THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 27 Apr 2014, 17:21

Title: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Apr 2014, 17:21
And here's your thread and poll.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 27 Apr 2014, 18:09
.....and Dora inadvertently outs Veronica as a Dominatrix to Jim. Cue drama.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Apr 2014, 19:34
You know, I didn't even think of that.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 27 Apr 2014, 21:08
COMIC!


...Uh, okay.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 27 Apr 2014, 21:13
It's just a "silly comic drawn for the convention", so no need to be worried. Unless it's canon, in which case I call for the creation of a Pintman Appreciation Society :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 27 Apr 2014, 21:39
ALL HAIL PINTMAN!

Hopefully this isn't his last appearance.  I'd really love to see a Pintsize/Pintman duel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Apr 2014, 21:41
The fur will really fly if we ever meet Pintsize's Canadian counterpart, 500-mL-size.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 27 Apr 2014, 21:50
Nor his Imperial cousin  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 27 Apr 2014, 21:54
I'd figured that this was some convention in-joke to which I am not privy. Ah well. /shrug
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 27 Apr 2014, 23:16
Nor his Imperial cousin  :mrgreen:

Hogshead!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 27 Apr 2014, 23:35
...

WHAT ??!?!?!?!?

Me confused now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 27 Apr 2014, 23:37
Nor his Imperial cousin  :mrgreen:

Hogshead!!

I was referring to an Imperial Pint, but eh. Alternatives include FlagonFace, TankardMan, PitcherMan, the possibilities are endless
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NilsO on 28 Apr 2014, 01:09
Time to reconsider Pintsize's impractical appendages. I guess the purpose is damage control, a fully functional set of hands and feet would cause mayhem beyond control. But is it a kind of punishment? Or just a precaution? Is Pintsize free to upgrade his body if he wants to?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 28 Apr 2014, 01:28
Nor his Imperial cousin  :mrgreen:

Hogshead!!

I was referring to an Imperial Pint, but eh. Alternatives include FlagonFace, TankardMan, PitcherMan, the possibilities are endless

A hogshead is a large cask of liquid (or, less often, of a food commodity). More specifically, it refers to a specified volume, measured in either imperial or US customary, primarily applied to alcoholic beverages such as wine, ale, or cider. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogshead)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 28 Apr 2014, 01:31
http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?topic=24757.msg968485#msg968485 (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?topic=24757.msg968485#msg968485)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 28 Apr 2014, 01:38
You know, I didn't even think of that.  :psyduck:

And she used to diddle to pics of her and figured out she was into girls because of her. (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1047)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 28 Apr 2014, 01:40
Time to reconsider Pintsize's impractical appendages. I guess the purpose is damage control, a fully functional set of hands and feet would cause mayhem beyond control. But is it a kind of punishment? Or just a precaution? Is Pintsize free to upgrade his body if he wants to?

Firmware can do it (especially if faulty!) - remember the thumbs!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 28 Apr 2014, 02:05
I was referring to an Imperial Pint, but eh. Alternatives include FlagonFace, TankardMan, PitcherMan, the possibilities are endless

A hogshead is a large cask of liquid (or, less often, of a food commodity). More specifically, it refers to a specified volume, measured in either imperial or US customary, primarily applied to alcoholic beverages such as wine, ale, or cider. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogshead)

Curses, my lack of knowledge regarding Imperial units has become evident! This is what I get for having nice, simple metric units.


http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?topic=24757.msg968485#msg968485 (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?topic=24757.msg968485#msg968485)

Cheers, pwhodges! So using this list, surely an Imperial Pintsize would be a Butt? It seems fitting.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 28 Apr 2014, 05:09
Imperial Pintsize will be marching to glory.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 28 Apr 2014, 09:05
And the German cousins would be a boisterous group as well.

German Beer is served in a Krug [stein] in either Mass [one lite] and  Half Mass [half lite] sizes but their Bavarien counterpart is Double-Mass [2L] and of course the seasonal souse and party animal - Oktoberfest [3L]
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 28 Apr 2014, 09:39
I'm thinking Jim runs into Dora's dad.

"You're dating Veronica Vance? I must have whacked it to her picture a million friggin' times!"



I AM PINTMAN, MAN OF PINTS
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: LordVaughn on 28 Apr 2014, 09:42
Pintsize's understudy evokes an uncanny valley effect from me for some reason. While laughing at the Chinese bootleg manner of phasing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 28 Apr 2014, 09:59
And the German cousins would be a boisterous group as well.

German Beer is served in a Krug [stein] in either Mass [one lite] and  Half Mass [half lite] sizes but their Bavarien counterpart is Double-Mass [2L] and of course the seasonal souse and party animal - Oktoberfest [3L]

Eh, it's still all bavarian. Everywhere else in Germany we serve beer in a glass, wirh typical sizes being 0.5l, 0.4l, and 0.33l. I think there are types of beer which are served in a smaller glass (I'm thinking Kölsch, which is served in so called Kölschstangen, which are afaik 0.2l), but those sizes are common for most types of beer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 28 Apr 2014, 10:03
Hands are probably expensive. Pintsize was a cheap enough model for Marten to afford.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 28 Apr 2014, 15:08
"It comes in Pints??!"


Pintman ...... Hmmmm, anyone hearing the Batman TV theme at this point?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 28 Apr 2014, 15:11
"Pintman" looks like Jeph drew him with his off hand.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 28 Apr 2014, 15:11
Pintman ...... Hmmmm, anyone hearing the Batman TV theme at this point?
Yeah, but with "Barman" instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 28 Apr 2014, 15:14
I was referring to an Imperial Pint, but eh. Alternatives include FlagonFace, TankardMan, PitcherMan, the possibilities are endless

A hogshead is a large cask of liquid (or, less often, of a food commodity). More specifically, it refers to a specified volume, measured in either imperial or US customary, primarily applied to alcoholic beverages such as wine, ale, or cider. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogshead)

Curses, my lack of knowledge regarding Imperial units has become evident! This is what I get for having nice, simple metric units.


Good, now get me a kor of wood to redeem yourself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 28 Apr 2014, 15:26
Much as I would enjoy furthder comedy-of-errors-ish treatment of this situation, I'm kinda hoping that Veronica gets to make her own impression on Jim.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zwammy on 28 Apr 2014, 16:19
Much as I would enjoy furthder comedy-of-errors-ish treatment of this situation, I'm kinda hoping that Veronica gets to make her own impression on Jim.

Only if she brought her dom gear along.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 28 Apr 2014, 16:25
And Pintsize hasn't found it this time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Apr 2014, 19:55
Nor his Imperial cousin  :mrgreen:

Hogshead!!

I was referring to an Imperial Pint, but eh. Alternatives include FlagonFace, TankardMan, PitcherMan, the possibilities are endless

A hogshead is a large cask of liquid (or, less often, of a food commodity). More specifically, it refers to a specified volume, measured in either imperial or US customary, primarily applied to alcoholic beverages such as wine, ale, or cider. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogshead)
What about a fuckbarrel?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 28 Apr 2014, 20:00
I maintain a Butt would be the most appropriate unit of measurement, given it's Pintsize we're dealing with here.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 28 Apr 2014, 20:05
Now I kinda want to put together a fanart thing of various clones of Pintsize. Maybe if I get some spare time over the next couple of days.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: slydon on 28 Apr 2014, 20:42
Pintman reminds me of "Runny's Replace" (http://www.whompcomic.com/2013/03/29/dip-replacement/) from Whomp
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: KOK on 28 Apr 2014, 22:33
I'm thinking Jim runs into Dora's dad.

"You're dating Veronica Vance? I must have whacked it to her picture a million friggin' times!"


"Million" is not literally true, but for once "friggin'" is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NilsO on 29 Apr 2014, 00:54
Yay! Yelling Bird! Perhaps someone can replace this stack of paper with Yelling Bird, to visualize the Death Via Belt Sander?
(http://9wows.com/files/2012/05/High-Speed-Disorganization.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: techkid on 29 Apr 2014, 03:01
Well, it's a bit classier than most other Yelling Bird strips  :psyduck:

Still, hope Jeph feels better tomorrow :(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 29 Apr 2014, 12:13
Jeph get better already!!!!

No ,but really, do get better.
Take all the time you need.
Guest strips, fillers with sweet cheeks, the shame orb or frozen burritos are fine as well.
As for yelling Bird.
 :parrot: That is gonna sting a bit  :parrot:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 29 Apr 2014, 16:16
Get well soon Jeph.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 29 Apr 2014, 19:36
Oh, come on, Veronica, who doesn't google somebody before a first date these days?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Apr 2014, 19:37
Especially since she googled him seconds after learning of his existence.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 29 Apr 2014, 19:44
Oh come on Veronica, Jim supplies Coffee of Doom with baked goods on a regular basis. How could he NOT know? :P
(I take it that she didn't know about her Wikipedia page.)

Jim seems like a pretty cool guy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Apr 2014, 19:46
Now I'm wondering what a prospective date would think when Googling me? I have a very common name, and there are a lot of weird things that come up (just for the record, I have never killed anyone, been killed by anyone, nor have I been killed by an icicle).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 29 Apr 2014, 20:53
The background looks familiar.  I don't feel like looking it up, but someone here must be nerdy enough for the task.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Apr 2014, 20:57
It's the Secret Bakery (in fact, I think the background might be reused from Marten's first visit there).

edit -- http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1846
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 29 Apr 2014, 21:38
So did "what do you do for a living" never come up in their online chats?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sorflakne on 29 Apr 2014, 21:56
You can find anything on google these days. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 29 Apr 2014, 22:03
So did "what do you do for a living" never come up in their online chats?

From tonight's comic it sounds like he already knew, didn't need to ask, and isn't turned off by it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NilsO on 29 Apr 2014, 23:31
You can find anything on google these days.
Well, you can hide away quite well by having a common name. There are several people in "real life" named Veronica Vance. An even more common name (e.g., John Smith) is, for all practical purposes, ungoogleable.

EDIT: Why the heck would Jim have his date at his own workplace? Is it to give his employees something to talk about?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Apr 2014, 00:41
She does NOT look happy about that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 30 Apr 2014, 00:57
EDIT: Why the heck would Jim have his date at his own workplace? Is it to give his employees something to talk about?

Being the owner, maybe both of them are in the shop after hours?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 30 Apr 2014, 01:43
That was about as smooth as that belt sander Yelling Bird got threatened with. Not the best move there Jim.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 30 Apr 2014, 01:58
I don't think she's going to be really pissed, though.
As a public figure (former public figure? Anyway, we know she was well-known enough at one point to have a regular TV documentary made about her) you have to expect people to find out who you are pretty quickly.
And in the QCverse, when you google her name, she's probably the first person who comes up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NilsO on 30 Apr 2014, 04:33
I don't think she's going to be really pissed, though.
As a public figure (former public figure? Anyway, we know she was well-known enough at one point to have a regular TV documentary made about her) you have to expect people to find out who you are pretty quickly.
And in the QCverse, when you google her name, she's probably the first person who comes up.
Also, VV googled Jim (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2484), so she should expect him to do the same to her. I guess it is part of a standard "background check" before going on a date these days, so it would not look credible if he pretended not to have googled her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Apr 2014, 04:35
Ahhh, that's why I couldn't find the strip. I thought it happened during the wedding arc.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 30 Apr 2014, 05:53
And in the QCverse, when you google her name, she's probably the first person who comes up.

Actually, even in our world if you google "Veronica Vance" the first result is the "Veronica Reed" page on the QC wiki.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ihs on 30 Apr 2014, 06:12
As someone who's been out of the dating scene for quite some time (happily married 16 years; you dad-gummed kids and your internet these days!), what's the real-life etiquette regarding Googling a prospective date?  I don't know that I would personally be bothered by it, but then, I have nothing to hide.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Apr 2014, 06:23
It's a bit of a weird cycle.

On one the one hand it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and quite rude to find out information about someone that they have not chosen to disclose to you.

On the other hand if you put that information on the internet without any privacy settings, it is naive of you to not expect people to find it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Neko_Ali on 30 Apr 2014, 06:42
Honestly, I figure most people would google a prospective date. Kind of the same way pre-internet saturation you would ask friends and acquaintances about someone you were going to go out with or thinking about going out with. It's just a simple precaution. However, it's kind of thought of as gauche to tell the other person you investigated them before going on the date.

Veronica has never made a particular secret of her professional life. So it really shouldn't have been any kind of surprise that Jim already knows what she does. Bonus points that he doesn't seem to be either bothered or eager about her job. Just "oh yeah, that's what you do".

I also apparently have an incredibly common name. Even if I limit it to the general area where I live, there are still dozens of people who share my name. So... sweet, blissful anonymity?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Apr 2014, 06:51
Googling someone is one thing, but I think that regurgitating information about themselves back at them might be a bit over the line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: anahata on 30 Apr 2014, 07:14
I've Googled people to see if there's anything about them on the web, without prior knowledge whether there'd be anything to find. I'm sure we've all done it.

Whether I'd repeat information to the subject's face rather depends on how obviously they are trying to promote themselves - if they have their own personal promotional web site with their name plastered all over it and at least a page full of highly relevant Google hits, it wouldn't seem odd at all. OTOH if you only find vague address information from "people search" services or something like a list of people who left school X in year Y, it might not look so good to make it known you were digging that hard.

And re last panel: I can't imagine anyone not knowing that there's a Wikipedia page about them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Apr 2014, 07:21
The background looks familiar.  I don't feel like looking it up, but someone here must be nerdy enough for the task.

In case it hasn't already been stated: they're having coffee at his coffee shop. (Okay, "The Secret Bakery", but that's mincing terms.)
(EDIT: I see that it has. That's me and this third shift thing for ya.)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Apr 2014, 07:40
Maybe Googling about such things should come AFTER date one?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Delator on 30 Apr 2014, 08:02
A cross-country "blind" date?

Yeah, I think it's perfectly fair for people to be Googling each other in that instance.

Lotta psychos out there.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheCallMeFez on 30 Apr 2014, 08:32
I recently experienced this, and its a little weird, but it saves them an awkward conversation later. It saves Veronica from having to watch what she says, lest she let something slip( As she's been known to do (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1824)) When you have something that is a big part of your life, it can be nice to be around people that don't know about it, but its also nice not to need to have The Conversation at some point later and try to explain it to them .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 30 Apr 2014, 11:16
"So, how about your kid? I dated his ex once ... "
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 30 Apr 2014, 11:39
What seems weird to me is that when Veronica was first introduced, we found out that "Veronica Vance" is her professional name, and she goes by "Veronica Reed" (her married name) in her private life. And while it's well known in our universe that Veronica Vance = Veronica Reed, in the QCverse there is no webcomic broadcasting the everyday lives of these characters to the Internet at large... so her private name should be much more, well, private.

So if Jim was googling "Veronica Reed", he shouldn't have come up with any links for Veronica Vance unless he was digging really hard -- a lot harder than I would normally expect for a first date.

Although... for Hollywood celebrities, biographical websites often include their birth names as well as their stage names, but they're generally a lot more famous and more thoroughly researched than porn celebrities. Still, Wikipedia editors can be pretty obsessive at times, so I suppose it's possible that VV's Wikipedia page actually had her real name on it, in which case my above analysis is completely invalid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Apr 2014, 12:42
You seriously think she'd be able to keep her real name that secret? Only people like Banksy manage that nowadays and that's because almost no-one has even seen his face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 30 Apr 2014, 13:17
It would surprise me very little if searching for Veronica Reed in QCverse returned:

Showing results for Veronica Vance
Search instead for Veronica Reed
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 30 Apr 2014, 15:59
Well, turnabout's fair play.  She did look him up on Google.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Cajun on 30 Apr 2014, 18:11
I half expected him to recognize her like a handful of others already had...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ysth on 30 Apr 2014, 18:44
I don't get why the thing hanging in the window is blocking the view of the sky instead of the brick wall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: JohnTheWysard on 30 Apr 2014, 19:02
Curses, my lack of knowledge regarding Imperial units has become evident! This is what I get for having nice, simple metric units.


Take me to your liter!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 30 Apr 2014, 20:39
I don't get why the thing hanging in the window is blocking the view of the sky instead of the brick wall.

It's probably a Light catcher. (http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=light+catcher&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=32998449488&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=s&hvrand=16508218537393750362&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=e&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_1qo9tcnl2n_e)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Apr 2014, 20:46
Is it just me, or is Marmom being kind of...unfair?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 30 Apr 2014, 21:06
No, she's just being Veronica Vance. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 30 Apr 2014, 21:54
I wonder what Kerry (Redacted) is doing now? Her professional name - https://www.google.com.au/search?q="sarah+foster+tate" (https://www.google.com.au/search?q="sarah+foster+tate)

Fixed the link - Method
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Apr 2014, 22:50
That look on panel five. I swear we have seen it on Marten before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ysth on 30 Apr 2014, 23:35
Hope springs eternal in the human breast.

So maybe some kind of nipple clamp?

Ah, more evidence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pandora_Loison_cour_Carree_Louvre.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pandora_Loison_cour_Carree_Louvre.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: NilsO on 30 Apr 2014, 23:39
Not sure how well this is going. Jim tends to say stupid things. On the other hand, VV might like his open attitude. Also, she might like men that are not easily dominated, and not frightened by her career and personality.

Pandora's box sounds like a medieval torture instrument.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Indicible on 01 May 2014, 00:09
Quote
Pandora's box sounds like a medieval torture instrument.

An iron maiden with dildos instead of spikes?

Also: Sarah Foster Tate's real name is Kerry? Damn, my mind is blown...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 01 May 2014, 00:28
Jeph has become seriously good at facial expressions!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 01 May 2014, 07:23
Pandora's Box is a Greek myth. Sheesh.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 01 May 2014, 09:38
Pandora's Box is also the name of a famous BDSM Club/Facility/Whatever (SFW Link). (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandora%27s_Box_%28BDSM%29)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 01 May 2014, 10:53
Oh Jim, you so smoooth.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 01 May 2014, 13:53
 :facepalm:

Jim, Jim, Jim... don't annoy the dominatrix. That's got to be the First Rule of something-or-other...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 01 May 2014, 14:11
Survival?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Tova on 01 May 2014, 19:54
Pfft, nonsense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Game and Watch Forever on 01 May 2014, 20:41
I freaking love how cartoony (at least that's the word coming to me) Sam's face in the last panel looks. XD
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 01 May 2014, 20:46
Looks like Dora is giving Sam espresso. Jim will be so thankful afterward.  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 May 2014, 20:49
Even more so when Sam uses the coffee shop WiFi to satisfy her curiosity about what Ms. Reed looks like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 01 May 2014, 21:20
Love Dora's exasperated look in the last panel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 01 May 2014, 21:25
The Date is Nigh!

A week of Yelling Bird Strips.    4 (7.1%)
It goes off pretty good - and we don't see a moment of it.    7 (12.5%)
It's a comic laugh riot - and we only hear of it like a "noodle incident."    7 (12.5%)
We follow along - and find out why Jim shaved the "soul patch" off.    6 (10.7%)
She tells him what she does for a living. "CHECK PLEASE!"    0 (0%)
"Intriguing!" (Or some variant thereof.)    0 (0%)
It's just coffee, for crying out loud.    8 (14.3%)
The Marriage Proposal takes place by the third cup.    0 (0%)
A week of Steve eating pancakes.    2 (3.6%)
Angus gets the rejection letter.    2 (3.6%)
Angus becomes COLBERT'S REPLACEMENT!    8 (14.3%)
Space Waffles and Ham with the Finest Space Tea!    0 (0%)
As usual: SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. (Ka-BOOOM!)    12 (21.4%)

Total Members Voted: 56

Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 01 May 2014, 21:55
BTW, is it still considered outing in this case, since Jim "took the initiative" and looked up VV's bio?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Detachable Felix on 01 May 2014, 22:06
Love Dora's exasperated look in the last panel.
+10
A real "fuck this shit" expression, I thought. Akima's right, Jeph is getting seriously good with facial expressions
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 01 May 2014, 22:16
Love Dora's exasperated look in the last panel.
+10
A real "fuck this shit" expression, I thought. Akima's right, Jeph is getting seriously good with facial expressions

And not just with faces -- her hand gesture is spot-on, too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 01 May 2014, 22:18
Looks like Dora is giving Sam espresso. Jim will be so thankful afterward.  :evil:

But she's only giving her Espresso to put into a Latte or something, not to drink it. She's extended her arm to hand it to a customer in panel three.

Sidenote: I enjoy that this strip is in basically "classic" format. It's wider, but it has the original four panel layout.
I also want to note, that over the last week I started to get used to the new layout, as my initial fears of lesser conversation due to too few panels has been disproved. As long as we're getting enough panels for longer conversations I'm fine with it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 01 May 2014, 23:55
Isn't Samantha supposed to be 13?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 01 May 2014, 23:57
Maybe. What about it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 02 May 2014, 00:04
Yes, she is (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1958).

I guess he was referring to her reaction to kissing being mentioned. Maybe it's because it's about her father. Maybe she just doesn't like it. Who knows.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 02 May 2014, 00:42
Her father being involved may partially explain her reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 02 May 2014, 01:18
It does seem a tiny bit 'young' for a thirteen year old though.

I'm reminded of the film Angus, Thongs And Perfect Snogging which is an absolutely deluded portrayal of 15 year old girls.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 02 May 2014, 01:36
All thirteen-years-old are not equally 'young'.

Nor is a given thirteen-years-old usually equally 'young' in every aspect:  Physical, emotional, social, intellectual ...

It's been years since I had any dealings with thirteen-years-olds, so it might not matter much, but I didn't find Sam's reaction unusual for an extrovert girl her age.

If anything, it's that "extrovert" aspect I'd find unusual.  Except in comics.  Everyone in comics wear their hearts on their sleaves ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 02 May 2014, 01:38
I'm fully aware that not all thirteen-year-olds will be equally young, but this seemed immature regardless.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 May 2014, 01:53
Just barely past 12, with an apparently overprotective parent and less than a full complement of friends. On top of that she lives in a universe where immaturity is rife at all ages.

Fair observation, but not surprising.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 02 May 2014, 01:54
Hadn't considered her lack of peer influence.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 02 May 2014, 02:58
Quote
Also: Sarah Foster Tate's real name is Kerry? Damn, my mind is blown...
Also into SF and Star Trek fandom at the time. One of the gals the ST:TOS uniform was made for.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 May 2014, 03:01
Am I the only one who sees Sam's expression in the last panel as more of "horrified fascination" than "disgust"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 02 May 2014, 03:15
"Fascinated disgust", perhaps?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Hotel Papa on 02 May 2014, 03:17
Am I the only one who sees Sam's expression in the last panel as more of "horrified fascination" than "disgust"?
Nope, that is horrified fascination. It's Sam after all. French kissing brings that activitiy in the neighborhood of frogs. (God, that pun is entirely unintentional. I still like it...)

I also like todays specials...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: KOK on 02 May 2014, 03:18
She looks neither horrified nor disgusted to me. That eww is very insincere.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 04:28
What KOK says, she has a huge smile on her face when saying it. Also, how is this immature for a thirteen-year-old?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Rimwolf on 02 May 2014, 04:30
Looks like Dora is giving Sam espresso. Jim will be so thankful afterward.  :evil:

I believe the specials blackboard says "Have your drink prepared by an unpaid child"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 04:32
unpaid child

Damn it, Dora, they're called interns.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Schmorgluck on 02 May 2014, 04:37
Also, how is this immature for a thirteen-year-old?
Precisely because she's thirteen, not nine. But I acknowledge your mileage may vary.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 04:53
I guess?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 02 May 2014, 04:53
Exactly. The thirteen year olds I knew weren't all 'OMG FRENCH KISSINGGGGGG,' they were all 'how quickly can I lose my virginity?'

I mean not all of them, obviously, as Schmorgluck says, mileage may vary - but it just seemed unlike even the most immature thirteen year olds I've ever met.

But again, it's been acknowledged that she is largely removed from her peer group and sheltered by her father.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 04:54
And she's also talking about her father.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 02 May 2014, 05:45
Sam doesn't need to worry. At the rate he's going, if Jim keeps talking there won't be much kissing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 02 May 2014, 06:52
Exactly. The thirteen year olds I knew weren't all 'OMG FRENCH KISSINGGGGGG,' they were all 'how quickly can I lose my virginity?'
Maybe I'm odd, but at 13 (and Sam's 12, as far as I know) I was definitely not worried about losing my virginity and neither were any of my friends. At that point, I was not in any way concerned with having a boyfriend. Sure, there were girls in my class who were very proud of having a boyfriend (though I'm not sure whether they lost their virginity at 13), but not the majority; I would say less than 30%.
Having a bit of a crush on someone and talking to your friends about it is of course a different thing, but I also didn't do that at 13, but more like 14 or 15 - and same for my friends. It's not like anyone said "OMG you're too young for sex or relationships", we were just interested in different things.

Granted, Sam's behaviour is pretty immature, but just wanting to have sex is not per se a sign of maturity - it can be the exact opposite.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 02 May 2014, 07:16
That depends on your definition of maturity, given that wanting to have sex is part of puberty and as such, physical maturity, given that your hormones are changing :mrgreen: [/douchiness]

I wouldn't say you're odd, I was exaggerating anyway, but the point is you wouldn't be like OH MY GOD FRENCH KISSING OOOOOOOOH at age 13, surely?

Who knows. Maybe we're all wrong. Maybe we're out of order. Maybe the whole freakin' system's out of order.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 May 2014, 07:18
Looks like Dora is giving Sam espresso. Jim will be so thankful afterward.  :evil:

I believe the specials blackboard says "Have your drink prepared by an unpaid child"
Woha. Well spotted.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 02 May 2014, 08:27
Nice reading of the specials, Rimwolf!  (I tried, and gave up, but I do believe you have it right.)

"Fascinated disgust", perhaps?
... or perhaps "scandalized"?

"Delightfully scandalized"?

... meh ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: brew on 02 May 2014, 11:00
Exactly. The thirteen year olds I knew weren't all 'OMG FRENCH KISSINGGGGGG,' they were all 'how quickly can I lose my virginity?'

I mean not all of them, obviously, as Schmorgluck says, mileage may vary - but it just seemed unlike even the most immature thirteen year olds I've ever met.

There's definitely a world outside the one you've lived in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 02 May 2014, 11:07
I wouldn't say you're odd, I was exaggerating anyway, but the point is you wouldn't be like OH MY GOD FRENCH KISSING OOOOOOOOH at age 13, surely?

No, you're right, I wouldn't have. At not at 12, as Sam is, either. And not when I was younger either. But then I used to be way more introverted as a little kid than Sam is. And also, rather more reasonable and not nearly as much up to adventures and shenanigans. My best friend was quite a bit more like Sam in that respect, though, so I still often went along with things I would never have come up with on my own.

What I meant with kids wanting to have sex being very immature: Very often this "OMG I totally want a (probably much older) boyfriend and make out and have sex" is purely a manifestation of peer pressure and trying to appear "cool" and succumbing to this is a form of severe emotional immaturity - not with everyone, of course, but quite often; and this is not restricted to people at 13, but rather roughly 13-17.
Also, I think a lot of little girls who think that having sex at 13 is sooooo cool end up pretty badly hurt (emotionally), because they let themselves be pressured into things that they are actually not mature enough for.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: KOK on 02 May 2014, 12:04
Just barely past 12, ...

Where have you got that from? She was 13 when Jim and Dora went on a date, which is some time ago now. Does anyone have a clue how long?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 12:34
13 is just barely past 12. It's the smallest number integer that's past 12.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 May 2014, 12:48
:roll: Smallest *natural* number
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 12:50
Fixed it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 May 2014, 13:02
Twelve in this reference (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/198307597772795904). There's no contradiction if she's just on the edge and Jim rounded up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 May 2014, 13:03
If Jim said she's 13, she's 13. Comic is highest canon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Platypodes on 02 May 2014, 13:20
When I was 13, some of the girls I knew were starting to think the idea of french kissing was cool, one or two had done it, and some were still just a little bit grossed out by the idea.

Besides cultural influences, there's the fact that kids hit puberty at varying ages.  I think Sam is a late developer.  She's shown zero indication of interest in boys/sexy things, zero desire to act or appear sophisticated or leave behind any of her "kid" mannerisms, and she doesn't have any curves yet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: niceboiiiii on 02 May 2014, 13:23
the comics this week were (in a word) AMAZEBALLS!

(Edited out the spam and banned the spammer - Method)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Platypodes on 02 May 2014, 13:25
Reading back over the thread, I see nobody has noted that Jim seems to have dyed his hair for this date.  He must really want to impress!

Even more so when Sam uses the coffee shop WiFi to satisfy her curiosity about what Ms. Reed looks like.

Hahaha!  If she thinks french kissing is gross....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 02 May 2014, 15:11
I'm just waiting for the moment where Sam and Veronica meet.

Veronicas new Padawan?   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 02 May 2014, 16:10
When I was 13, some of the girls I knew were starting to think the idea of french kissing was cool, one or two had done it, and some were still just a little bit grossed out by the idea.

Besides cultural influences, there's the fact that kids hit puberty at varying ages.  I think Sam is a late developer.  She's shown zero indication of interest in boys/sexy things, zero desire to act or appear sophisticated or leave behind any of her "kid" mannerisms, and she doesn't have any curves yet.

Exactly, plus she doesn't have any peer pressure because she hardly has any friends her own age, and apparently none she likes enough to hang out with much. So yeah, I find her a very believable 13.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Platypodes on 02 May 2014, 22:24
Yeah, and those things might build on each other.  Because she doesn't have a lot of friends, she hasn't given in to peer pressure to take up conventional pubescent girl interests, and then, because all the other girls have gone gaga for boys and fashion, she becomes even less interested in hanging out with them...

Alternately, maybe Sam used to have closer friends, but, being a strong-willed sort who doesn't give in to peer pressure easily, she lost interest in the other girls when they got all giggly and fashionable and stopped wanting to do fun stuff like catching frogs in the swamp.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 02 May 2014, 23:28
Reading back over the thread, I see nobody has noted that Jim seems to have dyed his hair for this date.  He must really want to impress!

Even more so when Sam uses the coffee shop WiFi to satisfy her curiosity about what Ms. Reed looks like.

Hahaha!  If she thinks french kissing is gross....
That depends on how you put it (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1885), doesn't it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 03 May 2014, 06:02
I au paired for a family with a 12 year old girl, and we once had a discussion about sex which basically consisted of her saying "but that sounds GROSS, why would anyone want to do that?!". I find Sam a believable 13, and agree that she's probably pre-pubescent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 03 May 2014, 07:15
Whether a character has started puberty or not doesn't seem like it should be discussed here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Barmymoo on 03 May 2014, 07:47
It's relevant to her behaviour - hormonal changes alter teenage behaviour significantly and Sam acts like a child, rather than an adolescent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrillho on 03 May 2014, 09:36
Precisely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 03 May 2014, 10:50
It's relevant to her behaviour - hormonal changes alter teenage behaviour significantly and Sam acts like a child, rather than an adolescent.
That's fair.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 04 May 2014, 06:00
Whether a character has started puberty or not doesn't seem like it should be discussed here.

Boy, Pablo Wapsi would have a field day with that comment, considering his comic's current storyline.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 04 May 2014, 06:08
Who? Also, if it's part of the storyline, that's completely different.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sidhekin on 04 May 2014, 06:13
Paul Taylor of Wapsi Square.  And yes, it's very much part of the current storyline.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 04 May 2014, 06:27
So that's completely different. But May explained why it's relevant here, so it doesn't really matter anymore.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 04 May 2014, 07:43
So - who wants to start a new thread? I'm net.challenged at the moment. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 04 May 2014, 07:53
Whoever wants to will.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ysth on 04 May 2014, 10:09
Awesome SFW (well, except for all the bare limbs) oglaf this week.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 04 May 2014, 19:55
Have the drinks always been available in S, M, L, and WTF?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 04 May 2014, 20:01
yep

I think the earliest comic in which we can read this sign is 244 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=244). We've seen the sign earlier, but I don't think it was legible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 04 May 2014, 21:29
The coffee prices haven't changed in all this time (whatever that amount of time is).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mabhatter on 04 May 2014, 21:37
Am I the only one who sees Sam's expression in the last panel as more of "horrified fascination" than "disgust"?
That's where Faye acts more like a "cohort" with Sam rather than an adult. Sam is more about the teenage "Ewww" factor of grownups kissing than actually being upset.  She's obviously big enough to know her father has been single for a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2691-2695 (28 April-2 May 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: snubnose on 05 May 2014, 01:55
That friday comic is seriously the most funniest QC I've seen in a long while !  :-D

(Not that the comic isnt very funny a lot, but this one is a definite climax)