THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2011, 08:52

Title: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2011, 08:52
So many questions, not enough panels to answer them all.

(By the way: GO PACKERS!)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: ndperfesser on 06 Feb 2011, 13:36
While we are waiting for the game to start and the comic to drop, I thought I would point out that Jeph has posted a collage of how Faye has changed over the years on his tumblr (http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/post/3096854264/inspired-by-some-other-folks-who-were-doing). I have to say, my personal preference in his artwork was during the 1400-1600 strips. I think he hit the sweet spot at that point between proficiency and exuberance. While Jeph's art has improved over the last 250 strips, he has been working hard on adding subtleties to his drawing. I think that has sapped a bit of the spontaneity out of the strip's art. Still, this is the only webcomic I like enough to actually hang out in the forums, so he is doing something right. What do you think of Jeph's evolution as an artist?
So, on topic, do you think Jeph will recreate strip 723 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=723) with Faye and Marigold?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 06 Feb 2011, 13:58
So, on topic, do you think Jeph will recreate strip 723 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=723) with Faye and Marigold?
An interesting idea. Some modifications are needed for it work. At least because Marigold and Faye aren't nearly as close friends as Dora and Faye already were at that time.  I also vote for Momo talking in her dreams on the sofa in place of Hannelore!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 06 Feb 2011, 14:41
An interesting idea. Some modifications are needed for it work. At least because Marigold and Faye aren't nearly as close friends as Dora and Faye were at that time.  I also vote for Momo talking in her dreams on the sofa in place of Hannelore!
Do anthro-PCs dream of electric Harrison Fords (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner)? Or Svens (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1658)?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Feb 2011, 14:49
(By the way: GO PACKERS!)

Tonight, I am torn.

You see, my two favorite NFL teams are the Browns and the Falcons.

As a Browns fan, I am bound by blood oath to hate the Steelers and everything they stand for, but the Packers eleminated the Falcons, so can I hope they both lose?

Also, did Jimmie Johnson just say that Rothlesberger has a lot of sex?







Oh he said "sacks."

Never mind.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Wraith11B on 06 Feb 2011, 20:02
Woot!  Pack!  And Comic!  I think I'm getting the first post-comic thing up too!  Firsts...

I think that we just need to get back into a regular roll.  Whatever happens, happens.  Also, Hanners is awesomely cute!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Dreyden on 06 Feb 2011, 20:18
Hope all you Packer fans are enjoying your moment!

The art was really well done here, you can see how into that thought process Hanners was. One of these days a guy will be able to match Hanners' neurosis and the lulz shall commence!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2011, 21:02
Quote from: Jeph
Tonight there was a really big football game that the Green Bay Packers won! This newspost will seem quaint and anachronistic after the machine overlords have enslaved humanity and outlawed "football" in five years.

Phhpbbbbttt. :P

If you didn't want me to use Hannelore in a Packers cap as an Avatar, you could have just sent me a message.

;)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 06 Feb 2011, 21:26
Hannelore's intent lean in panel 4 is adorable. And it's funny that rather than be flattered that he was flirting with her, she can shake it off. It shows that while she may still be oblivious, she's not as...whats a good word for it...easy to please? Like, I can see Marigold getting all flustered and stammering if someone even told her of second-hand flirtations.  :roll:


Afterthought: Wait a second, what is wrong with that dude?! Why run you fool?! The fact that it's Hannelore talking doesn't factor into this, but if I met a girl who could go off on such an intelligent tangent I would be head over heels! Ah, my weakness for intelligent women...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: emeraldbeacon on 06 Feb 2011, 21:27
I wonder what Hannellore would think about all that confetti being ejected onto the field at the end of the game... not that she'd do too well at a major sporting event, anyway, I would imagine.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: AngryCallCenterAgent on 06 Feb 2011, 21:34
Hannelore's really coming together, isn't she? I mean, I always thought she'd be wearing long sleeved shirts, and look at what she's wearing here. Say, is that a green bra?? :-o Gotta love all her expressions in this installment, still. Kudos with the art improvement skills, Jeph!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2011, 21:40
I wonder what Hannellore would think about all that confetti being ejected onto the field at the end of the game... not that she'd do too well at a major sporting event, anyway, I would imagine.

Are you kidding? 103k other people? She'd be hysterical before she even got to her seat!


...That's why she watches the games at home. On TV. Through her satellite link from her dad's station.

(Fixed due to AUS nerdiness ;) )
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 06 Feb 2011, 21:57
And it's funny that rather than be flattered that he was flirting with her, she can shake it off.
Personally, her reaction just made giggle "Way to go Hanners!". Why on earth would she, an intelligent young woman, be flattered by a clumsy, hackneyed line like that? As Hanners herself put it: "Well he wasn't very good at it!"

Through her satellite uplink from her dad's station.
That would be a downlink from. She uses her uplink for transmitting data (surveillance video, Winslow's backups, Marten's genetic profile etc.) to the station. Yes, data communication nerdery is part of my job, why do you ask?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sorflakne on 06 Feb 2011, 22:22
Ahh...there's the Hanners that's been sorely missing for the last several months [of real time].
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CompSarge on 06 Feb 2011, 22:52
Oh Hannelore, how I missed your intelligently oblivious tangents.  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Bastion on 06 Feb 2011, 23:38
What the fuck is hannelore staring at?Her eyes aren't focused on the dude.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Feb 2011, 00:00
And it's funny that rather than be flattered that he was flirting with her, she can shake it off.
Personally, her reaction just made giggle "Way to go Hanners!". Why on earth would she, an intelligent young woman, be flattered by a clumsy, hackneyed line like that? As Hanners herself put it: "Well he wasn't very good at it!"
Uh, actually he not too bad, as far as I can tell. For a normal woman, that might totally have worked. Was it his fault that Hanners has finer tastes ? He only lost because he didnt accepted the challenge.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 07 Feb 2011, 00:03
What the fuck is hannelore staring at?Her eyes aren't focused on the dude.
Of course not. She's focused on the ultimately subjective nature of sensory perception and its effects on that which we think of as objective reality. What's a dude with a plaid shirt and a lame line got to match that?
Also, I too am glad to see Hanners back as a mostly-contemporary of the Northhampton bunch; Hanners-as-everyone's-little-sister is uber-adorable, but she has some social-circle maintenance to do, and she needs to get sick of their shit ... in her usual catalytic, constructive way, of course.
... Man, that must have been some movie she and Marigold watched last night, hey?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Kugai on 07 Feb 2011, 00:32
That's shooting down a player with a Minigun.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 07 Feb 2011, 01:40
While we are waiting for the game to start and the comic to drop, I thought I would point out that Jeph has posted a collage of how Faye has changed over the years on his tumblr (http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/post/3096854264/inspired-by-some-other-folks-who-were-doing). I have to say, my personal preference in his artwork was during the 1400-1600 strips.

Agree, its not that i hate the current look.....I just like the old one a lot better


What the fuck is hannelore staring at?Her eyes aren't focused on the dude.

Yeah jeph kinda messed up on the direction of her right eye, but more importantly   what the fuck did jeph to do hanners hair?   1856 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1856)  vs  1855  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1855) or 1841 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1841)
She looks much better with very short hair


also, if we have hanners's hair to go by as a timeframe we just skipped ahead by a 9 months to a year.....

But hanners is improving, or maybe its because she was totally oblivious...  was a lot worse with the sjmdhmfgjhnrj


 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1753[1753[/url)
Dora's reaction seems odd, given that 100 strips ago Hanners and Cosette were being [url=http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1752]trained[/url] in Proposition Avoidance and Countermeasures...

Am I the only person who's never noticed the emoticon coffee cups before?

that was more to avoid really bad or awkward reactions from the both of them, not that they had to turn them down alltogether...

And yes, you are
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 07 Feb 2011, 02:16
I'm thinking that Hanner's "normal" hair is unkempt and just "as is." Today it looks like she brushed it, so it looks longer. She had the same look when she met Veronica in the hall.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 07 Feb 2011, 02:22
hmm your right, you cant tell she has that much hair behind hear ears normally though
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Feb 2011, 03:30
Yeah jeph kinda messed up on the direction of her right eye, but more importantly what the fuck did jeph to do hanners hair?

This is not an injunction to stop talking about it, but do keep in mind what Jeph wrote in the forums rules on this matter:

Nitpicking and/or placing way too much importance on minutiae while missing the big picture is probably Jeph's biggest pet peeve. Not every little detail is Fraught With Meaning. Sometimes the artist is just having fun. Maybe that character's clothing or hair changed simply because the artist got bored with drawing it the same way.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Feb 2011, 03:41
CoD back in the strip, Marten getting post-mumcalypse move on started, social circle returning to business as usual. But hold on, what's that on the horizon? Oh yes, it's Valentines Day. A quick run down the cast list suggests that there aren't any feasible potential romantic interludes that could be engineered in the space of a week so I'm wondering if Jeph is queing up some tasty, tasty awkwardness for us?

If so, will it be;
Marten & Dora
Marigold & Angus
Faye & Sven
Other?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 07 Feb 2011, 04:00
or maybe he will skip it altogether, since comic time doesnt really run sync with RL time

but if anything its gona be marten & dora, we already had marigold and angus (unless this week is all CoD and he is saving that theorized 'midnight itch' aftermath for next week), and faye&sven...meh cant see why    unless he has another 'he misses your body' type of encounter....which would be totally out of character

This is not an injunction to stop talking about it, but do keep in mind what Jeph wrote in the forums rules on this matter:


your right, damn that line is easy to cross..
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: sluthy on 07 Feb 2011, 04:06
Marten & Dora
Marigold & Angus
Faye & Sven

No, no and no. I predict nothing will happen for Valentine's Day. If anything, it won't be Marten or Dora (both still hurting). Maybe Faye and Angus might go on a Valentine's date but I suspect they'll just continue crawling along at their current rate.

Can't see Sven getting it on with anyone, no plausible single girls left in the story.

Maybe Marigold will feel sorry for herself all day, being all alone with Valentine's spam filling her inbox while Faye and Angus made love noises in the next room. Then just as her self-loathing and pity are peaking, Dale challenges her. Cue confrontation that results in furious battle/flirting.

That's the only love-based story arc I can see. But yeah, nothing is most likely.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Feb 2011, 04:11
Jeph has been doing QC for going on eight years now, and not once has there been an in continuity tie-in to any holiday.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: sluthy on 07 Feb 2011, 04:21
He did reference Thanksgiving (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=48) once, but yeah, apart from that any Xmas/NYE stuff was just candy.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 07 Feb 2011, 04:47
well the story kinda runs along the same date as we do now, if he ever wanted to pitch in valentines this would be a good time...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: carg1 on 07 Feb 2011, 05:15
Poor me.  I probably would've found the conversation interesting.  At that point: A) I end up getting pulled further down into madness and I'd be too polite to say so, so I'd have Hanners waiting for me with more than I can handle every time I get a coffee forever, or B) I somehow manage to wrangle a date out of it and end up back at A.  Its Hanners, though.  An acquired taste if there ever was one.  What I have to ask myself, from his position, is was it worth it?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Feb 2011, 05:45
well the story kinda runs along the same date as we do now, if he ever wanted to pitch in valentines this would be a good time...

That's probably wrong because it's been winter in QC for about two years now.

The time jump when Dora grew her hair out was mid winter, and we're just now getting to the point where ladies are forgetting their jackets.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Feb 2011, 06:02
Quote from: Jeph
Tonight there was a really big football game that the Green Bay Packers won! This newspost will seem quaint and anachronistic after the machine overlords have enslaved humanity and outlawed "football" in five years.

No risk of that - the overlords will recognize the "bread and circuses" required to keep us quiet.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tbones on 07 Feb 2011, 06:12
Quote from: Hanners
But doesn't that FREAK YOU OUT?

Moment of the week.

Of every week.

Forever.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2011, 06:55
Quote from: Jeph
Tonight there was a really big football game that the Green Bay Packers won! This newspost will seem quaint and anachronistic after the machine overlords have enslaved humanity and outlawed "football" in five years.

No risk of that - the overlords will recognize the "bread and circuses" required to keep us quiet.

That or hooking us up as giant batteries...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Feb 2011, 07:34
Nah, when the computers decide to do that IRL they won't be stupid enough to ignore much better sources of power. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 07 Feb 2011, 08:43
Quote from: Jeph
Tonight there was a really big football game that the Green Bay Packers won! This newspost will seem quaint and anachronistic after the machine overlords have enslaved humanity and outlawed "football" in five years.

Phhpbbbbttt. :P

If you didn't want me to use Hannelore in a Packers cap as an Avatar, you could have just sent me a message.

;)
Meh. Hanners wearing a Cheesehead, now ... Comedy gold, lemme tell ya. With a side of D'awwww.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: maddness on 07 Feb 2011, 08:44

Can't see Sven getting it on with anyone, no plausible single girls left in the story.



He starts dating the Secret Bakery version of Faye without consciously noticing the similarities until one day it suddenly hits him and he goes in to a downward spiral that concludes with Angus in a pit of lime and Faye bricked in his basement.  :-o



I may have been watching too many weird movies lately ...  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Feb 2011, 08:46
You need help.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Feb 2011, 08:48
How much lime do you need?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: StevenC on 07 Feb 2011, 09:32
That's shooting down a player with a Minigun.

I am now imagining Hanners as the Heavy from TF2. "What's that coffee? Kill them all? Good idea!"
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Feb 2011, 09:39
"What's that, coffee? Kill them all? Good idea!"

Now that's  coffee talk!!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pendrake on 07 Feb 2011, 09:44
For comic #1856...

1. I do not think the Robot Overlords would outlaw american football, I think they would just start fielding their own teams :wink: .  ("Welcome to Super Bowl LIX!  Today the San Francisco SkyNets will be going up against the Denver Broncos for the championship after winning over the Miami Matrixes...")

2. As always, Hannelore is good for a funny, even when she herself is not trying to be funny &/or CoD-barista-sarcastic.  Panel #4 definitely had me chuckling.

3. It would be "interesting" to see if there will be a CoD regular patron who comes in because he likes Hannelore despite, or because of, her quirks.  What kind of boy would be "Angus" to Hannelore's "Faye"...?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2011, 09:59
I liked it because it was more than just Hannelore thinking about philosophy and science.

She has ample reason from her own life to reflect on how brain chemistry threatens one's faith in objective reality, even without her hallucinations.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2011, 12:45
The BIG question of the week:

How will the Faye/Angus sleepover turn out?    - 17 (23.3%)
Will Hanners actually be able to watch the movie?    - 1 (1.4%)
Is Dora finally going to go to therapy?    - 16 (21.9%)
Will Sven actually finish reading his book?    - 5 (6.8%)
How are Cosette and Steve doing?    - 1 (1.4%)
Will Pintsize actually start being more sympathetic?    - 0 (0%)
Will Tai find love in the library stacks?    - 3 (4.1%)
What about the Secret Bakery people?    - 22 (30.1%)
Will there be waffles?    - 8 (11%)

Total Voters: 73
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Feb 2011, 12:59
Waffles are on the decline then.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2011, 13:00
Waffles are on the decline then.

There is no country for old waffles.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tomart on 07 Feb 2011, 13:02
if I met a girl who could go off on such an intelligent tangent I would be head over heels! Ah, my weakness for intelligent women...

Word!   She had me at:  

"...the chemicals in your head are LYING TO YOU!  You can't count on your own brain to present an objective view of reality!"

I'm in love.  (Or are my chemicals lying to me?)

My brain releases more happy-chemicals in proximity to Hannelore, coloring my perception of QC.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: soonerdog on 07 Feb 2011, 13:11
We've seen Hanners react like this to a compliment before...
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1762 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1762)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Kugai on 07 Feb 2011, 14:30
Hannelore Elcotte-Chatham

Faye Whittaker

Dora Bianchi




The Coffeenator
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2011, 14:40
Or Caffeinatrix (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=698).
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Somebody on 07 Feb 2011, 16:33
well the story kinda runs along the same date as we do now, if he ever wanted to pitch in valentines this would be a good time...

That's probably wrong because it's been winter in QC for about two years now.
"It's something like late-winter/early-spring in QC time" right now, per #1844 newspost (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1844). Mid-February would be about right.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: bicostp on 07 Feb 2011, 18:40
I wish mid-February in New England was "early-spring". :| It's probably around late March or early April.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 07 Feb 2011, 18:45
OK, Hanners, lemme give it a shot, here.
See, since the enjoyment of coffee or anything else is a subjective thing,  objectivity doesn't enter into it. So my brain isn't lying to me (this time, anyway) ... it's all part of the subjective experience of the coffee. In fact (Real World switch), your Intense Face in panel 4 triggered some happy chemicals in my brain, making my cup of convenience-store, push-button cheap-o-cino taste better.
Now (back in QC-world): Since a good bit of what made me enjoy this coffee is stuff I brought myself, in my very own brain, tell your boss over there I want a dollar off.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Feb 2011, 19:00
Yeah, doesn't work that way.

The $4.50 is for the flavorful oleoresins suspended in hot sugar syrup.

How you experience the consumption of said product is your business.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: knucklesandgyros on 07 Feb 2011, 21:45
Coffee Baristas by day...Kung Fu Rival Gangs by night? I smell a sitcom!

I also notice that Faye's hair looks a little longer than usual. Has there been a time skip or just another shift in the artistic evolution of this comic?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Torlek on 07 Feb 2011, 21:49
So, PseuDora is Indian in descent. I thought she looked as much. So I guess that only leaves faye-tai as Angus's ex and Marten needing to hook up with Padma and we shall have complete mirroring. Then Northampton will be swallowed by the singularity that opens between CoD and TSB. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Feb 2011, 21:51
When did QC turn into 'Kill Bill'?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Feb 2011, 21:58
Kill Bill, or Scott Pilgrim? 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Feb 2011, 22:08
Haven't read or seen Scott Pilgrim.







 *ducks* :psyduck:
I'm probably going to catch a lot of crap admitting that here. I should probably just delete my account now...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Feb 2011, 22:13
Angus:  "Oh,, sorry, I forgot to mention, you'll have to kill the other baristas I've dated."
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: ysth on 07 Feb 2011, 22:14
So what's the Secret Bakery analogue of Faye's "sculpture"?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 07 Feb 2011, 22:16
Agreeing with a lot of other people: I like Faye's longer hair! Here's hoping it's showing a time skip, because I'd like to see Marten on the tail end of his funk. SMILE BOY.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: ndperfesser on 07 Feb 2011, 22:20
When did QC turn into 'Kill Bill'?
Somewhere around here. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=745)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2011, 22:21
What will the Pugnacious Peach do when she finds out that Marten went to the Secret Bakery and liked it?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: songblade on 07 Feb 2011, 22:25
Kill Bill, or Scott Pilgrim? 
I thought "Man, too much Scott Pilgrim for Jeph" too.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: horsefish on 07 Feb 2011, 22:31
speed lines  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721) make everything better (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpeedStripes)

So, are they defending the honor of their respective coffeeshops, or are they just sizing each other up?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: AngryCallCenterAgent on 07 Feb 2011, 22:34
Now that she's been introduced properly... "HERE COMES A NEW CHALLENGER!" or if you prefer: "IIITTTSSS... TTTIIIMMMEEE!!! For the main event of the evening! Three rounds! In the Variable Geo Championship's international division! Introducing first: FIGHTING OUT OF THE COFFEE OF DOOOOOM!..."
'though I referenced BG, get your heads out of the gutter, this international division's likely headed by Dana White, still, so no post-fight shenanigans. Even if it is apt for Faye to run around the ring giving the jam-packed stadium the middle finger and telling everyone she'll drink from CoD and not Bud Light because Bud Light won't pay her nothin'.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: bicostp on 07 Feb 2011, 22:38
So what's the Secret Bakery analogue of Faye's "sculpture"?

A triceratops percolator?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Torlek on 07 Feb 2011, 22:42
So what's the Secret Bakery analogue of Faye's "sculpture"?

A triceratops percolator?
I was thinking stegosaurus coffee grinder.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: musicalsoul on 07 Feb 2011, 22:51
Did anyone else notice that Hannelore's hair was also longer in yesterday's strip. Anyway, I'm liking Faye's slightly longer hair. It looks good :-]

And just because I can:  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Feb 2011, 22:56
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should...

 :-D

speed lines  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721) make everything better (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpeedStripes)

Yes, they do! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: PenguinNinja1408 on 07 Feb 2011, 22:57
I was going through some of the more recent comics in random and found this.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363)

Does anyone else think this refers to Padma?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Feb 2011, 23:00
If this goes any further I'm going to have to start queueing up the Golden Harvest theme music before opeing each strip.

Brilliant.

Although I did laugh out loud and now my girlfriend is awake and would like to know why I'm an idiot.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CompSarge on 07 Feb 2011, 23:15
Yay! More Secret Bakery shenanigans!  :lol: This is going to turn into a very entertaining arc.





And, because I'm playing Pokemon as I type this:  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Feb 2011, 23:16
Hmm, could this secret bakery girl be Angus' ex?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 07 Feb 2011, 23:19
I was going through some of the more recent comics in random and found this.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363)

Does anyone else think this refers to Padma?

Angus seems a bit too pleased to see Padma for her to be his ex. Your link shows that it was a very sour relationship that ended badly. MAYBE it's the other coffeeshop girl, but I sincerely doubt it.

(am I the only one who misses Cossette's roomate? She was fun for the three comics she was in... :| )
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CEOIII on 07 Feb 2011, 23:22
Um............we're taking swings at people in the street for no reason now?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Feb 2011, 23:29
Oh, QC has Padme now.

Very Star Wars-y.

(I'm planning to play Star Wars: The Old Republic so I'm phrone to noticing such things)



(am I the only one who misses Cossette's roomate? She was fun for the three comics she was in... :| )
Cosette has a roomy ?

And I blame the Allosaurus.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 07 Feb 2011, 23:39
I think Padma and Faye just recognized each other as Alpha Baristae; naturally, a deathmatch was in order. Or it's part of Faye's natural mate-protecting routine, but she wasn't expecting the Incendiary Indian there to match her Peachly skills.

(Also, this (http://homestuck.bandcamp.com/track/showtime-original-mix) started playing in my head the minute I saw the fight panels. Which were really well done! Bravo Jeph.)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 08 Feb 2011, 00:00
You better not let Dora catch you calling Faye the alpha Barista.


Faye's just the alpha-bitch (can't find the comic where Penelope calls Faye that. Sorry.)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 08 Feb 2011, 00:09
Oh, QC has Padme now.

Very Star Wars-y.

(I'm planning to play Star Wars: The Old Republic so I'm phrone to noticing such things)


Yeah and the guys are called obi and anakin, second girl would be.......oh wait.....there is never more then one female character (with more then a minute of screentime) in any star wars trilogie, leia then


And dont mention TOR during weekdays, i try to refrain from obsessing about it till fridays, at least then there is usually some news on the site




ontopic:

The plot thickens, give a barista bitch-off
A competetive event to still the rivalry and bestow the title of best coffeeshop/drama factory in town :D
If COD loses we get a shift from the main hangout to TSB

This is a lot like when marten challenged angus to a slapfight at the start of their date, a test of resolve and hilarity ensues..

Hmm, could this secret bakery girl be Angus' ex?

I strongly doubt this is angus's ex, just look at him
No strong feeling at all, with the bad breakup and all you'd expect to see something different
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: cesariojpn on 08 Feb 2011, 00:13
Video game release yes please?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Tetrinity on 08 Feb 2011, 00:34
Very well done fight scenes, I must say... I'm enjoying this week of comics a lot, it's nice to get back into the full flow of signature QC humour after the past few months. :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: SJCrew on 08 Feb 2011, 01:28
That black chick is all kinds of sexy. I notice the detail in the hair too, as well as the increase in Faye's length (lovin' that too). Jeph put in work on today's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Delator on 08 Feb 2011, 01:39
Um............we're taking swings at people in the street for no reason now?

That was basically my reaction...

...and apparently Angus' as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: cesariojpn on 08 Feb 2011, 02:13
(am I the only one who misses Cossette's roomate? She was fun for the three comics she was in... :| )
Cosette has a roomy ?

Luna (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1546), though she describes her as a friend rather than a roommate.

I thought Cossette's roomy was Riker? (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1552)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Loki on 08 Feb 2011, 02:38
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should...

 :-D

speed lines  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721) make everything better (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpeedStripes)

Yes, they do! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485)

For the sake of completing the list, there was also this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1731).

Also, yay for comic. It made me laugh out loud for two minutes straight :D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 08 Feb 2011, 03:21
Um............we're taking swings at people in the street for no reason now?
No reason ? NO REASON ?

Its Secret Bakery vs Coffee of Doom !

This IS SERIOUS ! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2011, 03:31
Angus:  "Oh,, sorry, I forgot to mention, you'll have to kill the other baristas I've dated."

(groan, facepalm, laugh)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2011, 03:39
So, PseuDora is Indian in descent. I thought she looked as much. So I guess that only leaves faye-tai as Angus's ex and Marten needing to hook up with Padma and we shall have complete mirroring. Then Northampton will be swallowed by the singularity that opens between CoD and TSB. :psyduck:
Angus:  "Oh,, sorry, I forgot to mention, you'll have to kill the other baristas I've dated."
I was going through some of the more recent comics in random and found this.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1363)

Does anyone else think this refers to Padma?
Hmm, could this secret bakery girl be Angus' ex?
Angus seems a bit too pleased to see Padma for her to be his ex. Your link shows that it was a very sour relationship that ended badly. MAYBE it's the other coffeeshop girl, but I sincerely doubt it.

Gee, we're all thinking the same thing, aren't we?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2011, 03:44
What else affects the taste of your coffee?

The Beans.    - 4 (7.8%)
The Barista.    - 3 (5.9%)
The Milk.    - 4 (7.8%)
The Sugar/Sweetner.    - 3 (5.9%)
The Water.    - 2 (3.9%)
The Dopamine in your head.    - 3 (5.9%)
The Psychology behind it.    - 0 (0%)
The AnthroPC serving it to you    - 2 (3.9%)
The Emoticon on your mug.    - 15 (29.4%)
The Waffles.    - 15 (29.4%)


Total Voters: 51
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 08 Feb 2011, 03:46
Gee, we're all thinking the same thing, aren't we?

great minds think alike?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 08 Feb 2011, 03:49
The Emoticon on your mug.    - 15 (29.4%)
The Waffles.    - 15 (29.4%)



This is inspiring me to two inventions.

a) the waffle emoticon (#) - This might need a bit more work.
b) the emoticon waffle - This will need a lot more work.

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 08 Feb 2011, 03:57
: (#) "Om, nom, nom"
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 08 Feb 2011, 04:07
(>'_')>#   better?

  ▲
▲ ▲
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2011, 04:13

I prefer simplicity. (#)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2011, 04:36
That's the eggo emoticon...

Gee, we're all thinking the same thing, aren't we?

great minds think alike?

...and so do ours...

 :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 08 Feb 2011, 05:13
That's the eggo emoticon...


great minds think alike?

...and so do ours...

 :laugh:

:|
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 08 Feb 2011, 05:30
Um............we're taking swings at people in the street for no reason now?

That was basically my reaction...

...and apparently Angus' as well.

Mine was, "Why did Padma strike first?"
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 08 Feb 2011, 05:51
Mine was, "Why did Padma strike first?"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Feb 2011, 05:54
I think Angus' ex may have made them go to the Secret Bakery after the snail incident, hence how he knows Padma. Maybe the fight is more tSB believes CoD stole one of their favourite customers (and I mean, come on, who doesn't like Angus? Besides his ex, that is.)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2011, 05:57
That's the eggo emoticon...

Okay; maybe it's just that I prefer Belgian Waffles.

Let's try this:  [##]

Mine was, "Why did Padma strike first?"

You are VERY lucky I wasn't drinking something when I read that.

I think Angus' ex may have made them go to the Secret Bakery after the snail incident, hence how he knows Padma. Maybe the fight is more tSB believes CoD stole one of their favourite customers (and I mean, come on, who doesn't like Angus? Besides his ex, that is.)

They didn't "steal" one of their customers. Angus had actually been around for some time prior (I personally believe that he started coming in all the way back at strip 375 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=375).
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tbones on 08 Feb 2011, 06:14
I wonder why Angus took her to The Secret Bakery (TSB?)

I wonder why Angus introduce Faye as if she was a counter-part of Padma



I wonder when we are going to see Dora in therapy!!!! :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: carg1 on 08 Feb 2011, 06:19
I'm not really all that ashamed to say that I'd be kinda aroused if I was in Angus's position there.  Not into girl fights at all (injuries are not hot), but there's just something about a woman that can deftly defend herself.  Yessir.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Feb 2011, 06:54
I think Angus' ex may have made them go to the Secret Bakery after the snail incident, hence how he knows Padma. Maybe the fight is more tSB believes CoD stole one of their favourite customers (and I mean, come on, who doesn't like Angus? Besides his ex, that is.)

They didn't "steal" one of their customers. Angus had actually been around for some time prior (I personally believe that he started coming in all the way back at strip 375 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=375).

But they don't know that.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: maketehkisses on 08 Feb 2011, 07:22
It might just be me, but I looked at it more as when Angus showed up to take Faye out on their first date and he and Marten had their play fight--Angus "proving his worth". But because it's Faye and Padma, it was more of a realistic looking fight.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1731 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1731)

Just another theory.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: slydon on 08 Feb 2011, 07:29
This one confuses me.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Black Sword on 08 Feb 2011, 07:47
That black chick is all kinds of sexy. I notice the detail in the hair too, as well as the increase in Faye's length (lovin' that too). Jeph put in work on today's comic.

Her name is Padma. Her ethnic origin is the Indian subcontinent.

You know, this is just gonna be me, but if she does become a regular, I'd like to watch her go throughthe ABCD/FOB things that such a girl typically has identity crises about. (American Born Confused Desi and Fresh Off the Boat)

I think it'd it be interesting to watch JJ handle something different and more based on cultural clashes that happen within those people, rather than the continued handling of psychological and low self-esteem issues.

ADDENDUM: On the topic of people I'd like to see more of... http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1402 the redhead!

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tbones on 08 Feb 2011, 08:40
ADDENDUM: On the topic of people I'd like to see more of... http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1402 the redhead!

So, i'm guessing she was propositioned for a threesome in The Secret Bakery?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2011, 08:52
Nah, probably at Vladek's. 

"Wife and I t'ink you very sexy..."
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2011, 11:52
Off topic (maybe); 

Does anyone else think of The Secret Garden (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Garden) whenever they hear/see The Secret Bakery? 

It's one of my wife's favorite books, and my daughter was in the musical version at the age of 5, as a "ghost child" (I ran the trapdoor and fog machines...)  Since the story begins in India, maybe there's meant to be a connection? 

Edit: Wikipedia removed the synopsis since it seemed to be copied from here (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-Garden-ORIGINAL-VERSION-PUBLISHED/dp/B003LSSI66). 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2011, 12:18
Faye's just the alpha-bitch (can't find the comic where Penelope calls Faye that. Sorry.)
953. It's not in ohnorobot, had to check the wiki.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: PersianParadox on 08 Feb 2011, 15:01
Has Faye lost weight? She looks like she has in today's strip.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 08 Feb 2011, 16:57
Has Faye lost weight? She looks like she has in today's strip.

The sheer intensity of their makeouts burn 2,500 calories per second per second squared. 

Ludicrous physics aside...   Being emotionally well off (happy/not miserable) has been linked to the weight gain/loss cycle in some people.     Maybe Faye is working that.

OR it could be Jeph just drew her this way.   ;)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2011, 18:08
Has Faye lost weight? She looks like she has in today's strip.

The butt pimple burst.  Inches were lost off her butt, not to mention a few pounds of pus. 

Fortunately, it happened later, and Angus wasn't in the line of fire. 

Seriously, though - Jeph's damn good, but he's notoriously inconsistant in his body dimensions.  People inflate/deflate in the strangest ways, but never by extreme amounts, certainly not enough to make them look all that different.  I recall several complaints comments just over a year ago when Marten suddenly looked beefier in a strip or two, and then went back to his old skinny self. 

But yeah, lets let happiness explain it. 

'cause she is, you know.  Always at her happiest when throwing punches!   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2011, 18:49
We could also figure that the working out is paying off.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 08 Feb 2011, 18:51
I always figured that her scar faded/returned as a metaphor for her current emotional status.   You know deep profound subtext by a master artist who is the best damn webcomic ARTIST (nee, GOD) out there.


...but then Jeph said he simply forgets to draw it sometimes.      POOF goes the illusion.   :D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: billydaking on 08 Feb 2011, 18:55
Padma is supposed to be Dora's doppleganger, right? Surprised nobody jumped on the light symbolism there...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: SJCrew on 08 Feb 2011, 20:11
Quote
Her name is Padma. Her ethnic origin is the Indian subcontinent.
That was my second guess, and I had an honest feeling she was, but it's a comic and you really couldn't go wrong with 'black'.

Still, Jeph did a really good job drawing her, and I hope she shows up more often. A nicer, cuter version of Faye would seem to be a nice fit for her.

Quote
Seriously, though - Jeph's damn good, but he's notoriously inconsistant in his body dimensions.  People inflate/deflate in the strangest ways, but never by extreme amounts, certainly not enough to make them look all that different.  I recall several complaints comments just over a year ago when Marten suddenly looked beefier in a strip or two, and then went back to his old skinny self.
I've noticed this mostly with Faye. I can't remember which strip it was and I certainly can't find it, but she was wearing a yellow shirt in one strip and I could tell right away it was an art goof because it seems like she lost at least 50 pounds. But in later strips, she turns into kind of a porker. I'd be fine if he kept designing Faye the way she currently is.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: horsefish on 08 Feb 2011, 20:35
speed lines  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721) make everything better (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SpeedStripes)

Yes, they do! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485)

For the sake of completing the list, there was also this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1731).

Also, yay for comic. It made me laugh out loud for two minutes straight :D

I knew there were others -- but I couldn't find them.  Thanks!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2011, 22:24
love  the beads of sweat in the first panel, but they shouldn't have disappeared so quickly... [/nitpicking]

So, negotiations begin! 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 08 Feb 2011, 22:26
The Secret Bakery becomes pastry supplier to CoD.
Marten gets part-time gig as a baked-goods runner.
Hanners announces this post is a butt and I am also a butt
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CEOIII on 08 Feb 2011, 22:36
So, they're fighting for no reason.........then they just stop fighting for no reason.

Speaking as someone that never has and never will see Scott Pilgrim, should I just bail until this story is over?

And to think I wasted a perfectly cool name on this woman.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: SJCrew on 08 Feb 2011, 23:09
I'm starting to notice that while the hair is becoming fine and detailed, it doesn't really fit with the rest of the art. Jeph's going to have to make considerable improvements on both the wardrobe and other details to match its quality.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Kugai on 08 Feb 2011, 23:10
Southern Style Punch-Fu

Kiya ya'all   :-D


Well, now we know where CoD gets it's Pastry's from.

But is The Secret Bakery about to become their new supplier?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 08 Feb 2011, 23:50
So, they're fighting for no reason.........then they just stop fighting for no reason.

Why so literal?  It's a bit of good-natured joshing, expressing their rivalry in a natural enough way for a comic.

Quote
Speaking as someone that never has and never will see Scott Pilgrim, should I just bail until this story is over?

It has nothing whatsoever to do with Scott Pilgrim; unless you take the rather pointless view that all cartoons with any kind of fight in ever are related.

But do read Scott Pilgrim (the books are better than the film; although that's good fun, it's disappointing in comparison to the books).
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 09 Feb 2011, 00:00
I'm starting to notice that while the hair is becoming fine and detailed, it doesn't really fit with the rest of the art. Jeph's going to have to make considerable improvements on both the wardrobe and other details to match its quality.

the hair is actually just a single colour and for the details he scratches it with what looks like a rake tool or something (i dont know jack about photoshop, so dont ask me what it is)
It does look stunningly good compared to the amount of time it takes to make, if jeph had to do that for the clothes it would either take ages or he's gotta figure a neat trick for it too  (the first comic he did this technique is 1659 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1659) btw)


and about todays comic:

Jeph works in misterious ways...what the hell is he setting up with TSB here, the whole spontanious sparring match and now their striking up a converstation about work :S?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 09 Feb 2011, 00:01
So the implication I'm getting is that all Baristas are trained in some form of martial arts. Interesting  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Feb 2011, 00:08
It's a backup career option: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1217
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 09 Feb 2011, 00:11
It's a backup career option: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1217

Fixed the link
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: cloudkai on 09 Feb 2011, 01:50
Is that sweet-tits I see in the background?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Feb 2011, 02:13
I don't think so, though it's not impossible; I notice she appears to be wearing an apron, so perhaps she's from another  coffee shop? 

Actually, I suspect she's one of the occasional cameos that Jeph includes, but I've no idea of whom.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 09 Feb 2011, 03:04
You know, this is just gonna be me, but if she does become a regular, I'd like to watch her go through the ABCD/FOB things that such a girl typically has identity crises about. (American Born Confused Desi and Fresh Off the Boat). I think it'd it be interesting to watch JJ handle something different and more based on cultural clashes that happen within those people, rather than the continued handling of psychological and low self-esteem issues.
Are you an immigrant, or a member of an ethnic minority where you live? I am both, but I'm guessing you are not since you use the charming term "those people" :?,  so with what authority exactly do you pronounce on what is "typical"? I am quite certain that Jeph has the good taste, and good sense, not to make jokes about an experience he doesn't share, based on second-hand stereotypes of minority/immigrant.

I wonder how Padma knows about the "oven explosion of '98", or what Ed was like before it? That is fourteen years ago, so assuming she's another twenty-something, she'd have been maybe fifteen years old at the most. Was it some kind of legend locally?



Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 09 Feb 2011, 03:15
Agree with other posters. Padma is angling for a deal with CoD to become their pastry supplier. But surely she knows that Dora is the one calling the shots?

Anyway it seems to me that:

We may eventually have a showdown between Dora and Padma (= the famous Northampton Coffee Party that will be in the history books two generations down the road). They can probably also peacefully coexist. An additional plus is that Jeph can then use the same pastry tray drawings at both shops without nitpicking complaints, if Dora accepts this business proposal.

A distant possibility is that Padma may be trying to recruit Faye to add some spice sass to tSB menu. I can't see Faye accepting, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 09 Feb 2011, 03:18

I wonder how Padma knows about the "oven explosion of '98", or what Ed was like before it? That is fourteen years ago, so assuming she's another twenty-something, she'd have been maybe fifteen years old at the most. Was it some kind of legend locally?



Maybe The Secret Bakery is a family business and was run by her parents before her, and they've been doing business with Ed for thirty years. In fact, Ed is such a close family friend he's practically her godfather. Or something.



Also, and this is of no relevance whatsoever, I don't really care for Faye's new hair. She doesn't look like Faye, but rather a slightly pudgier Sweet-tits with brown hair and glasses.

I just miss Faye's ears.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 09 Feb 2011, 03:30
Quote

I wonder how Padma knows about the "oven explosion of '98", or what Ed was like before it? That is fourteen years ago, so assuming she's another twenty-something, she'd have been maybe fifteen years old at the most. Was it some kind of legend locally?





I recall a mill explosion and fire back in the late 70s...  I wasn't more than 5 or 6.     So memory works.  People remember stuff.    That's how it works.



On the other hand,   maybe she did her baking apprenticeship with Ed, and was there when the explosion happened. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: irlurkur on 09 Feb 2011, 04:44
I didn't see anyone say something before but isn't that sweet-tits in the first panel?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Feb 2011, 04:47
Someone did, and no, it isn't.  

Also, to Skewbrow; I'm not sure of the term outside the US, but here a cafeteria is an assembly-line style restaurant, food on steam tables, get a trayful, find your seat, bus your own tray.  We'd call CoD a cafe.  Or to most people, just a coffee shop. 

Gah, I sound snarky.  Sorry...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 09 Feb 2011, 05:14
S'alright man, its early.  and the GOM need to be grumpy about something, and with all the snow, there's no one on our lawns!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 09 Feb 2011, 05:18

Also, to Skewbrow; I'm not sure of the term outside the US, but here a cafeteria is an assembly-line style restaurant, food on steam tables, get a trayful, find your seat, bus your own tray.  We'd call CoD a cafe.  Or to most people, just a coffee shop.  

Gah, I sound snarky.  Sorry...

Not snarky at all. On the contrary. I was uncertain about the correct term myself. And could (should) have looked it up. I will never turn down a free(?) lesson in English. Lessons containing public (good natured) humiliation are even better, because those tend to stick. IOW: you are too kind  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Black Sword on 09 Feb 2011, 10:29
You know, this is just gonna be me, but if she does become a regular, I'd like to watch her go through the ABCD/FOB things that such a girl typically has identity crises about. (American Born Confused Desi and Fresh Off the Boat). I think it'd it be interesting to watch JJ handle something different and more based on cultural clashes that happen within those people, rather than the continued handling of psychological and low self-esteem issues.
Are you an immigrant, or a member of an ethnic minority where you live? I am both, but I'm guessing you are not since you use the charming term "those people" :?,  so with what authority exactly do you pronounce on what is "typical"? I am quite certain that Jeph has the good taste, and good sense, not to make jokes about an experience he doesn't share, based on second-hand stereotypes of minority/immigrant.

I wonder how Padma knows about the "oven explosion of '98", or what Ed was like before it? That is fourteen years ago, so assuming she's another twenty-something, she'd have been maybe fifteen years old at the most. Was it some kind of legend locally?


I'm the son of immigrants and a Colombian, so yes, I'm a minority. I say "those people" because while I'm obviously not one of them, it's also grammatically correct and accurately captures that it is a distinct group of people being discussed. Would you prefer "them people" or are you going to get into an argument about connotation? If you've decided to read "those people" as racist or a put down, that's unfortunate, friend, since I focus on the catholic definition of words.

Your charming aside aside, minorities are not cut of the same cloth; the Indian experience in the US differs from the Colombian experience, despite overt similarities, and given the sheer number of their ethnic groups, it varies within their ranks as well. The authority I say it with is because I was inundated in their culture for four years while dating my ex, a Gujrati girl, and as hip 20-somethings, they openly attached ABCD and FOB to the correctly identified persons. They also wondered amongst themselves as to their exact identity, given they were expected to be good Indian girls yet good American girls as well, a state of being that made some of them wonder that despite their completely Indian makeup and bloodline, if they themselves were not actually "half-breeds." And I say typical because direct observation as well as what they told me themselves revealed that the vast majority of them suffer that issue, and react to it in different ways, but all of them are caught in a net of "melting pot" that contradicts and confuses them. Some mild research on the manner indicates I'm not the only one to notice this. So firsthand observation, and firsthand, or "primary" sources. No stereotypes. If I wanted stereotypes, I'd say something about curry and bad smells.

I'm likely being very caustic, so I do apologize for that, but I would like to add you should note I said "explore." I did not say he should treat the subject manner lightly, but to handle it with the same care he handled Mr. Whitaker's suicide and the scars it inflicted on Faye. I don't know Jeph well, but I don't believe I've heard of him having to survive such an experience himself. Jeph's a good writer, and fully able to conduct in-depth research to accomplish a story or arc, and my wish is based on his obvious writing ability and a desire to see him explore something non-psychological issue related.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Cybit on 09 Feb 2011, 11:32
As an ABCD (not really, but Indian immigrant parents, but born in the US and definitely raised as an American due to being born in the middle of the Midwest), Black Sword speaks the truth. :D  It can be confusing, and that's something I think almost all children of immigrants face. 

Eh, it could be something they could get into should Padma ever start dating one of the members (for instance, Marten), and bouncing the absolutely hysterical culture clash that could occur if Marten's mother ever met the stereotypical Indian family.  But, either way, it's cool that there's an indian in the strip now.  Represent? :D 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Black Sword on 09 Feb 2011, 11:51
As an ABCD (not really, but Indian immigrant parents, but born in the US and definitely raised as an American due to being born in the middle of the Midwest), Black Sword speaks the truth. :D  It can be confusing, and that's something I think almost all children of immigrants face. 

Eh, it could be something they could get into should Padma ever start dating one of the members (for instance, Marten), and bouncing the absolutely hysterical culture clash that could occur if Marten's mother ever met the stereotypical Indian family.  But, either way, it's cool that there's an indian in the strip now.  Represent? :D 

I have no idea why, but I just took a liking to Cybit for no reason. Probably because he registered here on my birthday. Broski? *offers fist pound*
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 09 Feb 2011, 12:12

Eh, it could be something they could get into should Padma ever start dating one of the members (for instance, Marten), and bouncing the absolutely hysterical culture clash that could occur if Marten's mother ever met the stereotypical Indian family.  But, either way, it's cool that there's an indian in the strip now.  Represent? :D 

Yes please, that would be even better the veronica and sven meet
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tbones on 09 Feb 2011, 12:17
Nice comic but now i really want to know Padma's fighting style....
That chop looked really karate-ish, but when she avoids Faye's punch, the way she stands looks more like ninjitsu....

*EDIT*
Forgot to add the psyduck
 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 09 Feb 2011, 12:37
S'alright man, its early.  and the GOM need to be grumpy about something, and with all the snow, there's no one on our lawns!
Well, no-one except the snowmen. Never trusted them - all over the place in January but then you turn your back for a minute and they've up and disappeared! Now where do you suppose they go all year, eh?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 09 Feb 2011, 12:41
Ask any Canadian, we know (except for the folks from Vancouver and Victoria).  They're being interrogated in prep for the upcoming invasion  giving us all the information we need in exchange for a ride in the zamboni.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Feb 2011, 13:54
One of them froze Winslow. Very suspicious. Hannelore should add them to a list.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 09 Feb 2011, 14:12
The authority I say it with is because I was inundated in their culture for four years while dating my ex, a Gujrati girl, and as hip 20-somethings, they openly attached ABCD and FOB to the correctly identified persons. They also wondered amongst themselves as to their exact identity, given they were expected to be good Indian girls yet good American girls as well, a state of being that made some of them wonder that despite their completely Indian makeup and bloodline, if they themselves were not actually "half-breeds." And I say typical because direct observation as well as what they told me themselves revealed that the vast majority of them suffer that issue, and react to it in different ways, but all of them are caught in a net of "melting pot" that contradicts and confuses them.
Sure, I have confused feelings about my Chinese and Australian "selves" too, but there is a huge difference between members of a minority saying things about themselves, and having it said about them by non-members. You can't understand what growing up and living as a member of an ethnic and cultural minority is like by "doing research" at second hand, and it's pretty offensive (IMHO) for anyone who hasn't shared the often-unpleasant experience to make jokes about it.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: brew on 09 Feb 2011, 15:13

there is a huge difference between members of a minority saying things about themselves, and having it said about them by non-members. You can't understand what growing up and living as a member of an ethnic and cultural minority is like by "doing research" at second hand, and it's pretty offensive (IMHO) for anyone who hasn't shared the often-unpleasant experience to make jokes about it.

What about writing about someone losing a parent to suicide?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Feb 2011, 16:56
Your opinion of Padma?

The name fits her.    - 14 (13.5%)
I thought she was more of a "Tasha".    - 7 (6.7%)
So, is she Angus' ex or something?    - 9 (8.7%)
Those cakes she makes are really great!    - 4 (3.8%)
Meh, I preferred PseuDora.    - 4 (3.8%)
Good looking AND she knows kung fu.    - 30 (28.8%)
No, I think that's more Tai Chi.    - 3 (2.9%)
QC: now into MMA!    - 9 (8.7%)
What would happen if she ran into Dora?    - 12 (11.5%)
I want my Pintsize fix!    - 1 (1%)
Wonder if she makes waffles. [##] (#)    - 11 (10.6%)

Total Voters: 104
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Black Sword on 09 Feb 2011, 20:14
The authority I say it with is because I was inundated in their culture for four years while dating my ex, a Gujrati girl, and as hip 20-somethings, they openly attached ABCD and FOB to the correctly identified persons. They also wondered amongst themselves as to their exact identity, given they were expected to be good Indian girls yet good American girls as well, a state of being that made some of them wonder that despite their completely Indian makeup and bloodline, if they themselves were not actually "half-breeds." And I say typical because direct observation as well as what they told me themselves revealed that the vast majority of them suffer that issue, and react to it in different ways, but all of them are caught in a net of "melting pot" that contradicts and confuses them.
Sure, I have confused feelings about my Chinese and Australian "selves" too, but there is a huge difference between members of a minority saying things about themselves, and having it said about them by non-members. You can't understand what growing up and living as a member of an ethnic and cultural minority is like by "doing research" at second hand, and it's pretty offensive (IMHO) for anyone who hasn't shared the often-unpleasant experience to make jokes about it.

Should I have put in bold that I'm Colombian? That I am a cultural and ethnic minority where I live, more so because the vast majority of Hispanics in the US are Mexican, which is very much culturally different from my own heritage? Should I have added that my first language was Spanish and I didn't learn English until I was six years old? Should I add that I do not feel any particular connection to the American culture I am surrounded with and identify first and foremost with my Colombian heritage? Should I add that my ex is now my ex at least in part because she could not reconcile the good Indian girl with the good American girl struggle? Or do you want to stay on your soap box and feeling high and mighty over...what?

"Nobody can understand without living it first?" So clearly the entire topic of a parent's suicide cannot be done unless your parent suicides, and it cannot be done well enough for it to be a case study in properly done drama in a web comic. Clearly, the additional pigment in my skin makes me utterly unable to comprehend what a guy with an epicanthic eyefold experiences and what girls with bindis feel and TELL ME THEY FEEL. Obviously, what a person says about their experience is utterly unreliable, thereby rendering thousands of years of researching methodology invalid because a person said something and others corroborated it.

I continue to wonder why you're deliberately ignoring the fact that I would like it tastefully done. Get off your soap box already.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CEOIII on 09 Feb 2011, 23:11
She takes a swing at Faye for no reason, now she's causing relationship drama, I like this chick less and less.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: enigmamf on 09 Feb 2011, 23:17
Agree with other posters. Padma is angling for a deal with CoD to become their pastry supplier. But surely she knows that Dora is the one calling the shots?

Anyway it seems to me that:
  • tSB is first and foremost a bakery (look at that selection of bread and pastries). They serve coffee on the side.
  • CoD is first and foremost a cafeteria. They serve pastries on the side. Location (near SMIF?) helps CoD. Also the business model based on sass.

We may eventually have a showdown between Dora and Padma (= the famous Northampton Coffee Party that will be in the history books two generations down the road). They can probably also peacefully coexist. An additional plus is that Jeph can then use the same pastry tray drawings at both shops without nitpicking complaints, if Dora accepts this business proposal.

Well we know that money has always been tight (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1217). Maybe some sort of business agreement would be mutually beneficial? CoD supplies the caffeine, TSB the carbs...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Feb 2011, 23:24
Wow, Angus awkwardness brought about not by what he said but by what someone else said.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Fenriswolf on 09 Feb 2011, 23:26
Blacksword, telling Akima to "get off her soapbox" isn't really helping your point.

Sure, you're Colombian, but Jeph is not. I don't necessarily agree that it's impossible for a white American to cover such topics but it's bloody difficult, and the comparison to covering trauma related to the suicide of someone close to you isn't really apt. Such trauma isn't a constant battlefield of belittlement and passive-aggressive attacks the way racism is.

Also, most people with a developed sense of empathy could probably have a fairly good idea of how horrendous seeing your father kill yourself would be. At least well enough to work it into a webcomic. The subtleties of living as an ethnic minority is a lot more complicated and difficult! It's an interesting idea but I don't really blame Akima from having an instinctive reaction of "oh hell no!"

[/OT] Also, I am quite over Faye behaving like that. For christ's sake. It's not a big deal - it's her character, and it's a webcomic so by nature somewhat exaggerated. But I really fucking hate the idea that either partner should have to walk on eggshells wrt past relationships, and particularly that it's natural that the woman in a heterosexual relationship is entitled to be aggressive and go so far as to "punish" their boyfriend in such scenarios. Boo.  :x
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: ZERO on 09 Feb 2011, 23:37
God, I screamed like a woman reading today's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Feb 2011, 23:48
Please, people, calm down over the minorities matter.

Everyone's experience is different for a myriad reasons; but if this means that only they can ever say anything about it, the logical ending of that is the ghetto-isation of society - of which we have too much already.  What is required is not soapboxes and insults, but sympathetic discussion leading towards more understanding.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Penquin47 on 09 Feb 2011, 23:51
Also, I am quite over Faye behaving like that. For christ's sake. It's not a big deal - it's her character, and it's a webcomic so by nature somewhat exaggerated. But I really fucking hate the idea that either partner should have to walk on eggshells wrt past relationships, and particularly that it's natural that the woman in a heterosexual relationship is entitled to be aggressive and go so far as to "punish" their boyfriend in such scenarios. Boo.  :x

Eh, there's a difference between having trouble dealing with exes in general, and having trouble with the idea that your boyfriend's ex:
a) Has a similar physical type
b) Has a similar personality (which she'd know because of their conversations when Angus started coming back to CoD)
c) Has an eerily similar romantic storyline, that evidence suggests was beginning AT THE SAME TIME.  Angus was coming into CoD to get sassed by Faye, then he disappears for a while, then he shows back up explaining that his new ex-gf hated CoD and didn't want him going there.

If I were Faye I'd be bugged at this point too.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 09 Feb 2011, 23:55
Oh ... oh ... oh ...

I dont like where this is going.



If I were Faye I'd be bugged at this point too.
I agree, this is creepy.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 10 Feb 2011, 00:01
This had better resolve itself....else il be one sad panda  (damned you, emotional investment in a character >.>)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 10 Feb 2011, 00:04

<snip>

If I were Faye I'd be bugged at this point too.


Why?

Because the person you're dating now used to date someone who shares a few of your own characteristics?

That when you weren't ready to date anybody, he was dating someone else rather than sitting at home obsessing about your unavailability?

There are nearly seven BILLION people in the world, if you are "one in a million" that means there are 7000 others just like you.

You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

Or you are...

Maybe Renee was a lot like Faye, but more intense. Maybe she's bitchy to people and doesn't even feel bad, to the point that she barely has a conscience.

Maybe Renee is just like Faye, but dialed all the way up to ELEVEN!


Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Penquin47 on 10 Feb 2011, 00:27
Am too a beautiful and unique snowflake!  So there!    :mrgreen:

Seriously, I'd probably get over it pretty quickly, but the fact that he was going to two different places at the same time to flirt with two different people who have a lot in common, at least superficially, and that after dating the other one and it not working out he came back to me?

Sure, Faye wasn't emotionally ready to date anyone when Angus and Renee started dating, but that doesn't mean she can't be upset that he started going with Plan A and now she's Plan B.  Sure, if things had been different, maybe it would have been the other way around.  But maybe not.  And while it's somewhat irrational, it still hurts.  Just like it hurt watching Dora and Marten be happy together less than a week after finally developing the courage to tell Marten that it can't happen between them.

Consider what else Faye could be seeing here, too.  Marten and Dora just broke up because Dora couldn't get over feeling like she was Marten's replacement for an unavailable Faye.  Now Faye finds out that Angus's ex is similar to her, could be a little irrationality going on with "this won't work he's only dating me because on some level he misses Renee".  Hell, when he came back, he even SAID that he was looking for a good hard rebound sass!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 10 Feb 2011, 00:33
Huh, the way I saw it wasn't "Angus is creepy," so much as "Angus doesn't have much game."

i.e. He really only knows one way of getting to know/interacting with women.

If he is attracted to snarky, clever women, and Faye was like that, and Renee was like that, then it's understandable that he would use similar methods in interacting with them. Dear God, that last sentence is probably a grammatical mine-field, but I am far too tired to check.  


EDIT: I don't think that Angus was doing what people think he was doing...From what I gather it went down like this:

"Hmm, well Faye is cool and fun to riff with. And Renee is cool and fun to riff with. Now Faye is not really warming up to me, but it looks like I have a shot at something with Renee."

or maybe Renee made the first move, hell, we don't know! Don't assasinate his character yet folks! We're all human!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 10 Feb 2011, 00:43
Maybe he was so mortified after the "Bottle of DeGraves" incident that he wasn't comfortable enough to show his face at CoD, so he went to tSB, started sassing with Renee, and that led to a relationship.

Then, for whatever reason, that ended, and he decided to steer clear of tSB but he still needed his daily dose of caffeine and sass.

As I recall, when he came back to CoD, he wasn't really laying on the flirt as much as before, but YMMV.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 10 Feb 2011, 01:17
So Marten has reason to avoid CoD, and Angus has reason to avoid tSB; where will it all end?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Llewellian on 10 Feb 2011, 01:36
So Marten has reason to avoid CoD, and Angus has reason to avoid tSB; where will it all end?


Well, there is the theory that such people at last will meet in a coffeeshop in the middle between A and B. But that is bringing a critical mass together. Some say, this is what happened in the Great Oven Explosion of '98.

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 10 Feb 2011, 01:38
Huh, the way I saw it wasn't "Angus is creepy," so much as "Angus doesn't have much game." i.e. He really only knows one way of getting to know/interacting with women.

If he is attracted to snarky, clever women, and Faye was like that, and Renee was like that, then it's understandable that he would use similar methods in interacting with them.
Yes, I'd see it that way too. Padma, like Angus himself, maybe needs to work on that internal censor. Unless, of course, she has it in for Angus and is trying to mess things up for him. Maybe she is a friend of Renee's?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 10 Feb 2011, 01:52
You guys I think some of you got it backwards. Angus met Faye first, she kept rejecting him, he meets this Renee at a party (Renee almost has to be the other as yet-unnamed SB barista), they hit it off because she reminds him of Faye, they date, he gets burned, Angus tries again with the girl he's liked better all along anyway. Renee was the substitute Faye, Faye isn't the substitute Renee.

Maybe Renee was a lot like Faye, but more intense. Maybe she's bitchy to people and doesn't even feel bad, to the point that she barely has a conscience.

Maybe Renee is just like Faye, but dialed all the way up to ELEVEN!

This is an interesting idea.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 10 Feb 2011, 02:16
You guys I think some of you got it backwards. Angus met Faye first, she kept rejecting him, he meets this Renee at a party (Renee almost has to be the other as yet-unnamed SB barista), they hit it off because she reminds him of Faye, they date, he gets burned, Angus tries again with the girl he's liked better all along anyway. Renee was the substitute Faye, Faye isn't the substitute Renee.
Ooooh ! Yes, you're totally right !
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 10 Feb 2011, 02:27
Faye's self-sabotage module is looking for excuses to torpedo any impending relationship. A normal woman might have felt slighted, and Faye's SSM may seize upon this.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 10 Feb 2011, 02:38
Now I'm really scared Marten's gonna meet Renee.

Dora and Padma
Faye and Renee

Whose doppleganger will be named next?!?!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 10 Feb 2011, 04:23
Quote
Maybe Renee is just like Faye, but dialed all the way up to ELEVEN!




Renee may be dialed up to eleven but Faye is clearly over 9,000.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Feb 2011, 04:24
Oh my god, I don't beleive I called it...

http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,25966.msg1004251.html#msg1004251 (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,25966.msg1004251.html#msg1004251)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 10 Feb 2011, 04:33
You, sir, deserve props.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 10 Feb 2011, 04:36
So Marten has reason to avoid CoD, and Angus has reason to avoid tSB; where will it all end?


Clearly it will end in a bar somewhere... several panels of drinking while wearing fancy hats...   Someone will say something insightful and there will be a punchline.

*slaps $5 on the table*
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 10 Feb 2011, 04:51
your on

*slaps €5 on the table*

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 10 Feb 2011, 05:11
His on what?




/grammarjokes
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 10 Feb 2011, 05:15
His on what?




/grammarjokes

shouldnt that be 'he is on what?' ;o?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 10 Feb 2011, 05:18
Angus simply needs to remember the Lodge's pledge from Red Green - "I am a man, but I can change, if I have to, I guess."

The other key phrase is, "Yes dear, I accept all blame and/or responsibility."  Works for previous relationship drama, messing up dinner, forgetting to mail the phone bill in on time, the lousy movie you rented, the situation in the Middle East...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 10 Feb 2011, 05:26

shouldnt that be 'he is on what?' ;o?


Yes, except somebody forgot an apostrophe!


Clearly it will end in a bar somewhere... several panels of drinking while wearing fancy hats...   Someone will say something insightful and there will be a punchline.

*slaps $5 on the table*

No bet, that's what always happens!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 10 Feb 2011, 05:47
His on what?




/grammarjokes

shouldnt that be 'he is on what?' ;o?

It would be if you had said "you're on" before. You said "your on," which gives your sentence a slightly different meaning.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Feb 2011, 06:28
Now I'm really scared Marten's gonna meet Renee.

Dora and Padma
Faye and Renee

Whose doppleganger will be named next?!?!

Marten and Darren
Steve and Stan
Hannelore and Laura

(EDIT: Oh, I just had a thought: Stan Oliver and Laura Hardy....)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 10 Feb 2011, 06:32
grammar >.<
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: kent_eh on 10 Feb 2011, 06:44
Angus simply needs to remember the Lodge's pledge from Red Green - "I am a man, but I can change, if I have to, I guess."

Or their lodge motto would work as well..

"Quando omni flunkus moritati"  

(AKA:  "When all else fails, play dead")
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tbones on 10 Feb 2011, 06:55

<snip>

If I were Faye I'd be bugged at this point too.


Why?

Because the person you're dating now used to date someone who shares a few of your own characteristics?

That when you weren't ready to date anybody, he was dating someone else rather than sitting at home obsessing about your unavailability?

There are nearly seven BILLION people in the world, if you are "one in a million" that means there are 7000 others just like you.

You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

That really, REALLY remind me of Tim Minchin's if i didn't have you (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeZMIgheZro)

So, yeah, now this really looks like scott pilgrim. Faye has to defeat all Angus exes that have worked on a coffe shop or bakery.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: El_Flesh on 10 Feb 2011, 07:17
wooo now we have the issue that will ultimately break up Angus n Faye.

Then she can fall (eventually) into Martin's skinny girly arms.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 10 Feb 2011, 07:24
Is it me or does most everyone in this strip look for ways to sabotage themselves?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 10 Feb 2011, 07:37

<snip>

If I were Faye I'd be bugged at this point too.


Why?

Because the person you're dating now used to date someone who shares a few of your own characteristics?

That when you weren't ready to date anybody, he was dating someone else rather than sitting at home obsessing about your unavailability?

There are nearly seven BILLION people in the world, if you are "one in a million" that means there are 7000 others just like you.

You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

Or you are...

Maybe Renee was a lot like Faye, but more intense. Maybe she's bitchy to people and doesn't even feel bad, to the point that she barely has a conscience.

Maybe Renee is just like Faye, but dialed all the way up to ELEVEN!



Maybe, but if someone told me that my boyfriend's ex sounded that much like me and he didn't refute it but instead perpetuated it by claiming he has a 'type', it'd weird me out too.  It makes you start to wonder whether they're with you because of who you are or if they're looking for a clone of the ex, the latter being an incredibly uncomfortable situation that usually ends very, very badly.

I can't fault Faye for being on-edge.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: kent_eh on 10 Feb 2011, 08:07
Is it me or does most everyone in this strip look for ways to sabotage themselves?

- holds mirror up to society  (http://serve.mysmiley.net/innocent/innocent0009.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Cybit on 10 Feb 2011, 08:28
As for the entire cultural thing: as an indian from the middle of the midwest, I don't really expect anyone to understand as much as just empathize.  No two people fall into the same situation, and hell, no two people are going to react to all events the same way.  We spend too much of our time looking for differences, when we should really be looking for the common ground that unites us all.

Ohhh boy, Angus has a type, eh?  Faye hopefully isn't going to use this as a reason to cut things off, or claim she's second place.  :=/  Whether Padma spilled the beans or not is irrelevant, Faye would have found out regardless. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 10 Feb 2011, 08:41
does most everyone in this strip look for ways to sabotage themselves?

They don't need to; this forum will do it for them!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: someone1074 on 10 Feb 2011, 08:46
Is it me or does most everyone in this strip look for ways to sabotage themselves?

- holds mirror up to society  (http://serve.mysmiley.net/innocent/innocent0009.gif)

That, and this is a webcomic. We need to remember that it's supposed to be written to entertain. Without these dramatic and pseudo-realistic developments...it would lose a lot of its appeal.

I don't see anything especially alarming or wild about Faye's reaction. She's just being consistent. At worst, I think it'll be settled in a week. I'm willing to bet it won't take that long though.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 10 Feb 2011, 09:21
Yup. Most likely Faye and Angus will kiss and make up within a strip or three. But later, on her afternoon off and Angus at work, the imp of the perverse (or plain curiosity) will overcome Faye. She goes on a recon mission to check out Renee. She finally finds tSB and... sees Marten there flirting with Renee.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Duke on 10 Feb 2011, 09:41
You guys I think some of you got it backwards. Angus met Faye first, she kept rejecting him, he meets this Renee at a party (Renee almost has to be the other as yet-unnamed SB barista), they hit it off because she reminds him of Faye, they date, he gets burned, Angus tries again with the girl he's liked better all along anyway. Renee was the substitute Faye, Faye isn't the substitute Renee.
Ooooh ! Yes, you're totally right !

That is an interesting theory.  Do we know the timeline of that for sure?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 10 Feb 2011, 10:20
Is it me or does most everyone in this strip look for ways to sabotage themselves?

- holds mirror up to society  (http://serve.mysmiley.net/innocent/innocent0009.gif)

Now, now, only SOME people sabotage themselves intentionally.  The rest of them do it accidentally, a consequence of not paying attention.  (Were it not for the un-self-aware, there might be no "Reality" programming, which . . . actually, I wouldn't mind.)

Whether Faye is over-reacting to the info about Angus' ex or not, Angus's behavior seems very Marten-esque these past couple of strips.  I'm hoping that his reaction during the apparently impending argument shows some of the differences between him and Marten.  And perhaps waffles could be involved. 

Oh, and hey!  Spam!

 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pwhodges on 10 Feb 2011, 10:45
Oh, and hey!  Spam!

<clicks fingers - gone>
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Feb 2011, 11:20
Oooooohhh....

When I click my fingers, the only thing that happens is the small dog thinks it's walkies, and the cats hide. 

Oh, and my wife tells me to stop clicking my fingers...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Kugai on 10 Feb 2011, 12:46
So, our Angus has a type.

It should be interesting if/when Faye and Renee meet.

Explosive combination?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: celticgeek on 10 Feb 2011, 13:08
It has just occurred to me that my daughter's middle name is Renee.  However she does not work in a bakery, she is a librarian. 

Hmmm.  Rereading the above, I think that it has an extremely tenuous relationship to the comic. 

On topic(?):  I wonder how many Fayes (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=702) Renee will turn out to be.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 10 Feb 2011, 14:12
That is an interesting theory.  Do we know the timeline of that for sure?
No, we're lacking the information on that.

Here's a weird thought. There's one character who doesn't engage in self-sabotage. Would you say that means she's the character with the best mental health? It's Hannelore.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skelepunk on 10 Feb 2011, 16:24
That is an interesting theory.  Do we know the timeline of that for sure?
No, we're lacking the information on that.
Here's a weird thought. There's one character who doesn't engage in self-sabotage. Would you say that means she's the character with the best mental health? It's Hannelore.
As someone who has dealt with mental illness presumably her whole life, I think Hannelore is the most self aware or all the characters, and knows how to not self sabotage. She knows how to monitor her own behaviour in a way the others do not. And so I'd have to agree with your observation.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: tomart on 10 Feb 2011, 17:09
Sure, I'd probably get over it quickly, but the fact that he was going to two different places at the same time to flirt with two different people who have a lot in common, at least superficially, and that after dating the other one and it not working out he came back to me?    
       Um, yeah, that sounds like Life.

Sure, Faye wasn't emotionally ready to date anyone when Angus and Renee started dating, but that doesn't mean she can't be upset that he started going with Plan A and now she's Plan B.  
      You want to be upset because you're not Plan A?  
I'd estimate Angus' first crush ("Plan A") was probably before adolescence, so by his age now, whoever he meets is approximately Plan Z17B12.  
Seriously, you'd let that bother you?   

 And while it's somewhat irrational, it still hurts.  
  Life is irrational and hurts; you don't need to add to it!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: parvles on 10 Feb 2011, 18:18
I don't know, I think I would be kind of bothered by that. If my boyfriend's last girlfriend was someone who looked and talked like me, had the same attitude as I did, and worked the same job, it would be weird. Especially having had him tell me already that at the end of the relationship he had decided that his ex was a crazy bitch. For someone who is working on trust and opening up and needing to take things slow, knowing how much anger he had towards his ex and how similar you are to her is a little scary.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Feb 2011, 18:52
I think some of us are reading into this more than what's there. (Big surprise, right?)

Let's review:



My suspicion: right after 900, he met Renee. She told him about the snail incident (which may have happened prior to the start of the strip); he was probably only seeing her from roughly 900 to 1363.

I don't think he was seeing her for all that long, personally.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Penquin47 on 10 Feb 2011, 18:52
You want to be upset because you're not Plan A?  
I'd estimate Angus' first crush ("Plan A") was probably before adolescence, so by his age now, whoever he meets is approximately Plan Z17B12.  
Seriously, you'd let that bother you?   

I wouldn't be bothered that he had girlfriends and/or crushes before me.  Wouldn't even be bothered if they all ran to a particular physical type or personality type or if for some reason he had a thing for people who worked my job.  This is a specific scenario where the prior girlfriend is all three at once and there's something squiffy about the timing of his relationship with her and his flirting with me.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Feb 2011, 18:53
What else happened in the Big Oven Explosion of '98?

Much Property Damage.    - 8 (10.4%)
Cruellers coated the countryside.    - 3 (3.9%)
Custard and Jelly fillings EVERYWHERE.    - 6 (7.8%)
No proof that Faye was anywhere nearby.    - 13 (16.9%)
There was much sorrow amongst Bakery fans.    - 5 (6.5%)
Ed lost a big toe in the explosion, too.    - 4 (5.2%)
The worst thing? The wafflemaker was destroyed!    - 13 (16.9%)
Vladek took over his old shop in NoHam.    - 7 (9.1%)
Pintsize didn't do it - he wasn't even built yet.    - 2 (2.6%)
Hanners' mom, however...    - 16 (20.8%)

Total Voters: 77

EDIT: Please don't yell at me because of one of the new poll options, okay? It was the only thing I could think of that was similar-yet-different.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: leahneedsanap on 10 Feb 2011, 19:40
I don't know, I think I would be kind of bothered by that. If my boyfriend's last girlfriend was someone who looked and talked like me, had the same attitude as I did, and worked the same job, it would be weird. Especially having had him tell me already that at the end of the relationship he had decided that his ex was a crazy bitch. For someone who is working on trust and opening up and needing to take things slow, knowing how much anger he had towards his ex and how similar you are to her is a little scary.

I have actually had this happen to me.  A guy I was dating had previously dated a girl that I knew that looked EXACTLY like me--like, to the point that when she started going to my school people started asking me why I never mentioned I had a little sister (I didn't).  Only in that situation (and possibly in this one?) he had a thing for me long before she was around, and she was, in some ways, him settling for an alternate me.  Which is pretty creepy in hindsight, but I didn't know that when we started dating, and was actually resistant to dating him because I thought the reverse was true--that he was substituting me because he couldn't have her.  I hope that turns out NOT to be Faye's situation, because my ex turned out to be a total creepface in a myriad of awful ways, but I'm just saying, when it happens, it does feel a little weird and puts you on the defensive about the authenticity of someone's feelings.  Especially when you don't have any contrasting cases of other people they've dated to reduce the sketch factor.

But the more we talk about this, the more I feel like Faye might get a little taste of Dora's anxiety right after she started dating Marten--and by putting it in that context, it might actually make it easier for her to be like, "this is actually not a big deal and I'm not going to let it get me down," because she's seen where that road goes.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: DSL on 10 Feb 2011, 20:21
Might be interesting if, upon  noting Faye's relationship insecurity, *Dora* calls her on it. Dramedic tension ensues.
My guess is, the immediate crisis resolves within a strip or two, but the issue manifests later.
As to the comment about Hannelore being the most mentally healthy character in the strip in terms of being aware of her issues/problems and facing them ... yeah, I wanna go along with that because she's still my favorite character. I kinda hope Jeph brings back one of his occasional hints that Hanners is consciously and a little devilishly messin' with the others minds.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 10 Feb 2011, 22:39
Allow me to be the first to say "D'AAAWWWWWWW!!!!!"

Before all of the Angus haters lose their shit!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Dreyden on 10 Feb 2011, 22:40
Angus and Faye are just too damn adorable  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Feb 2011, 22:42
"I am your type, after all."

Quote of the year nominee.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: knucklesandgyros on 10 Feb 2011, 22:46
Not gonna lie, I did squee a little for the comic. I love Angus and Faye together (then again, I've liked them together since when Angus showed up in the ugly shirt and white belt just to get a reaction out of Faye. I thought it was cute) and this just reinforces it. I think that Angus is one of the few people who can go toe-to-toe intellectually with Faye and isn't intimidated by her (whether it's due to stupidity or arrogance, however, is up to your POV) I know there's other who still hold candles for Sven/Faye and even Marten/Faye, and that's all well and good but I just think that the metaphorical porridge is just right...at least until the steamboat finally slips and falls (and that would be rather entertaining after all!)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Blackjoker on 10 Feb 2011, 22:47
Angus and Faye are just too damn adorable  :-D

I agree, I was feeling kind of depressed before I read this comic, I am now happy through the power of adorable couple. Huzzah.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CompSarge on 10 Feb 2011, 22:52
Regarding the poll: I'm pretty sure Faye doesn't hate waffles (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=179).

Regarding the comic: Everyone say it with me. D'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: St.Clair on 10 Feb 2011, 22:53
and now, The Make Outs.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CEOIII on 10 Feb 2011, 23:00
RELATIONSHIP DRAMA ZONE DEFEATED!

and may i add "d'awwwwwwwwwwww"
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 10 Feb 2011, 23:01
One question before I head out:

Where is "bitchnium" on the Periodic table?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Mustakyy on 10 Feb 2011, 23:01
D'aaaaaaaaaaaawww!

If this wasnt a "adorable-overload"-moment, i dont know what is.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Somniloquence on 10 Feb 2011, 23:18
You know, it's bizarre. I haven't been really digging the Faye/Angus fluff. I don't know why. Just comes off...I don't know.

I do know that I'm excited for new characters. Padma and Renee seems like they could potentially be a lot of fun.

It's too bad that any romanticness of the main QC cast towards the Secret Bakery cast kind of automatically constitutes as being creepy.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: anabatica on 10 Feb 2011, 23:36
It's too bad that any romanticness of the main QC cast towards the Secret Bakery cast kind of automatically constitutes as being creepy.

No way. There's potential for a great Romeo and Juliet arc there.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Delator on 10 Feb 2011, 23:49
Regarding the comic: Everyone say it with me. D'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

D'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
 
:lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Antario on 10 Feb 2011, 23:57
D'awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww


I totally would have expected them to be in TSB right now ;o to booch their d'awww relationship, but their at angus's?  where did padma go? i thought faye would at least be curious about renee
but he certainly diffused faye's self destruct nuke with some tactical....similarities?  and faye is ssooooo about to jump his bones btw.....
he might not have 'game' as some suggested yesterday, but he certainly knows how to keep it together (instead of going uwww....welll.....uhmmm.... in panel 2)
he's good at getting his foot in his mouth, but now it came down to it he nailed it :)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 11 Feb 2011, 00:34
Where is "bitchnium" on the Periodic table?
Definitely down in the unstable Transuranic elements, I should think. Can't exist in nature, but constantly created in the nuclear fires of Faye's personality.

Angus proves once again, once he gets his game on, that he's a good match for Faye in every sense of the word (including setting her on fire occasionally). I definitely d'awww-ed.

I suppose it speaks for Jeph's writing that I've been thinking hard over the last couple of days about the whole "type" thing. QC is not just a comic. Kudos.

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TRVA123 on 11 Feb 2011, 00:39
I really like how Faye looks in todays strip. There was a long stretch of time, probably from around strip 800 until now, where I wasn't feeling the way Jeph was drawing Faye. I could see how it fit it with the way he was drawing the rest of the characters, and I was fine with the way the rest of them looked, but I though Faye had lost some of the attractiveness she had in the earlier strips. This seems like a great mix of what I liked about her look circa 700 and Jephs current style.

Or maybe Jeph was deliberately holding back on Faye so that he could draw her radiant with the happiness of her relationship with Angus. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: snubnose on 11 Feb 2011, 00:41
Yay ! Comic ! How wonderful !  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 11 Feb 2011, 02:12
Where is "bitchnium" on the Periodic table?
Definitely down in the unstable Transuranic elements, I should think. Can't exist in nature, but constantly created in the nuclear fires of Faye's personality.

That was my first thought, too. Mostly because the periodic table is kinda full all the way up to Uranium (and a bit beyond). We need more clues to place it more accurately. The only thing we can measure is its half-life. The most stable isotope of bitchnium seems to have decayed to ½ Faye in about 1000 strips. Another isotope mellowed considerably within the space of one strip (from 1859 to 1860), and is now at a level that is impossible to gauge accurately.

The half-life of Plutonium 239 is 24000 years. IIRC the new heavy elements have half-lives measured in fractions of a second. Does this help?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 11 Feb 2011, 02:18

...Does this help?


Not at all.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: VonKleist on 11 Feb 2011, 03:18
hmmm.. Everything went better than expected!?  :?


I was kind of looking forward to Faye getting all up in Angus' stuff -.-

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 11 Feb 2011, 03:23
Oh, dear...the adorable is seeping through my monitor.  Yay!  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Tetrinity on 11 Feb 2011, 03:26
I'm sort of getting the "alkali metal" vibe from bitchnium. They both share the explosive properties under certain conditions, after all. Perhaps element 119, currently named ununennium, is the one we're looking for?

I too d'awwed at this strip. This is why their relationship is working out; it's basically a never-ending "sass-off", and that seems to be their type. :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 11 Feb 2011, 03:42
Great.

Not only is she radioactive, she explodes if you get her wet!!! :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Border Reiver on 11 Feb 2011, 03:57
And this is unexpected how?

One the other hand- wet t-shirt contest!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheBiscuit on 11 Feb 2011, 04:02
Yesterday's comic promised much; the new one failed to deliver.

That said, as much as I would relish a sign that Faye and Angus have a less than utterly perfect relationship... this was pretty good. I know exactly the feeling. My own girlfriend loves to make me squirm in a similar way. The strip is very realistic from my perspective. I just don't know what to make of the fact that this relationship is too good to be true.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: horsefish on 11 Feb 2011, 05:01
My guess is, the immediate crisis resolves within a strip or two, but the issue manifests later.

Nailed it so far; I agree that it will probably come up again.

I join the chorus of D'AAAAAAAWWWWWWWWW.

The back and forth of their dialogue reminds me of listening to Baby, it's Cold Outside  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp3UoqOkFJo&feature=related) for some reason. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 11 Feb 2011, 05:33
Great.

Not only is she radioactive, she explodes if you get her wet!!! :psyduck:

snip

One the other hand- wet t-shirt contest!

... behind high strength Lexan shielding!

For blast protection and smooshing.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Irenfrea on 11 Feb 2011, 06:23
I for one expected some crisis or drama...

But forgot that we're talking about Faye, not Dora  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TastyRoe on 11 Feb 2011, 07:09
i liked this comic it was nice
for a few seconds every mon-fri i have a bit O fun reading QC today is no different
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Feb 2011, 07:57
How else is Renee similar to Faye?

Her brother is gay.    - 2 (3.7%)
She tends to make appliances burst into flame.    - 19 (35.2%)
She has a pimple on her butt.    - 7 (13%)
She gets a Jamaican accent when drunk.    - 12 (22.2%)
Her dad killed her mother when she was little.    - 4 (7.4%)
She has a babushka in her closet.    - 1 (1.9%)
She never graduated from Smith.    - 0 (0%)
She hates waffles.    - 9 (16.7%)

Total Voters: 54
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Cybit on 11 Feb 2011, 08:08
More D'awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww coming up, especially with Valentine's Day just around the corner.  >_< 

Also, good luck to those who are celebrating Valentine's day with a special someone, or attempting to start something with a special someone this weekend. 

Those of us that are single, if you live near Seattle, I have a lot of booze.... :D 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: C8LINC on 11 Feb 2011, 09:39
Seattle? Booze? I'm in! (And here!)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Kugai on 11 Feb 2011, 10:13
If they ever have kids, they'd be an interesting mix.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Feb 2011, 10:15
Not only is she radioactive, she explodes if you get her wet!!! :psyduck:
With a sufficient mass of U-235, you don't even need to get it wet. You can take two subcritical lumps, and if you put a bucket of water in between them you get a blue flash and everybody nearby dies. The water acts as a moderator facilitating a slow-neutron chain reaction.

Alcohol would probably work as a moderator too, but that doesn't fit the Pugnacious Peach: she's a happy drunk.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Feb 2011, 11:03
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 

Pair a person like that with another that has a thinner skin, and you'll have trouble. 

Pair them with a true  bitch/bastard, and it's just as bad (been there, done that). 

It's a delicate balance, and they seem to have hit it, spot on.  Let's hope they can keep it! 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CompSarge on 11 Feb 2011, 11:54
This comic reminds me of the relationship between me and one of my (female) friends. It's a fun dynamic, and I love seeing it.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 11 Feb 2011, 12:54
I'm sort of getting the "alkali metal" vibe from bitchnium.
<snip>
Not only is she radioactive, she explodes if you get her wet!!! :psyduck:
With a sufficient mass of U-235, you don't even need to get it wet. You can take two subcritical lumps, and if you put a bucket of water in between them you get a blue flash and everybody nearby dies. The water acts as a moderator facilitating a slow-neutron chain reaction.

Alcohol would probably work as a moderator too, but that doesn't fit the Pugnacious Peach: she's a happy drunk.

<chem nerd>
the reference to the alkali metal group (group 1) refers to elements such as Potassium or Rubidium which react violently with water

H20+K=HOH+H2+ purple flame (and a ball of molten Potassium rolls around the bowl)
H20+Rb=RbOH+H2+BOOM (smashing the bowl to bits) :-o

not balanced but hopefully the people who might complain will understand that I've presented it like this for general understanding

</chem nerd>

I didn't know about the neutron transfer, although I'd imagine that if you had access to 2 subcritical lumps of U-235 you would probably also know how to handle them

(and Angus obviously knows how to "handle" them  :-D)

EDIT: subscript
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Cybit on 11 Feb 2011, 13:05
Seattle? Booze? I'm in! (And here!)

LOL, message sent. :D  Anyone who has a Dr. Girlfriend avatar is inherently awesome, in my book.  (Though someone with Brock might top them.  All hail the Brock.)

As a newbie to this board, I'd like to point out that little frightens me in this world, but the fact we're now discussing neutron explosions from a comic about the "D'awwwwwwwwwwww" frightens me. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Feb 2011, 13:23
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 
Oh my, you realize there are a lot of people on this board who have NO IDEA what you're talking about?

(Hint for you young'ns: that lady who got nailed with the log in the Snickers Super Bowl commercial is Roseanne.)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Mominator on 11 Feb 2011, 13:46
I was expecting Faye and Angus to start singing "Let's Call The Whole Thing Off" for a bit there.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 11 Feb 2011, 14:00
I was expecting Faye and Angus to start singing "Let's Call The Whole Thing Off" for a bit there.
I've had this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N416Er-AFM) in mind since Angus' ex came up.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 11 Feb 2011, 14:21
Oh, and hey!  Spam!

<clicks fingers - gone>

Yay!  Huzzah to you sir!   :mrgreen:

I'm glad Angus and Faye's discussion didn't go the obvious argument route the way it seemed it might.  Angus might not have much game but he's got some.  More importantly, he knows Faye well enough to know how to approach a sticky topic with her now -- thrown-across-room avoidance seems to do wonders for one's logic fu, even if he still manages to get his foot jammed in his mouth from time to time.  Plus, Faye's relaxed a bit since things started with him.  We'll see where it goes.

I'm actually looking forward to a discussion of the Secret Bakery among the main cast.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 11 Feb 2011, 15:22
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 
Oh my, you realize there are a lot of people on this board who have NO IDEA what you're talking about?

(Hint for you young'ns: that lady who got nailed with the log in the Snickers Super Bowl commercial is Roseanne.)

You know, I'm not that old, but my god, reading that just makes me feel ancient.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 11 Feb 2011, 15:25
It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 

I have friends who sometimes wonder if me and my wife hate each other. Its just the way we work, and we really wouldn't want it any other way. I couldn't date someone who couldn't take and give jokes as well as me and my wife can.

Also, man, has anyone noticed the amount of chicken little syndrome that goes on here on the boards. OH NO SOMEONE SAID SOMETHING THAT SOMEONE COULD TAKE BADLY TOMORROW WILL BE DRAAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. Just saying. I find it hilarious.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Cybit on 11 Feb 2011, 15:42
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 
Oh my, you realize there are a lot of people on this board who have NO IDEA what you're talking about?

(Hint for you young'ns: that lady who got nailed with the log in the Snickers Super Bowl commercial is Roseanne.)

You know, I'm not that old, but my god, reading that just makes me feel ancient.

Yeah, the pop culture references are an amazing way to feel way older then you actually are. >_< 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Doctor Online on 11 Feb 2011, 15:43
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 
Oh my, you realize there are a lot of people on this board who have NO IDEA what you're talking about?

(Hint for you young'ns: that lady who got nailed with the log in the Snickers Super Bowl commercial is Roseanne.)

You know, I'm not that old, but my god, reading that just makes me feel ancient.

I still to this day will drop what I'm doing to watch Roseanne re-runs. I LOVE that show, I relate some of my childhood to it considering I grew up watching it, along with Married With Children. I'm with TheEvilDog on this, it makes me feel old.

I may only be 22 but it kills me at times seeing younger people spouting off about old music, saying "so and so is trying to copy *insert new actor(ress)/singer/band*." it's a  :psyduck: moment for me.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: pendrake on 11 Feb 2011, 16:46
For strips of Febuary 07-11, 2011...


1. Less than three strips, and I already like Padma.  Though I confess I also cannot hear/read her name without thinking of Star Wars... :roll:

2. It should be "interesting" to see when Faye and Renee meet.  Either they will also fight, or be really good friends, or make out with each other with Angus watching in horrified fascination.

3. Definitely looking forward for seeing more of The Secret Bakery and her crew, means Jeph's hard work on those backgrounds will see more use.  Here is to hoping we see a tSB version of Hannelore, after all :wink: .

4. And a minor groaner for all the chem nerds...

(http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ldltn1R7Oj1qb8lxuo1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: musicalsoul on 11 Feb 2011, 18:39
I get an interesting "Roseanne and Dan Conner" vibe from these two.  It works because even though they both will sacrifice each other's feelings for a clever retort, they both know  it's what they do, and so they're able to read around it. 
Oh my, you realize there are a lot of people on this board who have NO IDEA what you're talking about?

(Hint for you young'ns: that lady who got nailed with the log in the Snickers Super Bowl commercial is Roseanne.)

There are actually people who don't know who the Connors are!? Ugh, I loved Roseanne when I was a kid. I still like watching re-runs of it from time to time. Dan Connor kind of reminds me of my own dad. I feel old now. I'm 23, I soooo shouldn't feel old. And I agree with the original comment about the Roseanne and Dan vibe. But I like that  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: musicalsoul on 11 Feb 2011, 18:48


I may only be 22 but it kills me at times seeing younger people spouting off about old music, saying "so and so is trying to copy *insert new actor(ress)/singer/band*." it's a  :psyduck: moment for me.

Or better yet when people think a re-make of an old-school song is actually the original. When Limp Bizkit remade "Behind Blue Eyes" back when I was in high school... or maybe I was still in middle school, who knows, almost no one I knew realized it was actually by The Who. Of course, the song that sadly made Limp Bizkit famous was also a cover of an older song ("Faith" by George Michael) and I don't think anyone knew that.  Those were always huge  :psyduck: moments for me. The most recent  :psyduck: moment for me has to be Lady Gaga's new over-hyped song "Born this Way." It sounds like a carbon copy of "Express Yourself" by Madonna. How many teenagers who totally love Gaga are going to know that. Not many, cause, as old as it makes me feel, the little 14 year old's who are listening to it thinking "Oh my  God, sooooo creative and original" weren't even born yet when that song was released.

Everything I've just said is absolutely irrelevant to the comic, but you know, music gets me riled up.  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 11 Feb 2011, 20:00
What a nice end to a shitty (for me) week.   No epic cliffhanger or anything.

Internet is going to be iffy for me for quite awhile.  Health problems mean less online time and more VIGOROUS TESTING by the Doctors.     That means grabbing Net on the go as I turned off the cable-internet at home effective Monday.

I can leave the story off here if I have to and not worry about WHAT HAPPENS NEXT OMG.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Sharp on 11 Feb 2011, 21:00
Well, best wishes and good health to you MD_BS.

And while I would like to add my "d'aww" I think that the rest of the forum has done more than enough d'aww-ing for all of us!  :-D
I'm glad that for once a little thing hasn't blown up into a huge argument. Jeph said it best in the QC book: "Questionable Content: Mountains out of Molehills, Five Days a Week."

And as mentioned in the early days of the relationship ("I will let you touch my boobs if you shut up!") My song when thinking of Angus and Faye, Mr. North and Ms. South, is Yankee Bayonet. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjWgCCH4kuA)

"Oh I'll be your 'Yankee Bayonet.' Hurr Hurr Hurr."
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: horsefish on 11 Feb 2011, 22:15
Or better yet when people think a re-make of an old-school song is actually the original. When Limp Bizkit remade "Behind Blue Eyes" back when I was in high school... or maybe I was still in middle school, who knows, almost no one I knew realized it was actually by The Who. Of course, the song that sadly made Limp Bizkit famous was also a cover of an older song ("Faith" by George Michael) and I don't think anyone knew that.  Those were always huge  :psyduck: moments for me. The most recent  :psyduck: moment for me has to be Lady Gaga's new over-hyped song "Born this Way." It sounds like a carbon copy of "Express Yourself" by Madonna. How many teenagers who totally love Gaga are going to know that. Not many, cause, as old as it makes me feel, the little 14 year old's who are listening to it thinking "Oh my  God, sooooo creative and original" weren't even born yet when that song was released.

Everything I've just said is absolutely irrelevant to the comic, but you know, music gets me riled up.  :laugh:

What? Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings?

I'm a bit older, so my version of this was that in junior high, I thought Van Halen wrote that "new" song "Oh, Pretty Woman (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWQRDI7mTyw)."  Roy who (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBKdOtohALA)?
Maybe this belongs below the line under Confessions.  :psyduck:


Oh, and I liked Madonna then and I like Gaga now.  I think she's the new Madonna. I'm probably wrong. and yes, I'm straight. My wife wasn't so sure until our 3rd or 4th date.  did I mention I like show tunes? (Maybe this belongs under confessions too?)  and definitely waaay off topic.  But, then, if a WCDT can't drift off-topic late on a Friday night, when can it?

What a nice end to a shitty (for me) week.   No epic cliffhanger or anything.

Internet is going to be iffy for me for quite awhile.  Health problems mean less online time and more VIGOROUS TESTING by the Doctors.     That means grabbing Net on the go as I turned off the cable-internet at home effective Monday.

I can leave the story off here if I have to and not worry about WHAT HAPPENS NEXT OMG.

I Hope everything turns out OK for you. Health problems suck ass.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: The Duke on 11 Feb 2011, 22:58
Chem jokes, eh?...


What do you do with a chemist when he dies?

You Barium!


I heard it for the first time the other day and I thought it was funny please don't throw things at me.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: CEOIII on 11 Feb 2011, 23:33
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

*throws things*
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: horsefish on 11 Feb 2011, 23:36
Puns, Eh?

Guy walks into a tailor shop in ancient Greece with some torn togas.

The tailor says "Euripides (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euripides)?"

The guy says "Yeah.  Eumenides (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eumenides)?"

Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 11 Feb 2011, 23:37
Chem jokes, eh?...

I heard it for the first time the other day and I thought it was funny please don't throw things at me.

No we won't throw things at you. A class of water and some sodium will do just fine. Yes, I know that it is not a good idea to handle pieces of sodium with bare hands.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: chrisa1 on 12 Feb 2011, 01:29
All the insightful relationship chatter aside - I think Jeph got the pissed-off Faye profile just right in the last frame of 1859.

Yay artwork! (Or is this not the right forum, I can't keep track anymore).
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 12 Feb 2011, 02:27
how about an easy going chemistry question?

name the following molecule

       PhD    PhD
         \    /
         C - C
        /      \
       C        C
        \      /
         C - C

first correct answer wins an internet.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: disaacs on 12 Feb 2011, 04:44
how about an easy going chemistry question?

name the following molecule

       PhD    PhD
         \    /
         C - C
        /      \
       C        C
        \      /
         C - C

first correct answer wins an internet.

Orthodox

But don't give me an internet. I had help.

I tried to post the answer with a spoiler tag, but it wouldn't let me. Why not?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Feb 2011, 05:38
I think the spoiler tag is assuming a white background, and gives white text.  Since thet's the default text color...

Try the size, post tiny (1 or 2 pt) for spoilers, then if a person wants to read it they have to quote it. 

...and yes, I'm straight. My wife wasn't so sure until our 3rd or 4th date.  did I mention I like show tunes? (Maybe this belongs under confessions too?) 

See?  (BTW horsefish, you're not alone...)

For those of you feeling old, I was watching Roseanne while raising my own kids.  My wife and I like to think there was a great deal of good parenting advice in that show.  And we won't even start with the music redo's that I've had to live through.  I'm constantly  pointing them out to my girls. 

And Akima, thanks for the flashback - although this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqBTzfcIk4&feature=related) is the version I grew up with, I'll now never be able to avoid thinking of it whenever her name's brought up! 

Gotta love those old lip-synch "live" appearances.  I'm pretty sure the guitar isn't even plugged in...
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: J on 12 Feb 2011, 05:53
so, did angus select that sweater because it matched his couch, or did he buy the couch because it matched his sweater?

and does he have a pair of pants for the full camouflage effect?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 12 Feb 2011, 07:43
I know it's probably for his job, but I personally can't stand the way Angus dresses. It makes him look like such a square.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Skewbrow on 12 Feb 2011, 08:43
The one thing about Angus' attire that irritates me a little is the way his shirt sticks out under that piece of knitwear. Tuck it into your pants, please! My Mom would have none of that.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Feb 2011, 08:47
I was expecting Faye and Angus to start singing "Let's Call The Whole Thing Off" for a bit there.
I've had this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N416Er-AFM) in mind since Angus' ex came up.

...you couldn't find the original?
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Feb 2011, 08:57
Moment of the Week Time:

"Coffee tastes so much better when it's made by a beautiful woman."    - 1 (1.8%)
But doesn't that FREAK YOU OUT?    - 12 (21.1%)
He was trying to flirt with you. (Well he wasn't very good at it!)    - 10 (17.5%)
Padma vs. Faye!    - 2 (3.5%)
Muay Thai vs. Punch-fu (Savannah-style)    - 2 (3.5%)
Would you PLEASE stop SPARRING in the middle of the STREET    - 5 (8.8%)
Ed Bronchovsky's in Greenfield    - 0 (0%)
The big oven explosion of '98.    - 1 (1.8%)
Glass eye and the twitch    - 0 (0%)
We miss you... everyone but Renee    - 0 (0%)
Gee, that romantic arc sounds awfully familiar.    - 0 (0%)
She even LOOKS like you, Faye...    - 0 (0%)
So I have a type!    - 0 (0%)
She's even CRANKY like Renee!    - 1 (1.8%)
It's not the only reason I like you.    - 0 (0%)
Hidden core of pure, molten bitchnium    - 4 (7%)
MY eventual goal is to be an evil millionaire...    - 0 (0%)
I am your type, after all.    - 19 (33.3%) <===== RUNAWAY WINNER

Total Voters: 57
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Feb 2011, 10:20
I was expecting Faye and Angus to start singing "Let's Call The Whole Thing Off" for a bit there.
I've had this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N416Er-AFM) in mind since Angus' ex came up.

...you couldn't find the original?

Case in point - she's too young to know there was  an original (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqBTzfcIk4&feature=related)!  :grin:

Seeing these are weird - I never knew what any of these performers actually looked like when I was a kid. 
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Feb 2011, 10:52
Well, yeah - unless they went on TV on either Sullivan or some other variety show (Sullivan was already over and done by the time I was old enough to remember), you never saw them unless you happened to go to a concert.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Akima on 12 Feb 2011, 19:13
...you couldn't find the original?
I probably could have done, but Vonda Shepard is awesome. Her musical interludes, and of course Lucy Liu as Ling Woo :-D, were the only reasons I watched Ally McBeal. As for The Left Banke... Carl is quite correct, I didn't know they existed, but I can't imagine anything much less rive gauche that that squeaky-clean, squeaky-voiced lead singer.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: akronnick on 12 Feb 2011, 19:27
But Akima, you can't even see his eyebrows his hair's so long!!!!!

And the Guitar player's hair is DOWN TO HIS COLLAR!!!!!!

They're not following the standards and fashions of when I was in my twenties, you know, 1938!*

I bet they smoke the reefer!




Filthy commie hippies!


*I was actually born in 1975. I was acting like I was much older than I actually am.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Carl-E on 12 Feb 2011, 23:31
You guys are both too funny...

...and so was that group.  They were American, but obviously trying hard to emulate the Beatles' "mop top" look. 

And failing, miserably!
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: JackFaerie on 13 Feb 2011, 20:53

Should I have put in bold that I'm Colombian? That I am a cultural and ethnic minority where I live, more so because the vast majority of Hispanics in the US are Mexican, which is very much culturally different from my own heritage? Should I have added that my first language was Spanish and I didn't learn English until I was six years old? Should I add that I do not feel any particular connection to the American culture I am surrounded with and identify first and foremost with my Colombian heritage? Should I add that my ex is now my ex at least in part because she could not reconcile the good Indian girl with the good American girl struggle? Or do you want to stay on your soap box and feeling high and mighty over...what?

"Nobody can understand without living it first?" So clearly the entire topic of a parent's suicide cannot be done unless your parent suicides, and it cannot be done well enough for it to be a case study in properly done drama in a web comic. Clearly, the additional pigment in my skin makes me utterly unable to comprehend what a guy with an epicanthic eyefold experiences and what girls with bindis feel and TELL ME THEY FEEL. Obviously, what a person says about their experience is utterly unreliable, thereby rendering thousands of years of researching methodology invalid because a person said something and others corroborated it.

I continue to wonder why you're deliberately ignoring the fact that I would like it tastefully done. Get off your soap box already.

Dude, seriously?  It's great that you have apparently unresolved issues with your ex and her identity and now are putting all Desi people under the same umbrella as the ONE particular community you've been exposed to, but why in the world should Jeph be interested in that story?  It doesn't really go with the slant of his comic and, in context of what else has been/has not been covered, would be tying Padma's entire identity to her nationality. She's just be "that Indian chick, with the Indian cultural issues."  This is something not all minorities (http://sjaejones.com/blog/2009/why-do-i-read/) are fans of (http://sjaejones.com/blog/2010/im-korean-and-im-okay/#more-3870).

Meanwhile I know some Indian girls who, yes, struggle with the whole FOB/good Indian girl thing. And I know some Indian girls who have always lived in diverse environments or had Americanized parents or just due to their own personality, have never thought much about it--or had thought about it when they were much younger, but currently are at peace with themselves and are happily American (but of Indian descent,) or Indian (living in America), or something in the middle, or something else entirely.  (I even know recent immigrant Indian girls who are not at all bothered about being "good Indian girls.") Padma seems to be quite old enough that even if she went though that sort of identity crisis, it probably happened quite a bit earlier.
Title: Re: WCDT 7-11 February 2011 (1856-1860)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Feb 2011, 21:52
The comic has had plenty of opportunities to explore how characters handled being in a place where everyone looked different from them or had different values.

Jeph has seldom explored that line of storytelling. There were a few references to Faye's culture change, for example when she talked about suppressing her accent. But in general characters from all ancestries and cultures muddle through just like everybody else.

This may be because there aren't enough panels in a day to explore minority experiences while still reporting on relationships, sass, AnthroPC hijinks, and keeping all the plates spinning.