THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 27 Jan 2013, 06:24

Title: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Jan 2013, 06:24
Quick!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 27 Jan 2013, 06:30
Q: "Have you ever drawn a big fat salary?"
A: "No, but I once sketched a skinny tomatah!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 27 Jan 2013, 07:05
A duck walks into a bar and asks the barman "have you got any grapes?".
"No," says the barman, looking puzzled.
The duck walks out.

The next day the same duck walks into the same bar and asks the barman "have you got any grapes?".
"No," says the barman, looking annoyed.
The duck walks out.

The day after, the selfsame duck walks into the selfsame bar and asks the barman "have you got any grapes?".
"No," says the barman, looking angry, "and if you come in here one more time asking about grapes I'll nail your flippers to the floor!"
The duck walks out.

The fourth day the duck goes back to the bar and asks the barman "have you got any nails?".
"No," says the barman.
"Have you got any grapes?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 27 Jan 2013, 09:34
A certain amphibian needs money, goes to the bank to borrow some. Is shown in to see the loan officer, one Patricia Wack.

"Do you have any collateral?" she asks?

"All I have," said the frog, "is this little doohickey, this thimajig, that's been sitting on my curio shelf for years."

"I don't know," she said. "What does it do? Is it of any value as collateral?"

"It does nothing," said the amphibian, hopping up and down. "But it is of immense value to me. It was given to me by my father. Perhaps you have heard of him. His name is Mick Jagger."

"Now I really don't know," said the loan officer. "Perhaps I should bring this to the attention of our branch manager. Here she is. Ma'am, this amphibious creature wishes to borrow money, and can offer as collateral only this ... this ... well, I don't know what it is."

The manager examines the object and says:

"It's a knick-knack, Patty Wack. Give the frog a loan. His old man's a Rolling Stone."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 27 Jan 2013, 09:47
Geez, DSL, you're old!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 10:01
There once was a man from Nantucket
Who manufactured a line of plastic bucket
The equipment was old
And so were the molds
One day he closed down and said "fuck it."

He sold out to a lass named Irene
Who was an expert of plastic-molding-machines
They developed a glitch
She turned into a bitch 
Spare parts were few and far between.

So she hired a man named Bob.
Fixing broken things was his job...
He said with a frown
As the factory burned down
"All I did was turn this here knob!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 10:13
Irene then did say with much stress
As she looked at the burning mess
With all that I spent
Bob had no talents to rent
Why didn't I just hire Jess?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 27 Jan 2013, 10:24
Two men walk into a bar. They both suffered concussions.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 10:56
Irene then did say with much stress
As she looked at the burning mess
With all that I spent
Bob had no talents to rent
Why didn't I just hire Jess?

Arrived did the one they call Jess
Who's gender was anyone's guess
With a swish of the pen
Reconstruction begins
This time the windows all face west.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 10:58
(Wait, Jess can be a dude's name? I've only heard it as short for Jessica)

So then Irene sat with her pet
A dog given to her by her vet
Jessica's work was done
Her work second to none
A building perfect for viewing sunsets
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 11:15
Distracted will repost later

*click*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 27 Jan 2013, 11:21
There once was a thread from QC,
WCDT it was, don't you see?
It was hijacked with puns
then poetry -- with guns!
now it's headed for space (heeheehee).

I hate myself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 11:29
MDBS, what was that monstrosity? Six lines, no rhyme in the beginning (post does not rhyme with cost). Come on, you can do better. Redball, you should be proud of that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Jan 2013, 11:35
Take my wife. Please.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 11:37
MDBS, what was that monstrosity? Six lines, no rhyme in the beginning (post does not rhyme with cost). Come on, you can do better. Redball, you should be proud of that.

Was distracted,  I'm dealing with an overheated nipple (it melted) and also two phone-calls.    I'll edit it later.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 11:46
So long as you know.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 27 Jan 2013, 11:47
Overheated nipples, miss? 



There's a treatment for that... in the meantime, let me see what I can do to help...

 :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 11:49
Wait, Jess can be a dude's name?
e.g. Jess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess_Collins)
Short for Jesse (e.g. Jesse James (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_James)).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 11:53
The end of the printhead on the 3D printer I am fighting with is called a "nipple" in the technical drawing.     The heater coil malfunctioned again and caused it to melt.   Again.     It really is a poor design, it's made out of teflon-filled PEEK (or so the drawing claims..)   I however... being one of the most ARROGANT practitioners of the art of techno-fu...  am setting up my lathe (in fact the very same one in my Avatar!) to make a new nipple.

Out of brass.

Brass that has been sitting outside in 20 degree F weather.

So yes,  I can honestly say there are fewer things colder than a brass nipple in January.   *nod*


...


What? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 11:59
Wait, Jess can be a dude's name?
e.g. Jess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess_Collins)
Short for Jesse (e.g. Jesse James (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_James)).
Interesting. I guess it's a generational thing, I know a few guys named Jesse (but other than the Rick Springfield song, none named Jessie), but none who go by Jess.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Jan 2013, 12:08
I... won't go there with the name "Jess".

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 27 Jan 2013, 12:10
MDBS, what was that monstrosity? Six lines, no rhyme in the beginning (post does not rhyme with cost). Come on, you can do better. Redball, you should be proud of that.
Thanks. Just trying to remain topical.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Jan 2013, 12:16
Some people called Jess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess) - both genders.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 13:26
Some people called Jess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess) - both genders.

Hence my quip about gender.  :P

Well my brass nipple isn't quite there yet.   Requires some tweaking.

...

Move along now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 27 Jan 2013, 13:48
 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 27 Jan 2013, 15:57
Some people called Jess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jess) - both genders.

Hence my quip about gender.  :P

Well my brass nipple isn't quite there yet.   Requires some tweaking.

...

Move along now.


Any Brass Monkeys?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Uniquitous on 27 Jan 2013, 16:52
Wha't's a four-letter word that refers to a woman, ending with the letters UNT?

...

Give up? It's "Aunt!"

Why, what were you thinking?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 17:18
I understand they like to reboot movies and make them "darker and gritty-er" than the original.       Word on the street is they are doing just that to the next Batman Trilogy. 

In fact I have a special sneak preview of the script:

GORDEN:  Batman,  I just read the most disturbing report...
BATMAN:   ...
GORDEN:  My officers said you "ripped the Joker's nards off with a pair of vice-grips?"  Is that TRUE?!
BATMAN:  Channel-locks.
GORDEN:  I beg your pardon?
BATMAN:  I used a pair of channel-locks.  I left the vice-grips at home.
GORDEN:  Either way I cannot condone this kind of--
BATMAN:  Choke on my ****, Gorden.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 27 Jan 2013, 18:27
Wait, we were doing limericks earlier?

There once was a god called Zeus
to whom thunderbolts were of use.
He took them in hand,
threw them over the land,
which humans found somewhat a nuis...ance.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 18:33
MDBS, you're thinking of the Punisher.  And WAYF..

Zeus made his sister his wife
And she would cause nothing but strife
To those Zeus would fuck
They were shit out of luck
Their punishments less swift than a knife.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 18:40
MDBS, you're thinking of the Punisher.  And WAYF..

Zeus made his sister his wife
And she would cause nothing but strife
To those Zeus would fuck
They were shit out of luck
Their punishments less swift than a knife.

I stole the joke from someone else, and it was about Batman as well.  ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: henri bemis on 27 Jan 2013, 18:41
A man drives past his friend's house and sees him outside in front of his tractor, dancing and slowly removing his clothes.  He stops the car, gets out, and asks his friend what he's doing.

"My wife and I haven't been intimate in awhile, so we went to see a couples' therapist.  He suggested I do a striptease to a tractor."

*dodges tomatoes*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 27 Jan 2013, 18:56
Alright, alright, since we're clearly scraping the bottom of the barrel, here's one of my favourite lame jokes from Buffy: The Vampire Slayer, season one.

GILES: I've never actually heard of anyone attacked by a lone baseball bat before.

XANDER: Maybe it's a vampire bat.


I shall now join Henri in the tomato dodging. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 18:58
Two businessmen in Florida were sitting down for a break in their
soon-to-be new store. As yet, the store wasn't ready, with only a few
shelves set up.

One said to the other, "I bet any minute now some senior is going to
walk by, put his face to the window, and ask what we're selling."

No sooner were the words out of his mouth when, sure enough, a
curious senior walked to the window, had a peek, and in a soft voice
asked, "What are you sellin' here?"

One of the men replied sarcastically, "We're selling ass-holes."

Without skipping a beat, the old timer said, "Must be doing well...
only two left."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: henri bemis on 27 Jan 2013, 19:11
WAYF - Out of Mind, Out of Sight.  S1E11.  I can't judge, I can only be happy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 19:16
The leaders of the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force are playing golf.

After a few drinks the question came up: who had the most guts, biggest balls, the most courage.

The leader of the Marine Corps points at a passing Gunnery Sargent and shouts "YOU! RUN INTO TRAFFIC NOW!" The Gunny drops what he is doing and runs halfway across the expressway before he is hit by a bus.

The leader of the Air Force nods and says "Now watch this." He pulls out a radio, calls a jet fighter overhead and orders the pilot to point the nose at the ground and hit the afterburner, and don't pull up until ordered to do so. Seconds later the plane hits the ground full speed, killing the pilot.

The Admiral shakes his head and says "I can top that." He turns to the dock, looks high into the air and spots a seaman working aloft on an aircraft carrier.

He shouts: "YOU THERE! SEAMAN! JUMP!"

The Seaman shouts back "Sir, repeat that sir!"

The Admiral shouts again "I SAID JUMP!"

The Seaman looks down, frowns, and looks directly at the Admiral: "F*UCK YOU SIR" turns around and goes back to work.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 19:17
I stole the joke from someone else, and it was about Batman as well.  ;)
Yeah, but it would've been funnier using the Punisher, because then you could claim it was actually lighter and funnier than usual ::)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 27 Jan 2013, 19:41
It's the last day of assassins school, and the final three students are sitting in a room, waiting for the last test. The first one, a man, is asked to take a gun, shoot the person in the next room who has commited treason, then go to the room after, not telling them the gun is filled with blanks. He does so, but comes out in the next room over balling his eyes out.

"Sir, I can't do it sir, it's my wife, I can't shoot her, I love her!"

So he fails.

The next one, another man, takes a gun and goes through, only to appear on the other side crying as well, not having shot his wife. He fails as well.

The last student is a woman. She takes her gun and goes through, and for a few minutes there isn't a sound and her instructors figure she's failed as well. Then suddenly someone screams and shot after shot rings out, followed by a long series of thumps and crashes. The woman comes out on the other side, finally, spattered in blood and gore.

"What happened?!" Ask her instructors.

"Well, some idiot filled that gun with blanks, so I had to beat my husband to death with the chair."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 27 Jan 2013, 20:13
What did one volcano do when the other volcano told a joke?

It erupted with laughter!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 27 Jan 2013, 21:36
WAYF - Out of Mind, Out of Sight.  S1E11.  I can't judge, I can only be happy.

Correct! ;D

Incidentally, I left the forum yesterday (Australian time) and I came back this morning and suddenly everyone's making bad jokes. Is this a new trend? Make terrible jokes while waiting for a new week of QC to begin?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Jan 2013, 21:51
So... are we headed toward a wedding storyline some point soon?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 21:51
(edit:  Damn warning box)

SECOND ON-TOPICAL POST WOO!

Is it me or does anyone see Claire gradually slipping into the role once occupied by Faye.   Friend, partner, provider of punchlines.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 21:53
You'd think Marten would have known the date even before the save the date cards went out. But yeah, I didn't even think that Marten would bring his parents up, but it makes sense. Yay for Marten/Claire bonding!

Double red text! But yeah, MDBS, I think it's because Faye's all settled down and boring now. Well, not boring, but...hmm...

Cesium...maybe?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Jan 2013, 21:53
(edit:  Damn warning box)

SECOND ON-TOPICAL POST WOO!

Is it me or does anyone see Claire gradually slipping into the role once occupied by Faye.   Friend, partner, provider of punchlines.
Nah, Faye provides punches, not punchlines.

And I grade most of the jokes so far a C++ as best.  :-D
Title: NO SNEAKY STEALTH EDIT HERE! MOVE ALONG NOW... GOOD DAY.
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 21:55
Cesium133,  I already used C++ as a joke in the other thread.    750 yard penalty,  player ejected from game.   Still first down.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Jan 2013, 21:58
Cesium123,  I already used C++ as a joke in the other thread.    750 yard penalty,  player ejected from game.   Still first down.
Why does it seem like everyone wants to remove about 10% of my weight? The atomic weight of cesium is 133.  :roll:
Title: TALLYHO! THERE BE FUCKERY AFOOT
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 22:00
Cesium133,  I already used C++ as a joke in the other thread.    750 yard penalty,  player ejected from game.   Still first down.
Why does it seem like everyone wants to remove about 10% of my weight? The atomic weight of cesium is 133.  :roll:

What are you on about?   :?

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 27 Jan 2013, 22:21
How do you not even open the envelope? Now, not reading it I get, but all my mail is at least slit open practically before I get back in the door.

And doesn't inviting your son to a wedding engender more than the same card you sent to 50 other people? At least a phone call?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: foolsguinea on 27 Jan 2013, 22:23
Today's strip harks back to old QC snarky conversations.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 27 Jan 2013, 22:27
 Marten will open the card and find out that the wedding is... tomorrow!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 27 Jan 2013, 22:28
Wha't's a four-letter word that refers to a woman, ending with the letters UNT?
...
Give up? It's "Aunt!"
Why, what were you thinking?
I was thinking it's rude to call a woman a runt.

The last student is a woman. She takes her gun and goes through, and for a few minutes there isn't a sound and her instructors figure she's failed as well. Then suddenly someone screams and shot after shot rings out, followed by a long series of thumps and crashes. The woman comes out on the other side, finally, spattered in blood and gore.
"What happened?!" Ask her instructors.
"Well, some idiot filled that gun with blanks, so I had to beat my husband to death with the chair."
I don't find misandry any funnier than misogyny. Firefox spellcheck flagging it is also disturbing.


MD B S, I find your sentence spacing curious. What is your reasoning in this digital age?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 27 Jan 2013, 22:35
Is it me or does anyone see Claire gradually slipping into the role once occupied by Faye.   Friend, partner, provider of punchlines.

I think you're on to something. It's likely that Claire needs a level-headed good friend, and Marten always needs someone to confront him.

If the wedding's tomorrow, that would fit the family pattern of never planning ahead that Dora commented on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 27 Jan 2013, 22:46
***PLOT ALERT PLOT ALERT***

IF THIS WERE A REAL PLOT ALERT YOU WOULD BE DIRECTED TO A CEMETERY'S MARKETING WEB SITE.

INSTEAD THIS IS JUST A BAD PUN. YOU SAID TO BE PUNNY QUICK RIGHT?

***PUN  ALERT PUN  ALERT***

I'm very tired
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 27 Jan 2013, 22:50
Captain Procrastinator strikes again!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 27 Jan 2013, 23:12

MD B S, I find your sentence spacing curious. What is your reasoning in this digital age?

It is an oddity of the particular and rather...     shall I say PECULIAR input method I have chosen.    That is if you refer to the odd spacings around punctuation.    I am testing a speech to text program developed by a friend of mine.    For some reason when I dump the text into this forum I get odd spacing around punctuations.   

I choose to break up my thoughts line by line,   into smaller paragraphs because it just looks right to me.    No other reason.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 27 Jan 2013, 23:26
Marten will open the card and find out that the wedding is... tomorrow!  :psyduck:
No. The day AFTER tomorrow. DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUUN!


@Comic:
Well... Marten just broke his own record for passiveness. (passivity?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 23:28
Really? I think it's more laziness than passivity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 27 Jan 2013, 23:49
Brick Joke?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Arancaytar on 27 Jan 2013, 23:53
Spoiler alert: It's tomorrow.

(Or, if Jeph is feeling evil, yesterday :P )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 27 Jan 2013, 23:58
I highly doubt it's tomorrow, or really anytime soon. The save the dates come around a while in advance, they're basically a placeholder until the invitations are ready to be sent out, and even those are usually at least a couple months before the wedding. So...Marten's probably ok. Plus, his dad probably wants him to play a role in the wedding itself, so they'd probably talk about it on the phone, I doubt his dad would just be "well my son probably knows to show up".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 28 Jan 2013, 00:06
Plus, his dad probably wants him to play a role in the wedding itself
It better not be flower-girl, or Dora will be so upset...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ysth on 28 Jan 2013, 00:25
I am totally confused.  Didn't we already have the wedding?  If not, what wedding is it that I am remembering?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 00:32
The closest thing we've had to a wedding was Hanners's fantasy about her ideal man.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 00:53
I am totally confused.  Didn't we already have the wedding?  If not, what wedding is it that I am remembering?
They got engaged (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1520)...although the next morning the dad said they were heading up to Vermont (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1522), which I assumed at the time meant they were just going to get married up there. It could be that they did get married, but are having the wedding after the fact for friends and family? Then again, maybe they were just going there for vacation and the wedding is still in its planning stages. Who knows?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 28 Jan 2013, 01:11
Is anyone else particularly enjoying the stream of comics with Claire, when she was first introduced i was like "Eh, Background character probably", But now i find she's a great character, especially with the storylines,

That said, are all these comic strips happening in QCverse time of like one day? cause there sure has been a lot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 28 Jan 2013, 01:15

MD B S, I find your sentence spacing curious. What is your reasoning in this digital age?

It is an oddity of the particular and rather...     shall I say PECULIAR input method I have chosen.    That is if you refer to the odd spacings around punctuation.    I am testing a speech to text program developed by a friend of mine.    For some reason when I dump the text into this forum I get odd spacing around punctuations.   

I choose to break up my thoughts line by line,   into smaller paragraphs because it just looks right to me.    No other reason.
Ah, so ironically the reason IS the digital age, the cutting edge of it.

Is anyone else particularly enjoying the stream of comics with Claire, when she was first introduced i was like "Eh, Background character probably", But now i find she's a great character, especially with the storylines,

That said, are all these comic strips happening in QCverse time of like one day? cause there sure has been a lot.
There was once a run of 70 strips or so that took place on one day, so it's a common thing with QC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 01:26
Some people who are my superiors in nerdiness track QC time by looking for changes of clothes and growth of hair.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Abyssalin on 28 Jan 2013, 01:30
Some people who are my superiors in nerdiness track QC time by looking for changes of clothes and growth of hair.

Yeah I kinda derped, i blame being tired, and yeah i will keep that in mind.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 01:42
Dora DID ask "Do your parents ever plan ANYTHING more than a couple of days in advance?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 28 Jan 2013, 02:23
So, presumably Marten goes to the wedding. And I *think* that Marten's father does not know about the fact that Marten and Dora broke up. So he presumably sent an invitation for "Marten +1".

Whom does Marten take with him?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 28 Jan 2013, 02:39
So, presumably Marten goes to the wedding. And I *think* that Marten's father does not know about the fact that Marten and Dora broke up. So he presumably sent an invitation for "Marten +1".

Whom does Marten take with him?
His default seems to have been Hannelore in the past.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 28 Jan 2013, 02:50
I hope we do get to see the wedding, or at least some of it - since it's been mentioned again I suspect it will be in the story at least to some extent.

I've had post come and totally forgotten to open it because I knew what was in it. My birthday present sat for a full day on my bed until I thanked my stepmum for it and realised I hadn't actually looked at it (I knew what it was though, I'd asked for it). Between the porters' lodge where I collect my post and my room where I open it, it's easy to get distracted!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: crazdgamer on 28 Jan 2013, 04:27
Some people who are my superiors in nerdiness track QC time by looking for changes of clothes and growth of hair.
I won't go that far, but I do notice that it was winter when the proposal took place, and it's now summer.  Figure at least 6 months have gone by?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 28 Jan 2013, 04:56
Some people who are my superiors in nerdiness track QC time by looking for changes of clothes and growth of hair.

You know that there isn't really anyone who fits that description, right?  We are all equal before the great QC. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 28 Jan 2013, 05:12
Would it be unethical for Marten, a de facto supervisor, to ask Claire to accompany him to the wedding? (Hannelore might well get her own invitation.)
Claire's tight windings and her tendency to overreact would be good comedy, methinks. There might even be some lessons about tolerance and acceptance and respect thrown in, too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 28 Jan 2013, 05:22
I think a trans* person at a gay wedding could teach a few things about tolerance, acceptance and respect. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 28 Jan 2013, 05:29
I don't think being trans* automatically makes you more tolerant and respectful than the average. It is likely to make you acutely aware of a particular facet of intolerance and disrespect, but human beings are notoriously bad at extrapolating their specific experience to the general and treating others accordingly. Claire puts her foot in it quite a lot; being trans* has made her more female, not more sensitive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 28 Jan 2013, 05:43
Good point - being more sensitive to your own issues may not make one more empathing about other's.  However, I still don't think Claire'd be the one to cause problems / have misunderstandings at the wedding! 


OK, maybe if Marten's mom shows up. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 28 Jan 2013, 05:47
Yeah, it'll turn out Claire's a fan too…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 05:55
Nah, that'd be WAY too trite (Claire being a fan of Marten's mom).

You do have to wonder, though, if Marten has told dad about the breakup.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 05:56
Quick! Be Funny!

Did I ever tell you the one about the duck and the penguin?    1 (3.6%)
A priest, a rabbi and a politician walk into a bar. You'd think they'd have ducked.    6 (21.4%)
There is NO truth to the rumor we're just good friends.    2 (7.1%)
I do not want to be a member of any club that would want me to be a member.    4 (14.3%)
What is it about an arms race, anyways?    2 (7.1%)
Fluffy fluffy soft soft soft.    3 (10.7%)
I liek video games.    0 (0%)
SPAAAAAAATHHHEEE HAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEE!    2 (7.1%)
...I don't get it.    4 (14.3%)
Something else (C'mon! It's either that or break out the funny hats!)    4 (14.3%)

Total Members Voted: 28
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 28 Jan 2013, 05:57
Since Marten's parents appear to be on reasonably good terms, I expect his mum has told his dad if Marten himself hasn't.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 06:03
Yes - but did Marten tell him?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Arancaytar on 28 Jan 2013, 06:34
So, presumably Marten goes to the wedding. And I *think* that Marten's father does not know about the fact that Marten and Dora broke up. So he presumably sent an invitation for "Marten +1".

Whom does Marten take with him?

If he's not bringing most of his friends anyway, then I'm thinking Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 28 Jan 2013, 09:57
While it would increase teh funny, I don't see it as in character.  He's not dating anyone, so I'd see him bringing a good friend, if anyone.  While Claire found him trustworthy, and they're certainly getting to know each other better, I'm thinking one of the three primaries (Faye = BFF, Dora = amicable ex who met the grooms, Hanners = old friend who'd love to see a wedding for cultural anthropological reasons) would be most likely.  Hell, I think Tai'd be more likely than Claire...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 10:42
Oh please please let him bring Emily.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 10:54
Wait, you think he'd bring his ex to a wedding? Faye'd be willing to go, I'm sure (if only for the open bar), but I think Hanners is the best bet. I mean, he does owe her, she took him to space.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 28 Jan 2013, 11:26
An ex who's also a good friend and loves weddings that much? 

Yeah, I think it's a good possibility. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Spriteling on 28 Jan 2013, 11:47
I think Marten is sensitive to social norms, though, and it would just be hella awkward to bring an ex to a wedding.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ysth on 28 Jan 2013, 12:00
Marten brings Hannelore and Hannelore brings Station?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 12:09
I don't think +1s get +1s.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 13:45
Station wouldn't increase the catering expense, and he knows how to be flawlessly polite.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 14:38
I do actually expect Dora will get a separate invite from Dad, which will allow either Hanners or Faye to join him at the wedding.

And, of course, it would be funnier than all get out if Maurice WAS Claire/Clinton's uncle.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 28 Jan 2013, 14:57
It'll turn out Veronica knows Dr. E. (HANNERS: "Don't ask. Please don't ask.") and, the former Reed couple being on good terms and all, wangles an invite and the wedding is ON the station. So Station's not invited; he's catering. It's a big crowd, so ECT-102 is brought into service alongside 101, but it turns out Spaceship doesn't get along with his twin, who doesn't bother with holo-clothes at all.

It could happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 17:17
I think you may need to check your head cannon for gunpowder rot...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 28 Jan 2013, 17:57
Is offspring missing their parent's wedding better or worse than a parent missing their offspring's wedding?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 28 Jan 2013, 18:10
Claire does seem to be interested, if he's thinking of getting back on the horse.

If not, Faye seems most likely.  Marigold is possible, too, or Steve.  Don't think Hannelore.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 18:57
Is offspring missing their parent's wedding better or worse than a parent missing their offspring's wedding?
I don't want to say better, but yes, a parent missing their offspring's wedding would be considerably worse, I think.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 28 Jan 2013, 19:10
After this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1521), I'm not sure Faye would want to go.

After this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1522), I'm not sure she would be welcome ...

Nah, bring Hanners.  For the rematch.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 28 Jan 2013, 19:19
Ballroom blitz! LITERALLY.

It could be epic, or it could be a train wreck...but most likely, it will be an epic train wreck of epicness.

CHOO CHOO!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 19:20
After this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1522), I'm not sure she would be welcome ...
Considering the fiance played along, I doubt he'd hold it against her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 28 Jan 2013, 20:01
Haaaa....Maurice seems awesome, I want to see more of him.

...Yes, that is a double-entendre. Deal with it. 8)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jan 2013, 20:08
Comic we have.

Hm. Seems like Henry is the one who gives Marten his sarcasm.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 28 Jan 2013, 20:11
God dammit Marten...he's almost as bad as I am at opening mail.

How old is Maurice anyway? He looks about Marten/Steve age... LOL Henry's such a cradle robber.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jan 2013, 20:12
Interesting...sooner than I thought but not as soon as some others guessed. I wonder if we'll get a jump to then like before the pool party. (Two weeks as opposed to a few days, but still)

Red text...Bluesummers, I usually open mail as soon as I get it if only because I almost never get mail. At least not the snail variety.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Jan 2013, 20:28
Interesting.

Two weeks notice and not having spare cash is not being a jerk,  that's life.     Why don't you help your son out there DAD and spot him a round-trip ticket.

(gee not channeling real life at all here hugughblugblugzugbulhhhh)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 28 Jan 2013, 20:34
Why don't you help your son out there DAD and spot him a round-trip ticket.

 I understood that that was the idea?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 28 Jan 2013, 20:51
That's my impression...he'll cover Marten's tickets.

Of course, Marten could have just asked [insert friend name here] regarding the date, because chances are that most of the main crew got invites as well. Just sayin.

...Just saiyan. Heh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Jan 2013, 21:05
Why don't you help your son out there DAD and spot him a round-trip ticket.

 I understood that that was the idea?

Perhaps! 

I saw it as Martin not going at all and Martin-Dad resigned to that fact.

WE WILL FIND OUT SOON... YES?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 28 Jan 2013, 21:05
Jesus Jeph, we know you're Childfree and snipped and proud of it, stop grinding it into the ground. Yes, isn't it horrible that another person can make unreasonable demands and force you to shell out money because you still want them around, so let's make this into another comment on how horrible kids are and how much almost none of your characters want any! That's not children, that's family and friendship.

Sorry, sore point. This bugged me the first time a year or so ago when he newsposted or twittered about it when posting a comic, and once or twice since then, and now we get it twice in a month. I don't care what he accepts (helps that I accept most of it too), but I'm not really interested in inserts of what he rejects.

*looks at signature*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 28 Jan 2013, 21:12
Sorry, sore point. This bugged me the first time a year or so ago when he newsposted or twittered about it when posting a comic, and once or twice since then, and now we get it twice in a month. I don't care what he accepts (helps that I accept most of it too), but I'm not really interested in inserts of what he rejects.

If you don't like it, you're not required to read it.  :P

Jeph pokes the buttons of all kinds of folks, using various subjects like homosexuality, transgender, cheating/adultery, BDSM, mental disorders, etc. I know it's bound to hit a nerve with someone here and there, but that's life.

Example: I cannot STAND listening to my parents talk about how my wife doesn't deserve me, I never should have married her, etc. So I don't listen to them anymore. I still see them every once in a while, but I've come to accept the fact that they're never going to change, so I tune it out.  :parrot:

*looks at signature*

We can pull off at the next rest stop so you can pee and pick up a bag of doritos.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 21:19
This one actually struck me as a bit of a departure: it could have been a Something Positive episode in terms of the emotional dynamics.

From what we've seen, Henry and Veronica enjoyed parenthood.

Would you trust any of the major characters with a kid?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 28 Jan 2013, 21:22
Angst, drama, gloom and long distance phone calls



Wait



This is QC!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 28 Jan 2013, 21:25
Red text...Bluesummers, I usually open mail as soon as I get it if only because I almost never get mail. At least not the snail variety.

It does lend a certain gravitas to snailmail these days, I agree. The latest thing I got as an actual letter was a fancy invite for my cousin's wedding later this year... So I guess it's officially wedding-announcement-notes these days.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 28 Jan 2013, 21:28
This one actually struck me as a bit of a departure: it could have been a Something Positive episode in terms of the emotional dynamics.

From what we've seen, Henry and Veronica enjoyed parenthood.

Would you trust any of the major characters with a kid?
Faye. Though if we're talking about longer than a few hours... Still Faye. Penelope. Momo. Dora. Angus.

We can pull off at the next rest stop so you can pee and pick up a bag of doritos.
I could go for some cheetos, actually.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 28 Jan 2013, 21:28
I saw it as Martin not going at all and Martin-Dad resigned to that fact.

I'm confused. How does "I'm glad you can make it" fit into your interpretation?

... almost none of your characters want any (children)!

Apart from this couple and Dora, are there others that we know about? My memory is not that good, I'm afraid. I was a bit surprised by the "almost none" assertion, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 28 Jan 2013, 21:32
... almost none of your characters want any (children)!
Apart from this couple and Dora, are there others that we know about? My memory is not that good, I'm afraid. I was a bit surprised by the "almost none" assertion, though.
Tai and Steve I think, Marten, Hannelore (obviously, unless she gets a lot healthier). Pretty much everyone that's given an opinion yea or nay except Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Jan 2013, 21:34
I saw it as Martin not going at all and Martin-Dad resigned to that fact.

I'm confused. How does "I'm glad you can make it" fit into your interpretation?


Totally missed that.   hughghghgbublbuggguuuh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Shogouki on 28 Jan 2013, 21:41
Angst, drama, gloom and long distance phone calls



Wait



This is QC!!

And disappearing vegetables!   :-o 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 28 Jan 2013, 22:02
Is "hide the carrot" a variation of "hide the sausage?"    Perhaps some heretofore unknown vegan euphemism I was totally unaware of... until I made it up?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Shogouki on 28 Jan 2013, 22:14
Is "hide the carrot" a variation of "hide the sausage?"    Perhaps some heretofore unknown vegan euphemism I was totally unaware of... until I made it up?

I was going to go with the vegetables making their escape from certain mutilation when he had his back turned.  The talk about children was surely a hastily thought up distraction to hide his disappointment that he let another batch escape while on the phone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 28 Jan 2013, 22:38
Jesus Jeph, we know you're Childfree and snipped and proud of it, stop grinding it into the ground. Yes, isn't it horrible that another person can make unreasonable demands and force you to shell out money because you still want them around, so let's make this into another comment on how horrible kids are and how much almost none of your characters want any! That's not children, that's family and friendship.

Sorry, sore point.

*Macnut prepares sharp sticks to poke at Westrim's sore spot with an evil  :evil:*

Well, kids can be (and usually are) an expensive and emotionally draining pain in the ass. And I say this having raised 3 stepkids and looked after 2 step-grandkids for a year while their mother (my stepdaughter) was in Iraq dodging bullets and IEDs. While I love them all dearly like they are my own blood, I am SO glad that's all over now, and you could not PAY me enough to go back and do it again. Especially their teenage years *shudder*.

As seen with Marten and Henry, even the nicest kids can get on your nerves sometimes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Jan 2013, 22:50
Jim seems pretty glad to have Sam although he was content to stop there.

Momo with a child is a provocative idea. In a sense she's parenting Marigold.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 28 Jan 2013, 23:06
Hm... with Marten going abroad again (to a wedden') are we in for another Dora in wedding dress (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2126) episode? It would fit the situation.

If Dora's invited, I hope she doesn't bring that bazooka with her.

Incidentatlly, does Marten's Dad know about his current lovelife (specifically him and Dora not being together anymore)?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 29 Jan 2013, 00:24
In my experience people planning wedding ring you up five minutes after the RSVP date if you haven't replied, because of caterers and such. Though Maurice owns a night-club, so he might be organising that himself and so be more relaxed.

Puggles are a real thing, apparently. I did not know that, but I am not a dog person.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 29 Jan 2013, 01:00
let's make this into another comment on how horrible kids are and how much almost none of your characters want any!

I'm sure Jeph realises that there are alternative views - after all, we are shown the cast's varied (but generally OK) relationships with their parents quite often, even though they don't yet plan to have children themselves.

chances are that most of the main crew got invites as well.

Actually, no, it would seem.  They would most likely have opened their post, and then obviously would have talked to Marten about it.  (Scope for some quick retconning here, perhaps...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 29 Jan 2013, 02:05
Adding my vote to the belief that Marten was the only one invited, and his invite was for Marten +1, with the +1 assumed to be Dora. Also, I'm betting Marten got the invite back when he and Dora were still together, so even if Henry did get the news of their breakup (doesn't seem like it in the present comic, Marten's relationship status isn't discussed) it's probably too late to change the invite anyway.

I don't think Henry knows Marten's friends well enough to invite them separately, so it'll be up to Marten to decide who his +1 is going to be. I'll be surprised if it's Claire, quite frankly, Marten's just getting to know her and I don't see any real romantic interest there, at least on Marten's part. And since he and his father were talking about "plane tickets" that means a possibly long trip together and maybe sharing a hotel room or other guest quarters, not sure Claire would be up for that with a guy she's just getting to know. Other choices are between Faye and Hannelore, not sure Dora would want to be away from CoD (and Tai) for a couple days even if invited (yeah I know she was really excited about being a flower girl, but remember she's a business owner who's very reluctant to leave her business in the hands of anyone else, and closing it for a couple days could cost her customers).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 29 Jan 2013, 02:11
Actually, no, it would seem.  They would most likely have opened their post, and then obviously would have talked to Marten about it.  (Scope for some quick retconning here, perhaps...)

I dunno if they would have talked about it, as such. I mean probably they would have gossiped about it, but the underlying understanding would be there: "Marten is his son, and respects his dad's proposal to Maurice. Of course he'd be there!"

But you do make a fair point, themacnut. I mean, Dora is the only person they really know within Marten's social circle. Faye and Hanners were invited to the bar, sure, but that doesn't hold much sway in these things...

she's a business owner who's very reluctant to leave her business in the hands of anyone else
I think Faye would be able to handle things if Dora were to go. She's worked there the longest, and (I think, but not too sure) has looked after CoD once or twice (although if only for an hour here or there). There may be some managerial things to teach Faye, but the shop itself should be fine.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 29 Jan 2013, 02:57
They'd probably have talked about it in the sense of "Oh hey Marten I got an invite to your dad's wedding!" or something. It seems unlikely that no one would have mentioned it at all - it's a normal thing to talk about.

I'm going to another friend's wedding this summer. It's getting to be an annual event now. Next it'll be baby showers/christenings and I'll know I'm officially old.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 29 Jan 2013, 03:01

she's a business owner who's very reluctant to leave her business in the hands of anyone else
I think Faye would be able to handle things if Dora were to go. She's worked there the longest, and (I think, but not too sure) has looked after CoD once or twice (although if only for an hour here or there). There may be some managerial things to teach Faye, but the shop itself should be fine.

I agree with you about Faye being able to handle the shop for a few days, but the problem is Dora - she's shown a considerable reluctance to trust anyone else with her "baby"; far as I know, she still keeps the roasting process for the coffee beans close to the vest, never mind the rest of the managerial duties of the shop. I think it would take Faye practically staging a mutiny and shoving Dora out the door to get her to actually leave CoD for a few days.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NotAwesomeAnymore on 29 Jan 2013, 03:07
Wow, Maurice is way younger than Marten's dad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 29 Jan 2013, 04:00
After this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1522), I'm not sure she would be welcome ...


"Dad 2: Dad Harder" is still one of m favourite lines.

Henry did some good parenting there I think. Firm but accepting. Also we didn't hear Marten's side of the call but I'd guess he'd be pretty sorry and upset about leaving his mail.

Also I thought Jeph said he'd never do a wedding storyline once but maybe he said or meant an engagement/marriage continuing arc. In any case, it'll be nice to see more of Henry and Maurice, especially for something fun like a wedding. Lots of crowd scenes and new backgrounds so it'll be super fun.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 29 Jan 2013, 04:56

she's a business owner who's very reluctant to leave her business in the hands of anyone else
I think Faye would be able to handle things if Dora were to go. She's worked there the longest, and (I think, but not too sure) has looked after CoD once or twice (although if only for an hour here or there). There may be some managerial things to teach Faye, but the shop itself should be fine.

I agree with you about Faye being able to handle the shop for a few days, but the problem is Dora - she's shown a considerable reluctance to trust anyone else with her "baby"; far as I know, she still keeps the roasting process for the coffee beans close to the vest, never mind the rest of the managerial duties of the shop. I think it would take Faye practically staging a mutiny and shoving Dora out the door to get her to actually leave CoD for a few days.

You're confusing mutiny and coup.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 29 Jan 2013, 09:33
I think if she were going to the wedding, she might just close the shop for a few days. Might not be Dora-like to begin with, but it simplifies matters.

Then again, it eliminates Hannershenanigans and Faye-isms, which would deprive us of much needed comic relief. So I don't think it'll happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 29 Jan 2013, 09:50
It does appear that QC will soon be coming to California. It'll be interesting to see how my home state gets depicted.

You're confusing mutiny and coup.
Only one is flown, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 29 Jan 2013, 10:03
Driven, actually. With only two doors. Otherwise it's a sedan.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 29 Jan 2013, 11:02
...I thought Henry and Maurice lived in Florida?

(dives off to the archives)

EDIT: Yep. He's goin' to Miami. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=434)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 11:30
I'm going to another friend's wedding this summer. It's getting to be an annual event now.

It's not for me to judge, but maybe your friend should look into the reasons he or she is getting married annually.

(couldn't resist)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 29 Jan 2013, 11:34
Dad's Wedding - Who will be invited?

"Marten - Plus one"    7 (18.9%)

Marten and Dora get their own separate inivtes (Dora's got misplaced by her move.)    2 (5.4%)
Faye gets her own (but without a date)    0 (0%)
Dora gets to be the flower girl!    5 (13.5%)
Veronica is giving the groom away!    3 (8.1%)
Tai and Angus are both left on the sidelines.    1 (2.7%)
It doesn't matter - the wedding was last week.    4 (10.8%) <= Wrong answer.
Hannelore is SPECIFICALLY requested to attend.    3 (8.1%)
"You can bring anyone you wish, except for that scary AnthroPC of yours."    5 (13.5%)
(Why your mother PAID for that thing is BEYOND me.)    0 (0%)
Claire recognizes his Dad's boyfriend's name! It's her UNCLE!    5 (13.5%)
Other (something WAY too weird)    2 (5.4%)

Total Members Voted: 37
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Blood-Tree on 29 Jan 2013, 12:22
I wonder if Marten will be the best man?

(Or maybe he's more suited to being the maid of honour)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Jan 2013, 13:15
My girlfriend was her brother's "Best Woman" recently. That being said, I think Marten would have a little more notification than a "save the date card" (really? Not even a proper invitation?) if he was part of the wedding.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 29 Jan 2013, 13:42
I'm going to another friend's wedding this summer. It's getting to be an annual event now.

It's not for me to judge, but maybe your friend should look into the reasons he or she is getting married annually.

(couldn't resist)

I have a really good friend who, when we were both in our twenties, was asked to be a bridesmaid many many times, with the concomitant purchase of expensive and otherwise unwearable dresses. She noticed she was bridesmaiding for some of her friends multiple times and realized she was developing a decent sense going in as to which marriages were going to last for more than a couple years (or months). She decided if an impending nuptial didn't trip her enduro-meter, she would politely decline the honor of being a bridesmaid. After a while, her serially married friends became afraid to ask her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 29 Jan 2013, 13:57
I have never been asked to be a bridesmaid :( Not even for my mum and stepdad's wedding - they didn't have any. I can't actually think of any friends I am close enough to that they would ask me. That's really sad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 29 Jan 2013, 13:58
I've never been asked either. But then I'm a guy. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 29 Jan 2013, 14:01
I've also never been asked to be a bride - booo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Game and Watch Forever on 29 Jan 2013, 14:21
A really close friend has told me multiple times she wants me to be her "man of honor" whenever she gets married... Not sure how I feel about that, but I don't think I can say no.  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 29 Jan 2013, 14:37
A really close friend has told me multiple times she wants me to be her "man of honor" whenever she gets married... Not sure how I feel about that, but I don't think I can say no.  :laugh:

I'm sure you'll look real purdy in the dress! :3
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 29 Jan 2013, 14:49
A really close friend has told me multiple times she wants me to be her "man of honor" whenever she gets married... Not sure how I feel about that, but I don't think I can say no.  :laugh:

I have a male friend I want to be my Man of Honour even though I never thought of using that term. Take it as a compliment you're such a good friend that she's defying social convention to include you!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Shogouki on 29 Jan 2013, 15:01
A really close friend has told me multiple times she wants me to be her "man of honor" whenever she gets married... Not sure how I feel about that, but I don't think I can say no.  :laugh:

I have a male friend I want to be my Man of Honour even though I never thought of using that term. Take it as a compliment you're such a good friend that she's defying social convention to include you!

Indeed!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 29 Jan 2013, 15:57
Calling it here: Marten in a little boy-shorts formal outfit holding a ring sewn onto a pillow.

With blue hair.

#yagottahavebluehair #hashtagsdontworkontheforum

Even if it's not in the comic it'd be a great print for a con.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Ph2 on 29 Jan 2013, 16:31
Calling it here: Marten in a little boy-shorts formal outfit holding a ring sewn onto a pillow.

With blue hair.

#yagottahavebluehair #hashtagsdontworkontheforum

Even if it's not in the comic it'd be a great print for a con.

Marigold would love that, perhaps a little to much even.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 29 Jan 2013, 17:29
Wow, Maurice is way younger than Marten's dad.

They remind me of Dan Savage and his husband Terry Miller: (http://www.portlandmercury.com/imager/dan-savage-and-terry-miller/b/original/7677772/964b/terryDan.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 29 Jan 2013, 17:46
Just got done reading Page 3 of this thread...

I don't get how a couple of you came to such wildly different conclusions than I did, I admit. Marten's had the invitation for, if my experience is any indication, a month (minimum), unopened and forgotten. Time to hopefully put away money towards transportation, ask for time off, etc. Because he slacked and dropped the ball (something I'm guilty of sometimes), he's just about out of time, and so has to ask for help. His father is annoyed, but will pay (or loan).

Or am I missing something here?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 17:56
I took it the same way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 29 Jan 2013, 18:02
A "save the date" is not a formal wedding invitation.

Let my draconian rulings be unchallenged!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: blacksinow on 29 Jan 2013, 19:01
You'd think his dad would have told him, rather then sending him a card in the first place, as someone mentioned here... with Marten being his son and all. This is starting to sound like so many other web comic parent-son relationships that I've seen and heard so much about.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 29 Jan 2013, 19:39
My dad didn't tell me he had been in the hospital until weeks afterward.

When he was down in Arizona, and I was all the way up here in Wisconsin.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: StevenC on 29 Jan 2013, 20:08
It could also be that Mr. Reed did tell Marten, but knowing of his forgetfulness also sent a card.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 29 Jan 2013, 20:21
Comic!

....aaaaaaand there goes our top three guesses right out the window.

That leaves Tai, Emily and Claire.

Tai prolly won't want to leave because of Dora.

Emily will have some crazy excuse.

Guess who's going to be invited to go to his dad's wedding.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 20:23
This means Dora can't be flower girl!

Hannelore could wear her containment suit on the plane.

Momo would probably enjoy the chance to add to her social protocol database but she would attract gossip if there as a date.

Since he's OK with taking a Justafriend, why not Marigold?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Jan 2013, 20:24
Hannelore has a point. I once caught Norovirus from a Southwest flight. Not a pleasant experience at all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 29 Jan 2013, 20:33
Quote from: Jeph
I share Hannelore\'s concerns
Commercial airliners or feral hogs?

Both?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 29 Jan 2013, 20:37
Comic!Guess who's going to be invited to go to his dad's wedding.

Padma?












































































 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 29 Jan 2013, 20:42
 Faye looks kind of different.

 Also, we still have Tannelore  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 29 Jan 2013, 20:43
Not sure what the QCworld etiquette would be about this, but AnthroPCs can be shut down (we've seen both winslow and pintsize do it) so could momo go in the cargo hold?

Or maybe ship her big body as luggage and let Marigold "carry her on" as an infant?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: themacnut on 29 Jan 2013, 20:46
Yep, I was not at all surprised Dora begged off due to business responsibilities, she's essentially married to CoD. Also not surprised that Faye preferred doing couple things with Angus. Hannelore's reasons for not going even make sense, the closed environment of an airliner does make disease transmission quite easy (assuming the disease can be transmitted through the air, that is). They could always drive I suppose, but it'll be a long trip down to Miami, a couple days even they drive nonstop (and assuming either Marten or Hannelore CAN drive)

If Marten does end up having to take Claire, that could be an uncomfortable but hilarious trip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: J on 29 Jan 2013, 20:56
i'd bet 100quatloos he's gonna bring claire
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 29 Jan 2013, 21:03
I'm surprised Dora is even being considered.  I mean, really!

Yeah, my money's on Claire.  I'll hedge a bit with Mar and Steve, and lay Emily.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 29 Jan 2013, 21:06
 He's gonna bring... Gabby!  :psyduck: Did you want something unexpected? There you go.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: sha'mad conde on 29 Jan 2013, 21:07
I would like to order a Ghost-pepper Mocha, please. That is all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Parasol on 29 Jan 2013, 21:12
My heart skipped a beat at the thought of Hanners and Martin... I am going to hold out on this till the end of time if I have to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 29 Jan 2013, 21:13
I'm still thinking Hanners.  She has a tendency to overcome her fears.  Not to mention that she has easy access to private crafts, if it really came to that ...

Marigold would be another good option.  And yes, she could bring Momo.  Airliner restrictions could even be an opportunity to bring back the old chassis for a weekend.  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 29 Jan 2013, 21:17
Feral hogs are a real problem.  And since they're an invasive agricultural pest, conventional hunting laws don't always apply.

Someone once told me bringing a date to a wedding is like bringing a deer carcass to a hunting trip.  I think it was Vince Vaughn.  Considering the women at said wedding may be relatives I'm inclined to have qualms with that advice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 21:27
Feral hogs are reportedly tough opponents in a fight.

I won't confuse them with commercial airliners, though, not until pigs fly.

Oh no. A Terrible Idea just struck. Who says the +1 has to be female?

Imagine if Marten shows up at the wedding bringing Pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Jan 2013, 21:30
Or he brings Steve as his date.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 29 Jan 2013, 21:47
i'd bet 100quatloos he's gonna bring claire

Add my 100 to the pot as well.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 29 Jan 2013, 22:03
Commercial airliners or feral hogs?

Both?

Bring a rifle and you'll probably be alright in either case.

Allzeit bereit!

Edit: Okay I need sleep. I wrote that thinking Cougars, not airliners.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Jan 2013, 22:04
A "save the date" is not a formal wedding invitation.
That's what I said! Anyway, I like how Angus has finally convinced Faye to go to New York with him, after she'd previously refused (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2038).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 29 Jan 2013, 22:05
I don't think Marten wants to bring any of the interns.  Sooner he'd bring Sam.

I don't think Steve would go, leaving Cosette behind.  Amir, perhaps can spare a weekend ...

Or hey, Raven might be up for a bit of randomness ... if Marten dares inflict her on his father's wedding.  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: foolsguinea on 29 Jan 2013, 22:12
Is Claire really taking over the role of Marten's opposite-sex snarky dialogue partner, that is, the Faye role?
Or is Jeph just on a Claire kick?
Either way, it could be Claire. But she's an intern, and it feels "too soon" in their friendship to me, and I don't think Marten should try and use her as ersatz Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hobo386 on 29 Jan 2013, 22:34
The pacing of the comic seems to indicate Claire, but I'm really hoping for Emily, because I prefer her awesomeness and potential for comedy, compared to the "let's explore gender issues" that we get with Claire.  Not that it's a horrible thing; it's just not my cup of tea.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 29 Jan 2013, 22:47
I don't think Marten's necessarily TRYING to use her as anything. It's not as if he's recently had a falling out with Real Faye and needs a Replacement Faye to get by. :P
Jeph's probably just taking the time to develop her character a little bit more.

Re: New comic, I know that the forums do Wild Mass Guessing (TM) all the time, but when it comes time for FAYE to make presumptions of this sort, she's very often completely correct (see: Marten/Dora, Marten/Padma, Dora/Jim).
Though honestly, I wouldn't like it so much if Marten arbitrarily met somebody at the wedding.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Jan 2013, 23:14
I miss Raven. She'd be a good choice.

If we see the wedding we'll see Martenmom again. Her dynamics with the new characters: well, in the old days, IBM manuals would warn that doing certain things "may produce unpredictable results".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 29 Jan 2013, 23:40
He's gonna bring... Gabby!  :psyduck: Did you want something unexpected? There you go.

She won't go to Miami. It's the humidity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 30 Jan 2013, 00:08
Marten brings Marigold as his date...and just as the minister asks if anyone objects, an earwig bites her in the leg and she stands up and yells.

Poor poor Marigold, mistaken as a homophobe, and never to function in normal society. :psyduck:

Also, my browser doesn't recognize the word "homophobe"...I think this is a good thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jan 2013, 01:25
I wonder if this is an opportunity for more Hannermom? She could swoop in on a private jet to save the day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hakko504 on 30 Jan 2013, 01:29
I'm thinking Marten will bring Emily. And conveniently forgetting to tell her that it's a gay wedding, which will cause some interesting (i.e. funny) moments.

Claire is another possibility though that storyline would probably be quite different from anything with Emily. More serious for a start, more reflecting over life as gay and/or trans etc.

It's also possible that he may chose Marigold (and Momo), but she would more or less play the same role as Emily, comic relief, and AFAIK Marigold should know that Martendad is gay, which takes away a prime piece of comic real estate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ihaveavoice on 30 Jan 2013, 02:17
The pacing of the comic seems to indicate Claire, but I'm really hoping for Emily, because I prefer her awesomeness and potential for comedy, compared to the "let's explore gender issues" that we get with Claire.  Not that it's a horrible thing; it's just not my cup of tea.

I haven't seen any "let's explore gender issues" stuff with Claire outside of the arc where she came out as trans* to Marten. I've just seen her be the same snarky, tightly-wound character she was when she was introduced with no new plot interest in her gender identity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Spriteling on 30 Jan 2013, 02:50
I hope that Hanners ends up going, whether by overcoming her fears or private jet.  I just think it's too soon to ask Claire, and I think she might construe it as romantic interest even when there is none.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 30 Jan 2013, 03:38
The pacing of the comic seems to indicate Claire, but I'm really hoping for Emily, because I prefer her awesomeness and potential for comedy, compared to the "let's explore gender issues" that we get with Claire.  Not that it's a horrible thing; it's just not my cup of tea.

I haven't seen any "let's explore gender issues" stuff with Claire outside of the arc where she came out as trans* to Marten. I've just seen her be the same snarky, tightly-wound character she was when she was introduced with no new plot interest in her gender identity.

Yeah, I was gonna post basically this reply but ihaveavoice beat me to it. Amazing, really, isn't it, how simple knowledge can so distort someone's perceptions that they start inserting things that not only aren't there, aren't even close to being hinted at.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jan 2013, 04:31
He's gonna bring... Gabby!  :psyduck: Did you want something unexpected? There you go.

She won't go to Miami. It's the humidity.

How'd that brick get in here?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Vurogj on 30 Jan 2013, 04:40

How'd that brick get in here?
It's the longevity?

so, so, sorry.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jan 2013, 05:15
By the way, did anyone get that Faye was doing the double-entendre with Hannelore there?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 30 Jan 2013, 05:26
I wondered how long it would be before anyone commented on it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 30 Jan 2013, 05:30
I wonder what Marigold's up to that weekend?  Or Claire?

But I doubt Marty will require assistance in beating off all the folks hitting on him at the reception.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 30 Jan 2013, 05:42
Amazing, really, isn't it, how simple knowledge can so distort someone's perceptions that they start inserting things that not only aren't there, aren't even close to being hinted at.
Now, be fair – while these things "aren't there" in the comic, they've certainly "been here" in the forum.

I don't blame anyone who reads the forum for holding the idea that we're getting "let's explore gender issues" with Claire.

(The comic has handled it in a nice, calm way, rather low tone perhaps.  The forum was, for a while, a train crash, and could easily revert to that form.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 30 Jan 2013, 05:48
The forum was, for a while, a train crash,

It was very busy, but remarkably far from a train crash, I'd say.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jan 2013, 05:50
I did actually have a slight fear of what would happen if Marten did ask Claire to join him at his dad's wedding.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 30 Jan 2013, 05:51
If this was real-life rather than QC.... Claire goes with Marten, recognises Maurice as her father* (who she rather despises). He doesn't recognise her though, as he's unaware of her transition.

But such improbabilities only happen in reality, they're far too implausible to use in a comic strip.

So I'm going for.... Sven. Outside chance, Marigold.

* - or father's ex-boyfriend...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 30 Jan 2013, 05:59
I haven't seen any "let's explore gender issues" stuff with Claire outside of the arc where she came out as trans* to Marten. I've just seen her be the same snarky, tightly-wound character she was when she was introduced with no new plot interest in her gender identity.

I was going to say almost exactly this - yes, the forum did see a lot of discussion on the subject and in fact it's ongoing in the DISCUSS section, but Jeph can't really be held accountable for how much we talk about certain topics.

That said, I'd like to see Momo going with Marten. I think it'd be an interesting window into the way QC world handles anthroPCs - for example, I wonder how airport security screening works when you are full of the things that the scans find suspicious?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 30 Jan 2013, 06:16
I haven't seen any "let's explore gender issues" stuff with Claire outside of the arc where she came out as trans* to Marten. I've just seen her be the same snarky, tightly-wound character she was when she was introduced with no new plot interest in her gender identity.

Yeah, I was gonna post basically this reply but ihaveavoice beat me to it. Amazing, really, isn't it, how simple knowledge can so distort someone's perceptions that they start inserting things that not only aren't there, aren't even close to being hinted at.

Claire, who happens to be Trans: "[Pun]Talky[/Pun]"

Marten: "That was a weak pun, Claire"

Forum: "Why are you shoving Gender Issues in our face!?"

 :-D

By the way, did anyone get that Faye was doing the double-entendre with Hannelore there?

i am not a clever woman, pls explan
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mad Cat on 30 Jan 2013, 06:24
But such improbabilities only happen in reality, they're far too implausible to use in a comic strip.
Of course, all us LGBT peeps know one another from the annual meetings of the homosexual agenda steering committee.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 30 Jan 2013, 06:26
The cougar reference - Faye wasn't talking about wild cats.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 30 Jan 2013, 06:31
The cougar reference - Faye wasn't talking about wild cats.

Oh, it was that he meant? Nevermind then, thought I was missing some double entendre, since cougar is just a word for the older women getting it on with younger guys.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 30 Jan 2013, 06:44
It's more of a "hidden" double entendre with Hanners because it just goes over her head. :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 30 Jan 2013, 06:50
If this was real-life rather than QC.... Claire goes with Marten, recognises Maurice as her father* (who she rather despises). He doesn't recognise her though, as he's unaware of her transition.

But such improbabilities only happen in reality, they're far too implausible to use in a comic strip.
[ ... ]

Life is stranger than fiction, eh?


Dora: For reasons, no.
Faye: Away with Angus.
Tai: Dora stays, she stays.
Marigold: No time to buy a dress, too many neuroses to battle down in two weeks time.
Momo: AnthoPC, so probably not.
Hanners: Neuroses. Many people she doesn't know. Probably not.
Penelope/Wil: Not really close, probably not.
Steve/Cosette: Only available in pair, so no.
Jimbo: If he could find him. Might not be fit for weddings.
Sven: Dunno what's happenin' with him. Maybe.
Gabby: No real contact, it seems. No.
Emily: Probably not able to hold her act together long enough to get through a wedding without something weird happening. Definitely a possible +1 story-wise.
Claire: Great smalltalk with Marten. +1 possibility.
Tequilla monster: Do hallucinations count as a +1 if the alcohol level is constantly kept at level?
Pintsize: NO!
Yelling Bird: For obvious reasons ...

Did I forget anyone important? Oh yeah.

pwhodges: Responsible adults at a wedding? Pffffffffff!
DSL: Great at parties. I think. So possible +1.
And many more: You figure it out.


The cougar reference - Faye wasn't talking about wild cats.
Oh, it was that he meant? Nevermind then, thought I was missing some double entendre, since cougar is just a word for the older women getting it on with younger guys.
Isn't that more like "seeking to get it on with ..."?


It's more of a "hidden" double entendre with Hanners because it just goes over her head. :D
A SNEAKtendre.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jan 2013, 07:01
Dora: For reasons, no.
Faye: Away with Angus.
Tai: Dora stays, she stays.
Marigold: No time to buy a dress, too many neuroses to battle down in two weeks time.
I seem to remember that she has a dress that her rack looks amazing in.

Quote
Momo: AnthoPC, so probably not.
Hanners: Neuroses. Many people she doesn't know. Probably not.
Penelope/Wil: Not really close, probably not.
Steve/Cosette: Only available in pair, so no.
Jimbo: If he could find him. Might not be fit for weddings.
Future Jimbo: "I ain't ever allowed in Florida again."

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jan 2013, 07:19
Dad's Wedding - Who will be invited?

"Marten - Plus one"    13 (21.7%)
Marten and Dora get their own separate inivtes (Dora's got misplaced by her move.)    2 (3.3%)
Faye gets her own (but without a date)    0 (0%)
Dora gets to be the flower girl!    7 (11.7%)
Veronica is giving the groom away!    5 (8.3%)
Tai and Angus are both left on the sidelines.    1 (1.7%)
It doesn't matter - the wedding was last week.    4 (6.7%)
Hannelore is SPECIFICALLY requested to attend.    7 (11.7%)
"You can bring anyone you wish, except for that scary AnthroPC of yours."    6 (10%)
(Why your mother PAID for that thing is BEYOND me.)    0 (0%)
Claire recognizes his Dad's boyfriend's name! It's her UNCLE!    11 (18.3%)
Other (something WAY too weird)    4 (6.7%)

Total Members Voted: 60
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ink slinger on 30 Jan 2013, 08:51
He's gonna bring... Gabby!  :psyduck: Did you want something unexpected? There you go.

Beat me to it.

Marigold: No time to buy a dress, too many neuroses to battle down in two weeks time.
I seem to remember that she has a dress that her rack looks amazing in.

Indeed. And I imagine that wearing white to this particular wedding would be acceptable, since neither of the grooms will be wearing a white dress.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: slaufer on 30 Jan 2013, 09:51
forget all that gender issue shit, as a resident of buffalo i have only one question

what the shit is a buffalo scone

also take claire, i want shit to get real weird
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pendrake on 30 Jan 2013, 10:36
For comic #2374... (https://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2374)

1. Woo, new extended story-arc incoming.  It will be nice to see both Reed parents again.

2. Loved Faye's expression in panel #4, it really appealed to me art-wise.

3. While I also have my doubts to Hannelore being Marten's companion/date to Henry Reed's wedding, I think it would be and excellent & ironic turn-around from Hanners' taking Marten up to Station to meet her own father.  (Also, still wondering if her skin-tone is a permanent thing now?)

4. As for a non-Hannelore option...  Claire would be the apparrently obvious choice since she is not work-bound to Coffee of Doom, and Jeph enjoys drawing her.  And as a transsexual, Claire would probably mesh well with the likely crowd make-up of Henry Reed's wedding.

5. Marigold would be another viable choice, also not work-bound to Coffee of Doom, and another character Jeph enjoys drawing.  Whether Momo also accompanies will be an interesting story-factor too, Marigold flying "solo" for once (relatively speaking).

6. Whomever Marten brings to Henry Reed's wedding, I am certain it will be an entertaining interaction between the Reed parents towards Marten's perceived date :evil: , even if he brings a guy-friend.

7. Ghost Pepper Mocha.  That is one form of coffee that will probably wake you up, one way or another.

8. @Slaufer...  Buffalo Scones.  Scones hard-baked with buffalo wing sauce stuffed with buffalo meat-filling...obviously :roll: .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 30 Jan 2013, 11:23
8. @Slaufer...  Buffalo Scones.  Scones hard-baked with buffalo wing sauce stuffed with buffalo meat-filling...obviously :roll: .

That's one possibility.  The other is a scone made left behind by a buffalo, baked in the prarie's summer sun...

AKA buffalo chips. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: A_Polite_Noise on 30 Jan 2013, 12:10
I have been reading QC for years and also stalking these messageboards (and getting angry at a lot of you) for almost the same amount of time.  I just signed up for no reason other than to say I like Claire and hope Marten takes her and I hope they date each other and make out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ScoutX on 30 Jan 2013, 12:21
It has to be Hanners or alone.

I just can't see him taking an intern as a wedding date. He barely knows any of them.

His ex and his ex-infatuation who are both in relationships shouldn't have needed extra reasons to not be his date.

How comfortable would he be asking his dad to not only pay for his flight, but also for the flight of someone he isn't especially close to? Hanners is the only one that's been around long enough to be a friend date. She's also the only one (other than Faye and Dora) that's been around long enough to actually meet the couple.

If she doesn't go, I can't see him bringing anyone else without it feeling forced. We may even get a little talk where Faye and Dora have to explain to him why it'll be good for him to go off and do his own thing without his little harem.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ukrayf on 30 Jan 2013, 12:31
I assumed it'd be Claire. Does anyone know if a Claire/Marten fanship is at all prominent? They seem somewhat set up tbh.

If not Claire, it'll be Emily and the wedding'll be a comedy sideplot, as opposed to a romantic one. Is Gaby still alive?

@ScoutX Emily invited him to her beach house and implied he was basically one of her only friends. It's also pretty much fully set up that he and Claire are firm friends at this point.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: StevenC on 30 Jan 2013, 12:36
If this was real-life rather than QC.... Claire goes with Marten, recognises Maurice as her father* (who she rather despises). He doesn't recognise her though, as he's unaware of her transition.

But such improbabilities only happen in reality, they're far too implausible to use in a comic strip.

So I'm going for.... Sven. Outside chance, Marigold.

* - or father's ex-boyfriend...
If this was a soap opera, Claire goes with Marten, recognises Maurice as her father's ex-boyfriend who she had a single night of passion with before he had to leave for Antarctica on an exploration during which he fell into a coma for a year which drove Claire to drinking. After he awoke from the coma in a field hospital in central Africa, he suffered from Amnesia, not knowing anything about his past, only driven by a weird feeling of "I have to go there" to Miami, where he met Mr. Reed. Seeing Claire at his wedding, he recognises her even through the transition, again falls head over heels in love with her despite her now being a woman inside and out, and elopes with her.
A week later, Marten gets cut out of Mr. Reed's will.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 30 Jan 2013, 12:52
Emily invited him to her beach house and implied he was basically one of her only friends.

 Thanks. Now i remember that and i'm like "Awww, Emily  :cry: "
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: hobo386 on 30 Jan 2013, 13:06
Amazing, really, isn't it, how simple knowledge can so distort someone's perceptions that they start inserting things that not only aren't there, aren't even close to being hinted at.
Now, be fair – while these things "aren't there" in the comic, they've certainly "been here" in the forum.

I don't blame anyone who reads the forum for holding the idea that we're getting "let's explore gender issues" with Claire.

(The comic has handled it in a nice, calm way, rather low tone perhaps.  The forum was, for a while, a train crash, and could easily revert to that form.)

This may be what I was thinking.  But I feel the comic is still trying to explore them in the "trans-people are just people" way.  And that her coming out being placed at the climax of the party arc kindof made it important to some extent (though it did handle it well).

Personally, I don't understand most of the trans-community, and I don't think I ever will.  I can't really get beyond "people are people," so I can't really wrap my head around why people place so much importance on the distinction between things like cis, trans, pre-op, post-op, gender, sex, bi, bi-curious, genderqueer, queer, gay, pansexual, asexual, or whatever.  It's all too much to worry about.  And even though it don't understand the differences between half of them, I feel that the labels are somewhat harmful for people who identify with them because it pidgeonholes them into a category rather than letting them just be people.  However, this really isn't something I feel like discussing in the forums, so I'm gonna keep my mouth shut for the next week or so (And y'know, discuss at your own risk).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Jan 2013, 13:18
Welcome, new people! No Marten/Claire shipping, please. All we've seen is a Trusted Friend dynamic and Marten has already ruled out doing something as unethical as dating an intern.
---
It's sad that people aren't flexible enough to use a different running gag. It's the rigidity.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jan 2013, 13:28
Anyone Jeph can ship, we can ship better, we can ship anyone better than Jeph.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can, yes we can, yes we caaaaaaaaaaaaan!

My opinion is that for a ship to be sunk (even by word of god) it has to have already been out of drydock and set sail, and therefore all ships are valid, even gaudy top heavy ones like the Wasa. For my own use, I mostly don't because I think shipping is ridiculous when we have planes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ScoutX on 30 Jan 2013, 13:40
@ScoutX Emily invited him to her beach house and implied he was basically one of her only friends. It's also pretty much fully set up that he and Claire are firm friends at this point.

I thought the point was that it was strange that he was one of her only friends.

It feels to me that all of the interns are too young, too recently introduced, and too much like his employees for it to be appropriate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Blood-Tree on 30 Jan 2013, 13:45
Y'know this is all kinda interesting...

The problem with developing your characters is that, if you're not careful, they lose all the flaws and quirks that make them interesting and become normal well-adjusted people; Faye, Dora and Hanners have all grown and there isn't much to explore about them anymore.

For the sake of the narrative, Marten will pick one of the interns so they can join the main cast. Emily has been established as a 'Ralph Wiggum' now, so it probably has to be Clare. I agree that it does feel forced and that Marten hasn't really known Clare long enough to invite her to a family wedding.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: A_Polite_Noise on 30 Jan 2013, 14:18
This may be what I was thinking.  But I feel the comic is still trying to explore them in the "trans-people are just people" way.  And that her coming out being placed at the climax of the party arc kindof made it important to some extent (though it did handle it well).

I know you just tried to avoid this whole thing at the end, by saying you don't want to discuss it and are going to keep your mouth shut, but I'm sorry I really have to respond to some of this=)  There is just something strange and...troubling...about the phrasing "trying to explore them in the 'trans-people are just people' way", because...you know.  They are just people.  The idea that it is some strange diversion to have a trans character introduced as trans and then act as other characters do - i.e. like "just people" - is understandably off-putting as it seems to suggest that such a notion is forced, or so jarring that it disturbs the story.

Quote
Personally, I don't understand most of the trans-community, and I don't think I ever will.  I can't really get beyond "people are people," so I can't really wrap my head around why people place so much importance on the distinction between things like cis, trans, pre-op, post-op, gender, sex, bi, bi-curious, genderqueer, queer, gay, pansexual, asexual, or whatever.  It's all too much to worry about.  And even though it don't understand the differences between half of them, I feel that the labels are somewhat harmful for people who identify with them because it pidgeonholes them into a category rather than letting them just be people.  However, this really isn't something I feel like discussing in the forums, so I'm gonna keep my mouth shut for the next week or so (And y'know, discuss at your own risk).

...and the thing is, the thing you don't understand (in my opinion) in this instance isn't the trans community  but transphobia.  It wasn't the trans community, or any aspect of the LGBT community, that up and decided "let's label ourselves differently and distinguish ourselves and act like people aren't just people!"  It was bigots who created the divide, and new labels that aren't slurs and are created by and owned by disenfranchised groups, as well as distinctions that are beacons of solidarity and positive thought rather than the negative stereotypes and condemnations of hate, are a reaction to bigoted divisions, not a schism of the trans community's own making and devising.  That's my opinion on the whole thing, anyway.  I hope this didn't come off as attacking you!  I just thought I could respond to some notions in your post=)  Apologies if this at all feels like I'm "dragging" you into a discussion; I've said what I was compelled to say and I'm glad your post gave me the opportunity to =D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 30 Jan 2013, 14:27
Jimbo officiates. The Elvis costume just got back from the cleaners.

@Soulsynger: I have been assured I am not great at parties. Thanks though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Qwert2401 on 30 Jan 2013, 14:55
Ship Hanners and Marten... die of daawwwwwness
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Jan 2013, 14:59
*cough* Shipping is generally frowned upon here. Shipping Hanners with anybody is grounds for slow disembowelment, because it gets really creepy really soon, and we wouldn't want any of that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 30 Jan 2013, 15:02
OT: Loki, have you changed your avatar recently? Come back from a fairly long absence? I don't seem to remember you posting much until recently, but you've been around since long before I was.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ukrayf on 30 Jan 2013, 15:07
The problem with developing your characters is that, if you're not careful, they lose all the flaws and quirks that make them interesting and become normal well-adjusted people; Faye, Dora and Hanners have all grown and there isn't much to explore about them anymore.

Developed characters are thoroughly preferable to one-dimensional gag characters...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 30 Jan 2013, 16:17
... The problem with developing your characters is that, if you're not careful, they lose all the flaws and quirks that make them interesting and become normal well-adjusted people ...

I would say exactly the opposite. "Developing" a character doesn't mean eliminating the flaws and quirks that make them interesting; it means exploring in more depth the history and reason for said flaws and quirks (and hopefully weaves such exploration and the results thereof into the story in an artistically pleasing way)  -- in other words, makes the characters and story *more* interesting.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 30 Jan 2013, 16:19
I don't see why people keep suggesting that Claire is the obvious choice because she's trans. Being trans and being gay do not mean that people will automatically be friends. That's like saying "hey, May [that's me, by the way], you will really like my friends, because they are also female!" or "I want to introduce you to my friend Dwayne. You'll get along great because you're female and he's black". It is possible to be gay and still transphobic. It is possible to be trans and homophobic. It is possible to be gay or trans and just not a very nice person. It is possible to be trans and not want to go to a wedding between two men you have never met at which you will have to interact with a lot of other people you have never met, with someone who is technically your employer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jan 2013, 16:28
Going by what Jeph is saying on Twitter, there's a pretty good chance it'll be Claire going with Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 30 Jan 2013, 17:07
Speaking only for myself, I'm not saying Claire's a good choice to accompany Marten to the wedding because she's trans*. I'm saying she's a good choice because the tightly-wound personality Jeph's given her gives the opportunity for plenty of conflict. From conflict a good storyteller (and a receptive audience) can derive humor, pathos, insight ... any number of things expected by those who appreciate a good story.
Jeph is a good storyteller.
His audience is, for the most part, receptive.
So, yeah. Unrealistic though it might be (they just MET, f'cryin'outloud) I hope Claire goes to the wedding with Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 30 Jan 2013, 17:15
There's a "no shipping" rule, yeah.  It seems to operate under a narrow definition of "shipping," however, restricted to the obviously unlikely, but for that Hannelore/foo is the canonical example.  Still, I'm a little nervous even talking Marten and Claire, since we haven't really seen much evidence of an attraction between them, but no one seems to be complaining yet.

No, I don't think anyone is saying "because she's trans," more just because there's been a lot of interaction between the two of them lately.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: quix0te on 30 Jan 2013, 18:06
Geez, DSL, you're old!
That joke is a freaking classic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 30 Jan 2013, 18:19
TBH, I wasn't sure of the age of the joke. But Pete Seeger recorded "This Old Man" in 1953, and it was popular in a movie in 1958. So I wondered how many Questionables would have heard of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 30 Jan 2013, 18:23
Marten plus one ^///^ we shall not see a Dora throwing flowers though.

My hopes are for Hanners. She's just such a wonderful character and I think she'd make the arc much more enjoyable than Claire. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jan 2013, 18:27
I wonder if Claire would take it more as an "anthropological experience". You know, try to figure out what goes on in a gay wedding and all that - just for future reference.

And I'm betting Tai will encourage Marten to take Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: quix0te on 30 Jan 2013, 18:37
Every now and then how much Jeph hates his focal character is kind of off-putting.  If HE isn't willing to invest in the character, why should anybody else?
Marten's either such a screw-up he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad, or he's so passive-aggressive he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad.  I don't much care for my dad, but I'd certainly do that. 
As for who he should take, well, I'd like to see Marigold.  I think she's stealth cool.  I think it would make her feel like a pretty princess (although it would stress her out as well)  I think it would be a huge mistake to take Claire as its pretty clear she likes Marten and I don't get much of a reciprocal vibe.
TBH, taking ANYBODY at this juncture would be a huge mistake.  His dad is springing for a hotel room.  Unlikely he's springing for two.  This means close quarters.  Even if there was a mutual spark of interest, it would be wrecked by too much, too soon.
An AWESOME plot I'd love to see would be if he went alone (as he should). Then, one of the aforementioned cougars locks onto Marten and he goes with it.... and it wasn't so bad for either of them.  She could validate him and be supportive from a distance, and he could have a calmer relationship at a remove. 
But that lacks the hilarious 'Marten catches a line drive to the nuts' vibe that seems to be QC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Jan 2013, 19:20
Marten's either such a screw-up he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad, or he's so passive-aggressive he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad.
Or maybe he was in the middle of something when he got it, put it aside, and forgot to open it later. And maybe he expected an actual invitation to follow anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 30 Jan 2013, 19:22
 Marten and Claire will go to the wedding. Marten's dad was expecting Dora to be his date, so she could be the flower girl.
 Instead, and after saying no at first, Claire will be the flower girl!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 30 Jan 2013, 19:24
Anyone Jeph can ship, we can ship better, we can ship anyone better than Jeph.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can, yes we can, yes we caaaaaaaaaaaaan!

My opinion is that for a ship to be sunk (even by word of god) it has to have already been out of drydock and set sail, and therefore all ships are valid, even gaudy top heavy ones like the Wasa. For my own use, I mostly don't because I think shipping is ridiculous when we have planes.


"Fireing point proceedures. Make Tube One ready in all respects."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: henri bemis on 30 Jan 2013, 19:45
Marten's either such a screw-up he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad, or he's so passive-aggressive he didn't open a letter/card from his Dad.
Or maybe he was in the middle of something when he got it, put it aside, and forgot to open it later. And maybe he expected an actual invitation to follow anyway.

Yeah.  I just assumed Marten is a bit like me when it comes to mail - If it's not from my landlord, or otherwise potentially panic-inducing, I often just put it aside somewhere until later, and it slips my mind entirely until I remember I need it.  Which is obviously what happens at the end of 2372.  I'm only slightly better at it than at cashing paper checks in a timely fashion.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 30 Jan 2013, 20:21
Marten and Claire will go to the wedding. Marten's dad was expecting Dora to be his date, so she could be the flower girl.
 Instead, and after saying no at first, Claire will be the flower girl!  :psyduck:

And cue Veronica Vance making inappropriate remarks to Claire!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jan 2013, 20:40
*cough* Shipping is generally frowned upon here. Shipping Hanners with anybody is grounds for slow disembowelment, because it gets really creepy really soon, and we wouldn't want any of that.
I remember the days when she was getting paired with Marigold and people were screaming creepiness for all sorts of bad reasons (they aren't lesbians!, etc), so excuse me for being skeptical. She's an adult and fully capable of making her own informed decisions, even if those decisions are made in the minds of fans, Jeph, and his guest strip writers (who have happily flaunted ships that are declared nuclear).

The only bona fide creepiness I recall was REAL!Hanners and people making rapey comments, which is absolutely not okay if my calling it bona fide didn't make that clear.

"Fireing point proceedures. Make Tube One ready in all respects."
Joke's on you, I'm in an ekranoplane!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 30 Jan 2013, 20:44
Anyone Jeph can ship, we can ship better, we can ship anyone better than Jeph.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can.
No we can't!
Yes we can, yes we can, yes we caaaaaaaaaaaaan!

My opinion is that for a ship to be sunk (even by word of god) it has to have already been out of drydock and set sail, and therefore all ships are valid, even gaudy top heavy ones like the Wasa. For my own use, I mostly don't because I think shipping is ridiculous when we have planes.


"Firing point procedures. Make Tube One ready in all respects."

Nuclear-tipped anti-ship missile standing by.   Moderator attached to core.

Seriously.  Don't ship.  It attracts moderators, who moderate and YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE MODERATED, FOO.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jan 2013, 20:54
Nuclear-tipped anti-ship missile standing by.   Moderator attached to core.

Seriously.  Don't ship.  It attracts moderators, who moderate and YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE MODERATED, FOO.
As I said (but now more directly and less jokingly) I don't ship because I think it's ridiculous (I'm perfectly fine with what Jeph sketches out for us, unless it's cruel like the Veronica visit), but I do defend all manner of speculation, since that's what we do. The strip is mostly about relationships, so allowing people to speculate about anything EXCEPT relationships is also ridiculous.

Basically, ridiculousness, relationships, and speculation are all fine by me, though I don't do some of it.

How can the moderator moderate if they were attached to the exploding missile? Regardless of their corporeal status, I do hope they practice moderation moderately.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 30 Jan 2013, 21:00
Moderators are an essential part of nuclear operations.  Quit splitting hair over the rules (NO SHIPPING) and go read up on nuclear technology lest you enrage the Beltsander... for he is tired tonight.  And full of rage.  But mostly tired.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Jan 2013, 21:30
[moderator]Speculation is fine within reason. You'll know when you're not within reason.[/moderator] (Apologies to cold for stealing his bracket thing)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jan 2013, 22:07
Nope, guess it's not Claire after all. I think Jeph may have changed his mind after jwhouk tweeted him to remind him Marten's dad lives in Florida.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Jan 2013, 22:24
I don't think Jeph forgot, I think he's having the wedding in Vermont because same sex marriage isn't legal in Florida. Also maybe Marten's future father-in-law is from Vermont originally? Who knows. I just hope Marten's dad can get a refund on those plane tickets.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 30 Jan 2013, 22:26
How much do you want to bet Marten will try to rent a car only to realize he has no credit card?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: XSin on 30 Jan 2013, 22:27
muhahahaha, the plot progresses towards my hearts secret desire, Marten-Hannelore shipping! xD

Seriously tho, it would be pretty strange to take Claire, he really doesn't know her that well. If I was him I'd be worried about giving the wrong idea.

Unless he's into her in which case why not :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 30 Jan 2013, 22:44
I'm getting so tired of people dancing around the whole shipping rule by talking about shipping instead. It's like the forum equivalent of a six-year-old yelling I'm not touching you!!

/rant
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 30 Jan 2013, 22:51
Crap!  I just realized Dora will not be a flower girl!

EDIT:  And I think they're getting married in the same place they celebrated their engagement.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1517
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 30 Jan 2013, 22:55
She'll just have a spontaneous flower girl interlude at CoD.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 30 Jan 2013, 23:06
...the only place in northern Vermont anyone would conceivably fly to would be Burlington... which is a good three hours from Northampton.

Then again, the airport's most of an hour... and all the flights I can find from Hartford to Burlington go through Philadelphia or DC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LantisEscudo on 30 Jan 2013, 23:10
Crap!  I just realized Dora will not be a flower girl!

EDIT:  And I think they're getting married in the same place they celebrated their engagement.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1517

Stowe's a little bit farther than 90 minutes from Northampton, closer to 2.5 hours, even doing 75 the whole way.  90 minutes would realistically only get you to the mid-part of the state, going straight up Interstate 91.

Dora's probably underestimating the trip a bit, or they're getting married a little farther south (or she might have a lead foot).  Killington, Mount Snow, and Stratton Mountain are all within range, and they're all gorgeous places.  And there's a ton of other non-ski places in that area, too.

EDIT: (fixed a typo)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cpflux on 30 Jan 2013, 23:13
Having moved east from California myself, I can sympathize a little.

But only a little. I mean, c'mon Marten, you live in a world where Artificial Intelligence has literally transformed robots into living beings, and yet you can't even look up the address of the wedding on the internets?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cpflux on 30 Jan 2013, 23:29
How much do you want to bet Marten will try to rent a car only to realize he has no credit card?

We've only ever seen Tai and Raven actually drive or own a car, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 30 Jan 2013, 23:31
How much do you want to bet Marten will try to rent a car only to realize he has no credit card?

We've only ever seen Tai and Raven actually drive or own a car, right?

Dora has a car.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: percivaltercy on 30 Jan 2013, 23:33
MUSKRAT! MUSKRAT! MUSKRAT! MUSKRAT!!!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 30 Jan 2013, 23:48
How much do you want to bet Marten will try to rent a car only to realize he has no credit card?

We've only ever seen Tai and Raven actually drive or own a car, right?

Angus drove up Faye, Marten, Momo, and Marigold up to Emily's lakehouse. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2292)

Faye mentions Steve and Cosette pulling up (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2298)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 31 Jan 2013, 00:00
Having moved east from California myself, I can sympathize a little.

But only a little. I mean, c'mon Marten, you live in a world where Artificial Intelligence has literally transformed robots into living beings, and yet you can't even look up the address of the wedding on the internets?
Being in California, I wonder sometimes how badly it affects us that some federal employees on the East Coast likely don't grasp that some of our counties are bigger than some of their states, never mind an actual state to state comparison. Transportation cost calculations, for instance.

Why should they rent a Volvo? Do they come with a moose back guarantee?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Soulsynger on 31 Jan 2013, 00:09
How much do you want to bet Marten will try to rent a car only to realize he has no credit card?
We've only ever seen Tai and Raven actually drive or own a car, right?
Dora has a car.
Also Marigold. (new Momo chassis arc)


Personally, I'm just looking forward to Marten's embarassing speech (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1518).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 31 Jan 2013, 00:16
I once saw a loose moose vamoose. But not in Vermont.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 31 Jan 2013, 00:33
I once saw a loose moose vamoose. But not in Vermont.
Did it use a goose as a ruse to board a caboose?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 31 Jan 2013, 00:39
OT: Loki, have you changed your avatar recently? Come back from a fairly long absence? I don't seem to remember you posting much until recently, but you've been around since long before I was.

Both. I used to have Seraph from Matrix (http://stbenedict.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/seraph.jpg) as the avatar, then no avatar at all and have only been using this one for a few days. And I  haven't posted in a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 31 Jan 2013, 00:48
And as a transsexual, Claire would probably mesh well with the likely crowd make-up of Henry Reed's wedding.
With some, yes, but if it's like reality, there's a good to excellent chance that some gays present will be intensely transphobic.

Think werewolves vs vampires if you want an analogy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 31 Jan 2013, 01:11
Welcome, new people!

Please err on the side of caution when speculating about character relationships. Be grateful you were spared the history which led to the no-shipping rule. At one point the survival of the forum was threatened, and I am not exaggerating. And that was over a mention of a relationship that one of the characters involved actually wanted!

The safe kind of speculation is grounded on what actually happens in the strip.

Your common sense and experience on other forums will stand you in good stead here but the shipping rule, and its importance, are not what most people would anticipate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cpflux on 31 Jan 2013, 01:18
Having moved east from California myself, I can sympathize a little.

But only a little. I mean, c'mon Marten, you live in a world where Artificial Intelligence has literally transformed robots into living beings, and yet you can't even look up the address of the wedding on the internets?
Being in California, I wonder sometimes how badly it affects us that some federal employees on the East Coast likely don't grasp that some of our counties are bigger than some of their states, never mind an actual state to state comparison. Transportation cost calculations, for instance.

Why should they rent a Volvo? Do they come with a moose back guarantee?

SB County 4 liff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: VonKleist on 31 Jan 2013, 01:35
I want to see Marty and Hannelore drive to the wedding in an AI-car-chassi into which Momo is uploaded.
Then they continue throughout the lands, solving mysteries.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 31 Jan 2013, 02:01
I want to see Marty and Hannelore drive to the wedding in an AI-car-chassi into which Momo is uploaded.
Then they continue throughout the lands, solving mysteries.
Is Hannelore anything like Datalore?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: VonKleist on 31 Jan 2013, 02:23
Haha, that´s Data's evil brother, right?

Naw, I had more like bookish, smart-without-being-a-knowitall in mind :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 31 Jan 2013, 02:46
I want to see Marty and Hannelore drive to the wedding in an AI-car-chassi into which Momo is uploaded.
Then they continue throughout the lands, solving mysteries.
We need the fourth member of that cast.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 31 Jan 2013, 03:35
We need the fourth member of that cast.
(click to show/hide)
Storyline character: "Wait. Yelling Bird was pretending to be Randy ALL ALONG?"
Yelling Bird: "AND I WOULD HAVE ****ING GOT AWAY WITH IT TOO, IF IT WEREN'T FOR THOSE ****-****ING KIDS AND THAT ****ING ****-**** DOG!"

Randy (cameo appearance): "He failed! I will succeed! I'm Randy! I'm eternal!" *fades to black*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 31 Jan 2013, 03:37
And as a transsexual, Claire would probably mesh well with the likely crowd make-up of Henry Reed's wedding.
With some, yes, but if it's like reality, there's a good to excellent chance that some gays present will be intensely transphobic.

Think werewolves vs vampires if you want an analogy.
That… is the first time I've heard it expressed like that… yet it makes everything so clear, unless… who are the vampires in this scenario, exactly?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 31 Jan 2013, 03:39
What does it matter?  :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: VonKleist on 31 Jan 2013, 03:41
I want to see Marty and Hannelore drive to the wedding in an AI-car-chassi into which Momo is uploaded.
Then they continue throughout the lands, solving mysteries.
We need the fourth member of that cast.
(click to show/hide)

 :laugh:

And another male character because it´s two girls (in my book at least.. okay, a robotic girl-car) already.
Maybe Angus? Or Dale?? :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Somebody on 31 Jan 2013, 04:12
That said, I'd like to see Momo going with Marten. I think it'd be an interesting window into the way QC world handles anthroPCs - for example, I wonder how airport security screening works when you are full of the things that the scans find suspicious?
AIs are expected to hire bodies at the far end and internet themselves over, rather than fly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 31 Jan 2013, 04:20
Claire's not going, but even if she did, why would her being trans be an issue? I don't mean because people won't be transphobic, but what makes people think that anyone would know she was? None of Marten's friends know, Marten just knows because she told him, and they've known her longer than the people at the wedding ever will.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 31 Jan 2013, 04:20
That said, I'd like to see Momo going with Marten. I think it'd be an interesting window into the way QC world handles anthroPCs - for example, I wonder how airport security screening works when you are full of the things that the scans find suspicious?
AIs are expected to hire bodies at the far end and internet themselves over, rather than fly.
... Beats the hell out of flying commercial, wouldn't you say?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Doc on 31 Jan 2013, 04:20
Do Marten or Hannelore actually have a driver's license? Besides from getting a car, who will drive?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 31 Jan 2013, 04:34
I once saw a loose moose vamoose. But not in Vermont.


A moose has come out of
the impenetrable wood
and stands there, looms, rather,
in the middle of the road.
It approaches; it sniffs at
the bus's hot hood.

Towering, antlerless,
high as a church,
homely as a house
(or, safe as houses).
A man's voice assures us
"Perfectly harmless. . . ."

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 31 Jan 2013, 04:37
Americans are cute with their "big states-little states" thing.  Most Canadian Provinces are bigger than two or three states combined...except that Alaska place.  We gauge travel time in hours on the highway (for instance, my folks are a 10 hour drive away, no big deal).

Anyway, moose shouldn't be a problem - unless they plan to drive at night or go into the woods during the rut....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Truec on 31 Jan 2013, 05:44
Crap!  I just realized Dora will not be a flower girl!

EDIT:  And I think they're getting married in the same place they celebrated their engagement.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1517

Why would Marten need plane tickets or a car to get to The Horrible Revelation?"
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1520
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 31 Jan 2013, 05:50
I drove up to the white mountains, just on the New Hampshire side of the border, for my first anniversary, at the end of January a few years ago. There's a wonderful B&B up there in Bethlehem, NH, and we drove back in a blinding snowstorm so intense that D.O.T crews weren't even coming out. Not once did I ever catch a glimpse of a moose. I was so sad...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 31 Jan 2013, 06:02
Americans are cute with their "big states-little states" thing.  Most Canadian Provinces are bigger than two or three states combined...except that Alaska place.  We gauge travel time in hours on the highway (for instance, my folks are a 10 hour drive away, no big deal).
I live in New Jersey and am moving either to Boston or New Hampshire this summer. It's a four or five hour drive, depending on which one I move to. To my cousin in Montana, that's nothing. To me? I'm probably going to only make it once a month, because four hours is a significant journey.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 31 Jan 2013, 06:11
I'm a little puzzled by those who say that a ten-hour drive is a mere nothing - do they really have so little else to occupy their time that ten hours is so readily available?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 31 Jan 2013, 06:14
It's more that, in those areas, a ten hour drive is routine, due to the distances at play.

Myself, I find a 1 hour drive fairly normal (despite my commute being 10 minutes), a 3 hour drive not bad, a 6 hour drive moderate, and a 10+ hour drive long. 13 hours is about the most I can do in one sitting (although sometimes that 13 includes a couple ~15 minute nap stops).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TimO on 31 Jan 2013, 06:32
LOL, I find these sort of distances to be cute in the other direction.  With the USA you have a country (and states) so big that you're barely bothering to use much of it. :-D

I could get from Lands End to John O'Groats in around fourteen hours in a car, and the record for cycling it is well under fifty hours (depending on whether you count a recumbent as a cycle or not, which the Road Records Association doesn't).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 31 Jan 2013, 06:38
My daughter is north of NYC, a 10-hour drive from my part of Michigan. It's not a big deal, but I'm retired. In the next couple of days I'll drive to Arizona, 25-30 hours, three days, two nights, driving because I travel heavy and take two cats. I wish I had a companion, but I've managed it alone twice now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: tinkerbell on 31 Jan 2013, 07:19
Is it just me, or is it shocking that Marten first forgot that his dad had sent him a wedding reminder, then had to ask for money for plane tickets, and now has to be told he could drive there after his dad already bought those tickets? Kind of a crappy son if you ask me.

I know what you mean about driving long distances in Canada. Being Australian, driving for long periods is not strange at all. I drive to see my mother at least once a week and she lives 90 minutes away if I really speed there. Driven Sydney to Brisbane heaps of times and that is 10 hours minimum. I would like it if things were a little closer together, but that would probably just annoy all the dangerous animals that live here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Analyst on 31 Jan 2013, 07:30
Not just Moose.  Moose and Squirrel!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 31 Jan 2013, 07:50
Is it just me, or is it shocking that Marten first forgot that his dad had sent him a wedding reminder, then had to ask for money for plane tickets, and now has to be told he could drive there after his dad already bought those tickets? Kind of a crappy son if you ask me.

I thought that too. His da didn't question the need for plane tickets so he probably thinks the same way about distance as Marten (although he and Maurice were seen with a car during their last visit) but it'll still be pain when he's already paid for them. Hopefully Marten will say he can drive up so Henry can try to get a refund.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 31 Jan 2013, 09:23
Worrying about Moose, ey? I guess they're not exactly the cleanest in the world given their parasites (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipoptena_cervi). Those frakkers just don't let go. Though apparently they haven't really spread to moose in America yet, if Wiki is to be believed.

I'm a little puzzled by those who say that a ten-hour drive is a mere nothing - do they really have so little else to occupy their time that ten hours is so readily available?

Considering that in the past it'd take you thirty years in a wagon and half of you would die on the way..  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 31 Jan 2013, 09:48
More like a month or so...but according to the vast research* I've done, half would indeed die, either from dysentery or fording a 20 foot river.

*Oregon Trail
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 31 Jan 2013, 10:13
I think you're all burying the lead. Going in a car means....

ROAD TRIP!!!!

More people can fit in a car than are actually invited to the wedding... it would surprise me very little to see Hanners, Marigold *and* Claire go on the trip at this point.

The scripts almost write themselves!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Somebody on 31 Jan 2013, 11:06
That said, I'd like to see Momo going with Marten. I think it'd be an interesting window into the way QC world handles anthroPCs - for example, I wonder how airport security screening works when you are full of the things that the scans find suspicious?
AIs are expected to hire bodies at the far end and internet themselves over, rather than fly.
... Beats the hell out of flying commercial, wouldn't you say?
You may have a point! (Depending on the type/condition of the hire bodies, of course.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 31 Jan 2013, 12:26
Yeah, stay away from the el-cheapo chassis rental places.  You never know what the previous renter did with it...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 31 Jan 2013, 12:48
More like a month or so...but according to the vast research* I've done, half would indeed die, either from dysentery or fording a 20 foot river.

*Oregon Trail

 :-D

(It was referencing Louis C.K. (http://youtu.be/KpUNA2nutbk) FYI, of course it doesn't take that long. <3 )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ink slinger on 31 Jan 2013, 13:53
Moose are no laughing matter! If you hit a moose, it'll brush it off like nothing. Meanwhile, you'll be DEAD.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 31 Jan 2013, 14:12
Americans are cute with their "big states-little states" thing.  Most Canadian Provinces are bigger than two or three states combined...except that Alaska place.  We gauge travel time in hours on the highway (for instance, my folks are a 10 hour drive away, no big deal).
Alaska? Meh, two Australian states are larger. Western Australia is roughly 50% larger.

Quote
Driven Sydney to Brisbane heaps of times and that is 10 hours minimum.
People for countries like the UK tend to underestimate the sheer inadequacy of public passenger transport in Australia too. Sydney to Brisbane by train takes seventeen hours crawling along a rail network designed mainly to transport vast quantities of coal at low cost. One can at least fly to Brisbane, but to visit friends in Taree (https://maps.google.com.au/maps?saddr=Sydney,+New+South+Wales&daddr=Taree,+New+South+Wales&hl=en&sll=-32.856518,151.817322&sspn=2.161815,2.043457&geocode=FSE5-_0dTjwDCSk_dJrzOJgSazFQqDIWaH0BAw%3BFfKBGf4dTGMWCSn_1kW1Z7h1azHgqEOQtAkGBA&mra=prev&t=m&z=9), the practical choice is about three-and-a-half hours by car, or over five hours by train.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 31 Jan 2013, 14:20
Road Trip would be fun, but some would have to wait outside. Wedding parties are pretty serious business, dunno if Jeph's gonna try and go that route or not.

I don't really see the Marten/Claire thing. Jeph likes drawing Claire and Emily lately, but Emily's hard to have a conversation with. I guess mayyyybe if you see Claire as falling for him just because she has few/no other friends, which is possible...but I'm not willing to call that quite yet.

Since the ship conversation keeps coming up, I will say that every time I come across QC porn I laugh. And no, so far it's not actually been intentional, oddly enough.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ukrayf on 31 Jan 2013, 14:40
Marten's dad is progressive, and mature. I doubt he'd invite transphobic people to his wedding.

Where did that come from, anyway?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 31 Jan 2013, 14:43
Go with him Hanners!

also, *meese.

Moose are no laughing matter! If you hit a moose, it'll brush it off like nothing. Meanwhile, you'll be DEAD.  :psyduck:

Far too true for meese not to be scary. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 31 Jan 2013, 15:02
Go with him Hanners!

also, *meese.

Moose are no laughing matter! If you hit a moose, it'll brush it off like nothing. Meanwhile, you'll be DEAD.  :psyduck:

Far too true for meese not to be scary.

Someone clearly didn't get the memo: "The plural form of “moose” is “moose” because there is only one moose. #facts (https://twitter.com/jephjacques)"

Besides, in the eventuality that Moose replicates, everyone knows the correct plural is Älgar!


On a side-note: The word "Moose (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moose)" confuses me. Not the part about it's real plural being "Moose", that's already the case with Sheep etc., but that it's a borrowed word from Algonquian natives of America. What, no one English ever visited Scandinavia and saw one prior to that?

Edit: Ah, you do use the same word as us in the UK. Elk (Älg) (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/elk). It's just you Americans being weird again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 31 Jan 2013, 15:12
...the only place in northern Vermont anyone would conceivably fly to would be Burlington... which is a good three hours from Northampton.

Ran it through Streets & Trips. It's about 2:45, shooting up I-91. I could do that to get to something in Milwaukee, if I really had to, and it wasn't the crappy weather we've been having in Wisconsin as of late.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 31 Jan 2013, 15:18
I'm a little puzzled by those who say that a ten-hour drive is a mere nothing - do they really have so little else to occupy their time that ten hours is so readily available?

One of these days, Paul, you REALLY need to come to the US and drive the Route 66 heritage corridor.

And THEN you can talk about "ten hour drives".

;)

(P.S. - There is NO WAY you can drive from Chicago to LA in 10 hours without breaking a few speeding laws.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 31 Jan 2013, 15:46
Go with him Hanners!

also, *meese.

Moose are no laughing matter! If you hit a moose, it'll brush it off like nothing. Meanwhile, you'll be DEAD.  :psyduck:

Far too true for meese not to be scary.

Someone clearly didn't get the memo: "The plural form of “moose” is “moose” because there is only one moose. #facts (https://twitter.com/jephjacques)"

Besides, in the eventuality that Moose replicates, everyone knows the correct plural is Älgar!


On a side-note: The word "Moose (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moose)" confuses me. Not the part about it's real plural being "Moose", that's already the case with Sheep etc., but that it's a borrowed word from Algonquian natives of America. What, no one English ever visited Scandinavia and saw one prior to that?

Edit: Ah, you do use the same word as us in the UK. Elk (Älg) (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/elk). It's just you Americans being weird again.

Heh, you're right, I didn't see that at all.  I admit that I'm never able to go through an entire conversation with someone about those things without throwing the meese thing out there.  I then wait for them to roll their eyes and then ask them to explain "geese" if they're so confident. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 31 Jan 2013, 15:49
Far too true for meese not to be scary.

The last Meese that really scared me was named Edwin.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 31 Jan 2013, 15:52
(P.S. - There is NO WAY you can drive from Chicago to LA in 10 hours without breaking a few speeding laws.)
If by "breaking a few speeding laws" you mean "driving a Ferrari at top speed and only stopping for gas", then yeah. (You'd have to average 200mph the whole journey).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 31 Jan 2013, 15:56
One of these days, Paul, you REALLY need to come to the US and drive the Route 66 heritage corridor.

And THEN you can talk about "ten hour drives".
If Paul can get himself over to Chicago in the next couple of days, I'll drive the corridor as far as Arizona just for the company. Hell, I'd drive to the end. Long as he isn't allergic to cats.
My route parallels the corridor: From St. Louis, southwest on I-44 to Oklahoma City, then 40 to Albuquerque.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 31 Jan 2013, 16:41
That's pretty much what I meant by "corridor". I've driven the 55-44-40 route a few times, and even got enamored enough by a small town in New Mexico to get a photo of me standing right in the middle of what used to be Route 66:

(http://imageshack.us/a/img109/5884/route6603.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/109/route6603.jpg/)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 31 Jan 2013, 17:02
And I never leave the freeway except for the two overnight stops. I'd make an exception for a tourist, and the cats would probably forgive me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 31 Jan 2013, 17:13
(P.S. - There is NO WAY you can drive from Chicago to LA in 10 hours without breaking a few speeding laws.)
If by "breaking a few speeding laws" you mean "driving a Ferrari at top speed and only stopping for gas", then yeah. (You'd have to average 200mph the whole journey).

You can do Chicago to LA without getting stopped by cops, you just need to have the right charisma.

Sources: I'm Batman. *FWOOOOSH!!!*

Seriously though, Road trips are the shit. Paul, you've gotta rent a car and just start driving. You could end up like little miss trust-your-GPS-unconditionally (http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57563958-71/gps-sends-belgian-woman-to-croatia-810-miles-out-of-her-way/), but it'll still be a fun trip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 31 Jan 2013, 17:22
I drove from Maryland to Oklahoma once, stopping at my brother's house in Kentucky on the way. Bit of advice: never try to drive across Tennessee in August in a car without AC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 31 Jan 2013, 17:32
Moose:

(http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/sites/animals/img/5838_moose2.jpg)

Elk: 

(http://wdfw.wa.gov/living/species/graphics/elk1.jpg)



...I'm sorry, those are not the same animal.  Similar, yes.  But there's a reason we name these things the way we do...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 31 Jan 2013, 17:39
I once drove from New Jersey to Connecticut and back. It took a week and I drove 2,000 miles by way of Indiana, Canada and Buffalo. Road trips are pretty awesome indeed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 31 Jan 2013, 18:18
Moose:
Elk:
...I'm sorry, those are not the same animal.  Similar, yes.  But there's a reason we name these things the way we do...

No, those are American usages. In the UK it said it was the same as an Älg.

    (UK) The largest member of the deer family (Alces alces); a moose.
    (North America) The common wapiti (Cervus canadensis); the second largest member of the deer family, smaller only than a moose. Elk never have flat antlers; moose do.


This is an Älg:

(http://mondayriot.myshowroom.se/files/2011/08/%C3%A4lg.jpg)

(http://www.moosepark.net/img/gustav3.jpg)

Looks like what you called a Moose to me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 31 Jan 2013, 18:46
That's pretty much what I meant by "corridor". I've driven the 55-44-40 route a few times, and even got enamored enough by a small town in New Mexico to get a photo of me standing right in the middle of what used to be Route 66:


Driving across the country on I-40 in a u-haul truck containing our worldly belongings and pulling my car on a trailer behind, we went through a stretch of concrete pavement (in Oklahoma?) along which I could not drive faster than 47.5 mph. At 47.5 mph some kind of resonance/harmonic period was reached between the joints on the highway and the wheelbases of the truck and the trailer resulting in a dangerous swaying that threatened to throw us off the road.

I never got the guts up to try to go fast enough to get past that node, so we were getting passed and flipped off by everyone from grannies up to 18 wheelers.

Switching to the blessed asphalt of historic US 66 allowed us to make better time (no joints) and enjoy the countryside a bit. Highly recommended if you've got the time. And if you don't have the time, you should make the time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 31 Jan 2013, 19:23
That's pretty much what I meant by "corridor". I've driven the 55-44-40 route a few times, and even got enamored enough by a small town in New Mexico to get a photo of me standing right in the middle of what used to be Route 66:


Driving across the country on I-40 in a u-haul truck containing our worldly belongings and pulling my car on a trailer behind, we went through a stretch of concrete pavement (in Oklahoma?) along which I could not drive faster than 47.5 mph. At 47.5 mph some kind of resonance/harmonic period was reached between the joints on the highway and the wheelbases of the truck and the trailer resulting in a dangerous swaying that threatened to throw us off the road.

I never got the guts up to try to go fast enough to get past that node, so we were getting passed and flipped off by everyone from grannies up to 18 wheelers.

Switching to the blessed asphalt of historic US 66 allowed us to make better time (no joints) and enjoy the countryside a bit. Highly recommended if you've got the time. And if you don't have the time, you should make the time.
I don't remember a section like that on I-40, though I've never taken I-40 west of OKC, so it was probably there. There's a county in southern Oklahoma (Carter County, if I remember correctly) where I-35 is gravel held together with tar. Absolutely horrible road surface there; you can't have a conversation in the car because of the road noise.

Then there was the time when I was on U.S. 220 in Somerset, PA, with some kids from Baltimore. One of them had fallen asleep, and when he woke up he was surprised to see a freeway instead of the dirt road he thought we were on...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 31 Jan 2013, 21:16
I don't remember a section like that on I-40, though I've never taken I-40 west of OKC, so it was probably there.

Yes, this was between Oklahoma City and the Texas border.  Crossing the border into Texas was an "ahhhhh that's much better" moment. This was also back in 1999. I believe since then they've redone that stretch of I-40 with asphalt instead of concrete.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 31 Jan 2013, 22:08
I have a solution

Let the Moose drive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 31 Jan 2013, 22:30
(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01992/drunk-moose-tree_1992473i.jpg)

It's OK guys, I'm totally safe to drive. Seriously. Gimme the keys, I'll use both front hooves I promise.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cpflux on 31 Jan 2013, 23:36
(P.S. - There is NO WAY you can drive from Chicago to LA in 10 hours without breaking a few speeding laws.)
If by "breaking a few speeding laws" you mean "driving a Ferrari at top speed and only stopping for gas", then yeah. (You'd have to average 200mph the whole journey).

You can do Chicago to LA without getting stopped by cops, you just need to have the right charisma.

Sources: I'm Batman. *FWOOOOSH!!!*

Seriously though, Road trips are the shit. Paul, you've gotta rent a car and just start driving. You could end up like little miss trust-your-GPS-unconditionally (http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57563958-71/gps-sends-belgian-woman-to-croatia-810-miles-out-of-her-way/), but it'll still be a fun trip.

Wanted to do a road trip across the U.S. when I was moving out from California, but dang are rental fees ever expensive for anyone under 24.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 31 Jan 2013, 23:46
 He asked Hanners just for the car  :-\

 And...no more Tannelore  :psyduck: .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 31 Jan 2013, 23:50
Hmm.  I wonder if any of his interns might have a car?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 31 Jan 2013, 23:52
 Wait, so Winslow and Momo will take care of her?

 That means that Marigold (Angus+Faye in the city) will be alone? (and she has a car!).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 01 Feb 2013, 00:07
Maybe he can go with Steve. Steve is his best bro, right? And he has a car, right?

...

BROS! BROS! BROS!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 01 Feb 2013, 00:21
That's correct, in the UK what Americans call moose are called elk. That excellent photo of the drunk elk is explained in this BBC news story (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14842999), which handily confirms the fact.

We don't have either in the UK, so it doesn't make a lot of difference what you call them.

I sort of went on a road trip in the States this summer - Redball and I drove up to Wisconsin which wasn't very far but still a reasonable distance, and I did a fair bit of solo driving around Indiana. I really don't see the appeal though; it's nice to chat to whoever you're travelling with and get to where you're going, but I'd far rather split those two off - chat over dinner, coffee, whatever, and get the train to my destination.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 01 Feb 2013, 00:23
He asked Hanners just for the car  :-\

That was not really what I got from it. His top priority was arranging for her to be taken care of. Not "But you MUST drive me, how am I supposed to get there otherwise??1111". I interpret his face in panel 5 as "welp, I hope she is alright". And then the practical question kicks in.

Also, I propose for the new poll to be "How will Marten get there", but I assume JW already had the same idea.


...I propose he will fly on the Roomba.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Ravenswing on 01 Feb 2013, 00:25
Heck, Northampton is relatively blessed by public transportation.  Try living in GREENFIELD without a car (which I am), 20 minutes to the north.  Not much of a picnic.

But that being said, getting to Burlington is relatively easy.  He grabs a PVTA to Amherst, where the Vermonter train does one route a day to Burlington.  It's 70 bucks round trip, which in his shoes isn't likely to be cheap, but Dad can pay for that much.  (It's a lot less hassle than flying, for which he'd have to take a pair of Peter Pan buses to get to Bradley Airport in Connecticut.)

He could also take a Greyhound bus directly from Noho, but that's half again as expensive.  Go figure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 01 Feb 2013, 00:27
I have way too much knowledge of British nomenclature to trust their opinion on what anything should be called.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2013, 00:42
Who has a car, is overdue for an appearance, and would be bubbly good company at a wedding?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 01 Feb 2013, 00:42
That's correct, in the UK what Americans call moose are called elk. That excellent photo of the drunk elk is explained in this BBC news story (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14842999), which handily confirms the fact.

Stage 1) Open story, smile at story - realizing that the picture posted in this thread wasn't red from being shot and put on display by a hunter in a weird way.

Stage 2) Scroll down

Stage 3) Sees "Online fans help moose beat death" as a related story, read it as "help beat moose to death". -> "Gods damnit..  :-\ "

Stage 4) Open story and realize that it was actually talking about saving a moose from being put down, instead getting his own area.

Everything went better than expected.

We don't have either in the UK, so it doesn't make a lot of difference what you call them.

Apparently you used to have them, at least in Scotland, according to this other related link (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7346733.stm) I ended up at about some Scottish guy's project to reintroduce species.

..Elk shall reign supreme! Boo, Moosers!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Overkillengine on 01 Feb 2013, 00:47
Who has a car, is overdue for an appearance, and would be bubbly good company at a wedding?

Does Raven have a car?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 01 Feb 2013, 00:51
WOO FRIDAY CLIFFHANGER!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mad Cat on 01 Feb 2013, 01:26
Did I miss something? Was there a commitment for Hanners to drive Martin, so he got refunds on his plane tickets?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2013, 01:52
Who has a car, is overdue for an appearance, and would be bubbly good company at a wedding?

Does Raven have a car?

A New Beetle. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=423
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 01 Feb 2013, 01:59
Mad Cat, that wasn't specifically referenced but it's how I'm interpreting today's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2013, 02:02
(moderator)
ZoeB pointed out that depressingly many gay men and a small but prominent number of feminists would not be accepting of Claire if they knew about her history. To put it mildly.

I moved the post to Discuss, even though ZoeB did a good job with it, because it raises non-comic issues and documents its points with real-life quotes from feminists that are so vicious I wanted them out of the comic sub forum.

The post is at http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,28644.0.html , unless one of the moderators merges it with the existing thread on trans* issues.
(/moderator)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LittleKing on 01 Feb 2013, 02:44
I hope Marten asks Steve to come with and they get into all sorts of crazy shenanigans! I love Martens little (big) harem, but they're always around, a little testosterone would be fun for a change :D

Sidenote - I wonder why Marten has so few male friends? And the ones he does have don't really appear a lot, do they?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 01 Feb 2013, 03:13
Because marketability.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 01 Feb 2013, 03:41
Feeling another road trip coming on, a short one this year maybe. It's been a while.

About 2376, I just wanna say: Love the body language in Panel 2. Hanners is back in little-sister mode and "please don't be mad at me" and Marten, a bit taken aback, is the one broadcasting the "DON'T GET YOUR GERMS ON ME" vibe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: planetickets on 01 Feb 2013, 03:56
So why can't he just use the plane tickets? Sure, it'll take a little longer, but what's the big deal? Yes, I made an account just for this because nothing at all has ever bugged me as much as this comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 01 Feb 2013, 04:00
So why can't he just use the plane tickets? Sure, it'll take a little longer, but what's the big deal? Yes, I made an account just for this because nothing at all has ever bugged me as much as this comic.

According to Jeph's tidbit at the bottom "At least he got a haircut?" (and Tannelore?), so let's just presume he refunded them given the time-lapse. At least we can clear potentially wasting his dad's money by not even using them off the list that way.  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 01 Feb 2013, 04:31
I moved the post to Discuss, even though ZoeB did a good job with it, because it raises non-comic issues and documents its points with real-life quotes from feminists that are so vicious I wanted them out of the comic sub forum.
Darn good piece of moderating there, thanks. It didn't belong here, even if relevant.

One minor correction - TERFs aren't feminists, any more than National Socialists are Socialists, or Westboro Baptists, Baptists.

Can we talk about Moose - Mooses - Mice - Meece now?

Quote
Wi not trei a holiday in Sweeden this yer ?

See the loveli lakes

The wonderful telephone system

And mani interesting furry animals

Including the majestic moose

A moose once bit my sister...

No realli! She was Karving her initials on the moose with the sharpened end of an interspace toothbrush given her by Svenge - her brother-in-law - an
Oslo dentist and star of many Norwegian movies: "The Hot Hands of an Oslo Dentist", "Fillings of Passion", "The Huge Molars of Horst Nordfink"...

Mynd you, moose bites Kan be pretti nasti...

For tht matter, now the plane tickets are irrelevant, why does Marten have to take anyone?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2013, 05:09
He doesn't. He just needs a way there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Throg on 01 Feb 2013, 05:10
Well, at least no more Tannelore. Doesn't Marigold have a car?

Somehow I'd think Marten wouldn't consider Marigold as a last-minute wedding date anyway, what with her social phobia and all.

And I kinda picture Marten asking Hannelore just for the sake of a snazzy entrance on a stealth hovercraft.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 01 Feb 2013, 08:39

For tht matter, now the plane tickets are irrelevant, why does Marten have to take anyone?

Because otherwise Monday's comic will be Marten in a different shirt vaguely moping about having had to go.
Dora: "so how was the wedding?"
Marten: "it was okay...the return flight sucked. how is Hanners doing?"
Readers  :?

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 01 Feb 2013, 09:44
So Who Will Marten Take?

Claire.    20 (29.4%)
Hannelore (he will convince her somehow).    23 (33.8%) <== Guess this ain't happening.
Steve.    2 (2.9%)
Tai.    0 (0%)
Emily!    4 (5.9%)
Gabby.    0 (0%)
Clinton. (How's THAT for irony?)    2 (2.9%)
Marigold.    2 (2.9%)
Momo.    1 (1.5%)
Pintsize (?!?!?)    0 (0%)
Jimbo!    1 (1.5%)
Jim (the Secret Bakery owner)    0 (0%)
That gal who's always reading about dicksissels and bandicoots. Harriet something.    5 (7.4%)
He'll go stag.    1 (1.5%)
WAIT! There's ALWAYS another option!    2 (2.9%)
Like Lt. Potter!    5 (7.4%)

Total Members Voted: 68
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 01 Feb 2013, 09:45
I once drove from New Jersey to Connecticut and back. It took a week and I drove 2,000 miles by way of Indiana, Canada and Buffalo. Road trips are pretty awesome indeed.

Wat.
So you...and then...but to do that you had...I...I just don't...

 :mrgreen: :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ScoutX on 01 Feb 2013, 10:12
What does he need a car for? Can't he just ride his anthroPC? You know, that giant robot whale that he... oh wait. Crap.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 01 Feb 2013, 10:48
Hanners  :cry: 

There was absolutely no avoiding this poll being a planes, trains, and automobiles reference was there?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2013, 11:42
Marten,

It is theoretically possible to borrow a friend's car. Return it with a full tank of gas.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ink slinger on 01 Feb 2013, 12:00
Can't Marten just, you know, rent a car?

Quote
Edit: Ah, you do use the same word as us in the UK. Elk (Älg). It's just you Americans being weird again.

Let's just nix the word "elk." Moose shall be moose, and the animal known as elk (in N. America) shall be called wapiti.

Also, apparently wapiti are called elk because European explorers thought that they resembled moose (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elk#Naming_and_etymology).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Lubricus on 01 Feb 2013, 12:49
I guess Marten might not have a driver's license. That would be quite typical of him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 01 Feb 2013, 12:52
Let's just nix the word "elk." Moose shall be moose, and the animal known as elk (in N. America) shall be called wapiti.

pls stahp ;_;

The closer to mutual intelligibility the Northern languages are, the better! The Normans are the worst!

Pfft, needing fancy words for Pig-meat! Pansies!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Blood-Tree on 01 Feb 2013, 14:10
I think you're getting moose and elk confused with reindeer.








 :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 01 Feb 2013, 14:26
Reindeer?  You mean caribou?

My first thought was "of course Marten doesn't have a driver's license," but it occurred to me - you really can't get around California without a driver's license, can you?  The Northeast, shit as it is, has some of the best public transportation in this godforsaken country.  Even in the heart of Los Angeles, I hear, you absolutely need a car.  (I think San Francisco is better - maybe Marten's from San Francisco?)

Also, I looked it up - by bus, he could leave Northampton at 10 and reach Montpelier at 2, then leave Montpelier at 3 AM to reach Northampton at 11.  There's bus service from Montpelier to Stowe, but I'm not sure what the hours are.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 01 Feb 2013, 14:38
As for buses, from what I've seen, Greyhound is okay as long as you never go west of Pittsburgh. One experience of sitting next to a drug addict suffering from withdrawal symptoms from St. Louis to Columbus is enough. Still better than the kid in the seat behind me screaming "Oh Snap" repeatedly from Tulsa to St. Louis.

Since then, I've taken planes instead...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 01 Feb 2013, 15:27
Try Greyhound all the way from Columbus, to Portland, OR, and back.

Yeah, that's not an experience I ever want to repeat in my life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: no one special on 01 Feb 2013, 15:34
If his dad already bought him plane tickets, why can't he just get someone to drop him off at the airport? I'm not sure what his difficulty is...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 01 Feb 2013, 15:36
Try Greyhound all the way from Columbus, to Portland, OR, and back.

Yeah, that's not an experience I ever want to repeat in my life.
Yeah, mine was from Hagerstown, Maryland, to Norman, Oklahoma and back. Like I said, east of Pittsburgh, it was fine, but once you get west of Pittsburgh... not an experience I would want to repeat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Near Lurker on 01 Feb 2013, 15:45
If his dad already bought him plane tickets, why can't he just get someone to drop him off at the airport? I'm not sure what his difficulty is...

For most purposes, "the airport" for Northampton is either Bradley (=Hartford) or Logan, and for Stowe, Burlington, and that flight would most likely go through Philly or DC.  Unless his father's chartered a plane, in which case it was a hell of a thing for him even to consider going by car, it was all kinds of ridiculous for him even to think of it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LantisEscudo on 01 Feb 2013, 16:06
If his dad already bought him plane tickets, why can't he just get someone to drop him off at the airport? I'm not sure what his difficulty is...

For most purposes, "the airport" for Northampton is either Bradley (=Hartford) or Logan, and for Stowe, Burlington, and that flight would most likely go through Philly or DC.  Unless his father's chartered a plane, in which case it was a hell of a thing for him even to consider going by car, it was all kinds of ridiculous for him even to think of it.

There's also direct flights between Boston and Rutland Regional airport (via Cape Air).  Which actually might be a better choice than driving, given some of the crappy "highways" you'd be taking in that area (VT-103 is not a fun drive, and US-5 isn't a lot better).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 01 Feb 2013, 16:36
What does he need a car for? Can't he just ride his anthroPC? You know, that giant robot whale that he... oh wait. Crap.

Do you expect him to go thru the Atlantic Ocean, St. Lawrence Waterway, and the Great Lakes?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sassafras on 01 Feb 2013, 17:01
Marten,

It is theoretically possible to borrow a friend's car. Return it with a full tank of gas.

Given how much poor judgement Marten's been showing the past few strips, I'd be worried he'd trade my car for a handful of magic beans.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2013, 18:33
...maybe Marten's from San Francisco?

All we know is that it's somewhere in northern California (http://jephjacques.com/post/11678709862/qa-dump-12).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 01 Feb 2013, 19:07
If he bowed a friend's car, I'd expect him to get lost somewhere along the line and end up in Canada, where Raven has been hiding.

"The GPS told me to..."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 01 Feb 2013, 19:14
Marten will eventually go by Boom Tube
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 01 Feb 2013, 19:48
Makes sense, Darkseid loves to attend fashionable functions.  ::)

In unrelated news: Kugai, Live Long and Prosper. \\//,


EDIT: Hanners is full of crap, I swear to God. She's faking it for whatever reason, which is yet to be seen. THAT is my wager.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 01 Feb 2013, 20:46
Hanners  :cry: 

There was absolutely no avoiding this poll being a planes, trains, and automobiles reference was there?

No, considering at one point I drove past the hotel used in the movie every #### day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: riccostar on 01 Feb 2013, 20:53
Heh wow, that sounds exciting for about a week. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2013, 22:00
I once drove from New Jersey to Connecticut and back. It took a week and I drove 2,000 miles by way of Indiana, Canada and Buffalo. Road trips are pretty awesome indeed.

Wat.
So you...and then...but to do that you had...I...I just don't...

 :emotrex: :psyduck:
I should clarify. I live in New Jersey. Last summer I had just quit my job and my friend had a week off from work, and we both needed to be in Connecticut the Saturday at the end of his vacation for a day long thing.  So we decided to make a road trip, starting by driving to Indiana to see a friend, then driving to Buffalo to see another friend (although getting from Indiana to Buffalo by way of entering Canada in Detroit was just, well...I don't have a reason for that, but it was intentional).

Anyway, not as funny when I explain it, I suppose  :emotrex:  (Also I guess that explanation is also for Bluesummers in case his "getting lost and ending up in Canada" was a response to my post ::) )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 01 Feb 2013, 22:11
No no, after a minute I realized you had to have done something like that. I just...couldn't not say anything. I live in Indiana (sadly), so did a double-take when I read your post. You know how it is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2013, 22:13
Where in Indiana? I was in Muncie!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: quix0te on 01 Feb 2013, 23:30
Is it just me, or is it shocking that Marten first forgot that his dad had sent him a wedding reminder, then had to ask for money for plane tickets, and now has to be told he could drive there after his dad already bought those tickets? Kind of a crappy son if you ask me.
I had that thought a day or three back.  The consensus seemed to be... "No, he's just a ditz!"  I've been reading this comic for five years or so, and I'm trying to remember what I found exciting.  I think the vulnerability of the original characters, particularly Faye (believe it or not).  Now Dora and Marten aren't together and he just seems to have degenerated into a cardboard punchline with no possibility of growth.  I mean, statistically, he'd have to catch a break EVENTUALLY.   But he seems to be destined to fall off cliffs and have anvils land on him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Feb 2013, 00:01
Back before car engines were run by computers, it was common to try to start one, have it bang a couple of times, then stop. Then you'd try again, and the same thing would happen. Eventually it would keep running.

Marten may be like that. Someone kicks his metaphorical backside, he does band things for a while, then it peters out.

I hope the engine catches and he turns his dormant energy to the band, or at least to something.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: de_la_Nae on 02 Feb 2013, 01:35
Where in Indiana? I was in Muncie!

Leetle further south. Bloomington, these days. Don't think I've ever been to Muncie...for some reason a lot of people from southern Indiana, in my anecdotal experience, don't travel further north than here or Indy. Partially for the sake of distances, I assume, but sometimes I wonder if there isn't more to it. Possibly a rural v. urban mindset, even though I'm pretty sure the demographic split isn't *that* different.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Feb 2013, 01:53
Well my friend's friend lived there. I went to a state fair and ate some delicious pie. I forget the name of the pie place, but it was amazing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 02 Feb 2013, 03:04
Well my friend's friend lived there. I went to a state fair and ate some delicious pie. I forget the name of the pie place, but it was amazing.
Thank you for reminding me to check March 14th on the calendar.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Feb 2013, 10:02
Anytime. That being said, how do people who use the date/month system celebrate Pi Day...the best possible workaround I can think of is July 22nd.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 Feb 2013, 10:41
That being said, how do people who use the date/month system celebrate Pi Day...

I was doing an internship in a small IT startup from January till March last year. The IT team consisted of me, my immediate boss, his immediate boss who was also the CIO, and two other guys.

We are in a country which uses date/month. We celebrated Pi day on 3/14. Some of the IT guys made cake for the rest of the company. The cake was delicious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 02 Feb 2013, 13:14
Makes sense, Darkseid loves to attend fashionable functions.  ::)

Indeed.

In unrelated news: Kugai, Live Long and Prosper. \\//,

Peace and long life to you Bluesummers

EDIT: Hanners is full of crap, I swear to God. She's faking it for whatever reason, which is yet to be seen. THAT is my wager.

Well, she does have a few psychological issues, but I get the feeling there's more to it than that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Feb 2013, 15:20
It's not like she's never gotten the flu before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Feb 2013, 15:41
Raising the question of how someone who doesn't shake hands, maintains scrupulous cleanliness, and probably got a flu shot manages to catch flu. Airborne particles of a strain the vaccine didn't cover?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 02 Feb 2013, 15:42
It happens...yeah, usually it's a different strain.

It's not like she's never gotten the flu before.

Comic or it never happened. (Seriously, I can't remember her getting the flu)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 02 Feb 2013, 16:00
Raising the question of how someone who doesn't shake hands, maintains scrupulous cleanliness, and probably got a flu shot manages to catch flu. Airborne particles of a strain the vaccine didn't cover?

You build immunity and strengthen you immune response by exposing yourself to germs and infection.

Someone who avoids exposure,  has no defense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 02 Feb 2013, 16:12
Hanners has the flu. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1313)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sassafras on 02 Feb 2013, 16:18
Raising the question of how someone who doesn't shake hands, maintains scrupulous cleanliness, and probably got a flu shot manages to catch flu. Airborne particles of a strain the vaccine didn't cover?
Vaccines are great but even they aren't 100% protection and you still have a very small chance of catching the strains you're vaccinated for. Plus she works at a coffee shop and probably has tons of sick customers.

I used to work at a grocery store that targeted young hipsters and older hippies, and most of them bought the "doctors are working with big pharma to give you cancer and vaccines give kids autism" conspiracy crap, so I was getting sick every couple of weeks no matter what I did.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LantisEscudo on 02 Feb 2013, 16:34
It happens...yeah, usually it's a different strain.

It's not like she's never gotten the flu before.

Comic or it never happened. (Seriously, I can't remember her getting the flu)

1313 and following (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1313)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Feb 2013, 19:42
Come to think of it, immune response is hurt by sleep deprivation,
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 02 Feb 2013, 23:19
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........*SNORRT*   Huh? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 03 Feb 2013, 00:46
Sleep?   :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Redball on 04 Feb 2013, 20:00
I don't remember a section like that on I-40, though I've never taken I-40 west of OKC, so it was probably there.

Yes, this was between Oklahoma City and the Texas border.  Crossing the border into Texas was an "ahhhhh that's much better" moment. This was also back in 1999. I believe since then they've redone that stretch of I-40 with asphalt instead of concrete.
I drove it today, Oklahome City to Santa Rosa NM. There were a couple of short stretches of bad pavement on both sides of that border, but nothing really obnoxious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 04 Feb 2013, 23:00
What is this sleep you speak of? I can sleep when I'm dead, there's work to be done and comics to read!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2013, 10:12
I've experiments to run,
there is research to be done
on the people who are still alive.  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 05 Feb 2013, 11:07
You don't have to do all that work yourself, Blue! Maybe you can find someone else to help you.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2013, 23:02
Oh, if she only knew.......if she only knew.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2013, 23:37
/me waves hand

This is not the thread you are looking for.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 06 Feb 2013, 17:31
There are not the Posts you want to read.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Feb 2013, 17:36
Must read ALL the posts...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Jedit on 10 Feb 2013, 01:06
(I know this is going back a ways, but I've been playing catch-up after a PC fatality.)

Jesus Jeph, we know you're Childfree and snipped and proud of it, stop grinding it into the ground. Yes, isn't it horrible that another person can make unreasonable demands and force you to shell out money because you still want them around, so let's make this into another comment on how horrible kids are and how much almost none of your characters want any! That's not children, that's family and friendship.

I couldn't read that strip without cringing, but for different reasons.  When Henry asked Maurice if he wanted kids and Maurice said he just wanted 20 puggles, the question of whether Jeph knows British nomenclature was answered once and for all.  Over here, "puggle" is a rural word for a miscarriage.  :-(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 01:12
Yeah, on this side of the pond it's a half-pug/half-beagle that is just ridiculously adorable (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/BraxtonPuggle-edit1.jpg).  I wonder how "puggle" came to mean miscarriage, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 10 Feb 2013, 05:53
I've never come across puggle=miscarriage.  The Oxford Dictionary of Modern Slang has puggle=poggle=crazy, mad, drunk (mostly in military usage).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 10 Feb 2013, 07:04
I hope someone around knows that a puggle is also a baby platypus/echidna/hedgehog (I dunno which sorry, it'll take a less sleep deprived man than I this night. . . )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 09:01
Quote from: Wikipedia
For the baby echidna or platypus, see Monotreme.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 10 Feb 2013, 09:45
Um, that refers to an article about the order.  More relevant is what that article tells: "The proper name for an infant echidna is also echidna and not a Puggle as is widely believed."

(ETA: ... and by denying confirms, if you ask me ...)

(Echidna is also know as "spiny ant eaters", and like the platypus, they're monotremes.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 10:01
I'm just quoting the line on the top of the Puggle page. When you go to Monotreme and click both links next to  that, one says a baby echidna or platypus is called a puggle, the other says experts think it's wrong to use that for platypi, but not necessarily for echidna. Either way...weird sources to use to say it's not the proper name, unless that was just trying to show that it was widely believed?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 10 Feb 2013, 10:08
Um, that refers to an article about the order.  More relevant is what that article tells: "The proper name for an infant echidna is also echidna and not a Puggle as is widely believed."

As much as I'm loath to weaken my argument for the correct use of apostrophes, surely if the commonly-used name for a baby echidna a 'puggle', then that is what it is called.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 10:13
I'm curious, what is said argument? In what way do people use apostrophes wrong?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 10 Feb 2013, 10:16
As much as I'm loath to weaken my argument for the correct use of apostrophes, surely if the commonly-used name for a baby echidna a 'puggle', then that is what it is called.
Hence the "(ETA: ... and by denying confirms, if you ask me ...)".  You may have missed that ETA, of course ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 10:26
ETA means estimated time of arrival...what were you referring to? I mean, I'm guessing the E is edit but other than that I have no idea. Wait...edited to add? Why not just say "edit"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: henri bemis on 10 Feb 2013, 10:33
I tend to use 'edit' if I'm correcting something in the middle of a post, and 'eta' if I'm expanding on something I said but don't want to make a new post (usually because no one else has posted yet and I don't want to seem spammy).  Though I guess there isn't really much reason to make a distinction, as the reason should be fairly obvious in most cases.  For me, it's habit and convention I've carried over from other forums.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 10 Feb 2013, 10:38
I'm curious, what is said argument?

That apostrophes should be used correctly even though it seems like nobody bothers any more. As an example, Waterstones, a bookshop - which you'd think could get it right - founded by and named after Mr. Tim Waterstone, recently removed the apostrophe from its name.

In what way do people use apostrophes wrong?

Can you think of a way? It's been done. Yes, even that one.

It's just one of those things that really annoys me. It isn't hard to get it right, but I've seen signs around that use apostrophes incorrectly AND inconsistently. The best (worst?) one I've seen was "Come inside and see our magnificent range of bed's, sofas' and tables".

Hence the "(ETA: ... and by denying confirms, if you ask me ...)".  You may have missed that ETA, of course ...

I did miss it, but since there's no edit time on your post it seems I was just too lazy to read your post properly. Sorry.  :oops:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 10 Feb 2013, 10:45
Wait...edited to add? Why not just say "edit"?
Exactly.  Why?  I don't really know; I'm just following the lead.  Ten years ago I might have written "Edit:", but I've seen so many others use "ETA:", I've picked up the habit myself.

HTH, HAND, &c

Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Feb 2013, 11:32
I have never seen it before but whatever works, I guess. What's that stuff at the end of your post?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 10 Feb 2013, 11:51
More abbreviations, intended as a joke, but apparently falling flat ...

("HTH, HAND, &c" = "Hope that helps, have a nice day, etcetera")

Bedtime, methinks.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Feb 2013, 15:59
As an example, Waterstones, a bookshop - which you'd think could get it right - founded by and named after Mr. Tim Waterstone, recently removed the apostrophe from its name.

One of the reasons for this, according to at least one local company that did something similar, is that apostrophes can't be used in a web address.  So you can type in Waterstones.com and probably get to their website, but Waterstone's.com won't cut it. 

However, most browsers have gotten smarter than that lately. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 10 Feb 2013, 23:10
Domain names haven't though.

(My browser drops me in a web search when I type Waterstone's.com into the address field; if I type http://Waterstone's.com, it complains that the server is not found.  And what significantly different could it do?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 11 Feb 2013, 00:44

In what way do people use apostrophes wrong?

Can you think of a way? It's been done. Yes, even that one.

Quote from: Marigold
Griz'nakh
Gr'iznakh
Grizna'hk
Gri'z'n'akh
Grizna'hth
G'rizanakh

 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Bluesummers on 11 Feb 2013, 11:33
Quote from: Marigold
Griz'nakh
Gr'iznakh
Grizna'hk
Gri'z'n'akh
Grizna'hth
G'rizanakh

She can only misspell it four times before the Death Note invalidates it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2372-2376 (28 January - 1 February 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TimO on 17 Feb 2013, 16:37
... When Henry asked Maurice if he wanted kids and Maurice said he just wanted 20 puggles, the question of whether Jeph knows British nomenclature was answered once and for all.  Over here, "puggle" is a rural word for a miscarriage.  :-(

I've never heard puggle used in that context (or for that matter relating to dogs either), and it seems unlikely that what sounds like a cute term would be used for what most people consider a somewhat sensitive subject.  Possibly it's different in Scotland, but I can't say that I've ever heard the term used in the south of England (having lived in Exeter, Cheltenham, Brighton and London).