THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 20 Mar 2011, 05:32

Title: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 Mar 2011, 05:32
And to start off, we have the poll that SHOULD have been posted on Friday.

This might be a bit of a hectic week for me (I have at least one call-back at a place about 70-80 miles from me), so the poll might not be updated every night.

And side note: anyone wanna bet we get Yelling Bird on Monday?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890
Post by: akronnick on 20 Mar 2011, 05:45
Judging by Jeph's latest Twitter posts, that is a strong possibility.





And it's nice having you back in the driver's seat.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 20 Mar 2011, 06:06
Fuck yes Yelling Bird

MY BODY IS READY
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Mar 2011, 08:34
And to start off, we have the poll that SHOULD have been posted on Friday.
Wait, was I supposed to change the poll?  I'm new to WCDT creation.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 20 Mar 2011, 11:42
jwhouk generally changed the poll like every day to reflect the forum's constantly changing blabberstream of vaguely-related-to-the-comic horseshit, but it's cool. You're cool. I liked your driving fine.

Also I would like to motion for an end to the waffles thing. How did that even become a thing? These are terrible waffles, they are stale, get them off my plate, I ordered fucking eggs and steak anyway how hard is that to cook

But seriously, can we cut it out with the waffles.
Title: Just be glad that polls are back at all
Post by: bunnyThor on 20 Mar 2011, 11:49
And to start off, we have the poll that SHOULD have been posted on Friday.

QC Forum Weekly Reaction Thread Poll: SRS BSNS

(...until they get shut down by the mods for excess forum drama, that is.)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 20 Mar 2011, 12:11
Quote from: Dr. ROFLPWN
I don't think you realize the seriousness of the business going on in here. Let me tell you how serious this business is: you need to have an MBA and some Italian fucking loafers to be posting in this forum. You thought you could just come in here and talk about how funny some panel was? You thought WRONG, motherfucker. Crack open your literary analysis text, we are going to be here a while. Where is your psychological graph? Your shipping wall? Your thesis on who shot Faye's father? Get with the program here.

THE WCDT HAS STANDARDS. YOU WILL ABIDE BY THEM. OR BE FROWNED AT BY THE MEN IN SUITS AND FEDORAE WHAT SMOKE PIPES AND TAKE THEIR WHISKEY STRAIGHT.

(mostly because that's all the men can do, the men are not mods)

Title: Re: Just be glad that polls are back at all
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Mar 2011, 13:25
QC Forum Weekly Reaction Thread Poll:
(...until they get shut down by the mods for excess forum drama, that is.)

To those who think that sounds like a joke, be aware that there was a period a couple of years ago when the ability to make polls was removed in the WCD forum (which was separate from discussion at that time) because it was felt that they had got out of hand.  It was restored at or shortly after the time when the WCD and QC discussion forums were merged.

MEN WHAT TAKE THEIR WHISKEY STRAIGHT (the men are not mods).

Mods drink Whisky (not Whiskey), and of course  it's straight single malt.
Title: And hopefully none of that ice cube fuckery either.
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 20 Mar 2011, 14:19
Mods drink Whisky (not Whiskey), and of course  it's straight single malt.


That should be a truism of all men, women and mods.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Mar 2011, 14:34
Not gonna lie, when it comes to whisk(e)y, I prefer mine from the southern US.
Title: Re: Just be glad that polls are back at all
Post by: TheEvilDog on 20 Mar 2011, 14:35
MEN WHAT TAKE THEIR WHISKEY STRAIGHT (the men are not mods).
Mods drink Whisky (not Whiskey), and of course  it's straight single malt.

Depends - Whiskey, such as Irish Whiskey, and I will use this for the sake of the example, is tripled distilled, and can made from a single malt, single grain, blended or a pure pot still. It has a smooth taste, which has a slight spicy hint to it.

Whisky, such as Scotch Whisky has a smokey flavour to it, due to the method in which it is distilled, offering a unique taste.

The main difference is actually in the distilling methods used. I could go deeper into an proper explanation, but I'm in work at 6am for a training day....Cue muttering and grumbling as I travel tomorrow. (Oh, and btw, I worked in a major distillery for about two years...and before anyone asks, yes, I did get free stock.)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 20 Mar 2011, 15:32
Not gonna lie, when it comes to whisk(e)y, I prefer mine from the southern US.

Well. That's your right...

Talisker is my malt of choice. Some other smoky/peaty distilled goodness also works. I won't say 'no' to Jameson either. But that's partly because I have so many friends in Ireland that I only rarely need to pay for mine. And the triple distillation is not a bad idea.

My bridge team just advanced to the next round in our knock-out tourney by the narrowest possible margin, so I will celebrate with some...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Mar 2011, 15:36
Laphroaig. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 20 Mar 2011, 15:39
Would definitely be on my list, too. Laphroaig and Lagavullin are battling for the 2nd place on mine.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 20 Mar 2011, 15:51
Favorite whisky of all time ... Ardberg Uigeadail. you can almost chew the smokiness (you almost have to). followed by the rather fruity Tomintoul 27
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Doctor Online on 20 Mar 2011, 16:20
Butting into something I hardly know anything about, the talk of whiskey drew me in. I had a horrible experience with it, then again, I was 16 and it was Early Times. The smell to this day (I'm 22) of any whiskey makes me ill, the thought of it makes me ill. I was not aware whiskey had smokey flavors along with fruity. I feel like I have to go out and try these names you guys are throwing around now.

I'm more of a shots of Jäger with some Dr. Pepper on the side kind of gal.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Mar 2011, 16:33
Favorite whisky of all time ... Ardberg Uigeadail. you can almost chew the smokiness (you almost have to). followed by the rather fruity Tomintoul 27

I've heard of this, but my local store doesn't have it in stock.  However, a little effort shows another store that does have it.  I am planning to try it, definitely. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 20 Mar 2011, 16:39
Doc, if the smell of whisky makes you nauseous, can i recommend starting out with an Irish coffee? I've had several friends in your situation and that is the best method to allow them to realise "hey not all whisky tastes like spirit cleaner"(mostly due to necking a bottle aged 15 or so... Tesco basic whisky is a dangerous thing.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Mar 2011, 17:16
I was not aware whiskey had smokey flavors

The smokiest (the smokey flavour comes from peat used in the manufacturing) are those from Islay (http://www.islaywhiskysociety.com/), several of which have already been mentioned.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 Mar 2011, 19:35
Okay, so no waffles, but more whiskey? ;)

I keed, I keed. I just changed the polls along with whatever claptrap was being thrown out here about the comic. And, usually, I had the last poll of the week be the "moment of the week" from the previous five strips.

I also believe that the Waffles reference is from that Most Serious Comic Of All, 510. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=510)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: lunakitten on 20 Mar 2011, 19:38
What, no love for Bushmills? Not even Black Bush?  :?
And I agree- Irish coffee is a lovely way to start- caffine and alcohol all in one, and it tastes MILES better than those battery acid flavored energy drinks.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Mar 2011, 19:56
And, usually, I had the last poll of the week be the "moment of the week" from the previous five strips.[/url]
Ahhh, see, I saw that poll, so that's what I based it on.  But I went through the last week's strips and chose my own moments.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Mar 2011, 19:56
Jameson's.

 I have an Irish coffee mug, a present from my Daughter, with the following recipe printed on the side:

____________________________________ {Top of mug}

_____  Whipped cream (if you must)

_____  Coffee to here (optional)

         What the hell, you're
_____  Irish AND it's cold outside
         Fill it up to here.


          If you're Irish,
_____  Fill to here with
          Irish whiskey.


          If it's cold outside,
_____  fill to here with
          Irish whiskey.


_____  Fill to here
         with Irish whiskey.

____________________________________  {Bottom of mug}



The recipe is actually pretty good, whether or not you're Irish, and whether or not it's cold outside.  

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 20 Mar 2011, 20:26
I also believe that the Waffles reference is from that Most Serious Comic Of All, 510. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=510)

Yes and Pancakes are from this Most Momentous Comic. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1080)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Mar 2011, 20:30
Tasty pancakes (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=95)
Title: Re: Just be glad that polls are back at all
Post by: foolsguinea on 20 Mar 2011, 21:19
QC Forum Weekly Reaction Thread Poll:
(...until they get shut down by the mods for excess forum drama, that is.)

To those who think that sounds like a joke, be aware that there was a period a couple of years ago when the ability to make polls was removed in the WCD forum (which was separate from discussion at that time) because it was felt that they had got out of hand.  It was restored at or shortly after the time when the WCD and QC discussion forums were merged.
Yes, this was when I was trying to master the polling feature & having a hard time of it, & apparently the mods thought putting up with my repeated failed poll threads was too much trouble. At least that's how it looked from my corner. So, yeah, don't worry about it, it's all fine.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 20 Mar 2011, 21:23
Tasty pancakes (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=95)

hehe nearly forgot about that one; that's one of my favorite Marten punchlines
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: WaffleIron on 21 Mar 2011, 00:21
Okay, so no waffles, but more whiskey? ;)

But...but...
I just registered to tell everyone this Friday is Waffle Day.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sorflakne on 21 Mar 2011, 00:24
Wow Angus, I mean...wow.  I might be a nerd/dork/geek, but even I'm not that much of a nerd/dork/geek.  You just know he's a virgin when he's dropping lines like that.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ysth on 21 Mar 2011, 00:36
I think it's more the professional strawman coming out.  Remember, he's paid to lose arguments.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: 0kamisama on 21 Mar 2011, 00:46
Nice job missing your golden opportunity, Angus...

Poor guy, now he's most likely going to be sleeping in the doghouse (aquarium, in this case?) tonight
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Y on 21 Mar 2011, 00:46
I find it nice how Faye holds her lips like that when she was suggesting a possibility. Of course Faye meant for him to play with her boobs or alike, and he's using the same seafood references that disgusted them before to get some real sex. I'm sure in real QC time not much time has passed since they hooked up. So it may be to early for that.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: squishything on 21 Mar 2011, 01:02
Heh. Angus has a giant chin in that last panel. I guess something else also rises (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SomethingElseAlsoRises).
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 21 Mar 2011, 02:06
Nice job missing your golden opportunity, Angus...

Poor guy, now he's most likely going to be sleeping in the doghouse (aquarium, in this case?) tonight

Donations for Angus to buy a snorkel? He will need one. Here's my quarter.

Srsly. Either he's reading it perfectly, and realizes that it is still too soon for them to have sex, or he is just sooo nervous, and is on autopilot attempting to add levity whenever tension (and something else) rises. Whatever it is, I'm not sure that his is optimal approach. Mind you, it will probably work reasonably well in the end.

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odal on 21 Mar 2011, 02:13
"Fuzzy clam"?  Wow.  I'm guessing he doesn't really know for sure.  If he did, that'd be a little TMI lol.

But I'm sure that description does wonders for the bearhat guys.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: SJCrew on 21 Mar 2011, 02:28
If one thing can be said at all about this guy, it's that he never learns. Same chicks, same jokes, and persistent even when the other party is not interested. Faye has her work cut out for her.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 21 Mar 2011, 02:31
"Fuzzy clam"?  Wow.  I'm guessing he doesn't really know for sure.  If he did, that'd be a little TMI lol.

Funny, Faye was willing to explain the biology of the Bearded Clam to Hanners. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1538)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 21 Mar 2011, 02:40
I love me the Irish whiskey and bourbon, especially the really good Kentucky bourbon and the really old Irish (While in Ireland, there was a 25-year-old Redbreast I had that gave delicious truth to the "water of life" meaning!) but curiously have never liked Scotch! I'm not sure why.

And heh, I don't mind the waffles so much, but 's just like, maybe we should put the joke on the shelf for a little.

As for the comic, your snark does not serve you so well, young MacPhee, not this day. I mean, we've all had the urge to keep the joke going, son, but you gotta learn when to shut up. :P Faye may respect you for sticking to your guns, though; perhaps the dere-dere has not left tsun-tsun and punching in its wake yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: no one special on 21 Mar 2011, 03:02
I mean, I know Angus makes a good punchlie and all, but DOGDAMMIT is he a f***tard with no game or tact whatsoever. 

Dude's really lucky that Faye's into him.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 21 Mar 2011, 03:58
Someone is mad.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 21 Mar 2011, 05:27
(http://i.imgur.com/mbasx.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 21 Mar 2011, 05:57
You just know he's a virgin when he's dropping lines like that.
If he isn't, he deserves to be.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kal on 21 Mar 2011, 05:59
Am I the only person on whom that line would work?

I even think Faye's reaction was a tiresome cliche.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: dragontart on 21 Mar 2011, 06:36
The line itself wouldn't work for me. But I guess I would laugh hard, and since I like my sex funny and I'm always happy when I have something to laugh about, the whole situation would probably work for me, yes x)
I just don't know whether Angus was absolutely serious about that...comparison. That's not as funny, then.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Black Sword on 21 Mar 2011, 06:55
....Angus, you idiot. Ugh.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Mar 2011, 07:03
What was the moment of the week last week?

Tai visits CoD!    - 5 (7.7%)
"I really hope it's just food poisoning."    - 8 (12.3%)
"So how's the next espressosaurus coming along?"    - 0 (0%)
BOOFSH! "Definitely needs more work"    - 5 (7.7%)
"We could market it as a feature."    - 1 (1.5%)
"I knew I brought my helmet to work today for a reason."    - 3 (4.6%)
Nice black eye Wil.    - 0 (0%)
"extremely inebriated, homophobic slur, everything went red..."    - 1 (1.5%)
"bouncer Elliot actually took him out."    - 0 (0%)
"I'm a poet! I was using creative license!"    - 4 (6.2%)
The truth behind Beowulf.    - 2 (3.1%)
"WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MY APARTMENT?"    - 1 (1.5%)
"We were makin' out on the stairs... one flight too many?"    - 1 (1.5%)
"The DOOR was LOCKED."    - 11 (16.9%)
Never understand the appeal of kissing.    - 1 (1.5%)
The spectrometer!    - 1 (1.5%)
"YOU HAD A BONER ON MY COUCH?!"    - 21 (32.3%)

Total Voters: 65
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 21 Mar 2011, 07:38
First response on starting to read the comic was "Panel three looks very cute."

The reponse to the next panel was, "What an idiot!"
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 21 Mar 2011, 07:46
Panel 3 was cute, yes.  But my first thought in panel 4 was that he was pretty presumptuous about the activity she had in mind.  The body language says that it may   have been what he was thinking, but Faye's pulled that switch before, and may have actually suggested something else, given the chance. 

So Angus not only ruined it if it was what he  was thinking, he ruined whatever she  had in mind, as well! 

Smooth, he ain't. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ink slinger on 21 Mar 2011, 09:20
Wow Angus, I mean...wow.  I might be a nerd/dork/geek, but even I'm not that much of a nerd/dork/geek.  You just know he's a virgin when he's dropping lines like that.

Come on, it wasn't that bad. I'd probably make a bad joke like that (a virgin I ain't, though you may not believe me since I've just indicated that I'd make a joke like that). And, it might even work. Stupid jokes are often great methods for flirting and, IMO, there is no reason that you can't have some humour in the bedroom. As long as you're laughing with each other and not at each other, it's all good and fun.

Having said that, it was probably not the best joke to make given that they haven't actually slept together yet. That's something you save for a little bit later in the relationship when you're more comfortable with one another.

Favorite whisky of all time ... Ardberg Uigeadail. you can almost chew the smokiness (you almost have to).
That is a damn fine whisky. The Arbdeg Supernova is even better. It's similar to the Uigeadail, but bigger and peatier.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Mar 2011, 09:55
Indeed, Faye may have been about to propose going to the all-night pancake place.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 21 Mar 2011, 10:11
Favorite whisky of all time ... Ardberg Uigeadail. you can almost chew the smokiness (you almost have to).
That is a damn fine whisky. The Arbdeg Supernova is even better. It's similar to the Uigeadail, but bigger and peatier.

I prefer Highland Park myself
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Near Lurker on 21 Mar 2011, 10:39
Huh.  Angus must have realized this would happen... so basically, stripping the jokes and innuendo, Faye recommended they have sex, for the first time, and Angus turned her down.

Huh.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 21 Mar 2011, 10:58
I think you're giving Angus too much credit.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: BriGuy on 21 Mar 2011, 11:25
Angus, when a hot babe asks you to go down on her, YOU SAY YES!

Yeah, I watched Ghostbusters last night. Leave me alone. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: themacnut on 21 Mar 2011, 11:30
I don't think Angus was getting any at this time no matter what he said (or didn't). Either Faye was not ready to go that far yet (and would have stopped the sloppy makeouts before that point), or Hanners' ranting totally killed her mood. Either way, no sex for Angus just yet-Faye was most likely about to suggest doing something non-sexual.

What Angus's comment may have done, on top of Hanners' sealife-related comments, was squick Faye out so much that she just wanted Angus go home while she took a long shower to wash the squick away and go to bed.


Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 21 Mar 2011, 12:03
Way to go Angus

Smooth, real smooth.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 21 Mar 2011, 12:15
I don't think Angus was getting any at this time no matter what he said (or didn't). Either Faye was not ready to go that far yet (and would have stopped the sloppy makeouts before that point), or Hanners' ranting totally killed her mood. Either way, no sex for Angus just yet-Faye was most likely about to suggest doing something non-sexual.

What Angus's comment may have done, on top of Hanners' sealife-related comments, was squick Faye out so much that she just wanted Angus go home while she took a long shower to wash the squick away and go to bed.




(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y24/WdOdin/Smilies/emot-shlick.gif) ?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 21 Mar 2011, 12:18
I took this as Angus being unable to resist cracking a joke. I relate to it so much...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 21 Mar 2011, 12:35
It wasn't that bad people, maybe he was just a little confused as to Faye's real intentions. After all, look at what happened: He tries to re-engage the makeout session, she says shes too grossed out, but then two seconds later she gets coy and says she wants to do "other things." Knowing Faye, he probably wasn't sure what to expect next so he fell back on humor as a safety (maybe not a smart  safety, but there you go).
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Shaken on 21 Mar 2011, 12:54
Angus is going to give her The Del Monte Clam Hammer!

 :-o
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 21 Mar 2011, 13:11
Man I feel sad for you people if anyone carrying a joke maybe a touch too far = OMG HE HAS NO GAME AND SHOULD BE A VIRGIN.

Hell, I would make a joke like that. Its awful... thats the whole POINT was to be awful.

I can't resist the urge to make a bad joke, and guess what, I'M NOT A VIRGIN. Hell I've been married for nearly 10 years, and did fine with women even before that, and still do fine with them AFTER that (open marriage) so bad jokes does not equal what you think it means.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: DSL on 21 Mar 2011, 14:05
I'll bet she was going to suggest pancakes.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Mar 2011, 14:13
Wait a minute: they've "slept together" already, just there apparently has not yet been sexual intercourse.

Big diff in this day and age.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Mar 2011, 14:39
if they'd just fallen into each other's arms for panel four
That only happens when Toto is involved. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 21 Mar 2011, 15:42
Wait a minute: they've "slept together" already, just there apparently has not yet been sexual intercourse.

Big diff in this day and age.

For all we know, Faye or Angus has the clap.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 21 Mar 2011, 15:45
No, that's Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 21 Mar 2011, 16:04
to be honest, no-one's likely to say what Angus said in real life
snrk
teeheehee...
heh...
BUAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAAAHA!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 21 Mar 2011, 18:25
Panel 3 was cute, yes.  But my first thought in panel 4 was that he was pretty presumptuous about the activity she had in mind.  The body language says that it may   have been what he was thinking, but Faye's pulled that switch before, and may have actually suggested something else, given the chance. 

So Angus not only ruined it if it was what he  was thinking, he ruined whatever she  had in mind, as well! 

Smooth, he ain't. 

Do you mean "what she was thinking"?

There were two "what he  was thinking", and I meant them both. 

And I never said he was a virgin, or should be - don't remember who first suggested that one (CEO?), but it's a bit much. 


As for the overanalysing, it's what we do best!    :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tainted Wisdom on 21 Mar 2011, 19:06
Remarks like "You'd only say that if you're a virgin" - to be honest, no-one's likely to say what Angus said in real life - that's because it's the punchline for a comic strip

I know plenty of people who would say that in real life. One of my friends did this during sex: http://textsfromlastnight.com/Text-Replies-6899.html

The lady he was with at the time then wanted revenge and splashed some on his face while yelling "Uruk-hai!" edit: ...giving a whole new meaning to "The White Hand of Saruman"

Just sayin', it's a jungle out there   :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Y on 21 Mar 2011, 19:40
Faye was most likely about to suggest doing something non-sexual.

Unlikely, considering the way she bites her lips. It must be something more than making out, but less than intercourse.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ysth on 21 Mar 2011, 22:39
Quote
sure is a lot of bare skin in tonight's qc. I hope I don't run out of skin-colored pixels!

Oh, no.  Another locker room scene?  Another encounter at the library?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: bunnyThor on 21 Mar 2011, 22:42
Quote
sure is a lot of bare skin in tonight's qc. I hope I don't run out of skin-colored pixels!

Oh, no.  Another locker room scene?  Another encounter at the library?

From my glimpse of justin.tv a couple of seconds ago, we aren't going to be that lucky.  :x
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Mar 2011, 23:00
Mmph. "Lives up to its name."

Dust off the "NSFW" label again, kids.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ysth on 21 Mar 2011, 23:05
You're right.  Using the word SCREW like that...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 21 Mar 2011, 23:05
Looks like the people poo-pooing on Angus are about to eat their words.  :mrgreen:

Also, it's a very good thing I'm alone, because I really wouldn't have wanted to explain that the comic isn't always this sexual. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Mar 2011, 23:08
He could always ask Will about wrestling a bear.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Martok on 21 Mar 2011, 23:11
I really enjoyed Faye's and Angus' post-coital banter, and his responses were especially amusing!  I laughed out loud at his "wrestling a bear" comment.   :lol: 

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Boomslang on 21 Mar 2011, 23:17
Huh... wasn't expecting it to go THERE, considering last comic, but hey.

Bravo Faye. You have now at least begun the process of only sleeping with guys you actually like and respect. Hopefully this will not be too hard to continue.


Although... I kind of feel sorry for Marigold the next time they stay over at Angus's. I don't think she'll take it all that well.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 21 Mar 2011, 23:18
Is ANYONE that hyper after sex? I need a post nap fuck just about every time.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: SJCrew on 21 Mar 2011, 23:18
Maybe he was still a virgin?

@ CEO: I'm sure you meant post-fuck nap, but I'm going to take your sentence at face value because it's funnier that way.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 21 Mar 2011, 23:27
Post fuck nap, post nap fuck, both are very good...


And if you're not careful can lead to a cycle that will completely wipe out a weekend, or any productive contribution to society for that matter. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sorflakne on 21 Mar 2011, 23:30
You just know he's a virgin when he's dropping lines like that.
If he isn't, he deserves to be.
Welp, now we know for sure he's not a virgin [anymore].
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 21 Mar 2011, 23:33
Angus appears to have waxed his chest hair (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1854). Also, love his strategically-placed speech bubble in panel 4.

Also yay so happy for Faye  ^_^
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sluthy on 21 Mar 2011, 23:35
Post fuck nap, post nap fuck, both are very good...


And if you're not careful can lead to a cycle that will completely wipe out a weekend, or any productive contribution to society for that matter. :mrgreen:

I believe that blissfully unproductive state of mind/body is called "slex". Not that I'd know :(
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: no one special on 21 Mar 2011, 23:41
One of my friends did this during sex: http://textsfromlastnight.com/Text-Replies-6899.html

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kazukagii on 21 Mar 2011, 23:44
Panel four = Some pro word bubble censorship.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sharp on 21 Mar 2011, 23:48
CUE THE BOOTY DANCE. THE GODS OF PORKING DEMAND IT.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Torlek on 22 Mar 2011, 00:01
In the immortal words of George Takei, "Oh my!" Figured chances of that were doomed. I wonder about Angus though. If the sex was that great how the hell does he still have energy?
Title: Not exactly a ringing endorsement...
Post by: bunnyThor on 22 Mar 2011, 00:02
Please note that Faye's answer to Angus in panel 2 is not actually "yes". 

Or to sum it up:

ANGUS: That was great for me, was it good for you?
FAYE: I'll be okay.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Mar 2011, 00:07
"Fascinating, Captain. I've detected a large amount of Angus Hatred emanating from several posts on this thread."

"Analysis, Mr. Spock?"

"They appear to be coming from a poster known as 'bunnyThor', Captain."

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 22 Mar 2011, 00:11
Post fuck nap, post nap fuck, both are very good...


And if you're not careful can lead to a cycle that will completely wipe out a weekend, or any productive contribution to society for that matter. :mrgreen:

That's why you keep the gallon of Gatorade next to the bed.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: bunnyThor on 22 Mar 2011, 00:12
"Fascinating, Captain. I've detected a large amount of Angus Hatred emanating from several posts on this thread."

"Analysis, Mr. Spock?"

"They appear to be coming from a poster known as 'bunnyThor', Captain."

A. Spock needs to calibrate his sensors. That wasn't a large amount of anything.

B. My observation remains valid.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 22 Mar 2011, 00:13
Maybe he was still a virgin?

@ CEO: I'm sure you meant post-fuck nap, but I'm going to take your sentence at face value because it's funnier that way.

That is what I meant, but I'm not editing it. Truth be told, I've had a few post-nap fucks. Groggy sex is OK, alert sex is better. But sex is like pizza and all that.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 22 Mar 2011, 00:14
She looks a little too relaxed and happy to be just settling. The sweat on both of them is a telltale sign the sex wasn't fast and unsatisfying.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: bunnyThor on 22 Mar 2011, 00:18
But sex is like pizza and all that.

It's ruined if there's too much cheese on your sausage?

It's better without the red sauce?

Too much yeast makes a terrible crust?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 22 Mar 2011, 00:22
But sex is like pizza and all that.

It's ruined if there's too much cheese on your sausage?

It's better without the red sauce?

Too much yeast makes a terrible crust?

EVEN WHEN IT'S NOT THAT GOOD, IT'S STILL PRETTY GOOD, YOU HAMMER TOTING MARSUPIAL. *eyeroll*

Dear lord, you people are weird. I love this forum.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 22 Mar 2011, 00:22
But sex is like pizza and all that.

It's ruined if there's too much cheese on your sausage?

It's better without the red sauce?

Too much yeast makes a terrible crust?

ARRRRRGH   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 22 Mar 2011, 00:24
Angus' screwy eyes in the first panel are a nice touch.

Pizza is good.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: J on 22 Mar 2011, 00:29
so is angus ready for his certification exams then? (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1296)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odal on 22 Mar 2011, 00:38
Haha, I was also lucky there was no one around.  NSFW indeed.  Work is the only place I read the comic.
Title: Re: Not exactly a ringing endorsement...
Post by: no one special on 22 Mar 2011, 00:46
Please note that Faye's answer to Angus in panel 2 is not actually "yes".  

I loved her answer: "I'll be happy."  That's how we know that Faye really cares about him.  It doesn't have to be mind-blowing sex if you're with someone you care about.  Sure, it needs to be good, but intimacy makes up for a lot!

This is a really special comic, in that it is SO great to see Faye happy, and truly able to be emotionally present in her relationship. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 22 Mar 2011, 00:53
Oh my god such a huge grin right now, go Angus go. And go Faye go too! She looks so damn satisfied. Like a happy cat.

Though god damn, with all that energy you might as well go for round two, dude. Unless the sex really does make you hyper, then it's probably not good, you'll end up jittery and annoying and that would be a bad end to the night.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 22 Mar 2011, 01:17
Excellent. Now next time he'll need to push the envelope even further.
it is now merely a matter of time.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sluthy on 22 Mar 2011, 01:19
He's probably just like Dora (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1670). Either that or it is his first time and he's just super psyched.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 22 Mar 2011, 01:26
I wonder if Angus can harness this sex-produced energy for gains in his political career, now.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 22 Mar 2011, 01:43
EVEN WHEN IT'S NOT THAT GOOD, IT'S STILL PRETTY GOOD, YOU HAMMER TOTING MARSUPIAL. *eyeroll*
Rabbits are not marsupials. BunnyThor is a hammer-toting Lagomorph. /nerd

Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 22 Mar 2011, 01:52
Is ANYONE that hyper after sex?

I knew a couple girls like that (Not involved in relationships, just friends). Actually, one was a drug user, and another got into "slut mode" after a few drinks. Surprisingly, the only thing that got her drunk was Asahi Super Dry and other related Lagers. Fed her anything else, she'd empty the whole bottle before going tipsy. 

And then there was the pain slut...... 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Mar 2011, 02:00
Dora bakes carrot cake and reorganizes the dishes. Hannermom performs a string of corporate takeovers. What's the equivalent for a professional strawman? Will he pick a fight with Pennelope about religion? Will he try to lose an argument that's impossible to lose?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 22 Mar 2011, 03:21
More tiny pillows...

There's nothing tiny about those pillows...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Loki on 22 Mar 2011, 04:01
Is ANYONE that hyper after sex?
As I believe I have mentioned before, sex switches me from active to tired (as one would expect), but also from tired to hyper. So, yes :D

Also, the scars above Fayes boobs have once again mysteriously vanished.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: dragontart on 22 Mar 2011, 04:29
I am that hyper quite often after sex. But I find it kind of cute when people doze off afterward.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tergon on 22 Mar 2011, 04:37
Also, the scars above Fayes boobs have once again mysteriously vanished.
It's just one scar on her right boob (that's stage left for us), and it's pretty clearly there.  I thought it was tastefully done, not huge and obvious but it's there.

I personally tend to get pleasantly tired during the afterglow, but so long as I don't actually fall asleep, after about ten minutes I pretty much get as energised as Angus is here.

And ten points go to both of them: Angus for doin' the right thing by his lady, and Faye for managing to open up both physically and emotionally to a man for the first time in the entire comic.  Big d'awwwwww moment even without the sexy.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 04:49
Well that  was certainly unexpected. 

Don't worry, Angus, this feeling will last about 5 - 10 minutes.  If you don't actually get up and do  something, you'll be snoring soon enough.   :laugh: :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Y on 22 Mar 2011, 04:51
Not to be nitpicking here, but why does the drawer opens toward the bed? As it's below the bed level it seems like it only will open a little before bumping into the mattress. However it's enough to put in and pull out magazines in there. So could this be Faye's secret porn stash?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: horsefish on 22 Mar 2011, 04:53
Big d'awwwwww moment even without the sexy.

Yep.  And kudos to the forum for not being all "SQUEEEEEEEE FANSERVICE!!!!111!1!1ELEVEN" :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tergon on 22 Mar 2011, 05:00
The drawer that opens toward Faye's bed is most likely the home of her... ahem... best kind of boyfriend (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1011).  Y'know, the one that she made friends with back here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1381)?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Technoir on 22 Mar 2011, 05:14
But sex is like pizza and all that.

It's ruined if there's too much cheese on your sausage?

It's better without the red sauce?

Too much yeast makes a terrible crust?

Well, so much for finishing my very cheesy breakfast sammich.

Is it just me or does Faye's cross-chest arm in panel 1 look a little...short? Angus' too, actually. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: El_Flesh on 22 Mar 2011, 05:44
Quote
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Well the last I heard in uni some years ago (from a bunch of chix!) was that post gasm guys get some hormone released into the bloodstream that makes them slumber...
Tho evolution only knows what Darwinian benefit that would bestow...

Then again - today's comic explains it. Guys who fall asleep are alot more likely to survive than those who immediately go out and wrestle a bear.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 05:45
Is it just me or does Faye's cross-chest arm in panel 1 look a little...short? Angus' too, actually. 

Foreshortening.  Hers is running from the point of her shoulder (a high point, she's on her side) down to his chest, which is lower.  His is running up from his elbow (on the bed) to his chest.  The vertical distance combines with the vertical POV to make them look shorter than they are.  
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 22 Mar 2011, 05:46
"Is it just me or does Faye's cross-chest arm in panel 1 look a little...short? Angus' too, actually. "

It's a frigging hand-drawn comic. Hands, arms and legs change length as needed to fit the pose.

Take it easy on the over-anylizing.   [where the ^#%$*& is the spell checker?]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 22 Mar 2011, 05:51
Today's comic to yesterday's "Damn, Angus, what a fuckup!" =

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v613/inthedoorway/dr_orpheus.gif)

(Also topical to the foreshortening discussion!)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Mar 2011, 06:02
I wonder if Angus can harness this sex-produced energy for gains in his political career, now.

Well every other politician in the world has tried it, why not Angus?



Oh yeah, because Faye would rip out his skull through his nostrils.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Mar 2011, 06:09

Then again - today's comic explains it. Guys who fall asleep are alot more likely to survive than those who immediately go out and wrestle a bear.

You just need to be Canadian (http://www.badassoftheweek.com/wanyandie.html) to do so.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 22 Mar 2011, 06:25

Then again - today's comic explains it. Guys who fall asleep are alot more likely to survive than those who immediately go out and wrestle a bear.

Could be worse. The worst post-coital activity is shopping. Once read about a study about people in this blissful state overspending staggering amounts of money, when they go shopping with their SO.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 06:25

Then again - today's comic explains it. Guys who fall asleep are alot more likely to survive than those who immediately go out and wrestle a bear.

You just need to be Canadian (http://www.badassoftheweek.com/wanyandie.html) to do so.

Ahem (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24945.msg960631.html#msg960631).  

Alright, so it wasn't wrestling.  
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Mar 2011, 06:27
Is ANYONE that hyper after sex?
As I believe I have mentioned before, sex switches me from active to tired (as one would expect), but also from tired to hyper. So, yes :D

Also, the scars above Fayes boobs have once again mysteriously vanished.

No, they're there. I saw it in both panel one and two. You're looking more at the top of her cleavage and mistaking her scar for that.

Okay, I guess I'm officially in the nerd area for saying that.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Black Sword on 22 Mar 2011, 06:58
Don't suppose Jeph can warn us when he's going NSFW our butts? Would have been most awkward to explain at work. At least no one was walking by at that moment.

Still, go Angus! Foot in mouth demise prevented!

So let's see. Faye is opening up emotionally and physically, Angus got some, they both seem to be a happy, snarky couple, what could possibly go wrong? Am I right, Dr. Murphy?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Mar 2011, 07:04

Then again - today's comic explains it. Guys who fall asleep are alot more likely to survive than those who immediately go out and wrestle a bear.

You just need to be Canadian (http://www.badassoftheweek.com/wanyandie.html) to do so.

Ahem (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24945.msg960631.html#msg960631).  

Alright, so it wasn't wrestling.  

What you don't remember are the Canucks that came south in search of more bears, maple syrup, etc. and married into your family.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 07:56
Hey, there are no Great Lakes wetbacks in my  family tree! 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Mar 2011, 08:06
You only think there aren't.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: tbones on 22 Mar 2011, 09:19
The drawer that opens toward Faye's bed is most likely the home of her... ahem... best kind of boyfriend (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1011).  Y'know, the one that she made friends with back here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1381)?
God, you made me remember about the "Daft Punk Disco Dong".

I'd buy the shit out of that product.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Doctor Online on 22 Mar 2011, 09:39
Post fuck nap, post nap fuck, both are very good...


And if you're not careful can lead to a cycle that will completely wipe out a weekend, or any productive contribution to society for that matter. :mrgreen:

This happened the four days I stayed with my boyfriend, before we became "official" and wayyy before I moved to SC. 4 days of sleeping, waking up, banging, sleeping, waking up, banging, then going to swim, then eating, then banging, then nap. I think we had pizza delivered two nights... yeeeeeah. It was awesome. I couldn't walk right once I got back to Va.  :evil:

When you spend a month apart from someone, it just builds up.

Here I go again posting about sex.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 09:46
Here I go again posting about sex.

'S ok, we've come to expect no less.   :angel:

You only think there aren't.

Actually, it's the other way 'round - I'm only 3rd generation from the Germans/Romanians/Poles/Russians of my descent, and several of their relatives wound up going north - there's a street in Toronto with my family name, along with a delicatessen, and Google turns up several professsionals (Doctors & Lawyers) with the same (uniquely misspelled) surname. 

I think the bear-ish tendencies came across on the boat!  ;)
Title: Just sayin'
Post by: bunnyThor on 22 Mar 2011, 09:50
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Unless, apparently, you're Sven...  :|
Title: Re: Just sayin'
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Mar 2011, 09:51
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Unless, apparently, you're Sven...  :|

To be fair, the deal breaker might have been when he had sex with Gina Riversmith... just a hunch... :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Mar 2011, 09:53
Mmmmmyeah, post coital behaviour is trumped by extra-coital behaviour...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: bunnyThor on 22 Mar 2011, 09:57
Poor Sven. That guy can't ever seem to catch a break.  :cry:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Mar 2011, 10:00
He did catch a break. And catching it ended up with him getting kicked to the curb by Faye, bitch slapped by Dora and a stern telling off from his intern. Actually, that last part might explain why she isn't in the comic anymore.
Title: Re: Not exactly a ringing endorsement...
Post by: BillyxRansom on 22 Mar 2011, 10:32
Please note that Faye's answer to Angus in panel 2 is not actually "yes".  

I loved her answer: "I'll be happy."  That's how we know that Faye really cares about him.  It doesn't have to be mind-blowing sex if you're with someone you care about.  Sure, it needs to be good, but intimacy makes up for a lot!

This is a really special comic, in that it is SO great to see Faye happy, and truly able to be emotionally present in her relationship. 
....

yeah whatever MOAR TITZ PL0X LOLOLOLLOOL
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ink slinger on 22 Mar 2011, 10:35
Don't suppose Jeph can warn us when he's going NSFW our butts?
He did...unless he changed the title of the comic and it didn't mention NSFW until I got around to reading it. Of course, if you're reading it just by going to the site, rather than through a feed reader, yeah, there's pretty much no warning. So...um...I retract my statement? I guess?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: John_Knee on 22 Mar 2011, 10:43
Quote
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Well the last I heard in uni some years ago (from a bunch of chix!) was that post gasm guys get some hormone released into the bloodstream that makes them slumber...
Tho evolution only knows what Darwinian benefit that would bestow...


Depending on the mammal, the act of intercourse really zaps the energy and the body releases the hormones etc needed to put the animal into a deep sleep so that when the animal awakes, he is fully fresh. You find this post-intercourse snooze is more common with mammals that live in groups so that the other animals can provide a certain amount of protection - even if the male sleeping is the dominant one... Remember in terms of human evolution that we too, as cave dwellers, also used to live in groups and evolutionary still retain this "Darwinian benefit". Although we as a species no longer hang around in groups in the same way, following from mammal traditions we only have intercourse when we feel relatively safe and not in immediate danger...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 22 Mar 2011, 11:02
The drawer that opens toward Faye's bed is most likely the home of her... ahem... best kind of boyfriend (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1011).  Y'know, the one that she made friends with back here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1381)?

I was thinking that's where the condoms were. But yeah, Faye's special friend is probably in there.

I wonder if it'll get jealous of Faye's new "special friend"  :evil:

Also Skewbrow I loooooove what you've done with your icon  :laugh: How very appropriate!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ink slinger on 22 Mar 2011, 11:12
The drawer that opens toward Faye's bed is most likely the home of her... ahem... best kind of boyfriend (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1011).  Y'know, the one that she made friends with back here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1381)?

I was thinking that's where the condoms were. But yeah, Faye's special friend is probably in there.

The condoms and the "special friend" are probably kept in the same drawer.

Quote
I wonder if it'll get jealous of Faye's new "special friend"  :evil:

Why get jealous? Bring them both to bed.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 22 Mar 2011, 11:16
What makes you so sure she hasn't already? Angus seems like the type that would be down for that kind of action. :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Mar 2011, 12:01
Wonder how many pages we'll hit by Friday - nudity seems to draw us to the forums
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 22 Mar 2011, 12:07
People like nudity on the internet?! NEVER!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 22 Mar 2011, 12:42
Wait. Since when did Faye have scars above her tits?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Evilproduct on 22 Mar 2011, 12:47
Every morning for the past few weeks I have been checking this comic first thing in the morning before class. And I must admit, at 6 AM when the QC page loaded up and I saw Faye and Angus post-coital, I fist pumped the air for joy!! I checked it again during my computer's class and made my friend (who knows I read QC but knows nothing about it) give me a weird look when he saw all those flesh colored pixels. Haha! Faye/Angus forever! They better not have a Marten/Dora ending cause i was depressed for like two weeks when that happened.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 22 Mar 2011, 12:47
Since she was in a car wreck as a teenager?

EDIT: In response to yet another question asking how long Faye has had a scar on her boobs.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: tomart on 22 Mar 2011, 13:23
But sex is like pizza and all that.
It's ruined if there's too much cheese on your sausage?
It's better without the red sauce?
Too much yeast makes a terrible crust?
*eyeroll*
Dear lord, you people are weird. I love this forum.

me too!   :-D

Mor skin, Yay!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 22 Mar 2011, 14:48
Don't suppose Jeph can warn us when he's going NSFW our butts? Would have been most awkward to explain at work.
You might consider following Jeph's twitter feed:
Or, you know, just not read comics while you're at work?  :police:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Mar 2011, 15:00
 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Mar 2011, 17:09
Excuse me while I pick my jaw up from the floor-just checked the comic today... :-o :-o :psyduck:

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Mar 2011, 17:21
Or, you know, just not read comics while you're at work?  :police:

That's just crazy talk.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Mar 2011, 18:15
Or, you know, just not read comics while you're at work?  :police:

That's just crazy talk.

Thats half the fun of QC, hell, I had my boss laughing at the beer sledding party storyline. Anyway, if I read QC at work, its on my ipad during lunch.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: azurefirem on 22 Mar 2011, 18:19
Only commenting on the note at the bottom today:
Just sometimes, Jeph? Riiiiiiight.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Mar 2011, 18:40
What was the moment of the week last week?
Tai visits CoD!    - 9 (6.9%)
"I really hope it's just food poisoning."    - 11 (8.4%)
"So how's the next espressosaurus coming along?"    - 0 (0%)
BOOFSH! "Definitely needs more work"    - 10 (7.6%)
"We could market it as a feature."    - 3 (2.3%)
"I knew I brought my helmet to work today for a reason."    - 7 (5.3%)
Nice black eye Wil.    - 0 (0%)
"extremely inebriated, homophobic slur, everything went red..."    - 2 (1.5%)
"bouncer Elliot actually took him out."    - 0 (0%)
"I'm a poet! I was using creative license!"    - 6 (4.6%)
The truth behind Beowulf.    - 3 (2.3%)
"WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MY APARTMENT?"    - 2 (1.5%)
"We were makin' out on the stairs... one flight too many?"    - 2 (1.5%)
"The DOOR was LOCKED."    - 23 (17.6%)
Never understand the appeal of kissing.    - 2 (1.5%)
The spectrometer!    - 1 (0.8%)
"YOU HAD A BONER ON MY COUCH?!"    - 50 (38.2%) Runaway winnah!

Total Voters: 131
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Mar 2011, 18:59
Faye's scar (http://www.questionablecontent.net/454). Also 506.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tetrinity on 22 Mar 2011, 19:46
That comic was certainly... unexpected. Glad I decided to listen to music rather than catch up on webcomics while bored in my lab session earlier... would've required a lot of explaining to my lecturer.

Also, Faye is clearly secretly into the mollusc euphemisms.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sorflakne on 22 Mar 2011, 23:17
Wait. Since when did Faye have scars above her tits?
Ever since comic #100, or whenever it was when Marten accidentally walked in on Faye when she was getting dressed.

Or ever since she somehow crashed her car in the upper branches of an oak tree if you want to get technical.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 22 Mar 2011, 23:51
Operation M.A.N.A.S.S. is go.

The second I saw the dancing I knew how it had to end. Still effing hilarious, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 22 Mar 2011, 23:53
Best.

Booty.

Dance.

EVAR!!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: westrim on 22 Mar 2011, 23:54
Marten: Dammit Angus, that answer is not encouraging!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: lunakitten on 22 Mar 2011, 23:55
Oh gods, Marten's face! :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:
Just perfect, really. The dangers of having roommates. I got to see more of my friends (and more of their SO's ) than I ever planned on seeing.  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 22 Mar 2011, 23:58
Side effects of Op MANASS?  Excessive flapping which could lead to an (ahem) uncontrolled release of spent munitions.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Blackjoker on 22 Mar 2011, 23:59
Todays comic was quite amusing, that is all. :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 23 Mar 2011, 00:00
Is it normal to forget you still have the freaking condom on?! Seriously, I wanna know! Seems like a male blonde moment to me  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 23 Mar 2011, 00:09
Is it normal to forget you still have the freaking condom on?! Seriously, I wanna know! Seems like a male blonde moment to me  :-P

Especially if you had *ahem* reached your high. I don't think it would be very fun to have your dong marinating in your happy batter.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Mojo on 23 Mar 2011, 00:09
I'm not sure there is any amount of ridiculosity that can overcome this awkward zone.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Mojo on 23 Mar 2011, 00:10
Is it normal to forget you still have the freaking condom on?! Seriously, I wanna know! Seems like a male blonde moment to me  :-P

Especially if you had *ahem* reached your high. I don't think it would be very fun to have your dong marinating in your happy batter.

Let alone showing it off to someone else.  Especially unexpectedly.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: westrim on 23 Mar 2011, 00:13
Is it normal to forget you still have the freaking condom on?! Seriously, I wanna know! Seems like a male blond moment to me  :-P

Especially if you had *ahem* reached your high. I don't think it would be very fun to have your dong marinating in your happy batter.
*Girl tugs her mothers skirt.* Mommy is he saying that the man ejaculated in the condom and hasn't taken it off yet, so his penis is still in there with his sperm?  :evil:

I think he's getting ready for round x and has already put the next condom on, rather than keeping on the last one.


Let alone showing it off to someone else.  Especially unexpectedly.

You do know that you can edit posts and say something on more than one topic or more than one response rather than double posting, right?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 23 Mar 2011, 00:13
I'm not sure there is any amount of ridiculosity that can overcome this awkward zone.

Awkward, yes, but somehow I think that more than enough ridiculosity has already been presented, no?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 23 Mar 2011, 00:16
At least Marten's being a good sport about it...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: J on 23 Mar 2011, 00:17
Quote
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Well the last I heard in uni some years ago (from a bunch of chix!) was that post gasm guys get some hormone released into the bloodstream that makes them slumber...
Tho evolution only knows what Darwinian benefit that would bestow...


Depending on the mammal, the act of intercourse really zaps the energy and the body releases the hormones etc needed to put the animal into a deep sleep so that when the animal awakes, he is fully fresh. You find this post-intercourse snooze is more common with mammals that live in groups so that the other animals can provide a certain amount of protection - even if the male sleeping is the dominant one... Remember in terms of human evolution that we too, as cave dwellers, also used to live in groups and evolutionary still retain this "Darwinian benefit". Although we as a species no longer hang around in groups in the same way, following from mammal traditions we only have intercourse when we feel relatively safe and not in immediate danger...

additionally, the human penis has evolved a shape that, when in use creates a suction effect. evidence suggests that this is of use in removing 'genetic material' that may have previously been left behind by a rival male. if this is true, then it may be evolutionarily disadvantageous to have sex with the same partner consecutively in a short amount of time, as the suction effect would end up removing one's own 'genetic material' instead. (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=secrets-of-the-phallus)

 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 23 Mar 2011, 00:19
Quote
Go Angus! I take it all back; a guy who doesn't lapse into slumber and start snoring post sex is obviously a keeper...

Well the last I heard in uni some years ago (from a bunch of chix!) was that post gasm guys get some hormone released into the bloodstream that makes them slumber...
Tho evolution only knows what Darwinian benefit that would bestow...


Depending on the mammal, the act of intercourse really zaps the energy and the body releases the hormones etc needed to put the animal into a deep sleep so that when the animal awakes, he is fully fresh. You find this post-intercourse snooze is more common with mammals that live in groups so that the other animals can provide a certain amount of protection - even if the male sleeping is the dominant one... Remember in terms of human evolution that we too, as cave dwellers, also used to live in groups and evolutionary still retain this "Darwinian benefit". Although we as a species no longer hang around in groups in the same way, following from mammal traditions we only have intercourse when we feel relatively safe and not in immediate danger...

additionally, the human penis has evolved a shape that, when in use creates a suction effect. evidence suggests that this is of use in removing 'genetic material' that may have previously been left behind by a rival male. if this is true, then it may be evolutionarily disadvantageous to have sex with the same partner consecutively in a short amount of time, as the suction effect would end up removing one's own 'genetic material' instead. (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=secrets-of-the-phallus)

 :psyduck:

In 1993, the American Government funded a study to see why the Head of a Penis was bigger than the rest of it.

After one year and $180,000.00, they concluded that the reason the head was larger than the shaft was to give the man more pleasure during sex.

After the US published the study, France decided to do their own.

After $250,000.00, and 3 years of research, they concluded that the reason was to give the woman more pleasure during sex.

Poland, unsatisfied with these findings, conducted their own study. After 2 weeks and a cost of around $75.46, they concluded that it was to keep a man's hand from flying off and hitting him in the forehead.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 23 Mar 2011, 00:22
I'm not sure there is any amount of ridiculosity that can overcome this awkward zone.

Ponyplay, figging, and birchings.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Mar 2011, 00:30
Yeah, Marten's gonna need another bottle of hard liquor to scrub the image of nekkid dancing Angus (complete with hot pink condom) from his mind.

Heck after writing that I think I may need a bottle... :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kazukagii on 23 Mar 2011, 00:37
I enjoyed today's strip, Jeph. I also like Angus's taste in condom color, and respect his insistence on it being referred to as it's proper hue. Good show.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sharp on 23 Mar 2011, 00:38
CUE THE BOOTY DANCE. THE GODS OF PORKING DEMAND IT.

I'm sorry, I can't hear anything over how loud I CALLED THIS.  :mrgreen:






(I don't get to celebrate often)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sorflakne on 23 Mar 2011, 00:59
Ach...guy butt.

Psyduck purge my mind of the image.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 23 Mar 2011, 01:08
I think he's getting ready for round x and has already put the next condom on, rather than keeping on the last one.

Angus: Hold on a sec, sweetie, before we do this I just wanna do a "getting laid" dance naked around your living room for a little bit.
Faye: OK, don't be long!

Seriously, I figured Faye dozed off. If she were aware, I'm sure she would have stopped Angus from striding into the main room nude. C'mon, who does that?! I'm starting to wonder if Angus hit his head recently.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Y on 23 Mar 2011, 01:12
I'm not sure if the condom makes it worse or not, as it provides some covering. It would be weirder if the condom was a puppet or had eyes on it. But after that nothing more than like being in a locker room.

I'm sure she would have stopped Angus from striding into the main room nude. C'mon, who does that?! I'm starting to wonder if Angus hit his head recently.

I'm sure he didn't expect anyone to be there. Besides who hasn't walked around naked in a home when nobody was there?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 23 Mar 2011, 01:19
Seriously, I figured Faye dozed off. If she were aware, I'm sure she would have stopped Angus from striding into the main room nude.

You're probably right about Faye dozing off. My take is that Angus was on his way to bathroom to dispose of used prophylactics and wash off the residual ammunition before he would go back and cuddle Faye some more. But then he just couldn't keep the lid on...

C'mon, who does that?! I'm starting to wonder if Angus hit his head recently.

I guess being under the influence of Faye 's boobs has such an effect on him.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odal on 23 Mar 2011, 01:26
Ach...guy butt.

Psyduck purge my mind of the image.  :psyduck:
I dunno.  I think the mental image of a Angus dancing around with a hot pink condom on is worse.

 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Antario on 23 Mar 2011, 01:38
indeed....give poor marten a  :psyduck:


and i think there is enough ridiculosity mixed in with todays comics to not cause the awkward zone, it just creates one between marten and faye
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: John_Knee on 23 Mar 2011, 02:53

I'm sure he didn't expect anyone to be there. Besides who hasn't walked around naked in a home when nobody was there?

He wasn't expecting Martin to be there - note what appears to be keys in Martin's hands...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 23 Mar 2011, 04:47
Yeah, Marten's gonna need another bottle of hard liquor to scrub the image of nekkid dancing Angus (complete with hot pink condom) from his mind.

Heck after writing that I think I may need a bottle... :psyduck:


MAY need another bottle of hard liquor - and a straw...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Mar 2011, 04:59
I just had a thought...


If Faye and/or Angus can phase matter with the intensity of their passion,
is a condom really the best choice for birth control? :-o :? :| :psyduck:

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 23 Mar 2011, 05:04
I have not had nearly enough coffee to contemplate such things!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 05:07
Birthday suit gag! 


Perfect, 'cause it's my birthday!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tergon on 23 Mar 2011, 05:23
Happy Birthday, Carl-E.  Have some celebratory Manass.

Perfect though this comic was - I was wondering if we'd see a booty dance here - it does raise one question.  Since we now have it confimred that Angus is not dripping with manly hair all over his chest, back and shoulders, does this mean that he's shaved in order to quell Faye's disgust?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Mar 2011, 05:27
Knowing Angus, he probably went with a more permanent solution. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_hair_removal) :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 23 Mar 2011, 05:28
or Faye issued him with:

Congratulations: you are entitled to one free

Back, Sack and Crack wax.


faliure to utilise this coupon will void any chance of intercouse and may invalidate your relationship.



[edit]: spelling like a frigging moron[/edit]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Coffee_Kaioken on 23 Mar 2011, 05:45
I realize it's one day too late, but did anyone get the Scott Pilgrim reference in the last comic? "And I reserve the right to change my mind about the sex later."
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: blub on 23 Mar 2011, 05:47
Since we now have it confimred that Angus is not dripping with manly hair all over his chest, back and shoulders, does this mean that he's shaved in order to quell Faye's disgust?

I only recall the mention of back hair (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1854 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1854)) - and that's still there, and there's not that much less of it than before. Only the chest hair seems to have vanished. Not that there was much there in the first place.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: dragontart on 23 Mar 2011, 06:16
I love Angus' face so much. Especially in panel 3 and 4. And Marten in the last panel, now I want to collect all strips where he looks like that. I think I've seen him like that before on some occasions.
Much thanks for today's comic, could need that kind of cheering up.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: pwhodges on 23 Mar 2011, 06:38
I realize it's one day too late, but did anyone get the Scott Pilgrim reference in the last comic? "And I reserve the right to change my mind about the sex later."

 :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: inglenook on 23 Mar 2011, 06:38
My first post here - be gentle :)

I was of the opinion that Angus was on his way to the bathroom to dispose of said condom in the bin, wash his hands (etc) before heading back for round two / heading off for bear wrestling.

In panel 1, he did check around to see if anyone was about. Love the timing. Love Marten's expression.

Like Angus an awful lot more as this arc continues. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Mar 2011, 06:51
Ah yes, that awkward moment when you stop out of your girlfriend's bedroom, wearing nothing but a hot pink happy batter marinator and do a booty dance and notice your grilfriend's roommate/recently made single/best friend has a horrified expression on their face. Yeah, we've all been there  :roll: .

The only thing that could make this worse is if it was Pintsize who found Angus. And cue Marigold screaming as soon as she finds out.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Black Sword on 23 Mar 2011, 06:57
I correctly anticipated Jeph would do this and was prepared for the NSFW at work and Marten's mental scarring. I SEE ALL OF THE POTENTIAL FUTURES BEFORE US. I AM THE KWISATZ HADERACH!

On a related note, why in the world would you do a booty dance naked in someone else's apartment when their roommate might return at any moment? Illogical.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Mar 2011, 06:59
On a related note, why in the world would you do a booty dance naked in someone else's apartment when their roommate might return at any moment? Illogical.

The guy is fully prepared and willing to fight bears, I don't think logic is anywhere near his brain at the moment.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 23 Mar 2011, 07:31
Wait, he's still wearing the condom?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: inglenook on 23 Mar 2011, 07:35
On a related note, why in the world would you do a booty dance naked in someone else's apartment when their roommate might return at any moment? Illogical.

Well to be fair, he's not entirely naked...  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: maddness on 23 Mar 2011, 07:55
Question! 'Cause I don't remember. Did Faye ever have Sven in her bedroom or was it always over at his place?



Birthday suit gag! 


Perfect, 'cause it's my birthday!

Happy Birthday, Carl-E!!

It's a known fact that people born in March are super awesome.

That statement has nothing to do with the fact that my birthday was last week.

 :angel:

My first post here - be gentle :)

I was of the opinion that Angus was on his way to the bathroom to dispose of said condom in the bin, wash his hands (etc) before heading back for round two / heading off for bear wrestling.

In panel 1, he did check around to see if anyone was about. Love the timing. Love Marten's expression.

Like Angus an awful lot more as this arc continues. :)

That was my first thought as to why he was walking around with a condom on.

Maybe Faye doesn't have a waste basket in her room, maybe she doesn't like used condoms in her bedroom trash, maybe Angus wanted to do a post-sex tidy up in the bathroom, who knows?

Personally, I would have saved the booty dance for the bathroom, after shucking the condom ... if I was a dude.




On a related note, why in the world would you do a booty dance naked in someone else's apartment when their roommate might return at any moment? Illogical.

Well to be fair, he's not entirely naked...  :-D

I can already tell that you're going to fit right in here. lol
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 08:00
I realize it's one day too late, but did anyone get the Scott Pilgrim reference in the last comic? "And I reserve the right to change my mind about the sex later."

What she said was, "A lady always reserves the right to change her mind", which is very similar to a line in Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew, IIRC. 

So it's not really a Scott Pilgrim reference... that right's been reserved for aeons. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 23 Mar 2011, 08:07
Isn't this a replay of Defeat Awkwardness? (#1425)

[Oh, wow that was over 450 postings ago! Where did the time go?]

Today's punchline an 11 on the ridiculosity scale.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Mar 2011, 08:10
Question! 'Cause I don't remember. Did Faye ever have Sven in her bedroom or was it always over at his place?
I'm pretty sure it was always at Sven's.  Sven has his own place, and it would've been kind of weird if both Dora and Sven were fucking in the same apartment.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: raoullefere on 23 Mar 2011, 08:11
Question! 'Cause I don't remember. Did Faye ever have Sven in her bedroom or was it always over at his place?


Always his place.

Now I can't remember if Angus had chest hair or not before. It do seem an awfully unfair roll of the bear genes to have back hair and not have chest hair.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 23 Mar 2011, 08:34
Question! 'Cause I don't remember. Did Faye ever have Sven in her bedroom or was it always over at his place?
Not sure about her bedroom (though it's likely), but they did have sex on the couch (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1610).
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: maddness on 23 Mar 2011, 08:47
Question! 'Cause I don't remember. Did Faye ever have Sven in her bedroom or was it always over at his place?


Always his place.

Now I can't remember if Angus had chest hair or not before. It do seem an awfully unfair roll of the bear genes to have back hair and not have chest hair.

There was chest hair (http://"www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1854") the last time Angus was shirtless, but it did look rather short for his being so hairy. Maybe he's a shaver and she caught him on an a lazy day the first time around?



Also, this whole Angus back hair thing is bugging me. Barbarella scarred me for life where red back hair is concerned.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 09:58
Damn!  Now you've got me remembering a movie I saw years ago - either a three musketeers type film, or pirates, something of that era - where the villian was getting his back waxed. 

One big sheet of wax that had been dripped onto his back from candles... and the servants (female, IIRC) lfted it as he fell forward off the table - and you saw the bearskin rug trapped in the wax after he falls forward...

In reality, there should have been blood. 



Fuckin' old age!  My mammaries memory's failing! 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: The Duke on 23 Mar 2011, 09:59
Have some celebratory Manass.

I hope I never hear, see, or become otherwise aware of that sentence again as long as I live.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: tbones on 23 Mar 2011, 10:04
Woa, lots of dudes/dudettes vote for "text your ex"

I would do that!
Why not? Might as well sing her/him something like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ChippyD on 23 Mar 2011, 10:12
I completely support naked Angus <3.

I'm a little sad though. We've seen 'Full Body" (In the sense that its as full as its ever going to get in QC) of Sven and Angus, but I don't recall ever seeing more than Marten from the waist up.

This makes me sad.  :-(
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 10:17
Woa, lots of dudes/dudettes vote for "text your ex"

I would do that!
Why not? Might as well sing her/him something like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)

Feeling spiteful, are we?    :evil: :laugh: :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Mar 2011, 10:37
Marten has commented on how good Sven's ass looks to him.

Perhaps there will be some kind of contest to determine whose is best.

Perhaps it will be called the Battle of Manasses.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Mar 2011, 10:48
Except Marten has only seen Angus from the front.

Plus, that's a bull nobody wants to see run. (Don't analyze this sentence for meaning, there is none)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Mojo on 23 Mar 2011, 10:55
Marten has commented on how good Sven's ass looks to him.

Perhaps there will be some kind of contest to determine whose is best.

Perhaps it will be called the Battle of Manasses.


THAT deserves a thumbs up.

 :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 23 Mar 2011, 11:07
Marten has commented on how good Sven's ass looks to him.

Perhaps there will be some kind of contest to determine whose is best.

Perhaps it will be called the Battle of Manasses.

We have a winner!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Blackjoker on 23 Mar 2011, 11:14
Hmm, if they do the awkward zone defeat again Faye might wonder why Angus has returned in monocle and top hat.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Mar 2011, 11:37
Except Marten has only seen Angus from the front.

Unless it took Angus half an hour to turn around, Marten probably got the full monty, front and back.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 23 Mar 2011, 11:51
Marten has commented on how good Sven's ass looks to him.

Perhaps there will be some kind of contest to determine whose is best.

Perhaps it will be called the Battle of Manasses.

Except Marten has only seen Angus from the front.

Plus, that's a bull nobody wants to see run. (Don't analyze this sentence for meaning, there is none)

That would be a very uncivil war.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: maddness on 23 Mar 2011, 12:12
Woa, lots of dudes/dudettes vote for "text your ex"

I would do that!
Why not? Might as well sing her/him something like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)

You have no idea how many days it took me to stop listening to that song after it came out. I looped that thing for hours at a time! Who knows how long it will take me to stop this time.  :psyduck:

Edit: Already on my 5th loop.  :cry:


Marten has commented on how good Sven's ass looks to him.

Perhaps there will be some kind of contest to determine whose is best.

Perhaps it will be called the Battle of Manasses.


Winning!

Forget I said that.

Except Marten has only seen Angus from the front.

Plus, that's a bull nobody wants to see run. (Don't analyze this sentence for meaning, there is none)

How do you know? Maybe someone does?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 23 Mar 2011, 12:42
0_o

This is the perfect pictorial representation or bad timing.

Maybe Angus should have remembered Risky Business   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Mar 2011, 12:43
For non-US readers, the reference is to a Civil War battle which the North calls the Battle of Bull Run and the South refers to as the Battle of Manassas.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Mar 2011, 12:47
For non-US readers, the reference is to a Civil War battle which the North calls the Battle of Bull Run and the South refers to as the Battle of Manassas.
Shame on you, good sir.  Do I have to link you to TV Tropes?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 23 Mar 2011, 13:27
For non-US readers, the reference is to a Civil War battle which the North calls the Battle of Bull Run and the South refers to as the Battle of Manassas.

Thank you. Duly appreciated. I actually googled it up. So it is all about Manassas, Va. vs Manasses, Mass. Hopefully the explanation doesn't ruin the joke for the US readers.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 13:42
Manasses Mass? 

About 9 kilos. 

[rimshot]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 23 Mar 2011, 13:49
I correctly anticipated Jeph would do this and was prepared for the NSFW at work and Marten's mental scarring. I SEE ALL OF THE POTENTIAL FUTURES BEFORE US. I AM THE KWISATZ HADERACH!
Pschhh! Seeing all possible futures is easy; you're not really the Kwisatz Haderach until you can tell the universe exactly which one is going to come true.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 23 Mar 2011, 14:18
Manasses Mass? 

About 9 kilos. 

[rimshot]

Thank you. I guess it's my turn to do a translation, so for the benefit of the metrically challenged reader 9 kilos is very close to 20 lbs. No way a bony youngster could have that much! A Man OTOH?

Come to think of it, 20 lbs is about the size of the slab of ham my wife cooks in the oven for each and every Christmas. [reaches, scratches, a satisfied grin]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ChippyD on 23 Mar 2011, 15:18
Do you think if I asked, that the author would send me a high-def, enlarged crop of panel 5 in the latest comic? I'd love to have it as a desktop wallpaper o.o
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sluthy on 23 Mar 2011, 15:19
Hopefully the explanation doesn't ruin the joke for the US readers.

I actually get the joke now. I thought "what's so witty about calling it that?" Ah, it's a pun, and a good one. Well played.

Might as well sing her/him something like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)

How have I not seen this until now!? Haven't heard anything from Lonely Island since "Like a Boss".
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 23 Mar 2011, 15:46
I guess now they all live in Manassachusetts   8-)  :-D



Oh and Happy Birthday, Carl!!!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Obaten on 23 Mar 2011, 16:26
I don't know how this song wasn't mentioned yet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 23 Mar 2011, 16:28
Oh man.  I read today's strip (heh) this morning and laughed my ass off.  Just re-read it and yep, panel 5 still induces an actual laugh out loud.  Their faces, their positions, everything -- just perfect.   :-D  Gotta say, though, I'm kinda surprised that the fully-laden condom hasn't swung off with all that shakin' around.  At least he didn't helicopter.

I'm not sure if the condom makes it worse or not, as it provides some covering. It would be weirder if the condom was a puppet or had eyes on it.

Bahaha!  Condom with googly eyes!  That would be awesome -- not sure they'd sell, though.  The market demographic of dudes who want their dicks laughed at is probably kinda low.





PS: The closest we've seen Marten nakie (I think) was the Christmas beefcake thing when he and Steve were in speedos and Santa hats.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Mar 2011, 18:44
Y'know, Angus looks a lot like a certain guy named Gilgamesh in that fifth panel.

And I won't comment about the shades of blue and gray in today's comic.

(Wow, that was a long way for a pun, wasn't it?)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Mar 2011, 18:45
Other things you probably SHOULDN'T do after sex?

Skydive.    - 4 (4.4%)
Make Pancakes.    - 0 (0%)
Make coffee.    - 0 (0%)
Make Espressosaurs.    - 2 (2.2%)
Drive to work.    - 1 (1.1%)
Do ANYTHING with Pintsize.    - 15 (16.7%)
Do ANYTHING with Hannelore!    - 19 (21.1%)
Go ice skating.    - 0 (0%)
Eat soup with a fork.    - 4 (4.4%)
Text your ex.    - 31 (34.4%)
Read QC at work.    - 14 (15.6%)

Total Voters: 90
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Mar 2011, 19:05
Y'know, Angus looks a lot like a certain guy named Gilgamesh in that fifth panel.

And I won't comment about the shades of blue and gray in today's comic.

(Wow, that was a long way for a pun, wasn't it?)

You forgot the rimshot. :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 23 Mar 2011, 19:21
Now I can't remember if Angus had chest hair or not before. It do seem an awfully unfair roll of the bear genes to have back hair and not have chest hair.
Welcome back, Raoul!

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: BillyxRansom on 23 Mar 2011, 20:29
anyone else notice the lack of "no homo" at the end of the news post at the bottom of the strip? [/hurf durf]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Mar 2011, 20:53
No.

What's your point?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Mar 2011, 21:00
I don't know how this song wasn't mentioned yet.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)
Dude it's been mentioned like five times.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Ferahgo the Assassin on 23 Mar 2011, 22:25
This made me laugh a lot. http://stats.grok.se/en/201103/puce
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Coffee_Kaioken on 23 Mar 2011, 22:33
I realize it's one day too late, but did anyone get the Scott Pilgrim reference in the last comic? "And I reserve the right to change my mind about the sex later."

What she said was, "A lady always reserves the right to change her mind", which is very similar to a line in Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew, IIRC.  

So it's not really a Scott Pilgrim reference... that right's been reserved for aeons.  

.... you actually read and understood Shakespeare literature? That shit was way too cryptic for me.

I don't know how this song wasn't mentioned yet.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o)
Dude it's been mentioned like five times.

While we're on the topic of that, pause the video at 1:26 and look at the two people in the middle. That, my friends, is called "meeting the quota".
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Mar 2011, 22:56
It's because Jessica Alba's character was a racist.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Mar 2011, 23:01
This made me laugh a lot. http://stats.grok.se/en/201103/puce

...you've got  to be kidding.  Don't people know their tertiary colors anymore?  

Although it reminds me of a story my daughter likes to tell from the Episcopal youth retreats she goes on... one of the counsilers is a huge gay young man, known affectionately as BGD (for Big Gay Dave).  One of the rules is "no purple" (boys are blue, girls are pink, mix 'em and you got purple).  

Well, BGD was holding hands and skipping (no lie, 6'4", 270 lbs, red beard, skipping) with my daughter and some of the older girls on their way to dinner.  One of the other male campers shouted out "Hey, no purple!' and Dave, wothout missing a beat, turned and announced "Honey, this ain't purple, this is puce!"


.... you actually read and understood Shakespeare literature? That shit was way too cryptic for me.


Didn't you read any of it in high school?  I started with julius Caesar when I was about 10, but I was really into ancient rome at the time, and it was an annotated version, which helped a great deal.  Then there were the Shakespeare in the Park productions (in Buffalo, but they were really well done).  Seeing it is often better than reading it, especially the comedies.  And I've been in two prodductions, "As You Like It" in HS and "Midsummer Night's Dream" in college.  

It's not for everyone, but the language isn't nearly as hard as most people make it out to be!  
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: DSL on 23 Mar 2011, 23:24
Re: Shakespeare:
I began liking the Bard in high school (Julius Caesar and watching two oversexed English teachers react during a field trip to see Zefferelli's Romeo and Juliet) but was always grateful I had a professor in college who explained Shakespeare wasn't some longhair artiste but a guy who wrote what sold in his day ... Then explained all the dirty jokes. The effect was to make me regard Shakespeare as accessible and not some rarefied incomprehensibility.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sorflakne on 23 Mar 2011, 23:59
Quote
...you've got  to be kidding.  Don't people know their tertiary colors anymore?
Do people even learn tertiary colors as part of their normal education?  I never did...I learned a few on my own, but I can honestly say that I've never seen anything that would make me say, "Wow, that thing is very puce" (or beige, another color I would never be able to ID).  Take the color Bole for example (a reddish-brown color).  When would you ever describe something as bole-colored?  How many people do you know that would actually know what bole is?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 00:15
I didn't until now.  But now I want a reddish-brown bowl for obvious reasons (so I can eat soup with a fork from it).
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 24 Mar 2011, 00:16
Didn't you read any of it in high school?  

I remember more about Nineteen Eighty-Four than Romeo and Juliet.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 24 Mar 2011, 00:21
Quote
...you've got  to be kidding.  Don't people know their tertiary colors anymore?
Do people even learn tertiary colors as part of their normal education?  I never did...I learned a few on my own, but I can honestly say that I've never seen anything that would make me say, "Wow, that thing is very puce" (or beige, another color I would never be able to ID).  Take the color Bole for example (a reddish-brown color).  When would you ever describe something as bole-colored?  How many people do you know that would actually know what bole is?

Color is so subjective, names are so imprecise, beyond the eight colors of the basic Crayola box*, you might as well use RGB designations.


*red, yellow, blue, green, orange, brown, violet (purple), and black.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 00:23
a guy who wrote what sold in his day
(http://www.marriedtothesea.com/021306/got-to-get-paid.jpg)

@akronnick But what of Burnt Sienna?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 24 Mar 2011, 00:39
Not only reading it, but making shitty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(2000_film)) film (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1996_film)) adaptaions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1990_film)) of (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1969_film)) it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1948_film)).

And as to Burnt Sienna...

What brand?
How burnt?
Where was it found?

And they all can be fairly called "brown."

To be specific, you have to specify!  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 24 Mar 2011, 01:32
I want a party next time I get laid.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: J on 24 Mar 2011, 01:42
Not only reading it, but making shitty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(2000_film)) film (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1996_film)) adaptaions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1990_film)) of (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1969_film)) it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamlet_(1948_film)).
http://dresdencodak.com/2010/06/03/dark-science-01/
http://dresdencodak.com/2010/06/10/dark-science-02/
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 24 Mar 2011, 01:45
The further into the future we go, the shittier the Shakespeare is! :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ysth on 24 Mar 2011, 01:50
This made me laugh a lot. http://stats.grok.se/en/201103/puce

...you've got  to be kidding.  Don't people know their tertiary colors anymore?  
They've obviously missed out.
Quote
CHAPTER I. The Puce Dressing-gown

The peculiar angle of the earth's axis to the plane of the ecliptic-- that angle which is chiefly responsible for our geography and therefore for our history--had caused the phenomenon known in London as summer. The whizzing globe happened to have turned its most civilized face away from the sun, thus producing night in Selwood Terrace, South Kensington. In No. 91 Selwood Terrace two lights, on the ground-floor and on the first-floor, were silently proving that man's ingenuity can outwit nature's. No. 91 was one of about ten thousand similar houses between South Kensington Station and North End Road. With its grimy stucco front, its cellar kitchen, its hundred stairs and steps, its perfect inconvenience, and its conscience heavy with the doing to death of sundry general servants, it uplifted tin chimney-cowls to heaven and gloomily awaited the day of judgment for London houses, sublimely ignoring the axial and orbital velocities of the earth and even the reckless flight of the whole solar system through space. You felt that No. 91 was unhappy, and that it could only be rendered happy by a 'To let' standard in its front patch and a 'No bottles' card in its cellar-windows. It possessed neither of these specifics. Though of late generally empty, it was never untenanted. In the entire course of its genteel and commodious career it had never once been to let.

Go inside, and breathe its atmosphere of a bored house that is generally empty yet never untenanted. All its twelve rooms dark and forlorn, save two; its cellar kitchen dark and forlorn; just these two rooms, one on the top of the other like boxes, pitifully struggling against the inveterate gloom of the remaining ten! Stand in the dark hall and get this atmosphere into your lungs.

The principal, the startling thing in the illuminated room on the ground-floor was a dressing-gown, of the colour, between heliotrope and purple, known to a previous generation as puce; a quilted garment stuffed with swansdown, light as hydrogen--nearly, and warm as the smile of a kind heart; old, perhaps, possibly worn in its outlying regions and allowing fluffs of feathery white to escape through its satin pores; but a dressing-gown to dream of. It dominated the unkempt, naked apartment, its voluptuous folds glittering crudely under the sun-replacing oil lamp which was set on a cigar-box on the stained deal table. The oil lamp had a glass reservoir, a chipped chimney, and a cardboard shade, and had probably cost less than a florin; five florins would have purchased the table; and all the rest of the furniture, including the arm-chair in which the dressing-gown reclined, a stool, an easel, three packets of cigarettes and a trouser-stretcher, might have been replaced for another ten florins. Up in the corners of the ceiling, obscure in the eclipse of the cardboard shade, was a complicated system of cobwebs to match the dust on the bare floor.

Within the dressing-gown there was a man. This man had reached the interesting age. I mean the age when you think you have shed all the illusions of infancy, when you think you understand life, and when you are often occupied in speculating upon the delicious surprises which existence may hold for you; the age, in sum, that is the most romantic and tender of all ages--for a male. I mean the age of fifty. An age absurdly misunderstood by all those who have not reached it! A thrilling age! Appearances are tragically deceptive.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CompSarge on 24 Mar 2011, 02:19
Looks like Marten's not holding any grudges. Good for him.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Antario on 24 Mar 2011, 02:51
well, thats another awkward zone defeated
marten is starting to become a pro at this, maybe his next career move  'professional awkward zone slayer'



well at least faye is still very considerate of him, first shows it with the whole:  'that would be a real...shitty....thing to do to someone..... :oops:' (some archive genius look that one up)
and now marten basically shows her not to worry and slaughters the awkward zone in one go

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 24 Mar 2011, 03:03
Aaaaand


The 'Wood' metaphors abound.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Enduar on 24 Mar 2011, 03:07
If Marten still has anything going for Faye he deals with it well or has a very good instinct for such things. Faye however seems to have overreacted slightly and may have caused Angus some stress in the process. In Angus's position I would have be concerned about her still harboring feelings for Martin regardless of the time that has passed and a reaction like this would have just helped to confirm it a bit. (At least for me, but I'm a jealous creature and am paranoid/over analytical)

Other than that it's interesting to think what actual emotions are buried deep down. Do the characters themselves even know them?

In Martin's case is he able to cope and respond so well to this situation because there is nothing to cope with anymore? Or has he acknowledged what he feels on some level and is able to respond in a more logical, empathetic fashion because of it?

Does Faye on some level still think of Martin in that way? Subconsciously perhaps where she doesn't acknowledge it, or more conflictingly does she know and simply suppress it?

Food for thought. Gonna go back to lurking now.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 24 Mar 2011, 03:09
Didn't you read any of it in high school?
Yeah, isn't Shakespeare compulsory in every high-school English class ever? He's not so hard.

Marten demonstrates that he's a mensch. Pintsize demonstrates that he's a very odd little robot indeed. Why would he celebrate Arbor Day? Or did he just steal the banner for the lulz?

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 24 Mar 2011, 03:23
Marten demonstrates that he's a mensch. Pintsize demonstrates that he's a very odd little robot indeed. Why would he celebrate Arbor Day? Or did he just steal the banner for the lulz?

Does Pintsize do anything for any other reason than lulz?







Ever?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Blackjoker on 24 Mar 2011, 03:44
I figure Pintsize enjoys excuses to party, that and it probably makes for a good story if you have a really badass arbor day party.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sepik121 on 24 Mar 2011, 04:35
Marten demonstrates that he's a mensch. Pintsize demonstrates that he's a very odd little robot indeed. Why would he celebrate Arbor Day? Or did he just steal the banner for the lulz?

Does Pintsize do anything for any other reason than lulz?

Ever?


The only time pintsize doesn't do something for the lulz, he's just trolling people to think that. For more lulz.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: WaffleIron on 24 Mar 2011, 04:53
I'm pretty sure http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1812 wasn't for the lulz. He genuinely cared.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 24 Mar 2011, 04:56
If Marten still has anything going for Faye he deals with it well or has a very good instinct for such things. Faye however seems to have overreacted slightly and may have caused Angus some stress in the process. In Angus's position I would have be concerned about her still harboring feelings for Martin regardless of the time that has passed and a reaction like this would have just helped to confirm it a bit. (At least for me, but I'm a jealous creature and am paranoid/over analytical)

Other than that it's interesting to think what actual emotions are buried deep down. Do the characters themselves even know them?

In Martin's case is he able to cope and respond so well to this situation because there is nothing to cope with anymore? Or has he acknowledged what he feels on some level and is able to respond in a more logical, empathetic fashion because of it?

Does Faye on some level still think of Martin in that way? Subconsciously perhaps where she doesn't acknowledge it, or more conflictingly does she know and simply suppress it?

Food for thought. Gonna go back to lurking now.

Wow.  And I thought I  over-analyzed!  The Faye-Marten thing never got out of drydock - and they both know it so well by now.  For those who want to cite Marten's drunken grope, please remember that alcohol is not a window into the true desires of the soul, it's more like a blind with a badly rendered landscape painted on.  

He's genuinely happy for her.  And the fact that he can  be points to the progress he's  making in getting over Dora.  

As for Angus, there's no stress there.  He and Marten may not have had much opportunity to talk about it, but they're guys.  They don't really need to - there's an incredible amount of non-verbal communication between guys.  Like Angus starts to say, "Calm down, it's no big deal, he...".  

I think you're right that Faye's just overreacting to Marten's "delicate condition" post-Dora, not realizing how far he's come along.  Because as we know, she's been a bit preoccupied...

and so this strip will be the setup for tomorrow's where Faye and Marten get a chance to reconnect a bit.  Maybe over breakfast.  

Waffles, or tasty pancakes.  

After all, she needs some energy before she disappears for the next week or so into the bedroom with Señor McPhee.  
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 24 Mar 2011, 05:20
Either way - maple syrup for the win!

That was a pretty quick assembly of the party decorations - if it was my house I might be able to get down to the basement, dig out the stuff and get it up in about an hour (seriously, I could use some help getting the laundry room sorted).

And as for Shakespeare - hated it in High School, probably because every single teacher had us analyzing the symbolic significance of every second word.  then in university I sat through Mr. Branagh's version of Henry V  while waiting for Highlander to come on at the double feature and realized that - if I didn't have to analyze the play - that it wasn't so bad.  I now keep a few of my fav plays on the iTouch for reading. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: orinosuke on 24 Mar 2011, 05:25
I think you're right that Faye's just overreacting to Marten's "delicate condition" post-Dora, not realizing how far he's come along.  Because as we know, she's been a bit preoccupied...

I don't think it's even that far. Angus is her guest in the apartment, and he was going around with his wang out. I don't think she's rushing out to ease his emotional stress, just to apologize if it weirded him out (since it would be her responsibility). As many guys know (and in my experience, girls don't realize) we don't freak out if we see another's wang by accident, it's really not a big deal.

Now, if Angus had stuck around outside the room and lounged on the couch naked, I'd be concerned, but otherwise, there's nothing delicate going on here.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 24 Mar 2011, 06:00
Something else going on:

Marten re-connecting with Pintsize. There was quite a bit of ill-feelings there. Pintsize's antics were beginning to grate on Marten. So by enlisting Pintsize's 'resourses' to celibrate Faye's accomplishment, he and his anthro are getting to be buddies again.

That first antic after breaking up with Dora (1812) was in real poor taste (even by Pintsize's standards). Notice the Lake of Fire on the drawing on his back!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: kent_eh on 24 Mar 2011, 07:03
And as for Shakespeare - hated it in High School, probably because every single teacher had us analyzing the symbolic significance of every second word. 
Thiiiiissss!!!!!

And on the other important topic of the week... puce, purple, orange, brown. They're all the same to me.
Seriously, 80% colour deficient according to the optometrist.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Black Sword on 24 Mar 2011, 07:22
Marten and Pintsize redecorated rather quickly. It was apparent this was planned for quite some time.

I correctly anticipated Jeph would do this and was prepared for the NSFW at work and Marten's mental scarring. I SEE ALL OF THE POTENTIAL FUTURES BEFORE US. I AM THE KWISATZ HADERACH!
Pschhh! Seeing all possible futures is easy; you're not really the Kwisatz Haderach until you can tell the universe exactly which one is going to come true.

I foresaw you would say that. The Kwisatz Haderach possesses prescience, seeing all possible futures, thus being able to cause select threads of time to be realized through manipulation. This means the future can be created by action on my part...or inaction on my part. I could weave a particular future, but that would leave us trapped in my oracular vision for the next 3,500 years while a God-Emperor worm-thing whips humanity into a speciific form for our eventual liberation from prescience.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 24 Mar 2011, 07:52
Ahem!

Oblique Dune reference = cool.

Restating 1/2 the plot of 3 books = uncool.

Let's keep it silly, people.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 24 Mar 2011, 07:54
Way to go Martin! 

Awkward Zone =  OBLITERATED. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 24 Mar 2011, 08:01
Cool it, Faye. There's nothing creepy about a dude wearing only a grin and a puce condom.

Way to go Marten! Nice idea to have a party. But isn't Pintsize usually much better prepared for all kinds of contingencies??
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 24 Mar 2011, 08:20
But isn't Pintsize usually much better prepared for all kinds of contingencies??

Note the newspost. The banner was found in Jeph's closet.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 24 Mar 2011, 08:25
Ahem!

Oblique Dune reference = cool.

Restating 1/2 the plot of 3 books = uncool.

Let's keep it silly, people.

Dune references are never "cool", dude.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 24 Mar 2011, 08:49
Argument time!

IMHO, any oblique reference to a classic work, especially if it is humorous, stands as cool.

How hard did you laugh when you discovered that Dora was channeling Ctuthulu{sp} in (1754)?

The fact that we as readers have to think about what is presented and then put the pieces together makes the humor better.

Getting spoon-fed entertainment becomes boring very quickly. We enjoy Jeph's wonderful ride because of the intelligence behind the humor and the drama.

Jeph has mastered the techniques of Less-is-more and subtlety as well as sarcasm. He is especially good at implied action.

Enjoy what is presented and what your own mind fills in as the 'missing pieces'.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 08:57
Hey, people never seem to agree on this.  Is the h "humble" or "honest"?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 24 Mar 2011, 09:22
Hey, people never seem to agree on this.  Is the h "humble" or "honest"?
Nonsequitor! Frame, please.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 24 Mar 2011, 09:30
Hey, people never seem to agree on this.  Is the h "humble" or "honest"?

Actually it's Horace - there's a reason he only uses the initial.

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: westrim on 24 Mar 2011, 09:54
Shakespeare's easy once you realize that half the dialogue is sex jokes.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 24 Mar 2011, 10:12
And the other have relate to bodily functions or bad puns.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Odin on 24 Mar 2011, 10:44
Shakespeare's easy once you realize that half the dialogue is sex jokes.

Half? More like a good two-thirds.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 12:20
Hey, people never seem to agree on this.  Is the h "humble" or "honest"?
Nonsequitor! Frame, please.
Ha, that wasn't a non sequitur!  You had just used "IMHO"!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 24 Mar 2011, 14:11

IMHO, any oblique reference to a classic work, especially if it is humorous, stands as cool.


I mostly agree with your sentiment. It's just that IMHumbleO calling Dune a classic is a major stretch. Of course, it is entirely possible that my opinion would change if I could ever be bothered to read the series. I happened to see some video clips/episodes of a movie/tvseries/whatever (a few decades back), and it was a major turn off. What is the point of having these repulsive worms around, when the heros should be exploring new star systems, new laws of physics, boldly go were no man has gone before and such. As far as I'm concerned Verne is the only classic sci-fi author, and Asimov is well on his way of becoming one (and one that I would have no qualms elevating to classic status).

I am fully prepared to be in the minority re Dune, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: WaffleIron on 24 Mar 2011, 14:15
Happy Waffle Day (http://goscandinavia.about.com/b/2011/03/14/waffle-day-in-sweden.htm) everyone!




What? Of course it's on topic!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 24 Mar 2011, 14:53
Nice!  Gotta love the festive decorations -- I think the "FWEEE" in panel 3 is my favorite part of this strip.   :-D  The expressions, as ever, are great.

Dammit, now I want whisky-soaked waffles.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 24 Mar 2011, 15:27
Whiskey-Soaked Waffles: Bluegrass band name
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: lunakitten on 24 Mar 2011, 15:31


I am fully prepared to be in the minority re Dune, though.
[/quote]
I was lucky enough to have a fabulous English teacher for my freshman year of HS, who gave me the Dune series to read. Don't bother with the film (unless you already love the books, and then only David Lynch's version) but do read at least the first book, if you like Sci-Fi (and from your post it seems you do). It's worth the time. I'm a big fan of Asimov, Verne, Heinlein, and I'd put Herbert up there -not at the top, mind you, but in the running.
As for Shakespeare, I didn't get his work thoroughly until I saw it performed live. Just saw Midsummer Night's Dream for the upteenth time, and it just keeps getting funnier.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: helloandgoodbye on 24 Mar 2011, 17:58
  I don't understand why Faye's apologizing to Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: GoufCustom on 24 Mar 2011, 18:01
As for Shakespeare, I didn't get his work thoroughly until I saw it performed live. Just saw Midsummer Night's Dream for the upteenth time, and it just keeps getting funnier.

That's what always bugs me. So many people teach Shakespeare to be read. It was never intended to be read, it was intended to be seen and heard! Even just reading it aloud by yourself helps it make more sense.

Personally, I never really enjoyed Shakespeare until college, and that was mainly because I was taught not to look at it how it had been presented to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 18:02
@helloandgoodbye

For the awkward moment she feels she could've avoided.  But now she realizes that Marten is indeed happy for her and Angus was right, no biggy.  I think things'll get better from here.

I haven't read Dune, but as for Verne being the only "classic", I think you could easily call Asimov and Clarke classic (perhaps not all of their work, but some of it), and there's arguments to be made for Philip K. Dick as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: zadcap on 24 Mar 2011, 18:14
http://www.goblinscomic.com/03222011/

A day late, but oh, THE COLORS!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Mar 2011, 18:18
IS ONE OF THEM PUCE
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skelepunk on 24 Mar 2011, 21:04
Did no one else have a teacher that insisted on it being acted out? My grade 12 and 11 teacher had us actually act out Shakespeare, complete with costumes, swordfights with real swords. Definitely a bigger fan of his tragedies than his comedies though. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 24 Mar 2011, 21:12
Yeah we did a Shakespeare play around that age too. Not a single play, but like a compilation of different famous scenes. Pretty lame.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 24 Mar 2011, 21:32
There's a poll option missing...

Quote from: Jeph's newspost
March 24, 2011 4:27am

Man, back in college we had some insane Arbor Day parties. I STILL can't stand the taste of human blood!

Is this the origin story for Blood Tree? 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 24 Mar 2011, 21:41
It started out as a bunch of college idiots looking for any excuse to drink; even going so far as to celebrate a holiday about trees. But then one shit-faced fratboy too many puked on the ancient, twisted oak tree in the park. It was time for....revenge.


BLOOD TREE.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Monkey Says Yes on 24 Mar 2011, 23:50
Angus, the goofball you hate to love.

Man, I need me one of those party hats, though.  I like that party hat!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 24 Mar 2011, 23:52
I was thinking more of an ancient druidic rite of planting a tree at the full moon, and giving it a human sacrifice for its first watering...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 25 Mar 2011, 00:20
IMHO, any oblique reference to a classic work, especially if it is humorous, stands as cool.
I can't be sure I'm right, but I took Odin's remark about references to Dune not being "cool" as an allusion to the eponymous planet's average temperature.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 25 Mar 2011, 00:58
"Shit, man, I hit that so hard Rhianna wrote a song about it!"
"Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaang"

That was wrong and I'm sorry. Kinda sorry.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 25 Mar 2011, 01:12
Somehow I just can't picture Marten talking like a fratboy (thats the second time I've mentioned fratboys in 8 hours wtf). I have a feeling part of the reason for this is just to annoy Faye  :laugh:

Also Jeph forgot the high-five sound effect. Daaaaaaaaaaaaang
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 25 Mar 2011, 01:14
>Marten and Angus: Do the bro thing.

You succeed with flying colors, assholes.


Angus, dat metaphor. This is why you are one of my favorite characters. Shit like this. Yes. I am still giggling at Faye's angryface in the last panel.

Also, I move that Dune references are cool so long as they ref the terrible movie and/or don't go on too long. And they aren't that fucking Bene Gesserit mantra or a bastardization of said mantra. Shit gets old real quick.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: CEOIII on 25 Mar 2011, 01:16
Also, I move that Dune references are cool so long as they ref the terrible movie and/or don't go on too long. And they aren't that fucking Bene Gesserit mantra or a bastardization of said mantra. Shit gets old real quick.

Motion denied. Dune was ass, thus references to it are ass as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 25 Mar 2011, 01:29
But the fact that it was terrible is the joke D:

Although frankly I am willing to go with a blanket shunning of Dune just to avoid the Bene Gesserit thing because that is not even cool ironically. That motto is the most played out shit in nerd culture since someone thought to try and riff on Gandalf's "do not meddle in the affairs of wizards" quote.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sluthy on 25 Mar 2011, 02:01
Surely they were just winding up Faye. Why would Marten need to ask Angus if he'd tapped it, if not 30 minutes earlier he'd walked in on him doing a naked booty dance wearing a (possibly spent) condom?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 25 Mar 2011, 03:58
What would you do at an Arbor Day party?

Plant trees.    - 5 (6.7%)
Chop down trees.    - 3 (4%)
Have bonfires.    - 2 (2.7%)
Drink. Heavily.    - 13 (17.3%)
Cake and ice cream and party hats!    - 2 (2.7%)
Study Forestry.    - 2 (2.7%)
Drain maple sap.    - 6 (8%)
Visit Bill Proxmire's grave.    - 1 (1.3%)
Watch anime.    - 4 (5.3%)
Waffles and whiskey.    - 10 (13.3%)
Pancakes and pints of Guiness.    - 6 (8%)
What's an "Arbor Day"?    - 21 (28%)
Blood Tree!    - 0 (0%) (Okay, I just tacked this one on at the end, I'm sorry.)

Total Voters: 75
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Mar 2011, 04:04
Bros: it's all about the sharing. 

In as crude a format as possible. 


 :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tetrinity on 25 Mar 2011, 04:43
I am disappointed with the lack of "daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaang" in the moment of the week poll. I am instead forced to vote for gratuitous nudity.

I HOPE YOU ARE HAPPY
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 25 Mar 2011, 05:07
Gratuitous nudity - is it really so horrible?

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: sepik121 on 25 Mar 2011, 05:08
Bros: it's all about the sharing. 

In as crude a format as possible. 


 :lol:

Don't forget the sharing of crude things:

Friend: Dude, these this food is disgusting man. You should try some.
Me: Okay. (proceeds to eat and is does taste terrible)

This has happened to me. Sooo many times. And I keep doing it too.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Mar 2011, 05:24
"I think the milk went bad.  Here, check it for me..."
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 05:40
Hi All,

Gotta catch up on my replies:

The H in IMHO, I use "humble" in the most sarcastic sense. It's my opinion and you are damn well entitled to it.

A "classic work" is, as Mark Twain Sam Clemmons stated, "A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read."

Whether the classic is good, bad or indifferent, it doesn't matter.

As long as the reference forces a new connection to form in the reader's mind.

Personally, I read "Dune" many years ago and didn't really enjoy it. Waaaayyy to sexist and elitist. I prefer Star Trek TOS and Star Wars IV. [Is my GOM  showing?]
----
On today's comic: I can't beleive Marten and Angus are really that close yet. Whups, re-looked. They are that close and are deliberetly messing with Fay.

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Black Sword on 25 Mar 2011, 06:51
They're hipsters. They can do that sort of thing ironically, and it'll still amuse them.

I did not forsee the Dune hate in this forum. My status as the Kwisatz Haderach has been stripped from me. Woe is to me!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: IlGreven on 25 Mar 2011, 07:19
He hit that so hard, whoever pulls him out will be crowned King of All England.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 07:20
I did not forsee the Dune hate in this forum.
It's the rule of thirds. In any group of people, 1/3 will like, 1/3 will hate and 1/3 will be indifferent to a new issue thread.
---
If you follow R.A. Heinline, you'll remember that humor is a 'small wrongness'. The point being small. Tickeling is a physical assault that we know is not a threat. Laughter is when our minds must comprehend an invalid situation that doesn't impact us.

The humor impacts strongest when we, as the recipients of the humor, assemble the last part in our own minds.

So, heavy handed humor falls flat.

The best use a light touch. The punchline is short. Then pause as the audience gets it.

Why is the Dead Parrot Routine so funny? Because the shopkeeper is in denial that he sold a defective product? Regardless of the absolute proof in front of him? No. It's  John Clese's monolog of 25* euphamisims for "dead". Each one spaced perfectly from the last.

*It's an educated guess. I know the real count is out there.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: ysth on 25 Mar 2011, 07:45
And there are no beavers in Venezuela
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Afakaz on 25 Mar 2011, 08:32
Quote
Marigold Farmer   marigoldfarmer  @hanneloreEC who is in apartment? Bear is in apartment! 

Clerks cartoon reference!  Jeph, you made my day with this. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 25 Mar 2011, 08:58
Hi All,
. I prefer Star Trek TOS and Star Wars IV. [Is my GOM  showing?]

If your GOM was truly showing you'd have referred to them as "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" - only them young whippersnappers need to differentiate with that new stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 09:00
Quote
Marigold Farmer   marigoldfarmer  @hanneloreEC who is in apartment? Bear is in apartment!  

Clerks cartoon reference!  Jeph, you made my day with this. :)
To anybody curious: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL-A8GWyYAA
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 09:13
If your GOM was truly showing you'd have referred to them as "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" - only them young whippersnappers need to differentiate with that new stuff.

I used that form as a favor to the kiddies. My son turns 21 in a few months and we had to come up with a way of differntiating the versions. ANH TESB ROTJ TPM  AOTC ROTS got clumsy. Besides, he ususally put 'em in cronological order.


My bad habit of always saying precisly what I mean.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Mar 2011, 09:31
A real  GOM differentiates with an icy stare when someone asks which version he means. 

Then there's a few moments (anywhere from 10 sec to 2 min) of grumbling about riding on coattails and so on. 

Besides, all the other  Star Treks have monikers.  If you just say, "Star Trek", it must  be the original. 

And IV was tacked onto Star Wars when Episode 1 was retconned.  Clearly, if you just say "Star Wars", it's the movie with that name which we all saw in theatres and drive-ins back in '77! 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 10:16
A real  GOM differentiates with an icy stare when someone asks which version he means. 
And IV was tacked onto Star Wars when Episode 1 was retconned.  Clearly, if you just say "Star Wars", it's the movie with that name which we all saw in theatres and drive-ins back in '77! 

Sorry to burst your bubble, but it was Always "Episode IV: A New Hope"  Mr. Lucas wanted to drop us right in the middle of an ongoing story. The ultimate in suspension of disbelief. No filmmaker in the late 1970's would completely skip opening credits and open the film with a quick re-hash of stuff that was never presented and semi-spectacular space battle. Then it was ground-breaking. Now cliche'.

I sat through 7 screening of that film back in '77 (paid for 4) while my best friend and I taped the soundtrack. Video equipment was too bulky and expensive then. But I remember at a Star Trek con the following January in NYC somebody was showing off his VHS tape of the film.

Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: bunnyThor on 25 Mar 2011, 11:08
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it was Always "Episode IV: A New Hope" 

No.

From the Wookieepedia:

The film was originally released as—and consequently often called—Star Wars, without Episode IV or the subtitle A New Hope. The 1980 sequel, Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, featured the episode number and subtitle in the opening crawl. When the original film was re-released in 1981, Episode IV: A New Hope was added above the original opening crawl.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Somebody on 25 Mar 2011, 11:16
Marten demonstrates that he's a mensch. Pintsize demonstrates that he's a very odd little robot indeed. Why would he celebrate Arbor Day? Or did he just steal the banner for the lulz?

Does Pintsize do anything for any other reason than lulz?







Ever?

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=430 ?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 11:17
I coulda sworn it was there all along. My D&D friends in HS were all over speculating about what George Lucas was gonna 'do' about all of the holes he created in THE FILM. What were the Clone Wars? Who needed Bocci? How much time elapsed from the first battle until the medals were handed out? Didn't anybody ever EAT?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: EcoReck on 25 Mar 2011, 11:18
Long time reader, first time poster etc. etc.

Anyway, I've noticed that Marten's bags under his eyes have almost vanished! Does that mean he's getting better over the breakup? :)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 11:19
Marten demonstrates that he's a mensch. Pintsize demonstrates that he's a very odd little robot indeed. Why would he celebrate Arbor Day? Or did he just steal the banner for the lulz?
Does Pintsize do anything for any other reason than lulz?
Ever?
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=430 ?
You will note that Pintsize got the last laugh with a snarky comment of his own.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Mar 2011, 11:31
I coulda sworn it was there all along. My D&D friends in HS were all over speculating about what George Lucas was gonna 'do' about all of the holes he created in THE FILM. What were the Clone Wars? Who needed Bocci? How much time elapsed from the first battle until the medals were handed out? Didn't anybody ever EAT?


The novelization (that came out shortly after the movie) said that is was the first tale in the second trilogy, which would peg it at episode IV.  But not the film. 

And there were supposed to be three more... a trilogy of trilogies. 




No, I'm not still waiting.  Life's too short! 





At least, I hope Lucas' is...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 11:49
The novelization (that came out shortly after the movie) said that is was the first tale in the second trilogy, which would peg it at episode IV.  But not the film.  
And there were supposed to be three more... a trilogy of trilogies.  
No, I'm not still waiting.  Life's too short!  
At least, I hope Lucas' is...
The novel by Lucas that was published just before the film was released, simply claimed to be "From The Adventures Of Luke Skywalker".
Wow, did he miss the Mark on that one!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 12:07
The ideal scenario would be Mace Windu returning in Episode VII.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 12:20
I'm not allowed near paper anymore...

And give me one good reason Mace Windu shouldn't come back in Episode VII.

("He's dead" doesn't count, because he isn't.)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 12:25
The ideal scenario would be Mace Windu returning in Episode VII.
Sorry, can't see his ghost as a practical plot device in the rebuilding of the republic.


[edit] I withdrew my previous post 'cause I got confused about the characters. [edit]
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 25 Mar 2011, 12:26
quote author=Method of Madness link=topic=26533.msg1025742#msg1025742 date=1301080826]
I'm not allowed near paper anymore...

And give me one good reason Mace Windu shouldn't come back in Episode VII.

("He's dead" doesn't count, because he isn't.)
[/quote]

Because the only worthy opponent for for him is dead.[
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 12:36
Because the only worthy opponent for for him is dead.
Doesn't hold water. "For every fine cat, a fine rat." A fresh villan can always be created. I think it was from R.A. Hienline.
Yeah, from the much derided "Cat Who Walks Through Walls". Right after Richard accepts that Gwen used to co-write a TV space opera.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 12:39
Friendly correction, it's Heinlein.

Although I suppose Palpatine being gone is a problem, but not just for bringing Windu back from his self-imposed exile, because he was basically the Big Bad in all six movies, and there are no current characters to really replace him.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 12:49
A) Friendly correction, it's Heinlein.

B) Today's last panel brings back memories of an earlier strip...


A) Check my signature line. The correction is appreciated, thanks.

B) I'm pretty sure Jeph has used that one several times. Something with Sven and his intern. With Faye? Archive jockies, a little help here!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 12:56
Glad to help.  But I don't think a spell check would be of much use with proper nouns.  For example, I have to hit "add to dictionary" every time I write my name in a word document on a computer I haven't used before.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 12:57
Yeah, but it would cut down on the major blunders, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 25 Mar 2011, 13:05
Today's last panel brings back memories of an earlier (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=6) strip...

And a pleasant memory it is. They have come a long way. Today's lines would have earned Marten some severe punching back then. Also the guys know that Faye trusts them. Another lady might, upon hearing this, feel like she is worth 50 points in a sexual scavenger hunt but not much more. Not our Peach. Not with these friends.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Mar 2011, 13:12
Yeah, but it would cut down on the major blunders, though.
True.  If you have a thumb drive and can use it at work (or wherever you're force to use IE), then put portable Firefox on that.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 25 Mar 2011, 14:52
Ahh, male bonding   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 25 Mar 2011, 14:57
Ugh... Last time I checked this thread, people were getting all snarky about Dune nerdery, and now they're discussing the finer points of Star Wars!?!? That's like complaining about Mozart, and then getting excited about the homeless man on the corner busking with a penny whistle. The two "franchises" do have something in common though; two good first episodes (by release date), a much weaker third episode, and an apparently endless heap of smelly decaying flogged dead horses piled on top. Enough already!

Marten and Angus aren't real bros. They're wanna-bros! Ironically, of course.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 16:15
Ugh... Last time I checked this thread, people were getting all snarky about Dune nerdery, and now they're discussing the finer points of Star Wars!?!? ... an apparently endless heap of smelly decaying flogged dead horses piled on top. Enough already!

Well played, milady, well played. However, the discussion petered out aound 2:30 this afternoon. How about the Shakespere bouncing ball Thursday lunchime?
-------
Marten and Angus are trying very hard to be bros. They've got NOTHING in common except Faye. Marten and Faye are functioning more like brother and sister. If you've got opposite sex siblings, your relationship with your sibling's lover (call it future in-law) can get really awkward or fun. They already did awkward twice. And defeated it. Now they are working on the fun part.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 25 Mar 2011, 16:37
Because the only worthy opponent for for him is dead.
Doesn't hold water. "For every fine cat, a fine rat." A fresh villan can always be created. I think it was from R.A. Hienline.
Yeah, from the much derided "Cat Who Walks Through Walls". Right after Richard accepts that Gwen used to co-write a TV space opera.

Ugh... Last time I checked this thread, people were getting all snarky about Dune nerdery, and now they're discussing the finer points of Star Wars!?!?

Well played, milady, well played. However, the discussion petered out aound 2:30 this afternoon.
So I was two hours and thirty-one minutes late entering a discussion that took place while I was in bed, asleep, on the other side of the planet? My humblest apologies...
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 25 Mar 2011, 17:24
Apology accepted. 

We understand, but these lapses can be corrected with just a little more self discipline  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: mike837go on 25 Mar 2011, 17:29
Sorry for rankin' on a fellow traveler of this entertainment.

I tend to get a bit smug, being in the same part of the country as Jeph.

Now, anything on thread?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: pwhodges on 25 Mar 2011, 17:54
I live in the country of the Prime Meridian - the rest of you have got your clocks wrong.

(N.B. I will get annoyed at having to put my clock wrong next weekend - Grrr!)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Mar 2011, 18:12
Not nearly as annoyed as those of us forced to do it two weeks ago  :P

I spent 15 years in the great state of Indiana, at a time when they didn't acknowledge daylight savings.  Instead, we switched time zones - it was easier. 

The argument I remember hearing when I moved there was, "The cows need milked at dawn, no matter what time you call  it..."
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 25 Mar 2011, 18:26
Our current poll proves the old adage:

Sex sells.

EDIT: And Carl-E, that's the one thing I love about Arizona, when I go down there in the winter to visit my dad. They're not bothered with changing clocks or anything.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 25 Mar 2011, 21:00
I live in the country of the Prime Meridian - the rest of you have got your clocks wrong.

(N.B. I will get annoyed at having to put my clock wrong next weekend - Grrr!)

Crap, I forgot I have to put all my clocks forward an hour tonight. Great!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skewbrow on 25 Mar 2011, 22:24

I spent 15 years in the great state of Indiana, at a time when they didn't acknowledge daylight savings.  Instead, we switched time zones - it was easier. 


IIRC StJoseph and Elkhart counties were like that swapping between Eastern and Central. Don't remember about the rest of the Hoosier state. Gary was/is following Chicago?

But yeah, daylight saving is one of the most brain-dead ideas. Folks won't agree to wake up at 6, unless we all agree to call it 7, and also agree to mess up the railroad schedules for a day. Besides, what daylight is being saved? Is it really that important that in the summer, instead of it being light out at half ten, it stays light until half eleven??
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 26 Mar 2011, 00:15
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=430 ?

I'd say catching a pair of hipsters in deer-in-the-headlights paralysis is pretty lulzworthy.

Besides, not all lulz are mean.


And Carl-E, that's the one thing I love about Arizona, when I go down there in the winter to visit my dad. They're not bothered with changing clocks or anything.

I worked at an airport hotel a couple of years ago. When time change day came, all of the out of state guests who had flights to catch the next morning were so confused by the lack of the confusion!
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 26 Mar 2011, 00:33
I live in the country of the Prime Meridian - the rest of you have got your clocks wrong.

(N.B. I will get annoyed at having to put my clock wrong next weekend - Grrr!)

and it irks right through until October doesn't it? It certainly does for me.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: no one special on 26 Mar 2011, 03:32
Re: Shakespeare:
[...]I had a professor in college who explained Shakespeare wasn't some longhair artiste but a guy who wrote what sold in his day ... Then explained all the dirty jokes. The effect was to make me regard Shakespeare as accessible and not some rarefied incomprehensibility.

This is SO the key.  God bless your professor.  The reason so many people get turned off to Shakespeare is that some teachers act like his works are some holy tome that have to be kept on a pedestal.  Are some of his plays the most incredible things that have ever been written in English?  Yes... but that's not how you get kids interested!  (Also, some of his plays [The Tempest, The Winter's Tale] are just not that great.)  Shakespeare wrote stuff that people would buy and that made the family of his most famous benefactor (i.e. Queen Elizabeth I) look like saints.  Dude knew where his bread was buttered.  And yeah, Shakespeare was a dirty motherfucker - his plays are rife with sex jokes, poop jokes, fart jokes, more sex jokes, and even more sex jokes. 

If you break down Othello into a story about a dude whose friend told him a lie about his girlfriend - hell, everyone can relate to that!  And that's really all that that play's about.  Once you get kids interested, then maybe they'll be open to understanding the beauty of the words, and then, who knows?

I was lucky in that I've just always been interested in words, so Shakespeare just sorta came naturally to me, and always fascinated me. 

How much did it influence me?  Well, I'm a professional Shakespearean actor... so, I guess, quite a bit  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Tergon on 26 Mar 2011, 05:28
Damn right.  Any account I've read suggests that Shakespeare wasn't some tortured emo who stared wistfully at a vase of roses for inspiration, he was a storyteller.  Flowery writing and over-the-top symbolism is all well and good but you don't become as famous as he did if you're a one-trick pony.  He wrote what people liked and, well, people love a good laugh and a punch-up in between the love scenes, and Shakespeare delivered exactly that.

Romeo & Juliet includes a scene of Romeo and Mercutio basically exchanging "Do you know how I know you're gay?" jokes.  Hamlet pulls a "Rocks Fall, Everyone Dies" moment just for the hell of it.  No One Special just gave a fairly accurate summation of Othello being about a guy with the wrong idea about his ladyfriend.  Hell, even his less popular stuff like The Tempest has its moments, like two fellas roving about a desert island pissed as parrots, linking up with the play's equivalent of Igor the Manservant (who somehow decides the drunkards are from the Moon), before the inebriated trio decide to launch a spectacularly ineffective revolution against... well, they're not quite sure, but it's against someone!

Sure, when he got his lead up, Shakespeare could spout purple prose like nobody's business, there's no question about that.  It's just that he also loved fight scenes, dick jokes, and literally just making up words for the hell of it because fuck it, writing's too hard to bother about using the correct one when you can just spout gibberish and you know nobody's gonna call you on it.  And if you try to read Shakespeare as anything other than a guy with a sense of humour telling a story to entertain people, you're missing out on a lot of the good stuff in his work.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 26 Mar 2011, 06:57
He was also, almost always working with a really tight deadline.

The show must...


Well, you know.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Lupercal on 26 Mar 2011, 07:06
Re: Shakespeare:
[...]I had a professor in college who explained Shakespeare wasn't some longhair artiste but a guy who wrote what sold in his day ... Then explained all the dirty jokes. The effect was to make me regard Shakespeare as accessible and not some rarefied incomprehensibility.
  (Also, some of his plays [The Tempest, The Winter's Tale] are just not that great.) 

The Winter's Tale is a fantastic play and I will fight you if you say otherwise!

Seriously, 16 year disappearance of the female protagonist, the morbid jealousy is much more eloquently expressed, and the fact that it ends "well", in the sense that it is not a tragedy but a tragi-comedy/romance/problem play puts it above some others in my opinion. Also, Leontes isn't a character that you can just out and out hate, because he is his own Iago and feeds off of his own words and ideas. Its the implosion of the character that makes it interesting. Also you've got the parallels of Bohemia and Sicillia, two season, and damn, this play is home to Exit, pursued by a bear. Great stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skelepunk on 26 Mar 2011, 09:17
So what you're saying is, I must read The Winter's Tale. Because that sounds awesome. Why couldn't I have read that instead of Twelfth Night or king Lear?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Mar 2011, 09:19
Why not try Macbeth, its one of his shortest plays, and has murder, murder, some murder, little bit of murder and oh, some witches.

Damn it, nearly forgot the murder too.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Mar 2011, 09:48
Damn it, you're supposed to call it The Scottish Play! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h--HR7PWfp0)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 26 Mar 2011, 09:52
Only if you're inside a theater.






Or have a death wish.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Mar 2011, 10:04
Or if you're an actor.

Or superstitious.

Or Ian McKellan.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 26 Mar 2011, 12:15
I've always been fond of A Midsummer Night's Dream.  It's the original British Farce.  mistaken identities, crossed lovers, and faeries, all running around in a forest.  Not to mention the backwoods theatre troupe that tries to put on a high-minded romance, with completely slapstick results. 

Oh yeah, and a man with the head of an ass. 

I'm pretty sure Puck is the prototype for Pintsize... "Lord, what fools these mortals be!" 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Skelepunk on 26 Mar 2011, 14:24
Hamlet and Macbeth are my favorite of all the plays. There was a very good Australian movie of Macbeth, only with guns and gangfights. It's much better than I've made it sound. 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Border Reiver on 26 Mar 2011, 14:24
Why not try Macbeth, its one of his shortest plays, and has murder, murder, some murder, little bit of murder and oh, some witches.

Damn it, nearly forgot the murder too.

And runs completly against the history on which it is "based".  Macbeth was actually a fairly popular ruler who came to the throne because his predecessor was a war mongering fool who keep losing to a bunch of Vikings.  Oh and he had these weird southern ideas about kingship passing through the male line to the son.  All good Scotsmen know that it passes to whomever the council of thanes (leading families) selects.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Lupercal on 26 Mar 2011, 15:00
King Lear is also good but for morbid jealousy, Winter's Tale wins everytime.

But DUDES read Edward II by Christopher Marlowe because it is pretty awesome, a contemporary of Shakespeare and if you like sodomy with red hot pokers well, this will be your favourite piece of literature ever.

(I also enjoyed Jeph doing risque drawings again, I can tell he either sits there blushing or is like "damn, expression of the human body THROUGH a human body, I'm a genius")
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Mar 2011, 15:24
"damn, expression of the human body INSIDE a human body, I'm a genius"
Fixed that for ya. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 26 Mar 2011, 15:54
Moment of the week: 1890 panel 1, showing Faye relaxed, happy, and sober.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 26 Mar 2011, 16:47
Moment of the week: 1890 panel 1, showing Faye relaxed, happy, and sober.
I was literally just coming in here to comment on how adorable it was to see Faye making physical contact with a boy without either violence or threats of ultra-violence as a side -dish.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Mar 2011, 17:50
So obviously Marten's known Steve longer, but would it be accurate to say that Angus is now a closer friend?  His "main bro", if you will?
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Carl-E on 26 Mar 2011, 17:56
Well, if this thing with Faye doesn't implode, Angus and Marten are  going to be seeing a lot more of each other than the Marten-Steve bro-thing. 

Sooo.... maybe? 
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: akronnick on 26 Mar 2011, 20:28
...All good Scotsmen know that it passes to whomever the council of thanes (leading families) selects.

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait!!!!!!!

So you're saying the chief executive should be selected by a body of political representatives based on merit and actual ability?!?!?!?!

That, sir, sounds suspiciously like the beginings of Democracy!!!!!

And we all know where that leads...

SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 26 Mar 2011, 21:13
And carrying that through to it's (il)logical conclusion, that is just a step away form


COMMUNISM

 :-o  :police:  :-o :police: :-o  :police: :-o  :police:  :-o  :police:  :-o :police:
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Mar 2011, 21:49
I say we just scrap the whole system and install a philosopher king.  Which would be a lot easier if Bill Hicks were still alive.
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Sharp on 26 Mar 2011, 22:17
Well, if this thing with Faye doesn't implode, Angus and Marten are  going to be seeing a lot more of each other than the Marten-Steve bro-thing. 

I think Marten has seen enough of Angus to last him a while.  :roll:


DO HO HO
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Kugai on 26 Mar 2011, 22:36
I say we just scrap the whole system and install a philosopher king.  Which would be a lot easier if Bill Hicks were still alive.

You'd do better with Barry Crump
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 26 Mar 2011, 22:47
I'm pretty sure Puck is the prototype for Pintsize... "Lord, what fools these mortals be!" 

Good lord, can you imagine Pintsize running around with a free supply of psychotropic drugs? it would be the inappropriate relationship drama from hell  :-o :police: (slashfic gone mad)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Mar 2011, 03:14
The QC WCDT Weekly Moment of the Week Poll !

Aaaactually, I was thinking...    - 0 (0%)
Sea cucumbers and Fuzzy Clams    - 5 (5.9%)
NEVERMIND.    - 0 (0%)
"A lady always reserves the right to change her mind."    - 1 (1.2%)
NSFW! NSFW! NSFW!    - 14 (16.5%) <--- Proof: Sex sells.
Run a marathon, pushups, juggle, wrestle a bear!    - 3 (3.5%)
"Are you always this hyper after sex, or am I just that good?"    - 0 (0%)
Operation: M.A.N.A.S.S.    - 9 (10.6%)
It's really more of a puce.    - 11 (12.9%)
Happy Arbor Day 2003!    - 13 (15.3%)
"You should've SEEN that party. It was CRAZY."    - 4 (4.7%)
He was gonna bake a cake...    - 0 (0%)
National Endowment for the Arts!    - 6 (7.1%)
I CAN STILL HEAR YOU, A$$#OLES!    - 9 (10.6%)
Daaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnngggg.    - 10 (11.8%)

Total Voters: 85
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: cesariojpn on 27 Mar 2011, 03:17
Damn it, you're supposed to call it The Scottish Play! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h--HR7PWfp0)

But we still get justice for Ken Branagh's endless uncut 4 hour version of "Hamlet." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM-Y1ch4b5c&feature=related)
Title: Re: WCDT 21-25 March 2011 (1886-1890)
Post by: Akima on 27 Mar 2011, 17:32
Why not try Macbeth, its one of his shortest plays, and has murder, murder, some murder, little bit of murder and oh, some witches. Damn it, nearly forgot the murder too.
And runs completly against the history on which it is "based".
Macbeth is an early example of a Southern English writer invoking the Violent Scotsman (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ViolentGlaswegian) trope. Truly, it is older than steam (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OlderThanSteam).