in part because milk and espresso are expensive.  Muffins?  For lunch, every day of the week?  How many would that be, anyway? 

    Yeah, I'd have told him to stop mooching, I think.

    </taking the comic too seriously>
    When he says "free" he may have just meant that he didn't hand over cash in exchange for baked goods and lattes, but instead (for example) paid a bit more towards rent than did Dora. He could consider that part of his monthly expenses rather than paying for food.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Dec 2010, 13:25
    If Raven is anything, she's Zatanna.
    Tai strikes me as a cool Barbara Gordon.
     Hanners as Kitty Pryde.
    Marten seems like the closest superperson to him would be Spiderman.
    If Dora gets better, Sue Storm, if she spirals into self doubt, Catwoman.
    Steve seems Hal Jordan-esque.
    Faye to me seems more like Tulip O'Hare but she isn't superpowered so what am I gonna doooooooo?
    I was gonna chew you out for the Steve/Hal Jordan thing, then I remembered the secret agent gig that is either real (and therefore makes him a pretty damn good Lantern candidate) or a hallucination he believed so hard he actually willed Tortura into existence (which makes him a fucking awesome Lantern candidate, since he doesn't even need the ring).
    :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Max Wilder on 02 Dec 2010, 15:46
    So... the title of 1809 ("Lohn & Brot") must be something terribly obvious that I'm not getting, since nobody has mentioned it.

    Can somebody tell me what it refers to?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: xerada on 02 Dec 2010, 16:30
    Well, the only explanation I can think of is that it's German.
    Lohn und Brot is an idiom for employment, or paid work. (Literally those two words mean salary and bread).

    It's mostly used in the context of taking someone’s work away (for the googlers: jmd. um Lohn und Brot bringen).
    It is also kind of an old expression, it would be weird to hear it out of the mouth of an average 25-year-old.


    Edit: added content
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 02 Dec 2010, 16:33
    And it's also supposedly a song title (as Jeph has been on a song title for strips kick as of late).

    EDIT: Efdemin, "Lohn & Brat". Techno? Really? REALLY?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 16:43
    Don't you ever watch when Jeph broadcasts his drawing? Most of the music he listens to nowadays is techno/electronica, along with a healthy amount of death metal and some indie rock.

    I personally think it's pretty awesome...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 02 Dec 2010, 17:01
    Don't you ever watch when Jeph broadcasts his drawing? Most of the music he listens to nowadays is techno/electronica, along with a healthy amount of death metal and some indie rock.

    I personally think it's pretty awesome...
    where is this that he broadcasts? i've seen it mentioned but have no idea where it is
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 02 Dec 2010, 17:17
    I've tried, but justin.tv won't work on my other 'puter. And since I don't get into the same kind of music as Jeph (except for Toto, of course*), I usually mute it when I am able to watch.



    * - Unfortunately, my answer to the magic question is the same as Marten's. "Rosanna" FTW.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 17:18
    http://www.justin.tv/jephjacques/b/274918457? (http://www.justin.tv/jephjacques/b/274918457?)

    Follow Jeph on twitter (http://twitter.com/jephjacques (http://twitter.com/jephjacques)) because that's where he lets people know when he's broadcasting. The times he does it varies, so his twitter really is the best way of saying informed.

    Pimpin' Jeph's live comin drawin' awww yeah  8-)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: xerada on 02 Dec 2010, 17:31
    Huh, I sometimes watch. When I'm awake. He's always doing' it in the middle of the night, so I'm having difficulties with that, even when I stay awake until 2 or three am :( (yes, different time zone). But I'd do it more often if I could, because I absolutely enjoy watching him doing his magic :)
    But I'm with jwhouk in that matter, I don't enjoy listening to Jephs music, so I just turn the sound off.


    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 02 Dec 2010, 20:04
    While browsing the cast Twitter I found this little gem: (read from the bottom up!)

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/qctwitter.jpg)

    Hmm...why was she in such a hurry to see Marten? Like, a REAL hurry?

    TWUE WUV PEOPLE. SAY IT WITH ME NOW.



    COME ON, GATHER IN Y'ALL. PLENTY OF HUGS TO GO AROUND.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Pika_power on 02 Dec 2010, 20:35
    Tai seems harsh in this comic because she uses the "I'm sorry, but..." formula. It automatically makes any comment more bitchy than it would have been if said formula was not used.

    Observe:
    "I'm sorry that you broke up, but you really should eat healthily."

    as opposed to:
    "You really should eat healthily."

    See how much bitchier that first one is?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Cartilage Head on 02 Dec 2010, 20:48
    I don't see why Marten feels like he can't go to COD anymore. Just pop in and say hi, grab some whatever you want, and walk out.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: sterlingdragon on 02 Dec 2010, 21:05
    Well, perhaps he feels that seeing his ex is probably going to be what makes him snap. Even if she comes bearing news of Therapism, She might not make it as far as 'I got an appoi-' before he snaps and starts strangling her.
    Hell, I could see a Jail arc. And Pintsize can bust him out! And his Cellmate can be Jimbo! Jimbo does plenty of questionable things, right?

    Also, I really liked QC better when I first discovered it, because when I was finished reading an episode, the next thousand or so were RIGHT THERE! Because I gotta tell ya, this Seat Edge is really uncomfortable.
    Not that I'm complaining or anything, I should be damn happy there's more than one a week. But it's hella fun to start reading a drama webcomic years after it starts for this very reason. And I gotta say, there's only so many times you can re-read 'No Four-year-olds on the Pee-pee'.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 21:29
    I don't really think he's afraid of snapping if he goes to CoD.  Right now, it's really more of a space thing.  It's easier all 'round (both on him and  her) if they keep some distance as they work through the upset of the break up. 

    When you're still in school and you break up with someone, you still have  to see them, nearly every day - there's no way around it.  But once you're past that point, I think most people leave some space at a breakup, at least for a little while until the hurt and awkward fade enough to be able to talk without the fear of saying or doing something that will only make things worse. 

    In the meantime, his diet can only improve!  Unless he's like me when depressed. 

    Now, where'd I leave my ice cream scoop spoon? 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 02 Dec 2010, 22:21
    -DING DING DING-

    Baton down the hatches! Draw the main line and other such nautical things! There be a mighty wave a 'comin. She be large enough to drag us all down to a watery grave. An 'er name be: "MOTHER."  :evil:

    -shiver!-
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 22:21
    The Baroness is about to stage an assault on Coffee Of Doom.

    RUN, DORA, RUN
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Dec 2010, 22:29
    I bet Jeph does something unexpected.

    But wait, I'm expecting that, so ...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: melly21 on 02 Dec 2010, 22:35
    This will be interesting either way. Plus it will be good to see Marten's Ma again! I enjoy her.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 22:35
    So hey guys how about that comic yesterday with the sq--

    *sees today's comic*

    .......

    *lip twitch*

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAHAHAHAaaaaaa oh Dora you are FUCKED
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: knucklesandgyros on 02 Dec 2010, 22:36
    I am in giddy anticipation for next week's comics...now watch him do like 2 guest strips and 3 Yelling Birds just to mess with us all.

    But seriously, I can't wait! Dora is gonna get the fear of God in her even worse than anything Faye can inflict. Awesome. I don't hate Dora, per se, but I love Marten's mom.


    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jaredstar on 02 Dec 2010, 22:37
    his mom is returning, ah hell
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 22:38
    SQUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

    I have been wishing like CRAZY that Jeph would bring Veronica back into the strip!!! Now not only well we get to see her drawn in the newer, sexier style, we'll also get to see her make good on her word on what happens to people who fuck with her son. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459)

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MightionNY on 02 Dec 2010, 22:39
    Next week is going to be inexplicably awesome, methinks.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Irenfrea on 02 Dec 2010, 22:39
    OH SHI-

    Heironymous Bosch forecasted.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 22:43
    SQUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

    I have been wishing like CRAZY that Jeph would bring Veronica back into the strip!!! Now not only well we get to see her drawn in the newer, sexier style, we'll also get to see her make good on her word on what happens to people who fuck with her son. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459)



    I don't think so - Dora hasn't "fucked with her son" so much as fucked herself out of their relationship.  I doubt Ms Reed would get much enjoyment from kicking a wounded animal...  nor do I think Marten would let her. 

    Of course, I could be wrong.  Monday's such a LOOOONG way off!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Dec 2010, 22:45
    What if we miss out on the awesomeness of Bosch paintings, and Marten's mom provides insight instead? She seemed psychologically savvy during her last visit. Which I suppose is a job requirement.

    That being said, Dora might give some serious thought to joining the Foreign Legion.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: peterh on 02 Dec 2010, 22:46
    And just when I hit the reply button to say something like "I think Miss Reed is a bit too mature for that", Carl had to go and beat me to it.

    ;)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Tergon on 02 Dec 2010, 22:47
    Much as I'm looking forward to Ms. Reed's return, I have to admit, there's one that I'm looking forward to before she arrives.

    Marten's a nice guy, whatever else he might have been through.  And he probably has no illusions about what his angry Mama Bear will do if she meets up with Dora.  So most likely we're soon to see Marten's first post-breakup conversation with Dora when he goes and gives fair warning.

    ...he could tell Faye and get her to pass the message on, I guess, but that's not as much fun.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 02 Dec 2010, 22:48
    And just when I hit the reply button to say something like "I think Miss Reed is a bit too mature for that", Carl had to go and beat me to it.

    ;)

    Really?  And I'm such  a slow typist!  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 02 Dec 2010, 22:50
    I don't think Dora is doomed. I think that Marten is doomed.  :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 02 Dec 2010, 22:51
    SQUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

    I have been wishing like CRAZY that Jeph would bring Veronica back into the strip!!! Now not only well we get to see her drawn in the newer, sexier style, we'll also get to see her make good on her word on what happens to people who fuck with her son. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459)



    I see something out of Hellraiser. Barbed chains shooting out of nowhere. The sounds of screaming as if from far away, yet too dreadfully close. Pale, pale light silhouettes the form of Veronica Vance, arrayed in black leather and implements of pain.

    "TIME TO PLAY, DORA."

    (I'd hope Dora could find her way out of course, I like Dora, but the squirming. Deliiiicious.)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 22:53
    SQUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

    I have been wishing like CRAZY that Jeph would bring Veronica back into the strip!!! Now not only well we get to see her drawn in the newer, sexier style, we'll also get to see her make good on her word on what happens to people who fuck with her son. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459)



    I don't think so - Dora hasn't "fucked with her son" so much as fucked herself out of their relationship.  I doubt Ms Reed would get much enjoyment from kicking a wounded animal...  nor do I think Marten would let her. 

    Of course, I could be wrong.  Monday's such a LOOOONG way off!

    Heh yeah I know but it's fun to speculate. It's also gonna be fun to watch Dora squirm.  :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Shadic on 02 Dec 2010, 22:56
    It's been a long, long time since Veronica has been in the strip. Always like old characters coming back. (Poor Sarah)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: muffin_of_chaos on 02 Dec 2010, 22:56
    I don't think so - Dora hasn't "fucked with her son" so much as fucked herself out of their relationship.  I doubt Ms Reed would get much enjoyment from kicking a wounded animal...  nor do I think Marten would let her. 

    Of course, I could be wrong.  Monday's such a LOOOONG way off!
    I don't think Dora is doomed. I think that Marten is doomed.  :psyduck:

    I unfortunately have to agree.
    But.
    It would be incredibly sweet if Marten's mom just went off with demon fire on Dora.  Dora would be defensive and try to rally back, but would fail.
    Veronica would probably have to have some sort of secretly nice reason to do so though.  Like thinking Dora would be knocked out of some sort of fantasy or something.  I don't really see it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: themacnut on 02 Dec 2010, 22:58
    So hey guys how about that comic yesterday with the sq--

    *sees today's comic*

    .......

    *lip twitch*

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAHAHAHAaaaaaa oh Dora you are FUCKED

    And not in a way she'll enjoy, either.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 02 Dec 2010, 23:00
    I believe the threat was for Faye who at the time was punching on Marten ALL THE TIME.

    Not for Dora who Veronica felt a kinship with.

    I don't see her going mamabear but she'll get Dora with the best weapon in a mother's arsenal, GUILT.

    A mother's disappointment ruins a psyche more than any beating.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 23:02
    I don't think Dora is doomed. I think that Marten is doomed.  :psyduck:

    Really? Why? I am intrigue at this statement.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Dec 2010, 23:05
    If Ms. Reed tries to intervene I hope Marten will tell her to let it be, like he did with Faye.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 02 Dec 2010, 23:07
    Oh I am SO looking forward to next week!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 02 Dec 2010, 23:08
    I agree about there being a difference between Faye's treatment of Marten. It could be construed she was stringing him along, and I suspect if Fay had suddenly popped up with a boyfriend before Marten and Dora got together, the Bosch rendition would've been made.

    Dora's a different story. For one thing, given her track record, I'm not sure there's anything Veronica could do to her that would be worse than giving Dora a meaningful glare and a cold shoulder. Dora seems perfectly capable of taking care of the rest herself.

    I don't think Dora is doomed. I think that Marten is doomed.  :psyduck:

    Really? Why? I am intrigue at this statement.
    I'm not intrigued, but I am perplexed. Why is Marten doomed? Unless you think he's going to try to 'save' Dora from his mother. As I said, I really don't think there's much threat there.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 02 Dec 2010, 23:11
    Cue the Dora/Veronica shippers in 3...2...

      :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: 0kamisama on 02 Dec 2010, 23:23
    OH SHIIIIIIIII~, indeed, Jeph.

    Looks like we've got an impending family intervention/retribution event coming up for Dora, people.


    ... be very afraid.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sorflakne on 02 Dec 2010, 23:27
    Echoing the Oh SHIIIIIIIIIIIII-

    I saw the above before the comic started to load, and I automatically thought it was going to be a Marten/Dora confrontation or Dora freaking out over something, but what was depicted is about 1000 times better.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 02 Dec 2010, 23:32
    GOOD NEWS EVERYONE impending doom and destruction. wait a minute, that's not good news at all! XD
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: lts on 02 Dec 2010, 23:45
    (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/lmlyp/tigers.png)

    Indie music and drama no.

    Animal fighting yes.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Dec 2010, 23:47
    Byegers


    lol


     :lol:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Dec 2010, 00:07
    Has anyone else thought about what happens when Miss Reed(*) goes through airport security?

    (*)The form of address she asked for in 433.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 03 Dec 2010, 00:07
    Whow !

    Now this week ends with a real cliffhanger !

    @lts: LOL Faye wants to fight hundreds of tigers ? Easy. If you have a tank ! Well, or a nuclear missle.

    Cue the Dora/Veronica shippers in 3...2...
    OMG
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: ERRORCODE616 on 03 Dec 2010, 00:21
    New here. Though some may recognize me from the Ustream feeds at random times.

    Anyway, I'll agree that Marten will probably cut his mom off at the past before she mauls Dora.

    But, for some reason, Dora's earlier revelation that she used to masturbate to pictures of Veronica
    somehow factors into my predictions for Monday's strip. I don't know how. But I'll let you guys cook that stew.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: sterlingdragon on 03 Dec 2010, 00:28
    I can see it now...
    Marty tells Faye, Faye runs to tell Dora, Dora is scared out of her mind, and Faye, wanting to watch, leave Coffee of Doom attended only by a Crazy Lady, a Clumsy Lady, a Missing Lady and an Allosaurus-poop Lady.
    Hanners fraks out and goes running, Cosette fucks up and is swarmed, with nobody to help her, until the doors open, and Sara walks in, and reveals that she spent the last year or so in Barrista Ninja Training School. She proceeds to instantly whip up enough to satiate the customers, and allows Cosette to go find Dora, Hanners and Faye while she takes over.

    Cosette returns, with Hanners, Faye, Dora, Marty, Veronica and Marigold for some reason. Also Steve. Sara reintroduces herself to all those who forgot her, or never met her, and then she reveals the true reason for her going to Barrista Ninja school...
    To finally work up the courage to ask Marty out. Catches him on the rebound, and they go to the bakc room and have dirty sex.
    Then Dora walks in and sees them and is like 'Ew, gross, bye' and walks out, and then starts masturbating while listening to them having sex.

    Then Veronica notices and starts getting intimate with her, and they start lezzing out under the counter. Then Cosette and Steve start fucking, and...well, do I even have to say it? Alright, I guess I will.

    And THEN THEY ALL FUCKED
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Somebody on 03 Dec 2010, 00:33
    I don't think the Worry Hat (he's still wearing that?!) is working any more...

    But, for some reason, Dora's earlier revelation that she used to masturbate to pictures of Veronica somehow factors into my predictions for Monday's strip. I don't know how. But I'll let you guys cook that stew.
    Dora awakens upside down and naked in an X-shaped cross experiencing pain in ways only a professional can deal it? :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: ERRORCODE616 on 03 Dec 2010, 00:39
    Dora awakens upside down and naked in an X-shaped cross experiencing pain in ways only a professional can deal it? :psyduck:

    Jeph's not THAT much of a blatantly pandering whore yet.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Akima on 03 Dec 2010, 00:40
    I'm so looking forward to seeing new-art Veronica.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Dec 2010, 00:45
    Yes!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pendrake on 03 Dec 2010, 01:22
    For comic #1810...

    1. Definitely a "dun Dun DUN!" moment for a week-ender comic. It is well-written symmetry we are going to see Miss Reed again.  First time, she appeared just before The Talk.  Now, she is returning in the wake of The Break-Up.

    2. Worry Hat is getting quite a bit of comic-time.  And it is no small amount of irony of Marten wearing it while talking to its creator. :wink:

    3. Next week will definitely be interesting to read about Marten, since Miss Reed is someone he can fully vent out to unlike the rest of the QC-cast.  I also like the re-emphasis on Marten as central protagonist, it has been a while since we had a Marten-centric story-arc.

    4. I doubt Miss Reed will be all that harsh or threatening with Dora, aside a comical gag or two.  More likely the opposite, in the overall.  Perhaps a return to dark-haired Dora as a result too...? :-)

    5. I hope my grave will either require elephant guns &/or sherpas to walk over.  OR, whip-cracking archaeologists &/or dual-pistol wielding tomb-raiding women to escape from.

    6. As for some shipping, what if Miss Reed goes to have a "chat" with Dora at where she is currently staying, and instead meets...Sven? :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: cyro on 03 Dec 2010, 01:35
    THEN THEY ALL FUCKED

    So Hannelore Realdoll out in time for x-mas then?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: snubnose on 03 Dec 2010, 02:16
    Dora awakens upside down and naked in an X-shaped cross experiencing pain in ways only a professional can deal it? :psyduck:

    Jeph's not THAT much of a blatantly pandering whore yet.

    ... yet.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 03 Dec 2010, 04:42
    I'm guessing Veronica heads to COD without Marten's knowledge, goes inside...

    ...and calmly orders a beverage, and then drinks it in silence, all the while giving Dora the flaming-laser-eye-of-death, and then gets up and leaves without so much as another word.

    Cue Dora being all, "WTF?"
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Visible_One on 03 Dec 2010, 04:44
    She drinks a whiskey drink, she drinks a lager drink... :angel:

    She drinks a whisky drink, she drinks a vodka drink, she drinks a lager drink, she drinks a cider drink.
    If you want to be picky and exacting. (Why do I want to be picky and exacting about this? Really. Why?)

    I've been mulling these last few comics over, and I think Marten's kind of on autopilot right now. I hope it dawns on him slowly, and he doesn't find himself crumpled in the foetal position on the corner of the street CoD's on, crying and saying "Toto does NOT suck..." over and over and over...

    And yeah, he's definitely focusing on the food to avoid focusing on either seeing or not seeing Dora.
    It'll be interesting to see what Marten does while his mother's there. Especially given Dora's "walked-on-grave" chills, and Marten's protecting Dora (refusal to let Faye kill Dora or even break her arm), I do wonder if the two will be linked together in some undoubtedly interesting way.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Loki on 03 Dec 2010, 04:52
    Cue the Dora/Veronica shippers in 3...2...

      :psyduck:

    Curse at you for beating me to it.
    I'm guessing Veronica heads to COD without Marten's knowledge, goes inside...

    ...and calmly orders a beverage, and then drinks it in silence, all the while giving Dora the flaming-laser-eye-of-death, and then gets up and leaves without so much as another word.

    Cue Dora being all, "WTF?"
    Then Rick Astley (http://xkcd.com/524/) walks in.

    Here is a question, did Veronica ever actually meet Dora in person, except that one time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=455)?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TadPrime on 03 Dec 2010, 05:04
    Hmmm...  I wonder if Jeph is setting up for 1812 to be accompanied by orchestra and light artillery...   :psyduck:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: PhocsM on 03 Dec 2010, 05:14
    A lot of people has said this but I can't help it: I want to see Marten's mom with the new art.

    Also, it's fun that saying "Marten's mom" sounds a lot more perverse than saying Veronica.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 03 Dec 2010, 06:05
    I'm guessing Veronica heads to COD without Marten's knowledge, goes inside...

    ...and calmly orders a beverage, and then drinks it in silence, all the while giving Dora the flaming-laser-eye-of-death, and then gets up and leaves without so much as another word.

    Cue Dora being all, "WTF?"
    Then Rick Astley (http://xkcd.com/524/) walks in.

    Here is a question, did Veronica ever actually meet Dora in person, except that one time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=455)?
    Other than that (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=440) time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=441) they (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=442) had (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=443) lunch (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=445) together (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=446) you mean?

    Also, Miss Reed looks amazing with her hair down (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=448); I hope the new style does her justice.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 06:09
    CALLED IT!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: DJRubberducky on 03 Dec 2010, 06:09
    Delator, my speculation runs much the same as yours, but with one exception:  I believe Miss Reed won't even need to give Dora so much as a stern glare.  Her mere presence in the coffee shop will suffice to make Dora cycle rapidly between panic and self-loathing.  

    I have to say, though, if I'm not completely off the mark in identifying with Dora w/r/t insecurity, I think Miss Reed making a sincere and concerned inquiry into Dora's side of things would have a FAR greater effect than any sort of LAZORDEATHEYE she could give.  (And I suspect she's rather really good at lazordeatheyes and similar things.)  I have to admit to hoping this is how it goes down, but that's just so I can figure out if Dora and I are the same kind of crazy.  :laugh:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 06:28
    Has anyone else thought about what happens when Miss Reed(*) goes through airport security?

    (*)The form of address she asked for in 433.

    Oh, she probably checked all that stuff in here bags.

    And she's also pretty good open-handed, I'd suspect.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Cammy on 03 Dec 2010, 06:32
    Maybe Dora and Miss Reed will make-out.

    Just sayin'.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 06:34
    Hmmm...  I wonder if Jeph is setting up for 1812 to be accompanied by orchestra and light artillery...   :psyduck:

    Da-da-da-da-da-DADADA!!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOkZJbSjcyc)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Dec 2010, 06:38
    Cue Veronica ringing Tai and telling her that Marten will be sick for a week.

    Cue Dora trying to make strip 1300 come to pass in order to join the Foreign Legion.

    Cue Faye cackling like a maniac.... while in a specially designed bunker several hundred miles away from Coffee of Doom.

    Cue Hanners looking up Veronica Vance on wikipedia and google, as they've never met, and then undoing all the progress she's made since meeting Marten as Hanners finds out that a whip has another use.

    Cue Marigold telling Angus "I don't care which one Marten is. I'm trying to level up my Tauren Druid before Tuesday!.....Wait...Is Marten the tall guy with glasses?"
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Boomslang on 03 Dec 2010, 06:46
    Other than that (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=440) time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=441) they (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=442) had (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=443) lunch (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=445) together (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=446) you mean?

    Also, Miss Reed looks amazing with her hair down (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=448); I hope the new style does her justice.

    I would like to note that, at that time, Dora was NOT expressing any overt interest in being Marten's girlfriend. Faye was close, and she got the infamous Bosch warning.

    Personally, I see Veronica being VERY disappointed with Dora. There is no possible way Marten could have explained the situation to his mom (short of lying) that does not paint her as at least thoughtless, and more likely Miss Reed is assuming the worst of motives on Dora's part.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 06:53
    Who's next on the "Reaction to the Breakup" list?

    Marigold    - 18 (9.6%)
    Angus (CHECK - Couldn't believe it)    - 7 (3.7%)
    Tai (CHECK - Emo Marten)    - 76 (40.6%)
    Raven    - 4 (2.1%)
    Steve    - 25 (13.4%)
    Cosette    - 2 (1.1%)
    Jimbo    - 9 (4.8%)
    Ms. Vance (CHECK! She's on the next plane out!)    - 17 (9.1%)
    Mr. Reed    - 1 (0.5%)
    The Bianchis    - 2 (1.1%)
    Penelope    - 12 (6.4%)
    Dale (Daaaaangg.)    - 14 (7.5%)

    Total Voters: 187
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 03 Dec 2010, 07:00
    Next week, miss Reed is going to be all "wait, you went out with the skinny one? What happened to that nice Faye girl?" and Marten will be all "huh buh whah" again and she will continue "I mean sure she was a bit uptight, but I figured that was probably due to whatever trauma it was she was hiding from you..."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: pinch on 03 Dec 2010, 07:18
    http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459)

    This pretty much says it all in the last panel.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 03 Dec 2010, 07:32
    I predict there will be some actual DOOM in Coffee Of Doom......

    ...


    ...


    ...

    now it's not going to happen is it what have I done.  :(
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Border Reiver on 03 Dec 2010, 07:42
    Actually, I think Marten's reaction is quite normal - "I'm an adult, I can deal with a break up on my own and don't need you to come rushing out to help."

    And if Mom does overreact, then I can see Marten snapping.

    Personally, I don't care what is on my grave - I'm dead.  If I end up in some afterlife, then the material world isn't going to hold an attraction for me, save to see what the kids are up to.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 03 Dec 2010, 08:07
    I don't think Dora is doomed. I think that Marten is doomed.  :psyduck:

    Really? Why? I am intrigue at this statement.

    Ok maybe Dora is doomed in some way. But what is Veronica going to do? Stand up and get angry with Dora for her son? is that going to help Marten in anyway?

    OR  let's say she doesn't go for Dora. what is she going to do? go fo Marten! I mean, the guy HAS to take a stand for himself sometime!!!


    (I am NOT saying that Dora is not at fault. The relationship broke, cause of Dora's insecurities, but Marten REALLY needs to stop being a pushover!!)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: colleenxcore on 03 Dec 2010, 08:15
    First: LOL @ people earlier in the thread who were going on and on about grammar "mistakes".

    Second: The goose on the grave saying isn't referring to something walking over your grave after you're dead. Back in the days of yore, people used to believe if you got a sudden chill, it was because someone was walking over the place where your grave was eventually going to be. I think the goose part of it came in because of people calling the bumps you get on your skin from a chill "goosebumps" or "goose pimples."

    Anyway.

    Geez, Marten's mom is a little over-the-top with the mothering. Or maybe she just feels she needs to be that way because none of his relationships (that we can tell) seem to end up well. Didn't she threaten Dora when Marten wasn't at the table, that time she visited and they all had lunch together? Ruh-roh.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: ecstaticjoy on 03 Dec 2010, 08:46

    Second: The goose on the grave saying isn't referring to something walking over your grave after you're dead. Back in the days of yore, people used to believe if you got a sudden chill, it was because someone was walking over the place where your grave was eventually going to be. I think the goose part of it came in because of people calling the bumps you get on your skin from a chill "goosebumps" or "goose pimples."


    Thank you for explaining that, it made me feel old thinking I was the only person on this forum who was familiar with that saying.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 03 Dec 2010, 08:46
    Naw, Naw, Naw, Naw, Naw....

    Ms. Reed isn't coming to comfort Marten...

    She's coming 'cause Dora's single again and she wants to hit that before Tai!!!!!










    (I'm going to hell for that, ain't I)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: shengokai on 03 Dec 2010, 08:57
    Yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes! I eagerly await what Ms. Reed will do to Dora, though I don't think it will be as extreme as most are predicting: most likely a stern talking to/upbraiding for not dealing with her issues and doing what she did to Marten. Though, I am hoping for the Bosh-pants-shitting demonstrations of wrath from Momma Reed.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: azurite on 03 Dec 2010, 10:02
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?! It wasn't like Dora cheated on Marten, strung him along, or was abusive--she just couldn't deal with her insecurities about Faye (and gee, I mean, it's not like Marten was living with Faye or had a huge crush on her for any significant amount of time, it's not like everything they did socially as a couple had Faye in the room too, and we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice, like how they got their own place together to start fresh, and remember that amazing strip where he finally said "I love you"?.... Oh. Wait.) That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.

    Veronica's son is the one with his life stalled out on the shoulder. The only major changes in his life since her last visit have been switching from one dead end job to another and his relationship with Dora, which he just sort of fell into, and, then, subsequently fell out of. Dora's insecurities were over the top, but most of them did fall in line with the idea that she couldn't fully trust Faye or Marten. Faye did what she could to get Dora to trust her, and I think it's significant that Dora's first heart-to-heart after the breakup was with her. Marten, on the other hand, never seemed actively invested in their relationship. He'd have fun with Dora when she was in a good mood, and he'd do what he could to placate her when she'd freak out, but my overall impression was that he let Dora take charge of things--and because Dora's never been in a functional relationship, she wasn't going to see that as a problem.

    He's drifting along, not committing to anything... not even the things he seemed to enjoy--seriously close to slacker territory. And didn't he end up on the east coast for similar reasons? I suspect Ms. Reed Is Coming To Town to talk some stuff out with her son. I hope. Because in all honesty, seeing a grown woman who'd previously seemed insightful and mature go all assault and battery on Dora, who is already hurting pretty terribly, that would pretty much terminate my relationship with this strip.  :|
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 03 Dec 2010, 10:14
    THANK  you!!

    I've been reading this and have had much the same thoughts, but you've expressed them very well!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 03 Dec 2010, 10:30
    Woa azurite... just woa.

    You know when someone just says what you are thinking to say? :psyduck: :psyduck:

    Just... woa..
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 03 Dec 2010, 10:49
    What an amazing second post.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: shiroihikari on 03 Dec 2010, 10:56


    Indie music and drama no.

    Animal fighting yes.


    I registered for the sole purpose of saying I laughed my ass off at your edit.  Bravo, sir or madam.

    However, while I'm here:

    I suspect Ms. Reed Is Coming To Town to talk some stuff out with her son. I hope. Because in all honesty, seeing a grown woman who'd previously seemed insightful and mature go all assault and battery on Dora, who is already hurting pretty terribly, that would pretty much terminate my relationship with this strip.  :|

    This, 100%.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Undercover Pteranodon on 03 Dec 2010, 11:03
    Had to register just to tell you that I think that is the best post I have seen on these forums since "the break up", azurite. Hope you post more while I go back to lurking. ;)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Dec 2010, 11:18
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?! It wasn't like Dora cheated on Marten, strung him along, or was abusive--she just couldn't deal with her insecurities about Faye (and gee, I mean, it's not like Marten was living with Faye or had a huge crush on her for any significant amount of time, it's not like everything they did socially as a couple had Faye in the room too, and we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice, like how they got their own place together to start fresh, and remember that amazing strip where he finally said "I love you"?.... Oh. Wait.) That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.

    Veronica's son is the one with his life stalled out on the shoulder. The only major changes in his life since her last visit have been switching from one dead end job to another and his relationship with Dora, which he just sort of fell into, and, then, subsequently fell out of. Dora's insecurities were over the top, but most of them did fall in line with the idea that she couldn't fully trust Faye or Marten. Faye did what she could to get Dora to trust her, and I think it's significant that Dora's first heart-to-heart after the breakup was with her. Marten, on the other hand, never seemed actively invested in their relationship. He'd have fun with Dora when she was in a good mood, and he'd do what he could to placate her when she'd freak out, but my overall impression was that he let Dora take charge of things--and because Dora's never been in a functional relationship, she wasn't going to see that as a problem.

    He's drifting along, not committing to anything... not even the things he seemed to enjoy--seriously close to slacker territory. And didn't he end up on the east coast for similar reasons? I suspect Ms. Reed Is Coming To Town to talk some stuff out with her son. I hope. Because in all honesty, seeing a grown woman who'd previously seemed insightful and mature go all assault and battery on Dora, who is already hurting pretty terribly, that would pretty much terminate my relationship with this strip.  :|

    Marten never seemed actively invested in the relationship? Yeah I can agree he often let her take charge, but he put effort into their relationship, too. He was never distant with her or uninterested in her advances, wasn't afraid to be open with her, and when she suggested they live together, his first instinct was "I'd love it if you moved in!" (he only started to freak out a little when she suggested he move out and live with her alone, but it's important to note that his initial reaction was positive.) He bought her just-because presents. He wanted them to take a vacation together (after he won the bet with Hannelore's mom) Hell, he asked her why she hadn't taken him to meet her parents!*

    Just because Marten's passive doesn't mean he's completely detached or uninterested; he was nothing but open and affectionate towards Dora.



    *I can cite all the strips where these things happen if you want me to, I just didn't here because it would take forever
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 03 Dec 2010, 11:21
    Do I think Mart-e-mom will visit horrific violence on Dora?

    I do not.

    Do I think that Dora will freak out when she finds out that Mart-e-mom is coming to town?

    I do indeed.

    Do I think the freak-out will be hilarious?

    I do, I really do!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 03 Dec 2010, 11:47
    Do I think that Dora will freak out when she finds out that Mart-e-mom is coming to town?

    I do indeed.

    Do I think the freak-out will be hilarious?

    I do, I really do!

    agreed 100%+ the crazyness that will ensue when dora finds out is bound to be quite the spectacle
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 03 Dec 2010, 11:51
    She needs nothing to fear but fear itself. 

    And that's usually enough! 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 03 Dec 2010, 11:53
    This is going to prove very interesting.


    Either Ms Vance is gonna come and kick Dora's ass, or she's gonna drag Marten back home


    Or both.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Heliphyneau on 03 Dec 2010, 11:58
    If Ms. Reed tries to intervene I hope Marten will tell her to let it be, like he did with Faye.

    Actually, I think Marten's reaction is quite normal - "I'm an adult, I can deal with a break up on my own and don't need you to come rushing out to help."

    And if Mom does overreact, then I can see Marten snapping.

    This is the sort of trainwreck I could see coming -- Ms. Reed insists on talking to Dora, even politely, and Marten asks her not to; she does it anyway, and Marten finally yells at his mom, possibly something he's never done (we don't know at this point whether he's gotten confrontational with his mother).  It's the kind of thing that could be both hilarious and wrenching, and would give us more insight into Marten's relationship with his mother.  Whatever Jeph ends up doing with this, I'm definitely intrigued.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 03 Dec 2010, 12:00
    This is going to prove very interesting.


    Either Ms Vance is gonna come and kick Dora's ass, or she's gonna drag Marten back home


    Or both.
    I prefer the version where she kicks Marten's ass then drags Dora back home, to be her new protégé, since Marten clearly isn't into it.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 03 Dec 2010, 12:11
    This is going to prove very interesting.


    Either Ms Vance is gonna come and kick Dora's ass, or she's gonna drag Marten back home


    Or both.
    I prefer the version where she kicks Marten's ass then drags Dora back home, to be her new protégé, since Marten clearly isn't into it.

    That could be an interesting twist.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: AngelofShadows on 03 Dec 2010, 12:16
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?! It wasn't like Dora cheated on Marten, strung him along, or was abusive--she just couldn't deal with her insecurities about Faye (and gee, I mean, it's not like Marten was living with Faye or had a huge crush on her for any significant amount of time, it's not like everything they did socially as a couple had Faye in the room too, and we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice, like how they got their own place together to start fresh, and remember that amazing strip where he finally said "I love you"?.... Oh. Wait.) That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.


    Parent Logic. Protect your own. And when your own happens to be your only one, it tends to amplify it a bit.  I disagree on your thoughts about the relationship coming to an and and your thoughts on Marten, but that's not the point. You could point out how both parties are victims till you are blue in the face, the fact is,  All Marten's Mom is probably gonna hear is "Some Girl hurt my son, my only son. Now I have to hurt her."

    Her threat to Faye when she thought that Faye was gonna eventually date Marten, topped with the fact that she's flying out so, uhm, instantly, after hearing the news makes me think that There will be fear spread to Dora. I'd be surprised if there wasn't.  :psyduck: <-my surprise face.

    I would be pumped if, in an effort to Save Dora (or assume she'd need saving and panic), Hanners Calls her mom in to help handle this.




    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome.

    THERE HAS TO BE OTHERS!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Wiregeek on 03 Dec 2010, 12:19
    Quote
    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome

    Actually, I think you just might be the only one.

    I'm looking for the signup page for the 'moar jello wrestling' society, personally.

    I am now shipping Marten's mom and Hanners' mom.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tbones on 03 Dec 2010, 12:23
    Quote
    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome

    Actually, I think you just might be the only one.

    I'm looking for the signup page for the 'moar jello wrestling' society, personally.

    I am now shipping Marten's mom and Hanners' mom.
    .... This is such a perfect idea!
    Joining this ship
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 03 Dec 2010, 12:26
    i'm hoping martins mom runs into hanners, then hanners finds out what she does, that would make for some interesting fireworks too :evil:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: akronnick on 03 Dec 2010, 12:32
    I have a theory about how this will play out that is so awesome that I will not describe it here because I do not want it to not happen.


    It is that awesome
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Dec 2010, 12:33
    I don't think she's flying out due to overprotectiveness. Jeph has said that Dora and Marten have been dating for around a year, meaning it's been that much time since Ms. Reed's seen Marten. I think she wants to help him out through his tough time, and I'm willing to bet she's also just been missing her baby.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Dec 2010, 12:41
    To the best of our knowledge Miss Reed didn't go Bosch on Vicky.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mustakyy on 03 Dec 2010, 12:47
    *reads thru todays comic*

    MWA HA HA HA HAAA!  :-D  :evil:  :-D

    *catches breath after manical laughter*

    Well well well, quite a nice and suprising twist of events. I'm SO waiting for next week.


    Marten never seemed actively invested in the relationship? Yeah I can agree he often let her take charge, but he put effort into their relationship, too. He was never distant with her or uninterested in her advances, wasn't afraid to be open with her, and when she suggested they live together, his first instinct was "I'd love it if you moved in!" (he only started to freak out a little when she suggested he move out and live with her alone, but it's important to note that his initial reaction was positive.) He bought her just-because presents. He wanted them to take a vacation together (after he won the bet with Hannelore's mom) Hell, he asked her why she hadn't taken him to meet her parents!*

    Just because Marten's passive doesn't mean he's completely detached or uninterested; he was nothing but open and affectionate towards Dora.


    Damn man, couldn't have said it better.


    Seriously, on the subject of immediate future, i'm having serious doubts of Mart-e-mom inflicting serious bodily harm upon Dora. But, I think just the plain knowledge that Mart-e-mon is coming to visit, will cause Dora to freak out quite a bit (and there, hijinks will ensue). The question im thinking is: Will Marten give Dora any kind of warning, or does he just let things slide, and see what happens.

    I think next week will be quite interesting mix of teh drama and wacky antics.



    Ah, almost forgot. Goddamnit jwhouk, why did you have to bring that damn link up. Now i got the damn tune ringing in my mind and had to search for this. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9TtBYgyXzk&feature=related) (yes, i simply loved that movie, not as good as the comic, but still..)  :-P
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 13:37
    I'm not saying that Veronica's reappearance is going to mean Dora's untimely demise, mind you.

    I am going to say that Dora will DEFINITELY be "scared straight" over the ordeal.

    In fact, if Jeph really wanted to do a relationship reset, this little visit could do it before the year would be out.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: The Duke on 03 Dec 2010, 13:53
    What an amazing second post.

    I don't necessarily agree with everything that azurite said, but yeah, that is a pretty serious burst of insight for someone who appears to be new here.  Did you lurk for a while before now, azurite?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 03 Dec 2010, 13:59
    (I'm going to hell for that, ain't I)

    ...among other things.  :-D

    I have a theory about how this will play out that is so awesome that I will not describe it here because I do not want it to not happen.


    It is that awesome

    I have those all the time...but I never tell anyone...so I forget what they were...so I never know if I was right or not.  :lol:
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: O8h7w on 03 Dec 2010, 14:17
    I have a theory about how this will play out that is so awesome that I will not describe it here because I do not want it to not happen.

    Good of you, akronnick, I really hope whatever you are plotting actually will happen. And if it doesn't, please let us know about your theory, will you?  (There should be a puppydog-eyed emoticon here) Also, I sincerely hope that you're not going to hell...   :-)

    - - - - - - - -

    Sure did azurite write an awesome post, but I do think iduguphergrave has a good point. (I tend to do that a little too often, I know) Marten has not been all that passive, and I feel that he has improved greatly over the length of the relationship. Over the length of the whole comic, actually. I'm guessing there will be interesting talks between Marten and his mom now.

    - - - - - - - -

    Last but not least:
    Ceterum censeo (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ceterum_censeo), I badly want the Dora backstory. Which now must happen with the therapist, right?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: muffin_of_chaos on 03 Dec 2010, 14:18
    Marten, on the other hand, never seemed actively invested in their relationship.

    Error.

    Marten was definitely invested in the relationship he thought they had.  Marten doesn't do what I or you might do in a committed relationship, but always seemed willing to do what it would take, as long as he knew what it was.  It was not like he knew that Dora had such an issue with the Faye dynamic.  It wasn't like Dora ever asked him to change his situation, and we can't assume he stressed enough about the relationship for it to occur to him that he should without Dora's input.  Sometimes one doesn't know what one's relationship actually is; sometimes one doesn't know who it really is one has a relationship with.
    Ignorance or idealism isn't the relationship killer...refusing to communicate and try to rectify inevitable differences is.

    But you're right, in that Miss Reed will in all likelihood not antagonize Dora.  Probably won't even go to see her (though they might bump into each other for dramatic/comedic effect).
    Dora made some bad decisions regarding the relationship (which is functionally different from making no decisions ala Marten), and basically ruined the chances of fixing/making it stronger with unearned mistrust that she didn't actually attempt to get over (by, for instance, communicating with Marten or anyone about her needs/fears/whatnot).  But that is her privilege and wont as part of a two-person partnership, especially if Marten's life is stalled so much that he doesn't initiate much in the relationship.

    Veronica said that she thinks of Marten as a grown man, and she was perfectly nice to Faye except for the one threat (that was obviously half or more facetious).  The most she could possibly take issue with are Dora's actual actions when she was jealous/paranoid, or specifically only the porn-search (since the others were ameliorated).  Which very few people would think matters that much.

    But Dora still needs a reality-check.  Not necessarily a harsh one, but Veronica's would be funny.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 03 Dec 2010, 15:17
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?! It wasn't like Dora cheated on Marten, strung him along, or was abusive--she just couldn't deal with her insecurities about Faye (and gee, I mean, it's not like Marten was living with Faye or had a huge crush on her for any significant amount of time, it's not like everything they did socially as a couple had Faye in the room too, and we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice, like how they got their own place together to start fresh, and remember that amazing strip where he finally said "I love you"?.... Oh. Wait.) That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.


    Parent Logic. Protect your own. And when your own happens to be your only one, it tends to amplify it a bit.  I disagree on your thoughts about the relationship coming to an and and your thoughts on Marten, but that's not the point. You could point out how both parties are victims till you are blue in the face, the fact is,  All Marten's Mom is probably gonna hear is "Some Girl hurt my son, my only son. Now I have to hurt her."

    Her threat to Faye when she thought that Faye was gonna eventually date Marten, topped with the fact that she's flying out so, uhm, instantly, after hearing the news makes me think that There will be fear spread to Dora. I'd be surprised if there wasn't.  :psyduck: <-my surprise face.

    I would be pumped if, in an effort to Save Dora (or assume she'd need saving and panic), Hanners Calls her mom in to help handle this.




    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome.

    THERE HAS TO BE OTHERS!
    As I said before, Veronica threatened Faye because what Faye was doing could be seen as leading Marten on, using him for a security blanket and a place to stay before Faye found what she thought was a better guy, at which point she'd dump Marten. And I can certainly understand Veronica making that sort of threat. Dora, on the other hand, is clearly doing this to herself, and Marten is merely caught up in her self-sucking maelstrom—she's far more damaged by all this than Marten, who simply needs to learn from the experience. Veronica may not like that this happened, but any mature person looking at Dora and what she's doing to herself could only feel pity, and it was her son's, the grown man, job to get himself out of it or not, not his mother's.

    What's going to put the hurt on Dora is whatever she conjures up to punish herself, based on what she sees in Veronica (just like she 'saw' Marten's pining for Faye). Ms. Reed very likely won't have to do a blessed thing. Of course, I suppose she could add herself to Faye's Therapy Threat Squad. That might be genuinely helpful.

    Of course, it might be time for a 'Get on with your life and freaking DO something" speech to Marten, which, I suppose might be what someone meant by Marten being 'doomed'. That's a rather of immature way to look at it, though.

    Death match? Yes, you're the only one.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Loki on 03 Dec 2010, 15:29
    Quote
    Here is a question, did Veronica ever actually meet Dora in person, except that one time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=455)?
    Other than that (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=440) time (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=441) they (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=442) had (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=443) lunch (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=445) together (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=446) you mean?


    Uh, thanks, I should have thought of going a few pages back.

    Since there are ships being thrown around wildly, what about Taironica? Think about it. Veronica is just about to bust Dora's ass, then Tai walks in, effectively saving Dora from the UHMC (You hurt my cub)-wrath, because Veronica INSTANTLY falls in love with her and forgets everything she wanted to say. Later, they fight space wizards.

    Quote
    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome
    Nope, you aren't. But I think it would be over soon. Hannermom has enough money to have a full body suit made from Mithril or anything of similar quality.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: kiss-o-kill on 03 Dec 2010, 15:33
    YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH

    MY MAIN BITCH IS COMING BACK
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Dec 2010, 15:38
    Dora did communicate to Marten about her fears, in 1067 and maybe elsewhere. Granted, she didn't do it in the most functional way.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: melly21 on 03 Dec 2010, 16:16
    Personally I just think Veronica is coming out to make sure her son really is OK. Parents have this uncanny ability to know when their kid is not OK, even when they say they are. Sure she is travelling from the West (?) Coast to come visit him but like it has been mentioned as far as we know they haven't seen each other BEFORE he got together with Dora, so maybe she is using this as an excuse to come see her only child as well.

    I don't really see it as her being over-protective, we don't know what her motives are yet. If she turns up and goes all demon hell-bitch on Dora then yeah that is being over protective and being a super douche bitch. But to come out and see her only child when he is going through a rough patch to make sure he is OK? I think that's awesome.

    Although yeah if she came and saw him for every little trouble that he was going through that could be incredibly excessive...but from what we have seen she doesn't seem like that kind of mother anyway.

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 03 Dec 2010, 18:58
    You know, other than the rope thing from Tai's date, I'm not sure that Tai "knows" who Marty's mom is. What if she shows up at the library and Tai does an even WORSE fangirl moment right in front of him?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: The Duke on 03 Dec 2010, 22:21
    YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH

    MY MAIN BITCH IS COMING BACK

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A42SkxHo-x4
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 03 Dec 2010, 22:41
    Wait wait wait.

    Let us look at what Marten said:

    "What do you MEAN you already bought the tickets?! I don't-"

    Did you see it?

    "What do you MEAN you already bought the tickets?! I don't-"

    TicketS. Plural.

    Now is it as simple as implying a connection flight? Perhaps. But that is boring. I would posit rather, that we'll see Anderson Cooper  Mister Reed as well.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 03 Dec 2010, 23:08
    Round trip.  One there, one back.  At least, I've always said it that way - round trip tickets. 

    I'm not even sure Henry even lives in the same part of the country as Veronica anymore. 

    Then again, maybe there's a sibling?     :-o
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 03 Dec 2010, 23:18
    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tHEfOOL on 03 Dec 2010, 23:36
    I'm not even sure Henry even lives in the same part of the country as Veronica anymore. 
    im pretty sure at some point they said something like he lives in Florida now, i could be wrong though
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 03 Dec 2010, 23:42
    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)

    And worth every minute! 
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Dec 2010, 23:46
    When she was in the strip last Veronica said Henry lived in Miami. When they came to visit, Maurice said he worked in wetlands preservation, which seems to corroborate this.

    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)

    Nearly spit out my drink when I saw that. I just might have a new avatar. Maybe. If its ok with you. I suspect evil Marten would do things like purposely leave the toilet seat up and giggle mischievously when he hears the yell of unpleasant surprise. Then he'd apologize.

    Then again, if the amount of evil in a twin is proportional to the amount of good in the original then I wouldn't expect Mordecai to be anything less than a murderer-rapist. Yes, in that order.

     
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 04 Dec 2010, 00:55
    Permission granted!

    And oh jeez, I can't decide which would make more sense: A passive-agressive Mordecai who ends up being more inconvenient than evil, or the full-blown proportionate evil!


    *SPLOOSH*
    "MORDECAIIIII!!! YOU ASSHOLE!"

    "Hah! Ha ha ha ha! Haaa...aw jeez. I am a jerk...-sigh-"
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: deadbunny17 on 04 Dec 2010, 01:51
    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)

    Is Marten's evil twin brother Jewish?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 04 Dec 2010, 05:15
    Quote
    What? I can't be the only person who thinks that a Coffee Shop Match to the Death between Marten and Hanners Mom would be awesome

    Actually, I think you just might be the only one.

    I'm looking for the signup page for the 'moar jello wrestling' society, personally.

    I am now shipping Marten's mom and Hanners' mom.

    Oh hell yes, that is the only acceptable shipping choice not Marten x Couch. I am joining you on this ship, the SS Hot and Potentially Lethal Moms.

    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)

    Is Marten's evil twin brother Jewish?

    No, but he is part of the worldwide banking conspiracy/the Illuminati and shit.

    He just pretends to be Jewish so conspiracy nuts will give Jews a hard time.

    He's a dick like that.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 04 Dec 2010, 06:00
    Who's next on the "Reaction to the Breakup" list?

    Marigold    - 18 (9.3%)
    Angus (CHECK - Couldn't believe it)    - 7 (3.6%)
    Tai (CHECK - Emo Marten)    - 76 (39.2%)

    Raven    - 4 (2.1%)
    Steve    - 29 (14.9%)
    Cosette    - 2 (1%)
    Jimbo    - 9 (4.6%)
    Ms. Vance (CHECK! She's on the next plane out!)    - 18 (9.3%)
    Mr. Reed    - 1 (0.5%)
    The Bianchis    - 2 (1%)
    Penelope    - 13 (6.7%)
    Dale (Daaaaangg.)    - 15 (7.7%)

    Total Voters: 194
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 04 Dec 2010, 12:05
    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)
    Snidley Reedlash?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 04 Dec 2010, 12:45
    And his charmingly helpful AnthroPC Mortimer (http://minainerz.deviantart.com/art/Senor-Pintsize-188283727)...

    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: deadbunny17 on 04 Dec 2010, 15:50
    Of course! This is Jeph's big reveal! Marten's Evil Twin Brother! MORDECAI.  :-o

    (http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/twittermarten_bigger.jpg)

    (over 9000 hours in mspaint)

    Is Marten's evil twin brother Jewish?

    No, but he is part of the worldwide banking conspiracy/the Illuminati and shit.

    He just pretends to be Jewish so conspiracy nuts will give Jews a hard time.

    He's a dick like that.

    Some of my best friends are Jews! So I gotta tell ya, I don't think I like Marten's evil twin very much.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 04 Dec 2010, 16:31
    Are we in for the QC version of Knightrider?
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 04 Dec 2010, 17:37
    Since nobody in the whole cast save Raven has ever shown evidence of possessing a car, perhaps not.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 04 Dec 2010, 17:46
    Since nobody in the whole cast save Raven has ever shown evidence of possessing a car, perhaps not.

    Dora also has one though "even [she] forgets [she] has it sometimes."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Delator on 04 Dec 2010, 17:50
    Since nobody in the whole cast save Raven has ever shown evidence of possessing a car, perhaps not.

    Dora also has one though "even [she] forgets [she] has it sometimes."

    Was about to mention that...I'm trawling the archives for it now, but I can't seem to find it.

    I found THIS (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1006) though, which I'm looking at in a bit of a new light considering recent events.

    EDIT: Found it - http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=621
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: tomart on 05 Dec 2010, 08:53
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?!
     ...we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice,  
    ...That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.

    Veronica's son is the one with his life stalled out on the shoulder.
    ...Dora's insecurities were over the top,
     ...Marten, on the other hand, never seemed actively invested in their relationship.
     ...he let Dora take charge of things

    ...He's drifting along, not committing to anything... not even the things he seemed to enjoy--seriously close to slacker territory.
    ...Dora, who is already hurting pretty terribly,

    Wait, hold up, STOP.  Ok, realistically, many (most?) of us react to these characters and their behaviors mostly because of how (similar?) people have treated us or loved ones in OUR pasts.  I'll even concede that I may be about to snap at this post because my life is also "stalled, close to slacker territory, drifting" etc.

    But that being said...

    I saw all of the hurting on ONE side, her stupid angry attacks, accusations, control issues, while even you, doing your best to make this failure BOTH of their faults, if not actually HIS!?!?...  all you can come up with is a mild case of Marten depression.  

    I think you're judging Marten COMPLETELY unfairly, while elevating "poor, suffering Dora", to fucking MARTYR status.

    Yes, when a relationship fails, both usually suffer, obviously.  But this time, it WAS Dora hurting Marten.  Yep, there IS a huge difference.  Whether she's hurting herself also, is a separate issue!

    I hope Ms Vance AT LEAST strings Dora up by rusty chains over a fiery pit. And stands there with a whip, in full dom accoutrements.  In the Hell part of the triptych.
    Dora might even like it. (Check out her back tattoo!)  
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Mr_Rose on 05 Dec 2010, 09:39
    Yes, that's it! The final part of the back-piece will be a picture of Dora fighting Ms. Vance.
    It will be left up to the viewer to decide which one is supposed to be the "angel" and which one the "demon."
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Shadic on 05 Dec 2010, 16:17
    Since nobody in the whole cast save Raven has ever shown evidence of possessing a car, perhaps not.
    Penelope drove Faye to the gym.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Dec 2010, 18:21
    Steve has a truck.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Kugai on 05 Dec 2010, 18:48
    Steve has a truck.

    I will not go there

    I WILL NOT GO THERE!!!!!!!
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: jwhouk on 05 Dec 2010, 19:24
    Who's next on the "Reaction to the Breakup" list?

    Marigold    - 20 (10.2%)
    Angus (CHECK - Couldn't believe it)    - 7 (3.6%)
    Tai (CHECK - Emo Marten)    - 76 (38.6%)
    Raven    - 4 (2%)
    Steve    - 29 (14.7%)
    Cosette    - 2 (1%)
    Jimbo    - 9 (4.6%)
    Ms. Vance (CHECK! She's on the next plane out!)    - 18 (9.1%)
    Mr. Reed    - 2 (1%)
    The Bianchis    - 2 (1%)
    Penelope    - 13 (6.6%)
    Dale (Daaaaangg.)    - 15 (7.6%)

    Total Voters: 197
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: TheEvilDog on 05 Dec 2010, 19:44
    Not to mention either Faye's sister or mom owns a car.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: raoullefere on 05 Dec 2010, 21:18
    Why on earth would Veronica go whoop-ass on Dora?!
     ...we certainly saw Marten doing everything he could to make Dora feel like she was his first choice,  
    ...That's not so much hurting Marten as it is "being the other half of a relationship between two flawed people that ended with both people getting hurt." There's a huge difference.

    Veronica's son is the one with his life stalled out on the shoulder.
    ...Dora's insecurities were over the top,
     ...Marten, on the other hand, never seemed actively invested in their relationship.
     ...he let Dora take charge of things

    ...He's drifting along, not committing to anything... not even the things he seemed to enjoy--seriously close to slacker territory.
    ...Dora, who is already hurting pretty terribly,

    Wait, hold up, STOP.  Ok, realistically, many (most?) of us react to these characters and their behaviors mostly because of how (similar?) people have treated us or loved ones in OUR pasts.  I'll even concede that I may be about to snap at this post because my life is also "stalled, close to slacker territory, drifting" etc.

    But that being said...

    I saw all of the hurting on ONE side, her stupid angry attacks, accusations, control issues, while even you, doing your best to make this failure BOTH of their faults, if not actually HIS!?!?...  all you can come up with is a mild case of Marten depression.  

    I think you're judging Marten COMPLETELY unfairly, while elevating "poor, suffering Dora", to fucking MARTYR status.

    Yes, when a relationship fails, both usually suffer, obviously.  But this time, it WAS Dora hurting Marten.  Yep, there IS a huge difference.  Whether she's hurting herself also, is a separate issue!

    I hope Ms Vance AT LEAST strings Dora up by rusty chains over a fiery pit. And stands there with a whip, in full dom accoutrements.  In the Hell part of the triptych.
    Dora might even like it. (Check out her back tattoo!)  
    I don't think Veronica is going to do anything to Dora, nor should she. But to suggest the relationship was scuttled by anything other than Dora's issues is a trifle short-sighted, to say the least. Marten's stalled life had not a damned thing to do with it. Read the comic. Dora says repeatedly she's not expecting it to last. I suppose you could say she chose to have a relationship with Marten because she was sure it would fail, the same way I think Faye decided to have sex with Sven because she was sure that would go nowhere. But, unlike Sven, Marten did nothing on his end to screw things up, and everything to try to save it, including, as the comic Delator dug up shows, being scrupulously honest, which quite frankly puts the lie on any claim that he's in denial about carrying a torch for Faye.

    Certainly Dora's a martyr, but the DIY variety. I suspect we're going to see (if Dora actually gets into therapy and IF Jeph follows it) that Dora would've found a way and an excuse to terminate a relationship with Mr. Perfection. As far as 'investment' goes, I feel fairly confident that if Marten had been more invested, Dora would've simply ended things sooner because she felt unworthy of the investment (although I would like to know what the fuck more invested you want than this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1748) 'Tis times like these when the non-invested bails). That's her tragedy, and the tragedy of her and Marten's relationship failing.

    I feel very sorry for Dora. I still find her a basically nice person, and I don't think she deserves whatever brought her to the point where she feels like something that makes her happy simply must end. But whatever fault there is lies with whoever or whatever got her to that point. It may be chemical damage, it may be the way her brain is wired, it may be her family (my favorite at the moment), or it may be something entirely other. Whatever it is, though, it happened a long time before Marten happened. He just got 'lucky' enough to get swept up in it, and no amount of his drifting, not drifting, or anything else about him would've mattered save perhaps to have lengthened or shortened the time they had together.

    Edit: So I'm agreeing with Tomart—a little. Wouldn't want the world to end, after all.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 05 Dec 2010, 21:37
    Wow, first to comment? I feel so priveleged!  :-o

    Well, nice to see a little light-hearted humor. Although I don't forsee any relief for Marten's worries just yet. Man, I'm starting to agree with all the "Marten will snap" posters. Dude needs to let it out, how I'm not sure. Also, it's nice to see that Tai really does care about Marten as a friend, even if she is not the most tactful person. And I think we've all been in Marten's place before: where a day (or event) is so angering/depressing/upsetting that every little thing just seems like ANOTHER load to bear. I've been there, I know that much.
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Carl-E on 05 Dec 2010, 22:40
    Wrong thread...
    Title: Re: WCDT 29 Nov-3 Dec (1806-1810)
    Post by: Sharp on 05 Dec 2010, 22:50
    Who has two thumbs and fails? THIS GUY.