THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 04:47

Title: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 04:47
And we're back - even if I gotta type this on a different machine (RIP Gateway 4010GT).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 12 Aug 2012, 04:58
Noooo!

What happened to it?
Did you download a virus?
Did you download 423,827 viruses?


I don't like how the poll is something like 20:80 for bad/neutral outcomes:good outcomes. But then, this IS QC... :P
But I predict a nice, sunny future. Not because I think that's what will happen, but because I think they both need it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 12 Aug 2012, 05:16
Malware won't destroy a computer (unless you're running 95, 98, or Me, and you get infected by the CIH/Chernobyl virus, and your machine has a certain type of BIOS, and even then, the physical chip could still be removed, reflashed in an EEPROM programmer, and then reinstalled).

Also, one more vote for a bad outcome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 05:27
I bought the thing in '04 and it was running XPSP3. You do the math.

Oh, and the worst thing, WAYF?

...My iTunes library is essentially unusable now, since my iPod (not the Touch) isn't "linked" to this computer.

No listening to "One More Minute" on here. :(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 12 Aug 2012, 05:44
Awwww.

I had the same problem upgrading to this computer. Apart from anything else, it's Vista.
:( :( :( :( :(
But also, my iPod would no longer sync with it. I have to transfer any and all new music across to my old computer (which is on the verge of death) and then sync.
iPods are apparently not built for, shall we say, general compatibility.

I'll acknowledge your Weird Al reference if somebody acknowledges my Homestar Runner reference. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 12 Aug 2012, 06:34
Is the HDD still good? If so, you can copy the files over, I believe, then authorize the new computer for your library.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 07:14
The hard drive should still be in good condition. And lucky me backed it all up onto an external drive a week or so ago. Only thing is, puter I'm on right now has half the capacity.

I'm going to talk to the local computer repair guys about possibly seeing about getting it turned into an external drive, where I can hook it up to a new computer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 12 Aug 2012, 07:26
All you need is a HDD enclosure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_enclosure
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 12 Aug 2012, 07:54
The apple support site has instructions for moving iTunes libraries between computers… but I guess they sort of expect that the source comp is actually alive at the time.
Edit: Lots of instructions (http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=apple+support+itunes+library+transfer). :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 12 Aug 2012, 08:01
I'm hoping that tomorrow's comic is going to be Gabby and Marten talking for a couple of panels just to hear Momo shout "NO!", an offside flash and Emily flying across the room in the last panel!  :-D :evil:

As for Tai and Dora, the phrase "The candle that burns twices as bright lasts half as long." just keeps going around and around in the back of my mind.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 12 Aug 2012, 08:50
What if the candle has twice the fuel?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 12 Aug 2012, 08:59
The hard drive should still be in good condition. And lucky me backed it all up onto an external drive a week or so ago. Only thing is, puter I'm on right now has half the capacity.

I'm going to talk to the local computer repair guys about possibly seeing about getting it turned into an external drive, where I can hook it up to a new computer.
As was said earlier, disk enclosure.

If your new computer has USB 3.0 (on Windows machines, it's a blue USB port, on Macs, it is if it's one of the laptops released in June), get an enclosure with that. If it doesn't, then it depends on what ports your computer has. eSATA is a good one, FireWire is OK, USB 2.0 will work but is suboptimal. (If your computer doesn't have USB 3.0, a USB 3.0 enclosure will still work, but it'll act like a USB 2.0 one. eSATA and FireWire require those ports to be present, and it's hit or miss whether they're present on a random computer, which is why USB 3.0 is preferred - it'll work on just about anything.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: iduguphergrave on 12 Aug 2012, 09:12
What if the candle has twice the fuel?

Then it's not a candle, it's a lantern.


...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 12 Aug 2012, 09:20
And we're back - even if I gotta type this on a different machine (RIP Gateway 4010GT).

Since there have been a number of comments here, I have started a "Dead And Dying Computers"  thread in CLIKC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 12 Aug 2012, 09:33
I'm hoping Tai and Dora last long enough to have on-screen lovin' and inspire a massive forum shitstorm. Everything after that is just gravy. 8-)

(to forego any rightful harrumphing from ye mods, I give my word of honor I have learned my lesson and shall simply sit on the sidelines giggling like an idiot at the chaos rather than wade into the fray.)

Noooo!

What happened to it?
Did you download a virus?
Did you download 423,827 viruses?

While I grieve for jwhouk's machine, too, I must say that this quote, in addition to the cut of your jib, makes me like the sound of your town.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 12 Aug 2012, 10:48
I lol'd at the series of questions. But I suspect the root of the problem is it being a Gateway  :psyduck:

Brand dislike aside, 8 years for a computer isn't a bad run, imo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 12 Aug 2012, 11:05
I'm hoping Tai and Dora last long enough to have on-screen lovin' and inspire a massive forum shitstorm. Everything after that is just gravy. 8-)

(to forego any rightful harrumphing from ye mods, I give my word of honor I have learned my lesson and shall simply sit on the sidelines giggling like an idiot at the chaos rather than wade into the fray.)

When the chaos happens, can I sit next to you and watch it happen? I'll bring popcorn.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 12 Aug 2012, 12:22
I'll bring my chaos-powered popcorn popper and gumball* machine.




*Yes, gumballs, no, I don't know why. They just turn up at the bottom of the popcorn bucket.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 12 Aug 2012, 13:39
When the chaos happens, can I sit next to you and watch it happen? I'll bring popcorn.

Certainly! And Mr_Rose as well! It will be like watching a gladiatorial event, except instead of any slavery going on there will be dudes who "just registered because" or "never posted but", and they will be So Mad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 15:42
That's funny, I haven't had any major issues with Gateways since I purchased my first one at a Gateway store back in the early days of Windoze XP. The issues my sister has had with her Dell computers, however...

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 12 Aug 2012, 16:04
The answer is "never buy pre-built", clearly.

P.S. Dell only give a damn about your problems if you buy a support contract from them and no, the "free" guarantee doesn't count. Which is kind of annoying if you've ever experienced what they will do for you if you do have a real support contract with them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 12 Aug 2012, 16:34
Dell's domestic and commercial computers are light-years apart, both in quality and in support.  Both the reliability and the support (on the rare occasions it's been required) for the couple of hundred computers and servers I've been responsible for over the past nine years have been superb.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Midwesterner on 12 Aug 2012, 16:36
Speaking of Dell, my laptop battery is fading out. Lasted two and a half years, and apparently time to toss more money Dell's way.

For the poll, if Jeph has no idea, neither do I. But I'm really really hoping it goes well for at least a few weeks (our time), if not quite barfing butterflies well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Aug 2012, 18:46
We might not even see Tai and Dora for a few days.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 19:09
By the way, completely aside from anything: I have figured out that we are about in the Dead Tree Version vicinity of QC Volume 8.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 12 Aug 2012, 20:12
The greater irony would be if it was Claire asking Momo to shock her.
I'm not entirely sure what kind of person voluntarily asks a robot to give them an electric shock.
But then, I'm one of those crazy people who likes their hair and heart-rate the way they are. :P

No listening to "One More Minute" on here. :(

I'll acknowledge your Weird Al reference if somebody acknowledges my Homestar Runner reference. :P

While I grieve for jwhouk's machine, too, I must say that this quote, in addition to the cut of your jib, makes me like the sound of your town.

That was a nice Weird Al reference, Jwhouk.
Just remember that when it comes to getting a new computer, it's all about the Pentiums.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 20:16
Code crackers, hackers... WHAT?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 12 Aug 2012, 20:17
Are we to be treated to the infamous Momo pinky touch?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 12 Aug 2012, 20:20
It would seem so.  And Emily wants it.  The girl has problems. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 12 Aug 2012, 20:24
Code crackers, hackers... WHAT?

And you are DEFINITELY wasting time with all the chatroom yackers. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 12 Aug 2012, 20:45
It looks like Jeph fixed the last panel of Friday's comic - no more missing skirt piece and hand!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Aug 2012, 20:58
I can't say for certain I wouldn't have the same reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 21:00
Ya get the feeling Emily might have been dropped on the head a few too many times as a kid? ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 12 Aug 2012, 21:01
Seems like Momo isn't programed with the famous Three Laws of Robotics. That is good because that creates too many loopholes but I wonder what they use to avoid dangerous behavior...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 12 Aug 2012, 21:02
Is it just me or does it look like Momo is shrinking?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 12 Aug 2012, 21:20
Seems like Momo isn't programed with the famous Three Laws of Robotics. That is good because that creates too many loopholes but I wonder what they use to avoid dangerous behavior...

Avoid?  Are we reading the same strip?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Aug 2012, 21:24
The prospects for Tai and Dora are...

Good. As in OTP good. As in "run off and get married" good.    4 (12.5%)
Yeah, they're gonna be a couple for a while. Then Tai goes off to another job.    3 (9.4%)
Won't last as long as Marten & Padma.    1 (3.1%)
It's one of those burn hot and fast kinda things.    7 (21.9%)
Never gets past Teh Kisses stage.    0 (0%)
Crashes and burns before it even takes off.    1 (3.1%)
Something's gotta give. What, I dunno.    2 (6.3%)
Emily does something to bollox it all up.    0 (0%)
Jeph don't know, and neither do I.    13 (40.6%)
Insert mandatory meme response here (spathe ham, waffles, BOOP, etc.)    1 (3.1%)

Total Members Voted: 32
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 12 Aug 2012, 21:40
Ya get the feeling Emily might have been dropped on the head a few too many times as a kid? ;)

Dropped? She was bodyslammed and piledriven. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MightionNY on 12 Aug 2012, 21:44
What's with Momo's "new" neck seam?  Her new chassis didn't show it when it was introduced in 2000, and even when she's fresh out of the shower in 2028 she doesn't have it.

Or is it a necklace/cord of some sort?

(Yes, I tend to notice little things like this and gotta ask why. :D )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 12 Aug 2012, 22:05
Is it just me or does it look like Momo is shrinking?  :psyduck:

Yes

She's a Dimensomorph



Cue mandatory EMS visit for Emily
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Aug 2012, 22:15
Seems like Momo isn't programed with the famous Three Laws of Robotics. That is good because that creates too many loopholes but I wonder what they use to avoid dangerous behavior...

Welcome, new person!

Jeph said something the effect "It's fortunate that they like us". The ones with more prudence than Pintsize will avoid doing dangerous things because they don't want to and know better.

They may also be subject to the legal system.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mordhaus on 12 Aug 2012, 22:37
Note to self:

Never pinky-swear with Momo
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: no one special on 12 Aug 2012, 22:56
Speaking of Dell, my laptop battery is fading out. Lasted two and a half years, and apparently time to toss more money Dell's way.
Don't bother giving money to Dell, just buy a new battery from an online retailer, or even Amazon or  Craigslist. No reason to pay more than you have to. Make sure to get an OEM battery, though!  :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: foolsguinea on 12 Aug 2012, 22:58
Emily, you're so dumb!

Well, more CloudCuckooLander maybe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dust on 12 Aug 2012, 23:02
That's some quality schmuck bait.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 12 Aug 2012, 23:12
Cue mandatory EMS visit for Emily
Paramedic 1: "AnthroPC-induced shock, huh Emily? That's the fifth time this month..."
Paramedic 2: "And we stopped by that coffee place you told us about last time and got you a banana smoothie."

Sorry, but you could just about see that happening, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: helloandgoodbye on 12 Aug 2012, 23:44
  Okay, how does Emily even survive life?  She's the ultimate adult-child.

  ....Or maybe she's Obfuscating Stupidity?  Who knows?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 12 Aug 2012, 23:47
Seems like Momo isn't programed with the famous Three Laws of Robotics. That is good because that creates too many loopholes but I wonder what they use to avoid dangerous behavior...

Welcome, new person!

Jeph said something the effect "It's fortunate that they like us". The ones with more prudence than Pintsize will avoid doing dangerous things because they don't want to and know better.

They may also be subject to the legal system.

Well, I read this webcomic for a loooong time (original style) but I also read many others... Anyway, there are militar robots but haven't heard of hitman robots...

Avoid?  Are we reading the same strip?

Haven't heard about deaths caused by anthros yet, maybe they just remove the evidences and substitute them with an anthropc doppelgänger. Maybe Faye died in the fire and the one who moved to Marten is in fact the copy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 12 Aug 2012, 23:49
  Okay, how does Emily even survive life?  She's the ultimate adult-child.

  ....Or maybe she's Obfuscating Stupidity?  Who knows?  :-D

Nothing lethal so far, just one painfull... and some people have fetish for some painfull things (electric shock included)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 13 Aug 2012, 00:17
It's no fun when they willingly want to be blown off their feet :c
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 13 Aug 2012, 00:39
Seems like Momo isn't programed with the famous Three Laws of Robotics. That is good because that creates too many loopholes but I wonder what they use to avoid dangerous behavior...

Welcome, new person!

Jeph said something the effect "It's fortunate that they like us". The ones with more prudence than Pintsize will avoid doing dangerous things because they don't want to and know better.

They may also be subject to the legal system.

They would be - wasn't it mentioned some time ago that AnthroPCs were now regarded as full members of society? I'll se if I can find the strip.

EDIT: I seem to misremember. In Jeph's comment to this strip (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1996), he explains a bit about AnthroPCs, and it looks like they might lack some basic rights.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 13 Aug 2012, 01:05
I am kind of surprised that Momo doesnt just apply the electric shock herself ... ? Oh well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 13 Aug 2012, 04:36
Wonder if Momo can (or will) reduce the voltage?

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 13 Aug 2012, 05:03
Oh boy, add masochist maybe to Emily's growing list of strange? :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ukrayf on 13 Aug 2012, 06:10
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 13 Aug 2012, 06:14
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they
No, Emily and Momo are going to get together. And it's going to be shocking.  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 13 Aug 2012, 06:14
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they

Doesn't look like it, no. But who knows? Apparently not even Jeph...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: VonKleist on 13 Aug 2012, 06:27
I´m looking forward to seeing more of her. Kind of like the general idea of characters running loose inside of the creation :)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Black Sword on 13 Aug 2012, 06:44
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they
No, Emily and Momo are going to get together. And it's going to be shocking.  8-)

Penalty for lack of "YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: idontunderstand on 13 Aug 2012, 08:24
Penalty for spouting half-dead memes.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LordVaughn on 13 Aug 2012, 09:34
And the award for Cloudcuckoolander of the Year goes to.... Emily! But seriously, it's weird how odd she is, but it's at a level where you'd almost call it adorable.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 13 Aug 2012, 10:39
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they

Nope, I suspect Emily may be a bit too strange for Marten's liking.

Ya get the feeling Emily might have been dropped on the head a few too many times as a kid? ;)

Or perhaps she stuck a metal fork in an electrical outlet as a toddler and has been...different ever since.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 13 Aug 2012, 10:59
Or she had a sudden epiphany when Marten told her to quit it. She decided fair's fair and she deserves it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 13 Aug 2012, 11:08
Is anyone else hoping for another animated gif?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: JayJay on 13 Aug 2012, 11:44
Is anyone else hoping for another animated gif?

no ><
it fucks up when I'm trying to read on my mobile :~
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 13 Aug 2012, 11:55
I am kind of surprised that Momo doesnt just apply the electric shock herself ... ? Oh well.

Maybe they are progammed to not cause direct harm to humans but there is no law saying that they can't fool a human for some pain.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Aug 2012, 12:07
Reminded me of this:

(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/the_difference.png) (http://xkcd.com/242/)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Aug 2012, 13:03
Jeph said "absolute free will".

They have equal legal rights to humans (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1900).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Aug 2012, 13:57
Absolute free will is debatable, since humans might not even have that.  Also is there any canon (in-comic) re: free will?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Aug 2012, 15:05
I can't think of anything, but I'm not the ultimate archive master.

There is, in fact, a hint to the contrary. In 1345, Faye was under the impression that Pintsize had "morality programming". She may have been mistaken.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RyanW1019 on 13 Aug 2012, 15:51
Don't all of us recieve "morality programming" throughout most of our early life? To some extent, it never really stops, it's just less subtle. And clearly some of us have the free will to do some pretty amoral things, so our own programming is not set in stone; or at least we're capable of ignoring it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 13 Aug 2012, 16:10
Don't all of us recieve "morality programming" throughout most of our early life? To some extent, it never really stops, it's just less subtle. And clearly some of us have the free will to do some pretty amoral things, so our own programming is not set in stone; or at least we're capable of ignoring it.

The capability to ignore moral programming is why I'm not so quick to blame the parents for a child's, especially a teenager's, criminal behavior. We may call it programming, but we're not robots, we are able to make up our own minds about the morals we're taught. Some decide those morals are crap and do their own thing.

Also, some people never get much moral programming, or get a different set of programming than the rest of us. For example, what kind of moral code do you think a kid growing up in an inner-city family of drug dealers is going to pick up?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 13 Aug 2012, 16:57
I am kind of surprised that Momo doesnt just apply the electric shock herself ... ?
Or that she needs physical contact, since a previous strip established that she could blow someone out of his shoes at a hundred metres! ZAP!!!

<rationalisation>The power needed to "jump" an lightning-bolt through air would be much greater, and perhaps less easy to control precisely, so for minor corporal punishment Momo prefers a contact-zap.</rationalisation>
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Aug 2012, 18:17
Maybe it's just more fun to trick people into it than to attack someone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 13 Aug 2012, 18:39
If Momo really wanted to do some damage, she would show Emily the holopony she can never have.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Aug 2012, 18:40
I don't think Momo is that cruel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 13 Aug 2012, 19:37
Momo won't do it. She knows better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 13 Aug 2012, 19:45
Don't all of us recieve "morality programming" throughout most of our early life? To some extent, it never really stops, it's just less subtle. And clearly some of us have the free will to do some pretty amoral things, so our own programming is not set in stone; or at least we're capable of ignoring it.

The capability to ignore moral programming is why I'm not so quick to blame the parents for a child's, especially a teenager's, criminal behavior. We may call it programming, but we're not robots, we are able to make up our own minds about the morals we're taught. Some decide those morals are crap and do their own thing.

Also, some people never get much moral programming, or get a different set of programming than the rest of us. For example, what kind of moral code do you think a kid growing up in an inner-city family of drug dealers is going to pick up?
Part of the "moral programming" is not learned, we are born with it... well, at least most are.

I could give you better sources but I'm lazy so you will get just the first google result
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/05/robot-altruism/

There are many other "programs" we are born with. People aren't a mass produced equipament with a formated HD just waiting to be programmed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 13 Aug 2012, 20:35
We know Momo is one of the more "responsible" AnthroPCs in the comic, so she presumably knows there is a big difference between assaulting someone and defending yourself from harassment. As for her pinkie-shock technique, that's trickery, but its also something you see with siblings or some people, where someone says "I'm going to be kicking the air in front of me and if you get in the way it's your own fault." Emily has been warned what will happen but she is still going to try it. Again, that's Emily's own fault.

The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
A robot may not permanent injury to a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm (unless its the human's own fault and the possibility of permanent or fatal injury is negligible).
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws (unless an individual is causing harm or distress to other human beings).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 13 Aug 2012, 22:49
The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
A robot may not permanent injury to a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm (unless its the human's own fault and the possibility of permanent or fatal injury is negligible).
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws (unless an individual is causing harm or distress to other human beings).

You know, that first law still can result in robots taking over the World to protect humans from harming each other... I guess Jeff never stated anything exactly because it is extremely hard to make laws without unwanted effects.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 13 Aug 2012, 23:03
I would daresay, for all the discussion I've seen over months of reading these forums, that there are no "three laws of robotics" or any such similar laws in effect, because Jeph simply treats all of the A.I.s in the comic, by and large, as if they were people. So they have the same kinds of ethical frameworks as people, with all of the associated ambiguities and potential flaws.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 13 Aug 2012, 23:12
I would daresay, for all the discussion I've seen over months of reading these forums, that there are no "three laws of robotics" or any such similar laws in effect, because Jeph simply treats all of the A.I.s in the comic, by and large, as if they were people. So they have the same kinds of ethical frameworks as people, with all of the associated ambiguities and potential flaws.

The problem is that they are sentient, but they also are products.

If you attack someone they will sue you, if your dog attack someone they will sue you, if an iPhone explodes and hurt someone they will sue Apple. If an AnthroPC hurt someone will they sue the AnthroPC, the owner or the maker?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valandar on 13 Aug 2012, 23:23
I can see Emily and Hannelore becoming good friends - which would lead to chaos beyond mortal comprehension.  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 13 Aug 2012, 23:55
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they
Guh.

After the black Dora-lookalike the asian Dora-lookalike ?

And she's again an airhead on top of it, too !

I dont like the idea, but I dont dare to say "no".

To think Marten was once interested in girls like Faye before ...


The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 14 Aug 2012, 00:06
The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.


You know, those laws are needed exactly because Singularity happened and not the opposite.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 14 Aug 2012, 00:27
You know, those laws are needed exactly because Singularity happened and not the opposite.

So you say, but I don't see any evidence that they exist. These comics aren't created by Asimov. Jeph has even said somewhere (I don't remember where) that we are "lucky" the AIs like us - which is quite a long way from saying that they are bound by rules!

If you attack someone they will sue you, if your dog attack someone they will sue you, if an iPhone explodes and hurt someone they will sue Apple. If an AnthroPC hurt someone will they sue the AnthroPC, the owner or the maker?

I don't know, and neither do you. Maybe it depends on the circumstances?

I take it from the question that you are implying that the resulting ambiguity of the answer requires that the laws exist - I disagree, and what's more, I don't even necessarily agree that it implies that they should exist.

But regardless of what I may think, I just don't see any evidence that they do exist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: foolsguinea on 14 Aug 2012, 00:39
Beyond being flat-chested, do Emily and Dora actually look alike? Because I thought Padma was really clearly Bizarro-Dora, but Emily doesn't seem much like Dora at all to me.

She is sort of like Padma in that they're both "wacky." But they're not the same there either: As I recall Padma was mostly oblivious to cues, bad at reading people, stuff like that. Emily is more interested in unusual experiences and has unusual desires, and is indifferent to others' expectations and norms.

Hm. Marten is passive, Dora is anxious, Faye is PTSD, Hanners is OCD, Marigold is social anxiety/avoidant I think. Emily is funny-eccentric, while Wil is dramatic-eccentric. Pintsize is a prankster, Clinton is a socially awkward fan/enthusiast, Sven is self-destructive, Padma is oblivious.

It takes a certain something to put together characters that have this mix of neuroses and write them reasonably consistently and sympathetically, and be funny. Observation of the human condition, with both enough sympathy to like these people and enough abstraction of self to torment them, play them off each other, and generally put them through stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 14 Aug 2012, 00:56
I dont get Fayes statement "Not much of a pursuit, if you ask me".


The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.


You know, those laws are needed exactly because Singularity happened and not the opposite.
Drat.

And so I fueled the discussion I tried to stop !

Assimov has written many stories about the three laws. Basically one can summarize the result as: they just dont work. Neither will probably any other set of simple mechanical laws.

Fortunately, thanks to the singularity, robots are as intelligent as people now and can follow their own common sense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 14 Aug 2012, 00:59
I think Faye said that because Dora didn't require too much chasing in the end.

And, Hannelore: go for it. Can I help?  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 14 Aug 2012, 01:05
I want to see a courtroom-based spin-off of QC now.

DORA BIANCHI: JUDGE, JURY AND SEXECUTIONER.

Or at the very least I'd like a poster with Dora and those words on it. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 14 Aug 2012, 01:24
The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.


You know, those laws are needed exactly because Singularity happened and not the opposite.

How is it that almost no-one remembers that nearly every three laws robot story is an illustration of at least one case where the three laws have failed utterly? Asimov's Laws are a plot device, not a practical suggestion.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 14 Aug 2012, 01:38
That said the way Jeph is handling A.I.s in QC is probably the most comfortable one. Positive emotions (empathy, understanding, forgiveness) are always stronger and more enjoyable than negative ones. (anxiety, greed, hate)
I guess for any A.I. it would simply be logical to pursue positive human interactions (e.g. having fun with them) more than negative ones (e.g. enslaving them).

In that way, the dilemma inherent in Asimov's three laws kinda takes care of itself in QC.

...
Also I lol'd at Hanners in the last panel. She really doesn't want to do it but is bound by the shop policy. Turning the rule against the ruler must be impossibly baffling to her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Aug 2012, 01:45
Have we seen that customer before? He looks familiar.

Does Dora look younger because she's happy, or am I just imagining it?

Word Of God on AnthroPC ethics programming (http://jephjacques.com/post/10973725252/qa-dump-06). "Love your neighbor as yourself" is a perfectly cromulent basis for an ethical system.

That's a really good question about liability laws. The QC world has probably tried multiple approaches. Who would write liability insurance to cover acts of Pintsize?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 14 Aug 2012, 01:49
Yay Hannelore's back, she will always be my favourite QC character,

And haha, i wish i had a store policy like that, hell i have business plans for the future, I am going to have a store policy like that.

And yes, I've seen that customer before, hell i thought it was Angus for a few moments then realised it's just someone who looks similar.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 14 Aug 2012, 02:01
I would daresay, for all the discussion I've seen over months of reading these forums, that there are no "three laws of robotics" or any such similar laws in effect, because Jeph simply treats all of the A.I.s in the comic, by and large, as if they were people. So they have the same kinds of ethical frameworks as people, with all of the associated ambiguities and potential flaws.

And of course, remember that the first thing the first AI asked for was  equality (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2085).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 14 Aug 2012, 02:47
There are no Three Laws in QC for the same reason there were no tribbles on the space station, or an Eagle Transporter docked thereto: They belong to different fictional universes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 14 Aug 2012, 04:13
Also, Dora's comment reminded me of this comic (1946) (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1946) ... a lot of refreshing changes of pace for Dora lately... lucky gal. And cute hair.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 14 Aug 2012, 04:29
Am I a bad person that my first reaction on reaching the punchline of today's comic was "Woo!  Wet T-shirt!"?

Then the second reaction was, "B---, its a comic..."

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 14 Aug 2012, 05:14
Have we seen that customer before? He looks familiar.

Does Dora look younger because she's happy, or am I just imagining it?

Word Of God on AnthroPC ethics programming (http://jephjacques.com/post/10973725252/qa-dump-06). "Love your neighbor as yourself" is a perfectly cromulent basis for an ethical system.

That's a really good question about liability laws. The QC world has probably tried multiple approaches. Who would write liability insurance to cover acts of Pintsize?

It's the hair style.  Dora looks sexy with it.

Well, there's the whole just "nice to be pursued" thing. :psyduck:  I'll refrain from saying more on that as it pretty much mirrors what I've been saying.  That this is the relationship for getting back in the game and not anything lasting.

That said.

HANNERS!  Perfect expression for that statement.

And it really wasn't that much of a pursuit

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: JayJay on 14 Aug 2012, 06:27

Well, there's the whole just "nice to be pursued" thing. :psyduck:  I'll refrain from saying more on that as it pretty much mirrors what I've been saying.  That this is the relationship for getting back in the game and not anything lasting.


Dora may view it that way (or feel that way), but I'm pretty sure that Tai doesn't feel that way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 14 Aug 2012, 06:29
Also, some people never get much moral programming, or get a different set of programming than the rest of us. For example, what kind of moral code do you think a kid growing up in an inner-city family of drug dealers is going to pick up?

...You don't want me to answer that question, because I know the answer all too well. (I work with them.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 14 Aug 2012, 06:35
The prospects for Tai and Dora are...

Good. As in OTP good. As in "run off and get married" good.    9 (11.7%)
Yeah, they're gonna be a couple for a while. Then Tai goes off to another job.    7 (9.1%)
Won't last as long as Marten & Padma.    5 (6.5%)
It's one of those burn hot and fast kinda things.    12 (15.6%)
Never gets past Teh Kisses stage.    1 (1.3%)
Crashes and burns before it even takes off.    1 (1.3%)
Something's gotta give. What, I dunno.    7 (9.1%)
Emily does something to bollox it all up.    1 (1.3%)
Jeph don't know, and neither do I.    27 (35.1%)
Insert mandatory meme response here (spathe ham, waffles, BOOP, etc.)    7 (9.1%)

Total Members Voted: 77
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 14 Aug 2012, 06:56
Am I a bad person that my first reaction on reaching the punchline of today's comic was "Woo!  Wet T-shirt!"?

Then the second reaction was, "B---, its a comic..."

Well, there's Jeph's title for the comic, and the fact that the hose isn't hooked up to a spigot. I think the jury's still out, and the judge and sexecutioner may also be if someone doesn't stop Hanners.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sorflakne on 14 Aug 2012, 07:34
Sexecutioner...I am going to remember that one  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 14 Aug 2012, 08:04
Am I a bad person that my first reaction on reaching the punchline of today's comic was "Woo!  Wet T-shirt!"?

Then the second reaction was, "B---, its a comic..."

Well, there's Jeph's title for the comic, and the fact that the hose isn't hooked up to a spigot. I think the jury's still out, and the judge and sexecutioner may also be if someone doesn't stop Hanners.

omg you're right, it's def a beating
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 14 Aug 2012, 08:09

That's a really good question about liability laws. The QC world has probably tried multiple approaches. Who would write liability insurance to cover acts of Pintsize?

Robotic liability Insurance (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=125)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 14 Aug 2012, 08:58
Emily and Marten aren't going to get together are they
Guh.

After the black Dora-lookalike the asian Dora-lookalike ?

And she's again an airhead on top of it, too !

I dont like the idea, but I dont dare to say "no".

To think Marten was once interested in girls like Faye before ...


The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.

For one, pretty sure Padma was Indian and not black. Also, where's the indication that Marten has -any- romantic interest in Emily, or any of the other interns for that matter? Because he's talking to her or shares a panel with her? Cart in front of the horse, I'd say. I also don't see how Emily is a Dora clone - she's easily distinguishable from her. Is any female in the strip that you feel that Marten might hook up with a 'Dora clone'?

Anyway, someone asked who would be sued in the event of an anthroPC hurting someone. I imagine it would be the anthroPC they would sue - after all, the chassis is really just a shell for the 'intelligence' that inhabits it, and obviously they can own property, or at the very least stocks and financial materials if Station is anything to go by. So, being independent in their actions, and able to hold monetary property, I would say that yes, they would likely be the ones sued.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 14 Aug 2012, 10:13
Happy floaty Dora is nice to see, even if it doesn't last.   (please let it last)

I agree, she does look younger when she is happy, even taking the hairstyle into account.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 14 Aug 2012, 10:38
I dont get Fayes statement "Not much of a pursuit, if you ask me".


The Three Laws of QC are probably written up like this;
OMG can we PLEASE NOT GO THERE.

The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.


You know, those laws are needed exactly because Singularity happened and not the opposite.
Drat.

And so I fueled the discussion I tried to stop !

Assimov has written many stories about the three laws. Basically one can summarize the result as: they just dont work. Neither will probably any other set of simple mechanical laws.

Fortunately, thanks to the singularity, robots are as intelligent as people now and can follow their own common sense.

There is no such a thing as common sense or "good and evil" from a neutral point of view. And yes, a set of simple mechanical laws will never work. The problem is that they need some sort of ethical system to avoid some incidents where the best solution would involve hurting or killing a human. Maybe removing the "or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm" so if humans want to destroy each other is fine. or limit how many implications they would have to follow. Like stop imediate harm but not something like smoking or drinking too much.

Also, they would be really dangerous if they worked like humans, humans already are dangerous as they are.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Aug 2012, 12:07
So many AnthroPCs are unemployed that they're probably "judgment-proof", a short term for having so little that suing them couldn't recover anything useful.

One logical and functional law would be to require AnthroPCs to carry liability insurance when they go out in public, as we require of human car drivers. But how would they pay for it? Would their "owners" pay the premiums as a gift?

There is of course no evidence that there's such a law in the QC universe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: akronnick on 14 Aug 2012, 12:10
It's possible that the same criminal statutes and penalties that apply to humans applies to AIs.

The threat of imprisonment and loss of social status is just as motivating to them as to us.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 14 Aug 2012, 12:33
Asimov came to regard the original Three Laws, as presented to him by John Campbell, as inherently flawed. He tried to fix them by introducing the "Zeroth Law," in which the good of humanity take precedence over the Three Laws  (which protect individual humans). That gave us a galaxy of humans ruled covertly by robot nannies.

But that's another fictional universe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Eternal_Newbie on 14 Aug 2012, 14:23
Asimov came to regard the original Three Laws, as presented to him by John Campbell, as inherently flawed. He tried to fix them by introducing the "Zeroth Law," in which the good of humanity take precedence over the Three Laws  (which protect individual humans). That gave us a galaxy of humans ruled covertly by robot nannies.

But that's another fictional universe.
Not to forget Xenocidal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: iduguphergrave on 14 Aug 2012, 14:45
Faye looks like she's lost some serious weight.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sorflakne on 14 Aug 2012, 14:55
So who's That Guy?  That guy in the background of today's comic...he's been showing up as a background customer every now and then for years.  Almost looks like Angus, but isn't him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Renewman on 14 Aug 2012, 16:11
Yeaaaaaah, this relationship is going to last like a supernova; twice as hot and last half as long.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 14 Aug 2012, 18:11
Faye looks like she's lost some serious weight.
Marten is overweight.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 14 Aug 2012, 20:56
The Singularity happends, robots are sentient and dont need a set of mechanical laws to control their actions.

Last I checked, we still do.

Hang on.

*Goes down to basement, screams can be heard, stop short.*

Yep, still do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 14 Aug 2012, 22:21
Quote from: pwhodges
We need another comic to restore sense to this thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 14 Aug 2012, 22:31
Floaty Dora

Interesting


Lets hope that Hanners only means spraying Dora, not hitting her.


That would be fatal


For Hanners
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 14 Aug 2012, 22:47
Did Momo's pinky have anything to do with this? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 14 Aug 2012, 23:01
JephWatch: Still on a roll.

Hannelore was probably filling in for the role of Emily at CoD. It seems like the sort of thing she'd worry about.

Also, why does the lack of set date not surprise me at ALL? :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mothykins on 14 Aug 2012, 23:06
Naw Martin. Their heads totally would've 'sploded. Emily just averted a catastrophe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 14 Aug 2012, 23:12
Dora and Tai go boom


And not in the way Tai would hope.    :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mothykins on 14 Aug 2012, 23:33
Dora and Tai go boom


And not in the way Tai would hope.    :-D

When they really do bang, they'll prolly start a new universe in the process.

(hurr hurr astronomy + sex jokes hurr)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: T on 15 Aug 2012, 00:09
It's possible that the same criminal statutes and penalties that apply to humans applies to AIs.

The threat of imprisonment and loss of social status is just as motivating to them as to us.

Personally I think some AIs like Pintsize would actually enjoy some time in prison. And imprisonment wouldn't matter much if you can put yourself on standby.

Be reprogramed would be a more practical alternative but that would bring many others things to discuss...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Aug 2012, 00:16
(hurr hurr astronomy + sex jokes hurr)
"The best bang since the big one!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 15 Aug 2012, 00:19
... the original Three Laws, as presented to him by John Campbell

Interestingly, while Asimov gave Campbell the credit, Campbell said Asimov came up with them.

"No robot may injure a human being, unless it's funny" -- a potential QC version.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Aug 2012, 00:30
Perhaps one came up with the idea of them, that they might be necessary, and the other produced the formulation in actual laws; I can see that happening.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: foolsguinea on 15 Aug 2012, 01:18
For a moment I thought the phones had actually gone BOOM.

JEPH WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: no one special on 15 Aug 2012, 01:54
Naw Martin. Their heads totally would've 'sploded. Emily just averted a catastrophe.

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Totally did not get the comic AT ALL.  Now I do.  Thanks. 

Having understood it, I can now say this: what is wrong with Emily?  That is just a super-weird thing to even imagine might happen.  Not in the interesting "oh, how cool and weird" way, but the "ooooo-k, you are creeping me out and I'm just going to walk away now" way.  But oh well, whatever. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: vogonford on 15 Aug 2012, 02:04
This most recent comic shows really well one of the things I absolutely love about QC: Jeph gets his characters and lets them be. Each one of them reacts in a way that is absolutely them as we've come to learn them, in both lines and body language. While Marten and Faye, and Dora and Tai have the same lines, their body language shows that they don't say them in exactly the same way - they are still their own people. Unlike [removed to not offend], Jeph has a way of not only creating his characters, but listening to them and letting them do things in their own way. That's why I continue to check it at midnight or later every night to make sure I catch every new comic - it's really rare to find a writer who is so consistent with how he writes the people he's creating.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: VonKleist on 15 Aug 2012, 02:05
hehe. I love the reactions in the third line of panels. Marten is all "oh shiiiit", while Faye is a little bit more jaded and is just like "my, my" :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 15 Aug 2012, 02:11
One could say that Emily worried the romantic chemistry betwixt Dora and Tai was...

....

.....

Explosive.  8-)

(YYYYYEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 15 Aug 2012, 02:30
Is it just me or does it look like Faye was a bit glad that Dora blew up?

Course that means she'd probably try and take over the coffee shop.

"Hey Marten, Dora blew up, I now own a business!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 15 Aug 2012, 02:38
I must confess to being mildly disappointed Emily's hair isn't on end.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 15 Aug 2012, 04:10
I spend way too much time at the other job, when explosions cause me to go, "Where's the fragmentation?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 15 Aug 2012, 04:25
Emily's imagination is so contagious that it even affected Tai's love-addled brain.

Jeph certainly did that well. If not for the explosions, you could almost see that sort of thing happening...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Renewman on 15 Aug 2012, 04:34
Too busy kissing to stop and talk about a first date?  :roll: This is going places for sure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 15 Aug 2012, 06:17
Fiery explosions.  Just like their first go as sex, it will burn hotter than a thousand stars and last as long as a cookie in a room of fatties.  :psyduck:

I also admit disappointment in Emily's hair not being blown back or shocked .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Aug 2012, 06:24
@vogonford - Welcome to the insanity. You probably didn't read the newspost for the series of strips around the Dora-kisses-Marten arc. The characters have been pretty much on their own in the way of how they react since Faye and Marten had The Talk. Jeph is just the guy who draws the comic.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 15 Aug 2012, 07:13
One thing about this story acr is that it should give Jeph an excuse to draw Dora in  something other than a t-shirt.  It's been a while since we've seen Dora in a dress, or anything approaching gothy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 15 Aug 2012, 08:06
Just so you folks know, I'm getting a fallout bunker specifically built for when this eventually goes belly up. Access will be invitation only.

Seriously though, it seems Dora and Tai are not thinking with their brains, but with their libidos. Which is a perfect way to start a relationship! (/sarcasm)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 15 Aug 2012, 09:06
How is that NOT a good way to start off a relationship?  How are relationships supposed to start? You start with an initial attraction and build on it by spending time together getting to know each other better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 15 Aug 2012, 09:08
This most recent comic shows really well one of the things I absolutely love about QC: Jeph gets his characters and lets them be. Each one of them reacts in a way that is absolutely them as we've come to learn them, in both lines and body language. While Marten and Faye, and Dora and Tai have the same lines, their body language shows that they don't say them in exactly the same way - they are still their own people. Unlike [removed to not offend], Jeph has a way of not only creating his characters, but listening to them and letting them do things in their own way. That's why I continue to check it at midnight or later every night to make sure I catch every new comic - it's really rare to find a writer who is so consistent with how he writes the people he's creating.

Welcome, new person!

He's also done pretty well in inventing characters who play off each other well.

Marten's old boss's LTR began with sheer lust. I'm not saying it's a good foundation in general but it can work.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 15 Aug 2012, 09:14
Jeph's latest QA dump (http://jephjacques.com/post/29416886303/qa-dump-45).

He acknowledges that Emily is being influenced by Osaka (a character from Azumanga Daioh (http://myanimelist.net/anime/66/Azumanga_Daioh), for those who don't know it).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 15 Aug 2012, 09:27
I'm pretty sure it's the phones exploding, not their heads. Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 15 Aug 2012, 10:38
I'm pretty sure it's the phones exploding, not their heads. Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.

You're no fun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Aug 2012, 10:59
The phones emit a frequency which cause their heads to explode.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 15 Aug 2012, 11:15
The phones emit a frequency which cause their heads to explode.

Pintsize gutted the phones and filled them with plastic explosives.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Midwesterner on 15 Aug 2012, 11:19
The phones emit a frequency which cause their heads to explode.

Maybe this frequency? http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1708 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1708)?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 15 Aug 2012, 12:22
I'm pretty sure it's the phones exploding, not their heads. Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Yes, because all phones have a few ounces of C4 in them for just such an occasion. Those trickster phone manufacturers love a good explosion when you simultaneous dial you newly acquired kissmate but forget to setup a first date.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 15 Aug 2012, 14:00
Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Texting on the phone that just exploded? Is the idea that something bad happens if two people call one another at the same time an urban legend or meme or something?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 15 Aug 2012, 14:06
Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Texting on the phone that just exploded? Is the idea that something bad happens if two people call one another at the same time an urban legend or meme or something?

I think it was more the first three panels were Emily's imagination running wild and Tai being a little freaked out by said imagination in the last panel. Tai and Dora ringing each other at the exact same time and exploding is just a joke.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 15 Aug 2012, 14:41
I'm pretty sure it's the phones exploding, not their heads. Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Yes, because all phones have a few ounces of C4 in them for just such an occasion. Those trickster phone manufacturers love a good explosion when you simultaneous dial you newly acquired kissmate but forget to setup a first date.


"Good morning Mr. Jaques......"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Aug 2012, 15:07
The phones emit a frequency which cause their heads to explode.

Maybe this frequency? http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1708 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1708)?

Is it sad that I don't even have to look to know what strip that is?

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (Oh God, make it stop! Oh God, my fillings hurt! What the #### is going on in here? There's a pack of wild dogs outside wanting to come in!)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 15 Aug 2012, 17:32
Thus the 'Pretty sure it'll go to voicemail [if two people call each other at the exact same time]' and why Tai is texting instead.
Texting on the phone that just exploded? Is the idea that something bad happens if two people call one another at the same time an urban legend or meme or something?

I think it was more the first three panels were Emily's imagination running wild and Tai being a little freaked out by said imagination in the last panel. Tai and Dora ringing each other at the exact same time and exploding is just a joke.

This.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: akronnick on 15 Aug 2012, 20:23
Just so you folks know, I'm getting a fallout bunker specifically built for when this eventually goes belly up. Access will be invitation only.

Can I be in the bunker? I can help fend off the marauding hordes with my Useless Broom Made Entirely of Dicks! :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Aug 2012, 22:31
Dang, Pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mothykins on 15 Aug 2012, 22:42
I wanted to hug Pintsize, poor little guy. But then I good mood whiplash. And now he's in an anus-filled bathroom. So no hugs for him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 15 Aug 2012, 22:53
He actually had me going there.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Aug 2012, 22:54
His final panel was less convincing than the others...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 15 Aug 2012, 23:10
Yeah, this is probably as sincere as Pintsize is ever going to be. Don't be fooled by his sudden levity, Marten!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: idontunderstand on 15 Aug 2012, 23:51
MAJOR  :psyduck: today. Thanks Jeph.

Sometimes I wonder if it bothers Jeph that even 4000 strips after this one, a lot of the characters will be left undeveloped and possible arcs unexplored. There's only so much he can do with 5 strips a week after all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: no one special on 15 Aug 2012, 23:58
Can I be in the bunker? I can help fend off the marauding hordes with my Useless Broom Made Entirely of Dicks! :psyduck:

Hey, where did you get my UBMEOD???  I've been looking for that for 3 months!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 16 Aug 2012, 00:41
Ah, yes. The wondrous profession of the macro-rectagraphers... not many take up this famed and fabled vocation that is nontheless very important for the advancement of modern medicin and analanalysts alike.

None of them, however, would probably ever have thought for the fruits of their work to end up as tile pictures in someone's bathroom... straaaange world we live in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: akronnick on 16 Aug 2012, 00:52
Hey, where did you get my UBMEOD???  I've been looking for that for 3 months!!!

You must be mistaken, for I have had this UBMEOD for many years now.

This is my Useless Broom Made Entirely Of Dicks. There many like it, but this one is mine....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 16 Aug 2012, 01:37
Actually, until the very last panel, Pintsize was more or less entirely correct in everything he said. Whether he believes it or not.

Perhaps we are witnessing a bit of character development in Pintsize: from the overtly whacky and chaotic to the much more subtle and insidious troublemaker. I for one would like to see that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Aug 2012, 02:06
This comic felt to me like a bit of a call-back to comic 1.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Earin on 16 Aug 2012, 03:10
Actually, until the very last panel, Pintsize was more or less entirely correct in everything he said. Whether he believes it or not.

Perhaps we are witnessing a bit of character development in Pintsize: from the overtly whacky and chaotic to the much more subtle and insidious troublemaker. I for one would like to see that.

Later, he will reveal that he is bi-winning.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 16 Aug 2012, 03:30
Too bad.
Pintsize taking up Bible study could set religious scholarship back a thousand years.
Or forward.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 16 Aug 2012, 04:28
Too bad.
Pintsize taking up Bible study could set religious scholarship back a thousand years.
Or forward.

Or, perhaps more likely, in a completely unforseen direction.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 16 Aug 2012, 04:37
This comic felt to me like a bit of a call-back to comic 1.

But there was no offer of nice cheerful porn!  However will Marten cope?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 16 Aug 2012, 04:48
May be... may be... Pintsize needs to find a romantic interest? That would take him off his funk (and his mind off horse porn).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Jabberwocky on 16 Aug 2012, 05:19
And now he's in an anus-filled bathroom.

He actually had me going there.

My mind processed these two posts quite differently than intended.   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 16 Aug 2012, 05:24
May be... may be... Pintsize needs to find a romantic interest? That would take him off his funk (and his mind off horse porn).
Nah, if Pintsize DOES find a soulmate that shares his destructive tendencies, sense of humour and random distributions of horse porn...

God help us all!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 16 Aug 2012, 05:55
Oh Marten.  How many times are you gonna fall for that. :evil:
Finally, Pintsize returns!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 16 Aug 2012, 06:41
The prospects for Tai and Dora are...

Good. As in OTP good. As in "run off and get married" good.    9 (10.7%)
Yeah, they're gonna be a couple for a while. Then Tai goes off to another job.    8 (9.5%)
Won't last as long as Marten & Padma.    5 (6%)
It's one of those burn hot and fast kinda things.    14 (16.7%)
Never gets past Teh Kisses stage.    1 (1.2%)
Crashes and burns before it even takes off.    1 (1.2%)
Something's gotta give. What, I dunno.    7 (8.3%)
Emily does something to bollox it all up.    1 (1.2%)
Jeph don't know, and neither do I.    31 (36.9%)
Insert mandatory meme response here (spathe ham, waffles, BOOP, etc.)    7 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 84
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 16 Aug 2012, 07:38
Just so you folks know, I'm getting a fallout bunker specifically built for when this eventually goes belly up. Access will be invitation only.

Can I be in the bunker? I can help fend off the marauding hordes with my Useless Broom Made Entirely of Dicks! :psyduck:

Of course, you were already on the shortlist of invites anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Aug 2012, 07:46
Pintsize could get some ideas from the Bible.

Marten has already given a robot an existential crisis (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=706).

Hmm. Can AnthroPCs get their programming adjusted? Kind of like plastic surgery for their personalities?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 16 Aug 2012, 08:07
Did you mean 705? 706 is the resolution.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: JayJay on 16 Aug 2012, 12:04
Too bad.
Pintsize taking up Bible study could set religious scholarship back a thousand years.
Or forward.

Or it could trigger a worldwide holy war that would eventually turn into a nuclear war, and then the planet would turn into a radioactive wasteland where the humans who survived the war would be struggling to survive in the hostile enviroment. The new Earth then would be ruled by the robots which was pintsize's goal all along.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Aug 2012, 12:13
Too much radiation is not so good for electronics, either.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: JayJay on 16 Aug 2012, 12:17
They would secretely craft news bodies coated with lead :X
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bunnyThor on 16 Aug 2012, 21:49
Is it too much to hope for that Faye's words in the last panel are foreshadowing?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 16 Aug 2012, 22:00
The expression of satisfaction on Pintsize's face in the first panel of today's comic is priceless.

Is it too much to hope for that Faye's words in the last panel are foreshadowing?  :mrgreen:

Whose relationship are you damning with your thoughts today?
 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 16 Aug 2012, 22:17
Nothing like a little Pintsize mayhem to lighten up the week
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: iduguphergrave on 16 Aug 2012, 22:28
I dunno, Angus; not many straight guys would describe being surrounded by pictures of buttholes as mesmerizing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 16 Aug 2012, 22:49
What's straight got to do with it? He never said they were all male buttholes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 16 Aug 2012, 23:06
Knowing Pintsize it's probably animals anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Aug 2012, 23:09
Given Faye's predilection for tweeting about her butt, I'm not sure why she said what she did!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 16 Aug 2012, 23:16
Question: Do the comic personas know about their twitter personas?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Aug 2012, 23:30
There have been occasions when the tweets have been related to the comic, but there's no sign of the comic characters knowing about the tweets.  None the less, I think it appropriate that they should be considered canon, at least as an additional guide to the characters.  I can't recall if Jeph has commented on this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skaltura on 16 Aug 2012, 23:38
Alert the CDC, the Butt's disease virus (A5S3) has mutated. Individuals previously reported as immune are now contagious, a new vaccine is desperately needed!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dust on 17 Aug 2012, 00:42
He's .... oddly quick. Or they talk extremely slow. One of the two.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 17 Aug 2012, 00:45
Sheesh...

https://twitter.com/zmoreno/status/236321128791044098

Quote
@jephjacques I just realized that if you subtract the g, his name is Anus..... I am not surprised he was mesmerized by the wallpaper!

He's .... oddly quick. Or they talk extremely slow. One of the two.

Orrrr... Jeph just left out the little "Moments Later" caption.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 17 Aug 2012, 01:15
bunnyThor, at the rate things go here in QC-land, I suspect they'll be broken up by strip 3000.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 17 Aug 2012, 02:21
Given Faye's predilection for tweeting about her butt, I'm not sure why she said what she did!

I think Faye is just jealous of Angus' interest in sphincters besides her own. He has access unto the finest brown eye in all of Georgia--whither should he look at other butt(holes)?!? Angus, you cad!!

...

...oooooor in the interest of making this post not completely creepy I could acknowledge that Faye was probably being a Snarky Broad, as is her wont.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 17 Aug 2012, 04:05
bunnyThor, at the rate things go here in QC-land, I suspect they'll be broken up by strip 3000.

Or married
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 17 Aug 2012, 05:12
bunnyThor, at the rate things go here in QC-land, I suspect they'll be broken up by strip 3000.

Or married

Or both.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 17 Aug 2012, 07:31
Man, I hope Faye and Angus don't break up. He's been really good for her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: willpell on 17 Aug 2012, 07:31
Today's strip makes me wonder if Jeph intentionally picked the name Angus because it was one letter away from Anus.  It would seem to at least semi-fit the personality which he had prior to our learning his name (we of course don't know whether Jeph had named him when he first appeared).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 17 Aug 2012, 07:42
Angus has the butt fetish.   :psyduck:  Careful, Faye.  He could asking for the butt in the future. :-P

I'm surprised Pintsize doesn't have a projector set up flashing this song "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU" while people do their business.

And.....

I place my bet on Dora/Tai on comic 2800ish.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Midwesterner on 17 Aug 2012, 07:56
I place my bet on Dora/Tai on comic 2800ish.

Which will be three days from now in QC World.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 17 Aug 2012, 08:02
I place my bet on Dora/Tai on comic 2800ish.

Which will be three days from now in QC World.

Gonna go out like a supernova baby! 3 days? Eh, depends.  If Jeph decides on a new space-esque in length arc, could be longer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Aug 2012, 08:10
You know that we call the author of this comic by his name: Jeph - please remember to get it right.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Madmartigan on 17 Aug 2012, 08:12
You should know by now that we call the author of this comic by his name: Jeph.

Hey man. Sleeping 10 hours makes your brain fuzzy.  First typo of his name I've ever done.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 17 Aug 2012, 09:12
Fair enough; you'll see that I changed my wording after I checked and realised that (and before I saw your reply).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Aug 2012, 09:57
Tweets are secondary canon, subject to being overridden by the comic (http://jephjacques.com/post/10973725252/qa-dump-06).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 17 Aug 2012, 18:03
So what SHOULD Pintsize do?

Do something outside, regardless of whether or not it would get him arrested.    1 (3.1%)
Take up painting.    0 (0%)
Robot Yoga.    0 (0%)
Bible Study.    1 (3.1%)
Work on being a better companion to Marten.    2 (6.3%)
Go with what you know - small-scale mayhem.    9 (28.1%)
Ponder the meaning of life, the universe - everything.    1 (3.1%)
Forget that and go back to wallpapering the bathroom with macro-anuses.    1 (3.1%)
Visit the AnthroPC zoo (aka the kitchen appliances).    0 (0%)
Two words: cake mix.    4 (12.5%)
MOAR TAI-DORA!    6 (18.8%)
Waffles.    0 (0%)
Spathe Ham.    0 (0%)
Just be you, Pintsize. Just be you.    7 (21.9%)

Total Members Voted: 32

---

Heads up to y'all: another work weekend, tied with the joys of getting another computer set up and running, may mean I won't be around Sunday AM to start up a new WCDT.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bunnyThor on 17 Aug 2012, 19:57
Man, I hope Faye and Angus don't break up. He's been really good for her.


How can you tell? We haven't seen him in 137 strips. I was beginning to hope that Jeph had put him on a bus, then this strip showed up.


And I'll spare everyone my rants about Angus; they are almost as boring as he is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Aug 2012, 20:28
It suggests a non-boring question, though. What kind of person do you imagine being best for The Pugnacious Peach? It would have to be a new character.

Educated, assertive, quick-witted, compassionate come to mind as desiderata. There's too much history for Sven 2.0 to be an option.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: akronnick on 17 Aug 2012, 21:08
Educated, assertive, quick-witted, compassionate come to mind as desiderata.

Too bad there isn't anyone in the strip already with any of these qualities.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 17 Aug 2012, 22:25
Well, there is one character who is extensively self-educated and quick-witted, certainly assertive and occasionally capable of demonstrating compassion.

Pintsize and the Peach. OTP.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 17 Aug 2012, 22:26
Is there anyone here that doesn't detest at least one of the characters? Just curious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Omega Entity on 17 Aug 2012, 22:36
Educated, assertive, quick-witted, compassionate come to mind as desiderata. There's too much history for Sven 2.0 to be an option.

Angus isn't those things?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 17 Aug 2012, 23:10
Is there anyone here that doesn't detest at least one of the characters? Just curious.

Won't speak for anyone else, but I try not to get the BP too elevated about people who don't exist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 17 Aug 2012, 23:24
Won't speak for anyone else, but I try not to get the BP too elevated about people who don't exist.

I strongly suspect that no-one here does - rather, their BP gets elevated about someone who does exist. of whom some QC character reminds them. Hence the QC character becomes their metaphorical punching bag.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 17 Aug 2012, 23:31
Won't speak for anyone else, but I try not to get the BP too elevated about people who don't exist.

I strongly suspect that no-one here does - rather, their BP gets elevated about someone who does exist. of whom some QC character reminds them. Hence the QC character becomes their metaphorical punching bag.

Point. I do recall one such poster whose expressed hatred of Faye was truly astounding -- and it turned out, after other posters engaged her in conversation, Faye was pretty much a stand-in for a person who had done her a grievous wrong.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Aug 2012, 00:21
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transference

Come to think of it, Pintsize has made more than one advance toward The Pugnacious Peach. I will now try to forget the idea. Purple elephants purple elephants purple elephants.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 18 Aug 2012, 00:22
Welcome to the QC forums, where we nurse thousand-year grudges against fictional constructions. :mrgreen:

Seriously though, the only reason anyone actually hates Angus, it seems, is they were one of the people who were sure Marten and Faye were going to fuck, that she owed him a fuck, and were absolutely flabbergasted when Jeph basically went "Never happening."

Or he's supposedly 'boring', which I'm like, dude freestyles a Trojan War riff of Single Ladies and loves 'Africa'. You are wrong, bunnyThor. (No hostility, but you are.)

That's my take, anyhow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dust on 18 Aug 2012, 01:09
Won't speak for anyone else, but I try not to get the BP too elevated about people who don't exist.

I strongly suspect that no-one here does - rather, their BP gets elevated about someone who does exist. of whom some QC character reminds them. Hence the QC character becomes their metaphorical punching bag.

What if they remind us of someone who doesn't exist? My Tai-dislike largely stems from her being just a Hawaiian shirt, '50s lingo and a Comic Exaggeration boost away from becoming Quagmire.

But that's just me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Aug 2012, 01:46
Giggidy?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 18 Aug 2012, 02:07
It's all relative in the hatred, people get worked up over the silliest of things, THAT said, people do tend to stick hatred for things that don't truly exist but are similar to a real life person they have a grudge as a way to cope with hating a real person..

That said, If anyone goes out of their way to compare people they know to comic book characters they'll be able to do it eventually, doesn't make it true though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 18 Aug 2012, 02:08
I'm pretty neutral toward the QC cast, overall. I mean, my biggest pet peeve is combining ignorance and arrogance (read: being a f***tard (you know what I mean, I hope), a troll, or a politician), and none of the cast has displayed those qualities.

That's not to say there haven't been moments that haven't left me with a sense of "Why would you do that?" but that's also true in real life, anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 18 Aug 2012, 02:26
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transference

Come to think of it, Pintsize has made more than one advance toward The Pugnacious Peach. I will now try to forget the idea. Purple elephants purple elephants purple elephants.

... boners? (:

What if they remind us of someone who doesn't exist? My Tai-dislike largely stems from her being just a Hawaiian shirt, '50s lingo and a Comic Exaggeration boost away from becoming Quagmire.

I'm kinda glad you brought that up, because that is a different type of dislike... the one I was referring to is where you're 'immersed' in the character and dislike them... the other is when you dislike the characterisation, because it does not seem real to you at all, and you can't relate. I've seen that as well. I haven't felt it myself, but I can comprehend it more readily.

I'm pretty neutral toward the QC cast, overall. I mean, my biggest pet peeve is combining ignorance and arrogance (read: being a f***tard (you know what I mean, I hope), a troll, or a politician), and none of the cast has displayed those qualities.

I do know what you mean - that's pretty much how I feel as well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Dust on 18 Aug 2012, 06:52

I'm kinda glad you brought that up, because that is a different type of dislike... the one I was referring to is where you're 'immersed' in the character and dislike them... the other is when you dislike the characterisation, because it does not seem real to you at all, and you can't relate. I've seen that as well. I haven't felt it myself, but I can comprehend it more readily.

Fair point - her mild hovering over a couple I could buy from a background character, then she 'made the opening credits' and I didn't care for her. Especially the "forcing the matter again while she was drunk still didn't get me laid.. better put her on the spot, to hell with her unresolved issues." strips. I just got the feeling a hair-doll would have come into play if that didn't work - again, maybe that's just me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Aug 2012, 07:27
Won't speak for anyone else, but I try not to get the BP too elevated about people who don't exist.

I strongly suspect that no-one here does - rather, their BP gets elevated about someone who does exist. of whom some QC character reminds them. Hence the QC character becomes their metaphorical punching bag.

DINGDINGDINGDING! We have a winnah!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bunnyThor on 18 Aug 2012, 13:23
Welcome to the QC forums, where we nurse thousand-year grudges against fictional constructions. :emotrex:

Seriously though, the only reason anyone actually hates Angus, it seems, is they were one of the people who were sure Marten and Faye were going to fuck, that she owed him a fuck, and were absolutely flabbergasted when Jeph basically went "Never happening."

Or he's supposedly 'boring', which I'm like, dude freestyles a Trojan War riff of Single Ladies and loves 'Africa'. You are wrong, bunnyThor. (No hostility, but you are.)

That's my take, anyhow.


If Angus isn't boring, then where's he been for the last 296 strips? I posit that the surest indicator of which characters are interesting are which characters Jeph is inspired to write about in a featured role.  Other characters, for the most part, only show up as a prop for the main characters to react to or to witness the main characters' actions.


So who is currently interesting? Marten, Faye, Dora, Tai, Hanners, Momo, Marigold, and Pintsize.


Who isn't currently interesting? Steve, Cosette, Penelope, Wil, Raven, Jimbo, Amir, Angus, and (sadly) Sven.


And as to the specifics, almost any one of the characters is or has been a vehicle for witty/snarky/obscure riffs. Those are the kind of characters Jeph writes.


And preferring "Africa" to any of Toto's other songs is so obvious, it makes him less interesting. First of all 99% of all 20-somethings--if they are aware of the music of Toto at all--are only going to know the Top 10 hits: "Hold The Line", "Rosanna", "Africa", and "I Won't Hold You Back". Out of all of those, "Africa" was by far their biggest hit, and is their song that has best stood the test of time. Hell, "Africa" is my favorite Toto song, and I grew up during the time that their songs were actually new. If you go to the iTunes store, you can see that "Africa" is the #1 download (as well as #4, #6, and #9). "Africa" is really the only possible answer that you could give to the question, unless you are a music geek like Marten, or a soft rock hater like Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 18 Aug 2012, 14:33
Who isn't currently interesting? [...] (sadly) Sven.

Why "sadly"?  If he's not interesting, then you should be glad he's not taking up your time, and if he is interesting then your logic collapses.

There are too many characters to keep in the limelight all at once, and so Jeph's attention wanders where his mood and the story-lines take him; that is not necessarily any judgement on the characters, and in fact Jeph has fairly recently said (if I recall correctly) that it is not impossible for any character to appear again, except one (presumably Sara).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Aug 2012, 16:04
I thought he had written off Padma as well? (Though not to death by allosaurus, though)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Aug 2012, 16:26
Well she's out west for now, we don't know what the future will bring.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mothykins on 18 Aug 2012, 16:55
Is there anyone here that doesn't detest at least one of the characters? Just curious.

/raises hand

Personally, I like all of the characters, to a degree. They have interesting neuroses or satisfying character development or a nice design. Something that makes them interesting. I focus more on that than on their inevitable slip-ups.

Also might help that I'm not one for grudges irl, but meh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 18 Aug 2012, 19:58
And preferring "Africa" to any of Toto's other songs is so obvious, it makes him less interesting.

Wait... are you saying that he's not hipsterish enough for you?

(yes I'm being slightly mischevious, but only slightly)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Aug 2012, 20:39
I'll say now what I did then..."Africa" is the only Toto song I know.  I mean, sure, I know of a couple others, but "Africa" is the only one I can actually think of and hear in my head without external sources.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: iduguphergrave on 18 Aug 2012, 23:18
And preferring "Africa" to any of Toto's other songs is so obvious, it makes him less interesting.

Wait... are you saying that he's not hipsterish enough for you?

(yes I'm being slightly mischevious, but only slightly)

Hipster trap sprung
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 18 Aug 2012, 23:59
I didn't even know it by its name "Africa" until Angus brought it up.
And I'm thankful to Pintsize for letting me discover "Hold the Line".

Yeah, so I didn't get into music properly until a few years ago. I'm sorry. :(

Edit: Could somebody please clarify for me what emotion  :mrgreen: is suppose to convey? I mean, it's the dinosaur from Qwantz, right? What else?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Aug 2012, 00:28
Written out permanently:
Quote from: Jeph
Sarah, Ellen, Nat, any chance at happiness for Marten
http://jephjacques.com/post/11265563239/qa-dump-09
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 19 Aug 2012, 00:30
Knowing Pintsize it's probably animals anyway.
Nope (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2254) (yes, I answered with a link to the previous comic, so what?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 19 Aug 2012, 01:55
I don't sincerely hate any of the characters. But Tai has always rubbed me the wrong way, for some reason, and the way Faye has treated her friends in the past sometimes bothers me. Nobody really reminds me of anyone I know, except I totally saw this dude who looked like Angus every time I went to a particular class. He was always sitting on a bench and either reading or chatting. So, no, I don't have any emotions toward the characters because of people I know, so I also don't have any preferences that are due to people I like, either. Oh, and Marigold's old self bothered me some because she represented what people think people like me are like. She's gotten much more pleasant  since then.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 19 Aug 2012, 02:24
Could somebody please clarify for me what emotion  :mrgreen: is suppose to convey? I mean, it's the dinosaur from Qwantz, right? What else?

We just like it.  Don't you ever feel like a snarky dinosaur?

I used it for the admin status because I am a dinosaur.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 19 Aug 2012, 05:39
So what SHOULD Pintsize do?

Do something outside, regardless of whether or not it would get him arrested.    2 (5.1%)
Take up painting.    0 (0%)
Robot Yoga.    0 (0%)
Bible Study.    1 (2.6%)
Work on being a better companion to Marten.    2 (5.1%)
Go with what you know - small-scale mayhem.    10 (25.6%)
Ponder the meaning of life, the universe - everything.    2 (5.1%)
Forget that and go back to wallpapering the bathroom with macro-anuses.    1 (2.6%)
Visit the AnthroPC zoo (aka the kitchen appliances).    0 (0%)
Two words: cake mix.    5 (12.8%)
MOAR TAI-DORA!    7 (17.9%)
Waffles.    0 (0%)
Spathe Ham.    0 (0%)
Just be you, Pintsize. Just be you.    9 (23.1%)

Total Members Voted: 39
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Aug 2012, 09:57
Written out permanently:
Quote from: Jeph
Sarah, Ellen, Nat, any chance at happiness for Marten
http://jephjacques.com/post/11265563239/qa-dump-09 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11265563239/qa-dump-09)
Until they're not. I'm not saying Jeph will (or should) change his mind, I'm saying he might. Also, the possibility that he'll change his mind is what keeps that from being a spoiler.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 19 Aug 2012, 10:58
And before this wraps up, a photo today from Fark:

(http://i759.photobucket.com/albums/xx237/EccentricaG/TotoKansas.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 19 Aug 2012, 15:24
Orrrr... Jeph just left out the little "Moments Later" caption.
Yeah, seeing as how we should all have pretty good idea by now of how long "taking care of business" takes.

By the way, I suggest you don't do a Google image search on anus. Spoiled my dreams? Wrecked 'em.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bunnyThor on 19 Aug 2012, 20:15
And preferring "Africa" to any of Toto's other songs is so obvious, it makes him less interesting.

Wait... are you saying that he's not hipsterish enough for you?

(yes I'm being slightly mischevious, but only slightly)


No, I'm saying that in that regard, he is typical. Being typical makes one less interesting. Being atypical makes one more interesting. Not that being interesting is always a good thing. "May you live in Interesting Times.")

Who isn't currently interesting? [...] (sadly) Sven.

Why "sadly"?  If he's not interesting, then you should be glad he's not taking up your time, and if he is interesting then your logic collapses.


"Sadly" because he used to be interesting. In fact, he was very interesting. But right now he's not interesting, and that's a damn shame. He used to spark, and now he just broods. Pity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2251-2255 (13-17 August 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Aug 2012, 23:36
He's retreating to build up to doing something new.