THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 18 Sep 2011, 05:30

Title: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Sep 2011, 05:30
And another week hits us hard in t' midsection. Let's get t' speculation out o' t' way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Sep 2011, 07:05
The speculation will never end.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 18 Sep 2011, 09:11
gratuitous reply so that new posts will show up in the "Show new replies to your posts" button
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Sep 2011, 13:52
The speculation will never end.

While this is true, it's hardly comforting...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 18 Sep 2011, 14:08
Another day, another comic; what's to speculate about?  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Overkillengine on 18 Sep 2011, 14:19
Right about now would be a good spot to cut to characters other than Momo and Marten to cause maximum tooth grinding, I mean, suspenseful waiting.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 18 Sep 2011, 14:24
Yeah, time to see what Sven's been up to lately. Or some more cute couple stuff between Faye and Angus.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 18 Sep 2011, 14:50
Another day, another comic; what's to speculate about?  :evil:

How much Momo pays in Income taxes?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 18 Sep 2011, 17:01
I'll be really surprised if we stick with momo/marten strips this week. I'm guessing Dora/Faye or Faye/Angus. Possibly Tai/Dora if Jeph is in the mood to screw with shippers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Sep 2011, 17:45
gratuitous reply so that new posts will show up in the "Show new replies to your posts" button
Is that what you're doing, or were you accusing me of such things?

Because if so...yeah, I do it every week (when I don't outright create the thread).

The speculation will never end.

While this is true, it's hardly comforting...
Wait, what?  Are you implying speculation is bad?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Sep 2011, 18:27
I suspect Jeph finds it funny - if he ever bothers to look in on these forums.

In light of what he wrote in the afterword of QCV2, I still think he's shocked to realize how much his strip has touched people.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Sep 2011, 18:52
What'd he write?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Sep 2011, 19:33
Buy the book and find out ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Sep 2011, 19:56
I knew you'd say that.  So I'll lie truthfully inform you that I bought the book and it has not yet arrived.

...and if that doesn't work, I'll eventually buy it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 18 Sep 2011, 20:22
Method O Madness: it's what I was doing... I'm sure I'll find more creative ways to do it next time
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: CrowFairy on 18 Sep 2011, 21:11
I was considering doing the same type of thing, honestly. XD It's so hard to keep up with WCDT sometimes if you don't already have a post in it.

Not that that's what I'm doing right now...........



I actually hope to see some Angus/Faye stuff or just something with Sven and/or Hanners. I'd really like to see them go on another "date," actually. Buuuuut we'll probably get the hiking trip. I'll be happy if we find out something new from it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Sep 2011, 21:35
Jeph went out with a camera to get some reference pictures from the area where they'll be hiking, so strips about the hike are the way to bet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: CompSarge on 18 Sep 2011, 23:34
Strip's up. That Butts disease is vicious.

Jeph went out with a camera to get some reference pictures from the area where they'll be hiking, so strips about the hike are the way to bet.

You win the prize for best guess! Your prize is: nothing. Don't use it all in one place.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 18 Sep 2011, 23:35
Strip's up. That Butts disease is vicious.

Jeph went out with a camera to get some reference pictures from the area where they'll be hiking, so strips about the hike are the way to bet.

You win the prize for best guess! Your prize is: nothing. Don't use it all in one place.

The Stan Lee No Prize for True Believers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Merrick on 18 Sep 2011, 23:36
Today's strip is delightfully silly. I like it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Blackjoker on 18 Sep 2011, 23:40
This comic is amusing and Faye is adorable.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Sep 2011, 23:53
Previous strips involving Faye admiring Marten's buttocks:
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=41
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=140#
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: purple.platypus on 19 Sep 2011, 00:03
Yeah, time to see what Sven's been up to lately. Or some more cute couple stuff between Faye and Angus.
Well, looks like he managed to work the latter in, kind of, without going off the Marten/Momo/Padma/Elliot/Sam track he set up last week.

The strip's become such an ensemble piece I sometimes forget Marten and Faye are still roommates.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 19 Sep 2011, 00:09
The expression on Faye's face is kind of nauseating ...
Still, amusing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: brew on 19 Sep 2011, 00:30
I want that t-shirt.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pendrake on 19 Sep 2011, 00:33
For comic #2016...

1. I like how Marten is looks for the coming hike, tan shirt and (I am guessing) khaki shorts.  He at least is trying to dress the part.

2. It will be "interesting" to see how Marten's indie physique handles nature hiking, alongside an energetic teenager, a kawaii robot, a cute bakery girl, and a quietly looming bouncer/baker.

3. While this strip was amusing enough on its own, it disturbs me slightly at its ending, particularly with Marten's final lines.  I get the feeling we are seeing the tangible beginnings of Faye and Marten starting to drift away from each other, even as best friends.  This would not be intentional on either characters' part, but as consequence of how their QC-lives have been going.

4. I could be overthinking (or brain-numb thinking) all this of course, from long work fatigue.  But I could not go to sleep without catching up on my QC since #1999 :roll: .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: josiah on 19 Sep 2011, 00:49
I want that t-shirt.

Yeah, the sunn:))) t-shirt is, for my (admittedly strange) taste, is the funniest shirt yet.

Maybe that's because it's black on yellow (instead of light on dark).

Maybe it's also because I'm on the Sunn O))) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunn_O%29%29%29) album, Monoliths & Dimensions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoliths_%26_Dimensions) and have some idea what they're like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 19 Sep 2011, 00:57
Notice that Faye is not comparing Marten's butt to Sven's, which not just she (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1081), but everyone in the comic (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1770) considers the gold standard of butts. Of course, mentioning that wouldn't lead to happy memories, so she probably deliberately glosses over it now that she is in a relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 19 Sep 2011, 01:03
Or maybe she found that Angus' behind is even more pert and shapely than Sven's. She's discovered a whole new level of pleasing posteriors.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 19 Sep 2011, 01:31
It's funny how quickly being in a satisfying relationship can lead one to change one's standards.

They're not set in stone people!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 19 Sep 2011, 02:13
Just turn the other cheek, Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 19 Sep 2011, 02:45
(http://i.imgur.com/kgAtN.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 19 Sep 2011, 03:43
Oh my. Faye's :3 face is amazing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Throg on 19 Sep 2011, 03:49
Aw, how cute to see Faye with a goddammit ninja'd! 

Faye, Faye, Faye...red top, purple pants?  You're not one to throw stones in the fashion department.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 19 Sep 2011, 03:57
Faye laughs at Marten for wearing shorts and then reminds Marten that Angus is better than him.  What a great person that Faye is!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2011, 04:22
No, she doesn't say that "Angus is better than him", just that she likes Angus's butt better - that's quite different, and falls well within the usual range of banter between friends who live together.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 19 Sep 2011, 04:32
No, she doesn't say that "Angus is better than him", just that she likes Angus's butt better - that's quite different, and falls well within the usual range of banter between friends who live together.

Why would she bring that up though, if only to be mean?  Besides, after "the incident" I would think that Faye knows to not rub in anything regarding Sven or Angus.  There's healthy banter and then there's low blows, Faye is leaning towards the latter as usual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 19 Sep 2011, 05:27

Why would she bring that up though, if only to be mean?  Besides, after "the incident" I would think that Faye knows to not rub in anything regarding Sven or Angus.  There's healthy banter and then there's low blows, Faye is leaning towards the latter as usual.

Did you see the smirk on Faye's face? How much more  :-P :-P :-P :-P can you get?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Sep 2011, 05:31
Maybe it's subconscious payback for "the incident"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 19 Sep 2011, 05:39
You guys are talking too much about Faye's intentions. The only thing that really matters to me is that cool Sunn O))) t-shirt. I never thought that Marten would dig them (because if he owns that t-shirt only for the lulz... that's just dumb in my book).

Also... Faye's combination of colors is just awful to my eyes.

I'm on the Sunn O))) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunn_O%29%29%29) album, Monoliths & Dimensions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoliths_%26_Dimensions) and have some idea what they're like.

What do you mean with this?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: anabatica on 19 Sep 2011, 05:58
Aw, how cute to see Faye with a goddammit ninja'd! 

Faye, Faye, Faye...red top, purple pants?  You're not one to throw stones in the fashion department.

Those are clearly PJs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Akima on 19 Sep 2011, 06:55
Those are clearly PJs.
Does sleepwear get a pass? Benefit Of Peejay, or something? I have taken issue with Faye's colour-sense before...

I'm not sure, but Faye seems to be implying that Angus has a big bum. The eye of love, I suppose.  :roll:

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 19 Sep 2011, 06:56
Honestly, I didn't laugh at today's comic. I got to the last panel and was still waiting for the jokes to start.

But I can see other people liked it, so I'll just put that down to me being a boring churl (or immune to Butts Disease).

Bring on the hiking, that will cheer me up.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 19 Sep 2011, 07:17

Why would she bring that up though, if only to be mean?  Besides, after "the incident" I would think that Faye knows to not rub in anything regarding Sven or Angus.  There's healthy banter and then there's low blows, Faye is leaning towards the latter as usual.

Did you see the smirk on Faye's face? How much more  :-P :-P :-P :-P can you get?

She has to know how self conscious Marten is, and she laughs at his appearance right before he goes on a semi-date.  Then, to rub some salt in the wound, she brags about her superior-to-Marten boyfriend.  It's not silly, or funny, it's just mean.

Maybe it's subconscious payback for "the incident"?

She knocked Marten out.  That would be more than sufficient payback for trying to kiss her.

Honestly, I didn't laugh at today's comic. I got to the last panel and was still waiting for the jokes to start.

But I can see other people liked it, so I'll just put that down to me being a boring churl (or immune to Butts Disease).

Bring on the hiking, that will cheer me up.


Not everyone liked it.  I'm looking forward to the hiking as well, namely some forest and/or landscape backgrounds.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 19 Sep 2011, 07:43
Err ... I really, really, really have no clue why Marten is even trying to date Padma.

Yeah she looks like Dora with ebony skin. But she's totally NOT Dora on the inside. She's driving me nuts with her inability to spot the glaring obvious. And she apparently completely failed to notice the other guys interest in her for ages, so why would she notice Martens interest in her ?

Quite frankly - all Padma did in the comic so far was being annoyingly stupid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2011, 07:56
He has a pretty small circle of friends, as far as we can see; so in accepting an invitation to go on a hike with some acquaintances he is looking to change that by taking the opportunity to move them from acquaintances to friends.  Whether he will want to try to take it further than that with Padma at some point we have no clear indication of so far.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Sep 2011, 07:58
Yeah I think for Padma to notice Marten's interest, he'd pretty much have to grab her up and kiss her. Not only is Marten not going to be that aggressive (while sober anyway), but it most likely wouldn't do any good-pretty sure that whatever attraction Marten may feel towards Padma is NOT mutual-witness all the failures on his part in trying to connect with her on any level deeper than "regular customer".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 19 Sep 2011, 08:14
Faye's booty-comaprison made me think of this (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1096), so, yeah, Marten, why are your feelings hurt?

But honestly, I think it's just banter.

And so far, they're just going on a hike. A hike on which Momo should have invited Marigold ... if she had the chance. 'Cuz Mari's, y'know, busy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Sep 2011, 08:41
Faye's booty-comaprison made me think of this (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1096), so, yeah, Marten, why are your feelings hurt?

'Cause he's not gettin' that hot hot Dora sexing anymore? Not being with someone tends to make criticism of one's physical attributes harder to take.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Random Al Yousir on 19 Sep 2011, 08:43
Maybe Momo does convince Marigold to come along, who - meeting Padma - finds out, that she lied to Tai (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1792), which Padma (and only Padma) fails to notice.  

Or so she says.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 19 Sep 2011, 09:23
Faye's booty-comaprison made me think of this (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1096), so, yeah, Marten, why are your feelings hurt?

'Cause he's not gettin' that hot hot Dora sexing anymore? Not being with someone tends to make criticism of one's physical attributes harder to take.

'Cuz M. took the shot and now it's coming back, under nearly reversed circumstances. But I still think it's just banter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 19 Sep 2011, 09:49
No, she doesn't say that "Angus is better than him", just that she likes Angus's butt better - that's quite different, and falls well within the usual range of banter between friends who live together.

Why would she bring that up though, if only to be mean?  Besides, after "the incident" I would think that Faye knows to not rub in anything regarding Sven or Angus.  There's healthy banter and then there's low blows, Faye is leaning towards the latter as usual.

Considering the first time Faye and Angus had sex and Martin witnessed Angus's post sex dance (with pink condom) and put up celebrationary decorations, I think Martin is ok with the idea of Faye dating.

I think Faye is merely teasing Martin over the fact he is wearing shorts for the first time ever - and Faye only compares it with Angus's when Martin reminds her that she used to think it was cute... To be honest, I doubt Martin is that upset really...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: westrim on 19 Sep 2011, 10:07
I know a good therapist that specializes in these types of issues Jeph. His name is Seymour.  :angel:


I completely missed commenting last week on the fact the comics have now passed into the futuuuuure. In fact, the last mention I saw of the strip number/year correlation was 3 weeks ago. I predict that in 2016, I will own a computer with a 10 TB+ storage medium.


How much Momo pays in Income taxes?
Income tax laws have yet to take into account the individuality of anthroPCs. Thus, all their income is considered that of the person or organization most closely associated with them or with whom they have created a contract. Some argue against the tax code incorporating them, on the principle that if death (the near term mortal kind, not the heat death of the universe kind) is not certain for them, taxes shouldn't be either.

No, she doesn't say that "Angus is better than him", just that she likes Angus's butt better - that's quite different, and falls well within the usual range of banter between friends who live together.

Why would she bring that up though, if only to be mean?  Besides, after "the incident" I would think that Faye knows to not rub in anything regarding Sven or Angus.  There's healthy banter and then there's low blows, Faye is leaning towards the latter as usual.

Considering the first time Faye and Angus had sex and Martin witnessed Angus's post sex dance (with pink condom) and put up celebrationary decorations, I think Martin is ok with the idea of Faye dating.

I think Faye is merely teasing Martin over the fact he is wearing shorts for the first time ever - and Faye only compares it with Angus's when Martin reminds her that she used to think it was cute... To be honest, I doubt Martin is that upset really...
The QC forums: taking innocent teasing and elevating it to the level of "RED ALERT: RELATIONSHIP CRISIS" since strip five.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skaltura on 19 Sep 2011, 10:33
Never mind that Marten is wearing shorts, if you're gonna criticize Faye's choice of color, what about that hideous ensemble of yellow-beige that Marten is wearing. Yikes
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: ChainsawMessiah on 19 Sep 2011, 13:17
Ahem.

Sunn o))) SHIRT!!!    ZOMGWTFFWBBQ!!!!!!!

*melts from the sheer awesomeness*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1HEiQJEmBg
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: idontunderstand on 19 Sep 2011, 14:41
Man, the poster above just melted because a character in a comic on the internet wears a t-shirt with the name of a band which wear capes and average 4 chords per hour. I'm just saying that. Man.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: EcoReck on 19 Sep 2011, 14:52
"...and it's NOT Padma! (15 Votes)"
Oh you guys!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Akima on 19 Sep 2011, 15:21
Man, the poster above just melted because a character in a comic on the internet wears a t-shirt with the name of a band which wear capes and average 4 chords per hour. I'm just saying that. Man.
Yeah. And including ))) in the band name (unpronounced apparently) makes the equally silent Heävy Mëtal Ümläut (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HeavyMetalUmlaut?from=Main.ptitlerwc2j24ka224) seem quite sensible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Sep 2011, 15:44
You missed putting um̈lauẗs over some letters that don't ever have umlauts...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Akima on 19 Sep 2011, 16:14
I am not so brütäl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2011, 16:24
Yeah she looks like Dora with ebony skin. But she's totally NOT Dora on the inside.
For the first part, I just don't see it.  For the second part, that's a good thing.  That's not a shot against Dora, I just don't see why he'd want someone who acted like Dora, especially when like Dora on the inside would mean all her neuroses.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 19 Sep 2011, 17:16
I dunno I got the impression that Marten rather liked Dora on the inside if you know what I mean.   :evil:

/tasteless
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 19 Sep 2011, 17:54
Marten must suffer the same affliction that Hank Hill, in that he has no ass.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: josiah on 19 Sep 2011, 18:19
The only thing that really matters to me is that cool Sunn O))) t-shirt. I never thought that Marten would dig them (because if he owns that t-shirt only for the lulz... that's just dumb in my book).

I wouldn't doubt that Marten would listen to Sunn O))) and even list them as an influence for Deathmøle, but the shirt is a pretty hilarious parody of the darkness and seriousness of Sunn O))). In order to get lulz from a shirt like that, he'd really have to know who the band is and what they sound like. It's not funny at all, otherwise.

I'm on the Sunn O))) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunn_O%29%29%29) album, Monoliths & Dimensions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoliths_%26_Dimensions) and have some idea what they're like.

What do you mean with this?

I'm a musician—I play the French horn—and played in a recording session or two for Sunn O))) for M&D. It was a great experience, and all the musicians who were there were brilliant. (As an aside, I hope the free improvisations by trombonists Julian Priester and Stuart Dempster will someday be released on their own.)

Ahem.

Sunn o))) SHIRT!!!    ZOMGWTFFWBBQ!!!!!!!

*melts from the sheer awesomeness*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1HEiQJEmBg

I have the LPs, but I've never listened to them. I want to break the cellophane only for a good turntable with a good needle plugged into speakers that can handle the subtleties Sunn O))) plays with in the bass end. Someday...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 19 Sep 2011, 18:41
Dawww  he looks cute in shorts   :-D

It will be interesting to see if Marigold does come along on the hike.  I wonder if she and Elliott could wind up hitting it off?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: helloandgoodbye on 19 Sep 2011, 19:05
  God, Faye's one to talk. What's with her outfit in this strip?  It doesn't even match.  Purple and red together -- she must be colorblind. :/
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 19 Sep 2011, 19:16
Man, y'all have some strict standards for jammies.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Sep 2011, 21:18
  God, Faye's one to talk. What's with her outfit in this strip?  It doesn't even match.  Purple and red together -- she must be colorblind. :/

Or She's a closet member of the Red Hat Society!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Sep 2011, 21:19
What determines whether two colors match?  Seems kinda arbitrary.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: helloandgoodbye on 19 Sep 2011, 21:34
Man, y'all have some strict standards for jammies.


 My pajamas match.

Quote
What determines whether two colors match?  Seems kinda arbitrary.

 If you're a woman, then you just know.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 19 Sep 2011, 22:14
What determines whether two colors match?  Seems kinda arbitrary.

Bros, bros, bros!!!

Windows 3.1 has 16 colors. Thus there are 16 choose 2 = 120 pairs of colors. May I? Once and for all! Have a comprehensive list of
those pairs of colors that match. Please?!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 19 Sep 2011, 22:18
Your clothes should match, as long as they're not too "matchie-matchie."






Fashionistas just make it up as they go along don't they.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 19 Sep 2011, 22:28
Err ... I really, really, really have no clue why Marten is even trying to date Padma.

Yeah she looks like Dora with ebony skin. But she's totally NOT Dora on the inside. She's driving me nuts with her inability to spot the glaring obvious. And she apparently completely failed to notice the other guys interest in her for ages, so why would she notice Martens interest in her ?

Quite frankly - all Padma did in the comic so far was being annoyingly stupid.

She comes across as a (perhaps) slightly less clueless version of Raven. It wouldn't surprise me if she still thinks Marten is gay.  Of course it's possible that the punchline will be that Padma is a lesbian and isn't interested in either Marten or Elliot.

Frankly I'd be interested in seeing Martien try something with Renee, if only to see if she actually is the equivalent of Faye her character design implies.  So far all we've seen her do is be deadpain and swear a bit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 19 Sep 2011, 22:32


I'm a musician—I play the French horn—and played in a recording session or two for Sunn O))) for M&D. It was a great experience, and all the musicians who were there were brilliant. (As an aside, I hope the free improvisations by trombonists Julian Priester and Stuart Dempster will someday be released on their own.)

That's some pretty heavy company.  Especially Priester, who's been around for decades.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Sep 2011, 22:35
Welcome, new person!

Renee's definitely had more setup than she's had air time. It'll be interesting to see what happens with her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: spearlet on 19 Sep 2011, 23:52
I'm not sure where to post this, so maybe Jeph will read this or not.

I know Jeph is constantly working on his art, and I highly HIGHLY respect him as an artist.  I am honestly in awe of his artistic growth and I wish I had half of his talent.

I'm not sure if he is interested in feedback, but I know it is something I appreciate so I hope he takes this kindly: I think he could improve his necks in his drawing.  Anatomically, most necks connect at the back of the head - the base of the skull - not the middle of the head.  They are also generally at least half as wide as the head.  Faye's neck in Monday's comic (but generally when characters are viewed in profile) seemed a bit off.

That said, I love Jeph's work regardless.  I hope my ramblings aren't offensive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: josiah on 20 Sep 2011, 00:02
Now decidedly off-topic:

(As an aside, I hope the free improvisations by trombonists Julian Priester and Stuart Dempster will someday be released on their own.)

That's some pretty heavy company.  Especially Priester, who's been around for decades.

Depends, I suppose. Stuart and Julian are of similar ages (about 13 months apart, even), and I knew Stuart's playing and accomplishments long before I knew who Julian was. Not to disparage Julian—not by any means!—but I grew up on the classical side of the fence, and some of my personal explorations into the avant garde overlap with things he's done. They are both my heros, and it's too bad that their 45 minutes (or so) of that day's free improvisations are boiled down to about five minutes of music on Monoliths & Dimensions. That recording session was a lesson to anybody who heard them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Sep 2011, 00:05
I'm not sure where to post this, so maybe Jeph will read this or not.

Jeph doesn't come here these days; you'd probably be most sure of being noticed by putting your comment as a question on his Tumblr.

But now you're here, why not stay around?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2011, 00:10
My father in law shares Marten's lack of butt.  My daughter, at the age of 5, ran to give him a hug once and de-pantsed the poor man. 


Yes, he was wearing a belt at the time.  Didn't help at all. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: westrim on 20 Sep 2011, 00:15
No, run away, run far away lest you be dragged innnnnn.... Joinnn ussss.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 20 Sep 2011, 00:30
1. Awesome background! I hope Jeph keeps up making progress like this, artistically.

2. Padma has a very cute akward sense of humor.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Ethereal on 20 Sep 2011, 00:30
Sweet Zombie Jesus, that background on the new strip looks good!

Very nice job! ! !
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 20 Sep 2011, 00:32
 :-o

That background is beautiful.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 20 Sep 2011, 00:35
I had no idea Marten was living next to a jungle.

Also, software bugs are the main reason why I hope droids dont turn real any soon. Those buggers will do all kinds of crap, just because of software bugs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2011, 00:36
I wonder if the solvent in the bug spray is bad for the plastic in Momo's skin.

Kudos on the background.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 20 Sep 2011, 00:41
... oh dear. That was a bit of a groaner.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 20 Sep 2011, 00:45
I said it before and I'll say it again: I think Padma's high.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 20 Sep 2011, 00:56
Man, y'all have some strict standards for jammies.


 My pajamas match.

Quote
What determines whether two colors match?  Seems kinda arbitrary.

 If you're a woman, then you just know.

Uh-hu. I dont know what to say to that.





Err ... I really, really, really have no clue why Marten is even trying to date Padma.

Yeah she looks like Dora with ebony skin. But she's totally NOT Dora on the inside. She's driving me nuts with her inability to spot the glaring obvious. And she apparently completely failed to notice the other guys interest in her for ages, so why would she notice Martens interest in her ?

Quite frankly - all Padma did in the comic so far was being annoyingly stupid.

She comes across as a (perhaps) slightly less clueless version of Raven. It wouldn't surprise me if she still thinks Marten is gay.  Of course it's possible that the punchline will be that Padma is a lesbian and isn't interested in either Marten or Elliot.

Frankly I'd be interested in seeing Martien try something with Renee, if only to see if she actually is the equivalent of Faye her character design implies.  So far all we've seen her do is be deadpain and swear a bit.
Err ... Raven is SUCH a different person. Raven is funny. And Raven always proved between the lines that she was a lot more nifty than she showed.

All Padma did so far was IMHO being increasingly annoying.




I wonder if the solvent in the bug spray is bad for the plastic in Momo's skin.
I wonder why she does it at all, because plastic wont attract any insect attacks in the first place.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: raoullefere on 20 Sep 2011, 01:34
Sadly, I have exactly the same sense of humor Padma's demonstrating here. If I had actually been there, I would have been snickering about "bug spray" until the end of the hike or the moment my fellow hikers pushed me over a cliff, whichever came first.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: J on 20 Sep 2011, 02:20
damn, jeph's stepping his game up with these backgrounds.

they actually almost look too good, as the much more simply drawn/colored characters look kind of out of place in front of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: guayec on 20 Sep 2011, 02:31
Wait, so QC takes place in Northamptong, Vietnam?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 20 Sep 2011, 02:38
Anyone have the hook to drag Padma stage left?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 20 Sep 2011, 02:48
I wonder if the solvent in the bug spray is bad for the plastic in Momo's skin.

Let's hope she has read her own manual and also the warning label on the spray (or did a quick spectrometer analysis, whichever is easier).

Padma humor! Oh! <3 <3 <3 <3

That may be bad news for the boys. It doesn't look like Padma's sense of humor is compatible with that of either of the suitor-wannabes' (if you can call them that). Nor with the other males. Well, Jim might be an exception?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Near Lurker on 20 Sep 2011, 03:13
...

Well, his last girlfriend was a stoner, too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Welu on 20 Sep 2011, 03:17
Well, Dora's parents smoked weed. We just saw her get a contact high.

On yesterday, Marten's lack of butt has been mentioned before. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=495) So it's not like her comment was completely out of nowhere. (Although I was expecting a comment about Sven's butt) She liked Marten's butt when she had feelings for Marten and now she likes Angus' butt because she has feelings for Angus. Maybe my circle of friends are all jerks with thicker skins but their banter isn't beyond us, down to the "Why does that hurt my feelings."
Also Faye smirk is both nauseating and adorable.

Much props to Jeph for the backgrounds today. They're stunning.
I assume Momo used the bug spray because other people were and she just didn't question it. Her and Marten's look at each about Padma's joke is brilliant.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 20 Sep 2011, 03:53
Never mind that Marten is wearing shorts, if you're gonna criticize Faye's choice of color, what about that hideous ensemble of yellow-beige that Marten is wearing. Yikes

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=139 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=139)

I'm not sure Faye has the right to critisise the colour choices of other characters...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 20 Sep 2011, 04:03
Poor Momo.  She was just trying to fit in and then Padma had to go make a (albeit funny) computer joke.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Sep 2011, 04:04
Well, Dora's parents smoked weed. We just saw her get a contact high.
Really?  Maybe I'm remembering it wrong I thought only Marten declined, and she smoked.  I don't think she does it regularly, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 20 Sep 2011, 04:22
Poor Momo.  She was just trying to fit in and then Padma had to go make a (albeit funny) computer joke.

While I saw the joke, all that went through my mind with the punchline was, "If you have to explain it, it's not funny."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 20 Sep 2011, 04:39
Maybe my circle of friends are all jerks with thicker skins but their banter isn't beyond us, down to the "Why does that hurt my feelings."

I really think some people here are incapable of understanding the way different social circles work outside of their specific ones. I have one circle of friends where if I wasn't occasionally being insulted I would start to worry that something is bothering them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Throg on 20 Sep 2011, 04:44
Anyone have the hook to drag Padma stage left?
This.

There are good jokes, there are bad jokes...there are good bad jokes...and then there's this.  The looks Marten and Momo were trading speak volumes. 

...

The backgrounds are gorgeous, BTW. 

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 20 Sep 2011, 05:17
I said it before and I'll say it again: I think Padma's high.  :psyduck:

Permanently?

Anyhow, comments on comic:

1. Nobody has mentioned Elliot's cute little hat yet. Why is this.

2. Padma is one of those unfortunate people who can spot something that is (in her mind) funny but has not the ability with words to shape it into a joke for other people to share.

3. Why is everyone wearing shorts to go hiking? In the UK, I certainly know that long trousers would be first thing on my list. I am not sure if this is a cultural or climatic thing. Or perhaps in the USA they don't have nettles.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 20 Sep 2011, 05:26

3. Why is everyone wearing shorts to go hiking? In the UK, I certainly know that long trousers would be first thing on my list. I am not sure if this is a cultural or climatic thing. Or perhaps in the USA they don't have nettles.


Depends on how warm hot it is, how likely there are to be mosquitos (if the number is minimal then shorts with spray often sufficient) and the state of the paths you are going on. I suspect they are all wearing trainers (or sneakers) or something similiar rather than proper solid hiking shoes. Quite possibily they are merely looking to camp in the forest rather than "hiking" in which case they can make do with lighter clothing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 20 Sep 2011, 05:47
Man, the poster above just melted because a character in a comic on the internet wears a t-shirt with the name of a band which wear capes and average 4 chords per hour. I'm just saying that. Man.
Yeah. And including ))) in the band name (unpronounced apparently) makes the equally silent Heävy Mëtal Ümläut (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HeavyMetalUmlaut?from=Main.ptitlerwc2j24ka224) seem quite sensible.

The O))) at the end of their name is not really to "look cool/metal/whatever", it's a tribute to their favorite amps. Sunn Amps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunn) So yeah, even the O is silent.
So I wouldn't compare their name to the "Heävy Mëtal Ümläut" at all... I'm just saying.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2011, 05:48

3. Why is everyone wearing shorts to go hiking? In the UK, I certainly know that long trousers would be first thing on my list. I am not sure if this is a cultural or climatic thing. Or perhaps in the USA they don't have nettles.


Depends on how warm hot it is, how likely there are to be mosquitos (if the number is minimal then shorts with spray often sufficient) and the state of the paths you are going on. I suspect they are all wearing trainers (or sneakers) or something similiar rather than proper solid hiking shoes. Quite possibily they are merely looking to camp in the forest rather than "hiking" in which case they can make do with lighter clothing.

For a forest near an urban area, the paths will be well worn and wide - nettles and brambles won't be a problem.  

And judging by the woods, it's high summer, so shorts are appropriate for some exercise in the heat.  
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Sep 2011, 06:16
it's a tribute to their favorite amps: Sunn Amps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunn)

Jeph commented on twitter how some people linked the shirt to the band, and others to the amps.  He didn't say which he/Marten had in mind (I'm assuming the band).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Sep 2011, 06:47
New theory!

Elliot's wearing a floppy hat.  He's developing a bit of a bald spot, and so protects it when hiking.  That's 'cause he's a bit older than the rest of the crew. 


And the woman he's been pining for isn't Padma - it's Jim's ex.  He's watching after Sam for her...

I can hear her now: "Elliot, be a dear and keep an eye on Sam when she's at her father's bakery.  Make sure she doesn't get into too much trouble?"

"Uh, OK, sure thing... "


He takes it very serously. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 20 Sep 2011, 07:03
I see that Jeph has posted a couple alternate versions of panel 1 on Tumblr this morning too.  One of the versions is without text, the other is just the background, and there are hi-res versions of them both.  I'm thinking the later would make an excellent desktop picture.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: miquelfire on 20 Sep 2011, 07:14
Any reason the image for the comic is 8-bit, even though it's PNG format, and PNG can support 32-bit colors?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 20 Sep 2011, 07:30
Any reason the image for the comic is 8-bit, even though it's PNG format, and PNG can support 32-bit colors?

Artist's personal style....  Just because a format can support 32-bit worth of colours, doesn't mean you have to use the full allocation.

I wonder if the solvent in the bug spray is bad for the plastic in Momo's skin.

Kudos on the background.

Momo sprays the stuff on her shorts, not directly onto her skin (/pedantic)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Sep 2011, 07:44
Any reason the image for the comic is 8-bit, even though it's PNG format, and PNG can support 32-bit colors?

Bandwidth; it costs him money, and 32-bit images are much bigger.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: sluthy on 20 Sep 2011, 08:08
Well, Dora's parents smoked weed. We just saw her get a contact high.
Really?  Maybe I'm remembering it wrong I thought only Marten declined, and she smoked.  I don't think she does it regularly, though.

No, in that strip just her mom smoked (and maybe the dad too (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1043)). She just got a contact high.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Sep 2011, 08:16
She just got a contact high.

As she says herself (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1045).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Wimblesaurus on 20 Sep 2011, 10:35
Padma is Osaka.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: rje on 20 Sep 2011, 10:52
This just in: Elliot wears hat.
Still absolutely adorable.

...
That is all.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Somebody on 20 Sep 2011, 11:02
I think it's now been definitively proven that Padma wasn't playing around in strips like #2009 and #2013. She's just plain thick.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2011, 11:21
What do you want to bet that Momo's social protocol database has a default heuristic that says "if you don't know what to do, and if moral programming doesn't prevent it, do what others are doing"? It's not a bad heuristic in our culture, and as far as I know a better one in Japan. Hence the bug spray.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: vsonics on 20 Sep 2011, 11:43
I think it's now been definitively proven that Padma wasn't playing around in strips like #2009 and #2013. She's just plain thick.

That's harsh. While I do think that she might be a little bit (lot of bit) slow on the uptake sometimes, I think she's much more silly than stupid. I like her.

And Elliot's hat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Somebody on 20 Sep 2011, 11:48
Actually, looking at the strip again... the background appears to have eaten all the colours. Look at the hair, especially Momo's...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: NotAwesomeAnymore on 20 Sep 2011, 12:29
Is that really how it works? That it makes it look like the "spray" tool in MSPaint?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Sep 2011, 13:27
In a PNG with a palette, there can be 256 distinct colours.  Even with that background, I'm surprised that so many of the main blocks of colour are dithered, so I wonder if Jeph is using a non-optimal method of creating the palette in Photoshop (or does he do that bit in Illustrator?).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Sep 2011, 14:10
Well, Dora's parents smoked weed. We just saw her get a contact high.
Really?  Maybe I'm remembering it wrong I thought only Marten declined, and she smoked.  I don't think she does it regularly, though.

No, in that strip just her mom smoked (and maybe the dad too (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1043)). She just got a contact high.
I stand corrected.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 Sep 2011, 14:28
All I can say is that the background is a bit too much for my deuteranopic eyes. I love the detail, but it's just a bit bright for my liking - which causes, unfortunately, the characters to seem "washed out" in front of it.

Of course, that's why Jeph is a webcomic artist and I'm not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 20 Sep 2011, 15:51
Wait, so QC takes place in Northamptong, Vietnam?  :psyduck:

Yep, it's were the Northampton Vicious AnthroPC's hide out plotting their war.   :-D

Padma is definitely an ...... unusual individual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 20 Sep 2011, 16:48
The more I think about it, the more I think she's a ESL (English as Second Language) speaker, raised in a different country. Coming from another country, another culture to ours could explain a lot of her eccentricities. She probably speaks with an accent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 20 Sep 2011, 17:44
Screw this cold. I took a week off to get better...and I still have it. Dammit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
So this week begins with Butts Disease and bad puns. Yep, sounds like this will be a normal week here. And there's nothing wrong with that.

Nice to see Marten in something besides pants for a change. Let's hope this hike doesn't end poorly for him.

Also, Samantha...rule #1 when applying bug spray is to keep your mouth closed. Everyone knows that. Rule #2 is to be ready to swat any bugs that are either immune to it or don't bother leaving you alone. Rule #3.....is there a rule #3?

I kinda like Elliot's hat. If I had some money to spare, I might get one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 20 Sep 2011, 19:34
Also, Samantha...rule #1 when applying bug spray is to keep your mouth closed. Everyone knows that. Rule #2 is to be ready to swat any bugs that are either immune to it or don't bother leaving you alone. Rule #3.....is there a rule #3?

You don't talk about fight club.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Somebody on 20 Sep 2011, 20:08
In a PNG with a palette, there can be 256 distinct colours.  Even with that background, I'm surprised that so many of the main blocks of colour are dithered, so I wonder if Jeph is using a non-optimal method of creating the palette in Photoshop (or does he do that bit in Illustrator?).
The only way I can see the fairly poor results of #2017 happening is if Jeph's just done the conversion on the default settings, when he really needed to convert the background to 128-colour separately (in advance of joining bg and foreground) to leave a reasonable palette for the characters in the web version of the comic.

Or, failing that, use JPEGs for as long as he's got a background that busy (which he's done at least once before). All that dithering has murdered the filesize (3x the size of #2016) to the point even a full-colour PNG probably wouldn't be much worse.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 20 Sep 2011, 21:43
Also, Samantha...rule #1 when applying bug spray is to keep your mouth closed. Everyone knows that. Rule #2 is to be ready to swat any bugs that are either immune to it or don't bother leaving you alone. Rule #3.....is there a rule #3?

You don't talk about fight club.

You just broke Rule #2
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 20 Sep 2011, 22:12
Also, Samantha...rule #1 when applying bug spray is to keep your mouth closed. Everyone knows that. Rule #2 is to be ready to swat any bugs that are either immune to it or don't bother leaving you alone. Rule #3.....is there a rule #3?

You don't talk about fight club.

You just broke Rule #2
Y'all quit talking about things you're not supposed to talk about.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Sep 2011, 22:29
"Tomboyish" may not be exactly the right word.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 20 Sep 2011, 22:31
Samantha has surprised me by jumping after the snake. I did not expect that.

Also her final position in that second panel is amusing.

Also, re yesterday's Padma moment: Padma needs to stop saying the stuff she thinks is funny, because it isn't to others, as someone else said. As someone else who has done the thing Padma is doing many a time, I highly advise her to stop, because she's embarrassing herself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Ravenswing on 20 Sep 2011, 22:34
Holy heck, does that ditz know that Mt. Tom has RATTLERS?

They're not precisely common up there - in all the times I was there, I never myself saw one - but they're there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 20 Sep 2011, 22:36
Whatever else you can say about Sam, she is definitely not a scaredy cat.  :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Cartilage Head on 20 Sep 2011, 22:36
What is up with the hair and hats and stuff in #2017?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: starkruzr on 20 Sep 2011, 22:38
How the hell did Sam not break something in that fall?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 20 Sep 2011, 22:42
Toon Physics (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ToonPhysics)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 20 Sep 2011, 22:49
Must ... not ... click on trope link.

That big panel is a candidate for the QC Captions thread if I've ever seen one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 20 Sep 2011, 22:50
How the hell did Sam not break something in that fall?  :psyduck:
You do have to wonder...the way she hits her back in the third...position? Segment?...of the fall looks like it should have done some serious, if not permanent, damage.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tuitsuro on 20 Sep 2011, 22:56
One of the comics where I'm glad to have a low-rez monitor.  Scrolling through Sam's fall really gave me that 'Oh shit' feeling.

And it's probably too early to speculate, but whatever damage she has, it doesn't appear to be bloody.  In fact, it appears quite... grey and metallic.  
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: J on 20 Sep 2011, 23:10
i like this girl
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 20 Sep 2011, 23:40
One of the comics where I'm glad to have a low-rez monitor.  Scrolling through Sam's fall really gave me that 'Oh shit' feeling.

And it's probably too early to speculate, but whatever damage she has, it doesn't appear to be bloody.  In fact, it appears quite... grey and metallic.  
Oh mah gawd, Samantha is a robot!

(http://skepticalteacher.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/conspiracy.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 20 Sep 2011, 23:52
Wow, most other girls I've known, in fact, just about ALL other girls I've known, would have damn near killed themselves trying to get AWAY from the snake. Quite a few guys too...

The more I see of Sam, the more she amuses me, and the more I feel sorry for her parents. Can you imagine having a child liable to do crazy stuff like set your kitchen on fire, talk an AnthroPC into showing off her electro-defense feature (possibly on hapless passersby)  or dive off a cliff after a snake? (Yes I know she most likely didn't intend to go over the cliff, but it's lucky for her it wasn't higher...) This child STILL manages to get herself in trouble while under ADULT SUPERVISION!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 21 Sep 2011, 00:02
This week is getting better and better, comicwise :laugh:

The title, the fall, the faces
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 21 Sep 2011, 00:02
That's a fall of what, ten meters, and she's barely scratched her face. Is she a Terminator?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 21 Sep 2011, 00:04
One of the comics where I'm glad to have a low-rez monitor.  Scrolling through Sam's fall really gave me that 'Oh shit' feeling.

I use my TV for my monitor and for once I'm grateful for it's terrible native resolution. Scrolling through that fall was an awesome experience. Well drawn by Jeph.

I'm torn 50/50 on if this is "ZOMG ROBITS!" or "The resilience of youth" here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Enduar on 21 Sep 2011, 00:05
Come on, Jeph, everyone knows fall damage uses d6's.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 21 Sep 2011, 00:20
Sam of The Jungle!! 

Jeez, i expected to see them having to call in SAR to get her out!!



And while I should resist, after that incredible survival, I won't


*takes deep breath*


BADGERBADGERBADGERBADGERBADGERBADGERBADGERBADGERBADGER
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 21 Sep 2011, 00:42
That's a fall of what, ten meters, and she's barely scratched her face. Is she a Terminator?
Me thinks five (or at most six) meters is closer to the mark. She is clearly shorter than Marten, so estimating her height somewhere between 1,5 and 1,6 meters (or between 5ft and 5ft4in). So from the top to the first stump sticking out of the side is about 2 Sams or a bit above 3 meters. Then add one Sam and then some to the bottom.

Still a nasty fall, so I agree with you. The babysitters were not doing their job.

But I love how focused to the task Sam stays thru her fall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Sep 2011, 00:51
We now know a little more about the capabilities of AnthroPCs. Momo could not move fast enough to prevent possible serious injury to a human.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 21 Sep 2011, 00:56
Still a nasty fall, so I agree with you. The babysitters were not doing their job.

I'm guessing the babysitters didn't have much time to react. Although if she pulls this kind of  stuff often you'd think Padma and Elliott would be a little more alert.

That big panel is a candidate for the QC Captions thread if I've ever seen one.

You think so? I was wondering about it; I was worried it would be awkward since it's so big, but then again I can see the possibilities....hmm
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: St.Clair on 21 Sep 2011, 01:01
What the hell, girl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: gopher on 21 Sep 2011, 01:08
The srtip reminds me of the many crashes Calvin and Hobbes had in their cart. I'm sure with Jeph's fondness for Bill Watterson's work that is deliberate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 21 Sep 2011, 01:43
Is that a "dazed" star coming off the snake at the bottom, or just a leaf?
It's a Canadian snake. So both.


Also, RE: Falls: small children are much more likely to bounce than break, something about incomplete ossification. Gonna hurt like hell in the morning though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 21 Sep 2011, 02:53

Also, re yesterday's Padma moment: Padma needs to stop saying the stuff she thinks is funny, because it isn't to others, as someone else said. As someone else who has done the thing Padma is doing many a time, I highly advise her to stop, because she's embarrassing herself.

I suspect Padma's colleagues are used to her sense of humour by now and so probably just roll their eyes... I think this is the first joke she has said in QC - certainly in a "very much off the road" way? Quite possibily she has the occassional moments of bad punnary. Martin and Momo looked shocked as the (terrible) punnary was an unexpected.

And she might be embarrassing herself, but since she is completely unaware of the fact, I don't think she'll care.



We now know a little more about the capabilities of AnthroPCs. Momo could not move fast enough to prevent possible serious injury to a human.

I think the only thing fast enough would be Hanners if someone puked up behind her a fraction of a second before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Akima on 21 Sep 2011, 02:59
Wait, so QC takes place in Northamptong, Vietnam?  :psyduck:
It does look a bit lurid and jungle-y for New England, but I can't see any river sampans or girls in ao dai.

She probably speaks with an accent.
Who doesn't?

And she might be embarrassing herself, but since she is completely unaware of the fact, I don't think she'll care.
Is it even possible to embarrass yourself if you're not aware of it? Usually, when people say "you're embarrassing yourself" it's just a sneering way of saying "I don't like what your are doing and I want you to stop".

I don't understand the fuss about snakes. They're common in any piece of scrub land here, and even in gardens. Mostly they're shy and unaggressive, and even the so-called aggressive species won't attack without provocation. Leaping on a snake like Sam is perhaps the best way to get bitten. But she certainly won't need to worry about snake bite if she breaks her neck falling like that. 'Toon physics, definitely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 21 Sep 2011, 03:13
Snakes? Two species can be found here. One is venomous, the other is not. I guess I might (=should ?) be able to tell which is which, but I'm not gonna bother. If I see a snake, say, at the summer cottage or in the garden, either it hides quickly or it dies. There's something about snakes that does that to me. Sorry. Seeing statues of snake gods on a trip to India didn't change me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 21 Sep 2011, 03:36
Yeah, people either generally hate snakes or love 'em, there's very little in-between. Many women (of all ages), at least here in the US, tend to run away screaming at the sight of one, while men tend to murder them on sight (if they don't run away themselves-I see an increasing number of young men running now...).

Akima, you're in Australia, right? Considering that the most poisonous species of snakes live down there, I think I'd be running away at the sight of an Australian snake in the bush. And I'm not afraid of snakes-but I keep a wide berth from poisonous ones. Sam, I think, would not survive long in Australia...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 21 Sep 2011, 03:42
In b4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gmw-F52kjjo

Hmpf, they don't have the "Don't kill no snake" song on YT :C
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 21 Sep 2011, 03:45
... I'm not afraid of snakes-but I keep a wide berth from poisonous ones. Sam, I think, would not survive long in Australia...
Especially the way she's holding that snake. It's got plenty of wiggle room to turn and bite, if it's so inclined. By the neck, Sam. By the neck. Always treat a snake as if it's loaded.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 21 Sep 2011, 03:46
Samantha leave the wildlife alone it does not want you to cuddle it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 21 Sep 2011, 03:56
Yeah, people either generally hate snakes or love 'em, there's very little in-between. Many women (of all ages), at least here in the US, tend to run away screaming at the sight of one, while men tend to murder them on sight (if they don't run away themselves-I see an increasing number of young men running now...).

Akima, you're in Australia, right? Considering that the most poisonous species of snakes live down there, I think I'd be running away at the sight of an Australian snake in the bush. And I'm not afraid of snakes-but I keep a wide berth from poisonous ones. Sam, I think, would not survive long in Australia...

Snakes are venomous - not poisonous (/pedantic)... :P

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Somebody on 21 Sep 2011, 04:21
Snakes are venomous - not poisonous (/pedantic)... :P
Not strictly true. SOME are poisonous. It just doesn't matter in the "do I need to run away" stakes the way venomous/not venomous matters. :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 21 Sep 2011, 04:30
So the question stands, "I've caught it!  Now what?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Throg on 21 Sep 2011, 04:33
Damn that looks like a long fall. The only way I think she could have escaped without serious injury if it's meant to imply she somersaulted down that hill, rather than she was airborne for the whole way down. 

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: BluishJeans on 21 Sep 2011, 05:16
Yeah, people either generally hate snakes or love 'em, there's very little in-between. Many women (of all ages), at least here in the US, tend to run away screaming at the sight of one, while men tend to murder them on sight (if they don't run away themselves-I see an increasing number of young men running now...).

Akima, you're in Australia, right? Considering that the most poisonous species of snakes live down there, I think I'd be running away at the sight of an Australian snake in the bush. And I'm not afraid of snakes-but I keep a wide berth from poisonous ones. Sam, I think, would not survive long in Australia...

Snakes are venomous - not poisonous (/pedantic)... :P


Heh, isn't that the same thing?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 21 Sep 2011, 05:18
Venomous means you die if it bites you.

Poisonous means you die if you bite it back.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Welu on 21 Sep 2011, 05:37
<simple>Nice art!</simple>

Jim did decribe Sam as a tomboy-ish, not as mini-female Bear Grylls. (Spelling?)
I like the little dazed star coming off the snake. On the college monitors it's hard to see but I chuckled when I noticed it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 21 Sep 2011, 05:37
Venomous means you die if it bites you.

Poisonous means you die if you bite it back.
Really ? Interesting.

There is only one word (giftig) for either circumstance in german.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: S_g on 21 Sep 2011, 06:02
Coming from Australia and growing up bush walking, grabbing almost any snake, let alone a brown one normally ends in badness.

As for an above poster saying they are non aggressive, obviously never been chased by a brown snake on a hot day.  Nasty angry little buggers. 
Generally if you leave them alone they leave you alone thou. 

Todays comic just made me shudder.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: raoullefere on 21 Sep 2011, 06:07
Venomous means you die if it bites you.

Poisonous means you die if you bite it back.
Really ? Interesting.

There is only one word (giftig) for either circumstance in german.
To be fair, the same is true for many, many people in the U.S., who probably wouldn't recognize the word 'venomous' if it bit them on the ass (at least until they, you know, died from it). Many folks in my area would, in fact, be more likely to ask if the snake is poison.

And, yes, if I were that snake, I'd bite the kid, even if I couldn't kill her. I'd be even more inclined to do so if I knew the hullabaloo that would likely result. After all, she probably broke my damn spine, whipping me around like that…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tuitsuro on 21 Sep 2011, 06:26
And, yes, if I were that snake, I'd bite the kid, even if I couldn't kill her. I'd be even more inclined to do so if I knew the hullabaloo that would likely result. After all, she probably broke my damn spine, whipping me around like that…

Which reminds me of this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEVq_fGsY-o).  (Disclaimer: It has no teeth.  *Knowing this*, you'll still freak out.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 21 Sep 2011, 06:28
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward.  The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Sep 2011, 06:31
How will the hike go?

Marten will get sick or have some lame injury.    - 10 (12%)
We find out exactly on whom Elliot has a crush.    - 17 (20.5%)
...and it's NOT Padma!    - 18 (21.7%)
Momo HATES snakes.    - 3 (3.6%)
Pintsize comes along in Momo's old chassis!    - 3 (3.6%)
Hike? We're going to spend an entire week on Sven!    - 11 (13.3%)
No, an entire week on Hanners!    - 10 (12%)
NO! We wantz moar PINTSIZE!    - 2 (2.4%)
Waffles rule, robots drool.    - 1 (1.2%)
Leda wanders into CoD, buys coffee.    - 2 (2.4%)
Leda = Pizza Girl!    - 6 (7.2%)

Total Voters: 83
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 21 Sep 2011, 06:45
Can we blame everything on Momo? Technically, she's a robot.....and they can't prosecute a robot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Sep 2011, 06:48
I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.

Then I guess a lot of comics annoy you (Scott Pilgrim would, for sure!).  Since there are other distortions of our reality in QC already (robotics and AI), does it really hurt to have another?

More seriously, people have survived (seriously injured, to be sure) falling from 47 stories up a building, and even from planes; and they have got up and walked away from substantially bigger falls than illustrated.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 21 Sep 2011, 06:48
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward. The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.


Personally, I'm perfectly happy for Jeph to throw out reasonable physics for special occasions. Not that we know how seriously injured she is yet.
I don't think the hiking trip will finish just yet (Jeph would still want to get some mileage out of those backgrounds, after all), but I do expect we'll see a bit more of Jim's inner protective dad coming out upon their return.

I just have one question, stoutfiles. How serious are you each time you express your distaste for a certain aspect of the comic? I'm thinking about things like Sam's fall, Charlotte's behaviour while Marigold and Momo were picking out a new chassis... that sort of thing. You tend to look at things somewhat pedantically, and that's FINE (I've certainly had my share of pedantic moments), but how much do these things affect your over-all enjoyment of the comic?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 21 Sep 2011, 06:54
Yeah, people either generally hate snakes or love 'em, there's very little in-between. Many women (of all ages), at least here in the US, tend to run away screaming at the sight of one, while men tend to murder them on sight (if they don't run away themselves-I see an increasing number of young men running now...).

Akima, you're in Australia, right? Considering that the most poisonous species of snakes live down there, I think I'd be running away at the sight of an Australian snake in the bush. And I'm not afraid of snakes-but I keep a wide berth from poisonous ones. Sam, I think, would not survive long in Australia...

Snakes are venomous - not poisonous (/pedantic)... :P


Heh, isn't that the same thing?


Venom is 'injected' into the body in some way - usually via fangs etc or in the case of plants - thorns or barbs.

Poision isn't directly administered directly into the body. Hence some poisonous animals will have toxins etc on their skin which'll then find its way into the victim by either the victim trying to eat it, or get it on its skin and then licking it clean.

You wouldn't call arsenic or cynide venom but it'll certainly poision you if you drank or ate it. On the other hand, it is possible in some cases to drink some types of venom and not die - largely since venom is designed to kill in a niche way, the acid in your stomach can break down the toxins in the venom before it can reach your bloodstream in sufficient quantities.

And now back onto actually discussing the comic......
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Daris on 21 Sep 2011, 07:08
Try a Somersault!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: zmeiat_joro on 21 Sep 2011, 07:08
I assumed Jeph exaggerated the steepness of the slope to fit the constraints of the 600 pixel width of the comic.

I also VERY MUCH hope those of you who say they kill snakes have first made sure none of the species endemic to the area are endagered!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 21 Sep 2011, 07:11
I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.

Then I guess a lot of comics annoy you (Scott Pilgrim would, for sure!).  Since there are other distortions of our reality in QC already (robotics and AI), does it really hurt to have another?

More seriously, people have survived (seriously injured, to be sure) falling from 47 stories up a building, and even from planes; and they have got up and walked away from substantially bigger falls than illustrated.

No, Scott Pilgrim quickly labeled itself as a video game crossover in the first volume.  If Marten started battling people in video game duels and they exploded into coins, then I would have a problem with it after 2000+ strips of establishing a physics-based world.

Falling is one thing, falling onto a rock face is another.  She should be hurt.

She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward. The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.


Personally, I'm perfectly happy for Jeph to throw out reasonable physics for special occasions. Not that we know how seriously injured she is yet.
I don't think the hiking trip will finish just yet (Jeph would still want to get some mileage out of those backgrounds, after all), but I do expect we'll see a bit more of Jim's inner protective dad coming out upon their return.

I just have one question, stoutfiles. How serious are you each time you express your distaste for a certain aspect of the comic? I'm thinking about things like Sam's fall, Charlotte's behaviour while Marigold and Momo were picking out a new chassis... that sort of thing. You tend to look at things somewhat pedantically, and that's FINE (I've certainly had my share of pedantic moments), but how much do these things affect your over-all enjoyment of the comic?

I'd say...slightly serious.  I'm just pointing out the negative things since everyone else is covering the positives.  For that to be the only negative today is pretty good, for the most part the plot is always entertaining and the illustration is always great. I'd say the only thing that really bothers me is Faye sometimes; I don't find physical abuse or degrading behavior to be even remotely funny, and that's Faye 75% of the time.  She's better than she used to be though, knowing the characters are evolving brings me back as well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: dragontart on 21 Sep 2011, 07:17
Quote
I'm just pointing out the negative things
*things you dislike.
I personally enjoyed this comic especially because it would be completely impossible within the QC universe and is thus simply silly.

Quote
It's worse than that she's DEAD JIM!
I laughed.


Oh, I have a question: it's poisonous when I bite it, it's venomous when it bites me, what's it called when I go dead from touching it? Are there such things at all for humans? Somebody (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?action=profile;u=56626) in some other window just threw in dimethylmercury (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethylmercury), does it count as poison/venom in English?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: inhuman_decency on 21 Sep 2011, 07:38
So the question stands, "I've caught it!  Now what?"

Stuff it in a little ball so it can fight for her, of course!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 21 Sep 2011, 07:48
Personally, I'm okay with a few physics handwaves here and there.  After all, there are plenty of times Jeph writes someone out of character in order to deliver a punchline, and we accept that (well, more or less).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Skaltura on 21 Sep 2011, 08:12
Venomous means you die if it bites you.

Poisonous means you die if you bite it back.

However, both are toxic and can have potentially noxious effects!

Hey everybody, it's synonym week!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Sep 2011, 08:13
Congrats kiddo, that took brains!  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: emeraldbeacon on 21 Sep 2011, 08:18
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward....

Actually, if you look at the third image during the fall, there's a sudden appearance of several leaves (that aren't anywhere to be seen elsewhere).  What I read that as, is her falling into a tree limb or bush, which could significantly reduce her downwards velocity, which would have a direct correlation to her chance of serious injury.  I must admit, though, it does look like she whacked herself right against a rocky outcropping... which, after a one-story-fall, would be pretty dang painful, particularly considering she had a second story to go.

Guessing Jeph will give us some kind of "how she 'knew' the fall was safe" explanation tonight...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 21 Sep 2011, 08:55
I loved catching snakes as a kid, but even I never took a flying leap off a cliff after one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Sep 2011, 09:01
As another explanation or way of viewing it, it seems to me that the height of the cliff may be not actually representative, but stretched out vertically to accommodate the multiple images of the stages of the fall (and fill the panel).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: wrwight on 21 Sep 2011, 10:27
She probably speaks with an accent.
Who doesn't?

Thank you. I hate it when people don't understand this, haha.

Also, I agree with pwhodges. Until I read the wcdt I just thought everyone would come to that conclusion, that the cliff wasn't as high as it was drawn in the comic, but that was simply the best way to draw it to convey what Jeph wanted to get across.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: billydaking on 21 Sep 2011, 11:46
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward.  The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.

Considering that I had similar fall (fell on back, bounced off, then went forearms first into the ground) when I was about 10 years old and came away with just bruises...yeah, it can happen. My little sister also fell down two flights of concrete steps and survived without anything broken. The thing is this...kids tend to get less seriously injured than adults because they don't think (i.e., prepare themselves mentally for) about is to happen, so they don't tense up, which highly increases the likelihood of broken bones. The same reason why drunk people have a habit of walking away unscathed from car wrecks.

I'm annoyed when people think they understand reality, but it's really just their perception of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 21 Sep 2011, 11:52
Quote from: Welu
Jim did decribe Sam as a tomboy-ish, not as mini-female Bear Grylls.

Hey now, nobody said she drinks her own urine.



...sorry

Quote from: cesariojpn
Can we blame everything on Momo? Technically, she's a robot.....and they can't prosecute a robot.

? Why couldn't they? If they have constitutional rights (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1900), they're basically citizens, aren't they? That would imply that they're subject to the same laws as any human citizen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pendrake on 21 Sep 2011, 12:19
For comic #2018...

1. My thoughts on Samantha's thoughts for panel #2...

 -1st: Oh no you don't!
 -2nd: Oop...
 -3rd: Ow!
 -4th: Hah!

2. Hopefully Momo will appreciate Samatha's effort to show her a snake :wink: .

3. On grabbing snakes, sure most grown-ups or a knowledgable person would know not to grab a snake (or how to properly grab one).  This, however, is an a 13 year old girl with more enthusiasm than wisdom.

4. As for injuries, from a parent's field experience: children, kids (yes, there is a difference), and teenagers are shockingly damage resilient at times.  Of course, that in no way mitigates the worries of the parents :psyduck: .  Comic-wise, minor injuries ("minor" being a very broad term in comics & animation) make for good punchlines.

5. 2d10 falling damage?  What system is Jeph playing...?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: brew on 21 Sep 2011, 12:31

No, Scott Pilgrim quickly labeled itself as a video game crossover in the first volume.  If Marten started battling people in video game duels and they exploded into coins, then I would have a problem with it after 2000+ strips of establishing a physics-based world.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=61
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kagey on 21 Sep 2011, 12:33
I love this strip because this happened at my kids' elementary school last week -- someone yelled "snake" and a crowd of little girls (average age: 6) dashed toward the speaker. At least there was a knowledgeable mom on hand to identify the snake a harmless garden snake. The girls who didn't get to hold it before we decided the poor snake had had enough were crushed. This is the new breed of girl, people. Running towards snakes.
I love it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 21 Sep 2011, 13:02
So, 2d10 fall damage for Samantha translates into several cuts, a few bruises (both bone and skin) and mild concussion. And a stunned snake. I'll go along with it.


I await the reactions from the rest of the party tomorrow. They shall be entertaining.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mad Cat on 21 Sep 2011, 14:09
Resilience of youth my pasty, white ass. When I was 4, I fell 5 feet backwards out of a tree, landed flat on my back and broke both arms, my left one in three places.

The expression on Sam's face at the bottom reads to me like, "OMG, I just broke every bone in my body."

Note that that trauma dissuaded me from climbing trees in no why whatsoever. When us cousins were together climbing trees, I was always the highest monkey in it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: rje on 21 Sep 2011, 14:48
...am I the only one thinking 'omg....that poor snake!'    lol
I hope she didn't hurt it
(I cant really blame her at all though, snakes are awesome and I'm jealous, I've never gotten to touch a snake that wasn't there specifically to be touched [like at the zoo or something])

Although I think this is the first snake I've seen that's taken a flying leap off a cliff to get away from a pursuer xD
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Sep 2011, 15:08
My money is that Elliott is the one who goes hysterical, while Padma remains calm and serene.


... though the reverse would be hilarious, and probably more in character.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: CrowFairy on 21 Sep 2011, 15:34
I've gone through it in my head because I'm probably pretty close to Samantha's size (DON'T JUDGE ME D: ), and I doubt I'd be much more injured than she is. I probably would have hit a few more rocks than she did because I'm unlucky. I couldn't imagine anything being broken other than whatever she landed on, but I imagine she put some points in Tumble, so she should be fine. :-D

Also, I hope the snake is okay. T_T
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 21 Sep 2011, 16:10
Nah, she most likely snapped it's spine. It's dead Jim.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 21 Sep 2011, 16:15
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward.  The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.

Considering that I had similar fall (fell on back, bounced off, then went forearms first into the ground) when I was about 10 years old and came away with just bruises...yeah, it can happen. My little sister also fell down two flights of concrete steps and survived without anything broken. The thing is this...kids tend to get less seriously injured than adults because they don't think (i.e., prepare themselves mentally for) about is to happen, so they don't tense up, which highly increases the likelihood of broken bones. The same reason why drunk people have a habit of walking away unscathed from car wrecks.

I'm annoyed when people think they understand reality, but it's really just their perception of it.

I'm annoyed when people give outliers and try to say that they understand reality better than others.  Throw a 100 kids down concrete stairs or 20 ft rock faces and see how many walk away perfectly fine.  While your muscle statement may be true, kids get less injured because they weigh less and their bones are much softer.  They still get injured and they most definitely cry.  The only reason why none of this is happening is because it's not funny that way, and that's what Jeph was going for.  Works for most people, but not for everyone.


No, Scott Pilgrim quickly labeled itself as a video game crossover in the first volume.  If Marten started battling people in video game duels and they exploded into coins, then I would have a problem with it after 2000+ strips of establishing a physics-based world.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=721
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=61


Perfectly fine with the robots being established as comic relief since it was established that way by day 1.  I've only had a problem with it lately when Momo became a major character and we had to discuss things like robot's rights.  They became more than comic relief and I wouldn't feel the same now if Pintsize shot a deadly laser at Marten...it wouldn't be seen as slapstick, somewhat non-canon humor but a very deadly act that almost murdered him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Sep 2011, 16:44
It's apparently something Jeph has had in mind all along: on Tumblr he said of AnthroPCs "I had always expected to develop their role in society more".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: brew on 21 Sep 2011, 16:49

Perfectly fine with the robots being established as comic relief since it was established that way by day 1.  I've only had a problem with it lately when Momo became a major character and we had to discuss things like robot's rights.  They became more than comic relief and I wouldn't feel the same now if Pintsize shot a deadly laser at Marten...it wouldn't be seen as slapstick, somewhat non-canon humor but a very deadly act that almost murdered him.

The violence has all been slapstick from the beginning, human or otherwise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvJeATp31dw
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Sep 2011, 16:53
Throw a 100 kids down concrete stairs or 20 ft rock faces and see how many walk away perfectly fine.
I don't think I'd get past five or six without being arrested.  I'm not a very fast thrower.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 21 Sep 2011, 17:07
We don't know yet how extensive her injuries are... the fall panel ends with her hitting the ground, ostensibly happy about catching the snake but not necessarily fully processing all the owwies yet.

That said, based on my own understanding of Jeph's style having read the comic, I seriously doubt that Jeph's going to have any major physical consequences happen to Sam. Comics wouldn't be interesting if they always showed the most probable outcome from a given setup.

Just saying we don't know yet. If there were going to be Serious Consequences, I doubt Jeph would represent them with Xes for eyes on Sam after a fall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 21 Sep 2011, 17:29
My money is that Elliott is the one who goes hysterical, while Padma remains calm and serene.


... though the reverse would be hilarious, and probably more in character.
I'm expecting Momo to walk up to Samantha, say "I'm sorry", and then electrocutes Samantha as punishment. Followed by Elliot and Padma attempting to complain about Momo's actions, only to say "Yeah. I'd do that if I had that ability."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: westrim on 21 Sep 2011, 17:47
The truth is, Sam is secretly a ROBOT, and Jim is a MAD SCIENTIST using the coffee shop to fund his EXPERIMENTS!

Her passion for snake hunting and her apparent wounds? Merely tests of her durability and ability to pass as human!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: St.Clair on 21 Sep 2011, 19:24
As I think at least one other poster has said:  if I was that snake, I would probably bite the big scary monster that chased/threw me down a cliff, even if I wasn't venomous.  Just because I'm that freaked out and pissed off.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 21 Sep 2011, 19:33
I hope that Jeph continues to incorporate slapstick into his comic. It just adds some variety and comedy into the mix, thus making the comic that much more fun to read.

That said, I didn't think that this instance was *that* outrageous.

And the expressions on her face as she went down really were priceless. I love the action girl kind of pose at the top, too.

As for the captions I mentioned earlier:

1. Gotcha, you little...!
2. OK, didn't think that through.
3. This is gonna sting...
4. YES! The snake is OK!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Interlude on 21 Sep 2011, 19:38
I love this strip because this happened at my kids' elementary school last week -- someone yelled "snake" and a crowd of little girls (average age: 6) dashed toward the speaker. At least there was a knowledgeable mom on hand to identify the snake a harmless garden snake. The girls who didn't get to hold it before we decided the poor snake had had enough were crushed. This is the new breed of girl, people. Running towards snakes.
I love it.

I think you're right. I work at a preschool and over the summer we had a professional reptile handler (mostly bringing snakes) come in. My two-year-old girls were, for the most part, more excited than the boys. One of them tried to grab the snake right from the guy, and it was pretty big. She also squashes bugs and tries to kill spiders if she sees them. At the same time, she  loves Disney princesses and dress-up. I think typical stereotypes are definitely changing, and I love it, too.

Although, I really have to DISCOURAGE them from going after snakes and unknown insects... 


(Note: I just bring up my preschoolers every chance I get. I apologize.  :roll: )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cabbagehut on 21 Sep 2011, 19:53
Perfectly fine with the robots being established as comic relief since it was established that way by day 1.  I've only had a problem with it lately when Momo became a major character and we had to discuss things like robot's rights.  They became more than comic relief and I wouldn't feel the same now if Pintsize shot a deadly laser at Marten...it wouldn't be seen as slapstick, somewhat non-canon humor but a very deadly act that almost murdered him.

Personally, I feel the same way.  I don't really like the robots-as-major-characters storylines, because QC has, up until this point, been largely realistic.  While there are always exceptions (Pizza Girl (but we don't even know if she's real), The VespAvenger, etc.), this is sort of a whole new dimension.  I don't really have much interest in the Momo/Pintsize/Winslow-based storylines and only come back every few days to see what's up in the comic.  That's just my personal preference, though.  Other people seem to really like these storylines, and the author himself seems to enjoy them, so I just kind of ignore them and read more thoroughly when it focuses on arcs I like more.

I am sort of hoping that Samantha/Sam doesn't become a major character, though.  I liked QC as a primarily-adult world, and she feels a little shoehorned in to make stuff happen.  Most of the characters now are somewhat passive and pretty reasonable people, and she really isn't.  I tend not to like kid characters, because they often make every situation about themselves, and people's reactions and stresses have to revolve around whatever half-baked idea they have in their heads.  That's not a criticism of writing, necessarily; that's frequently how kids are in the real world, too (again, not their fault, but I do find it frustrating).

I do like QC - some storylines I like a lot better than others.  This is one of the arcs I have very little interest in.  Not a criticism of the author - his fans seem to like them just fine, as does he.  But I tend to be a little more vocal about the things I don't like, because they're easier to pinpoint.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: westrim on 21 Sep 2011, 20:00
It is completely realistic. It just happens to be a different reality. I remember reading something once where Jeph expressed surprise at people not realizing it was science fiction despite the "little robots running around" and other stuff that is my our standards fantastical. The comic has always been in a world with that stuff going on, and to get all picky and annoyed that it's not focusing on the human relationships quite as much at this point in time is a bit pedantic. Also, passive and reasonable describes exactly one character on a consistent basis, and that's Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Sep 2011, 20:40
Your memory is correct. You're thinking of

"Someone[sic] people do not often realize is that the world in which QC takes place is considerably stranger than our own. You'd think that with all the little talking robots running around everywhere that this would be obvious, but I am consistently surprised at how often people take it for granted." (Jeph Jacques, Strip 399 newspost)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Akima on 21 Sep 2011, 22:57
So, 2d10 fall damage for Samantha translates into several cuts, a few bruises (both bone and skin) and mild concussion.
Well you can roll as little as 2 with 2d10 after all (probability of 0.01). Sam plainly has that quality Napoleon is supposed to have valued highly in his marshals; luck.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cabbagehut on 21 Sep 2011, 23:19
It is completely realistic. It just happens to be a different reality. I remember reading something once where Jeph expressed surprise at people not realizing it was science fiction despite the "little robots running around" and other stuff that is my our standards fantastical. The comic has always been in a world with that stuff going on, and to get all picky and annoyed that it's not focusing on the human relationships quite as much at this point in time is a bit pedantic. Also, passive and reasonable describes exactly one character on a consistent basis, and that's Marten.


Agree to disagree, I suppose.  I know it's a science-fiction reality, but it's just not my style of science-fiction.  I just don't particularly care for those aspects of the story, because they feel... underdeveloped, I guess?  Lots of comics have various non-realistic aspects to them, and you sort of just suspend disbelief because they're not engaged or something.  I felt that was about the AnthroPCs in QC.  They were just sort of ancillary things that didn't change the fundamental nature of the world - just sort of a reinterpretation of the actual world with talking personal robots.  I don't feel that I'm being particularly pedantic here, because I'm not saying these things don't belong or that they're terrible and should be removed forever, just that I find them less interesting and I have a harder time suspending my disbelief when Momo moved from a little personal computer to basically a human-sized doll.  Part of this is probably that the AnthroPCs often don't interact with anyone outside of their homes and don't have a lot of character development.  They seem like wacky side-kicks, not actual characters?  I'm not sure why I don't appreciate them, exactly.

I said "somewhat" passive and reasonable - most of the characters at this point have expected reactions and don't seem to be there just to stir up drama.  Tai, maybe, doesn't fall into this category (and it's one of the reasons I don't often like her character, but I feel she's mostly believable).  Pretty much everyone else, in my opinion, does do things that are reasonable.  I mean, they make mistakes, but they rarely do anything as brash as leaping off of a cliff.  Faye might rudely snark at someone, or Hannelore might have a strange reaction to something, but we understand why that happens.  Maybe with more development, I'll like Samantha/Sam more.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: CompSarge on 21 Sep 2011, 23:55
MAN HOW ABOUT THOSE BACKGROUNDS THEY CERTAINLY LOOK LIKE NATURE DON'T THEY?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Sep 2011, 23:57
I sympathise with Marten.  When I trekked up Mount Kenya (in 1989), one of our camps was on a plateau at 14,000ft.  The edge of the plateau had a sheer drop to the valley below of over a kilometre - I did look over the edge (at the tops of the clouds in the valley), but I crawled to it...



And I see Sam got grazes on both arms and legs from bumping down that cliff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Sep 2011, 00:00
This is evidence in favor of the belief that Padma is clueless.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 22 Sep 2011, 00:04
This is evidence in favor of the belief that Padma is clueless.

Bachi. Bachi for Padma.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Sep 2011, 00:04
And that lack of clue could have been the end of her-unless that was the same cliff Sam just fell down. Somehow I doubt it though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 22 Sep 2011, 00:11
Re: yesterday's comic - I have this daughter?  She has done nearly exactly the same thing (though she was oly about 10 at the time), and several other things as well. 


But not always without injury.  The emergency room admissions officer at the small hospital near our home used to joke that we needed a frequent flyer system for her...  after a while we stopped telling the doctors what happened and made her  explain it herself.  It never sounded believable when we said it, and my wife was sure that child protective services would be all over us at some point!

No kitchen fires, though.  That's my other daughter...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Sep 2011, 00:41
Carl, those daughters of yours sound like the kind of kids that age a parent well before their time (I know, I've got a stepson like that). Bet you look about 20 years older than you really are thanks to them. I'll also bet that when each of them reached their 18th birthday you were thanking your lucky stars you actually got them that far (I was certainly thinking that with my stepson).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Sep 2011, 00:43
One wonders what would have happened if she'd had Sally Field's headgear from The Flying Nun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 22 Sep 2011, 00:53
MAN HOW ABOUT THOSE BACKGROUNDS THEY CERTAINLY LOOK LIKE NATURE DON'T THEY?  :psyduck:

WHY YES THE BACKGROUNDS DO LOOK VERY IMPRESSIVE.
No, really, they do. Serious kudos to Jeph for having the patience to make them ... and make them well.
The cartoon-y leaves add a nice touch as well. :D

As for the rest of the bushwalk... well, the mood for whacky hijinks has certainly been set. It'll probably get even whackier from here... especially if Pintsize shows up. Oh man, if Pintsize shows up... :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Sep 2011, 00:59
Oh man, if Pintsize shows up... :psyduck:

Gods, I hope not!

I wonder what happens next. This COULD lead to a tender moment between Padma and Marten, but, of course, most likely it won't.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 22 Sep 2011, 01:00
Let the drama commence! :psyduck:


In other news: Elliot looks like a Park ranger :D
Plus I can probably could connect with Padma, having nearly been run down by traffic and other things in the past few weeks alone :|
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Sep 2011, 01:10
I sense a trend. Who's going to have a cliff-related problem next?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 22 Sep 2011, 01:41
Maybe Dora will meet her new hot neighbour "Cliff" :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: nonethousand on 22 Sep 2011, 01:50
Maybe Dora will meet her new hot neighbour "Cliff" :-D
(http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/3683/pfffffhahah.jpg)
I think I just invented a new emoticon! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 22 Sep 2011, 01:52
whoa... forgot the *badum-tss* there  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 22 Sep 2011, 02:08
Maybe Dora will meet her new hot neighbour "Cliff" :-D

Who's gay!! Nonono, wait....."Cliff" was originally "Clara!!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 22 Sep 2011, 02:51
Maybe Dora will meet her new hot neighbour "Cliff" :-D

*ZINGER*.

I'd really love to turn Padma's face into an emoticon... but then I would be obliged to do all the other characters' faces as well.

Marten would be reluctant
Pintsize would be perverted
Faye would be sassy
Dora would be... er... I'll come back to that one.
Hannelore would be worried
Winslow would be... suspicious (he's the one who talks about robots taking over the world, right?)
Marigold would be self-deprecating
Momo would be timid
Steve would be chilled
Cosette would be clumsy
Raven would be ditzy
Tai would be flirty
Jim I would dress up in one of those fancy "Defeat Awkwardness" oufits and call him a fancy British gentleman.
Samantha would be eager
Renee would be foul-mouthed
PT410X would be grumpy
and Padma would be easily amused
etc.

(Angus doesn't get one because 'sassy' is already taken :P )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Sep 2011, 03:12
Angus could be snarky.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Sep 2011, 03:17
Dora could be aloof. Or maybe mildly annoyed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 22 Sep 2011, 03:22
Heh, imho Dora does a pretty good contempt/haughty expression, amirite?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Sep 2011, 03:28
Yes, exactly! That's the right role for Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Throg on 22 Sep 2011, 03:47
Pizza girl would be AAAAAA
and Bros would be Bros

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: HiFranc on 22 Sep 2011, 03:58
I think Padma may feel something for Marten as:


{edit} On yesterday's mishap, I've always viewed QC as a sitcom (or "black comedy" at the very least) so I don't worry too much about it.

{edit 2} Given what Sam said when they arranged the walk (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2013) it's not surprising that she acted the way she did.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 22 Sep 2011, 05:49
I did look over the edge (at the tops of the clouds in the valley), but I crawled to it...

Well, at least you looked over the edge. It would take me a long time to get my courage up to do that.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Mad Cat on 22 Sep 2011, 06:25
Is it just me or are the ladies of tSB all crazy?

...

Okay, crazier than the ladies of CoD.

At this point, Sam and Padma make Hanners and Faye look mundane.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 22 Sep 2011, 06:26
I doubt Padma has any feelings for Martin.  More than likely she used Martin to steady herself with simply because he was the closest.  However, the look on Elliot's face is priceless there: is it because one of his friends almost went over a cliff, or because that friend is now holding onto someone other than him for dear life?  Hopefully we'll find out tomorrow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Sep 2011, 06:31
So now what?

Cut scene to the emergency room and a hysterical Jim.    - 1 (1.6%)
Are you kidding? She dusts herself off and holds the (very dazed) snake in TRIUMPH!    - 23 (37.7%)
Cut to the ER, but she's only got a few stitches.    - 1 (1.6%)
The fall wasn't that bad. Only a few meters down.    - 0 (0%)
She's done this before. The ER doctor tells Marten so.    - 10 (16.4%)
It's worse than that she's DEAD JIM!    - 7 (11.5%)
Cut scene to Jim visiting CoD and gushing about his smart little girl.    - 2 (3.3%)
She's okay, they check on her, she shows them the snake... and it bites Momo.    - 3 (4.9%)
...and it bites Marten.    - 4 (6.6%)
...and it bites Padma.    - 0 (0%)
Waffles will make it all better.    - 2 (3.3%)
I just LOVE the backgrounds! (Forget the storyline right now.)    - 8 (13.1%)

Total Voters: 61
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Jesus DeSaad on 22 Sep 2011, 06:46
Jeph, if you want to keep drawing outdoor scenes you need to update your characters' colors a bit.

Their coloring remains city-moody, which makes them appear like carton cut-outs when contrasted to the nature around them.

I propose you introduce some single cell highlights on their darker parts of skin and clothes to accompany the single cell shadows.

Not forever, just for the nature scenes. That way you won't have to draw highlights in every comic.

Here's what I mean, I threw this in literally 3 minutes 45 seconds. Select the highlight areas, Hue/Saturation, up the brightness by 20%, up the saturation by 5%. I also added an extra sky blue layer set in normal mode but only at 5% to produce a more uniform color palette all around.

(http://i.imgur.com/4pPeA.jpg)

I think It would really compliment the outdoors scenes.

Just a friendly suggestion, keep up the good work!

-JDS

-edit- no, not as much brightness as 20%. Try it at 10-15%, in retrospect it works better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Sep 2011, 06:59
Note that Jeph does not read the forums these days (or at least only very occasionally).  If you want to contact him, I suggest putting a question on his Tumblr (http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/) - he responds there from time to time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 22 Sep 2011, 07:12
Is it just me or are the ladies of tSB all crazy?

...

Okay, crazier than the ladies of CoD.

At this point, Sam and Padma make Hanners and Faye look mundane.

But as I said upthread we really haven't seen what Renee's personality is like.  And has Padma really done anything yet that Raven hasn't already done or would do given the chance?  She hasn't flashed anyone in a crowded bar, or turned soimeone's coffee brewing sculpture into a space-time travel machine.

Given the amount of effort that's gone into the backgrounds this week we'll probably end up with a whole week of Yelling Bird strips next week.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 22 Sep 2011, 07:38
The truth is, Sam is secretly a ROBOT, and Jim is a MAD SCIENTIST using the coffee shop to fund his EXPERIMENTS!
Jim owns a backery, not a coffee shop ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Sep 2011, 07:46
His bakery sells and serves coffee, which makes it also a coffee shop in my book.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 22 Sep 2011, 08:16
Aw, I wanted to see if Padma would fall.

Not that I actually want her hurt, mind, but that without her actually falling, this one seemed to not have much of a point. Plus I think it would have fit her personality, to not fully pay attention and thus fall because of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Welu on 22 Sep 2011, 09:03
Heh, imho Dora does a pretty good contempt/haughty expression, amirite?

Not as haughty as Hanners. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1721)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TheCollector on 22 Sep 2011, 10:33
Y'know, gotta say, she seems a bit dim at times, but I'm really starting to like Padme.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: vsonics on 22 Sep 2011, 11:36
I'm rather appreciating Momo's expression in the back of the first panel there. Obviously she likes eels a great deal more than snakes.

I don't understand why they don't have a first aid kit with them. I really just want to slap some band aids onto Sam.


Added: Looking back it's occurred to me that they don't seem to have brought anything with them, including water bottles. Other than some vanishing bug spray. Maybe they've got bags we just keep not-seeing. Probably it doesn't really matter.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 22 Sep 2011, 12:01
Y'know, gotta say, she seems a bit dim at times, but I'm really starting to like Padme.

Had a bit of snark here about that gal Natalie Portman played, but I realized how irritated I get by some of the "MartEn" folks.
Yeah, I've liked Padma since she showed up. Sweet but ditzy with a touch of sass, without guile, though I'm still wondering if she is way sharper than she lets on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 22 Sep 2011, 12:20
You know, when you describe her that way, she sounds more like Raven. Though Padma's rack isn't quite as awesome (not that I'm complaining)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Sep 2011, 13:11
I really just want to slap some band aids onto Sam.

My wife, who has done research into various aspects of skin, strongly prefers to leave cuts and grazes uncovered to dry out and scab naturally, unless they cannot be managed without protection or containment of bleeding.  Obviously cleaning them first is not discouraged, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: LeeC on 22 Sep 2011, 13:12
I really just want to slap some band aids onto Sam.

My wife, who has done research into various aspects of skin, strongly prefers to leave cuts and grazes uncovered to dry out and scab naturally, unless they cannot be managed without protection or containment of bleeding.  Obviously cleaning them first is not discouraged, though.

I guess its true, Chicks dig scars.  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 22 Sep 2011, 13:25
Okay, Padma gets a pass because Mother Nature always loves to be a douche when you least expect it. Mother Nature saw Padma tempting fate, and gave her a serious warning.

Will the hike end tomorrow? Or will there be more hijinks?

My money's on hijinks, naturally.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 22 Sep 2011, 13:34
please, please, hijinks!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 22 Sep 2011, 15:56
For a second I thought Padma was going down.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Sep 2011, 17:17
Perhaps that's how Sara really ended up - "tempted fate, got blown away atop Mount Tom".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Sep 2011, 17:23
Maybe it was only her broken corpse that got eaten by the Allosaurus!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 22 Sep 2011, 17:28
In other news: http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/post/10537867365/goodbye-easthampton
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Sep 2011, 17:40
Sam's an old school Simpsons fan!

(http://dr.jeebus.sydlexia.com/simpsonsgood25.jpg)

Quote from: Homer Jay Simpson
I call the big one Bitey!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: raoullefere on 22 Sep 2011, 17:55
I really just want to slap some band aids onto Sam.
I started to 'fix' this as:
I really just want to slap Sam.

But then I realized that wasn't enough.
I really just want to bite Sam.

Repeatedly. With my posoi venemu hot death fangs. 'Bitey,' my ass. Damn kid is asking for it, and Elliot makes it sound as though it's high time she got it.




Okay, I don't want to actually kill her (even if she's not real). It'd be enough to make her swell to about three times her normal size for eight hours, hurt like hell for twenty-four, and twitch uncontrollably every time thereafter she spots an innocent snake. Although my guess is she'll still keep grabbing and imprisoning them; I strongly suspect the late Steve Irwin managed to slip one into whosname's ex-wife.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Sep 2011, 19:13
I really just want to slap some band aids onto Sam.
I started to 'fix' this as:
I really just want to slap Sam.

But then I realized that wasn't enough.
I really just want to bite Sam.

Repeatedly. With my posoi venemu hot death fangs. 'Bitey,' my ass. Damn kid is asking for it, and Elliot makes it sound as though it's high time she got it.

I'm thinking, with Elliot mentioning how she names all her captured critters "Bitey", that Sam DOES get it, every time she grabs some wild creature. (And by "it" I mean getting bitten). For all we know, she may very well have already had a near-death encounter with a rattler, and I agree that she seems like the type of kid who would be completely unfazed by it (much like Mad Cat's falling out of a tree as a young girl, as she mentioned in this thread, didn't stop her from climbing right back into one soon as her bones knit).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 22 Sep 2011, 21:38
The snake seems to like her well enough now, even though it got rather dizzy in the fall. Maybe it's not a venomous or vicious kind of snake?

I imagine that Samantha takes them home every time she goes bushwalking, asking her dad if she can keep it as a pet, which her dad refuses. (Hence why she apparently always names them "Bitey")


EDIT: Consider that the last time we saw a large amount of shrubbery in the background, it looked like this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1964). And I STILL thought that was fantastic. Yet that's how much he's improved in a short time.
(No I don't care that it might have been based off a real place, it still counts :P )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 22 Sep 2011, 22:58
Clearly Marten is going to follow Padma to L.A. and then wacky hijinks ensue.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 22 Sep 2011, 23:00
2020:
A) Well, that solves that question ... Wait a minute, LA area?
2) Couple weeks? A few months IRL.
Gamma) I thought Jim did the baking.

Oh well. All those little robots running around ...

EDIT ... while you were typing AH SHADDUP.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: westrim on 22 Sep 2011, 23:02
Oh god I hope the comic moves to LA so I can finally lord my knowledge of it over all you Massholes oh god ohgod hogod.

Probably not gonna happen, but a Californian can dream, can't he?

It would be an awesome shift, though. New architecture, a refocus on Marten, an onslaught of new characters to declare our like or dislike for, big city issues...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: vsonics on 22 Sep 2011, 23:07
Aw.

Poor EVERYONE who was infatuated with Padma baked goods.

I'm going to be sorry to see her go. Maybe in the end she won't? Pretty hard to back out on grandma, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: DSL on 22 Sep 2011, 23:08
All this LA speculation has me wondering if there's more to  this  (http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/) than meets the eye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Sep 2011, 23:09
a Californian can dream, can't he?

A Californian's dream just died.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Sep 2011, 23:15
Was it ever established what part of California Marten was from?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Sep 2011, 23:20
Not that I'm aware.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Delator on 22 Sep 2011, 23:41
1. That's about as direct as we've EVER seen Marten be towards a female he wasn't dating. Pretty low key, and yet as obvious as a fire alarm. The problem being that...

2. Padma retains her title as Queen of the Oblivious.

However...

Yeah, I've liked Padma since she showed up...though I'm still wondering if she is way sharper than she lets on.

...I'm wondering if the "move" isn't a ruse to get Marten to stop being anxious regarding Elliot.  :|
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 22 Sep 2011, 23:53
I think Jeph mentioned in one of his tumblr question dumps that Marten's probably from the SF area.

Poor Marten. I wish we could see what he was thinking.
Title: Will Marten follow not!Dora back to LA?
Post by: foolsguinea on 22 Sep 2011, 23:59
Yeah! Do it! Do it! Do it!

OK, Marten shouldn't follow Padma back to LA, because she's not into him at all. But if she were, yeah. Let New England go.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 23 Sep 2011, 00:02
If Padma wouldnt have proven again and again that she's missing out the obvious, I would have guessed she tried to just avoid the issue.


Jeph, if you want to keep drawing outdoor scenes you need to update your characters' colors a bit. [...]
I honestly have downloaded the picture without checking the text and then tried to figure out for several minutes what the heck the diff was ... so unless you know what to look for, or are an expert for this, one honestly doesnt notice the difference at all.


Y'know, gotta say, she seems a bit dim at times, but I'm really starting to like Padme.
Oh, I always liked Padme.

Padma is a different issue, though.


For a second I thought Padma was going down.
From the looks of it, that would have been a much deeper fall ... and her undoing.


Perhaps that's how Sara really ended up - "tempted fate, got blown away atop Mount Tom".
Who ?

Seriously, who cares about Sara.


2. Padme retains her title as Queen of the Oblivious.
More like Queen Amidala.

Padma, on the other hand ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Sep 2011, 00:20
I would be very surprised if Marten chose to move to LA following a woman who he wasn't even sure was into him, especially after what happened with his ex Vicki. You will recall he ended up in New England in the first place following her from California, and that didn't end well for him. And they were in a relationship (that was already dying, but Marten didn't get that memo).

Marten's not dumb or infatuated enough to repeat that mistake. So no Padma for him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kazukagii on 23 Sep 2011, 00:38
I don't think Marten is even close to considering moving back to LA. I think it's more of the fact that for the first time since the whole Dora breakup, Marten has finally found somebody he has an interest in pursuing, only to have it snatched away right from under him. It's an extension of his infinitely bad luck regarding women.

At any rate, I believe this allows Marten to retain his "Character most deserving of a break and a hug" award. Poor guy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: foolsguinea on 23 Sep 2011, 00:50
Jeph, if you want to keep drawing outdoor scenes you need to update your characters' colors a bit.

Their coloring remains city-moody, which makes them appear like carton cut-outs when contrasted to the nature around them.

I propose you introduce some single cell highlights on their darker parts of skin and clothes to accompany the single cell shadows.

Not forever, just for the nature scenes. That way you won't have to draw highlights in every comic.

Here's what I mean, I threw this in literally 3 minutes 45 seconds. Select the highlight areas, Hue/Saturation, up the brightness by 20%, up the saturation by 5%. I also added an extra sky blue layer set in normal mode but only at 5% to produce a more uniform color palette all around.

[...]

I think It would really compliment the outdoors scenes.

Just a friendly suggestion, keep up the good work!

-JDS

-edit- no, not as much brightness as 20%. Try it at 10-15%, in retrospect it works better.
I think the blue filter is actually darkening some of the warmer skin tones, there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 23 Sep 2011, 00:54
In other news: http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/post/10537867365/goodbye-easthampton

The backgrounds are modeled on real places now? I guess that's why they look so awesome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Sep 2011, 00:59
They always have been to an extent. It's just that now, the story has moved out of the downtown NoHo area.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Sep 2011, 01:02
1. Samantha goes over a physical cliff.
2. Padma almost goes over a physical cliff.
3. Padma sends Marten over an emotional cliff
(not that she meant to).

At least Jeph didn't end the week with a cliffhanger.

Maybe instead of reading the whole week we could just have looked at the Cliff Notes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kazukagii on 23 Sep 2011, 01:11
Yeah, it's good thing Jeph didn't leave us all on edge.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: raoullefere on 23 Sep 2011, 01:28
So I bet you're all* saying, "Look! Sam released the snake! No serpent incarceration. I bet you feel really bad about wanting her bitten now, Raoul!"

Not a bit of it. "Bitey." Good god.






*Yes, I'm flattering myself here. Especially with all those exclamation points.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 23 Sep 2011, 02:08
At least Jeph didn't end the week with a cliffhanger.
BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA LOL

Yeah, it's good thing Jeph didn't leave us all on edge.
:D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 23 Sep 2011, 02:16
Let's not start with the puns - it's a very slippery slope.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 23 Sep 2011, 02:19
Something tells me we're in for a rock-slide of puns.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 23 Sep 2011, 02:36
The background art this week absolutely blew me away...

*chorus of boos, tomatoes*


More seriously, I'm kind of wondering exactly what it is about Padma's baking (ahem) that's infatuating Marten. Does she have some aspect to her personality that he's seen which doesn't include "letting everything Marten says fly over her head"?

No really, come to think of it, the VAST majority of his interactions with Padma involve her not really understanding what he's trying to say.
[archive-fu]
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1865 (sort of doesn't really count, but still demonstrates her clueless nature)
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1906
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2009
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2013
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2019 (Counts because Marten was clearly afraid of the very large drop, and then...)
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2020
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tellusora on 23 Sep 2011, 02:40
Hope this doesn't get buried under the slew of other comments.

Poor Marten, guy can't catch a break. Ever.
And I actually liked Padma. Sad to see her go. )=
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 23 Sep 2011, 02:46
I'm not sure what it is about her, but I guess Marten did fall for her after all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: idontunderstand on 23 Sep 2011, 03:21
I can't get over the fact that it looks like they're standing in front of a quite badly painted backdrop.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Welu on 23 Sep 2011, 03:33
Go on, Marten. You want that soup so go get it!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Sep 2011, 03:40
NO soup for Marten. Ever. He is destined to remain soupless from here on in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Sep 2011, 03:50
What are you, some kind of Soup Nazi? :police: :evil: :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Tova on 23 Sep 2011, 04:17
I'm sure there's a chicken noodle soup joke in there somewhere, but I just lack the imagination.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 23 Sep 2011, 05:00
Something tells me we're in for a rock-slide of puns.

"Rocks fall, EVERYBODY dies."

(Except Shelby)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Welu on 23 Sep 2011, 05:13
Or Randy. Randy is eternal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Sep 2011, 05:50
I think Jeph mentioned in one of his tumblr question dumps that Marten's probably from the SF area.

Either that or San Diego.

So now what?

Cut scene to the emergency room and a hysterical Jim.    - 2 (2.6%)
Are you kidding? She dusts herself off and holds the (very dazed) snake in TRIUMPH!    - 31 (40.3%)
Cut to the ER, but she's only got a few stitches.    - 1 (1.3%)
The fall wasn't that bad. Only a few meters down.    - 1 (1.3%)
She's done this before. The ER doctor tells Marten so.    - 10 (13%)
It's worse than that she's DEAD JIM!    - 8 (10.4%)
Cut scene to Jim visiting CoD and gushing about his smart little girl.    - 2 (2.6%)
She's okay, they check on her, she shows them the snake... and it bites Momo.    - 3 (3.9%)
...and it bites Marten.    - 4 (5.2%)
...and it bites Padma.    - 1 (1.3%)
Waffles will make it all better.    - 2 (2.6%)
I just LOVE the backgrounds! (Forget the storyline right now.)    - 12 (15.6%)

Total Voters: 77
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 23 Sep 2011, 05:57
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 23 Sep 2011, 06:00
Quote from: Friend of mine
"Well, a lot of stuff can happen in a few weeks"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Sep 2011, 06:21
I suspect Jeph decided to take the whole "mirror image COD" to it's limit - the reason why he came to NoHo in the first place ends up being the reason why he can't date the girl who he fell for at tSB.

So I'll go and make a prediction: He ends up dating Renee.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Black Sword on 23 Sep 2011, 06:27
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 


He admitted he's infatuated with her. However, our pretty Indian subcontinental friend is so clueless she doesn't realize it. Or only realizes the vaguest outline of it.

I think that Jeph (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TeasingCreator) is playing Battleship  (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipSinking) with our hearts and minds. If only there was a trope that covered what he is doing before our eyes (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipTease).

Three for one special!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Sep 2011, 06:53
Okay, I want that last 20 minutes of my life back.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 23 Sep 2011, 06:57
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 


He admitted he's infatuated with her. However, our pretty Indian subcontinental friend is so clueless she doesn't realize it. Or only realizes the vaguest outline of it.

I think that Jeph (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TeasingCreator) is playing Battleship  (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipSinking) with our hearts and minds. If only there was a trope that covered what he is doing before our eyes (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipTease).

Three for one special!

Yes, but why is he infatuated with her?  Other than the initial attraction, the comics haven't shown any similar interests, touching moments, etc.  Their interactions have been stressful, awkward, confusing, etc.  Liking a girl based on looks alone is doomed to fail.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 23 Sep 2011, 07:02
I suspect Jeph decided to take the whole "mirror image COD" to it's limit - the reason why he came to NoHo in the first place ends up being the reason why he can't date the girl who he fell for at tSB.

So I'll go and make a prediction: He ends up dating Renee.

I suspect it's more likely the whole bakery gang is going to be "put on the bus."  It would be cool if he'd date Renee, because if she's like Faye as many suspect it would show us how dating Faye would have actually worked, without the complete destruction of their friendship and Faye fleeing back south that probably would have resutled.

With Padma leaving Marten is free to hunt down his real next girlfriend, the girl with the flannel shirt, short skirt, and glasses from a while back.  The one who looked a bit like a cross between Faye and Marigold.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: gprimr1 on 23 Sep 2011, 07:06
Could it be that Martin's attraction comes from the old adage: Men want what they can't have.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Black Sword on 23 Sep 2011, 07:37
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 


He admitted he's infatuated with her. However, our pretty Indian subcontinental friend is so clueless she doesn't realize it. Or only realizes the vaguest outline of it.

I think that Jeph (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TeasingCreator) is playing Battleship  (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipSinking) with our hearts and minds. If only there was a trope that covered what he is doing before our eyes (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipTease).

Three for one special!

Yes, but why is he infatuated with her?  Other than the initial attraction, the comics haven't shown any similar interests, touching moments, etc.  Their interactions have been stressful, awkward, confusing, etc.  Liking a girl based on looks alone is doomed to fail.

You don't need a reason to like a person. You barely need a reason to love a person (though if you want a marriage, you have plenty of other factors besides love to consider), but he likes her because he likes her. She's pretty and interesting. Reason enough to be attracted to her and liking her.

Okay, I want that last 20 minutes of my life back.

They were delicious!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: maddness on 23 Sep 2011, 08:30
Can I be really juvenile and make a joke about how much he likes her cinnamon buns? Please?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Black Sword on 23 Sep 2011, 08:38
Can I be really juvenile and make a joke about how much he likes her cinnamon buns? Please?  :-D

Yes, you may, but please make sure it's not half-baked.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Coffee_Kaioken on 23 Sep 2011, 09:06
FAREWELL SHACKUPS FAREWELL SHACKUPS
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Jedit on 23 Sep 2011, 09:15
More seriously, I'm kind of wondering exactly what it is about Padma's baking (ahem) that's infatuating Marten.

As a wise man once said, "You ain't seen nothing till you're down on the muffin".

But, Padma gone in two weeks... that's bad.  We'd barely got to know her, and now in 500 strips she'll be gone?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 23 Sep 2011, 09:46
FAREWELL SHACKUPS FAREWELL SHACKUPS

Wait - are you saying farewell to the prospect of shackups, or are you pushing for shackups as a form of farewell? 


The latter strikes me as a bad idea. 


so Padma might actually go for it...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 23 Sep 2011, 11:49
I love all the choices that are being set up here:

Marten gets to choose whether or not to pursue Padma
-- a long distance relationship would be a way to park him in his current predicament and keep the general mopeyness
-- if he chooses not to pursue her then he gets to go and live in the post-Dora "decide what you want to do and go after what you want" era

Momo's choosing how live her life as an AI:
-- she's currently getting a serious look at what a 13yo life might be like should she choose to act like that
-- if she decides to assume an older persona then she might want to choose a different chassis
-- she's also getting some exposure to real physical danger which might influence the chassis question

Marigold's eventually going to have to choose how to relate with Momo, should Momo go in a different direction with her persona/chassis

Elliot has been showing signs of being a Good Guy. Elliot's got to choose whether he thinks Marten's a Good Guy too to decide if he wants to take down his "big aloof slightly threatening" facade and actually befriend Marten

Any more?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: John_Knee on 23 Sep 2011, 11:53
Just because she is planning to return to California, it doesn't mean she'll actually return - it depends on her reasons. Maybe with the realisation of possible romance that she might hang around for a bit longer and ultimately exit stage left back to California upon splitting up... Maybe...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 23 Sep 2011, 12:22
Alas poor Padma, We Hardly Knew Ye (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WeHardlyKnewYe). Does this mean someone new will arrive to take her place at TSB? Or will we really be leaving Mass. for some time?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: dragontart on 23 Sep 2011, 12:46
Well I'd go with stoutfiles' comments here. If anything I would've guessed Marten is sad about a lost possible chance rather than about losing Padma as a person.

Quote
She's pretty and interesting. Reason enough to be attracted to her and liking her.
Define "interesting". (I didn't find her interesting but that's of course a matter of taste, I just want to ask which aspects of her you're referring to.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Sep 2011, 13:03
He ends up dating Renee.
And brotray Angus?  Are you crazy?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Sep 2011, 13:39
Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings


Just what Marten goes for!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Sep 2011, 13:58
Could it be that Martin's attraction comes from the old adage: Men want what they can't have.

And it's corollary: Men really just want their mothers.

You don't need a reason to like a person. You barely need a reason to love a person (though if you want a marriage, you have plenty of other factors besides love to consider), but he likes her because he likes her. She's pretty and interesting. Reason enough to be attracted to her and liking her.
Falling in love requires a pulse. Staying in love requires a plan.

Okay, I want that last 20 minutes of my life back.
They were delicious!

:P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: TRVA123 on 23 Sep 2011, 14:21
Quote
She's pretty and interesting. Reason enough to be attracted to her and liking her.
Define "interesting". (I didn't find her interesting but that's of course a matter of taste, I just want to ask which aspects of her you're referring to.)

I'm the kind of person who would be attracted to someone like Padma, She has such a different perspective that I want to follow her down some of her tangents and see the world the way she sees it. Also there's the "What will she say next?" factor, which keeps you on your toes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: dragontart on 23 Sep 2011, 16:13
I see what you mean, didn't think about her behaviour in that way. I agree that it could be something to attract people on a personal level. I don't think that's exactly what Marten sees in her, though, but I can't claim that to be anything but a personal guess. He just didn't seem to be exactly curious about that behaviour of her but pretty ..overchallenged? in such situations.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: BlueMark on 23 Sep 2011, 17:39
How self-aware is Padma? It may only take a week back in LA before she remembers why she left it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Sep 2011, 17:42
Family obligations might make her feel she has to stay there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Rimwolf on 23 Sep 2011, 17:45
So, Marten, you can now tell yourself that she didn't fall for you because she's known she was leaving soon.
It might even be true.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Spectreofwar on 23 Sep 2011, 17:59
Quote
She's pretty and interesting. Reason enough to be attracted to her and liking her.
Define "interesting". (I didn't find her interesting but that's of course a matter of taste, I just want to ask which aspects of her you're referring to.)

I'm the kind of person who would be attracted to someone like Padma, She has such a different perspective that I want to follow her down some of her tangents and see the world the way she sees it. Also there's the "What will she say next?" factor, which keeps you on your toes.

I keep a few people like that as friends (like pets!).

As a girlfriend, though, she may very well drive me nuts.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Muirghiel on 23 Sep 2011, 18:50
No. Bad plot! Do not going to spend months building up tension to see whether Marten will move to LA to be with a girl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Sep 2011, 19:08
Okay, I want that last 20 minutes of my life back.

Only 20 minutes on TVTropes? That's some impressive self-control you've got there.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Wimblesaurus on 23 Sep 2011, 19:23
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now.  


He admitted he's infatuated with her. However, our pretty Indian subcontinental friend is so clueless she doesn't realize it. Or only realizes the vaguest outline of it.

I think that Jeph (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TeasingCreator) is playing Battleship  (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipSinking) with our hearts and minds. If only there was a trope that covered what he is doing before our eyes (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShipTease).

Three for one special!

Yes, but why is he infatuated with her?  Other than the initial attraction, the comics haven't shown any similar interests, touching moments, etc.  Their interactions have been stressful, awkward, confusing, etc.  Liking a girl based on looks alone is doomed to fail.

Infatuated literally means "made stupid."  So basically, there's no readily apparent reason for the attraction; it cannot and does not need to be explained.  The infatuatee just needs some perspective to see whether there's any substance to the crush, not that that ever really happens.

No, I'm not speaking from experience here  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Interlude on 23 Sep 2011, 19:51
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 


Marten has a crush on Padma. You don't really need to explain a crush-- you see someone, there's that spark. BOOM. So, I'd say it's more than just thinking that she's hot... Crushes are hard to explain.  But I wouldn't say that he has any real/serious feelings for her. They don't seem to have a lot of (or any) common interests, they have never had an in-depth conversation, etc, etc.


Crushes are normal, healthy, and fun! It's good for him to have that, but I'm glad that she's moving away. I think he just needed to direct those feelings toward someone after the break-up with Dora. I never saw any real possibility of them being together-- it's just my opinion, but they do not seem like they would work well in a relationship. She's actually starting to grow on me, but I still don't see them as a couple. Like someone else already said-- with her out of the picture, Marten can find his REAL next girlfriend. It might be funny if it WAS Padma's replacement at the bakery.  :roll:

Annnyways. I wouldn't be too surprised if Padma does like him. Oblivious people don't always know how to express things to other people. She'll spring it on him right before she leaves.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 23 Sep 2011, 19:53
Dawww,

Marten's gonna need a drink to put out those flames.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Sep 2011, 20:09

Annnyways. I wouldn't be too surprised if Padma does like him. Oblivious people don't always know how to express things to other people. She'll spring it on him right before she leaves.  :-P

Heh, yeah I can see something like this happening: the day she's leaving, she's gives Marten a smoking hot goodbye kiss, then gets in the cab to the airport. Marten's left standing there red-faced and with a raging and obvious boner. D'oh!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: emeraldbeacon on 23 Sep 2011, 23:42
Well, Padma did say she was going home "In a couple of weeks".  At the rate time passes in this comic, that should give us a few months' worth of webcomics with her, at least...  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: imaginaryideals on 23 Sep 2011, 23:57
Full circle!

Marten leaves Cali for NE for a girl. Realizes he's got issues. Girl he likes leaves NE for Cali.


I like that it's tied together this way. I hope Marten has some epiphanies after this :>

Been reading this comic for years and years, I think about ~200 strips in from the beginning. It's really improved a lot! You're doing a great job, Jeph (in case you read this which you probably don't)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: raoullefere on 24 Sep 2011, 01:55
But, Padma gone in two weeks... that's bad.  We'd barely got to know her, and now in 500 strips she'll be gone?
Oh, come on, time isn't that slow in the strip. I think she'll set foot in LaLa land in about 450 or so. And, by the way, I fear for her grandmother.

"Padma, dear, I don't think I can stand up."
"Yeah, I hate all that Pixar junk, too."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: billydaking on 24 Sep 2011, 05:57
She fell ~10 feet onto a jutted rock, hitting her square in the back, then another ~6 feet afterward.  The fact she isn't seriously injured annoys me; I don't like when comics that exist on the plane of reality bend the laws of physics for comedy.  The robots and dinensional portals are one thing, but humans, gravity, and rock faces are another.

At the very least the hiking trip should be over, you can't take a kid hiking if they're flinging themselves off cliffs.

Considering that I had similar fall (fell on back, bounced off, then went forearms first into the ground) when I was about 10 years old and came away with just bruises...yeah, it can happen. My little sister also fell down two flights of concrete steps and survived without anything broken. The thing is this...kids tend to get less seriously injured than adults because they don't think (i.e., prepare themselves mentally for) about is to happen, so they don't tense up, which highly increases the likelihood of broken bones. The same reason why drunk people have a habit of walking away unscathed from car wrecks.

I'm annoyed when people think they understand reality, but it's really just their perception of it.

I'm annoyed when people give outliers and try to say that they understand reality better than others.  Throw a 100 kids down concrete stairs or 20 ft rock faces and see how many walk away perfectly fine.  While your muscle statement may be true, kids get less injured because they weigh less and their bones are much softer.  They still get injured and they most definitely cry.  The only reason why none of this is happening is because it's not funny that way, and that's what Jeph was going for.  Works for most people, but not for everyone.

This is late, but I can't let this pass...

1. It is not an outlier. If what you imply is true, then every single kid in my Kenny and Co. childhood would have wound up with broken bones, in traction, or dead every single year. The fact is that kids and pre-teens frequently do things that would normally do serious damage to adults but come away with only cuts and bruises. Any parent or camp counselor can tell you that, and most people I know have a story like mine or my sister's from their own childhood.

2. Beside the point, you said, "bending the law of physics," saying that it was *impossible* for any kid to have that fall and emerge unscathed. I simply pointed out that it was not impossible because I had a similar fall in my own life, as did my sister, and came through without anything broken. You are wrong in that Jeph bent the law of physics and portrayed something completely unrealistic, when it's something that a lot of people actually experienced in their own lives, even if you and others did not. That's what I meant by mistaking your perception as reality.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Sep 2011, 07:02
What was... THE MOMENT OF THE WEEK?

I've never seen you wearing shorts before.    - 0 (0%)
It's all right, but it's no Angus-booty.    - 2 (3.6%)
Why does that hurt my feelings.    - 3 (5.4%)
Mount Tom - and Elliot's silly hat    - 0 (0%)
Awesome backgrounds!    - 4 (7.1%)
Bug spray - for Momo?    - 0 (0%)
"BUG Spray! Get it? Software bugs? Hahahahahaha..."    - 3 (5.4%)
SNAKE!    - 1 (1.8%)
2d10 falling damage (but she caught the snake!)    - 17 (30.4%)
"I'm gonna name him Bitey!"    - 2 (3.6%)
"You always name them Bitey."    - 4 (7.1%)

"What, are you scared? C'mon, it's perfectly..."    - 1 (1.8%)
FWOOOOOSH! "-aaaaAAAAAAAIEEEE"    - 2 (3.6%)
Padma's nearly blown away!    - 1 (1.8%)
"You're free, Bitey! You're free!"    - 0 (0%)
"Ah, I'm gonna miss this place."    - 0 (0%)
"I'm moving home in a couple weeks..."    - 1 (1.8%)
LA. "I miss my family, and my grandma needs someone to take care of her."    - 1 (1.8%)
"Wow, are you really gonna miss my baking that much?"    - 1 (1.8%)
"I'm, uh, I'm pretty infatuated. With your baking. Yes."    - 13 (23.2%)

Total Voters: 56
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 24 Sep 2011, 12:17
I'd feel bad for Marten if he actually liked Padma, but he doesn't.  He just thinks she's hot.  Most of their interactions have ended awkwardly or leaving Marten with hurt feelings, so it's best it ends now. 


Marten has a crush on Padma. You don't really need to explain a crush-- you see someone, there's that spark. BOOM. So, I'd say it's more than just thinking that she's hot... Crushes are hard to explain.  But I wouldn't say that he has any real/serious feelings for her. They don't seem to have a lot of (or any) common interests, they have never had an in-depth conversation, etc, etc.


Crushes are normal, healthy, and fun! It's good for him to have that, but I'm glad that she's moving away. I think he just needed to direct those feelings toward someone after the break-up with Dora. I never saw any real possibility of them being together-- it's just my opinion, but they do not seem like they would work well in a relationship. She's actually starting to grow on me, but I still don't see them as a couple. Like someone else already said-- with her out of the picture, Marten can find his REAL next girlfriend. It might be funny if it WAS Padma's replacement at the bakery.  :roll:

Annnyways. I wouldn't be too surprised if Padma does like him. Oblivious people don't always know how to express things to other people. She'll spring it on him right before she leaves.  :-P

Crushes are fine, but can be unhealthy if your crush shows no interest in dating you.  At some point you need to cut your losses or you'll just be the constantly depressed Nice Guy.  The fact that people are pondering that Marten would consider moving to LA to follow a girl who sees him as barely a friend would be INSANE.  "Oh hey, I gave up my life on the east coast to follow you here because you're pretty.  Want to go do something?".  Someone call the police!  While chasing his girlfriend was pretty crazy too, he was in love and they had been together.  He barely knows Padma, they have little in common, their conversations go horribly most of the time, etc.

After Dora's supposed eye-opening speech he had one band session and has been hoping for a Padma romance that has had no legs from the start, on top of which he could be eventually replaced at his low skill job by a much more efficient robot.  At least he's getting exercise hiking, so that's something productive.  Normally it's work, coffee/bakery/bar with lots of moping/whining.  Today is a good day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 24 Sep 2011, 15:53
I suspect Jeph decided to take the whole "mirror image COD" to it's limit - the reason why he came to NoHo in the first place ends up being the reason why he can't date the girl who he fell for at tSB.

So I'll go and make a prediction: He ends up dating Renee.

In completing the mirror universe, perhaps Renee narrowly survived a suicide attempt due to an abusive father at a young age?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 24 Sep 2011, 17:17
If that turns out to be so, then Renee may have a lot of anger toward men in general. Which means Marten would be in for hell dating her. Heck, he'll be catching it just trying to talk to her or asking her out.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: gprimr1 on 24 Sep 2011, 21:16
I wonder, we have seen Faye go home to Georgia for a few strips, it would be interesting to see where Martin grew up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 24 Sep 2011, 21:30
He's in a better position to afford plane tickets, given the 30% raise.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2016-2020 (19-23 Sep 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 25 Sep 2011, 01:13
I wonder, we have seen Faye go home to Georgia for a few strips, it would be interesting to see where Martin grew up.

Wonder how Veronica Vance lives? Does she mix home life with Business, like Lady Heather in CSI: Crime Scene Investigation?