THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => CHATTER => Topic started by: mberan42 on 14 Dec 2010, 20:18

Title: TOMMY!!
Post by: mberan42 on 14 Dec 2010, 20:18
Scarlett Johansson is getting a divorce! (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/14/scarlett-johansson-ryan-r_n_796659.html)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 14 Dec 2010, 22:16
call me when anne hathaway is single
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 14 Dec 2010, 23:06
Aww man Anne Hathaway's not single?

Ehh, showbiz relationships never last long. I can wait it out.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 14 Dec 2010, 23:07
Alternative post:

She's been single for nearly 400 years, Johnny!!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 14 Dec 2010, 23:12
i have no idea, maybe she is, maybe she isn't. someone find it out for me i'm about to crash from energy drinks
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: MusicScribbles on 14 Dec 2010, 23:14
I will call no one when I'm single, because I am not famous or cute in an HD way.

This is the ultimate disappointment of my life. Men do not want of me.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 15 Dec 2010, 03:52
Become a serial killer, you'll be famous and many men will consider you cute and want of you. And the icing on the cake is they'll be the type of men to be really committed to a mental institution.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BeoPuppy on 15 Dec 2010, 04:00
call me when anne hathaway is single

Seriously? Man ... that nose ... just, no.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 15 Dec 2010, 04:53
i have no idea, maybe she is, maybe she isn't. someone find it out for me i'm about to crash from energy drinks

I'm imagining you sitting shirtless in a dingy motel room, empty cans all over the floor, staring wild-eyed at your own reflection. You crush the last can and let it drop to the floor. Suddenly there is a knock at the door; you turn your head and let out a long incoherent scream.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 15 Dec 2010, 05:21
TOMMY!!

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldgwbkTgfS1qzou5ko1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 15 Dec 2010, 05:51
call me when anne hathaway is single

I WILL DUEL YOU FOR HER.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Dec 2010, 09:21
call me when anne hathaway is single

Seriously? Man ... that nose ... just, no.

you're a dead man
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 15 Dec 2010, 10:33
I like Anne Hathaway because you can play Charlie Brooker's Billie Piper game with her also: What facial feature is the biggest?

(http://www.celebrityrush.com/celebrity-pictures/Anne-Hathaway-1212679917.jpg)

I don't know!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 10:37
Anne Hathaway is fairly cute but just going by looks I'm a li'l surprised Hollywood hasn't stuck her in those roles where she's supposed to be the plain best friend despite being prettier than most people in a given random sampling. Most damning of all, the really jealous and possessive ladies I know think she's "nice and one of the prettiest women in movies," instead of a "skank" like pretty much every other actress under 30. Translation: they don't even find her threatening.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 15 Dec 2010, 10:37
Anne Hathaway does not resemble a rodent, whereas Billie Piper looks like a goddanged chipmunk.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Dec 2010, 10:51
anne hathaway's also got like mad acting chops dudes
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Katherine on 15 Dec 2010, 11:52
And terrible taste in men.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 11:53
She is definitely a good actress.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: cyro on 15 Dec 2010, 11:54
I like Anne Hathaway because you can play Charlie Brooker's Billie Piper game with her also: What facial feature is the biggest?

(http://www.celebrityrush.com/celebrity-pictures/Anne-Hathaway-1212679917.jpg)

I don't know!

Oh damn, I just got that reference.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: bainidhe_dub on 15 Dec 2010, 12:12
Anne Hathaway needs to stop ruining movie adaptations of perfectly good books. She may have fixed this herself by getting too old to play the heroine of children/teen stories, but I was so excited about Ella Enchanted until I heard she was in it.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Damnable Fiend on 15 Dec 2010, 12:25
Anne Hathaway is fairly cute but just going by looks I'm a li'l surprised Hollywood hasn't stuck her in those roles where she's supposed to be the plain best friend despite being prettier than most people in a given random sampling. Most damning of all, the really jealous and possessive ladies I know think she's "nice and one of the prettiest women in movies," instead of a "skank" like pretty much every other actress under 30. Translation: they don't even find her threatening.

they haven't watched this movie

(http://www.impawards.com/2005/posters/havoc_ver2.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 12:53
Nah, my habitually jealous cousin insists they should have gotten someone less adorable for that movie. And she once cut up a roommate's clothes in college. The girl is completely insane.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: scarred on 15 Dec 2010, 13:35
Anne Hathaway is a babe! Billie Piper is not.

But Scarlett is far prettier than both of them.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Dec 2010, 13:48
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldgwbkTgfS1qzou5ko1_500.jpg)

It's like a remake of Aguirre, Wrath of God starring capybaras.

I wonder if that capybara knows how to do the Kinski turn?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: squawk on 15 Dec 2010, 13:54
why is no one saying anything about khar's vision of jc

because that killed me
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 15 Dec 2010, 14:32
Or vice versa. Perhaps she's the one who called it quits.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Dec 2010, 14:34
Come on, who'd be tired of fucking Ryan Reynolds!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Drill King on 15 Dec 2010, 14:40
Guys, whoever is saying Anne Hathaway is unattractive is either blind or a moron. Like, seriously if I knew a girl that looked like that I'd probably die.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Joseph on 15 Dec 2010, 14:48
I'd trust Andy to pick attractive girls over pretty well anyone on this forum.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 15 Dec 2010, 14:50
yeah i gotta agree with andy here, whenever i witness this kind of dude talk where everyone seems to have ridiculously high standards of attractiveness for women i find myself really curious as to what kind of sex life said dudes have actually had and whether or not they are still single
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Patrick on 15 Dec 2010, 14:52
Dude what fuckhead in his right mind would not nail Anne Hathaway if given the option

Hell, if I was in a coma I'd snap out of it if I heard she was on the phone looking for me
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 15 Dec 2010, 14:55
seriously though, i don't get it what's wrong with her nose

is it that she's gorgeous? if that's a bad nose then what's a good nose, i'm missing something here
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Dec 2010, 14:57
Guys, whoever is saying Anne Hathaway is unattractive is either blind or a moron.

I have no idea if she's attractive, because attractiveness comes from the mind, and I don't know her; she's passably pretty, I guess.  Also, I am clearly programmed to be suspicious of anyone well-known in any case.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: imagist42 on 15 Dec 2010, 14:59
Query: If you could nail Anne Hathaway once in exchange for an otherwise celibate life, would you?

Saying no to this question does not mean you gain magical hook-up talent you currently lack.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 15:01
Hell no.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 15:04
I say that mostly because you could create some entirely hypothetical insanely gorgeous human being who was also a great conversationalist and I'd still say no to the "once," thing.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Dec 2010, 15:08
why is no one saying anything about khar's vision of jc

because that killed me

ask tommy & tania how it stacks up against what i was actually like on two loko in chicago
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 15 Dec 2010, 15:12
anne hathaway is pretty and all, but if you answer "yes" to that question you are essentially forfeiting your capability to ever have meaningful and intimate relationships with other human beings again for the entire rest of your life in exchange for banging a semi-famous celebrity one time and no offense but wow that's a stupid decision to make
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 15 Dec 2010, 15:17
There was also a lengthy drunken spiel about your former drummer which I missed filming by a few short seconds. The bits I do remember were utterly hilarious.

i can't be in these estates anymore because i like "freefalling" by tom petty too much
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: imagist42 on 15 Dec 2010, 15:22
The correct answer to the query was: Say yes with your fingers crossed behind your back. Then fuck some other people anyway.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: imagist42 on 15 Dec 2010, 15:23
And, you know, generally have a meaningful and fulfilling life however you please.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 15 Dec 2010, 15:33
yeah i gotta agree with andy here, whenever i witness this kind of dude talk where everyone seems to have ridiculously high standards of attractiveness for women i find myself really curious as to what kind of sex life said dudes have actually had and whether or not they are still single

I ain't actually saying she's not pretty, she's gorgeous as hell. Just goddamn lady, you got some big everythings on that face. She's lucky they're all symmetrical and beautiful.

(Also, Billie Piper is a pretty lady too; people are silly.)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 15 Dec 2010, 15:36
other favourite memory: jc opening a bag of munchies and just immediately pouring the contents into his mouth while mason kept yelling "DON'T EAT LIKE THAT JOHNNY, DON'T EAT LIKE THAT" repeatedly from across the room

truly the Best Vacation Ever
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 15:41
She's not unattractive. If anything I think what I said reflects more on just how high the standards for "Hollywood homely" is. For god's sake, they used to give Audrey Hepburn "plain girl" roles at one point. AUDREY HEPBURN!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 15 Dec 2010, 15:48
and different people can have wildly different standards, remember. personally, i prefer my ladies to be at least a little bit weird looking, so to me Anne Hathaway is pretty, but far too "normal" looking for me to go all gaga over.

joanna newsom, zooey deschanel etc. is more my style. Maybe i have a thing for big eyes....I dunno. Or maybe I am projecting their voices and personalities onto their faces, making any imperfections (real or perceived) pretty much moot.

i don't know, i'm not a doctor
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Patrick on 15 Dec 2010, 15:52
i'm not a doctor
(http://imgur.com/BCbuK.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Christophe on 15 Dec 2010, 17:46
Not that I WASN'T THERE TO WITNESS JOHNNY GONE LOKO but here is a thing I guess:

(http://cstrips.bitstrips.com/77WZL_7T2L.png)

Also, when is the Chicagodoc coming out? I've yet to see any footage of me taking a knee.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Christophe on 15 Dec 2010, 17:48
Here is another comic showcasing the dynamic duo.

(http://cstrips.bitstrips.com/TVZ7L_7T2L.png)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Dec 2010, 17:57
If anything I think what I said reflects more on just how high the standards for "Hollywood homely" is. For god's sake, they used to give Audrey Hepburn "plain girl" roles at one point.

It's not so much that Hollywood has high standards, it's more that they have extraordinarily homogenised standards, and anyone who deviates by even the slightest degree from what is accepted physical perfection in Hollywood is relegated to the back-blocks regardless of how attractive they actually are.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 19:00
I can agree with that. It's kinda like how Sofia Vergara dyes her hair black in the US just because that's pretty much what's expected of a Columbian model/actress.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 15 Dec 2010, 19:05
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/sharp_knees.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 15 Dec 2010, 20:20
Also if dudes judge Hollywood-perfect ladies like that

What the heck kinda chance do I have
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Dec 2010, 20:34
I'm not sure, you'll have to show us a picture of your knees.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: squawk on 16 Dec 2010, 01:40
chris omg those comics
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ptommydski on 16 Dec 2010, 04:18
Also if dudes judge Hollywood-perfect ladies like that

What the heck kinda chance do I have

That's not the way it works though. I doubt even a diehard chauvinist thinks like that.

Most female celebrities are not attractive to me on many levels and thus borderline any girl who I actually like is going to be more attractive.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 16 Dec 2010, 04:34
Also if dudes judge Hollywood-perfect ladies like that

What the heck kinda chance do I have

There's a formula for that.

R=H-Y

where Y = (T x X)/(Q+N/2)

T is time a man has been single and is either 1 if the man has only been single for a fortnight or 100 where it's been longer
X is their own rating on a 1-10 scale by popular assessment.
Q is their perception of women in their area
N is the number of single women in the area

H is the Hollywood popular assessment of the ideal object of a man's affections (capped at 11)

R then is the lowest number on the 1-10 scale that a woman rates by popular assessment that a man will consider as a potential mate.

Conversely, a man's chances are determined by (BP/2)+1 where BP is the Hollywood popular assessment of a woman's favourite celebrity (nominal Brad Pitt).
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 16 Dec 2010, 06:25
C+, show your workings.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 16 Dec 2010, 12:33
.any girl who I actually like is going to be more attractive.

This. My healthiest relationship was with a woman who took care of herself but wasn't really a looker. She was a positive influence in my life on many levels and when I think of her now it's not even really the way she looked that comes to mind.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: neomang5 on 18 Dec 2010, 07:44
For god's sake, they used to give Audrey Hepburn "plain girl" roles at one point.

Meh. She wasn't really that attractive and I don't get the hype around her as some gorgeous figure of womanly beauty. She was pretty okay looking and did well in Hollywood. The only reason I couldnt see her as a plain girl is the dignified air about her.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 18 Dec 2010, 08:23
That's because she's more of a fashion icon than the bombshell type.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 22 Jan 2011, 05:31
Those pants don't look very practical. I think she might need to get a new belt.

Perhaps she recently lost weight and now her belt's too loose? Good for her!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 22 Jan 2011, 05:38
Butt crack.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Patrick on 22 Jan 2011, 06:21
I think you're right Harry. Did she perhaps get taller since the last time she wore that top? It looks a little bit like it's not long enough to reach the waistline of her jeans! God, look at that poor little thing.

Tommy I think we should be sad for this poor girl's situation! She is clearly of Circumstances.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: schimmy on 22 Jan 2011, 06:50
The poor girl doesn't even appear to be able to afford underwear! Perhaps some sort of charitable foundation needs to be set up to help her?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BeoPuppy on 22 Jan 2011, 07:55
And maybe they can get her a nose normalising operation too?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BeoPuppy on 22 Jan 2011, 07:58
Thank you for a new expression.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 22 Jan 2011, 08:04
And maybe they can get her a nose normalising operation too?

i asked this before but really, what's wrong with her nose? is it supposed to be something obvious? i keep looking and i don't get it
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 22 Jan 2011, 08:26
I think it's a nose, rather than 80% plastic, that is bothering people of a certain ilk.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: McTaggart on 22 Jan 2011, 08:55
Her nose is really cute.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dimmukane on 22 Jan 2011, 09:39
In addition to what Sam just said, I ain't big on Owen Wilson schnozz on a lady.  I can look past it, but I knew a girl once who had that coupled with a REALLY nasal voice and I couldn't deal.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Patrick on 22 Jan 2011, 10:45
I ain't a big fan of Owen Wilson having any kind of prominence in Hollywood for any reason. His nose is the absolute least of them. Honestly I think the only role that has ever been good for him was the one he had in the Royal Tenenbaums as a drug-addled idiot who fucks everything up. Because that is a role that doesn't require a significant amount of effort.

(I hope I'm not the only one who thinks Roddy's post is god-tier boarding)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 22 Jan 2011, 13:31
I am okay with the lady in this picture. I am okay with basically everything happening here.

hotttt

Totally playing against type, this is some serious angel/devil shit going on. I mean, wasn't there even a movie where she was literally the good half of a pair of good/evil fairies or witches or whatever?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 22 Jan 2011, 14:33
how far in advance of the announcement of a movie's release dates can you buy tickets
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 22 Jan 2011, 14:34
also jesus the nose chat is freaking me right out
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 22 Jan 2011, 16:48
What the hell problem do people have with Anne Hathaway's nose?  She is a good-lookin' lady.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: IronOxide on 22 Jan 2011, 19:02
I honestly looked back at her picture five times to figure out what the problem with her nose.

Then I googled her to find a picture in profile, and I still can't find the problem.

I mean, I probably wouldn't have sex with her nose alone, but that's almost as largely an issue of logistics.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Slick on 22 Jan 2011, 19:11
Honestly I think the only role that has ever been good for him was the one he had in the Royal Tenenbaums as a drug-addled idiot who fucks everything up.

Like, maybe Wes Anderson is the only person who can get him into a decent movie, but, like, do not disregard the stand-up performance in Life Aquatic.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dazed on 22 Jan 2011, 20:02
Or Bottle Rocket.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 22 Jan 2011, 20:41
Anne Hathaway is a pretty lady! I don't get why people think her nose is weird, it's a very nice nose.

But I can't really notice much in that photo because her bottom is distracting!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 22 Jan 2011, 20:54
I think she's cute but that's a pretty silly picture.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 22 Jan 2011, 20:59
I understand, but I still think it's kinda silly.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 22 Jan 2011, 21:28
I think it looks silly. Aesthetically.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 23 Jan 2011, 04:48
The picture is excellent, I am not entirely sure what people want from the world.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 23 Jan 2011, 06:05
her bottom is distracting!

That's a problem?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: LTK on 23 Jan 2011, 07:26
hotttt

Totally playing against type, this is some serious angel/devil shit going on. I mean, wasn't there even a movie where she was literally the good half of a pair of good/evil fairies or witches or whatever?

Absolutely. I'm looking at this picture and literally can't believe it's Anne Hathaway, that look just clashes so hard with the established mental image resulting from the other movies she's starred in.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 23 Jan 2011, 10:49
Honestly I think the only role that has ever been good for him was the one he had in the Royal Tenenbaums as a drug-addled idiot who fucks everything up.
Like, maybe Wes Anderson is the only person who can get him into a decent movie, but, like, do not disregard the stand-up performance in Life Aquatic.

It's probably worth noting that Owen Wilson co-wrote a few of the Wes Anderson flicks, so he's not completely useless.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 23 Jan 2011, 10:53
Oh yeah and Anne Hathaway is basically like perfect
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dimmukane on 23 Jan 2011, 11:07
I have nothing against Owen Wilson except for Marmaduke, I just hope he doesn't donate his nose to future female rhinoplasty recipients.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 23 Jan 2011, 13:56
So I just got back from seeing Love, and Other Drugs, and it is mostly Anne Hathaway having sex and being really bad at acting like someone who has Parkinson's disease. That might make you want to see it I guess? You see her breasts a whole lot.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 23 Jan 2011, 14:26
FUCK YEAH I LOVE BREASTS
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 23 Jan 2011, 14:46
i don't know anything about that film except that jake gyllenhaal and anne hathaway have a lot of sex and are pretty naked a lot which is honestly more than enough for me. jake gyllenhaal is kind of the male version of whatever anne hathaway is in this thread.

look here he is on sesame street! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IOYU4JUyr4)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 23 Jan 2011, 15:07
You mean he's got a nose of undetermined type as well?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 23 Jan 2011, 15:08
TANIA MY SNARKY POINTLESS COMMENT WILL FOLLOW YOU NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU DELETE AND REPOST THE COMMENT TO WHICH IT WAS REPLYING
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 23 Jan 2011, 15:21
You mean he's got a nose of undetermined type as well?

actually jake gyllenhaal's nose is grass-type
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 23 Jan 2011, 15:28
harry i really am kind of sorry for that edit but admit it, after watching that clip you totally want jake to be the father of your weird illegitimate gay love children. i don't know how you had kids, it was probably kind of complicated so i won't ask
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 23 Jan 2011, 15:45
If you must know, we asked the octopus to be our surrogate.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: calenlass on 23 Jan 2011, 19:02
For god's sake, they used to give Audrey Hepburn "plain girl" roles at one point.

Meh. She wasn't really that attractive and I don't get the hype around her as some gorgeous figure of womanly beauty. She was pretty okay looking and did well in Hollywood. The only reason I couldnt see her as a plain girl is the dignified air about her.


(http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/2631/audreyhepburniii.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 23 Jan 2011, 19:14
(http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=96113&d=1238210091)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 23 Jan 2011, 22:56
I would be more impressed by the Hepburn pic if it weren't fake.  Your point is still valid though, Hepburn was super gorgeous.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Patrick on 24 Jan 2011, 01:41
The thought of Audrey Hepburn naked is pretty appealing, why'd you have to ruin it? I have terrible vision, I was content, man!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Spluff on 24 Jan 2011, 02:02
Audrey Hepburn is pretty cute, but no matter how nice an ass you stick on her she'll always just be cute. She's basically the Audrey Tautou of five decades ago.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 24 Jan 2011, 12:46
Both of those people are really attractive, who is it that you're considering more attractive than them? I'm genuinely interested, not criticising.

Also, Jens, I will watch any film which is in English and showing on a Sunday afternoon, since it only costs me 5,90 Euros and I have nothing else to do. But I quite like Anna Hathaway so I went for that one and it was pretty funny.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Spluff on 24 Jan 2011, 22:25
To take an immediate example, Anne Hathaway.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 25 Jan 2011, 11:27
What the fuck is wrong with cute
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 25 Jan 2011, 11:29
Wait yeah, that.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 26 Jan 2011, 01:56
pretty cute, but no matter how nice an ass you stick on her she'll always just be cute.

That is exactly how I feel about Anne Hathaway. I like cute though.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 26 Jan 2011, 02:53
I'm gonna say it. "Cute" is better than "beautiful".
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 26 Jan 2011, 05:31
I don't know if I who would take "Gosh you're cute!" over "You are so beautiful", though. I mean, speaking from the everyone-calls-me-cute point of view.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 26 Jan 2011, 05:33
It's probably worth noting that Owen Wilson co-wrote a few of the Wes Anderson flicks, so he's not completely useless.

But Dovey! All Wes Anderson's films are terrible!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JD on 26 Jan 2011, 08:11
You could also spoiler tag em.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 26 Jan 2011, 08:12
It's probably worth noting that Owen Wilson co-wrote a few of the Wes Anderson flicks, so he's not completely useless.

But Dovey! All Wes Anderson's films are terrible!

Khar, you just lost every ounce of respect I ever had for you.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Allybee on 26 Jan 2011, 19:57
(http://www.association-tiwizi-suisse.ch/arthur%20rimbaud.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 26 Jan 2011, 21:58
(http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Books/Pix/pictures/2010/9/13/1284369243965/Roald-Dahl-006.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 26 Jan 2011, 22:13
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f5/Alice_roosevelt_color_3.jpg/292px-Alice_roosevelt_color_3.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 26 Jan 2011, 22:49
(http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq71/HDS_Overflow/Queen_Elizabeth_II.jpg)

This is it, this is what all the centuries of inbreeding were for.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Eris on 26 Jan 2011, 23:20
I went to an exhibition of photos by Annie Leibovitz today, and saw the most amazing photo of the queen.

(http://obamapacman.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Annie-Leibovitz-Queen-Elizabeth-II-official-portrait.jpeg)

Look at that sky! And the cape!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Gemmwah on 26 Jan 2011, 23:55
(http://i43.tinypic.com/vgo2sk.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: calenlass on 27 Jan 2011, 00:35
(http://www.daemonstv.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/tn2_rufus_sewell_1.jpg) (http://johnnydeppwow.com/wp-content/themes/frugal/graphics/cat/pics/johnny-depp-74.jpg) (http://www.posters.ws/images/274736/antonio_banderas.jpg)

Sorry I am boring, guys. I guess I just like 40-something dudes that everyone else on the planet thinks is attractive, too. What can I say?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JimmyJazz on 27 Jan 2011, 01:15
(http://i876.photobucket.com/albums/ab325/desolationrow10/pattismith.jpg)

I don't care what anybody says, Patti Smith used to be an attractive lady back in the day.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 27 Jan 2011, 06:24
Khar, you just lost every ounce of respect I ever had for you.

You like Wes Anderson films Shane? I knew you were write but I didn't realise you were also upper middle class, self-absorbed, shallow and vaguely racist.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 27 Jan 2011, 07:24
you'll have to run the racism part by me
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 27 Jan 2011, 07:46
You like Wes Anderson films Shane? I knew you were write but I didn't realise you were also upper middle class, self-absorbed, shallow and vaguely racist.

Well...duh. There's more to me than just talking about football with Rob and Tommy in Meebo.

Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Yayniall on 27 Jan 2011, 08:18
(http://blogupnorth.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/nigella-lawson.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 27 Jan 2011, 13:08
Ugh. I can't stand that woman.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Gemmwah on 27 Jan 2011, 15:05
I consider Nigella Lawson very serious competition when it comes to my girlfriend, because everytime she comes on the tv, Clare goes into some sort of older-woman-coma and I'm left sat there like a nob.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 27 Jan 2011, 15:14
you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad. I will admit to not having fully perused the entire ouevre because I find every one of his films I've tried to watch frankly embarrassing as cultural artefacts. I have seen bits of most of his films though; I once shared a house with several film students, one of whom was obsessed with like, Anderson and Michel Gondry.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tom on 27 Jan 2011, 15:54
(http://sfrevu.com/ISSUES/2005/0508/china-mieville.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 27 Jan 2011, 15:58
(http://www.honeymag.com/wp-content/gallery/newsjanuaryweek2/anderson-cooper.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 27 Jan 2011, 16:09
you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad.

so you saw part of a movie with brown guys in it, which is also a movie about tourists, and are now tossing arguments of "vague racism" at it. i say this only because there is a potential argument to make about it but like i'm not sure it's an entirely intellectually honest argument since it relies on deep misunderstandings of the main characters (viz. that in fact the white people in the film are quite strongly cultural tourists, and that they gloss over the diverse complexity of the nation by doing goofily what their mother does in a serious and equally problematic way, which on a second viewing was one of the most interesting subtexts of the film)

sorry i just enjoy wes anderson's arch, precious films about rich people*

*from which category you should probably exclude bottle rocket, which is decidedly not about a bunch of privileged people's problems, and rushmore, which is in part a film about a dude from the outside of wealthy america's odd little social sphere trying desperately to become a part of it and discovering that in fact acts performed in the worship of social status are somewhat hollow in the face of acts formed from a desire and need to connect empathetically to other human beings
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tom on 27 Jan 2011, 16:12
(http://infosecurity.us/images/alan.turing.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tom on 27 Jan 2011, 16:13
(http://www.squarehippies.com/images/athletes/matthew_mitcham/matthew_mitcham3.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2011, 16:14
Quote
You don't have permission to access /images/alan.turing.jpg on this server.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: michaelicious on 27 Jan 2011, 16:35
you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad. I will admit to not having fully perused the entire ouevre because I find every one of his films I've tried to watch frankly embarrassing as cultural artefacts. I have seen bits of most of his films though; I once shared a house with several film students, one of whom was obsessed with like, Anderson and Michel Gondry.

I justify it to myself by saying that the Darjeeling Limited is an exploration of the sort of arrogance and Orientalism that often leads people to travel to India on 'spiritual journeys'. The tourist industry and neo-colonialism are pretty intimately linked. There is idealisation, and perhaps homogenisation, of the culture but I think that gives the viewer a better understanding of how the characters are maybe seeing things. I don't think Indian people are necessarily denigrated by the film.

I guess you could say it is racist because the film is organised around white consciousness. It is a movie about India without any really developed Indian characters. India and its people are sort of reduced to the ground for these privileged grown up children to work out their 'daddy issues'.

I contradicted myself a bit, but I am okay with that.. I was mostly just trying to work it out in my head rather than present an argument.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 27 Jan 2011, 17:00
Yeah except it's not a film about India. It's a film about white people travelling through India. There's all the difference in the world.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: michaelicious on 27 Jan 2011, 18:20
Yeah that is where my second train of thought sort of breaks down.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 27 Jan 2011, 18:36
I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad.

One of the plot points in The Royal Tenenbaums was Gene Hackman's character being vaguely racist (his ex-wife was marrying a black guy) but I don't recall anything to suggest that Wes Anderson is vaguely racist. But yeah his movies get tedious for other reasons (you mentioned how self-absorbed the characters are.)

anderson cooper

I passed him in Columbus Circle when I live in NYC. He must have had a bad day at the office because he was scowling something fierce.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Katherine on 27 Jan 2011, 20:49
(http://www.kingkoncert.com/Portals/7ecbf8d1-c7e0-4596-974c-cd348ddfe15f/Henry%20Rollins%201991%20sized.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Der Golem on 27 Jan 2011, 21:16
Should have been the pagebreak.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: imagist42 on 28 Jan 2011, 08:19
Quick! Trade posts with Joe!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 28 Jan 2011, 08:35
Don't the white dudes in the Darjeeling Limited, or at least one of them, 'find themselves' in the arms of a dusky magic brown-person lady? I admit that my memories of a film I saw partly a few years ago may be muddied, but I thought it was a neo-colonialist fantasy then and I have no particular reason to re-watch it because Wes Anderson films are terrible. And I don't like terrible things! I will keep calling Wes Anderson vaguely racist because I have no interest in 'intellectual honesty' and because it mildly annoys people who like Wes Anderson films, who shouldn't like Wes Anderson films because Wes Anderson films are terrible.

Also, his work embodies fascist aesthetics. (http://thehighhat.com/Nitrate/006/Life_Nordstrom.html) When you combine that with the fact that he is vaguely racist, he is basically Hitler. The Hitler of making films that are terrible.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 28 Jan 2011, 09:25
I have no interest in 'intellectual honesty'

man it's not like you're a new poster here, i know this is patently untrue

e: but then again

Quote
Let me be clear: I am not calling Anderson a fascist, nor am I calling his work fascist propaganda. I only submit that certain tastes, patterns, and inclinations of his work can be identified with a fascist aesthetic.

so like i mean what is your deal
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: E. Spaceman on 28 Jan 2011, 09:31
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UncrqlD9lUs/TEUdWbt04sI/AAAAAAAABMQ/E4immO4SZC8/s1600/0292-laibach_02.jpg)



come on.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 28 Jan 2011, 09:32
i was going to bring up neofolk
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Joseph on 28 Jan 2011, 10:11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaYBbA9WeY0
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tyler on 28 Jan 2011, 10:20
(http://gauchegal.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/anderson-cooper-2.jpg)

Fascist Anderson?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 28 Jan 2011, 14:07
Jens and I watched The Darjeeling Limited at Christmas 2009 and I thought it wasn't very good, but I think Jens thought it was. I have no idea what was going on in it so I didn't like it. I have simple tastes in films.

(http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/photoessay_5581_images/1105081456_M_110408_virginia_woolf_350.jpg)

(By the way, when I googled to find that picture I accidentally typoed and at first got this (http://www.virginiawoof.com/) which I find hilarious.)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 28 Jan 2011, 14:20
i was going to bring up neofolk

Yeah, but they're pretty up-front about the imagery they employ. Wes Anderson is a crypto-fascist, the most dangerous form of fascist.

In many ways, Wes Anderson is worse than Hitler.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: michaelicious on 28 Jan 2011, 16:34
Worse than single serve coffee machines?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 28 Jan 2011, 17:08
Yeah, but they're pretty up-front about the imagery they employ.

oh well then that's okay
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 28 Jan 2011, 19:25
1) WHY IS ANYBODY EVER ANYWHERE SURPRISED THAT KHAR DOESN'T LIKE WES ANDERSON

2) I'm pretty sure I leveled the exact same arguments at Khar re: his love of lots and lots and shitloads of stuff that overtly uses fascistic imagery up to and including genuine Neo-Nazis in the "We hate sports" thread and he pulled the same stupid + transparent little bit of logical gymnastics whereby actual fascists are totally acceptable as opposed to things that seem vaguely fascistic in really weak and insignificant ways. Give up guys, yr weapons are useless against him.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 28 Jan 2011, 19:26
ON A COMPLETELY UNRELATED NOTE I always thought Eva Braun was a bit of alright
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Cire27 on 28 Jan 2011, 21:11

Quote
Let me be clear: I am not calling Anderson a fascist, nor am I calling his work fascist propaganda. I only submit that certain tastes, patterns, and inclinations of his work can be identified with a fascist aesthetic.


Am I the only one who thought of Glenn Beck when reading that?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 28 Jan 2011, 21:15
(http://www.iill.net/wp-content/uploads/images/mike-rowe.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 28 Jan 2011, 21:24
Wes Anderson only has one film in 1001 Films You Must See Before You Die, but both Triumph Des Willens and Olympia are included. This is empirical proof of my theories.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KharBevNor on 28 Jan 2011, 21:24
Also,

(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/90135/Anne+Briggs.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JD on 28 Jan 2011, 22:00
(http://www.rap-up.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/janelle-monae.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 29 Jan 2011, 00:05
god i just want to hang out with janelle monae in a totally like non-sexual way she just seems like a super fun person
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 29 Jan 2011, 00:06
watch a janelle monae music video and try to not feel the same way
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tom on 29 Jan 2011, 00:54

Quote
Let me be clear: I am not calling Anderson a fascist, nor am I calling his work fascist propaganda. I only submit that certain tastes, patterns, and inclinations of his work can be identified with a fascist aesthetic.


Am I the only one who thought of Glenn Beck when reading that?

I thought that was the joke.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: squawk on 29 Jan 2011, 01:39
i went from like page 2 to page 4. what is this thread about?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: sean on 29 Jan 2011, 03:26
tommy asked us to post attractive people

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/hs063.snc6/167381_10150364812240584_648825583_16797224_935107_n.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 29 Jan 2011, 10:03
bold move
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 01 Feb 2011, 04:33
Try to find a smallish, relatively respectable photo of your all time crush

I honestly don't have an "all time crush".  I have been sitting here trying to think of one for like, 10 minutes.  I just can't think of one.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 01 Feb 2011, 08:26
I honestly don't have an "all time crush".  I have been sitting here trying to think of one for like, 10 minutes.  I just can't think of one.

i honestly don't believe it
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 01 Feb 2011, 08:26
i mean i rolled mine out in what was literally the first reply to this thread
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 01 Feb 2011, 08:59
god i just want to hang out with janelle monae in a totally like non-sexual way she just seems like a super fun person

This. This so much.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 01 Feb 2011, 09:23
all time crush
(http://lh5.ggpht.com/_8s1TB229vsg/TCt3yWLwr_I/AAAAAAAANAc/_BzsLoD-zLQ/millionflavours-sm%5B4%5D%5B6%5D.png)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 01 Feb 2011, 10:05
Holy large photo, Batman!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 01 Feb 2011, 10:06
I REALLY LOVE ICE CREAM




(sorry, fixed)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 01 Feb 2011, 10:12
i ate about 15 of those things last semester
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dazed on 01 Feb 2011, 10:13
(http://www.thefancarpet.com/uploaded_assets/images/gallery/3012/The_Last_of_the_Mohicans_28478_Medium.jpg)

Madeleine Stowe: the thinking man's dream woman.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 01 Feb 2011, 10:22
(http://www.damnimcute.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/george-clooney.jpg)

not surprising or original in the slightest, but you can't deny who you really are and who i really am is a woman who has perverted thoughts about this dude on a frighteningly regular basis
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 01 Feb 2011, 10:45
Man did anyone save that Meebo convo about trying to imagine that dude getting his bone on?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Liz on 01 Feb 2011, 11:42
If I was in meebo at the time I'll have it in my chat log thanks to pidgin. I don't recall this conversation, though, so I probably was not there. When was this?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dliessmgg on 01 Feb 2011, 16:43
(http://images.wikia.com/finalfantasy2/de/images/9/95/Gackt.jpg)



(http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/blessedM0804_450x300.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 01 Feb 2011, 17:10
11:12:41 PM Tania: what is the best thing in the world
11:12:41 PM Dovey: um it is a long title, i need to look it up
11:12:44 PM Tania: quick someone tell me
11:12:48 PM Tania: get this image out of my head
11:13:05 PM Dovey: Angels of Darkness, Demons Of Light 1
11:13:06 PM Stephen: oh yeah
11:13:12 PM Ozy: A happy puppy playing with a kitten?
11:13:12 PM Stephen: that's the one I downloaded the other day
11:13:13 PM Tania: cheesecake
11:13:15 PM Tania: puppies
11:13:15 PM Dovey: tania: puppies!
11:13:16 PM Stephen: Just listened to it
11:13:18 PM Stephen: love it
11:13:21 PM Tania: having sex with george clooney
11:13:28 PM Dovey: corgi flop corgi flop corgi flop
11:13:34 PM Ozy: George Clooney?
11:13:36 PM Ozy: Really?
11:13:39 PM Tania: yeah
11:13:48 PM Tania: he's handsome
11:13:54 PM Dovey: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glii-kazad8
11:14:00 PM Dovey: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCTN_sDpyP8
11:14:05 PM Ozy: I just...I can't imagine George Clooney really being into sex for some reason
11:14:05 PM Dovey: there you go tania
11:14:10 PM Dovey: soothe yr trouble soul
11:14:17 PM Dovey: unknit brow
11:14:20 PM Tania: yeah i mean it wouldn't be like hot steamy sex
11:14:39 PM Stephen: That corgi
11:14:41 PM Tania: but like maybe we'd bang and i'd tell him about my thesis and he'd be like "wow tania, that sounds really interesting"
11:14:46 PM Stephen: he is belly flopping for all he's worth
11:14:52 PM Dovey: do you know what Jordan i think you are right
11:14:57 PM Dovey: i honestly can;t imagine it
11:15:00 PM Tania: and i'd go "oh man, george clooney just told me my thesis was interesting"
11:15:04 PM Dovey: i think he'd be really great dinner company
11:15:13 PM Dovey: and like just all drinking wine with
11:15:19 PM Tania: hmm
11:15:21 PM Tania: yeah actually
11:15:23 PM Tania: you're right
11:15:24 PM Dovey: but i can not put george clooney in a sex situation
11:15:31 PM Dovey: AND I AM TRYING
11:15:32 PM Dovey: LIKE
11:15:34 PM Dovey: REALLY HARD
11:15:36 PM Tania: i'm thinking really hard about it right now and i can't really imagine it
11:15:40 PM Tania: and i just can't
11:15:43 PM Tania: see myself doing it
11:15:44 PM Tania: damnit
11:15:46 PM tommydski: i think he was basically being himself in Burn After Reading
11:16:01 PM Joseph: I can imagine him post-sex
11:16:03 PM tommydski: just a stupider version
11:16:04 PM Joseph: chatting naked in bed
11:16:09 PM Joseph: not sex itself
11:16:32 PM Tania: yeah
11:16:44 PM Dovey: man
11:16:50 PM Dovey: way to be so charming, Clooney
11:16:50 PM Tania: george clooney's character was the one who built the sex chair
11:16:54 PM Tania: maybe that's what i really want
11:17:00 PM Tania: to have dinner and wine with george clooney
11:17:07 PM Tania: and then for him to build me a sex chair
11:17:08 PM Dovey: so charming that you kind of priced yourself out of the market
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 01 Feb 2011, 17:21
You know, I can't imagine Clooney having sex either. At all. But I can easily see him in bed with Tania discussing her thesis.

George Clooney, wtf. You are a dashing man and that is all you will ever be.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 01 Feb 2011, 17:22
george clooney: too aloof for you
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 01 Feb 2011, 17:26
not in the filthy gutter that is my mind he ain't
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 01 Feb 2011, 17:40
(http://collider.com/wp-content/uploads/nathan_fillion_02.jpg)

Dear Nathan Fillion,
Please carry me off into the sunset. I would be very much obliged.
<3 Yours truly,
Me!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 01 Feb 2011, 17:44
so tempted to photoshop tania and george clooney onto some porn
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JD on 01 Feb 2011, 18:08
(http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/blessedM0804_450x300.jpg)

Is it the beard you have a crush on or the man?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Katherine on 01 Feb 2011, 19:38
Is  it possible to separate one from the other?  I think not.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 01 Feb 2011, 19:49
Do you know what? This thread should just be completely deleted except for that Brian Blessed photo.

-

Subject: TOMMY!!

Body: BLESSED.jpg
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 01 Feb 2011, 20:33
Yeah except it's not a film about India. It's a film about white people travelling through a quaint, anglocentric notion of "India". There's all the difference in the world.
FYP

But they save some brown kids so in a way, isn't the entire concept of India as a cleansing bath washing away their white, white problems not problematic at all?
(spoiler alert)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 01 Feb 2011, 20:38
ITT: India as a billion-strong magical negro hivemind
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 01 Feb 2011, 21:28
But they save some brown kids so in a way, isn't the entire concept of India as a cleansing bath washing away their white, white problems not problematic at all?

that scene actually just affirms that they are like total strangers? what they eventually discover is that they have fundamental human emotion in common with the indian people but very little else, and they are completely out of sorts with these people. after that scene, where they have extraordinary trouble even communicating with anyone, they go home. do you not think that is significant
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 01 Feb 2011, 22:24
"people"
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 01 Feb 2011, 22:33
I mean what sets Anderson apart from his indie-quirk descendants is his ability to instill real pathos in his central characters but I think in TDL specifically the characters at the periphery suffer just as much as they would in, say, Good Dick or Eagle Vs. Shark. Which is to say, the affect is so heavy that robbed of the focus of the film they become ciphers, and when they don't speak the language of the main characters that effect is compounded. That sort of thing might actually be used well to explore culture shock and the like, but in the end I don't feel like TDL was about anything more than exactly what Anderson gets accused of fixating on - the family issues of disaffected white pseudo-intellectuals. I was sufficiently charmed by The Royal Tenenbaums but it wore very thin in his next two films.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dliessmgg on 02 Feb 2011, 01:06
(http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04/blessedM0804_450x300.jpg)

Is it the beard you have a crush on or the man?

His voice. I want to have sex with his voice.

And the beard too.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 02 Feb 2011, 01:34
I honestly don't have an "all time crush".  I have been sitting here trying to think of one for like, 10 minutes.  I just can't think of one.
i honestly don't believe it


I can think of plenty of celebs and actresses and models and so forth that I've been attracted to, but none of them stand out as worthy of that moniker.  When I was a kid/teenager there was Mia Sara, Ally Sheedy, Molly Ringwald, Phoebe Cates, Tia Carrere, Kathleen Turner, Rae Dawn Chong, Kelly LeBrock, Tamlyn Tomita, Lisa Lopes, and of course, y'know, Carrie Fisher.  There was plenty more then and since then, but you get the point I hope.  I'm not saying that I've never been attracted to any celebs or had crushes on them, etc, I'm just saying that there is no one big one that stands out.

Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JD on 02 Feb 2011, 12:40
Is there any celebrity you'd like to hang out with then?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 02 Feb 2011, 13:35
Jesus, you're old, Ben.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 02 Feb 2011, 14:30
Yeah I thought we already knew this.  I knew when I was writing that out I'd be showing my age, but whatevs.  I was googling some of them to get the spelling of their names right and all that and wow, some of them haven't aged well at all :(

JD: Yeah sure, plenty.  Maybe this is because I watched Spicks & Specks last night, but I think that at the moment I'd prob want to hang out with Adam Hills for a bit.  He's always so brutally cheerful and positive.  I don't think I've ever seen him anything but happy.  I'd love to figure out how the hell he manages it, because for the most part it eludes me.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 02 Feb 2011, 14:34
On the back of that question I just tried to think of the old "what would be your perfect dinner party group?" thing, and I got to three separate groups (enjoyable company, tech talk, politics) before realising I was being dumb.  But there are plenty of people I'd invite that wouldn't necessarily get on well with one another or have anything to talk about.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 02 Feb 2011, 14:36
RE: ben's old lady list

ally sheedy still looks pretty good sometimes! i just saw her in a new movie or show the other day and she was smokin hot.

i always had a soft spot for her in breakfast club though; even as a kid i was like "fuck molly ringwald, i want to know what's up with that chick!"
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Graphite on 05 Feb 2011, 06:34
I may be too late for this thread but oh well!

(http://www.radiotimes.com/shows/kingdom/gallery/stephen-fry/005/photo_lrg.jpg)

(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlWmeZZ0kJIlQjaj8w-qPJ7bdteDTJcF3biiUiM9oH03Gi1bV6wg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5gXEbt54USE/S-NW2Kk__cI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/fLg9v0sh0XY/s320/crystal-renn-6.jpg)

And in my youthier youth, this kid:
(http://www.forshorts.com/adam%20lamberg.jpg)

Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: calenlass on 05 Feb 2011, 20:04
Oh, Stephen Fry. He is not what I would call sexy, but dude has got a brain.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Alex C on 08 Feb 2011, 17:11
There was plenty more then and since then, but you get the point I hope.  I'm not saying that I've never been attracted to any celebs or had crushes on them, etc, I'm just saying that there is no one big one that stands out.



I'm much the same way. There's usually been someone in my personal life that I'm pretty infatuated with, for one thing, and I've always kinda suspected that being very fixated on people I'll never meet is bad policy in general. More than anything I guess it just never occurred to me that I'd have to pick one, so why think about it?


As for the dinner party thing, I don't really have a list for that either. If I made one, I suspect it'd be all political figures provided I could basically turn it into a question and answer session. For example, when we discussed a historical figure dinner party as an icebreaker in one of my history classes, I picked a list almost entirely made up of traitors and spies. I guess I'd rather be a nosy bastard than listen to Twain and Voltaire be waaaay more witty than I am.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 09 Feb 2011, 05:25
Hey tommy, have you seen Match Point? I watched it a long time ago and didn't think it was very good, but I was recently reminded of it and I'm curious what you think of how it depicts American vs. British women.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: squawk on 09 Feb 2011, 11:20
i still don't know what this thread is about. what is it about? can i post andrew garfield? i'm just going to do that

(http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgcq5cS9Fm1qfjyuso1_500.jpg)

he just hast he nicest hair

what is this thread about
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 09 Feb 2011, 12:40
My dinner party would basically be these guys:

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Bloomsbury.gif/800px-Bloomsbury.gif)

Meeting them in the flesh would either validate or extinguish my obsession with them, for a start.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 09 Feb 2011, 13:45
May you are a nerd.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: michaelicious on 09 Feb 2011, 15:50
My dinner party would basically be these guys:

[bloomsbury set diagram thing]

Meeting them in the flesh would either validate or extinguish my obsession with them, for a start.

Can I come to your dinner party?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: michaelicious on 09 Feb 2011, 16:03
Is it visibly not on there, or not visibly on there?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Yayniall on 09 Feb 2011, 16:14
conspicuous by its absence
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 09 Feb 2011, 16:17
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlWmeZZ0kJIlQjaj8w-qPJ7bdteDTJcF3biiUiM9oH03Gi1bV6wg)

Seconded!

Also:

(http://www.celebs101.com/gallery/Colin_Firth/25848/colin_firth_photo_38.jpg)

(http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/colin-firth/colin-firth-20060620-138534.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 09 Feb 2011, 16:28
(http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgb4lau3uq1qd2jrlo1_500.gif)

(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgazfdwH6C1qcz4ut.gif)

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgb2ffsyl91qd2jrlo1_r1_500.gif)

(http://streebgreeblings.tumblr.com/photo/1280/3180746583/1/tumblr_lgaw47MBB91qd2jrl)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 09 Feb 2011, 16:46
:psyduck:

 :cry:
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BlahBlah on 09 Feb 2011, 16:49

(http://www.celebs101.com/gallery/Colin_Firth/25848/colin_firth_photo_38.jpg)


(http://www.seedol.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Piers-Morgan.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 09 Feb 2011, 18:56
No! Buh...I don't even! Just...no!

I'm sorry, but Pierce doesn't hold a candle to Colin Firth and is nowhere near as dashing.

(http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/10000000/Colin-Firth-in-Manhattan-magazine-colin-firth-10050601-454-600.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 10 Feb 2011, 05:22
OK I admit that Colin Firth is sexy. I was holding out until we got to the second picture and then it was all over.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: elizaknowswhatshesfor on 10 Feb 2011, 05:32
My work mate told me I was bad & wrong for fancying him because he looked like a duvet. I tried to argue & he hit me on the nose with some rolled up papers.

My libido is a naughty puppy.

Also I'm upset because Jay Barachel is dating Allison Pill. I'm jealous of both of them (But mostly her)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Graphite on 10 Feb 2011, 05:42
Jay Baruchel is a perfectly good actor but he has elevated having an annoying voice to an absolute artform.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: allison on 10 Feb 2011, 06:15
I've had a big nerdy crush on Jay Baruchel since he was on Popular Mechanics for Kids.
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4141/4779742735_8b2dab5aaf.jpg)

Even 8-year-old Allison had a thing for skinny nerds...
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 10 Feb 2011, 06:28
I'm sorry, what are we talking about now? I couldn't hear you over the sound of me thinking about Rebecca Hall.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 10 Feb 2011, 06:49
I'm sorry, but Pierce doesn't hold a candle to Colin Firth and is nowhere near as dashing.


That would be Piers.

Pierce looks like this.

(http://www.spotlight.com/hallfame/portraits/pierce_brosnan.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Feb 2011, 07:51
And Pierce can DEFINITELY hold a candle to Colin Firth. Like close enough to start singing things.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 10 Feb 2011, 09:36
Except that Pierce can't sing. (jk) But he is a very handsome man.

OK I admit that Colin Firth is sexy. I was holding out until we got to the second picture and then it was all over.

I was disappointed by google's lack of scruffy Firth photos. <3 scruff.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 10 Feb 2011, 12:52
The mention of Jay Baruchel reminded me that Judd Apatow and I must have very similar taste in women because I have had huge nerdy crushes on the leading female actresses in pretty much everything he's done (although not Leslie Mann, who Apatow is married to, funnily enough).

Linda Cardellini from Freaks and Geeks
(http://www.thementalshed.com/movies/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/freaks-geeks-linda-cardellini.jpg)

Carla Gallo from Undeclared
(http://www4.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/BAFTA+LA+Awards+Season+Tea+Party+0Jp6HtVh2A_l.jpg)

Catherine Keener in The Forty Year Old Virgin
(http://www4.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Premiere+Universal+Studios+40+Year+Old+Virgin+2MhRHlyJMLMl.jpg)

Jenna Fischer who I guess has been in a few of his things!
(http://www.collider.com/wp-content/uploads/jenna-fischer22.jpg)

and so on!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Christophe on 10 Feb 2011, 13:09
When I was like fifteen years old I had this photo of Ms. Alyson Hannigan hanging on my bulletin board:

(http://images.cryhavok.org/d/3565-2/Alyson+Hannigan+-+Basketball.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Feb 2011, 13:32
Cute hair, wonky tatas
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 10 Feb 2011, 14:10
sharp knees
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: calenlass on 10 Feb 2011, 14:30
Man, what exactly about Colin Firth is sexy? The only photos there where he is attractive are the ones where he has dark hair, from Pride and Prejudice (I think?). Like, I dunno, he just kind of looks bland, and kind of old in some of those pictures.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Liz on 10 Feb 2011, 14:36
(http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/3700000/Sundance-2009-joseph-gordon-levitt-3757808-423-594.jpg)

nnnnnnghhhgghhghg
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 10 Feb 2011, 14:38
catherine keener is really just the best lady ever
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Gemmwah on 10 Feb 2011, 14:42
oh my god why haven't i been reading this thread there is half naked alyson FUCKING hannigan
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 10 Feb 2011, 14:43
Clin Firth is handsome (I think so anyways), but I just like him. I really enjoy him as an actor. Him being handsome is a nice bonus.

Also one day I'd like to give JGL a high five.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Liz on 10 Feb 2011, 14:46
I'd like to give him a little more than a high five if you know what I mean.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 10 Feb 2011, 15:11
Do you mean he can high five your vagina with his penis?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 10 Feb 2011, 15:37
I'd like to give him a little more than a high five if you know what I mean.

Oh do you want to go dancing in the street with him too? I do! Hurr hurr.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Elizzybeth on 10 Feb 2011, 15:40
Man, so, I haven't seen the Pride and Prejudice miniseries, but I just read the book for the first time and goddamn if I didn't imagine Colin Firth saying everything Mr. Darcy says.

Was I influenced by knowing he played the role?  Probably.  But maybe also that casting was perfect.  

brb, must go download miniseries.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 10 Feb 2011, 15:42
Oh do you want to go dancing in the street with him too? I do! Hurr hurr.

I'd rather go dancing in the street with this guy

(http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_leowknVCiP1qzoaqio1_400.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Tom on 10 Feb 2011, 15:52
i still don't know what this thread is about. what is it about? can i post andrew garfield? i'm just going to do that

His arse is one of the single best things atm.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Liz on 10 Feb 2011, 15:54
I would do pretty much anything if Joseph Gordon-Levitt was involved. Aside from like, murder. But most other things.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 10 Feb 2011, 15:59
Elizzybeth, you MUST download the miniseries. It is the single greatest thing on Earth and you will never look at a boy from the 21st Century the same ever again.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 10 Feb 2011, 17:15
you will never look at a boy from the 21st Century the same ever again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apu_585SW18 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apu_585SW18)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 10 Feb 2011, 17:57
Man I have to agree with the last five pictures so hard.

I posted this not realizing there was a whole new page but it's still true.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lunchbox on 10 Feb 2011, 18:40
Will Arnett is one exception maybe, Harry.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Katherine on 10 Feb 2011, 18:46
Will Arnett is swoontastic.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 10 Feb 2011, 19:30
When I was like fifteen years old I had this photo of Ms. Alyson Hannigan hanging on my bulletin board:

I think she is pretty hot but I am not a fan of that picture.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 10 Feb 2011, 19:45
My reaction to that whole shoot was "what, why.  what are you doing"
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 11 Feb 2011, 00:13
Yeah she's cute, but the shoot was pretty awful and out of character in my view
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Graphite on 11 Feb 2011, 01:13
Wait, wait, Dovey, does that include Katherine Heigl? I can't be attracted to her because every time I see her face in a movie I am almost certain to be about to watch something terrible. Her agent should be drawn and quartered.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 11 Feb 2011, 04:50
Not really familiar with that woman but she looks alright to me.

This is where I am tempted to photodump every other picture of her ever taken. However it is much more efficient for you to simply gis "alyson hannigan."

Sorry, I haven't seen this.

You might want to watch it sometime when you're bored. It's not an amazing movie, but it still fascinates on several levels, including the oddity of a movie by Woody Allen that isn't really a "Woody Allen movie." Indeed, it's possible he wrote is primarily for an excuse to make a movie with Scarlett Johansson.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 11 Feb 2011, 05:21
An odd aversion to posed sports pics with people who don't look like they actually play said sport. I reckon there are far better images of Hannigan out there.

On the other hand, Victoria Pendleton always looks hot when she's doing her thing.

(http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44523000/jpg/_44523846_pendleton-flag-416.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 11 Feb 2011, 05:42
Yeah she's cute, but the shoot was pretty awful and out of character in my view

In retrospect, that shoot comes across as an insecure girl trying too hard, which is probably literally what happened since at the time she was playing the nerdy sidekick to a blonde bombshell.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Gemmwah on 11 Feb 2011, 06:22
I liked that shoot, i had the pictures all over my wall when I was a teenager, and I thought it was nice to see her doing some shoots like that rather than the cutesy flower pictures and stuff like that. Also the American Pie photoshoot with the other girls in the red white and blue bikinis was awesome.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 11 Feb 2011, 08:11
Wait, wait, Dovey, does that include Katherine Heigl? I can't be attracted to her because every time I see her face in a movie I am almost certain to be about to watch something terrible. Her agent should be drawn and quartered.

Knocked Up was a very good film and Katherine Heigl certainly isn't a pain to look at, but I find it pretty hard to care too much about her, even to the point of including her in a vaguely creepy+sexist set of pictures on an Internet forum.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: elizaknowswhatshesfor on 12 Feb 2011, 06:28
I read an article about her (It was in a real magazine so I can't link to it) & she came across as the nicest lady ever.

So on a rainy, bored afternoon I watched 27 dresses.

No one is nice enough to apologise for how utterly offensive that movie is to every sensibility I have or hold dear.

Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Graphite on 12 Feb 2011, 07:03
Three words: The Ugly Truth.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 12 Feb 2011, 07:38
a vaguely creepy+sexist set of pictures on an Internet forum.

lol wut
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 12 Feb 2011, 11:01
I felt kind of skeezy putting up that post? Like, "here are some women I have thought about having sex with". It's not even necessarily this thread, which is pretty tame (I'm sure mostly due to the restraint employed by the people posting in it), but most forums I have been on have a similar thread, usually with a totally cringeworthy title like "I'd Hit That!". Add to that that it's pretty rare to GIS any female actress and not have it come up with some Maxim or FHM shoot and usually also some grainy screenshots of a nude scene in a movie, and it's not too difficult to see why someone who's a bit neurotic and overly conscious of how he appears to others (i.e; me) might feel somewhat damned by association by making a post like that.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 12 Feb 2011, 12:54
No dude, gotta change your sig.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Barmymoo on 12 Feb 2011, 13:34
Gotta get banned.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 12 Feb 2011, 13:39
waitaminute something is fishy here, I see two different sigs
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: JD on 12 Feb 2011, 13:42
Gotta get banned.
It would be a silly thing to get banned over.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Blue Kitty on 12 Feb 2011, 13:45
waitaminute something is fishy here, I see two different sigs

I was wondering that too
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 12 Feb 2011, 14:31
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nice try, dude
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 12 Feb 2011, 14:33
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lf89wxB3ja1qe0eclo1_r34_500.gif)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If we don't remember me is pretty cool, though
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 12 Feb 2011, 17:20
Knocked Up was a very good film and Katherine Heigl certainly isn't a pain to look at, but I find it pretty hard to care too much about her, even to the point of including her in a vaguely creepy+sexist set of pictures on an Internet forum.

remember when she said that 'knocked up' was sexist & reductive and then made 'the ugly truth'
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 13 Feb 2011, 02:49
Hey are we still doing photos of famous people we've always been crushin' on?

Because if we are then MANCRUSH

(http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq71/HDS_Overflow/GeneKelly.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 13 Feb 2011, 11:00
You've got a broken link so we can't see your mancrush. I'm slightly disappointed.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 13 Feb 2011, 14:24
Photobucket'd.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 13 Feb 2011, 14:55
Nice choice, Harry.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 14 Feb 2011, 21:43
So I started watching Community recently

(http://www.denimblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Joel-1.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 14 Feb 2011, 21:46
See this shits me. What the hell is he wearing on his legs. That is not appropriate "Go to an awards show and pose with pretty women" attire. That's barely even appropriate "Go to a nice bar on a Friday night" attire. Damn you modern man, learn to dress properly!
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: imagist42 on 14 Feb 2011, 21:51
damn are they some pretty women, though
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 14 Feb 2011, 22:03
I approve of all three people in Dovey's picture.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 14 Feb 2011, 22:22
Oh hey it's Tweetie, cool.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: squawk on 14 Feb 2011, 22:59
COMMUNITY FUCK YEAH!
Alison Brie is just so adorbs.

Also

(http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg610/scaled.php?tn=0&server=610&filename=3fvwe.jpg&xsize=640&ysize=640)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Feb 2011, 05:20
Wait are we talking about French women now? I can do that.

(http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq71/HDS_Overflow/ElodieBouchez.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: LTK on 15 Feb 2011, 05:43
Yes please!

(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/02ChanelNo5PrintAdvert.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 15 Feb 2011, 06:14
Is play-doh some kind of slang for talented and versatile actress? I thought I was down with the kids but apparently not.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 15 Feb 2011, 06:16
I thought it was a pretty obvious joke about how that photo has clearly been photoshopped and has nothing but soft edges and a weird glow, causing Tatou to look oddly softened and almost as if she was made of a malleable substance marketed as a childrens toy.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BlahBlah on 15 Feb 2011, 06:22
(http://www.gonemovies.com/WWW/MyWebFilms/Drama/BoutPatricia1.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: BlahBlah on 15 Feb 2011, 06:23
and
(http://theselvedgeyard.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/1983_belmondo1.jpg)
might as well
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Yayniall on 15 Feb 2011, 06:38
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XFeDEzGR_-U/TBwuTxW7w3I/AAAAAAAAC08/p2gw8pB0xDU/s1600/sophie+reade+hot+bikini.jpg)

Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: LTK on 15 Feb 2011, 07:01
I thought it was a pretty obvious joke about how that photo has clearly been photoshopped and has nothing but soft edges and a weird glow, causing Tatou to look oddly softened and almost as if she was made of a malleable substance marketed as a childrens toy.

Which is pretty much what you'd expect from an ad for Chanel, but that doesn't change that she's very pretty.

Better? (http://wallbase2.org/high-resolution/c0a84d60b05b174a780e97c88791b15e/wallpaper-415777.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 15 Feb 2011, 07:55
I reckon you could find worse if you wanted to. There are even a couple of websites dedicated to these things.

Besides, given that it's a screen grab from the film and therefore a part of a wider advertising campaign, it would be pretty silly to change the image so that it no longer looks the same. Such are the ways of interlinked advertising strategies. The picture itself is nothing spectacular but I quite like the advert, a careful homage to the noir genre in a classic setting treading the edge of animation. A bold move but well balanced.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Liz on 15 Feb 2011, 07:58
So I started watching Community recently

[img]http://www.denimblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Joel-1.jpg[img]

You have made a wise decision.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Feb 2011, 08:13
EVERYONE STOP POSTING FRENCH WOMEN, MY PANTS ARE BECOMING VERY UNCOMFORTABLE
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 15 Feb 2011, 08:26
Oh c'mon, are you really saying that by posting a picture of some like Vanessa Paradis;

(http://news.jukebo.fr/files/2009/05/vanessa-paradis2.jpg)

You're going to suffer from some kind of sartorial discomfiture?

How are you impacted by other nations, for instance a German like Franka Potente?

(http://img.listal.com/image/8917/600full-franka-potente.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Feb 2011, 09:08
EVERYONE STOP POSTING FRENCH WOMEN,

Have an English one, then, also the daughter of a Hungarian baroness:

(http://cassland.org/images/MarianneFaithfull.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Dliessmgg on 15 Feb 2011, 15:31
Are only real people allowed? Because DANG

(http://danbooru.donmai.us/data/sample/sample-e9011d3180568e6cdfa2cc2e31e80504.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Feb 2011, 15:44
look dudes those other ladies are okay but their first language isn't french so no contest, dig?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Feb 2011, 15:45
no offense intended toward 70's-era marianne btw whose voice alone has merited several pages in my "love diary" (just a notepad file i keep on my desktop)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Feb 2011, 16:04
That photo is from 1965, not the 70s (when she was living on the street with her heroin).
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Feb 2011, 16:16
i am always wary about marianne faithfull's age because my awareness of the brouhaha with her and the Stones is just this side of "dim"
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Feb 2011, 16:26
Don't worry Johnny, she's not French she's Belgian:

(http://i435.photobucket.com/albums/qq71/HDS_Overflow/DeborahFrancois.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Johnny C on 15 Feb 2011, 16:51
Don't worry Johnny, she's not French she's Belgian:

close enough
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 15 Feb 2011, 17:07
It sure is.

It suuuuuure is.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 16 Feb 2011, 01:07
Are only real people allowed? Because DANG

(horrible anime girl)

Only real people.  Yayniall is also in violation of this for posting Sophie Reade.  Page 3 girls aren't real people.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: elizaknowswhatshesfor on 16 Feb 2011, 07:22


Only real people.  Yayniall is also in violation of this for posting Sophie Reade.  Page 3 girls aren't real people.
[/quote]

I used to know one in real life, but my real life, not hers, she wasn't, as stated above, real.


(I agree).
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: tania on 16 Feb 2011, 13:48
not a celebrity but i'll admit... i have a big crush on one of the models on the fossil website. it's made browsing during my breaks from work a bit awkward lately.

(http://i53.tinypic.com/9kt1r6.jpg) (http://i56.tinypic.com/2lkqiq8.jpg)

yeah yeah i can tell your fossil brand clothes that you are being paid to wear make you happy but your clothes don't love you like i do
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 16 Feb 2011, 14:27
Ooo! My hair is around that length! Now I know what to do with it!

See, Fossil is good for more than their awesome fashions. Also I want that jacket.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: KvP on 16 Feb 2011, 17:16
What Tania you don't like girls shut up
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: jhocking on 03 Mar 2011, 18:37
You know, I can't imagine Clooney having sex either. At all. But I can easily see him in bed with Tania discussing her thesis.

George Clooney, wtf. You are a dashing man and that is all you will ever be.

I thought of you guys when I heard this:
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/02/23/2011-02-23_george_clooney_on_politics_ive_had_too_much_sex_done_too_many_drugs_to_ever_run_.html
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Lines on 03 Mar 2011, 19:23
George Clooney is in my city. Maybe you should visit, Tania.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Ozymandias on 03 Mar 2011, 20:13
I imagine Clooney gets a lot of play because A) he's Clooney and 2) like, girls don't actually expect to be having sex with him. Major guard down. Like they will be engaged in the pre-sex because he's Clooney and that's expected and then they'll suddenly be like "Oh hey. George Clooney is doing my vagina. George Clooney is rocking my vaginal region right now what's up with that." and it'll just be too surreal.

I just had to add "Clooney" to Firefox's spelling dictionary.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Inlander on 06 Mar 2011, 06:09
But even one out of five Clooneys would be ridiculously handsome! What about us poor ordinary folk who can only aspire to the dizzy heights of mere milliClooneys?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Cire27 on 06 Mar 2011, 07:43
You all have Chloomydia.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Metope on 07 Mar 2011, 08:37
Looks like he's made from the same play-doh as Audrey Tautou, maybe they're related?
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: Metope on 07 Mar 2011, 09:07
I'm sure he appreciates that, he'd probably turn all disfigured if someone tried to climb on him.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: David_Dovey on 14 Mar 2011, 13:15
(http://www.brooklynvegan.com/img/metal/various/rollins.jpg)

e: Interview what that pic done come from (http://www.brooklynvegan.com/archives/2011/03/an_interview_wi_48.html)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: nufan on 14 Mar 2011, 13:28
(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9710/toystory3mrpotatohead18.jpg)
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: valley_parade on 14 Mar 2011, 13:29
Wonderful skill, also inexplicably dresses like Dick Tracy on occasion -

Tommy, that's the new Real away kit, duh.
Title: Re: TOMMY!!
Post by: est on 19 Mar 2011, 13:02
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/0B8Y8QTCJN_9.jpg)

hey