THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 02 Oct 2011, 14:59

Title: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Oct 2011, 14:59
Another week, another thread, another speculation poll.

P.S. Four more shopping days. ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 02 Oct 2011, 15:33
Given how little we've seen her lately I'm guessing it will be a Faye heavy week, with maybe some Dora thrown in since we haven't seen much of her lately either.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Oct 2011, 16:54
Haven't Faye and Angus argued before?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 02 Oct 2011, 17:02
If I remember right they had a slight tiff about Angus having a "type" when we first met Padma and found out that he'd dated the Faye doppelganger from the Secret Bakery but that ended in make-outs pretty quickly so I don't think we could call it a full on "fight". I can't recall any other instances between them that would qualify.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Oct 2011, 18:03
I can't imagine anything recent that would cause them to fight, so I think this week is too soon for that to happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 02 Oct 2011, 21:05
I agree. I think we're going with a continuation of the current plot (Fallout of Padma/Elliot) but if it's not that I'm guessing more Faye strips but not particularly a fight. Just more Faye than there has been lately if only to get her back on screen in something besides a punchline strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Oct 2011, 22:50
Ar ar, "punch" line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 03 Oct 2011, 02:47
 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 03 Oct 2011, 03:27
What's going to happen to that poor frog? 

I mean two frog's legs is not enough for both Sam and Marigold.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: slydon on 03 Oct 2011, 03:28
All hail froglord :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Oct 2011, 03:31
rrrrrrrrrrRRRRibbitt!!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 03 Oct 2011, 03:32
Damn that is a big old frogger.

Also, if not for knowledge to the contrary, Marigold really comes across as Momo's mother in this strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: HiFranc on 03 Oct 2011, 03:34
If Sam doesn't move she's probably going to get a scalded foot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Jimor on 03 Oct 2011, 03:51
Nah, knowing Marigold, she probably made that ramen 3 hours ago then did a "quick" raid while it sat on her desk untouched. Stone cold noodles, it's what's for dinner.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Jabberwocky on 03 Oct 2011, 04:29
And I, for one, welcome our new amphibian overlord.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 03 Oct 2011, 05:19
THat frog is friggin huge. The facial expressions are just perfect. What a great way to show the first Marigold/sam scenario. Love this comic!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Swedish Chef on 03 Oct 2011, 05:31

It needed to be sung: It's not easy being a green king (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpiIWMWWVco)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Akima on 03 Oct 2011, 05:37
And I, for one, welcome our new amphibian overlord.   :-D
My first thought was: "Oh no! The Cane Toad (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cane_toad) has reached Northampton!"
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1zhGC3jiUeY/TGvIi3JgFHI/AAAAAAAAACc/Fil-9Jsv12o/s400/070327-monster-toad.jpg)
 It's a toadally awesome comic! I will never froget it! But why doesn't Momo have her own key? Or does she simply extrude lock-picks from her fingertips, and doesn't want to give Sam any ideas...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Oct 2011, 05:58
And I, for one, welcome our new amphibian overlord.   :-D

THWAP! (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1780)

I just thought of something: doesn't Marigold have ranidaphobia? (fear of frogs)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Oct 2011, 06:04
I just thought of something: doesn't Marigold have ranidaphobia? (fear of frogs)

I thought Marigold had sciurophobia, especially after that incident where Momo tried to help her rebuild her computer.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Welu on 03 Oct 2011, 06:12
Brilliant comic. That is a big old frog and the expression on it is great.  :lol:

I don't think Marigol has a fear of frogs but she probably dislikes them after getting one down her top.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Black Sword on 03 Oct 2011, 06:24
I just thought of something: doesn't Marigold have ranidaphobia? (fear of frogs)

Wouldn't she have to kill giant frogs in WoW? Surely she'd have gotten over* any phobia that way.

So, the instant I saw the girls' expressions in panel 2, I knew they were up to no good. My big brother senses tingled. What followed was just hilariously well done. Bravo, J^2! Bravo!

*missed a word there
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: RefD on 03 Oct 2011, 06:51
Also, if not for knowledge to the contrary, Marigold really comes across as Momo's mother in this strip.

that was exactly the impression i got as well.

i wonder how that dynamic will play out?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: wrwight on 03 Oct 2011, 06:55
It kind of seems like a role reversal, doesn't it? It kind of makes sense, though. Momo's seeing the world through new eyes now, like a child, and it's closer to the world Marigold has known (or at least known about lol).

This was a fantastic comic, though. QC gold.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Oct 2011, 06:56
Re: Marigold's experience with frogs: 1621 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1621)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 03 Oct 2011, 07:05
So, what does everyone think is the chance of Hannelore showing up in the next strip?  I don't know what would be worse for her, the frog itself(himself?), or the dirt and grime on Sam and Momo.   I doubt frogs are one of her animal favs.

Speaking of creatures it's probably long past due for Mieville to show up again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 03 Oct 2011, 07:24
Wow she really likes the outdoors.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Oct 2011, 07:51
So, what does everyone think is the chance of Hannelore showing up in the next strip?  I don't know what would be worse for her, the frog itself(himself?), or the dirt and grime on Sam and Momo.   I doubt frogs are one of her animal favs.

Funny, when I saw the dirt and grime, I actually thought, "you know, Hannelore coming in here right about now would suck for her."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 03 Oct 2011, 08:22
Damn that is a big old frogger.

Also, if not for knowledge to the contrary, Marigold really comes across as Momo's mother in this strip.

If Marten was already mistaken for her father, then

(Never mind, that's ridiculous.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 03 Oct 2011, 08:24
It'd be fun to buy a talking computer, then buy it a better chassis so it can leave the house and bring a messy kid over with its frog.  Oh right, that's the opposite of fun.  

Padma better be just outside the door out of view.  Letting a 13 year old run around the city with a robot you just met is incredibly irresponsible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Throg on 03 Oct 2011, 08:34
But it's OK, they were protected by Frogzilla, guardian of tweens and chibis, with a +2 Tongue of Accuracy.   :-P

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Somebody on 03 Oct 2011, 09:00
An amphibian king? That's ridi--

(http://www.beingpeachy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/large-Hypnotoad_animated.gif)

All Glory To The Hypnotoad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 03 Oct 2011, 09:34
Damn didn't know they grew frogs that big in Massachusetts. Anyway, I now officially like Sam, she is just pure tomboy. However, I would not want to be her parents, I bet she's responsible for at least half the gray hairs on Jim's head.

Also, I wonder if Marigold is now having PTSD-type flashbacks at the sight of that monster hopper?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 03 Oct 2011, 09:39
I just thought of something: doesn't Marigold have ranidaphobia? (fear of frogs)

I thought Marigold had sciurophobia, especially after that incident where Momo tried to help her rebuild her computer.  :-D

He he, my thoughts exactly.  Then again, strip 1485 is arguably my favorite, so of course my thoughts would go there.   :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Oct 2011, 11:23
That's an interesting question...

Momo's only about 2 and a half years old, so that's all the time she's spent with Mari.  In that amount of time, she's gotten pretty used to Marigold's lifestyle, and though she tried to help her improve it, it has not been all that successful. 

Perhaps she thinks that engaging Marigold more directly in the great outdoors would be good for her.  Then again, it may just be her own excitement of new discovery inspiring her to share with her owner/friend.  Either way, Mari would do well to at least  "take a hike"!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 03 Oct 2011, 12:15
I take a week off to deal with personal stuff.....and return to Froglord.

As a great philosopher once said, "Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit drinking."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 03 Oct 2011, 13:18
HELLO MY BABY! HELLO MY HONEY! HELLO MY RAGTIME GAAAAAAAL! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HAjhtPZGDY)

Wonderfully done, Jeph!

Great way to start the week and I can't wait to see the Momo/Mari interplay as a result of this. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 03 Oct 2011, 13:42
Jim better be just outside the door out of view.  Letting a 13 year old run around the city with a robot you just met is incredibly irresponsible.

FTFY
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Near Lurker on 03 Oct 2011, 13:47
Thirteen's old enough to be out on her own a bit in broad daylight, especially in a city like Northampton.  We need to stop being so paranoid about kids; a few of them dying is the only way they'll learn.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 03 Oct 2011, 13:55
I hear you Near Lurker, but no parent wants to be the one burying their child, hence the growing paranoia concerning child safety...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Akima on 03 Oct 2011, 14:24
I hear you Near Lurker, but no parent wants to be the one burying their child, hence the growing paranoia concerning child safety...
But who wants to be the parent of a 25-year-old toddler? If you're still treating a 13-year-old as a little kid, at what point do you take the nappies (diapers) off?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 03 Oct 2011, 14:45
It's not a new phenomenon, all this mollycoddling, though more universal than it once was; how much it matters is not clear, though I strongly disapprove of it. 

For example, the violinist Yehudi Menuhin was not allowed to cross the road alone, or to use a telephone, until after his eighteenth birthday - however, before then he had performed Bach, Beethoven and Brahms concerti in Berlin, made his seminal recording of Elgar's Violin Concerto with the composer conducting, and started on the first ever complete recording of the solo violin works of Bach.  So it didn't exactly hold him  back.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Oct 2011, 15:16
I'm reminded of this (http://comedians.jokes.com/elvira-kurt/videos/elvira-kurt---safety)...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 03 Oct 2011, 15:20
You know, it just occurred to me to wonder: why did Momo knock the front door to her own apartment?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 03 Oct 2011, 15:22
She probably forgot to bring a key.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Welu on 03 Oct 2011, 15:33
If she has one. She did go over to hang out with Pintsize and Winslow when she was small sometimes but probably not enough to need a key, if she could reach the lock.

It probably didn't occur to her to grab Marigold's or that Marigold would be out when she came home.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Oct 2011, 15:41
She might not've realized it was Momo at first, all covered in mud n' stuff. Or maybe the reality of "two mud-covered humanoids standing on my carpet" just set in. Then again Marigold ain't exactly a neat freak so maybe not.

Maybe she heard a ribbit  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: HiFranc on 03 Oct 2011, 15:48
[...]

Letting a 13 year old run around the city with a robot you just met is incredibly irresponsible.

And accompanying them everywhere is?  When are they ever going to learn responsibility for their own actions?  When are they ever going to learn how to look after themselves?

13 is definitely old enough to be out on your own.  Just because society is so scared of some scenarios that they don't see others doesn't mean that that fear should rule peoples' lives.

For example, the school run is not risk free: Having more cars around increases the chance of an accident, repiratory illnesses, etc.  Add to that it instills such a fear of the unknown that people live the rest of their lives in fear.  This also has economic implications because entrepreneurs need to be confident (i.e. not fearful), independent people who can measure risk and be willing to take some.

From the age of about 7 or 8 I made my own way to school and back.  For people of my generation that was not unusual.  If you teach your children about the risks but let them make their own judgement they will learn from their mistakes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 03 Oct 2011, 16:14
If they survive said mistakes. It's the not surviving, possibly, that gives many parents nightmares. It's getting to the point that a parent may be considered irresponsible for NOT being overprotective (see stoutfiles' post above).

The overprotective ones don't think ahead and realize they may be creating adult children who can't do a thing for themselves even well past the age of 18.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Oct 2011, 16:26
Yeah, letting Momo run around unsupervised with Sam is a bad idea, Sam could be as corrupting an influence on her as Pintsize.   :-D

I'd be more interesting in wondering which Genetics Lab that Frog had escaped form.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 03 Oct 2011, 16:47
Did the frog bite Sam? Do frogs bite?

♪ Frogger Girl! Frogger Girl!♪

Look out criminals here she comes!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 03 Oct 2011, 17:50
If they survive said mistakes. It's the not surviving, possibly, that gives many parents nightmares. It's getting to the point that a parent may be considered irresponsible for NOT being overprotective (see stoutfiles' post above).

The overprotective ones don't think ahead and realize they may be creating adult children who can't do a thing for themselves even well past the age of 18.

I'm all for kids having adventures, but a 13 year old running around with a robot she just met and who knows very little about the world can be considered a good idea.

Just one of those situations where you say "let kids be kids" and then something happens and people wonder why the parents are so horrible.  How about going places with your kids, let them bring their friends, and give them their space?  They don't need to be experiencing the city alone at 13.

Of course this could all be moot and Padma could be in the hall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: BlueMark on 03 Oct 2011, 17:54
Why did Momo knock on her own door?  Look at panel 2  - She wanted to make dramatic entrance: Look Marigold! Momo was in a swamp! She's covered in mud!  She and Sam found Frogzilla! It's so freaking cool!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Oct 2011, 18:21
How's it different from being out with an agemate? Except that her physical safety is way better because of Momo's defense system.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 03 Oct 2011, 18:26
How's it different from being out with an agemate? Except that her physical safety is way better because of Momo's defense system.

I'm not just not in the camp of allowing two 13 year-old's to run around a large city.  Agree to disagree.  While Momo may be strong, the inverse could be that the abductor is a robot.  A world with robots that own military grade weapons and have free will would not make me feel better about letting a kid roam free.

I also imagine Froglord's motif to be this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUQcS4xhhqo&feature=related
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: CrowFairy on 03 Oct 2011, 19:00
I like that Momo's having fun, but am I the only one who doesn't really necessarily like today's change in her? It just seems ... off to me. She was her normal self during the hike, as far as I could tell. But it's almost like something sprung loose in her, and I wouldn't mind her being this way if she were a totally new character..... Again, I'm fine with her making friends and doing fun things, but she doesn't seem the same anymore. Maybe it's just a "today's strip" thing, but it just really threw me off because it was almost like she was a different character altogether.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Akima on 03 Oct 2011, 19:14
I'm not just not in the camp of allowing two 13 year-old's to run around a large city.  Agree to disagree.
On what constitutes a large city for one thing. According to Wikipedia:

"The city of Northampton is the county seat of Hampshire County, Massachusetts, United States. As of the 2010 census, the population of Northampton's central neighborhoods, (excluding its outer, incorporated villages, Florence, Massachusetts and Leeds, Massachusetts,) was 28,549."


How about going places with your kids, let them bring their friends, and give them their space?
It's hard to "give space" when hovering close enough to intervene at every threat, real or imagined.  I was never in any doubt about being "under supervision" when my parents were anywhere in the vicinity.  Actually, that's still true...  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Oct 2011, 19:29
Fictional Northampton doesn't seem to have much in the way of street crime, and adult company wouldn't help anyway in situations such as scimitar-wielding kung fu monks jumping out of vans.

There's a really interesting question here. Does Momo count as adult supervision? She's considered an adult or near-adult for employment purposes. She sometimes acts like a child. She's responsible enough to go out and get a job. She looks after Marigirl, but that doesn't require being an adult.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 03 Oct 2011, 19:58
I've actually been wondering about that. For all that it appears to be a city, and the characters talk as if they live in a city, the whole setting seems quite rural. Never been anything huge I can put my finger on, but once in a while I'll see something small and just kind of note how townish it seems.

That's a very small population. Puts things in perspective and makes them make more sense. If it's a city it's just barely so. A lot of the town rules apply and there probably isn't quite so much suspicion directed at the neighbors.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 03 Oct 2011, 21:19
So were the robot posters on the wall always there or are they Momo's new teen robot heartthrob crushes?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Throg on 03 Oct 2011, 21:30
Did we forget that Momo is the walking taser? At the very least she could probably defend Sam, if need be. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 03 Oct 2011, 21:41
If one of my sister's new preadolescence friends had a tazer with her I'd hardly be comforted.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: idontunderstand on 03 Oct 2011, 22:23
She can also shoot live eels out of her...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: daryljfontaine on 04 Oct 2011, 01:04
I can't help but hear this:

And de Froglord comes in de niiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTCfFrqiHwc&feature=related)


FROGLOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRD!

D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: nonethousand on 04 Oct 2011, 01:11
quite a heavy discussion on Mr Jaques twitter... :|
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 04 Oct 2011, 01:22
I get Jeph's pain over the criticism; as many people may say they love your creative work, that one critic, especially that one ASSHOLE critic who's intentionally nasty, can really get you down. All you can do is keep in mind all the people who gush over your work and keep doing it for them-or keep doing it for yourself, if compliments about your work are few and far between. But this forum alone shows that's definitely not the case for Jeph.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 04 Oct 2011, 01:37
Maaaan, what a downer..

Complaining about that free webcomic you enjoy completely free (did I mention that you don't pay for it) 5 days a week not being there on time... :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Blackjoker on 04 Oct 2011, 01:52
Maaaan, what a downer..

Complaining about that free webcomic you enjoy completely free (did I mention that you don't pay for it) 5 days a week not being there on time... :psyduck:

I think it depends on the situation. I don't mind when comics are late usually, but Rich Burlew (Guy who does order of the stick) actually annoys me with how he takes it. Anyone making any comment, including one person on the forums asking if Burlew was sick because he has mentioned medical problems in the past and hasn't updated for 6 months, was banned for 'bothering the creator about updates'.

Not saying that everyone does that, but yeah. I also take issues with guys like Gallagher who does Megatokyo and all of his 'I'll get to this when I feel like it' on his website when his comic is his main source of income and gives snide answers when people ask when he will feel like it. Not to mention the fact that he's frequently so far behind on updates... But rant mode off.

I like Jephs work and when it is late or there are problems he will usually say such, thus I don't mind at all. The whole webcomic thing with creator vs. readers for update schedules and the like...well it's sort of a weird area for me, but meh.

On a different note, giant frogs are amusing but I fear what pintsize would do if he realized he had a potential mount.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 04 Oct 2011, 02:14
Just remembered that Marigold had a traumatic frog experience as a kid...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 04 Oct 2011, 03:19
Maaaan, what a downer..

Complaining about that free webcomic you enjoy completely free (did I mention that you don't pay for it) 5 days a week not being there on time... :psyduck:

The thing is, there are asshats like that everywhere. Suck it up and get on with your life. One guy is not gonna be the end of you.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 04 Oct 2011, 03:22
Eh, sometimes you're just having a rough day and something that normally wouldn't be that big a deal is anyway. We all have them. Hopefully he'll feel better soon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 04 Oct 2011, 03:24
Not the first time he was late :) can happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Hebes on 04 Oct 2011, 04:15
quite a heavy discussion on Mr Jaques twitter... :|

Indeed. I'm glad he decided to spite that dude and make the comic.

For those who don't follow Jeph on twitter or tumblr, some ass wrote this to him earlier tonight on twitter:

Quote
Whatever...still waiting on a plot line. Start drinking again, if that's what it takes.

Jeph also wrote this on his tumblr as kind of a response: http://jephjacques.tumblr.com/post/11016004407/high-and-dry

So yeah, for those wondering, that's why the comic is late.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 04 Oct 2011, 04:25
Can't we just have yelling bird strip berating the guy that made this mess? And Sweet-tits for some ironic monologue?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Fen on 04 Oct 2011, 04:52
Jeph should ban that guy from the comic.

Like, damn.

Also, Lolibot, similar to how Pintsize's attitude changes when you switch his language settings, it is likely that Momo's character changes once she is in a chassis that does not restrict her regional behavior. Before this she was in a Japanese chassis and was acting like a Japanese person, whereas now she acts like a Westerner.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jdreyfuss on 04 Oct 2011, 04:53
Holy crap! Is Marigold starting to gain some self confidence or is that just her natural nerd snark?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 04 Oct 2011, 04:53
Can't we just have yelling bird strip berating the guy that made this mess? And Sweet-tits for some ironic monologue?

I think this is a job for the Shame Orb.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 04 Oct 2011, 04:57
Quote from: Jeph
holy shit frogs are fun to draw

I'm now inclined to believe this was the entire raison d'être of the last two strips. :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 04 Oct 2011, 05:00
Do you think Marigold might machine wash Momo's 'skin'? I think it'd be great to see the internal structure of her new chassis (possibly involving someone else coming in and getting freaked out about "aagh scary metal robot" and not recognising her)

although thinking back to pintsize's comment about the anthroPC lapdancing club (chicks flashing their PCI slots) Momo might get freaked out about being seen 'naked'
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Oct 2011, 05:04
Jeph should ban that guy from the comic.

When I started reading this forum several years ago, people used to come on and post "F5 F5 F5" for a couple of hours during the run-up to the comic appearing.  There was no U-Stream to check in those days, but I thought it was really irritating none-the-less.  There used to be offensive comments like that tweet, too - ah, the seamy past of this place...!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: bhtooefr on 04 Oct 2011, 05:33
Hmm.

So, the manual specifically says that the COVERING should be removed and put in the dishwasher.

Momo is angry, and going to take a shower. Also, she's new to her full-size humanoid form, and may not be used to showering.

Prediction: She'll forget that she's supposed to take her covering off and clean that, and short something out, requiring her to be moved back to her old chassis.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 04 Oct 2011, 05:51
I had that thought too, but I doubt Jeph plans to go there.  Not that Jeph can't be cruel to his characters, but I get the impression he's enjoying writing about Momo's new chassis too much to seriously consider putting her back in her old one.  All IMHO of course.

More practically, if her chassis can't handle a shower, what would happen if she was caught outdoors during a heavy rain?  I suspect the manual's instruction to remove the covering is required in order to make it fit inside the dishwasher: I don't know about anyone else, but I doubt I would have fit into a dishwasher when I was thirteen.  At least not without breaking something.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Oct 2011, 05:56
So were the robot posters on the wall always there or are they Momo's new teen robot heartthrob crushes?

They've always been on the wall. Take a look back at the Sven/Momo dream sequence; they were there back then as well.

EDIT: And Marigold is obviously teasing Momo in that last panel.

EDIT AGAIN: Uh, how do you set a dishwasher to the "gentle" cycle?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Sylentknight on 04 Oct 2011, 06:17
Maybe the protective covering, ie: the skin, comes off in sections allowing it to be placed in the dishwasher?
As for the Marten/Marigold thing - that would take some serious writing and probably a year or two to unfold. Not impossible or unbelievable but...
Also, on the subject of late strips, I get it for free so I feel fortunate to get them at all. There are webcomics I follow that are very random. "Sequential Art" comes to mind. So if Jeph is running late on a strip or even misses I'm okay because I have other things to do anyway.
That's enough from me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Bored@Work on 04 Oct 2011, 06:20
I had that thought too, but I doubt Jeph plans to go there.  Not that Jeph can't be cruel to his characters, but I get the impression he's enjoying writing about Momo's new chassis too much to seriously consider putting her back in her old one.  All IMHO of course.

I certainly hope not.  I hope that Jeph enjoys drawing Kid Sister (as I have been calling her in my head) as much as he seems to....  and as much as I like seeing Momo v2.0. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Oct 2011, 06:27
The problem is, Howard Tayler shames every webcomic artist out there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 04 Oct 2011, 06:29
I would hope that a sentient AI wouldn't have to depend on hardware that will be destroyed if it's not kept dry.

That would be a horrible design.

The outer covering probably comes off and is dishwasher safe just for convenience.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 04 Oct 2011, 06:41
We rely on hardware that's destroyed if not kept warm. It's better, but it's still not ideal. I mean, if my house didn't have a heating system I'd freeze to death at room temperature. Weird to think that through most of the year it's some thin electrical coil in the corner of the room that allows me to type without getting frostbitten.

Definitely agree though. Seems like waterproofing would be step one in the AI design. Good proper waterproofing too. Not like those watches that are supposed to be good for fifteen feet, but heaven help you if you take them swimming after they've experienced a little wear and tear.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 04 Oct 2011, 06:46
Haaaahahahhaahahahahahahahahahaaaa
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: philharmonic on 04 Oct 2011, 06:53
The thing that caught my eye today was the treadless ad in the sidebar. I'd post a pick but I haven't figured out how to put a screencap from my iPown onto the intarwebs. I thought OMG it was Marigold in the flesh. The brunette chick in the black t-shirt with the rainbow skull and crossbones.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Throg on 04 Oct 2011, 06:56
It would be profoundly creepy if Marigold had to wash Momo as stated in the instruction manual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 04 Oct 2011, 07:11
EDIT AGAIN: Uh, how do you set a dishwasher to the "gentle" cycle?
They introduced that after they invented human-sized Droids ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Oct 2011, 07:31
Eh, my dishwasher has a gentle cycle, though it's not labelled exactly that.

It makes sense for the skin layer to be removable in any case, not least for ease of manufacturing; also, it gives the option of customising for different communities (i.e. skin colour and suchlike).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 04 Oct 2011, 07:48
Eh, my dishwasher has a gentle cycle, though it's not labelled exactly that.
Yeah, on some dishwashers it's labelled "special guest" presumably in case Tai comes around.


(pun totally intended)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Oct 2011, 08:08
The problem is, Howard Tayler shames every webcomic artist out there.

Damned work ethic, always getting in the way of, well, life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 04 Oct 2011, 08:29
How would you dry the skin layer? Clothes dryer? Dishwasher's warm-dry cycle? Hang it on the line?
I can see Momo sitting around in her skinless chassis (and a bathrobe, for the lafz) waiting while her integument hangs from a couple clothespins.

It occurs to me Pintsize is mostly OK after having been kept in the freezer, the toilet tank (or bowl, I can't remember which) and inside a snowman, not to mention ballistic abuse from Faye and a recent robo-noogie from Momo -- whose first chassis survived a dunking in taco meat. I hopi it's not a case of more expensive things being more delicate.

Man, I'm thinking way too much about this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Oct 2011, 08:32
I'm intrigued that Momo is intent on being treated as a human. Has she been like that all along, feeling trapped in a KawaiiPC chassis?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 04 Oct 2011, 08:56
For some reason I like how Marigold looks today. Specially the last panel, looks cute :P
I'm not creepy... right?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 04 Oct 2011, 09:34
For some reason I like how Marigold looks today. Specially the last panel, looks cute :P
I'm not creepy... right?  :psyduck:

Not until you asked that last question, no. ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 04 Oct 2011, 09:48
I think it might just be Jeph's evolving style but Marigold has looked exceptionally nice lately. It's really subtle though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 04 Oct 2011, 09:52
EDIT AGAIN: Uh, how do you set a dishwasher to the "gentle" cycle?
With Macguyver insanity, naturally.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Oct 2011, 10:00
Mine has "Light", "Normal", and "Heavy Duty" cycles. 

It also has "No Heat Dry" which I leave on.  That heating element's a waste of electricity, and besides, it deforms the tupperware...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Oct 2011, 10:02
It's entirely possible that Marigirl is eating better now and showering more often, which could make her look better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pendrake on 04 Oct 2011, 10:03
For comic #2027...

1. Art-wise, that was an unusual pose for Marigold moving out of frame in panel #1.

2. #2027's punchline: Hah, Marigold zing!  Loved it, and hope we see more of them (character growth-wise).

3. I imagine cleaning the exterior "skin" chassis would similar in practice like Number 1013: Who'd Be John Connor? (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1013) for removal and putting it in the dishwasher.

4. Jeph's Twitter comments for #2027: "Momo cleaning alternatives: car wash, dry cleaner, log flume, autoclave."   Log flume would probably be the most fun method to clean by.  To the amusement park!  /stationwagonaway

5. It is good that Samantha returns the animals her nature enthusiasm picks up, rather than the generally more harmful (to the animals) act of keeping them.  I also enjoy Samantha's nature enthusiasm as well.

6. Probably missed it in past strips &/or WCDTs, but is Momo's chassis model name "iDoru" or "Idoru"?  Hard to tell looking at that "User Manual" in #2027.

7. Also, saw the Twitter drama (redundant phrase, I know :roll:) in the older posts.  Jeph is absolutely correct: even jokingly suggesting a former alcoholic go back to drinking for any reason is extremely poor form.  If anyone said such to me in Real Life, they have a high risk of getting punched in the face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 04 Oct 2011, 10:07
It's 'Idoru'.  Strip 1996 has a sign in the background.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ChristineIrene on 04 Oct 2011, 10:22
Marigold's skin is definitely clearer than when she first showed up, that's one of the first things I noticed in this strip in the last panel. Before it seemed she had really bad acne.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 04 Oct 2011, 10:44
Dunno about acne but she was the only character who had these black dots in her face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 04 Oct 2011, 11:02
I'm intrigued that Momo is intent on being treated as a human. Has she been like that all along, feeling trapped in a KawaiiPC chassis?

I was wondering about mentioning this myself because I noticed it too-- Momo's chassis situation bore a strange resemblance to someone dissatisfied with their own gender and getting a sex-change. I mean, the Sven daydream alone (shall I link that comic? Do you know what I'm talking about? /sarcasm) says a lot about what she wanted deep down, and that had to be months ago in comic time. Then, Marigold tries to bribe Momo with the chassis she'd been looking at, meaning she's been looking at a new chassis long and frequently enough for Marigold to notice. And once she got the new skin, she's so moved she cries, says she loves her, and later feels compelled to reiterate that gratitude. The point is, I think Momo's wanted this deeply for a long time, and she seems much more in her element now that she's upgraded.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Near Lurker on 04 Oct 2011, 11:52
I have GOT to get out of the habit of staying up for QC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 04 Oct 2011, 11:57
I have GOT to get out of the habit of staying up for QC.

I´ve got to get out of the habit of starting my day/work only after I read QC  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Oct 2011, 12:01
I'm intrigued that Momo is intent on being treated as a human. Has she been like that all along, feeling trapped in a KawaiiPC chassis?

I was wondering about mentioning this myself because I noticed it too-- Momo's chassis situation bore a strange resemblance to someone dissatisfied with their own gender and getting a sex-change. I mean, the Sven daydream alone (shall I link that comic? Do you know what I'm talking about? /sarcasm) says a lot about what she wanted deep down, and that had to be months ago in comic time. Then, Marigold tries to bribe Momo with the chassis she'd been looking at, meaning she's been looking at a new chassis long and frequently enough for Marigold to notice. And once she got the new skin, she's so moved she cries, says she loves her, and later feels compelled to reiterate that gratitude. The point is, I think Momo's wanted this deeply for a long time, and she seems much more in her element now that she's upgraded.

She's wanted to be a big girl (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1533) for a long time...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ChaosWolf on 04 Oct 2011, 12:45
How would you dry the skin layer? Clothes dryer? Dishwasher's warm-dry cycle? Hang it on the line?
I can see Momo sitting around in her skinless chassis (and a bathrobe, for the lafz) waiting while her integument hangs from a couple clothespins.

I made an forum account just so I could say I support seeing this - even if doing so might probably end up turning Jeph's finger's into pretzels drawing all the funky mechanical details.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Throg on 04 Oct 2011, 12:54
That's what I meant by profoundly creepy.  I've had IT PUTS THE LOTION ON ITS SKIN running through my head all day, with that mental image of Momo's hollow-eyed skin flapping in the breeze, or over a balcony.  High-octane-nightmare fuel indeed.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 04 Oct 2011, 12:57
She's wanted to be a big girl (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1533) for a long time...

1533 would be a lot more disturbing with new Momo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Welu on 04 Oct 2011, 13:12
I really like how Marigold looks in this comic. I've been rereading the comic in chunks and her skin has cleared up a lot. It could be most Jeph's art evolving but her overall appearance seems cleaner and maintained. The only thing the same is her clothes but since she's home a lot, I can understand sticking to the comfy clothes.
It's also fun seeing her joke around with Momo.

Today and yesterday's comic has made me realize I want to see more frogs in the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 04 Oct 2011, 13:20
She really looks healthier than the first time we saw her back in 1413. Good for her!  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Oct 2011, 13:37
She's wanted to be a big girl (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1533) for a long time...

1533 would be a lot more disturbing with new Momo.
I don't think Hanners has returned the boyfriend bot yet...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Cornan on 04 Oct 2011, 13:50
The problem is, Howard Tayler shames every webcomic artist out there.

The dude's data center caught on fire and he still managed to get the comic posted on time. The man is a robot and shouldn't be used as a comparison for any mere human. Amazes me every day when Schlock is up right on time. I keep thinking that eventually he'll run out of buffer.

As far as today's strip goes the smirk on Marigold when she reads out of the manual was just perfect. It's the exact same face that my girlfriend has when she's caught me out being wrong about something and can prove it.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: J on 04 Oct 2011, 14:15
i would've liked to see momo without her chassis covering.


wait, that didn't sound right.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 04 Oct 2011, 14:16
She's wanted to be a big girl (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1533) for a long time...

1533 would be a lot more disturbing with new Momo.
I don't think Hanners has returned the boyfriend bot yet...

My mind made the same connection, so I had a browse through the archives. As far as I can tell, last we saw of him was Hanners putting him back in the box (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1017) after saying in the previous strip that she would return him and it'd be creepy to keep him. So whether he's still around is unknown, but I would presume she followed up on her word and didn't keep his exoskeleton in her closet for surreptitious ass-grabbing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Oct 2011, 14:24
He's sitting on a shelf in the back at Idoru...

Charlotte spends a lot of time back there when she's not toying with the customers. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 04 Oct 2011, 14:46
So were the robot posters on the wall always there or are they Momo's new teen robot heartthrob crushes?
They've always been on the wall. Take a look back at the Sven/Momo dream sequence; they were there back then as well.

so they are... nice memory, jwhouk
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 04 Oct 2011, 14:54
So, we get the Obligatory Bathhouse Shower scene so prevalent in Anime? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeY8isaNs58)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 04 Oct 2011, 17:00
I like the fact that Marigold is reading a Manual, when I get the distinct impression that Momo's new Chassis probably has it installed already and she's probably accessed it to learn about the care and operation of her her new Chassis.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: emeraldbeacon on 04 Oct 2011, 22:00
Oddly enough, I absolutely saw Sam's RL doppleganger today at work (Michaels craft store).  A girl, around age 12, brown hair pulled back into a ponytail, freckles and a pretty deep tan, red shirt and blue jeans, looking very tomboyish.

Then she asked me where feathers and rhinestones were...  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Aethir on 04 Oct 2011, 23:27
Another day, another intarwebz drama.  :-o - oh, wait, intarwebz... says it all, really.
Today's random additions to the discussion, then...

Marigold, looking cuter than ever
Her new social circle is working wonders for her! I daresay having Cyclone Hannelore go thru her room like a cleaning dervish on meth (and embarrassing the hell outta Marbear in the process) might have had something to do with it; the attention she seems to receive whenever she makes an effort to dress up would certainly have boosted her self-image/esteem problems, so it's only logical that she'd clean up her act a bit. I still think she's hell cute when she dances, too :D

Momo-tan
Perhaps, her enthusiasm for her new chassis stems from having less creepy old guys ogling her... even for an Anthro, I'd say being seen as a fetishist object rather than an entity with identity/personality/emotions would become pretty tiresome, especially when (at least in this case) it seemed that Momo was... less than happy about her original chassis to begin with. It also makes her look more ordinarily human, which I assume would go some way towards assuaging any latent or overt complexes Momo may have about Anthro-racism and her self-perception of her place and acceptance in society...

Twitter-douche
Kudos to Jeph for handling it as calmly and rationally as possible given the circumstances. I know myself how easy it can be to let seemingly off-hand comments run rampant amidst your neuroses; I congratulate Jeph on both his patience, and his triumph over an adverse situation. Addictions suck ass.

Posting times, and the irrelevance thereof
First - I'm on the other side of the Blue Marble, in southern Australia. So with timezones by Beelzebub and Co., it's rare that I'd ever be actually at home and/or awake enough to spam F5 around the general upload time. However! Even if I lived the next street over, who am I to get narky about when a strip gets posted? Real life happens, people. Well, at least to some of us. I'm just grateful that Jeph sees fit to share his prodigious talents with me the world :)

(especially when seen in the light of some other comics which have fallen by the wayside; a delay of a couple of hours is SFA compared to a strip that was meant to be updated 28th of August... and which still remains in limbo. No reasoning, apologies, nada. Just a cold slap in the face where one of my fave strips used to be.)

</rant>
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Oct 2011, 00:25
Did I say "welcome" yet, by the way?

That's a good point about possible psychological effects from Hannelore's cleanup. Her surroundings were probably sapping her energy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 05 Oct 2011, 01:59
Wow, I missed the big argument on Twitter, but Jeph dealt with that guy like a champion. Telling someone who he clearly knows has had problems with alcohol in the past to start drinking again is just unbelievable. Yet if we are to believe Jeph's tumblr, he managed to turn such a devestating insult into inspiration to get a comic done regardless of how late it would be.

What a guy. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 05 Oct 2011, 04:22
I guess it'd be reasonable to assume that Hannelore likes everything squeaky clean...
Oh wait, Jeph already made that joke...

Wait, what is Hannelore doing entering a bathroom when there's clearly someone else using it?
 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: HiFranc on 05 Oct 2011, 04:53
Today's strip reminds me of one from Wapsi Square (http://wapsisquare.com/comic/scientific-metho/) (Warning: contains spoilers).

I think someone needs to remind Hannelore how she used to feel when someone invaded her personal space.  Momo is just as deserving of respect as everyone else in the strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Y on 05 Oct 2011, 05:03
Momo wearing a towel makes me wonder if they made her anatomically correct .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 05 Oct 2011, 05:32
Stoppit, Hannelore. Seriously! Looks like the new Momo is reluctant to administer those small electric shocks.

Also the question about seams on Momo's 'skin' is now definitely settled. Or could a garment have so thin straps?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Sylentknight on 05 Oct 2011, 05:35
So now I have the image of a Barbie doll in my head.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 05 Oct 2011, 05:39
Hmm what is Marigold doing ? She's just sitting there, apparently. So un-WoW-nerd-ish !

@Skewbrow: Err of course Momo doesnt shock people left and right just because they annoy her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Aethir on 05 Oct 2011, 05:44
Momo wearing a towel makes me wonder if they made her anatomically correct .
If they didn't, then I don' wanna know where the eels come out of...

Did I say "welcome" yet, by the way?
And here I was thinking that warm, fuzzy feeling was just the Ewok-skin jerkin I'm wearing.  :wink:

Wait, what is Hannelore doing entering a bathroom when there's clearly someone else using it?
Hannelore's perception of 'property boundaries' (as distinct from personal ones) seem to be hazy at best... after all, she's appeared in Marten's place so many times I think they've stopped wondering how she gets in. (My theory is she set up a card skimmer, and cloned everyone's entrance keycards.) Besides which, given her propensity for bathroom conversations, she just seems to gravitate towards them. Perhaps the hygiene factor makes her more comfortable?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 05 Oct 2011, 05:54
Surprisingly, the bathroom is usually the cleanest room in the house, and the toilet seat is the cleanest spot in the bathroom.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Daniel Patrick Moynihan on 05 Oct 2011, 06:01
THE BEST HANNERFACE EVER IN PANEL 7 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Llewellian on 05 Oct 2011, 06:16
Now that's what i call "squeaky clean" ;o)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Oct 2011, 06:16
I guess it'd be reasonable to assume that Hannelore likes everything squeaky clean...
Oh wait, Jeph already made that joke...

Wait, what is Hannelore doing entering a bathroom when there's clearly someone else using it?
 :psyduck:

In case no one pointed it out - she's not in the bathroom; she just came out of the shower.

By the way: nice fanservice. That is, if you're into RealDolls, I guess...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Random Al Yousir on 05 Oct 2011, 06:48
Depends on the universe.  In QCverse the selling point (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=633) of RealDolls is that they are AI-less.   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 05 Oct 2011, 06:55
@Skewbrow: Err of course Momo doesnt shock people left and right just because they annoy her.

Well, I am uncertain, whether in this case a tiny shock would be considered self-defence or not :-D

And the threat of a shock (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1460) is more effective than the actual shock (except apparently in Hannelore's case).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 05 Oct 2011, 07:03
Ok, I laughed pretty hard at today's comic.  I imagine the squeaking sound to be one of those sounds that makes the roots of your molars feel like they're tingling and vibrating at the same time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 05 Oct 2011, 07:39
I like to think that it's the same sound that you can make with some soffas...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 05 Oct 2011, 07:40
Uh.

I dont consider todays comic a "fanservice". And I consider it kind of insulting to call Momo a "realdoll". For if AnthroPCs would be real, I wouldnt consider them even half as supercreepy as these "realdolls".

Realdolls are build to look like people, but they are dead and have never been alife. They are basically artificial corpses. Corpses made for sex ! Now thats extremely creepy.

QCs AnthroPCs arent just made for sex, more like not at all, and they basically behave like people. They also only look a lot, but not perfectly, like real people. So yeah, the creepy factor really isnt there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 05 Oct 2011, 07:46
but they are dead and have never been alife.

How can something be dead if it has never been alive in the first place?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 05 Oct 2011, 07:48
Momo wearing a towel makes me wonder if they made her anatomically correct .

I doubt it. I imagine the towel is not so much for Momo's own sake, so much as for the fact that humans would probably feel very awkward if they walked in on an AnthroPC 'naked'. It may only be synthetic replica-skin, and she may have no rude bits, but from a lifetime of social etiquette, the majority of humans would still be pretty embarassed by it. Momo does have that social protocol database, after all, and I suspect it includes the general consensus that naked humanoids walking around public places is a no-no.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 05 Oct 2011, 09:19
lulz from Jeph's twitter:

Quote from: Jeph
Photo: Alternate version of QC #2028: http://jephjacques.com/post/11061895016/alternate-version-of-qc-2028 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11061895016/alternate-version-of-qc-2028)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 05 Oct 2011, 09:23
Towel is funny. Momo 2.0 in towel is cute and funny. Momo in towel followed by Hannelore in silly mode is more cute and funny. Marigold baffled by preceding is even more so.

Sometimes things are just funny. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=469)

EDIT: So they found the high-frequency sound that sets off Hanners' built-in defense mechanism?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Precipice on 05 Oct 2011, 10:01
Momo wearing a towel makes me wonder if they made her anatomically correct .

I doubt it. I imagine the towel is not so much for Momo's own sake, so much as for the fact that humans would probably feel very awkward if they walked in on an AnthroPC 'naked'. It may only be synthetic replica-skin, and she may have no rude bits, but from a lifetime of social etiquette, the majority of humans would still be pretty embarassed by it. Momo does have that social protocol database, after all, and I suspect it includes the general consensus that naked humanoids walking around public places is a no-no.

I disagree, I think being seen naked would embarrass Momo just as much as any human. Strip 2002 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2002) shows that she didn't like it when Pintsize tried to peek up her skirt before her upgrade; now that she's bigger than him, she can finally take revenge.

I suspect that being seen without her skin on would be even more embarrassing.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 05 Oct 2011, 10:22
Sometimes things are just funny. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=469)
Raven's line in 469* reminds me of Futurama.

Leela: Fry got his head stuck in a crater.
Fry: (sadly) I thought it would fit.

*Previously Unaware Poet
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 05 Oct 2011, 10:48
I suspect that one of the reasons Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo so much is because it's a lot like poking someone without the anxiety of touching a real person.  Yes, I know she's be seen to touch people before, but I suspect that for the most part she was forcing herself to try to be normal (with or without the use of medication).  She's come a long way, but I'm sure she's still not 100% comfortable touching real people yet no matter how much she tries to tell herself it's ok.

And yes, I do know how creepy 'Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo' sounds.   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Oct 2011, 11:25
At least the sound effect wasn't "SQUICK!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Oct 2011, 11:38
I wouldn't want to turn on my electric shock system while covered with water.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Jam on 05 Oct 2011, 11:40
Never thought of it that way Paranoid, I thought Hannelore wasn't just uncomfortable touching others but just really doesn't want to.
To me it had to do with how she needs things clean, so the sound is comforting... Or addicting! Next comic, squeak intervention!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 05 Oct 2011, 11:56
Well, that too.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 05 Oct 2011, 12:52
Well, this week's cheesy pun has been dealt with.

Giggling Hanners is cute. :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Oct 2011, 14:24
What do cheese curds have to do with Momo's skin?

:-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pendrake on 05 Oct 2011, 14:26
For comic #2028...

1. Squeaky-amused Hanners of panels 6-7 is both cute and funny.  I laughed at the gag :-) .

2. Background characters looking on (in this case, Marigold) only makes the gag funnier.

3. Interesting to know that Momo does indeed have some "non-human" joint-connections.  I think I would have liked that better than the too-human looking Momo, especially since Momo v2 was inspired by the "obviously a robot" Nano of the Nichijou anime series.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Akima on 05 Oct 2011, 14:48
Never thought of it that way Paranoid, I thought Hannelore wasn't just uncomfortable touching others but just really doesn't want to. To me it had to do with how she needs things clean, so the sound is comforting... Or addicting!
I think it's more than that. What wouldn't Hanners give for a machine-washable integument (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integumentary_system), rather than the oddly-shaped bacteria colony (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/151852.php) enclosing her now?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 05 Oct 2011, 15:13
Hannelore was...kind of a jerk in this comic.  I don't find invading someone's personal space very funny.  This was disappointing since Hannelore has so far been the nicest character in the strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Oct 2011, 16:18
Hanners can be a bit of a jerk on occasion just like everyone else can be at one time or another.

Squeaky clean Momo - an axiom in real life.

As for her Electroshock Defense, I just had a sudden thought - what if that's actually a facility of her old Chassis and is not available in her new one?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 05 Oct 2011, 16:19
I suspect that one of the reasons Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo so much is because it's a lot like poking someone without the anxiety of touching a real person.  Yes, I know she's be seen to touch people before, but I suspect that for the most part she was forcing herself to try to be normal (with or without the use of medication).  She's come a long way, but I'm sure she's still not 100% comfortable touching real people yet no matter how much she tries to tell herself it's ok.

And yes, I do know how creepy 'Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo' sounds.   :psyduck:
There's probably also a certain fascination with a body that doesn't have all the hygienic issues of the human form.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Oct 2011, 16:48
Momo told Sam that the new body has an electric self-defense mechanism.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Arancaytar on 05 Oct 2011, 17:26
I suspect that one of the reasons Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo so much is because it's a lot like poking someone without the anxiety of touching a real person.  Yes, I know she's be seen to touch people before, but I suspect that for the most part she was forcing herself to try to be normal (with or without the use of medication).  She's come a long way, but I'm sure she's still not 100% comfortable touching real people yet no matter how much she tries to tell herself it's ok.

And yes, I do know how creepy 'Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo' sounds.   :psyduck:
There's probably also a certain fascination with a body that doesn't have all the hygienic issues of the human form.

In before the inevitable shipping.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 05 Oct 2011, 17:35
I suspect that one of the reasons Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo so much is because it's a lot like poking someone without the anxiety of touching a real person.  Yes, I know she's be seen to touch people before, but I suspect that for the most part she was forcing herself to try to be normal (with or without the use of medication).  She's come a long way, but I'm sure she's still not 100% comfortable touching real people yet no matter how much she tries to tell herself it's ok.

And yes, I do know how creepy 'Hannelore enjoys squeaking Momo' sounds.   :psyduck:
There's probably also a certain fascination with a body that doesn't have all the hygienic issues of the human form.

In before the inevitable shipping.

Hehe, I came really close to using that line to call the Momolore shippers to arms too.   :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Oct 2011, 18:41
Momo told Sam that the new body has an electric self-defense mechanism.

She die?  Hmmmm i don't remember that - But then, sometimes I'm a seivehead on such details
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Oct 2011, 19:19
Ah, Kugai, I see you're giving your own tribute to Steve Jobs' passing by making the spelling errors that the Newton wouldn't have caught. ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Tova on 05 Oct 2011, 19:43
Didn't Steve kill the Newton?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Oct 2011, 19:52
(moderator)
Shipping is not inevitable.
(/moderator)

Momo mentions the self-defense system in strip 2012.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Oct 2011, 20:19
(moderator)
Shipping is not inevitable.
(/moderator)

What, we can't imply that Hanners has a squeeky fet.......

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 05 Oct 2011, 20:27
OK, for all the rampaging cuteness in the rest of the comic, what's giving me the giggles is Hanners' first line. I'm imagining "Did you fall in a LAKE?" in the squeaky voice Jeph says (in his Tumblr) she has.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 05 Oct 2011, 21:17
OK, for all the rampaging cuteness in the rest of the comic

Can someone explain how this is cute?  It'd be like Hanners going up to Marigold and pinching her fat while laughing, then continuing to do it when Marigold asks her to stop.

Momo has shown to be both very sensitive and aspiring to be more like a human.  Having Hanners point out her robotic flaw and laughing about it is rude...to continue to do it after Momo says for her to stop is horrible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 05 Oct 2011, 21:38
Watch the next comic be Hanners standing there looking electro-fried and smoking while Momo stands surrounded by an electric aura and saying "I told you to stop!"

Momo would be totally justified in such retaliation. I get the feeling that Jeph isn't going to do that to Hanners though...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 05 Oct 2011, 21:43
Seriously?  Personally I put it on par with being excessively tickled by someone even though you asked them to stop.  I'm not exactly Mr. Sociable in real life, but even I know that this is perfectly common and acceptable behavior when among close friends, and I would like to think that Hannelore and Momo are becoming close friends by now.  We've seen much worse behavior between friends on this comic in the past: just look at Faye and Marten.  Surely the robotic equivalent of a poke or tickle can hardly be called rude, especially in this context.  Now, if Hannelore whines about the upcoming payback Momo is planning on dishing out it'd be a different story, but I really don't see that happening.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 05 Oct 2011, 22:38
It's cute because Hanners can finally take a little step out of her hangup- and OCD-imposed shell and actually interact with another being in a physical way. She's getting to do at age 21 what most others got out of their system when they were four or five.

Momo's getting the other side of this: characters tended to intract with old-chassis-Momo as a doll, more than as a physical being to relate to, so she's sort of the little sister of this relationship--not necessarily what she bargained for when she asked for the new chassis.

I find this interaction charming and cute for the fact of it and also for the novelty the situation presents to both parties involved. Plus the expressions are impeccably drawn and convey emotions far beyond the text.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 05 Oct 2011, 22:57
Worse things have happened to Momo. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1624)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Blackjoker on 05 Oct 2011, 23:51
Seriously?  Personally I put it on par with being excessively tickled by someone even though you asked them to stop.  I'm not exactly Mr. Sociable in real life, but even I know that this is perfectly common and acceptable behavior when among close friends, and I would like to think that Hannelore and Momo are becoming close friends by now.  We've seen much worse behavior between friends on this comic in the past: just look at Faye and Marten.  Surely the robotic equivalent of a poke or tickle can hardly be called rude, especially in this context.  Now, if Hannelore whines about the upcoming payback Momo is planning on dishing out it'd be a different story, but I really don't see that happening.

I actually find myself agreeing with Stoutflies on this. While it is sort of...nice to see Hannelore able to overcome a hangup this isn't a nice way of doing it. I can't think of a good comparison that doesn't sound creepy, so after trying for a bit I'll just state it simply. Hannelore is doing to Momo something that she would HATE having done to her. Fear of touch aside, it seems kind of mean. I have a suspicion that had it not been Hannelore doing it, say had it been Faye or Dora, there would have been more 'Leave Momo alone' comments made.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 06 Oct 2011, 00:01
I personally see it as something that's all in good fun as a lone incident, but probably requires a talk if it becomes a repeated occurrence. Certainly not a big deal right now though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 06 Oct 2011, 00:41
I tend to the cheeky tickling view myself; but either way, it may be prudent to remind ourselves of what Jeph wrote when he originally set up this forum (my emphasis):

Nitpicking [...] is probably Jeph's biggest pet peeve. [...] Sometimes the artist is just having fun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Oct 2011, 00:51
Sometimes even I have to admit it's not a documentary.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mad Cat on 06 Oct 2011, 01:38
Momo's so clean... she squeaks. I think we've finally found someone Hanners feels safe being in physical contact with. Let the Hanners/Momo ship set sail!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 06 Oct 2011, 01:41
The ship was sunk only a dozen posts ago.  Watch it!  I'm about to get annoyed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: idontunderstand on 06 Oct 2011, 01:54
Watching Jeph draw the comic on Ustream.. I giggle when he moves around Dora's boobs..

...

just thought you should know that..
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 06 Oct 2011, 01:58
I like the way we've previously had an AnthroPC duct-taped to a wall, shut in a freezer and punched so hard it needed repair, but seeing one getting prodded is where people draw the line... (and this was basically my first thought as well).

I dunno, when we give an Anthro PC human like qualities via a body that is one shot away from committing high forms of heresy, is that a line people draw? Let's look at it from another angle: What if Momo was a Human Clone? Specially raised and bred to be an empty shell that can be made to "learn" skills and whatnot and willfully serve someone in a capacity that is akin to slavery.


Warning - while you were reading...............

GODDAMMIT, FUCK YOU!! I was too busy watching 21 Jump Street, okay?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Aethir on 06 Oct 2011, 02:13
I tend to the cheeky tickling view myself; but either way, it may be prudent to remind ourselves of what Jeph wrote when he originally set up this forum (my emphasis):

Nitpicking [...] is probably Jeph's biggest pet peeve. [...] Sometimes the artist is just having fun.

...and we all should know by now, that Jeph enjoys being awful mean to his characters ;)
I still think Momo should give Hannelore a taste of the Idoru Coronal Discharge Self-Defense Mechanismtm tho. It would be essentially equivalent to Faye punching people who cross the line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Tova on 06 Oct 2011, 03:05
I wish I had a shiny gold coin for every time a bunch of posters on the forums came out and exclaimed that one of the characters had done something horribly offensive to someone else, that this someone else was quite entitled to being absolutely furious, and that the payback would be terrifying.

Only for things between those characters to be perfectly fine in their next comic.

Why on earth do we get so horribly offended on behalf of characters who aren't nearly as thin-skinned or precious as we seem to make them out to be?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Oct 2011, 04:02
You will tell Dora what you were talking about, or there will be... consequences.






And drama. Lots and lots of Drama, but there's really no way to avoid that now, is there?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 06 Oct 2011, 04:08
I love shoes.

*puts on ratty-ass vans*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 06 Oct 2011, 04:24
Interesting that Faye shares this with Raven.  More interesting that she didn't wait until the boss was safely out of town.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: nonethousand on 06 Oct 2011, 04:50
Quote from:  QA Dump #8
http://jephjacques.com/post/11097408311/qa-dump-08 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11097408311/qa-dump-08)

Quote
Does Momo have nipples? They wouldn’t have a point since she’s a robort, but she was wearing a towel when she was out of the shower.
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.

[..]

Quote
I’ll be the creepy pervert to ask: just how anatomically correct are anthro PCs? After seeing Momo covering herself with a towel in the last QC comic (2028), I wondered if it was because she has proper bits to keep hidden or if it was because it was more socially acceptable or if it was just because she was still wet from the shower.
Quote
Is Momo’s new chassis, erm, anatomically correct? I’m assuming so, because of the towel after her shower, and I seem to remember something about eels on her old chassis…
See above.

 :psyduck: come on, people!!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 06 Oct 2011, 04:54
Rats !

Now I have to stop being fan of Faye.

Seriously(*) - a woman not interested in shoes ? How unfeminine !

Next thing Faye will do is getting a sex transformation. Ewww !!!


(*) In case you wonder: not really ...






but they are dead and have never been alife.

How can something be dead if it has never been alive in the first place?
Yeah. Thats the question.

Another like that: how can there be anorganic chemistry if those chemicals have never been organic ?

But do you really actually have any trouble understanding what I wanted to say ? I kinda doubt that.



[...] Momo does have that social protocol database, after all, and I suspect it includes the general consensus that naked humanoids walking around public places is a no-no.
Uh.

In many western places, thats not really such a big no-no anymore.



I wouldn't want to turn on my electric shock system while covered with water.
Thats kinda wise.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 06 Oct 2011, 05:00
Quote from:  QA Dump #8
http://jephjacques.com/post/11097408311/qa-dump-08 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11097408311/qa-dump-08)

Quote
   any possibility of coming to australia? :3

Someday. Possibly soon, depending on how some secret plans pan out.

He needs to get past the border first: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eob-K-iBmWA

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 06 Oct 2011, 05:08
(click to show/hide)
:psyduck: :psyduck: :psyduck:

Hilarity will ensue.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 06 Oct 2011, 05:16
Hannelore was...kind of a jerk in this comic.  I don't find invading someone's personal space very funny.  This was disappointing since Hannelore has so far been the nicest character in the strip.
Hanners and NICE ?

Thats a kinda weird impression, considering that she has, for example, once threatened to kill all her friends because they might file charges against her for posessing an illegal weapon.

Or that she "befriended Marten through STALKING".

Nicest person in the strip, that could be, for example, Marten, Raven, or Winslow.

Though, in the end, everyone on QC is nice(*), even if some (Marigold, Faye, Hanners, Elliot) are socially akward. They still try in the range of their abilities.

(*) Ok there are some exceptions to the rule, especially the biker girl with the killbot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 06 Oct 2011, 05:25
I wish I had a shiny gold coin for every time a bunch of posters on the forums came out and exclaimed that one of the characters had done something horribly offensive to someone else, that this someone else was quite entitled to being absolutely furious, and that the payback would be terrifying.

Only for things between those characters to be perfectly fine in their next comic.

Why on earth do we get so horribly offended on behalf of characters who aren't nearly as thin-skinned or precious as we seem to make them out to be?


Most of the characters just bottle things up or avoid the issue due to awkwardness.  It doesn't mean they've completely let it go, past issues are uncorked from time to time. 

It's addressed so people don't think that you can insult or threaten your friends with physical violence day in and day out and expect to still have friends.  People want to root for likeable characters, not mean and insensitive ones.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Oct 2011, 06:40
Raven and Dora just do not look... right for some reason.

Yes, I know, Dora's got a new hairdo. But Raven's face doesn't look right in that last panel.

Meh. I know, Jeph doesn't care. Still - Dora and Raven need to visit the local salon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 06 Oct 2011, 06:58
Hopefully Dora doesn't do something dumb like try to push Padma and Marten together.  She's had problems in the past respecting his boundaries, and he's not the kind of guy who'd have a quick fling with anyone.

I found the comment about Raven not being permanently written out amusing.  Has anyone, other than maybe the Vespavenger, been portrayed as truly never being able to come back?  Even long gone Sara 's fate is the subject of speculation.  (One of these days she and Ellen will reappear, having married.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Oct 2011, 07:05
Yes, I know, Dora's got a new hairdo. But Raven's face doesn't look right in that last panel.

For Dora it's the hair, yes.  Another time skip - it's getting quite long!

For Raven, I think it's the look of combined disgust (curled lip) and concern (raised, slanty eyebrows) that's throwing you off.  The face shape's pretty much the same, although she too has more hair, and the pink region seems to have grown...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: idontunderstand on 06 Oct 2011, 07:25
She doesn't have a new hairdo. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1982
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Border Reiver on 06 Oct 2011, 07:54
I just thought that Dora was looking alot like Aubrey from Somthing Positive (http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp09302011.shtml), less the glasses and choker.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 06 Oct 2011, 08:31
Raven and Dora just do not look... right for some reason.
Yes, I know, Dora's got a new hairdo. But Raven's face doesn't look right in that last panel.
Meh. I know, Jeph doesn't care. Still - Dora and Raven need to visit the local salon.

What? No
I actually think they look really god! Specially Dora, the only thing I was going to comment about this comic was that I think she looks really good.
Jeph doesn't care about my opinion either but still: Keep her like that!

but they are dead and have never been alife.
How can something be dead if it has never been alive in the first place?
But do you really actually have any trouble understanding what I wanted to say ? I kinda doubt that.

No, I just found that sentence weird. I'm not stupid.
Even though I find those realdolls extremely creepy I won't gold that against anyone. There are far worse people around and those are the "normal" persons. If said person was having some "quality time" with the doll in public then I would have a problem with that person.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Welu on 06 Oct 2011, 08:37
Raven has some shiny hair. I had an added giggle at this strip because the placement of her speech-bubble in the last panel kind of looks like it's her hair talking.

I was going to say I thought Dora was looking really good in this strip too, I'm a fan of the hair. She's got some very pink lipstick on her. Is it just me or do the girls, except for Raven, seem to be wearing less lipstick? Faye definitely doesn't wear it as much any more. Not a negative or positive thing, just something I noticed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TRVA123 on 06 Oct 2011, 08:43
Has anyone, other than maybe the Vespavenger, been portrayed as truly never being able to come back?  Even long gone Sara 's fate is the subject of speculation.  (One of these days she and Ellen will reappear, having married.)

Sara is secretly Portia de Rossi?

I kid, I kid.

Looks to me like Dora is revisiting her goth roots. Was she dressing differently before just to appeal to Marten? Or is it just laundry day?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 06 Oct 2011, 08:48
[...] Momo does have that social protocol database, after all, and I suspect it includes the general consensus that naked humanoids walking around public places is a no-no.
Uh.

In many western places, thats not really such a big no-no anymore.

Care to name one?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: grimeyville on 06 Oct 2011, 08:55
Place your bets now! Will Dora freak out about Marten trying to date?!

Will she try to "help"!?

Will she show character growth and not do a damn thing?!

Your results may vary.

  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Throg on 06 Oct 2011, 09:04
I dunno, it's drama bait. 

It's one thing for Marten (and even Tai) to be all GLOOOOM-y about Dora going out on a date -- but after that talk that Marten and Dora had on the porch during Tai's party, it'd be terribly hypocritical for Dora to flip out about Marten dating. Sad or wistful, sure, but nothing beyond a moment's pause.  It's Faye and Raven that are underestimating Dora to expect she couldn't handle it. 

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Random Al Yousir on 06 Oct 2011, 10:20
[...] Momo does have that social protocol database, after all, and I suspect it includes the general consensus that naked humanoids walking around public places is a no-no.
Uh.

In many western places, that's not really such a big no-no anymore.

Care to name one?
In some German towns like München or Berlin it wasn't that uncommon an appearance in the late 80's/early 90's.

It started as a protest against stuffy morals, some people got arrested, there were discussions, and the general agreement was, that it was the more graceful way to simply accept this kind of behavior.

But it grew so much out of fashion in the last 15 years that it's highly uncommon again, these days.

The last I heard is, that in the vicinity of Karlsruhe some people, bicycling along the Rhine, naked, were ordered to dress under threat of a fine.

Of course, there are a lot of beaches where wearing bathing clothes stands out like a sore thumb.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 06 Oct 2011, 10:25
Place your bets now! Will Dora freak out about Marten trying to date?!

Will she try to "help"!?

Will she show character growth and not do a damn thing?!

Your results may vary.

  :mrgreen:

Considering that Dora was asking Marten if he'd met any girls at the party (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1981), and that he was ogling a chick right in front of her and she just joked about it, I'd say she'll be cooler with it than Faye and Raven think. Of course, they weren't there for that conversation, so they might not know that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 06 Oct 2011, 10:35
Dora being terribly hypocritical?  Perish the thought... :evil:
Seriously, Faye and Raven have more than enough justification to be worried about this.  Don't get me wrong, I like Dora.  It's Marten's gf from strips 565 to 1799 that I had issues with.  Now, iduguphergrave makes a good point about Dora kidding Marten about ogling someone, but there is a difference between ogling and actively pursuing.  Hopefully she'll be calm about it, but people aren't always rational.  Of course, there's also the chance that Dora would have been cool about it except the fact that noone expecting her to be cool about it gets her all riled up and overreacting and I think I'll stop over-analyzing now.  We'll find out soon enough I expect: if not tomorrow than probably Monday.

As for the idea of western places where nudity is acceptable, I seriously doubt Northampton is one of them.  Besides, look at how uncomfortable everyone gets when Tai starts stripping.  Surely Momo's social protocol database would have informed her that whatever the norm is around Northampton concerning casual nudity that her owner and new friends have (mostly) decided against it.

All my $.02, as usual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Oct 2011, 12:17
Northampton is not San Francisco (http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/08/local/la-me-0908-public-nudity-20110908). Though it was indoors and only women around. Maybe not being seen naked is part of Momo's campaign to assume human dignity. Or maybe Jeph didn't want to draw nudity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 06 Oct 2011, 12:48
Place your bets now! Will Dora freak out about Marten trying to date?!

Will she try to "help"!?

Will she show character growth and not do a damn thing?!

Your results may vary.

  :mrgreen:

Or Faye could just tell her to mind her own business.  Interrupting a conversation does not mean you get to know what it was about.

Then again, she is the boss and Faye/Raven aren't doing anything productive as usual.  I'd hire some more efficient robots to replace them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 06 Oct 2011, 12:50
Ya know.....I kinda can see Faye wearing a dead rat carcass for shoes. In some post-apocalyptic alternate universe, mind you.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 06 Oct 2011, 13:58
Ya know.....I kinda can see Faye wearing a dead rat carcass for shoes. In some post-apocalyptic alternate universe, mind you.

Hey wouldn't it be cool if QC had a post-apocalyptic alternate universe week/month/year? Who do you think would get killed first? Who would survive the longest?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 06 Oct 2011, 14:10
Faye would totally be the big tough guy who gets killed off to display how badass someone else is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 06 Oct 2011, 15:40
Hannelore would likely survive because she probably has an impenetrable shelter someplace, stocked with 30 years of food, water, and Mr. Clean products.  Or a hidden spacecraft, allowing her to return to her father's space habitat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Oct 2011, 16:14
Faye is not indifferent to shoes: it's probably a matter of affordability.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 06 Oct 2011, 16:28
Or she wears the ratty old pair to work because they are broken in (half) and super-comfortable to be standing up in all friggin' day.

Betcha she has at least one pair of dancin' shoes stuffed in her closet somewhere, and maybe a pair of seducin' ones too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 06 Oct 2011, 16:54
super-comfortable to be standing up in all friggin' day.

This is what shoes are for.

This is the only thing shoes are ever for.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 06 Oct 2011, 17:04
Or she wears the ratty old pair to work because they are broken in (half) and super-comfortable to be standing up in all friggin' day.

Betcha she has at least one pair of dancin' shoes stuffed in her closet somewhere, and maybe a pair of seducin' ones too.

Sandals at least once. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=176) Hope she had a nicer pair of shoes to go with her date-with-Angus dress, or at least a newer pair of Chucks.

OK, I've crossed some sort of line. What should we call the QC equivalent of "Trekkie"? "Questie" is sort of taken.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Oct 2011, 17:12
There's an official word on the question of why Momo thought it necessary to wear a towel:
Quote from: Jeph
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 06 Oct 2011, 17:18
I'm just concerned things could get outta hand and they all end up crossing the Shoe Event Horizon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe_Event_Horizon#Shoe_Event_Horizon)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 06 Oct 2011, 19:04
There's an official word on the question of why Momo thought it necessary to wear a towel:
Quote from: Jeph
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.
So the official word is that there never will be official word.  Which is of course absurd, because everybody's heard that the :psyduck: is the word.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 06 Oct 2011, 20:02
Oh God, I have Peter Griffin stuck in my head again now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Tova on 06 Oct 2011, 21:29
I thought Grease was the word.

Aaanyway I like the new forum subtext "The content here is questionable". Not quite as succinct as FFFFFFFFFFFFFffffffffffff but still gets the point across.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: rje on 06 Oct 2011, 22:28
omg am I gonna be the first???
okay!
*deep breath* hhhhhhhhhhh------------------

AWWWWWWWWWW!!

No srsly aw that is adorable
I think those playful little games you have are one of the things I miss the most about relationships
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 06 Oct 2011, 22:39
I can relate to Marten here. Normal couple activities are fine, but walk in on something truly adorable like that and I'm sitting here like "I knew I was single, but I don't think I realized I was bitter until just now".

Ah, fun. Seriously too cute. Had a moment of shock like "OMG is she cool with this?" and then had to check her facial expression. Hilarious and heartwarming all at once. It's pretty cool that Angus seems to be helping Faye out with a lot of her issues. I seem to recall a strip where Faye set up a scenario like this as some manner of nightmare fodder for her when meeting Marten's mom. Seeing her able to frolic this way without problem has to be one of the more enjoyable types of character growth.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Oct 2011, 22:42
Now he's on the other side of the ear-fucking incident! :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 06 Oct 2011, 22:42
So, will this early comic satisfy this week's Entitled Jerk?

Faye must have more than one of those shirts in her closet given how many times she's worn it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Blackjoker on 06 Oct 2011, 22:45
Seriously?  Personally I put it on par with being excessively tickled by someone even though you asked them to stop.  I'm not exactly Mr. Sociable in real life, but even I know that this is perfectly common and acceptable behavior when among close friends, and I would like to think that Hannelore and Momo are becoming close friends by now.  We've seen much worse behavior between friends on this comic in the past: just look at Faye and Marten.  Surely the robotic equivalent of a poke or tickle can hardly be called rude, especially in this context.  Now, if Hannelore whines about the upcoming payback Momo is planning on dishing out it'd be a different story, but I really don't see that happening.

I actually find myself agreeing with Stoutflies on this. While it is sort of...nice to see Hannelore able to overcome a hangup this isn't a nice way of doing it. I can't think of a good comparison that doesn't sound creepy, so after trying for a bit I'll just state it simply. Hannelore is doing to Momo something that she would HATE having done to her. Fear of touch aside, it seems kind of mean. I have a suspicion that had it not been Hannelore doing it, say had it been Faye or Dora, there would have been more 'Leave Momo alone' comments made.

I like the way we've previously had an AnthroPC duct-taped to a wall, shut in a freezer and punched so hard it needed repair, but seeing one getting prodded is where people draw the line... (and this was basically my first thought as well).

In the cases where this happened Pintsize had also insulted or assaulted people. IE there was a nature of punishment involved. With this Momo is asking her to stop and she wasn't. I'm not calling it a grand crime, I think it was kinda rude. And I also made the point that if someone other than Hannelore had done it reactions might be different. As to todays comic...poor Marten.

Edit: I don't know how but apparently I accidentally put my response IN the RE block showing what I was responding to. I apoligize, I am made of idiot and my hovercraft is full of eels.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: CompSarge on 06 Oct 2011, 22:50
*writes down "duck duck boobs" for future use*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Oct 2011, 22:54
So, will this early comic satisfy this week's Entitled Jerk?

Nothing will ever satsify the Entitled Jerks of the world.

Don't even try.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Tova on 06 Oct 2011, 22:55
Don't think I'm game to try that game out on my partner.  :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Oct 2011, 23:25
Quote from: from Jeph's newspost below the comic
Angus is going to think this is a lot less cute when Faye plays duck duck balls



Ow. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Oct 2011, 23:30
Marten's deprivation continues (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=416).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 06 Oct 2011, 23:39
Ducks or Boobies? (http://www.galapagosonline.com/nathistory/wildlife/birds/boobies.htm)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Skaltura on 06 Oct 2011, 23:46
Great tits. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Tit)

I think she likes it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: emeraldbeacon on 07 Oct 2011, 00:03
There's an official word on the question of why Momo thought it necessary to wear a towel:
Quote from: Jeph
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.

Of course not. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1658)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Skewbrow on 07 Oct 2011, 00:06
OK, I've crossed some sort of line. What should we call the QC equivalent of "Trekkie"? "Questie" is sort of taken.

OneOfUs?

QCHolicsNonAnonymous?


Neither sounds good, me thinks. We may need help from an outsider.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Oct 2011, 00:24
Forumites?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Oct 2011, 00:27
CoDdies?  Kewcies (say it aloud)?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Random Al Yousir on 07 Oct 2011, 00:29
Damn!  A minute to slow.

I had the same idea.  QCs, rhyming with "cuties".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Skaltura on 07 Oct 2011, 00:31
I thought we were dick-broom handlers? Or is that just a specific subgroup?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Oct 2011, 00:33
There's an official word on the question of why Momo thought it necessary to wear a towel:
Quote from: Jeph
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.

Of course not. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1658)

Err ... you think thats CREEPY ?!?  :-o ???
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Soulsynger on 07 Oct 2011, 00:53
Creepy enough to dislocate Jeph's argument's shoulders at least.

@Comic: (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2030)
ARGAFARGL needs to be a bandname! Who's with me?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: WAYF on 07 Oct 2011, 01:03
I think ... or hope... that Faye will spend the next few minutes laughing too hard to deliver horrific retributions upon Angus.

In any event, I think this is likely to be Angus's way of getting Faye to loosen up.
In some sort of "all or nothing" kind of way. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 07 Oct 2011, 01:04
@Comic: (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2030)
ARGAFARGL needs to be a bandname! Who's with me?

I am! Thrash metal! NOW
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Oct 2011, 02:13
Quote
Angus is going to this this is a lot less cute when Faye plays duck duck balls. 

Am I the only one who has a hard time to figure out what Jeph wanted to say ?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 07 Oct 2011, 02:26
You did read the comic preceding the newspost right? That illuminates it quite a bit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kyronea on 07 Oct 2011, 02:34
OK, I've crossed some sort of line. What should we call the QC equivalent of "Trekkie"? "Questie" is sort of taken.

OneOfUs?

QCHolicsNonAnonymous?


Neither sounds good, me thinks. We may need help from an outsider.
Questionable Fans.

Anyway, Duck Duck Boobs seems like a fun game.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Soulsynger on 07 Oct 2011, 03:03
@Comic: (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2030)
ARGAFARGL needs to be a bandname! Who's with me?
I am! Thrash metal! NOW
Our first album will be called "GUNURGLHURR" and it will feature singles like "HORGRR" and "AARDVAARK" (a song about an extraordinarily brave aardvark twice as long as a normal one).
Our sound will be based around playing various instruments by shouting loudly at them.
Our stage show will be that of Amon Amarth, only with less vikings and more ducks and boobs.


@Kyronea:
Very boring game if you're a girl, I imagine.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Hebes on 07 Oct 2011, 03:18
Quote
Angus is going to this this is a lot less cute when Faye plays duck duck balls. 

Am I the only one who has a hard time to figure out what Jeph wanted to say ?

Replace the first "this" with "think"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Oct 2011, 03:22
Quote
Angus is going to this this is a lot less cute when Faye plays duck duck balls.  

Am I the only one who has a hard time to figure out what Jeph wanted to say ?

For our non-USaian readers who may not be familiar:

There is a childrens game in the US called "Duck Duck Goose"
The children sit in a circle facing inward and the child who is "it" walks around the outside of the circle, touching each child on the head and saying either "Duck" or "Goose." If the child who is "it" says "duck" nothing happens and he continues around the circle. If he says "goose" the child who was touched must chase the child who was "it." If she catches him, he must sit in the middle of the circle until another "it" is caught, and she becomes it and the game continues. If he runs around the circle to the spot where the "goose" was sitting, she becomes it and the game continues.

That's what Angus is refering to in today's comic.

Sound off: where did you grow up and did kids there play such a game and if they did, what was it called?

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 07 Oct 2011, 04:11
Faye and Angus each have such great facial expressions today. This seems the most relaxed and happy we've ever seen her. A very silly but very cute and funny comic. :)

Also, they are starting to look like each other. Soon they will meld into one being called Fangus (possibly also the name of Faye's shirt).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: augusto on 07 Oct 2011, 04:22
Thanks @akronnick! I was wondering what was all that ducking and boobing.

I'll definitely try this at home... I need to find the Dutch variant of the game :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 07 Oct 2011, 04:22
Yes, yes. Happy couple.

Moving on  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Oct 2011, 04:23
I remember apparently having awesome reflexes in kindergarten, or at least enough sense to try this, because once I got picked as goose.  Instead of taking time to get up and losing precious seconds, I just reached back and tagged the tagger.  I forget if it counted, though.

Either way, that's one of those games that are fun to play, but reading the description years later makes it seem really, really weird.

DOUBLE RED TEXT (that doesn't apply to my post, so I shall hit post again)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Welu on 07 Oct 2011, 04:24
I love the expressions in this comic so much. Not just Faye's in the last panel but Angus's eyes in the second last panel are brilliant. Throughout, Faye's confusion and Angus' giddy-ness is just so cute.

Jeph's newpost did make me go, "Ow..."

@akronnick I'm in Northern Ireland and we played Duck, Duck, Goose the way you describe. Sometimes without having someone sit in the middle. Just if It was caught, they had to be It again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: bhtooefr on 07 Oct 2011, 04:57
Yeah, I don't recall anything about sitting in the center.

Kid who's it calls goose, and takes off

Kid who's goose gets up and chases kid who's it

If kid who's it makes it back to goose's spot w/o getting tagged, (s)he can sit in goose's spot, and goose is now it

If goose tags it, goose can sit back down, and it is still it
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 07 Oct 2011, 05:05
I think we played it without the tagging. It was a simple race to see if the goose could beat "It" back to their space. May be remembering wrong, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Jabberwocky on 07 Oct 2011, 05:06
Ducks or Boobies? (http://www.galapagosonline.com/nathistory/wildlife/birds/boobies.htm)

Great tits. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Tit)

Forgetting someone?   :wink:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickcissel
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Oct 2011, 05:17
@Augusto,

Welcome, new person!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Tanman on 07 Oct 2011, 05:20
I'm going to give this game a try tonight.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Spiff on 07 Oct 2011, 05:55
There's an official word on the question of why Momo thought it necessary to wear a towel:
Quote from: Jeph
I’m not answering any of these kinds of questions, nor do I plan on ever doing anything cheesecakey with Momo in the comic, because that would be creepy.

Of course not. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1658)
The chassis in this comic looked much older.
In the chassis she uses now Momo looks and behaves like she's about the same age as Sam.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: BluePaladin25 on 07 Oct 2011, 06:23
Inside Marten's mind:

"I am reminded that if I had ever tried this, I would be forced to take all sustenance through a straw. EMO MODE AWAY!!!!!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Black Sword on 07 Oct 2011, 06:25
....I wish I'd thought of this a few years ago. *kicks rock, sulks*

Still, it's nice to see them having fun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Oct 2011, 06:51
It is nice to see Faye happy with a boy.
It means there might be hope for me yet...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 07 Oct 2011, 07:04
[Our first album will be called "GUNURGLHURR" and it will feature singles like "HORGRR" and "AARDVAARK" (a song about an extraordinarily brave aardvark twice as long as a normal one).
Our sound will be based around playing various instruments by shouting loudly at them.
Our stage show will be that of Amon Amarth, only with less vikings and more ducks and boobs.



The hidden bonus track on the album would be a straight cover of "Sink the Bismarck" by Johnny Horton.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Oct 2011, 07:20
> akronnick
> Duck attack survivor

Err ... is this really one of the automatic titles the forum sets you ?

Or is there some kind of option to set your title yourself that I happen to have missed ?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 07 Oct 2011, 07:24
It is nice to see Faye happy with a boy.
It means there might be hope for me yet...

At the expense of Marten.  The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Oct 2011, 07:40
It is nice to see Faye happy with a boy.
It means there might be hope for me yet...

At the expense of Marten.  The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

Err ... what ?

Expense ?

What ?

So: If you live with a girl in the same appartment and the girl has a boyfriend that is NOT you - the girl is having that boyfriend at "your expense" ?

It might be my being mighty tired but I really dont get that ?

Or did you wanted to say something completely different ?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Oct 2011, 08:01
At the expense of Marten.

This assumes that there is "one true relationship", which is not so, neither in Jeph's mind (under 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509) he wrote: "I honestly have no idea whether this is going to lead them to be together in the end or not"), nor in Marten's (also in 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509): "If I have to have you as a friend and not a girlfriend, I'd rather at least have you as a HAPPY friend"), nor typically in the wider world.

Quote
The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

I can see why you say that, but it's not really that simple.  Consider that he had his long-standing relationship with Dora without moving out, and he appears to have thought about trying to start up with Padma also without moving out; living with Faye is not necessarily holding him back, though of course it contributed in the end to Dora breaking up with him - but that was down to Dora rather than him.  Finally, moving out might get him away from some familiar potential hang-ups, but there is a reasonable chance that he'd move right into a different set; the ability to move on in the same  environment is one sign of a developing personality, I'd suggest, so if he does, that would be interesting.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 07 Oct 2011, 08:02
It is nice to see Faye happy with a boy.
It means there might be hope for me yet...

At the expense of Marten.  The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

Err ... what ?

Expense ?

What ?

So: If you live with a girl in the same appartment and the girl has a boyfriend that is NOT you - the girl is having that boyfriend at "your expense" ?

It might be my being mighty tired but I really dont get that ?

Or did you wanted to say something completely different ?


When he was dating Dora he was able to ignore it, but ever since he's been a Debbie downer everytime there's some sort of Faye/Angus flirting.  He clearly doesn't like to see it or hear about it anymore.  

So yes, Faye is happy, but her happiness with Angus just makes Marten feel bad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 07 Oct 2011, 08:12
At the expense of Marten.

This assumes that there is "one true relationship", which is not so, neither in Jeph's mind (under 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509) he wrote: "I honestly have no idea whether this is going to lead them to be together in the end or not"), nor in Marten's (also in 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509): "If I have to have you as a friend and not a girlfriend, I'd rather at least have you as a HAPPY friend"), nor typically in the wider world.

Quote
The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

I can see why you say that, but it's not really that simple.  Consider that he had his long-standing relationship with Dora without moving out, and he appears to have thought about trying to start up with Padma also without moving out; living with Faye is not necessarily holding him back, though of course it contributed in the end to Dora breaking up with him - but that was down to Dora rather than him.  Finally, moving out might get him away from some familiar potential hang-ups, but there is a reasonable change that he'll move right into a different set; the ability to move on in the same  environment is one sign of a developing personality, I'd suggest, so if he does, that would be interesting.

While I still agree that Marten would date Faye if given the chance, I feel at this point he just doesn't need to feel like a third wheel around her.  Their time together used to be just them, but now there's Angus and by the way, he's more important than you now. 

I'll ignore drunk Marten this time and just say that some guys get turned down with the "it's not you, it's me" line and take it really well, and then later on realize what happened.  Some guys also hate waiting in line (which is what Marten was doing) and then the second they step out of line it starts moving again.  He wasn't bitter about it when with Dora but now that she's gone and there are no more women to be had he's kinda sad about it.  And then he looks at Faye/Angus and possibly wonders "what if I had waited...".  But most likely, it's just that he's been replaced on all aspects of their relationship and would be better off moving out and doing his own thing, before Faye moves out and/or kicks him out for Angus.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 07 Oct 2011, 08:54
Impressive.  Faye didn't turn Angus into a red splatter on the walls and ceiling.

Guess we'll have to wait till Monday  :oops:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: sitnspin on 07 Oct 2011, 09:09
I am definitely going have to try this game with my girlfriend. Probably safer that way than trying it with some random woman in a club.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ink slinger on 07 Oct 2011, 09:10
I honestly expected a more obvious goose (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=goose) joke, but "Boobs!" was way funnier. I wonder if I could get away with such a thing in real life...

Anyway, to answer the question of Duck Duck Goose...yes, we played that here in Canada (Alberta, to be specific). It was played the way that Welu and bhtooefr describe, it though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Thrudd on 07 Oct 2011, 09:51
Very boring game if you're a girl, I imagine.

It would be depending on the "Tickle Factor" and if the other person was a girl or a guy with boobs aaaand I think I better stop now ......
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Fhqwhgads on 07 Oct 2011, 09:57
Sound off: where did you grow up and did kids there play such a game and if they did, what was it called?
FWIW, I grew up in northern Minnesota and I'm remembering this as "Duck Duck Grey Duck".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Shteevie on 07 Oct 2011, 09:57
For our non-USaian readers who may not be familiar:

There is a childrens game in the US called "Duck Duck Goose"
The children sit in a circle facing inward and the child who is "it" walks around the outside of the circle, touching each child on the head and saying either "Duck" or "Goose." If the child who is "it" says "duck" nothing happens and he continues around the circle. If he says "goose" the child who was touched must chase the child who was "it." If she catches him, he must sit in the middle of the circle until another "it" is caught, and she becomes it and the game continues. If he runs around the circle to the spot where the "goose" was sitting, she becomes it and the game continues.

That's what Angus is refering to in today's comic.
Now, with video! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28QiEg-V5FA
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ChristineIrene on 07 Oct 2011, 10:03
I don't think its odd that Marten is uncomfortable with walking in on Angus and Faye being disgustingly cute. Faye reacted the same exact way whenever she would walk into the apartment and catch Dora and Marten in an awkward moment. Now Marten is on the opposite side of the table, and it is uncomfortable.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Oct 2011, 10:24
FWIW, I grew up in northern Minnesota and I'm remembering this as "Duck Duck Grey Duck".

According to Wikipedia, that's the only state in which the "goose" form is not used!  But "grey duck" is used elsewhere alongside "goose".

I have no recollection of either myself or my children playing this form of tag in the UK, though I note that as close as France the circular form (using the dropping of a rag) is played as "rag tag".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Jedit on 07 Oct 2011, 10:52
Impressive.  Faye didn't turn Angus into a red splatter on the walls and ceiling.

When a man is tired of not grabbing Faye's breasts, he is tired of life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Oct 2011, 11:56
What if Momo's wearing a towel is for the same reason she took a shower in the first place instead of putting her skin through the dishwasher? It's what a human would do to preserve dignity, and she wants to be treated with human dignity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Oct 2011, 12:29
> akronnick
> Duck attack survivor

Err ... is this really one of the automatic titles the forum sets you ?

Or is there some kind of option to set your title yourself that I happen to have missed ?

No that's just what the forum does. That I am in that range when the duck, duck, goose issue came up is just a happy coincidence.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Binary on 07 Oct 2011, 12:32
1) Never heard of "Duck Duck Goose" when I was a kid (I'm in the UK).

2) It seems to be a lot less fun when Ralph Wiggum plays it (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S29A97UPyRM).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Oct 2011, 13:12
At the expense of Marten.

This assumes that there is "one true relationship", which is not so, neither in Jeph's mind (under 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509) he wrote: "I honestly have no idea whether this is going to lead them to be together in the end or not"), nor in Marten's (also in 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509): "If I have to have you as a friend and not a girlfriend, I'd rather at least have you as a HAPPY friend"), nor typically in the wider world.

Quote
The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

I can see why you say that, but it's not really that simple.  Consider that he had his long-standing relationship with Dora without moving out, and he appears to have thought about trying to start up with Padma also without moving out; living with Faye is not necessarily holding him back, though of course it contributed in the end to Dora breaking up with him - but that was down to Dora rather than him.  Finally, moving out might get him away from some familiar potential hang-ups, but there is a reasonable chance that he'd move right into a different set; the ability to move on in the same  environment is one sign of a developing personality, I'd suggest, so if he does, that would be interesting.

That brings up something - and I'm not trying to pull the OTP here, so hear me out: Jeph admitted in Volume 2 when he discussed "The Talk" arc that he'd had a definite ending to QC already set up.* I wonder if part of his longer-term plans still include that planned ending, because that may be a reason why Marten won't be going anywhere anytime soon.**

* - If you don't already know what that ending was going to be, you need to go buy the book.
** - Nor will the other, obvious party involved in the ending. Go buy the book already!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Sorflakne on 07 Oct 2011, 13:29
Sound off: where did you grow up and did kids there play such a game and if they did, what was it called?
FWIW, I grew up in northern Minnesota and I'm remembering this as "Duck Duck Grey Duck".
You heathen...As someone who also grew up in northern MN, it was called 'Duck duck Goose!'.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Oct 2011, 13:43
Jeph's put a lot of dirt on the grave of the original ending.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Oct 2011, 14:01
Wait, he actually says what said ending IS?  Or just that he did have an ending (which may not even be true 1500 strips later)?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 07 Oct 2011, 14:13
FWIW, I grew up in northern Minnesota and I'm remembering this as "Duck Duck Grey Duck".

According to Wikipedia, that's the only state in which the "goose" form is not used!  But "grey duck" is used elsewhere alongside "goose".

I have no recollection of either myself or my children playing this form of tag in the UK, though I note that as close as France the circular form (using the dropping of a rag) is played as "rag tag".

Ohio born and bred here. "Duck duck goose" it was for me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Oct 2011, 14:30
He doesn't even look annoyed, it's more of a "whoa, didn't expect that" look, I think.

Modifier: I actually think panel 4's funnier than the boobs panel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jacjyd on 07 Oct 2011, 15:34
It is nice to see Faye happy with a boy.
It means there might be hope for me yet...

At the expense of Marten.  The day Marten moves out will be a good day for him.

It'll be a good day for me.  I'm not a big Faye fan...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Oct 2011, 15:45
I wonder if part of his longer-term plans still include that planned ending, because that may be a reason why Marten won't be going anywhere anytime soon.

But Jeph answered that already in the original note under 509 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509), as I've already pointed out.  Here is a fuller quote (my emphasis):

Quote from: Jeph in 509
It's too early for me to say whether this marks the halfway point or 3/4ths point or hell the 1/10th point of the overall story, but I do think it's safe to say that things will be a little different from here on out. Marten and Faye are closer now than they've ever been before, but I honestly have no idea whether this is going to lead them to be together in the end or not. I promise I'll do my best to let the story go where it wants to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: stoutfiles on 07 Oct 2011, 15:58
So yes, Faye is happy, but her happiness with Angus just makes Marten feel bad.

Comics 1888-1891 say you're wrong - any counter-evidence?

2016
2030

Which are the only times that Marten, Angus, and Faye were the focal points of the comic (after 1888-1891).  It's also using some common sense that the constant flirting and listening to them bang (the walls are paper thin) is going to be pretty uncomfortable after a while.  I agree that Marten might be fine about not dating Faye right now, but being the third wheel of the apartment would get old too.  Pretty sure he wouldn't be high-fiving Angus at this point if he saw him walking around naked with a condom on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 07 Oct 2011, 16:24
so cuuute, I love Faye's smile
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Akima on 07 Oct 2011, 16:49
For our non-USaian readers who may not be familiar: There is a childrens game in the US called "Duck Duck Goose"
Aaaaaah! Thank you, all is explained! I for one had no idea what was going on. If Angus had shouted "goose (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=goose)" while grabbing Faye's bottom, I might have had at least some idea. I'd never heard of such a game in either of my cultures. Jeph's wonderful drawing of Faye's expression, by contrast, requires no references to appreciate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Paranoid on 07 Oct 2011, 16:52
I see your Angus-booty (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2016) and raise you some pod people (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=992).   :evil:

I mean, I'm sure no one is expecting Marten to be 100% comfortable about the role reversal, but so far I haven't seen him witness anything worse than what he and Dora have subjected to Faye in the past, nor has he reacted any worse than Faye to such incidents.  Talking about Marten needing to move out seems a bit premature at this point, especially when the only evidence so far for that is a couple of spoken aloud self-introspective that are probably meant to further a punchline and not character development.  All IMHO, as usual.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: SirDudley on 07 Oct 2011, 17:38
.....
.....
That's not how I remember "Duck Duck Goose." *sigh* Kids these days, ruining everything that I loved as a kid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Kugai on 07 Oct 2011, 18:13
It's all in the timing Marten.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Oct 2011, 18:27
What's on tap for QC this week?

Angus and Faye - first argument?    - 5 (5.3%)
Fallout from Padma/Elliot    - 17 (18.1%)
Momo's misadventures in the stacks    - 12 (12.8%)
Marigold copes with Momo's job    - 10 (10.6%)
Hannelore's new misadventures    - 4 (4.3%)
A week of CoD interplay    - 3 (3.2%)
Pintsize hijacks Momo's old chassis    - 2 (2.1%)
Surprise: Sven buys Charlotte!    - 8 (8.5%)
Happy Toaster makes Waffles FUN!    - 11 (11.7%)
Something else from the twisted mind of Mr. Jacques.    - 22 (23.4%)

Total Voters: 94
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: wrwight on 07 Oct 2011, 18:58
I'd throw the Phillies up as my avatar, but that would just be a little too far. I'm a Braves fan at heart, and so I can only spare so much love for the Phillies, even though they're my favorite team in the postseason this year.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Oct 2011, 22:24
That's not how I remember "Duck Duck Goose." *sigh* Kids these days, ruining everything that I loved as a kid.
Ruined?  Or made better?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: JD on 08 Oct 2011, 01:01
Digging the totally nonsensical post underneath today's comic
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Vurogj on 08 Oct 2011, 01:30
I'd have really liked more votes in the moment of the week poll. Froglord, Sqeeek and Argafargl are all delightful silliness that I definitely appreciated.
/me applauds politely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: VonKleist on 08 Oct 2011, 04:34
Most definitely Froglord.

Hail!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 08 Oct 2011, 07:41
I'm not buying that either considering that anyone would be uncomfortable seeing and hearing sexy things near you despite how much of a friend you are to those persons. It's still awkward but it's no proof that he feels bad about it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Oct 2011, 09:38
Marten and Faye have been so close for so long, they're like family. 



Do you really  want to hear about a family member's sex life? 







Me neither. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: cesariojpn on 08 Oct 2011, 14:10
That's not how I remember "Duck Duck Goose." *sigh* Kids these days, ruining everything that I loved as a kid.
Ruined?  Or made better?

I don't see Angus pulling up Faye's shit to reveal her boobs/bra. So yes, Ruined.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: gangler on 08 Oct 2011, 14:18
So lack of toplessness has ruined it? Now I wanna know how Duck Duck Goose goes where you live.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: TinPenguin on 08 Oct 2011, 15:32
At least it wasn't Duck Duck Goosh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: themacnut on 09 Oct 2011, 09:30
Or Duck Duck Honk Honk!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: DSL on 09 Oct 2011, 10:57
So, a little thought experiment:

Faye moves in with Angus.
Marigold and Momo2.0 move in with Marten (she gets Faye's old room, you filthy people)
Hanners is overjoyed; so is Winslow.
And Pintsize is nervous ALL THE TIME.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Oct 2011, 12:04
Uhm, does someone else wanna go with the WCDT this week? I'm a bit... distracted.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Oct 2011, 12:10
Everything OK, I hope?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Method of Madness on 09 Oct 2011, 12:24
I would, but I honestly can't think of a poll.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 09 Oct 2011, 14:11
Everything OK, I hope?

I hope he's just referring to the upcoming National League Championship Series, followed by (hopefully) the World Series.

When one's favorite MLB team is in the post-seasons, one's priorities get a bit...shifted.  :psyduck:

It was ever so with me in 1995 when the Atlanta Braves (the team from the town I grew up in, and my favorite MLB team) faced and defeated the Cleveland Indians (the team from the town where I live, and my favorite American League team) in six games.

Suffice it to say I did not get much sleep that October.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Oct 2011, 14:28
Sleep? What's that?

DAMN Greinke!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Oct 2011, 22:31
Christ, I've been staring at that baseball glove for nearlty a week, and just now saw the team initials...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: akronnick on 09 Oct 2011, 22:39
Look at the FedEx logo. I mean really look at it...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Oct 2011, 22:44
I have.  More importantly, Randy has for me (http://xkcd.com/960/). 

(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/subliminal.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2026-2030 (3-7 October 2011)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Oct 2011, 23:02
Christ, I've been staring at that baseball glove for nearlty a week, and just now saw the team initials...

It takes the inexperienced a while to see it - usually until it's pointed out.

(For our friends overseas: the "m" forms the fingers of a stylized baseball glove, while the "b" forms the thumb and a baseball in the middle of the glove's palm.)