THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Kugai on 17 Jan 2015, 21:04

Title: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 17 Jan 2015, 21:04
Brace yourselves!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 17 Jan 2015, 21:18
Marten and Claire get drunk while Faye watches a movie.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 Jan 2015, 00:46
I'm not sure Dora will 'fire' Faye. However, I'm sticking with my idea that Faye will be too obviously drunk and Dora will suspend her until she dries out. It turns into a long, hard wait because Faye still has further to fall.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Loki on 18 Jan 2015, 02:21
Nitpick: It's "weirder".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 18 Jan 2015, 05:38
I still want the parents to meet.  All we really know about Claire's mother is that she's a nice lady who makes good pancakes.  A meeting with Veronica would let us learn more about her, and probably learn all sorts of hilariously embarrassing stories about Claire.  After all, we got to learn embarrassing stuff (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1828) about Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ysth on 18 Jan 2015, 09:32
I still think Clairemom is a hairdresser (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1983).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 18 Jan 2015, 11:26
and probably learn all sorts of hilariously embarrassing stories about Claire.

Trying to make Claire blush sounds dangerous. Her head might pop.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 18 Jan 2015, 11:39
Nitpick: It's "weirder".


Here's your Badge   ;D

(http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f50/Kugai2/Memes/GrammarPolice.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Loki on 18 Jan 2015, 12:02
That sentence no predicate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 18 Jan 2015, 12:33
Well, shit.

I'm not sure I want to watch this play out one-strip-a-day in real time.  Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to take a few weeks off and come back when there's a small backlog...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 18 Jan 2015, 12:34
New comic...

...and the shit's about to hit the fan...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ysth on 18 Jan 2015, 12:46
Lighten up, Dora.  It's not Faye's fault you've lost the ability to banish her overhead bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 18 Jan 2015, 12:48
(http://the365effect.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ShitHitsFanMediumT.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 Jan 2015, 12:51
Ooh.. yup. That's the trigger event alright! I think that the Faye-Dora argument that I predicted is about to break out. The way I see it, one of three things will happen:
I think that option (3) is bizarrely (although it involved Faye virtually having a nervous break-down) the least painful. The other two options involve Faye going through a period of self-ostracism and further decline.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 18 Jan 2015, 12:56
I think that option (3) is bizarrely (although it involved Faye virtually having a nervous break-down) the least painful. The other two options involve Faye going through a period of self-ostracism and further decline.

Anything that avoids your rooftop suicide attempt (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30376.msg1294033.html#msg1294033) scenario is fine by me. *shudder*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 18 Jan 2015, 13:16
Okay, at least Faye didn't screw up anything relating to the business before she was found out. Dora would've destroyed her if that had happened, now she's only angry at Faye for lying to her and falling into old habits. The only person she's hurting so far is herself but that could change very quickly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Jan 2015, 13:25
Dora seemed to have no idea that Faye was drunk all day if she was that surprised to see Faye drinking. Faye may be more functioning than we gave her credit before, not that it's a good thing.

Damn it, Gladstone, I was trying to forget that post :(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 Jan 2015, 14:01
Dora seemed to have no idea that Faye was drunk all day if she was that surprised to see Faye drinking. Faye may be more functioning than we gave her credit before, not that it's a good thing.

Truth. Usually, it's the most accomplished and long-term alcoholics who can simulate sobriety upon need.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Roxtar on 18 Jan 2015, 14:09
reminds me of one woman I used to work with. Always had a bottle of "water" on her desk... the owned eventually found it that it was vodka. The owner was a great guy to work for (before he sold the company for $fuckton) and gave her another chance. kept paying her while she went to rehab, but with the understanding that this was the only "second chance" she was going to get. after rehab, things were fine for a bit, but when she came to work drunk again, he fired her on the spot.

Faye needs a serious wake-up call... and the support of her friends.
Hoping Angus makes an appearance during the "intervention" arc.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 18 Jan 2015, 14:21
Mind your feet because the other boot is about to drop.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 18 Jan 2015, 15:42
ohhh snap.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Boomslang on 18 Jan 2015, 16:20
I've been embarrassed before about coming into work slightly hungover, regardless of the fact others were as well and no one said anything. The stress and self loathing from drinking, even a single beer, before work, would be unbearable.

Actually drinking, on the job?

I can understand why people can and do rationalize it when they're already alcoholics, but I get a sick feeling in my stomach just at the idea of doing that. I understand that, at the bottom of it, Faye's job is really safe and no one's life is ruined if she screws up their coffee, but it's the principle of the thing. If you're accepting money from someone for doing something, you have a responsibility to not sabotage yourself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: HauntedNorth on 18 Jan 2015, 16:37
God, I hate it when the cliffhanger is the moment of the slam after the speed wobble.  Although... Maybe I missed it, but there's one thing that I think nobody's mentioned yet.

I'm pretty sure at least one or two other members of the cast have Faye's mom's number. Like, back when she went home for a spell. I think at least one person had that number. Something scarier than an angry Dora with a broadsword sits waiting, drinking sweet tea and wondering just how her dear daughters are. Why, I bet she has the retirement money to come and visit, even. The slam may still be coming.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Conzy on 18 Jan 2015, 16:43
I've been embarrassed before about coming into work slightly hungover, regardless of the fact others were as well and no one said anything. The stress and self loathing from drinking, even a single beer, before work, would be unbearable.

Actually drinking, on the job?

I can understand why people can and do rationalize it when they're already alcoholics, but I get a sick feeling in my stomach just at the idea of doing that. I understand that, at the bottom of it, Faye's job is really safe and no one's life is ruined if she screws up their coffee, but it's the principle of the thing. If you're accepting money from someone for doing something, you have a responsibility to not sabotage yourself.

We're not told how much she's drinking, if it is, as today's comic suggests, she's just keeping a buzz going through the day then she's unlikely to be any worse at her job, in Faye's case it might actually improve her (nonexistent) customer service skills while not impacting negatively on her coffee making abilities. The real problem here is that Dora explicitly forbade it the previous day and Faye's sneaking it anyway, the main concern isn't anything to do with the job as an entity now, the trust between Faye and Dora in terms of boss and employee is now damaged, and we all know the issues Dora has with trust. I didn't think it would come to this but considering that Dora seems to be oblivious (how can she be oblivious? Faye's never tried to hide the fact she's hungover before and no 'medicine' can perk you up that much after a night of drinking) I can see her firing Faye on the spot this week out of sheer rage. I'm sure she'll reconsider when she cools off but I don't see how things can be the same between the two of them any time soon. Also take into account the passage of time in the QC world, how long has it been since Faye got her promotion? Two weeks? That's a real kick in the teeth after a friend and boss shows so much faith in you, despite the fact you've never shown much to deserve it in the first place.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 18 Jan 2015, 17:03
Well, now. Faye's been caught. Bare minimum response: Sent home for the day to sober up. Maximum: Fired. Also, that's no appendix. Also, the face of someone who knows what she's doing is wrong. Goddamnit Faye, just admit you need some help. =/ Nobody's going to judge you for that much.

However, this is probably going to get dragged out some more. Because goddamnit, Faye.

Guess we'll see how Dora explodes tomorrow. (the not-appendix is obvious.)

EDIT: Dora's shirt says: "Gojira". How appropriate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 18 Jan 2015, 17:33
Let's play the Questionable Content drinking game!

Every time Faye takes a drink, take a look at the alcohol in your own hand and seriously question your own life choices that led to it being there!

[Note: Not to say "All alcohol is bad". That's wrong. It's just that watching Faye's trainwreck is seriously conducive to introspection.]
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 18 Jan 2015, 17:35
Just noticed something... Compare Faye's face in the last panel of 2876 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2876) to Faye's face in the last panel of 2755 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2755). Apparently this is Faye's "I'm lying about this" face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 18 Jan 2015, 17:35
Who put alcohol in my hand?

Just noticed something... Compare Faye's face in the last panel of 2876 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2876) to Faye's face in the last panel of 2755 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2755). Apparently this is Faye's "I'm lying about this" face.

That's her "I'm so damned clever" face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 18 Jan 2015, 17:37
Who put alcohol in my hand?

Pintsize.

Ironically, he put a pint sized glass there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 18 Jan 2015, 18:03
Who put alcohol in my hand?

Just noticed something... Compare Faye's face in the last panel of 2876 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2876) to Faye's face in the last panel of 2755 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2755). Apparently this is Faye's "I'm lying about this" face.

That's her "I'm so damned clever" face.

She won't feel so clever when she gets pink-slipped.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Jan 2015, 18:12
Honestly it seems more of an "oh shit, please don't see I'm lying" face rather than a face of triumph.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: 94ssd on 18 Jan 2015, 18:22
Oh shit, it's confrontation time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: GarandMarine on 18 Jan 2015, 18:32
Called it. This is gonna hurt. Bosun! Sound collision alarm! All hands brace for impact!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 18 Jan 2015, 18:33
Who put alcohol in my hand?

Just noticed something... Compare Faye's face in the last panel of 2876 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2876) to Faye's face in the last panel of 2755 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2755). Apparently this is Faye's "I'm lying about this" face.

That's her "I'm so damned clever" face.
It's too nervous an expression for cleverface. It's her "I hope I'm not caught" face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 18 Jan 2015, 18:49
That's not the same bottle she found when she woke up.  Is she already on her second bottle of the day?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Jan 2015, 18:50
It's too nervous an expression for cleverface. It's her "I hope I'm not caught" face.

No, it's her "Shit, I've been caught" face. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 18 Jan 2015, 18:56
That's not the same bottle she found when she woke up.  Is she already on her second bottle of the day?

Not to say that she's NOT on her second bottle necessarily, but I think it is supposed to be the same as the one she found in her bed. The one that was empty from the night before looks like a fifth and the new one in bed - as well as the one she's hittin' at work - looks like a pint.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Jan 2015, 19:10
More evidence that it was a gift from Pint-size. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 18 Jan 2015, 19:18
A fifth is bad news if you've had it all to yourself in the space of a day and it's empty the next, a pint is disaster when taken that way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 18 Jan 2015, 19:54
Ummm... a fifth is larger than a pint.  A pint is only an eighth of a gallon, half a quart. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 18 Jan 2015, 20:21
Nope. It's smug face all right.  She's probably buzzed enough that she find herself terribly funny.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 18 Jan 2015, 21:21
Oh shit, it's confrontation time.

No no. It's filler robots being wacky time.

THEN it's confrontation time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 18 Jan 2015, 22:14
Oh shit, it's confrontation time.

No no. It's filler robots being wacky time.

THEN it's confrontation time.

Oh, but it will be the confrontation of Marten with Claire's parents, globviously
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 18 Jan 2015, 22:55
Ummm... a fifth is larger than a pint.  A pint is only an eighth of a gallon, half a quart.
And that's what I get for working in the sciences. I screw up the imperial units instead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 18 Jan 2015, 22:58
Oh, but it will be the confrontation of Marten with Claire's parents, globviously

Why? He's already met Mrs. Augustus and they like each other. Maybe we'll meet Mr. Augustus?

Assuming of course the date even goes ahead - if Dora's sufficiently angry/concerned she could call Marten and get him to stay with her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 18 Jan 2015, 23:09
Ooh, and I just remembered the last panel of this strip (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1720).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 18 Jan 2015, 23:13
Prediction: Jeph will now alternate between horrible conflict scenes culminating in Dora firing Faye and sweet, sweet scenes of Marten and Claire having the BEST TIME EVER - just to mess with our heads!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 18 Jan 2015, 23:25
Ooh, and I just remember the last panel of this strip (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1720).

So, showing up drunk is one of Dora's red lines. Does she know Faye has a problem? If she hasn't guessed that, then all she knows is that Faye has broken both a standing rule and a specific instruction to her personally. This conversation will be ugly; it will only get worse if Faye is defensive and tries to justify her actions, avoid responsibility or somehow make it about Dora.

I suspect that the movie date will not go ahead; Marten will have a domestic crisis to deal with. I wonder how Claire will deal with that? The alternative is him coming home from the date to find Faye in a bad way. Again this could impact on his relationship with Claire because he may blame it for his not being there for his friend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Jan 2015, 23:47
I wouldn't blame Marten if he resented Faye for interfering with his happiness. Not rational, not in character, but I wouldn't blame him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 18 Jan 2015, 23:55
Termination.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 19 Jan 2015, 00:23
Well, shit.

I'm not sure I want to watch this play out one-strip-a-day in real time.  Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to take a few weeks off and come back when there's a small backlog...
Real time is very different from QC time. A few hours in QC may stretch over several weeks our time. So if you want QC time to synchronize with your time, you will have to spend most of your time in hibernation. Alternatively, speed away from Earth at 99% lightspeed (and try to get reliable Internet connection during the trip).

We are wathcing a drama unfolding in extremely slow motion from our point of view. This is not necessarily bad, as it gives time for us to think and discuss possible outcomes. But I agree, it is frustrating at times. However, it would be even more frustrating taking a few weeks off, knowing that something important might have happened in QC.

EDIT: Here (https://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/timedial.html) is a handy table showing the time dilation effect. At 99% light speed, one day on your spaceship equals 7.09 days on Earth...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 19 Jan 2015, 00:32
Personally, I am completely unable to leave QC alone for any stretch of time. I feel depressed if I'm unable to access it for some reason.

Wow, sounds like I have a problem...  :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 19 Jan 2015, 00:34
Wow, sounds like I have a problem...  :-o
You are not alone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Akima on 19 Jan 2015, 00:43
The only place I've worked where somebody drank on the job, the drinker was the head of the department...

Seriously Faye, up your tee-shirt? You want to get caught, don't you?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 19 Jan 2015, 01:10
Good point there. Smarter move would've been to calmly stuff it back in the purse. Not that there was time for that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 Jan 2015, 01:16
We are wathcing a drama unfolding in extremely slow motion from our point of view. This is not necessarily bad, as it gives time for us to think and discuss possible outcomes. But I agree, it is frustrating at times. However, it would be even more frustrating taking a few weeks off, knowing that something important might have happened in QC.

April would be able to confirm this, but I believe that the previous week, in-comic, has lasted three or four months IRL. Of course, I'm sure we've all had weeks where so much has happened that it has ended up feeling like three or four months! :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 19 Jan 2015, 01:23
Hmm - "old still" bourbon?
(http://www.oldstuffonly.com/images/oldpotsilableee.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 19 Jan 2015, 01:27
So, showing up drunk is one of Dora's red lines. Does she know Faye has a problem?

I think she pretty much knows exactly what's going on, judging by this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2867).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 01:29
Seriously Faye, up your tee-shirt?

What else would you expect from someone exhibiting such poor judgement right now?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Sullivan on 19 Jan 2015, 02:34
Well, that happened a lot sooner than I thought it would.

Kudos to Jeph for not prolonging our dread.

Unless of course Faye somehow gets out of this and the real crisis is still to come.

(But I doubt it, since the drunk bubbles are visible to Dora now.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 02:49
Ummm... a fifth is larger than a pint.  A pint is only an eighth of a gallon, half a quart.

Last week, I mentioned that in my early 20s I worked at a bar in Northampton in which on-the-clock drunkenness (not to me mention pot, some hard drugs, and sex) was basically tolerated so long as employees didn't fuck things up too badly. Not condoned, but tolerated. In those days, I could drink a pint of Seagram's Seven (which is gross, btw) during/after work, then get up and work a lunch shift, usually with a few slugs of hair-of-the-dog beer sneaked from the bar's taps to get me through.

Now I work for a college and have a kid, and if I have a second IPA with dinner I get sleepy.

My point is that early 20s hedonism isn't necessarily a problem. Everyone I worked with at that place is fine now, and most have settled down with families into relatively mellow, sober lives. If not for Faye's backstory, I would find this arc more of a comedy than a tragedy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Sullivan on 19 Jan 2015, 03:40

My point is that early 20s hedonism isn't necessarily a problem. Everyone I worked with at that place is fine now, and most have settled down with families into relatively mellow, sober lives. If not for Faye's backstory, I would find this arc more of a comedy than a tragedy.
It's not just her backstory. There's also:
a) She's not using alcohol because of her backstory, or because she just likes having a buzz on through the day; she's using it to get past her hurt over Angus.
b) She's in a work environment where it is a problem, and
c) she knows that. And furthermore
d) she's lying about it,
e) clumsily.

Even without her backstory, I'm just not seeing "comedy."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 03:47

My point is that early 20s hedonism isn't necessarily a problem. Everyone I worked with at that place is fine now, and most have settled down with families into relatively mellow, sober lives. If not for Faye's backstory, I would find this arc more of a comedy than a tragedy.
It's not just her backstory. There's also:
a) She's not using alcohol because of her backstory, or because she just likes having a buzz on through the day; she's using it to get past her hurt over Angus.
b) She's in a work environment where it is a problem, and
c) she knows that. And furthermore
d) she's lying about it,
e) clumsily.

Even without her backstory, I'm just not seeing "comedy."

a) doesn't concern me all that much. What's a little dissolute binge for, if not to misguidedly get through a breakup?

The rest, you have a point. Alienating friends and messing up one's employment (and a recent promotion) are certainly big problems in and of themselves.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 19 Jan 2015, 03:57
I worry that Dora might start doubting herself for giving Faye the extra responsibility. She's not all that mentally sturdy herself, and might get into some kind of existential anxiety as a result of Faye's meltdown. Dark times might be ahead. I still hope we might get some Marten and Claire sunshine and puppies to tide us over, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: techkid on 19 Jan 2015, 04:14
At the very least, I think it might be time for a little role-reversal of another, not dis-similar incident (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1808).

Dora knows what's going on, and I don't think she will fire Faye over it. But, she will want her to get help ASAP, and will probably utilise any influence she has to get her to fix herself up. Even calling Angus over to talk to her would probably not be considered "below the belt", I don't think (would that week have passed in QC time, I wonder?).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 04:30
At the very least, I think it might be time for a little role-reversal of another, not dis-similar incident (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1808).

Dora knows what's going on, and I don't think she will fire Faye over it. But, she will want her to get help ASAP, and will probably utilise any influence she has to get her to fix herself up. Even calling Angus over to talk to her would probably not be considered "below the belt", I don't think (would that week have passed in QC time, I wonder?).

I just noticed the title of today's comic. Probably a joke reference to Faye's piss poor attempt at deception, but perhaps some foreshadowing as well. The question is, will she be hospital-bound after this because of violence committed by Dora or because of some tragic drunken accident (i.e. "accident")?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Welu on 19 Jan 2015, 05:15
I haven't checked to see if someone posted this recently but possibly some foreshadowing over a thousand strips in the making? (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1720)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 19 Jan 2015, 05:18
This will all end in owls.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 19 Jan 2015, 05:22
Appendicitis -> Hospital-bound. But there definitely is a double entendre here. Drug rehab next? Somehow, I do not think this is the best option for Faye. But Dora Friend should scramble a rescue team. Team members: Hanners and Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 19 Jan 2015, 05:24
And Sven! *ducks*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 Jan 2015, 05:34
Something tells me that Faye is going to learn just how terrible it is to be surrounded only by good friends when their idea of what is in your best interests and yours have begun to diverge. I'm talking about cold turkey, the DT shakes and practically a flush-out with nothing but mineral water for a day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Skewbrow on 19 Jan 2015, 06:25
Considering that one of the alternatives is the roof top scene, a day week on mineral water sounds like paradise.

Last time we were foreseeing Drunk Faye Mistakes, was when  she resorted to a coping mechanism on the rocks (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2039). That time  she escaped with a broken nose (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2043) and Marten got laid. It does look like this time will be different, but not as bad as we can imagine.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 19 Jan 2015, 06:49
Y'know, I never worked out what made Padma do that. If it was Pintsize, I could have understood; I mean, he's the sort of 'bot that people can't help but hit. Faye, on the other hand? Either Padma was drunk/high or someone had given her an entirely exaggerated impression of Faye's martial prowess...

That said, I really couldn't see how that night ended up the way it did. I mean, okay, Padma was pretty, exotic and nice in a kooky way. However, her main entry in Marten's mental index cards would be: "Crazy lady who hit my room-mate hard enough to injure her for no easily-explicable reason". Me, I would have tried to find some way to extract myself from all but casual contact with her as a matter of urgency!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mawnck on 19 Jan 2015, 06:58
or someone had given her an entirely exaggerated impression of Faye's martial prowess...

Their first meeting:
http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1857 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1857)
http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1858 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1858)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 07:12
Y'know, I never worked out what made Padma do that.
Didn't they fight the first time they met? Padma probably assumed it was their version of a secret handshake from then on.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 07:22
And then, just to mess with everyone's heads, Padma comes back to town to see Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 07:56
And then, just to mess with everyone's heads, Padma comes back to town to see Marten.

I actually think that would be kinda awesome, for the sake of the dramaz. Also, it's been almost 3 years to the day since Padma left.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: brew on 19 Jan 2015, 07:56

Padma was ... exotic

Um...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: freeman on 19 Jan 2015, 08:11
Well, that happened a lot sooner than I thought it would.


Almost too soon, like soap opera soon. "Oh no, Faye has a problem! Everyone help Faye!" "It's a very special episode. Wow. Very sad. Much drama." "Hurray, Faye is healed and everyone lived ever after."

I personally would have preferred to leave her stew in her own juices for a longer time. After all, real alcoholism brews for years, easily. Now,  how it's portrayed, it's almost like how you got your first bottle of wine and tried to sneak out with it, but your own  guilty  damn face rat you out. (Early end  to of that party, that time.  :cry:)

Anyway, it's Jeph's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Jan 2015, 08:13
Well, that happened a lot sooner than I thought it would.


Almost too soon, like soap opera soon. "Oh no, Faye has a problem! Everyone help Faye!" "It's a very special episode. Wow. Very sad. Much drama." "Hurray, Faye is healed and everyone lived ever after."
You're assuming Faye is going to be "healed"...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 19 Jan 2015, 09:12
Well, that happened a lot sooner than I thought it would.


Almost too soon, like soap opera soon. "Oh no, Faye has a problem! Everyone help Faye!" "It's a very special episode. Wow. Very sad. Much drama." "Hurray, Faye is healed and everyone lived ever after."

I personally would have preferred to leave her stew in her own juices for a longer time. After all, real alcoholism brews for years, easily. Now,  how it's portrayed, it's almost like how you got your first bottle of wine and tried to sneak out with it, but your own  guilty  damn face rat you out. (Early end  to of that party, that time.  :cry:)

Anyway, it's Jeph's comic.

It only seems soon, because we're seeing it slightly before the characters are. That doesn't mean she hasn't been a functioning alcoholic for some time. As pointed out earlier, she's been using booze to try and cope or at least not feel the pain of Angus leaving even before he got the job. Or to be more accurate, the pain she feels that people she are close to are going away again. The comic doesn't follow Faye around 24/7, so this could have been going on for months or even years and everyone has assumed it was just part of Faye's personality. There have been hints of alcoholism around her for a long time. It's just that now we are seeing how bad it really is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: KOK on 19 Jan 2015, 10:38
(http://the365effect.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ShitHitsFanMediumT.png)

OK, this did it. Many times I have read people claiming that something funny made them spit out what they were drinking, but it never happened to me. Until now. Fortunately it was plain water, and did not hit anything but the desk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 19 Jan 2015, 10:41
I just noticed the title of today's comic. Probably a joke reference to Faye's piss poor attempt at deception, but perhaps some foreshadowing as well. The question is, will she be hospital-bound after this because of violence committed by Dora or because of some tragic drunken accident (i.e. "accident")?

If Dora carried out an assault that put Faye in hospital, she'd be shortly after put in jail.

Does that sound likely?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 19 Jan 2015, 10:46
This comic had a punching intern. An intern whose duty was to be punched by other people.

He was seen with bruises and lacerations, so we aren't talking love taps.

Realism is not the order of the day. If Jeph think it would make a good punchline, it's going to happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 10:50
Realism is not the order of the day. If Jeph think it would make a good punchline, it's going to happen.
Except that considering how close this particular storyline hits home for Jeph, I doubt there's going to be any real "punchline".
There's a lot that Questionable Content will make jokes about, but there are certain topics that are treated completely seriously and I would wager that Faye's descent into alcoholism is one of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 19 Jan 2015, 10:51
Pissed Dora is pissed. I've lost track of which chance this is for Faye, but I could definitely see Dora interpreting this as "one chance too many", even if just on a whim or because Faye's being indifferent to the responsibility Dora has trusted her with.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 11:03
I just noticed the title of today's comic. Probably a joke reference to Faye's piss poor attempt at deception, but perhaps some foreshadowing as well. The question is, will she be hospital-bound after this because of violence committed by Dora or because of some tragic drunken accident (i.e. "accident")?

If Dora carried out an assault that put Faye in hospital, she'd be shortly after put in jail.

Does that sound likely?

Apparently I need a "This Comment Was Meant Figuratively" button. How many times have characters in this comic (usually Faye) threatened severe bodily harm? I assume Faye also doesn't actually know a good place for ditching bodies and wasn't actually going to break Clinton's arms and face, because facetiousness.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 19 Jan 2015, 11:04
It is certainly one of those times when it's hard to be the boss of your friends. Friend Dora would very much like it if Faye wasn't hurting so much and would like to help her friend. Boss Dora is just tired of this shit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 19 Jan 2015, 11:13
It is certainly one of those times when it's hard to be the boss of your friends. Friend Dora would very much like it if Faye wasn't hurting so much and would like to help her friend. Boss Dora is just tired of this shit.

That's as perfect and succinct a summary of the situation as one could write, I think.

And it made me realize something I'd never really thought about before: the tension between Dora and Faye being best friends AND boss/employee has been at the center of a LOT of storylines.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 19 Jan 2015, 12:18
Realism is not the order of the day. If Jeph think it would make a good punchline, it's going to happen.
Except that considering how close this particular storyline hits home for Jeph, I doubt there's going to be any real "punchline".
There's a lot that Questionable Content will make jokes about, but there are certain topics that are treated completely seriously and I would wager that Faye's descent into alcoholism is one of them.

You're projecting yourself on to Jeph.

Richard Prior was, among other things, injured in a fire which was related to his drug problem--He described the incident in a show as mixing full fat milk with skim milk and "when I dipped the cookie in, the shit blew up!" He also did bits on all aspects of his drug problems.

A humorist's greatest "weapon" for maintaining advantage over the audience is the realization that anything can be a punch line. Anything.

Whether you get away with it boils down to how you craft the punchline and the awareness of the audience. There are jokes that the majority would have laughed out five years ago, but today seem hurtful and in bad taste.

The end of Fight Club is basically a punchline. Punching up at corporate America as the shining edifices of their power--skyscrapers--topple at the hands of radical idealists. People liked it.

It wouldn't have worked so well if it had come out in 2002 rather than 1999. Something about actual skyscrapers toppling at the hands of radical idealists takes the satisfaction out of the fantasy.

I think Jeph may have even written a rape joke, once.

It's not that I think you're wrong about what he will do. I don't know Jeph's mind at all. But it's mistake to reason that he had a hard time, so he's going to be utterly serious. He's already told jokes about very bad parts of drinking problems. There's no knowing where he draws the line, unless he comes in here and tells us.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 19 Jan 2015, 13:23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qYbVQu7YAQ
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Uniquitous on 19 Jan 2015, 13:57
Dorasplosion imminent. Don't know if it'll proceed to a firing, though. I envision an inversion of the strip in the aftermath of the Dora/Marten breakup where Faye threatened Dora with bodily harm if Dora didn't get her ass to therapy tout suite.

Since this is Faye, they'll probably have to smack her upside the metaphorical head with a frying pan to get through her stubbornness. Maybe offer her a vanilla milkshake into which to pour her bourbon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 19 Jan 2015, 13:58
There's no knowing where he draws the line, unless he comes in here and tells us.

I'm pretty sure I know where he draws the line. Last I heard, it was on a Wacom tablet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Sorflakne on 19 Jan 2015, 15:04
Oh.  Shit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 15:06
Hands up if you saw this coming.
*Giant foam hand shoots up*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 19 Jan 2015, 15:19
This seems a bit trigger happy for Dora, except for the fact we know she's already under stress over Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 19 Jan 2015, 15:21
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 19 Jan 2015, 15:21
Man. No debate. Just fired, straight up.

Can't say I blame Dora though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Jan 2015, 15:30
Pissed Dora is pissed. I've lost track of which chance this is for Faye, but I could definitely see Dora interpreting this as "one chance too many", even if just on a whim or because Faye's being indifferent to the responsibility Dora has trusted her with.

I don't think we've seen how pissed Dora could get over this. Faye crossed one of her stated employment rules, and then tried to lie about it to her face - shortly after Dora entrusted her with extra responsibility at the shop. I think we may see Dora reach entirely new levels of "pissed" over this, and I also think both Faye's job AND their friendship is now in grave danger.

I also do not think we will see Faye be healed quickly either - she's entirely too stubborn to give up her "coping mechanism" so easily. I suspect we are seeing the beginning of Faye's long ugly slide down into the gutter, either metaphorically or literally.



Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 19 Jan 2015, 15:34
So no Friend Dora present at all, just Boss Dora. Interesting. Maybe she figured there was nothing to say that hadn't already been said.

Is anyone else a little confused at Faye's apparent lack of reaction? I was expecting at least a little guilt or something in panel 2 but there's nothing, it's just like "yeah...and?". Likewise in panel 4, shock or dismay? Maybe the booze is blunting her emotional response and she'll hit a wall back home (metaphorically, and quite possibly literally).

...except for the fact we know she's already under stress over Sven.

Has she, or anyone, even mentioned Sven in the last 100 comics? #2784 was the last mention of that drama I could find.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 19 Jan 2015, 15:39
So no Friend Dora present at all, just Boss Dora. Interesting. Maybe she figured there was nothing to say that hadn't already been said.

Is anyone else a little confused at Faye's apparent lack of reaction? I was expecting at least a little guilt or something in panel 2 but there's nothing, it's just like "yeah...and?". Likewise in panel 4, shock or dismay? Maybe the booze is blunting her emotional response and she'll hit a wall back home (metaphorically, and quite possibly literally).

...except for the fact we know she's already under stress over Sven.

Has she, or anyone, even mentioned Sven in the last 100 comics? #2784 was the last mention of that drama I could find.

The reactions somewhat feel a bit 'deer caught in headlights'.

The Sven thing it would make sense for nobody to have mentioned given Dora basically told nobody and to those she did, made it very clear what her stance was.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Jan 2015, 15:44

I don't think we've seen how pissed Dora could get over this. Faye crossed one of her stated employment rules, and then tried to lie about it to her face - shortly after Dora entrusted her with extra responsibility at the shop. I think we may see Dora reach entirely new levels of "pissed" over this, and I also think both Faye's job AND their friendship is now in grave danger.

I also do not think we will see Faye be healed quickly either - she's entirely too stubborn to give up her "coping mechanism" so easily. I suspect we are seeing the beginning of Faye's long ugly slide down into the gutter, either metaphorically or literally.

My previous post above was made before I saw the latest comic (obviously), but I still think most of it applies - especially the part about this being the beginning of Faye's slide into the gutter. The next push will come from Marten realizing he can't have a perpetual drunk for a roommate, especially one who is no longer providing her half of the rent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: anahata on 19 Jan 2015, 15:44
Is anyone else a little confused at Faye's apparent lack of reaction?
No. Even drunk, she knows damn well she hasn't a leg to stand on.

And "Dora the Friend" might take a more sympathetic  line with Faye, but only after she's finished work and she isn't busy being Dora the boss.
I didn't think she'd do this, but I can understand why she did. Anything less would signal to Faye that it didn't really matter, with the result that nothing would change, and things have clearly reached the point where they do have to change.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Welu on 19 Jan 2015, 15:51
Oh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 19 Jan 2015, 15:53
Faye broke up with Angus because she was afraid of change. Now she has to deal with a serious change, and not the good kind. Funny how that works sometimes.  :-(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: gopher on 19 Jan 2015, 15:54
New Comic, Marten happy, wonder if we are heading towards an end?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 19 Jan 2015, 16:03
To be honest, I'm kind of glad to see Faye get fired, and hope that it sticks...at least for a little while. I think this is a storyline that needs serious consequences, and shouldn't be resolved quickly and within a week of strips. If there has been a weakness in the writing of QC over the years, it's that a storyline will lead up to a drama bomb, and then everything is over and done with and resolved very quickly, with minimal fallout or residual tension in a situation where there really should be some fences to mend and lasting consequences to deal with.

If Dora changes her mind and tells Faye to come in tomorrow after all - as she did after the Hugging Incident - then it greatly undermines what has been a serious and realistic storyline about Faye falling upon hard times. In the aforementioned incident, Dora overreacted due to her own insecurities, and made a bad call in blurring the lines between friendship and employment; changing her mind was a case of cooler heads prevailing, when she realised her mistake. In this case, she's rightfully upset that her rules and her trust have been breached. It would be bad writing to quickly go back on that, just for the sake of maintaining the status quo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 19 Jan 2015, 16:04

I don't think we've seen how pissed Dora could get over this.

Methinks that Faye is the one who is pissed, or pished for that matter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 16:07
Oh, FUCK YOU, Dora. What a stupid fucking thing to do.

Not firing Faye, extreme, but justified. I mean firing Faye NOW. It'd be one thing if she told Faye to go home and they'd talk in the morning, but firing her when she's drunk and hurting? Faye will no longer feel like she has anything to hold back for, so what happens next will probably be much worse than maintaining a buzz.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Nyithra on 19 Jan 2015, 16:11
This would be one thing if Dora and Faye only had a professional relationship, but Dora knows that Faye has been going through a rough time. Suspension without pay, dragging her to a therapist, or telling her to go to AA would have been much more sensitive solutions. I do understand why Dora had this kneejerk reaction, but she's still Faye's friend and should treat her with a little compassion instead of just telling her to get the fuck out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 19 Jan 2015, 16:21
Keep in mind that Dora has a long history of flying off the handle and making snap, rash decisions. Like firing Faye (very briefly) for hugging Marten. Usually once she calms down a bit she thinks a bit more clearly. But obviously being drunk at work is a big thing for her. In the space of a day's time she's caught Faye trying to bring booze at work, showing up drunk, lying about it and then drinking on the job behind her back. Telling Faye 'Get out, you're fired' is totally in character for Dora.

Now after talking about it with the rest of the crew at the shop, probably Marten and Tai she may calm down some and offer Faye her job back.. on the condition that she gets some real help and stops drinking. The question is how hard will Faye fall in the mean time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 16:24
Telling Faye 'Get out, you're fired' is totally in character for Dora.
Oh, absolutely in character. My criticism wasn't at Jeph. Something can be in character and still absolutely fucking terrible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 16:31
Oh, FUCK YOU, Dora. What a stupid fucking thing to do.

Not firing Faye, extreme, but justified. I mean firing Faye NOW. It'd be one thing if she told Faye to go home and they'd talk in the morning, but firing her when she's drunk and hurting? Faye will no longer feel like she has anything to hold back for, so what happens next will probably be much worse than maintaining a buzz.
She already gave Faye a warning and sent her home the day before. Dora has already stated on at least one occasion that she didn't want Faye drinking on the job and said to Hanners and Cosette that she's relatively okay as a boss as long as they don't come in drunk or high. Well Faye has already gotten a warning and she's broken one of the rules that would have been in her contract. It's not a stupid thing to fire someone when they blatantly ignore the rules you have in place in the workplace.

And how can Dora know exactly how much Faye is hurting? She isn't omnipotent, Dora can't peer into Faye's mind and go "Oh, well she's hurting over Angus". She's already been a friend to Faye, but right now Faye has crossed two lines, drinking on the job and lying to Dora's face. Everyone has that point where they'll stop supporting a friend because they crossed a line and guess what? Dora and Faye have reached that point.

Hopefully this kind of shock will jar Faye into sorting her life out, but given her own character, probably won't happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 16:44
Honestly Faye deserves to be fired. She's already a pretty lousy employee, Dora doesn't need a drunk lousy employee either and quite frankly believing their friendship should give Faye excuses is abuse on Faye's part.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 19 Jan 2015, 16:44
Finally, Faye gets some of the comeuppance she deserves.  I actually laughed out loud with today's comic.  Thanks, Jeph!  :-D

S
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 16:45
That's kind of disgusting.

*I say that as a person, not as a mod. You're well within your rights to say that and think that, but...eww.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Platypodes on 19 Jan 2015, 16:47
Yes, Dora is being insensitive as all hell right now as a friend, doing this so harshly and abruptly when a moment's consideration would tell her that Faye must be hurting in a really big way over Angus.

But friendship goes both ways: BECAUSE Faye is her friend, Dora must be feeling all the more hurt and betrayed by Faye's behavior.  Her friend is sneaking, lying, and showing zero respect or concern for Dora's business, which Faye has every reason to know is extremely important to Dora.  Especially after trusting Faye enough to give her the assistant manager position, Dora must be feeling seriously betrayed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: 94ssd on 19 Jan 2015, 16:47
To be honest, I'm kind of glad to see Faye get fired, and hope that it sticks...at least for a little while. I think this is a storyline that needs serious consequences, and shouldn't be resolved quickly and within a week of strips. If there has been a weakness in the writing of QC over the years, it's that a storyline will lead up to a drama bomb, and then everything is over and done with and resolved very quickly, with minimal fallout or residual tension in a situation where there really should be some fences to mend and lasting consequences to deal with.

So you're hoping for "Dora and Marten not speaking for 200 strips" level of drama.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 19 Jan 2015, 16:49
I just hate Faye's guts for how she treated Marten.  Anything bad happens to her, I cheer.  Simple.  :evil:

S
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 19 Jan 2015, 16:50
What would've been the best firm-but-fair/I-love-you-but-enough-is-enough response? "Go home and don't come back without a signed letter from Dr Corrine"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 16:54
Like I said before, telling her to go home, giving both an opportunity to cool off. Firing her in the morning would've still been much better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 16:56
The problem is the fair but firm response is firing Faye. If Faye wants to skip work to stay home and get drunk thats one thing but her choosing to come in drunk and planning to drink on the job when quite frankly she's already a poor worker sober shows a lack of respect on Faye part. No one would bat an eyelash if Dora did this to unnamed employee #3. Faye being her best friend is no excuse either.

Waiting for the morning might make Dora go soft and change her mind, sometimes you have to do things in the moment to make them stick.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 19 Jan 2015, 16:59
To be honest, I'm kind of glad to see Faye get fired, and hope that it sticks...at least for a little while. I think this is a storyline that needs serious consequences, and shouldn't be resolved quickly and within a week of strips. If there has been a weakness in the writing of QC over the years, it's that a storyline will lead up to a drama bomb, and then everything is over and done with and resolved very quickly, with minimal fallout or residual tension in a situation where there really should be some fences to mend and lasting consequences to deal with.

So you're hoping for "Dora and Marten not speaking for 200 strips" level of drama.

It doesn't necessarily have to be that, but something other than a week of strips then forgiveness, just to maintain status quo. It's a pretty big deal, a pretty big breach of rules and trust. Barring a time-skip, I think it does need to play out over a longer amount of time, in-universe and in terms of the number of strips. I don't want to put an exact number on it, but if this is all water under the bridge by next week, I think it'll make things a bit anti-climactic, and potentially stifle any further character development for Faye.

The problem is the fair but firm response is firing Faye. If Faye wants to skip work to stay home and get drunk thats one thing but her choosing to come in drunk and planning to drink on the job when quite frankly she's already a poor worker sober shows a lack of respect on Faye part. No one would bat an eyelash if Dora did this to unnamed employee #3. Faye being her best friend is no excuse either.

Agreed. Faye has also been given plenty of rope throughout the years, and has recently been entrusted with more responsibility as the assistant manager. Best friend or not, I can't fault Dora for taking a zero tolerance approach, especially when she's been pretty clear about her stance on the matter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 17:02
I forgot she's assistant manager that makes it even worse on Faye's part.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Blackbird on 19 Jan 2015, 17:05
Faye isn't just her employee or her friend.  Faye is her assistant manager, the person she's supposed to be able to be trust beyond a shadow of a doubt, and she just slapped Dora's trust in the face. 

My prediction: Faye cleans up in a few days (comic time), asks for her job back, and of course gets her original job back but finds out Penny is the new asst. manager.  Hilarity ensues.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 17:08
Like I said before, telling her to go home, giving both an opportunity to cool off. Firing her in the morning would've still been much better.
Would that have stopped Faye from coming in drunk the next morning? Or the morning after that? Where's the cut off point there?
Faye got a warning and sent home the day before. And she still came in drunk and was caught drinking on the job. Dora did what any responsible employer would have done in that situation.
Is it fair? Not at all but Faye still broke several rules and is probably in breach of her contract.
It isn't always a case of having a right time to fire people. My first job was in a supermarket and we'd have someone fired every couple of weeks. One girl got fired midshift because she was spritzing the back of several co-workers' shirts with a bottle that had a bit of bleach mixed with water. A guy got fired Christmas Eve because he was jumping across this hole we had in the storage area (for getting stock from the ground floor to the first floor and vice versa) and have you ever been in a supermarket on Christmas Eve, let alone worked in one?
Each employer has a point and if you cross it, you're gone. Faye crossed that line when she brought in a bottle of alcohol to work and went to take a swig from it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ysth on 19 Jan 2015, 17:09
No, not Penny; Dora digs up Sara's number!

Dora has to be feeling betrayed here, and it seems to be that being "compassionate" would just be enabling.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 19 Jan 2015, 17:10
As someone else pointed out, you have to consider that this is also quite a hurtful betrayal from Dora's POV too. She explicitly told Faye no drinking at work the prior day (which shouldn't need to be said anyway). For someone to ignore that, then go at lengths to deceive (all while being at a business you run and an accident is a big fuckin' deal) must be infuriating.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 19 Jan 2015, 17:14
Faye isn't just her employee or her friend.  Faye is her assistant manager, the person she's supposed to be able to be trust beyond a shadow of a doubt, and she just slapped Dora's trust in the face. 

My prediction: Faye cleans up in a few days (comic time), asks for her job back, and of course gets her original job back but finds out Penny is the new asst. manager.  Hilarity ensues.
Now I sort of want to see Penny's reaction when she finds out Faye's been fired. There will be celebrations...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Jan 2015, 17:16
But friendship goes both ways: BECAUSE Faye is her friend, Dora must be feeling all the more hurt and betrayed by Faye's behavior.  Her friend is sneaking, lying, and showing zero respect or concern for Dora's business, which Faye has every reason to know is extremely important to Dora.  Especially after trusting Faye enough to give her the assistant manager position, Dora must be feeling seriously betrayed.

Yep, Dora did what she had to do. Faye is her friend, and she is obviously hurting over her breakup; but Dora has a business to run, and her new assistant manager is now acting in a way that threatens to hurt that business by setting a lousy example for other employees, among other things. Dora cannot let that go on, she has to nip it in the bud as soon as possible. The business, Dora's only source of income, has to come first in this case.

It's not pleasant to do or see, but it is part of the possible consequences of mixing friendship and business. Which doesn't necessarily mean that Dora has stopped being Faye's friend, she just can't allow her friend to continue to work at Dora's business while that friend has a growing drinking problem. Not that Faye's going to accept any overtures of friendship from Dora now of course - an alcoholic tends to despise anyone who even threatens to interfere with their drinking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 17:17
Faye isn't just her employee or her friend.  Faye is her assistant manager, the person she's supposed to be able to be trust beyond a shadow of a doubt, and she just slapped Dora's trust in the face. 

My prediction: Faye cleans up in a few days (comic time), asks for her job back, and of course gets her original job back but finds out Penny is the new asst. manager.  Hilarity ensues.
Now I sort of want to see Penny's reaction when she finds out Faye's been fired. There will be celebrations...
Or a sad, mournful aside to herself "Not like this. Not like this." Worthy opponent and all that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 17:24
Oh god, she can't say that! Then she'll be unplugged! :o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 19 Jan 2015, 17:33
I like it, although it's a bit sad it's realistic to me, including that it's maybe not the best choice on Dora's part to implement it that way (it might be the best way too, but the fact that it's unclear, again, is realistic- Dora is thinking on the spot). I also like the magic colour changing bottle in the background.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 17:36
I also like the magic colour changing bottle in the background.
It's mood soap, the latest in novelty hygiene! Yellow for disappointed, blue for sad.
(Note, this soap was taken off the hand wash market almost immediately when it was discovered some of the ingredients were in fact deadly when used. Great for clearing a path through the spiders in the cellar though)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 19 Jan 2015, 17:38
I can't blame Dora for this one.  I've told other minions to go home because they had shown up drunk, and the last time I got an excuse for showing completely pissed was after having to pull a 16 hour shift, so half of my $200 USD in tips went on my bar tab.  Faye has had a drinking problem for years, even in comic time, and she has clearly crossed the line.  Her firing might only be temporary, but it's at least there for a warning.

I hope that Marten is now setting-up folding chairs in their flat for an intervention.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 19 Jan 2015, 17:50
Now I sort of want to see Penny's reaction when she finds out Faye's been fired. There will be celebrations...

Not just Penny, either.  Coffee of Doom's sales go through the roof as word spreads around town that "The mean one is gone!"  Faye sobers up out of spite, enacts convoluted scheme to get hired back, hijinks ensue.


Well, shit.

I'm not sure I want to watch this play out one-strip-a-day in real time.  Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to take a few weeks off and come back when there's a small backlog...
[...]
We are wathcing a drama unfolding in extremely slow motion from our point of view. This is not necessarily bad, as it gives time for us to think and discuss possible outcomes. But I agree, it is frustrating at times. However, it would be even more frustrating taking a few weeks off, knowing that something important might have happened in QC.

I responded to this earlier, right before the comic went up, and then my curiosity got the best of me.  Self-imposed QC blackout lasted <5 minutes.  Still not sure I want to watch all this happen one day at a time, but not sure I can actually stay away for 1-4 weeks to get appropriate distance.  It's been a while since I reread the entire comic, so I could always distract myself with that, but I doubt that'll take me more than a few days...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Blackbird on 19 Jan 2015, 17:55
Not just Penny, either.  Coffee of Doom's sales go through the roof as word spreads around town that "The mean one is gone!"  Faye sobers up out of spite, enacts convoluted scheme to get hired back, hijinks ensue.

Or CoD's sales plummet as word spreads around town that "the mean one is gone".  Faye sobers up out of a sense of duty to the community, enacts convoluted scheme to get hired back, hijinks ensue. 

I think both are equally likely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 19 Jan 2015, 17:57
Coffee of Doom's sales go through the roof as word spreads around town that "The mean one is gone!"

But isn't that the whole appeal of Coffee Of Doom? Spite with a side order of coffee? I remember people were lining up to get abused by Faye et al after that gossip mag write-up. Business might actually suffer for her absence.

Her firing might only be temporary, but it's at least there for a warning.

Is it? Given her attitude to Sven ("that's it, too far, he's out of my life forever") Dora might hold a grudge and not take Faye on as an employee again even after she sobers up. Although that's unlikely since they are (hopefully) still friends and she's paying half her other friend/ex-boyfriend's rent.

I hope that Marten is now setting-up folding chairs in their flat for an intervention.

Given that his only inclination of a problem existing was "isn't it a little early to be drinking?" the day before, and the fact that he's now got a date tonight, I'd suggest he won't be home until very late/the next morning and Faye will be a wreck. That is unless Dora gives him/Tai a heads-up text or call right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 19 Jan 2015, 18:01
...Did someone just hear a huge shoe drop in Central Massachusetts?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Jazzmaster on 19 Jan 2015, 18:07
I honestly see this as a great opportunity for Faye to wake up and get her shit together.  Since the start of the comic she's been knocking people around and doing/saying whatever she damn well pleases, because people continued to put up with her shit without ever really calling her out on it.  She physically abused people, mouthed off to everybody including her own boss.  Hell, she got a boyfriend who somehow loved her jaded attitude, and was even encouraged to treat customers badly at work.  People either put up with every single one of her personality quirks, or they put a positive spin on it.


Now, FINALLY, she crossed the line and is going to have to deal with the consequences.  Yeah, she has problems, but so do the rest of us.  Tough shit, you still get held to the same standard as the rest of us even if you have "baggage", as most of us do.

I wonder what's going to happen now, with Marten and Claire potentially becoming more serious and Faye being unable to make her half of the rent.  Time will tell....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 19 Jan 2015, 18:39
Personally I think Dora-friend and Dora-boss are in complete alignment. I've had alcoholics in the family, and you're not doing them any favors by going easy. Faye has a very serious problem, and nothing short of this is going to get through the illness' defenses. Faye needs to see that she'll lose everything if she continues drinking. From Dora-boss' perspective, this is not tolerable in the workplace. From Dora-friend's perspective, enabling Faye helps neither Faye nor anyone else. Last of all, when dealing with an alcoholic, both friends and family have to protect themselves from the actions the alcoholic will take to keep drinking (and make no mistake, the alcoholic doesn't have to be as stubborn as Faye to make the lives of everyone in her circle miserable).

Dora might want to give a head's up to Marten, for his sake rather than Faye's, and because Faye may well try to enlist Marten as ally to prevent her (Faye) from having to face the consequences of her actions. The most helpful thing everyone can do is form a united front, to help Faye see she must seek help.

Faye will need a stint in detox, followed by AA and a sponsor to help her stay sober. More than that, however, she'll need to choose herself to want to get clean. Even with all that, the odds are not good that she'll stay on the wagon. For Faye, this is now a lifelong commitment. You never leave recovery.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ysth on 19 Jan 2015, 18:42
"Go home" is very different from "Get out".  I suspect Dora will make a call or two to others.

There's no such thing as a temporary firing, and from the perspective of either of them, no guarantee that the other would be willing to have rehiring happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 19 Jan 2015, 18:42
Okay, I'm not siding with the alcoholic here, but man. Dora is being a terrible person here. Faye very, very clearly has abandonment issues, (Her dad killed himself in front of her, for starters,) and Dora has not only done very little to help, but ignored Faye's obviously terrible attempts to cope until it got to the point of firing. Obviously I can't say what's going to happen next, this could be a ploy, but Dora should know better.

If your friend says they want to be drunk all the time because they can't handle what they're going through, you go out of your way to help this friend. You do NOT ignore their problem and then get mad at them only when it begins to directly affect yourself. They need to be hard on Faye, definitely, and Faye needs to get help, but until now Dora (who is the only one who's had a chance to see the extent of Faye's depression) has done little to try and help, and seems genuinely surprised that Faye was drinking at work, the day after she said she never wanted to be sober and the afternoon after she came in reeking of booze with no hangover.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 18:43
Oh, FUCK YOU, Dora. What a stupid fucking thing to do.

Not firing Faye, extreme, but justified. I mean firing Faye NOW. It'd be one thing if she told Faye to go home and they'd talk in the morning, but firing her when she's drunk and hurting?

I don't think she would have been any less drunk or any less hurting the next morning. It would not have made an ounce of difference.

Dora made the tough decision and she made it resolutely. If she had put it off, she may not have been able to to it. Yet it absolutely had to be done. Props to her, I say.

The change Faye has been desperately avoiding has now arrived. Maybe she can now start to deal with it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 19 Jan 2015, 18:45
I don't think she would have been any less drunk or any less hurting the next morning. It would not have made an ounce of difference.
She would've know she'd been caught, and acted accordingly. If that meant still drinking, then I'd stand by the firing. If that meant sobering up and getting a hold of herself, then Dora may have still fired her, but hopefully would talk to Faye about getting her help.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 19 Jan 2015, 18:48
Prediction: Jeph will now alternate between horrible conflict scenes culminating in Dora firing Faye and sweet, sweet scenes of Marten and Claire having the BEST TIME EVER - just to mess with our heads!  :psyduck:

I'm sure Maridale will get in there somehow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 19 Jan 2015, 18:50
Just to make sure I wasn't talking out of my ass, I went back and looked closely at the comics since Christmas. Literally everything we see Dora do to support and help Faye is tell her 'Alcohol isn't the solution, Faye.'
Furthermore, when she sees Faye drinking at work, there is absolutely no sympathy, concern, or worry in her expression. We see confusion, and then anger. That's it. Some friend.

Send her home, definitely. Tell her she can't come back in until she sobers up. Hold an intervention. Make sure everyone else knows what is going on so they can help. Don't just yell at your friend for a minute and tell them they're fired without another word.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 19 Jan 2015, 18:51
If your friend says they want to be drunk all the time because they can't handle what they're going through, you go out of your way to help this friend. You do NOT ignore their problem and then get mad at them only when it begins to directly affect yourself.
This is an understandable, humane and decent impulse. It's also exactly what alcoholism needs in order to thrive. Show me an alcoholic that went on drinking for years, and I'll show you someone with enablers trying misguidedly to help them. Dora's doing the right thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 18:51
This is my surprised face. This is me being surprised.

And this is a small business, not a huge corporation that has resources to help people deal with alcoholism. One incident where Faye hurts someone because she's drunk and the business is basically over.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 19 Jan 2015, 18:51
I told myself I wouldn't start commenting in the forums, because it's time consuming and habit forming, but I just HAD to say something after this much needed bomb finally dropped on Faye's self centered head. Now I'm not going to lie, I've never really liked Faye. I think she's selfish, stubborn, and generally obnoxious for no reason other than because she's too afraid to deal with her own issues, but even from an objective point of view, it astounds me that so many people *still* feel sorry for her here. I mean when it comes right down to it, she has abused the trust and good will of her friends time and time again for years, but this time she went too far, and she fully deserves to face some real consequences for it. Faye might not be a terrible person at her core, but she has behaved incredibly selfishly, and especially after all the times her friends have overlooked it in the past, this absolutely had to be the last straw. I mean she came into work, drunk, and furthermore continued to drink while still at work. She took the immense amount of trust that Dora placed in her, and threw it back in her face just because she's upset with something going on in her life outside of work, AGAIN. Honestly, all things considered, this goes beyond just being worthy of a firing, this is friendship ending grade stuff. I'm not saying that I think it will actually come to that, but if it did, Faye would definitely deserve it.

Anyway, that's just my personal point of view on the situation. In terms of what I feel would be good for the actual story, and the development of the characters therein, I still hope that she doesn't get her job back. I don't think that it would do her, Dora, or anybody who's involved any good if everybody just forgave and forgot something that Faye did because she refuses to learn how to deal with life like an adult, yet again. It needs to be a turning point in her life, and for that to happen she needs to face the music, not be coddled.

I feel an intervention coming on. (Hopefully)

And holy bejeezus people, stop attacking Dora. She has every freakin' right to be as angry as she wants right now. Faye coming into work drunk was bad enough, but continuing to drink while still *at* work, near the beginning of her shift, lost her any and all claim that she might have had on even a shred of sympathy. She's threatened Dora's business, and betrayed her trust. You shouldn't be saying "Fuck you Dora", you should be saying "Holy shit, good on her for finally firing Faye. That selfish shit certainly deserved it this time." I mean ultimately, if you want to feel sorry for Faye then go ahead, that's up to you, but don't do it at the expense of your opinion of Dora, she absolutely did the right thing here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Estron on 19 Jan 2015, 18:51
"Go home" is very different from "Get out".

But in this case, Jeph has Dora say "Go home, Faye . . . " because we all have heard it a gazillion times and it always ends up with " . . . you're drunk."  He has her start it that way so we can have little bit of a twist in a non-humorous punch line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: iasthai on 19 Jan 2015, 19:00
But hasn't Dora fired Faye before?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 19 Jan 2015, 19:01
If your friend says they want to be drunk all the time because they can't handle what they're going through, you go out of your way to help this friend. You do NOT ignore their problem and then get mad at them only when it begins to directly affect yourself.
This is an understandable, humane and decent impulse. It's also exactly what alcoholism needs in order to thrive. Show me an alcoholic that went on drinking for years, and I'll show you someone with enablers trying misguidedly to help them. Dora's doing the right thing.
I never said that you don't try to stop her from drinking. When I said 'Go out of your way to help them' I never said anything about enabling them. When I said 'Help', I meant hold an intervention. Keep them from drinking. Get them to seek a therapist (Again). Heck, they even got Faye to sober up for a while and see a therapist a while ago, back when she was going through different emotional issues. (I can't remember the exact context, but it happened.) My frustration here is that Faye is only showing anger, not sympathy, not concern, just a general pissed attitude that Faye is drunk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Jazzmaster on 19 Jan 2015, 19:09
Maybe this little kick in the ass will give Faye a chance to pursue something like her art.

Seriously, the combination of breaking up with Angus and losing her job at CoD is a fantastic opportunity for some honest-to-God character development here. 

Just to make sure I wasn't talking out of my ass, I went back and looked closely at the comics since Christmas. Literally everything we see Dora do to support and help Faye is tell her 'Alcohol isn't the solution, Faye.'
Furthermore, when she sees Faye drinking at work, there is absolutely no sympathy, concern, or worry in her expression. We see confusion, and then anger. That's it. Some friend.

Send her home, definitely. Tell her she can't come back in until she sobers up. Hold an intervention. Make sure everyone else knows what is going on so they can help. Don't just yell at your friend for a minute and tell them they're fired without another word.
What is with people in this thread seriously fucking blaming Dora, when clearly Faye is the one who made such a bad choice? 

I honestly think we're reading a different comic here, because what you are reading as "Dora's an asshole who can't understand Faye's problems", I see as "Faye is acting incredibly irresponsibly and needs to get a grip; it isn't the job of her friends or anybody else to just keep putting up with her shit until the end of time".

I mean, do you ever stop to think that maybe it's because Dora IS tired of Faye's crap and saw no other option, because Faye has really gone over the line?  Do you think maybe Faye is the one who needs to make a serious change, and that it's not the responsibility of the entire universe to continue to look for ways to make it the least painful for her, even when they've already gone out of their way to help her and she hasn't really done enough for herself?  Do you think maybe it's actually Faye's job to take care of Faye and not do dumb shit like show up at work drunk only to end up drinking more, that it isn't Dora's or Marten's or Angus' or anybody else's job to fix her shit for her?

Hate to be That Guy but I'm thinking her abandonment issues and the potential consequences of recent events are being way, way overblown in here.  I'd like to THINK that Faye has actually progressed as a person since the comic started.  I'd like to THINK that as a person, she has developed the self awareness to understand that she is in control of her life and her actions, and that she can actually learn from her mistakes and let life's lessons mold her into a wiser, stronger person. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 19 Jan 2015, 19:16
I never said that you don't try to stop her from drinking. When I said 'Go out of your way to help them' I never said anything about enabling them.

Unfortunately, addiction thrives on good intentions.  Interventions and rehab programs frequently don't work for the simple reason that the subject isn't ready to change.  They can perfectly realize how much they're hurting their loved ones, and even themselves, and will go right back to the addictor without so much as a by-your-leave.  They will hate themselves for it, too, and break down into a weepy quivering puddle, but will go right back to the same behaviour at the first opportunity. 

It's hard to know what triggers a change in the ones that successfully conquer an addiction, it's different for every addict.  But something fundamental must change, and that comes from within, not from their friends or family or social workers. 

Faye's not ready yet, and it may take a while.  In fact, I hope it does.  Because any "fast cure" isn't going to be believable, and if there's one thing you can say about this comic, it's that the characters are believable. 

Even the robots. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Platypodes on 19 Jan 2015, 19:20
And this is a small business, not a huge corporation that has resources to help people deal with alcoholism. One incident where Faye hurts someone because she's drunk and the business is basically over.
That's a very good point. I can't remember when Dora last spoke of the CoD finances, but my general impression is that the business is juuuuust staying on the successful side of things.  Wasn't it a humongous stress when the espresso machine broke?  A drunk-ass employee in a place of responsibility could be a total catastrophe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 19 Jan 2015, 19:23
Just to make sure I wasn't talking out of my ass, I went back and looked closely at the comics since Christmas. Literally everything we see Dora do to support and help Faye is tell her 'Alcohol isn't the solution, Faye.'
Furthermore, when she sees Faye drinking at work, there is absolutely no sympathy, concern, or worry in her expression. We see confusion, and then anger. That's it. Some friend.

Dora may be Faye's friend, but she's also got a business to run. A small business that is her sole source of income, that can be sued into bankruptcy if Faye injures a customer while drunk (it can be as simple as accidentally spilling hot coffee on them while handing it to them). Faye's drunkenness is threatening the business, not to mention violating one of Dora's employee rules. For the second time in a row, I might add.

Being friends with the boss does not give one license to do as he or she may please. Faye needs to find other, healthier ways to deal with her pain besides trying to drown it in hard liquor, maybe this firing will be the kick in the butt she needs to start finding those ways.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 19 Jan 2015, 19:27
With alcoholism, it's not a question of the drinker's moral character. Alcoholism is a disease which can make the most responsible, loving, caring person and turn them into a menace to their friends and family. Those friends and family may choose to try to intervene, but frankly they are under no moral obligation to do so. It's up to the drinker to choose to commit to sobriety. Then and only then can friends and family constructively assist. Failing that, misguided attempts to "help" will just enable the alcoholism to continue.

AA isn't just for drinkers. There are meeting for those close to alcoholics, where these very hard facts get imparted. However much they may love the alcoholic, those close to them must not protect them from the consequences of their actions. It won't help the drinker, and it sure won't help those close to the drinker.

Not sure how realistic Jeph wants to get about Faye's alcoholism. Assuming he does, this is the way it works. It's heartbreaking, but that's alcoholism.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 19:27
I love how everyone is trying to imply that Dora needs to "help" Faye but how is she? She can't MAKE Faye do anything. The issue is alcoholics need to hit rock bottom. They need to know that the choices are fix their lives or lose everything because otherwise if you keep bailing them out they'll keep regressing

Like I'm sorry to there's no nice way for recovery

Plus Faye needs to see some real consequences. Faye has been consistently in the wrong (burning down an apartment, blaming Sven for cheating even though they weren't exclusive, being a shitty friend, breaking up Angus on the spot) yet everyone has either bailed or out and took her side.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 19 Jan 2015, 19:31
Unfortunately, addiction thrives on good intentions.  Interventions and rehab programs frequently don't work for the simple reason that the subject isn't ready to change. 

Exactly right.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 19 Jan 2015, 19:33
I was really glad to see Dora taking such a direct, if be it harsh, action to Faye's crap.  I know a lot of people feel she should have sent her home for the day, and dealt with it at a later point, but Dora has coddled Faye for a long time.  Sure they're friends, good friends, but that doesn't give Faye free reign to drag her meltdown into work with her.  She was warned about drinking once already, once is enough.  Dora is a young business owner, to get to the point where she is at her age we assume she has poured her blood and sweat into her business, she obviously feels very serious about keeping her business safe.  Although she has given Faye a pass on being "herself" at work before, this time she viewed a direct threat to her investment, and acted accordingly.  I think she feels betrayed by what she perceives as Faye's selfishness, even if she knows that Faye does have a deeper problem.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 19:33
My frustration here is that Faye* Dora is only showing anger, not sympathy, not concern, just a general pissed attitude that Faye is drunk.
Because heaven forfend that Dora shouldn't be angry that her assistant manager is hungover, trying to sneak a drink at work and lying to her. As an employer, specifically Faye's employer, Dora does have a right to expect a certain amount of professionalism from her employees and that's not what is happening here. I haven't seen any sign of Penny or Cosette or Hanners in the shop, so I'm assuming that Dora and Faye are opening up, which considering CoD's opening hours must be pretty early in the morning.

There is a reason why friends shouldn't employ friends, especially in small businesses like Coffee of Doom, because you end up in dilemmas like this. This isn't something to laugh about, this is Faye screwing around with Dora's livelihood. Damn right Dora has every reason to be pissed off with Faye.  Dora has tried to be understanding about the breakup, she's tried talking to Faye and telling her that alcohol isn't the solution (technically it is, but I have no mind for puns right now). Dora has tried to be there for Faye and now Faye has pretty much dumped on that effort by blatantly lying to Dora. Because guess what, if someone is intent on drinking themselves down the drain, it doesn't make someone a bad friend to wash your hands of them. Otherwise, you might get dragged down with them.

I say this as someone who has had to deal with alcoholics in his family tree for 30 years (thankfully not absolutely immediate family). Some people are perhaps more saintly with their patience, but there comes a point where you have to stop helping and walk away. Some people realise that a lot earlier than others. In the end, it doesn't matter what you say to an alcoholic, unless they want to get out of the gutter, the bottle will always win out.

For once, Dora isn't the bad guy here, it's Faye. And it's going to be Faye and Faye alone who decides if she wants help or not.

*I assume you originally meant Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 19 Jan 2015, 19:36
My frustration here is that Faye* Dora is only showing anger, not sympathy, not concern, just a general pissed attitude that Faye is drunk.

For once, Dora isn't the bad guy here, it's Faye. And it's going to be Faye and Faye alone who decides if she wants help or not.

*I assume you originally meant Dora.

Agreed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 19:38
I would also argue that this is the best thing Dora can do for Faye as a friend. Sometimes friends have to be harsh in order to help someone; you just have to hope that when the dust settles you can stay friends throughout.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: brown paper bag on 19 Jan 2015, 19:41
I approve of "time to shit all over Faye". As a selfish thoughtless bitch, she's had it a long time coming. Treated Marten like garbage for years while harboring a secret crush. Used to physically assault Marten and others. Used Marten and others as emotional crutches. Fucked a well-known douchebag in a friends with benefits situation for months and was too thick to foresee that she'd eventually suffer collateral damage from his douchebaggery. Treated a dude like shit for years, warmed up to him, loved him, then effectively told him to go fuck himself when he wanted to follow his dreams. Dad dying is an explanation that only works for so long. Eventually one has to take responsibility for their shitty actions. I hope Faye becomes a better person out of all this.

Dora firing Faye is completely in line with Dora's hasty shithead behavior that she's showed for years in the comic. If she gets pissed off, she literally burns everything down. Dumped Marten for standing up for himself. Disowned her own brother. Now she's fired Faye. Dora has no concept of loyalty or empathy. I'm actually more interested to see where Dora's character arc goes, if it goes anywhere at all. I think Jeph uses Dora as a one-dimensional stereotype of erratic bitch behavior that we've all had experience with. I'd like to see Dora completely alone and possibly a meth-head after seeing the way she alienates everyone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Platypodes on 19 Jan 2015, 19:42
A question for those who know more about alcoholism than I do: can we really say with certainty that Faye is an alcoholic?

I thought Faye had been generally successful at drinking in moderation for quite some time after realizing that she'd been overdoing it.  Now she's clearly on a horrendously unhealthy bender, but it's only been a few days since her breakup.  I get that she's showing all the classic signs of alcoholism right now, but does a few days of such behavior demonstrate full-on addiction, or might it just be part of her being generally an emotional wreck this week?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 19:46
Its classic relapsing. Its quite normal for alcoholics to have good periods of months where they're healthy or good or to face some sort of challenge, heartache or even boredom. its often these relapses or drinking Bender's that define alcoholics where they destroy everything they built up the last few months in a week.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tangerinewarrior on 19 Jan 2015, 19:48
Does anyone have any idea of how long in comic it's been since Faye and Angus split? I'm trying to figure it outs and I come up with 2, maybe 3 days top. Also, I'm wondering where on earth Angus is- has he just been written out completely? I feel like there is stuff unresolved in his side of the story arc. As far as Faye getting fired- it is justified, but I really don't see it sticking (although it should). Again, everything seems to be happening ridiculously fast in story.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 19:51
A question for those who know more about alcoholism than I do: can we really say with certainty that Faye is an alcoholic?

I thought Faye had been generally successful at drinking in moderation for quite some time after realizing that she'd been overdoing it.  Now she's clearly on a horrendously unhealthy bender, but it's only been a few days since her breakup.  I get that she's showing all the classic signs of alcoholism right now, but does a few days of such behavior demonstrate full-on addiction, or might it just be part of her being generally an emotional wreck this week?

If Faye isn't an alcoholic now, she's about to jump off the slippery slope into alcoholism.
If you wake up in the morning and the first thing you do is reach for a bottle - You might have a problem.
If the second thing you do is find a bottle you don't remember purchasing - you might have a problem.
If you sneak said bottle into work with the intent of drinking it during your shift - you might have a problem.
Faye has a whole load of problems right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 19 Jan 2015, 19:52
Something a lot of people seem to ignore: Faye is clinically depressed. If her alcoholism were just a problem in and of itself, I could understand the hate on her, but she's got a disease. She is sick.

Also, once again, it's not Dora's actions I'm mad at, it's her nonactiom. If she had sat down Faye and talked to her, been assured that everything was okay, and *then* all of this happened, it'd be fine. If Dora seemed reluctant to fire Faye but had to for legal reasons, it'd be fine. But as it stands, after being told by Faye that she intends to drink herself into oblivion, Dora did pretty much nothing. She didn't try and fail, she didn't try and get rejected, she just didn't *try*.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 19 Jan 2015, 19:52
Aaaand

The other shoe drops



This is gonna get messy now, isn't it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 19 Jan 2015, 19:54
A question for those who know more about alcoholism than I do: can we really say with certainty that Faye is an alcoholic?

I took the test here (https://ncadd.org/learn-about-alcohol/alcohol-abuse-self-test) using what we know about Faye. She scored 15. Here's what the test says about answers above 8:
"If you answered “yes” to more than 8 questions, you may have a serious level of alcohol-related problems requiring immediate attention and possible treatment.  You should seek professional guidance. "

Short answer: yes, she's an alcoholic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 19:54
I don't think she would have been any less drunk or any less hurting the next morning. It would not have made an ounce of difference.
She would've know she'd been caught, and acted accordingly. If that meant still drinking, then I'd stand by the firing. If that meant sobering up and getting a hold of herself, then Dora may have still fired her, but hopefully would talk to Faye about getting her help.

Pffft. Okay, let's say Dora were to do this.

Faye is all apologetic, maybe even lies (again) about getting help to get her job back, and Dora relents. Maybe not the next day but soon, Faye is drunk at work again and injures a customer. Dora is in deep trouble.

To fire Faye at home, in a space where Dora is a friend not a boss, would be very difficult if not entirely inappropriate.

Dora already gave Faye a second chance. She blew it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rusty on 19 Jan 2015, 19:55
Does anyone have any idea of how long in comic it's been since Faye and Angus split? I'm trying to figure it outs and I come up with 2, maybe 3 days top. Also, I'm wondering where on earth Angus is- has he just been written out completely? I feel like there is stuff unresolved in his side of the story arc. As far as Faye getting fired- it is justified, but I really don't see it sticking (although it should). Again, everything seems to be happening ridiculously fast in story.

Seems like its been about a week, judging by Claire/Marten 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 19 Jan 2015, 19:56


Also, once again, it's not Dora's actions I'm mad at, it's her nonactiom. If she had sat down Faye and talked to her, been assured that everything was okay, and *then* all of this happened, it'd be fine. If Dora seemed reluctant to fire Faye but had to for legal reasons, it'd be fine. But as it stands, after being told by Faye that she intends to drink herself into oblivion, Dora did pretty much nothing. She didn't try and fail, she didn't try and get rejected, she just didn't *try*.

We know Dora has been really stressed and busy over CoD lately though, and we know Faye isn't the most receptive to people sitting down and talking to her about her problems.  I hear where you're coming from but given Dora's own worries I think it's unfair for us to expect her to watch over Faye as well, even if that's what we might expect from a close friend.  I think it's just a bad time for everyone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ysth on 19 Jan 2015, 19:57
I predict major aftershocks of (misplaced) guilt from Dora.  She may even cry on Marten's shoulder (somehow I don't see Tai in that role).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 19 Jan 2015, 19:57
I predict major aftershocks of (misplaced) guilt from Dora.  She may even cry on Marten's shoulder (somehow I don't see Tai in that role).

Poor dude must have sore shoulders by now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 19 Jan 2015, 19:59
I predict major aftershocks of (misplaced) guilt from Dora.  She may even cry on Marten's shoulder (somehow I don't see Tai in that role).

To be honest, I don't think Tai would really be the best choice for that role (AT THIS STAGE IN HER LIFE). I could see Dora wanting to talk to Tai but Tai too busy getting ready for that party she's planning for the library.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 20:02
Something a lot of people seem to ignore: Faye is clinically depressed. If her alcoholism were just a problem in and of itself, I could understand the hate on her, but she's got a disease. She is sick.

Something a lot of people routinely ignore: Dora is not privy to our knowledge. She is not seeing what we are seeing. What's obvious to us is not obvious to her, and even we get into arguments over what we've seen.

I'll be interested to see what her next move will be. Get Marten to intervene?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 19 Jan 2015, 20:08
I think that this could go either way

It'll either be the catalyst that gets Faye to get her shit together after the whole thing with Angus (with suitable drama and angst) or will send her into a deeper depression - in which case she might try and do what her Father did.


I hope it's the former and not the latter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 20:12
Notice how close The Pugnacious Peach already is to hitting bottom.

She's lost the job that was the center of her social life and which gave her a purpose and scope for growth. The job market is terrible where she lives (remember Momo's difficulties). It was not the drinking that did it, but she's lost the relationship she was depending on for healing.

What she has left is Marten, who might try to cover all the rent himself out of confusing martyrdom with friendship, but who probably can't afford to. And even Marten can be pushed too far.

EDIT: She doesn't even have a car to live in after losing the apartment.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 19 Jan 2015, 20:13
Something a lot of people seem to ignore: Faye is clinically depressed. If her alcoholism were just a problem in and of itself, I could understand the hate on her, but she's got a disease. She is sick.

Something a lot of people routinely ignore: Dora is not privy to our knowledge. She is not seeing what we are seeing. What's obvious to us is not obvious to her, and even we get into arguments over what we've seen.
Dora has seen more than anyone else, though. Dora is the only one who heard Faye say (and I bring this up again) that she never wants to be sober, ever. Ignoring everything else we've seen, that one thing puts Faye squarely in the 'Really needs help' section.

Also, where are the other CoD employees in all of this?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 20:22
Something a lot of people seem to ignore: Faye is clinically depressed. If her alcoholism were just a problem in and of itself, I could understand the hate on her, but she's got a disease. She is sick.

Also, once again, it's not Dora's actions I'm mad at, it's her nonactiom. If she had sat down Faye and talked to her, been assured that everything was okay, and *then* all of this happened, it'd be fine. If Dora seemed reluctant to fire Faye but had to for legal reasons, it'd be fine. But as it stands, after being told by Faye that she intends to drink herself into oblivion, Dora did pretty much nothing. She didn't try and fail, she didn't try and get rejected, she just didn't *try*.

Alcohoism itself isn't a disease but whatever causes it seems to be. Dora has told Faye before not to drink, she isn't equipped to handle Faye problem considering her own.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 20:28
Yes Dora. Your friend is obviously in need. Firing them is the best thing to do at the moment.

God damn it, Faye's consistently been established to be volatile but still one of her best damn employees. She also knows that this behaviour is uncharacteristic. I understand why she'd be pissed, but Jesus Christ this seems like the worst possible thing for Dora to have done.

In one fell swoop she's exacerbated her friend's suffering when they're already past breaking point and lost one of her best employees for an incident that, whilst it isn't exactly minor, was more deserving of disciplinary action than termination. It's just bad business.

Especially when customers come just for her service in particular.

Seriously. A massive pay dock and the loss of a few shifts for a while. There are levels between "Nothing/Coddling" and "Termination".

EDIT: By 'uncharacteristic' I don't mean the drinking. Using alcohol to cope has been typical behaviour for her. She's never let it interfere with her work, before, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 20:34
The only reason why Faye is one of the best employees is by being best of the worse, not by any actual quality.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 20:36
The only reason why Faye is one of the best employees is by being best of the worse, not by any actual quality.

If that were true, she wouldn't have been promoted to management.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 20:41
Again best of the worse. No one is making Hannelore and Mono assistant manager. Cosette is a student and way too clumsy for the job. Penelope was the only real competition and Dora putting Faye over her was probably an act of seniority and favoritism.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: qc001 on 19 Jan 2015, 20:46
I would be delighted to have tomorrow's comic (or whenever we return to the Dora-Faye-CoD situation) pick up two seconds after this one leaves off, along the lines of:

Dora: "You're fired, until such time as you sober up and start to get your shit together again.  See Dr. Corrinne, enroll in AA, maybe talk to Angus when you feel up to it.  When you've got a hold on things again, come back here and talk about your job with Boss-Dora.  Until then, I'm Friend-Dora, only."

::cue Marten/Hannelore/Whitaker Family/MariDale/Tai/Jimbo?/[anyone else who wants to show up] to step up and take Faye away for some serious intervention time::

I am of the camp that both Dora and Faye (and most everyone in the cast, perhaps excepting Hannelore) can do some pretty shitty things at times, but I'm hoping that this is just drama for art's sake with the comic, and not going to spiral hideously out of control for everybody.

Okay, relurking powers, activate!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 20:47
[...]and Dora putting Faye over her was probably an act of seniority and favoritism.

So Dora is simultaneously the kind of person who would make the decision to immediately fire a friend without question for drinking when they know they're suffering after turning down a more competent employee out of pure favouritism?

Look, whilst I understand humans are creatures of contradiction, you have to understand just how hard I'm calling bullshit on this.

Warning - while you were typing a new coworker has appeared. Hide your bottle under your shirt before they notice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 19 Jan 2015, 20:51
Notice how close The Pugnacious Peach already is to hitting bottom.

She's lost the job that was the center of her social life and which gave her a purpose and scope for growth. The job market is terrible where she lives (remember Momo's difficulties). It was not the drinking that did it, but she's lost the relationship she was depending on for healing.

What she has left is Marten, who might try to cover all the rent himself out of confusing martyrdom with friendship, but who probably can't afford to. And even Marten can be pushed too far.

EDIT: She doesn't even have a car to live in after losing the apartment.

Yeah, it's quite ironic that she decided to not go with Angus to NYC because she was afraid of change/liked her life the way it was.  And now, in only a few short days, she's completely wrecked that life. 

Honestly, if Faye wasn't stuck in a depressive cycle I'd wonder if she'd come crawling back to Angus and beg to come with him to New York at this point, leaving behind a messy situation and run away from her problems yet again.  But she's going to be heavy into the self loathing for awhile yet. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 19 Jan 2015, 20:54
"One of her best employees?"

Um... no. An Assistant Manager is supposed to be, among other things, an example to other employees. Faye is an asshole on her best days. And, since I like all the QC characters, including Faye and yes, even Clinton, I am being generous here.

It wouldn't be hard to convince me that everyone is suffering compassion fatigue, is tired of Faye's shit, plus the fact that a person in a position of authority has shat upon the owner of the business.

Gone, baby, gone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 20:55
[...]and Dora putting Faye over her was probably an act of seniority and favoritism.

So Dora is simultaneously the kind of person who would make the decision to immediately fire a friend without question for drinking when they know they're suffering after turning down a more competent employee out of pure favouritism?

Look, whilst I understand humans are creatures of contradiction, you have to understand just how hard I'm calling bullshit on this.

Warning - while you were typing a new coworker has appeared. Hide your bottle under your shirt before they notice.


Immediately firing her would've been her firing her yesterday.

Firing her the next day when she's still drunk if not worse because she's now bringing booze into the work place, lying to her face about it, , after she gave her a promotion and everything which is now putting her business at stake? That is not without question

Again the only reason Faye seems to be a good employee is because of the quality of the other employees and because we don't see Dale and Penelope at work enough.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 19 Jan 2015, 20:58
Yes Dora. Your friend is obviously in need. Firing them is the best thing to do at the moment.

God damn it, Faye's consistently been established to be volatile but still one of her best damn employees. She also knows that this behaviour is uncharacteristic. I understand why she'd be pissed, but Jesus Christ this seems like the worst possible thing for Dora to have done.

In one fell swoop she's exacerbated her friend's suffering when they're already past breaking point and lost one of her best employees for an incident that, whilst it isn't exactly minor, was more deserving of disciplinary action than termination. It's just bad business.

Especially when customers come just for her service in particular.

Seriously. A massive pay dock and the loss of a few shifts for a while. There are levels between "Nothing/Coddling" and "Termination".

This is it. This is the comment that gets me to join.

You are confusing business with friendship. You never mix the two. Having Dora hire her friends was already a step in the wrong direction, but she is doing the responsible thing here. When faced with a decision between friendship and business, business should win out. Friendship will not pay for the liabilities Faye will cause by being drunk. Friendship will not pay for any damages both physical and emotional she causes at the store. Friendship is not a valid defense when a drunk employee injures a patron. Friendship ends when it becomes a huge liability for a business. A business, mind you, that is the only income Dora has.

So, why not just give her a few days off? Well, first off, that encourages Faye. It shows her that she can show up drunk, which was pretty much one of the few rules Dora actually held, and have little to no punishment for it. It shows her that she can drunk all the goddamn time and there will be no consequences. Please tell me how that will help Faye recover from her drinking problem? It won't. The only way to get to an alcoholic is for the alcoholic to realize she has a problem. Firing her proves to her that she has a problem. And don't go "she could realize she had a problem with the threat of a firing". No she wouldn't. When someone is currently in alcoholic withdraw, they will justify their drinking in any way possible. Only when the writing is on the wall will an alcoholic even consider thinking that they might have a problem, and even then they might still choose to drink.

Secondly more deserving of disciplinary action?. I'm sorry, what?!? Something that could have serious economic consequences for her store is only deserving of disciplinary action? Look, even if that were true, Faye has more than racked up warnings. Dora even gave her a position of power. That position comes with trust. And what did Faye do with said trust? Spit on it because "screw you, my problems mean more to me than your livelihood". You're mad that Dora's a bad friend to Faye? Be mad that Faye is using her friendship as an excuse. Faye with her drinking crossed a line in both the business side and friendship side with Dora and Dora's reaction was more than justified.

Should Dora help Faye with her problems? Of course. But that happens outside of working hours, when her own livelihood isn't threatened.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 19 Jan 2015, 21:00
I worry that one of two things will happen here:

1.  Faye goes home, Marten comes home, Faye cries on Marten's shoulder, Marten misses date with Claire, Claire second-guesses herself into a worried tizzy or misconstrues what's going on and feels Marten isn't being a fantastic boyfriend any more.

2.  Faye goes home, Marten doesn't, Faye was depending on Marten to be there and does something ill-advised, Marten comes home to find disaster.

I kinda hope:

3.  Faye goes home, Marten doesn't, Hannelore tells her to put her big girl panties on and sober the hell up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:01
Welcome, new people and lurkers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 21:10

Immediately firing her would've been her firing her yesterday.

Firing her the next day when she's still drunk if not worse because she's now bringing booze into the work place, lying to her face about it, , after she gave her a promotion and everything which is now putting her business at stake? That is not without question

First: This is still the same day, in-strip time. It's later on in that same day. That's important.

Second: Yes. Absolutely. She made a poor decision to lie to her boss, whilst drunk, and then continued to drink. That's a horrible, terrible thing to do.

But a bigger hit to Dora's business is losing an otherwise good manager (one who has a loyal customer base and manages to keep the other employees well in check) in the heat of the moment. Her decision to punish Faye? Justified. Being sick of Faye's shit? Justified.

But the loss of a valued employee, and a manager at that, is now made up for in the overtime she needs to pay other people to make up for Faye's shifts, time investment in hiring a new employee, and time Dora herself has to spend since she was the only other manager. If Faye's actions haven't caused more damage, or will cause more damage, than her termination will, then the termination is a poor decision. Especially since it's not a repeat offense, it's a first-time incident of this type of behaviour.

So it's a bad business decision as well as a bad friend decision.

Warning - while you were typing 3 new bottles of bourbon appeared on the wall. Note them down, pass them around.



This is it. This is the comment that gets me to join.

I'll fight you all!


Quote
You are confusing business with friendship.

I just covered that now. Let's move on.

Quote
So, why not just give her a few days off? Well, first off, that encourages Faye. [...]

Ahh... No? No it doesn't. If his is her only source of income, giving her a week or two without shifts is a serious financial burden. Huge. Give Faye a taste of what termination would be like if she didn't get her shit together and know that Dora means business. It's not like a school suspension, especially since Faye is paid by the hour and not a set wage.

She should absolutely be punished severely. A permanent termination is a step too far.

Quote
Secondly more deserving of disciplinary action?. I'm sorry, what?!? Something that could have serious economic consequences for her store is only deserving of disciplinary action?

Again, covered above. The severity of her punishment should scale with the permanency of her incompetence. It's the difference between rehabilitation and retribution. Retribution may feel more righteous, but guess which one ends up more effective long-term?

Alright, who else needs verbal fisticuffs? I'll take you all on, Hemmingway style.

EDIT: I would also like to state, for prudence's sake, that I am, in fact, joking about fighting people. I do not wish for this to devolve into a flame war of any flavour.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:16
One of the wiser things I've ever heard about dealing with addicts is "Don't jump in and try to save an anchor from drowning".

Proportionate measures are for normal healthy people screwing up. The Pugnacious Peach is looking less and less like such a person.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:18
I do not wish for this to devolve into a flame war of any flavour.
Global Moderator Comment The moderators stand with you.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 19 Jan 2015, 21:22
I'm still trying to process all this (and I can see everyone else is, too).  I mean, this is Faye we're talking about.  She's been around since the beginning. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=4)  And while, yeah, she started out prickly and violent, she's spent the entire run of the comic getting better--getting to know Marten, moving in with him, making other friends, opening up about her past, kissing a boy, dumping that boy when he broke the rules, getting a boyfling, making art, holding down a steady job and getting promoted--and suddenly that's all come crashing down in just a few short days because her drinking, which has always been a small problem but never more than a bad hangover the next morning, has at last turned into something bigger and cost her the job she has had since before she met Marten.  This is kind of a big deal, as big as Marten getting a girlfriend or breaking up with a girlfriend, and for some reason I can't quite process it yet.  I really have to trust Jeph on this, because I have no idea where he's going with it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 21:25
I for one like shitty things to happen every once in awhile to one of our beloved characters. Or at least them proving to be imperfect. Besides the break up everything's been going too good for everyone anyway (they're not real people, I'm allowed to want them to suffer some adversity okay?)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 19 Jan 2015, 21:30
Oh, I'm not complaining or anything.  I have nothing against it happening.  I'm just trying to grasp the enormity of the situation.   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 21:31
One of the wiser things I've ever heard about dealing with addicts is "Don't jump in and try to save an anchor from drowning".

Proportionate measures are for normal healthy people screwing up. The Pugnacious Peach is looking less and less like such a person.

Repeat offense? Termination. Reasonable.

Ultimatum: Come back clean in two weeks or don't come back at all. Reasonable.

When a person does it twice, that's when it starts being more prudent to just straight out fire someone. Right now? Not the case.

If I was working as a producer and I caught someone drinking on set, I'd fire them immediately. Around that much equipment, it's possible to get someone killed. In that situation, the possible liability of their actions exceeds the cost of replacement. If it was, however, a co-producer I'd worked with for years, behind the scenes, who showed up drunk once because his dog just got hit by a car...

I'd pick up their slack, ax them from that project and wipe them from the budget. But I'd work with them again. I wouldn't blacklist them, certainly. I wouldn't have been working with them for years if they weren't otherwise competent, and that's excruciatingly difficult to find.

But then again, a film set is nothing like a coffee shop.

Warning - while you were typing 2 new shady-lookin' cowpokes mozied on into the saloon. They better be quick on the draw to interrupt whiskey hour.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:34
Faye has acknowledged a problem before (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=983).

She felt like her life was falling apart uncontrollably.

That arc was quite a while ago and even back then Dora saw that The Pugnacious Peach had a drinking problem.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 19 Jan 2015, 21:37

Immediately firing her would've been her firing her yesterday.

Firing her the next day when she's still drunk if not worse because she's now bringing booze into the work place, lying to her face about it, , after she gave her a promotion and everything which is now putting her business at stake? That is not without question

First: This is still the same day, in-strip time. It's later on in that same day. That's important.

Second: Yes. Absolutely. She made a poor decision to lie to her boss, whilst drunk, and then continued to drink. That's a horrible, terrible thing to do.

But a bigger hit to Dora's business is losing an otherwise good manager (one who has a loyal customer base and manages to keep the other employees well in check) in the heat of the moment. Her decision to punish Faye? Justified. Being sick of Faye's shit? Justified.

But the loss of a valued employee, and a manager at that, is now made up for in the overtime she needs to pay other people to make up for Faye's shifts, time investment in hiring a new employee, and time Dora herself has to spend since she was the only other manager. If Faye's actions haven't caused more damage, or will cause more damage, than her termination will, then the termination is a poor decision. Especially since it's not a repeat offense, it's a first-time incident of this type of behaviour.

So it's a bad business decision as well as a bad friend decision.

Warning - while you were typing 3 new bottles of bourbon appeared on the wall. Note them down, pass them around.



This is it. This is the comment that gets me to join.

I'll fight you all!


Quote
You are confusing business with friendship.

I just covered that now. Let's move on.

Quote
So, why not just give her a few days off? Well, first off, that encourages Faye. [...]

Ahh... No? No it doesn't. If his is her only source of income, giving her a week or two without shifts is a serious financial burden. Huge. Give Faye a taste of what termination would be like if she didn't get her shit together and know that Dora means business. It's not like a school suspension, especially since Faye is paid by the hour and not a set wage.

She should absolutely be punished severely. A permanent termination is a step too far.

Quote
Secondly more deserving of disciplinary action?. I'm sorry, what?!? Something that could have serious economic consequences for her store is only deserving of disciplinary action?

Again, covered above. The severity of her punishment should scale with the permanency of her incompetence. It's the difference between rehabilitation and retribution. Retribution may feel more righteous, but guess which one ends up more effective long-term?

Alright, who else needs verbal fisticuffs? I'll take you all on, Hemmingway style.

1. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2866 is Faye trying to get permission to drink
2. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2867 is Dora telling her not to drink at work
3. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2875 is Faye the next morning deciding to continue to drink

It's the next day. She went home from work, got wasted, woke up, and decided to make the worst mistake of her life. It's not the same day is Dora's telling her not to drink.

Also, it does not matter if she was a good manager before, it matters what she is doing right now. I can't exactly use the excuse that I was the top of the employee chart in order to not get fired for injuring someone at work, can I? Dora cannot use Faye's good employee record in court if Faye's drunkenness causes serious injury to a patron, can she? The past doesn't matter, the present does. If someone refuses to show even the slightest respect for their boss, then the boss has every right to fire that person.

And "valued employee?" Let's be honest here, barristers don't exactly have a hard barrier of entry. You are placing Faye in way too much importance. Dora currently has more people working for her then she ever did before. Not counting Faye and Dora, there are, I believe, 4 employees working under Dora. This is why she needed an assistant, the workload was becoming too much to bear. More employees means more paperwork. Guess what happens when you fire an employee? Also, even if we went with your way, Dora would STILL have to work extra hours and reschedule everything because Faye would suddenly not be working for a few weeks. So...how does that factor into "good business"?

Look, I don't know you, but my experiences with people who are alcoholics is this: if they want to drink, THEY WILL DRINK! It doesn't matter if you try and lay them off for a while. It doesn't matter if they live in their car. It doesn't matter if they don't have two pennies to rub together. THEY. WILL. DRINK. They will come up with every excuse in the dictionary just to get another sip. It, quite frankly, is not worth keeping a "valuable" employee if this behavior continues. Because, quite frankly, their value just sank to rock bottom. Especially if Dora gave a warning.

And as for running a business. Yes, Dora now has a huge burden on her shoulders. Guess what? Dealing with that burden is infinitely easier than dealing with an employee who refuses to listen. She might not even have to hire another person to replace Faye. Dale currently could fill that gap. That man would love getting extra hours in. Problem solved. While it isn't that easy, it is still better than dealing with a potential lawsuit. You are placing friendship at a level with Dora's business. When a solution involves a scenario where Dora could lose her sole income, Dora is justified in placing the business above friendship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 19 Jan 2015, 21:41
But then again, a film set is nothing like a coffee shop.

Maybe not to you, but for Dora, CoD is more or less everything, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:43
It can be good business to try to salvage someone.

Dora may have seen enough alcoholics in her life to recognize the pattern and conclude that no management tool at her disposal could redeem the situation.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 19 Jan 2015, 21:44
I for one would like to see Faye go home for a few days, we can get some interaction between her and her mom.  That will reveal some more backstory I'm sure, maybe explain a bit more (in addition to what we already know about her dad and her abandonment issues) why she is so quick to be self destructive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 21:46
I'm finding this debate quite interesting.

But!

Given that Dora's very livelihood is at stake - the very thing she has poured her self into and which defines her - I would not be so judgemental even if I disagreed with her decision.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:46
Ooh, interesting. Her problems are so severe that it's possible there were pre-existing conditions before her dad put a bullet through her life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 21:47
I think Dora's choice to fire Faye was a good choice, both in terms of character and in more objective terms.

Dora is not responsible for Fayes actions. Dora has no control over what Faye does when she is not at work. In fact, Dora has been actively trying to overcome her own control issues and to back off and trust other people in her life.

Dora also might not have any experience dealing with alcoholism. Her reactions won't be the actions proscribed by a "dealing with alcoholism" textbook. What is more important is that her actions are in character.

Faye has a problem. She is hurting, and an alcoholic, and depressed. This does not mean that Faye is not responsible for her actions, nor does it mean that Dora should sacrifice her business and lively hood to support and possibly enable Faye.

Maybe when Dora gets off shift she will organize an intervention. Maybe she will make sure Faye sees her therapist as soon as possible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:50
I wonder if people in the QC world can get insurance that covers therapy when they're unemployed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 21:54
I wonder if CoD provides insurance. Assuming the ACA even exists in their universe, Dora employs fewer than 50 people. She wouldn't be obligated to provide insurance to her employees.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 21:56
Dora said something about health insurance but it might have been a joke.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 19 Jan 2015, 21:58
What I'm surprised about is Faye looks like she's surprised.  It's not as if she wasn't warned, and didn't know she was in the wrong.  If she wasn't afraid of being fired she wouldn't be sneaking around drinking in the back room instead of out in the open.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 21:59
In Massachusetts I believe the limit is 10 and not 50 (my uncle owns a business and states it's the biggest reason for why he doesn't expand).

But that's not the type of business (CoD) that can usually afford to give its employees insurance.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 22:00
There's a famous gravestone inscription "I expected this but not so soon".

Faye had gotten very used to having that job and having Dora put up with her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 22:01
The fact therapy is so easy and that AI have rights suggest far more liberal political environment.

Also Faye looks surprised because she was expecting her friendship to save her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 22:04
Marten's first job, crappy as it was, included health insurance. On the other hand that was a much larger business than Coffee of Doom.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 22:11
But then again, a film set is nothing like a coffee shop.

Maybe not to you, but for Dora, CoD is more or less everything, right?

Thus my palpable sarcasm.

1. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2866 is Faye trying to get permission to drink

Which was, as we established, a cry for help from Faye which Dora played off, mostly, in the next panel that you linked. That's her dropping the ball as a manager more than it is Faye fucking up as an employee. It would have been smarter for Dora to see the risk and not give her a shift until she knew she wasn't at-risk. That didn't happen.

Instead we get the conversation here:
Quote
2. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2867 is Dora telling her not to drink at work

Where Dora does give her a fair warning, but absolutely no reprimand or discipline. So, as we've established, she might as well just have given lip service. This is absolutely Faye's fault, but because there wasn't a disciplinary action, I stand by my statement: She shouldn't have been terminated. It wasn't a repeat offense.

And:

Quote
3. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2875 is Faye the next morning deciding to continue to drink

Is a personal problem, not a professional problem. Now, had she called in sick at that point, it would have been unprofessional, but it wouldn't have resulted in today's nadir. That's neither here nor there though.

Quote
Also, it does not matter if she was a good manager before, it matters what she is doing right now.

It absolutely does matter if you're gauging whether or not a permanent solution is necessary. If something costs fifty dollars to fix, you want to know if it's your TV remote or the widescreen it's the remote for. The first is obviously a replacement. The second is a bargain. Unless it's going to need to be re-repaired every day, of course. The points you go on to list are examples of the latter. Faye hasn't proven that she will be permanently fucking up this hard, though.

Quote
Let's be honest here, barristers don't exactly have a hard barrier of entry.

Which is why it might be hard to find one who is as skilled at their job and at management who hasn't moved on to brighter things. Or happily entrenched in old positions due to this economy.

Quote
Also, even if we went with your way, Dora would STILL have to work extra hours and reschedule everything because Faye would suddenly not be working for a few weeks.

I cede to this point. Egregious error on my part, and I apologize.

Quote
Look, I don't know you, but my experiences with people who are alcoholics is this: if they want to drink, THEY WILL DRINK!

And my experience with business is that it's significantly harder to retrain people for a position than it is to stop the people already trained from it from fucking up. The other employees also typically work better with someone they already respect or are comfortable with. For better or worse, the other employees actually like Faye... most of the time. That's a huge positive to productivity. Think how much better you, personally, have worked with bosses that you respected. Better the devil you know.

So, sure Faye will still be an alcoholic and that will impact her personal life severely. If, however, she can keep that the hell out of Coffee of Doom, then that's completely irrelevant. Well... not completely. But irrelevant enough.

Quote
is not worth keeping a "valuable" employee if this behavior continues

Emphasis on if this behaviour continues. Single incident.

Quote
Dealing with that burden is infinitely easier than dealing with an employee who refuses to listen.

Yeah, because she ignored all the punishments from those other times she got drunk at work. Remember that other time she did this and... uh... hrrm. No, wait, what 'bout... no?

Ignoring a warning is different to a repeat offense. Only the latter should truly be grounds for a permanent termination.

Quote
Dale currently could fill that gap. That man would love getting extra hours in.

Not management material. Yet.

Quote
You are placing friendship at a level with Dora's business.

Hell, at this point I think it would be more suitable for Dora to ax the friendship than the business. I'm not confusing those around at all. This business is her livelihood, as other people have said, and Dora works really goddamn hard for it. This is a huge insult to Dora. Friendship should go, however, before a qualified manager does.

Quote
When a solution involves a scenario where Dora could lose her sole income, Dora is justified in placing the business above friendship.

Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

Warning - while you were typing 13 newcomers challenged you. It looks like you're going to have to take 'em all!


Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SJCrew on 19 Jan 2015, 22:12
Too many people jumping the gun about this comic.

Especially MrNumbers.

For one, nobody deserves a pass for showing up to work inebriated, even if friendship and seniority were factors. That's your entitlement talking. You know that in the real world if you were hired by anyone who took their shit seriously, you couldn't get away with any gross display of unprofessionalism no matter how isolated the incident.

Next, who said this was the end? We haven't even gotten to day two. For all we know, Faye can be fired for all of a day or a week before she patches things up or Dora seeks her out to get all 'supportive friend' on her, then give her the brass tacks before offering her job back. These things happen all the time in fiction.

She's still fired, that much is certain, but how quickly she gets her job back is all in how quickly she makes it up to Dora. Either way, Dora's ass is covered morally and professionally because she's the one who was lied to, and she's the one who has to look out for the health of the business so that everyone can get paid.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 19 Jan 2015, 22:12
Dora likes Faye. There's nothing saying she can't rehire her after Faye gets her act together.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: qc001 on 19 Jan 2015, 22:14
I've seen a lot of posts mentioning the possible liability of keeping Faye on the payroll/at CoD while she is drunk.  While I agree with the myriad problems of having drunk employees in ANY field in the real world, CoD has canonically been rather abusive to its customers without any fear of reprisal, to wit:

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=81 - Faye mentions that Dora is "ten times worse" than she is, and made the DA cry for peeking down her shirt.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=259 - Dora (initially grudgingly) condones Faye's attack of a customer (in this case, Marten's ex, so justifiable?) using a dairy product, and outright praises her actions by the conclusion of the comic.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=285 & 286 - Dora is verbally abusive to a customer, Faye explains the business model of being abrasive to the clientele, and in 286, Dora says that she should consider reevaluating her business plan (of abusing the customers), as the customers are tipping Raven (man, we haven't seen Raven in a while!) for being friendly to them.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=654 - Dora and Faye are thrilled because the local write-up has brought in tons of new business precisely BECAUSE everyone is so abusive.

http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1258 - The espresso machine explodes, potentially scalding Faye's face/chest, but Dora responds by asking if the espresso machine is okay (clearly not concerned about the possibility that Faye could be seriously injured, and if so, could sue CoD for medical expenses)

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2278 - Hosing the obstreperous customers MUST be legal at CoD if Hannelore is willing to engage in such an activity.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2468 - Dora is concerned that a spider might have bitten Sam, which is perhaps the first inkling of worrying about anyone's personal safety while in the store, and noting that a basement full of spiders is a health hazard.  Of course, Dora's concern might be due more to the fact that Sam is Jim's kid, since she routinely has her employees go into the basement to pick up the coffee.  (Also, one hundred strips later, there are still a ton of spiders in the basement, so clearly Dora didn't actually do anything about it.)

Meanwhile, in variously sampled CoD strips, even if the dialogue topic isn't specifically the customers, the Specials on the blackboard continue to speak to CoD's...antipathy towards its customers (most just involve horrific-sounding food or drink items, but a couple of non-food ones stuck out to me):

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1288 - "We murder your pets and burn your house down. -$3.75"

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1880 - "Cactus up the _______" (we can guess the rest!)

(Random note: whenever Hannelore is on the clock, the Specials menu is always very friendly!)

Anyway, with this established in-comic history and Dora's policies, I find it difficult to justify the idea that Faye being drunk at work would lead to any serious liability vis a vis the safety of the customers leading to a lawsuit.  Not that I wish to condone being drunk at work by any stretch of the imagination, but in QCVerse, at CoD, customer abuse is the house blend, so the idea that Dora being afraid of repercussions due to Faye unintentionally injuring a customer or somesuch is preposterous.  To say otherwise is in direct violation of canon since the beginning of the strip.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mmeaninglessnamee on 19 Jan 2015, 22:14
[Jumping back through the discussion a bit]

Yeah, Tai's party at the library is this weekend, QC-time. In the past, parties in QC have brought reconciliation to plots, but I'm more expecting an expanding shitstorm at this one. Or maybe it will be entirely separate from Faye and Dora, just serving as a distraction for Marten to not be around when everything is (metaphorically) burning down.

[Yada Yada 3 new replies, forum's busy today]
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 19 Jan 2015, 22:15
And once again the lovely Dora-hate rears its head. Huzzah!

It's cool for people who have despised Dora since she "stole Marten" from Faye to now take a collective dump on her for actually drawing a hard line against ickle Faye, but I'm sure that when/if Faye cabbages Marten and Claire's relationship, all of a sudden Faye will have a "problem." Right now Faye coming in drunk, lying, and trying to sneak a drink at work is at the same level of her making a customer a pickle/peanut butter monstrosity. Alrighty then. Or would it have been cool if Sam had come in while Faye was plastered and gotten her face burned off by a blowtorch? That would have been cool with ya'll? Rockin'.


At this point I hope Jeph kills Dora off. There can be a tearful Tai/Bailey reunion and Sven can but CoD and turn it into a recording studio and Penny and the rest can be retrained into sound engineers or something. Marten and Claire can buy part-interest in Secret Bakery and the real hijinks can ensue. Ooh, maybe even  have Faye kill Dora, because hey, why the fuck not, Faye will be forgiven anything and I swear to fucking god some of you will only be satisfied when Dora's head is literally on a fucking stake outside the doors of CoD.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 22:21
Too many people jumping the gun about this comic.

Especially MrNumbers.

OI! Mate. Mate.

Quote
For one, nobody deserves a pass for showing up to work inebriated, even if friendship and seniority were factors. That's your entitlement talking. You know that in the real world if you were hired by anyone who took their shit seriously, you couldn't get away with any gross display of unprofessionalism no matter how isolated the incident.

1: What entitlement? That's a hell of an insinuation to make.

2: You're also insinuating I wish Faye should get away with it. It's clearly stated I want her to be severely reprimanded, with a lot of financial penalties. Termination is not literally the only thing in the world that ever works.

Quote
Next, who said this was the end?

... is Dora going to say "Is what I will say if you don't get your act together"? That would be one hell of a twist.

Quote
We haven't even gotten to day two. For all we know, Faye can be fired for all of a day or a week before she patches things up or Dora seeks her out to get all 'supportive friend' on her, then give her the brass tacks before offering her job back. These things happen all the time in fiction.

Which is exactly the kind of reprimand I'm endorsing. Except you don't call that a termination. That... I mean... if that turns out to be the case, I'll be incredibly vindicated. So I've still yet to see why you've singled me out?

Quote
She's still fired, that much is certain, but how quickly she gets her job back is all in how quickly she makes it up to Dora. Either way, Dora's ass is covered morally and professionally because she's the one who was lied to, and she's the one who has to look out for the health of the business so that everyone can get paid.

Again, agreed.

... why was I singled out, exactly. If she gets hired back in two weeks, it's just another version of what I was saying Dora should do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 22:24
*Snip!*

Can I just say how much I love you, right now?

Everything this dude said, right here, ties in to:

Quote
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

This thing I've said, right here.

Thank you so much, QC001, for doing all that wonderful legwork for me so that I didn't have to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 22:28
Quote
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

This thing I've said, right here.


I'm going to go with a lot of things, like so many. It's a little thing called negligence, it's very costly for a business like, this business may not get to exist anymore costly. Especially for a small business like that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 19 Jan 2015, 22:31
... why was I singled out, exactly. If she gets hired back in two weeks, it's just another version of what I was saying Dora should do.

Time out! You've been telling us how what she already did was wrong, not about what she should do next.

And while I'm at it, your "palpable " sarcasm was not, I'm afraid. I'm yet to understand how your film set scenario does not apply here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 22:37
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

I'm going to go with a lot of things, like so many. It's a little thing called negligence, it's very costly for a business like, this business may not get to exist anymore costly. Especially for a small business like that.

Don't get me confused with a naif, sir. I understand there are a lot of things Faye could have done that would have been, or could have been, harmful to the small business's reputation.

That's not what I asked though.

I asked what she could have done that would have been more harmful to it than her termination, considering the current nature of Coffee Of Doom's reputation.

Time out! You've been telling us how what she already did was wrong, not about what she should do next.

Quote
Seriously. A massive pay dock and the loss of a few shifts for a while. There are levels between "Nothing/Coddling" and "Termination".

From literally my first post. Which was then subsequently followed up with what I meant by 'the loss of a few shifts for a while' as 'at least no shifts for a week, probably two'.

A fortnight of no income is hell on your savings when you're actively trying to piss it away on alcohol.

Quote
And while I'm at it, your "palpable " sarcasm was not, I'm afraid. I'm yet to understand how your film set scenario does not apply here.

My sarcasm should have been palpable for the reason you said: There isn't a reason why the film set scenario shouldn't apply here. I was daring someone to comment on how my personal production experience doesn't relate to the operation of a small business in some way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 22:38
I would say that the business being sued out of orbit for negligence would be more harmful to the business than Faye being terminated. Or any person being harmed in any way through Faye's drunken antics.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 22:41
I would say that the business being sued out of orbit for negligence would be more harmful to the business than Faye being terminated. Or any person being harmed in any way through Faye's drunken antics.

We are talking about the same business that has threatened customers with a broadsword they keep under the counter at all times, right?

And do you forget, so soon, about the Malaysian Battle Spatula? http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=540

EDIT: Oh, yes, and there's also this http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1723
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 19 Jan 2015, 22:43
I'm with the numeric gentleman on this one.  If Faye gets to come back once she's gotten her shit together, then she was never really fired.

I'm also of the opinion that Dora's been a pretty crappy friend up to this point, taking action, be it by really firing Faye or just giving her the boot until she straightens out, is the first thing she's done to try and help her friend, and it seems she wasn't even thinking about that, only about getting rid of a liability.  Which isn't a bad mindset, Dora's a business owner first and foremost.  But she had other options, and if Faye is really fired, she took the most aggressive option without a second thought.

It never should have gotten this far though, because after yesterday's (in comic time) episode of Faye wanting to drink at work, and her stated intention to stay drunk whenever she's conscious, Dora should have done something, anything, other than letting her go home to get drunk again when her shift was up.  Good boss, good business owner, crap friend.

Also, this isn't the first case of Faye drinking at work, and she never made an effort to hide it in the past.  I can't remember any instance of her drinking on the clock with Dora in the shop, but almost definitely around other employees.  The emergency bourbon wasn't exactly a secret.

Warning - while you were reading 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to hide in a sewer while the guy reenacting a sidescrolling beat'em up fights them all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SJCrew on 19 Jan 2015, 22:43
Quote
... why was I singled out, exactly. If she gets hired back in two weeks, it's just another version of what I was saying Dora should do.
It's not. What you're saying is that the punishment was too harsh and irreversible. What I'm saying is the complete inverse: a) she can be planning to give her the job back all along, but had to send a strong enough message to get through to her, a message that "Go home" or "You're suspended" could not, and b) even if she wasn't expecting an immediate turnaround from Faye, she is doing what any good boss would do in her situation by setting an irrevokable standard for her business and her employers. If anybody else is having a shit time, they will know not to go 'full Faye', and take it out on the job.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 22:46
I would say that the business being sued out of orbit for negligence would be more harmful to the business than Faye being terminated. Or any person being harmed in any way through Faye's drunken antics.

We are talking about the same business that has threatened customers with a broadsword they keep under the counter at all times, right?

And do you forget, so soon, about the Malaysian Battle Spatula? http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=540

EDIT: Oh, yes, and there's also this http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1723

oh, you mean those things that WERE NEVER USED TO HURT CUSTOMERS?


Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 22:46
SJCrew, don't let it get personal.

MrNumbers, I thought about your question, and a possible answer is "starting a fire". She's done it before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 19 Jan 2015, 22:48
I'm with the numeric gentleman on this one.  If Faye gets to come back once she's gotten her shit together, then she was never really fired.
Yes, but Faye, right now, does not know she might be rehired. And that's why using the words "You're fired!" are better than "Take some time off and get your shit together." The shorter, direct firing has a sharper sting across the cheek that might help wake Faye up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 19 Jan 2015, 22:49
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

Break a coffee machine. Break a window. Actually harm an patron or an employee (such as breaking a bone or seriously wounding someone with the dangerous weapons they have lying around). Ruin relations between Dora and her supplier. Sexually harass an employee or patron (you're drunk, logic and common sense left the window long ago). Unproductive behavior at work. Sleeping on the job. Finally crossing the line with her fellow employees (who have noted that they heavily dislike working under Faye). Causing employees to quit because of clear double standards. The destruction of property, such as the coffee beans. Failure to properly clear the basement of spiders. Do I need to continue?

And Faye's "loyal" customer base doesn't seem to be doing much. Dora isn't making much of a profit. When was the last time we even heard of people coming to the coffee shop to hear her snark? That fad has most likely passed. And even if it hadn't, you are placing FAR too much power to Faye here. Faye shouldn't be fired because she is too important? It's almost like saying we shouldn't default a bank because "they are too big to fail". Remember what happened? Because it wasn't good, let me tell you. You do NOT drink on the job. That is the basis for an immediate termination. I don't care if you sold the most coffee or are the best employee, you just showed me that you think you are more important then anyone else and will break any rules I set.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 22:50
Come to think of it, a violent drunk around a broadsword and a Battle Spatula is a "recipe for unpleasantness", the kind of unpleasantness that can run to five figures in no time.

Global Moderator Comment It's only right for feelings to run hot on this story arc. Anyone who's been close to an alcoholic is now thinking of the worst experiences of their lives. Anyone who's been ignored by a friend after threatening suicide, including the slow suicide of being drunk every waking hour, is going to be hurt seeing Dora's failure to intervene. That said, PLEASE do not take it out on other forum members.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 19 Jan 2015, 22:52
When I was a shift manager at a small coffee shop, one of my responsibilities was setting up the soup du jour for the lunch rush. I started at 5a, opened for 6a, and worked until noon or 2, depending on the day.

Normally the soup was delivered by the co owner around 10, and normally my main thing was setting it up in our giant couldron, stirring in chicken broth or half and half, and letting it heat through. One day, I had had to close the night before and still got stuck opening. I was wicked exhausted, but present because I really loved the shop. I don't remember what the soup was, but I swear I thought it was supposed to have half and half. Long story short, i added diary to something that made it curdle, gave myself and the other shift manager food poisoning, and we had to toss about 120 dollars of food, and find someone to cover our shifts. I didn't get fired, but I probably should've been. And I wasn't even drunk! Between that, the times me or another barista got burned by the steam wand, the time I burnt my nipple because of a shitty loose spigot... Goodness, there are too many jabbity bits and food safety issues to work behind the bar impaired. That's not even going into stuff like quality control, since if you're not at Starbucks, you're probably eyeballing the foaming and temperature for the milk and the quality of your shots.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 19 Jan 2015, 22:54
I would say that the business being sued out of orbit for negligence would be more harmful to the business than Faye being terminated. Or any person being harmed in any way through Faye's drunken antics.

We are talking about the same business that has threatened customers with a broadsword they keep under the counter at all times, right?

And do you forget, so soon, about the Malaysian Battle Spatula? http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=540

EDIT: Oh, yes, and there's also this http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1723

oh, you mean those things that WERE NEVER USED TO HURT CUSTOMERS?

THANK YOU! The CoD do flagrantly abuse and insult their patrons, but they rarely go beyond that. They have hundreds of dangerous items lying around BUT THEY NEVER USED THEM AGAINST OTHER CUSTOMERS. Faye actually injuring a customer would be completely different than threats or snark.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 22:54
Quote
... why was I singled out, exactly. If she gets hired back in two weeks, it's just another version of what I was saying Dora should do.
It's not. What you're saying is that the punishment was too harsh and irreversible. What I'm saying is the complete inverse: a) she can be planning to give her the job back all along, but had to send a strong enough message to get through to her, a message that "Go home" or "You're suspended" could not, and b) even if she wasn't expecting an immediate turnaround from Faye, she is doing what any good boss would do in her situation by setting an irrevokable standard for her business and her employers. If anybody else is having a shit time, they will know not to go 'full Faye', and take it out on the job.

This, so much this.

I just don't get why people are trying to give Faye a pass on this. She fucked up. There are consequences when you fuck up.

Yeah, you might say that Dora is being a bad friend (although I don't think we've let this play out enough to make that call) But Dora has to be the boss first. She can't just think of Faye. She has to think of her business, herself, and her other employees. Friendship doesn't trump those things.

Also, Faye has to realize that her friends/coworkers have breaking points. I don't get why people are jumping on Dora for not hearing Fayes cry for help, but people aren't jumping on Faye for pushing Dora too far.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Leveton on 19 Jan 2015, 22:55
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

Spill hot coffee on a customer. A customer who sues. In court, it comes out that Faye was drunk and Dora knew it before it happened. Compensatory damages covering medical care, as well as the famed "pain and suffering." Punitive damages for knowingly allowing a drunk employee to handle scalding-hot liquids around customers. Because of that same gross negligence, Coffee of Doom's liability insurance won't pay any claims from the suit. In such a lawsuit, compensatory and punitive damages could EASILY surpass the point at which Dora would lose Coffee of Doom (and any other assets Dora has that are not protected by U.S. bankruptcy law). Everyone at Coffee of Doom is out of a job.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 19 Jan 2015, 22:59

Also, Faye has to realize that her friends/coworkers have breaking points. I don't get why people are jumping on Dora for not hearing Fayes cry for help, but people aren't jumping on Faye for pushing Dora too far.

Because that's not how it works here. Dora sealed her fate with much of this crowd when she had the temerity to ask Marten out when Faye made it clear nothing was going to happen between them anytime soon.

Oenone's (I love that name, yay Greek mythology!) anecdote is very apropos here. Suppose a customer with a severe nut allergy who makes that clear when ordering asks for a nonfat skim mocha and drunk!Faye makes it with Almond milk and adds a dash of hazelnut syrup to it? Someone dying would definitely be a buzzkill for the cafe and Dora would be lucky to escape with her ass intact, especially if it were to come out that Faye had been warned before and Dora let things stand.

But by all means, Dora-haters, commence with burning her in effigy. Dumb bitch deserves it for not being omnipotent and existing and ... stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 19 Jan 2015, 23:00
Name one thing Faye could have done whilst drunk that would have been more damaging to the business than Faye's irreparable termination, knowing Faye has a loyal customer base that come in just for her patented scorn and that her termination is almost a guaranteed drop in loyal, repeat customers?

Spill hot coffee on a customer. A customer who sues. In court, it comes out that Faye was drunk and Dora knew it before it happened. Compensatory damages covering medical care, as well as the famed "pain and suffering." Punitive damages for knowingly allowing a drunk employee to handle scalding-hot liquids around customers. Because of that same gross negligence, Coffee of Doom's liability insurance won't pay any claims from the suit. In such a lawsuit, compensatory and punitive damages could EASILY surpass the point at which Dora would lose Coffee of Doom (and any other assets Dora has that are not protected by U.S. bankruptcy law). Everyone at Coffee of Doom is out of a job.

And that's not including the dangerous weapons the CoD have around like the broadsword and the blowtorch. Do people really think that threatening someone with a broadsword and accidentally injuring someone with said broadsword are the same thing?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 23:01
Another hypothetical disaster would be if Faye mishandled food and someone got sick. The disaster would come when the health department came in for an inspection. Between the spiders in the basement and the science project in the carafe (strip 729) CoD would get closed the same day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 23:07
SJCrew, don't let it get personal.

MrNumbers, I thought about your question, and a possible answer is "starting a fire". She's done it before.

But then Hannelore would get to see the sexy firemen again!

Oh, wait, they're all gross and sweaty in person.

*Sigh*.

Yeah, point ceded on that one. A fire would definitely be a thing. Even if it'd finally get all the basement spiders.

Come to think of it, a violent drunk around a broadsword and a Battle Spatula is a "recipe for unpleasantness", the kind of unpleasantness that can run to five figures in no time.

... I want to see this strip now.

oh, you mean those things that WERE NEVER USED TO HURT CUSTOMERS?

You do realize that the threat is still enough to claim an assault charge, with a deadly weapon at that, and there's more than enough customers in the store at any given time to make it an open-and-shut court case?

So... yeah. Unless Faye got drunk enough that she thought actually stabbing someone was a good idea (which I don't think was the case... yet...) I stand my ground on this one.

It's not. What you're saying is that the punishment was too harsh and irreversible. What I'm saying is the complete inverse: a) she can be planning to give her the job back all along, but had to send a strong enough message to get through to her, a message that "Go home" or "You're suspended" could not, and b) even if she wasn't expecting an immediate turnaround from Faye, she is doing what any good boss would do in her situation by setting an irrevokable standard for her business and her employers. If anybody else is having a shit time, they will know not to go 'full Faye', and take it out on the job.

If nothing else, I'm just going to say that your former point directly contradicts your latter point and that your former point doesn't guarantee that Faye, upon termination, will come back by the time Dora decides it's okay, because someone could get pretty goddamn desperate with a job hunt and luck out just so you could 'make your point'. I really, sincerely doubt this was Dora's plan for a whole variety of reasons, least of which is Dora's just not that subtle.

Warning - while you were typing 4 new people logged in to yell at you. Prepare your Malaysian Battle Spatula for rebuttal.


THANK YOU! The CoD do flagrantly abuse and insult their patrons, but they rarely go beyond that. They have hundreds of dangerous items lying around BUT THEY NEVER USED THEM AGAINST OTHER CUSTOMERS. Faye actually injuring a customer would be completely different than threats or snark.

1) Which is still already grounds for numerous court cases and
2) there's still no guarantee that being drunk would have made Faye carry out the threat, so the point's moot. I brought it up to point out Faye being drunk isn't more of a lawsuit magnet than anything they already do.

Spill hot coffee on a customer. A customer who sues. In court, it comes out that Faye was drunk and Dora knew it before it happened. Compensatory damages covering medical care, as well as the famed "pain and suffering." Punitive damages for knowingly allowing a drunk employee to handle scalding-hot liquids around customers. Because of that same gross negligence, Coffee of Doom's liability insurance won't pay any claims from the suit. In such a lawsuit, compensatory and punitive damages could EASILY surpass the point at which Dora would lose Coffee of Doom (and any other assets Dora has that are not protected by U.S. bankruptcy law). Everyone at Coffee of Doom is out of a job.

If the coffee is served at normal, legal temperatures, the above scenario doesn't happen. The court case you're referencing, the McDonald's coffee at the very least, were coffee spills from coffee served way, way above legal maximum temperature, which resulted in large skin grafts. The pain and suffering addition was for McDonalds initially refusing to take responsibility for their ludicrously illegal actions, and dragging it into the court in the first place.

The rest? Completely valid point. Except for the fact that Faye could have been sent home without being fired, which renders the rest, once more, moot.

I asked what she could have done drunk that would have been worse. This hinges on Dora not knowing, so her insurance can point out gross negligence. Either Dora's insurance would have covered, as she didn't know her employee was drunk, or Faye being sued directly, in the case of -- above -- it being taken as an assault case. Neither of which destroys her business.

Warning - while you were typing 3 new kids appeared on your lawn. Equip your old man cane and yell at them
Quote from: Is it cold in here? [/color

[link=topic=30386.msg1294971#msg1294971 date=1421737265]
Another hypothetical disaster would be if Faye mishandled food and someone got sick. The disaster would come when the health department came in for an inspection. Between the spiders in the basement and the science project in the carafe (strip 729) CoD would get closed the same day.

That's... still more Dora's fault than Faye's. Incredibly unlikely, seeing as she hands muffins to people with tongs, but if she did get drunk-lazy enough to think handling the baked goods with her bare hands was okay, you're right, that would be a complete clusterfuck. Point ceded.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 23:10
I also need to say, in big bold letters:

I don't dislike Dora. I think she made a rash decision, but I think, morally, she's in the clear here. There is no Dora-hate going on here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:11
You're missing a huge point. If Faye is lying about being drunk in the first place it makes Dora unable to accommodate her. Dora can't trust her and trust is a very important commidity in businesses like Doras especially since its clear that she hires people she knows usually.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: qc001 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:11
Suppose a customer with a severe nut allergy who makes that clear when ordering asks for a nonfat skim mocha and drunk!Faye makes it with Almond milk and adds a dash of hazelnut syrup to it? Someone dying would definitely be a buzzkill for the cafe and Dora would be lucky to escape with her ass intact, especially if it were to come out that Faye had been warned before and Dora let things stand.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1123 - She already sort of did that, though Angus did not mention that he was lactose-intolerant prior to her making that particular drink (though unless he got his coffee black every day - which perhaps he did, since he would just throw it out - Angus likely would have asked for non-dairy creamers in his beverages, which he always ordered from Faye...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 23:13
Quote from: MrNumbers
... I want to see this strip now.

Oh my, the possibilities. SWAT team standoff, Bianchi parents trying to calm her down with baked goods, Pintsize contributing to the crisis ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 19 Jan 2015, 23:13
Yay! So jazzed when people don't assume I misspelled Oneone.

Speaking of drink prep: fudging drink orders because you think someone's ordering soy or whatever to be a snot is never funny. I could see drunk!Faye doing that as a joke, not realizing that someone specifically wanted XYZ done Q way because of allergies. Or heck, even cross contaminating the steam wands. I was kind of anal about wiping them down regularly, but the other shift manager specifically designated one as the nondairy and one as dairy.

It also sucks to open when someone else is slacking off. Everyone is in a rush, no one wants to be late for work, and if it's just you working because someone's hungover or late themselves, it's easy to get a queue of angry, uncaffeinated customers who are now angry they still have to give you money for their drinks.

seriously Faye would suck as a co worker.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:15
Mr Numbers, out of curiosity, why is it so important to you that Faye not be fired?

Especially, as numerous people have pointed out, Faye could be rehired when she gets her shit back together. At this point it almost seems like a semantics argument; "It would be just like Faye was fired, but without Dora having to say the word fired!"


On your  point about CoD being sued because there are weapons present on premise... As far as I remember, the weapons are never used to threaten someone who isn't a friend. Even if that isn't the case, there is a difference between threatening someone with a weapon in a clearly sarcastic way, and hurting someone with a weapon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Y on 19 Jan 2015, 23:19
I also think this was more of a wake up call. It also means she might follow Angus now, for a while though (otherwise she would be on the bus as well).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: qc001 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:20
On your  point about CoD being sued because there are weapons present on premise... As far as I remember, the weapons are never used to threaten someone who isn't a friend. Even if that isn't the case, there is a difference between threatening someone with a weapon in a clearly sarcastic way, and hurting someone with a weapon.

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1323 - Well, this springs to mind.  No actual violence (probably, we don't see any sword-scars when Cosette appears a couple of strips later), but certainly a verbal threat from Dora.  And this was before Cosette was a regular of any kind (it's only her second appearance, IIRC).  Faye's comment of it being Penny's turn to clean up the blood is clearly a joke, but still...perhaps there's a secret seamy underbelly to CoD - a racist murdercult!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 19 Jan 2015, 23:21
I am amused by all the emotion this stirred up. I don't know why.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 19 Jan 2015, 23:22


http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1123 - She already sort of did that, though Angus did not mention that he was lactose-intolerant prior to her making that particular drink (though unless he got his coffee black every day - which perhaps he did, since he would just throw it out - Angus likely would have asked for non-dairy creamers in his beverages, which he always ordered from Faye...)

I hear you on that, but causing someone to get the runs is not on the level of causing someone to go into anaphylactic shock. I know you're not equating the two, and I'm not trying to dismiss your point. It's just that as you said, Angus didn't specify. It could be argued that Faye should have asked, but he didn't make it clear and it was an honest mistake. If Faye, impaired by liquor, were to add dangerous, life-threatening substances to a customer's drink after said customer alerted her to a severe allergy would be grounds for Dora's arse to be nailed to the wall.

I'm sensitive about this because my fiance has a nut allergy and in college was nearly murdered by an asshole server who thought my guy was "being difficult" about asking how the food was prepared because of said allergy and deliberately doused his food in peanut oil. My fiance did not sue the restaurant, though I think he should have (this was before we met). The server was fired, however, word got out, and the business went under about a year later.

But, to take your point, if Faye were to do that again, and instead of the runs, the customer got severe cramping and vomitting requiring hospitalization... yeah. No good. This is a shop that handles foodstuffs, some of which are served at extremely hot temperatures. There can't be anything left to chance here. An impaired employee is just asking for trouble.

I also resent that it seems Dora can't win for losing in this case. If she shrugged it off and Faye caused mayhem, then she would have been lambasted as too permissive. There was actually nothing that Dora could do in this case that wouldn't result in some sort of (IMO unfair) backlash against her, and as a fan of hers, it gets tiresome. I'm all for holding her accountable when she does something irredeemably dumb (the "hug" incident, ignoring Marten's stricture to stay out of his porn, the Sven stuff), but it just is frustrating as hell that there is such a large and vocal contingent of people who will use any logic to justify their dislike of her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 23:24
Mr Numbers, out of curiosity, why is it so important to you that Faye not be fired?

Especially, as numerous people have pointed out, Faye could be rehired when she gets her shit back together. At this point it almost seems like a semantics argument; "It would be just like Faye was fired, but without Dora having to say the word fired!"

Genuinely because I purely think it's a poor business decision made more out of hurt than calm thought. Or maybe Dora thinking she's trying to be calm and rational and overshooting the mark.

If I genuinely thought Dora was doing this just so she could hire Faye back, well... I don't think that's the case. Dora isn't the kind of person to do that. For one thing, it's incredibly dishonest, and for another, Dora doesn't have that subtlety. Faye's gone. That's it.

If she was just going to be hired back, then it would be better to be upfront about that and hammer in that this is an intentional punishment rather than lie about it for shock/scare value because... do I really need to explain that one?

And if you honestly believe that it would be better that Faye be hired back, why are you so determined to argue against me that a two weeks unpaid vacation combined with a hefty salary cut wouldn't be good enough?

Quote
there is a difference between threatening someone with a weapon in a clearly sarcastic way

I have PTSD. A surprising amount of people do. If you waved a weapon at any of those people in a 'sarcastic way', your attorney would be facepalming so goddamn hard.

"Why did a coffee shop need a broadsword anyway?"

"We use it to threaten customers whose drink order is too complicated, or if they use a Starbucks coffee size." <- Remember that? That happened.

 Warning - while you were typing 3 people overtook you. Fire that blue shell you've been saving.


I am amused by all the emotion this stirred up. I don't know why.

Probably because you're a baaad person?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 23:32
See, that's what I feel is weird. If you state this is poor business decision I'm going to have to vehemently disagree.

Say if I'm a business owner, an employee of mine is drunk on the job; unless there was a work sponsored event with alcohol just before that that person is getting so very fired. With the amount of money Dora is working with that's basically all she can do. She does not have the resources to see someone through a detox program and even if she did she'd still be in the right simply because being drunk at work is pretty... pretty bad... Again, it only takes Faye to fuck up once while she's drunk and the business will probably be destroyed (through the process of law). That's a huge risk for little reward, the two things you usually aren't looking for in "good business decision".

Regardless of friendship or feelings, the decision ought to be the same.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: qc001 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:34
I hear you on that, but causing someone to get the runs is not on the level of causing someone to go into anaphylactic shock.

Oh, believe me, I completely agree.  Food alterations leading to anaphylaxis are no joke, regardless of whether it occurred due to a purely innocent accident, alcohol/chemical-induced negligence, or malicious intent.

On a not-really-related note, I would love to see a strip or two that shows what Angus has been up to since we last saw him in http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2815.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 23:37
See, that's what I feel is weird. If you state this is poor business decision I'm going to have to vehemently disagree.

You don't have to put Faye through a detox program. You don't have to spend any money. Hell, cutting her salary but keeping the same level of competent employee, since they have that incident hanging over their head, is tantamount to a bargain, with faint undertones of blackmail...

If Faye ever, ever, did this again, I'd be completely agreeing with you. But a lone incident should not a years-long career inherently break.

EDIT:

Let's put this in the context of being caught drink-driving, a situation which very realistically gets people killed.

Here in Australia a drink-driving offense has an immediate 250 dollar fine, $500 dollars maximum if the court finds you off, for a first offense. You also get five demerit points: About the same as going 35 kilometers - about 20 miles - over the speed limit.

You need to lose 12 in a three year period before you lose your license.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 23:39
Mr Numbers, out of curiosity, why is it so important to you that Faye not be fired?

He's answered that himself, but I'd like to add the insight that there are plenty of people who've been seriously hurt by hip-shooting overreaction in real life, and Dora pushes their buttons.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 19 Jan 2015, 23:42
I'm actually surprised that no one has (until right now) brought up the fact that Faye has deliberately doused a customer with milk. I mean, as a customer, I would be more likely to sue over that (if I were the trigger happy type) than to sue over a sword being stuck into a counter.

I just feel that there are so many good reasons why Dora firing Faye was the right course; many of which have already been stated in this thread, but whatever, sure I'll rehash them for you:
-Dora covers her businesses ass in terms of liability
-Sets firm boundaries for all employees about what is acceptable behaviour, and what the consequences will be.
-Shows other employees that Faye is not immune from rules just because she is friends with Dora
-Shows Faye that her choices have serious consequences
-Might show Faye that she is on a serious downward spiral, and she needs to snap out of it before she crashes.

Honestly, if I were in Fayes position, I would rather be fired than publicly shamed. "yeah, you can stay, but we are going to take your position and some of your salary away from you!"
That might just be me, though.

He's answered that himself, but I'd like to add the insight that there are plenty of people who've been seriously hurt by hip-shooting overreaction in real life, and Dora pushes their buttons.

I honestly have no idea what you mean by hip-shooting.

Dora often overreacts, but I don't think she is right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 19 Jan 2015, 23:44
But it's not a lone incident, everyone knows Faye has alcohol issues. I also think that just punishing Faye like that would make things worse, but I cannot stipulate on that because I know nothing of psychology.

In my mind, it's an unnecessary risk for a small business owner to take. Not to mention, and I hope I'm not coming off as a huge dick, but Faye can be replaced. The shop had enough employees (keep in mind, it apparently only started with 3) and again, I hope I don't come off as that much of a dick, but making coffee isn't exactly the most skilled job and Faye's responsibilities as a manager weren't that high.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 19 Jan 2015, 23:49
I just feel that there are so many good reasons why Dora firing Faye was the right course; many of which have already been stated in this thread, but whatever, sure I'll rehash them for you:

Here is a list of things, from your reasons listed, that firing covers but not the serious punishment:

Now here is a list of things the punishment also covers from your list:
- It covers Dora's arse
- It shows firm boundaries and consequences for the other employees
- Shows other employees Faye is not immune to The Rules
- Shows Faye that her choices have serious consequences
- Shows Faye that she is on a serious downward spiral, and she needs to snap out of it before she might get actually fired for real.


Quote
Honestly, if I were in Fayes position, I would rather be fired than publicly shamed. "yeah, you can stay, but we are going to take your position and some of your salary away from you!"
That might just be me, though.

Which means that you agree that the punishment would be sufficiently severe.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 19 Jan 2015, 23:50
"Hip-shooting", metaphor for impulsive action with an implication of not taking normal care. Clearer when phrased as "shooting from the hip".

Dora's done it before and it's one of the first conclusions someone could likely draw when Dora does anything drastic.

This time of course there are sound business arguments for her action, as many people have pointed out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 00:03
Also, the point about killing Fayes career in being a barista.... yeah... no....

If she was in a franchise and had the opportunity to really advance, then maybe..

Also, she could probably get hired at another coffee shop. She would only need minimal training, and those sorts of jobs have a high turnover rate anyway.

I don't think Faye is particularly interested in a career. I think she is interested in security; and she needs to know that no job is so secure that you can expect to come to work drunk and keep your job.

Quote
Honestly, if I were in Fayes position, I would rather be fired than publicly shamed. "yeah, you can stay, but we are going to take your position and some of your salary away from you!"
That might just be me, though.

Which means that you agree that the punishment would be sufficiently severe.
no. I don't agree.

Dora firing Faye isn't a "punishment". Dora isn't punishing Faye. Dora is protecting herself and her business from the liability of a drunk employee.

What you are suggesting would be a "punishment".

There are some things in a professional environment that warrant immediate termination. Showing up drunk or high, stealing, sexually or physically assaulting someone, etc... I don't get why this is so shocking to some people on this forum.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 20 Jan 2015, 00:11
There are some things in a professional environment that warrant immediate termination. Showing up drunk or high, stealing, sexually or physically assaulting someone, etc... I don't get why this is so shocking to some people on this forum.

Can someone bring up all the times Faye and Penelope have physically assaulted each other or a customer without proportionate punishment?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: madamlark on 20 Jan 2015, 00:11
Crud, I was never going to do anything but lurk.  Damn it.

(And I just lost everything I typed with a bad click so I'm going to be briefer than I'd initially like.)

Faye seemed to be playing off her drunkenness with a lot of humor and I don't see Dora missing a call for help out of that, especially when Faye is so prone to just making jokes about her alcohol issues.  I didn't see that Dora should necessarily have read that as deeper hurt.  She's not seeing everything we see.  Faye has also been doing a lot of hiding of her true feelings lately, she's clearly decent at seeming functional.

Dora has stated her advice as far as she feels comfortable giving it as regards the situation and admitted that she's not a shrink so doesn't know how more to help.

She also has been quite clear that drinking and/or being drunk on the job is a no.  She stated it to all of the employees when Faye was promoted and again the day prior to Faye directly.  Faye ignored that.  How can she be sure Faye won't just ignore it again in the future?  Multiple warnings are enough, I would say.  I didn't think she'd fire Faye so quickly, if at all, but I'm not terribly surprised and don't think it was wrong.

Others have already stated it, she's a small business owner and she has to think of her livelihood.  If she cannot trust Faye to respect the warnings, especially being a manager, then she can't keep her on staff.  She wasn't cruel and she didn't rip into her, she was about as calm as I think anyone can be upon feeling so betrayed by a good friend.  I'm sure she knows Faye is hurting, but Faye is the one who didn't seek out additional help in the way or therapy.  And Dora hinted she should do so when she said she wasn't a psychologist.

Ok, there's my two cents.  May chime in for more in this arc, but hopefully I will go back to my lurker ways afterwards, too much to do taking care of my kiddos to stalk these forums, heh.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Alphawolf55 on 20 Jan 2015, 00:11
See, that's what I feel is weird. If you state this is poor business decision I'm going to have to vehemently disagree.

You don't have to put Faye through a detox program. You don't have to spend any money. Hell, cutting her salary but keeping the same level of competent employee, since they have that incident hanging over their head, is tantamount to a bargain, with faint undertones of blackmail...

If Faye ever, ever, did this again, I'd be completely agreeing with you. But a lone incident should not a years-long career inherently break.

EDIT:

Let's put this in the context of being caught drink-driving, a situation which very realistically gets people killed.

Here in Australia a drink-driving offense has an immediate 250 dollar fine, $500 dollars maximum if the court finds you off, for a first offense. You also get five demerit points: About the same as going 35 kilometers - about 20 miles - over the speed limit.

You need to lose 12 in a three year period before you lose your license.

A DUI can make you lose your license in one go in theUS
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 00:14
Remember that this is Dora that we're talking about. Going a step too far is in-character for her. That said, I would argue that this is Dora the Friend acting here; a friend who has tried to ask her friend not to drink at work. The response? She carried on drinking and used deception and lies to do so. Dora, the insecure woman is sure to see that as a personal betrayal, making her reaction explicable, if not ideal.

The thing about Faye is that she's never gotten over her dad's suicide. She's had her emotions numbed by prescription meds and later by self-medicating with alcohol. Her ability to deal with emotional stresses of all kinds has atrophied away. She even needed to drink to deal with a guy saying that he loves her, something as diametrically opposed to a negative experience as can be imagined. In a very real sense, she's still standing next to her dad's fresh corpse in catatonic shock.

If this arc is to benefit her in any way, it will be in forcing her to deal with her emotions without a crutch. That will ultimately climax with accepting that Daddy is gone and isn't coming back. I think that she needs to mourn (she was originally committed and probably was too far under to do so before) and try to move on.

For Faye, this is only the start. Her aggressive nature will mean that she casts herself as the wronged party and she will alienate her friends trying to get what she wants: passive acceptance of how she currently wants to be. The reason behind my suicide post is because I believe that she will really push herself to the point that she honestly believe she has nothing left. The only way forward for her, IMHO, is to survive her own end-of-the-road crisis and realise that she wants to live badly enough to seek help to change and heal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 00:16
I think HannahRose has is basically right  when she says Faye is a terrible person (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30386.msg1294856.html#msg1294856). But then most people are terrible people, and there's a little something wrong with just about every character's relationship decisions up to now, except Dale and Marigold, really. And with them it's not making good choices, it's the fact that explicitly don't know any better. There's no such thing as good choices in a first relationship.

But Faye really has ridden a remarkable wave of tolerance. And it seems less than likely that the wave is over, unless Jeph means to put Dora on a bus.

Which he might. It's toot early to tell what's actually happening here.

I'm amused, as I said before, by the emotion mostly because it all about treating the characters as real people. I use that tactic all the time, myself. It's the first stage of analysis. But it's not the last.

Speaking as a writer, for every action a character should face and equal an opposite punishment. There are so many ways main characters can make the right choice right now and have it blow up spectacularly, that it's not even funny. And the best part is, it doesn't matter how you define "right."

There's literally nothing Dora could do here that couldn't go horribly wrong, because there's nothing anyone can do in any situation that couldn't go horribly wrong. Even doing nothing can have negative consequences.

In the real world, a writer can't actually make every choice a character makes backfire, especially in an open ended story. Right now, it's too early to say whether Dora's choice here is actually critical to Dora's story. If it's not, then this is just a case of Faye's choice backfiring on her. Dora's just the messenger.

The fact is, Dora's best choice--and know this from watching a lot of alcoholics--is to fire Faye. No amount of support will make a change if Faye really is an alcoholic at this point and if she isn't the shock ought to open her eyes. But "best" and "right" are not always the same thing. Sometimes the only way to see which is which is to make a choice and see what happens.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 20 Jan 2015, 00:21
*Snip*

Alright, all of this.

I'm going to say: No further comment until I see tomorrow's strip. Dora's explanation and Faye's reaction.

Then I'll be comfortable making a further arse of myself.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Doc on 20 Jan 2015, 00:26
Next: pregnancy!
And fire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 20 Jan 2015, 00:27
Beyond the Dora stuff, I'm actually intrigued as to how this will affect Claire and Marten. I'll admit to being dense as hell in some cases, so I was unaware that Claire was crushing on Marten until the bar night out. However, Claire was given the "rundown" of Marten and Faye's situation via Pintsize. I have no idea if she had any romantic feelings toward Marten at that time.

She does now, however, and she is known to be a bit of a stickler for protocol in the workplace and a bit of pedant. I really wonder what would happen if Marten takes Faye's part in this. I could see Claire seriously side-eyeing a person who would try to excuse and justify someone coming into work drunk and putting others at risk. It might cause her to think over what Pintsize told her and start questioning whether Marten is fully committed to dating her or if he still harbors feelings for Faye subconsciously hoping things might work out someday, and hey, Faye is single now ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Akima on 20 Jan 2015, 00:29
Well, things just got real. As a boss, I think Dora did the right thing. It also illustrates that being boss is difficult to combine with being friends. And to anyone thinking that Dora should have cut Faye slack because she's a friend, I'd point out that the obligations of friendship cut both ways. It is not honouring friendship to turn up to work drunk at a business owned by your friend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Japheree on 20 Jan 2015, 00:36
As far as it is worth anything, I both feel desperately sorry for Faye and fo the opinion that Dora did the right thing.

I feel sorry for Faye because I can empathize with her. I know what it is like to self medicate to the extent that it starts to negatively impact on your life. I also feel like perhaps losing her job is going to make her realize that booze is not compatible with any sort of happy life for her. I managed to make those two things work together for a long time because I was able as a graduate student, to garner a nice habit while being clever enough to complete my work on the days I felt okay.

Hopefully, like me, when it became clear I couldn't carry on doing this and have the financial security, professional and home life, she will take steps to stop. It has taken me a long time and it is a big struggle but I am getting there.

The good news for Faye is that if she manages to get herself clean in the next few months (and I hope to god she does) she can actually start working on the feelings deep inside and work out how to live her life instead of deferring the pain of change indefinitely by soaking it is whisky.

Faye is desperately depressed and up to now her drinking has been a clear case of self medicating. For those reasons I can't help but feel anything other than sorry for her.

Dora did the right thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: thedevilissix on 20 Jan 2015, 00:40
And I'm back from the relurk :evil:  :mrgreen:

I have to say I'm in with the crowd in favour of the firing, as bad as it must seem for Faye. In every single place of work I've worked for, turning up to work drunk is classed as gross misconduct. The employer's response to that is either bring the employee concerned in front of a disciplinary panel whereby dismissal is the likely outcome (big businesses) or respond in much the same way Dora did (small businesses). It's called gross misconduct less because of "waah, look at this revolutionary, she turned up drunk, burn her" and more because of the practical possible consequences that might arise from Dora allowing Faye to continue working that day considering the state she was in, which have all already been mentioned here.
Indeed let's see what happens tomorrow, but whether it's temporary or not, if it gives Faye the wake-up call needed and diffuses a work clusterfuck that was waiting to happen, then I'm in favour.
As for Faye and whether or not Dora will be supportive still as a friend-I don't think Dora's will to do that is gone necessarily but it will certainly be extremely awkward. I'm worried for Faye and for what might happen. However as I've found to be the case, if a person is in dire straits, oftentimes they have more positive influence over the situation than they might assume.
And Faye does-she has access to a therapist who knows her situation well, friends who care about her, lack of alcoholic enablers (at the moment) who could make matters worse for her.
She has so much at her disposal to try and steer this around, and I really hope she does.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: thedevilissix on 20 Jan 2015, 00:46
Well, things just got real. As a boss, I think Dora did the right thing. It also illustrates that being boss is difficult to combine with being friends. And to anyone thinking that Dora should have cut Faye slack because she's a friend, I'd point out that the obligations of friendship cut both ways. It is not honouring friendship to turn up to work drunk at a business owned by your friend.

Yup. Very much this. Honouring a friendship and a work relationship cuts both ways.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: gopher on 20 Jan 2015, 01:00
Got to feel sorry for Dora. Her bext friend is an alcoholic and her girlfriend is a hardcore pothead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 20 Jan 2015, 01:01
Dora did not make a mistake (necessarily) by firing Faye. Her mistake was not doing anything before firing Faye. It is not Dora's responsibility to take care of Faye, but if they really are friends then she should have at least tried something during Faye's spiral towards oblivion before it got to this point.

Dora and Faye spend a huge amount of time together (You know, the entire day, most days of the week,) Dora has no excuse for being unaware what Faye was going through. And yet, in today's comic, all Dora shows is anger.


Faye is certainly not in the right here, but I can empathize with her position. After seeing her dad commit suicide, she has major issues with abandonment. She's always struggled with alcoholism, to one extent or another using it as a painkiller when she was feeling emotional. Angus was the first solid relationship that she felt good about and had no regrets with, and he just decided to leave her because something else was more important to him. (I'll not get into whether Angus was justified here. Different argument.) Faye is crushed, and this rips open old wounds that she hasn't had to deal with in a long time. She dropped her snarky, sarcastic defenses entirely for one person, and he is now gone. Faye is in a very bad place, and one of her two remaining best friends, Marten is: One, currently dealing with his own personal life in a happy way, which Faye doesn't want to screw up by bringing in her problems. Two, someone related to her past trauma of being abandoned. (All that boyfriend drama, remember?) Both of these make him a poor candidate for helping her.

Now let's talk about Dora. Other than business troubles (Which don't seem that major seeing as the same troubles have been around since the dawn of the comic,) she doesn't really have any major conflicts going on right now, and no new relationships to be screwed up. She's Faye's oldest friend, they spend all day together, and they've both been there for each other many times in the past.

It is impossible that Dora did not know how terribly wrong things were for Faye, at least to the degree that she should have known Faye needed an intervention or a shoulder to cry into without booze being involved. When Faye says she doesn't want to spend a waking moment sober, Dora does nothing. When Faye comes in reeking of booze, suddenly chipper, and hangover free, Dora doesn't realize something is obviously wrong. She has to walk in on Faye in the act to finally react in any major way, and all we get is anger.

Based on this, Dora is either blind and stupid, or has absolutely no sympathy for her friend's suffering.

If we had seen Dora try to deal with the issue and Faye lie and say things are fine and she'd slow down the drinking, or if Dira had called Marten and Hannelore and maybe a few other people with her concerns I'd be more okay with today's strip. If Dora had only suspended Faye indefinitely, I'd be okay with today's strip. If Dora had shown any emotion on her face besides anger (Hurt, sympathy, disappointment, indecision,) for even one panel, I'd be okay with today's strip.

As it stands, though, I'd never guess that Dora was friends with Faye based off of this story arc.


I'm not saying that Dora should be enabling Faye, or letting this slide, I'm only saying that she's acting like she doesn't care about Faye as anything more than an acquaintance in spite of their years of friendship, and Faye's actions, while not justified, are at least understandable once you consider how fragile and injured she is.

Dora was justified as a boss in firing Faye, but a horrible friend in not doing anything else.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: GarandMarine on 20 Jan 2015, 01:04
Whelp. Called it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 20 Jan 2015, 01:05
It is not honouring friendship to turn up to work drunk at a business owned by your friend.
Dora did not make a mistake (necessarily) by firing Faye. Her mistake was not doing anything before firing Faye. It is not Dora's responsibility to take care of Faye, but if they really are friends then she should have at least tried something during Faye's spiral towards oblivion before it got to this point.
I reiterate the fact that, for years, all of Faye's friends have helped. And helped. And helped.

The sum total of all of this help has been... ?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 20 Jan 2015, 01:12
It is not honouring friendship to turn up to work drunk at a business owned by your friend.
Dora did not make a mistake (necessarily) by firing Faye. Her mistake was not doing anything before firing Faye. It is not Dora's responsibility to take care of Faye, but if they really are friends then she should have at least tried something during Faye's spiral towards oblivion before it got to this point.
I reiterate the fact that, for years, all of Faye's friends have helped. And helped. And helped.

The sum total of all of this help has been... ?

Faye generally improving, becoming more friendly, happier, capable... Up until this relapse, Faye's outlook has generally been improving. And Faye has helped others when she could. The Vespavenger comes to mind, standing up for Marten when his ex came around, many other things which I don't have the time or memory to recount. It has not been an entirely one-way relationship.

Also: Ditching your friends because they're too needy when they most desperately need your help is a shitty thing to do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 01:12
Dora was justified as a boss in firing Faye, but a horrible friend in not doing anything else.

No she wasn't. There's no friendly way to do that. You really don't understand until you have to drop your best friend in the world like a bad habit because they are self destructive drinkers who will happily take everyone else down with them. You look back on all the damage you've suffered--real and emotional--doing "something else" to honor the friendship and realize it was all pointless.

What Faye did, no matter the reason, really is friendship ending level stuff. Dora would only be wrong here if she dragged it out. "Go home. You're fired." is the second kindest thing she could have done.

The kindest being: "You're fired. Go home."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: madamlark on 20 Jan 2015, 01:18
It's been....3 days since the breakup?  I don't see that Dora had a LOT of time to intervene, and since Faye was trying to play off the alcohol problem, I feel she should be cut some slack.  She's also dealing with the hurt of cutting her brother, her blood relative, out of her life.  I think she should be forgiven a little lack of observation.

She's hurting too.  She's loosing her brother and now must feel more than a little betrayed that her best friend would do something like this on the job after being warned, more than once that drinking and being drunk on the job is one of her major lines.

She may have every intention of doing the friend Dora part later on.  Right now boss Dora has every right to be pissed.  At least that's my opinion.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 20 Jan 2015, 01:23
ReindeerFlotilla, to be clear, I meant before the firing. I don't really know how I could have been *more* clear on this point, but I meant she was a horrible friend for doing nothing to comfort her friend after her life was crushed, until it got to the point where Faye was drunk at work on purpose.

Plus, Dora didn't even look upset or sad, just angry. That's the kicker for me.

Madamlark: I'm not asking for a lot, just something (Anything!) to try and comfort, assist, or be a friend to Faye. Three days is enough time to make a phonecall or sit Faye down and have a conversation. She may be hurting, but she hasn't shown it. And at this point, I'm not going to count it if she realizes later and feels like crap about it: She's done that every time she makes a mistake.

'Lack of observation' is also not an excuse when your best friend who you work with 8 hours a day says explicitly that they want to drink themselves into oblivion.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: madamlark on 20 Jan 2015, 01:34
You keep coming back to that specific part, but part of my disagreement with your take is that I don't read Faye saying that the same way.  To me she comes across joking, and she jokes about alcohol all of the time!  Does she have a bit of truth to it, yeah, but it doesn't come across as completely obvious, to me.  And let's face it, Faye has smelled like a brewery before.  The part where she doesn't have a hangover...well I don't drink enough to know if that's a big tell, lots of my friends can drink lots and not have hangovers so long as they get enough water and pain killers.  When Dora has been very very clear about her feelings on drinking at work, I don't blame the angry face.  I'm sure she is feeling conflicted, but I completely get how anger would win out in her expression.  You're entitled to your way of seeing it, but I can't see this situation in the same light as you do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: explicit on 20 Jan 2015, 01:42
Here's something, it's not up to Dora to get help for Faye, it's up to Faye to ask for it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 20 Jan 2015, 01:46
I doubt Faye would blink at one joke or one missing hangover, but there's just SO MUCH evidence that you have to ignore to assume everything is okay.
Faye doesn't just make an offhand remark, she first asks permission to get wasted at work, insists that it's because she wants to tie one one, and then DORA first mentions that Faye wants to be drunk all the time. (Faye confirms this with more sarcasm.) Then Faye 'jokes' that she wants it so she won't have to feel anything.

The next day, after being obviously depressed, she comes in reeking of booze and yet happy and not hungover. She then says it's not luck or a happenstance, but that she took 'Medicine' for it.

That's a of jokes about alcohol in a 24 hour period, for a known alcoholic, who's clearly depressed and just suffered some major emotional trauma.

It's too much to look over for me. Again, they are best friends. They should know each other well enough to see when something is this plainly wrong.


Explicit: If someone is drowning at the bottom of a lake do they have to yell for help before someone will save them? If the lifeguard comes and is fought away that's one thing, but sometimes it's not si easy to ask for help.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Masterpiece on 20 Jan 2015, 01:47
She may be hurting, but she hasn't shown it.

And how is Dora supposed to know that? You can't help people if they obviously don't want to be helped (and don't show others they need the help!!).

That is, besides showing them that their actions have serious repercussions. And that's what Dora did.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 01:47
I can more-or-less see how things are going to go and it isn't going to be nice. Faye is, despite her innumerable issues, a very strong-willed person with a strong handle on what she wants and the will to pursue it (alcoholics tend to be).

After an initial period of horrified shock, Faye is going to go on an immediate counter-offensive based on the fact she considers herself the wronged party. She's going to tell lies to Marten to make Dora seem the unreasonable one. Martin will confront Dora ('confront' in Marten terms; in other words, talk to her from a neutral perspective) and get the other side of the story. I'd say that will be 'tomorrow' in comic terms. Marten is going to think about it (Marten, remember?) and decide that Faye has a problem. He's going to clear all the alcohol out of the house, over Pintsize's objections.

Faye will have an argument with Marten over this which will devolve into a painful bit of bargaining with Faye digging deeper and deeper in an attempt to get her own way, using guilt and even attempting seduction (which is more embarrassing than anything else - she isn't good at it). I would like to see a 'now I know what it's like to kiss my brother' moment here. Eventually, Faye will seem to compromise and agree with Marten's new house rule. She'll just get drunk at bars... and smuggle booze in whilst Marten is out. Marten will find out when he catches Pintsize stealing from her stash.

In the meantime, Faye would be busily blowing up every bridge she has ever had and reacting as if it is the other party's fault.

Finally, the next shoe drops. The lease has come up for payment and Faye has drunk herself into penury. Marten has enough money to cover both sides for one month but, if Faye can't get a job, he's going to have to ask her to move out so that he can find someone who can pay. The lease's terms explicitly give him this right (indeed demands that he do so). Faye has been holding out for weeks, sure that Dora would eventually 'come crawling back to her'. In desperation, she does the crawling; Dora tells Faye straight-up that she needs to dry out before she'd think of re-hiring her; there is another argument that devolves into Faye being insultingly defensive (blaming Dora for the crisis and outright saying that she is trying to get Faye thrown out of the apartment as revenge for the failure of her relationship with Marten). This is the most recent of the bridges Faye does her level best to destroy.

In the meantime, Claire has been stewing over how embarrassing her mother is whenever Marten comes around. She talks to her and her mother suggests that she find her own space. She isn't being thrown out but at 24-25 Mrs A really thinks that her daughter is ready to spread her wings and fly off to a nest of her own. She talks to Marten about it and, after some number-crunching over Claire's tuition fund and the allowance Smif is paying her for her work at the library, they realise that Claire can more than cover the other half of Marten's lease. If Faye turns herself around, she knows of a certain someone (Momo, Marigold having moved in with Dale) who is looking for a new roomie.

So we reach the 'bottles on the bench' moment. Marten has given Faye an ultimatum and she is well aware that Claire has been all-but measuring up the apartment's curtains. She's had a horrible argument with Marten and Claire about it and it's pretty clear that she lost. She's lost her job, in her eyes, her friends have 'abandoned' her and she's about to lose her home.

She has nothing and no-one left. She doesn't even have hope. It's at that point that a passer-by makes a comment about a 'disgusting drunk'. Faye looks at her reflection and sees one looking back at her. Like thousands before her, at this darkest, lowest moment, she turns her face to the metaphorical wall, puts the gun to her head and, as Lord Havelock Vetinari put it...

Her angel appears.

Of all the things in this world he ever expected to be, Marten Reed never expected to be a guardian angel.

That is the thought process that was going through my mind when I wrote my now-infamous 'suicide post'; I compressed it into a week but it is really how I see this arc going.

FWIW, I can see the next strip after the suicide attempt being Marten calling Tai and saying he might not be in that day as Faye was sick. In the background, we can see a crying Faye being talked to by the Doc with a nurse standing by with a tray full of a real pharacopea of meds. I expect Faye to go into residential care for a while (the group therapy scene) and, when she is released, to be a very different person, both negatively (more quiet and reserved) and positive (more determined to seize life in both hands and live it rather than hide away in a comfortable little self-exile). I can see a lovely strip in my head of a very nervous Faye leaving the clinic and being engulfed in her friends' arms.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 20 Jan 2015, 02:15
Reading these last few strips, I get the feeling that Faye's father's reason for killing himself was deeply connected to alcoholism. I think about the fact that he snuck bourbon into his milkshakes without telling his wife, who did not allow to drink, and that his sudden suicide came as a complete shock to his daughters. Maybe he was in deep alcoholic trouble, but was able to hide it very well, and ended his life when he couldn't take it anymore. That would fit quite well with how Faye is acting presently - and the predilection for substance abuse is often hereditary. Does this look right to you guys?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 20 Jan 2015, 02:35
I gave up on the WCDT a while ago but I just want to say that this particular development makes me very sad and in need of hugs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 20 Jan 2015, 02:36
*Snip*!

(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6pb52KgGk1rwm7mjo1_400.gif)

That's... that's brilliant. And it makes so much sense, too. All the pieces fit together so neatly...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 20 Jan 2015, 02:54
I sort of hope that if Sven is brought into this, he will harken back  to that time he made a good point (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=984). That strip also establishes that Faye is aware her drinking is an issue and has made a deliberate choice to not tell Dr. Corinne because her psychiatrist might actually make her do something about it.

Yet, it's Dora who fucked up here. Mmm hmm. Okay.

ETA: Okay, I read ahead and stand corrected. She did talk to Dr. Corrinne who asked her to stop drinking and try exercise and Omega 3s. I'd like to know what happened to that program and if Faye does revisit this with Dr. C. if she will now suggest the antidepressants.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 03:17
Come to think of it, a violent drunk around a broadsword and a Battle Spatula is a "recipe for unpleasantness", the kind of unpleasantness that can run to five figures in no time.
Five figures? More like seven or eight. If CoD is a sole proprietorship, rather than an LLC or similar, Dora will be paying for that the rest of her life, and only get enough money to barely survive in extreme poverty (unless she starts working for someone under the table).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 20 Jan 2015, 03:22
This is the way it had to be. When someone messes up normally, a proportionate response is sound. When someone messes up because they were chasing a substance or a state of mind, you can't half-ass your response. It just doesn't work. This firing will probably stick, too. I don't see Dora being too trusting of Faye afterward, even should she clean up. This moment will remain in the back of her mind. The pain of having to do this to a friend, too. I think Dora's never going to hire a friend again.

Reading these last few strips, I get the feeling that Faye's father's reason for killing himself was deeply connected to alcoholism. I think about the fact that he snuck bourbon into his milkshakes without telling his wife, who did not allow to drink, and that his sudden suicide came as a complete shock to his daughters. Maybe he was in deep alcoholic trouble, but was able to hide it very well, and ended his life when he couldn't take it anymore. That would fit quite well with how Faye is acting presently - and the predilection for substance abuse is often hereditary. Does this look right to you guys?
Makes a lot of sense to me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 20 Jan 2015, 03:24
Without pointing at any previous posts I'd like to make a couple of points.

1 - References to things earlier in the comic, like the weapons, are irrelevant - as the comic changes through the years, and in any case has always alternated between the crazy gags and the serious.  Using a gag as an argument in the serious part just doesn't work out.

2 - Saying this is the first time for anything is a bit too literal-minded.  Faye's had problems throughout the comic and has worked on them and had backslidings as well.  This doesn't come entirely out of the blue.

3 - Dora's response is in character - the instant over-the-top reaction that she showed Marten on several occasions.  If it's really seen to be OTT, the opportunity to retract when (if) circumstances justify that is always available.

4 - It's been mentioned by someone, but not picked up, that Faye could now see herself free to follow Angus, if he is willing to take her back.  As the immediate cause of her resumption of drinking is the separation, that would give her the opportunity to get back in control without the same level of temptation.  Whether such a decision would lead to her being on the bus permanently would be up to Jeph, of course; but it would give more space for Marten's relationship with Claire to develop, and help stem the perpetual increase in the number of characters that slows the story down more and more.

5 -
Global Moderator Comment The discussion, though busy, has not quite got over-heated. Thank you all for that. But please remember that there will always be disagreement, and control the urge to try to answer every point and win every argument. Once you've said your thing, it's there and available for anyone to read and consider; there's no need to reiterate it unless presenting a new argument or distinctly different angle on it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 20 Jan 2015, 03:27
You know... other webcomic artists have killed off major characters.

It could happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 03:36
I have a problem. It keeps me from getting laid, which is a different issue entirely, but still the problem itself is totally germane.

See, I'm really really bad at subtext when it is directed at me. Like, if you get all emo and passive-aggressively cry for help in Bob's direction, I'll probably notice, but if you do it in mine it's going to zip right by.

This is my problem. I don't hold it against someone that I didn't get their message. On the other hand, it's not my fault either. Because when they decided to send a subtext, instead of being upfront, they made a choice that the potential for me not to get the message was worth some other thing. Maybe not consciously, but it's just not my damned job to keep up with the motives of every other person on Earth so I can decode the secret messages.

You cannot define caring as infinite capacity for sacrifice. Because you can always sit in the armchair and determine that a person SHOULD HAVE seen the clues at point X. But Then that guy over there can point out how it should have been obvious before point X.

The fact is that Dora didn't know how bad things were because FAYE has actively dodged discussing it with anyone, preferring to hide in a bottle. Given the fact that Faye has a reputation (well earned) for violence and being prickly, it is not--in fact--unreasonable for her friends to wait for her to open up. For all Faye's talk of being an experienced person, Angus represents the very first time Faye's friends Marten and Dora have seen her go through a breakup. They are unaware of the extent of Faye's internal hurt because Faye is keeping it from them, and it is not actually their job to read the subtext.

Caring often has the secondary effect of catching the subtexts when you otherwise would not, but that's a bonus. It's not a feature and it's not an obligation. No one can live up to that. So, no. Dora was not obligated to notice what Faye wasn't telling her for the handful of days that have passed since Faye broke up with Angus.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 20 Jan 2015, 03:45
Well put, RF!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 20 Jan 2015, 04:00
Quote from: MrNumbers
... I want to see this strip now.

Oh my, the possibilities. SWAT team standoff, Bianchi parents trying to calm her down with baked goods, Pintsize contributing to the crisis ...

Seriously. I'm starting to realize just how dangerous my own on-the-job shenanigans might actually have been back in the day.

Daaaaaaaang.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 20 Jan 2015, 04:05
There is a bit of humor in the fact that Dora is dating the person who regularly goes in to work tripping balls.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SJCrew on 20 Jan 2015, 04:08
Quote
And at this point, I'm not going to count it if she realizes later and feels like crap about it: She's done that every time she makes a mistake.
Because she's human. Or a well-written fictional portrayal of one, anyhow. It's part of the game.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 04:10
There is a bit of humor in the fact that Dora is dating the person who regularly went in to work tripping balls.

Dora isn't Tai's boss so it isn't something she necessarily has an opinion about (although I do wonder sometimes if Tai may have already decided to cut back after the faux pas of forgetting to tell Marten she's already graduated).

That said, it might be an interesting arc (in the fullness of time) for Dora and Tai to have a cold few weeks after an argument about Tai's drug habit, possibly exacerbated by Tai missing her swinging life-style and having sudden cold feet about commitment. This would almost certainly devolve into yet another personal crisis between his friends that Marten has to referee/mediate. FWIW, that's one of the starting points for the potential Taira Marriage Arc.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 20 Jan 2015, 04:16
Actually, I could see more the argument happening because Tai doesn't agree with her firing Faye because to her showing up with your brain messed up isn't a big deal.

Also, I do think its funny that people treat what Tai did as much less offensive, just because its "party" drugs. Faye was drunk, but still obviously coherent enough that Dora didn't notice until she actually saw her with the bottle. Tai was literally seeing the employees she was supposed to manage as firebreathing dragons.

EDIT: Just to clarify, I'm not against what Dora did (though I think she should have sent her home then talked it through the next day, then fired her if that was what was necessary), I just think that its an interesting comparison. I'm not sure I would want to date someone who wasn't at least ethically on the same level as I would hold an employee. (Not saying only someone I would hire would be dateable, because they might not have the right skillset or temperament, but I wouldn't want to date someone who would break the ethics style rules of my company)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: techkid on 20 Jan 2015, 04:22
In situations like this, it is hard to say what the correct course of action is. Faye is clearly in the wrong, but did Dora really handle it the right way? Or, to put it another way: How would I react and respond if I were in Dora's position?

My answer? I don't know. My own life has been a series of slippery slopes with only a couple of reliable tracks found thus far (I haven't hit bottom before, but sometimes one's own psychology can make it feel like you're there). I have never been in Dora's shoes, where I've had to make such a decision.

However, was an on the spot firing really justified? I don't think so. Immediate unpaid leave, with strict conditions that Faye gets help to clean herself up in two weeks or then she's out on her ass? That is a fair call, and is strict without being harsh. You've laid down your terms and conditions, and they have to act, knowing there will be repercussions if they don't.

The current decision, given that it is probably mid-morning, could lead anywhere (and BenRG has laid out a few scenarios that get very dark very fast). Will Faye seek comfort in the bottom of a bottle (which, given she lost her boyfriend, her job and possibly also her best friend in the space of a week, is highly likely)? Will Faye decide that Northampton doesn't have a place for her in it anymore, and follow Angus to NYC (Maybe. Angus didn't really want to split, but Faye made the call and he bitterly accepted that decision)? Or will Faye decide that the world has no place for her in it anymore, and attempt or commit suicide? QC is a pretty good reflection of real life, but it would be absolutely fucking heartbreaking to anyone, who has invested so much of their own life, whether it be the characters in the QCverse, or even us as readers and members of this online community, to accept or even really grasp such an act of desperation. Especially so for the people who unfortunately have been there, and more so for those who have to deal with the repercussions of those decisions.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 20 Jan 2015, 04:23
Also, I think the comic has been pretty clear. Dora ISN'T Faye's best friend. Marten is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 20 Jan 2015, 04:33
Come to think of it, we have seen Dora Boss quite a lot recently, but Dora Friend not so much. Does that mean that Dora has distanced herself from their friendship lately? When was the last time Dora appeared in a social setting with Faye? After Dora moved to Amherst, and started her relationship with Tai, I guess she in practice (if not by design) has removed herself from Faye's "inner circle" (currently, Marten, Hannelore, and Pintsize).

Dora Boss is a tough nut. Although she tolerates quite a lot from her employees, there is a limit; in particular if it has negative impact on her business. Therefore, I shall not judge Dora too harshly yet (but if Dora Friend does not appear after work, I shall be pissed at her). Dora Friend cannot let Faye destroy herself without at least trying to help.

I guess the best option for Dora Friend is to alert Marten and Hanners about the situation. They are probably the only ones that can really help Faye through this. There will definitely be snags (Sven comes to my mind), but long term recovery is still possible.

S/S Claireten might suffer through this. Marten can try to explain the situation to Claire, but it might feed Claire's insecurities and lead to a breakup. Still, I guess Marten will do everything he can to try to help Faye.

Warning - while you were typing 12 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Busy day, indeed...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: phyllis on 20 Jan 2015, 04:35
Hello everyone. Long time lurker, first time poster. The reason that this week has dragged me out of lurkerdom is to make this point--people have brought up that Faye told Dora she wanted to be drunk whenever she was awake. That strip reminded me of a thing in one of my friendships, where one of my friends has a history of trying to kill herself, but also often makes jokes about wanting to kill herself, both when she is and isn't suicidal. Although I *hate* that she does that, because it makes it almost impossible for me to know whether she's serious or joking, she does it as a distancing technique. I think Faye was doing the same thing, and Dora had the same problem that I've just mentioned--having no idea whether Faye was being serious, because she is so used to Faye joking about being wasted that she can't actually assess what frame of mind she's in.

I also wanted to point out that Dora has been concerned about Faye's drinking for a REALLY long time, even in-strip:
 http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=981

She has previously released her from work to go to therapy, specifically to allow her to discuss her drinking:
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=989

She encouraged her to attend the gym when that was the therapist's recommended alternative outlet:
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=991

She even went with her (although more due to competitiveness than supportiveness):
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=999

I definitely feel for Faye, but this is not the first time that her drinking has caused her problems in her personal life, and her friends have tried to help her more gently before--including Dora, who actually called Marten out for not addressing it properly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Scarblac on 20 Jan 2015, 04:43
You've laid down your terms and conditions, and they have to act, knowing there will be repercussions if they don't.
They already had a discussion about alcohol at work the day before, and Dora made it clear that that was not an option. So that point was already past.

Anyway, in the real world drinking on the job is immediate dismissal too. Dora didn't really have a choice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 04:50
S/S Claireten might suffer through this. Marten can try to explain the situation to Claire, but it might feed Claire's insecurities and lead to a breakup. Still, I guess Marten will do everything he can to try to help Faye.

Which makes me think of a couple of other possibilities.

Maybe Marten decides to not focus on Faye, after his breakup with Dora in an extremely similar (although much smaller magnitude) scenario. Maybe that's even the best thing for Faye, if it helps her hit rock bottom more safely.

Maybe Marten decides to involve Claire in helping Faye, specifically to alleviate her anxieties. And, Claire might even like that idea - even though she and Faye hadn't gotten along in the past, they were getting on better terms, and Faye gave her the push to realize what her feelings actually were towards Marten - she may even feel that she owes Faye. This may not be the best thing for Faye, mind you.

Now, I wonder if Clairedad had any other vices other than cheating, too... for some reason, I think Claire's going to be important in this arc, and I suspect there's a twist regarding her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 04:59
@bhtooefr,

Actually, I can see Claire being defensive of Marten and getting into an argument with Faye about how her behaviour is hurting him. This would come as a cold slap in the face for Faye who, like many in her situation, isn't likely to consider the affects of her behaviour on others until it is literally rubbed in her face.

It's even money if this would make her turn around or if it would be another personal fault in the increasingly long list that makes her question the value of her continued existence.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 20 Jan 2015, 04:59
Dora caring about Faye and wanting to help her, and Dora taking harsh but not inappropriate action as her employer are not mutually exclusive, either. I would suggest that she does indeed care about Faye and doesn't want to add to her troubles or see her come to harm, but at the same time, her trust has been betrayed (personally and professionally) and her hand has been forced. It's strongly suggested that drinking/being drunk on the job is a zero tolerance issue; friend or not, if that's the case, then it's hardly an overreaction. Of course, this being Dora, it's always going to look like one. If nothing else, she could've chosen less terse wording, but it is a big deal, and she's obviously (and rightfully) angry about the situation, so it's understandable.

It's not that Faye's situation doesn't warrant sympathy - in-universe and out - but she also messed up, big time. Firing her isn't exactly a nice thing to do, and short term it isn't helpful (in the long run, as a means of not enabling her, and providing her with a wakeup call...well, perhaps it will be), but by the apparent terms of her employment, it's justified.

And, as others have pointed out, on top of the possible risks and severe consequences Dora would face for allowing an employee to work while impaired, it's also potentially affecting the employment and income of the rest of the CoD staff. Furthermore, a slap on the wrist sends a bad message to the rest of the staff, and they would be quite within their rights to be upset if the assistant manager - who they're not that thrilled about being in charge in the first place - was allowed to benefit from a double standard like that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 20 Jan 2015, 05:25

4 - It's been mentioned by someone, but not picked up, that Faye could now see herself free to follow Angus, if he is willing to take her back.  As the immediate cause of her resumption of drinking is the separation, that would give her the opportunity to get back in control without the same level of temptation.  Whether such a decision would lead to her being on the bus permanently would be up to Jeph, of course; but it would give more space for Marten's relationship with Claire to develop, and help stem the perpetual increase in the number of characters that slows the story down more and more.


I know that I made point on Number 4 here (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30376.msg1293975.html#msg1293975) in last week's thread. However, long ago when I suggested that Dora's Svenectomy decision certainly must have been precipitated by some off-screen unacceptable behaviour, I was more or less told that Jeph doesn't "do" off-screen, and what you see is what you get in QC. If this is true, then Angus has washed his hands of Faye. Without the allowance that he tried to reach out to her off-screen, we are left to assume he has shaken her off and is preparing for her new life, and may not want Faye to follow him.

That doesn't preclude her doing some Felicity-type thing and finding success as an artist and the love of her life in New York, but at the moment, it seems as if Angus is over the relationship and her. I'll admit when I wrote that, I did so thinking it was the least of the possibilities and that Faye would not have to face the consequences of her actions quite so soon.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 20 Jan 2015, 05:28
Dora could be as much firing Faye for her own good as anything else. I'm sure that once she's sorted herself out she'll be welcomed back with open arms.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 20 Jan 2015, 05:30
@phyllis: Excellent first post. Welcome!

Yes, Faye's alcohol consumption has been a running gag throughout the series, but also with a very serious undertone. Her friends have been concerned for a long time. Personally, I do not have any close friends struggling with alcoholism, but I can certainly understand and appreciate Jeph's handling of the subject. The bottom line is that there are no easy ways out, it is a slippery slope leading to self-destruction. If Faye manages to escape from this in a believable manner (and with a little humor), it will be masterful storytelling indeed.

Other speculations:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 05:34
Regarding Hannelore, if Faye wants to listen, she might be the Voice of Experience.

Hanners has been slowly working herself off of the small zoo of psychiatric medications that she initially needed even to be able to function. Although she still has plenty of quirks and probably will never be free of them all, she has made considerable progress mostly by personal force of will. If anyone can preach to Faye of working your way off of chemical dependence (in a way that is both unintentionally funny but also without cruelty) it is her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 20 Jan 2015, 06:03
...This is going to be one of those record-breaking threads, isn't it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 20 Jan 2015, 06:15
Also, I do think its funny that people treat what Tai did as much less offensive, just because its "party" drugs. Faye was drunk, but still obviously coherent enough that Dora didn't notice until she actually saw her with the bottle. Tai was literally seeing the employees she was supposed to manage as firebreathing dragons.

Tai is also regularly stoned at work.  We've seen her taking hits outside while talking to Marten.  Which no one has thought of as being a big deal, either in comic or in the thread. 

I have no doubt that when Dora tries to talk about it with Tai, she'll think it was a huge over-reaction to fire Faye.  Tai has been established as being pretty carefree/irresponsible (but smart enough to fake competence anyway). 

Come to think about it, Marten was even drinking on the job once.  Mind you, it was because his supervisor gave him a drink, but still. 

More generally to the current debate, while Dora might be doing the right thing, (both as an employer and as a friend) I see nothing of friendship in her eyes.  No exasperation and line-drawing.  Just being pissed.  So I don't think she's acting out of the goodness of her heart here, although she might later rationalize it as such. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 20 Jan 2015, 06:39
A difference between Tai being stoned and Faye being drunk is that Tai is the boss and has basically free reign at the library, where Faye was told directly the day before that being drunk at work is not acceptable. Tai doesn't go around hiding being impaired the way Faye has been either. I'm not saying Tai is any better for this. No matter what, being drunk or high at work is very irresponsible. The issue is that Faye broke the rules, and one of the big ones.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 06:55
That makes me think of yet another way this could go.

Marten and Tai simultaneously siding against Claire and Dora on how to handle this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 20 Jan 2015, 06:56
My personal take on this is that Faye put Dora in a position where all Dora's options were bad ones.

And let me emphasize: Faye put Dora in that position. It's not like Dora was looking for an excuse to fire Faye. This is a direct result of Faye's actions. Dora had to respond, and she had no good options, so criticizing her for not finding one is absurd. Dora did what she had to do. She's probably no happier about it than any of us are.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 20 Jan 2015, 07:07
THREE PAGES since midnight? 

I think I'm going to hunker down 'till next week. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 20 Jan 2015, 07:18
Faye has done what Faye does:  duck relationships and drink to dull the pain.

Dora has done what Dora does: angry knee-jerk reaction.

It remains to be seen if Marten will do what Marten does (support Faye unconditionally).

Tai and Claire are unknown quantities in this sort of issue, but if they don't end up being involved, I'll be disappointed.

Good stuff, storytelling-wise.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 20 Jan 2015, 07:22
Why didn't Faye just take the bottle into the bathroom? I mean, the stockroom, where anyone could wander in and catch you mid-tipple? Amateur hour.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 Jan 2015, 07:26
This may be extremely evil, but possibility for tomorrow's comic:

Faye and Dora silently leave the storage room as Penny arrives for work. Faye heads for the door, looking sad. Dora says to Penny, "You're the new assistant manager." Penny puts two and two together and realizes Faye's been fired. She cheers in celebration. Faye, still within range of hearing, is horrified.  :psyduck:

After all, it isn't the first time Penny's said something inappropriate around Faye (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1343).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 07:27
I'm also amazed that people aren't jumping on Marten for "ignoring Fayes desperate cries for help". He lives with her, he's seen how drunk she's been getting, and he is probably aware of how many bottles are lying around the house (empty or otherwise)

<sarcasm> Clearly Marten is a terrible friend! He should have dropped everything to help Faye, but instead he is going to work and planning dates with cute girls! How dare he! </sarcasm>

As for Tai, If the University paid any amount of attention to her, they would probably have laid down the law about drugs, but they clearly don't care as long as the library doesn't burn down and comes in under budget.

Also, in Jephs writing, you can clearly tell tone. Tai's drug use has always been played for laughs, while Fayes drinking has always been taken fairly seriously.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Xenologist on 20 Jan 2015, 07:28
Does anyone else think that Pintsize is going to play a role in this? He has previously said that he thinks his job with Marten is almost finished. He is a zany comic relief character, but we did get that little bit of exposition where he explains what his 'purpose' (it was to momo i think?)

Then here: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2872

He is hanging out with Faye, but he seems to be taking it as seriously as he ever really takes anything of importance (he even seems to be trying to give her honest and useful advice). And his punchline was very subdued compared to his normal craziness. 

I think we might see this:
-Faye goes home
-Prepares for something drastic
-Pintsize appears as a voice of reason *gasp*

Just a thought. I'm very likely completely wrong but it would be interesting because it would provide more development for a primarily comic relief character.


P.S. maybe even becoming Fayes andro-pc companion? Can companions switch humans?

EDIT: Found the original comic i was thinking of : http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2332
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 20 Jan 2015, 07:28
My personal take on this is that Faye put Dora in a position where all Dora's options were bad ones.

And let me emphasize: Faye put Dora in that position. It's not like Dora was looking for an excuse to fire Faye. This is a direct result of Faye's actions. Dora had to respond, and she had no good options, so criticizing her for not finding one is absurd. Dora did what she had to do. She's probably no happier about it than any of us are.

Yes! Exactly! Dora is in a lose-lose situation here, but it was Faye who put her in that position!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 07:30
The other thing is that Tai's main drug is far less damaging than alcohol can be. (That's not to say that there aren't people whose lives have been fucked up while on marijuana, but how much of that is due to it being illegal, and the culture around it, rather than inherent characteristics of the drug? At the very least, the addiction mechanisms are very different and not as damaging.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 20 Jan 2015, 07:36
A difference between Tai being stoned and Faye being drunk is that Tai is the boss and has basically free reign at the library, where Faye was told directly the day before that being drunk at work is not acceptable. Tai doesn't go around hiding being impaired the way Faye has been either. I'm not saying Tai is any better for this. No matter what, being drunk or high at work is very irresponsible. The issue is that Faye broke the rules, and one of the big ones.

Note, I'm not saying Faye being drunk at work is excusable from an employment standpoint.  I'm saying that everyone is now convinced that Faye is an alcoholic because she shows up drunk for work one time.  But no one thought that Tai had a drug problem despite being on something at work all the friggin time. 

Mind you, as alluded upthread, I think Jeph is using Faye here to channel some of his own issues with drinking, so I know why he decided to make Faye's descent scary, but make Tai seem harmless.  Still, I'm not sure why the rest of the cast (and the audience it seems) are personally treating the two so differently. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 07:38
One thing is that Faye's descent has a history of depression and potentially suicidal thoughts, that we and the cast both know about.

Tai's drug use seems to be the "I go to a liberal arts school and party all the time" type, not as much trying to escape from mental issues. Then again, maybe it is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 07:41
Tai's drug use seems to be the "I go to a liberal arts school and party all the time" type, not as much trying to escape from mental issues. Then again, maybe it is.

Tai does have her own issues; she mentioned to either Marten or Dora that she was bullied for her sexual orientation at school and that left some behavioural scars. However, I don't think she has anything approaching the scale and severity of Faye's near-untreated condition.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rusty on 20 Jan 2015, 07:47
For some reason reading this, the first thing I thought of was Fayes dad, and potentially her heading that way... But that seems dark for this
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 20 Jan 2015, 07:47
Oh, and it's worth noting that Faye's outright mentioned that her alcohol consumption is self-medication for her depression and PTSD: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=298

And I recall a similar comment before she went into therapy, too.

Edit: Here: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=806

And it was after she started therapy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 20 Jan 2015, 07:54
A difference between Tai being stoned and Faye being drunk is that Tai is the boss and has basically free reign at the library, where Faye was told directly the day before that being drunk at work is not acceptable. Tai doesn't go around hiding being impaired the way Faye has been either. I'm not saying Tai is any better for this. No matter what, being drunk or high at work is very irresponsible. The issue is that Faye broke the rules, and one of the big ones.

Note, I'm not saying Faye being drunk at work is excusable from an employment standpoint.  I'm saying that everyone is now convinced that Faye is an alcoholic because she shows up drunk for work one time

I don't think that's why everyone is convinced that Faye is an alcoholic. We've seen her use alcohol as a Coping Mechanism even before Angus first went to New York for the audition (and I don't think that's the first time we've actually seen her refer to it as a coping mechanism - I think she made reference to it back after The Talk, though I could be misremembering).  We've seen her allude to Emergency Bourbon, seemingly as a joke but realistically this is something that's been a theme throughout the comic.  Faye hits a breaking point, Faye starts to drink.  It's not an isolated incident.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 07:57
Note, I'm not saying Faye being drunk at work is excusable from an employment standpoint.  I'm saying that everyone is now convinced that Faye is an alcoholic because she shows up drunk for work one time.

No, we're saying that Faye is an alcoholic because she clearly has a substance problem. Her drinking has been a plot feature throughout the comic, Faye was nervous about talking to her therapist about her drinking, Her friends have expressed concern about her drinking before, and the first thing Faye does when something bad happens is reach for a bottle. Not to mention Fayes depression.

The reason people are flipping their shit now is because Faye's drinking is fucking up her life. Before this, you could call Faye a functioning alcoholic. I wouldn't say you could do that now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cabbagehut on 20 Jan 2015, 08:32
I don't really think Dora was in the wrong to fire Faye.  It's really hard to figure out how to help someone that you think might have a dependence problem, and I'm not sure anything Dora ever did could actually help.  I also don't really believe in the "snap out of it" argument.  I mean, maybe it happens, but it seems that people with substance abuse problems tend not to respond to that.  They just see it as other people being unreasonable, mean, two-faced, uptight, etc.  They seem to find something on their own that turns the tables, but I'm no expert here.

All that said, without a job, is it possible for Faye to access help?  If she had insurance to see her therapist before, she probably won't now.  Things like detox, therapy, etc., cost considerable money, and depending on how realistic the strip decides to go with it (it wavers for the sake of comedy, but tends to side on the more realistic for serious plotlines), Faye might not be able to go get help if she decides she wants it.  Again, it's not necessarily Dora's responsibility, but there could be more to the losing a job than losing a job and possibly friend.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 08:37
That could be a good way for Hanners to step in. Faye complains that she has no insurance anymore and Hanners offers to pay for Faye's treatment.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 20 Jan 2015, 08:48
Jeph's chirper
Quote
Tomorrow may be filler though because jetlag lol

Ahhhh!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 09:26
Jeph's chirper
Quote
Tomorrow may be filler though because jetlag lol

Ahhhh!

Well, it is a seven-hour flight followed up by how long a car journey back to town? I wouldn't feel like drawing any strips either!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 20 Jan 2015, 09:33
I can't believe you guys are talking about Dora firing Faye when the really important thing in this comic is obviously the pulsating orange-blue soap dispenser.  :-P

You mean that wasn't a hallucination?

Oh, thank god...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 20 Jan 2015, 09:36
Well, it is a seven-hour flight followed up by how long a car journey back to town? I wouldn't feel like drawing any strips either!

The drive home from the airport depends on which airport he's flying into. It's probably Boston, which is around 2 hours from Northampton with a large variation depending on traffic. He could also be flying into Hartford, which is only 45 minutes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: FayeDouble on 20 Jan 2015, 09:37
Wow. I knew when I saw today's comic the thread would explode, and it has. Throwing my 2 cents in here:
1) As you can guess from my name, I adore Faye. That being said, I think Dora was right. As someone who has tried to help an alcoholic out of their situation, they can't and won't change until they want to. No matter how much we care for them. It's an illness. Dora needed to protect her business, and had already given warnings about this behavior.
2) I'm not sure if Sven or Angus will appear to help Faye. Either she will be crying somewhere and Sven will find her and try to help her since he loves her, or she will take off to New York on a bus and fall into Angus' arms crying. Either way, or if something else happens (which is very likely) we are at a major turning point in Faye's life.
3) Even if Faye does sober up, I don't see her working at CoD anymore. It's become less of a focal point in the comic lately, and the breach of trust Faye created is hard to heal. I see her pursuing another road, after she's sobered up.
4) I suspect a major time-jump is coming, where at least 6 months will flash by. During this time Faye has sobered up and found alternate employment. Not before the end of this week, however.

Of course I could be wrong on ALL points. I wonder if Faye will do what her father did...or try to...and maybe Angus will appear and save her?
The possibilities in QC are endless.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 20 Jan 2015, 09:46
@bhtooefr,

Actually, I can see Claire being defensive of Marten and getting into an argument with Faye about how her behaviour is hurting him. This would come as a cold slap in the face for Faye who, like many in her situation, isn't likely to consider the affects of her behaviour on others until it is literally rubbed in her face.

It's even money if this would make her turn around or if it would be another personal fault in the increasingly long list that makes her question the value of her continued existence.

Actually, I see it going a different way.  I think Faye would lash out at Claire, Marten immediately backs up his girlfriend, Faye loses another friend, and discovers that you can still dig yourself deeper after you hit rock bottom if you try hard enough.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 09:54
Dora could have offered a hug right after the breakup, and could have said she was concerned when Faye first turned to a bottle.

I'd think better of her skills as a friend, as would many people who've posted.

It wouldn't have made a difference. Faye would still have gone off the rails and Dora would have been confronted with the same decision.

It's relevant that Faye snapped pretty fast.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Echoweaver on 20 Jan 2015, 10:00
Heya. Longtime QC reader, first time poster -- because the need to talk about today's post finally overcame my laziness and made me go hunt up the forum.

My first thought reading through this thread was that Faye isn't automatically an alcoholic because she self-medicates with alcohol. Alcohol's addictiveness is tricksy (I love that Chrome marks "tricksey" as misspelled but is fine with "tricksy"), and not all problems that present as excessive drinking are physical addiction to alcohol. In some ways, I think it would be interesting if her problem was alcoholism, just because that would be a different take on things.

However, after following the links everyone posted and thinking about how long this has been building, I think she probably is an alcoholic. Faye seems to be able to keep her drinking within the bounds of acceptability when she has everything else under control. But when life hands her a stressbomb, especially one like this with built-in recrimination and self-loathing, she just loses it.

I'm on the side of Dora here. "You will be fired if drunk at work." is often a biggie in the old employee handbook. Being the boss of your friends (literally rather than figuratively) is dangerous. I think she HAS to fire Faye, perhaps more so even than if she had no relationship with Faye outside of work. She's a small business owner living on the edge. She can't afford the conflict of interest and the potential damage it could do to CoD.

Faye leaving CoD may well have broad consequences for the story. It enables Dora and CoD to move even further to the periphery of QC. I don't know if that will happen or not, but that *is* the way relationships and life tend to happen.... they slowly drift and change.

I think it's interesting that Sven has walked back into Faye's life recently. I've always secretly wanted to see Sven and Faye give it another go. I adore Sven precisely because he's a shithead -- a shithead who now can see him self and is trying desperately to bootstrap his head out of his ass. I think that if Sven gets word of Faye's newfound single status, he's likely to track her down. I think the probability of this being a Bad Thing is about 70%, with a 20% chance of it actually being a chance for Sven to take his next step to humanity, and 10% being just peripheral annoyance.

It's going to be hard to wait till tomorrow morning for another comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Y on 20 Jan 2015, 10:04
Actually, I see it going a different way.  I think Faye would lash out at Claire, Marten immediately backs up his girlfriend, Faye loses another friend, and discovers that you can still dig yourself deeper after you hit rock bottom if you try hard enough.

I would think Marten usually keeps cool, and wouldn't back up either side in this case. I seem to remember that it wouldn't be the first time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: twixieshores on 20 Jan 2015, 10:21
Faye has done what Faye does:  duck relationships and drink to dull the pain.

Dora has done what Dora does: angry knee-jerk reaction.

It remains to be seen if Marten will do what Marten does (support Faye unconditionally).

Tai and Claire are unknown quantities in this sort of issue, but if they don't end up being involved, I'll be disappointed.

Good stuff, storytelling-wise.

Actually, in this case, Dora is doing what literally any boss in the real world would do after catching their employee drinking on the job. The only place that is even SOMEWHAT acceptable is a bar. Faye has blown through a million chances with Dora. This isn't a knee-jerk reaction, it's an entrepreneur who has had enough of her employee taking advantage of their friendship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 20 Jan 2015, 10:26
Actually, I see it going a different way.  I think Faye would lash out at Claire, Marten immediately backs up his girlfriend, Faye loses another friend, and discovers that you can still dig yourself deeper after you hit rock bottom if you try hard enough.

I would think Marten usually keeps cool, and wouldn't back up either side in this case. I seem to remember that it wouldn't be the first time.

It's true that he's been the super-passive spineless wimp in the past, but if BenRG's scenario were to happen (which it won't, because the forums predicted it), then I think the Clairten dynamic would result in Marten stepping up.  His relationship with Claire is way different than anything we've seen him in before, and because of that, I think he would act differently than we've seen him act before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 20 Jan 2015, 10:27
Jeph's chirper
Quote
Tomorrow may be filler though because jetlag lol

Ahhhh!

An idea for a "filler" strip that wouldn't actually be filler: A single wordless panel of Faye passed out face-down on the kitchen table with a couple of empty bottles next to her.

That being said, it's probably going to be a Yelling Bird.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 10:28
I really like the suggestion about moving to the space station.

Station has proven he can out-perform the most expensive human therapists. Someone immortal who is always available to talk would be a balm for Faye's abandonment issues.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Echoweaver on 20 Jan 2015, 10:29
It's true that he's been the super-passive spineless wimp in the past

I actually think Clairten is a big character-building step for Marten too. He just can't be passive with her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TeaOfDeath on 20 Jan 2015, 10:32
Sometime lurker, first-time poster here.

Let me begin by saying I think Dora's actions in this specific, isolated case are pretty reasonable. Caught her employee drinking on the job, fires her.

However, honestly, this newest strip really cements my dislike of Dora's character, which was sparked a long time ago when she wouldn't stop whining about how TERRIBLE her childhood was because...she had a successful, smart, good-looking older brother. That's her big claim to having had struggles of any kind, and yet she has the audacity to judge Faye, whose father literally shot himself right in front of her. Seriously, what kind of sister not only can't even be happy for her older brother's success, but actually twists it in her mind to being a personal problem to deal with? She completely cut her brother out of her life for...what again? Sleeping around? How is that any of her business to judge him on, and how does it affect her in literally any way? Seems like a form of slut-shaming to me. If he wants to sleep around, let him.

Dora has repeatedly shown herself to be a very judgmental, compassion-deficient person who has never had any serious personal problems of any kind, and yet stomps on people who are actually struggling with legitimate problems the second they act in any way that goes against her sensibilities. She seems like an awful friend and an awful sister. I wouldn't want her in my life, that's for sure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 20 Jan 2015, 10:35
I think that's the core of it, Echo.  All the other girls we've seen him with/pursue have been fairly proactive about things, and now he's with this adorable lil pixie whose inexperience has put him more firmly in the driver's seat than we've seen him in before.  I think it's good for him. 

@Tea: I don't think anyone is saying that Dora is never a bitch, just she's right this time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TeaOfDeath on 20 Jan 2015, 10:39
@Tea: I don't think anyone is saying that Dora is never a bitch, just she's right this time.

Fair enough! I am just getting to the point where I feel like I can't stand her bitchiness any more. I hope someone points it out to her so that she can finally grow up and stop burning bridges for little or no reason.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 20 Jan 2015, 10:48
I really like the suggestion about moving to the space station.

Station has proven he can out-perform the most expensive human therapists. Someone immortal who is always available to talk would be a balm for Faye's abandonment issues.
Well, his ability to talk at any time may be dependent on whether or not he's burnt-out any processor banks watching butterflies lately. (M-x butterfly FTW)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 10:50
Welcome, new people!

I have a hunch that there's more wrong from Dora's childhood than we've heard. The much-missed Raoul LaFerre had stinging criticisms of Peter and Elssa for not being sufficiently involved with their kids.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 20 Jan 2015, 10:51
Fair enough! I am just getting to the point where I feel like I can't stand her bitchiness any more. I hope someone points it out to her so that she can finally grow up and stop burning bridges for little or no reason.

Someone has (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2171), but I don't think it really took. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: toffee-skye on 20 Jan 2015, 10:54
Sometime lurker, first-time poster here.

Let me begin by saying I think Dora's actions in this specific, isolated case are pretty reasonable. Caught her employee drinking on the job, fires her.

However, honestly, this newest strip really cements my dislike of Dora's character, which was sparked a long time ago when she wouldn't stop whining about how TERRIBLE her childhood was because...she had a successful, smart, good-looking older brother. That's her big claim to having had struggles of any kind, and yet she has the audacity to judge Faye, whose father literally shot himself right in front of her. Seriously, what kind of sister not only can't even be happy for her older brother's success, but actually twists it in her mind to being a personal problem to deal with? She completely cut her brother out of her life for...what again? Sleeping around? How is that any of her business to judge him on, and how does it affect her in literally any way? Seems like a form of slut-shaming to me. If he wants to sleep around, let him.

TeaOfDeath, i really like your point here, but i have to disagree - there's a lot of factors that led to Dora's anxieties re: Sven, a lot that I (as a younger sister) recognise. Sven's actions are not evil, this is true, and certainly not as destructive as Faye's father's death; none of the problems Dora has connected to him are his direct fault, but more the reactions of people to Sven. She details in an earlier strip how her friends were pretending to be her friends so they could make out with him, and from that we can see as a teenage boy he was willing to go with that. So young Dora learns two things - her friends don't actually like her and she cannot trust them, and her brother sees nothing wrong with taking advantage of a situation that hurts her and she cannot trust him. Not just that, she mentions too how he's always seemed to have it easier, and I can imagine many a conversation between "weird sister who wore too much black and had bad skin" and parents about how she can't seem to make more than Cs and Ds in school, and "why can't you be more like your brother?" (or insinuations thereof).

I agree that the two situations are not comparable, but it's less "she can't be happy for her older brother" and more "my older brother impacts my life in a way I find hurtful". Her wording of him as a toxic person I feel is unfair, and extreme, especially when last time we saw him he was going into emotional meltdown; but when all she's seen of his emotions other than 'sleeping around' is a) happiness in a situation that hurts her and b) cocksure smugness about his great life whilst she has struggled, it's easy to see why she would view him telling Faye he loves her as just more manipulation and more hurt. She does not trust him, and that's been a long standing issue.

Anyway, psychoanalysis of Dora done, can you tell I'm supposed to be working on essays?  :evil:

That said: I believe she's being as compassionate as she can in this move. Dora has shown before - especially when something triggers her trust issues - to overreact, lose her temper, and shout at the perceived perpetrator. Faye would gladly rise to that bait and chew on it if it meant she had any chance of winning, but that's a) not what she needs and b) unprofessional. As said, better by earlier posters, this is Dora's livelihood and basically her baby. She's very attached to Coffee of Doom, and Faye's actions have jeopardised its future. Dora is being a good boss here: no screaming, no shouting, no arguing in front of customers, but quick, quiet dismissal. She's also being a good friend: as said, Faye would chew her out if it meant she could win and keep drinking - it would be a form of enabling her. Dora has given her a serious wake up call that her actions are unacceptable, as a friend and employee, and cannot remain as either if she continues.

Round of applause to you, Dora.

Warning - while you were typing 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post, scrap it, and go back to trying to get your bachelor's degree instead of procrastinating on a forum.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Echoweaver on 20 Jan 2015, 11:01
Honestly, you don't have to have trauma in your past to have issues. Dora's allowed to have issues too.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TeaOfDeath on 20 Jan 2015, 11:03
Fair enough! I am just getting to the point where I feel like I can't stand her bitchiness any more. I hope someone points it out to her so that she can finally grow up and stop burning bridges for little or no reason.

Someone has (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2171), but I don't think it really took.

Whoa, I completely forgot about that strip. Yeah, she really isn't good with criticism, even when it comes from someone who is clearly only interested in helping her figure out her life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TeaOfDeath on 20 Jan 2015, 11:05
Honestly, you don't have to have trauma in your past to have issues. Dora's allowed to have issues too.

She's allowed to have issues, just as I am allowed to dislike her for  treating people with much worse issues like crap because she has no idea what it's like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 20 Jan 2015, 11:06
Honestly, you don't have to have trauma in your past to have issues. Dora's allowed to have issues too.

She's allowed to have issues, just as I am allowed to dislike her for  treating people with much worse issues like crap because she has no idea what it's like.

That's a compromise I can accept.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 11:08
There's some irony here, but I'm gonna let it slide/

I remain unconvinced that Faye's an alcoholic at this point. Alcoholism is tricksome. Some people live soaked in booze for years and never actually develop a dependence.  Others (like my childhood best friend) have a few beers and become instant lushes. I knew one guy who was certain he was an alcoholic to the extent that he went to AA. But it turned out that he just hated his job.

Self medication really can just get out of hand. That's why it's bad. We know Faye's self medicating

That said, there's also plenty of good evidence that she is an alcoholic. One of the things that has, in my experience, separated problem drinkers from people with drinking problems is quality, rather than quantity. It's not the alcoholics won't drink the good stuff. It's that they don't give a damn. Problem drinkers tend to stick at the same quality they always have. They may want to dull the pain, but crappy booze isn't an option. Faye's penchant for crappy booze has been part of character since she moved in with Marten. That seems to suggest she's always been an alcoholic (to the extent that always = her entire time in the strip_

But I have to doubt that. Jeph's original story ended around strip 500. So her choice of booze was likely just quirk/joke that turned into a running gag.

Maybe the gag has become the elephant in the room, or maybe Jeph is doing a story about how depression and alcohol don't really work together very well. I'm not even going to try guessing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 11:10
Honestly, you don't have to have trauma in your past to have issues. Dora's allowed to have issues too.

She's allowed to have issues, just as I am allowed to dislike her for  treating people with much worse issues like crap because she has no idea what it's like.

Well put!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Echoweaver on 20 Jan 2015, 11:14
Honestly, you don't have to have trauma in your past to have issues. Dora's allowed to have issues too.

She's allowed to have issues, just as I am allowed to dislike her for  treating people with much worse issues like crap because she has no idea what it's like.

Woo. You seem to feel intensely about this.

At the risk of drifting too far afield, I'll say that the people in my life who have the most frightening past trauma have underscored to me that you don't compare pain. I think this is one of the wisest ideas anyone has shared with me. Pain isn't a competition.

For myself, I like my characters flawed with room to grow. Dora and Faye are both like that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 20 Jan 2015, 11:19
At this point, every ounce of simpathy I might have had for Faye is long gone.

I just really, REALLY hope Faye doesn't cause problems for Marten and Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Maenad Danced on 20 Jan 2015, 11:38
American employment laws are the worst, no HR no tribunal...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 20 Jan 2015, 11:44
American employment laws are the worst, no HR no tribunal...

If you're lucky enough to work for a unionized profession you still have some more resources, like legal counsel and support if you were terminated unjustly.  Even in cases of gross misconduct, like Faye, the union would still provide legal advice.  Unfortunately that's a dying thing in the U.S.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 20 Jan 2015, 11:57
Still, Faye had an insane amount of liberties working for Dora. Hell, Dora even let her have time to work on her art while on the clock...
When you consider that, the recent promotion, and the fact that not drinking on the job is essentially Dora's ONLY rule... I can see why Dora fired her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 20 Jan 2015, 12:11
I have to wonder if Dora would have fired her pre-promotion.  Faye has more responsibility now, and with that comes more... well... responsibility.

Either way, I see a lot of plot threads coming together here that might bring about the next big momentous plot event for QC.  Hopefully it will eventually lead to a better place for Faye (and everyone else, indirectly,) even if the road to get there is bumpy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 20 Jan 2015, 12:31
I'm hoping we get to hear more of Faye's repressed accent as part of this story arc.
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=96
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 20 Jan 2015, 13:20
Oh jeez, this could lead to Tai/Marten arguments which leads to Tai/Claire arguments and possibly Claire/Marten arguments
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Econoclast on 20 Jan 2015, 13:27
Be rude and threaten customers? Totally fine. Show up drunk even though it's not visibly affecting performance in any serious way? Fuckin' fired.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 20 Jan 2015, 13:36
Be rude and threaten customers? Totally fine. Show up drunk even though it's not visibly affecting performance in any serious way? Fuckin' fired.

Her rudeness was something customers seemed to come back for, so maybe that's why up to now it's been tolerated.  Being drunk at work could result in a workplace accident (lots of hot steam at CoD), which would lead to a MAJOR lawsuit for Dora if a customer or another employee were hurt. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 20 Jan 2015, 13:45
Be rude and threaten customers? Totally fine. Show up drunk even though it's not visibly affecting performance in any serious way? Fuckin' fired.

Being rude to people is encouraged (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=654), however drinking on the job (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=642) is definitely against the rules (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1720) .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 13:54
Be rude and threaten customers? Totally fine. Show up drunk even though it's not visibly affecting performance in any serious way? Fuckin' fired.

That is actually the way it is at my place of work. There is an employee who is rude to customers, an absolute shit of a human, and management just keeps him off of the sales floor. However, if he were to show up late 4 times in a quarter, steal, test positive for drugs, or show up drunk/get caught drinking on the job, he would be immediately fired.

Also, Dora caught Faye drinking on the job, that is quite a bit farther than showing up drunk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 20 Jan 2015, 13:54
Reasons why being drunk at work is a problem for a coffee shop:
*Several apparatus that can produce scalding steam - compensation for staff injuries alone could potentially bankrupt Dora, let alone any customers.
*There is a coffee grinder in the cellar, Faye could injury herself or worse down there, especially if part of her responsibilities as an assistant manager is to go down there for coffee in the morning.
*Keeping customers in line with one liners and overly exaggerated threats is one thing, but if Faye is drunk and actually acts on that, then that's a huge problem for Dora.
*There is a whole slew of health and safety regulations, each depending on state and country, that state why being drunk at the workplace is a sackable offence. One would presume that Dora would have to comply those regulations in order to get a business license.

Every contract you've had to sign when you begin work somewhere has a list of offences that result in instant dismissal, if not actually in the contract, than a document that an employer has to supply at the request of an employee. Faye has breached that contract, and even if Dora made a snap decision, she still acted in a manner for the best of her business. Faye was messing with her livelihood.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ItsNotATumor on 20 Jan 2015, 14:12
I've read several comments saying that Dora should have put Faye on leave of some sort, with a condition of cleaning herself up. In the US (the real US, not fictional QC US), that's a terrible idea. A manager doing that is opening themselves up to potential liability by having given a verbal expectation that the employment will continue.

Companies used to have things like performance improvement plans, but these have been phased out. Current HR theory is that it's best to just fire immediately. Dora has done the absolute right thing for her company.

(I am not a lawyer, so what I write should not be taken as legal advice)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: AnnathEawesoMe on 20 Jan 2015, 14:21
While we lambaste Dora for making the decision that we all saw coming, let's remind ourselves that Dora is actually a fairly smart human. She is the one who first put into words that Faye has, at the absolute least, an alcohol problem, as early as #981. Except when playing victim to her self esteem, she gives sound advice and has held together the (admittedly horrendous) business of CoD. AngryBoss Dora may have had no choice but to fire Faye, but I personally think that what feelings Dora acts on next will be more telling of her real character. She can either keep holding a grudge and act on the basis of being betrayed by her 2nd in command co-worker and friend, OR calms down and realizes its nothing to do with her, and that Faye is in need of help.

I also sincerely doubt that Faye will go home. Going home would mean facing the reality of being fired, while going to a bar would enable her to keep running from it. What time is today's comic taking place in QC universe? It can't be after noon...

Regardless, Jeph has written this arc exceedingly well and I can't wait to see where this goes.

Woooo first post after reading QC for 4 years and forum lurking for at least 1!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Welu on 20 Jan 2015, 14:47
A good first post at that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Svennerson on 20 Jan 2015, 15:18
Okay so I'm just gonna go ahead and throw in my two cents on a number of questions here that got me thinking:

Was a straight up firing justified?  I say so.  It's one of the very few hard lines we're given Dora has with her employees.  She was very straight with Faye THE DAY BEFORE about not drinking on the job.  Dora has full context of Faye's alcoholic tendencies and knows just sending her home, even on unpaid suspension, would not change her issues.  In addition, Faye got promoted solely due to her seniority.  There is very little in-comic evidence to suggest Faye works harder/smarter/better than another employee would given her experience.  Finally, that presents a major immediate liability, which would continue for the forseeable future.  Aside from the milk incident, all "harm" given to customers has been solely verbal, which is not something that can be sued over.  And the milk incident was not any serious harm.  Marten's ex knew she didn't have a leg to stand on between no observable damages and three witnesses who would claim it was an accident.

This could actually hurt someone, and Dora has enough scraps of empathy to not allow that to happen.

The termination is completely justified, and is in my opinion the best course of action Dora could take.

Dora's not being supportive/Faye's being a bitch/This will only spiral Faye downwards/About time Faye gets comeuppance/Screw Dora/Screw Faye

No.
No.
NONONONONO.

These are two reasonable people dealing with stresses the best way they know how.  Faye is stuck with a number of issues, especially abandonment and alcoholism, and has been able to continue getting by due mostly to good friends and good luck.  This is the first time her issues have led her right into a wall, and her best shot at overcoming them yet.  Being mentally scarred and unable to cope properly is an entirely different animal from being selfish.  At the same time, Dora's tried being supportive, even gone through the therapy/gym scenario with her, and has found the issues worse.  She has a liability to her business and to the hundreds of customers she will likely get that day before Faye.

What will happen next?

There are a hell of a lot of scenarios, so I'm gonna go through a few and their likeliness/my opinions on them because I have nothing better to do.

1 - Dora pulls a turn around and is only giving Faye a temporary suspension.  I've seen this a lot on the forum, but I would hate to see this.  Faye needs to feel a really bad break, much more than a suspension to get her mind right, and it would remove a lot of Dora's reputation as a lenient-unless-you-do-this-bad-thing boss.  I don't think Jeph's gonna go this way, as a full-on drama bomb has been building for a while and it's not gonna defuse that easily.

2 - Faye, without a job or a Marten to rant to/punch/hug/barf on, drunk calls Angus.  This is the one I want.  It gives a chance for actual closure with Angus and development with Faye.  This could also lead to a number of possibilities (LDR, hook-up and move out, some form of closure), and could segue into any of the later options.  I have a gut feeling Jeph will do this, but I wouldn't call it likely.  But PLS JEPH PLS.

3 - Marten chooses ailing best friend over date with Claire, first argument ensues.  I'd argue this is the most likely scenario.  Marten, although he's gotten firmer over the past year real time, is still Marten.  He's still caring to a fault, easily pushed around, and cares about Faye more than he does anyone (except Claire) at this point.  Claire, in her first relationship, and still having a fair amount of self-esteem issues, could easily take this the wrong way, spreading the drama throughout.

4a - Drunk Faye goes to Sven, drunk sex causing nuclear levels of fallout with Dora.  Please, Jeph, no.  Faye needs a rock right now and might see that in our (least) favorite smarmasaur.  Sven is obviously still smitten for Faye, and would love a chance to "prove" himself worthy.  The rest of this writes itself, but it seems too easy.

4b - Drunk Faye goes to Sven, Sven actually is a gentleman and turns Faye down.  Okay, before anyone asks, no, my name is not in reference to this Sven, it was my online handle before I read QC because I am quarter Swede.  I feel like this would be a great opportunity to give character development to two of the least-developed characters in universe, Sven and Faye.  It could prove Sven actually deserves a spot in the QC cast and has some shreds of decency, and he could easily be Faye's rock in helping sober up.

5 - Either drunken or sober, Faye gets back into art.  I feel like this is the likely long term scenario, as I don't see Faye getting rehired.  Faye has been shown to have artistic success (the dino statue commission.)  She's gonna need to make rent.  And the key to her recovering is to start taking ownership of her actions and her life, instead of riding on Marten and Dora's coattails.

And finally, 6 - Steve eats more cereal.  Because duh.

Any questions class?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Meilu on 20 Jan 2015, 15:28
Never really liked Dora, but anyone that thinks she's wrong for firing Faye is crazy. I've owned my own business, that kind of nonsense being allowed comes back at the employer just as much as the employee. Faye's downward spiral is obvious and Dora's already called her on it, Faye brushed it off. It's all on her. Dora can still be her friend here, depending on how she reacts beyond this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 20 Jan 2015, 15:48
I agree this is going into one of QC's more momentous phases. The ground work for a lot of this have been laid down for a very, very long time.

I do fear how far Faye could fall, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 20 Jan 2015, 15:55
I think everyone honestly saw that one coming.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Fenriswolf on 20 Jan 2015, 16:02
What makes me twitch about this comic is not whether or not Dora made the right decision. My feeling is probably. What I don't like is the out of hand "you're fired". In NZ (and Australlia, I'm sure) we do not have the right to fire people whenever we feel like it, and while intoxication may be cause for immediate termination you would still have to have a sit down meeting and a discussion with paperwork.

Quote
  • Any relevant provisions in the employment agreement must be followed
  • An employee has the right to be told what the problem is and that disciplinary action is a possibility.
  • The employee should be advised that they have the right to have a representative present at a disciplinary meeting.
  • The employee must then be given a genuine opportunity to respond with their side of the story before the employer decides what to do.
  • The employer should investigate any allegations of misconduct thoroughly and in a manner that is impartial and without being influenced by irrelevant issues.
  • Generally speaking, the employee should be given clear standards to aim for and a genuine opportunity to improve. However, some forms of misconduct may be deemed so serious, that it can warrant instant dismissal. What constitutes this sort of misconduct may be set out in the employment agreement.

http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297 (http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297)


I absolutely despise the casual manner by which Dora was able to fire Faye, and that it doesn't raise any eyebrows. Especially since it seems the QC-verse has the same situation as the modern day US with no real public healthcare and likely limited unemployment benefits.

It makes my skin crawl, frankly, and makes me sad that in a generally more liberal imagining of the US you're still completely at the mercy of your employer. (Whether or not Faye deserves to lose her job it utterly irrelevant this point.)

Edit to fix random tags.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 20 Jan 2015, 16:08
What makes me twitch about this comic is not whether or not Dora made the right decision. My feeling is probably. What I don't like is the out of hand "you're fired". In NZ (and Australlia, I'm sure) we do not have the right to fire people whenever we feel like it, and while intoxication may be cause for immediate termination you would still have to have a sit down meeting and a discussion with paperwork.

Quote
  • Any relevant provisions in the employment agreement must be followed
  • An employee has the right to be told what the problem is and that disciplinary action is a possibility.
  • The employee should be advised that they have the right to have a representative present at a disciplinary meeting.
  • The employee must then be given a genuine opportunity to respond with their side of the story before the employer decides what to do.
  • The employer should investigate any allegations of misconduct thoroughly and in a manner that is impartial and without being influenced by irrelevant issues.
  • Generally speaking, the employee should be given clear standards to aim for and a genuine opportunity to improve. However, some forms of misconduct may be deemed so serious, that it can warrant instant dismissal. What constitutes this sort of misconduct may be set out in the employment agreement.

http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297 (http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297)


I absolutely despise the casual manner by which Dora was able to fire Faye, and that it doesn't raise any eyebrows. Especially since it seems the QC-verse has the same situation as the modern day US with no real public healthcare and likely limited unemployment benefits.

It makes my skin crawl, frankly, and makes me sad that in a generally more liberal imagining of the US you're still completely at the mercy of your employer. (Whether or not Faye deserves to lose her job it utterly irrelevant this point.)

Edit to fix random tags.

While I would be tempted to agree, I can't help but feel that the immediateness of it is more of a 'comic flow' thing than 'QC universe works like this'.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 20 Jan 2015, 16:12
What makes me twitch about this comic is not whether or not Dora made the right decision. My feeling is probably. What I don't like is the out of hand "you're fired". In NZ (and Australlia, I'm sure) we do not have the right to fire people whenever we feel like it, and while intoxication may be cause for immediate termination you would still have to have a sit down meeting and a discussion with paperwork.

It does come off a bit like George Jetson Job Security, and I can confirm that it's more or less the same in Australia, with sit-down meetings, warnings, notice, and all that. However, employers do have ways around that, and can immediately fire people/make them redundant. Granted, there's usually a sit-down meeting, but...well, is Faye in any condition for that?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 20 Jan 2015, 16:13
Somewhat unrelated question: Will Jeph ever update the cast page? Angus is no longer Marigold's roommate, Gabby's gone, and Claire ought to be promoted up the page, for starters. And Faye is no longer a COD employee, apparently.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 Jan 2015, 16:15
Quote
  • Generally speaking, the employee should be given clear standards to aim for and a genuine opportunity to improve. However, some forms of misconduct may be deemed so serious, that it can warrant instant dismissal. What constitutes this sort of misconduct may be set out in the employment agreement.

Is that not the case here? Can Dora reasonably expect to have a meeting with Faye if she's drunk?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 20 Jan 2015, 16:17
Quote

It does come off a bit like George Jetson Job Security, and I can confirm that it's more or less the same in Australia, with sit-down meetings, warnings, notice, and all that. However, employers do have ways around that, and can immediately fire people/make them redundant. Granted, there's usually a sit-down meeting, but...well, is Faye in any condition for that?

Most contracts have an immediate-fire clause for incidents like this however.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 20 Jan 2015, 16:29
What makes me twitch about this comic is not whether or not Dora made the right decision. My feeling is probably. What I don't like is the out of hand "you're fired". In NZ (and Australlia, I'm sure) we do not have the right to fire people whenever we feel like it, and while intoxication may be cause for immediate termination you would still have to have a sit down meeting and a discussion with paperwork.

Quote
  • Any relevant provisions in the employment agreement must be followed
  • An employee has the right to be told what the problem is and that disciplinary action is a possibility.
  • The employee should be advised that they have the right to have a representative present at a disciplinary meeting.
  • The employee must then be given a genuine opportunity to respond with their side of the story before the employer decides what to do.
  • The employer should investigate any allegations of misconduct thoroughly and in a manner that is impartial and without being influenced by irrelevant issues.
  • Generally speaking, the employee should be given clear standards to aim for and a genuine opportunity to improve. However, some forms of misconduct may be deemed so serious, that it can warrant instant dismissal. What constitutes this sort of misconduct may be set out in the employment agreement.

http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297 (http://www.dol.govt.nz/workplace/knowledgebase/item/1297)


I absolutely despise the casual manner by which Dora was able to fire Faye, and that it doesn't raise any eyebrows. Especially since it seems the QC-verse has the same situation as the modern day US with no real public healthcare and likely limited unemployment benefits.

It makes my skin crawl, frankly, and makes me sad that in a generally more liberal imagining of the US you're still completely at the mercy of your employer. (Whether or not Faye deserves to lose her job it utterly irrelevant this point.)

Edit to fix random tags.

A quick look on google and I found this page (http://www.mass.gov/courts/case-legal-res/law-lib/laws-by-subj/about/termination.html) about the law concerning termination of employment in Massachusetts. One of the points on the page states:
"Although it seems almost impossible to believe, employers in Massachusetts, or in any other employee-at-will state, can fire any employee at any time for any reason — or even for no reason at all. An employer can terminate any employee, with or without notice."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 20 Jan 2015, 16:54
Comic's up.

I thought that was Cosette for a moment.

EDITED TO ADD:  Woo hoo, first time I've ever had the chance to make that announcement!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Jays on 20 Jan 2015, 16:56
I absolutely despise the casual manner by which Dora was able to fire Faye, and that it doesn't raise any eyebrows. Especially since it seems the QC-verse has the same situation as the modern day US with no real public healthcare and likely limited unemployment benefits.

It makes my skin crawl, frankly, and makes me sad that in a generally more liberal imagining of the US you're still completely at the mercy of your employer. (Whether or not Faye deserves to lose her job it utterly irrelevant this point.)

Edit to fix random tags.

My, a lot of us are coming out of lurkerdom today.

New York state, where I live, is an at-will employment state. (As are many others, including Massachusetts, I believe.) Per the Department of Labor website: Barring a contract (which is rarer and rarer these days), "an employer has the right to discharge an employee at any time for any reason."

I witnessed a co-worker get fired once because a member of the public made a complaint about her, and while it couldn't be backed up, the boss told her point-blank that the goodwill of the complainer was more important. (That boss was particularly odious.)

Personally, I agree that Dora had to do it. But I do wish that someone would SEE how Faye is getting deeper and deeper into the abyss, to an alarming degree. :( Two flawed characters, but aren't we all?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 17:02
I wish Marten were wearing his "my mommy spanks people" shirt in today's filler.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 20 Jan 2015, 17:25
 Maybe she can take Joyce on as a apprentice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 17:28
Wait, is that who that was supposed to be?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ankhtahr on 20 Jan 2015, 17:32
Yep. Look at the news. It's one of Willis' characters, so it's obviously Joyce.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 20 Jan 2015, 17:34
Probably would have been a better idea to put her in a sweater vest so she would be more recognizable :P.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 17:38
Maybe it's the style, but she looks exactly like Cosette. Like...uncannily.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 20 Jan 2015, 18:07
Except Cosette is a brunette.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 18:09
For now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 20 Jan 2015, 18:10
The image is in the "random" directory (random/joycemarten.png), so it won't show up in the archives.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 18:14
(click to show/hide)

Well, now we can always find it easily.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: LeeC on 20 Jan 2015, 18:17
hahah yay Joyce cameo!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 18:22
Maybe because the shape of the hair is just...different. Different styles, I get it, but still. I never would've realized it was Joyce if I wasn't told (or if I'd bothered to read the news post today :roll:)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 20 Jan 2015, 18:34
I thought that was Cosette too!  Sure, Cosette currently has her hair dyed darker, but... it looks JUST LIKE HER other than that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 20 Jan 2015, 18:36
Hey, come on, Jeph's been on a plane all day. So what if he just slapped a new head on Cosette's body and called it Joyce? The guy's tired.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 18:41
Ha, it's the head that looks like Cosette.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 20 Jan 2015, 18:51
Most states in the US have an At-Will employment policy, I believe. Unless it is a union job, but certain sectors are doing their best to break the unions because with at-will employment all of the power basically lies with the employer. No, it isn't a good way to do things. But the US has been steadily destroying it's middle and lower classes for years.

In any case, a sit down meeting and official termination could happen at a later date, with paperwork and everything. Faye being drunk and Dora being angry means now is not the time for that kind of conversation. And the fact that this is a comic means those details will be glossed over anyway, unless something important happens during the conversation. But yeah.. being sent home immediately when found drinking on the job is pretty standard fare, at least in the US.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 20 Jan 2015, 19:38
Regarding Dora's issues, one that may be lurking in the background is her bisexuality.  No matter how supportive her parents might have been, or the other people in her life, there's a very good chance Dora has faced prejudice about it at some point.  Especially if she came out in high school.  We already know that she wasn't one of the "cool kids," and some people might have been even more inclined to avoid her or mistreat her if they knew she wasn't straight.

As far as Faye getting help goes I'll be the odd man out and predict it will come either from May or Marigold.  Given that she's an outsider May might have a more unbiased perspective than the others.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 19:48
Ais may have a more accurate understanding of humans than humans have of each other.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 20 Jan 2015, 19:48
Almost certainly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 20 Jan 2015, 19:53
Regarding Dora's issues, one that may be lurking in the background is her bisexuality.  No matter how supportive her parents might have been, or the other people in her life, there's a very good chance Dora has faced prejudice about it at some point.  Especially if she came out in high school.  We already know that she wasn't one of the "cool kids," and some people might have been even more inclined to avoid her or mistreat her if they knew she wasn't straight.

As far as Faye getting help goes I'll be the odd man out and predict it will come either from May or Marigold.  Given that she's an outsider May might have a more unbiased perspective than the others.

Kind of an interesting theory about Dora.  Maybe she's quick to the draw at breaking friendships, relationships, etc because she's been hurt by people she trusted and confided in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 20 Jan 2015, 20:00
Hey, come on, Jeph's been on a plane all day. So what if he just slapped a new head on Cosette's body and called it Joyce? The guy's tired.

He actually drew it seven months ago: http://jephjacques.com/post/87646817720/drawings-from-tonights-patreon-launch-party

He drew a better Joyce shortly beforehand: http://jephjacques.com/post/86250436045/i-drew-a-joyce-while-playing-with-watercolor

And one with Claire and Carla later on: http://jephjacques.com/post/98928768545/i-did-a-drawing

Kind of an interesting theory about Dora.  Maybe she's quick to the draw at breaking friendships, relationships, etc because she's been hurt by people she trusted and confided in.

We know that, that's why she dumped Marten and is (was?) in therapy.Sven pretty much confirmed that it's all from previous abusive relationships. But I doubt that's got anything to do with this. She's just straight up pissed at Faye for, well, being pissed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 20 Jan 2015, 20:06
Hey, come on, Jeph's been on a plane all day. So what if he just slapped a new head on Cosette's body and called it Joyce? The guy's tired.

He actually drew it seven months ago: http://jephjacques.com/post/87646817720/drawings-from-tonights-patreon-launch-party

He drew a better Joyce shortly beforehand: http://jephjacques.com/post/86250436045/i-drew-a-joyce-while-playing-with-watercolor

And one with Claire and Carla later on: http://jephjacques.com/post/98928768545/i-did-a-drawing

Kind of an interesting theory about Dora.  Maybe she's quick to the draw at breaking friendships, relationships, etc because she's been hurt by people she trusted and confided in.

We know that, that's why she dumped Marten and is (was?) in therapy.Sven pretty much confirmed that it's all from previous abusive relationships. But I doubt that's got anything to do with this. She's just straight up pissed at Faye for, well, being pissed.

Yeah this was a different thing altogether.  This was anger felt when you feel someone threatening whatever you happen to hold most dear, CoD in Dora's case, which of course is her livelihood and independence.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 20 Jan 2015, 20:11
Hey, come on, Jeph's been on a plane all day. So what if he just slapped a new head on Cosette's body and called it Joyce? The guy's tired.

He actually drew it seven months ago: http://jephjacques.com/post/87646817720/drawings-from-tonights-patreon-launch-party

He drew a better Joyce shortly beforehand: http://jephjacques.com/post/86250436045/i-drew-a-joyce-while-playing-with-watercolor

And one with Claire and Carla later on: http://jephjacques.com/post/98928768545/i-did-a-drawing

Kind of an interesting theory about Dora.  Maybe she's quick to the draw at breaking friendships, relationships, etc because she's been hurt by people she trusted and confided in.

We know that, that's why she dumped Marten and is (was?) in therapy.Sven pretty much confirmed that it's all from previous abusive relationships. But I doubt that's got anything to do with this. She's just straight up pissed at Faye for, well, being pissed.

Yeah this was a different thing altogether.  This was anger felt when you feel someone threatening whatever you happen to hold most dear, CoD in Dora's case, which of course is her livelihood and independence.

Not too different. She trusted Faye (enough to make her assistant manager) and saw a potential betrayal. Chop!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 20:30
I'd say she saw an actual betrayal. I mean, if Faye had any consideration for her friend or her job, she wouldn't have come to work drunk.

But in this case I really don't think Dora's reaction was motivated by any of Doras issues or hangups. Faye fucked up, right after being told not to fuck up in that specific way. Dora did what any responsible employer would do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: swapna on 20 Jan 2015, 21:19
I must admit, my first reaction was more or less 'Really? She fires her on the spot? How messed up is that?' I think it was more a reaction to the possibility of being fired like, right now. Not with a week or two having to take her vacation days and THEN be jobless, or be sent home with some variation of 'this is a severe offence, go home now and we will discuss the consequences later'.

As other posters have pointed out, that might be non-US-citizen-sensibilities perking up.

Especially since Faye has been employed for years, even QC-time; she has been made assistant manager, whatever that means at the Coffee of Doom, it meant that she had additional responsibilities. I don't know if she even got a pay raise for that, since it's never been brought up after Angus mentioned it (as far as I remember). She's been in charge of training and hiring new employees, scheduling, even delegating tasks. I understand Dora protecting her business, but she owes Faye. She owes her at least a proper termination of employment (including paying her for unused vacation days), and not that kind of casual dismissal.

I think (hope) that yesterday's comic portrayed it that abrupt for the sake of drama, and Dora still does her duty as responsible (non-vindictive) employer.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 20 Jan 2015, 21:27
Faye is being fired for misconduct, or fired "with cause" as opposed to being laid off/let go by a company that is downsizing. As far as I understand if you are fired "with cause" you don't get any severance package, you forfeited it when you broke your employment contract. If you are fired "without cause" the company should include vacation days and other compensation as part of the severance package, as they are the ones breaking the employment contract.

Faye might be eligible for unemployment?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 21:54
Unemployment depends on the interplay of state and federal rules. Being fired for cause can delay or reduce your unemployment benefit in some states and eliminate it in others. I don't know of any where it doesn't matter, but I guess that's possible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 20 Jan 2015, 21:57
Faye has almost hit bottom before (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=729).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 20 Jan 2015, 22:04
Faye has broken what could be considered COD's one and only hard rule after being told in no uncertain terms that it was not allowed. In the restaurant in which I work there are several offenses which will lead to instant termination, drinking and doing drugs on the clock being high on the list. I'm theorizing that since not drinking at work has been mentioned several times that something has happened in the past that brought about the policy. Ultimately Dora is responsible both intellectually and financially for everything that happens inside that building and needs to make any decision based on that responsibility.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 20 Jan 2015, 22:09
At least in my state if the termination fulfills certain criteria unemployment benefits are denied though I am not sure what those criteria are.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 22:14
Faye has almost hit bottom before (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=729).

No sure if visual pun good or bad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 23:07
You would think that Marten would have learned by now not to mention his mother's career to casual acquaintances. What will make this worse is that Joyce will now nervously ask all these questions about Veronica because, let's face it, most people couldn't help but do so. It's only a matter of time before he snaps and storms off.

This is probably why Marten has only been in a few relationships, despite being a dyed-in-the-wool good-guy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 23:16
I don't think I've ever seen Marten actually get upset over having to explain Veronica. It's old and worn terrority that he doesn't care to revisit, but it's not otherwise upsetting to him.

I con only imagine him getting upset if someone got judgmental. That this applies to Joyce is kind of an aside, because I still don't see it happening. Marten gets angry when people are unreasonable with him, or when his boundaries are crossed. Everything else, he tends to tolerate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 20 Jan 2015, 23:22
I love seeing Jeph's take on characters from other webcomics. I wouldn't mind more crossovers!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 20 Jan 2015, 23:32
I don't think I've ever seen Marten actually get upset over having to explain Veronica.

It's not the explaining that annoys him. It's the fact that Veronica instantly becomes the sole topic of conversation. Girls just find her worryingly fascinating and all they want to talk with him about is his mother! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: phyllis on 20 Jan 2015, 23:41
Even as a non-US citizen, I wouldn't expect a sit-down meeting to dismiss me if I showed up drunk to a non-professional job. If I was drinking while working on my current job, I would expect to be suspended immediately followed by a formal termination process & loss of my right to practice, but if I'd turned up drunk when I worked at a pizza place as a student, I would have expected to be fired on the spot. When someone sexually harrassed a colleague--the only significant misconduct that I can think of that happened whilst I was there--he was sent home unpaid for the rest of the shift, on the understanding that he would be fired on the spot if it happened again. If it had been a thing that endangered our customers, I'm pretty sure he would have been fired straight away.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 20 Jan 2015, 23:52
Old and worn. He doesn't care to revisit. He doesn't get upset, he doesn't enjoy it. He tolerates it. Still don't seem him storming anywhere.

Has he ever stormed anywhere? I think he might have exited on a cutting remark once, and gone off in exasperation with Veronica once, but those were both boundary related. If you want storming off, you want Dora. She storms off, she storms on. Much of the anti-Dora rage of late is colored by her habit of storming.

Marten simmers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 21 Jan 2015, 00:38
I have a friend who has had similar problems to Faye.  He's running out of fingers to count the number of times he's been fired from that coffee shop.  Faye may be able to get her job back, and it may because Dora considers her "family".  Although, given the way she has cut-off Sven, she may stick with it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Markus Ramikin on 21 Jan 2015, 00:50
What I'd really love to see after this is Dora NOT letting either her own stupid brain or anyone else push her into guilt. If she was like "you know what, fuck this, I did the right thing, I refuse to feel bad about it."

That would be refreshing.

And yeah, I also thought of how she cut off Sven, indeed, except in that case I still have no idea what she finds so very toxic about him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 01:03
I gotta say, that would be pretty shitty of Dora.

She did the right thing.

And her friend is going to suffer for it.

She should feel bad about it.

At the base of the human condition there is truth, as much as anything can be true, that most people refuse. And the refusal of that truth is the root of most pain, suffering, and conflict inflicted by humans on humans. And that truth is thatlife doesn't come in tidy packages. That two different things, that seem to contradict, can both be right. That beyond the facts of existence, there is no truth or meaning but what we make.

Second guessing is nothing more than introspection. Introspection is good. Second guesses get a bad rap. It's fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh guessing that's a problem. If Dora doesn't check herself, that's shitty. But just because yopu take the time to check, it doesn't mean you have to change your mind.

You should feel bad about things you must do, when they suck. Seriously. Who says, "I had to put the dog down, but it was time so I refuse to feel bad about it"? Really creep people, IMO. Healthy is, "This hurts, and I feel guilty, but I know it's the right thing to do."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 21 Jan 2015, 01:07
My guess as to Dora's toxic perception of Sven? Still-unresolved resentment over his effect on her early life, fueling her feeling he's about to do something similar (get his enjoyment, no matter the cost to another) to her friend. Result? "Fuck it, that's enough."
Speaking of "fuck it, that's enough," depending on whether Dora and Faye remain any semblance of friends, I could see as realistic Sven approaching Dora about Faye, expecting another warn-off under threat of grievous bodily harm and instead getting a "meh, whatever, screw yez both," from Li'l Sis.
Hell, that might even shock Sven out of his self-absorption and into the first faint glimmer of empathy.
Naaaah.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 21 Jan 2015, 01:09
I don't think I've ever seen Marten actually get upset over having to explain Veronica. It's old and worn terrority that he doesn't care to revisit, but it's not otherwise upsetting to him.

He's trying to chat up a pretty girl. She's more interested in his mother's career as a professional dominatrix to the point that is all she wants to talk about. Do you really think he would be interested in continuing the conversation?

Anyway, I'm thinking that you're maybe taking a light-hearted post a little too seriously?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 01:16
He's trying to chat up a pretty girl. She's more interested in his mother's career as a professional dominatrix to the point that is all she wants to talk about. Do you really think he would be interested in continuing the conversation?

Anyway, I'm thinking that you're maybe taking a light-hearted post a little too seriously?

Interested in? No. Would he continue? Certainly.

You're off base to suggest what I'm taking too seriously or not. It's patronizing and dismissive. You're also off base to argue that this difference of opinion has anything to do with Marten's feels. I said, and reiterated, her would not storm. Storming is not in character for him. If you think I'm wrong about that, by all means, make a case. But let's not pretend I'm talking about something else.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Markus Ramikin on 21 Jan 2015, 01:45
DSL: makes sense, though it seems to me the problem lies more with Dora than with Sven in this case.

RF: Let me be a bit more specific than I was before: feel bad yes, feel guilty no. Her friend is in trouble and that's a bad thing, and yes, if Dora cares about her then she will feel accordingly. But any feelings of "I shouldn't have done that" or "I'm a bad person because I did that" - any guilt - she doesn't deserve, she should know that she doesn't, and stand by her decision against anyone, including the little voices in her head.

There is no such thing as 'two conflicting things are right'. Two conflicting things can both be important to you, having to choose one and miss out on the other can hurt, but they can't both be right in any specific instance. If both scales are weighed heavily, still if one is heavier than the other - there usually is - then that is the right decision, and the other is the wrong one, and that's all there is to it.

Of course life is messy, and we get screwed over by uncertainty, time-pressure, priorities changing over time, etc. But in principle, if you made the best knowable decision at the time, there's no reason in the Universe you deserve to feel bad about that. Sure, it may be "natural" to, but it's not shitty of you if you manage not to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 21 Jan 2015, 02:03
DSL: makes sense, though it seems to me the problem lies more with Dora than with Sven in this case.

We don't disagree. Dora's perceptions, accurate or otherwise, are the major driver of developments here.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 21 Jan 2015, 02:20
Oddly enough, I can see this all working towards the 2014 cast poster 'garden party'.

Time-skip forward three or more months. Faye has just left rehab after some time recovering from the worst and most self-destructive few weeks of her life and is looking to reconnect and rebuild bridges. Dora, too, is trying to put her connections to her Northampton friends back in order after a guilt-induced self-exile after Faye hitting rock bottom (she blamed herself, no matter how many times Marten, Hannelore and Tai told her that such a viewpoint was self-indulgent stupidity). Marten decided to get all the gang together in order to do so. Veronica volunteers Jim's big backyard as the venue.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 02:24
There is no such thing as 'two conflicting things are right'.

Like I said. That certainty is the root of most human evil. if it were obvious, there wouldn't be any conflict in the world.

Let me be clear: aside from fundamental facts about the universe, nothing is "true." If nothing is true, nothing can be right.

The only way to define anything as "right" or "wrong" is to make assumptions about what must be true. To establish axioms.

Let us establish the Axiom that there is nothing more important than friendship. Based on that single axiom, what Dora did is wrong.

See how easy that is? No matter what it is you believe to be true, no matter how deeply you've reasoned it out, it's all resting on some assumption that you simply assume is correct. Rather more critically, you can't even get to an actual fundamental truth. Try to justify your assumptions, and you will find you've simply invoked another set of axioms.

Critically, not everyone is using the same axioms. Sometimes, you can demonstrate that someone's axioms contradict each other. As such, their reasoning can't be "right." Sometime you can demonstrate that someone's reasoning is in conflict with their axioms. This is another case that can't be right.

But two people can apply different axioms to the same problem and come up with different answers. Both answers are "right." "Wrong" in this case doesn't mean "not true," it means "I reject your axioms."

Most people axioms aren't formal. They are beliefs and feelings. "I have to protect my business." "I have to act in a morally sound manner." :I have to support my friends." "Good people don't do hurtful things."

Those can all be the beliefs of a single person. Using any combination of those beliefs a single person can reach the conclusion that a single action is bot right and wrong. Or that two exclusive actions are both the right thing to do.

The fact is, there reasoning is correct. The failure of humans, and wellspring of evil, comes of the desire for simplicity and black vs white answers. But reality doesn't work in those terms. Reality doesn't even factor right or wrong. Reality just is. Everything else is just a point of view.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Markus Ramikin on 21 Jan 2015, 02:46
Quote
Let us establish the Axiom that there is nothing more important than friendship.
Uh, why would we want to do that? It's clearly nonsense. Sure, "nothing is true" if the only thing you examine for truth-value is sweeping statements like that.

A certain character once said, "My favorite three questions are, What do I want?, What do I have?, and How can I best use the latter to get the former?" I have always found it a wonderful summary that cuts through a lot of philosophical nonsense. You don't need any axioms around values such as friendship. Just need to realize that you have multiple values and need to weigh them. Have an idea how important friendship is to you - obviously it's not infinitely important - compared to other things. And to the degree that friendship has priority in your life, what's the best way to pursue it with your limited time and energy.

Not saying it's an easy problem. It can be fiendishly difficult. But high mathematics isn't easy either, doesn't mean a true solution to an equation doesn't exist.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 03:37
Quote
Let us establish the Axiom that there is nothing more important than friendship.
Uh, why would we want to do that?

To create a sample axiom that allows for an example that doesn't, itself, require further explanation. You want me to write a whole thesis on a concept, with real world detail, you have to pay me. You probably don't want to do that.

Most of the time, people don't reason out their beliefs. Since their beliefs are effectively their axioms, people haven't reasoned out their axioms. And in this case I mean all people. For every ideal you think you've handled rationally, there are probably 100 that you aren't even aware of. Your beliefs about the world have been forming ad hoc since you were born. Some of them formed before you knew what reasoning is.

When presented with internal or external conflicts, people tend to choose "destroy all uncertainty with prejudice." This leads to over reaction, war, useless self blame. Lots of different things.

Here's a really good Axiom: Never take a decision until you absolutely have to. Is it "the truth?" Of course not. But in a vast range of situations, it's probably the  best place to start. But not always. It's not really a moral axiom, so people who use it as belief are comfortable when other beliefs conflict with it. Breaking the "rule" doesn't represent a moral failure. Indeed, it can be spun as a virtue. Look at how decisive I am!

We do this all the time, juggling beliefs to get answers we're comfortable with. The issue comes in when the answers conflict and we aren't comfortable with any of them. Like say the answers say you have to protect your business and protect your friend, but you can't both without hurting your friend or your business.

Guilt is not a bad thing, in itself. I guess. It would be weird if most of humanity was wired for a pathological response. Guilt in a no win situation can act, in a reasonably healthy mind, as a motivation to find a different answer--either for the problem at hand or for similar issues in the future. Guilt only becomes an issue, when it is both misplaced and accepted as misplaced. Otherwise, it's just a file index tag that says "this memory doesn't playout the way I would like." and that's okay.

Emotion is very important to how humans work, but sometimes we give it too much power. "I have guilt here, so I must be wrong." But all guilt is is a signal of discomfort. Sometimes discomfort is the best you can do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: swapna on 21 Jan 2015, 03:55
Faye is being fired for misconduct, or fired "with cause" as opposed to being laid off/let go by a company that is downsizing. As far as I understand if you are fired "with cause" you don't get any severance package, you forfeited it when you broke your employment contract. If you are fired "without cause" the company should include vacation days and other compensation as part of the severance package, as they are the ones breaking the employment contract.

Faye might be eligible for unemployment?

Yeah, that's what I meant. I was just wondering why Dora would do that - it wouldn't be that much harder to terminate Faye's employment properly, that would make her eligible for unemployment benefits, she would pay the vacation days and she can be sure that Faye won't sue her or anything since Faye knows the alternative is having none of that.

I'm not saying Faye shouldn't be fired at all, I'm just don't know why you wouldn't make sure your friend (and valued employee! As I said, Dora owes her as friend and business owner, even if Faye messed up just now) could find work again as fast as possible and could collect unemployment so she can make rent next month.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 21 Jan 2015, 03:58
The thing is, this way really will help push Faye towards rock bottom faster, and therefore getting the help she needs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: swapna on 21 Jan 2015, 04:02
I must disagree there, sorry - I don't think messing up chances with future employers and cutting off her money so that she can't make rent is 'helping' in any way. Why would you want her to hit rock bottom instead of assuming getting fired is hitting rock bottom while still making sure she can pay her therapist?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 04:14
Yeah, that's what I meant. I was just wondering why Dora would do that - it wouldn't be that much harder to terminate Faye's employment properly, that would make her eligible for unemployment benefits, she would pay the vacation days and she can be sure that Faye won't sue her or anything since Faye knows the alternative is having none of that.

There's no master record of employment. Even unemployment is down to things filed with the state that are basically confidential. Firing Faye for cause only impacts Faye's future prospects to the extent that Dora tells a future employer what she did and why. And that only applies to the extend that Faye uses Dora as a reference. Dora could fire Faye for this and not tell anyone the reason. So, as of now, none of Faye's future prospects is involved.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 21 Jan 2015, 05:26
Not only that, but it's generally considered best practice for employers to not say anything about an employee's performance, only that they did work there. Otherwise, they're opened up to a lawsuit.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 21 Jan 2015, 05:33
Not only that, but it's generally considered best practice for employers to not say anything about an employee's performance, only that they did work there. Otherwise, they're opened up to a lawsuit.

"I'm afraid that we do not give our detailed references for our former employees. However, if we did, his would rhyme with 'Mazy Loron'."
-- Catbert, the Evil Director of Human Resources
-- Dilbert (http://www.dilbert.com/)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Jan 2015, 06:48
There's a formulation of the Categorical Imperative which dictates that you must never treat humans as means to an end but always as ends in themselves.

Taken at face value, that would make Dora's action unethical, along with virtually every other management action in the world.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 21 Jan 2015, 06:58
People are assuming that Faye got vacation days / sick days / personal days. As a small business, and a traditionally unstable one being the food service industry, Dora probably can't afford to pay for days off. I work for a corporate franchise and my vacation pay was eliminated over five years ago. Now if I want time off I have to save up for it or I won't be able to afford it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Markus Ramikin on 21 Jan 2015, 07:03
RF: I don't really wanna dig more into the unseemly things you're doing to words like "axiom" and "truth", so let's get back to the actual situation we were discussing, and see if we disagree about anything of substance.

You say that second-guessing, by which you mean introspection by which you mean Dora taking time to check, isn't a bad thing. Sure. I agree. Decisionmaking happens in conditions of uncertainty, with limited time, energy, patience, and intelligence. If you think about it later, maybe you'll see a way you could have done better. That can be useful.

You say that guilt can motivate you to look for better answers. Me, I earlier said,
Quote
"feel bad yes, feel guilty no. Her friend is in trouble and that's a bad thing, and yes, if Dora cares about her then she will feel accordingly.
That feeling of "this is a shitty situation and I wish I didn't have to fire Faye" is the relevant motivator, and I have no issue with that causing her to give more thought to the situation. But when I say guilt, I mean this:
Quote
But any feelings of "I shouldn't have done that" or "I'm a bad person because I did that", she doesn't deserve, she should know that she doesn't, and stand by her decision against anyone, including the little voices in her head.
(Assuming that in hindsight the reasons for firing Faye look sound to her, and according to her best judgement that decision remains the correct one.)
Whether or not we'd agree to define the word guilt this way, are we in disagreement about my actual meaning here?

Quote
Guilt is not a bad thing, in itself. I guess. It would be weird if most of humanity was wired for a pathological response.
We are. For more than one. The human brain is a horrible kludge. I'm sorry.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Devlosirrus on 21 Jan 2015, 07:54
Not only that, but it's generally considered best practice for employers to not say anything about an employee's performance, only that they did work there. Otherwise, they're opened up to a lawsuit.

Not technically true.  Employers are free to say whatever they'd like to someone calling for a reference, they just need to have documents to back it up.  I've given several people extremely shitty references, with very specific examples of their shitty behavior.  However, before I did so, I made sure that I had signed disciplinary documents to prove it.  If you say something bad about someone and can't prove it, then you could be sued.

Weird thing to post about, I know.  This thread just has me feeling that managerial feel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 21 Jan 2015, 08:50
Not only that, but it's generally considered best practice for employers to not say anything about an employee's performance, only that they did work there. Otherwise, they're opened up to a lawsuit.

Not technically true.  Employers are free to say whatever they'd like to someone calling for a reference, they just need to have documents to back it up.  I've given several people extremely shitty references, with very specific examples of their shitty behavior.  However, before I did so, I made sure that I had signed disciplinary documents to prove it.  If you say something bad about someone and can't prove it, then you could be sued.

Weird thing to post about, I know.  This thread just has me feeling that managerial feel.

For the most part, when I'd terminate I'd give vague, lukewarm-positive responses to any questions other employers asked me because I didn't see the point in screwing them out of another job.  I'd just never tell them whether we terminated or they did. 

Except when they'd get fired for something so beyond the pale, and then have the audacity to file for wrongful termination with the state (which happened twice, with two different employees).  Then I'd get out the employee file and had fun.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Devlosirrus on 21 Jan 2015, 09:26
For the most part, when I'd terminate I'd give vague, lukewarm-positive responses to any questions other employers asked me because I didn't see the point in screwing them out of another job.  I'd just never tell them whether we terminated or they did. 

Except when they'd get fired for something so beyond the pale, and then have the audacity to file for wrongful termination with the state (which happened twice, with two different employees).  Then I'd get out the employee file and had fun.

Oh yeah, sure.  If it was a situation wherein they just didn't work out, then I'd certainly give a positive reference.  I've had to fire several employees who worked out perfectly at a different business down the street.  Some people just aren't suited for certain jobs, it's nothing to get mad about.  However, I have had some employees who were either constantly coming in hung over or otherwise impaired, had a piss-poor attitude and work ethic, or were stealing controlled substances, and I'm not nearly as forgiving with those kinds of infractions.  This was at an emergency vet clinic, bee tea dubs, so we took that kind of shit very seriously.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 10:05
RF: I don't really wanna dig more into the unseemly things you're doing to words like "axiom" and "truth", so let's get back to the actual situation we were discussing, and see if we disagree about anything of substance.
Don't go casting aspersions on the way I use words. Either point out what is wrong, in your opinion, or keep it civil. Calling my use "unseemly" isn't civil. If you feel I've impugned upon you honor or something, come out with it or call a mod.

(Assuming that in hindsight the reasons for firing Faye look sound to her, and according to her best judgement that decision remains the correct one.)
Whether or not we'd agree to define the word guilt this way, are we in disagreement about my actual meaning here?

At this point you appear to be waliking back you original declaration that Dora should declare "I'm not going to feel bad about this." In that case, no. But you seemed to want dig into the concepts, not argue the point. If you want to declare one of us is the winner, I'm not playing that game.

Quote
Guilt is not a bad thing, in itself. I guess. It would be weird if most of humanity was wired for a pathological response.
We are. For more than one. The human brain is a horrible kludge. I'm sorry.

Pathological: involving, caused by, or of the nature of a physical or mental disease.
Disease: a disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant, especially one that produces specific signs or symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a direct result of physical injury.

It would be weird if humanity were wired for mental disease. Kludged as it is, Kludged is the way it supposed to function.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 21 Jan 2015, 10:10
As BenRG said in the previous page, I think a timeskip might be in order really soon.

Faye's situation will not be resolved anytime soon, in comic time. A timeskip allows her to work out her issues without the  "Faye's alcohol problems" arc dragging for YEARS in real time. It would be really weird if Jeph resolved the whole thing in a few days, comic time, even if that took months or years real time.

And that also has the bonus of allowing Marten and Claire to live a happy relationship for some time, just as Dora has the same opportunity, without having any drama.

I can see the whole group falling apart due to Faye's problems, for a while at least.

With Alice Grove slowly taking off... I wonder how far we are from QC's end o_O
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: drmike on 21 Jan 2015, 10:11
Except when they'd get fired for something so beyond the pale, and then have the audacity to file for wrongful termination with the state (which happened twice, with two different employees).  Then I'd get out the employee file and had fun.

Places I have worked, even if we had the documentation to prove it, we weren't allowed to give reason or explanation.  You may have been able to back it up but the former employee could still file a lawsuit and that would mean money being spent fighting it.

Just to mention, there appears to be an issue with the website.

Starting on the home page:  http://questionablecontent.net/

Click on the previous link you get Comic 2878.  It doesn't go back to 2879.

From 2879, click on the next link and you just get a reload.

if this has been reported previously, please excuse me but I don;t see a mention of it.

thanks
-drmike
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Echoweaver on 21 Jan 2015, 10:51
The question of a timeskip is an interesting one.

I don't think that a timeskip is required for Faye to combat alcoholism in the story. It would be required if we wanted pull the curtain on her fight against addiction. But days advance for people fighting alcoholism. They have jobs and friends too. And even senses of humor.

It really depends on the story Jeph wants to write. Of course.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 21 Jan 2015, 11:02
Except when they'd get fired for something so beyond the pale, and then have the audacity to file for wrongful termination with the state (which happened twice, with two different employees).  Then I'd get out the employee file and had fun.

Places I have worked, even if we had the documentation to prove it, we weren't allowed to give reason or explanation.  You may have been able to back it up but the former employee could still file a lawsuit and that would mean money being spent fighting it.

Just to mention, there appears to be an issue with the website.

Starting on the home page:  http://questionablecontent.net/

Click on the previous link you get Comic 2878.  It doesn't go back to 2879.

From 2879, click on the next link and you just get a reload.

if this has been reported previously, please excuse me but I don;t see a mention of it.

thanks
-drmike

I think today's panel doesn't count as an update in terms of comic numbers.  My guess is when tomorrow's comic goes up, the next comic will go straight from 2879 to that one.

Same thing happened with the Marten/Claire christmas panel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 11:24
A nice visit from the Walky-verse

I really don't want a timeskip. I'm just philosophically opposed, I could see the therapist coming back. We haven't seen her for a while and this is the kind of issue their supposed to help with
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 21 Jan 2015, 11:36
Even with my previous knowledge, I am aghast at what this discussion is revealing of employment law and practice in the US.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 11:37
A nice visit from the Walky-verse

I really don't want a timeskip. I'm just philosophically opposed, I could see the therapist coming back. We haven't seen her for a while and this is the kind of issue their supposed to help with

A time skip might be somewhat unavoidable for this type of storyline, to have Faye reach the bottom and stay there for a time and then have to claw back through rehab and therapy might take a little too long, especially when there are other characters to consider.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Svennerson on 21 Jan 2015, 12:24
I must disagree there, sorry - I don't think messing up chances with future employers and cutting off her money so that she can't make rent is 'helping' in any way. Why would you want her to hit rock bottom instead of assuming getting fired is hitting rock bottom while still making sure she can pay her therapist?

It was pointed out earlier in this thread by people who have experience with alcoholic family/friends that you need to ABSOLUTELY cut them off from ANY method of alcohol.  If she has money to pay her therapist, she would spend it on booze instead.  If she only has enough money for rent, she would pay for booze instead.  Even without money, she would have a singleminded focus on finding ways to mooch alcohol off of friends.  Giving her money right now for any purpose is a terrible.  Frikkin.  Idea.

Alternative possibility: Dora talks it over with Tai, Tai talks it over with management (who she likely has blackmail of because she's Tai like that), Marten gets a temporary raise so that he can shoulder the rent and be in charge of money for the home, giving him the tools to cut Faye off (to a degree).  Boss Dora is keeping her workplace safe, Friend Dora isn't abandoning Faye, Faye is forced to sober up and confront her problems, the new assertiveness Marten's beginning to develop can be tested and utilized, and Tai continues to be a boss.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 21 Jan 2015, 12:34
WRT timeskipping, I'll just note that time compression is a venerable and legitimate tool of narrative storytelling. Faye can go off to rehab for a month or two (real time) and come back well on the way to recovery. I think Jeph has already done a fair bit of compressing in having her drop this far since the Angus breakup in just a couple of days QC time. We'll see how long it takes to get her into treatment from the current crisis. I'm hoping we don't need too many horrific scenes of Faye destroying her relationships with all friends and family as happens with actual alcoholics.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 21 Jan 2015, 12:40
Alternative possibility: Dora talks it over with Tai, Tai talks it over with management (who she likely has blackmail of because she's Tai like that), Marten gets a temporary raise so that he can shoulder the rent and be in charge of money for the home, giving him the tools to cut Faye off (to a degree).  Boss Dora is keeping her workplace safe, Friend Dora isn't abandoning Faye, Faye is forced to sober up and confront her problems, the new assertiveness Marten's beginning to develop can be tested and utilized, and Tai continues to be a boss.
Or Claire takes this opportunity to fly the nest, and moves in while Faye crashes on the couch. Or Pintsize gets a job (comedy gold possibilities there).

 i do hope Dora phones Marten and gives him a heads-up. Best for everybody, including Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: davedig on 21 Jan 2015, 12:45
Anyone have that Christmas picture? I miss it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 21 Jan 2015, 13:08
Anyone have that Christmas picture? I miss it.

I have it, not sure if it's kosher to post it.  Mods?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 21 Jan 2015, 13:13
Anyone have that Christmas picture? I miss it.

I have it, not sure if it's kosher to post it.  Mods?
Kosher? No, that's the Hanukkah picture.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 21 Jan 2015, 13:20
Anyone have that Christmas picture? I miss it.

I have it, not sure if it's kosher to post it.  Mods?
Kosher? No, that's the Hanukkah picture.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 21 Jan 2015, 14:14
In my state, the only thing a former employer can be asked is "would you rehire this person?" -- any answer past that can end in a lawsuit.

For unemployment, a termination by the company means automatic unemployment, unless the company fights against paying it on the grounds that the employee was WRONGFULLY terminated.  Unless the former employee can prove the reasons were unjust, unemployment is delayed six weeks.

If you walk off the job or voluntarily resign, unemployment benefits are rare if non-existent.

Health care, however, has changed.  An individual terminated from their position has several possibilities of receiving health care coverage.  They can choose to continue their coverage under COBRA (see here: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/cobraemployee.pdf) or apply to the Health Care Marketplace.  If they have not been able to secure another position where health care is offered, they may be placed into state Medicaid or they may be given state-sponsored insurance or vouchers (thanks, Obama!).  Mental health care coverage is included.  For any interim period between termination and new coverage, the state will cover up to 90 days worth of medical bills.

However, if one chooses not to engage or enroll in a health benefits package, they can receive a tax penalty.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 14:32
I don't know if someone has said it already, but from what I keep hearing about how employment in the US, I'm so glad I live in Europe. It's not perfect but wow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Jan 2015, 14:56
I'm not too keen on working in America, either, so there's that.

10 pages by Wednesday. If this wouldn't have been filler, I can only imagine how many posts I'd have to sift through...

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 21 Jan 2015, 15:16
We honestly don't know how far Faye has slid into alcoholism, if she is an alcoholic. She is certainly showing a lot of warning signs of being. Not every person needs to hit rock bottom, living on the streets, begging or worse for their next fifth of rotgut before they realize how bad it is. Having something Very Bad like this happening as a direct result of her drinking problem may be enough to shock Faye into realizing where she is headed. Or maybe not. Tellingly, when she was caught, she didn't offer up some lame excuse or brush it off. By her expression and body language she knew she screwed up big time. We haven't seen the aftermath of 'Go home, you're fired' yet, but she didn't immediately blow up at Dora. Being sympathetic and understanding of her, and letting her do what she wants has only let Faye stuff herself into the bottle. Having it slammed in her face like this might be enough to wake her up. Or Marten could come home from date night to find Faye passed out and surrounded by empties. It could really go either way right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 21 Jan 2015, 15:47
Faye knows. She knows what she's doing and that it's wrong, but #2872 basically implies she just doesn't care anymore. Whether or not this is also alcoholism, it's definitely depression first and foremost. Maybe that word 'fired' was a sobering slap, maybe not.

Is it confirmed that Angus has already left? Pintsize said "it's not too late", so maybe he hasn't moved out yet?  I strongly suspect any emotional intervention will have to involve him, just so both of them can have closure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 21 Jan 2015, 16:08
Having been to the "just don't care" stage many times before, it can be even worse than having suicidal impulses.  That's often what happens when you start to "get better", as if the mind just shuts-down to prevent direct self-harm, but by doing so, often means doing things like Faye is doing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 17:16
Anyone have that Christmas picture? I miss it.

I have it, not sure if it's kosher to post it.  Mods?
I don't see why not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 21 Jan 2015, 17:30
Cool.  Here 'tis.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 21 Jan 2015, 18:10
Re: timeskip, something like what (if I remember correctly) happened with Sven's storyline could happen. Faye could continue to exist, but for however long not be part of the story. During this time, Dora and Sven's thing, Marten and Claire, Hannelore in general, etc could be explored. We've had characters have pretty long breaks before without it being conspicuous. Faye's plot not being quickly resolvable doesn't mean everyone has to get a skip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 21 Jan 2015, 18:34
With Alice Grove slowly taking off... I wonder how far we are from QC's end o_O

Does anyone besides Jeph actually know how well Alice Grove is doing? It's early days, and not everyone who is a QC fan will be an AG fan, so it will have to build its own fanbase.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Jan 2015, 18:38
All hands, brace for impact...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 18:38
The Great Schism indeed :(
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 21 Jan 2015, 18:43
Image is not showing up at the moment on the website... Jeph's comment is not making me optimistic.

Comic is up...

Oh ####.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 21 Jan 2015, 18:47
Welp, that didn't go well. Somehow I doubt Dora's even worried about giving Marten any heads-up anymore, she's done.

Although she should call Marten anyway for his sake: "Hey, you might want to start saving some pennies - from now on, the rent is all you. And wear some flame-retardant when you go home tonight..."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Em on 21 Jan 2015, 18:49
Faye noooooo.
Dora noooooo.
Noooooooooo.
NOOOOOOOO.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 18:50
Oh nooooo, and also I missed my 12,345th post.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 18:52
Oh crap.

(The comic, not MoM missing his 12345th post)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 21 Jan 2015, 18:54
Whelp. Looks like Faye when for Option B. Denial and lashing out. Crash and burn time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 21 Jan 2015, 18:55
Are there customers in the store? Are Penny or Hanners on shift? Because that exchange was out in the shop and I can't imagine either of them keeping their voices down.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 19:00
I'm getting the feeling that this is Dora and Faye opening up in the morning.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 21 Jan 2015, 19:04
So, how many more ways can Faye fuck up this week?

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 21 Jan 2015, 19:06
I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 21 Jan 2015, 19:08
Wow.  That hit hard.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 21 Jan 2015, 19:09
Holy hell. Judging by that "screw you", we're probably going on a full-on self destructive rampage here. Will there be an apartment left to return to when Marten gets back from Movie Night?

So, how many more ways can Faye fuck up this week?

 :facepalm:
How many things does Faye have, and how many friends does she still have? That many ways.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 21 Jan 2015, 19:13
I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.

Good point, that. Go back over the entirety of the strip and Dora definitely has set the tone in the shop that might have allowed Faye to think this is OK. Though she's gone "hell-boss" -- at least in Faye's opinion -- before, Dora's strategic mistake was to let things ride, even contribute to the situation, before allowing things to build to the point where she's looking for an excuse, any excuse, to push the button. I've been on both ends of this (reflecting no credit on myself, believe me) and it's not fun to watch it happen, either from the outside or in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 21 Jan 2015, 19:18
I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.

Good point, that. Go back over the entirety of the strip and Dora definitely has set the tone in the shop that might have allowed Faye to think this is OK. Though she's gone "hell-boss" -- at least in Faye's opinion -- before, Dora's strategic mistake was to let things ride, even contribute to the situation, before allowing things to build to the point where she's looking for an excuse, any excuse, to push the button. I've been on both ends of this (reflecting no credit on myself, believe me) and it's not fun to watch it happen, either from the outside or in.

There's the silly insubordination of tricking new workers into cleaning the awful bathroom after Dora told you to, and there's ignoring your boss having told you not to drink at work.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 19:18
I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.

Good point, that. Go back over the entirety of the strip and Dora definitely has set the tone in the shop that might have allowed Faye to think this is OK. Though she's gone "hell-boss" -- at least in Faye's opinion -- before, Dora's strategic mistake was to let things ride, even contribute to the situation, before allowing things to build to the point where she's looking for an excuse, any excuse, to push the button. I've been on both ends of this (reflecting no credit on myself, believe me) and it's not fun to watch it happen, either from the outside or in.
I think that Dora does encourage witty banter and discussion about assignments, insubordination not so much

But the real worry, does saying "Screw this place, I'm out!" count as quitting? Or is Dora firing first, first legally?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Jan 2015, 19:22
Oh ####.

I could not have put it better.

This is worst-case stuff, Faye pulling lines from the self-destruction playbook.

This may be about the heaviest drama since The Talk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: AnnathEawesoMe on 21 Jan 2015, 19:26
This is huge. Rather than leaving with the impression of just being fired for drinking, Faye can now portray Dora as having flipped out on her and being out of touch with reality. I totally agree with Natswash that Faye can and probably will tell her friends she quit instead of being fired. More importantly, Faye can now use this angle to poison Marten/everyone else against Dora and avoid admitting the real reason for her dismissal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 19:28
I predict Faye will now gravitate towards Sven, as he might be both a place of temporary comfort and in her mind a way to get back at Dora. 

We're gonna see more and worse destructive behavior before this gets any better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 21 Jan 2015, 19:36
Makes sense.  Dora drops Sven from her life to avoid drama (she's trying to make her life less complicated), and fires Faye for the same reason.  Faye + Sven would make the drama bomb reach "nuke the entire site from orbit" levels.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Jan 2015, 19:37
Thank FSM she doesn't have a car.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 19:42
I predict Faye will now gravitate towards Sven, as he might be both a place of temporary comfort and in her mind a way to get back at Dora. 

We're gonna see more and worse destructive behavior before this gets any better.
So instead of a Svenectomy I get a Svenpocolypse?!
While recognizing it would be wrong to cheer I am a little tempted.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 21 Jan 2015, 19:43
This is huge. Rather than leaving with the impression of just being fired for drinking, Faye can now portray Dora as having flipped out on her and being out of touch with reality. I totally agree with Natswash that Faye can and probably will tell her friends she quit instead of being fired. More importantly, Faye can now use this angle to poison Marten/everyone else against Dora and avoid admitting the real reason for her dismissal.

Except Marten's reaction will most likely be to talk to Dora.  The other employees at the coffee shop are going to hear Dora's side first, and most likely agree with her.  I predict Hanners is going to be a nervous wreck after this though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 19:43
I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.

I've found that smaller companies and businesses tend to develop a sort of friendly insubordination just by the nature of their size. It's natural, because everyone knows each other or at least they know a fair bit of each other.

My last big job was with a small committee-run company helping to develop tourism in a local area, so we always had some big event or display on, especially when 2013 was the "Year of the Gathering". There was myself and three other full time staff, including the boss and during the year we had about 20 students working with us from various programs. For the most part I was in charge of training the students as well as dealing with vendors for fairs. Now, for most of the year, I could jokingly tell my boss to "feck off, I'm busy" while she called me a "sarcastic bastard". All in good fun, but there was also knowing where the boundries were - I would never dare dream of talking to anyone like that in front of board member (where we got most of our funding), nor would I talk like that during a meeting. Likewise the first day we had students in, I would be polite and mild-mannered. The reason my boss and I got into that frame of mind was because she knew that any task I was handed would be completed quickly and efficiently and that I wouldn't slack off.

You need that kind of friendly insubordination with a small group of people because it's all on them whether the business succeeds or not. And more likely than not, any small group of people working together will become friends and friends backtalk to each other, it's all about giving as good as you get with some people. But you also need to know when to stop messing around and act like a professional. There has to be a limit, a line drawn in the sand of what is acceptable and what is not and Faye crossed it by drinking on the job, or at least attempting to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 19:47
This is huge. Rather than leaving with the impression of just being fired for drinking, Faye can now portray Dora as having flipped out on her and being out of touch with reality. I totally agree with Natswash that Faye can and probably will tell her friends she quit instead of being fired. More importantly, Faye can now use this angle to poison Marten/everyone else against Dora and avoid admitting the real reason for her dismissal.

Except Marten's reaction will most likely be to talk to Dora.  The other employees at the coffee shop are going to hear Dora's side first, and most likely agree with her.  I predict Hanners is going to be a nervous wreck after this though.

I dunno,  I could see him finding out from Faye first, then talking to Tai about it. I definitely see Tai getting involved and talking with Claire/Marten about it. Probably talk to Emily too.
Who was it that said this could be Claire's chance to leave the nest while Faye couch surfs? Because as much as I would privately be heartwarmed, it's not likely they've been dating for what? Two/three days? A week tops?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 21 Jan 2015, 19:49
Faye... what are you doing?  This can't end well.

Quote
You should feel bad about things you must do, when they suck. Seriously. Who says, "I had to put the dog down, but it was time so I refuse to feel bad about it"? Really creep people, IMO. Healthy is, "This hurts, and I feel guilty, but I know it's the right thing to do."

My old beagle, I don't feel bad about putting down at all.  When we pulled the injection, the dog had been diabetic and blind for over a year.  Three days before, he had a stroke that left him in a state where we had to guide him to his supper bowl because he could not find it on his own.  Sure, it sucks that I lost a dog I loved, but I honestly believe that the stroke killed the dog and all we had put down was the empty shell.  Call me creepy all you want, but I have never felt guilt about making the call to put him down.

I thought Dora encouraged insubordination.
I've found that smaller companies and businesses tend to develop a sort of friendly insubordination just by the nature of their size. It's natural, because everyone knows each other or at least they know a fair bit of each other.

I can say that at my school, the teachers have this kind of relationship with each other and with our principal.  We know where the line is, we know when to pull the line back (such as in front of students and parents), and hoo boy if a teacher showed up drunk there would be hell to pay.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 19:50
I really hope Faye's downward spiral doesn't cause Marten/Claire or Tai/Dora friction.  I can see that happening, but I really don't want to be more pissed at her than I already am.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 20:01
Call me creepy all you want, but I have never felt guilt about making the call to put him down.
Agreed. I would've felt bad if I weren't in the room with him, but I'll never feel guilty about putting my old dog down a few years ago. That's not to say it wasn't difficult, and I certainly was sad, but never guilty.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 20:02
Who was it that said this could be Claire's chance to leave the nest while Faye couch surfs? Because as much as I would privately be heartwarmed, it's not likely they've been dating for what? Two/three days? A week tops?

I think they've had all of one official date, not counting breakfast with Mrs. Augustus. So, that's kind of why I'm shaking my head at the idea of Claire moving in with Marten. And I can't imagine either of them thinking it would be a good idea.

If it comes down to Marten needing to pay rent, I'd say Hanners would be the most likely one to step in and offer to help pay the rent for a time, because Marten is her friend.

To me, the most likely candidates for potential flatmates would be Dale (closer to work and Marigold), Tai (wanting to get out of the dorms) or Dora (because it's closer to work and probably cheaper than her house in Amherst). Now, I mention Dora because it would probably cause even more friction between her and Faye (possibly driving her deeper into her demons) and might roughen things between Dora and Tai. (Bear in mind that these are 4am musings and should probably be ignored)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 21 Jan 2015, 20:02
Okay, this is good. But most of this comic's content needed to happen before Fridays, not after. If Dora had told Faye to get help and Faye had said she doesn't need it before Faye was fired, I'd be firmly in support of Dora here. As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 21 Jan 2015, 20:06
Considering their past relationship, I don't see Dora or Tai moving into an apartment with Marten. Either one of them would probably cause stress between Marten and Dora, and Faye with everyone (more than is going to be caused as is anyway).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 21 Jan 2015, 20:07
Considering their past relationship, I don't see Dora or Tai moving into an apartment with Marten. Either one of them would probably cause stress between Marten and Dora, and Faye with everyone (more than is going to be caused as is anyway).

Kinda my point.
I do like to live up to the middle part of my name at times.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 21 Jan 2015, 20:09
As generally unlikable as Dora is, she isn't in the wrong. She pulled back a bit, told Faye to get help.

I am really, really disappointed (but not surprised) with Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: FunkyTuba on 21 Jan 2015, 20:12
Some predictions

* Dora may have fired Faye but Dora's going to have to find a way to make herself do the paperwork, she will probably find that harder to do than she feels at the present

* Sven will show up when he can do the most good, not when he can do the most bad

* Unfortunately that means Faye's got farther to fall (yes it's possible)

* Hopefully it doesn't happen while she's babysitting Sam (or if it does then Sam shows herself to be as capable of handling herself as she usually does)

* Marten's going to get hit with some serious choices

* The next time we see Angus he'll be eating cereal

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 21 Jan 2015, 20:12
As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.

... I guess, but anyone who is holding Dora to that standard, but not Marten.... is kinda holding a double standard.

Assuming you mean that Dora should have tried to help Faye before she fired her. Marten is just as guilty of not trying to help Faye out in the relatively short span of time it has taken her to spin out of control.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 20:14
Like I said too early for Claire. I think Marigold and MoMo would be the logical choice as we already know that a new roomate is something they'd like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 21 Jan 2015, 20:19
I doubt we'll see anyone else move in or Faye move out permanently. I suspect Veronica will be most likely to chip in with the rent until Faye gets back on her feet. She's the most well-off of the cast (other than Hanners), she's openly scoffed at the cost of rent in the area and she'd be helping out her son.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 21 Jan 2015, 20:21
My old beagle, I don't feel bad about putting down at all.  When we pulled the injection, the dog had been diabetic and blind for over a year.  Three days before, he had a stroke that left him in a state where we had to guide him to his supper bowl because he could not find it on his own.  Sure, it sucks that I lost a dog I loved, but I honestly believe that the stroke killed the dog and all we had put down was the empty shell.  Call me creepy all you want, but I have never felt guilt about making the call to put him down.

Agreed. I would've felt bad if I weren't in the room with him, but I'll never feel guilty about putting my old dog down a few years ago. That's not to say it wasn't difficult, and I certainly was sad, but never guilty.

Are you saying you didn't feel bad? I never required guilt. I just said there's nothing wrong, or pathological about guilt itself. That Guilt is Healthy in those circumstances. Broccoli is healthy too, but if you don't eat it, it doesn't mean your sick. Did you declare that you weren't going to feel bad about? Cuz I gotta stick to my guns on that one. That's a bit of creepy thing to do after your dog dies.

If you didn't feel bad, um... Okay. I'm not getting the impression that that's the message, so I don't see the point. Care to elucidate?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 20:23
I doubt we'll see anyone else move in or Faye move out permanently. I suspect Veronica will be most likely to chip in with the rent until Faye gets back on her feet. She's the most well-off of the cast (other than Hanners), she's openly scoffed at the cost of rent in the area and she'd be helping out her son.

Veronica as a temporary roommate for Marten?  It's sounds so painful and yet I eagerly want to see it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 21 Jan 2015, 20:24
I believe they meant Veronica covering Faye's half of the rent, not moving in. That's something neither of them would want to do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 20:28
I believe they meant Veronica covering Faye's half of the rent, not moving in. That's something neither of them would want to do.

I understood that, I was just thinking of the possible scenario.  Veronica seems eager to be involved in Marten's life, but I doubt he would ever agree to let her actually move in.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 21 Jan 2015, 20:30
April would be able to confirm this, but I believe that the previous week, in-comic, has lasted three or four months IRL. Of course, I'm sure we've all had weeks where so much has happened that it has ended up feeling like three or four months! :-P

It's worse than that! A week ago in comic time, Veronica signed a lease in Northhampton, May was job-hunting, and Marten went hiking with Emily and Sam. In real time, those strips ran from June 4th to July 1st. So the time dilation factor is currently on the order of 1 day comic time ≈ 30 days real time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rusty on 21 Jan 2015, 20:34
Somehow, I am surprised that nobody has commented in the 2 hours since it was posted.

From what Dora says, it seems as though she has some sympathy for Faye- if she did what Dora suggested, she might even get A job back- not the Ass. Manager, but something. 

But like many people who have developed problems, Faye cant see it.  I forsee that she has yet to hit rock bottom.... 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 21 Jan 2015, 20:34
The strip's been consistent through most of its run as to approx. 30 strips=1 day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 20:38
If you didn't feel bad, um... Okay. I'm not getting the impression that that's the message, so I don't see the point. Care to elucidate?
I can only speak for myself, but if I hadn't convinced myself it was the right thing to do (which it was), I would've been consumed with grief. Like I said, I was very sad, but I didn't feel at fault.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tova on 21 Jan 2015, 20:42
Quote
My favorite memory of him will always be the milkshakes. We'd go down to the ice cream parlor and get vanilla milkshakes, and he'd pour a little bourbon in his. He wasn't an alcoholic or anything. I mean he'd have like the one milkshake with bourbon in it a week and that was it, but mom was raised Baptist and didn't want him drinkin' at all. It was our little secret.

I originally took this at face value, but I have become sceptical...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 20:51
Quote
My favorite memory of him will always be the milkshakes. We'd go down to the ice cream parlor and get vanilla milkshakes, and he'd pour a little bourbon in his. He wasn't an alcoholic or anything. I mean he'd have like the one milkshake with bourbon in it a week and that was it, but mom was raised Baptist and didn't want him drinkin' at all. It was our little secret.

I originally took this at face value, but I have become sceptical...

I was thinking the same thing, that's why I'd really like to see Faye go home for a bit,  maybe we can get more of her backstory as well as her dad's through conversations between her and her mom.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 21 Jan 2015, 20:55

But like many people who have developed problems, Faye cant see it.  I foresee that she has yet to hit rock bottom....

You can run on for a long time, but sooner or later Gods gonna cut you down.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 21 Jan 2015, 20:56
As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.

... I guess, but anyone who is holding Dora to that standard, but not Marten.... is kinda holding a double standard.
My problem wasn't just that Dora didn't tell her to get help, but either way that's an unfair comparison.
Dora has known Faye for longer, for one. She also spends far more time with Faye than Marten does, and unlike Marten, Dora has been directly told by Faye that she wants to drink herself into oblivion. As far as we've seen, Marten has only observed Faye drinking earlier in the day than usual. Dora has far more information about the situation that Marten does. And, after catching Faye drinking on the job, (Which should come as no surprise after Faye said she wanted to be drunk on the job the day before, came in reeking of booze, happy, and had no hangover,) Dora didn't seem concerned or sympathetic in the slightest, just angry.

So yes, I hold Dora to a different standard then Marten, because Marten is far more ignorant of the situation and hasn't reacted with pure anger to his best friend hitting rock bottom.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 21 Jan 2015, 21:02
As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.

... I guess, but anyone who is holding Dora to that standard, but not Marten.... is kinda holding a double standard.
My problem wasn't just that Dora didn't tell her to get help, but either way that's an unfair comparison.
Dora has known Faye for longer, for one. She also spends far more time with Faye than Marten does, and unlike Marten, Dora has been directly told by Faye that she wants to drink herself into oblivion. As far as we've seen, Marten has only observed Faye drinking earlier in the day than usual. Dora has far more information about the situation that Marten does. And, after catching Faye drinking on the job, (Which should come as no surprise after Faye said she wanted to be drunk on the job the day before, came in reeking of booze, happy, and had no hangover,) Dora didn't seem concerned or sympathetic in the slightest, just angry.

So yes, I hold Dora to a different standard then Marten, because Marten is far more ignorant of the situation and hasn't reacted with pure anger to his best friend hitting rock bottom.

YOU, are a small business owner.  You have recently promoted a long time friend to Assistant manager at her urging, because it will cut back on your workload.  Said friend had previously signed a contract with you stating that she would not drink at work, do drugs at work, or any other actions that might interfere with her ability to preform her assigned duties.

Said friend is now clearly in breach of contract.  You have a choice at this point.  Act like her friend, or act like her boss.  Previously, your other employees have expressed disapproval at the friend's promotion.  If you allow your friend to continue at work after a large breach of contract, what kind of message does it send?  What does it say to those employees who no doubt have their own problems, but continue to show up to work sober no matter the temptation to get shitfaced?

Also, we haven't seen Marten's reaction to this situation.  Remember when he had to deal with Dora's problems?  He reacted with anger and disgust at the end of his rope.  He's likely going to leave Faye by herself, or have to cancel his date with Claire to deal with Faye.  This is going to breed resentment.  Marten is zen yes, but human nature dictates that at some point he will snap and react in a similar manner to Dora if Faye doesn't straighten out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 21 Jan 2015, 21:04
I highly doubt Faye signed a contract of any sort.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 21 Jan 2015, 21:07
Dora was a massive control freak and did everything by the book.  I'd be surprised if Faye didn't have some sort of contract.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 21:16
Dora was a massive control freak and did everything by the book.  I'd be surprised if Faye didn't have some sort of contract.

If she didn't get a contract she I'm sure got the same talk Hanners and Cosette did when they were hired.  http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1720

In some states that might constitute a type of implied contract.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 21 Jan 2015, 21:17
Also, we haven't seen Marten's reaction to this situation.  Remember when he had to deal with Dora's problems?  He reacted with anger and disgust at the end of his rope.  He's likely going to leave Faye by herself, or have to cancel his date with Claire to deal with Faye.  This is going to breed resentment.  Marten is zen yes, but human nature dictates that at some point he will snap and react in a similar manner to Dora if Faye doesn't straighten out.

The problems aren't remotely similar. Dora's problems affected him directly, and accused HIM of doing things wrong. Faye's problems do affect him (in that now she has no job and no way to make rent), but also the problems don't immediately have a "I have issues so I'm pissed with you now and you should apologize" interaction. Dora's problems basically caused her to be adversarial with Marten, that was DIRECTLY the problem. Faye's problems on the other hand, are just self-destructive, and can in periphery cause damage to Marten, but aren't really directed at him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 21 Jan 2015, 21:22
Call me crazy but I like Dora a bit more during this arc. Actually, ever since she started dating Tai (feels like ages ago) I think her character has been on a constant upswing. The one thing all the characters have struggled to develop is decisiveness and the ability to take responsibility for their actions - I feel Dora has made the most progress in this area of all the characters (newer characters like Claire or Emily excluded from this comparison, of course). The next big step, as others have mentioned, is for Dora not to backslide into guilt - whether with or without the effort of reflection - and self-incrimination. But I have a feeling that Jeph likes things twisty, so blah, I'm expecting some of the other characters to try and commandeer Dora into guilt over these events. Stay strong Dora!  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 21 Jan 2015, 21:22
Also, Faye and Dora started their relationship (as far as we know) as employee/employer. I doubt they were friends until Dora hired Faye to work at the shop.

They probably didn't know each other for very much longer than Faye knew Marten. Hadn't she just moved up to NorthHampton?

She also spends far more time with Faye than Marten does, and unlike Marten, Dora has been directly told by Faye that she wants to drink herself into oblivion. As far as we've seen, Marten has only observed Faye drinking earlier in the day than usual. Dora has far more information about the situation that Marten does.

Marten and Faye LIVE together. I would argue that they probably spend a comprable amount of time together as Faye and Dora spend together, taking into account that they (all three of them) work different shifts and are dating other people. Faye found a bottle in her bed, how many bottles are in the living room/around the house now? Marten has gotten different warnings signs than Dora had, but he still should have noticed something. He chose to not push the issue with Faye, just as Dora chose not to push the issue with Faye.

As far as I can tell, the only real difference between Marten and Doras interactions with Faye is that Marten didn't see Faye drinking/drunk at work. Its possible, even probable, that Marten and Dora just were not aware of how bad it was getting for Faye, and by the time Dora really realized how bad it was, it was too late. Dora had no choice but to fire her at that point.

I'm not saying that Marten should necessarily have done something, but if people are going to jump on Dora without jumping on Marten for being in a similar situation of "friendship responsibility" then yeah, I would say there is a double standard.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 21 Jan 2015, 21:31
Can we all just agree that, so far, Ben has made for a damned good prophet?

I say we deify him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 21 Jan 2015, 21:32
Anyone want to blame Pintsize for not noticing? He has watched her change clothes (#33), lives with her, has fewer distractions than Marten does, is in the apartment all day, and knows a little about how bad she's been feeling about Angus.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 21 Jan 2015, 21:33
Anyone want to blame Pintsize for not noticing? He has watched her change clothes (#33), lives with her, has fewer distractions than Marten does, is in the apartment all day, and knows a little about how bad she's been feeling about Angus.

Can't really blame a puppy for peeing on the floor before you've housebroken them.  Can't blame Pintsize for not showing empathy, because he doesn't have any.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 21 Jan 2015, 21:36
Yeah, I actually thought of including him in my argument, but I thought it would just weaken my point.

To be absolutely clear, I am not trying to blame anyone, Dora, Marten, or otherwise for not taking the right actions/noticing the right things with regard to Faye. I am just trying to point out that the people jumping all over Dora for "not helping Faye enough" are being a bit harsh. (or too lenient on Marten, I guess.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 21 Jan 2015, 21:39
Also, I can't help but wonder what Faye's next line would have been if Dora had simply stopped after the second panel.  :?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: OldGoat on 21 Jan 2015, 21:43
No speculation as to where the story line will go, but I have to say Jeph did an amazing job with the DFF (Dora Fury Face) in panel 2 of Thursday's strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 21:44
Also, I can't help but wonder what Faye's next line would have been if Dora had simply stopped after the second panel.  :?

I'm assuming she would have tried to joke/charm her way back into Dora's good graces. That seems to be her m.o.  I don't think she would have lost her cool if she hadn't been directly told to confront her issues.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 21 Jan 2015, 21:46
No speculation as to where the story line will go, but I have to say Jeph did an amazing job with the DFF (Dora Fury Face) in panel 2 of Thursday's strip.

I was just talking with someone about how that just might be the angriest face we've seen on Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: haikupoet on 21 Jan 2015, 21:53
I'm baffled as to how anyone can not be giving Dora the benefit of the doubt here. In my view, it's reasonable, even desirable, to be friends with your employees, but you still have to be a hardass when shit hits the fan like this. Now, admittedly, I'm an aspie so this is something that'll probably come across as being very weird to some people, but you gotta do what's best for the situation, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 21 Jan 2015, 21:54
I have real problems with Faye's entitlement here. You "can't" fire me? Uh? Special snowflake much? You come into work plastered and you expect that to be cool?

And yet, I think this is an issue that goes back to Dora. She has issues asserting boundaries and then she doubles down and it's seen as irrational. I will always believe that Dora should have broken up with Marten when he balked at living with her without Faye. To me, it seemed clear that for Marten, Faye was always going to come first. I think Dora realized that subconsciously, but she didn't enforce boundaries, which set up the acrimonious breakup.

Here, as she says, she put up with Faye's blatant disrespect to other employees. Faye hazed Raven and was a shit to Penny. I've actually never really seen her interact much at all with Cosette, and she's Hanners' friend and is sort of *shrug* about Dale. Dora should have shut her down back when it was just her, Raven and Faye and Faye acted like a shit to Raven continuously. Dora allowed Faye to feel untouchable and now she's reaping the whirlwind.

I want Faye to stay gone from CoD. I don't wish her ill and I do hope she takes someone's advice to get help. Angus doesn't want her anymore. She's lost her job. Marten is in a budding relationship with someone else. Sven is ... Sven. Faye has basically hit bottom and it's up to her - not Dora, not Marten, not Hannelore - to pull herself out. I hope she does. But I don't want her back at CoD, and to be frank, I don't want her and Dora to interact after this.

I do think Jeph is setting this up to phase Dora out of the comic, at which point I'll bid the comic adieu. His choice, of course, but QC without Dora being a large part of it won't work for me. However,  if he is putting Dora on a metaphorical bus to ensure that she has washed her hands of Faye's toxicity for once and all, I'll approve. I won't continue to read, but I'll approve.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 21 Jan 2015, 22:07
Thank FSM she doesn't have a car.
No kidding.  I once sent someone home for showing up to work completely drunk and who spent the first hour of her shift vomiting in the toilet.  I had no authority to fire her, and the boss didn't decide to do so.  About an hour after that, my remaining co-worker and I realised in horror that she always *drove* to work, and despite trying to do the right thing, let someone who was completely smashed behind the wheel of a car. 

In retrospect, it'd have been better to let her sleep it off on the sofas, at least until the owner came in, that is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 21 Jan 2015, 22:08

Who was it that said this could be Claire's chance to leave the nest while Faye couch surfs? Because as much as I would privately be heartwarmed, it's not likely they've been dating for what? Two/three days? A week tops?

Not only that, if there's anyone who needs their boundaries and privacy respected, it would be Claire. On top of all the reasons it would be a worse idea than Marigold moving in with Dale would have been, she can't live with Pintsize. An ideal for Claire would be a place of complete privacy and refuge like Hannelore has and which she could in no way afford.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 21 Jan 2015, 22:16
I do think Jeph is setting this up to phase Dora out of the comic,
Half the cast works at COD. Really doubt it's possible to delete Dora from the comic. Faye, OTOH...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 21 Jan 2015, 22:16
Some predictions

* Dora may have fired Faye but Dora's going to have to find a way to make herself do the paperwork, she will probably find that harder to do than she feels at the present

* Sven will show up when he can do the most good, not when he can do the most bad

* Unfortunately that means Faye's got farther to fall (yes it's possible)

* Hopefully it doesn't happen while she's babysitting Sam (or if it does then Sam shows herself to be as capable of handling herself as she usually does)

* Marten's going to get hit with some serious choices

* The next time we see Angus he'll be eating cereal

Sam usually gets sent to CoD, so I think it wouldn't happen, but I'd like to think either Faye or Jim would realize that her babysitting was a bad idea (if she smells like booze, like she did when she got to CoD today, I don't think it would really matter to Jim if she claimed she was just hungover). Otherwise I feel bad for everyone, but especially Sam. And maybe Jim, after his ex found out, if Faye had been convincing when Sam was left with her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 21 Jan 2015, 22:28
Half the cast works at COD. Really doubt it's possible to delete Dora from the comic. Faye, OTOH...

I hope you're right, but it seems to me that the characters Jeph has gotten bored with have worked at shop, from the girl who was there at the start of the comic, to Raven, to Penny and Cosette being unseen for months, etc. Hanners doesn't need the job and I agree with those who say that she will shit on Dora for this move and possibly quit in protest/solidarity. Dale and Marigold's arc don't necessitate his being in the coffeeshop just as Amir and Natalie's arc didn't necessitate their being in Nat's apartment that she shared with Steve's redheaded ex after she was put on a bus.

If, as others predicted, Dora and Tai fight over this, it's likely they'll break up, severing another coffeeshop tie, and I could see Marten also coming down hard on Dora for this and deciding to cool his heels at Secret Bakery, especially now that he's over Padma and probably won't have any lingering sadness about this.

So while you make a good point, there are lots of ways to write around CoD being a focal point, and it could be that Jeph wants to take the QCverse and storyline in a different direction and center it back on Faye and Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 21 Jan 2015, 23:07
Quote
* Hopefully it doesn't happen while she's babysitting Sam (or if it does then Sam shows herself to be as capable of handling herself as she usually does)

Sam usually gets sent to CoD, so I think it wouldn't happen, but I'd like to think either Faye or Jim would realize that her babysitting was a bad idea (if she smells like booze, like she did when she got to CoD today, I don't think it would really matter to Jim if she claimed she was just hungover). Otherwise I feel bad for everyone, but especially Sam. And maybe Jim, after his ex found out, if Faye had been convincing when Sam was left with her.

Faye did teach Sam how to make an "old fashioned" if thats any concern..... (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2180)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 21 Jan 2015, 23:33
It was always likely with Faye's personality, that her response would be defensive denial. Irrespective of whether she personally thinks that she needs help, she'd never admit to it under these circumstances. The big shock for Faye (and a major decline driver) will be that her friends have only tolerated her quirks. The continual drunkenness is a step too far and I think that it will shock her how little leeway they will give her.

The next step? She's going to want revenge on Dora. She could tell Marten lies but it would be too easy for him to find out what really happened. No, I think that she is going to try to start a relationship with Sven. She might even try to move in with him if Marten insists on her getting this 'help' that she does not believe that she needs. Of course, Sven may not be interested in a constantly drunk Faye and that will be another bridge burnt.

Regarding Marten, thanks to life events, he hasn't been spending as much time at the apartment as he usually does. He may have only seen Faye early and late. Combined with his knowledge of how badly breaking up with Angus has hit her, he's probably has been giving her the benefit of the doubt. He's going to be out until late today with Claire so he likely won't find out about this until tomorrow morning unless Dora thinks to ask Tai to warn him.

Sam will be hit hard; she loves Faye! But Jim won't want her around a woman in this state. I also think that she will probably scare Sam off in short order if the girl tries to see her secretly. Alternately, drunken hijinx in charge of a teenager may see her end up in court-mandated rehab. I just hope Sam isn't too badly traumatised if that happens!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 21 Jan 2015, 23:37

But like many people who have developed problems, Faye cant see it.  I foresee that she has yet to hit rock bottom....

You can run on for a long time, but sooner or later Gods gonna cut you down.
I looked for Josh White's version, but this is Cash. It'll do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Meilu on 21 Jan 2015, 23:37
I'm baffled as to how anyone can not be giving Dora the benefit of the doubt here. In my view, it's reasonable, even desirable, to be friends with your employees, but you still have to be a hardass when shit hits the fan like this. Now, admittedly, I'm an aspie so this is something that'll probably come across as being very weird to some people, but you gotta do what's best for the situation, right?

I'm an Aspie as well. I'm confused by people thinking Dora is wrong in any way at all here too. I've never really liked Dora, but this is making me respect her. She set very obvious ground rules which Faye decided to ignore. CoD is Dora's baby, it's her life and livelihood. I'm starting to like Dora and dislike Faye, never even saw it coming.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 21 Jan 2015, 23:51
After reading today's comic, I am filled with a new hope that Faye is not even close to the end of her emotional curb-stomp.

How low can she go?  How low WILL she go?  Where will she end up?

...and WILL I HAVE ENOUGH POPCORN??
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 21 Jan 2015, 23:53
Bless you Tragic Pizza, if you hadn't posted it I would've.

Ben RG stop being right, it's painful.

Going to throw some Wild Mass Guessing out there but if Jeph was setting up to put Faye on a bus, I would expect it to be with Angus to NYC
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 22 Jan 2015, 00:00
I approve of "time to shit all over Faye". As a selfish thoughtless bitch, she's had it a long time coming. Treated Marten like garbage for years while harboring a secret crush. Used to physically assault Marten and others. Used Marten and others as emotional crutches. Fucked a well-known douchebag in a friends with benefits situation for months and was too thick to foresee that she'd eventually suffer collateral damage from his douchebaggery. Treated a dude like shit for years, warmed up to him, loved him, then effectively told him to go fuck himself when he wanted to follow his dreams. Dad dying is an explanation that only works for so long. Eventually one has to take responsibility for their shitty actions.

I see I am not the only one who despises Faye for her ongoing human cockroach behavior.

Quote
Dora firing Faye is completely in line with Dora's hasty shithead behavior that she's showed for years in the comic. If she gets pissed off, she literally burns everything down. Dumped Marten for standing up for himself. Disowned her own brother. Now she's fired Faye. Dora has no concept of loyalty or empathy. I'm actually more interested to see where Dora's character arc goes, if it goes anywhere at all. I think Jeph uses Dora as a one-dimensional stereotype of erratic bitch behavior that we've all had experience with. I'd like to see Dora completely alone and possibly a meth-head after seeing the way she alienates everyone.

Oh, I don't know about seeing Dora alone and a meth-head.  But it would be nice to see the world backhand the everloving sunshine out of her a couple of times for her overall contribution to the character misery index.

But Faye...oh, Faye...I'm watching that girl's deconstruction with rapture and popcorn.  Dora's probably got a couple of serious spankings coming, too, but that won't distract me from The Main Event.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Dust on 22 Jan 2015, 00:06
Regarding Marten, thanks to life events, he hasn't been spending as much time at the apartment as he usually does. He may have only seen Faye early and late. Combined with his knowledge of how badly breaking up with Angus has hit her, he's probably has been giving her the benefit of the doubt. He's going to be out until late today with Claire so he likely won't find out about this until tomorrow morning unless Dora thinks to ask Tai to warn him.

Dora's gonna have to call in one of the others to cover the empty shift now, so there's a 2/3 chance of Hanners or Cosette. The phone tree will get to him pretty quick, with either of those.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Arancaytar on 22 Jan 2015, 00:07
So. That just happened.

Whatever I think of Dora and Faye in general (they both tend to be pretty abrasive, honestly), Dora is completely in the right here. This didn't come out of nowhere - Faye being an ass to customers has been a staple gag as long as she's worked there, and while that used to be business as usual (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=285), Dora's disapproved of Faye's antics for quite a while (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1215). This not really a "final straw", because drinking on the job has been worse than anything she normally does, but it does explain why Dora isn't giving her another warning here.

If Faye manages to get her shit together after this, I think she'd likely get rehired. But so far she hasn't taken any of Dora's warnings seriously, and that is why Dora isn't sticking to a warning this time.

Edit: By the way, speaking of Dora's "get some help", it's been quite a while since Faye's talked to her therapist, hasn't it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 22 Jan 2015, 00:19
Wow, can people tone down the "Lol, glad she gets what she deserves/Dora is a complete bitch" crap.

Not only is it pretty shitty, I'd rather this thread not turn into the Marten/Dora breakup thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Scarblac on 22 Jan 2015, 00:32
I'm baffled as to how anyone can not be giving Dora the benefit of the doubt here. In my view, it's reasonable, even desirable, to be friends with your employees, but you still have to be a hardass when shit hits the fan like this. Now, admittedly, I'm an aspie so this is something that'll probably come across as being very weird to some people, but you gotta do what's best for the situation, right?

I'm an Aspie as well. I'm confused by people thinking Dora is wrong in any way at all here too. I've never really liked Dora, but this is making me respect her. She set very obvious ground rules which Faye decided to ignore. CoD is Dora's baby, it's her life and livelihood. I'm starting to like Dora and dislike Faye, never even saw it coming.
I'm not an aspie (and not American) and I also think Dora is doing the completely right thing, anger included. She is also doing the right thing for Faye: tolerating her doing this sort of thing is the last thing she needs. The only thing she can do as a friend is to support Faye once she's started on the road to recovery, now there's nothing to do but be tough.

I can't really imagine Faye getting rehired. She needs to sober up, and then take the next step in her life. Dora has been trying to push her to do that before (the art projects). And, in general, I think going back to places you once worked never works out anyway, and definitely not after this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 00:33
I do think Jeph is setting this up to phase Dora out of the comic,
Half the cast works at COD. Really doubt it's possible to delete Dora from the comic. Faye, OTOH...

The only cast members we see regularly these days--who are also employees--are Dora, Dale, and Hanners. Dora is dating Marten's boss, Dale has all of the jobs (and is dating Marigold, AND is rooming with the newest regular), and Hanners is the Woobie. Dora could totally drop out of the comic with little loss of options for the remaining cast.

She won't. There will be drama over Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: gopher on 22 Jan 2015, 00:44
Pretty much from her introduction Faye has been an entitled leeching thug. Her interactions with others are rarely pleasant, nearly always to her benefit and usually joyless. At leaast Pintsize has the excuse he was programmed that way, Faye is just an extremely self-centred jerk and frankly "wah wah, I saw my dad kill myself" doesn't hack it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: anahata on 22 Jan 2015, 01:02
This is worst-case stuff, Faye pulling lines from the self-destruction playbook.

I have real problems with Faye's entitlement here. You "can't" fire me? Uh? Special snowflake much? You come into work plastered and you expect that to be cool?

If she's downed a bottle of whisky, she's VERY drunk.
Plus she's Faye - always taking the aggressive line of defence.
Don't expect her to be rational.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 01:24
So, we have one more day this week. What is likely to happen? I'm thinking that we have basically two options:
So, what next week then? Perhaps Marten is either warned by Pintsize of what is going on (does Pintsize have a wireless modem? I think so and that means he should be able to send Marten an emergency text about what Faye is doing) or he comes home from his second date with Claire. What happens then very much depends on when Marten gets home. If he comes home whilst Faye is getting into her second bottle or something, then there will be an argument that could easily end with Faye making a rash decision (to move out because she's got 'hundreds of friends' with whom she can live).

I think it is quite possible that he won't find out until he comes home from his date with Claire. Maybe he's turned off his 'phone so they won't be disturbed. Maybe no-one thinks to tell him because it's remarkable how stupid people are and how hard it is for them to realise that a friend is in a potentially life-threatening emotional crisis. It is quite possible that the next couple of weeks will be the Second Date before Jeph returns to this story thread. In this latter scenario, Marten may come home to find Faye in a really, really bad state - worst case, she's unconscious (not passed out - unconscious) in a pool of her own vomit and bodily wastes after succumbing to alcohol poisoning.

After that, we go into the 'Friends of Faye Crisis Meeting' whilst Faye is in hospital. I could see Hanners paying for Faye's rehab on the grounds that she has more money than any one human could spend in several lifetimes. This will be good for Faye because Hannelore is the sort of hardass who would enforce any necessary behavioural changes with a fist of iron and a small legion of willing robotic watchdogs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 22 Jan 2015, 01:35
OK, screw Dora. But Faye has now lost her income. Marten cannot afford to pay her part of the rent, even if he is willing to accept her behavior for a while. Now, let us look at some of the options:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 01:51
OK, screw Dora. But Faye has now lost her income. Marten cannot afford to pay her part of the rent, even if he is willing to accept her behavior for a while. Now, let us look at some of the options:
  • Faye moves in with Sven. Unfortunately, this is a possible and probable scenario. Faye will get sweet revenge on Dora, but Sven will probably kick her out again if she does not sober up. Besides, with Sven's notorious man-whore ways, this will not last (even if Sven proclaims to have changed, he will probably change again when he finally gets what he wants).
(snip...)
  • Will Sam play a role? She adores Faye, and may have a positive influence. Hunting snakes and frogs in the woods may be just what Faye needs.

I agree that both of these are very possible. Sven throwing Faye out because he isn't interested in a relationship with a drunk will be another major milestone along the bad road. I also think that Sam is the one person whose perspective of Faye is important enough for her that she would try to be sober for her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Doc on 22 Jan 2015, 01:55
'Go home and get some Help.'

Help. I don't know that brand. Is Help a single malt?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Jan 2015, 02:15
Sounds more like bourbon, really.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: anahata on 22 Jan 2015, 02:16
Or coping mechanism on the rocks (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2039)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Welu on 22 Jan 2015, 03:54
I think Faye has at least one more big blowout coming, possibly from Marten or Hanners, who has been the loud voice at the end of their tether before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 22 Jan 2015, 03:55
  • Faye gets a job at the Horrible Revelation. This will be a very bad idea.
Actually, the HR may be interested in offering her a part-time job, as a bouncer (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=783). But she must not gain access behind the counter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Conzy on 22 Jan 2015, 04:27
As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.

... I guess, but anyone who is holding Dora to that standard, but not Marten.... is kinda holding a double standard.
My problem wasn't just that Dora didn't tell her to get help, but either way that's an unfair comparison.
Dora has known Faye for longer, for one. She also spends far more time with Faye than Marten does, and unlike Marten, Dora has been directly told by Faye that she wants to drink herself into oblivion. As far as we've seen, Marten has only observed Faye drinking earlier in the day than usual. Dora has far more information about the situation that Marten does. And, after catching Faye drinking on the job, (Which should come as no surprise after Faye said she wanted to be drunk on the job the day before, came in reeking of booze, happy, and had no hangover,) Dora didn't seem concerned or sympathetic in the slightest, just angry.

So yes, I hold Dora to a different standard then Marten, because Marten is far more ignorant of the situation and hasn't reacted with pure anger to his best friend hitting rock bottom.

YOU, are a small business owner.  You have recently promoted a long time friend to Assistant manager at her urging, because it will cut back on your workload.  Said friend had previously signed a contract with you stating that she would not drink at work, do drugs at work, or any other actions that might interfere with her ability to preform her assigned duties.

Said friend is now clearly in breach of contract.  You have a choice at this point.  Act like her friend, or act like her boss.  Previously, your other employees have expressed disapproval at the friend's promotion.  If you allow your friend to continue at work after a large breach of contract, what kind of message does it send?  What does it say to those employees who no doubt have their own problems, but continue to show up to work sober no matter the temptation to get shitfaced?

Also, we haven't seen Marten's reaction to this situation.  Remember when he had to deal with Dora's problems?  He reacted with anger and disgust at the end of his rope.  He's likely going to leave Faye by herself, or have to cancel his date with Claire to deal with Faye.  This is going to breed resentment.  Marten is zen yes, but human nature dictates that at some point he will snap and react in a similar manner to Dora if Faye doesn't straighten out.

Great post Magniras, I honestly find it astounding that people are still willing to go a bit easier on Faye in order to put some of the blame on Dora. People have been putting up with Faye for months, and I honestly can't quite figure out why. What does she bring to the other character's lives? At the start she gave Marten company when he was basically a desperate loser, and through her he made a load of other friends, which seems more a peripheral benefit than anything Faye actually did. What she did actually do was threaten him, beat him up and vomit on him. In terms of Dora no stepping up to try to get Faye some help, does no-one else think she saw Faye had a problem and just couldn't be bothered trying any more? She's repeatedly tried to help her in the past to no effect, there comes a time when everyone has had enough, and as someone has said previously 'having issues' really doesn't excuse being a (sexist insult removed by moderator) to your friends day in / day out. Also, aside from Marten, is there anyone left in the QC universe who actually likes Faye anymore? I think after today we have seen the end of Dora and Faye's friendship. (Rightly so IMO, what Faye did would have been a massive betrayal to someone who didn't have trust issues, to do it to Dora meant the result would be inevitable.) Does Hanners really like Faye, or does she just make an effort around her because of Marten? They certainly don't interact much on their own, even at work. The rest of the CoD staff certainly don't think much of her, we know Veronica was skeptical from the start, which pretty much just leaves Sam, who's a kid and doesn't know any better. I've got to say, if I knew someone like Faye in real life, I would have completely annexed them from my life very early on. Friendship is a two way street and if all you do is take you can't be surprised when your free run ends, which is exactly what Faye has done today.

Also think it's worth pointing out that I haven't exactly been Dora's biggest fan in the past, but after what's happened so far I really respect her as a businesswoman and a person in this arc. She's done the right thing for her own sanity and for her business. I agree with others in saying that she should definitely call Marten for his sake, so he knows what he's coming back to, but rage has a way of blinding us in the short term, so I wouldn't blame her if it skipped her mind. Also, first priority for her is to call her staff and get someone to cover for Faye, that has to take priority.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Conzy on 22 Jan 2015, 04:35
My old beagle, I don't feel bad about putting down at all.  When we pulled the injection, the dog had been diabetic and blind for over a year.  Three days before, he had a stroke that left him in a state where we had to guide him to his supper bowl because he could not find it on his own.  Sure, it sucks that I lost a dog I loved, but I honestly believe that the stroke killed the dog and all we had put down was the empty shell.  Call me creepy all you want, but I have never felt guilt about making the call to put him down.

Agreed. I would've felt bad if I weren't in the room with him, but I'll never feel guilty about putting my old dog down a few years ago. That's not to say it wasn't difficult, and I certainly was sad, but never guilty.

Are you saying you didn't feel bad? I never required guilt. I just said there's nothing wrong, or pathological about guilt itself. That Guilt is Healthy in those circumstances. Broccoli is healthy too, but if you don't eat it, it doesn't mean your sick. Did you declare that you weren't going to feel bad about? Cuz I gotta stick to my guns on that one. That's a bit of creepy thing to do after your dog dies.

If you didn't feel bad, um... Okay. I'm not getting the impression that that's the message, so I don't see the point. Care to elucidate?

In my experience, reducing a discussion to semantics is a sure fire way to create tension in said discussion. I'd say that it's pretty obvious that Penguin47 is saying that he felt sad that the right thing to do was to put his dog down, but was in no way going to feel like it was his fault, due to it being the right thing to do. That's a healthy way to approach an unenviable task. I can see this going the same way your discussion went a couple days ago with a poster whose name I can't remember, and in both cases I'm afraid I think you're being a little overly-critical of people's uses of language, seeing as you obviously have a background in philosophy, Reindeer. Like I said, when in discussion with those who might not have the same background it would probably lead to fewer arguments if you were to take people up on the spirit they have made their points in, rather than the specific philosophical definition of some of the words they have used.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 22 Jan 2015, 05:10
'Go home and get some Help.'

Help. I don't know that brand. Is Help a single malt?
No, it is blended:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Svennerson on 22 Jan 2015, 05:12
I honestly find it astounding that people are still willing to go a bit easier on Faye in order to put some of the blame on Dora. People have been putting up with Faye for months, and I honestly can't quite figure out why. What does she bring to the other character's lives? At the start she gave Marten company when he was basically a desperate loser, and through her he made a load of other friends, which seems more a peripheral benefit than anything Faye actually did. What she did actually do was threaten him, beat him up and vomit on him.

Okay, so before I continue, this is NOT a defense of Faye right now.  She's fucking up big time, and Dora is doing the right thing.  That being said, pre-breakdown Faye was definitely one of my favorite characters and would probably fight with Tai for best friend in the group, and I think it has to deal with the culture in Massachusetts.  If you're not being an ass to your friends there, you're not caring enough.  When my family gathers, it's basically a room full of Fayes (including the alcohol), and everyone is laughing and loving it.  Despite being displaced and raised in NC, my best friends have always been the ones that are at least a bit abusive to me.  Why?  Their hilarious, their loyal as hell when they need to be, they won't let ANYONE mess with me the wrong way.  I understand Faye's...attitude...is one that would not be appreciated everywhere, but in Mass it's almost revered.

They're called Massholes for a reason, you know.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: LeGrande on 22 Jan 2015, 05:13
What if Faye follows in her father's footsteps and commits suicide? After being fired and going on another drinking binge, she might think everything is hopeless. Even though she has a possibility of being rescued by Sven, who might decide to put up with Faye's issues because he's blinded by love/lust.

I could imagine a scenario where Marten and Claire come back from their date and find Faye's lifeless body on the sofa or in the bathroom. If Faye kills herself, the repercussions on the cast will be huge. The funeral would be a way to bring old characters back in an ensemble setting.

It's also possible that they find Faye so drunk and passed out that they call an ambulance and she goes to the hospital. Again, it would be a way to bring older characters back as they visit Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 22 Jan 2015, 05:18
I'm quite surprised at how resentful so many people are about Faye as a character, and even more about Dora.

One thing I'd say is that we have to keep in mind the slightly more comedic and, for lack of a better term, slightly less 'enlightened' circumstances of the earlier comics.

Jeph is an educated, sensitive gent, but in the early days he was playing Faye's violent tendencies for laughs, perhaps due to a lack of consideration or simply because the comic was a bit more cartoony in those days - either way I think he is nowadays far less likely to end a comic with the punchline being someone getting punched in the face.

The point I'm making is that accusing Faye of being a bad person based on her behaviour in earlier comics, when Jeph possibly won't have known himself as much as a writer, or known as much what he was aiming to achieve, isn't really fair on him at all, or on the character of Faye.

As for Dora I've no idea where this angry attitude is coming from.

Tell ya one thing though, I'd really like it if people stopped referring to anybody, fictional or otherwise, as a 'bitch' in this thread, mmm'kay?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Svennerson on 22 Jan 2015, 05:21
Tell ya one thing though, I'd really like it if people stopped referring to anybody, fictional or otherwise, as a 'bitch' in this thread, mmm'kay?

I'm sorry, I don't take orders from a bitch...
Mistew Gawwison

(The above was sarcasm, I do not have enough data to say whether or not you're a bitch :P )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 22 Jan 2015, 05:29
...

I really dont like the comic right now.  :cry:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 05:40
As for Dora I've no idea where this angry attitude is coming from.

IMHO, at least for some veterans, it is the break-up with Marten. It is simply amazing the degree to which some people have internalised that event and made it a personal affront.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 22 Jan 2015, 05:43
Really? Man, not sure how I feel about that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 22 Jan 2015, 05:56
I know that looking at Faye's behavior from the outside, it make perfect "logical" sense to say "why does everyone put up with her?" and act as if she's a horrible person.  I also know that even in real life it sometimes makes sense to cut someone out of your life when your interactions with them are only enabling their self-destructive (and destructive to others) behavior, or when their behavior is only hurting you; sometimes you have to distance yourself from something toxic for everyone's good.

But I think it's easy to forget that Marten, Dora, Hanners, etc are Faye's friends.  Friends accept.  It doesn't mean they overlook problems like this, or ignore them.  But it also means they don't just say: "You're in a bad place, you're a terrible person, this is hard for me to deal with, so good luck on your own."  They say: "How can we help you," even if that help is of the "tough" variety (and that can even include, at the most extreme, distancing themselves. )

Faye's not evil, she has a disease, and right now she isn't even willing to admit to needing to get well.  That's a hard place, and while I wouldn't condemn anyone for wanting to get away from that (being a friend/family member of an addict can be hell, and no one should be guilted into feeling that its their responsibility to fix someone else's problems) I think we're forgetting what the running theme of this comic always has been.  If Dora's response is immediately hardcore, and new-confident-Marten might be closer to that than we'd expect, and Hanners might show that hidden (but always present) backbone, I still couldn't see them ever stopping being Faye's friend, nor trying (in whatever way is appropriate) to help her move beyond this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 22 Jan 2015, 06:09
12 pages on Thursday. Could go nuclear depending on the Friday cliffhanger.

Damn you, Jacques! (does appropriate fist- wave)

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 22 Jan 2015, 06:13
I don't really want to think about what I might see in Friday's comic. The possibilities are just depressing. (excepting Movie Night, which would partially serve to make Faye storming off the cliffhanger)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Jan 2015, 06:13
It wouldn't surprise me if tomorrow's strip is a cute one featuring Marten and Claire, possibly ending in Marten getting home to find Faye smashed, as some have predicted. Too much drama is left in this arc to end it comfortably this week anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 22 Jan 2015, 06:17
I don't know if anyone's noticed this yet, but Dora has permitted Faye to drink at CoD before (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2448) (yes, it's just beer, but still...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ankhtahr on 22 Jan 2015, 06:24
But there's a huge difference between social drinking, as in drinking a beer with the pizza, together with everybody else, and getting drunk, just to get drunk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Blackbird on 22 Jan 2015, 06:26
I kind of wonder how this will affect Dora/Tai. 
Dora: "I had to fire Faye for drinking on the job."
Tai: "I get high as fuck at work all the time, what's the big deal?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 22 Jan 2015, 06:40
People can be just as alcoholic with beer as with hard liquor. It's not a 'milder' drink.. You just drink more of it. That said, the 'beer and pizza' was a different situation. By the look of things, it was near the end of the shift and the place was pretty dead. Dora was the one who mostly suggested having the beer and pizza there. And it wasn't like they were completely drunk, hiding and lying about it. It may be kind of hypocritical to say 'it's okay to have a drink on the job if I'm drinking too', but that situation and this one are very different animals.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Bologna on 22 Jan 2015, 06:46
I saw some musings about Faye's father's condition at the time of his death, and found this comic (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=591) while digging through the archives:

Faye: Mom, do you really have no idea why Dad killed himself?
Mrs. Whitaker: Honey, I've thought and thought about it for years and I still haven't got a clue. He never said anything to me, the coroner couldn't find anything unusual in his system, and his family doesn't have a history of depression.  It's just a mystery to me.

Thankfully, I don't have too much experience with post-mortem toxicology reports, but surely alcohol would appear on one, right?  So, chances are that Mr. Whitaker didn't have a traceable BAC at time of death.  Again, not sure how all of this works, but with all the talk about her father's condition, I thought I'd throw this out there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 06:50
@ Bologna,

I'm not going to insist on this being the answer but mothers do lie to their daughters if they think it will protect them. Maybe, because Mrs W knows how close Faye was to her father, she decided to hide the fact that he was an alcoholic from her? If so, then she could make an appearance if Faye ends up in hospital/rehab to tell the real story to Faye's friends.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Bologna on 22 Jan 2015, 06:57
@Ben, that's...possible.  Can't say we know too much about Faye's mom to infer either way.  That's almost a-whole-nother plotline in itself. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 22 Jan 2015, 07:01
I kind of wonder how this will affect Dora/Tai. 
Dora: "I had to fire Faye for drinking on the job."
Tai: "I get high as fuck at work all the time, what's the big deal?"
:mrgreen: Alternative Tai: "You bitch! I get high as fuck at work all the time. Why don't you fire me as well? No, wait a minute, I quit!"

Although drug and alcohol abuse are different, I would guess Tai is going to have great sympathy for Faye. Tai appears not to view her drug abuse as a problem, and seems not to have been reprimanded for it at her workplace. For her, drugs and alcohol are a natural part of daily life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 22 Jan 2015, 07:02
It's also questionable what the coroner might have thought was 'anything unusual'. Or it's possible he knew Mrs Whittaker was a devout non-drinker and hid the fact that he was drunk at time of death to spare her further pain. Or it's possible Faye was right. He wasn't an alcoholic, he only had one drink a week and just snuck it because his wife didn't approve of drinking. You don't have to have a family history of alcoholism, depression or mental health problems do have one of those issues. It is brought up because if there is a history of those sorts of things in your family, it increases your risk of developing them yourself. It could very well have been that Mr Whittaker was very depressed for a long time, or had other issues in his life that he hid from his family/they didn't see. Issues that he saw no other escape from. It's very easy to get into that sort of cycle of self destruction if you keep negative feelings bottle up. Even those that seem and are minor things when talked about and brought out into the light can be huge monsters if you keep it to yourself in the dark and keep poking at it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 22 Jan 2015, 07:17
Dora's reaction makes sense, I just wish she inverted the order. Seriously talk to Faye about why this is unacceptable and really damaging to her life, implore her to go to therapy, send her home for the day and then bring her in sober to talk about punitive measures.

I totally get why Dora did what she did though, especially since Faye blew off their last conversation about her drinking with humour. There's dramatic irony in that we can clearly see how self-destructive Faye is acting, while Dora and Marten have only gotten glimpses of Faye being a somewhat happy drunk*. If they had been witness to the Pintsize moment I think they'd have made a bigger deal about it.

*Even so, they still pressed the issue to some extent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Bologna on 22 Jan 2015, 07:18
So, really, what Mrs. Whitaker said might not mean anything at all. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 22 Jan 2015, 07:52
I'm quite surprised at how resentful so many people are about Faye as a character, and even more about Dora.

One thing I'd say is that we have to keep in mind the slightly more comedic and, for lack of a better term, slightly less 'enlightened' circumstances of the earlier comics.

Jeph is an educated, sensitive gent, but in the early days he was playing Faye's violent tendencies for laughs, perhaps due to a lack of consideration or simply because the comic was a bit more cartoony in those days - either way I think he is nowadays far less likely to end a comic with the punchline being someone getting punched in the face.

The point I'm making is that accusing Faye of being a bad person based on her behaviour in earlier comics, when Jeph possibly won't have known himself as much as a writer, or known as much what he was aiming to achieve, isn't really fair on him at all, or on the character of Faye.

As for Dora I've no idea where this angry attitude is coming from.

Tell ya one thing though, I'd really like it if people stopped referring to anybody, fictional or otherwise, as a 'bitch' in this thread, mmm'kay?

Yeah, this is a big issue for me too. In fact, I think the only way to really reconcile some bizarre contradictions in the strip's narrative/character world is to consider everything pre-500 to be non-canon. In fact, just from seeing how excited I am to read QC lately - let's face it, this is as dramatic and compelling as it's been in a long time maybe ever - my wife said today that she might finally start reading it herself. I'm considering suggesting that she just start at comic #500. I feel like I could fill in the necessary background in 2 minutes; not that I don't enjoy rereading those first 499 strips myself, but I've noticed that others who try to read the comic at the behest of serious fans tend to find them offputting. Or they'll get through the first 100 or so and be like "I had to stop, I don't get why you like this so much."

Then again, the post-500 strips, not to mention later dramaz like The Breakup might pack less of a punch if read this way. I dunno.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: AnnathEawesoMe on 22 Jan 2015, 08:12
This is huge. Rather than leaving with the impression of just being fired for drinking, Faye can now portray Dora as having flipped out on her and being out of touch with reality. I totally agree with Natswash that Faye can and probably will tell her friends she quit instead of being fired. More importantly, Faye can now use this angle to poison Marten/everyone else against Dora and avoid admitting the real reason for her dismissal.

Except Marten's reaction will most likely be to talk to Dora.  The other employees at the coffee shop are going to hear Dora's side first, and most likely agree with her.  I predict Hanners is going to be a nervous wreck after this though.

I dunno,  I could see him finding out from Faye first, then talking to Tai about it. I definitely see Tai getting involved and talking with Claire/Marten about it. Probably talk to Emily too.

How likely is Dora to tell Marten, or anyone else about this? It's well within her character to work the rest of the opening shift by herself, she's done it before. The only reason CoD is usually shown with 2-3 workers at a time is for the plot and dialogue reasons. ALSO it's kind of shitty to spread rumors around your friend circle. Even though Faye does have a problem, she is still a friend and a human, and Dora sending a mass text to everyone "HEY I JUST FIRED FAYE CAUSE SHE'S DRUNK HAHA" would be real douchey, not to mention unprofessional. No one's full out saying that she should do this of course, but she does have to approach this situation more delicately, being Faye's former employer. That being said, sending a Marten a head's up text to let him know to keep an eye on Faye, not necessarily what the full situation is, would be a good move. Truth be told Faye could easily be unsupervised until tomorrow morning (if Marten stays the night at Claire's, shwink :wink: ) and in her current state that's very dangerous.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: anahata on 22 Jan 2015, 08:26
Dora sending a mass text to everyone "HEY I JUST FIRED FAYE CAUSE SHE'S DRUNK HAHA" would be real douchey, not to mention unprofessional.

For sure, but not informing her/Faye's friends about what had happened (in more respectful tones, of course) would be downright irresponsible.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 08:28
Dora sending a mass text to everyone "HEY I JUST FIRED FAYE CAUSE SHE'S DRUNK HAHA" would be real douchey, not to mention unprofessional.

For sure, but not informing her/Faye's friends about what had happened (in more respectful tones, of course) would be downright irresponsible.

An attempt may be made and I think Hanners will be available but Marten...?

"Hi, this is Marten; leave a message 'cause I can't take calls right now..."

"Yeah, he's busy making out with me! *giggles*"

"Claire! Damn it! No more sugar for you! Anyway, yeah, leave a message and a number, kay?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2015, 08:44
Dora sending a mass text to everyone "HEY I JUST FIRED FAYE CAUSE SHE'S DRUNK HAHA" would be real douchey, not to mention unprofessional.

For sure, but not informing her/Faye's friends about what had happened (in more respectful tones, of course) would be downright irresponsible.

Dora would definitely try to contact Marten before anyone else, mainly because you know, he lives with Faye and is her best friend. Which might cause a little friction with Tai who might wonder why her girlfriend is calling her ex before her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kiloku on 22 Jan 2015, 08:45
Dora sending a mass text to everyone "HEY I JUST FIRED FAYE CAUSE SHE'S DRUNK HAHA" would be real douchey, not to mention unprofessional.

For sure, but not informing her/Faye's friends about what had happened (in more respectful tones, of course) would be downright irresponsible.

An attempt may be made and I think Hanners will be available but Marten...?

"Hi, this is Marten; leave a message 'cause I can't take calls right now..."

"Yeah, he's busy making out with me! *giggles*"

"Claire! Damn it! No more sugar for you! Anyway, yeah, leave a message and a number, kay?"

[/lurk]
They're not this kind of couple. And Marten is rather good at prioritizing his friends.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 08:56
Faye basically decided to not follow Angus to NYC because of CoD and Marten (her other friendships, like Hanners, are secondary).  Now CoD is gone, and Marten is all she has left.  Thus she has every reason to try and find Angus, patch things up with him, move to NYC.  This would also allow her to continue running from her problems, at least for awhile.

That said, I don't think Angus is going to go for it.  For one thing, it's going to be a drunken confrontation, and given his lack of tact, he's going to say something which pisses off Faye.  For another thing, he's probably already begun moving on mentally - the spell is broken for him.  Mostly though, it isn't going to happen because it's really bad storytelling for Faye to leave a wake of devastation and then be "put on the bus."  She has further to fall still.  So if she crawls to Angus, he must rebuke her. 

The problem is, I don't see how she hits bottom here - quickly anyway - because Marten is Marten.  As others noted, I just don't see how she will get Marten so mad he won't put up with her shit in the shorter run.  Marten is someone with great patience, and very submissive - he's a textbook enabler.  And he already has a dynamic where he's willing to do whatever is needed to support Faye.  Faye drunkenly trying to seduce Marten out of loneliness would be ugly and awkward, but it wouldn't sunder their friendship any more than Martin doing inverse hurt things.  Faye would need to be an unemployed drunken bum for months before Marten would start setting limits - and even then I wonder if he'd hit up his mom for some money rather than kick Faye out. 

Also, no one else is moving in with Marten unless she's put on a bus.  Yes, she could go to the Station for awhile.  Or go back home for awhile and discover the truth about her dad.  Or go into rehab.  But all of these would take between a few weeks and a few months, not a year of time, and wouldn't require Marten to have someone new move in.  And all of them would signal Faye was on recovery, so it would be shitty for Marten to take in someone new knowing she'd be able to be gainfully employed again soon enough.  And I just don't see her moving in with Sven, even though she might try to get involved with him again, given she didn't ever seriously consider moving in with Angus.  Plus as far as I know, Sven has never lived with a girl - even if he's in love with her, he'll probably want his distance for a time. 

The title of the comic (The Great Schism) makes me think that the division will last for hundreds of strips, and involve more than just Dora and Faye - sundering the whole cast to a degree for a time.  It also seems to imply that neither one of them will be exiting the comic - at least to me.  Though I agree that if Faye stays in the comic, Dora will be dialed way, way back once the immediate drama passes.  She'll still be seen as Tai's girlfriend (however long that lasts) and we'll periodically see CoD because Hanners and Dale work there, but that will be about it.

Finally, I think it should be noted there's an outcome that people haven't considered - that Faye "recovers" for a time, dialing back the drinking without addressing the underlying issues.  I could see her rationalizing the reason she went to work drunk was not because she was an alcoholic, but because she actually started to hate working at CoD, and was looking for an excuse to leave.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Svennerson on 22 Jan 2015, 09:00
Really? Man, not sure how I feel about that.

Sorry man, was just trying to be funny, no offense meant.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 09:15
Also, no one else is moving in with Marten unless she's put on a bus.

Have to disagree with this one. Remember, there was a trio in the apartment for short while with Dora living with Marten. Faye didn't seem to mind so it could easily happen again.

Other Points
I don't think that CoD will be de-emphasised any more than it is already (and it's already dropped down to joint importance as a setting with the Library). Remember that Marten goes there for a reason other than Faye anyway, so he has no particular reason to stop doing so.

I also don't think that there will be a taking of sides and a splitting of the cast. Whilst there may be a variation of responses as to reactions to these events, most characters have their own independent relationships other than those defined by the Dora-Faye axis. To me "The Great Schism" is entirely about Dora and Faye going their separate ways. Remember that this was a constant in the characters of Faye and Dora that even pre-dates their meeting Marten. It's going to be a big shock to the system for both of them not to have that in their lives anymore.

I'm hoping that Faye won't attempt to make it a 'It's CoD or me' choice because she'll alienate all her friends in pretty short order. Even Marten is now confident enough in himself to tell her that is a stupid and childish thing to do.

As for Dora specifically, she's been pushed back to secondary character status ever since her relationship with Tai became more settled. The primary characters at the moment seem to be Marten, Claire, Emily, Dale, Marigold and Faye with all the others being defined by their relationship to those six.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 22 Jan 2015, 09:16
I have no issues with the way that Dora reacted towards discovering Faye drinking on the job as either Boss Dora or Friend Dora. When you run a business, you don't get to play favorites with your friends. If Dale or Penny had been caught drinking on the job, I don't imagine a lot of people would object to Dora bringing down the hammer. They object because they believe that Faye deserves some special sympathy because she is friends with the boss. Let's not forget that she's running a business. Many of the other users have given detailed explanations on why she should have been fired with prejudice and I agree with all of them. I would also like to add that I believe Dora needed to be that harsh. Giving Faye any kind of leniency including an ultimatum of "get help or get fired" would have sent the wrong message not only to her coworkers but to Faye herself. She believed that due to her friendship with Dora, all would be forgiven. Faye needed to see that there were serious consequences for her actions. Sometimes when you screw up badly enough, you don't get a second chance. All you get is the chance to learn and grow into another opportunity. I certainly hope Dora doesn't waffle on her decision in the near future because I would hate for Dora to be an enabler to Faye's alcoholism.

Even Friend Dora was right to be pissed. I never really was on board too much with the Faye hate before. However, her behavior especially as of late has been incredibly selfish. She lashes out and fights other people because it's harder than having to fight herself. She seems to take advantage of her relationships with her friends and use them to pick her up whenever she falls without making a real attempt to get her shit sorted. The thing that really pisses me off is that she not only knows she has a problem, she knows what it is. She's choosing the easy way out by self medicating. Both Dora and Marten have been good friends to Faye through this, despite whatever major issues Dora had herself. Dora is making a conscious effort in order to make her life better and drama free. I don't think she always makes the right decisions in that respect, but she's at least trying. Despite all that, she's still attempted to be a good friend to Faye outside of work and Faye responds by continuing a self-destructive spiral that is guaranteed to cause collateral damage and get irresponsibly drunk in a business that Dora damn well cares about, which threatens her business. I imagine Dora feels betrayed by that course of actions and anyone who could keep a cool head and not swing the ace of murdering pink slips would be a far more zen person than I.

Personally speaking, I don't see this as the revolution of the QCverse against Dora. I can imagine Faye would go to her friends, but she'd be wasted out of her mind because now she needs to self-medicate for losing Angus, losing her job, and losing Dora. Her friends are going to attempt to intervene and get help, but in her typical fashion of denial she's going to throw all their help in their faces all the while knowing they're right.

I don't really see Marten wanting to get himself that involved in the situation. I think while Marten would try to be there, he is showing a healthy growth towards looking for his own happiness first instead of that of others. He's become more confident in his life and choices and I don't think he'd want to dive into the spiraling rabbit hole of self-destruction after Faye. He has a lot more to lose now. That's not to say that he won't help Faye or he'll toss her butt out, but I think that the textbook running to Marten won't pay off like it used to.

Now this is where we get from the realm of what I think to what I hope. I really would like Sven to come back. If he does, Faye would likely attempt to make foolish decisions to get with Sven, but Sven attempting to become "a better person for Faye" will likely turn her down. However, he can be the support and calm reality check she needs to start attempting to confront her issues.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 22 Jan 2015, 09:48
Really? Man, not sure how I feel about that.

Sorry man, was just trying to be funny, no offense meant.

That was aimed at BenRG, not you. Had I thought your comment out of line, I'd have taken mod action, not seemed personally wounded :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 22 Jan 2015, 10:54
I see that someone mentioned something about Marten not putting up with Faye's shit anymore. Allow me to go a bit back (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=509)

Here, in 509, Marten specifically tells Faye to get fixed up. While it's an entire different context - it works here. Marten will get home, hear the news, see Faye several stages of fucked up, and maybe decide that after all this time Faye hasn't actually got any better. He might get mad. He could kick her out. Maybe cut his relationship with her.

Or as someone mentioned earlier, call mom. Veronica Reed can be very convincing. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2383)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 22 Jan 2015, 11:11
Hanners is the only one who's exploded and not put up with Faye's shit (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1108).  Hanners will sort Faye out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 22 Jan 2015, 11:11
Or as someone mentioned earlier, call mom. Veronica Reed can be very convincing. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2383)

...and is not (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459) to be fucked with.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheCallMeFez on 22 Jan 2015, 11:18
A couple comics in a row  telling Faye to go home. Maybe its time for Faye to take a trip down South?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 11:24
Jeph said himself that if he met a Faye in real life he probably wouldn't get along with her.

Addressing the speculation about how bad it could get, Faye IS committing suicide right now. She's doing it on the installment plan instead of all at once.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: KOK on 22 Jan 2015, 11:28
Next we will see Marten return very happy from his date. Either after watching the movie, or if the date goes extremely well, the next morning. He will find Faye in a bad state. Total emotional breakdown, perhaps even acute alcohol poisoning.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2015, 11:30
Hanners is the only one who's exploded and not put up with Faye's shit (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1108).  Hanners will sort Faye out.

Thing is, would Faye even care at this stage?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Drachenfel on 22 Jan 2015, 11:32
As it is... Faye isn't in the right here, but Dora still lost likeability.

... I guess, but anyone who is holding Dora to that standard, but not Marten.... is kinda holding a double standard.
My problem wasn't just that Dora didn't tell her to get help, but either way that's an unfair comparison.
Dora has known Faye for longer, for one. She also spends far more time with Faye than Marten does, and unlike Marten, Dora has been directly told by Faye that she wants to drink herself into oblivion. As far as we've seen, Marten has only observed Faye drinking earlier in the day than usual. Dora has far more information about the situation that Marten does. And, after catching Faye drinking on the job, (Which should come as no surprise after Faye said she wanted to be drunk on the job the day before, came in reeking of booze, happy, and had no hangover,) Dora didn't seem concerned or sympathetic in the slightest, just angry.

So yes, I hold Dora to a different standard then Marten, because Marten is far more ignorant of the situation and hasn't reacted with pure anger to his best friend hitting rock bottom.

Why should Dora be sympathetic? There are plenty of alcholics that manage to still show up for work sober, or at least realize they could be a danger to their co-workers and customers in their state and do the smart thing in call in sick.  What Faye did was betray Dora's trust here which is a major requirement of friendship.  If you can't trust your friends...how can they even be your friends?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Drachenfel on 22 Jan 2015, 11:35
Hanners is the only one who's exploded and not put up with Faye's shit (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1108).  Hanners will sort Faye out.

OMG this reminds me why I love Hanners so much!!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 11:44
FWIW, I'm not saying that Marten couldn't reach the end of his rope eventually.  But it would be out of character for him to be anything but supportive in the shorter run.  By which I mean he won't kick her out, and will continue talking to her, even if he doesn't always tell her exactly what she wants to hear. 

Now of course, he could tell her it wasn't a good idea to drink on the job, inferring that he agrees with Dora that she should have been fired.  In turn this could cause Faye to explode at him.  But Faye couldn't burn the bridge all at once, because he'll rationalize that she was just drunk and upset, and didn't mean it, yadda yadda. 

Honestly though, Marten can be a dumbass, but I just don't see him prodding the angry hornets nest which is Faye right now.  He has more sense than to tell Faye something she knows already, given she fucked up in such a spectacularly obvious way.  That's what Angus will do if he comes back into the picture again for a bit.   :-D

I think newcomers to the comic somewhat discount how strong the bond between Faye and Marten is.  Faye has said several times that Marten is her best friend, and she couldn't consider losing him.  He's far more important to her than Sven or Angus ever were.  And while it's harder to determine with Martin, since he's less expressive, I think he feels bound to Faye in as strong of a matter.  No matter how much Faye toyed with him in the first 500 strips, she basically created his entire social life, since he had nothing but Steve and Pintsize before.  And she was there for him in many other ways as he began developing as a character - particularly through his breakup with Dora.  The Faye/Martin bond, even if it is now totally platonic, is the core of the comic.  And it's one bridge which I don't foresee Faye burning on purpose (unlike Dora, who, despite being her friend, was always a target of resentment). 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 11:48
In my experience, reducing a discussion to semantics is a sure fire way to create tension in said discussion. I'd say that it's pretty obvious that Penguin47 is saying that he felt sad that the right thing to do was to put his dog down, but was in no way going to feel like it was his fault, due to it being the right thing to do. That's a healthy way to approach an unenviable task. I can see this going the same way your discussion went a couple days ago with a poster whose name I can't remember, and in both cases I'm afraid I think you're being a little overly-critical of people's uses of language, seeing as you obviously have a background in philosophy, Reindeer. Like I said, when in discussion with those who might not have the same background it would probably lead to fewer arguments if you were to take people up on the spirit they have made their points in, rather than the specific philosophical definition of some of the words they have used.

A: I have no background in philosophy, beyond thinking about the stuff.

B: This becomes an infinite semantic regression. I didn't say "You must feel guilty when situations like X happen." That was a semantic distiction introduced by Penguin47. So who is "wrong" in invoking a semantic argument?

C: The issue you speak of from the last few days involved BenRG and had to do with BenRG deciding that I was upset when I wasn't. This makes me upset. If you wish to psycho-analyse me, there's your symptom. I rather dislike people presuming to frame my emotional state. To suggest I am upset on the basis that I don't agree with you is, as I told BenRG at the outset, patronizing and dismissive. It could be a lot of other things, but to speculate as to what those are would require that I presume to know someone else's feelings/state of mind. (Unless you're talking about the question of axioms and beliefs, which is pretty much a semantic discussion from the outset, and another case where any upset assigned to me exists only in the reader's head).

Everyone is capable of presumption, or communication missteps. Everyone injects their own tone into what other people write (unless they read everything in Morgan Freeman's voice, which--thinking about it--would probably make the world a better place if everyone did it). I've been on the internet since pretty much the time when the World Wide Web became a thing. I've been up and down the tone policing debates, and there's no winning response. No matter how you communicate, there's someone out there who is going to take what you say and inject something you didn't say into it. Sometimes, it's malicious, sometimes it's just what they understood you to be talking about.

For example, in the case BenRG, I wrote a passing objection to the idea that Marten would storm anywhere. BenRG seemed (seemed: I have no actually knowledge of his state of mind) to assume that I was arguing that Marten would not be upset. I took his initial responses as objections to my objection, when--in reality--we weren't on the same subject. I only became aware of the disconnect when the rather left field accusation of emotional disturbance cropped up. Up to that point I wasn't aware there was anything to be emotionally invested in.

Call it semantics, on my part. I can't say you're wrong. But I'd point out, again, that I didn't say that guilt is mandatory, but Penguin47 (and by extension, MoM) framed the quote they used to say that. That framing is semantics as well--finding a reading of what I wrote and disagreeing with it. I didn't say what BenRG seemed to be defending against. Trying to clear that up is semantics as well.

I'm not accusing them of anything. I just finished pointing out that everyone understands what they read as their own interpretation. But if someone interprets what you write as something you didn't actually say, exactly how do you point that out without invoking semantics? It seems to me that there's nothing wrong with semantics, unless you are splitting hairs in order to create conflict. In my case, my intent is to clarify what I wrote when it seems to me that someone has attached meaning to it I didn't intend.

I'm not sure I can be any more clear than that about it. I can be abrupt, but that's decades of internet (Frak, I'm old. At least I can only date back as far as the first years of the WWW). I'm not extolling rudeness, just cutting to the chase. And it seems to me that the chase, here is that we've now reached the point where the topic has lost all relevance to QC and is now about me. I came here to post something relevant about addiction, but it seems to me that it would be overwhelmed. Of course, I didn't have to respond. My choice. But I'll save the relevant stuff for another time). I don't presume to moderate, but it seems to me that this is not the appropriate forum for the topic of me. There's PM's and stuff for that--though this isn't an invitation to PM. I've said everything I have to say so I likely won't bother reading anything more on the subject, unless it's handed down by a mod in an official capacity. I'm tired of it (from my perspective, it's other people becoming bizarrely and inexplicably upset. I'm just aware that I don't know what's actually motivating them, so I'm not going to cast aspersions). It's a no win situation, and I'm not James Kirk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2015, 11:50
As others noted, I just don't see how she will get Marten so mad he won't put up with her shit in the shorter run.  Marten is someone with great patience, and very submissive - he's a textbook enabler.  And he already has a dynamic where he's willing to do whatever is needed to support Faye.  Faye drunkenly trying to seduce Marten out of loneliness would be ugly and awkward, but it wouldn't sunder their friendship any more than Martin doing inverse hurt things.  Faye would need to be an unemployed drunken bum for months before Marten would start setting limits - and even then I wonder if he'd hit up his mom for some money rather than kick Faye out.

And this is why I believe the SS Clairten may be in danger of running aground on Drunken Faye Reef. Marten knows that his friend Faye is drinking because she's in pain, and him being the kind of guy he is, he'll try to help Faye however he can. Faye won't hesitate to soak up ALL the help Marten tries to provide, especially if it enables her to keep drinking (which it almost certainly will). This being the very beginning of his and Claire's relationship, Claire may object to Marten giving so much attention to someone apparently determined to drink themselves into the gutter (as Claire may think). Also, Marten being Marten, it may take him a long time to realize he has to set boundaries on what he does for Faye, and even longer to actually put those boundaries in place. Meanwhile, his erstwhile girlfriend gets more and more annoyed at the time and attention sink drunken Faye is becoming.

This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pendrake on 22 Jan 2015, 11:54
[Faye]: Help?  HELP?  I don't need any fuckin' help.

~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~

As a former Social Worker, I heard this line (still do hear it, sadly) far too many times, with far too many tragic results.

When does one hit Rock Bottom?  It is not about getting help by then.

One of the clearest signs of hitting Rock bottom...? When you have gotten so low that finally admit you need help... Only to discover no one is around offering it to you any more... :-(

Warning - while you were typing new replies have been posted. You may wish to review how you used to be a regular here.  What happened, dude?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 22 Jan 2015, 11:58
This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

Yeah, Imma have to put my chips on the other square.  I think if Faye does anything to insert herself between Marten and Claire, the spine he's been developing for the last 80 strips is going to turn to steel and Faye's going to lose (again).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 12:08


This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

I agree with all of what you wrote, themacnut, but particularly this passage. Claire does not pull her punches. Marten is her first boyfriend and she will not want to rock the boat too much, but I can't see her co-signing Marten deciding to spend a lot of time on Faye at this point. I could see Claire feeling that Faye's problems are self-inflicted. She is the one who decided she didn't love Angus enough to follow him to New York. She is the one who decided to crawl into the bottle rather than face her situation. I can't think that Claire would be all right with Marten being Faye's enabler. Dora allowed it and resented it, as has been pointed out, but she was also Faye's friend and wanted to help her.

I think that that whoever said that the title of this being the Great Schism means more than just Faye and Dora is right. I think that all of the months that Marten wondered about his rudderless life will culminate in his decision that he needs to break free of Faye and her problems. I don't mean he'll drop her as a friend, just that he can't let her issues consume him and he will move away from her similarly to the way he moved away from Steve. I disagree, themacnut, that Claire will be the loser. I think Faye will be. I feel Marten understands that if he allows Faye to drag him into her mess, he'll be back at square one. He's growing and Faye is regressing. Possibly she'll get pulled out of it, but I think that in this arc, we will see Marten actually growing a pair and deciding to do what is best for him. Claire is what's best for him and I think he is starting to realize that.

ETA: MooskiNet's post says what I wanted to say much more succintly and much better put!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 12:09
If this thing doesn't go Thermonuclear by Friday, it'll be a miracle of biblical proportions
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 12:14
This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

And this is why I'd vote on Claire. Well, two reasons more: First, Claire was recently Jeph's favorite character. It would be an extremely odd (but actually kind of heroic in a writerly sort of way) if Jeph put his fav on a bus. I'm assuming Jeph is human and probably won't do that.

Second, Claire is the single trans character in Jeph's comic and Jeph is committed to "doing it right." Making the trans character disposable is a big risk.

I've struggled with the same issue in creating a trans character. From my perspective, the character is just a character. A really important one. But looking at the story from the outside, I can see how the culmination of another character's story arc will (almost certainly not just possibly, it will be taken this way) seem like the trans character is getting shat upon in a way that disrespects trans people. I can't do anything to mitigate that without giving away almost the whole plot. I could give that part of the story to a different character, but that would basically reduce the trans character to token status. I could make the character not trans, but... Well, the whole point of the trans character is that the trans aspect isn't what defines them (it does have a distant impact on the story, and informs the character) but it's not a plot driver. Also, this character has been in development forever. I was kind of bummed when Claire "beat me to the punch" with the whole trans but no big deal thing).

So, for all I know Jeph is going to put Claire on the bus, because he's gone down the same road and come to the same conclusion--dodging the plot elements in favor of the trans character's transness is just as bad as playing the trans character for a spectacle. But it's a damned hard decision to make, and I don't see the necessity of putting anyone on a bus, just yet.

On the other hand, if a bus is ordained, I can see Faye on it. It's the kind of thing people in bad decision spirals do. Disappear only to show up later totally used up, or in dire need of help getting out of jam they made for themselves. Or both.

edit: Plusorminus said better than I.

edit edit: typo
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 12:20
And this is why I believe the SS Clairten may be in danger of running aground on Drunken Faye Reef. Marten knows that his friend Faye is drinking because she's in pain, and him being the kind of guy he is, he'll try to help Faye however he can. Faye won't hesitate to soak up ALL the help Marten tries to provide, especially if it enables her to keep drinking (which it almost certainly will). This being the very beginning of his and Claire's relationship, Claire may object to Marten giving so much attention to someone apparently determined to drink themselves into the gutter (as Claire may think). Also, Marten being Marten, it may take him a long time to realize he has to set boundaries on what he does for Faye, and even longer to actually put those boundaries in place. Meanwhile, his erstwhile girlfriend gets more and more annoyed at the time and attention sink drunken Faye is becoming.

This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

Faye was very insecure when Marten started dating Dora, but at that time the romantic feelings between them were not fully buried, and they had been friends for a much shorter period of time.  While she's going through a bad spell now, I don't think she'll worry about Claire stealing Marten away for quite awhile.  Not unless he starts talking about moving out or something, which (judging by the flow of comic time) isn't going to happen for 500+ strips.  The worst thing that would happen is Marten will be going out on dates fairly often.  But even here, given Claire lives at home, it's more likely that Claire will be at the apartment than vice versa in the future. 

Faye will, of course, be resentful of Marten's happiness.  But Faye has always had a great grasp on reality when it comes to other people, just not herself.  I can't think of one time Faye seriously misinterpreted the intentions of anyone in the strip (though I'm sure people will find some links).  She doesn't jump to wrong, paranoid conclusions the way Dora does anyway. 

I think that that whoever said that the title of this being the Great Schism means more than just Faye and Dora is right. I think that all of the months that Marten wondered about his rudderless life will culminate in his decision that he needs to break free of Faye and her problems. I don't mean he'll drop her as a friend, just that he can't let her issues consume him and he will move away from her similarly to the way he moved away from Steve. I disagree, themacnut, that Claire will be the loser. I think Faye will be. I feel Marten understands that if he allows Faye to drag him into her mess, he'll be back at square one. He's growing and Faye is regressing. Possibly she'll get pulled out of it, but I think that in this arc, we will see Marten actually growing a pair and deciding to do what is best for him. Claire is what's best for him and I think he is starting to realize that.

Aside from Faye jerking Marten around in terms of a potential love interest in the first 500 strips (and a little bit of residual possessiveness thereafter), what exactly has Faye done to this point which is emotionally draining to Marten?  When did she ask him to choose between emotional growth and supporting her?  It would be just weird for Marten to turn his back now, when she's in the wrong but clearly needs support, because it's not like he's been continually fucked over in recent years. 

Edit:  Bottom line is while you might think that Faye is a shitty person, and was a shitty employee, she has been a great friend to Marten since around the thousandth strip.  You cannot undo all that overnight, or even in 200-300 strips. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2015, 12:35
This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

And this is why I'd vote on Claire. Well, two reasons more: First, Claire was recently Jeph's favorite character. It would be an extremely odd (but actually kind of heroic in an writerly sort of way) if Jeph put his fav on a bus. I'm assuming Jeph is human and probably won't do that.

Bear in mind that at various times Jeph has said Dora and Faye have been his favourites. He's been writing the comic for twelve years and things change, favourites change and right now, Dora is seemingly fading into the background, while Faye is crashing and burning. Nothing is ever certain. Remember that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 22 Jan 2015, 12:37
I don't presume to moderate, but it seems to me that this is not the appropriate forum for the topic of me. There's PM's and stuff for that--though this isn't an invitation to PM. I've said everything I have to say so I likely won't bother reading anything more on the subject, unless it's handed down by a mod in an official capacity.

Global Moderator Comment Quite so. If there is personal stuff to discuss, take it to PMs; if it's too unfriendly, take it to the mods; if it's a matter that could still be of wider interest, make a thread in Relate. There is a paragraph to this effect in the forum rules. We have a tradition of being tolerant about odd subjects that come up as a result of the comics being discussed in this thread, especially at the weekend; but personal matters are different.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ItsNotATumor on 22 Jan 2015, 12:48
(Going into management practices in the real life US).

Dora in 2879 is textbook fine. Catches her employee drunk, fires her on the spot. Well done. Clear message, to the point, and no liability.

Dora in 2880 in panel 2 makes a big mistake. She brings up "abuse, disrespect, insubordination". Has she been giving regular feedback to Faye about these things? Has Faye been notified about these three things? I've never seen Dora bring any of these issues up to Faye. Big, big mistake on Dora's part to say this. Now, Faye has a case. Faye can make the case that she was fired not due to negligent performance, but because of trumped up personal issues. "Your honor, I'd been doing a wonderful job at CoD, and then one day Dora just *makes up* all of these reasons! No, she'd never talked about any of these things before! Yes, she joked around with customers, and I followed her lead! Is it possible that she fired me because I'm best friends with her ex, and she never got over that? Why yes, that DOES make sense!".

Bad move, Dora. You should have shut up after "You're fired". Even if Mass. is an at-will employment state, it's not good to open yourself up to that kind of thing. If those other issues were problems you needed to have talked to Faye about them (and taken notes that you'd done so). If those other issues were simmering under the surface then you failed by not bringing them up earlier. Bringing them up is a very big negative EV move with no upside. It gives Faye a potential out for legal action.

Finally, telling her to get help is another Very Bad Move (as a manager). It indicates that Dora might have known there was an ongoing problem. And if she knew there was an ongoing problem, that's more potential liability. "Your honor, she *knew* that I was having ongoing problems with alcohol, she even told me to get help. But then she fired me out of nowhere! No it wasn't a surprise to her, she knew about this all along *sobs*".

Double bad move Dora. Her anger here and outburst could potentially lose her the business if Faye chooses to go that route.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 12:57
This conflict may get serious enough where Marten may find himself forced to choose between Faye and Claire, and whoever he decides against will then proceed to remove themselves from his life. Considering the history between him and Faye, and the fact that Claire is a relative newcomer...it doesn't look good for Claire.

And this is why I'd vote on Claire. Well, two reasons more: First, Claire was recently Jeph's favorite character. It would be an extremely odd (but actually kind of heroic in an writerly sort of way) if Jeph put his fav on a bus. I'm assuming Jeph is human and probably won't do that.

Bear in mind that at various times Jeph has said Dora and Faye have been his favourites. He's been writing the comic for twelve years and things change, favourites change and right now, Dora is seemingly fading into the background, while Faye is crashing and burning. Nothing is ever certain. Remember that.

No disagreement there. But the last fave before Claire was Marigold. Unless he's moved on to Dale and May, I'm willing to take the risk that Claire's still high up on the fav totem pole. Bussing Faye out works even in the favorite zone because she's unfinished--assuming it goes down as conflict between Faye's priorities and Claire's with Marten between. With Faye's major issue unresolved, she has to come back. In that same conflict, Claire leaving would be a hard break to come back from.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 12:59
It's Not a Tumor, none of that will fly. Dora has discussed Faye's performance with Faye. There have been numerous examples given by others in this thread. She's told her to cut the shit and basically most of the other baristas are just used to Faye's acerbicness but Dora has reigned her in when it has gotten to be counterproductive. Also considering Dora bumped Faye up to Assistant Manager well after her breakup with Marten, and risked alienating her workstaff by doing so, it would be very hard for Faye to argue that Dora had it in for her because she's Marten's best friend.

There have also been examples given in this thread where Dora has stated coming to work drunk and/or high is a no. Faye did that, lied about it, and proceeded to try to get loaded again on the job.

Faye has no case.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: toffee-skye on 22 Jan 2015, 13:09
What I've found interesting is how many people have mentioned Tai and Dora in relation to Faye.

We know - hell, we've seen it in action - how Tai frequently goes to work high or under some form of inebriation. What we don't know if it's purely recreational (and just livens up working in a student library which would try anyone's patience) or is closer to a coping mechanism (like Faye's drinking).

I know it's not fully comparable, but look at how Tai's reacted to a similar friend-shock-meltdown situation; "Oh shit, I had no idea about any of this". (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1682) She straight up apologises, sits down, lets her more-informed friends take the reins. Call this pure speculation but I don't think it'll be in Tai's character to be anything other than understanding and sympathetic towards Dora's position right now. Sure, she's previously advocated drug use at work but there's an implication that it's recreational and whilst she might view drunkness at work from the position of "hey man, I just work here, I'd use it as blackmail material (http://www.questionablecontent.net/842)" Also, as mentioned, it's a different environment - Faye works with hot steam, has a sculpture studio in the basement; i.e. is frequently around objects that can and do cause injury. Tai works in a university library, which is probably a bit less high-pressure and (presumably) less dangerous.

Plus, it wouldn't surprise me if off-camera Dora would vent to Tai about her business - she's the sole proprietor of a small business, whereas Tai is working a student job that makes her pretty expendable - and I think Tai would be sympathetic. Comparing Tai's inebriation at work to Faye's inebriation is kind of.. Apples and oranges, as it were. Similarities and differences; similar in that they're both inebriated, different in that.. well, Faye's fucked up, put simply.

Faye followed the course I predicted; she tried to bargain and argue her way out. I still think Dora's in the right here.

Quote from: ItsNotATumor
It gives Faye a potential out for legal action.

Honestly? I don't think Faye even has the mental togetherness to fathom that as a reasonable course of action. This sounds very naive I'm sure, but I think something in Faye's (more sober) brain would still go "hey, woah, no, she's my friend" - hence why she tried to bargain for her job back. She might be done with CoD and her employment, but I don't think she's manipulative or vindictive enough to try and get Dora's business sunk.

I can see Marten having to choose between Faye and Claire. Claire isn't as established in the friend group, and whilst she might be a favourite, we've seen her react with volatility to perceived wrongdoings on certain subjects (http://www.questionablecontent.net/2370) and whilst I doubt Faye would drunkenly come on to Marten, if Claire sensed inappropriate behaviour she would freak out. This isn't even speculating on how Claire would respond to alcoholism, or what Faye could say to Claire, or other stuff. I think it might boil down to who does Marten care about more? Faye, who has been abusive in the past, who has also been a good friend in the past, but is currently struggling and requiring a time-consuming recovery period, or Claire, who he wants to date and cares about? Even if it didn't come to this straight away, I can't help but wonder if Claire would feel neglected if Marten repeatedly said "no, sorry, I need to help Faye" to her.

[also this took freaking forever to write up because I compulsively needed receipts for all the crap I'm referencing. I have a weirdly good memory for these comics so it's like.. oh-god-no-one-else-will-remember-must-find-proof]
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2015, 13:11
Faye was very insecure when Marten started dating Dora, but at that time the romantic feelings between them were not fully buried, and they had been friends for a much shorter period of time.  While she's going through a bad spell now, I don't think she'll worry about Claire stealing Marten away for quite awhile. 

No no, that's not what I'm talking about at all. I'm talking about Marten seeing his longtime good friend Faye in trouble, drinking herself half to death, him trying to help her, and Claire being resentful of his efforts, especially once it becomes clear that Faye is taking advantage of that help (as alcoholics do) to get more alcohol and stay drunk.

For example, Faye goes home after her firing, gets drunk and then drunk-dials Marten while he's out with Claire. He picks up, she starts crying into the phone about how unfair Dora is etc, while slurring horribly, making it clear to Marten that she's very drunk. Then she drops the phone and Marten hears gagging and puking sounds as Faye throws up. He's quite naturally going to end his date with Claire early to rush home and check on Faye. Claire's not going to like that. She may try to be understanding at first, but if this kind of thing keeps happening (and it will, Faye 'cause Faye will keep getting plastered for awhile yet) she's going to start speaking out against doing anything for Faye.

This will cause a growing conflict within Marten - listen to his girlfriend, who will demand he cut Faye off, or help his equally demanding and troubled friend Faye, who he fears will destroy herself? His choice will determine whether he keeps his girlfriend and maybe the course of Faye's life; if Marten decides he's sick of her shit, who else can she depend on to put up with her?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 22 Jan 2015, 13:12
What if Faye follows in her father's footsteps and commits suicide? After being fired and going on another drinking binge, she might think everything is hopeless. Even though she has a possibility of being rescued by Sven, who might decide to put up with Faye's issues because he's blinded by love/lust.

I could imagine a scenario where Marten and Claire come back from their date and find Faye's lifeless body on the sofa or in the bathroom. If Faye kills herself, the repercussions on the cast will be huge. The funeral would be a way to bring old characters back in an ensemble setting.

It's also possible that they find Faye so drunk and passed out that they call an ambulance and she goes to the hospital. Again, it would be a way to bring older characters back as they visit Faye.

Oh, now you're just teasing and making me want more popcorn.

I'm quite surprised at how resentful so many people are about Faye as a character, and even more about Dora.

One thing I'd say is that we have to keep in mind the slightly more comedic and, for lack of a better term, slightly less 'enlightened' circumstances of the earlier comics.

Jeph is an educated, sensitive gent, but in the early days he was playing Faye's violent tendencies for laughs, perhaps due to a lack of consideration or simply because the comic was a bit more cartoony in those days - either way I think he is nowadays far less likely to end a comic with the punchline being someone getting punched in the face.

Even with this being the case, and yes, I fully understand playing Faye's violent streak for hyperbolic humor, Faye has treated her FRIENDS in an emotionally abusive manner, indicative of malignant narcissism, and deserves every bit of misery visited upon her.  I won't call her names.  In fact, when I call someone a "Faye" it's far worse than any commonly used derogatory epithet.

Pretty much from her introduction Faye has been an entitled leeching thug. Her interactions with others are rarely pleasant, nearly always to her benefit and usually joyless. At leaast Pintsize has the excuse he was programmed that way, Faye is just an extremely self-centred jerk and frankly "wah wah, I saw my dad kill myself" doesn't hack it.

And thank you for putting that so succinctly.  Faye's antics have reduced me to a sputtering rage for years, and so her comeuppance is especially cathartic to me.  Thank you for distilling my reasons behind that so well.

Better than I could.

Finally, I think it should be noted there's an outcome that people haven't considered - that Faye "recovers" for a time, dialing back the drinking without addressing the underlying issues.  I could see her rationalizing the reason she went to work drunk was not because she was an alcoholic, but because she actually started to hate working at CoD, and was looking for an excuse to leave.

That would DEFINITELY be a very Faye thing to do.  You're right.  She needs to fall a lot farther.

A LOT.

And I see my popcorn is running low.

Addressing the speculation about how bad it could get, Faye IS committing suicide right now. She's doing it on the installment plan instead of all at once.

And I appreciate the ability to savor every bit of it.

S

Warning - while you were composing that mishmash you call a post, a new reply has been posted because this thread is like a runaway train. You may wish to review your post and cut out a bunch of crap from it because it may be seen as utterly irrelevant by the time you actually hit "post".  Or you may not care or actually realize you hate Faye because she reflects many of the negative aspects of your own personality.  Either way, you really ought to re-read it and decide, but whatever you choose, own those feelings.  That'll be 500 bucks.  Next Tuesday?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 13:17
It may be that this is the proverbial 'Kick in the pants' that Faye needs (both from Dora and others if I read this right) to finally get her act together.

I can see Jeph sending her back home, maybe back to her mother and away from all that's happened recently in order to start getting herself back together, but I also think I can see her dropping further into the hole she's digging for herself at the moment before she finally hits bedrock and admits she has a problem.

I don't see Jeph writing her out of the comic, but that's just me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 22 Jan 2015, 13:19
I find it very difficult to really hate someone on a personal level when that someone is a fictional character created and written by someone trying to tell a story. There are characters I dislike seeing, but I have a hard time forgetting that they do not themselves have much in the way of agency and that makes it very difficult for me to let myself fill my head and my heart with the purest most malign kind of hatred. It just feels weird and fucked-up I guess.

I thought I'd dislike the coming arc but I think I'm going to enjoy seeing Jeph's take on Faye's descent into drunkenness.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 22 Jan 2015, 13:20
Lots of assumptions about Claire in recent posts. My bet is Jeph is going to show us a Claire that rates a lot more respect than we thought. "Little Mother," anyone? Might break the Pugnacious Peach into little peach pieces, which will gratify some (EDIT: and might be good for Faye).

I haven't seen such Faye-hate, by the way, since a former forumite projected her real-world nemesis onto the P. Peach. The venom is dripping into the popcorn.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 13:21
Hmmmm

Interesting preposition.


Claire as Fayes Big Sister/Saviour
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 13:23
This thread's only up to 13. During the SS Claireten launch it topped 30.

I find it very difficult to really hate someone on a personal level when that someone is a fictional character created and written by someone trying to tell a story. There are characters I dislike seeing, but I have a hard time forgetting that they do not themselves have much in the way of agency and that makes it very difficult for me to let myself fill my head and my heart with the purest most malign kind of hatred. It just feels weird and fucked-up I guess.

I thought I'd dislike the coming arc but I think I'm going to enjoy seeing Jeph's take on Faye's descent into drunkenness.
Well said.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 13:29
No no, that's not what I'm talking about at all. I'm talking about Marten seeing his longtime good friend Faye in trouble, drinking herself half to death, him trying to help her, and Claire being resentful of his efforts, especially once it becomes clear that Faye is taking advantage of that help (as alcoholics do) to get more alcohol and stay drunk.

For example, Faye goes home after her firing, gets drunk and then drunk-dials Marten while he's out with Claire. He picks up, she starts crying into the phone about how unfair Dora is etc, while slurring horribly, making it clear to Marten that she's very drunk. Then she drops the phone and Marten hears gagging and puking sounds as Faye throws up. He's quite naturally going to end his date with Claire early to rush home and check on Faye. Claire's not going to like that. She may try to be understanding at first, but if this kind of thing keeps happening (and it will, Faye 'cause Faye will keep getting plastered for awhile yet) she's going to start speaking out against doing anything for Faye.

This will cause a growing conflict within Marten - listen to his girlfriend, who will demand he cut Faye off, or help his equally demanding and troubled friend Faye, who he fears will destroy herself? His choice will determine whether he keeps his girlfriend and maybe the course of Faye's life; if Marten decides he's sick of her shit, who else can she depend on to put up with her?

When you put it that way, I don't see how Claire wins.  In Marten's eyes, Claire's demands will seem petty, cold and self-serving.  Unless he realizes on his own (e.g., independent of any relationship conflict) that he's enabling Faye.  Then all bets are off.  But if Claire keeps harping on it, it will become *the* fight of their relationship, which will make him want to back down on it less and less.  Thus dooming things. 

Still, I think people here are presuming a bit too much about the continued trajectory.  Remember that everyone in the strip thought that Faye was a functional human being up until a few days ago.  The norm for her would be to peel back out of this bender at some point - probably before she gains any self-awareness as to her status.  Faye will not become an (early) Marigold like slug who doesn't leave the apartment.  It would be totally out of character.   Not to mention boring from a strip perspective. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 13:31
Lots of assumptions about Claire in recent posts. My bet is Jeph is going to show us a Claire that rates a lot more respect than we thought. "Little Mother," anyone? Might break the Pugnacious Peach into little peach pieces, which will gratify some.

I haven't seen such Faye-hate, by the way, since a former forumite projected her real-world nemesis onto the P. Peach. The venom is dripping into the popcorn.

I'm sorry, but I can't really see this happening given what we know of Claire. This IS the same woman who called Tai a "homewrecker" when she got the wrong end of the stick about how her relationship with Dora came about. This is also someone who has made it clear that a workplace is sacrosanct and not for shenanigans. I can't see her all of a sudden becoming the Hanners to Faye's Marigold.

Jeph has shown us enough of Claire that those of us predicting a schism that will feature her on one side and Faye on the other can feel fairly confident in that prediction. She is insecure. She dug Marten for a long time and now they're dating. She has literally never had a boyfriend before and is concerned with doing everything "properly" and her movie invitation hints that she is ready for Marten to start thinking about the two of them spending serious time alone. I think that, more than any sisterly care, is what prompted her to go along with the Clinton/Emily stuff. She wants him out of her hair so that she and Marten can get to know each other properly.

I'm not sure how you can reconcile that person and think that suddenly she is going to be Faye's Florence Nightengale. I could see it happening if MRS. Augustus, not Mr. Augustus, battled the bottle in the wake of her marriage falling apart. Then I think it might be fair to say Claire, having experienced this with her mother, would have the tools to help Faye. But there is nothing, IMO, in the way Claire has been presented to us thus far that in any way suggests that she is going to be anything but livid if Faye's issues come between her and Marten. Themacnut's last post on this sums this up brilliantly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 22 Jan 2015, 13:32
I would respond to those who have been saying that this is Faye getting ready to be sent off on the bus... I don't see it. From a storytelling perspective, it would be horrible after all this setup... And this has started at the VERY least back when Faye found Angus' audition notice for the job in The City. To wrap it all up at this point with 'And Faye got some therapy and started seeing AA and got better' or 'Faye decided to go with Angus after all' would really be cheaping both the story so far, and the very real struggles that alcoholics, the people who care for them and those suffering from serious depression have to go through. There is no quick fast forward button and a quick wrap up in real life, or in good storytelling. No.. I see this as the storyline reaching a dramatic peak in these last couple of weeks. And Faye is about to come crashing down hard, with a lot of collateral damage to her friends and support structure. Because that is how alcoholism really works. I honestly feel that this will keep going on for quite some time now... There won't be any quick or easy solutions to be found.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 13:35
Which is why I can see this dragging out for a week or three until she finally hits rock bottom and metaporically 'Burns Her Bridges' with everyone, at which point Jeph may send her away for a while (with the odd peak in) while she gets her act together.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 22 Jan 2015, 13:39
I think that would be to clean a resolution though. Once money runs out I could see her heading back to Savannah for a visit with her mother though. That would still seriously impact other members of the cast, especially Marten. Not only would it be a financial burden on him, I really see him as the kind of person who would want to try to 'fix' his friend, and feel bad that he didn't see how bad it was getting for her.  And from those who have ever known alcoholics or attended Al-Anon (not AA, but friends and family of alcholics) meetings can tell you, that never goes well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 13:39
Which is why I can see this dragging out for a week or three until she finally hits rock bottom and metaporically 'Burns Her Bridges' with everyone, at which point Jeph may send her away for a while (with the odd peak in) while she gets her act together.

Two or three weeks comic time, or our time?  Because our time, that's one, possibly two comic days.  And once again, I just don't see how Marten is going to get "tired of her shit" after 1-2 days, given she hasn't been giving him any shit at all for years in comic. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 22 Jan 2015, 13:41
Plusorminus, you typed a hell of a lot in a hurry. I would say some of the things you cited, in particular the high value she places on stable relationships, in fact point to Claire's *empathy* and surprise those on the forum whom are predicting/hoping for a psychonuclear exchange. Note that once she learned the full(er) story of the Marten-Dora-Tai progression, she backed down from her "homewrecker" accusation. She and Tai appear to get along fine now, the main problem being confetti-intolerance,
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 13:48
Global Moderator Comment Everyone please find replacements for sex- or group-based insults like "bitch", "cunt", and their relatives. Being inclusive means not driving people people away by sounding prejudiced against them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 13:50
I mean out time.  I personally wouldn't want to see Fayes decent into self-destruction to drag out more than that - maybe with an extra two weeks thrown in with the odd 'Filler Strip' to give us a breather from all the drama - to do so would be, I think, flogging the proverbial dead Horse Comic and Storyline wise before she's dragged offscreen for a wee while for Rehab.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 14:00
I mean our time.  I personally wouldn't want to see Fayes decent into self-destruction to drag out more than that - maybe with an extra two weeks thrown in with the odd 'Filler Strip' to give us a breather from all the drama - to do so would be, I think, flogging the proverbial dead Horse Comic and Storyline wise before she's dragged offscreen for a wee while for Rehab.

Again, Jeph could always surprise me, but I don't see Marten stopping his enabling so quickly.  Or rather, there is nothing I can imagine that Faye would do which is in character (and plausible) that could cause Marten to lay down the law after only a few days of a drunken bender.  If one of his parents was actually an alcoholic at one point, and he knew what he had to do (or stop doing) maybe.  But while they both seem to have had wilder days in the past, neither one of them seems to be a recovered alcoholic.  Marten will try to "do the right thing" and do the wrong thing for quite awhile yet. 

Honestly, I think Sven is more likely than anyone in comic to really try a full-on intervention on short notice.  While he seems to have no issue with social drinking, given his gregarious nature, I am 100% sure that one of his good friends (if not a family member) has struggled with alcoholism. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 14:00

Aside from Faye jerking Marten around in terms of a potential love interest in the first 500 strips (and a little bit of residual possessiveness thereafter), what exactly has Faye done to this point which is emotionally draining to Marten?  When did she ask him to choose between emotional growth and supporting her?  It would be just weird for Marten to turn his back now, when she's in the wrong but clearly needs support, because it's not like he's been continually fucked over in recent years. 

Edit:  Bottom line is while you might think that Faye is a shitty person, and was a shitty employee, she has been a great friend to Marten since around the thousandth strip.  You cannot undo all that overnight, or even in 200-300 strips.

Sorry, eschaton, I missed this somehow.

I can admit that I am probably overstating the "drag Marten into her mess" thing a tad. I don't mean that Faye is doing it purposely. But their proximity and relationship to each other - as roommates - entertwines their fates a bit whether Faye means to do so, or not. I will own that Faye cares for Marten and has been a good friend to him. She helped him through the Dora breakup and also through the Padma mess. She loaned an ear when he was confused about Emily's intentions and has supported his musical aspirations.

And you're right - to this point, Faye has not asked Marten to choose. He has made some of those choices on his own, most notably, to not form a separate household with Dora without Faye being included. That was not on Faye.

But I think the time has arrived. The difference between then and now is that - not to be unfair to Marten - he really didn't have much "growth" going on. He was just sort of there, rudderless, especially after the Dora breakup. He was in his library job just doing whatever. Now, he is taking steps to really do something musically, he has a girlfriend and he's trying to man up ... just as Faye is falling apart. Faye has always relied on Marten sort of just being there for her. I think subconsciously she has relied on the notion that if things had gone a bit differently, she and Marten would be together and she was Marten's 'first choice.' Marten has grown a lot in this time and I don't know if Faye recognizes this. Just as she spoke in an entitled manner to Dora after being fired, I think that Faye feels a bit entitled to Marten's unwavering support. If she doesn't get it, she may very well press the issue. That won't end well for either of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2015, 14:18

When you put it that way, I don't see how Claire wins.  In Marten's eyes, Claire's demands will seem petty, cold and self-serving.  Unless he realizes on his own (e.g., independent of any relationship conflict) that he's enabling Faye. 

I do see Marten realizing he's enabling Faye - eventually. But "eventually" is generally a long time, and in that time Marten's budding relationship may die on the vine as Claire backs off to avoid becoming part of the oncoming trainwreck.



Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 22 Jan 2015, 14:22
If nothing is true, nothing can be right.

But is everything permitted?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 22 Jan 2015, 14:29
From a comic-having a dramatic arc perspective rather than a people-having-people-drama perspective, I think the coming story arc revolves around one very important question: Jeph's willingness to ax a core character.  The characters who have been put on a bus or simply disappeared from view so far haven't been core characters to the comic, and Faye's ultimate fate largely depends on whether or not Our Benevolent Comic Overlord is ready to make that choice.  If he is, then we could very easily see this arc end with Faye gone in one way or another.  I don't have any predictions as to the way he would do so, though Bus seems like the cleanest way to make that break.

Another possible long term outcome is what I'm going to call Cast Demotion.  I'm sure there's a term for it, but I don't peruse TVTropes, so I don't know it.  We might see Faye go from core cast to supporting cast once everything blows over.  We've seen Cast Promotions a couple of times, most notably with Claire going from a supporting role to a core cast member almost overnight during the Scritch Event, (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2800) but other than Cosette kind of fading into the background, we really haven't seen much in the way of characters becoming less vital to the comic.

So, as I see it, we have a few possible long term outcomes, listed in from I feel like is the most probable to the least: 
-Salvage, in which Faye's relationship with the other cast members will eventually recover, or at least reach some sort of equilibrium.  No guarantee she'll get hired back, though.
-Demotion, with Faye getting a lot less face time, representing how her relationship with her friends has suffered and they just don't spend as much time together.  Would probably include her moving out.
-The Bus, probably with Faye either going back south or following Angus.  It might end up being a Bus with a return ticket, but a long absence seems likely if she comes back at all.
-The End, with Faye permanently written out, possibly dead. 

It all comes down to Jeph's plans for the comic, and which outcomes he's willing to use. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 22 Jan 2015, 14:31
It's interesting to see all the posters who think Tai would be upset at Dora firing Faye for drinking.  That assumes that Tai sees marijuana and alcohol  in the same way.  She doesn't have a problem with people drinking, but she might see weed as a more natural and healthy substance than alcohol.  And as has already been mentioned she might figure being drunk in a coffee shop is a bigger potential problem than being high in the library, as the former has more potential for risk.  As for Dora we have no idea whether she knows that Tai indulges at work or not.

I can't see Faye either killing herself or fatally ODing on booze.  It really wouldn't fit in with the feel of QC.  Yes, Faye's dad killed himself, but he wasn't an actual participant in the series, and we didn't see his death directly or as it happened. 

I suspect we aren't going to see Angus again.  I think he's done.  Part of the thing about Angus is that he never got developed much past being Faye's love interest.  I don't think Jeph ever had the intent for him to be anything but that, and unlike other characters Angus never particularly caught his interest. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 22 Jan 2015, 14:38
If nothing is true, nothing can be right.

But is everything permitted?

If you're implying that Faye might have hidden blades somewhere I'm moving to another multiverse.

Warning: While you were considering exactly how dangerous a Fayessassin would be (MUCH), there have been two actual responses. You might want to review your post to something meaningful

So, as I see it, we have a few possible long term outcomes, listed in from I feel like is the most probable to the least: 
-Salvage, in which Faye's relationship with the other cast members will eventually recover, or at least reach some sort of equilibrium.  No guarantee she'll get hired back, though.
-Demotion, with Faye getting a lot less face time, representing how her relationship with her friends has suffered and they just don't spend as much time together.  Would probably include her moving out.
-The Bus, probably with Faye either going back south or following Angus.  It might end up being a Bus with a return ticket, but a long absence seems likely if she comes back at all.
-The End, with Faye permanently written out, possibly dead. 

It all comes down to Jeph's plans for the comic, and which outcomes he's willing to use. 

Considering that Faye appeared on strip 3, I find it hard that any of the last two is possible. It's not like she appeared a couple times and got eaten by an allosaurus. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/cast/sara.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 22 Jan 2015, 14:41
Yeah, but this somehow feels bigger than the Marten/Dora breakup, you know?  I would understand if Jeph decided it was time to shake the QCverse to its core, and this was his method of doing so. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 22 Jan 2015, 14:50
From a comic-having a dramatic arc perspective rather than a people-having-people-drama perspective, I think the coming story arc revolves around one very important question: Jeph's willingness to ax a core character.  The characters who have been put on a bus or simply disappeared from view so far haven't been core characters to the comic, and Faye's ultimate fate largely depends on whether or not Our Benevolent Comic Overlord is ready to make that choice.  If he is, then we could very easily see this arc end with Faye gone in one way or another.  I don't have any predictions as to the way he would do so, though Bus seems like the cleanest way to make that break.

Another possible long term outcome is what I'm going to call Cast Demotion.  I'm sure there's a term for it, but I don't peruse TVTropes, so I don't know it.  We might see Faye go from core cast to supporting cast once everything blows over.  We've seen Cast Promotions a couple of times, most notably with Claire going from a supporting role to a core cast member almost overnight during the Scritch Event, (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2800) but other than Cosette kind of fading into the background, we really haven't seen much in the way of characters becoming less vital to the comic.

So, as I see it, we have a few possible long term outcomes, listed in from I feel like is the most probable to the least: 
-Salvage, in which Faye's relationship with the other cast members will eventually recover, or at least reach some sort of equilibrium.  No guarantee she'll get hired back, though.
-Demotion, with Faye getting a lot less face time, representing how her relationship with her friends has suffered and they just don't spend as much time together.  Would probably include her moving out.
-The Bus, probably with Faye either going back south or following Angus.  It might end up being a Bus with a return ticket, but a long absence seems likely if she comes back at all.
-The End, with Faye permanently written out, possibly dead. 

It all comes down to Jeph's plans for the comic, and which outcomes he's willing to use.

I think the demotion thing already happened for the main characters. While Marten, Dora, and Faye still are largely important, I feel like the strip has become more ensemble-encompassing. We sometimes don't see one or two of the main three for an arc. What remains to be seen is if this events shakes up this dynamic more and we get one of the three dropped down even further.

Also, I know this is semi-old but I don't see a time skip happening. Even if Faye leaves the shop for a while, there are still other characters the comic could focus on.

EDIT: Somehow lost a bracket. FORGIVE ME OVERLORDS!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ItsNotATumor on 22 Jan 2015, 14:55
My prediction for an upcoming comic is Marten comes home from date. He then sees Faye face down on the floor/couch. Unclear if she's passed out or dead...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 15:04
My prediction for an upcoming comic is Marten comes home from date. He then sees Faye face down on the floor/couch. Unclear if she's passed out or dead...

That's definitely a possibility and one that I sincerely hope doesn't happen. :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 22 Jan 2015, 15:06
To get really meta for a moment, I'd just like to say it takes a hell of a lot of nerve to mess with your bread and butter the way Jeph has - the only paths I can see for this plotline either shake up the cast in a big, big way (Great Schism, anyone?), or get him yelled at for deus ex machine.

I wonder how much he's been gritting his teeth over this one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 15:07
If nothing is true, nothing can be right.

But is everything permitted?

That depends on the system of government you live under. ;p

I'm not in favor of any particular prediction for how Marten's going to process this, because the fact that the second date and the Great Schism fall on the same day is probably super important. How Marten views this, and what he does or doesn't learn from it will depend heavily on how the super important plays out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 22 Jan 2015, 15:09
If nothing is true, nothing can be right.

But is everything permitted?
As the professor who taught my graduate electromagnetism course likes to say, "Everything which is not forbidden is required."

He used that statement to justify the existence of magnetic monopoles.  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 22 Jan 2015, 15:24
Everyone!!!! What if this is the beginning of Cosette's Curse????
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1710
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ItsNotATumor on 22 Jan 2015, 15:33
Quote from: ItsNotATumor
It gives Faye a potential out for legal action.

Honestly? I don't think Faye even has the mental togetherness to fathom that as a reasonable course of action. This sounds very naive I'm sure, but I think something in Faye's (more sober) brain would still go "hey, woah, no, she's my friend" - hence why she tried to bargain for her job back. She might be done with CoD and her employment, but I don't think she's manipulative or vindictive enough to try and get Dora's business sunk.

It's Not a Tumor, none of that will fly... (snip)... Faye has no case.

Yeah, I agree that Faye the character won't do that (or think of it), and that even if she did it would likely not succeed.

With that said, from a business standpoint, Dora should have just been quiet after "You're fired". When Faye started to protest, she should have continued with "I need you to go now, you're fired".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aliensporebomb on 22 Jan 2015, 15:49
Wow - fireworks.

I expected this.  But somehow it's a little more brutal than I expected.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 22 Jan 2015, 15:57
The most awkward (but possibly most entertaining) option: Faye builds her current drunk to blackout drunk, forgets that any of this happened, and comes in to work the next day.  :-o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 16:13
I hit "random" and came across this one here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1707).

I think that might be one of my points of criticism of the strip as a whole. Jeph has the characters make these wonderful and necessary insights, and then they just sort of get glossed over when they become most appropriate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 22 Jan 2015, 16:20
Counting down to Fridays comic, Faye might lose it in the street (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1342), although I'm hoping for snuggles (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2800) to keep the blues away for this weekend. However it'll probably be something like this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2813).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 22 Jan 2015, 16:37
My bet's on a cute romantic interlude with Marten and Claire. Maybe interrupted by a phone call from Dora or Faye, or we may not get back to Faye until Monday or later.

 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 16:42
Another forgotten insight (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=838).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 22 Jan 2015, 17:03
but other than Cosette kind of fading into the background, we really haven't seen much in the way of characters becoming less vital to the comic.

How quickly you forget that Steve used to be a main character.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 22 Jan 2015, 17:11
I suspect how you perceive Steve depends on when you started reading QC.  Or any other character for that matter.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 22 Jan 2015, 17:21
I started reading somewhere in the 1400's and I always considered Steve to be a main character...although I read the previous comics from the start in rapid speed (my at the time gf was reading it so I had to as well)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 22 Jan 2015, 17:43
You know, I just realised - everyone who has been coming up as to how Faye will go off the rails, seems to have forgotten one key aspect of Faye's personality: she's a fighter.

I wouldn't be surprised if rock bottom involves Faye's pugnacious predilections landing her in trouble with the law. A night in the drunk tank or being stood in a court might shock her enough to snap out of this, or it might push her deeper into the bottle.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Conzy on 22 Jan 2015, 17:47
I find it very difficult to really hate someone on a personal level when that someone is a fictional character created and written by someone trying to tell a story. There are characters I dislike seeing, but I have a hard time forgetting that they do not themselves have much in the way of agency and that makes it very difficult for me to let myself fill my head and my heart with the purest most malign kind of hatred. It just feels weird and fucked-up I guess.

I thought I'd dislike the coming arc but I think I'm going to enjoy seeing Jeph's take on Faye's descent into drunkenness.

I don't think it's necessarily weird or fucked up to hate a fictional character. Now, let me be clear, there is a point where that goes too far. But being rational and saying 'in the world that character resides, based on his or her actions, I hate them' isn't anything unheard of. In fact, it's what fiction has done for a long time. Think of literature, I had to read 'The Catcher in the Rye' while at school. On talking to people about the book, one of the most common responses was that people hated Holden Caulfield. That was the exact word a lot of people used. I thought it was an entirely reasonable response, even though I felt differently. My reaction to that was 'and?' Just because you love or hate a specific character isn't indicative of the merit of the work, which is the most important thing. I have reasons for liking and not liking certain characters in QC and I will readily admit that Faye is my least favourite character person-wise. By that I mean if I were to meet someone with Faye's characteristics in real life I would do my best to have nothing to do with them, which one could define as hatred. However, as an excellent, well developed, entertaining and believable character, I would rank her among the best, if not the best in QC, and I salute the writer for it.

Aimless, I'm fairly sure you meant the melding fiction and reality type hatred that is conveyed sometimes (I always (wrongly, probably) assume a degree of hyperbole) and this isn't really aimed (sorry, horrible pun) at you, but quoting your post gave me an easy way to convey some points that have been rattling around my head since seeing views on characters by people (myself included) on these forums. Woo, that was a long sentence.

Edit: I think this line of thought can be useful when thinking about and discussing the events of the comics in terms of who is right and wrong. In my relatively short time on th forums, I have seen many posts (to take Faye as an example) making up ridiculous excuses as to why she is at fault in situation A. At the same time, I've seen many posts making up ridiculous excuses as to why it's ALL her fault in situation B. What I'm basically saying is that I think it's okay to hate a fictional character, but don't let it cloud your judgment.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 22 Jan 2015, 17:51
I find it very difficult to really hate someone on a personal level when that someone is a fictional character

I don't think it's necessarily weird or fucked up to hate a fictional character.

(https://rockpaperwatch.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/ojw2b1mivw7e06xjmt151.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 22 Jan 2015, 17:51
If there's a conflict with Claire, I think (especially in the short-term), it's less likely to have anything to do with jealousy (even over time being spent elsewhere), and more likely to be because Claire might think Faye is a harmful thing in his life. I'm pretty sure everyone gets annoyed when their friend, significant other, etc, gets completely sucked into someone else's problems, and talks about them all the time, to the point where it is negatively effecting them. Based on Claire's reaction to cheating and so on, I do think it's fairly likely that sort of thing would bother her. On the other hand, that would depend how much Marten got involved.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 22 Jan 2015, 17:54
But I think the time has arrived. The difference between then and now is that - not to be unfair to Marten - he really didn't have much "growth" going on. He was just sort of there, rudderless, especially after the Dora breakup. He was in his library job just doing whatever. Now, he is taking steps to really do something musically, he has a girlfriend and he's trying to man up ... just as Faye is falling apart. Faye has always relied on Marten sort of just being there for her. I think subconsciously she has relied on the notion that if things had gone a bit differently, she and Marten would be together and she was Marten's 'first choice.' Marten has grown a lot in this time and I don't know if Faye recognizes this. Just as she spoke in an entitled manner to Dora after being fired, I think that Faye feels a bit entitled to Marten's unwavering support. If she doesn't get it, she may very well press the issue. That won't end well for either of them.

Remember, it can be argued that Faye set Claire and Marten up.  At least, Faye confronted Claire about her feelings for Marten, which may have played a role in why things happened later that night. 

More broadly, this gets back to the point that out of all the main characters, Faye really does seem to have the highest "emotional intelligence" when it comes to others.  She just sucks ass at understanding why she does things.  Which is why I think Faye should be aware of Marten's "growth" - even if it makes her insecure when compared to her own stagnation.

other than Cosette kind of fading into the background, we really haven't seen much in the way of characters becoming less vital to the comic.

Totally untrue.  There's lots of examples of characters falling into the background.  People brought up Steve, who used to be a pretty well rounded, interesting character.  Remember the Meena arc?  It was refreshing.  There's also Raven, who was also unquestionably part of the core comic, and basically has been written out.  Arguably Penelope counts as well, although the period she was a major character in the comic only lasted a few years.  Hanners has receded a lot as well - she was a main cast member, and has more been a supporting cast member lately, mostly seen only as Marigold's friend.  Hell, Pintsize, although he's still seen, really only makes appearances a handful of times per year now.   
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Conzy on 22 Jan 2015, 17:57
I find it very difficult to really hate someone on a personal level when that someone is a fictional character

I don't think it's necessarily weird or fucked up to hate a fictional character.

(https://rockpaperwatch.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/ojw2b1mivw7e06xjmt151.jpg)

Not going to lie, that came to mind while writing the post. Decided to go with the Caulfield analogy as I though he and Faye were more comparable in terms of reasons why people might hate them.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Cattus on 22 Jan 2015, 18:09
I'm amazed at some of the negative comments here about Faye and Dora.  Lets have a quick look at Faye.  When young and impressionable, Faye witnessed the violent suicide of her best friend and Dad.  The trauma took years to overcome and she never really got over it.  She distanced herself emotionally from everyone, learning in the process that booze numbs the emotional senses and allows her to cope.  She FINALLY lets a person into her emotional psyche and he proceeds to leave her behind.  It is true that she could have gone with him but that would have meant leaving all her friends behind in exchange for a possibly uncertain relationship.  So now she has lost two people she loves.  She is certainly in most ways, broken, and booze is her glue.  I think all her friends understand that to some degree and Dora especially.

But Dora has her own life and business to protect.  She gave Faye a huge amount of latitude over the 'years' (?) but also realized that staff drinking on the job could ruin her business.  She did what she had to do and I'm sure she hopes that Faye WILL get some help and at that time I have no doubt they will work things out.  It's 'tough love' in action here.  Faye will likely fall further before she gets better and her friends and family will likely help considerably.

I find that Jeph is quite insightful when it comes to what's right for his 'family'.  I don't think he's going to kill off or otherwise dispose of a loved member.  The drama in QC is the drama of real life - exaggerated to some degree, for sure, but not the extent it could be.  I anxiously await the next chapters in this story arc.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Call me Ms on 22 Jan 2015, 19:18
Cattus -- yes, finally, someone said it.
I've been a reader for a few years now, and gone through large swaths of the archive, including the first 500. And while I e-mailed Jeph over a story line or character once, it's the QC events of the last few days that prompted me to find the forums.  Have been reviewing comments for the last two days, and this is the first, I think, that I found what I've been wanting to say (it's been eye-opening, actually, to read everyone's take on things... so different!).

Faye's in a bad place, definitely, and quickly spiraling down. But I don't think it's where she has been up till the break up. And as annoyed as I was by her presumptuous, wide-eyed "aren't I kinda cute"-ness when Dora found her drinking, I do feel for her. After all -- she acknowledges her issues.  Comes clean and releases Marten. Takes it admirably -- and honestly -- when her friend and boss starts dating her love interest. Does a lot of work, goes overboard on the other end (Sven), does some more work, and finally is capable of, and has, a real relationship.

The long distance question is always tricky, and usually difficult to pin blame solely on either party. To many people, an announcement of leaving feels like abandonment. Regardless of what the facts are, on some level I think Angus' departure has triggered Faye around her father's suicide: the first man she trusted & let in romantically, and he leaves (just like her Dad did). Of course it's set spiraling back into her prickly shell, with a vengeance.

And none of her friends seem to be noticing. She's turning into her father -- I see a suicide attempt coming up -- and the times she's showing her alcoholism I read as those "cry for help" moments.

And I do fault Dora here. Of course it's in her right to fire Faye here. But she's acting in a flying-off-the-handle, I'll-show-you fashion, not a professional, sorry-but-you-give-me-no-choice manner. Much less in a tough-love mode. And in pulling the "insubordination" etc., ish, she is completely changing the narrative the tone & character of the work-friendship relationship she and Faye have.

I'll come back to this point a little later; felt like I've said plenty, for now, especially for a first post.

I hope Faye gets the help she needs, but I do see a suicide attempt -- or something approaching one -- coming first.

Anyway it was good to find this forum!  Some really great points & discussion.

 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: wlewisiii on 22 Jan 2015, 19:54
I see it's slowed down, suddenly. It's as if we're all holding our breath waiting for the Friday comic to be posted.

I don't have much to add in the interim; tho discussion has been good to read however.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 20:17
Welcome, new person!

Maybe to put us all in our place we will get five panels of Pintsize eating cereal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 22 Jan 2015, 20:23
 I miss euro time updates.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: AnnathEawesoMe on 22 Jan 2015, 20:24
Or someone eating cereal out of Pintsize!

Though I think that's been done before.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 22 Jan 2015, 20:29
I'm rooting for some sweet Clairten to end this very sour week.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Arkantos on 22 Jan 2015, 20:33
It's Up.

nooooOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 22 Jan 2015, 20:33
F***!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2015, 20:35
Fuck!
Agreed :(

Also I do like to think Pintsize tried to stop her, which is why he's off.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: stephber on 22 Jan 2015, 20:35
Ooooooooooook. Comic's up. Seems like date night is being somewhat derailed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: lot_jockey on 22 Jan 2015, 20:36
Ugh. That's how Hendrix died.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 22 Jan 2015, 20:37
 I feel bad for Pintsize, I mean, AI are supposed to be autonomous entities, right? I feel like thier off switches should be hidden or removed, or something.

It looks to me like he objected to how much Faye was drinking, so she turned him off, preventing him from going for help when things started to get bad.

Or are they implying that Pintsize drank so much that he also passed out?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2015, 20:40
Or are they implying that Pintsize drank so much that he also passed out?
If he did, then he very well may have saved Faye's life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 22 Jan 2015, 20:41
At least Marten didn't get kicked in the crotch this time.


Yet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 22 Jan 2015, 20:41
I feel bad for Pintsize, I mean, AI are supposed to be autonomous entities, right? I feel like thier off switches should be hidden or removed, or something.

It looks to me like he objected to how much Faye was drinking, so she turned him off, preventing him from going for help when things started to get bad.

Or are they implying that Pintsize drank so much that he also passed out?

First thing I said after was 'wonder what happened to pintsize?'

I was assuming the drinking idea, but seeing as my partner looked at it and said "looks like he told Faye to stop drinking and she threw him at the wall," so if that was the apparent answer for both of you, I'm starting to lean in that direction too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 20:42
I am having so much trouble sympathizing with Faye, she's causing so much damage.


Did she kill Pintsize?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 22 Jan 2015, 20:43
If Pintsize can actually be turned off, why has this never happened before?  Why proceed with duct taping him to a wall or hanging him from the ceiling to prevent him from doing something awful?

I worry for our anthro pal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 20:43
With Claire and Martin's relationship being so new, I can easily see Claire, with her insecurities, making herself think that Martin's suddenly decided that he doesn't want to date her after all.

The drama-train just keeps picking up steam.

Warning - while you were typing 4 people have slipped in the puddle of Faye-vomit. You may want to put on your galoshes.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 22 Jan 2015, 20:44
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: stephber on 22 Jan 2015, 20:47
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.

We don't know how he's going to react when he learns what happened. Yes, Marten will likely be mild-mannered and supportive like always, but he doesn't know about her getting fired yet.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2015, 20:48
I don't think that'll matter right now.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 20:49
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.

We don't know how he's going to react when he learns what happened. Yes, Marten will likely be mild-mannered and supportive like always, but he doesn't know about her getting fired yet.

Agreed, I think at this point he just wants to me sure she doesn't die in her sleep.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 22 Jan 2015, 20:50
Jeph wouldn't kill her off by having her choke on her own vomit.

... she is just passed out right now, I'm assuming.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 20:51
Two bottles -- is this when you call 911? With or without the risk of choking?

I'd hate to hit someone with the medical expen$e$ of an emergency room visit if all that were needed was carrying them to a bed, but the opposite mistake would be incomparably worse.

Agreed about Pintsize. Turning off a citizen who has equal rights has got to be an issue.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 20:52
It looks like maybe she threw a lot of it up, but two bottles for a girl that size is definitely something you'd consider medical intervention for, regardless of how well she's held her liquor in the past.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 22 Jan 2015, 20:54
Jeph wouldn't kill her off by having her choke on her own vomit.

... she is just passed out right now, I'm assuming.

One would assume that if she wasn't obviously breathing he would have run over to check _before_ calling Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: stephber on 22 Jan 2015, 20:57
From someone who works in the ER (pharmacist), as long as her liver is ok and didn't choke on vomit, she'll live (albiet with a massive hangover). But with her depression, I'd get her to the ER for fear that she took something with it and tried to kill herself - not that Jeph would ever off a main character like that. A banana bag and some IV fluid, and she'll be ready for they psychiatrist....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 20:57
Did she kill Pintsize?

At a guess, she didn't. It would be heavier drama than Jeph's ever done, and to kill Pintsize she'd have to find and erase all the backups. After the virus incident, Marten should be careful about that.

I'll just tell myself that Marten assured himself Faye was breathing as his first step before he called Claire.

Didn't Marten turn Pintsize off when he was making love with Padma?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 22 Jan 2015, 20:59
Yeah, no way would Marten call Claire if he had any suspicion Faye wasn't breathing. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 21:00
From someone who works in the ER (pharmacist), as long as her liver is ok and didn't choke on vomit, she'll live (albiet with a massive hangover). But with her depression, I'd get her to the ER for fear that she took something with it and tried to kill herself - not that Jeph would ever off a main character like that. A banana bag and some IV fluid, and she'll be ready for they psychiatrist....

Even people with healthy livers can die of alcohol poisoning.

Quote
http://www.alcohol.org.nz/alcohol-you/your-body-alcohol/health-effects/alcohol-poisoning (http://www.alcohol.org.nz/alcohol-you/your-body-alcohol/health-effects/alcohol-poisoning)

Quote
http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/ade90201.page (http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/ade90201.page)

Edited to add another link.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 22 Jan 2015, 21:00
Marten needs to call 911 NOW. Probably even before calling Claire. He'll need to accompany Faye to hospital, and tell what he knows to the ER. Once that's done he needs to call Faye's family.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 22 Jan 2015, 21:03
I'm not sure turning him off is a nice thing to do period -- though he may have felt justified, ensuring Padma's safety.

Warning - while you were reading 3 new eels have escaped from their crotch-borne lair. You may wish to have yourself tested.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 22 Jan 2015, 21:05
Didn't Marten turn Pintsize off when he was making love with Padma?
I believe so, that's what I was thinking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 22 Jan 2015, 21:05
I am having so much trouble sympathizing with Faye, she's causing so much damage.


Did she kill Pintsize?

Pintsize looks to be turned off. And it has happened before in the comic. It's usually when they need to fix him but it isn't unheard of.

OT: Yeah, Marter needs to call 911. Whether he realizes it or not is a different story. Faye has thrown up from drinking and fell asleep before and its not as if he is privy to what happened earlier. He may just think to leave her there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 22 Jan 2015, 21:06
He should earn boyfriend points for remembering to call Claire at all.  This is a perfectly acceptable reason to lose one's sh!t.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: poofdepoof on 22 Jan 2015, 21:08
I swear I could smell/taste vomit as I looked at this strip. (There's nothing of that sort around me, so I think that just points to Jeph's storytelling?)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 21:08
That link said one liter of distilled liquor can be lethal for a 60 kg person. Faye may be heavier than that but it sure looks like two empty pints there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 21:09
I am having so much trouble sympathizing with Faye, she's causing so much damage.


Did she kill Pintsize?

Pintsize looks to be turned off. And it has happened before in the comic. It's usually when they need to fix him but it isn't unheard of.

OT: Yeah, Marter needs to call 911. Whether he realizes it or not is a different story. Faye has thrown up from drinking and fell asleep before and its not as if he is privy to what happened earlier. He may just think to leave her there.

I'm fairly certain that before, she was coherent after upchucking and was summarily put to bed after being forced to drink some water (the ever-present treatment for those in the group that have over-imbibed in the past). I think it's pretty safe to say she's passed out in her own puddle of vomit, which is significantly worse than simply 'falling asleep'. I stand corrected.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 21:14
Not coherent afterward (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=185).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 21:16
Ya'll's is forgettin'. Marten's barely 26. Party days are not a distant memory. He's probably not really versed on the dangers of alcohol overdose. Passed out, puked, and breathing is a party foul at that age.

OtoH, those of you who say ER are correct. The LD50 for alcohol is 7.8ml per kilogram at 80 proof. Admittedly, that's taken all at once. But that, based on eyeballing Faye's BMI, is about half the amount of Bourbon she's had. That is to say, she's drank enough to have a fifty fifty chance of killing herself twice. It's not possible to know how fast she drank it, and how much she's vomited out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 22 Jan 2015, 21:19
Oh boy
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 21:20
Not coherent afterward (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=185).
Post redacted.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: stephber on 22 Jan 2015, 21:21
Going back through the last few comics... what bottle of booze is she on?

- Glenfart bottle 1 and 2 http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2875 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2875)
- Old Still bottle 3 http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2878 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2878)
- 2 unknown's bottles 4 and 5 http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2881 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2881)

On second thought.... time for a visit to the hospital.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 22 Jan 2015, 21:22
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.

Right, because firing someone for coming in plastered and loading up again, against regulations is the exact same thing as finding your AI companion shut off or erased and said person passed out in a pool of their own vomit.  :roll:

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 22 Jan 2015, 21:25
Looking at Pintsize it looks to me like she threw him into the wall.  She has done this in the past and for simple comments, just picture what she could do if Pintsize commented on or tried to interfere someway with her drinking.  If she did toss him and did some critical damage to his systems Martin might not be very forgiving, for all of Pintsize's faults he is still Martin's oldest friend.

Martin should call 911, hopefully that's what happens next.  And hopefully Pintsize is ok.

BTW new to the forum.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Nyithra on 22 Jan 2015, 21:26
Did pintsize try to drink Faye's liquor?

Jokes aside, I wonder where Faye is going to go from here. It is going to be difficult to stay in denial for long with her living situation potentially in danger after her job loss.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 22 Jan 2015, 21:27
Wow. This is grim. Not that I didn't see it coming. It's why I was kinda bummed about how Dora handled the situation.

Really hope Faye and Pintsize survive this...  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 21:31
Pintsize will survive.

Okay, all I have is logic. AI is people, post singularity. If Faye rendered him permanently inoperative, she murdered him.

That's one way to put her on a bus, but I really don't see Jeph going there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 21:31
Welcome, new person!

Pintsize is protected by military-grade shockproofing and has survived numerous wall impacts.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Euthemes on 22 Jan 2015, 21:32
Everyone!!!! What if this is the beginning of Cosette's Curse????
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1710

I really hope not, much as I like her.

Marten and Faye living together is one of the core elements of the comic. Should Faye leave in any way, I will start to believe we are approaching the End. I think Marten will save the day. If he can't do it, nobody else will.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 22 Jan 2015, 21:33
I'm still surprised by all the talk about characters being put on the bus. I doubt anyone involved in this scenario will get on the bus.

Although, now I wonder what Steve's doing (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2407)

Oh, and to the person, whose post was a few pages back and I forgot to go back and quote, who put up a list of outcomes from the perspective of this just being an arc in a webcomic (crazy talk), you let out the option:
 6. The outcome of this arc is preparation for how Jeph ends the comic entirely
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 21:33
Yes, but then I would have said that Faye working at Coffee of Doom was one of the core elements of the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 22 Jan 2015, 21:34
As depressing as the subject matter is,  these may be the theee most expressive, well drawn pages I've seen from this comic.  Dora's cold fury and Marten's resignation as he makes the call especially. And there was something chilling about seeing Pintsize, well, dead (if only temporarily). We know Pintsize cares more than he's given credit for. Maybe his attempt to share Faye's alcohol earlier was an attempt to prevent this very situation?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 22 Jan 2015, 21:36
I'm guessing Pintsize can be rebooted. In any case he's not going to be getting worse as he sits there deactivated. Same is not true for a human being; Faye has, at a minimum, serious alcohol poisoning. If she took anything else on top of the alcohol, she could be in real danger of death or coma. Singularity or no, Faye's the priority.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: grez on 22 Jan 2015, 21:40
Also, has that painting always been there?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 21:47
That depends on what you mean by "that" and "painting."  But no. it hasn't. it's been there a while in real time, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: KOK on 22 Jan 2015, 21:51
Dora ought to have called Marten the moment Faye went out the door. Of course we don't know that she did not.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 21:56
Mistakes may have been made.

It's okay. It's traditional.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 21:56
Just want to say: Faye could be just fine or already dead.  Alcohol's kind of funny like that.

Her head is turned to the side, which reduces her chances of choking on her own vomit or blood by a tremendous amount.  Of course, if she drank a bottle of 80 proof whiskey inside of a day, she's probably in a state where her health could deteriorate rapidly.  Even if you don't take her to a hospital, you basically gotta baby her just in case she starts having breathing problems (especially because of her weight and how heavy her drinking is).

Anyway, why would Jeph kill Faye off?  It'd be too easy.

I just hope, for the love of chicken, that Angus does not come back and give up on his dream to be with Faye.  There's never a good reason to jump on a sinking ship.

Obligatory :clairedoge: included because I enjoy the image.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 22 Jan 2015, 22:01
Marten and Faye living together is one of the core elements of the comic. Should Faye leave in any way, I will start to believe we are approaching the End.

6. The outcome of this arc is preparation for how Jeph ends the comic entirely

And if this is how it ends, I'm going to be pissed.  I mean, sure, I don't expect Jeph to continue QC forever, but if he ends it this way it'll just feel like a kick in the gut.  I stuck around this week because I was too horrified to look away, but I think it's time for an actual break.  Seeing Faye like this is too painful.  Need to get away for a bit.  And if I come back in a month to find her dead, I shall be very cross.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 22:10
Just want to say: Faye could be just fine or already dead.  Alcohol's kind of funny like that.

Her head is turned to the side, which reduces her chances of choking on her own vomit or blood by a tremendous amount.  Of course, if she drank a bottle of 80 proof whiskey inside of a day, she's probably in a state where her health could deteriorate rapidly.  Even if you don't take her to a hospital, you basically gotta baby her just in case she starts having breathing problems (especially because of her weight and how heavy her drinking is).

Anyway, why would Jeph kill Faye off?  It'd be too easy.

I just hope, for the love of chicken, that Angus does not come back and give up on his dream to be with Faye.  There's never a good reason to jump on a sinking ship.

Obligatory :clairedoge: included because I enjoy the image.

Two things:  1: Her weight?  By no stretch of the imagination is Faye overweight enough to cause breathing problems.  2. I'm sure Marten checked to see that she was breathing before he called Claire.  If she were dead (which she is 100% not) I think his reaction would not have been nearly as chill.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 22:17
On the contrary, the worry may be about how light Faye is. For all her self-image problems, the fact is that she's short and not obese, so there's not a lot of her to dilute that amount of alcohol. Just imagine how bad it would be if she were Tai.

And we're talking about a dose that would be a problem even for Elliott.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Jazzmaster on 22 Jan 2015, 22:17
Warning - while you were reading 5 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.


Gotta say, the couch vomit might be one of the most graphic things we've seen in the comic for a while.  As far as I remember, whenever somebody vomited it always happened "off screen"...until now.  I mean, there is it is, completely uncensored.  It actually makes me a bit uneasy just looking at it...

Anyways, hopefully Marten can be the calm in this shitstorm.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 22:20
I might have misunderstood what the poster meant by "her weight".  Yeah for her size, that much liquor could cause alcohol poisoning.  Here's hoping those little white chunks on the couch aren't pills.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 22:21
He's taken Faye to the emergency room before. He'll be the island of calm.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Jan 2015, 22:21
Anyways, hopefully Marten can be the calm in this shitstorm.
"Eye of the shitstorm", eh? Sounds nice...

I'm sad that Marten's date was cancelled. Damn you, Faye!

Warning - while you were typing an incalculable number of new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your math skills.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 22 Jan 2015, 22:21
Okay, all I have is logic. AI is people, post singularity. If Faye rendered him permanently inoperative, she murdered him.
Yeah, that was in my mind as well.

I looked it up and in this strip (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1457) his eyes go dim when Marigold turns him off to repair him. AI are handled a lot differently now, so it could probably still have some ramifications as a shitty thing to do to a sentient being with rights, but he's probably not in as bad shape as I first thought. All I could think of was the Momo-is-dead gag when Winston found her old chassis.

Marten definitely needs to rush Faye to the hospital ASAP, regardless of Pintsize's state.

Here's hoping those little white chunks on the couch aren't pills.

Oh, fuck.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 22:27
Just want to say: Faye could be just fine or already dead.  Alcohol's kind of funny like that.

Her head is turned to the side, which reduces her chances of choking on her own vomit or blood by a tremendous amount.  Of course, if she drank a bottle of 80 proof whiskey inside of a day, she's probably in a state where her health could deteriorate rapidly.  Even if you don't take her to a hospital, you basically gotta baby her just in case she starts having breathing problems (especially because of her weight and how heavy her drinking is).

Anyway, why would Jeph kill Faye off?  It'd be too easy.

I just hope, for the love of chicken, that Angus does not come back and give up on his dream to be with Faye.  There's never a good reason to jump on a sinking ship.

Obligatory :clairedoge: included because I enjoy the image.

Two things:  1: Her weight?  By no stretch of the imagination is Faye overweight enough to cause breathing problems.  2. I'm sure Marten checked to see that she was breathing before he called Claire.  If she were dead (which she is 100% not) I think his reaction would not have been nearly as chill.

It's not that she's overweight enough to cause breathing problems normally, it's that alcohol consumed in blackout quantities combines with a slightly above average weight to create those conditions.  Admittedly, the correlation goes for just about anybody who weighs say 20 pounds or more above what would be the 'desired' weight for their body.  But that's the reason why you shouldn't drink so dang much.

Also, as I said, she could die later.  That's the biggest risk of 'leaving someone to sleep it off', which too many people do.  Don't do that, by the way.  Too many people do that.

Of course, I can't see him killing of Faye right here.  It's not like he can't replace her, but if she's going to shuffle off the mortal coil it's probably going to be at the end of the comic.

---

To the other person, the real issue is that Faye's a woman and women aren't better at tanking alcohol than men before we even factor weight in.  And, well, you or I would likely die from drinking a whole fifth of 80 proof whiskey in a day, especially if you pounded half of it right at the end.

I'm kind of on the hefty side and I'm pretty ready to go to bed after a few shots.  I've gotten to the point where I was worried about dying before, of course, but that's how I know that it's way better to just get your head spinning a little bit and then go lie down or post on forums for laughs.  Speaking of which, I got some E and J XO calling my name.   Only a little bit, but, hey, it's been a good night.  I just wish we weren't going to cliffhanger on this comic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 22:29
I had not caught that. As jwhouk would say, "####!".

For future reference, don't try to drive someone to the hospital in a situation like that. If she stops breathing, better to have it happen inside an ambulance with oxygen and expert people right there than in your car in traffic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 22:31
Indeedily!

Leave it to the trained medical professionals who are more than likely experienced in dealing with people in such horrid states of alcohol poisoning.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 22:32
Indeedily!

Leave it to the trained medical professionals who are more than likely experienced in dealing with people in such horrid states of alcohol poisoning.

Well said.

I'm still totally convinces she's alive though. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 22 Jan 2015, 22:33
I'm gonna say that Faye is still alive. The way the comic is set up is way too undramatic for it to be her deathbed. I think she's in serious trouble but Marten's reaction would be more shock and horror than a quick cell phone call joke. Faye's still gonna need that ambulance though. Wonder if the punching intern still works there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Jazzmaster on 22 Jan 2015, 22:37
Anyways, hopefully Marten can be the calm in this shitstorm.
"Eye of the shitstorm", eh? Sounds nice...

I'm sad that Marten's date was cancelled. Damn you, Faye!

Warning - while you were typing an incalculable number of new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your math skills.

Yup.  Hurricane Faye made landfall tonight as a category 5.  Expect it to be the costliest event in QC history.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 22:37

It's not that she's overweight enough to cause breathing problems normally, it's that alcohol consumed in blackout quantities combines with a slightly above average weight to create those conditions.  Admittedly, the correlation goes for just about anybody who weighs say 20 pounds or more above what would be the 'desired' weight for their body.
 

So is it the same mechanism that puts even modestly overweight people at risk for sleep apnea, but with the alcohol making things worse by blocking the wake-up reflex, even before it pulls its other trick of direct respiratory depression?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: mikmaxs on 22 Jan 2015, 22:40
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.

Right, because firing someone for coming in plastered and loading up again, against regulations is the exact same thing as finding your AI companion shut off or erased and said person passed out in a pool of their own vomit.  :roll:
No, but being told that your best friend *intends* to drink themself into oblivion and desires to be drunk at all times is pretty similar to finding them passed out drunk and with vomit on the couch. That is, the thing Dora IGNORED.
Why do people keep acting like Faye's drinking at work came totally out of the blue?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 22:46

It's not that she's overweight enough to cause breathing problems normally, it's that alcohol consumed in blackout quantities combines with a slightly above average weight to create those conditions.  Admittedly, the correlation goes for just about anybody who weighs say 20 pounds or more above what would be the 'desired' weight for their body.
 

So is it the same mechanism that puts even modestly overweight people at risk for sleep apnea, but with the alcohol making things worse by blocking the wake-up reflex, even before it pulls its other trick of direct respiratory depression?

That sounds remarkably logical and much more well-worded than the way I would have expressed it.  If it still sounds remarkably logical once the brandy has hit my brain, I'm going to note it down as fact.   My training is a bit out of date, and not as in-depth as a medical professional.   Are you a medical professional or some sort of specialist in the sciences of life?  Because that was well written and I appreciate you putting logical words to my now semi-drunken floundering.  Either way, I just remember being taught that being overweight or underweight are indicators that caution needs to be used when alcohol is being consumed in a 'binge' fashion, the former because of potential breathing problems (either exacerbated or created by the alcohol's effects on the body) and the latter because of lowered tolerance to the extent that the person is a 'one drink wonder'.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 22:49
Hooray, Marten reacted with trying to help Faye once realizing how she had hit rock bottom. Instead of the other thing.

Right, because firing someone for coming in plastered and loading up again, against regulations is the exact same thing as finding your AI companion shut off or erased and said person passed out in a pool of their own vomit.  :roll:
No, but being told that your best friend *intends* to drink themself into oblivion and desires to be drunk at all times is pretty similar to finding them passed out drunk and with vomit on the couch. That is, the thing Dora IGNORED.
Why do people keep acting like Faye's drinking at work came totally out of the blue?
It didn't really come out of the blue as Faye's been known to handle her problems with alcohol before. Faye wasn't letting on that the breakup was hitting her as hard as it was. You have to take into account that Martin's time has been spent out of her presence more often lately due to Claire, and therefore he likely hasn't realized just how often she's been drunk for the past few weeks. As for Dora, if she's only around her at work and hasn't been hanging out with her outside of it, same thing. I've known plenty of people who come into work hung over, and don't even let on. However, once Faye came in drunk and proceeded to drink in the store, shit got real. Faye pole-jumped over the line that Dora drew in the sand, and Dora acted accordingly. She's never been one to mollycoddle.

Add in how lackadaisical Faye is about everything, and it's no wonder that anyone didn't realize how bad things are for her. Constant sarcasm and levity tend to be a pretty good way to mask that you're hurting, especially if it's par for the course with that person.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Jan 2015, 22:54
It's time Marten sacks up and buys a new couch!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 22:54
Are you a medical professional or some sort of specialist in the sciences of life?

Nothing of the kind, which is why I had to ask the question. Just speculating based on my own sleep apnea problem. Please do not add that to your fact bank unless I turn out to have guessed right!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 23:00
Are you a medical professional or some sort of specialist in the sciences of life?

Nothing of the kind, which is why I had to ask the question. Just speculating based on my own sleep apnea problem. Please do not add that to your fact bank unless I turn out to have guessed right!

I think you have.  More research is required.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 22 Jan 2015, 23:01
It's time Marten sacks up and buys a new couch!

It's cool, just flip the cushions over. Again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 22 Jan 2015, 23:11
He needs anti-Mobius cushions, which never run out of sides to flip. A hexaflexagon might come close.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 23:15
He gotta hit up craigslist.

He can sell that old couch for like thirty as long as he flips the vomit down, then buy a used couch for like fifty.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: swapna on 22 Jan 2015, 23:16
Ah, it's getting worse and worse :(

I'm with a few other posters here - Marten should have called the emergency services immediately. Like, now. No calling Claire beforehand. And no, I don't think he already has - he's exactly where he was when he entered the room, he didn't move over to check if she's still breathing or has a pulse, which the operator would have told him to do.

It would have been way more responsible to call Claire when Faye's on the way to the hospital or already there - I mean, he probably wouldn't need to call it off anyway, he could just call the EMTs, let them take Faye and then proceed to watch a movie at Claire's. Won't take more than 15 minutes. I don't know how response-times are in the US, but they're in a city; emergency services should be at the scene in in less than 10. Of course I don't think he'll leave Faye alone when she's hurting like that, but the impression I got from his priorities (first tell his girlfriend that movie-night is off, an announcement that could have waited 10 minutes, especially when his friend might be in life-threatening danger; he didn't even check on her) is that he's mostly annoyed and way less concerned.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 22 Jan 2015, 23:19
Ah, it's getting worse and worse :(

I'm with a few other posters here - Marten should have called the emergency services immediately. Like, now. No calling Claire beforehand. And no, I don't think he already has - he's exactly where he was when he entered the room, he didn't move over to check if she's still breathing or has a pulse, which the operator would have told him to do.

It would have been way more responsible to call Claire when Faye's on the way to the hospital or already there - I mean, he probably wouldn't need to call it off anyway, he could just call the EMTs, let them take Faye and then proceed to watch a movie at Claire's. Won't take more than 15 minutes. I don't know how response-times are in the US, but they're in a city; emergency services should be at the scene in in less than 10. Of course I don't think he'll leave Faye alone when she's hurting like that, but the impression I got from his priorities (first tell his girlfriend that movie-night is off, an announcement that could have waited 10 minutes, especially when his friend might be in life-threatening danger; he didn't even check on her) is that he's mostly annoyed and way less concerned.

We don't know what happened between panels 3 & 4.  He might have checked her breathing already.  It looks like he hasn't moved, but it might just be the way our POV is set up.  Agreed that he should be calling 911 though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 23:19
In my podunk town, EMTs can do five minutes if you're lucky.  I think they can do less than ten in a city.

Either way, I'm guessing that in the next comic is either going to cut to a hospital or Marten's going to slap Faye awake or be panicking about how he can't wake Faye up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 23:23
Depends on the size of the city, how many EMT stations are in said city and where they're located, time of day and how heavy the traffic is, construction, weather/road conditions... in other words, it could be 5 minutes, it could be half an hour or longer, all depending on the variables.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 22 Jan 2015, 23:23
I don't pretend to be any kind of medical professional (okay, once or twice), but wouldn't vomiting mean Faye's in significantly less danger, because a sizable puddle's worth of alcohol is now in a sizable puddle, and not in her?  I thought that was the whole reason people vomit from drinking too much.

I don't know how response-times are in the US, but they're in a city; emergency services should be at the scene in in less than 10.

That's a difficult thing to judge about US cities, but I live near Detroit, so I'm a bit biased.

Warning - while you were typing 5 new replies have been posted. At least you know where your towel is.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 22 Jan 2015, 23:26
I'm not sure what Marten thinks he'll spend time doing at this point - if Faye's injured or dead, he'll have to leave her to the EMTs, and if she's not, he'll probably not be able to wake her up. And maybe he shouldn't, anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 22 Jan 2015, 23:27
I don't pretend to be any kind of medical professional (okay, once or twice), but wouldn't vomiting mean Faye's in significantly less danger, because a sizable puddle's worth of alcohol is now in a sizable puddle, and not in her?  I thought that was the whole reason people vomit from drinking too much.

I don't know how response-times are in the US, but they're in a city; emergency services should be at the scene in in less than 10.

That's a difficult thing to judge about US cities, but I live near Detroit, so I'm a bit biased.

Warning - while you were typing 5 new replies have been posted. At least you know where your towel is.

Hey, I'm like an hour north of Detroit! Small world.

As to vomiting, it can mean that you're fine, but not always. It all depends on how much alcohol was absorbed into the bloodstream in a short amount of time. If she didn't eat anything, for instance, the booze would get into her bloodstream that much faster.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: swapna on 22 Jan 2015, 23:36
We don't know what happened between panels 3 & 4.  He might have checked her breathing already.  It looks like he hasn't moved, but it might just be the way our POV is set up.  Agreed that he should be calling 911 though.

Yes, could be, but he's standing directly in the doorframe, and a 911 call would be at least a few minutes of checking on Faye (therefore moving), giving them the address and so on. If he already called 911, I think it would be clear (He's sitting besides Faye, the EMTs are already there, he's in the ambulance on the way to the hospital...)

I don't pretend to be any kind of medical professional (okay, once or twice), but wouldn't vomiting mean Faye's in significantly less danger, because a sizable puddle's worth of alcohol is now in a sizable puddle, and not in her?  I thought that was the whole reason people vomit from drinking too much.

Yeah, sometimes, but it could mean she can't breathe because her windpipe is blocked by vomit. Also, as Omega Entity pointed out, it could be too late since she drank a lot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 22 Jan 2015, 23:42
As tough as the story is to see unfold - even for someone like myself who doesn't have any experience with addicts or alcoholics - I'm glad to see it continue, and not have cutaways to overly cutesy dates or gag strips or the like. That would just be some serious Mood Whiplash, and pretty choppy storytelling. Unpleasant, difficult, and confronting as this arc may be, it's one of the most important and serious ones in a while. It needs to play out.

I'm sure if Faye does end up having to go to hospital, it's not going to do much to restore Dora's image with readers who are already upset with her. For my part, I still think her hand was forced, and she was justified in the firing. I also think some people might be misinterpreting the "insubordination" speech; to me, it sounded like she was saying "Look, I put up with your quirks, I even eat up your (metaphorical) shit and call it ice cream, but you broke the one rule I asked everyone not to break under any circumstances."

At the end of the day, Faye is an adult, and whether this is truly a sign of a deep problem or a case of the blues that got way out of hand, she needs to take responsibility for her actions. One can sympathise with her, but that doesn't hand her a Get Out Of Jail Free card for anything and everything she does that's hurtful or objectionable.

I sympathise with Faye, but I also sympathise with Dora, who had to make a tough decision, and wasn't out of line given the circumstances (prior warnings, an understandable zero-tolerance rule, plenty of rope, assistant manager...it's all been covered in previous posts). I sympathise with Faye, because she's going through an awful time, quite likely has a serious problem, and is hitting rock bottom. I sympathise with Dora, because Faye can be extremely difficult, crossed the line here, and forced her hand.

It's natural to pick sides (especially when both characters are polarising among the fanbase), and nominate a good guy and bad guy in fiction. But honestly, I don't think there's a villain here.

Well, except Steve, of course. A friend he's known since the beginning of the strip is spiralling out of control, and all he can do is sit at home and eat cereal. What. A. Jerk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 22 Jan 2015, 23:42
I don't pretend to be any kind of medical professional (okay, once or twice), but wouldn't vomiting mean Faye's in significantly less danger, because a sizable puddle's worth of alcohol is now in a sizable puddle, and not in her?  I thought that was the whole reason people vomit from drinking too much.

Vomit includes some of the poison and your stomach contents.  The problem is that if the alcohol makes you puke, it's already gotten past your stomach and into your blood.  You will throw up some of the alcohol, but your body has already gotten enough in it that it could be at or past a dangerous amount.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Jan 2015, 23:45
I bet if Jeph had any idea the reaction was going to escalate this quickly, he'd have written this differently. Like, smaller bottles, to start.

I don't think real world physics is in play here. I mostly pointed out the LD50 because people need to be aware. In real life, that much drinking can kill you.

As for what Marten has to spend time doing: Leaving out the alcohol poisoning stuff, he has to get Faye out of her own vomit. Bile and skin should not be mixed.

He needs to clean up what he can.

I don't know about you, but after policing vomit, I wouldn't want to jump right into cuddles and a movie.

Ew.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 22 Jan 2015, 23:54
Damn it. I'm starting to hate being right with this arc! :-(

So, it's to hospital for a while for Faye. The vomit is dark enough that there is blood in it. That means a ruptured stomach ulcer or something similar, which is not surprising for someone with a long-term drinking habit plus a history of stress-induced mental illness. That will mean even longer in the hospital and a doctor saying: "You will be teetotal or you will die." Faye is for a long, hard rehabilitation and I can't see her being the same woman ever again. Sharing a bottle with the Grim Reaper does that for you.

I think that next week will mostly be set at hospital with the cast waiting for Faye to get out of surgery and asking themselves if they could have done anything to have prevented this. The answer is probably 'no' but that won't stop them feeling guilty; especially Dora, who may end up just in as much danger as Faye.

As for Pintsize? I doubt that Faye shut him down in line with manufacturers' guidelines, so he might have lost his short-term memory cache and may need repairs. At the very least, he'll need attention from Marigold.

One final thought: in my view, this was a 'cry for help' suicide attempt.

I don't know about you, but after policing vomit, I wouldn't want to jump right into cuddles and a movie.

He may still need and get the cuddles. They'll just be on a hard bench in a hospital waiting room.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 23 Jan 2015, 00:03
Long time Lurker, first time poster!

I don't like Faye, I've never really liked her to be honest? That type of person I'd find extremely unpleasant to be around, I fully acknowledge that she's been through hell, but she always puts the other people around her through hell too which is really unfair , she seems to expect constant support no matter how badly she behaves...I think it's time she finally dealt with some consequences of her actions (Losing her job is a consequence of her own actions)

I don't blame Dora for firing her, nor do I blame her for not fussing and  calling Martin so he can babysit Faye. (I also don't like this sentiment of HOW DARE SHE FIRE  FAYE, Faye deserved to be fired, not only did she show up /drunk/ she /LIED/ about showing up drunk and then slipped in the back to drink more, she lied and broke one of the only few rules given to her by Dora, she deserved to be canned dang it)

Honestly I'm more worried about Pintsize than I am for Faye, Pintsize  has been in the background for a /long/ time, in fact he's even said his job with Marten is over because Marten has real friends now, this very well may be Jeph  escorting him out of the comic on a sadder note.


(So sorry about the long post  :-( )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 00:26
I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DonInKansas on 23 Jan 2015, 00:32
Anyways, hopefully Marten can be the calm in this shitstorm.
"Eye of the shitstorm", eh? Sounds nice...

I'm sad that Marten's date was cancelled. Damn you, Faye!

Warning - while you were typing an incalculable number of new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your math skills.

"Eye of the Shitstorm" is my Alestorm cover band.

Is it awful that the first thing I imagined when I saw Pintsize was South Park?

Oh my god, she killed Pintsize!

You bastard!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 23 Jan 2015, 00:35
The word I used was /dislike/ I do not HATE her, I reserve hate for REAL people, and me DISLIKING  a character due to how they act isn't a discredit to the author, the fact I can feel ANYTHING for any of the characters period is a testimony to the authors  writing, and besides me disliking Faye does not discredit my opinion in the slightest, last I checked one of the rules of the site wasn't "You must like ALL OF THE CHARACTERS to discuss them"

*edited b/c Doe snot is irrelevant to mah post
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 00:37
doe snot

Don't bring female deer with the flu into this!

Sorry, I couldn't resist...  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: something random on 23 Jan 2015, 00:39
Ah, it's getting worse and worse :(

I'm with a few other posters here - Marten should have called the emergency services immediately. Like, now. No calling Claire beforehand. And no, I don't think he already has - he's exactly where he was when he entered the room, he didn't move over to check if she's still breathing or has a pulse, which the operator would have told him to do.

It would have been way more responsible to call Claire when Faye's on the way to the hospital or already there - I mean, he probably wouldn't need to call it off anyway, he could just call the EMTs, let them take Faye and then proceed to watch a movie at Claire's. Won't take more than 15 minutes. I don't know how response-times are in the US, but they're in a city; emergency services should be at the scene in in less than 10. Of course I don't think he'll leave Faye alone when she's hurting like that, but the impression I got from his priorities (first tell his girlfriend that movie-night is off, an announcement that could have waited 10 minutes, especially when his friend might be in life-threatening danger; he didn't even check on her) is that he's mostly annoyed and way less concerned.

I agree everything you say about what the responsible thing for Martin to do would have been but people do not always act responsibly.

It may wishful thinking on my part but I think it would be  plausible for Martin to release that his friend might be in life-threatening danger as the penny drops either just after he finished the call or as he is telling Claire what happened. Assuming he has not phoned the EMT's already or coarse.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 23 Jan 2015, 00:39
I foresaw your wit and beat you to the punch :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 23 Jan 2015, 00:42
I mean, he probably wouldn't need to call it off anyway, he could just call the EMTs, let them take Faye and then proceed to watch a movie at Claire's. Won't take more than 15 minutes.

Oh come on!  Marten is going to stay with Faye, even if she goes to hospital, and even if the hospital relegates him to a waiting room.  There's absolutely no way he can or will just go out to enjoy himself.

I'm not yet sure Jeph will take it the hospital route, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 23 Jan 2015, 00:45
I mean, he probably wouldn't need to call it off anyway, he could just call the EMTs, let them take Faye and then proceed to watch a movie at Claire's. Won't take more than 15 minutes.

Oh come on!  Marten is going to stay with Faye, even if she goes to hospital, and even if the hospital relegates him to a waiting room.  There's absolutely no way he can or will just go out to enjoy himself.

I'm not yet sure Jeph will take it the hospital route, though.

Yeah I can't fathom a scenario in which Marten doesn't stay by Faye's side through the night in this situation, be it in the hospital or there in the livingroom.   The guy has the curse of caring.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 23 Jan 2015, 00:47
Yeahhh the last thing I can see Marten doing is "WELP That problem is solved"-sprays mouth spray in mouth- "Time to get my cuddles on, see ya later Faye-gator"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: GarandMarine on 23 Jan 2015, 00:53
Damn you Faye, interrupting my Claireten feelgoodtimes with your issues.

Also a fifth of whiskey really isn't that much, considering how much and how often Faye drinks, her tolerance is likely quite high.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 01:00
I foresaw your wit and beat you to the punch :mrgreen:

You cheater!  :-D

Damn it, if all this drama causes trouble for Marten and Claire somehow, I'll be pissed!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 01:01
The word I used was /dislike/ I do not HATE her, I reserve hate for REAL people, and me DISLIKING  a character due to how they act isn't a discredit to the author, the fact I can feel ANYTHING for any of the characters period is a testimony to the authors  writing, and besides me disliking Faye does not discredit my opinion in the slightest, last I checked one of the rules of the site wasn't "You must like ALL OF THE CHARACTERS to discuss them"

*edited b/c Doe snot is irrelevant to mah post

Reaver, there's been a surprising amount of vitriol and ill will directed at Faye and Dora this week. Your post inspired my question but it wasn't directed at you in particular. It was general to all those expressing that emotion--which is why I didn't name one of the two, but left a blank.

I find this more difficult to understand than the Claire haters. Almost certainly some percentage hate Claire because she's trans, but most are probably just not a fan. Claire is to them what Yelling Bird is to me--a distraction from what drew them to the comic. (I don't hate YB, btw. It's just disappointing to see him.) But the idea of Clair as a distraction makes sense from the POV that there's a vast wealth of QC in which Claire doesn't exist.

Dora and Faye are core cast members. They've technically been in the strip from the start (When you realize that Sara IS Dora, it becomes clear--works at a coffee shop, carries secret torch for Marten, friend of Faye's--Sara was redundant. Dora had all of her qualities and more. Everyone knows that being redundant summons allosaurus, or gets you put on a bus to LA).

Hating on one of them but still reading seems to me like religiously following Star Trek even though you hate Spock. When a character turns me off, I lose interest. That's made it difficult for me to frame the question--it's been on my mind for a few days. I have no frame of reference. The closest I've come is TNG's Reginald Barclay, and the fact is he's the center of some bloody fine episodes.

So, like I said, I'm not saying there's something wrong. I just don't understand, and I'd like to.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 23 Jan 2015, 01:02
Damn you Faye, interrupting my Claireten feelgoodtimes with your issues.

Also a fifth of whiskey really isn't that much, considering how much and how often Faye drinks, her tolerance is likely quite high.

It wasn't a fifth of whiskey though, all added up she's consumed a lot more than that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: GarandMarine on 23 Jan 2015, 01:07
Sure, and what's your point? My personal record is some where around 5-6 fifths (I don't remember, and 5 bottles is the average of what everyone else told me after the fact.) and that was in a much shorter period of time. We know Faye woke up buzzed, and she's made it through half a bottle of booze by the time Dora busts her, while not good for you, that is not a high/fast level of consumption. If that new bottle on the couch is indeed a new bottle... that's a problem. Otherwise I think you people have wimpy livers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 23 Jan 2015, 01:07
I can understand that Reindeer, but your post came right after mine, when I had mentioned no such thing of hating any of them, and I suppose some people continue to read even though they HATE certain characters, is because while they may HATE them, they can't help but want to see what happens next?

Also yeah she's drank more than a fifth of Whiskey, she never sobered up from the first time she started drinking after the break up =/
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 23 Jan 2015, 01:09
Let's not go down the "dude, I can so drink way more than that!" road.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 01:13
Agreed with Zalder. If we assume the pint on the couch is the same she had at COD, then she's either had a fifth and two pints, two fifths and pint, or one pint plus maybe a fifth and maybe another pint pluse however much of the fifth she found in her bed. The unkowns are whether the large bottle in today's is a fifth or a pint and how much is left in the the bottle from the morning, if anything.

That's a lot of booze in a part of a day.

Also, five or six fifths in a short period is probably in the LD75 range. It would kill most people. So, um cool that you aren't dead, but that's not really a standard people should aspire to. I can't think of any practical day-to-day need for that level of alcohol tolerance. Those little numbers are the population of animals exposed who died. LD50 means Lethal Dose to 50%. so 50% exposed, die. LD75 is obviously 75%. They test this by repeatedly exposing animals to those level and count how many are dead, after.

Unless you weigh about 1000 pounds, you've pushed the LD75 and lived. You played Russian roulette with 4 chambers loaded and lived. That's as much luck as it is tolerance.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Shjade on 23 Jan 2015, 01:17
I'm not sure what Marten thinks he'll spend time doing at this point - if Faye's injured or dead, he'll have to leave her to the EMTs, and if she's not, he'll probably not be able to wake her up. And maybe he shouldn't, anyway.
Given the state of both Faye and Pintsize, and his couch, I'm guessing Marten's thinking she shouldn't be left unsupervised, which indicates to me he isn't planning on a hospital trip, at least not yet.

Or he plans to go with her for support.

Either way.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dielicious on 23 Jan 2015, 01:18
Okay, when i saw the comic the last thing that came to my mind was an hospital.
I'm seeing thinks like Marty taking care of Faye, when she woke up and do a move on him.
But you guys are probably right.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 23 Jan 2015, 01:20
Agreed with Zalder. If we assume the pint on the couch is the same she had at COD, then she's either had a fifth and two pints, two fifths and pint, or one pint plus maybe a fifth and maybe another pint pluse however much of the fifth she found in her bed. The unkowns are whether the large bottle in today's is a fifth or a pint and how much is left in the the bottle from the morning, if anything.

That's a lot of booze in a part of a day.

Alirght, I'm a teetotaler so...what's a fifth in measurement terms? A fifth of the bottle?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 23 Jan 2015, 01:22
Agreed with Zalder. If we assume the pint on the couch is the same she had at COD, then she's either had a fifth and two pints, two fifths and pint, or one pint plus maybe a fifth and maybe another pint pluse however much of the fifth she found in her bed. The unkowns are whether the large bottle in today's is a fifth or a pint and how much is left in the the bottle from the morning, if anything.

That's a lot of booze in a part of a day.

Alirght, I'm a teetotaler so...what's a fifth in measurement terms? A fifth of the bottle?

Fifth of a gallon, about 25 ounces. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 01:26
Okay, when i saw the comic the last thing that came to my mind was an hospital.
I'm seeing thinks like Marty taking care of Faye, when she woke up and do a move on him.
But you guys are probably right.

Let's put it this way: there really looks like there was a lot of blood in Faye's vomit. That means a ruptured stomach ulcer and it means that she's bleeding out internally right now. She's going to hospital and she's going under the knife to sew her stomach lining back together. Although that's a routine operation, it does have a surprisingly high failure rate so it's going to be everyone hugging in the waiting room and hoping for the best.

After that, the doctors are going to want to monitor her for a few days and flush the toxins (booze) out of her system. Depending on how well she recovers and how certain the doctors are she may or may not end up in alcohol rehab for a few weeks to make sure that she is on the wagon. One thing that she is going to have to get used to is this: with a weakened stomach lining, she's going to be on a very bland diet for a few weeks and she's going to be told "No more booze or else".

Overall, Faye is going to be out of circulation for between a week and a month at least, in-comic time.

A lot of things are going to have changed, I think, when she's ready to rejoin the world.

[edit]
Fix'd typo
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 01:27
Also 757 milliliters for the metric people who don't know. But keep in mind the LD50 is for 80 proof (proof is double the alcohol percentage. So 40% alcohol by volume).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 23 Jan 2015, 01:30
Okay, when i saw the comic the last thing that came to my mind was an hospital.
I'm seeing thinks like Marty taking care of Faye, when she woke up and do a move on him.
But you guys are probably right.

Let's put it this way: there really looks like there was a lot of blood in Faye's vomit. That means a ruptured stomach ulcer and it means that she's bleeding out internally right now. She's going to hospital and she's going under the knife to sow her stomach lining back together. Although that's a routine operation, it does have a surprisingly high failure rate so it's going to be everyone hugging in the waiting room and hoping for the best.

After that, the doctors are going to want to monitor her for a few days and flush the toxins (booze) out of her system. Depending on how well she recovers and how certain the doctors are she may or may not end up in alcohol rehab for a few weeks to make sure that she is on the wagon. One thing that she is going to have to get used to is this: with a weakened stomach lining, she's going to be on a very bland diet for a few weeks and she's going to be told "No more booze or else".

Overall, Faye is going to be out of circulation for between a week and a month at least, in-comic time.

A lot of things are going to have changed, I think, when she's ready to rejoin the world.

Is that when they make you drink that charcoal thing?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Finwolven on 23 Jan 2015, 01:31
Also, we cannot _hear_ and _see_ what's going on. Perhaps Marten can see Faye breathing (her back moving) or even hear it clearly, without a snore that would require a sound-effect (not that those seem to be common in QC anyway). So before you write Faye off, or blame Marten for taking a moment to call his girlfriend and not EMTs, consider that a drawn picture is bad at conveying small detail.

Also, blood in vomit? I don't see that. I see whiskey (perhaps poorly rendered) and gravy or curry, eaten in a huff. Blood on comic terms would be more red, as that stuff isn't dried out yet (if it was dried out, she'd probably be dead by now).

75cl of whisky is a hard days/nights binge all right, but not necessarily lethal-dosage levels. Depends on what else is going in the tummy during the drinking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: RealityXcursion on 23 Jan 2015, 01:38
Depends on the size of the city, how many EMT stations are in said city and where they're located, time of day and how heavy the traffic is, construction, weather/road conditions... in other words, it could be 5 minutes, it could be half an hour or longer, all depending on the variables.

Well, Smif isn't back from summer break yet, so traffic shouldn't be too bad.  And the hospital is really close -- IRL I've *walked* there from Smith College in about 15 minutes, and was not going full speed for reasons related to needing the hospital. I'm thinking closer to 5 minute response time.

(I did not get a punching intern. :( Had to make do with a stress ball.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 23 Jan 2015, 01:46
Also, blood in vomit? I don't see that. I see whiskey (perhaps poorly rendered) and gravy or curry, eaten in a huff. Blood on comic terms would be more red, as that stuff isn't dried out yet (if it was dried out, she'd probably be dead by now).

I agree. As with the suggestion that the white chunks are pills, I think that's assuming the darkest, worst case scenario. Not to insult Jeph's style or abilities, as he can draw a hell of a lot better than I can, but QC's style isn't photorealistic. We could certainly be wrong about this, but I'm with you; I don't think it's meant to be blood.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 01:47
Vomit always contains corn and carrot, no matter what you've actually eaten. Everyone knows that!  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 23 Jan 2015, 01:51
People, this is a comic strip, although sometimes quite realistic. If Jeph wanted to educate us how to handle a case of acute alcohol poisoning, I guess today's strip would have been a bit different:
A good guide on what to do can be found here (http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/alcohol-poisoning/basics/symptoms/con-20029020).

As for Pintsize, others have already suggested a couple of theories:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 23 Jan 2015, 02:06
Vomit always contains corn and carrot, no matter what you've actually eaten. Everyone knows that!  :angel:

actually bits of stomach lining, detached and brought up by the force of the contractions/emesis.  Yummy!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 23 Jan 2015, 02:21
New bet:

What are the odds Sven finds out about this, ends up on Angus's talk show as a music guest some day, and punches him in front of the cameras for reasons neither of them fully understands?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 23 Jan 2015, 02:31
Yep, it is time they say to Faye what my sis had to tell my father 2 years ago. Most certainly. Probably under threat of throwing her to Hanner's washing machines.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 23 Jan 2015, 02:33
Also 757 milliliters for the metric people who don't know.
Actually, a fifth is typically 750 ml nowadays (it was redefined from 1/5 of a US gallon to 750 ml during metrication).

Hopefully Marten explains to Claire what's actually going on, too - Claire's the kind of person who will work herself up into a panic over Marten just cancelling a date out of the blue, if there's not a reason for it. I think she'll be completely understanding if he explains, but...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dielicious on 23 Jan 2015, 02:34
Okay, when i saw the comic the last thing that came to my mind was an hospital.
I'm seeing thinks like Marty taking care of Faye, when she woke up and do a move on him.
But you guys are probably right.

Let's put it this way: there really looks like there was a lot of blood in Faye's vomit. That means a ruptured stomach ulcer and it means that she's bleeding out internally right now. She's going to hospital and she's going under the knife to sew her stomach lining back together. Although that's a routine operation, it does have a surprisingly high failure rate so it's going to be everyone hugging in the waiting room and hoping for the best.

After that, the doctors are going to want to monitor her for a few days and flush the toxins (booze) out of her system. Depending on how well she recovers and how certain the doctors are she may or may not end up in alcohol rehab for a few weeks to make sure that she is on the wagon. One thing that she is going to have to get used to is this: with a weakened stomach lining, she's going to be on a very bland diet for a few weeks and she's going to be told "No more booze or else".

Overall, Faye is going to be out of circulation for between a week and a month at least, in-comic time.

A lot of things are going to have changed, I think, when she's ready to rejoin the world.

[edit]
Fix'd typo

I was not being sarcastic, i really get your guys point.
I was just hope that a post-faint Faye could do a Drunk Desperation Move (KOF XXX) kissing Marty and all the tension that it could cause.

Don't get me wrong, i'm new to QC forums, since i met the comics about a month and a half ago, got addicted and read the entire series in about 3 days.
I like how you guys really takes real facts and hypothesis to the comic discussion, makes it in a whole new level.

Also sorry for any grammar mistake, i'm still learning english, :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 23 Jan 2015, 03:00
Hopefully Marten explains to Claire what's actually going on, too - Claire's the kind of person who will work herself up into a panic over Marten just cancelling a date out of the blue, if there's not a reason for it. I think she'll be completely understanding if he explains, but...

We can probably assume he will, albeit off-screen due to conservation of detail, and the first couple of sentences of the conversation being a punchier way of punctuating the strip.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 23 Jan 2015, 03:04
I quickly scanned this thread, and I haven't read recent WCDTs, so maybe someone already said it, but this storyline seems like a perfect opportunity to bring Steve back to the forefront: he's been through something similar, he's in a good position to help.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Euthemes on 23 Jan 2015, 03:09
Yes, but then I would have said that Faye working at Coffee of Doom was one of the core elements of the comic.

Not anymore, a lot of characters work here as of 'today'. Marten and Faye is what started everything and still plays a large role to the development of the story (e.g. Faye as a catalyst for the Clairten thing to happen). Of course, Faye could move out and have less screen time (the Amherst effect), after all her and Marten cannot live together forever, being just friends. Plus, there are a lot of characters Jeph could show more. I just think this would be very risky and would deprive the comic of a very useful and familiar plot mechanism.

Even if there is a Faye demotion, I can't see myself not waiting anxiously for the next strip every morning (I live in Greece)  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 23 Jan 2015, 03:13
New bet:

What are the odds Sven finds out about this, ends up on Angus's talk show as a music guest some day, and punches him in front of the cameras for reasons neither of them fully understands?
I vote for this as the most unlikely theory I ever read in this forum.

(Though I fear by voting for it this way, we only give Jeph bad ideas ...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 23 Jan 2015, 03:13
I'm seriously concerned about Pintsize. It's possible he's in worse shape psychologically than Faye.

And yes, emergency services for Faye. She's in the recovery position, which is good, but 750ml for someone that size is no joke unless over 48 hrs.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 03:14
I also think some people might be misinterpreting the "insubordination" speech; to me, it sounded like she was saying "Look, I put up with your quirks, I even eat up your (metaphorical) shit and call it ice cream, but you broke the one rule I asked everyone not to break under any circumstances."

I missed this on my first trawl through the posts for Friday's strip. However, I just wanted to give my support to ASB84's interpretation of Dora's comments in that panel on Thursday. The one thing Dora has never questioned is Faye's commitment to the job; that's the reason why she's tolerated Faye's abrasive personality for so long because, in the end, it's jsut a quirk and doesn't affect the quality of her work. By turning up drunk and drinking on the job, not only has she crossed the one red line that Dora has ever specified, it implies strongly that she's stopped caring about the job. It was caring about the job, more than anything else, that is why Faye got the Assistant Manager gig. It's obvious that she cares about CoD and doing the job right (that's why she's so strict with the others about their work, attitude and handling of the equipment). Hell, she's trained all of them on the job with the possible exception of Hannelore, who was partly trained by Marten, of all people, after she had her panic attack.

But she turned up drunk. She was drinking strong spirits at work. She lied to Dora about it. Not only is that dangerous but it was a breach of trust, not only with her employer but also with one of her oldest friends in Northampton.

Should Dora have realised that Faye was in a death spiral? Should she have called Marten and maybe Hannelore to warn them that Faye desperately needed help? Maybe but I think she was too angry and upset about the breach of trust to think straight. She's human and she makes mistakes, the same as everyone else.

I'm expecting Dora to tear herself a fresh one in the hospital waiting room, blaming herself for what has happened to Faye. Marten will probably tell her that she's being stupid. Faye's just too practised and capable at hiding her feelings and keeping potential helpers at arm's length.

Marten should have noticed something but either ignored the signs or was too wrapped up in his own life to notice. Dora should have realised just how serious things had to be for Faye to drink at work. Pintsize shouldn't have tried to handle things himself and told Marten what was going on. Faye should have gone to her friends rather than try to handle this herself. There is plenty of blame to share around for everyone. What they have to focus on now is being there for Faye when, God willing, she's regains consciousness.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 03:30
New bet:

What are the odds Sven finds out about this, ends up on Angus's talk show as a music guest some day, and punches him in front of the cameras for reasons neither of them fully understands?

Quite high odds, I'd say - Sven's not likely to punch anyone.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hakko504 on 23 Jan 2015, 03:39
Speaking of Hanners, is the next strip going to start with Marten showing up at Hannelore's door with a Tom Collins (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1148) in his hand?

I've read the thread and I'm seriously worried about Faye. This is not good. I'm also very curious to see how Claire reacts to Marten cancelling their date. If he doesn't ask her to come over and help him, she may get all sorts of wrong ideas fueled by Pintsize's tl;dr. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2457)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 23 Jan 2015, 03:48
I'm sad that Marten's date was cancelled. Damn you, Faye!

Yet another misery she has visited upon poor Marten.  She really is a happiness vampire.

For future reference, don't try to drive someone to the hospital in a situation like that. If she stops breathing, better to have it happen inside an ambulance with oxygen and expert people right there than in your car in traffic.

Unless of course you ARE the expert and realize that the response time of your colleagues delays care unacceptably.

I wouldn't know anything about that.

Nope, nope, nope.

Are you a medical professional or some sort of specialist in the sciences of life?

Nothing of the kind, which is why I had to ask the question. Just speculating based on my own sleep apnea problem. Please do not add that to your fact bank unless I turn out to have guessed right!

I think you have.  More research is required.

It's actually slightly worse, as severe alcohol intoxication can inhibit the gag reflex, which is why choking on vomit or positional asphyxiation is more probable.

http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/AlcoholOverdoseFactsheet/Overdosefact.htm

I bet if Jeph had any idea the reaction was going to escalate this quickly, he'd have written this differently. Like, smaller bottles, to start.

I don't think real world physics is in play here. I mostly pointed out the LD50 because people need to be aware. In real life, that much drinking can kill you.

As for what Marten has to spend time doing: Leaving out the alcohol poisoning stuff, he has to get Faye out of her own vomit. Bile and skin should not be mixed.

He needs to clean up what he can.

I don't know about you, but after policing vomit, I wouldn't want to jump right into cuddles and a movie.

Ew.

Nah.  Spend a couple years in EMS and you'll find your ability to eat Hawaiian Style pizza right after a patient has painted the entire interior of your rig in vomit yellow increases dramatically.

Excellent assessment, by the way.  But Marten, sadly, is not a professional, so it is unlikely he will know any of this.

Long time Lurker, first time poster!

I don't like Faye, I've never really liked her to be honest? That type of person I'd find extremely unpleasant to be around, I fully acknowledge that she's been through hell, but she always puts the other people around her through hell too which is really unfair , she seems to expect constant support no matter how badly she behaves...I think it's time she finally dealt with some consequences of her actions (Losing her job is a consequence of her own actions)

Damn skippy.

I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.

Because:
1) I love the comic, including the characters I love to hate.
2) Seeing the characters I love to hate getting their comeuppance makes me smile.
3) I enjoy good storytelling that can actually evoke an emotional reaction from me, good OR bad.
4) In every story, there's a character you cheer for, and a character you boo and hiss at.  Faye, in this case, is my boo-hiss character.  Both types of character give me happiness to read, but for different reasons.

That's why.

Also a fifth of whiskey really isn't that much, considering how much and how often Faye drinks, her tolerance is likely quite high.

I was thinking that, too.

Highest BAC I have personally witnessed was something ridiculous like .454, and not only did the person live, she was unharmed and did not spend a minute in ICU.

The human body is a weird and wonderful thing.

Let's put it this way: there really looks like there was a lot of blood in Faye's vomit. That means a ruptured stomach ulcer and it means that she's bleeding out internally right now. She's going to hospital and she's going under the knife to sew her stomach lining back together. Although that's a routine operation, it does have a surprisingly high failure rate so it's going to be everyone hugging in the waiting room and hoping for the best.

That's an excellent point.  Think Jeph made the vomit that color with this condition in mind?

More popcorn, more vitriol, more catharsis.

This...THIS RIGHT HERE, and THIS DISCUSSION...is why I love this comic.

Warning - while you were slapping this mess together someone else actually posted something worth reading. You may wish to delete it until you can post something smaller than a novella.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 23 Jan 2015, 04:15
I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.

I think it's less about truly hating them as though they're individuals and more about deciding which character(s), for you as a reader, fill the role of antagonist. Every story needs conflict and most conflict is caused by people, right? Hating Faye (or Dora, or whomever) seems to me no different from saying "I hate Iago, look what he's doing to poor Othello!" That doesn't mean you don't think he's a well-constructed character in a compelling story.

It's a strong, thoughtful author who can inspire this kind of diversity of reaction in his readers, to the point that people are taking sides about who the antagonist even really is. Instead of one mustache-twirler, we get deeply human, sometimes ambiguous or contradictory, behaviors that we interpret differently. And we can all point to different strips to support different readings.

To me, asking "Why read the comic if you hate the characters?" misses the subtleties of what "hate" entails when used in this context. We do it for the same reason we watched seasons 1 & 2 of The Office even as Michael Scott's social ineptitude made us almost physically uncomfortable. Anything that can inspire a visceral reaction, even if it's a negative one, makes for enjoyable narrative art.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 23 Jan 2015, 04:27
There is also the matter of characters that one loves to hate, especially with the Schadenfreude  that results when they get knocked down a peg or two.  At this moment, I don't feel that way about Faye.  She's hurting hard, and I've been in a similar situation, and fear falling back into it if I can't get my psychiatric situation sorted.  It's made even worse by the fact that I was forcibly detoxed from Lithium because the clinic hasn't got back to the pharmacy about the matter of getting it paid for (didn't have the cash on hand to pay for it). 

This shit is hitting pretty close to home.  I'm not going to make Dora into a villain either.  She did what she had to do.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 23 Jan 2015, 04:32
Next question: How will Dora react? Is she going to blame herself for causing this? Or will she be the hard-nosed Dora Boss, saying "Meh. Not my responsibility, she is no longer my employee, I did what I had to do." Of course, Dora could not have foreseen this, but knowing Faye, she should have been at least a little concerned for what could happen after Faye walked out from CoD.

The appropriate thing to do would be to make sure Faye got some support from her friends. Alerting Marten and Hanners would be a natural thing to do, but we have no indication Dora actually did this.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 04:37
Yeah, it would have made sense for Dora to alert Marten to the situation. Then again, she might not have had the chance yet. She's at work, after all, minus one employee.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rubick on 23 Jan 2015, 04:37
Storyline implications and theories aside, I'm glad that Jeph is tackling this subject with all the seriousness that it should be.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 04:44
I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.

I think it's less about truly hating them as though they're individuals and more about deciding which character(s), for you as a reader, fill the role of antagonist. Every story needs conflict and most conflict is caused by people, right? Hating Faye (or Dora, or whomever) seems to me no different from saying "I hate Iago, look what he's doing to poor Othello!" That doesn't mean you don't think he's a well-constructed character in a compelling story.

It's a strong, thoughtful author who can inspire this kind of diversity of reaction in his readers, to the point that people are taking sides about who the antagonist even really is. Instead of one mustache-twirler, we get deeply human, sometimes ambiguous or contradictory, behaviors that we interpret differently. And we can all point to different strips to support different readings.

To me, asking "Why read the comic if you hate the characters?" misses the subtleties of what "hate" entails when used in this context. We do it for the same reason we watched seasons 1 & 2 of The Office even as Michael Scott's social ineptitude made us almost physically uncomfortable. Anything that can inspire a visceral reaction, even if it's a negative one, makes for enjoyable narrative art.

I'm not unaware of that kind of, I guess, adversarial, response to a villainous character.  But the Dora/Faye hate in this thread seems to be different. I can't relate to your feelings about the Office. I don't find that kind of comedy funny. I'm bad at schadenfreude, I guess.

I'm guessing this involves some kind of thrill of watching a train wreck, or something. I'm not big on villains I don't love to hate. Greg House for example. I don't want to be him. I don't condone his methods. But I enjoy watching him being bad. I can't relate to watching a bad guy and actually despising the character.

I'm not sure if you're talking about something different from my experience or not. It sounds like those who have expressed vitriol towards Dora and Faye are not enjoying the villainy they see. The best example I can relate is a slasher film. I don't enjoy the villainy. I don't watch them. If that makes any sense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 04:46
Next question: How will Dora react? Is she going to blame herself for causing this?

Yes. Also, given her own issues, I would strongly advise Tai not to let her out of sight for a while. My concern is that she'll have such a strong guilt reaction that she might self-harm. I'm also expecting her to lash out randomly at everyone for reasons of guilt transference.

Please note that I'm still not blaming her; I'm just saying that she'll blame herself. As I've already said, Dora was probably too angry to think straight and tell anyone else about her confrontation with Faye. It's strange how the human mind works sometimes. Dora probably told herself that she wanted to calm down so she could explain to Marten (and maybe Hanners) what is up with Faye without letting her anger control her words. It is even possible that she intended to visit Faye that evening and talk to her as a friend rather than as a boss, with Marten as mediator.

It is possible that her desire not to use counter-productive insulting or angry language when talking about Faye's situation with her friends may have overridden whatever concerns she may have had about whether Faye was in immediate peril. "She's a big girl and she's not stupid - We can hash this out tonight after we've both calmed down."

I also suspect that Faye's dismissal will be quietly forgotten, assuming that Faye herself is able to remember it, something of which I'm not sure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 23 Jan 2015, 04:46
I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.

I think it's less about truly hating them as though they're individuals and more about deciding which character(s), for you as a reader, fill the role of antagonist. Every story needs conflict and most conflict is caused by people, right? Hating Faye (or Dora, or whomever) seems to me no different from saying "I hate Iago, look what he's doing to poor Othello!" That doesn't mean you don't think he's a well-constructed character in a compelling story.

It's a strong, thoughtful author who can inspire this kind of diversity of reaction in his readers, to the point that people are taking sides about who the antagonist even really is. Instead of one mustache-twirler, we get deeply human, sometimes ambiguous or contradictory, behaviors that we interpret differently. And we can all point to different strips to support different readings.

To me, asking "Why read the comic if you hate the characters?" misses the subtleties of what "hate" entails when used in this context. We do it for the same reason we watched seasons 1 & 2 of The Office even as Michael Scott's social ineptitude made us almost physically uncomfortable. Anything that can inspire a visceral reaction, even if it's a negative one, makes for enjoyable narrative art.

I'm not unaware of that kind of, I guess, adversarial, response to a villainous character.  But the Dora/Faye hate in this thread seems to be different. I can't relate to your feelings about the Office. I don't find that kind of comedy funny. I'm bad at schadenfreude, I guess.

I'm guessing this involves some kind of thrill of watching a train wreck, or something. I'm not big on villains I don't love to hate. Greg House for example. I don't want to be him. I don't condone his methods. But I enjoy watching him being bad. I can't relate to watching a bad guy and actually despising the character.

I'm not sure if you're talking about something different from my experience or not. It sounds like those who have expressed vitriol towards Dora and Faye are not enjoying the villainy they see. The best example I can relate is a slasher film. I don't enjoy the villainy. I don't watch them. If that makes any sense.

If people see Faye or Dora as comparably one-dimensional as, say, Jason Voorhees, then I agree, that's a weird, adversarial place from which to be reading a comic about occasional kissing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 23 Jan 2015, 05:09
Yeah, it would have made sense for Dora to alert Marten to the situation. Then again, she might not have had the chance yet. She's at work, after all, minus one employee.
I imagine Dora was there just to open shop with Faye, and handle the daily coffee roast. Now, she has to cover Faye's shift. She could call Dale, who is always happy for more work, but he may of course be busy with one of his other jobs. Anyhow, after the morning rush there should be plenty of time to make a few phone calls.

Come to think of it, CoD usually appears empty of customers (I know, they are just outside the cartoon frames, and it is a heck of a job to draw them all), but as presented, the business would soon be bankrupt. Of course, economic laws are somewhat different in QC.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 23 Jan 2015, 05:23
I don't know about all this; I mean, Dora wasn't wrong on any of her points.  Faye hasn't exactly been the most professional, and for someone whose boss is supposedly also her friend she does have a tendency to be really disrespectful.  There have been times even prior to this when I wondered why Dora didn't push her to find another job.  I don't know if the same Dora who just disowned Sven not that long ago really will blame herself for anything or question whether she made the right choice...I almost feel like this is also something that's been building for a while.  They've been blurring the lines of employee/employer and friends for a while, usually to the detriment of the employee/employer side of things.  This is Dora's business and her livelihood.  If she's smart, she won't regret her decision...but hopefully, she'll also leave the door open for Faye to return later should she get herself together.

That being said, I'm really hoping this isn't going to mean that Dora is going to just abandon Faye as her friend, too.  It's not going to be easy, but a friendship can be salvaged even though the work relationship had to be terminated.  Hopefully when Faye sobers up, she'll be able to stop being defensive enough (which, let's be real here, is typical of her character) to recognize that she really screwed up all on her own this time. 

There's a nagging part of me that worries that all of this is gradually leading to Faye going back to Georgia, and I'm not really sure why that is.  I don't see her running after Angus at this point, but going home...that seems plausible, though I'm really hoping that won't be the case.  I like Faye's character.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 23 Jan 2015, 05:34
Well, she might go to Georgia for a visit - that has been good for her before. It won't likely cure her of alcoholism, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 23 Jan 2015, 06:05
I'm not trying to challenge anyone's right to detest fictional characters, but I gotta ask: If you hate [insert appropriate girl's name here] so much, why do you read the comic?

I am honestly unable to guess why, and I really would like to know.

I think it's less about truly hating them as though they're individuals and more about deciding which character(s), for you as a reader, fill the role of antagonist. Every story needs conflict and most conflict is caused by people, right? Hating Faye (or Dora, or whomever) seems to me no different from saying "I hate Iago, look what he's doing to poor Othello!" That doesn't mean you don't think he's a well-constructed character in a compelling story.

It's a strong, thoughtful author who can inspire this kind of diversity of reaction in his readers, to the point that people are taking sides about who the antagonist even really is. Instead of one mustache-twirler, we get deeply human, sometimes ambiguous or contradictory, behaviors that we interpret differently. And we can all point to different strips to support different readings.

To me, asking "Why read the comic if you hate the characters?" misses the subtleties of what "hate" entails when used in this context. We do it for the same reason we watched seasons 1 & 2 of The Office even as Michael Scott's social ineptitude made us almost physically uncomfortable. Anything that can inspire a visceral reaction, even if it's a negative one, makes for enjoyable narrative art.

I'm not unaware of that kind of, I guess, adversarial, response to a villainous character.  But the Dora/Faye hate in this thread seems to be different. I can't relate to your feelings about the Office. I don't find that kind of comedy funny. I'm bad at schadenfreude, I guess.

I'm guessing this involves some kind of thrill of watching a train wreck, or something. I'm not big on villains I don't love to hate. Greg House for example. I don't want to be him. I don't condone his methods. But I enjoy watching him being bad. I can't relate to watching a bad guy and actually despising the character.

I'm not sure if you're talking about something different from my experience or not. It sounds like those who have expressed vitriol towards Dora and Faye are not enjoying the villainy they see. The best example I can relate is a slasher film. I don't enjoy the villainy. I don't watch them. If that makes any sense.

If people see Faye or Dora as comparably one-dimensional as, say, Jason Voorhees, then I agree, that's a weird, adversarial place from which to be reading a comic about occasional kissing.

I'll also add that for some readers, it could be a case of "Love to Hate". Some people kind of enjoy having a character they find dislikeable, one that represents values or a personality that rubs them the wrong way in real life, which they can dislike and cheer against in a cathartic sort of way. Indeed, storylines in professional wrestling and soap operas pretty much run on that trope.

For other people, they may genuinely dislike and not enjoy the characters, or perhaps they've just grown sick of them, but it's just not enough to turn them off the strip completely.

Additionally, since neither Dora nor Faye appear in every single strip, or are heavily involved in every single story arc - they're main characters, so they're in a lot of them, but not all of them and not in a way that necessarily pushes someone's buttons as a reader - someone who dislikes either or both of them can probably gloss over that to some extent, and just focus on the characters and arcs that they do like.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Jan 2015, 06:17
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!



On to other thoughts that have probably already been aired in the four pages that have been posted since last night:

I'm really suspicious that Pintsize may have tried to stop her from drinking. Ergo he ended up turned off while she's puking up on the couch.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 23 Jan 2015, 06:22
It is entirely possible that Dora called Marten off screen, and that's why he went home to check on Faye before going over to Claire's.  It is also equally possible that Dora didn't think to call, or was to angry to call. Not out of spite towards Faye, but in a 'I just don't want to talk about it' way. In the end, it was Faye who made the decision to go home, finish the bottle she was working on and another too. Clearly a few hours have passed between Faye and Marten getting home, so I am guessing either he didn't know, or he didn't he would have to rush home to try and stop Faye from trying to drink herself to death.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 23 Jan 2015, 06:27
A further thought regarding the severity of the situation: Jeph's commentary for the strip is "oh dear". Now, perhaps I'm reading too much into two words, but to me, that would be a pretty big understatement if things were really dire. An "oh dear" moment isn't exactly good, but it's a long way from an "oh shit" moment too. So, perhaps it's an indication that while things are certainly bad, they're not going to get as dark as has been suggested.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: kent_eh on 23 Jan 2015, 06:37
In late, but here's my thoughts.

- We don't know if the bottle(s) were full when she started guzzling. I doubt she planned this binge by first making a shopping trip. She may have just drank whatever part bottles she could find in the house (and in her purse).

- the color of puke: Maybe she had marinara for lunch.

- Pintsize: Whatever happened, I doubt he was much other than a smartass. That's historically been his character.  His current apparently catatonic state could be anything from impact damage to a porn induced haze. Or he could have gotten bored after Faye passed out and simply gone into "screen saver" mode for a while.

We don't really know, but given that it's Friday, we're going to be hanging on this dramatic cliff-hanger for a couple of days. Jeph is a clever and evil man.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TinPenguin on 23 Jan 2015, 06:39
Well.

(http://www.mcjazz.f2s.com/images/Art/BrilliantShipwreck1839.jpg)

This is not hilarious.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Jan 2015, 06:44
AH fuck balls.
That's all I've got to say.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Bologna on 23 Jan 2015, 07:04
I'm assuming that Marten's going to tell Claire a bit more about the situation than what we've seen.  It would be nice to see her go over to Marten's to help him clean up and just generally be there for him.  It'd be sad if Marten had to deal with all of this alone; I doubt he's going to take this time to call upon his other friends (though Hannelore might get drawn in due to proximity).

Marigold could also be brought back into the picture to help with whatever's going on with Pintsize. 

Faye...what's there to say? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 07:15
I'm assuming that Marten's going to tell Claire a bit more about the situation than what we've seen.  It would be nice to see her go over to Marten's to help him clean up and just generally be there for him. 

I'm thinking of something like this:

PANEL 1 (one-third page width)
MARTEN is sitting on a wooden bench. On the off-white wall behind him are various posters about vaccinations, sexual health and identifying common illnesses. He's looking down at the floor sadly.

PANEL 2 (one-third page width)
CLAIRE is standing next to MARTEN, who's looking up at her.
CLAIRE: "Hey."
MARTEN: "Hey."

PANEL 3 (one-third page width)
CLAIRE is sitting next to MARTEN and they are cuddling, CLAIRE cuddled up against MARTEN's size and nuzzling into his neck. MARTEN has his face buried in CLAIRE's hair

PANEL 4 (full page width)
MARTEN and CLAIRE are still cuddling. Next to them, HANNELORE is sitting bolt upright with an expression of dull, horrified oblivion. Furthest over, DORA is sitting, nearly bent over double onto her knees and is covering her face, sobbing heart-brokenly; TAI is sitting close by her, rubbing DORA's back in an attempt at comfort.

A DOCTOR is standing at the end of the panel, looking at a clipboard.

DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 23 Jan 2015, 07:17
About Pintsize, I believe Faye shut him off because he was bothering her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 23 Jan 2015, 07:18
DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"

Where I am it is 2am, and I'm watching British soap operas and one of the characters is a drug-addicted cancer patient.

They paused, midline, looked over my shoulder at your post through the television screen, then just muttered; "Well, fuck" and the show cut to commercial break.

EDIT: They've redoubled their efforts to compete with the dark edge that your posts contain. They reek of desperation to attempt what you seem to be pulling off so effortlessly. It's kind of sad, really: Still not as sad as the mental images you're conjuring.

I mean, damn, dude.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 23 Jan 2015, 07:22
If one fifth of 80 proof liquor REALLY had a 50/50 kill chance, I, as well as a large number of my friends, have all had lottery winning levels of luck in not dying in our 20s. I think that there is something you might be missing in how those calculations are done.

(also, I'm sure Faye weighs more than 60kg, though I didn't in my hardest drinking partying days)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 23 Jan 2015, 07:26
In late, but here's my thoughts.

- We don't know if the bottle(s) were full when she started guzzling. I doubt she planned this binge by first making a shopping trip. She may have just drank whatever part bottles she could find in the house (and in her purse).

- the color of puke: Maybe she had marinara for lunch.

- Pintsize: Whatever happened, I doubt he was much other than a smartass. That's historically been his character.  His current apparently catatonic state could be anything from impact damage to a porn induced haze. Or he could have gotten bored after Faye passed out and simply gone into "screen saver" mode for a while.

We don't really know, but given that it's Friday, we're going to be hanging on this dramatic cliff-hanger for a couple of days. Jeph is a clever and evil man.

I think the fact that a whole panel is devoted to Pintsize looking, honestly, as if he has been deactivated or erased sort of indicates that whatever is happening with him, it's not mundane. Especially considering this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2870). I think it's entirely possible that he tried to stop her and said he was calling Marten and she turned him off or, as suggested, threw him against a wall.

There had been something bugging me about this comic and I think I know what it is, and that's Marten's complete lack of surprise. As opposed to here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2816). The cases are similar. If he had no heads up, he would probably, upon seeing Pintsize be like "What the fuck ...?" instead of resigned silence. The same with Faye. He looks concerned but he doesn't have the look of shock as a person who has no idea that their roommate got fired for drunkenness and might have gone on a bigger bender. So I am thinking, especially since prior to their first date he told Claire that getting all dressed up wasn't really necessary, that Dora did call him or text him, or at the very least, texted Tai.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 23 Jan 2015, 07:34
OK, I'm a noob, and I know this isn't the time for it...

but someone has to explain to me the whole "While you were posting, such and such" thing, and how it seems to (sometimes) intelligently comment on what's been posted.

Are these forums actually a self-aware AI?  They are, aren't they?  And QC is just Jeph's extremely round-about way of making society comfortable with the concept of AI-human interaction.

That's the QC endgame, isn't it?

 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 23 Jan 2015, 07:36
OK, I'm a noob, and I know this isn't the time for it...

but someone has to explain to me the whole "While you were posting, such and such" thing, and how it seems to (sometimes) intelligently comment on what's been posted.

Are these forums actually a self-aware AI?  They are, aren't they?  And QC is just Jeph's extremely round-about way of making society comfortable with the concept of AI-human interaction.

We copy and paste them, add a colour tag and edit it ourselves.

Sorry. Is this like telling a kid the Santa Clause in the mall isn't real by shooting him execution-style in front of them?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 23 Jan 2015, 07:37
It's people making fun/smart comments about the automated "people have posted while you were writing" message. Not copy/pastes. It's kind of a forum tradition.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 23 Jan 2015, 07:41
DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"

Unless Faye has a legal directive authorizing Marten to do so, he can't make any medical decisions on Faye's behalf. Hospital will try to make contact with next of kin, so I hope Marten has their number. He wouldn't be a designated emergency contact unless Faye has woken up and made him such.  Assuming Faye's still out, they'll either be treating her in the ER or admitting her. If there's no insurance available, they'll be less likely to admit her. (Yes, I've been through family medical drama. It's grim.)

This all assumes that Marten is on the ball enough to realize he needs to call 911. The fact that he called Claire first is not a good sign. WRT all the speculation about how much she consumed/pills or blood in the vomit etc. this is all beside the point. She was passed out in her own vomit. That's enough to call in professionals and not play guessing games.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: SRRRRRRRR on 23 Jan 2015, 07:44
New bet:

What are the odds Sven finds out about this, ends up on Angus's talk show as a music guest some day, and punches him in front of the cameras for reasons neither of them fully understands?

I'd pay to see that.

Then the next comic is immediately a joke about butts.  Possibly about how someone got their butt kicked.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 07:45
DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"

Unless Faye has a legal directive authorizing Marten to do so, he can't make any medical decisions on Faye's behalf.

This is only a gut feeling on my part but I suspect that Faye has long since had either Dora or Marten listed officially as having authorisation to act on her behalf if she's incapacitated. Her mother lives several states away and there is no guarantee that she would be available; the sensible move for Faye would be to have the most clear-headed of her friends named to act for her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 23 Jan 2015, 07:46
Prediction:  This is Faye hitting bottom, at least for now.  She may relapse later, but nearly killing herself (either intentionally or unintentionally) with booze is so excessive that everyone will know she has a drinking problem and do everything they can to make her stop.  And presuming she didn't actually try to commit suicide (or, when she sobers up, is horrified that she tried) she'll probably be scared straight for a bit.  After all, Jeph has never before shown the degree of sadism to make one of his characters have a very, very bad spell for months of comic time on end.  Also, Jeph has been open about is own alcoholism, and of course he himself never "hit bottom" in the sense of destroying every aspect of his life before he got wise and sobered up.  There's no reason to think that Faye will either. 

One other prediction:  This will sunder the friendship between Dora and Marten.  Marten will hear about what happened - either when he calls Dora to ask if anything unusual happened at work today, or when he reboots Pintsize.  He will be viscerally angry at Dora for how she handled the situation, even before Faye gets a chance to put her two cents in and make herself look better.  Like many in the thread, he will wonder why she didn't just tell Dora to go home, or put her on leave without pay.  Dora may blame herself, or may take the "I'm sorry to hear this happened, but she made her own choices here, not me."  Either way, Marten will be much more upset with Dora than Faye, and it may take him quite a long time (even longer than Faye, perhaps) to forgive and forget. 

Ya'll's is forgettin'. Marten's barely 26. Party days are not a distant memory. He's probably not really versed on the dangers of alcohol overdose. Passed out, puked, and breathing is a party foul at that age.

Indeed.  It's a good thing both bottles are still next to her, or he wouldn't consider the seriousness of the situation.

Yet another misery she has visited upon poor Marten.  She really is a happiness vampire.

For fuck's sake, stop it with this.  As I said upthread, you can hate Faye, but pretty soon after "the talk" she settled into being a great friend for him.  Almost all positive changes in his life, other than working at the library, are due to knowing Faye.  She's a good friend who headed into a dark place, and Marten is responding with compassion, as he should. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 23 Jan 2015, 07:46
OK, I'm a noob, and I know this isn't the time for it...

but someone has to explain to me the whole "While you were posting, such and such" thing, and how it seems to (sometimes) intelligently comment on what's been posted.

Are these forums actually a self-aware AI?  They are, aren't they?  And QC is just Jeph's extremely round-about way of making society comfortable with the concept of AI-human interaction.

We copy and paste them, add a colour tag and edit it ourselves.

Sorry. Is this like telling a kid the Santa Clause in the mall isn't real by shooting him execution-style in front of them?

Awwwwww, there goes my headcanon.  :(

Unless... that's what the self-aware forum AI wants me to think...  ;)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 23 Jan 2015, 07:53
OK, I'm a noob, and I know this isn't the time for it...

but someone has to explain to me the whole "While you were posting, such and such" thing, and how it seems to (sometimes) intelligently comment on what's been posted.

Are these forums actually a self-aware AI?  They are, aren't they?  And QC is just Jeph's extremely round-about way of making society comfortable with the concept of AI-human interaction.



We copy and paste them, add a colour tag and edit it ourselves.

Sorry. Is this like telling a kid the Santa Clause in the mall isn't real by shooting him execution-style in front of them?
It's people making fun/smart comments about the automated "people have posted while you were writing" message. Not copy/pastes. It's kind of a forum tradition.

Although if we actually were a self-aware AI we would probably want you to believe otherwise. Not my call to make in all honesty.


DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"

Unless Faye has a legal directive authorizing Marten to do so, he can't make any medical decisions on Faye's behalf.

This is only a gut feeling on my part but I suspect that Faye has long since had either Dora or Marten listed officially as having authorisation to act on her behalf if she's incapacitated. Her mother lives several states away and there is no guarantee that she would be available; the sensible move for Faye would be to have the most clear-headed of her friends named to act for her.

NEXT UP: Actually, it's Pintsize. Since the night before. He broke into the government records just in case (since after all he was the one with more info about the situation, down to the actual chemical properties of the cheap booze Faye was downing).

This is my headcanon until proved otherwise.

Which would make getting Pintsize up to boot that much more critical.

Warning - while you were typing Dexeron has read right through us. The beans of doubt have been planted. Which is sad because we wanted to do it before
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 23 Jan 2015, 08:01
What I am not telling you of course is that it's all a cover up, that I became a mod by being assimilated into the forum Borg Collective.


I'm not telling you that because it isn't true, of course.




Or is it?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 23 Jan 2015, 08:02
Dammit. I don't like being assimilated. I even got mad when I couldn't beat Borg Multiball in the Star Trek pinball table.

I guess I'll never moderate around here (which on the other hand might be better for all of us).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 23 Jan 2015, 08:05
Greetings, All -

Old fan and lurker. New to discussing.

In late, but here's my thoughts.

- We don't know if the bottle(s) were full when she started guzzling. I doubt she planned this binge by first making a shopping trip. She may have just drank whatever part bottles she could find in the house (and in her purse).

- the color of puke: Maybe she had marinara for lunch.

- Pintsize: Whatever happened, I doubt he was much other than a smartass. That's historically been his character.  His current apparently catatonic state could be anything from impact damage to a porn induced haze. Or he could have gotten bored after Faye passed out and simply gone into "screen saver" mode for a while.

We don't really know, but given that it's Friday, we're going to be hanging on this dramatic cliff-hanger for a couple of days. Jeph is a clever and evil man.

I think the fact that a whole panel is devoted to Pintsize looking, honestly, as if he has been deactivated or erased sort of indicates that whatever is happening with him, it's not mundane. Especially considering this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2870). I think it's entirely possible that he tried to stop her and said he was calling Marten and she turned him off or, as suggested, threw him against a wall.

There had been something bugging me about this comic and I think I know what it is, and that's Marten's complete lack of surprise. As opposed to here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2816). The cases are similar. If he had no heads up, he would probably, upon seeing Pintsize be like "What the fuck ...?" instead of resigned silence. The same with Faye. He looks concerned but he doesn't have the look of shock as a person who has no idea that their roommate got fired for drunkenness and might have gone on a bigger bender. So I am thinking, especially since prior to their first date he told Claire that getting all dressed up wasn't really necessary, that Dora did call him or text him, or at the very least, texted Tai.

I fear Pintsize is permanently deactivated—especially after what you pointed out. He's been showing up less and less, and this seems to be a really huge turning point for the whole strip. If he isn't deactivated, it wouldn't be a surprise if he's changed physically and/or personality-wise. Of course, I may be completely wrong, and he may be there so when Marten starts him back up he can explain what happened. Either way, this is quite a cliffhanger!

I don't think Faye will die or even end up in the hospital. We don't see Marten calling 911. Of course he could have done it off-camera prior to calling off the date, but it seems like the kind of thing we would have been shown if he had.

Faye's vomit looked more red earlier. It looks very brown now. Did it get edited? I was on a phone instead my laptop so maybe the color looked different, and that's why some people think it's blood. Seeing it now, though, it's definitely brown—and not in a dried blood way.

I think a lot of things are about to change in the strip—from the chemistry between the cast members to the actual cast itself. It's been kind of heading that way as we've been seeing more and more of the library.

On a different note, having worked at a college library (and very briefly at a crappy concession stand), it's totally normal for staff/faculty members to smoke pot once in a while at a college workplace versus a food place. My ex-library boss even told me he smoked on campus during work with one of my relatives. I suppose you could harm someone with a book, but it's a lot less likely than the harm you can cause in the food industry where you can wreck things easily—from screwing up someone's order to burning them or giving them food poisoning. At a restaurant, you quickly can destroy your company's reputation and put it out of business through lawsuits or health violations. Coffee houses are generally considered higher end than something like fast food, too—even though you have to hustle the same (even not quicker—pre-caffeinated customers are grumpy). But college libraries? Most of those are state funded. And being stoned on a little pot is usually a lot less severe or noticeable than being drunk unless you are spending all day smoking or doing some really heavy stuff (speaking as an observer—I've only drank but been around a lot of pot smokers).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheCallMeFez on 23 Jan 2015, 08:10
You know whats cool about this though? We get to see Pintsize being a companion. As he said here (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2332) he has a different view on how to do his job. I think he has been acting a bit more subdued in his interactions with Faye and perhaps part of his natural aptitude with being a companion  compelled him to gravitate towards Faye recently. Drinking with her and listening to her problems and possibly even trying to help her to the point of getting in harms way. I like to think that Pintsize is a lot more deep than we give him credit for. Really hoping this shows his softer side and doesn't end up being another butt joke
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 23 Jan 2015, 08:16
I have been around a lot of people who smoke and a lot who drink. It's really more about how much you do more than what you do. Pot is often touted as a 'lighter' drug than things like cocaine or alcohol... but it's not, really. You can get just as messed up. I can't speak for long term effects of it, but in the short run I've seen people as disabled by smoking as by drinking. I've seen those who have enough of a buzz on that their judgement is impaired on both, and enough that have just a light buzz but otherwise function normally. I couldn't tell you personally though. I've been mildy drunk before, but never falling down drunk. And I can't go near pot smoke. Even being near people who are smoking gives me migraines. Tai seems to be someone who just gets a light to moderate buzz, and has enough awareness to know when she has had to much and should just sit down and watch Adventure Time.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 23 Jan 2015, 08:20
Regarding Pintsize: If his current chassis has been seriously damaged, then they'll need another one to get him operational again. The only two available are Momo's original Chibi-chassis and, possibly (if she never got around to shipping it back) the RoboBoyfriend Dr Elicott-Chatham built for Hannelore.

Now, just think about what Pintsize might be like running around in a human-sized body that's just a bit too 'uncanny valley' for any girl to find attractive.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 23 Jan 2015, 08:25
I have been around a lot of people who smoke and a lot who drink. It's really more about how much you do more than what you do. Pot is often touted as a 'lighter' drug than things like cocaine or alcohol... but it's not, really. You can get just as messed up. I can't speak for long term effects of it, but in the short run I've seen people as disabled by smoking as by drinking. I've seen those who have enough of a buzz on that their judgement is impaired on both, and enough that have just a light buzz but otherwise function normally. I couldn't tell you personally though. I've been mildy drunk before, but never falling down drunk. And I can't go near pot smoke. Even being near people who are smoking gives me migraines. Tai seems to be someone who just gets a light to moderate buzz, and has enough awareness to know when she has had to much and should just sit down and watch Adventure Time.

I don't completely disagree with that—having grown up with parents who were addicted at different points of my child and adulthood (part of why I won't smoke—though I don't judge others who do). When people high on pot, though, they tend to be a lot less likely to exhibit volatile behavior—though some can be complete @ssholes coming off their high. Also, how much they are stoned depends on what they smoke and their personalities to begin with.

That aside, it's generally more accepted (sometimes expected) at a university or even in an art environment (like an ad firm I designed for) to occasionally smoke on the job, but very frowned upon to drink to the point of drunkness. Ironic—considering pot's been illegal in the US until recently.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Jan 2015, 08:36
(if she never got around to shipping it back)

You....you do realise that this is Hannelore Ellicot-Chatham you're talking about right? The woman who has a military grade robot for cleaning her living room? The woman who ends messes? The woman who took her OCD and made it a business for counting? We are talking about the same woman, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 23 Jan 2015, 08:37
Regarding Pintsize: If his current chassis has been seriously damaged, then they'll need another one to get him operational again. The only two available are Momo's original Chibi-chassis and, possibly (if she never got around to shipping it back) the RoboBoyfriend Dr Elicott-Chatham built for Hannelore.

Now, just think about what Pintsize might be like running around in a human-sized body that's just a bit too 'uncanny valley' for any girl to find attractive.

Unless Hannelore got a hold of something else from her dad. I really have a feeling, though, Pintsize could be gone. Pretty symbolic if he is. Or he will be a source of information if/when he wakes up.

Was thinking about the lack of surprise from Marten could be a sign his emotions are shut down right now until everything is assessed and cared for. Been there as a parent during emergencies. Somehow instinctively you shut feelings away in these situations until the person(s) under your care are out of danger. You have to in order to think clearly and get done what needs to be done.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 23 Jan 2015, 08:51
If it turns out that Pintsize is seriously injured, that really could be a turning point, some real consequences that might force Faye to think about where she is and where she is going.  (Whether it would lead to the beginning of a struggle towards recovery, or a further sliding down the spiral is another question entirely...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 23 Jan 2015, 09:25
Pintsize is going to be fine. Jeph would not have the death of a major character happen off-camera. And yes, Pintsize is still a major character, even if we haven't seen as much of him lately.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 23 Jan 2015, 09:50

There had been something bugging me about this comic and I think I know what it is, and that's Marten's complete lack of surprise. As opposed to here (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2816). The cases are similar. If he had no heads up, he would probably, upon seeing Pintsize be like "What the fuck ...?" instead of resigned silence. The same with Faye. He looks concerned but he doesn't have the look of shock as a person who has no idea that their roommate got fired for drunkenness and might have gone on a bigger bender. So I am thinking, especially since prior to their first date he told Claire that getting all dressed up wasn't really necessary, that Dora did call him or text him, or at the very least, texted Tai.

I suspect the scent of puke hit him the moment he opened the door.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 23 Jan 2015, 10:14
Ben stop making scary predictions! It's scary!

I think Pintsize may have tried to stop Faye from overdosing with the booze and she turned him off in a grumpy taciturn response.
Thinking about an AnthroPC getting turned off is actually kinda frightening, it's a massive loss of personal power (pun unintended and then relished and kept). I have to wonder if they have the ability to turn themselves back on after being externally deactivated, or if they must wait for external reactivation. If it's the first that must be a massive fear for some of them.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 23 Jan 2015, 10:15
What I think can happen now that Marten had to cancel his date:
Claire, being inexperienced and apparently quite insecure, might be a little shaken. I don't think she knows about Marten and Faye's pre comic 500 past, so when she DOES learn about that, she might start going down the same insecurity route Dora went.
And that's the moment Dora herself enters the picture and tells Claire not to make the same mistake she did.

I can see Pintsize's current situation being used to bring up a AI rights subplot.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2015, 10:17
Quote from: BenRG
Sharing a bottle with the Grim Reaper

When you can turn a phrase like that you are either a writer or should be.

Welcome, dielicious! We have a lot of ESL speakers around with different skill levels.

A random thought is that even if Faye didn't need medical attention (Marten's not qualified to judge that of course) then it would still do her a different kind of good if Marten calls 911. Waking up in a hospital would be a cold splash of reality in her face.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 23 Jan 2015, 10:21
What I think can happen now that Marten had to cancel his date:
Claire, being inexperienced and apparently quite insecure, might be a little shaken. I don't think she knows about Marten and Faye's pre comic 500 past, so when she DOES learn about that, she might start going down the same insecurity route Dora went.
And that's the moment Dora herself enters the picture and tells Claire not to make the same mistake she did.

I can see Pintsize's current situation being used to bring up a AI rights subplot.

Claire is aware of Marten and Faye's early relationship - as a matter of fact, it was summarized  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2457)by Pintsize.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 10:23
If one fifth of 80 proof liquor REALLY had a 50/50 kill chance, I, as well as a large number of my friends, have all had lottery winning levels of luck in not dying in our 20s. I think that there is something you might be missing in how those calculations are done.

(also, I'm sure Faye weighs more than 60kg, though I didn't in my hardest drinking partying days)

It's not a fifth, you're right. It's 535 millimeters. About 13 shots for a 75 kg person.

It's actually somewhat surprising that human beings survive anything, but in this case it generally takes some work to reach that level, and it does all have to be consumed faster than the liver can process it.

Around 13 shots per hour will give 50/50 odds of death for a 160-ish pound person. I'd guess Faye to be in the 140 to 160 range, so the fact that she's had more than a liter and a half, possibly more than 2 liters, is worthy of consideration.

Math is not that hard.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Quartsize on 23 Jan 2015, 10:26
This clearly opens the door for the return of Sarah, who Dora will hire as Assistant Manager.   Faye will go with Angus to do arts in the city where she can sell arts.  Just as the drama is set to peak the story will cut away to Emily for a day doing something that the kids would refer to as "totes cray cray."

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 23 Jan 2015, 10:28
Claire is aware of Marten and Faye's early relationship - as a matter of fact, it was summarized  (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2457)by Pintsize.

That's great to know! I still really hope Marten explains the current situation so she doesn't get any wrong ideas.

Having your possibly best friend passed out on a pile of their own vomit is a reasonable reason to kill any date, sadly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 23 Jan 2015, 10:28
I'm not surprised Marten hasn't called 911, assuming he isn't about to do so next comic. After all, Faye's a long-time hard drinker and this is not the first time she's drunk herself unconscious, or even thrown up on the couch. He simply may not think she's in any danger and indeed she may not be, after all her tolerance would be a lot higher that the rest of her present social circle. We may just cut to her waking up in bed with the mother of all hangovers, with no recollection of how she got there, or of being fired either.

The fact of Faye's hard-drinking habit may be part of the reason he's not very surprised at what he walks in on, though a heads-up from Dora or Tai makes more sense.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 23 Jan 2015, 10:40
Somewhat relevant, an interesting article I ran into on addition today. 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: stephber on 23 Jan 2015, 10:51
Using ReindeerFlotilla's assumptions, here's where we would be for the BAC:

(http://s16.postimg.org/ioapvlgzp/Faye_BAC.png)
from  http://www.globalrph.com/bac.cgi (http://www.globalrph.com/bac.cgi)

We don't know how long she's been away from COD - I'm assuming 6 hrs from the AM firing to when Marteen arrives. I'm also assuming a slightly higher then normal alcohol clearance due to how much Faye drinks. Quite a few studies from Toxicology journals show "There is wide variation in the metabolism of ethanol. The unhabituated drinker clears ethanol from the blood stream at an approximate rate of 15 to 20 mg/dL (3 to 4.5 mmol/L) per hour. Patients with chronic ethanol abuse can clear ethanol at a rate of 25 to 35 mg/dL (5.5 to 8 mmol/L) per hour, or even faster in some cases."

Now, we're all making assumptions that the vomit there is "coffee-ground emesis" - pretty much the standard for showing a GI bleed. We don't know if that's the case or if Jeph just likes his vomit drawn dark brown with the ever-present corn and carrots.

Should Marten call 911 and get her to the hospital? With her looking like that and having a likely BAC over 0.3, heck yeah. Do I think that Faye's likely to die from this? Not very as we have a few 'regulars' showing up to our ER by EMS with BAC like this getting discharged 4-5 hours later after some IV fluid and thiamine.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 23 Jan 2015, 10:52
Pintsize is fine, we've seen him shut off before, and Marten keeps backups.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 23 Jan 2015, 10:57
If one fifth of 80 proof liquor REALLY had a 50/50 kill chance, I, as well as a large number of my friends, have all had lottery winning levels of luck in not dying in our 20s. I think that there is something you might be missing in how those calculations are done.

(also, I'm sure Faye weighs more than 60kg, though I didn't in my hardest drinking partying days)

It's not a fifth, you're right. It's 535 millimeters. About 13 shots for a 75 kg person.

It's actually somewhat surprising that human beings survive anything, but in this case it generally takes some work to reach that level, and it does all have to be consumed faster than the liver can process it.

Around 13 shots per hour will give 50/50 odds of death for a 160-ish pound person. I'd guess Faye to be in the 140 to 160 range, so the fact that she's had more than a liter and a half, possibly more than 2 liters, is worthy of consideration.

Math is not that hard.

I've known plenty of people who have regularly downed 1-2 fifths in a single night. They got sick, woke up fine (though very hung over). This happened a LOT when I was in my early 20s. To myself and others I have known.

The problem with the math is that that is in ONE HOUR. I sincerely doubt she downed two bottles in an hour, and depending on how much it has taken in the past for her to get drunk, Marten might actually not find it as that much overkill. The biggest two warning signs that this is "big problem" rather than just Faye getting drunk the way she has most of the comic is that A. She was completely alone, and B. its the middle of the day.

She was fired at what looked like opening. He was just getting off work before preparing to go out on a date. I'd guess it was around 4-5 o'clock. My bet is that she had a good 6-7 hours of drinking in there before she passed out. Also, that one bottle looks like the one she had at CoD, which she started drinking when she first woke up.

Literally, if 13 shots killed people 50/50, there would be more than around 2,200 alcohol poisoning deaths a year in the US. You'd probably have that just on University campuses. I know from experience.

Also, the actions to take before calling 911: Check and see if they are breathing irregular, check to see if their pulse is low, check if breaths per minute is low, check if they have a pain response. If none of those things come up negative, you really just need to keep a REALLY close eye on them. If any of those come up as a warning sign, THEN call 911.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2015, 11:07
What if Pintsize files charges?

It would be out of character but good exposition.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 23 Jan 2015, 11:09
Also, the actions to take before calling 911: Check and see if they are breathing irregular, check to see if their pulse is low, check if breaths per minute is low, check if they have a pain response. If none of those things come up negative, you really just need to keep a REALLY close eye on them. If any of those come up as a warning sign, THEN call 911.

Um...do YOU want to tell Marten, or should I?

Warning - while you were typing something you thought was funny, someone else typed something they thought was relevant.  You may wish to review your priorities about life.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 23 Jan 2015, 11:15
It's fine to talk the science of it for the sake of it, but I doubt it's actually relevant since Jeph probably doesn't know the science. He probably didn't research appropriate puke colors for the strip.

Faye fucked herself up good, but if she were literally dying it'd be a much different tone.

Pintsize on the otherhand is totally dead.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 23 Jan 2015, 11:21
"Assuming Faye's still out, they'll either be treating her in the ER or admitting her. If there's no insurance available, they'll be less likely to admit her. (Yes, I've been through family medical drama. It's grim.)"

MA has universal health care. I drive an ambulance, I've taken plenty of drunks to the hospital, some passed out, some annoying, none get turned away. I don't live in MA.

On the bright side, I want to comment Jeph for drawing Faye in close to the recovery position. We always put drunks on their sides, makes it easy to throw up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 23 Jan 2015, 11:22
It's fine to talk the science of it for the sake of it, but I doubt it's actually relevant since Jeph probably doesn't know the science. He probably didn't research appropriate puke colors for the strip.

Faye fucked herself up good, but if she were literally dying it'd be a much different tone.

Pintsize on the otherhand is totally dead.

This too. I think people are reading way too much into this as far as the literal immediate danger. This is a plotline about a downward spiral. I seriously think the whole "she is vomiting blood", "pintsize is dead" stuff is just... a little weirdly over the top.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 23 Jan 2015, 11:26
It's fine to talk the science of it for the sake of it, but I doubt it's actually relevant since Jeph probably doesn't know the science. He probably didn't research appropriate puke colors for the strip.

Faye fucked herself up good, but if she were literally dying it'd be a much different tone.

Pintsize on the otherhand is totally dead.

I think he probably does at least know some of the science, but didn't much bother with it. I agree that it'd be more serious if she were dying, although I do not envy her the hangover.
Hush you, Pintsize will live on wherever people watch porn.

Warning - while you were typing 2 people had better points. You may wish to be envious of them

Prediction wise if Marten consoles Drunk!Faye and Claire comes over to find out what happened I could totally see her walking in on a hug and getting the wrong idea. Or worse.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 23 Jan 2015, 11:27
Prediction wise if Marten consoles Drunk!Faye and Claire comes over to find out what happened I could totally see her walking in on a hug and getting the wrong idea. Or worse.
We've already had that storyline, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 23 Jan 2015, 11:28
Prediction wise if Marten consoles Drunk!Faye and Claire comes over to find out what happened I could totally see her walking in on a hug and getting the wrong idea. Or worse.

Nah, we did that arc with Dora already. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 23 Jan 2015, 11:29
It's fine to talk the science of it for the sake of it, but I doubt it's actually relevant since Jeph probably doesn't know the science. He probably didn't research appropriate puke colors for the strip.

Faye fucked herself up good, but if she were literally dying it'd be a much different tone.

Pintsize on the otherhand is totally dead.

This too. I think people are reading way too much into this as far as the literal immediate danger. This is a plotline about a downward spiral. I seriously think the whole "she is vomiting blood", "pintsize is dead" stuff is just... a little weirdly over the top.

A lot of people on this forum tend to have a habit of putting the cart before the horse. And quite a few of them think they're the Nostrodamus of webcomics. Are we really surprised?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 23 Jan 2015, 11:31
Ben stop making scary predictions! It's scary!

I think Pintsize may have tried to stop Faye from overdosing with the booze and she turned him off in a grumpy taciturn response.
Thinking about an AnthroPC getting turned off is actually kinda frightening, it's a massive loss of personal power (pun unintended and then relished and kept). I have to wonder if they have the ability to turn themselves back on after being externally deactivated, or if they must wait for external reactivation. If it's the first that must be a massive fear for some of them.

I don't think Faye hurt/turn him off directly. I think he damaged himself drinking with her. He's already wrecked his body once before consuming cake mix (if I remember right).

It's fine to talk the science of it for the sake of it, but I doubt it's actually relevant since Jeph probably doesn't know the science. He probably didn't research appropriate puke colors for the strip.

Faye fucked herself up good, but if she were literally dying it'd be a much different tone.

Pintsize on the otherhand is totally dead.

This too. I think people are reading way too much into this as far as the literal immediate danger. This is a plotline about a downward spiral. I seriously think the whole "she is vomiting blood", "pintsize is dead" stuff is just... a little weirdly over the top.

A lot of people on this forum tend to have a habit of putting the cart before the horse. And quite a few of them think they're the Nostrodamus of webcomics. Are we really surprised?

Just because someone has theories about what will happen (regardless of whether it does or not—I'm not Jeph) doesn't mean they think higher of themselves than others. A forum is a fine place to talk about theories. It's not like I'm trashing others who don't agree. ;) 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 23 Jan 2015, 11:41
Maybe Pintsize tried drinking with Faye, as he did before, as a subtle way of making her drink less. She drank WAY too much and that killed his chassis.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 23 Jan 2015, 12:12
Two bottles -- is this when you call 911? With or without the risk of choking?

I'd hate to hit someone with the medical expen$e$ of an emergency room visit if all that were needed was carrying them to a bed, but the opposite mistake would be incomparably worse.

Agreed about Pintsize. Turning off a citizen who has equal rights has got to be an issue.

I'm a couple pages behind on comments, so people probably have addressed this, but I think yes. Not just choking but alcohol poisoning, and it's also not as though he doesn't know she's depressed, whether or not he knows what degree it's to. QC hasn't called the police over mental health emergencies yet (they're all either settled with friends or okay to wait until therapy), so I don't know if or where Marten would draw the line for calling. That said, he doesn't know if it was only two bottles, and probably would assume it's more- I mean, Faye has been pretty wasted in the past, and he's seen her drunk many many times, but she's only passed out vomiting the one time in his lap, and I would argue that that was different (a different kind of passed out, more snoozy than unresponsive and floppy, plus he was there when it happened so he had an idea what happened).

Actually, definitely yes, but the rest of the reasoning was more on if Marten specifically would/would know he should.

Also, if Marten could, he could try to spare her the ambulance fees by getting someone (Hanners and Dale have cars and may be in the building) to drive her there, but moving her would be difficult.

ETA:
Ya'll's is forgettin'. Marten's barely 26. Party days are not a distant memory. He's probably not really versed on the dangers of alcohol overdose. Passed out, puked, and breathing is a party foul at that age.

I'm 21 and this is standard understanding for most people I know (if anything, it's just people who are under age ('what if we get in trouble?') or older (40 or 50+, whatever age bracket my parents are in) adults ('it's just alcohol let them sleep it off') who regularly don't, other than the occasional dumb person. I know a couple people who have been to the ER for alcohol poisoning, most of which were taken by their similarly young friends, and I know more people who were helping facilitate (or just watching while someone else did) 911 calls and calls home and who would go to the hospital with them.

I still don't think Marten would necessarily call right away, but I don't think remembering partying would be why. If anything, I think it would be another reason he'd know to (and I just realized, that's sort of a plot point early on with Billy in Willis' DOA comic).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 23 Jan 2015, 12:53
That said, he doesn't know if it was only two bottles, and probably would assume it's more- I mean, Faye has been pretty wasted in the past, and he's seen her drunk many many times, but she's only passed out vomiting the one time in his lap, and I would argue that that was different (a different kind of passed out, more snoozy than unresponsive and floppy, plus he was there when it happened so he had an idea what happened).

Exactly this. I don't think that Jeph would have been so explicit with Faye's condition (he's never drawn -anyone- lying in their own vomit, that I recall, and there's been plenty of puking in the past), nor would he have made the leadup with Pintsize so dramatic, i.e. with him lying right by the door as Martin walks in, and him looking down when, presumably, his foot hit him. It's a very unusual place for Pintsize to be laying even if he were 'awake', which leads me to believe Faye probably chucked him at the door to cause his shutdown, and especially taking into consideration that Faye has been known to be violent sober, let alone drunk and angry. If she'd taken the time to shut him down, she'd have likely put him on a table. You're also forgetting that Pintsize is mobile, and I would think that he'd run like hell if he realized that she was going to try shutting him down.

To also title the comic 'Heavy Stuff', and then proceed to half-ass it and not treat it with the seriousness for which his leadup has set the stage, would be extremely poor storytelling and frankly, be rather irreverent with what is often an extremely serious topic.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 23 Jan 2015, 13:05
Re: the general Pintsize worries: He's not going to be dead. It wouldn't make sense for his mind to be wiped (and as others said, backups exist). If his chassis is ruined, he works on the desktop (as seen when Marten cleaned his chassis), so that would work as an interim until they could afford a new one. Also, I'm pretty sure they still have his old chassis around- I believe it was mentioned when they were thinking of what to do with Momo's old chassis, but it might have been another time. There was a joke about skeletons in their closets.

I'm divided as to whether Faye hucked him at the wall, turned him off, or just let him drink. However, I am a fan of the 'Pintsize is going to help as Faye's companion now,' theory, especially seeing as unlike Marten, her friend count is dipping. I also like the idea of Steve helping, although Steve didn't ever seem to be at the 'call emergency services' point, other than that a brief stint to help sober him up might have helped.

DOCTOR: "I have a Mr Marten Reed as Ms Whittaker's designated emergency contact...?"

Unless Faye has a legal directive authorizing Marten to do so, he can't make any medical decisions on Faye's behalf. Hospital will try to make contact with next of kin, so I hope Marten has their number. He wouldn't be a designated emergency contact unless Faye has woken up and made him such.  Assuming Faye's still out, they'll either be treating her in the ER or admitting her. If there's no insurance available, they'll be less likely to admit her. (Yes, I've been through family medical drama. It's grim.)

This all assumes that Marten is on the ball enough to realize he needs to call 911. The fact that he called Claire first is not a good sign. WRT all the speculation about how much she consumed/pills or blood in the vomit etc. this is all beside the point. She was passed out in her own vomit. That's enough to call in professionals and not play guessing games.
I'm still not sure whether he will call 911 (although since people here seem pretty heavily in agreement, I want to know what Jeph will do if he doesn't), but that aside- you can list whoever you please as an emergency contact. They don't have to have medical authority over you. They may be expected to call someone who does, or to know about your insurance, but they don't even have to do that. Your emergency contact is just the person they contact first, to know that you were injured (or however you were admitted). Since most people aren't comatose forever once they're in the hospital, your emergency contact is usually also someone to help you get home, since they don't like to just put patients out at the bus stop (usually- that sucked). They've been to the hospital more than once, it's not unlikely that they'd have asked for a contact upon admitting her the first time, and Faye reasoned that Marten lives with her, so if she needs help, he can get to her quickly and also can let her back in the apartment.

Before I was married, I didn't want the hospital phoning my legal next of kin unless I was dead (in which case, they wouldn't really be getting an emergency contact out of me anyway), and I'm not an extreme abuse case or anything, it was mainly a privacy issue. Seeing as Faye's next of kin live pretty far away, I think it's more than understandable that at least one of her emergency contacts (most forms ask for two) would be Marten.

(She might not have emergency contacts at all, even if she goes to the hospital, of course. If she does, I see Marten.)

Someone has replied so now you won't be double posting.
Yes!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 13:11
If one fifth of 80 proof liquor REALLY had a 50/50 kill chance, I, as well as a large number of my friends, have all had lottery winning levels of luck in not dying in our 20s. I think that there is something you might be missing in how those calculations are done.

(also, I'm sure Faye weighs more than 60kg, though I didn't in my hardest drinking partying days)

It's not a fifth, you're right. It's 535 millimeters. About 13 shots for a 75 kg person.

It's actually somewhat surprising that human beings survive anything, but in this case it generally takes some work to reach that level, and it does all have to be consumed faster than the liver can process it.

Around 13 shots per hour will give 50/50 odds of death for a 160-ish pound person. I'd guess Faye to be in the 140 to 160 range, so the fact that she's had more than a liter and a half, possibly more than 2 liters, is worthy of consideration.

Math is not that hard.

I've known plenty of people who have regularly downed 1-2 fifths in a single night. They got sick, woke up fine (though very hung over). This happened a LOT when I was in my early 20s. To myself and others I have known.

The problem with the math is that that is in ONE HOUR. I sincerely doubt she downed two bottles in an hour, and depending on how much it has taken in the past for her to get drunk, Marten might actually not find it as that much overkill. The biggest two warning signs that this is "big problem" rather than just Faye getting drunk the way she has most of the comic is that A. She was completely alone, and B. its the middle of the day.

She was fired at what looked like opening. He was just getting off work before preparing to go out on a date. I'd guess it was around 4-5 o'clock. My bet is that she had a good 6-7 hours of drinking in there before she passed out. Also, that one bottle looks like the one she had at CoD, which she started drinking when she first woke up.

Literally, if 13 shots killed people 50/50, there would be more than around 2,200 alcohol poisoning deaths a year in the US. You'd probably have that just on University campuses. I know from experience.

Also, the actions to take before calling 911: Check and see if they are breathing irregular, check to see if their pulse is low, check if breaths per minute is low, check if they have a pain response. If none of those things come up negative, you really just need to keep a REALLY close eye on them. If any of those come up as a warning sign, THEN call 911.

If Faye weren't drinking hard, given that she ought to have a drinker's liver, she wouldn't have puked. Seriously.

There's no doubt in my mind that Faye is going to be fine. But in the real world, when you find a hard drinker passed out in their own vomiting, it's time to start thinking about alcohol poisoning.

Most binge drinkers don't singlehandedly knock back 13 shots per hour without vomiting, even in college, just like most aren't going to consume a fifth without sharing. About 2,200 people die each year in the US from alcohol poisoning. The rate of hospitalization rate is around 30,000 and that excludes cases where drugs are also involved.

Oh, and those numbers are for 18 to 24 year olds only.

It turns out that people aren't dropping dead at the rates you expect because emergency medicine is a thing.

I've known hard drinkers myself. I've seen fifths taken down in a night. In fact. I once saw four men consume 5 fifths in one night. Over the course of about seven hours. Some woke more hung over than others, but none actually drank as hard as Faye has to have. Unless she got a stomach bug the same day she decided to go on a bender. So either the time between Faye's sacking and Marten's return is shorter than you think, or Faye drank a lot in short time at the end.

Odds are Faye didn't go home and begin a measured drinking, or guzzling bottles. She worked up to it.

So, again it's unknown how much she had, how fast and a BAC .3 could kill her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 23 Jan 2015, 14:10
She's a good friend who headed into a dark place, and Marten is responding with compassion, as he should.

I am ever so glad I don't have "good friends" like her.  Ugh.  Guess it's all about standards.

S
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 23 Jan 2015, 14:14
Standards which are too high can limit your options and lead to loneliness.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 23 Jan 2015, 14:36
Standards which are too low gives you a large circle of acquaintences who take more than they give.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: madamlark on 23 Jan 2015, 14:39
Meh, you can still be lonely if your "friends" are people that insult you/are a general jerk/etc.  Never been much of a Faye fan, she's just plain mean sometimes and there's no way I would put up with that in an actual friend.  I get enough jerky behavior from other people, I don't need it from the people I have in my life that I choose to spend extra time with.  A little teasing now and again is one thing, but there's a lot of actual meanness in what Faye says to people.  I don't understand it and couldn't keep a friend who was like that, even if it meant I was lonely.  I'd rather be a little lonely than be made to feel bad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 14:42
Standards which are just right lead to being eaten by bears.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Jan 2015, 14:43
You know you could just mix the porridges.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 23 Jan 2015, 15:01
You know you could just mix the porridges.

Or feed the bears little red riding hood. She did break into their home after all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 15:19
Never been much of a Faye fan, she's just plain mean sometimes and there's no way I would put up with that in an actual friend.  I get enough jerky behavior from other people, I don't need it from the people I have in my life that I choose to spend extra time with
Emphasis added.

So, there's a super huge point in there that isn't being acknowledged about both Dora and Faye. Choice.

These people hang out with each other by choice. Neither has been dishonest, by any normal standard, about who they are. Quite the opposite. They aren't taking advantage of their friends. They are, instead, saying "this is me, flaws and all." And their friends are saying, "Cool." It's like they are getting accepted for who they are.

Weird, I know.

Hmmm.... Acceptance. Synonymous with inclusion. I wonder what the word of God is on inclusion (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2323). Inclusion, though, is kind of a given--that is, if you aren't inclusive you're probably being a jerk. (Not that being a jerk isn't the default for for humanity. It totally is.) Acceptance does go a step farther, because there are things it's morally permissible to reject. To accept is to give blessing to. It is saying, "I think this is of value."

Not that anyone should change their opinion of characters they don't like. But it's kinda of relevant. The flaws being cited are known and accepted by the friends. If they see them as a burden, it's one they willingly picked up. I think that's part of how friendship works.

We all suck. And as cool as we might play it, our friends are probably familiar with most of the ways we suck, just as we are with their flaws. We go on accepting it all, anyway.

edit: of course, to accept can also be to tolerate. But in this case it still amounts to a value judgement, because everyone has a choice. This isn't forced tolerance if it is tolerance. It's tolerance because the good outweighs the bad.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 23 Jan 2015, 15:20
Actually that was Goldilocks.

Going back to the mechanics of barista-ness: I'm at a coffee shop right now, there was just a brief rush, and the windows all fogged up because of the quantity of drinks steamed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 23 Jan 2015, 15:25
I'm still ashamed every time I see your name because I totally had forgotten that Paris was fucking married already when he went to Sparta to kidnap/consensually abscond with* Helen.

*Given the time, I suppose the latter isn't really likely
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 23 Jan 2015, 15:35
What next on this wild and crazy ride we call QC?

Faypocalypse Sven    9 (6.9%)
Claireten Snuggles    12 (9.2%)
Clintonhand Naughtyness    3 (2.3%)
Dora fires Faye - Drama and drunkenness ensues    50 (38.2%)
Clairemom and Martenmom accidentally meet    4 (3.1%)
Emily gets weirder (is that even possible?)    4 (3.1%)
Sven rescues Faye - Dora gets wrong end of stick    12 (9.2%)
The surprise return on Angus - Blood and mayhem ensue    5 (3.8%)
Purple Monkey Dishwasher    7 (5.4%)
Whatever it is, it'll be completely unexpected    22 (16.9%) <== Except to BenRG...
ALIENS!    3 (2.3%)

Total Members Voted: 131


Did a slight edit to update the final results since I locked my Poll after seeing this - Kugai
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2015, 16:31
Standards which are just right lead to being eaten by bears.

Rampaging bears are the answer to all our cultural missteps.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: osaka on 23 Jan 2015, 16:54
Ok, quick recap of my thoughts:

1.- Pintsize is not dead. Simple as that. Would make absolutely no sense since, as it's been mentioned, there are backups.
2.- Dora is not only right, but surprisingly tame. I would cold-slap a motherfucker. And probably something more.
2.1.- Specially since Dora's been known for nuclear reactions.
3.- Someone mentioned Marten shutting down. Since my father was clinically dead at the point I turned 19, I know that he might very well have.
4.- Steve wasn't as fucked up as Faye is right now, but I see where you're going. He could help in one way or another.
4.1.- On the other hand, Faye in the DOKYA would be a massive improvement. Maybe she would find love there, like Steve. But that's a whole different story.
(click to show/hide)
5.- Claire will be officially pissed. Let's hope she understands and it's only temporal.
6.- Faye should develop a friend-induced alcohol allergy.
7.- Some people around are either much more functional human beings than anybody on my family or much less impervious to attack. Everything gets roasted in my household. That's part of why I liked Faye, really.
8.- Maybe it's because here in Spain we have socialized healthcare. Still, if you get home and find your best friend/s abso-fucking-frootly smashed, you call 911. Just in case.
8.1.- That's kind of aggravated by the fact that it seems that puke is dry. Which means Faye's been passed out.
9.- Dammit why everybody keeps stealing my opinions and wording them better than I ever would, even in my own mother language.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to hug a bear

10.- Why aren't we funding that? Or bearsball, as defined by Jeph via Drunk Angus and Drunk Marten? (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1427)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: lot_jockey on 23 Jan 2015, 17:03
It looks like she (and maybe Pintsize) drank more than thirteen shots to me. There's 17 shots (1.5 ounces) in a fifth, and I'm not sure what type of bottle the second one is, but assuming it's a pint, that's at least another 10 shots (bringing the grand total to 27). That's a lot of alcohol in one day.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 23 Jan 2015, 17:33
Meh, you can still be lonely if your "friends" are people that insult you/are a general jerk/etc.  Never been much of a Faye fan, she's just plain mean sometimes and there's no way I would put up with that in an actual friend.  I get enough jerky behavior from other people, I don't need it from the people I have in my life that I choose to spend extra time with.  A little teasing now and again is one thing, but there's a lot of actual meanness in what Faye says to people.  I don't understand it and couldn't keep a friend who was like that, even if it meant I was lonely.  I'd rather be a little lonely than be made to feel bad.

Faye is a jerk to people she doesn't know (mostly the customers at CoD).  As I said, she hasn't done anything even borderline shitty to Marten since the first 1000 strips or so of the comic. 

Frankly, out of everyone in the strip, Tai seems to be the worst friend to have.  Although she's sort of up front about it with Marten, which is refreshing. 

Edit:  And Marigold.  If there's one character in the strip I can't stand, she's it. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 17:35
10.- Why aren't we funding that? Or bearsball, as defined by Jeph via Drunk Angus and Drunk Marten? (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1427)

WHY IS THIS NOT A THING?!?!? 0_0
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 23 Jan 2015, 17:58
Standards which are just right lead to being eaten by bears.

Rampaging bears are the answer to all our cultural missteps.

Right now you want scarygoround.com, then.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: xaszatm on 23 Jan 2015, 18:21
You know...looking it over, it's possible that Faye may not have drunk as we thought. Remember when she started this drunken rampage:

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2870

Pintsize suddenly becomes interested in drinking alcohol, even demanding to drink it out of the bottle itself. Plus in the next strip Pintsize talks about how Faye described his life when she talks about knowing what the right thing is but not knowing how to do it. I think Pintsize has been trying to prevent Faye from drinking too much since that strip. I don't think she finsihed most of that bottle, Pintsize risked damaging his circuits by drinking most of it. Hell, I'd wager that the bottle Faye found isn't actually a hard liquor but something lighter solely to prevent Faye from committing alcohol poisoning.

It might be why Pintsize is knocked off on the floor right now. Faye brings home ANOTHER bottle and this time Pintsize tries being more direct, resulting in Faye shutting him off.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 23 Jan 2015, 18:35
That explanation does sort of make sense... it would explain why Faye didn't know about the other bottle. Pintsize may have entered her room while she was asleep, disposed of what was left in the bottle she had, and then gave her a bottle of weaker stuff. Though she probably would have noticed it was weaker stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 23 Jan 2015, 19:09
You know...looking it over, it's possible that Faye may not have drunk as we thought. Remember when she started this drunken rampage:

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2870

Pintsize suddenly becomes interested in drinking alcohol, even demanding to drink it out of the bottle itself. Plus in the next strip Pintsize talks about how Faye described his life when she talks about knowing what the right thing is but not knowing how to do it. I think Pintsize has been trying to prevent Faye from drinking too much since that strip. I don't think she finsihed most of that bottle, Pintsize risked damaging his circuits by drinking most of it. Hell, I'd wager that the bottle Faye found isn't actually a hard liquor but something lighter solely to prevent Faye from committing alcohol poisoning.

It might be why Pintsize is knocked off on the floor right now. Faye brings home ANOTHER bottle and this time Pintsize tries being more direct, resulting in Faye shutting him off.
While I don't disagree with your overall point, I doubt Pintsize risked any damage to himself by drinking.  It's been established that anything he intakes just goes to a holding tank with a spectrometer hooked up to it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Wreck Smurfy on 23 Jan 2015, 19:19
Just to stick in my two cents (five cents in Canada):
1. Faye is not in any medical danger. She's done a binge, passed out, puked in the best possible position for a passed out person (Instinct, experience? Obviously alchies can pass on their genes, so this might be inherited behavior.)
2. Pintsize is not dead, he's shut down. Honestly, can you imagine any writer killing off one of the two first characters of his/her story as casually as this? I suppose it could happen, but not by a writer as talented as Jeph.
3. That twice-puked-on (that we know of), often slept on, and sat on since http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=7 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=7) nearly the beginning, really has to be replaced. I'm far from Hanners-fastidious, but that piece of furniture has to go. Faye could make a peace offering to Marten in offering to pay the price. Where she might come up with the funds is beyond my ken, given her current unemployed status.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 19:48
I think Pintsize would only really become interested in alcohol if he worked out a way to pressurize the holding tank, and ignite it as it exited.

Flaming farts? Oh yeah. Flame thrower ass? Even better.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 23 Jan 2015, 19:50
1. Faye is not in any medical danger. She's done a binge, passed out, puked in the best possible position for a passed out person (Instinct, experience? Obviously alchies can pass on their genes, so this might be inherited behavior.)
Once again, I repeat - just because you puked up (some of) the alcohol, doesn't mean that you aren't still in danger medically, or at risk of dying.

Taken from: http://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/otheralcoholinformation/factsaboutalcoholpoisoning.aspx#CriticalSigns

Quote
Critical Signs and Symptoms of Alcohol Poisoning

-Mental confusion, stupor, coma, or person cannot be roused.
-Vomiting.
-Seizures.
-Slow breathing (fewer than eight breaths per minute).
-Irregular breathing (10 seconds or more between breaths).
-Hypothermia (low body temperature), bluish skin color, paleness.

What Should I Do If I Suspect Someone Has Alcohol Poisoning?

-Know the danger signals.
-Do not wait for all symptoms to be present.
-Be aware that a person who has passed out may die.
-If there is any suspicion of an alcohol overdose, call 911 for help. Don't try to guess the level of drunkenness.

I seriously hope some of you are never the voice of reason at a party with lots of alcohol and drinking involved. You could very easily let someone die by means of lack of education on the matter. Not pointing fingers at anyone directly, but just saying.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 23 Jan 2015, 20:00
But I'm always pale.  I tend to avoid the day-star. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 23 Jan 2015, 20:01
I'm with you there. Damned bright thing in the sky, waking me up. That jerk.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Xenologist on 23 Jan 2015, 20:15
I think for a twist the big shocker might be that Faye is OK, but pintsized is seriously damaged. Thousands of dollars in repairs damage.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 23 Jan 2015, 20:21
No. The big shocker would be Faye wakes up, it's all been a dream and Bobby is in the shower.

Or maybe this (http://jamesleestone.deviantart.com/art/Spider-Villain-The-Shocker-HEY-166273586)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: DSL on 23 Jan 2015, 20:42
No. The big shocker would be Faye wakes up, it's all been a dream and Bobby is in the shower.

Or maybe this (http://jamesleestone.deviantart.com/art/Spider-Villain-The-Shocker-HEY-166273586)

Why not both?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: akronnick on 23 Jan 2015, 20:53
10.- Why aren't we funding that? Or bearsball, as defined by Jeph via Drunk Angus and Drunk Marten? (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1427)

WHY IS THIS NOT A THING?!?!? 0_0

Mostly because of the maulings.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 23 Jan 2015, 21:05
Meh

I'd prefer Chicken Fights


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpoki4wBwtA
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 23 Jan 2015, 22:42
I seriously hope some of you are never the voice of reason at a party with lots of alcohol and drinking involved. You could very easily let someone die by means of lack of education on the matter. Not pointing fingers at anyone directly, but just saying.

Honestly, I would hope that some of the people here weren't trying to be the voice of reason, because if every single time someone puked and passed out in my vicinity, we called 911, I would have probably seen half a million dollars worth of medical bills over time easily.

Be aware, but if you can still rouse them, they are still breathing well, both not breathing shallow and not breathing irregularly, and have a steady pulse and you live in the a country without socialized medicine, please, for the love of god, just keep a close eye on them and don't put them thousands and thousands of dollars in dept.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 23 Jan 2015, 23:31
All I'm pointing out is that just because they've puked they aren't automatically in the clear, as some people have stated previously. That's dangerous thinking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 23 Jan 2015, 23:33
All I'm pointing out is that just because they've puked they aren't automatically in the clear, as some people have stated previously. That's dangerous thinking.

You are correct there. Any time someone is passed out and has puked, its a serious situation. Someone needs to be all over that situation. It just doesn't necessarily need a hospital visit if that is the extent of the warning signs. I'm more reacting to the people who are reacting as though he should have been dialing 911 immediately upon seeing her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 23 Jan 2015, 23:40
Some people are more difficult than Faye (http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2t6zw7/whats_your_favorite_way_to_annoy_your_significant/).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Markus Ramikin on 24 Jan 2015, 00:12
Oh my god, she killed Pintsize.

...

...

Finally she did something good for Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 24 Jan 2015, 01:19
You are correct there. Any time someone is passed out and has puked, its a serious situation. Someone needs to be all over that situation. It just doesn't necessarily need a hospital visit if that is the extent of the warning signs. I'm more reacting to the people who are reacting as though he should have been dialing 911 immediately upon seeing her.

Depending on what Marten knows about the situation, phoning emergency services might mean not just a short trip to the ER, but a longer trip to a mental hospital.  It's a safer place for her to detox than rehab, at the very least, and if the speculation of her having pills in that vomit is true, it shows that she's suffering from suicidal impulses.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Xenologist on 24 Jan 2015, 04:34
Anyone else think the title of the past weeks strips are a little bit of foreshadowing? we have

2878: Hospital-Bound
2879: Homeward-Bound
2880: The Great Schism
2881: Heavy Stuff

So a possible story arc as i see it. Faye goes to the hospital. Maybe she goes to rehab maybe she doesn't, either way she goes down south for a while to stay with her mother, maybe visit her fathers grave again. The Great Schism/Heavy Stuff could be her leaving the QC universe and going to NYC or elsewhere to pursue her art and recover.

Not 100% about that last part but i'd be willing to bet that she goes back down south for a while.

I'm sorry if someone else has mentioned this already  :laugh: I didn't see it in 20 pages of posting but its entirely possible i missed it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 24 Jan 2015, 05:24
I think Pintsize would only really become interested in alcohol if he worked out a way to pressurize the holding tank, and ignite it as it exited.

Flaming farts? Oh yeah. Flame thrower ass? Even better.

You may be on to something there.  That would be SO Pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Y on 24 Jan 2015, 06:06
Did she tried to drink from Pintsize? Like the alcohol is stored in him, like the cake mix. And there might be a few ways to get it out. Have we seen Faye actually drink non-socially, or to forget problems? I'm glad people never called an ambulance on me for being too drunk/puking back in my college/uni days, although I haven't actually passed out drunk(except going into that zone where you can't remember anything), but sleeping and waking up to puke is pretty common. But then you usually would have a bucket handy and made it to bed. Then immediately afterwards you want to never drink this much again. Having to go to the hospital equals never be allowed to drink a drop of alcohol again, so that would be why drunk people wouldn't want to go.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 24 Jan 2015, 09:17

Faye is a jerk to people she doesn't know (mostly the customers at CoD).  As I said, she hasn't done anything even borderline shitty to Marten since the first 1000 strips or so of the comic. 

Frankly, out of everyone in the strip, Tai seems to be the worst friend to have.  Although she's sort of up front about it with Marten, which is refreshing. 

Edit:  And Marigold.  If there's one character in the strip I can't stand, she's it.

You keep saying how Faye has not done anything shitty to Marten in a while, and that's fine. What about other people outside of CoD customers? Or was Penny and Cosette's reaction to her promotion being that they both were prepared to walk just "haters hatin'"?

I love Dora but I can acknowledge the things she has done that have been shitty, hysterical and just plain wrong. You seem to operate on the idea that as long as Faye isn't being a shitlord to Marten, she needs to be canonized.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 24 Jan 2015, 09:43
BTW I don't think that Faye has hit bottom yet, in fact I don't think she's even gotten close. Sure, she's lost her job, and probably her friendship with Dora, but her reaction in the previous comic to this one indicates she thinks both are replaceable (her opinion on that may change when or if she sobers up). None of that was enough of a shock for her to resist the siren call of more hard liquor.

So she's now passed out in her own vomit on the couch, after doing only Jeph knows what to Pintsize (always assuming Pintsize didn't short himself out trying to match her drink-for-drink). The consequences of that are yet to be depicted, maybe Marten has her taken to the ER, maybe not, he may be able to wake her, which could cause more problems in itself.* We also don't know Pintsize's condition, he may be fine after a reboot and a cleaning out of his chassis (not necessarily in that order).

Even if the worst case happens, Faye ends up in critical or intensive care and Pintsize is seriously damaged or even gone, I think Faye will be entirely too stubborn to stop drinking. Rather the opposite, she may have an even stronger desire to drink to escape all the nasty consequences of her recent drunken actions coming down on her head. That's how alcoholics think, after all, and Faye has definitely become one if she wasn't one already. I would say she's at the very least crossed the line from "hard drinker", seeing as how she has allowed her drinking to start badly affecting everyone around her.

* If Marten is able to wake Faye, I'd bet the first thing she'll want to do is grab for a bottle. Marten may try to stop her, in which case she'll most likely go all angry drunk on him. In that case, I think the abuse we've seen her heap on him in the past may pale in comparison to what she may say and/or do to him then. Get between a drunk and their next bottle? That's just asking for trouble there, son. The ultimate consequences of that may be Marten deciding he can't live with Faye as long as she continues drinking. He may ask Faye to leave, or he may move out himself. Yes Marten is a chill guy who takes a lot of crap from people, but even he has his limits; if Faye clocks him or kicks him in the nuts for getting between her and her next bottle, he may decide he's taken enough and he ain't takin' no more, especially if it turns out she's done serious damage to Pintsize as well.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 24 Jan 2015, 11:21
Depending on what Marten knows about the situation, phoning emergency services might mean not just a short trip to the ER, but a longer trip to a mental hospital.  It's a safer place for her to detox than rehab, at the very least, and if the speculation of her having pills in that vomit is true, it shows that she's suffering from suicidal impulses.

Marten knows there's a suspected suicide attempts in Faye's past. If those are pills, and if a doctor asks Marten the right questions, a mental hospital had _better_ be on the agenda.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Channelore HellicottAtham on 24 Jan 2015, 13:08
I don't think this is rock bottom for Faye yet either. For what it's worth the puke just looks like the bourbon she's drinking to me, exact same colour, with neither frank blood nor coffee grounds type haematemisis present. Had she been vomiting for a long time, or been a very long term alcoholic, we may expect frank blood. Ditto the darker oxidised blood that had been sitting in her stomach for a while pre-emesis. This just seems to me that she drank herself unconscious during the afternoon and vomited what drink she had left in her stomach.

As for rock bottom, this is only the start, this is the descent. She is not yet grinding herself into the bedrock. That I feel would come when Faye continually drinks her way through her unemployment for days on end, alienates every friend and wears out even Marten's limitless compassion and best intentions, and finds herself homeless and friendless as well as jobless and Angusless. I'll not inflict a protracted scene-by-scene prediction upon you all, but I doubt Jeph would take it that far; I expect rather that an early intervention from friends and possibly (probably?) family too will be incoming.

Having said that I don't think either that her recovery will necessarily be so rapid as her decline, and frankly I'd rather it weren't. Even if the common descent of alcoholism + depression isn't bashed out in full, I cannot imagine Jeph skimping on the recovery and skimming over the fact that such recoveries are very slow, painful, and exhausting for both the patient and their support crews.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 24 Jan 2015, 13:59
I think the problem we're having is that people who are just coming into the strip haven't seen the whole character development of Faye Whitaker. She started out being jerkish, but we eventually got a compelling character with one hell of a backstory.

I wasn't here at the beginning, but with the number of strips that we're at, I might as well have been (1323 was when I came 'round, by the way). It took a while to understand who people were, and why they were acting the way they were, but once it fell into place - Jeph had me hooked.

I've picked up all four (to date) dead tree versions of the strip, and when I read through the whole commentary that Jeph had about wanting to end the strip after The Talk - but felt like he couldn't, because that wasn't the end of the story - I realized that this wasn't a comic about just Marten and Faye. It was a comic about Marten and Faye and the whole menagerie of people they interact with regularly as they wander through the streets of fictional Northampton.

Even at the point where I came in, if you would have told me that he and Faye would eventually hook up, and have a relationship serious enough that their breakup would end in her going on a full-on drunk... well, I would have looked at you very funny and said, "Oh, yeah, right, and the next thing you're going to tell me is that Marten and Dora are going to break up."

In this whole strip, when it comes to characters, the old song is true: "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys, there's only you and me, and we just disagree." Every character has faults, every character has positives. (Okay, maybe not Vespa Avenger, but that was long ago.)

And, I think, we need to remember that this isn't a webcomic based on real life. The tipoff, as Jeph has also said, is that there's a bunch of little robots wandering around.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 24 Jan 2015, 14:56
Also, a space station with rotational gravity that's been in orbit since at least 1986. And holograms.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Storel on 24 Jan 2015, 15:05
In this whole strip, when it comes to characters, the old song is true: "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys, there's only you and me, and we just disagree."

Haven't thought of that song in decades, and now it's running through my head, TYVM. And I can't remember any of the lyrics besides the lines from the chorus you just quoted, so having those few lines on repeat is quickly getting old.

Here's my revenge: "Feelings... Nothing more than... feelings..."  :evil:

And, I think, we need to remember that this isn't a webcomic based on real life. The tipoff, as Jeph has also said, is that there's a bunch of little robots wandering around.

And a bunch of not-so-little ones too, these days. (Momo, May, all the salesdroids at the place where Momo upgraded her chassis...)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 24 Jan 2015, 15:08
And DeathBot 9000
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 24 Jan 2015, 16:09
Don't forget the eldritch horrors.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ybtlamw on 24 Jan 2015, 18:03
Let me preface this by saying I think Faye's a wonderfully well-written character. That said, were Faye a real person, I wouldn't like her, and she certainly wouldn't be in my group of friends. That said, I hope she gets the help she so clearly needs—and that Marten puts his foot down and doesn't let her walk all over him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 24 Jan 2015, 18:34
That would be character growth for Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 24 Jan 2015, 18:49
There's been a lot of character growth for Marten lately.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Channelore HellicottAtham on 24 Jan 2015, 20:49
I think Faye has evolved a helluva lot throughout the strip too, to the point where despite still being somewhat abrasive, she would I think nonetheless make a tolerable friend. I've been reading QC since she spoke without contractions and had not yet had The Talk nor explained The Scar. The Faye of today is a pussycat compared to that wildcat of old!

I've actually been pondering whether Marten is the character who has evolved the least so far..
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 24 Jan 2015, 21:09
Marten's at least finally on track since :claireface: is making him more assertive.

At least until Faye makes them break up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 24 Jan 2015, 21:40
I agree with the suggestion that a lot of Faye's earlier behaviour - particularly the violent outbursts - should be treated as very loosely canon, or kind of glossed over as Early Installment Weirdness, with Jeph still figuring things out as far as tone and whatnot. I think it's best to look at those early strips as broad strokes in canon; after all, several of them definitely refer to AnthroPCs as being property with explicit references to having owners and curfews, and needing permission to go out by themselves (or be taken somewhere). I'd say that's been retconned with the "AI companions" backstory that has since been revealed.

However, we still do see examples of Faye going a bit too far with her abrasiveness towards other people. In this strip (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2448) from just a couple of years ago, Claire admittedly puts her foot in her mouth somewhat with her remark, which Faye probably would've taken better had it been said by a closer friend (then again, maybe not). For daring to point something out to Faye and being a bit incredulous and scornful of her completely overlooking the obvious, she is threatened with violence (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2449) unless she keeps balancing a can of beer on her head.

Typing it out like that, it does seem a bit silly and minor, and it was obviously played for laughs. Still, we have a punchline that's based on Faye threatening violence and being intimidating over a pretty minor gaffe on Claire's part, where she did kind of have a point. That's coming within the last couple of years, so we do still see that element of her character in firmly established canon, at least to some degree.

To that end, it's understandable that some readers don't find her particularly likeable or sympathetic, and that characters within the QC universe have their issues with her, or in Dora's case, are at the end of their rope as far as she's concerned. She's not a complete monster, but she's a lot to take, and she can be very difficult and abrasive. On top of that, while she'll readily call out other people on their BS - rightfully so, in many cases - she kind of has to be handled with kid gloves herself. To a certain extent, there's a sense of her being able to sass, insult, threaten, intimidate, or even hit anyone she pleases, but people shouldn't dare criticise her.

As for where the story is going, I wonder if we're going to see a bit more of her family. I think it'd be interesting to bring them in again (as well as Dr Corrine) and explore some of those issues and her backstory again. A lot of good theories have been put forth about David Whitaker, and I think it'd be interesting if the comic does revisit his suicide and the possibility that he was an alcoholic. I don't think Faye's being written out, I think she's being set up for a new character arc.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 24 Jan 2015, 21:45
I've actually been pondering whether Marten is the character who has evolved the least so far..

I would posit the exact opposite, Marten has always been developing. It's just happened in such minute stages that it's actually quite hard to tell.
Marten has always been one of those characters who has been on the verge of more substantial development, only for it to seemingly fail at the last second. But the fact that Marten keeps getting to those points must mean something is sticking. It's not a boulder going up a hill, it's the tide on the shore.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 25 Jan 2015, 00:37
Think of it this way: We've had an extended character arc about Marten's personal growth that can really be traced back as far as his ill-fated fling with Padma. Faye's journey (and the possible involvement of unexpected or new characters) may be just as long and complex.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Truec on 25 Jan 2015, 16:07
Has anybody ever attempted a QC timeline?  This talk of how characters act now compared to earlier in the comic makes me wonder how much time has passed and if we're expecting them to change too quickly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2878-2882 (19-23 January 2015)
Post by: Stoutfellow on 25 Jan 2015, 16:11
Truec: Check out the "Passage of Time in QC" thread. There's lots of information there.