THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 19 Jan 2013, 22:32

Title: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 19 Jan 2013, 22:32
A bit of a change for a poll this week, since we're focused a bit on libraries...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2013, 23:02
I've seen none of these.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 20 Jan 2013, 02:11
I'm torn between the games-not-on-library-machines and the robot. I went for the robot because I built the offending device.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 20 Jan 2013, 03:19
I seem to remember that one time the school library had boxes of toilet paper all over the desks. They were there one day, and gone the next. And it wasn't just a few either, it was like enough to stock a super market for a week, just huge amounts.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: PintsizeForPresident on 20 Jan 2013, 04:46
I have never encountered something really weird in a library. One amusing example was a law student, asleep on top of his study books, in the library of the astronomy department at my university. Law students often came to our library because it was a lot quieter than their own one. At least, until they arrived. They had a tendency to bray (is that the right word? "Talking" would not do them justice) loudly about the latest case they were studying.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 20 Jan 2013, 05:14
Not something I've seen myself, but I know lots of librarians and library staff through Edith and one day they were all exchanging stories about library users who pooed in the library. Apparently it's more common than you'd think, and not only children either...

Also, oi, I don't bray!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 20 Jan 2013, 07:22
I feel incredibly stupid for not having "Using the stacks as a toilet" option.  :psyduck:

OFF TOPIC: Anyone think Psyduck should be changed to where he's doing "Opa Gangam Style"? ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Jan 2013, 07:26
A librarian friend of ours had to remove a student (apparently drunk) who had removed all of her clothes and had gone to sleep on the floor. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2013, 07:27
@Joseph - No. Just...no.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 20 Jan 2013, 10:03
Rather lame by these standards; the strangest thing in my college library was this bit of graffiti:

"Pope John Paul I - Patron saint of limited-term employees."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Jan 2013, 10:55
Better than "heart attack patients"! 

I've not only seen people dropping acid in the stacks, I was an offender... but you needed multiple choices, because I've seen sex in the stacks and drinking (not sodas), swordfights, and all sorts of unusual behaviour. 

Then again, the Purdue library stacks used to comprise 5 densely packed floors, and it's really impossible to tell what the fuck's going on in there. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 20 Jan 2013, 12:07
Multiple choices for "weirdest"?

... it's a tie, then?

Mine is a boring life: I cannot recall having seen anything I'd call weird at a library.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 20 Jan 2013, 14:07
Wait, sword fights in the stacks are unusual?
Or are you talking about actual steel blades and not whatever was to hand?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Jan 2013, 14:10
Epees and sabres.  No masks, though. 


Bloody fencers...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 20 Jan 2013, 14:58
Nothing weird unfortunately, but I have just this week seen a photo of a sign allegedly placed in a library stating that various Lance Armstrong books were to be moved to the fiction section.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: miados on 20 Jan 2013, 15:24
I was watching the first episode of every anime they had in the college library to decide if the anime club wanted to show any of them. oddly enough the only reason they had any was because we donated part of our club budget to allow them to have anime in the library. anyway there i was with my portable dvd play and a stack of anime watching the start of about a dozen series taking notes on the genre, age rating, voice acting quality, and percieved target audience to give to the others with power in the club so we could decide on our shows.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 20 Jan 2013, 17:39
I hate the fact that Flattr button is too close to the QC forums link. I try to pinpoint to the QCF link, and that damn Flattr button pops up and completely obscures the QCF link. ARGH!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 20 Jan 2013, 18:09
Wait, sword fights in the stacks are unusual?
Or are you talking about actual steel blades and not whatever was to hand?
Epees and sabres.  No masks, though. 


Bloody fencers...
I reckon tinfoil and spoons counts as "whatever was to hand" personally…

(I am not a fan of most 'sport' martial art forms)

Also, my old school library did have, in the reference section, what seemed to be every issue of Punch Magazine ever printed and as subscription to the new ones. Never found out why, but it would have explained some of the faculty....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 20 Jan 2013, 18:39
I hate the fact that Flattr button is too close to the QC forums link. I try to pinpoint to the QCF link, and that damn Flattr button pops up and completely obscures the QCF link. ARGH!!!

I second that
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Jan 2013, 19:33
Moved and seconded.  All in favor? 

(Aye!)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 20 Jan 2013, 20:25
I like it where it is because it means it's less likely that my IRL friends won't find me. :mrgreen:

No, seriously, I don't want them to come on here and guess who I am. >_>
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 20 Jan 2013, 21:38
*GROAN*


The weirdest thing to happen in my high school library was for all the goth kids to show up one day and just start playing Yugioh on the floor in the middle of the research area. I mean, I was the VP of the Trading Card Club, but this was an unsanctioned event...they should have come to me or the Prez first.

The weirdest thing to happen in my college library was going down to the stacks one morning, to find some research materials, opening the particular stack, and having some dumbshit pot-head fall out from them. Apparently he had gotten wasted, wandered in there, and when they closed on him, instead of walking out (they're motorized but really slow), he crawled up onto an empty shelf and fell asleep.

When the police questioned him, it turned out he wasn't even a UConn student...he was from Eastern, the college about fifteen miles away.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 20 Jan 2013, 22:15
My high school library had a racist anthropology book from 1925.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 20 Jan 2013, 23:30
I saw a small elastic band battle during high school. Mind you, the students involved were in years 10 and 11 (in Australia, year 12 is your last year of school, just for reference).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Truec on 20 Jan 2013, 23:47
Marten what not do well in my archery course.  5 pushups for being caught with your hands in your pockets, 10 for using the word 'what'. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 20 Jan 2013, 23:51
...and here... we... go.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: BluishJeans on 20 Jan 2013, 23:59
Marten and working out. Okay, let this sink in for a minute. :mrgreen:

I'm envisioning a training montage with a disappointed, exhausted Marten at the end. What about you guys?
Also, what's up with all the hate for puns, I liked Claire's joke ^^'
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 21 Jan 2013, 00:00
Nothing weird unfortunately, but I have just this week seen a photo of a sign allegedly placed in a library stating that various Lance Armstrong books were to be moved to the fiction section.
Apparently Genuine. I'm in Canberra now, but that's Manly library alright.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Adjamemnon on 21 Jan 2013, 00:01
To answer the poll question, as I put down "Other":

Funniest:  Someone wrote "JESUS SAVES" on the bathroom stall, and someone added "you money on a new or used vehicle."

Weirdest:  A she-male porn mag left in the bathroom.  This was in a college library where the nearest porn store was one town over, about an hour away.  So someone not only brought their own porn to a college bathroom, they left it there.

or

Same college library, different restroom; it had a reputation for being very "cruisy."  There was always a ton of graffiti on the stalls, making it clear what people going in there could expect at certain times if they tapped their foot, etc.  In an effort to combat having to clean off all the pen and pencil marks on the stalls, the janitors installed a bulletin board, complete with supplies of paper and pencils, and a message asking people to use that instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 21 Jan 2013, 00:01
Jeph, I'm not sure who keeps telling you your puns are lame, but they've clearly never met my family. :P
Personally I think that one's very clever.

I especially like Claire's tendency to hold her grin (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2305) for a while after making a joke. Nice character quirk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 21 Jan 2013, 00:04
I hate the fact that Flattr button is too close to the QC forums link. I try to pinpoint to the QCF link, and that damn Flattr button pops up and completely obscures the QCF link. ARGH!!!
I second that

Thirded.

@Comic:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 21 Jan 2013, 00:06
Also, what's up with all the hate for puns, I liked Claire's joke ^^'
No reaction. No groan. No return sally.
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 21 Jan 2013, 00:45
I feel incredibly stupid for not having "Using the stacks as a toilet" option.  :psyduck:

I've seen that, unfortunately...

Quote
OFF TOPIC: Anyone think Psyduck should be changed to where he's doing "Opa Gangam Style"? ;)

YES!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 21 Jan 2013, 00:53
Also, what's up with all the hate for puns, I liked Claire's joke ^^'
No reaction. No groan. No return sally.
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.

We'll see. It sort of depends on Martens reason for not replying - it might be an attempt at teasing or something.

Seems to me that Claire and Marten are getting along quite well. That does probably not mean that they're going to get involved or anything, but they do seem to become real friends, I think.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 21 Jan 2013, 01:17
Marten gets well along with everyone, doesn't he?

... well, except Clinton, perhaps ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 21 Jan 2013, 01:49
Marten gets well along with everyone, doesn't he?

Sure, but it doesn't seem Claire does. So even if it is business as usual for Marten, it will be more significant for her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 21 Jan 2013, 01:55
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.
That pun is flying on a wing and a prayer. Claire demonstrates that every girl likes to think she has a touch of Helen of Troy in her (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1732).

"If you liked it, then you shoulda pumped some iron for it. Wa-ah-oh!"

Puns are awesome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 21 Jan 2013, 03:54
Akima, your link sent me on a journey through old comics which ended 61 comics later with the realization I am running late for class and probably shouldn't be reading Space Wizards (http://questionablecontent.net/spacewizards.html).

Edit: And then the Dora-looking-at-Martens-porn-ordeal happened.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 21 Jan 2013, 04:52
[ ... ]
Edit: And then the Dora-looking-at-Martens-porn-ordeal happened.  :psyduck:

I can see men in black suits placing fingers on their ears. Most of them look serious. Some of them reach for pockets on the inside of their jackets. Short, slender metallic-looking sticks with rounded tops emerge.
They start moving towards you with quickening pace...

Quick, get out of here!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Blackjoker on 21 Jan 2013, 05:22
...her pun and expression make me think of Marten from when the comic started.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Jan 2013, 05:42
Marten and working out. Okay, let this sink in for a minute.

Marten already exercises (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=993).

I hate the fact that Flattr button is too close to the QC forums link. I try to pinpoint to the QCF link, and that damn Flattr button pops up and completely obscures the QCF link. ARGH!!!

(1) Haven't you bookmarked the forum yet?
(2) You need to develop your wrist control. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 21 Jan 2013, 05:55

(1) Haven't you bookmarked the forum yet?


Psh, bookmarking is for sissies. I start typing forums.q and then go down the required number of times, then hit enter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 21 Jan 2013, 05:57
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.
That pun is flying on a wing and a prayer.

Puns are awesome.

Depends on the pun, that one lacked some strength.

I do have to say that the interaction between Marten and Claire seems very natural and unforced.  Well done.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 21 Jan 2013, 06:03
I've signed up at a senior dating site. My first effort at describing myself and my preferences is lame. But I ask that a companion recognize and acknowledge puns quickly, with a groan, a chuckle or a punch. Doesn't matter which. Marten flunks.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 21 Jan 2013, 06:21
And push ups don't really build shoulder muscles, do they?

Not when there's no muscles to build. Poor Marten. Poor, poor unmuscular Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 21 Jan 2013, 06:24
Protein drinks. That's what Marten needs. Along with some steriods. Then the pushups might help.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Finvara on 21 Jan 2013, 06:46
Also, what's up with all the hate for puns, I liked Claire's joke ^^'
No reaction. No groan. No return sally.
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.

See, that's a great pun. I thought Claire's pun was great, too. Marten's just sore he was Delt a bad hand.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Jan 2013, 07:01

(1) Haven't you bookmarked the forum yet?


Psh, bookmarking is for sissies. I start typing forums.q and then go down the required number of times, then hit enter.

"Option-W - porn? That's weird." (http://)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 21 Jan 2013, 07:49
I liked Claire's pun too! I can't think of a single exercise that will alter the shape of Marten's shoulders though. I suppose he could do some weirdly-specific exercises that would bulk up the muscles around them, but basically it's down to bone structure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hakko504 on 21 Jan 2013, 07:54

(1) Haven't you bookmarked the forum yet?


Psh, bookmarking is for sissies. I start typing forums.q and then go down the required number of times, then hit enter.
Me too. The fact that QC is usually the first item in that list is both disturbing and convenient.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ElvisRevenge on 21 Jan 2013, 08:40
Dude, the second I saw that Marten agreed that Hannelore was pretty, I RAN MY ASS OVER TO THIS FORUM.

And what do I find?

NOBODY TALKING ABOUT IT!

It's like I'm the only one even TRYING to ship these two.

HARUMPH
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 21 Jan 2013, 08:44
Mainly because any shipping that involves Hannelore is frowned on, due to it exceeding the creepy threshold almost all the time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Finvara on 21 Jan 2013, 08:45
I was under the impression that ALL shipping was frowned upon here, regardless of how cute or hot some couples might be, or how amusingly ill advised other couples would be.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 21 Jan 2013, 08:52
I can't think of a single exercise that will alter the shape of Marten's shoulders though. I suppose he could do some weirdly-specific exercises that would bulk up the muscles around them, but basically it's down to bone structure.

Could always get some tips from Jesslyn. (https://dl.dropbox.com/u/86901301/MISC/Jesslyn.jpg) Dat pre-transition denial and attempting to "masculinize" the feelings away.

Shipping Hannelore

Inconceivable!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 21 Jan 2013, 08:53
Also, what's up with all the hate for puns, I liked Claire's joke ^^'
No reaction. No groan. No return sally.
I'll go out on a limb and say this relationship has no future. Though that's a matter of a pinion.

See, that's a great pun. I thought Claire's pun was great, too.

 No, she must be pun-ished (?).

 
 
We'll see. It sort of depends on Martens reason for not replying - it might be an attempt at teasing or something.

 Jeph said:
Quote
If he had responded it only would have encouraged her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ElvisRevenge on 21 Jan 2013, 08:54
WELL I'M IN THE THICK OF IT NOW

(http://www.allaboutshipping.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/ships/ship2.jpg)

RAISE THE ANCHOR, BITCHES!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Finvara on 21 Jan 2013, 08:56
Great puns NEED encouragement! You don't want her to feel guilty about her urge to be an artist, her medium the pun! What would this world come to if she felt guilty, hiding her puns like a Red Skelton in her closet?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 21 Jan 2013, 09:00
And no comments about Claire's face/reaction in the third panel?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 21 Jan 2013, 09:06
I just realized it slipped my mind what a push-up specifically meant in English (Armhävningar) and when I googled it I got a bunch of links and pictures of push-up bras.  :psyduck:

I guess because we don't translate that part ("push-up bra" -> "push-up behå"), so it gets more prominent on our searches.

And no comments about Claire's face/reaction in the third panel?

Edit: Opps. Thought of the wrong one. Yeah, yay blush-attacks. :3
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 21 Jan 2013, 09:21
(_)

We can start the pun jar at Claire, then we'll pass it around until everyone in violation has put in their dues. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Jan 2013, 09:33
It's like I'm the only one even TRYING to ship these two.

You will find this addressed in the stickies at the top of this forum, especially in the "Conduct in this forum" thread.  This reads like a historical document now, because the forum has changed - but anyway, we find plenty to talk about without the shipping, and the fact is that uncontrolled shipping pretty quickly leads back to the bad behaviour.  Note that discussion arising from the actual interaction of the characters in the comic need not be seen as shipping - but once it calls itself shipping, then its agenda is seen to have changed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Xader on 21 Jan 2013, 10:18
Hey Marten!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 21 Jan 2013, 10:54
I swear Jeph made this comic just as an excuse to draw Claire-faces again. Blush, Bad Joke 'Eh, eh?', and Pout all made guest appearances!

Damnit, I thought it strange Zoe would have fucked up a spelling that badly; she's usually pretty conscientious-seeming about that sort of thing. I didn't *actually* get it until Akima. Thanks for the assist, also I love/hate you both. >:(  (bonus points to Finvara)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 21 Jan 2013, 10:55
Quote from: Jeph
If he had responded it only would have encouraged her.

Quote from: A sign on an office door somewhere
Incorrigible punster.

Do not incorrige.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 21 Jan 2013, 10:59
Also as to exercising...I can't think of any exercises off the top of my head that would work *directly* on shoulder/shoulderblade region muscles, but quite a few of the arm exercises should have an effect.

Actually it occurs to me that weighted shoulder-shrugs are a thing too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 21 Jan 2013, 11:43
I swear Jeph made this comic just as an excuse to draw Claire-faces again. Blush, Bad Joke 'Eh, eh?', and Pout all made guest appearances!
[ ... ]
Also  :psyduck:-face. (Does that count as a pun?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 21 Jan 2013, 11:53
And no comments about Claire's face/reaction in the third panel?  :psyduck:

Actually, I'm just wondering if she ever paid Cosette the $20 and copped a feel (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2301). I think she's earned it by now. Man up, Steve!  >:D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Jan 2013, 12:43
Shipping Hannelore

Inconceivable!

A good pun since she's on the Pill.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 21 Jan 2013, 13:22
I'm shocked at it being Marten being that cold over a pun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 21 Jan 2013, 14:32
Dude, the second I saw that Marten agreed that Hannelore was pretty, I RAN MY ASS OVER TO THIS FORUM.

And what do I find?

NOBODY TALKING ABOUT IT!

It's like I'm the only one even TRYING to ship these two.


Sorry dude, but Marten knows better than anyone in-comic (and most of us readers know even better than that) that he and Hannelore have no future as a couple, not with those issues she has about sex and even kissing being icky and nasty. He'd have a better shot at stealing Faye away from Angus, or running off to California chasing Padma (and we all know his chances of succeeding at either of those range somewhere between nanometer-slim and none).

Basically, shipping Marten and Hannelore is a waste of time; heck, shipping Hannelore and ANYONE is a waste of time, her issues simply preclude her having a full romantic and sexual relationship. And yeah, the mods kinda frown on it anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Halloween Jack on 21 Jan 2013, 14:54
I've worked in a library for many years, and the weirdest thing that I've seen is someone come into the library to sell steaks--not from a fundraising catalog, but steaks that had obviously just "fallen off a truck." They were a little put out when I kicked them out. I've occasionally caught people getting or about to get sexual, and more often come across evidence of same (pages in certain books stuck together, used condoms in wastebaskets), but that's really not unusual--it was well known at one of the universities that I attended that a certain men's room on one of the less-used floors of the university library was the campus cruising spot.

Also, Marten doing some exercise that built up only his deltoids would make him look like one of those World of Warcraft avatars that are really skinny but have huge shoulder pads. He should look into some basic weightlifting; there's a school of thought that says that, unless you're a bodybuilder, you really only need to do the overhead press, the bench press, and the squat to stay in shape.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 21 Jan 2013, 15:15
(_)

We can start the pun jar at Claire, then we'll pass it around until everyone in violation has put in their dues.

Should be able to get enough for a round of drinks...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 21 Jan 2013, 20:27
Oh come on Marten!!!

That was a damned good pun.

 :x
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 21 Jan 2013, 21:13
(_)

We can start the pun jar at Claire, then we'll pass it around until everyone in violation has put in their dues.

Should be able to get enough for a round of drinks...
Or perhaps a round of pizza.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2013, 21:20
Yeah, I was also surprised at Marten's complete non-reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 21 Jan 2013, 21:25
I dunno if I'd say that's a non-reaction. Deadpan glare?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2013, 21:34
I dunno, doesn't really look like deadpan or a glare to me. But that'd be just as bad, come on, Marten. That was a solid pun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 21 Jan 2013, 21:40
At least MarBear and Momo gave it a thought... (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2305)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2013, 21:42
Yeah, but that wasn't a clever pun, that was just mean.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 21 Jan 2013, 21:46
Mean, yet hilarious. It even got Emily's attention, and I'd imagine that can be difficult at times.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 21 Jan 2013, 22:48
Attention is easy. Focus is the one you want.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 21 Jan 2013, 23:38
Honestly, I know what Claire feels like, because I've been there. It's not a joke falling flat; you know it's good, and you know the audience knows it's good. It's more like they're reacting as though you've done a Bad Thing and are trying not to encourage it by giving you any attention, which is pretty demoralizing since you thought you were doing a Good Thing- jokes are fun, right? And then the second guessing sets in and you worry if you're a jerk, or they're jerks, or you should swear off puns altogether. Then 5 minutes later you make a joke about Dr. Hu being a President of China with two hearts.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hakko504 on 21 Jan 2013, 23:49
OK, seriously Emily, what are you taking? Maybe time to stop?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 21 Jan 2013, 23:52
OK, seriously Emily, what are you taking? Maybe time to stop?

IDK, Emily might seem borderline psychotic at times, but this was not one of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 21 Jan 2013, 23:54
Didn't we used to have a penalty box for these puns?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 21 Jan 2013, 23:59
I'm starting to wonder if Emily is in fact an alien using a human puppet to explore our world.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 22 Jan 2013, 00:04
Didn't we used to have a penalty box for these puns?
Only at the coffee shop. Unfortunately, the Library is Tai's domain, and as long as she gets stoned and watches Adventure Time on the clock, these ridiculous puns will continue to occur. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 22 Jan 2013, 00:11
As strange as it might be, it got me wondering, how do the "runners" celebrate their victory? By sticking out the thumb and pinky? (You know, like how some IRL runners raise their arms after crossing the finish line).

My mind goes weird places sometimes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2013, 00:12
I wonder whether Emily's brain works kind of like Jeph's.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 22 Jan 2013, 01:44
I did not see dongs. I did not see dongs. I did not see dongs.

Damit Emily! You're worse than Willis!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 22 Jan 2013, 01:47
Hahahahaha wonderful, this might be my favourite strip ever.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 22 Jan 2013, 01:47
Then 5 minutes later you make a joke about Dr. Hu being a President of China with two hearts.
I Xi what you did there, but that joke will soon be out of date.

I know how Emily feels. I had a similar reaction on discovering Hemingway's "A Farewell To Arms".

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 22 Jan 2013, 02:15
I remember I did that in class once.

Sat outside cackling for the whole lesson . . .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: shlominus on 22 Jan 2013, 02:28
panel #2, pic #2, epic!  :-D




ps:  :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LordVaughn on 22 Jan 2013, 03:43
I don't know why, but I found Emily's laughter on the third panel rather unsettling, as if the tone of her voice changed to make it boom through the library in a manner enough that by the time Marten hears it, it sounds like something outright demonic. And given this is a comic where there were at least three occurences of someone using eldritch speak, I can't say if this would be too out there or not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2013, 04:06
Yeah, Emily's reaction does not surprise me at all, and seeing that the last panel is almost certainly what's in her head at that moment, I get why she's laughing so hard. Arms race indeed.  :lol:

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 22 Jan 2013, 04:17
Let's have a hand for Claire, Emily and 2368.

Nope. Not sorry at all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 22 Jan 2013, 04:18
Sorry DSL, I only have two hands to give.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NoOne3 on 22 Jan 2013, 04:38
I can't think of a single exercise that will alter the shape of Marten's shoulders though.
Any small thing matter. Even a set of pushups, and chinups/pullups will make a difference, at least in the shoulders department.

Anyway, does anyone else can smell a possible plot development, where some of Marten's bros will fall for Claire, with possible mutuality? If asked for a little wing-help Marten might find himself in kind of a greek tragedy conflict there...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 22 Jan 2013, 04:45
Let's have a hand for Claire, Emily and 2368.

Nope. Not sorry at all.

You should be though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Latias on 22 Jan 2013, 06:02
Basically, shipping Marten and Hannelore is a waste of time; heck, shipping Hannelore and ANYONE is a waste of time, her issues simply preclude her having a full romantic and sexual relationship. And yeah, the mods kinda frown on it anyway.

Have you ever heard of asexuality? It's honestly kind of offensive that this is the attitude you take to relationships - "nobody can have meaningful relationships unless sex". Hey, if you need intimate contact in your relationships, that's cool - but to say that that's a prerequisite for all relationships is just ignorant.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: idontunderstand on 22 Jan 2013, 06:14
This comic is amazing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MugenHAN on 22 Jan 2013, 06:17
Hahahahaha wonderful, this might be my favourite strip ever.

I agree! Hands down, one of the best strips. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Jan 2013, 06:59
Hey, if you need intimate contact in your relationships, that's cool - but to say that that's a prerequisite for all relationships is just ignorant.

However, in the specific context of shipping, do you ever see non-sexual pairings?  Really?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 22 Jan 2013, 07:06
Hey, if you need intimate contact in your relationships, that's cool - but to say that that's a prerequisite for all relationships is just ignorant.

However, in the specific context of shipping, do you ever see non-sexual pairings?  Really?

That's what makes them creepy.   

That and the names....    Mannerlor?   Han-Tai?    Farten?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 22 Jan 2013, 07:17
I wonder whether Emily's brain works kind of like Jeph's.

I still think she's a tribute to Osaka (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayumu_Kasuga)...her last name is another tip of the hat.

That and the names....    Mannerlor?   Han-Tai?    Farten?
Oh boy, comedy material! Let's see...

Mannerlor: A type of fishing lure designed exclusively for the manliest of fishermen.

Han-tai: A Mai-tai, but stylized to resemble Han Solo.

Farten: ......I'm not going there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2013, 07:41
Mean, yet hilarious. It even got Emily's attention, and I'd imagine that can be difficult at times.
No, no, the pun was clever, the comment about how Clinton lost his hand wasn't.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: percivaltercy on 22 Jan 2013, 07:45
Library weirdness:
I go to the photocopy section.
There are separate stalls for each one of the 5 machines.
I hear giggling from the stall next to mine. I can't quite hold my curiosity. I climb on the chair to see over the stall wall, and there they are.
A couple of girls are using it to take "pics" of their asses and breasts.
They bothered to tell me why. Someone forgot their photocopy machine card inserted in the slot, and they thought that would be a funny way to use it.
That was quite a LOL.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Jan 2013, 07:48
Sorry DSL, I only have two hands to give.

But the Beatles had Eight Arms To Hold You. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help!_%28film%29)


(Whistles "I've Just Seen A Face" as I drop some semaphore flags into the pun jar)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2013, 07:55
Ok, so straight away, Emily's imaginings remind me of two Clive Barker stories, The Body Politic and Hell's Event.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: drewdane on 22 Jan 2013, 08:13
I wish I'd known a girl like Emily when I was young and single.   :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2013, 08:35
Maybe you did and never realized it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Cambyses on 22 Jan 2013, 08:37
I used to know someone who was a librarian, and he had plenty of stories of library weirdness.

1. The time someone snuck a box of Cheerios into the library, took it into the bathroom, scattered most of the contents on the floor, defecated into the box and set it on fire.

2. The time a severely unwashed man came to the desk asking if there were any books on how he could learn how to have sex for money.

3. The dude who brought a globe up to the reference desk and asked them to point out which countries were "with us."

4. The massive fight that erupted between two groups of kids in the children's section, resulting in a wooden mancala board being split in two.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: idontunderstand on 22 Jan 2013, 08:52
I've done it in a library.  :oops:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 22 Jan 2013, 08:54
I think dating or spending any significant time around Emily would be exhausting and confusing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2013, 09:05
Or a good source of inspiration for a horror writer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2013, 09:15
3. The dude who brought a globe up to the reference desk and asked them to point out which countries were "with us."
I'd point to the Rand McNally logo and tell him "don't trust anyone from there."
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 22 Jan 2013, 09:52
3. The dude who brought a globe up to the reference desk and asked them to point out which countries were "with us."
I'd point to the Rand McNally logo and tell him "don't trust anyone from there."
(click to show/hide)

I'd say, "Oh, you're one of those people who thinks it's round."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 22 Jan 2013, 10:00
Emily's laughing kinda reminds me of Hannelore's "EEEE"ing. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1708) I think it's Marten coming in from off panel is like Penelope in the last panel.

I also love this strip, Jeph has been expanding his drawing subjects lately and I love him for it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Blood-Tree on 22 Jan 2013, 12:08
I think Claire deserves a big thumbs up for this - it must have been hard to elbow that story into a conversation but it's paid off hand-somely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 22 Jan 2013, 12:39
Ba-doom tish! Yes, I know that I'm the last person who should point the finger.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaosWolf on 22 Jan 2013, 13:01
I won't lie - I scrolled down the image and, until I saw the hands on the end, I thought those were weirdly-drawn penises.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 22 Jan 2013, 15:11
The arms are wearing the hats......

yyeeeesssssss
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Shremedy on 22 Jan 2013, 15:36
This is a further note in Emily's "that gurl jest ain't right" file.  And a great lead-in for my movie idea, Arm-y of Dorkness.  The visualization is one that I might even come up with -- but the hysterical laughter?  I'd have to be at least four beers into a party to laugh like that.. 

Marten really should have acknowledged the pun, even if only with a visible wince; he's been guilty of the pun himself.  The beauty of a pun is in the "oy" of the beholder...

Quote
Invertebrate Punster; spinelessly unable to resist a pun.
Annoyed?  Slug Me!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 22 Jan 2013, 17:41
Misread that as Army of Dookness.

Suddenly FERRETS
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 22 Jan 2013, 17:55
Library weirdness:
I go to the photocopy section.
There are separate stalls for each one of the 5 machines.
I hear giggling from the stall next to mine. I can't quite hold my curiosity. I climb on the chair to see over the stall wall, and there they are.
A couple of girls are using it to take "pics" of their asses and breasts.
They bothered to tell me why. Someone forgot their photocopy machine card inserted in the slot, and they thought that would be a funny way to use it.
That was quite a LOL.

You kind of buried the lead here.....
The copiers in your library have SEPARATE STALLS? Is the copy room in a disused lavatory in the basement?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 22 Jan 2013, 18:04
Misread that as Army of Dookness.
Suddenly FERRETS

Gee thanks, and now I'm visualizing ferrets in hats marching lockstep and playing ukeleles.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2013, 19:49
You make me wish I could draw.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 22 Jan 2013, 19:59
I googled "Military ferret" and this is what I got:

(http://www.camerasnaps.org.uk/military/diamler-ferret-scout-car.jpg)

Apparently the "Ferret" was an APC used by the UK during the Cold War...so you've got the right idea. Just not fuzzy enough.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Eddurd on 22 Jan 2013, 20:14
I saw the last panel and immediately starting humming the "Chariots Of Fire" music.  Which I will now be going through my head ALL NIGHT. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: SJCrew on 22 Jan 2013, 20:28
I've always liked Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2013, 20:34
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2013, 21:32
International version...the vulva was about 244cm tall and wielded a cricket bat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 22 Jan 2013, 21:50
Jolly good, eh? *whack* Right in the knickers!

It does sound a bit terrifying though...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2013, 21:56
I never have dreams like that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaosWolf on 22 Jan 2013, 21:56
...I f##king DARE someone to draw her dream.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 22 Jan 2013, 21:57
Jolly good, eh? *whack* Right in the knickers!

It does sound a bit terrifying though...

It crossed over from being "amusingly terrifying" to "dark and horrible" the moment I imagined it speaking in one of the many varied regional accents of the UK.

That said,   sounds like she needs to make it go VOOM.   4,000 volts should do it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaosWolf on 22 Jan 2013, 22:04
That said,   sounds like she needs to make it go VOOM.   4,000 volts should do it.

Nah, you just need a couple AA batteries and a little free time to make those things go VOOM.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 22 Jan 2013, 22:06
Jolly good, eh? *whack* Right in the knickers!

It does sound a bit terrifying though...
It crossed over from being "amusingly terrifying" to "dark and horrible" the moment I imagined it speaking in one of the many varied regional accents of the UK.
Sing it in a cockney accent to the tune of 'Brick in the Wall.'

"If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?!" O__O;;
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2013, 22:08
I never have dreams like that.

Apparently to have such a dream you'd have to go without sex for an extended period of time. Probably weeks at least, maybe months. And I'm guessing you're not supposed to jerk off either. But that's an experiment I'm unwilling to undertake, so I couldn't tell you for sure.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2013, 22:14
Lends new meaning to the diagnosis of "vulvar pain".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 22 Jan 2013, 22:22
Baby batter is one thing, vulva batter is quite another.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 23 Jan 2013, 00:04
This strip reminded me of  this piece of feminist art  (http://www.trendhunter.com/trends/mimosa-pale-vulva-bicycle-taxi) by a fellow countryman. Somewhat NSFW (depending on your boss and place of employment) and no baseball bat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 23 Jan 2013, 00:54
In Finland they have Vulva taxis. In Sweden, I suppose they are Volvo taxis?
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_nmgDzu-mFsc/TNH7LZGwg1I/AAAAAAAAAAs/7copMaOWFnY/s400/Untitled.jpg)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Doc on 23 Jan 2013, 02:05
Her vulva must have pointy ears. Like Spock. He's a vulvan too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 23 Jan 2013, 04:03
International version...and wielded a cricket bat.

I think you're quite overestimating the spread of cricket outside of the Commonwealth, there. :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 23 Jan 2013, 04:05
Jolly good, eh? *whack* Right in the knickers!

It does sound a bit terrifying though...
It crossed over from being "amusingly terrifying" to "dark and horrible" the moment I imagined it speaking in one of the many varied regional accents of the UK.
Sing it in a cockney accent to the tune of 'Brick in the Wall.'

"If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?!" O__O;;

"We don't need no fornication
We dont need no self control
No dark sarcasm in the bedroom
Dora! leave them nards alone
Hey! Dora!! Leave them nards alone!
All in all it's just another dick in the --"

 :-o

This is what happens when Mr. Beltsander gets a FULL six hours of sleep.   
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 23 Jan 2013, 04:25
*Politely Applauds*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 23 Jan 2013, 04:44
Jolly good, eh? *whack* Right in the knickers!

It does sound a bit terrifying though...
It crossed over from being "amusingly terrifying" to "dark and horrible" the moment I imagined it speaking in one of the many varied regional accents of the UK.
Sing it in a cockney accent to the tune of 'Brick in the Wall.'

"If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?!" O__O;;

"We don't need no fornication
We dont need no self control
No dark sarcasm in the bedroom
Dora! leave them nards alone
Hey! Dora!! Leave them nards alone!
All in all it's just another dick in the --"

 :-o

This is what happens when Mr. Beltsander gets a FULL six hours of sleep.

Carry on then.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaosWolf on 23 Jan 2013, 06:25
I never have dreams like that.

Apparently to have such a dream you'd have to go without sex for an extended period of time. Probably weeks at least, maybe months. And I'm guessing you're not supposed to jerk off either. But that's an experiment I'm unwilling to undertake, so I couldn't tell you for sure.

If that were true I would have been having nightmares of being assaulted by my own genitalia repeatedly for the past few years.

Unless, of course, as you said, self-stimulation fights it off.  Then my genitals would be so pacifist they'd make the Dalai Lama seem like a boozed-up soccer hooligan.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 23 Jan 2013, 07:06
I never have dreams like that.
Apparently to have such a dream you'd have to go without sex for an extended period of time. Probably weeks at least, maybe months. And I'm guessing you're not supposed to jerk off either. But that's an experiment I'm unwilling to undertake, so I couldn't tell you for sure.
[ ... ]
Unless, of course, as you said, self-stimulation fights it off.  Then my genitals would be so pacifist they'd make the Dalai Lama seem like a boozed-up soccer hooligan.

We are SO FAR down right now the Japanese are going "NANI!?" at the sight of some forum posters' feet sticking out of the ground.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 23 Jan 2013, 07:50
I completely sympathise, Dora.  I went without sex for a month and a half once. My gf/fiance at the time had this crazy idea to refrain after we got engaged until the wedding. It got bad when I didn't even have to be asleep for things like this to happen. Luckily she came to her senses and ceased that little experiment.  I have made it a point to never neglect my vulva again.


My vulva and i have something of a co-dependent relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 23 Jan 2013, 09:08
I never have dreams like that.
Apparently to have such a dream you'd have to go without sex for an extended period of time. Probably weeks at least, maybe months. And I'm guessing you're not supposed to jerk off either. But that's an experiment I'm unwilling to undertake, so I couldn't tell you for sure.
[ ... ]
Unless, of course, as you said, self-stimulation fights it off.  Then my genitals would be so pacifist they'd make the Dalai Lama seem like a boozed-up soccer hooligan.

We are SO FAR down right now the Japanese are going "NANI!?" at the sight of some forum posters' feet sticking out of the ground.


Cricket-bat-armed vulvas singing classic rock in proper British accents...  Or soccer-hooligan-themed dicks drinking at the pub...   that's MILD compared to what the Japanese come up with.     

I mean... all I have to say is "tentacles" and leave it at that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 23 Jan 2013, 09:29
Hold on now, most of the time the tentacles don't wear trucker hats and lounge about a bar, waiting with their hockey sticks at hand for a passing victim.

Most of the time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 23 Jan 2013, 10:10
I've seen some interesting vulvas in my time, even British ones, but none that swung cricket bats or sang. Some of them were vocal, but I don;t know that I would call it "speaking".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 23 Jan 2013, 10:21
Hold on now, most of the time the tentacles don't wear trucker hats and lounge about a bar, waiting with their hockey sticks at hand for a passing victim.

Most of the time.

You've never accidentally walked into a lesbian-bar on Bull-Dyke Thursday by mistake have you?   :-o 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 23 Jan 2013, 10:24
Accidentally? By Mistake?

Hm...no, pretty certain never by mistake.  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: raoullefere on 23 Jan 2013, 11:24
God. Apparently couple portmanteaus are to me what sexy things are to Dora; I somehow sensed this post and homed in on the exact damn page to find it, too. All that just to say: Bleah! Hate 'em!

Just another of my many useless 'talents.'

Edit: another thought: if Marten does work out and really bulks up, will he still be able mope as effectively if his arms can no longer dangle, spindle-like, at his sides?



Yeah, I agree: I'd better stick to the anti-couple portmanteau-crusade.

Hey, if you need intimate contact in your relationships, that's cool - but to say that that's a prerequisite for all relationships is just ignorant.

However, in the specific context of shipping, do you ever see non-sexual pairings?  Really?

That's what makes them creepy.   

That and the names....    Mannerlor?   Han-Tai?    Farten?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 23 Jan 2013, 11:54
I completely sympathize, Dora. I went without sex for a month and a half once.
Seeing people complaining about this like a major, cocaine withdrawal level distraction always perplexes me, since I've gone 24 years without sex and I'm doing fine so far.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2013, 11:56
Welcome back!

Marten can still slouch and stare at the ceiling, and brood. Those skills cover most of what's needed for moping.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 23 Jan 2013, 13:29
if Marten does work out and really bulks up, will he still be able mope as effectively if his arms can no longer dangle, spindle-like, at his sides?
He could take lessons from Elliot.

Welcome back, Raoul!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Majicou83 on 23 Jan 2013, 14:25
How does a vulva even hold a baseball bat?  Let alone swing one...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 23 Jan 2013, 14:29
This is why. (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfFunny)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Majicou83 on 23 Jan 2013, 15:04
Pleh. I was hoping for a pun about how it became armed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Jan 2013, 17:26
I completely sympathize, Dora. I went without sex for a month and a half once.
Seeing people complaining about this like a major, cocaine withdrawal level distraction always perplexes me, since I've gone 24 years without sex and I'm doing fine so far.
While part of me agrees with you, part of me wants to point out that you've probably also gone 24 years without cocaine and you're probably doing fine with that, too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: crazdgamer on 23 Jan 2013, 17:34
Comic 2369, panel 1...

... what's happening in the window there?  What kind of store is that? What are they selling?  Why does it look like there's some Shakespearean production happening on the other side of the glass that we're not privy to?

I've been staring at it for 5 minutes.  Dora's vulva is clearly not the main focus of the comic. 

(... that's a weird sentence right there.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 23 Jan 2013, 17:39
Comic 2369, panel 1...

... what's happening in the window there?  What kind of store is that?
They're coming out of the Gym  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 23 Jan 2013, 17:42
Pleh. I was hoping for a pun about how it became armed.

Bat in, down the snatch?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Majicou83 on 23 Jan 2013, 17:43
Pleh. I was hoping for a pun about how it became armed.

Bat in, down the snatch?

Are you saying its been so long, now there are bats?

Also.. the window shapes are disturbing me now. I'm thinking Yoga. Or a Bandicoot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: crazdgamer on 23 Jan 2013, 17:50
Comic 2369, panel 1...

... what's happening in the window there?  What kind of store is that?
They're coming out of the Gym  :-D
I'm... not quite sure.  It's certainly possible, but they never actually said where they were going. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2363)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2013, 17:56
Are you saying its been so long, now there are bats?

Good callback (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=740).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 23 Jan 2013, 18:16
I gotta say I often feel like my reproductive organs are completely autonomous.  If they ever get separated from me (please let that never happen) I half believe they could get up and walk away and lead a very sexual life.

Wow that was a strange post  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 23 Jan 2013, 18:34
I completely sympathize, Dora. I went without sex for a month and a half once.
Seeing people complaining about this like a major, cocaine withdrawal level distraction always perplexes me, since I've gone 24 years without sex and I'm doing fine so far.

Seeing people say things like this always perplexes me, as I can not even fathom going that long without sex. I've gone through cocaine withdrawal, and I will take that over lack of sex any day. :)

Different people are different.

Is it possible there is a hump you can get over (no pun intended) where if you go past a certain amount of time without it the cravings cease, sort of like cigarettes?  Entirely possible, but I have never seen the point of trying.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 23 Jan 2013, 18:43
...............
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 23 Jan 2013, 18:52
Comic 2369, panel 1...

... what's happening in the window there?  What kind of store is that?
They're coming out of the Gym  :-D
I'm... not quite sure.  It's certainly possible, but they never actually said where they were going. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2363)

 But they're going to the gym since 996 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=996) - 1000.
 And they went again the day after. So, i guess they're kind of members right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Jan 2013, 20:31
I completely sympathize, Dora. I went without sex for a month and a half once.
Seeing people complaining about this like a major, cocaine withdrawal level distraction always perplexes me, since I've gone 24 years without sex and I'm doing fine so far.

Seeing people say things like this always perplexes me, as I can not even fathom going that long without sex. I've gone through cocaine withdrawal, and I will take that over lack of sex any day. :)

Different people are different.

Is it possible there is a hump you can get over (no pun intended) where if you go past a certain amount of time without it the cravings cease, sort of like cigarettes?  Entirely possible, but I have never seen the point of trying.
I'm fairly certain that the 24 years is Westrim's entire life. That's not to say people who have never had sex don't want to (cough), but you can't exactly go through withdrawal from lack of something if it's something that you've never done.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 23 Jan 2013, 21:04
I go long stretches between partners.   It's not something I've ever craved or gone through withdrawal over though.      Guess it's just not the dominant driving force in my life like it is for some people.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 23 Jan 2013, 21:23
Seeing people complaining about this like a major, cocaine withdrawal level distraction always perplexes me, since I've gone 24 years without sex and I'm doing fine so far.
While part of me agrees with you, part of me wants to point out that you've probably also gone 24 years without cocaine and you're probably doing fine with that, too.
It wasn't a direct comparison, it was an analogy. Substitute caffeine or nicotine. Or for non drugs, and things I actually have gone at least a year without after doing so regularly, seeing a movie, watching tv, using a computer, playing video games, and eating chocolate. I also went without masturbating for three months and got by without major hankerings. Stuff that pleases me, pleases me. Not doing one thing means I'm likely doing something else that pleases me, or too busy to worry about it. Whenever I do get around to copulation, I intend for it to be more about pleasing my partner than scratching my own itch, since if I wanted to please myself I have a hand. Or maybe I'm just a naive virgin and everyone can go about their business.

I'm fairly certain that the 24 years is Westrim's entire life. That's not to say people who have never had sex don't want to (cough), but you can't exactly go through withdrawal from lack of something if it's something that you've never done.
This is a fact. I have filled out my forum profile a bit, though it's a few months behind.

EDIT: And now I've upgraded to Beyonce. Not sure how I feel about that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Jan 2013, 21:27
I wasn't criticizing, I was just saying it's easier to do without something you've never had. And yeah, people are different, some people need some things more than others. That thing is sometimes sex. (shrug)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 23 Jan 2013, 21:32
Seeing people say things like this always perplexes me, as I can not even fathom going that long without sex. I've gone through cocaine withdrawal, and I will take that over lack of sex any day. :)
Different times between strokes for different folks?

...............
Congratulations on being love childless.

I wasn't criticizing, I was just saying it's easier to do without something you've never had. And yeah, people are different, some people need some things more than others. That thing is sometimes sex. (shrug)
I didn't read it as criticism, insert comment about the difficulty of ascertaining tone from text.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Overkillengine on 23 Jan 2013, 22:26
Withdrawal (to me) is better than putting up with someone not worth the hassle just to get laid; or worse yet, since no (non surgical) birth control method by itself that I know of is 100% effective....having a child with someone that would be a bad choice as a long term partner/parent.

Or I could just be too picky for how ugly I am.

That being said, getting used to having an activity so pleasant readily available then going without it does tend to place on the lower end of the suck spectrum.


Edit: also, diseases. Far simpler just to err on side of caution.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 23 Jan 2013, 23:36
I've gone without sex for about 5 or 6 months now after only getting it every three weeks or so on the weekend for about 3 years.
I find myself falling between the cracks here again as I'm not quite certain whether I'm doing well or not. (It's missed, but has never been a big driving force in my life.)
Or in the words of JD from Scrubs when asked whether he was sexually active at the moment: "Oh, it's active."


[ ... ]
EDIT: And now I've upgraded to Beyonce. Not sure how I feel about that.

I feel you, BROyonce.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 23 Jan 2013, 23:45
Oh Claire, you assumer, you.

...Poor Marten. *Takes a drink*

EDIT: And now I've upgraded to Beyonce. Not sure how I feel about that.
I feel you, BROyonce.

♫ If ya post it then ya shoulda put a ring on it ♫
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 23 Jan 2013, 23:49
 At least Claire have some moral values...i guess?

 Also, does Dora's nightmare count as a wet dream?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 24 Jan 2013, 00:27
While I still find Claire obnoxious (and still don't know why I find her worse than the other obnoxious characters), I find this particular instance of obnoxiousness almost endearing.

/me is confused.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: St.Clair on 24 Jan 2013, 00:38
She's being obnoxious in (what she thinks is) defense of a friend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Overkillengine on 24 Jan 2013, 00:49
....with Marten's luck, he's better off just not ever saying anything.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 24 Jan 2013, 01:21
I also don't think it's a good idea to shred the dean's forms in half because of some jump'd shark conclusion... Oo


[ ... ]
 Also, does Dora's nightmare count as a wet dream?  :psyduck:
No,  but it counts as a bat dream. Amirite, fellas!!?




... Fellas?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 24 Jan 2013, 01:24
I also don't think it's a good idea to shred the dean's forms in half because of some jump'd shark conclusion... Oo


[ ... ]
 Also, does Dora's nightmare count as a wet dream?  :psyduck:
No,  but it counts as a bat dream. Amirite, fellas!!?




... Fellas?

*sounds of footsteps echoing out into the distance*
*door slams*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 24 Jan 2013, 01:41
While I still find Claire obnoxious (and still don't know why I find her worse than the other obnoxious characters), I find this particular instance of obnoxiousness almost endearing.

/me is confused.

Cognitive dissonance?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 24 Jan 2013, 02:03
/me is confused.

/me  hurt itself in it's confusion!  :psyduck:

Ahem. Sorry, I just had to go there.

I need a Nintendo 3DS by October. So excited.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 24 Jan 2013, 02:32
(http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/write.ign.com/59210/2013/01/jump-to-conclusions-mat.jpg)

Also, is Claire jealous of Marten for having dated Dora, or Dora for having dated Marten?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 24 Jan 2013, 02:33
....with Marten's luck, he's better off just not ever saying anything.

I think he's done well so far by not saying much - he comes off as quite suave, for once. Go Marten!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 24 Jan 2013, 02:33
No,  but it counts as a bat dream. Amirite, fellas!!?


... Fellas?

Don't make me break out the Pun Foul gifs again...

It's a good thing that Tai doesn't seem to feel guilt very easily, otherwise she might start wondering why all two of the interns who know about the history with her, Dora and Marten have reacted badly to it.
I wonder how much Momo knows...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 24 Jan 2013, 02:54
I wish I'd known a girl like Emily when I was young and single.   :mrgreen:
I knew a girl a lot like Claire... we've been married now for 32 years.
Despite me having transitioned in 2005.
Asexual relationships do miss something, but if they're good enough, that's not a dealbreaker.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 24 Jan 2013, 03:11
No,  but it counts as a bat dream. Amirite, fellas!!?
[ ... ]

Don't make me break out the Pun Foul gifs again...

[ ... ]

... awww. And I was sepcifically (and, might I add, expertly) fishing for one of those... damn daaang.


I wish I'd known a girl like Emily when I was young and single.   :mrgreen:
I knew a girl a lot like Claire... we've been married now for 32 years.
Despite me having transitioned in 2005.
Asexual relationships do miss something, but if they're good enough, that's not a dealbreaker.

Wow. That is DEFINITELY something way up there on my "interesting stuff to make short comics about"-list. It's all I can do not to ask you for your adress and phone number. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 24 Jan 2013, 03:51
Oh alright. :P

(http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk86/wayf_photos/HorriblepunfoulONE_zps9f216b88.gif)

You haven't made any OTHER terrible puns this week, have you?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 24 Jan 2013, 04:06
Okay, I totally forgot to ask: Can anyone explain Claire's "Luckyyyy" comment to me?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ImaTripp on 24 Jan 2013, 04:09
Wondering who Claire is calling lucky. For some reason I assume it's Marten. This would mean she's bi?

Worked in a library for 4 years. The weirdest thing I ever experienced was closing the serials department one night. Part of that entails walking to the bathrooms on our floor and telling people the library is closing in 5 minutes. If no one is in the bathroom, going in and looking for any books or magazines that might have been left in there. There were no male coworkers on my shift with me that night so I had to take care of both bathrooms. I opened the womens room and announced our closing. No one was in there. I knocked on the men's bathroom door, cracked it open and announced, "We are closing in five minutes!" From the bathroom bellowed an upset voice, "Five minutes!? NOoooooooooooo!!!"

Curious, I hid in the bound journal stacks next to the bathrooms to see who yelled. A 20-some YO student who looked like a human basketball with coke bottle glasses, greasy black hair, and acne deserving of a teenager waddled out. I watched carefully and he waddled down the stacks aisle to replace a bound journal from where he must have found it. After he left, I walked over to where he put the journal away to see what he had taken into the bathroom. It was Women's Health and Fitness.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 24 Jan 2013, 04:12
What the.... also, welcome to the forum.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ImaTripp on 24 Jan 2013, 04:21
What the.... also, welcome to the forum.  :mrgreen:

Thank you! :) Saw the polls had to share. At the time, I think one of the weirdest parts was thinking, "Wow. That guy either has to have a spandex fetish or has no idea what else is here. He should have grabbed Spiegel" Spiegel is a german magazine like People is here--except Germans are apparently more open about sex so you'd find articles in it that had pictures like Playboy--except some with S&M. A lot of these would get ripped or neatly cut out. XD
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 24 Jan 2013, 04:44
(http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/write.ign.com/59210/2013/01/jump-to-conclusions-mat.jpg)

Also, is Claire jealous of Marten for having dated Dora, or Dora for having dated Marten?

Yes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 24 Jan 2013, 04:44
Wondering who Claire is calling lucky. For some reason I assume it's Marten. This would mean she's bi?

Doesn't have to mean that. She might consider Dora to be way above Marten's level without wanting to sex her up herself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 24 Jan 2013, 05:25
Oh alright. :P

Horrible pun foul.gif

You haven't made any OTHER terrible puns this week, have you?

Thank you for that. And no, not yet.


[ ... ]It was Women's Health and Fitness.
Haha! Great first post. Made me giggle.
I never quite understood why people would do that in a public place and not at home.

And Germans aren't quite as tightly clenched about sex as Americans but we're still very much by European standarts. The thing with the Spiegel is just that they like to push boundaries ... (plus, for obvious reasons, it sells.) °O
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 24 Jan 2013, 06:01
I found it weird that Marten said "it's complicated". Um, no it isn't. Dora and Marten broke up, they were apart for ages, Marten got with Padma, Tai asked him if it would be ok if she dated Dora, Dora and Tai got together. It's actually the least complicated reconstitution of friendship-group-relationships I've seen in a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 24 Jan 2013, 06:10
I just took it as "I'll explain later, right now I've got stuff to do." as in "It's complicated to explain why it's okay." ...

But actually, it isn't... okay, I don't get it either.

edit:
I just got it. He meant the whole ordeal from start with Faye to break up with Dora and the reason why when he said "It's complicated."

-> "It's complicated, I had a crush on Faye once but it turns out she had abandonment issues and was a nervous wreck of sorts. So when she told me and I had to stop crushing on her, her boss, Dora, dashed in and when that broke apart over HER insecurity issues caused by self-doubt yadda..."

Talk about ping-pong-ball-syndrome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 07:11
Oh, Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Jan 2013, 07:13
Oh, Claire.

You keep misspelling the name of the city. It's "Eau Claire".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 07:15
Didn't see that one coming, I was sure someone was going to make an "Au clair de la lune" joke out of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 24 Jan 2013, 07:25
It's complicated enough that Faye's counselor had to map it out and label it using thumbtacks and string. THAT's complicated.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 24 Jan 2013, 07:54
Whenever I do get around to copulation, I intend for it to be more about pleasing my partner than scratching my own itch, since if I wanted to please myself I have a hand.

Pleasing my partner is how I scratch my itch. I may be an anomaly, but pleasing the person I am with is how I achieve gratification. Masturbation just doesn't quite cut it.

Withdrawal (to me) is better than putting up with someone not worth the hassle just to get laid; or worse yet, since no (non surgical) birth control method by itself that I know of is 100% effective....having a child with someone that would be a bad choice as a long term partner/parent.

Being a lady who exclusively has sex with other ladies is a pretty surefire way to avoid pregnancy. It has worked so far. But, yea, for straight couples I can certainly see that an issue, though there is a pill for that. As far as "putting up with someone" goes, there really isn't that much to put up with for a casual encounter/relationship.  Generally, most people are decent people and are pretty interesting if you give them a chance. I find nearly all women physically beautiful in one way or another (barring extreme outliers) and most of them are beautiful inside as well.  If they have a shitty personality, then I am not going to be attracted to them anyway. I am pretty good at reading people, if someone is a shitty person I generally pick up on it right away and move on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 24 Jan 2013, 07:59
I am trying to get a read on Cliare's "luckyyyy". The way she states her first line suggest she is shocked that Marten could get someone like Dora. But, the way she attempts to come to his defense against Tai, suggests she thinks Marten is the desirable one.  Or maybe she was just surprised to find that Tai's gf used to be Marten's. She hasn't been around this group long enough to realize what an incestuous little clan it is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 24 Jan 2013, 08:07
Oh, Claire.

You keep misspelling the name of the city. It's "Eau Claire".
Wait, what's this about watering Claire?  :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 24 Jan 2013, 09:38
I am trying to get a read on Cliare's "luckyyyy". The way she states her first line suggest she is shocked that Marten could get someone like Dora. But, the way she attempts to come to his defense against Tai, suggests she thinks Marten is the desirable one. 

It's probably your first thought. Many times when people see a average guy dating a "hot" girl, it's assumed he got lucky, that she "took pity" on him somehow. And let's face it, that is pretty much how it happened, what with Dora moving in on Marten soon after Faye said she couldn't get with him. Sure Dora was attracted to Marten, but she could have gotten so annoyed at his passivity and indecision (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=564) over dating her that she could have written him off as a dating prospect.

For a guy like Marten, who isn't all that smooth with the ladies, getting with someone like Dora is "getting lucky".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 24 Jan 2013, 11:15
I think that Claire is developing a crush on Marten and that she thinks Dora was the lucky one.  It must end badly for her because Marten has already said  it would be unethical  (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2216)  and also  does not like the idea of dating a trans woman. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)

Thanks to everyone who told me how to  hide the url of a link.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 11:25
(URL=http://questionablecontent.net)Questionable Content(/url). Replace the parentheses with brackets and you get Questionable Content (http://questionablecontent.net).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 24 Jan 2013, 11:30
I can show you how easily to find out: "Quote" the post above yours. Look at the syntax of the url, and how the words used to refer to it are placed.
I haven't memorized the technique, so that's how I look for each time I need it. Others might have a simpler method. You can pull out the url reference and put it somewhere for easy reference.
And welcome, new person!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 24 Jan 2013, 11:48
I think that Claire is developing a crush on Marten and that she thinks Dora was the lucky one.  It must end badly for her because Marten has already said http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2216 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2216) it would be unethical  and also http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615) does not like the idea of dating a trans woman.

This is my first post -- can someone tell me how to  hide the url of a link?


Welcome to the forums!

I will give you the "unethical" point, but the way I see it, the latter post does not imply that he would be unwilling to get in the sack with a trans woman. I think it's just him going along with the "trans women who used to be men are a turn off" clichee/joke. (And outside the universe, I suspect Jeph might have forgotten about the comment anyway).

That said, I don't like the idea of Marten getting together with Claire too much either; to me, she is somewhat lacking depth. She would be like the Ginny of QC.

Now I am gonna hide under my bed because there is bound to be a Ginny x Harry fan here somewhere with pitchforks and torches.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 24 Jan 2013, 11:58
Yeah, things have kind of changed even in the world at large since that strip was written, in '06 - I think there are a lot of people who might have made a joke like that then who wouldn't now.

I took "lucky..." to mean lucky to mean she had something for Dora, going back to the theme from two days ago.  I actually had thought she was blushing in that panel, but now she doesn't appear to be...?  Huh.  Might be just saying he was a lucky guy, or as has been said that Dora was lucky, but probably the less said about that idea the better.

(I actually took the last panel of that last strip to mean she was starting to feel something for Marten, but then I noticed Marten's face in the previous panel and got it right.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 24 Jan 2013, 12:01
Really easy way to create a link - type the words you want the link to be (so for example these are the words I want to put my link in (http://www.questionablecontent.net)) and then select those words, click the picture of the globe with a piece of paper on it, and magically url tags will appear. After "url" in the first one, type =http://www.thisisnotareallink.com and voila!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 24 Jan 2013, 12:09
I will give you the "unethical" point, but the way I see it, the latter post does not imply that he would be unwilling to get in the sack with a trans woman. I think it's just him going along with the "trans women who used to be men are a turn off" clichee/joke. (And outside the universe, I suspect Jeph might have forgotten about the comment anyway).

Yeah, way easy to dig up stuff from the past in either case. Just look at the dishonest quote-mining a lot of religious/ideological people do of the already-dead-so-can't-argue-anymore who lost their faith at a later point in their life. Besides, it's not like people don't change from actually knowing others rather than just as an abstract concept. I know of a guy who was full on "All homos should be in death camps" in his own words prior to watching the movie Philadelphia of all things and is now totally fine with LGBT people.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 24 Jan 2013, 12:10
Welcome, new people!

Claire is high-strung and focused on her career. She probably finds Dora more to be admired than Marten just on a non-sexual level.

EDIT: Here's another probably irrelevant thing from the past: http://www.questionablecontent.net/1300.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 24 Jan 2013, 12:16
EDIT: Here's another probably irrelevant thing from the past: http://www.questionablecontent.net/1300.

Shows just how little Marten knew!  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 24 Jan 2013, 12:39
Regarding Marten and trans people, I'm pretty sure the point of his comment was that it would be a hard thing to learn directly and specifically after sex with the trans person in question, not a comment on trans people in general or the possibility of having a relationship with one.

Regarding Claire, Martens luck, and Steves shoulders, I think she's just acknowledging that both Dora and Steve are very attractive without any subtext regarding her own inclinations or her opinion of Marten (except his shoulders).

Question: what was Claire's original name? Her brother is Clinton, so I'm going to guess 'Carl,' just so I can imagine Clinton saying "CARRRRRRL!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 24 Jan 2013, 13:10
that it would be a hard thing to learn directly and specifically after sex with the trans person in question, not a comment on trans people in general or the possibility of having a relationship with one.

Myeah, although that isn't really a thing that happens to any noteworthy extent. Immoral if you think they'd object (and if you don't: no point in hiding) and a quick way to become part of the sizable statistic of murdered transwomen if it's the.. less-than-stable sort of person.

Question: what was Claire's original name? Her brother is Clinton, so I'm going to guess 'Carl,' just so I can imagine Clinton saying "CARRRRRRL!"

Maybe she didn't change a thing. ;)  "The name was traditionally considered male, specifically when spelled Clair; however, it is now commonly used as a female name and is usually spelled Claire." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_%28given_name%29)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 24 Jan 2013, 13:15
If I were to transition to male, which I wouldn't because I'm definitely cis, I already have two male names which are both perfectly acceptable first names. I have them because they happen to be my surnames, but still.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: blacksinow on 24 Jan 2013, 13:24
I think overall, Marten simply wants to forget about the whole thing. He doesn't really like to fight and a co-worker is dating is his ex. But I think what Claire had said needed to be mentioned in the first place. I think they are simply trying to just get around the rhino blocking the road, instead of talking it out. And I'm going to say this now, I like the idea of Dora not getting laid. She definetely needs to suffer a bit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 24 Jan 2013, 13:44
I'm definitely cis
Being a former Soviet has nothing to do with gender, though.  :angel:

I think overall, Marten simply wants to forget about the whole thing. He doesn't really like to fight and a co-worker is dating is his ex. But I think what Claire had said needed to be mentioned in the first place. I think they are simply trying to just get around the rhino blocking the road, instead of talking it out. And I'm going to say this now, I like the idea of Dora not getting laid. She definetely needs to suffer a bit.
I think it's more 'doesn't care' than 'wants to forget'. He's over it and moved on and not angry or disgruntled anymore.

As for Dora, her greatest punishment is being with her own mind.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 24 Jan 2013, 13:47
I think it's something completely different. On all counts.


(There is something to that "luckyyy" that feels familiar. That's why I think that.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 14:26
I think the closest male name to Claire would be Clarence. As for names, not only is my name Eric, but my middle initial is A. I'd never need to, but I have received junk mail addressed to "Erica Surname".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 24 Jan 2013, 14:27
Man look how far she jumped to get to that conclusion...

Maybe we should try to get her into the Olympics.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 24 Jan 2013, 14:28
Welcome, new people!

Claire is high-strung and focused on her career. She probably finds Dora more to be admired than Marten just on a non-sexual level.

EDIT: Here's another probably irrelevant thing from the past: http://www.questionablecontent.net/1300.

Marten and Dora are almost the exact same physical person in that comic.  If Dora grew a dick we might have clones!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 24 Jan 2013, 15:17
Regarding the name Claire was given at birth:
More often than not, it seems (from what I've seen) that people transitioning choose a name that is completely and utterly different from their birth name. She could have been "Wendell" for all we know. Just some food for thought.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 24 Jan 2013, 15:32
Regarding the name Claire was given at birth:
More often than not, it seems (from what I've seen) that people transitioning choose a name that is completely and utterly different from their birth name. She could have been "Wendell" for all we know. Just some food for thought.

Yeppers, it's pretty common. It's also neat when some people find out alternative names their parents were considering if they had had a child born the other sex. Though I was an accident that made it through birth-control, so they found out which.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 24 Jan 2013, 16:54
And I'm going to say this now, I like the idea of Dora not getting laid. She definetely needs to suffer a bit.

  I bet Dora wanna get all up in Tai's business (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2239)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Jan 2013, 17:12
Oh, Claire.
You keep misspelling the name of the city. It's "Eau Claire".
Wait, what's this about watering Claire?  :?
No, no, Eau Claire. You know, the Blugolds? Medium-size city about halfway between Saint Paul and Madison?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 24 Jan 2013, 17:19
Oh, Claire.
You keep misspelling the name of the city. It's "Eau Claire".
Wait, what's this about watering Claire?  :?
No, no, Eau Claire. You know, the Blugolds? Medium-size city about halfway between Saint Paul and Madison?
Yes, I know, I was just referring to the French source of its name, which translates to English as "Clear Water". Though I don't know what Blugolds are.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 24 Jan 2013, 17:32
Yes, I know, I was just referring to the French source of its name, which translates to English as "Clear Water". Though I don't know what Blugolds are.

Scientology? Save Claire!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Jan 2013, 17:46
Though I don't know what Blugolds are.

Neither do the rest of us in the WIAC.  :laugh:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: blacksinow on 24 Jan 2013, 18:18
I am betting, considering that her brother is named Clinton, her original name had to begin with Cl, so... who can say? And this isn't one of those comics that reminds you of real life either.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Jan 2013, 18:44
I'm leaning more towards the "Clarence" to "Claire" theory. Of course, of the three TG individuals I know, the "Keep the first two letters" theory only works for two of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 24 Jan 2013, 18:54
She was CLIFFORD THE BIG RED DOG!!!

No wonder she wanted to leave her past behind. She was a big as a house.

"Clarence" make me think of the angel from "It's a Wonderful Life" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_a_Wonderful_Life). Weeeeeird.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 24 Jan 2013, 20:59
Well, of course Emily never does anything weird.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 21:03
Dang, poor Claire. And Clinton. And especially their mom.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 24 Jan 2013, 21:33
Emily do something weird? Absurd!

That definitely gives us a better look into Claire's mindset.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: St.Clair on 24 Jan 2013, 22:09
Well, of course Emily never does anything weird.

Of course not!  Everything Emily does is entirely reasonable and sensible!

... from a certain point of view.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 24 Jan 2013, 22:11
It is only logical to want a good understanding with bees.

Unstable family? No wonder Claire prizes order.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 24 Jan 2013, 22:13
Well, of course Emily never does anything weird.

Of course not!  Everything Emily does is entirely reasonable and sensible!

... from a certain point of view.
So she's Ben Kenobi? Oh sure Obi-Wan, Darth Vader is TOTALLY the guy that killed Anakin.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 22:18
He sort of is...from a certain point of view...midichlorians...and such.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 24 Jan 2013, 22:32
He sort of is...from a certain point of view...midichlorians...and such.

We'll see what JJ has to say about that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 22:34
Hopefully George Lucas is kept in a cage away from the script...and the set...and everything having to do with episodes VII-IX.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 24 Jan 2013, 22:43
Hopefully George Lucas is kept in a cage away from the script...and the set...and everything having to do with episodes VII-IX.

Is it possible to... I don't know...  store him in suspension on Pluto until they get things sorted out?

He's swell and all, but it's time for him to let go and let others play in the sandbox.  :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 24 Jan 2013, 22:45
Hopefully George Lucas is kept in a cage away from the script...and the set...and everything having to do with episodes VII-IX.

Is it possible to... I don't know...  store him in suspension on Pluto until they get things sorted out?

He's swell and all, but it's time for him to let go and let others play in the sandbox.  :)
He was fine when it came to making an outline, but crap when he tried to write and direct himself, with no outside input.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 24 Jan 2013, 23:08
At this point, I'd rather him have nothing to do even with the outline. I like MDBS's idea.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Overkillengine on 25 Jan 2013, 00:55
Hopefully George Lucas is kept in a cage away from the script...and the set...and everything having to do with episodes VII-IX.

Is it possible to... I don't know...  store him in suspension on Pluto until they get things sorted out?

He's swell and all, but it's time for him to let go and let others play in the sandbox.  :)

Some "creative" types function better when supervised and kept within strict boundaries.

A few AU should be a suitable minimum distance to set his boundary at.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 25 Jan 2013, 01:10
Emily should write the script.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 25 Jan 2013, 01:15

Wow. That is DEFINITELY something way up there on my "interesting stuff to make short comics about"-list. It's all I can do not to ask you for your adress and phone number. :D

Google Zoe Brain. You can contact me via my blog.
I have a fairly high Internet profile....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 25 Jan 2013, 01:37
Regarding the name Claire was given at birth:
More often than not, it seems (from what I've seen) that people transitioning choose a name that is completely and utterly different from their birth name. She could have been "Wendell" for all we know. Just some food for thought.

My former name was Alan. It's still my favourite boy's name.
I picked the new name Zoe - sort of an A-to-Z change , though that wasn't why I did it.

At age 10, I was certain by then I'd been put in the wrong group. They weren't big on sex ed in the UK in the 60s, I thought the differentiation only happened at puberty - i had no idea that boys and girls were born looking different.

I was a bit concerned about the problems that would arise when everyone realised a silly mistake had been made, but I thought adults knew what they were doing, and everything would get fixed. Naive isn't strong enough a word.

Anyway.. I picked the name sometime between May and October, 1968.
Later, at Uni, I dropped Astrophysics for Computer Science, but kept with the Pure Maths.

If you don't get the reference to my roll model, the girl I wanted to be like - and am like to a great extent, in personality anyway - you don't know your Dr Who companions. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Heriot)

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5y9dunHkW1qzg2i4o1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 25 Jan 2013, 01:55
Okay, I take back the comment about Claire being Ginny after seeing today's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 25 Jan 2013, 04:23
As you should. . .

And for the record, Lucas should be cast in Carbonite and dumped into the Maw before anyone starts the next Star Wars. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 25 Jan 2013, 05:21
 I really hope we can see Emily, Tai and Claire in the fancy clothes of "Awkward Zone Defeated" .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 25 Jan 2013, 05:24
I really hope to see Emily, Tai and Claire in the fancy clothes of "Awkward Zone Defeated" .

I think I just went blank there for a minute. . .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 25 Jan 2013, 06:06
Is the Doctor just travelling with all these companions because he never wants to settle down with just one girl? Just sayin'.

  I really hope we can see Emily, Tai and Claire in the fancy clothes of "Awkward Zone Defeated" .
 

IT MUST BE DONE.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 25 Jan 2013, 07:20
Emily just jumped up into first place on my list of favourite characters. She was already high on the list, this little exchange edged her the rest of the way up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 25 Jan 2013, 08:01
Bluesummers, I think it's more because all the girls die? Not necessarily in the show, but eventually? And he doesn't want to deal with that? Am I missing a joke here?

Claire is still kind of overreacting. I mean, that's pretty much exactly what happened with my parents (except the parental roles reversed) and I don't jump to those conclusions. It says something about Claire, sure: it tells us how she reacts to people cheating. We already knew that from her reaction to what she thought was cheating!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Jan 2013, 08:10
My former name was Alan. It's still my favourite boy's name.
That's my middle name! It is a pretty cool name, and I'd almost consider going by it instead of Eric, but I don't think I would like it at all when people inevitably called me Al.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sitnspin on 25 Jan 2013, 08:16
My name is Syl. If I were to transition, I'd likely change my name to Syd. Close enough to be familiar and not a jarring change, but masculine enough to satisfy the male identification thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 25 Jan 2013, 09:55
  I really hope we can see Emily, Tai and Claire in the fancy clothes of "Awkward Zone Defeated" .
 

IT MUST BE DONE.
Seconded!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 25 Jan 2013, 10:37
My name is Syl. If I were to transition, I'd likely change my name to Syd. Close enough to be familiar and not a jarring change, but masculine enough to satisfy the male identification thing.

"If I were to...": your take on this might not reflect the typical case.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: StevenC on 25 Jan 2013, 11:04
Bluesummers, I think it's more because all the girls die? Not necessarily in the show, but eventually? And he doesn't want to deal with that? Am I missing a joke here?
That's pretty much the reason he leaves people behind. Being with him is dangerous. He doesn't want them to die on some planet millions of lightyears away from where they're from, in a time they weren't even born yet.
On the other hand, traveling alone doesn't do him good.
So he's kinda torn between not wanting to rip people out of their lives and not wanting to be alone.

Also Zoe: Jamie and Zoe are best. As is the second Doctor. You're awesome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 25 Jan 2013, 11:22
Near Lurker, I'm confused, what do you mean by not the typical case? (Mostly I'm confused by why you said that in response to "If I were to".)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 25 Jan 2013, 11:24
Basically, that idle musing on what one's name would be if one transitioned probably doesn't reflect the mindset of those who do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 25 Jan 2013, 11:28
Oh I see. Well I suppose so, but part of me feels that when you're making a decision like that, what your name will become is probably not the biggest part of it - an important part, but not the most important!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 25 Jan 2013, 14:41
I do agree that the name is important but not the most important. It's always good to feel like the label people identify you by actually matches how you feel. One of my friends had a very pretty, very unusual female name from birth but has transitioned into using a very old-fashioned male name (and legally too!), so I don't think it's unreasonable to wonder about such things. If you're going to be called something, it would be nice if it reflected how you feel inside. :) I personally wish I had a more androgynous name. I don't know what I would prefer, but I do feel a bit uncomfortable having a name that's strictly female (except when I filled out bubble-in forms at school and my whole name wouldn't fit--then I get a male version of my name XD). I highly doubt I'll ever change it, but I've never particularly liked my name. When The Lion King came out, I insisted that my family call me "Ed" since it was so much shorter than my name. :P I have quite a few drawings and things buried deep at home with "Ed" on them where my name should be. XP I was secretly really thrilled when I found out that a female character in an anime (Cowboy Bebop) is named Ed/Edward so I felt a bit less alone in liking the name for myself.
(click to show/hide)


Also, I really like that you can tell that Emily hasn't had her hair fixed up from when she cut it. The edges are all jagged. :-D It's a nice touch.
I think that I've had one of those moments before, except I believe I was told to do something cute, and I was baffled. :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 25 Jan 2013, 15:31
LoliBot, is your name Josephine? I had a friend growing up who had that exact problem...she'd become Joseph when taking standardized tests!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 25 Jan 2013, 15:44
Don't be silly, her name is LoliBot! And the male version is Lolib.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 25 Jan 2013, 15:55
LoliBot, is your name Josephine? I had a friend growing up who had that exact problem...she'd become Joseph when taking standardized tests!

Code: [Select]
$guess_name_LoliBot_IRL = "Josephine";
if(preg_match('#\bed(\w*)\b#', $guess_name_LoliBot_IRL) === 1){
    echo "Yep, it's possible.";
} else {
    echo "Nope.";
}



Nope.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 25 Jan 2013, 17:16
  I really hope we can see Emily, Tai and Claire in the fancy clothes of "Awkward Zone Defeated" .
 

IT MUST BE DONE.
Seconded!
Petticoats 4-EVZ, YO! :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 25 Jan 2013, 17:47
Nope.
To be fair, she didn't claim that "ed" was part of her name, just that it was shorter and she liked it better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 25 Jan 2013, 19:20
It should be dirigur for any person in contact with Marten, Dora, Faye et al to recieve an PADD to bring them up to speed.



Yes Emily, I'm sure you don't   


*Smiles and backs away slowly*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 25 Jan 2013, 19:23
Comic 2369, panel 1...
... what's happening in the window there?  What kind of store is that? What are they selling?  Why does it look like there's some Shakespearean production happening on the other side of the glass that we're not privy to?
It's the same window of an establishment called "...Solace" as in 1844 panel 3, adjacent to a store from which a fairy emerges. Someone suggested a yoga studio. I had a vague thought of an orgy, but that's probably just wishful thinking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 25 Jan 2013, 19:24
Yes Emily, I'm sure you don't   


*Smiles and backs away slowly*

She's totally serious too. As serious as this. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2238)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 25 Jan 2013, 22:05
Google Zoe Brain. You can contact me via my blog.
I have a fairly high Internet profile....

So, I did. 


Wow.  There are a lot of assholes out there who really get offended just because you're who you are.  You mentioned earlier, in other threads, how fragile some world views are, and that anything challenging them can provoke a violent reaction, but it's very different to see that in action. 

My condolences, and hats off to you for getting through the bullshit thrown your way. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 26 Jan 2013, 06:49
Code: [Select]
$guess_name_LoliBot_IRL = "Josephine";
if(preg_match('#\bed(\w*)\b#', $guess_name_LoliBot_IRL) === 1){
    echo "Yep, it's possible.";
} else {
    echo "Nope.";
}



Nope.

I love myself a fellow PHP coder.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jan 2013, 08:01
I wish I knew more about code.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 26 Jan 2013, 08:27
http://www.codecademy.com/
https://phpacademy.org/

Go FORTH, learn!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 26 Jan 2013, 08:29
Go FORTH (http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/551.jvn.fall01/primer.htm), learn!

;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 26 Jan 2013, 08:43
Go (http://golang.org/) FORTH, learn!
Although I've never actually programmed in it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jan 2013, 08:48
http://www.codecademy.com/ (http://www.codecademy.com/)
https://phpacademy.org/ (https://phpacademy.org/)

Go FORTH, learn!
I very well may. Thanks!  :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 26 Jan 2013, 08:55
I think that programming is lots of fun. (http://www.celticgeek.com/languages.html)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 26 Jan 2013, 09:05
Go FORTRAN (http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/), learn!
:roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 26 Jan 2013, 09:52
Good grief, it was only a throwaway pun!

/me struggles out from under pun-pile
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emmyisnotcool on 26 Jan 2013, 10:19
Google Zoe Brain. You can contact me via my blog.
I have a fairly high Internet profile....

So, I did. 


Wow.  There are a lot of assholes out there who really get offended just because you're who you are.  You mentioned earlier, in other threads, how fragile some world views are, and that anything challenging them can provoke a violent reaction, but it's very different to see that in action. 

My condolences, and hats off to you for getting through the bullshit thrown your way.

Fuck. I googled the name too. The first hit was this blog (http://gendertrender.wordpress.com/tag/zoe-brain/).
And I was stupid enough to read that vitriol and the comments section. God, I'm depressed now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emmyisnotcool on 26 Jan 2013, 10:28
I wish I knew more about code.

Um. Just a link that might be helpful. I don't know a lot about programming either, but I found out about this site called Coursera where you can take online courses. They have this one that's an introduction to Computer Science course. The actual class hasn't happened yet but the material is available for independent study. I've been following along with the material and it presents it in a way that's pretty easy to understand.

Here's where you can find it: https://www.coursera.org/course/cs101

I think they have other more advanced CS courses as well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 26 Jan 2013, 10:45
Good grief, it was only a throwaway pun!
/me struggles out from under pun-pile
That's a BASIC component of this forum, isn't it?
I thought about computer courses. But I figured even if I COBOLed together what little I remember of math, the best I could do would be a C+, not even a C++.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 26 Jan 2013, 10:53
Oh, speaking of:
http://www.learncpp.com/

That's quite good too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 26 Jan 2013, 11:17
Good grief, it was only a throwaway pun!
/me struggles out from under pun-pile
That's a BASIC component of this forum, isn't it?
I thought about computer courses. But I figured even if I COBOLed together what little I remember of math, the best I could do would be a C+, not even a C++.
Could be worse. You could get a D (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_%28programming_language%29), and then the only Python (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Python_%28programming_language%29) you'd know would be Monty.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 26 Jan 2013, 11:24
I'm going to bash (http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html) all of you. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jan 2013, 11:48
To the people who posted links, I love you all. Thanks :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 26 Jan 2013, 13:01
I'm going to bash (http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html) all of you.
I C (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)) what you did there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 26 Jan 2013, 13:20
When puns start they SNOBOL out of control. I'm afraid what we've seen is just a Prolog.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 26 Jan 2013, 13:33
Man, these puns are a total Brainfuck (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck). I need a cup of Java (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_(programming_language)) and maybe this headache will go away.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 26 Jan 2013, 13:49
What have I done?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 26 Jan 2013, 14:52
Ask PASCAL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_%28programming_language%29), perhaps he knows.

(I had to. It's the only other prog. language I learned besides BASIC and HTML...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 26 Jan 2013, 15:13
We totally have to try an IRP thread. I'll start on tomorrow unless someone gets there first.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 26 Jan 2013, 16:55
Please.  HTML is no programming language – it's a markup language.

Postscript is though.  It's even Turing complete.  Reportedly, there have even been Postscript viruses.  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 26 Jan 2013, 18:39
I'll just file that perl of wisdom away for another day...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 26 Jan 2013, 18:56
I'll just file that perl of wisdom away for another day...
I like that one! Made me SQL!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 26 Jan 2013, 21:07
LoliBot, is your name Josephine? I had a friend growing up who had that exact problem...she'd become Joseph when taking standardized tests!
Nope--I'm a Stephanie. :-D So I became Stephan on my standardized tests. XP It was really upsetting when it happened the first time in first grade. I asked my teacher what to do, and he told me there was nothing I could do. T_T The annoyance didn't end until high school, if I remember correctly.

Don't be silly, her name is LoliBot! And the male version is Lolib.
It's my middle name. :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 26 Jan 2013, 21:15
I consider it my good FORTRAN that I haven't had to code much since college...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 26 Jan 2013, 21:47
What have I done?

Nothing but tcl our wordplay tendencies.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 00:24
In print no one can hear you Lisp.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 00:29
I c++ what you did there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 00:31
All this punning really quite REXX a conversation; perhaps there's a PL/1 to cure us.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 27 Jan 2013, 00:37
When puns start they SNOBOL out of control. I'm afraid what we've seen is just a Prolog.

Or barely out of the Assembler line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 01:15
Our puns are Modula, for easy self-assembly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 27 Jan 2013, 01:41
This thread is starting to become a bit Pythonesque.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 27 Jan 2013, 02:02
This thread is starting to become a bit Pythonesque.

If anyone starts to quote Tim, i'm lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade in to stop it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: CrowFairy on 27 Jan 2013, 02:10
It's not my fault that they call me Tim! (Does referencing count as avoiding quoting? I don't know. I'm not entirely sober.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 27 Jan 2013, 04:23
Our puns are Modula, for easy self-assembly.
I wasn't paying attention to this thread, if I had, I would have come to the Ada you sooner. As it is, I'll have to content myself with making Smalltalk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 27 Jan 2013, 04:50
It's just getting too TeX-nichal for me. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 27 Jan 2013, 06:11
Maybe you should read some Shakespeare (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespeare_%28programming_language%29) instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 27 Jan 2013, 09:38
Fortunately nobody has reached for an RPG yet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 09:41
BASIClly this is the best pun-war ever.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Jan 2013, 09:43
Some of the puns require some Assembly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Jan 2013, 11:30
"Please state the nature of your Pun-ical emergency."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 27 Jan 2013, 12:08
"Punical"? Yeah, I'd say we've reached the punical, the absolute summit. No place to go but down from here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 12:22
"We find the forum guilty. The fee is $42 billion in punitive damages."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 27 Jan 2013, 12:29
I dunno. We'll have to wait and SSE. We might be able to push a few more out, though the odds are stacked against us.

Ha! You'll never SSE your money.  You might get half, at a push, but the odds are stacked against it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 13:30
Clearly, you'll be surprised if it pops up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 27 Jan 2013, 13:42
(http://www.max-boost.co.uk/max-boost/Gifs/jack_in_the_box_md_wht.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 27 Jan 2013, 20:19
sh
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 27 Jan 2013, 22:38
Why? are you afraid he'll get bash-ed upside the head?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: St.Clair on 27 Jan 2013, 22:42
You all need to get a grep.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 27 Jan 2013, 23:58
That's what she sed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 00:29
This is getting awkward.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 28 Jan 2013, 02:36
I'm starting to pine for the days when we didn't have to vi to be funniest.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 28 Jan 2013, 02:52
But, as always, a cat is funny.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 28 Jan 2013, 03:43
This thread needs a kill -9
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 28 Jan 2013, 03:49
Silly, you don't kill threads, you kill processes! (All the child threads will die when you do that, mind you.)

And, if you killed this process, more child threads would die than in soldiers in Gettysburg.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 05:52
Weirdest thing you've seen at a library?

Two people making out.    5 (7.8%)
Kids playing video games.    3 (4.7%)
...and NOT on the library computers.    6 (9.4%)
Someone using the bathroom sink as a sponge bath.    4 (6.3%)
Horrid abuse of the Victorian Porn Collection.    1 (1.6%)
The entire collection of MAD Magazine, from issue 1.    5 (7.8%)
A robot. Seriously. And it WASN'T Pintsize. (Thankfully)    2 (3.1%)
Police arresting someone for not paying their fines.    0 (0%)
Someone eating between the stacks.    6 (9.4%)
Someone smoking/drinking/dropping acid in the stacks.    4 (6.3%)
Someone re-enacting the Death Star trench scene with desk chairs and paper hats.    8 (12.5%)
COMPILING!    20 (31.3%)

Total Members Voted: 64

Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 10:38
It keeps us Jovial.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 28 Jan 2013, 10:42
By Jove, King of the Times Roman font. 

I have not thought about Jovial in a long, long time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 29 Jan 2013, 02:01
Google Zoe Brain. You can contact me via my blog.
I have a fairly high Internet profile....

So, I did. 


Wow.  There are a lot of assholes out there who really get offended just because you're who you are.  You mentioned earlier, in other threads, how fragile some world views are, and that anything challenging them can provoke a violent reaction, but it's very different to see that in action. 

My condolences, and hats off to you for getting through the bullshit thrown your way.

Fuck. I googled the name too. The first hit was this blog (http://gendertrender.wordpress.com/tag/zoe-brain/).
And I was stupid enough to read that vitriol and the comments section. God, I'm depressed now.

I find it hilarious, personally. Plese don't feel depressed! The link to the "Fake Intersex/Fake Rocket Scientist" bit is amazing; the intellectual knots some tie themselves up in when confronted with eyewitness accounts that contradict their cherished beliefs are astounding.

A bit saddening that several people devote so much time, so much of their lives, trying to figure out ways to hurt me, when they could be devoting their considerable intellects to making the world a better place, but on the other hand, it does no-one any harm. I'd rather they go after me than others more vulnerable. I have an ego so big it enters the room at least ten minutes before I do, and realised before my teens that I'd be "the girl with the wonderful personality". I live by the advice I give to other rape victims - they can violate your body, but they can't humiliate you without your permission. You can refuse to give it.

Sometimes I feel as if I should pretend to be hurt - for they're obviously giving it their best shot, and to have someone refuse to be hurt by that shows massive disrespect. I don't want to disrespect them, they're already leading pretty unpleasant existences, I prefer to reduce, not increase, the misery in the world, especially of those already hurting. On the other hand, they're adults, and to pretend like that would be showing even more disrespect, and I'm not good enough an actress to keep a story like that straight anyway. I guess there are some people I just can't help. I can wear a cape and leotards with my panties on the outside, but I'm not Supergirl.

Summary - when they're going after me, they're not going after others who they really could hurt. So I am content.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 29 Jan 2013, 02:18
As for languages - I'm in the Ada camp myself.

I can recommend the Lovelace Tutorial (http://www.adahome.com/Tutorials/Lovelace/lovelace.htm) for programmers.

For those new to programming, this one (http://www.infres.enst.fr/~pautet/Ada95/a95list.htm) is good. A "Hello World" program is in chapter 2.

Programs in many languages can be run online, without need to download a compiler, via http://ideone.com/
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 29 Jan 2013, 02:42
I respect your stance, ZoeB. Don't bow down, and don't back down. It's something I told my friend when he came out as being gay. Something along the lines of "you're not just fighting to live, you're fighting to choose your life". He's done pretty well for himself since (better, since the prick landed the sweet IT gig (we're best mates, but you couldn't tell by the way we act around and treat each other)).

Man. All this programming talk... I gotta go. I need to PHP.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Spriteling on 29 Jan 2013, 02:56
Man, I should set a Python on you lot to stop these awful puns.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hakko504 on 29 Jan 2013, 05:00
No, no, don't stop now. The skype is the limit ;-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 29 Jan 2013, 06:58
Hmm, I sense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_%28programming%29) a groovy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groovy_%28programming_language%29) scheme (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language%29) go (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_programming_language)-ing on here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 29 Jan 2013, 10:07
We seem to be climbing out of this PIT with all the speed of a turtle obsessed with its Logo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 29 Jan 2013, 10:18
sense (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_%28programming%29)

* vomits *

I did the first, possibly second run of the course that's used in. Maybe it was what they had us using it for, but it is horrible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 29 Jan 2013, 10:21
I had to check if Vomits might be a programming language. It isn't. I wonder why not -- everything else seems to be.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 29 Jan 2013, 10:34
Yeah I'm quite proficient in PUKE, RALPH and BLOW-cHUNkS but I've never hears of VOMITS.   Is it object-oriented?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 11:24
Back to my knitting and perling.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Jan 2013, 13:14
Someone already did Perl. I know because I was going to use the same "perls of wisdom" line this morning that Carl did a few days ago.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 29 Jan 2013, 13:51
END OF LINE.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 29 Jan 2013, 14:09
Ah, we've looped back to Daft Punk at last. Nothing like going back to the source to fix things.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 29 Jan 2013, 15:30
Time to walk the Planc (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLANC), I think, as I've failed to think up acceptable puns for the other two main languages of my programming career: Algol and BCPL (nor a minor one: Manchester Autocode); I'll leave them in the Coral (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_66) for someone else to try.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 29 Jan 2013, 15:37
Walk the Planc? Try an algolcide instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 30 Jan 2013, 05:27
I think we've wandered a bit off TRAC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAC_%28programming_language%29)...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 30 Jan 2013, 06:21
"C++? Oh my God, she said I'll shoot my eye out!"

Seriously, nobody jumped on that before I did?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2367-2371 (21-25 January 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaosWolf on 04 Feb 2013, 21:02
How does a vulva even hold a baseball bat?  Let alone swing one...

I've seen videos.  Bizarre, confusing, and sexy videos.