THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)
Fun Stuff => BAND => Topic started by: mustang6172 on 02 May 2013, 20:34
-
I hear a lot of people praise the virtues of 8-track tapes. Are these just Baby Boomers blinded (or deafened) by nostalgia, or did these tapes have a sound quality I do not understand?
-
Nostalgia and cloth ears.
-
I've heard that 8-tracks tapes have superior sound. It makes sense if you think about it. However, the equipment used to actually play an 8-track may not be up to today's standards.
-
The eight-track tape had the same track width as a compact cassette (which came later), but ran at twice the speed (so still half the track width and half the speed of a domestic "hi-fi" tape). The tape was a continuous loop that fed out from the centre, bending the tape and requiring a lot of slipping of layers over each other, so tape speed was never secure, tape wear was an issue, and rewinding was impossible - you had to wind the whole way round. The head moved physically between tracks, on a mechanism that gave more scope for misalignment and unreliability. They were primarily designed for use in cars, which probably says all the rest.
Any idea that it was in any way a decent format is based on nostalgia alone.
-
'Twas probably more a matter of content than quality. Anything you could get on 8-trak was available on vinyl, though, and usually much better quality - and most (but dammit, not all) is available digitally now.
A few years ago I got my father some CD's of his favorite London "FFRR" (Full Frequancy Range Recordings) Gilbert & Sullivan operettas from the 50's - his vinyl copies were destroyed in a radiator catastrophe back in the 80's.
He was a very happy man.
-
I always figured it was kind of a step between Vinyl Records and the Cassette Tape.