THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: BenRG on 01 Feb 2015, 06:19

Title: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 01 Feb 2015, 06:19
So, a new week is upon us.

I've said this before but I'm more confident than ever that this week could see a time skip. There is not much else to deal with immediately except, perhaps, Marten taking Faye home, sitting her down and them having The Talk v.2.0.  However, given how Jeph has been turning off of lengthy dialogue exposition of late, he may not want to do it. After all, we know more-or-less what Faye's problems are and arguably there is little to be gained, in story-telling terms, by having her repeat them to Marten in a week's worth of strips. The only other available thread I can identify is what happened to Pintsize and there is no compelling reason to spend too much time on it unless you want to address Faye's relationship with Pintsize.

So, what could happen? Much like the last of last week's Alice Grove comics, I've been increasingly been getting the feeling of an end of a chapter. A phase in our characters' adventures has come to an end and I think it's plausible to pick these up some time later, perhaps a few weeks into Smif's autumn term. Possible features:
I'd really like to hear what everyone else thinks.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 01 Feb 2015, 06:28
I think I recall reading that Jeph stated, once upon a time, that there will never be a pregnancy arc.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 01 Feb 2015, 07:23
Voted for three dads 'cause hell yeah, three dads.

That said, the freeway is wide open.  There are quite a few plot lines in varying stages of development, and with Faye out of immediate danger, Monday could see any one of them taking the camera.

I still like the time skip idea; it avoids discussion of things that Jeph has indicated he will not discuss, and it's a hell of a lot easier to retcon something you've never actually said in the first place.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2015, 07:30
I think I recall reading that Jeph stated, once upon a time, that there will never be a pregnancy arc.
No pregnancy arc doesn't necessarily mean no pregnant characters. Someone could be pregnant and have a kid without it being a main focus. Benergy makes an interesting point about the "end of a chapter", but has this whole run so far been simply the first chapter? If there have been splits before, where did they occur? That one time jump a while back is the only one I can think of, although I guess The Talk and The Breakup could count as chapter breaks too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 01 Feb 2015, 07:32
I'm kinda mixed on the idea of May becoming Faye's companion AI. In some ways I think it would work. May wouldn't have the patience to put up with Faye's avoidance crap and could go toe to to with her in a verbal sparring match. Maybe even physical depending on her chassis. And I think Faye will need someone to give her a hard slap to stay focused once in a while. Part of the problem she has has been surrounding herself with people who mostly let her get away with just sliding through with a joke or intimidation. May wouldn't have any part of that.

On the other hand.. could you imagine the chaos those two could get into when they sync up in ideas? They have very similar personality types. That tends to either repulse each other or sync up and feed into each other. And the two of them working together could be hard on people around them. The force of their scorn magnified could shatter worlds. Or maybe they'll start their own business together with a little help from Veronica. Start a welding a verbal abuse shop. It's already known that people are willing to go some place and pay to be yelled at by Faye... Just cut out the middle man of a coffee shop.

In the short term it could deal with the issue of where to get money to cover rent until Faye gets back on her feet. May staying with Dale was short term anyway... She could move in with Faye, Marten and Pintsize and help with the rent since she has a job. But poor Marten, having to live with the three of them. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 01 Feb 2015, 08:00
Man, I love May. POOR IMPULSE CONTROL, THAT'S WHY!! Faye doesn't have the best impulse control either, so that would either crash and burn horribly or be the funniest arc so far. Can't decide.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 01 Feb 2015, 08:12
Actually, May has excellent impulse control (setting up a quarter-cent diversion for a bunch of transactions would take a lot of patience vs. Simply writing herself a new bank balance); what she doesn't have is the correct list of impulses that should be controlled.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 01 Feb 2015, 08:45
Yes, probably. I was just citing her reasoning of why she's not that good at being a virtual companion to Dale ;)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2015, 08:46
Wait, did it specifically say she Office Spaced her way to all that money? I assumed she just hacked an account and took it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 01 Feb 2015, 08:49
It was supposed to take longer so they wouldn't notice, but she always misses mundane details...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 01 Feb 2015, 09:33
Wait, did it specifically say she Office Spaced her way to all that money? I assumed she just hacked an account and took it.

I think it was more of a case that May was skimming the money from various accounts; where it could be anything from a couple of cent that people won't miss to tacking on larger amounts to budgets. You'd be amazed how often people don't really check what the "Miscellaneous" actually constitutes on a budget.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 01 Feb 2015, 09:40
This week on a solemn QC we attend Pintsize's funeral.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 01 Feb 2015, 09:43
"In compliance with Pintsize's will, we have covered every surface in Northampton with macro shots of human anuses."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 01 Feb 2015, 10:23
The idea of a potential time skip has been brought up over and over again the last few months, and I don't understand why. I really don't see any evidence that it's going to happen. And I don't get why so many people seem to want it to happen.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 01 Feb 2015, 10:43
And I don't get why so many people seem to want it to happen.

Because Jeph has stretched a week out to about three or four months and we want several character threads to move on to a later point that, realistically, will take several weeks, in-comics time at the very least to emerge. It's kind of frustrating, waiting for something that we suspect will happen but, at the current rate of progress, will take about a year before we see it.

Don't get me wrong; I've enjoyed this week. However, the time has come to move on to next week or even further down the line.

FWIW, my previous prediction of a time skip came from the fact that I couldn't imagine Faye going from 'drinking to forget' to 'drinking yourself into a coma' within a week, in-comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Boomslang on 01 Feb 2015, 10:56
RE: May and Faye

May wants to be a fighter jet.

Not only is Faye probably capable of building a (fairly primitive) fighter jet if someone else can do the engineering work, it would seem like a kick ass project. And, to step back a bit, maybe actually directly helping someone else succeed would do Faye some good with her own issues.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 01 Feb 2015, 11:08
MAY: "That's a rather small fighter jet."
FAYE: "It's a prototype. Until you prove you won't kill every last one of us with your mounted guns, you'll be on the small thing. Plus, I like having you around"
MAY: "Psh, whatever twinkle-tits."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 01 Feb 2015, 11:38
The beginning of QCs version of The Odd Couple.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 01 Feb 2015, 11:42
My vote: "How do you come back from firing your best friend?"

At least, I think that is going to be the major theme for the next two, three weeks. Interspersed with Faye coming to grips with her alcoholism...  My money is on  Dora and Faye beginning reconciliation before the end of February IRL. Also, possibly the blossoming of Claire's and Martin's sexual relationship... depending on how ambitious Jeph is feeling.

Not so sure about the May-Faye thing... seems more like something the forum wants than what Jeph is actually leaning towards.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 01 Feb 2015, 11:46
Of course the forum wants May and Faye to be together. It's bound to be hilarious.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 01 Feb 2015, 12:15
I think we'll stick with the Faye story arc for a bit. Here's why: Last week, Jeph tweeted (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/560839694184103936), "[This story is] coming from a personal place, yes, but I finally have the distance necessary to write about it." There is something emotionally cathartic about writing about things that have happened in the past and this might be Jeph's way to achieve peace (for lack of a better word, sorry) with what happened to him a couple years ago.

(If this has been brought up in previous WCDTs, sorry; with the flurry of new posts, it's been difficult to track what has been opined!)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 01 Feb 2015, 13:11
The beginning of QCs version of The Odd Couple.

I still think that should be Claire and Tai, who despite conflicting personalities decide to share a apartment for no reason which leads to a spin off web sitcomic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 01 Feb 2015, 14:17
Wait, did it specifically say she Office Spaced her way to all that money? I assumed she just hacked an account and took it.

I think it was more of a case that May was skimming the money from various accounts; where it could be anything from a couple of cent that people won't miss to tacking on larger amounts to budgets. You'd be amazed how often people don't really check what the "Miscellaneous" actually constitutes on a budget.

A lot depends on where May was working.  If she was employed by the Department of Defense, one of the intelligence agencies, or a military contractor there would be a lot of potential for her to play games with finances.  On the other hand if she was working for any of those employers you'd think her time in jail would have been a lot longer, and her release conditions a lot harsher.

Of course there's the off chance May isn't telling the truth, and her crime was something more mundane.  Or her supposed backstory is totally made up and she's there for some other purpose.  Perhaps she actually is there to be a bodyguard to Hannelore.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 01 Feb 2015, 17:11
I think we'll stick with the Faye story arc for a bit. Here's why: Last week, Jeph tweeted (https://twitter.com/jephjacques/status/560839694184103936), "[This story is] coming from a personal place, yes, but I finally have the distance necessary to write about it." There is something emotionally cathartic about writing about things that have happened in the past and this might be Jeph's way to achieve peace (for lack of a better word, sorry) with what happened to him a couple years ago.

(If this has been brought up in previous WCDTs, sorry; with the flurry of new posts, it's been difficult to track what has been opined!)
This is why I'm not feeling the "timeskip" idea yet. There's still more to deal with in Faye's state of mind. More to work out. We just don't see all of it yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 01 Feb 2015, 19:16
2888 up.  For the moment. 

http://www.questionablecontent.net/comics/2888.png (http://www.questionablecontent.net/comics/2888.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2015, 19:21
So Faye's cooperating with getting rid of alcohol, and
(click to show/hide)
The former is definitely good, the latter is...maybe? What's she going to do next?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 01 Feb 2015, 19:25
Beats me. The anti-Pintsize traps kind of make me wonder how he's holding up. (Has he been lying around powered down the entire time?) Good that she's recognizing she needs to clean up the booze, not everyone makes that step.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 01 Feb 2015, 19:25
Okay, real comic is up.

1. Makes sense to stay with Hanners so Marten can de-alky the apartment.
2. Heh, Pintsize-proof underwear drawer.

As for the "early" comic:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2015, 19:41
Poor Hannelore. She's getting hurt by problems she did not contribute to.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Wharrrrrrgarbl on 01 Feb 2015, 19:47
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: wlewisiii on 01 Feb 2015, 19:54
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.

The rule of story wins in comics when it's Comics vs Reality.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ybtlamw on 01 Feb 2015, 20:19
It's nice to see Faye's realized she's got to get all the booze out of the apartment. I'm not going to lie, though... I've got a feeling she's not out of the clear yet. I can see her having one more setback before she finally gets real help. But, of course, that's just me. Who knows?

As for Jeph posting tomorrow's comic already: Has he done that before? It seems a little odd to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 01 Feb 2015, 20:23
He doesn't always have a buffer, but this time he did and simply uploaded the wrong one first.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 01 Feb 2015, 20:28
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.
Very skeptical that this is any sort of standard procedure. Hospital risks getting sued to kingdom come by involuntarily putting a patient in a psyche ward, based on a verbal history.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 01 Feb 2015, 20:28
It's really great that she seems to be gung-ho about cleaning herself up.  Hanners is being a champ about all this too, giving her anxiety issues, she's really showing some strength.  I hope that Faye gives herself enough time to just recover from this incident before she starts planning major life changes. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 01 Feb 2015, 20:31
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.

Nope, that is not the way that works, at all.  Believe me, I've been the accompanying party at the ER before, usually they just get a talking to followed by a referral before they're discharged
.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 01 Feb 2015, 20:32
Warning - while you were reading 7 new replies have been posted. You may wish to forget everything you ever knew and submit to reprogramming.

Dadgummit! I didn't even get my first sentence out!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 01 Feb 2015, 20:37
I really wonder if we're going to get something totally different, such as Dale admitting his deep dark secret past or Jimbo taking up with Emily.  There needs to be some serious yet amusing break to this story, such as Steve's spyhard sequence.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 01 Feb 2015, 20:38
... Poor pintsize... deprived of the panty raid!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 01 Feb 2015, 20:43
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.

Nope, that is not the way that works, at all.  Believe me, I've been the accompanying party at the ER before, usually they just get a talking to followed by a referral before they're discharged
.
Depends on whether or not the docs think there are suicidal intentions, at least in my state.  The second and third times I was committed, there were other patients who were detoxing, and it wasn't pretty, even though they were given every drug that could possibly make it easier on them. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 01 Feb 2015, 20:48
Here in California, if it's a first time visit to the ER for too much alcohol consumption doctors don't seem to concerned.  I went a long a couple times in college with friends who were in bad shape after too much booze, both times the doctors just gave a super quick "don't do it again" and left it at that.  I imagine though that if it had been a repeat occurrence they might do pysch referral.  As far as being committed though doctors here I think would be way too afraid of lawsuits to try that unless there was pretty concrete evidence.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 01 Feb 2015, 20:56
I live in California as well, and it really depends on circumstances.  I did spend an evening with a co-worker on her 21st birthday, and after she disappeared, I found out the next day that she needed 2 litres of fluid in the ER that night, and the bartender was surprised that I was vertical the next night, not to mention having worked an 8 hour shift, but then again, I was the more experienced drunk.  If she gave the same psych history that I gave the last couple of times I was in the ER, I have no doubt that that she would have seen the inside of the proverbial padded room.

Edit:  Sad Hanners these past few strips kinda hurts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 01 Feb 2015, 22:17
Edit:  Sad Hanners these past few strips kinda hurts.

Agreed.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Y on 01 Feb 2015, 22:47
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.
I think if getting stuck into a psych ward is one of the usual outcomes when visiting the ER after alcohol abuse, a lot of people would be afraid to seek help.

I would have thought she emptied her entire supply of booze by now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 01 Feb 2015, 22:59
Now that it seems like Faye is on the right track, at least for now, I'm curious to see how the rest of the cast is going to react to this whole series of events.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Feb 2015, 23:20
Her medical history includes a possible suicide attempt and hospitalization for it. It might not have been a good story to have her hauled off, but it would have been a plausible one.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 01 Feb 2015, 23:35
I think that we get an insight here about what it is like for a woman to live with Pintsize. Booby-trapped underwear drawers? Laundry day must be like a warzone!

At least Faye is cooperating with Marten on drying out. If anything, she looks a bit embarrassed that things came to this! Of course, organisations like AA wouldn't even exist if it was as easy as that, so this is a first step on a long path.

Finally: it might be me, but Faye seems to be struggling slightly to remember the disarm sequence. I wonder how many times she has been caught by her own booby-trap?

[edit]
Fix'd typos
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 02 Feb 2015, 00:25
It doesn't look to me that she's forgotten. If there was hesitation (...) or a verbal stumble (uh or hm), then I might believe it. Otherwise, it looks more like... not resignation, exactly, but I can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's just tiredness.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 02 Feb 2015, 00:37
It's nice to see Faye's realized she's got to get all the booze out of the apartment. I'm not going to lie, though... I've got a feeling she's not out of the clear yet. I can see her having one more setback before she finally gets real help. But, of course, that's just me. Who knows?
As I have said before, I do not think this is sufficient. Faye needs a change of scenery as well, or else it will be too tempting to visit the nearest booze shop whenever she gets the urge (unless Marten and Hanners also confiscate her money and credit cards). A vacation with her friends, far away from bars and city life, might do her good.
Finally: it might be me, but Faye seems to be struggling slightly to remember the disarm sequence. I wonder how many times she has beencaught by hher own booby-trap?
I do not think she struggles to remember, but she might be a bit embarrassed letting Marten access her underwear drawer. As for the booby-trap, it obviously is not lethal (or Pintsize would be dead by now), but I would guess it involves copious use of duct tape. With Faye's proven engineering skills, I guess it is very advanced.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 02 Feb 2015, 00:53
Very skeptical that this is any sort of standard procedure. Hospital risks getting sued to kingdom come by involuntarily putting a patient in a psyche ward, based on a verbal history.
Mmm... Yes. On a first admission for drinking way too much, I'd say it was unlikely too, even in much less litigious Australia. For one thing, there are limited places for psych observation/treatment, and cases have to be triaged against ones where there is immediate risk of the patient harming themselves or others.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 02 Feb 2015, 01:13
It looks like Faye now has decided to stop drinking, and is happy to get help from Marten and Hanners. If it works, it should cement their friendship further, making Faye, Marten, and Hanners the "core group" of the QC cast. However, there are pitfalls. While Marten and Hanners probably will quit drinking (at least when Faye is present), Faye will still have the craving. Marten and Hanners cannot watch her 24/7 (although Hanners could quit her job, as she does not need the money, and the CoD job is probably less attractive for her with Faye fired).

The rent is probably a thing that needs to be resolved soon. Faye really should try to get another job, but might not be quite ready for it yet. I guess Hanners can help out, but it is not a long term solution.

Sven is another potential shark in the water. If they hook up, Faye might be happy for a while, but Sven is too much of a man-slut to remain faithful for long. When that happens, Faye is guaranteed to hit the bottle again.
(http://static4.quoteswave.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Friendship-is-the-only.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 02 Feb 2015, 01:36
Nils actually posted his comment whilst I was typing the one below but, as they cover some of the same ground, I think that it's worth partially quoting it.

The rent is probably a thing that needs to be resolved soon. Faye really should try to get another job, but might not be quite ready for it yet. I guess Hanners can help out, but it is not a long term solution.

Well, once Faye has had the chance to catch her breath and find her balance (say, a week) she's going to need a job. The problem is, of course, that her resumé isn't exactly a sparkling example of 'Hire me now!' I've got a feeling that CoD is her only real work experience. She has definitely got metalwork skills but would a bodywork shop be willing to hire her? More importantly, would that be the sort of job she wants? She's an artist, not an engineer and I think fixing stuff 'to spec' wouldn't be her idea of an ideal job.

I'm wondering whether Faye will end up working at the Secret Bakery? It's broadly the same sort of job she had at CoD but would be a change of scene. It also will bring her closer to a girl who I think would be the most powerful motive she could have to stay clean - She'd not want to risk her right to spend time with Sam for anything, IMO.

Re-introducing SB as a location would enable Jeph to do several things. Firstly, it would enable him to move Jim, Sam and possibly the other counter-clerk, Elliot, up to first-string supporting characters. It would also make it a lot smoother and more organic to follow Jim and Veronica's romantic (mis)adventures. Also, Elliot, as an unattached, local male, could be used for a number of romantic misunderstandings ("I'm not Padma, Elliot; get over it!") as well as potentially widening Faye's rather limited social circle. You could even imagine a strip or two where Marten waxes nostalgic about her 'spreading her wings'.

Would this spell the end of CoD as a location? No more than it already has been relegated in favour of the Library, IMHO. Marten still goes there for his own reasons (most notably to caffeinate the Library staff every morning). Hannelore works there and Dora is Tai's girlfriend, so there are still lots of reasons to go there. Most notably there are a couple of Dora-centric story threads that would likely include CoD and the barista girls as window-dressing.

Would Hannelore quit? I'm really not sure. I think that Dale, Penny, Cosette and Dora are Hanners' friends in their own right now. Whilst I could see Hannelore maybe requesting a leave of absence to help look after Faye, the reason why she chose to work at CoD - to socialise and have a 'normal' life - is still as valid as ever.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Channelore HellicottAtham on 02 Feb 2015, 02:17
Not sure why it would necessarily rejig the entire cast just because one character no longer works at CoD. Two are still there, and I think since Faye accepts that she is at fault in losing her job there I feel that once her pride and psyche heal (and perhaps once she's moved on in employment also) she'll return as a customer & friend again. Even Marten started going back there after splitting with Dora and they had a horrid breakup. Yes both Faye & Dora feel like shit over Faye's departure from the payroll, but there is no conflict to my mind over why this occurred that should keep them apart once time begins doing its thing. Hope that makes sense. I think Elliott & SB are old news beyond Veronica's new love life - it'd be kinda weird to return there as a major setting. (To my recollection too Padma left to care for family members rather than to spread her wings? That whole arc seemed more an interlude story anyway.)

Now I'm really hoping we see what remains of Pintsize tomorrow tomorrow. I always secretly love it when strips are inadvertently uploaded early, but just as reliably end up regretting this when I realise the following day that I get no new QI for another 24 hours! It would fit well into the schedule however if 2889 showed Marten returning to his apartment to debooze it as promised, and this would naturally allow us to see how he's doing. Given that noone has shown ongoing anxiety about anything other than Faye's predicament - I mean, they don't seem distracted or sad about Pintsize, nor showing any resentment towards Faye for anything she may have done to him - I suspect he has simply drunk himself blotto and is resetting somehow at home.

No, I have no idea how the pathophysiology of an android might allow it to achieve blottodom. Perhaps he popped his bladder and shorted himself out. I doubt his identity, his self has been irreparably damaged, however. Perhaps he'll be relegated to a USB stick, blinking profanities in morse code with the little blue light, whilst his chassis dries out in a massive sack of rice...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 02 Feb 2015, 02:22
I have little to no doubt that Pintsize was simply turned off by Faye for her to drink in peace. The lack of any drama regarding his wellbeing supports this, I feel.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 02 Feb 2015, 03:20
I'm wondering whether Faye will end up working at the Secret Bakery? It's broadly the same sort of job she had at CoD but would be a change of scene. It also will bring her closer to a girl who I think would be the most powerful motive she could have to stay clean - She'd not want to risk her right to spend time with Sam for anything, IMO.
Jeph introduced the Secret Bakery as a kind of alternate (or bizarro) universe (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1845), where the cast is complementary (but different) to CoD. Faye and Renee are strangely similar (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1859), and both have had a relationship with Angus (they are his "type"). Therefore, Faye and Renee as colleagues is a recipe for disaster, and I do not think this will happen.

Sam is Marten's stepsister (OK, not formalized yet); therefore, there are plenty of reasons for Sam to get involved in Faye's recovery, without Faye working at the Secret Bakery. I guess Sam wants to hang out with them whenever possible, she does not care much for hanging out with friends her own age (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2464).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Wharrrrrrgarbl on 02 Feb 2015, 03:40
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.
I think if getting stuck into a psych ward is one of the usual outcomes when visiting the ER after alcohol abuse, a lot of people would be afraid to seek help.

I would have thought she emptied her entire supply of booze by now.

So, there are two possible scenarios here: either what Marten saw in strip 2881 was vomit made of booze and pills, or it was vomit made of booze and food. Let's take each in turn.

Booze and pills: given history of suicide attempt and mental health issues, it's malpractice not to consult psychiatry in the ED. Given history of suicide attempt and unclear history of intentional or accidental overdose, it's malpractice for the psychiatrist not to recommend a medical hold followed by inpatient psychiatric care. So assuming no malpractice, Marten didn't mention seeing pills (maybe he was too freaked out to give a good history), and Faye minimized what happened sufficiently for the ED doc to make medical decisions without thinking about a pill ingestion. Still bad form not to get a toxicology screen on somebody found down and brought to the ED, though it looks like Marten did it by private car instead of calling EMS, so more understandable. So the medical decision making probably played out more like scenario 2:

Booze, no pills: Faye has been drinking pints of hard liquor daily for what looks like a week, minimum. She drinks more than intended, she drinks when getting up in the morning, she drinks enough to get fired, she drinks enough to get brought to the emergency department. At minimum she meets criteria for a moderate alcohol use disorder, which should make the ED doc suspicious that whatever amount of drinking she endorsed to him or her is less than what she is actually drinking. Alcohol withdrawal can kill you (~5% in-hospital mortality, up to 50% at a year if untreated in some studies), and is absolutely an indication for admission. The only way she gets out of the ED without medical admission for alcohol withdrawal is if she states that she wants to continue drinking (does not appear congruent with her attitude in 2885), at which point she definitely meets criteria for a severe alcohol use disorder.

Marten may not have known about her getting fired, etc., and may not have been able to provide that history. Assuming no malpractice, Faye didn't tell her docs when they asked about it. If she had been admitted to the hospital, the history taken for the admission should include a psychiatric history, which should dig up the history of suicide attempt and big pile of recent psychosocial stressors. Now we're back in "was this a suicide attempt?" territory, and psychiatry should be consulted, though depending on the answers they get from her friends regarding safety/support, she might get linked with outpatient resources. There are some docs I know who might not consult psychiatry if she stated that she was not interested in talking to a psychiatrist, though.

So, if she's getting discharged from the emergency department, she did it through a combination of lying/evading questions that should come up in a basic history. If she got discharged from an inpatient hospital bed (which should be 3-7 days after admission, depending on what happens on the withdrawal front), and there were no pills, I can maybe see a way she gets discharged home instead of to the psych ward.

HOWEVER, I'm pretty sure I see a bunch of pills in the vomit in 2881, so I don't think Faye told them what actually happened, and Marten somehow forgot to mention the pills. If Faye has had been to a psychiatric hospital before (esp. involuntarily, as happens after some suicide attempts), then she may have decided to minimize her history in order to avoid a second stay. This is pretty common behavior.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 02 Feb 2015, 04:55
Psych ward??

From  my experiences from bringing people to the hospital with alcohol poisoning: The doctors treat them, tell them 'well you overdid it there, lucky somebody called us', and then send them home. Especially if they're there the first time. They'll ask questions related to your well-being or search for indicators that you might need additional treatment, but that's all they do.

Pills in the vomit  - I don't think that there were any. If there were, the doctors do know about it. Why? It would have been in the EMT report if the EMTs saw them, and if Marten does have a tiny bit of common sense, he would have told them, since drugs do have contraindications with other drugs, and a sedative that's safe with alcohol might not be with other drugs.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 02 Feb 2015, 06:25
Pills in the vomit  - I don't think that there were any. If there were, the doctors do know about it. Why? It would have been in the EMT report if the EMTs saw them, and if Marten does have a tiny bit of common sense, he would have told them, since drugs do have contraindications with other drugs, and a sedative that's safe with alcohol might not be with other drugs.
Also, we have no indications Faye has ever used pills. Alcohol has always been her preferred medication. If she tried to commit suicide, it could be questioned, but we have no indication she did try this. The vomit just look like the ordinary stinky soup with carrot bits (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2881). I would not suggest there are pills involved unless we had clear indications of this. Drawing vomit is probably difficult work, I do not think we should overanalyze this.

As for the couch - I guess the cushions already has been flipped too many times (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1610). Unless Hanners is able to clean up, I guess a new couch is a priority in the immediate future.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 02 Feb 2015, 06:55
In regards to the recurring theme of 'Faye should work at the Secret Bakery'. No, I don't see it. They have a business relationship where they meet to trade goods on a daily basis. Even if they were looking to hire someone (which would be an amazing coincidence) it would mean having to keep dealing with Dora at work. Something I don't think Faye would want right now. Not to mention that Jim would want to know why she's not working for her friend anymore... Maybe she'll wind up working at another coffee shop in town. There are a ton, apparently. But I doubt it will be the Secret Bakery.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 02 Feb 2015, 06:59
LAN Perk? 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 02 Feb 2015, 07:17
No, it's time for Faye to do something completely different.

Manager for Deathmøle. I'm calling it now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 02 Feb 2015, 07:42
LAN Perk?
Considering what May ran into looking for a job, that might lead to an interesting scenario: "Sorry, we don't hire humans."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Feb 2015, 07:45
Finally: it might be me, but Faye seems to be struggling slightly to remember the disarm sequence. I wonder how many times she has been caught by her own booby-trap?

Pun Jar. Now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Estron on 02 Feb 2015, 07:48
He doesn't always have a buffer, but this time he did and simply uploaded the wrong one first.
I'm imagining this being said by "The Most Interesting Man in the World" from the beer commercials.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 02 Feb 2015, 07:48
Finally: it might be me, but Faye seems to be struggling slightly to remember the disarm sequence. I wonder how many times she has been caught by her own booby-trap?

Pun Jar. Now.

Unintentional, I assure you.  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 02 Feb 2015, 07:52
Why is everyone so excited for Faye to get another barista job? I mean, meh? There's nothing wrong with that line of work, but I don't think Faye was ever super into it.

She should go to the art gallery, ask for an advance, and then make something. She could probably live comfortably on a comission a month.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Boomslang on 02 Feb 2015, 07:54
Considering what May ran into looking for a job, that might lead to an interesting scenario: "Sorry, we don't hire humans."

I really doubt that, barring deliberate joke on Jeph's part- the rationale behind not hiring AIs had at least something to do with allowing humans to work at least SOME jobs while AIs performed the ones only AI could do. Otherwise the AIs would be responsible for a lot of human suffering from unemployment and homelessness, and I really doubt they'd be okay with causing such a state of affairs. In addition, Faye would almost certainly not be qualified for any job specific to AI, and THAT would be the objection rather than her being human. Again, barring a deliberate joke, and I would expect that to be retracted in the next panel or comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kiloku on 02 Feb 2015, 07:55
To read the early comic or not to read, that is the question.

I feel so damn conflicted  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 02 Feb 2015, 08:09
Def think it's food in her vomit, not pills. To many irregular shapes.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 02 Feb 2015, 08:12
Why is everyone so excited for Faye to get another barista job? I mean, meh? There's nothing wrong with that line of work, but I don't think Faye was ever super into it.

She should go to the art gallery, ask for an advance, and then make something. She could probably live comfortably on a comission a month.

I don't know if people *want* her to get a job in another coffee shop it's just that she has shown talent for two things. Being snarky and welding. The only work experience she's shown has been the Coffee of Doom. As far as going to an art gallery and asking for money... I don't see that working. At all. There's a reason 'starving artists' are a thing. She had that one job literally fall into her lap and she could barely be bothered to do anything about it. That doesn't happen to most artists, who tend to spend years working at low paying jobs before selling anything.

Then again, this is a world where Sven can churn out a terrible song and get paid tons of money, and Jimbo makes a comfortable living writting about steampunk werewolf princesses...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 02 Feb 2015, 08:15
Finally: it might be me, but Faye seems to be struggling slightly to remember the disarm sequence. I wonder how many times she has been caught by her own booby-trap?

Pun Jar. Now.

Unintentional, I assure you.  :angel:

No, no, take credit for it. Totally worth it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 02 Feb 2015, 08:15
No, it's time for Faye to do something completely different.

Manager for Deathmøle. I'm calling it now.

Maybe that would allow her to work on her art as well, setting up massive metal stages not unlike those of the EDM acts in real life.

What. Deadmau5' stage is kickass.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 02 Feb 2015, 09:55
Why is everyone so excited for Faye to get another barista job? I mean, meh? There's nothing wrong with that line of work, but I don't think Faye was ever super into it.

She should go to the art gallery, ask for an advance, and then make something. She could probably live comfortably on a comission a month.

Because it would be the Secret Bakery. That would be quite entertaining to see.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: azurite on 02 Feb 2015, 10:11
Still bad form not to get a toxicology screen on somebody found down and brought to the ED, though it looks like Marten did it by private car instead of calling EMS, so more understandable.

I think Marten called EMS. The fourth panel in 2882, when the EMT is taking her pulse, is at the apartment--it at least has the same color walls in the living room and the same walls/cabinets in the kitchen. If that's the case, the EMTs saw the vomit and would have noted the presence of pills. Also, I really can't see Marten trying to cover up a suicide attempt. If Faye had taken pills, it would have been addressed by this point.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MaxCaine on 02 Feb 2015, 10:14
Wherever Faye ends up, it's going to have to be somewhere where other members of the cast can and are willing to go to say hi.  That's what's so useful about CoD. It's not out of the way for any of the cast, people are always dropping in and out, it's great for framing scenes. You know, where everyone knows your name, and they're always glad you came. They want to be where they can see, their troubles are all the same. They want to be where everybody knows their name. If it is out of the way, if it's work to find reasons why the cast would be at Faye's place of work her job will slowly slide into the background and she's likely to become a patroness of CoD.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 02 Feb 2015, 10:28
As I've said before, I really don't agree with the "Faye has further to fall" comments.  While Jeph clearly skipped over a lot of dialogue, it's clear that Faye realized (or was convinced) she needed to quit drinking, and while she's upset about what a fool she made of herself, is taking responsibility for her actions.  Plus so far it seems Jeph is modeling Faye's decline/recovery on his own, which would lead one to believe this was the wake up call, and she'll spontaneously recover from alcoholism without much outside help (besides maybe going back to her normal therapist). 

One possibility which hasn't been considered yet is Faye might start working at the library.  Marten could certainly ask Tai for it as a favor, once things have settled down.  This may cause...friction...between Tai and Dora, but it will probably be good for story purposes. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 02 Feb 2015, 10:34
No, it's time for Faye to do something completely different.

Manager for Deathmøle. I'm calling it now.

Maybe that would allow her to work on her art as well, setting up massive metal stages not unlike those of the EDM acts in real life.

What. Deadmau5' stage is kickass.
So are Apocalyptica's metal thrones they sometimes have on stage.

I'm really impatient for Dr Corrinne's overdue reappearance.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 02 Feb 2015, 10:44
I'm really impatient for Dr Corrinne's overdue reappearance.

yes... I miss her a lot. She was always funny, but usually had very good advice.  I don't know if I want to see her with Faye first, though, I'm curious about Hanners' sessions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 02 Feb 2015, 10:51
By the way, was Faye still seeing her? Maybe less frequently , since Faye was doing better lately? I don't know the usual protocols in the States.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 02 Feb 2015, 11:24
If it was covered by her insurance, then probably she was. Unless she was one of those that said 'Whelp, I have a boyfriend now, my relationship issues are over!' Which doesn't really sound like her. However, since we haven't seen the Doctor during this whole arc, she may have stopped going. I mean she would be the perfect person to be talking to about her worries over Angus getting the job and what it will mean. That is what she gets paid for after all.

For me it was a simple matter why I stopped going. I couldn't afford to go. My main reason was to get a hormone referral letter, but my doctor did help with talking about some of my other issues. But when my hours started to be cut at work, anything that was not essential (rent, bills, food) started getting cut away. There are times I wish I could go back, but I don't live in that area anymore, any my money still isn't great. I have bigger priorities to budget.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 02 Feb 2015, 11:38
If it was covered by her insurance, then probably she was. Unless she was one of those that said 'Whelp, I have a boyfriend now, my relationship issues are over!' Which doesn't really sound like her. However, since we haven't seen the Doctor during this whole arc, she may have stopped going. I mean she would be the perfect person to be talking to about her worries over Angus getting the job and what it will mean. That is what she gets paid for after all.

For me it was a simple matter why I stopped going. I couldn't afford to go. My main reason was to get a hormone referral letter, but my doctor did help with talking about some of my other issues. But when my hours started to be cut at work, anything that was not essential (rent, bills, food) started getting cut away. There are times I wish I could go back, but I don't live in that area anymore, any my money still isn't great. I have bigger priorities to budget.

I think this would be a great place to bring back the doc for a few panels here and there.  Like I said earlier, it appears that Faye has bounced off the bottom, I'm hoping the rebound doesn't destroy her further.  So far I'm liking how Faye is dealing with this, much needed Character development for her and much needed in terms of character likability and sympathy for us readers.  Hopefully we see some of this for Dora as well.  (For the record I think Dora was justified in the firing and Faye was in the wrong.  But the character flaws of both of them caused the situation to spiral out of control, so it will be nice to see some more development her way)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Feb 2015, 12:02
Welcome, new people!

Another advantage of a change of scenery is that it would give Jeph a chance to stretch himself and do new things. A brand new location would be best for that, but the suggestion of the space station makes more sense the more you think about it. Hannelore could swing it, she could become a creative welder for building research gadgets, and I can just see Hannelore in her room saying "Station? You know how you helped me? Faye needs help untangling herself. Will you do that for me?".
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 02 Feb 2015, 12:34
Another advantage of a change of scenery is that it would give Jeph a chance to stretch himself and do new things. A brand new location would be best for that, but the suggestion of the space station makes more sense the more you think about it. Hannelore could swing it, she could become a creative welder for building research gadgets, and I can just see Hannelore in her room saying "Station? You know how you helped me? Faye needs help untangling herself. Will you do that for me?".
Called it last week:
  • Personally, I am hoping Hanners invites Faye to the Station. Faye may get treatment there, and perhaps be offered a barista job. I suspect they really need better coffee up there. It could also lead to an even bigger quantum leap in creativity.
Of course, Jeph may have other ideas. But perhaps he will listen if enough Forum members support this idea?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 02 Feb 2015, 13:22
I can just see Hannelore in her room saying "Station? You know how you helped me? Faye needs help untangling herself. Will you do that for me?".

'Are you satisfied with your care?'
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 02 Feb 2015, 14:00
It doesn't look to me that she's forgotten. If there was hesitation (...) or a verbal stumble (uh or hm), then I might believe it. Otherwise, it looks more like... not resignation, exactly, but I can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's just tiredness.

I'm probably going to get flamed for saying this, but I'm also surprised the possibility hasn't been brought up yet. We're all assuming she's hit rock bottom because she said she screwed up. You can realize you've screwed up and just keep on going screwing up. Hell, she's been in therapy since shortly after The Talk, and look where that's gotten her. So what if that's not forgetting or hesitation, but deciding? As in, "Do I tell him about the fifth in the toilet tank or not? Or do I hope he finds that one so I don't have to mention the flask taped to the bed frame?"

I'd much prefer that she'd get it together, but 'til I see evidence that she's actually trying to do that, I remain skeptical.

Why is everyone so excited for Faye to get another barista job? I mean, meh? There's nothing wrong with that line of work, but I don't think Faye was ever super into it.

She should go to the art gallery, ask for an advance, and then make something. She could probably live comfortably on a comission a month.

I don't know if people *want* her to get a job in another coffee shop it's just that she has shown talent for two things. Being snarky and welding. The only work experience she's shown has been the Coffee of Doom. As far as going to an art gallery and asking for money... I don't see that working. At all. There's a reason 'starving artists' are a thing. She had that one job literally fall into her lap and she could barely be bothered to do anything about it. That doesn't happen to most artists, who tend to spend years working at low paying jobs before selling anything.

Then again, this is a world where Sven can churn out a terrible song and get paid tons of money, and Jimbo makes a comfortable living writting about steampunk werewolf princesses...

Here's the problem: like nearly anybody, Faye has to decide among things she'd be good at,  the things she'd actually like to do, and the ones that would allow her to make a living. She's shown aptitude at snark, coffee-making, and welding/sculpture. The first two skill sets are pretty common, while the third -- for which she has a genuine talent -- she doesn't seem to have either the inclination or the confidence to pursue. She comes off as someone who's pretty intelligent, but we haven't seen her really express any interest in doing anything (or, for that matter, stepping far enough out of the comfortable-if-stifling confines of CoD to make a change).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 02 Feb 2015, 14:02
By the way, was Faye still seeing her? Maybe less frequently , since Faye was doing better lately? I don't know the usual protocols in the States.

I'm not in therapy yet, but my sister is, and her therapist decided she should be coming in once a week. So I imagine that it really, really depends on the person and their issues, and how serious they are.

As for an actual psychiatrist, I innitially saw mine once a month, when was then recently extended out to a two-and-a-half month gap once the medication seemed to be working well.

Warning - while you were typing a new psychosis has emerged. You may want to review how often your therapy sessions are.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 02 Feb 2015, 14:09
The week begins

It'll be interesting to see how the drama plays out now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 02 Feb 2015, 14:31
I could see Faye getting another coffee shop job, but I also suspect it won't last.  Instead she gets the job, finds the new job conditions too restrictive(most places aren't going to let her be as prickly towards the customers), and it helps her decide to do whatever it is that's planned for her storyline.

A permanent job at the Secret Bakery seems unlikely.  After all that would likely end up largely duplicating what's already been done.

And here's my longshot, unlikely to happen idea:  Faye somehow gets a job with the local talk radio station.  Imagine her doing a phone in show and dealing with the typical talk radio phone in show listeners.  Like Pintsize.  He'd probably love bothering the local equivalent of Rush Limbaugh, although he'd probably only get a chance to do it once before he was banned from calling again.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 02 Feb 2015, 14:50
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.

I speak from bitter experience when I tell you it is really, really hard to get someone involuntarily admitted to a psych ward, and even harder to get them to keep them there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 02 Feb 2015, 14:51
And here's my longshot, unlikely to happen idea:  Faye somehow gets a job with the local talk radio station.  Imagine her doing a phone in show and dealing with the typical talk radio phone in show listeners.  Like Pintsize.  He'd probably love bothering the local equivalent of Rush Limbaugh, although he'd probably only get a chance to do it once before he was banned from calling again.
Pintsize would be impossible to effectively ban. Dude's an AI, he'd be pretty capable at getting around bans, spoofing fake numbers and such.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 02 Feb 2015, 15:17
Faye Whittaker, Mass. Radio Shock Jock.  :D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 02 Feb 2015, 15:55
And how about Jimbo as her co-host/sidekick?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 02 Feb 2015, 16:04
And here's my longshot, unlikely to happen idea:  Faye somehow gets a job with the local talk radio station.  Imagine her doing a phone in show and dealing with the typical talk radio phone in show listeners.  Like Pintsize.  He'd probably love bothering the local equivalent of Rush Limbaugh, although he'd probably only get a chance to do it once before he was banned from calling again.

Nah, she gets a job at the sex toy shop. Hell, the owner seems cool about drinking on the job. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1379)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 02 Feb 2015, 16:04
*Soapbox*

A few people have mentioned this, but I would like to put an exclamation mark on it... I want to see Faye go back to therapy, not only for the good of the story but also because it can be a powerful statement. Alcoholism often has a mental health aspect to it, and I want to see that explored. Mental Health issues are often treated with less respect than other health issues, and I feel that the Faye-recovery story line can help address that. Even if Jeph's work convinces only one person to seek help rather than suffer in silence (or worse), I think he should do it...

*Steps off Soapbox*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 02 Feb 2015, 16:13
And here's my longshot, unlikely to happen idea:  Faye somehow gets a job with the local talk radio station.  Imagine her doing a phone in show and dealing with the typical talk radio phone in show listeners.  Like Pintsize.  He'd probably love bothering the local equivalent of Rush Limbaugh, although he'd probably only get a chance to do it once before he was banned from calling again.

Nah, she gets a job at the sex toy shop. Hell, the owner seems cool about drinking on the job.
Which is exactly why it'd be a terrible idea for her to work there. The idea is to get her away from alcohol, not immerse herself in a place where her addiction would be condoned.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 02 Feb 2015, 18:18
It doesn't look to me that she's forgotten. If there was hesitation (...) or a verbal stumble (uh or hm), then I might believe it. Otherwise, it looks more like... not resignation, exactly, but I can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's just tiredness.

I'm probably going to get flamed for saying this, but I'm also surprised the possibility hasn't been brought up yet. We're all assuming she's hit rock bottom because she said she screwed up. You can realize you've screwed up and just keep on going screwing up. Hell, she's been in therapy since shortly after The Talk, and look where that's gotten her.

Indeed, therapy has been no help with her recent issues. I'm guessing she either hasn't been going lately, or would not talk about her issues with Angus during her sessions. Probably didn't mention her drinking either...heck it makes more sense if she has simply stopped seeing Dr Corinne.

So what if that's not forgetting or hesitation, but deciding? As in, "Do I tell him about the fifth in the toilet tank or not? Or do I hope he finds that one so I don't have to mention the flask taped to the bed frame?"

I'd much prefer that she'd get it together, but 'til I see evidence that she's actually trying to do that, I remain skeptical.

Yep I'm wondering about this as well. Sure she admitted to the bottle in her underwear drawer, but was that her only stash? We probably won't find out for sure until after she's back in the apartment, but until then I too remain skeptical about her confession - it would be too easy to simply not mention any other hidden bottles.


Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 02 Feb 2015, 18:22
Slightly off topic, click on the tiny "dord" link at the bottom of the QC homepage.
 :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Feb 2015, 18:30
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Feb 2015, 19:40
Doom on Rodeo Drive?
Dora on Returns Delivered?
Dude, Onward Right Down?

Anyway, my non-existent powers of precogniscence tell me that Hanners is going to tear up a lot and that Faye is going to be snappy for a while as she goes sober.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 02 Feb 2015, 19:46
George McFly: Lorraine. My dord has brought me to you.
Lorraine Baines: What?
George McFly: Oh. What I meant to say was...
Lorraine Baines: Wait a minute. Don't I know you from somewhere?
George McFly: Yes. Yes. I'm George. George McFly. I'm your dord. I mean, your density.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NemoX on 02 Feb 2015, 19:50
Well, it's good to see Faye at least acknowledges that she is not ok, and is willing to let Marten/her friends help her...even tho she still looks peeved at Dora, on some level she knows it is her own fault (she is after all admitting she deserved it). Still seems a bit harsh she huffs at Dora's help there.

Still, baby steps. Admitting it is the first step and what not.

Also, second to last panel is one of the cutest I've seen Hanners in a while ^_^
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 02 Feb 2015, 20:19
And in tomorrow's strip, everyone agrees to go back to the way things were, to avoid making Hanners sad. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 02 Feb 2015, 20:31
Yes Faye, it was nice of Dora, a courtesy that a lot of employers probably wouldn't extend to someone who wasn't also a friend. But perhaps I'm misreading the tone of that first panel; in the second one, Faye is certainly showing some awareness that she brought the situation on herself, so perhaps her comment in the first panel is meant to be more of a vague acknowledgement, in a morose and defeated tone.

In addition to hitting us right in the proverbial feels, the latest strip also brilliantly demonstrates Hanners' naivety. Endearingly, she suggests that simply asking very nicely will erase the transgression, and the betrayal of trust. If only it were that simple when we messed up big time in our lives, and only it were that simple for two of our main characters here.

At the same time though, Hanners is also a bit naive about Faye and her personality. I don't think that Hanners truly realises how abrasive, difficult, and bullying Faye can be towards other people. It's understandable, because Faye treats her better than pretty much everyone else in the cast. To Hanners, she's one of her first real friends apart from Station, someone who has helped her with her anxiety and have what most of us would consider a normal and healthy social life. As such, she holds Faye in very high regard.

Faye hasn't been nearly as warm or supportive towards other people in the past though, and her character flaws have certainly been described and discussed in length. Hanners was happy (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2524) when Faye was made assistant manager, subsequently shocked by Penelope and Cosette being ready to immediately quit, and insisted (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2525) Faye be given a chance, because she's not truly aware of how horrible Faye can be to other people, nor why other employees at CoD would find her being (officially) in a position of power off-putting and undesirable.

I also still think that was an eye-opening moment for Dora, a reason why she's lost patience with Faye. Before that, I'm not sure that she really appreciated or understood that not everyone had the same tolerance for Faye that she did, and that some her quirks were that much of a problem for other people. It's understandable on both hers and Hanners parts though, not to mention realistic. When you are friends with a difficult person, and aren't bearing the brunt of their less than admirable traits, you're not truly aware of the extent of them. I think Dora now is, but Hanners isn't, because it's filtered by her history with Faye and the way she's treated by her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 02 Feb 2015, 20:32
Tomorrow, Station drops a tungsten rod on CoD out of an over abundance of sympathy.  People around the world freak out about AI, leading to a tense standoff and congressional hearings. Beatrice comes up with a dastardly plan to restore faith in AI. Only a few dozen deaths required, and mostly bad people. Hanners finds out about the plan and must choose between protecting her robot friends our saving not so innocent lives.

It's a lot to fit into one strip, but Jeph has it under control.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ybtlamw on 02 Feb 2015, 20:42
It's obvious Faye knows she screwed up, but now she's acting like a bitch toward Hanners, and that's not OK. Hanners cares too much about her friends, and for Faye to be talking to her like that makes me irrationally angry. (I'd said in another post that I'd never be friends with Faye in real life, and this is a prime example of why. I hate her personality.) Any anger Faye's got should be self-directed for putting herself in such a position, unhealthy as that may be, but it's clear to me that she's angry with Dora, even if she's not saying it, which isn't fair anyway, since Dora did what any rational, sane boss would've done. Maybe she didn't know how bad Faye's drinking actually was, and never expected Faye to drink herself into the hospital.

That's why I think we're in store for another setback from Faye. I've got a feeling all of her friends doing their best to help her out is going to freak her out and she's going to end up having one more episode before she really, truly realizes what she's doing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 02 Feb 2015, 20:51
It's obvious Faye knows she screwed up, but now she's acting like a bitch toward Hanners, and that's not OK. Hanners cares too much about her friends, and for Faye to be talking to her like that makes me irrationally angry. (I'd said in another post that I'd never be friends with Faye in real life, and this is a prime example of why. I hate her personality.) Any anger Faye's got should be self-directed for putting herself in such a position, unhealthy as that may be, but it's clear to me that she's angry with Dora, even if she's not saying it, which isn't fair anyway, since Dora did what any rational, sane boss would've done. Maybe she didn't know how bad Faye's drinking actually was, and never expected Faye to drink herself into the hospital.

That's why I think we're in store for another setback from Faye. I've got a feeling all of her friends doing their best to help her out is going to freak her out and she's going to end up having one more episode before she really, truly realizes what she's doing.

Yeah, this kind of thing is why I felt it was really lousy for Dora to even task her to talk to Faye about the insurance to begin with. Faye has always been a temperamental type of person. I'm sure coming off drinking doesn't make her any more pleasant—though it was a surprise how compliant she was with everyone who was helping her at the hospital.

The one good thing out of it is it sounds like she's done with CoD. Time for character growth!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A_S00 on 02 Feb 2015, 20:54
Looks like Faye lied to her doctors about what's going on, because if she responded truthfully to a basic history regarding alcohol use, she would be getting admitted a psych ward.

Nope, that is not the way that works, at all.  Believe me, I've been the accompanying party at the ER before, usually they just get a talking to followed by a referral before they're discharged.
Affirmative.  I can confirm as the accompanying party that blowing a .41 on arrival the second time in a month you drink yourself into a hospital is not enough to get you committed.  Going home and immediately taking all of the pills they gave you for the withdrawal symptoms at once and washing them down with a fifth of vodka is, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ybtlamw on 02 Feb 2015, 21:14
Yeah, this kind of thing is why I felt it was really lousy for Dora to even task her to talk to Faye about the insurance to begin with. Faye has always been a temperamental type of person. I'm sure coming off drinking doesn't make her any more pleasant—though it was a surprise how compliant she was with everyone who was helping her at the hospital.

The one good thing out of it is it sounds like she's done with CoD. Time for character growth!

I'd imagine the reason she was so compliant's because she wanted to get the hell out of the hospital. She probably didn't say anything about wanting to get out to Marten and Hanners because they'd have taken it the wrong way. (If she would've said something, I'm sure Jeph would've dedicated a strip to it, so she clearly kept that to herself, if that's the case.) And now, with the way she's acting toward Hanners, who did nothing wrong at all and who's now taking the brunt of her anger (as tertiary as it may be at this point), it just seems to me like she's going to have another setback before all's said and done.

I mean, I could be wrong, and I'm probably definitely wrong, but that's just how I see it playing out. I can also still see her going to Sven to get back at Dora for firing her, or some other sort of huge, ridiculous falling-out scenario between Faye and Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Wildroses on 02 Feb 2015, 21:19
It's an interesting feeling, realising you are sad because someone broke up with a coffee shop.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 02 Feb 2015, 21:38
I'd imagine the reason she was so compliant's because she wanted to get the hell out of the hospital. She probably didn't say anything about wanting to get out to Marten and Hanners because they'd have taken it the wrong way.....

I mean, I could be wrong, and I'm probably definitely wrong, but that's just how I see it playing out. I can also still see her going to Sven to get back at Dora for firing her, or some other sort of huge, ridiculous falling-out scenario between Faye and Dora.

All that and she may also have another fifth or two hidden around the apartment that she didn't tell Marten about. I could be wrong about that as well, but I wouldn't be surprised if I wasn't - Faye's compliance is really suspicious to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 02 Feb 2015, 21:41
I don't think Faye is being a bitch to Hanners. I mean, Faye isn't being all sunshine, but who would be in this situation. She needs to be firm about not crawling back to Dora. No matter how much pressure their respective friends put on them to reconcile and make "everything just like it was before".

I think both Dora and Faye realize that that chapter in their lives and their friendship is over. I'm not saying that they won't eventually work things out and become friends again, but I don't think it will be an easy thing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: kyraeus on 02 Feb 2015, 22:33
I dunno. Call me crazy, but I think ybtlamw had it more or less on the head up above.  Faye's reaction and expressions in the first, third, and final panels pretty much speak volumes to me that not only is she kinda being shitty towards Hanners who is, let's face it, probably the ONLY person who WON'T judge her overly harshly for what just happened... She's pretty much writing off Dora, who just reacted EXTREMELY well for the situation as well. 

I'm not saying I expected it to go back to business as usual, that kinda wasn't an option, really.  But for her to have that final reaction to Hanners.. It's kinda like she suddenly just lost all respect and/or tolerance of the people she calls friends.  It seems like not only is she NOT ready to grow, but she's pretty much in a tailspin just waiting for terminal velocity to wake up half drunk in a trailer park somewhere in a really bad situation, IF she wakes up at all.  All the progress she seemed to be making on the face of things with being social and NOT being shitty towards others is pretty much gone.  If you can treat someone like Hanners, who wants nothing more than to see everyone happy, like crap.. well... not much else needs to be said.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: kyraeus on 02 Feb 2015, 22:37
Actually, I should qualify that.  I don't think she ever really WILL realize what she's doing at this rate.  I'm honestly questioning whether she'll be able to not only avoid rationalizing her attitude and actions, but realize that she's been pretty much nothing but a gigantic bitch to.. well, pretty much everyone at some point or another in a big way.

And even if she does..  Well, it'd be a pretty huge revelation, and frankly if I was in her shoes, I'd probably crawl into a hole somewhere and never come back out, rather than feeling like I could EVER make amends for what's gone down.  I really actually hope to see some dialogue between herself and her mom about this, but I doubt that would ever happen, and if so, I don't see her mom being the guiding force in her life she really seems to need right now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 02 Feb 2015, 22:57
I think capping off the "we quit!" moment for Dora was the strip a few days later, when Faye suggests hiring Dale because he looks like a wimp. I thought the Wtf?? Moment for Dora then was that  Faye legit didn't care how much her coworkers disliked working with her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SmilingHobo on 02 Feb 2015, 23:02
I think Faye is just cranky/in a bad mood, and understandably so. She's lost her job and her boyfriend, and now she has to quit drinking cold turkey. It doesn't justify her being curt with Hanners, but I think everyone has been in a bad mood and behaved similarly at some point in their lives. She's acting like a human being...the less pleasant side of that humanity is on display now, but I wouldn't be so quick to demonize Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Feb 2015, 23:08
Welcome, new people!

Faye has confronted herself about her dealings with others (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=338) but it doesn't seem to have made a lasting impression.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Y on 02 Feb 2015, 23:20
I don't know, it seemed Faye felt genuinely sad and remorseful in panel 2 and trying to hide it in the other panels. She knows she screwed up, although humans are allowed to screw up(and AIs). If she does return to work she'd be Dora's slave for a long while. As I remember CoD needs someone with Faye's personality as that was CoD's appeal. As for trust issues, usually an apology goes a long way, but it might not cut it for now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 02 Feb 2015, 23:34
Poor Hanners! Poor Faye too, because how are you supposed to say 'no' to a face like that? This is the moment when Faye realises that her actions do not occur in a vacuum - they also affect everyone around her. I don't think that she always appreciates that.

I think that Hannelore is afraid that this is a precursor to losing Faye as a friend, as ridiculous as that seems. She needs reassurance that change =/= loss which, ironically, is also one of Faye's fears. I've got a feeling that Faye, who likely expected to have them counselling her, will end up counselling Hanners and gain an epiphany in the process. My guess is that Marten will return on Friday to find them hugging and crying.

Yeah, I think that Hannelore will need reassurance so badly that she'll think about Faye's germs later!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 02 Feb 2015, 23:50
Hanners is probably the most empathic character in the QC 'verse.  Marten, and Momo probably follow, though due to various reasons, they aren't as aware. 

And yeah, that look she has makes one want to give her a great big hug, except for the fact that she'd freak-out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 03 Feb 2015, 00:08
Poor Hanners! Poor Faye too, because how are you supposed to say 'no' to a face like that? This is the moment when Faye realises that her actions do not occur in a vacuum - they also affect everyone around her. I don't think that she always appreciates that.
I do not think Faye intended to be mean towards Hanners, as suggested by some. But she had to stop Hanners from believing she could go back to CoD. Faye genuinely likes Hanners, and is well aware of Hanners' vulnerabilities, but sometimes things have to be told.

Faye has probably started thinking how this is going to affect her. In particular, her loss of income. This is enough to put anyone in a bad mood, so I do not really blame her for appearing less than happy. On the other hand, with Hanners reacting like this, I guess Faye will try to cheer up a bit. I guess the Hanners-Faye-Marten(-Sam?) interactions will be interesting in the days ahead of us.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 03 Feb 2015, 00:22
It's definitely good that Faye recognizes that she has a problem, rather than denying it as she has in the past. However, with the level of self-loathing she seems to be displaying in this strip, it seems like she's going too far in the other direction. Hopefully seeing how what she's saying hurts Hanners will make her realize that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 03 Feb 2015, 02:08
It's kind of interesting how our experiences shape what we see - I was thinking about the before-last comic and Marten offering up to clean out Faye's booze.

I thought that was pretty much an overreaction - yeah, Faye shouldn't drink right now, but it's not as if she must be treated like a little child. The only way that she could be in any way functioning in society, around her friends, is a healthy relationship with alcohol. No matter if that means drinking in moderation or not at all. If she doesn't want to drink at all, she should clean out her booze herself. If she hasn't made a decision and just wants to keep on drinking, Marten's cleaning up of the place won't help at all since she can just get more (even in the same house - Marten's got booze, Ellen and Natasha (if they still live there) too, and Hanners has got an extremely organised place and a love for martinis.

Also: poor Hanners. Faye's really in a bad mood (understandable) and is trying to keep it in, but her success is debatable. I like how she doesn't touch Hanners with kid's gloves though - she won't tell lies or white lies (she could just say 'maybe' and have Hanners of her back)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 03 Feb 2015, 02:15
Removing liquor from the apartment is more symbolic than practical, I agree. However, it does have one practical aspect: By removing all booze that is within easy reach, Marten is making it impossible for Faye to drink passively. If she wants alcohol, she's going to have to persuade someone to give her some and go out and buy some. Making such an active choice is harder and imposes upon Faye the chance to think about what she's doing.

It's far from foolproof, of course, but it is a checkpoint of sorts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 03 Feb 2015, 02:25
I agree, cleaning out the apartment at all probably isn't the worst idea if Faye feels it necessary. Then she should do it herself, though, because just lying to marten and not telling him about every stash would enable her to drink 'passively', too. That's what I meant in not treating her like a child - she's an adult.

I just thought Marten offering was very weird.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Arancaytar on 03 Feb 2015, 03:09
maybe Hannelore has a secret [...] (e.g.: "Dale... I'm... I'm pregnant!").

with Marigold! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2874)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 03 Feb 2015, 03:16
Conservation of detail means we're coming into the conversation part of the way through. It's likely that the possibility of removing all the booze from the apartment was brought up and agreed upon prior to the part of the conversation we're privy to.

Yeah, this kind of thing is why I felt it was really lousy for Dora to even task her to talk to Faye about the insurance to begin with. Faye has always been a temperamental type of person. I'm sure coming off drinking doesn't make her any more pleasant—though it was a surprise how compliant she was with everyone who was helping her at the hospital.

I don't know about that. Her reaction to Hanners passing on Dora's message was at worst delivered a bit sarcastically. What made Faye snap at Hanners wasn't the delivery of Dora's message about the insurance, but Hanners pushing the issue of her being able to get her job back, which seems like a conversation that likely would've happened regardless.

I think capping off the "we quit!" moment for Dora was the strip a few days later, when Faye suggests hiring Dale because he looks like a wimp. I thought the Wtf?? Moment for Dora then was that  Faye legit didn't care how much her coworkers disliked working with her.

Good point, I'd forgotten about that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 03 Feb 2015, 03:25
with Marigold! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2874)

So a plot roughly similar to Heinlein's ''All You Zombies'', involving time-travel and Beatice Chatham being the future Marigold (perhaps with the help of cosmetic surgery).

Meh.... I've heard worse.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 03 Feb 2015, 04:19
with Marigold! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2874)

So a plot roughly similar to Heinlein's ''All You Zombies'', involving time-travel and Beatice Chatham being the future Marigold (perhaps with the help of cosmetic surgery).

Meh.... I've heard worse.

FWIW, my headcanon has long been that Hannelore is Beatrice's clone with genetic and cybernetic upgrades to make her 'perfect'. Unfortunately, neither Dr E-C nor Ms C considered whether this tinkering would have unplanned consequences on how the child's brain would develop; Hannelore's menagerie of mental health issues is the direct result.

I have got a fan-fiction semi-planned out in my head where it turns out that Hannelore could, potentially, be a sort of super-woman given her combined 'Woman-plus' genetics and 'The Bionic Woman' upgrades but she simply isn't that sort of personality. She may have the potential strength to bench-press an SUV but she would never want to cause a fuss by doing something like that. Besides, the underside of cars are dirty; she wouldn't want to touch that! :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 03 Feb 2015, 05:06
Faye has a long way to go.  One of the hardest moments in recovery is the one where you realize that even though you're not drinking, your problems are still there, including the one where you're still kind of fucked up and need to work on that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Jays on 03 Feb 2015, 05:23
I'm not the biggest fan of Faye either, but I'm a little perplexed by the hate from the last few panels.

Maybe it's the sort of friends I have myself (sarcastic and a little cynical :) ) but I saw absolutely nothing wrong with the conversation in the newest one. If anything, Faye seemed a bit gentler than usual ("Not like I didn't deserve it" instead of something more sarcastic or bitter.)

And frankly, Hanners tearing up irritated me a bit too. It's not about HER, it's about Faye, and when you're struggling to come to grips with something, the last thing you need is someone trying to set that back.

(Disclosure: I just lost my job of 17 years when the company closed our office. People from the other local offices, many of whom were sort-of friends of mine, would come in and say "We're so SORRY" and maybe get a little teary and it drove me NUTS. One, this isn't about you, you're not losing your job; two, we're all coming to grips with this ourselves, and when you come in and just remind us how YOU still have a job and how awful it all is, you really don't help. Unfair, maybe, but true.

I try, far more than Faye seems to, to be a kind, patient, empathetic person. And yet, I was right there with Faye on that last statement. (Although I probably would have kept it internal. Probably.) She doesn't need to have to reassure sad Hanners, she has her own shit to deal with.

I know many people love Hanners and hate Faye, and it's really coming across strong here. And I don't see why.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 03 Feb 2015, 05:29
Jays, thanks for putting my thoughts into words.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 03 Feb 2015, 05:30
And frankly, Hanners tearing up irritated me a bit too. It's not about HER, it's about Faye, and when you're struggling to come to grips with something, the last thing you need is someone trying to set that back.

I would have liked to see Hannelore trying to hide her reaction, to try to focus on Faye's situation. But she IS entitled to a reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: shrike1978 on 03 Feb 2015, 06:01
I gotta jump in as well and wonder about the people who say Faye is being mean to Hannelore or "taking it out on her."  I don't see it at all.  Faye is being the realist, taking responsibility for her actions and stating things as they are.  She's not directing anything at Hannelore that Hannelore didn't interject herself into.  I'm not a big Faye fan, but if anything it's Hannelore that is out of line in this one.  I know that Hanners isn't very socially aware, but you can't expect anyone in Faye's current frame of mind to react with tact, and if anything, this a good lesson for Hannelore, who has almost certainly never had to deal with anything like this before.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 03 Feb 2015, 07:03
I gotta jump in as well and wonder about the people who say Faye is being mean to Hannelore or "taking it out on her."  I don't see it at all.  Faye is being the realist, taking responsibility for her actions and stating things as they are.  She's not directing anything at Hannelore that Hannelore didn't interject herself into.  I'm not a big Faye fan, but if anything it's Hannelore that is out of line in this one.  I know that Hanners isn't very socially aware, but you can't expect anyone in Faye's current frame of mind to react with tact, and if anything, this a good lesson for Hannelore, who has almost certainly never had to deal with anything like this before.
Exactly. Hanners is getting better every day, but still has a way to go regarding her response to harsh realities. Nobody wants to hurt Hanners, but she has to face facts when needed. Faye is not in the best mood, but all things considered, I think her behavior towards Hanners is friendly enough.

With several people in the Forum disliking or hating Faye, I think it is time for a Faye fan club. Faye is my favorite character, and always has been. Of course, her physical appearance may play a role here. I tend to agree with Sven (see my sig below).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 03 Feb 2015, 07:04
So are you all this binary and unforgiving in your real-life relationships?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 03 Feb 2015, 07:05
The WCDT, where being human, or well, anything short of a perfect moral robot, will get a character criticized.

Seriously. She is in a bad mood, and she is being grumpy. I would be in a bad mood and grumpy in that situation, too. And she isn't attacking Hanners at all, she is just stating what she thinks in a grumpy tone.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 03 Feb 2015, 07:27
Yes, +1 what Jays said as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Bologna on 03 Feb 2015, 07:28
I'm chalking it all up to how much time one can spend twiddling their thumbs over such things.

There's only so much you can fit into one day's comic.  If that's all you have to work with, it's gonna be picked apart until it's bone dry.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 03 Feb 2015, 07:34
It was very kind of Dora to hold off for the insurance. I may be projecting, but perhaps Faye is reacting sarcastically because someone who she has just treated badly is now doing her a favour. It may be highlighting just how badly she screwed up, so she reacted with sarcasm as a sort of buffer. Gratitude can be intertwined with guilt very easily, especially if the recipient doesn't feel they deserve it.

As for treating Hannelore badly..I don't see it. Faye's a bit cantankerous, but she didn't say anything that didn't need to be said.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 03 Feb 2015, 07:39
As for treating Hannelore badly..I don't see it. Faye's a bit cantankerous, but she didn't say anything that didn't need to be said.

I said this in my comment above but I think Hannelore isn't upset at Faye's words but upset at the thought of Faye being around less in her day-to-day life. She enjoys interacting with Faye at CoD and losing that is losing a special part of her social interactions. Faye's final comment wasn't disgust and it wasn't anger, IMO, it was a sort of disbelief that things had escalated so quickly.

As I said, Faye's going to try to talk sense into Hannelore and end up touching on her own issues completely by chance. In all probability, the two of them will end up a hugging, blubbering mess because of the strength of the bottled-up emotion they'd just let out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Arancaytar on 03 Feb 2015, 08:09
with Marigold! (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2874)

So a plot roughly similar to Heinlein's ''All You Zombies'', involving time-travel and Beatice Chatham being the future Marigold (perhaps with the help of cosmetic surgery).

Meh.... I've heard worse.

FWIW, my headcanon has long been that Hannelore is Beatrice's clone with genetic and cybernetic upgrades to make her 'perfect'. Unfortunately, neither Dr E-C nor Ms C considered whether this tinkering would have unplanned consequences on how the child's brain would develop; Hannelore's menagerie of mental health issues is the direct result.

I have got a fan-fiction semi-planned out in my head where it turns out that Hannelore could, potentially, be a sort of super-woman given her combined 'Woman-plus' genetics and 'The Bionic Woman' upgrades but she simply isn't that sort of personality. She may have the potential strength to bench-press an SUV but she would never want to cause a fuss by doing something like that. Besides, the underside of cars are dirty; she wouldn't want to touch that! :laugh:

It's scary how plausible this is.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 03 Feb 2015, 08:18
"Quote from BenRG"

Hadn't we already established that BenRG was Jeph's mind? That's my headcanon at least.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Feb 2015, 08:35
The problem with headcanons is that you keep getting your mind blown. 





 :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 03 Feb 2015, 10:48
Oblig.

(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/new.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 03 Feb 2015, 11:45
I think that strip's partly how DSL's avatar came about.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 03 Feb 2015, 11:48
IIRC, that xkcd strip was after DSL got his avatar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Feb 2015, 11:59
A boosted Hannelore would explain some incidents where she's moved faster than anyone expected.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 03 Feb 2015, 12:49
Seriously. She is in a bad mood, and she is being grumpy.

And very possibly in a fair amount of physical pain as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 03 Feb 2015, 12:55

I know many people love Hanners and hate Faye, and it's really coming across strong here. And I don't see why.

Because Hanners is innocent, naive and somewhat childlike.

Understand, I'm not in the "hate Faye" contingent. I totally get where she is. She's so miserable she's snapping at HANNELORE, and that's got to be pretty danged miserable.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 03 Feb 2015, 13:59

FWIW, my headcanon has long been that Hannelore is Beatrice's clone with genetic and cybernetic upgrades to make her 'perfect'. Unfortunately, neither Dr E-C nor Ms C considered whether this tinkering would have unplanned consequences on how the child's brain would develop; Hannelore's menagerie of mental health issues is the direct result.


That makes her sound sort of like a QC version of Sylia Stingray.  (The 2032 version.  I watched I think a grand total of two episodes of 2040 before bailing.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Feb 2015, 15:19

That makes her sound sort of like a QC version of Sylia Stingray.  (The 2032 version.  I watched I think a grand total of two episodes of 2040 before bailing.)

More fool you then
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 16:41

I know many people love Hanners and hate Faye, and it's really coming across strong here. And I don't see why.

Because Hanners is innocent, naive and somewhat childlike.

Understand, I'm not in the "hate Faye" contingent. I totally get where she is. She's so miserable she's snapping at HANNELORE, and that's got to be pretty danged miserable.

I don't hate Faye either, but she really does need to be careful. Hanners gives as good as she gets...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 03 Feb 2015, 16:54
IIRC, that xkcd strip was after DSL got his avatar.

I think RM and I were operating independently of one another. My previous head-cannon avatar was a riff on a Pintsize quote.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 03 Feb 2015, 17:44
Yeah, I gotta chime in that I don't see this as Faye being mean or bitchy. I think the 3rd panel line is a straightforward, firm way to be clear how she feels about the situation to avoid getting to the point where mean words are exchanged.

Maybe that has failed and she will go too far in the next comic, but for now I can't really fault her for feeling shitty and speaking in short sentences.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 03 Feb 2015, 18:07
I understand that Hannelore is naive, but it doesn't mean that Faye isn't allowed to put her foot down against shitty behavior.

Hanners got things to learn too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 03 Feb 2015, 18:13
I do think this is hard for Hanners. She has obviously spent a lot of time trying to build a stable life for herself, taking carefully calculated risks to expand what she can handle. People in her life experiencing crises, like breakups or hospital visits, are outside the realm of things she can consciously prepare herself to adapt to.

However, part of her learning and growing process is to learn that some things can't be idealistically pieced back together, and sometimes friends are short with you when you are helping them in times of trouble. Hanners needs to realize that Faye is not angry with her, but angry with the situation she is in.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 03 Feb 2015, 18:26
Joss Whedon once said that if he wanted to make the audience cry, he'd have Alyson Hannigan cry. In Hannelore, Jeph has a similar means of breaking hearts.

I don't think Faye's being actively mean here, it's more about Hanners being averse to change, and more than a bit naive (which is true to her character). Hanners getting this upset is unfortunate, and perhaps Faye could've put it more gently, but she's understandably not feeling too good herself and as TRVA said, it's a difficult lesson than Hanners needs to learn. Things can't get resolved with a fingersnap, or by asking really nicely.

That said...if we're going to ease up on Faye for being imperfect and human, that same courtesy should extend to Dora. Both are divisive characters and understandably disliked by groups within the fanbase (with some overlap from fans who dislike both characters), but it feels like the goalposts are constantly being moved with Dora, in an effort to blame her for what's happened to Faye, or criticise her handling of the situation.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Feb 2015, 18:28
@TRVA123, I agree, treating Hanners like she's a china doll is not going to do her any good. I can understand where some of the naivety of hers is coming from and why she might hope for a perfect world. A perfect world she wouldn't be as messed up as she is (I've always liked Hanners and yeah, she's made some pretty big strides, but she is still something of a wreck). The problem, as we all know, is there is no such thing as a perfect world. Hanners needs to realise that so she has some sort of a chance to learn to adapt to that. People constantly backpedalling because they're afraid of making her sad....that's going to do more harm than good in the long run.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 03 Feb 2015, 18:39
Joss Whedon once said that if he wanted to make the audience cry, he'd have Alyson Hannigan cry.

Joss Whedon is a monster.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Feb 2015, 18:55
The litany of Whedon's literary crimes is long indeed, but this isn't really the place to go into that particular topic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 19:09
Honestly, I read it as Hanners being upset that Faye would no longer be there at CoD, not at Faye's snapping at her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 03 Feb 2015, 19:23
Honestly, I read it as Hanners being upset that Faye would no longer be there at CoD, not at Faye's snapping at her.

Agreed.  Given Hanners' reaction to Marten going to Secret Bakery after breaking up with Dora, she was going to be extremely upset, and now both Faye and Dora have made it clear that Faye coming back to CoD as an employee is Not Gonna Happen.  Faye could have gone completely OOC and wrapped it in chocolate frosting with a cherry on top, Hanners was still going to be devastated by the change in her life.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 19:34
Honestly, I read it as Hanners being upset that Faye would no longer be there at CoD, not at Faye's snapping at her.

Agreed.  Given Hanners' reaction to Marten going to Secret Bakery after breaking up with Dora, she was going to be extremely upset, and now both Faye and Dora have made it clear that Faye coming back to CoD as an employee is Not Gonna Happen.  Faye could have gone completely OOC and wrapped it in chocolate frosting with a cherry on top, Hanners was still going to be devastated by the change in her life.

Indeed. And we've seen how Hanners reacts to her friends being dicks, and it isn't teary - it's duck and cover. There's a comic that illustrates this, iirc, I just need to remember what the art style looked like so that I can properly troll the archives for it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 03 Feb 2015, 19:38
Joss Whedon once said that if he wanted to make the audience cry, he'd have Alyson Hannigan cry. In Hannelore, Jeph has a similar means of breaking hearts.

Alyson Hanners-gan
 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 20:05
Honestly, I read it as Hanners being upset that Faye would no longer be there at CoD, not at Faye's snapping at her.

Agreed.  Given Hanners' reaction to Marten going to Secret Bakery after breaking up with Dora, she was going to be extremely upset, and now both Faye and Dora have made it clear that Faye coming back to CoD as an employee is Not Gonna Happen.  Faye could have gone completely OOC and wrapped it in chocolate frosting with a cherry on top, Hanners was still going to be devastated by the change in her life.

Indeed. And we've seen how Hanners reacts to her friends being dicks, and it isn't teary - it's duck and cover. There's a comic that illustrates this, iirc, I just need to remember what the art style looked like so that I can properly troll the archives for it.

Hot Damn! Found it! That didn't take as long as I thought it would. And it is, indeed, Hanners dealing with Faye being snarky with her:

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1108

On a side note, going through pages, it's mentioned A LOT that Faye shouldn't drink so much, by a myriad of characters.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 03 Feb 2015, 20:11
I think I'm on record for not being a Faye fan... but yeah, she isn't being mean to Hanners. She's just talking. Not even venting, really.

OmegaEntity has it right in re Hanner's tears.

I think we all just have a little too much time to overthink these strips sometimes...  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 20:13
Honestly, I read it as Hanners being upset that Faye would no longer be there at CoD, not at Faye's snapping at her.

Yeah, it's not Faye she's upset with. She's upset that her routine, and the sense of safety that goes with it, has been upended. Faye's reaction, meantime, seems like the reaction I'd expect from someone who's pretty burnt out facing down their own issues and doesn't quite have the energy at the moment to deal with someone else's.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 03 Feb 2015, 20:17
The litany of Whedon's literary crimes is long indeed, but this isn't really the place to go into that particular topic.

52 page thread, with several dozen forum members getting banned.  Yeah, not a good idea.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 21:14
No comic tonight? My page isn't showing the Twitter feed, so I'm kinda out of the loop...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 21:14
Also, looking back, it's amazing how Hanners has evolved through the strip. Her OCD seemed like more of an afterthought with her at the beginning. Was that chalked up to different medication, maybe?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 03 Feb 2015, 21:15
Hot Damn! Found it! That didn't take as long as I thought it would. And it is, indeed, Hanners dealing with Faye being snarky with her:

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1108

On a side note, going through pages, it's mentioned A LOT that Faye shouldn't drink so much, by a myriad of characters.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2682 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2682)

Also looks like Hanner's more recent outburst was also triggered partly by Faye's drinking.

Although Hanners hides it well, she might have very little patience for her friends indulging in behavior they KNOW is destructive.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 21:20
Yep, I came across that one too in my troll, lol. The one I posted simply seemed more apt and specific  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 21:22
Also, looking back, it's amazing how Hanners has evolved through the strip. Her OCD seemed like more of an afterthought with her at the beginning. Was that chalked up to different medication, maybe?

Yes. Can't remember the strip, but Marten remarks about the long hair and cigarettes, and Hanners specifically chalks it up to the meds.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Feb 2015, 21:27
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1046
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 03 Feb 2015, 21:32
Ah, that's right. Thanks!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: maxh on 03 Feb 2015, 21:33
(click to show/hide)

No comic tonight? My page isn't showing the Twitter feed, so I'm kinda out of the loop...
Eh, give it time. As for Twitter, you're not missing much now; he hasn't posted in the past six hours.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 03 Feb 2015, 21:35
The litany of Whedon's literary crimes is long indeed, but this isn't really the place to go into that particular topic.

52 page thread, with several dozen forum members getting banned.  Yeah, not a good idea.

Ah...I wasn't aware that he was such a contentious issue. Truth be told, I've never actually seen much of his work, but I am a fan of Alyson Hannigan and had heard about that comment in passing; it seemed an apt comparison, given what the sight of Hanners crying in QC does to us as the audience. Anyway, apologies for bringing him up, as I said I wasn't aware of the history there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 03 Feb 2015, 21:39
Well that was unexpected change.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Spiritz on 03 Feb 2015, 21:40
Damn it!

2890 is up instead of 2889... now I have nothing to look toward tomorrow >_<
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 03 Feb 2015, 21:40
New comic.

(click to show/hide)

ACTUAL new comic:

Good for Marten for clarifying.  Good for Faye for taking it as it was meant.

[edited because the original comment talked about Thursday's comic unspoilered]
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 03 Feb 2015, 21:41
I can't see anything.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 03 Feb 2015, 21:42
Apparently friday's comic appeared in the front page for a split second. I can't see today's comic yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 21:42
So, wait... 2890 is up but not 2889? 2890 is adorable, though.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 03 Feb 2015, 21:43
I guess the site is having a slight breakdown...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 03 Feb 2015, 21:45
it IS quite a creepy combination. No comic, the ominous "never" from Jeph. No twitter feed...and dord
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 03 Feb 2015, 21:47
Ok, it's up now.

Now the "never" makes sense.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 03 Feb 2015, 21:47
On 2890:
(click to show/hide)

Edit: I posted this before seeing 2889.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 03 Feb 2015, 21:52
Warning - while you were dording 2 new dords have been dorded. You may wish to review your dord.

2889 is up. Faye really does look tired, and a nice backtrack/clarification from Marten.

(click to show/hide)

Dord - dord dord dord dording 2 dord redords dord dord dorded. Dord dord dord dord dord dord dord.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 03 Feb 2015, 21:54
I hope that's a new couch Marten's sitting on. :-\

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to examine your couch's cleanliness.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Feb 2015, 21:54
Faye looked more at ease in the last panel than in a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 03 Feb 2015, 21:56
Given the content of 2890 and the recent influx of new people, I'm just going to leave this here:

On Discussion of Private Parts https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Feb 2015, 22:16
Amen to that Marten, amen to that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 03 Feb 2015, 22:21
Secret mystery comic.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 03 Feb 2015, 22:32
Nice to get a couple of happy strips.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CasAttack on 03 Feb 2015, 22:36
Reading through here, I'm now immensely confused and sad I missed the preemptive thing that thinged.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CaptainFish on 03 Feb 2015, 22:47
Reading through here, I'm now immensely confused and sad I missed the preemptive thing that thinged.

Maybe try some comic url manipulation. :P
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 03 Feb 2015, 22:47
Marten has wonderfully illustrated something here:

Sentiment always comes before logic, but logic always catches up to sentiment. One is the sprint, the other the marathon.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 03 Feb 2015, 23:16
GAH! I want to comment on 2890, but I don't think this forum can handle the amount of spoiler tags I'd need!  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 03 Feb 2015, 23:24
 I think what Marten said also illustrates, in a comedic way, the shift in Marten's thinking away from his enabling behavior. Or at least I hope it does.

Also, I really should have learned my lesson by now about clicking spoiler tags after the 5 billionth time that I've regretted it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 03 Feb 2015, 23:32
To me, the title of strip 2889 and the news postscript are both messages from Jeph. I think that he underestimated how much that this arc would affect him personally. It's been sort of emotionally draining and he's hoping never to have to address it again. Still, characters can get away from you sometimes.

(click to show/hide)

Sorry, normally, I have more self-control, but I had to mention the early post today!

It's my feeling that the next steps for Faye will happen in parallel to another arc rather than be the focus.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 03 Feb 2015, 23:38
Faye's situation seems to be a lot less dire than I would have expected - I wonder if this is because Jeph wants to move on to happier things, or if this is just a temporary improvement.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hakko504 on 03 Feb 2015, 23:46
2889:

I loved Martens clumsy attempt at reassuring Faye.

2890:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 00:07
2890 made me tear up with joy.  I'll have more - much more - to say at the appropriate time. 

Makes me thing there's going to be YB for Friday, though.  I mean, where do you go from there? 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: McH on 04 Feb 2015, 00:16
I'm impressed with Marten's tactful way of telling Faye to not pull shit like that whilst not letting it come off cross. Not quite reassured that Faye's also on the track to recovery. As many, I do not think she's being mean or anything. Just cranky, hurting and dealing with the realization that she f*cked up in a bad way.

I think it's very good for plot development that we're at least not going on the route where Faye comes back to CoD and everyone lives angstily ever after. Curious to see what direction Jeph will take that particular part, but I'm hoping it involves art.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: maxh on 04 Feb 2015, 00:31
2890 made me tear up with joy.  I'll have more - much more - to say at the appropriate time. 

Makes me thing there's going to be YB for Friday, though.  I mean, where do you go from there?
QC MMDCCCXCI: Behind Closed Doors
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 04 Feb 2015, 00:43
2890 made me tear up with joy.  I'll have more - much more - to say at the appropriate time. 

Makes me thing there's going to be YB for Friday, though.  I mean, where do you go from there?
QC MMDCCCXCI: Behind Closed Doors

If only Jeph would do like David Willis and make a Slipshine story...  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 04 Feb 2015, 00:52
I hope that's a new couch Marten's sitting on. :-\
No, it is the same couch (I doubt they would get an identical one). But Marten is sitting on the non-puked (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2881) side. I guess they have flipped the cushion on the other side (again). Of course, they must address the issue eventually (Hanners has for a long time refused to sit in that couch).

As for today's strip, another good Faye/Marten interaction. They really are best friends. But where is Pintsize? Sleeping? Do robots sleep (and dream of electric sheep (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Androids_Dream_of_Electric_Sheep%3F))? Or is he still powered down by Faye? Is that a crime, unless it is planned maintenance or upgrade? I can understand why Faye and Marten might want to get rid of him for a while, I just want to question the legality.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 00:58
Oh dear.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 04 Feb 2015, 01:15
2890 made me tear up with joy.  I'll have more - much more - to say at the appropriate time. 

Makes me thing there's going to be YB for Friday, though.  I mean, where do you go from there?

I have had some thoughts about that in this post (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30376.msg1294202.html#msg1294202).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 04 Feb 2015, 03:38
And seems that Jeph took 2890 down, as URL manipulation does nothing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 04 Feb 2015, 04:07
Oh dear.

(click to show/hide)

Come on now. Jeph wouldn't do that shit.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 04 Feb 2015, 04:11
I'm kind of glad I didn't see 2890 yet, because the Claire/Marten storyline does nothing for me. I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

Faye: wow, I would have expected a lot more bad mood from her, but she's thankful and nice. Puts the interaction with Hanners in a different light, too, since she just seems unhappy and not mean-spirited or anything, as a few posters before have pointed out (thank you - I always like how you guys can change my perspective with well-placed arguments)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Feb 2015, 04:21
I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

You take the view that happy stories are boring, and only ones with conflict are worthwhile, do you?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: anahata on 04 Feb 2015, 04:23
Faye: wow, I would have expected a lot more bad mood from her, but she's thankful and nice.

So far. I wonder how she'll be when she hasn't had a drink for a week... a fortnight... a month...
Or next time something stressful happens to her, for which job-hunting will provide plenty of opportunities.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 04 Feb 2015, 05:09
I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

You take the view that happy stories are boring, and only ones with conflict are worthwhile, do you?

No, I like happy stories, but compare with how Tai and Dora got together - they actually talked. Their first date? They told each other stuff about themselves, interesting stuff. It was still happy, but it engaged me instead of just thinking: oh, another wasted page of Marten and Claire being all bumbly around each other. yaaaay.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 04 Feb 2015, 05:18
Because, you know, Claire hasn't told Marten about herself at all (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2323), and Marten hasn't told Claire about his passions while on a date with her (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2323).

Never.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 05:21
Look, people who barely know each other need to tell each other about themselves. 

People who've worked together for quite a while - several months so far at least - and are friends who have already talked several times get to revel in each other's company instead. 

I'd say it's just realistic. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 04 Feb 2015, 05:25
Another thing to consider is that we already know Marten pretty well, as he's the main character, and is pretty open about his history. Showing him telling Claire about himself (except for a little bit so that it feels natural) isn't that interesting, because it's telling the reader something they already know.

Conversely, Dora's history... we know a fair amount of her personality and her history with men, and we know she's bi, but before she actually started dating Tai, we didn't know much at all about her history with women. There was more of Dora's story to tell.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 04 Feb 2015, 05:36
Nothing wrong with how Marten/Claire are becoming ... more than friends/co-workers. It's just that Tai/Dora got itself an extra serving of greatness when Tai stepped out of her clumsy-puppy-love persona to try to kick down some of Dora's insecurity wall. In the vernacular of The Site That Will Ruin Your Life, that in my mind was Tai's Moment of Awesome.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 04 Feb 2015, 06:07
I hope that's a new couch Marten's sitting on. :-\

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to examine your couch's cleanliness.
I may be a bit Hanneloreish, but my first thought on seeing today's comic was how Marten can stand to sit on that couch now. Though it is important to note he's sitting on the right side of the couch. The left side is the puked side.

Oh, and I haven't seen tomorrow's comic yet. The glitch seems to have been fixed before I woke up.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Feb 2015, 06:14
I hope that's a new couch Marten's sitting on. :-\

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to examine your couch's cleanliness.
I may be a bit Hanneloreish, but my first thought on seeing today's comic was how Marten can stand to sit on that couch now.

I'm agreeing completely.

And I missed the new comic.  :-(
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 04 Feb 2015, 06:22
Faye: wow, I would have expected a lot more bad mood from her, but she's thankful and nice.

So far. I wonder how she'll be when she hasn't had a drink for a week... a fortnight... a month...
Or next time something stressful happens to her, for which job-hunting will provide plenty of opportunities.

I think she would have been detoxed at the hospital, but yes I agree the next stressor.

One thing that her dialoge tells me is that this probally wasn't a suicide attempt. Most of the people I know who have tried suicide have been much, much more angry at the person who stopped them, at least initially.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ankhtahr on 04 Feb 2015, 06:30
I'm glad I didn't see the comic. This way I can still get a comic tomorrow. I always look at the comic, if it's available early, and am always sad the next day.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 04 Feb 2015, 06:33
I... found it.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Jays on 04 Feb 2015, 06:42
I agree with posters who said that Hannelore wasn't upset with Faye "snapping" at her, but at the idea of Faye not being at CoD. :) I don't blame Hanners for her reaction. I just think I might have reacted to it the same way Faye did.

Missed the early comic. Grr.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 04 Feb 2015, 06:55
Because, you know, Claire hasn't told Marten about herself at all (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2323), and Marten hasn't told Claire about his passions while on a date with her (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2323).

Never.

You linked to the coming-out-strip twice, but I hope you know what I mean?  we have at least 10 comics or so where both of them don't do anything else than being all into each other and cute. 2-3 comics about that is fine, but.. really? Tai and Dora talked about her coming-out, about Tai's bullying in school, that kind of stuff. On their date.
The coming-out of Claire was long before they started dating, and Marten liking metal wasn't anything new

Look, people who barely know each other need to tell each other about themselves. 

People who've worked together for quite a while - several months so far at least - and are friends who have already talked several times get to revel in each other's company instead. 

I'd say it's just realistic. 

Yeah, it is, and it's fine, actually, but the 'screentime' it gets bothers me. We saw Corsette and Steve's first date, because it was funny and very character-defining for her, but we didn't see all of them because that would have been boring. We saw Tai and Dora's first, and at least one in between, but not the few that followed - it wouldn't have been interesting.  We get told EVERYTHING with Marten and Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 04 Feb 2015, 07:06
Swapna; Yeah, I agree with you.

Marten and Claire are together, I am very happy about that and they seem well adjusted. But I've gotten my squees out of my system and I would rather see more of the three or four other ongoing plotlines.

Now, if Marten and Claire do something new, have an interesting conversation, etc... I would be happy to see that. It doesn't even have to be conflict. Hell, I would be happy hearing more Claire backstory, or a discussion about what they consent to sexually. just something with more substance than them being cute together. Its not like I want them to have a fight or anything, they can be happy and interesting at the same time.

I also haven't seen tomorrows comic, I am interested to see Claire's take on the Faye situation.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 04 Feb 2015, 07:33
I also missed the early comic, but from the sound of it, it may have been a good thing.  Can't wait until Marten and Claire settle into the "good friends who cuddle and fuck" stage, and start acting normal around each other again. 

More generally, I've found myself increasingly frustrated with the MOAR DRAMA contingent on the forum. 

The "Never Again"  caption on 2889 seems to say to me not only that Marten is setting boundaries, but we're not going to see Faye hit such a low point again in the strip.  Not to say that she might slip up and get drunk again, but that she's going to for the most part be on a general recovery path.  This not only keeps with Jeph's own experience with drinking, but also fits with Jeph not being really comfortable with high drama in his comic for long periods.  The strip has no antagonist, and none of the main characters get the crap kicked out of them steadily for years of comic time.  I don't think Jeph has it in him to write that sort of comic - he is attached to his characters, and not a sadist. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 04 Feb 2015, 08:39
I also missed the early comic, but from the sound of it, it may have been a good thing.  Can't wait until Marten and Claire settle into the "good friends who cuddle and fuck" stage, and start acting normal around each other again. 

More generally, I've found myself increasingly frustrated with the MOAR DRAMA contingent on the forum. 

The "Never Again"  caption on 2889 seems to say to me not only that Marten is setting boundaries, but we're not going to see Faye hit such a low point again in the strip.  Not to say that she might slip up and get drunk again, but that she's going to for the most part be on a general recovery path.  This not only keeps with Jeph's own experience with drinking, but also fits with Jeph not being really comfortable with high drama in his comic for long periods.  The strip has no antagonist, and none of the main characters get the crap kicked out of them steadily for years of comic time.  I don't think Jeph has it in him to write that sort of comic - he is attached to his characters, and not a sadist.

Agreed, all that is left is the answer to what happened to Pintsize, likely turned off but there is just enough ambiguity in how he was detected to make me and a few other wonder (and he has been shown to have been rattled after an impact to the wall despite the mil grade body, I forget which comic it was)

 And I think my computer is possessed as it's autocorrect tried to render Pintsize that in a way that would have made Pintsize proud. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 04 Feb 2015, 09:14
And seems that Jeph took 2890 down, as URL manipulation does nothing.

I wonder if there's some reason behind this since he doesn't normally do that when this happens, once it's out there it's out there. I wonder if he's changing anything or wants to set it up first.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Feb 2015, 09:28
The course of true love never runs smooth. Claire's insecurities and Marten's low level of ambition may cause plenty of drama ahead. I'm happy to savor the squeeee in the meantime.

Anyway, "you're cute when you're reasonable" was a line worth sitting through some amount of boredom for.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 10:03
Everything isn't all drama all the time. Whether it's a story or real life, people need time and space to step away from everything, take a deep breath, and just be. As IICIH mentions, there'll be time for drama later. Maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but to me one barometer (among many) of a healthy relationship is the avoidance of unnecessary drama. My prediction for the short term? Marten probably hasn't slept a wink since finding Faye on the couch; he'll be out before his head hits the pillow.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 04 Feb 2015, 12:06
I missed something?


Damn.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 04 Feb 2015, 12:47
And seems that Jeph took 2890 down, as URL manipulation does nothing.

I wonder if there's some reason behind this since he doesn't normally do that when this happens, once it's out there it's out there. I wonder if he's changing anything or wants to set it up first.

If you look that archive numbering is a bit screwed up at top. He might have taken it down to fix and issue with the site given that this is the second time in a row its happened.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 04 Feb 2015, 13:44
Everything isn't all drama all the time. Whether it's a story or real life, people need time and space to step away from everything, take a deep breath, and just be. As IICIH mentions, there'll be time for drama later. Maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but to me one barometer (among many) of a healthy relationship is the avoidance of unnecessary drama.

True, but there isn't really a reason to show us that, is there? I assume Penny and Will are completely happy and maintaining their relationship well, mostly because we havent' checked in on them in a long time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 04 Feb 2015, 14:00
Heh, now cue two weeks of Wil and Penelope doing something, like trying to get some of his poetry published, and the ensuing hijinks.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 14:13
Everything isn't all drama all the time. Whether it's a story or real life, people need time and space to step away from everything, take a deep breath, and just be. As IICIH mentions, there'll be time for drama later. Maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but to me one barometer (among many) of a healthy relationship is the avoidance of unnecessary drama.

True, but there isn't really a reason to show us that, is there? I assume Penny and Will are completely happy and maintaining their relationship well, mostly because we havent' checked in on them in a long time.

The flip side of that, though, is the degree of connection to the rest of the cast. Penelope isn't really close to any of the main cast. Sure, she works at CoD, but even Dora seems to forget that from time to time. For his part, Wil's really only connected to Sven (who we haven't seen) and otherwise only shows up when the story calls for beer and fancy clothes. Sure, we don't have to see every last time Penelope gets angry at Wil for leaving the seat up, but it's also not like they're close enough to anybody else to figure much in their stories except as window dressing.

Marten, on the other hand, has connections to the whole main cast (he is, after all, the comic's protagonist), and Claire is connected not only to Marten, but also the gang at the library, plus Clinton. Clinton aside, she's good friends with several of the people she's met. In other words, their relationship could be smooth sailing for the remainder of the strip* and there'd still be plenty of reason to feature both of them, since they'd presumably have an interest in what goes on in their friends' lives, and they offer support where they can.

*Not that I foresee it playing out that way, or think that it should, mind you.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 04 Feb 2015, 14:23
This might be a good opportunity to take a breath and check-in on the various storylines happening right now in the Q.C. universe. Faye has been on our minds a lot lately (for obvious reasons) and it seems like tomorrow's comic might be some more development of Marten and Claire's relationship. So here is my list, submitted with permission:

- Faye: what happens next post-Angus, post-CoD, and after her stay in hospital?
- Marten and Claire’s relationship development
- How will Dora reconcile with Faye? What about Sven?
- What happened to Pintsize?
- Sven's unrequited pining of Faye
- Veronica possibly moving to Northampton to be with Jim
- Emily and Clinton
- Pintsize and Winslow Kickstarter shenanigans
- Hannelore's new nemesis: Juicy
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 14:34
Marten and Claire are together, I am very happy about that and they seem well adjusted. But I've gotten my squees out of my system


No, you haven't.  Not yet. 


Trust me. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 14:35
This might be a good opportunity to take a breath and check-in on the various storylines happening right now in the Q.C. universe. Faye has been on our minds a lot lately (for obvious reasons) and it seems like tomorrow's comic might be some more development of Marten and Claire's relationship. So here is my list, submitted with permission:

- Faye: what happens next post-Angus, post-CoD, and after her stay in hospital?
- Marten and Claire’s relationship development
- How will Dora reconcile with Faye? What about Sven?
- What happened to Pintsize?
- Sven's unrequited pining of Faye
- Veronica possibly moving to Northampton to be with Jim
- Emily and Clinton
- Pintsize and Winslow Kickstarter shenanigans
- Hannelore's new nemesis: Juicy

Two questions:
1. I thought Veronica had already moved?
2. How long has it been (in-comic) since Sven's "confession"?

I don't have the same hatred of Sven that a lot of people on the boards seem to... I think that if Dora gives him a good talking to about Faye's life of late, he could actually be helpful, or at least try to be. Whether that's the best thing for Faye, of course, is something else again.

I think that Juicy might be like the Emergency Bourbon... a one-off gag that'll bring up endless speculation every time someone who looks even vaguely like her pops up in the strip.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 04 Feb 2015, 14:45
Marten and Claire are together, I am very happy about that and they seem well adjusted. But I've gotten my squees out of my system
No, you haven't.  Not yet. 

Trust me.

Man, how bad a fanboy do I have to be that just reading you TALKING about the squee makes me wanna squee.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 04 Feb 2015, 15:03
I'm kind of glad I didn't see 2890 yet, because the Claire/Marten storyline does nothing for me. I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

I'm in the same boat. The date comics and a lot of their interactions are just a bit too cutesy and saccharine for my tastes. That's not to say I want every conversation to be deep, or for the strip to be filled with nothing but drama, but I'd just like something to cut through the treacle, as it were. As I said, it's just a bit too much for my tastes.

That said, I'm obviously in the minority, so I don't want to be a grumpy malcontent who rains on everyone else's parade. So for those who do love it and can't help but squee...right on, by all means enjoy the hell out of it! We'll just have to agree to disagree on its appeal and awesomeness.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 04 Feb 2015, 15:14
I'm kind of glad I didn't see 2890 yet, because the Claire/Marten storyline does nothing for me. I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

I'm in the same boat. The date comics and a lot of their interactions are just a bit too cutesy and saccharine for my tastes. That's not to say I want every conversation to be deep, or for the strip to be filled with nothing but drama, but I'd just like something to cut through the treacle, as it were. As I said, it's just a bit too much for my tastes.

That said, I'm obviously in the minority, so I don't want to be a grumpy malcontent who rains on everyone else's parade. So for those who do love it and can't help but squee...right on, by all means enjoy the hell out of it! We'll just have to agree to disagree on its appeal and awesomeness.

You said it better than I would have.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 15:25

- Veronica possibly moving to Northampton to be with Jim


Two questions:
1. I thought Veronica had already moved?
2. How long has it been (in-comic) since Sven's "confession"?

1. She has already moved, yes. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2832) Her apartment is on Main Street, as I recall. Couldn't find the exact strip for that. Found it. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2718)
2. Immediately after second callback (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2739) Click a few pages.

I'm kind of glad I didn't see 2890 yet, because the Claire/Marten storyline does nothing for me. I've even started to dislike Marten because he's so utterly boring around Claire.

I'm in the same boat. The date comics and a lot of their interactions are just a bit too cutesy and saccharine for my tastes. That's not to say I want every conversation to be deep, or for the strip to be filled with nothing but drama, but I'd just like something to cut through the treacle, as it were. As I said, it's just a bit too much for my tastes.

That said, I'm obviously in the minority, so I don't want to be a grumpy malcontent who rains on everyone else's parade. So for those who do love it and can't help but squee...right on, by all means enjoy the hell out of it! We'll just have to agree to disagree on its appeal and awesomeness.

Count me in the minority dinghy. I mean, I like the relationship well enough, and it has some intriguing aspects that hopefully we'll get some insight on. It's the ridiculously over-the-top gummy gumdrops, rainbows and unicorns aspect that just makes me... ugh. And this coming from someone who reads corny romance novels in her space time.

Warning - while you were typing your diabeetus became more severe. You may want to up your dosage of insulin.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 15:29
It's still in its early stages.  A lot of relationships start out like that.  Bitter recriminations happen shortly after marriage.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 04 Feb 2015, 16:50
It's still in its early stages.  A lot of relationships start out like that.  Bitter recriminations happen shortly after marriage.

Yup! You've got to get to know someone before you can really hurt them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 17:24
Jeph's depiction of Claire's anxiety while waiting for Marten to make a move on her was quietly brilliant, but I agree with ASB84 and Omega that the date arc was tedious and saccharine, and a missed chance for these characters to open up to each other. Claire still feels sketchy and unlayered to me and the relationship with Marten isn't developing her so far.

2890 feels awkward, because while I can totally buy that passionate makeouts are Marten's place of comfort right now, it's harder for me to imagine what's going through the profoundly libidinous-inexperienced-maybe-dysphoric Claire's mind. The fact that we aren't given a lot of insight makes her makes her seem more like Marten's stress-ball than an independent person here.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 04 Feb 2015, 17:50

- Veronica possibly moving to Northampton to be with Jim


Two questions:
1. I thought Veronica had already moved?
2. How long has it been (in-comic) since Sven's "confession"?

1. She has already moved, yes. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2832) Her apartment is on Main Street, as I recall. Couldn't find the exact strip for that. Found it. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2718)
2. Immediately after second callback (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2739) Click a few pages.

Ah, yes. Thanks for catching that!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 04 Feb 2015, 18:05
2890 feels awkward, because while I can totally buy that passionate makeouts are Marten's place of comfort right now, it's harder for me to imagine what's going through the profoundly libidinous-inexperienced-maybe-dysphoric Claire's mind. The fact that we aren't given a lot of insight makes her makes her seem more like Marten's stress-ball than an independent person here.

I'm not sure if it's intentional or simply a symptom of so many concurrent plot lines, but I've noticed these sorts of holes appearing more and more often in the narrative.  Maybe holes is too strong a word, but the best I can come up with besides that is 'places where the reader is forced to draw their own conclusions, because it's not addressed in the story.'
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 18:14
I have nothing against subtext when it's used carefully. I don't want everything to be spelled out! But Claire's first sexual relationship should be a pivotal moment in her life and I think these moments should be at least as much about her as they are about Marten and Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 04 Feb 2015, 18:34
Can we just not discuss comics that aren't technically up yet and some of us have not had a chance, or ability, to read.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 18:37
I've seen it, but yeah, it make sense to at least spoiler it.  Once can always edit it back after the comic goes live properly.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: wlewisiii on 04 Feb 2015, 18:40
I have nothing against subtext when it's used carefully. I don't want everything to be spelled out! But Claire's first sexual relationship should be a pivotal moment in her life and I think these moments should be at least as much about her as they are about Marten and Faye.

While trying to avoid playing spoiler,
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 04 Feb 2015, 18:43
I think there's a difference between spelling everything out and leaving the reader to wonder how something happened (or if).  One of the hardest things about using subtext is knowing when it's coming across - I agree that the subtlety of Claire falling for Marten was pretty well done, but even though I have a pet theory that works for me, there's nothing at all before Marten puts his hands in Claire's hair that indicates he thinks of her as anything more than a friend.  Hell, even as he was doing it, he appeared to be surprised that Faye was leaving the room. 

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 19:01
I have nothing against subtext when it's used carefully. I don't want everything to be spelled out! But Claire's first sexual relationship should be a pivotal moment in her life and I think these moments should be at least as much about her as they are about Marten and Faye.
Wasn't this her first relationship, period? I mean, she had to ask when asking for a second date was appropriate. This all is going waaaay too fast if that's true, especially considering Claire's, shall we say, unique circumstances.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 19:22
2890 feels awkward, because while I can totally buy that passionate makeouts are Marten's place of comfort right now, it's harder for me to imagine what's going through the profoundly libidinous-inexperienced-maybe-dysphoric Claire's mind. The fact that we aren't given a lot of insight makes her makes her seem more like Marten's stress-ball than an independent person here.

I'm not sure if it's intentional or simply a symptom of so many concurrent plot lines, but I've noticed these sorts of holes appearing more and more often in the narrative.  Maybe holes is too strong a word, but the best I can come up with besides that is 'places where the reader is forced to draw their own conclusions, because it's not addressed in the story.'

It's also worth noting that there was a shift in the storytelling that accompanied the last change in the art; Jeph moved from less "telling" and more "showing." In the same way that the art has taken some time to settle in each time it's changed, I think that a stylistic shift in the storytelling would take a similar period of adjustment, especially when you're going from a very talky style to one that's a bit more minimalist. The number of dangling plot threads -- they're getting to be more like a fringe, or maybe tassels at this point -- likely isn't helping things any.

April, I understand your concerns, but I may be reading this a bit differently; for one thing, we might be jumping the gun a bit assuming sexytimes at this point; for another, we haven't seen anything either explicit or implied that suggests that Claire's giving up any of her agency in this situation. She's there of her own volition, but more to the point, Marten's kept the focus very much on her by taking his cues from her comfort level and needs.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 19:27
we haven't seen anything either explicit or implied that suggests that Claire's giving up any of her agency in this situation.

I don't think she's being exploited, I'm just saying that I know exactly what is going through Marten's head in that scene and I can barely guess what Claire is thinking or feeling. That feels off.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 04 Feb 2015, 19:28
Okay, today's comic is finally up.

I have to say I'm surprised people squeed, because there's nothing cute in it besides Claire's puppy-dog face in the first frame.  It might be steamy, but it isn't endearing.  Frankly, the hint of tongue in the kiss is kinda nauseating.  Just IMHO, but semi or entirely open mouth kissing is one of those things which may be fun to do, but is pretty gross to see. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 19:30
An inevitability of their character designs, since neither Claire nor Marten have lips to lock.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 04 Feb 2015, 19:32
An inevitability of their character designs, since neither Claire nor Marten have lips to lock.

True enough.  Every time they kiss I also think about their sharp, jutting chins jabbing into each other.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 04 Feb 2015, 19:34
Okay, today's comic is finally up.

I have to say I'm surprised people squeed, because there's nothing cute in it besides Claire's puppy-dog face in the first frame.  It might be steamy, but it isn't endearing.  Frankly, the hint of tongue in the kiss is kinda nauseating.  Just IMHO, but semi or entirely open mouth kissing is one of those things which may be fun to do, but is pretty gross to see.
Just going by avatars, I'd expect AprilArcus to be the one saying this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2590).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Feb 2015, 19:35
There's more to the whole thing than what we see. Kinda like that blackout comic from last week.

Three things I'm assuming happened between 2887 and 2890:

1. Marten called Claire and told her about Faye, and that he had to get the booze out of the apartment.
2. He then likely called her once Faye got home, and the apartment was de-boozed.
3. She asked if he still wanted her to come over "for some comforting." He responded with a yes.

Then - things just went from there.

Kids: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 19:35
Just going by avatars, I'd expect AprilArcus to be the one saying this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2590).

Don't let it fool you. Hannelore in the streets, Sven in the sheets.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HeavyP on 04 Feb 2015, 19:41
Don't let it fool you. Hannelore in the streets, Sven in the sheets.

I came here to make a suggestive comment about hearing saxophones playing faintly, but this stopped me cold. 

I feel like Steve Harvey talking to the Tran family - "I can't top that joke!"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 04 Feb 2015, 19:42
Where is this room with pink walls?  I don't think we've been in there before.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 04 Feb 2015, 19:43
Dang


And YES!!!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 04 Feb 2015, 19:43
I wanna high five them both. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emoroffle on 04 Feb 2015, 19:50
One of these days my head is going to explode from all the squeeing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 04 Feb 2015, 19:52
Where is this room with pink walls?  I don't think we've been in there before.

Pretty sure it's just that the kiss was so Important and Meaningful that it completely eliminated the background and replaced it with a pink haze.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 19:54
I would like to point out, that this looks like the front door, not the bedroom door.  And most places I have lived, the doors are self-locking.  Things may not actually be going "too fast" here.  Also, there are a few ways that I have looked at Claire's expression in panel 1. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 04 Feb 2015, 19:56
I would like to point out, that this looks like the front door, not the bedroom door.  And most places I have lived, the doors are self-locking.  Things may not actually be going "too fast" here.  Also, there are a few ways that I have looked at Claire's expression in panel 1.

If that's the case, the doorknob jumped from one side to the other in a single panel.  I'm thinking that's his bedroom. 

My personal head canon is whatever they're doing, there's no WAY Marten's doing it on the couch.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 20:01
I'm surprised that he hasn't tried scavangening a faux-leather one around moving day.  Much easier to clean for the drunken antics of the cast.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 20:05
we haven't seen anything either explicit or implied that suggests that Claire's giving up any of her agency in this situation.

I don't think she's being exploited, I'm just saying that I know exactly what is going through Marten's head in that scene and I can barely guess what Claire is thinking or feeling. That feels off.

As I mentioned earlier, I don't think Marten's slept in a couple of days. I think if we see anything, it's going to be a callback to the post-wedding cuddle and snooze, 'cause Marten's likely so tired that he'll be asleep in no time. I could be wrong, but I get a feeling that's where that's going.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 20:06
I'm surprised that he hasn't tried scavangening a faux-leather one around moving day.  Much easier to clean for the drunken antics of the cast.

Either that, or those old-school plastic slipcovers (if you have Italian relatives, you know what I'm talking about).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 20:18
I think Marten probably informed Claire (briefly) what was going on when he called her and told her he couldn't make it.  I think JWHouk's right, though, that either Marten called to let Claire know he was back, or Claire called to see if he was back yet. 

I get the feeling the conversation was more along the lines of,

CLaire: "That must have been difficult for you." 
Marten: "Yeah, it was pretty rough." 
Claire "I can come over if you want to talk?" 

Or maybe she just decided to come over to comfort him.  But he needs that now. 



And why would he need it now?  A good friend is on the edge, was almost over the edge, in fact.  But you'll notice that he never gave Faye a hug to comfort her...

Faye established a no-touchy rule early on in their relationship.  The one time we've seen them hug was the flower-pits comic.  Maybe in their undies, I don't remember (and I'm not up to an archive trawl).  But at this point in time, Marten just doesn't feel comfortable comforting Faye physically.  Perhaps simply because of the loss of Angus, he thinks it would feel like a "move" to her. 

But after the night he just went through, he needs a hug.  I'm not suggesting Claire is any kind of substitute for Faye or anything, far from it.  And, as another forumite mentioned, after the day (days?) he's just had in the hospital, I imagine he'll be passing out holding onto Claire in pretty short order. 

Which, I think, is more what he needs than anything else from her.  Just... comfort. 

The comic made me weep a bit, by the way.  Not squee, just - just tear up a bunch. 


But I get emotional easily these days, so take that as you will. 

Warning - while you were typing Arizaphale made the same point, only much more succinctly.  You may wish to review your post.

Nah, thanks.  I'm good. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: grez on 04 Feb 2015, 20:19
I'm glad Claire's not mad at Marten, but I was rather more curious about her reaction to the "Big Story" as a relative outsider. Maybe next time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 04 Feb 2015, 20:23
Is it just me or does this feel too soon after the drama with Faye?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CasAttack on 04 Feb 2015, 20:25
While it isn't exactly clear how Claire feels about everything, she clearly isn't afraid to stay away and I love that. She's present, comforting Marten who also has had a long night and that to me is a great indicator of a mature relationship. Hope things stay this way, especially when Marten is probably gonna have to navigate some Tough Moments between Dora and Faye (probably Tai involvement, too as I could see Tai not taking Dora's side on this).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 04 Feb 2015, 20:28
Did that click mean they locked the door?

Ooohhhhhh :-o :-o :-o :-D :-D :-D

PREPARE THE ARBOR DAY BANNER!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 20:29
Is it just me or does this feel too soon after the drama with Faye?

Depends on what's going on behind the door. 


But whatever that may be, clearly the participants don't think so. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 04 Feb 2015, 20:33

PREPARE THE ARBOR DAY BANNER!!!

Are we going to celebrate the wood? Ha boner joke, I'm so funny.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 04 Feb 2015, 20:37
Is it just me or does this feel too soon after the drama with Faye?

Depends on what's going on behind the door. 


But whatever that may be, clearly the participants don't think so.

I'm thinking more from a story telling perspective: there wasn't a lot of lead up. I kinda found it jarring.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vodyanoi on 04 Feb 2015, 20:39
It's pretty obvious from the comic what is happening.  Marten is obviously eating Claire's face.  My representation of what is happening in the room: http://imgur.com/IKp0Apr
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 20:42
I'm thinking more from a story telling perspective: there wasn't a lot of lead up. I kinda found it jarring.

Yes, thank you.  Jarring.  Couldn't quite put my finger on it. 


Of course, real life is rarely smooth...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Feb 2015, 20:48
I'm thinking more from a story telling perspective: there wasn't a lot of lead up. I kinda found it jarring.

...You have read through the archives, right? Like, the first 511 strips?

"Lead up" may appear to be jarring, but it's actually because it tends to be glacial. When one of the icebergs finally fall off the ice shelf, that's when we notice it.

But this - this has kinda been building for a while. We just haven't seen it since the two of them were off holding hands.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 20:49
Marten probably hasn't slept a wink since finding Faye on the couch; he'll be out before his head hits the pillow.

Is it just me or does this feel too soon after the drama with Faye?

Did Faye spend a whole night in the hospital, or just a few hours? When are we right now?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Feb 2015, 20:55
Hannelore: "Do you have any IDEA how much work I put into cleaning that disgusting couch?! How could you have the nerve to cover it with squeee?"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Sullivan on 04 Feb 2015, 20:57
I would like to point out, that this looks like the front door, not the bedroom door.  And most places I have lived, the doors are self-locking.  Things may not actually be going "too fast" here.  Also, there are a few ways that I have looked at Claire's expression in panel 1.

If that's the case, the doorknob jumped from one side to the other in a single panel.  I'm thinking that's his bedroom. 
Hmmm.... I think it's the front door, and by panel 3 they've rotated 180 around each other and the POV is now from the hallway.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 04 Feb 2015, 20:58

Did Faye spend a whole night in the hospital, or just a few hours? When are we right now?

The day after she got hammered.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 04 Feb 2015, 21:01
Did Faye spend a whole night in the hospital, or just a few hours? When are we right now?

Well it was early morning to afternoon when she was fired and daylight when Hanners came out and talked to Dora.
In between Marten got off work and came home (but apparently didn't stop at the coffee shop in between Faye being fired and going home) so my guess is that it is the same day as he might have been stopping at home during his lunch break or only working a half day.

But we just don't know
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 04 Feb 2015, 21:01
You all may recall what Marten said when Claire asked if he was OK with her being trans: he mentioned how natural it felt to snuggle her. Yes, cuddles with Claire are just what a tired Marten needs at the moment, and it doesn't have to lead to immediate carnality (though it might). Whichever it is, it's not going to be nervous fumbling, I'm guessing.

I'm wondering if ClaireMom is OK with daughter having a sleepover.

Warning - while you were dawdling on the keyboard three other things got posted. You may wish to review your post. Of course if you do, your post may fall victim to a variant of Zeno's paradox.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 04 Feb 2015, 21:07
my guess is that it is the same day as he might have been stopping at home during his lunch break or only working a half day.

If that were so then why would Marten have bags under his eyes? I'm thinking Faye did a full overnight at the hospital, and was probably not released until the following afternoon. (I've been in hospital; they are not that swift at releasing you once you've been admitted.) Assuming the schism happened on a Friday morning, then this is Saturday evening.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 04 Feb 2015, 21:09
my guess is that it is the same day as he might have been stopping at home during his lunch break or only working a half day.

If that were so then why would Marten have bags under his eyes? I'm thinking Faye did a full overnight at the hospital, and was probably not released until the following afternoon. (I've been in hospital; they are not that swift at releasing you once you've been admitted.) Assuming the schism happened on a Friday morning, then this is Saturday evening.
Stress? Although that's a very good point you raise and I'm just offering a token reason. I think you're probably right
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 21:10
Given how far out she was, that makes the most sense.  Could even be days later if she had to go through medically supervised detox.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 04 Feb 2015, 21:11
Sounds about right.  She's need a good bit of both time and IV fluids to be out of the woods from alcohol poisoning. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 04 Feb 2015, 21:14
I'm wondering if ClaireMom is OK with daughter having a sleepover.

She's twenty-four! ClaireMom probably can't push her out the door fast enough.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 21:29
I would like to point out, that this looks like the front door, not the bedroom door.  And most places I have lived, the doors are self-locking.  Things may not actually be going "too fast" here.  Also, there are a few ways that I have looked at Claire's expression in panel 1.

If that's the case, the doorknob jumped from one side to the other in a single panel.  I'm thinking that's his bedroom. 
Hmmm.... I think it's the front door, and by panel 3 they've rotated 180 around each other and the POV is now from the hallway.
That doesn't really make sense, though. That would involve Marten stepping out of the apartment, kissing Claire while simultaneously turning her around, then backing her back -into- the apartment, if we look at the doors themselves and whether they open in or out respective to the couple.. Doable, but extremely awkward, especially since Jeph is usually decent at depicting movement.

It makes far more sense, flow-wise, that Claire stepped in, the kiss happens, and they then migrated their way into (presumably) a bedroom.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 21:35
It makes far more sense, flow-wise, that Claire stepped in, the kiss happens, and they then migrated their way into (presumably) a bedroom.

Plot twist: it's the broom closet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Feb 2015, 21:37
Isn't that where he'd lock Pintsize up (assuming he's working again) before she came over?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 21:39
Isn't that where he'd lock Pintsize up (assuming he's working again) before she came over?

Further plot twist: Faye hears moaning from the closet, which turns out to be Pintsize's cooling fan, muffled by a down jacket.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 04 Feb 2015, 21:43
Another, slightly more disturbing plot twist: They're in Faye's room.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 21:44
 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 04 Feb 2015, 21:53
Still-further-plot-twist: Without realizing it, they've wandered into Jimbo's apartment.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 04 Feb 2015, 22:11
It makes far more sense, flow-wise, that Claire stepped in, the kiss happens, and they then migrated their way into (presumably) a bedroom.

That and the room they go into is darker than the hallways.

Interesting body language in panel 2, is she maintaining a small bubble of body space or just copping a feel?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 04 Feb 2015, 22:15
I see that type of kiss all the time in comics, but never in real life. Like, it's an awkward way to kiss someone.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 04 Feb 2015, 22:29
I see that type of kiss all the time in comics, but never in real life. Like, it's an awkward way to kiss someone.

Claire has a smudge from Marten's nose on her glasses now. Well, where they're going she probably won't need them anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 04 Feb 2015, 22:30
I am conflicted right now. On the one hand, the analytical side of my personality tends to agree that this all seemed to happen kind of quickly. On the other hand, the more emotional side of my personality is thinking YES!

Right now I am going with my emotional response and trusting in Jeph that he will show us what he needs to show us in order for this progression to make sense. I'm hoping for a conversation afterwards in which they talk about what this means for their relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 04 Feb 2015, 22:34
Sorry to break the plot twist chain, I just wanted to comment in response to some of the people who are musing about it being "too soon" for Claire and Marten to do.. whatever they might be doing.

It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.

There's something else that I'd like to add as well, speculating about whether or not they should get together based on the stage that they're at in their relationship is one thing (although it's still no one's business but Claire and Marten's), but the comments about Claire's trans* status, and whether or not it should affect what's about to happen behind that door really bother me. The only people who are in any place to make decisions based on that are Claire herself, and by extension Marten, if indeed they are going further than cuddles. Other people discussing it just seems a little bit too close to a direct discussion about Claire's body, which if I'm not mistaken, is not allowed on these forums, since it's not only rude, but also potentially offensive to trans* people who may be reading the comments (and no, as has been stated over and over, just because Claire is fictional does not make it okay).

Case in point, I'm trans*, and those comments are offending me, since frankly, how I navigate my love life around, or in regards to my own body are my own business, and I would certainly not be pleased if a bunch of people I didn't know felt that it was their right to discuss what I should or shouldn't be doing at any point in time. I doubt that Claire would feel any differently.


And I know that some of you are well meaning, but believe me, it is still possible to be offensive even if you're coming from a place of concern. I mean it's sweet that you care, I guess, but again, it isn't, and shouldn't be anyone's business, nor concern what or when Claire does whatever she does with whoever she chooses to do it with, other than Claire herself. :/

Warning - while you were typing 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.  nothankyou

Edit: Thanks to the person who caught me using "Case and point" rather than the correct "Case in point". I'm ashamed of myself for such a careless mistake. -hides self-
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 04 Feb 2015, 22:35
It makes far more sense, flow-wise, that Claire stepped in, the kiss happens, and they then migrated their way into (presumably) a bedroom.

I think this is right. The door in panel 1 is not the same door as in panels 3 and 4. Note the doorframe in the last two panels is thicker. Panel 1 is probably the apartment door, and 3 and 4 are Marten's bedroom door.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 04 Feb 2015, 22:38
Its definitely his bedroom door.

The hallway outside their apartment does not have a chair rail (reference: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1049 )

Also, the door he opens at first is definitely the front door. As if he was inside his bed room, it also, does not have chair rail. (reference: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1048 )
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 04 Feb 2015, 22:47
I'm solidly in the "Woooo!" camp, though I feel like I should post something more insightful than just "wooo."

Given Claire's personality and Marten's level of chill-ness, it's entirely possible that it's just going to be cuddles.  It wouldn't surprise me at all, and I think the fanbase would happily accept that clarification as the next comic, because it both makes sense and still contains high levels of squee-inducing potential.  It would still be a significant step in their relationship.  On the other hand,
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MightionNY on 04 Feb 2015, 22:49
All I'll say on the Marten/Claire relationship is that it shows me again that Marten is a far better person than I am.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 04 Feb 2015, 22:53
Sorry to break the plot twist chain, I just wanted to comment in response to some of the people who are musing about it being "too soon" for Claire and Marten to do.. whatever they might be doing.

It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.


Sorry, I  know for myself wasn't really thinking hard enough about some of the subtext of my comments. I certainly didn't mean to imply that they shouldn't be doing what they're doing because she is trans, or even that they shouldn't be doing it at all. However, not having intended to say something offensive doesn't mean that I can't still say something offensive, and I apologize again for that. Like I said, I fall overall into the "Woooo!" camp. I just hope that as things progress Jeph gives us more insight into how their relationship is progressing. Especially since I want Claire and Marten's relationship to be a lot longer and healthier than his relationship with Padma or Tai's friend.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 22:53
Sorry to break the plot twist chain, I just wanted to comment in response to some of the people who are musing about it being "too soon" for Claire and Marten to do.. whatever they might be doing.

It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.

There's something else that I'd like to add as well, speculating about whether or not they should get together based on the stage that they're at in their relationship is one thing (although it's still no one's business but Claire and Marten's), but the comments about Claire's trans* status apparently having something to do with it really bother me. The only people who are in any place to make decisions based on that are Claire herself, and by extension Marten, if indeed they are going further than cuddles. Other people discussing it just seems a little bit too close to a direct discussion about Claire's body, which if I'm not mistaken, is not allowed on these forums, since it's not only rude to discuss another person's body, but also potentially offensive to trans* people who may be reading the comments (and no, as has been stated over and over, just because Claire is fictional does not make it okay).

Case and point, I'm trans*, and those comments are offending me, since frankly, how I navigate my own love life around, or in concordance with my body are my own business, and I would certainly not be pleased if a bunch of people I didn't know felt that it was their right to discuss what I should or shouldn't be doing at any point in time. I doubt that Claire would feel any differently.


And I know that some of you are well meaning, but believe me, it is still possible to be offensive even if you're coming from a place of concern. Again, it shouldn't be anyone's business, nor concern what or when Claire does whatever she does with whoever she chooses to do it with (not because of her trans* status, at least). :/

Warning - while you were typing 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.  nothankyou

If you had read my post, you'd have seen that my interpretation of it being 'too soon' was that I recalled Claire having not had any relationship experience previously (her unique situation being entirely secondary to that fact), inferring that usually people who are are new to relationships in general don't usually jump into it nearly as quickly. The -only- reason I made any reference pertaining to Claire's trans* status was as a potential reason for her to be more apprehensive about the inevitable next step in the relationship, as it pertains to it requiring an extra layer of trust as opposed to a standard cis relationship. I think you're doing everyone a disservice here by automatically assuming that the 'too soon' comments are directly correlated to her status.

In regards to Marten and his experiences, all parties involved were no strangers to relationships, and specially, those of a sexual nature. It makes absolute sense that they wouldn't have apprehension about the activities involved, as opposed to a virgin (-any- virgin. I don't want words put in my mouth.). And therefore, it makes sense that there isn't the discussion of 'too soon' when it comes to those relationships.

I get that you'd be offended, and it sucks that you feel that way. But I think that I can say that most of us that do screw up, do so out of a place of ignorance (of the non-willful kind) and naivete, more so than any deliberate lack of respect. I get a bit grumpy when it feels like I'm being accused of being offensive when it wasn't my intent, but hopefully I've better explained my earlier post. For me, I know I react better to gentle education. But I also appreciate that some required the not-so-soft touch of a clue-by-four.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 04 Feb 2015, 22:56
Still-further-plot-twist: Without realizing it, they've wandered into Jimbo's apartment.

Or Hannelore's. That has happened before (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1884), just with a different couple.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: iasthai on 04 Feb 2015, 22:58
Just going by avatars, I'd expect AprilArcus to be the one saying this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2590).

Don't let it fool you. Hannelore in the streets, Sven in the sheets.

Pintsize in the sheets is where the real fun's at.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 04 Feb 2015, 23:18
Well, it's about time Marten and Claire hooked up.  Good for them!  Woooo!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Feb 2015, 23:22
<snip>
It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds.
<snip>
The only people who are in any place to make decisions based on that are Claire herself, and by extension Marten, if indeed they are going further than cuddles.

The two people concerned have already agreed with each other to take things in stride.

I think the "too soon" criticism is a criticism of the writing, not of the relationship, from people who didn't see how long Jeph was laying the groundwork for this. AprilArcus pointed out some nuances of Claire's body language in earlier strips that showed she's been constantly working to overcome relationship anxiety all along.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: wdfarmer on 04 Feb 2015, 23:27
Claire's "puppy-dog" expression, raised eyebrows, and body language says to me, in the context of this strip:
    "I've decided that you're the guy for me.  Here I am.  Will you take me?  Whatever you want to do is fine."

On the other hand, if I received that expression from a woman in real life, I'd be concerned that there was something wrong that had gobsmacked her, and I'd want to find how I could help her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 04 Feb 2015, 23:28
So are you all this binary and unforgiving in your real-life relationships?

No.   First off, Faye isn't anyone I'd call a friend.  Ever.  Any "relationship" I'd have with someone like that would be at the very BEST, professional and from a great distance.  Because I dislike Faye so intensely I reserve the right to cut her no slack whatsoever.  And being mean to Hanners is like kicking a kitten.

Warning - while you were typing all this new Faye-Hatorade a new reply has been posted. You may wish to consider how long it's been since you piled on the Faye-hate and maybe hold off for another page.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 04 Feb 2015, 23:34
Firstly: I! Freakin'! Called! It!

A long while back, I guessed that Marten and Claire's first intimate encounter would be triggered by a highly emotionally-charged moment. I'd thought (and hoped) that it would be after a particularly successful date but this works just as well.

As for 'too soon'? Well, I'm a firm believer in sex after marriage, so my viewpoint is probably somewhat different from some. However, in story and characterisation terms, this feels right. Marten feels punchy and maybe more than a little sad, so he wanted something light and joyful to cling to. Claire decided that, with a sick friend, Marten would need comfort and support. I'm wondering if she went over with the intention of staking her claim on him in an unequivocal way, motivated by a fear that focus on Faye's problems would distract him from her. However, at that moment, she saw in him all the the loved about him - his compassion and care for his friends - and suddenly needed to express her feelings.

Then again, I'm a romantic.  :wink:

I'm pretty sure that something sexual is happening, based on the fact that Marten locked his bedroom door behind him. They might not "go all the way" but I expect that they'll go far. I expect Faye to complain to Hanners at some point that, while she's a believer in the free expression of love, did they need to express it for four damn hours?

PREDICTION for next week
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 04 Feb 2015, 23:42
And Marten, as the sly dog he is, has put off reviving Pintsize until after sexy time is over...  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 04 Feb 2015, 23:46
Friggin' finally. I hope when they (or Jeph, don't know) got that out of their system, there'll be less content-deprived saccharine comics about those two.

Okay, let's be realistic, I don't really think so,  but there's still hope!

To soon/Finally: I think that kind if intimacy between them is usual at that point, though I would have preferred it if Claire had the initiative. She doesn't look that happy approaching the door and after that it's hard to know since she's all obscured by make-outs.

Pintsize: I hope he's all right! I've got a craving for crude dick-jokes right now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 04 Feb 2015, 23:47
If you had read my post, you'd have seen that my interpretation of it being 'too soon' was that I recalled Claire having not had any relationship experience previously (her unique situation being entirely secondary to that fact), inferring that usually people who are are new to relationships in general don't usually jump into it nearly as quickly. The -only- reason I made any reference pertaining to Claire's trans* status was as a potential reason for her to be more apprehensive about the inevitable next step in the relationship, as it pertains to there requiring to be an extra layer of trust as opposed to a standard cis relationship. I think you're doing (mostly) everyone a disservice here by automatically assuming that the 'too soon' comments are directly correlated to her status.

In regards to Marten and his experiences, all parties involved were no strangers to relationships, and specially, those of a sexual nature. It makes absolute sense that they wouldn't have apprehension about the activities involved, as opposed to a virgin (-any- virgin. I don't want words put in my mouth.).

I think context, and intent to insult really should be taken more into consideration before getting one's choice of undergarments into a bunch. Sometimes people don't know the exact way to approach a discussion, and it seems like no matter how careful someone is, -someone- (not pointing fingers) is going to get offended. It seems far more constructive to gently correct them, rather than chastise them as a whole - making them feel like terrible people for making honest mistakes has a habit of getting people's dander up, rather than wanting to make them want to learn the proper way to address things.

Edit: I get that you'd be offended, and it sucks that you feel that way. But I think that I can say that most of us that do screw up, do so out of a place of ignorance (of the non-willful kind) and naivete, more so than any deliberate lack of respect. I get a bit grumpy when it feels like I'm being accused of being offensive when it wasn't my intent, but hopefully I've better explained my earlier post. For me, I know I react better to gentle education. But I also appreciate that some required the not-so-soft touch of a clue-by-four.

My post wasn't in response to you, at least not specifically.

Now that you mention it though, unless Claire specifically asked for advice about how careful she should be, I still feel that it's no one's place to offer it, even if that advice is coming from concern. Like I said, It's her business, and her decision, not ours.

In regard to my original post apparently coming across as unduly harsh, or sounding like I was chastising people, that wasn't my intention. I've been told that I'm very blunt when it comes to this subject, even when I'm trying to be educational rather than condescending. I guess it's just a habit that I've developed after having had to explain all of this stuff a thousand times to people I know in real life. <- I know that last sentence sounds like I'm being condescending, but I'm not, it's just true. lol

Response to edit:
Maybe I could have worded the whole "I'm offended" part of my post a little bit better, but believe me my intent wasn't to accuse so much as it was to emphasize just how easy it is to *be* offensive with that kind of discussion, even if/when your intentions are completely innocent/coming from a place of concern. Thus proving (well, as much as anecdotal evidence *can* prove something) my point that it's probably better to just avoid the subject all together. :P


(This next part isn't really specifically in response to you either.)
As for my opinion that any discussion about Claire's sex life which relates to her trans* status is just too close for comfort to a discussion about her body, I do realize that that's all it is, my opinion. I'm aware that other people might feel differently, and even though I interpreted it as something that shouldn't be allowed on the forums, I'm obviously no mod, so if they choose to let that type of discussion happen then there's not much that I can do about it. All I can do, and all I was trying to do, was state that I don't like it, and that I feel that it's an (potentially) offensive topic of discussion which should be avoided if possible. That said, I'm not going to spam the report button if other people do wish to discuss it though, but in that event, I just hope that they remember to choose their words carefully at least, since it could very easily cross the line between a thoughtful discussion, and an offensive one.

Given how generally thoughtful and considerate the people who post here usually are though, I'm honestly not all that worried about any such discussion devolving into something unsavory, but nevertheless I still felt the need to comment on it given how close to home the issue is for me personally.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 23:50
I've actually edited down my original post after conferring with IICIH, since I was in a bit of a heated place at first posting  :-)

Indeed, if she wanted advice she'd ask for it. She's certainly not afraid to speak up. Rather than advice I was pointing out, it was really just commentary on on the relationship in general. No advice on my part :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 04 Feb 2015, 23:55
Prediction for tomorrow:

An unresponsive Pintsize, who has been placed in Marten's room for safekeeping, wakes up.

"Oh man, what happe-"
...
:0
...
:D
...
*record*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 04 Feb 2015, 23:55
It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.

And for it being Claire's first relationship, I present counter-argument Marigold/Dale.  They had anime weekend, CoD makeout session, and Marigold having a medical emergency that torpedoed their first official date.  I remember a lot of jokes about pancakes, but nowhere near as much criticism of it being "too soon".  In fact it was specifically addressed in-comic with Marigold asking Momo for reassurance and Momo telling her that it's her business and no one else's when she chose to start having sex with her boyfriend (obviously, boyfriend gets a say, but I seriously doubt Dale was judging Marigold there).  Marten's shown time and again that he's respectful of consent and that if his partner says she wants to wait, he'll wait.

I can understand the argument that Claire's first time should be, if not something special, at least about her and Marten instead of Marten needing comfort after dealing with Faye.  But not having relationship experience doesn't mean not being able to say "I'm not ready" or "We shouldn't do this now."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 04 Feb 2015, 23:58
Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks. I get that. It just took my geeky ass a couple of months with my first boyfriend before I was ready to lose my virginity  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 04 Feb 2015, 23:59
Prediction for tomorrow:

An unresponsive Pintsize, who has been placed in Marten's room for safekeeping, wakes up.

"Oh man, what happe-"
...
:0
...
:D
...
*record*

I wonder what place it would have on the AnthroPC-only message board (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=639)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 00:03
Prediction for tomorrow:

An unresponsive Pintsize, who has been placed in Marten's room for safekeeping, wakes up.

"Oh man, what happe-"
...
:0
...
:D
...
*record*

I wonder what place it would have on the AnthroPC-only message board (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=639)

I doubt that they're much interested in human gland-games, except for the weirdos on /h/.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 05 Feb 2015, 00:04
It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.

And for it being Claire's first relationship, I present counter-argument Marigold/Dale.  They had anime weekend, CoD makeout session, and Marigold having a medical emergency that torpedoed their first official date.  I remember a lot of jokes about pancakes, but nowhere near as much criticism of it being "too soon".  In fact it was specifically addressed in-comic with Marigold asking Momo for reassurance and Momo telling her that it's her business and no one else's when she chose to start having sex with her boyfriend (obviously, boyfriend gets a say, but I seriously doubt Dale was judging Marigold there).  Marten's shown time and again that he's respectful of consent and that if his partner says she wants to wait, he'll wait.

I can understand the argument that Claire's first time should be, if not something special, at least about her and Marten instead of Marten needing comfort after dealing with Faye.  But not having relationship experience doesn't mean not being able to say "I'm not ready" or "We shouldn't do this now."

I can't believe I forgot about Maridale as an example, but that is perfect... Thank you. haha
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 00:05
To be fair, that one struck me as a bit rushed, too  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 00:08
Hannah, you do have forum rules acknowledging the same things you've said: https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,27423.msg1205549.html#msg1205549 . Among other things, my post there was an attempt to short-circuit some of the Far Too Frequently Asked Questions that even the ambassadorial types get tired of seeing.

Please do PM with suggestions for any changes you see as necessary or advisable.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 05 Feb 2015, 00:09
Prediction for tomorrow:

An unresponsive Pintsize, who has been placed in Marten's room for safekeeping, wakes up.

"Oh man, what happe-"
...
:0
...
:D
...
*record*

I wonder what place it would have on the AnthroPC-only message board (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=639)

I doubt that they're much interested in human gland-games, except for the weirdos on /h/.
That actually made me laugh. Now my co-workers think I'm a weirdo  :psyduck:

Sooo.. it's just used for blackmail?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 00:10
Oh please. First GF and I had our first date (which was also our first meeting ever) and were almost cuddling by the end of it.
For our third date one week later, I took her up to a really romantic place, and viscious makeouts were had.
Were we moving too fast? Too bad.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: USS Martenclaire on 05 Feb 2015, 00:15
My prediction for tomorrow is that its the following morning. We see Marten kiss Claire goodbye at the door and we have no idea whether they slept together, kissed and cuddled or built a duvet fort together. :p
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 05 Feb 2015, 00:16
Oh please. First GF and I had our first date (which was also our first meeting ever) and were almost cuddling by the end of it.
For our third date one week later, I took her up to a really romantic place, and viscious makeouts were had.
Were we moving too fast? Too bad.

Well, you're not Claire. She takes it slow - she didn't kiss Marten because he was drunk, she obviously wanted make-outs but went for Ice-cream..
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 00:18
Oh please. First GF and I had our first date (which was also our first meeting ever) and were almost cuddling by the end of it.
For our third date one week later, I took her up to a really romantic place, and viscious makeouts were had.
Were we moving too fast? Too bad.
I was referring to 'too soon', in comparison to my own personal pace (which is akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates), not as any overt criticism. To each their own.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 00:21
I think that would be great!

Come of think of it, there is one thing in the course of Marten and Claire's relationship that happened with unusual speed. She was impressively quick to size up Marten's character and realize he could be trusted with a major, indeed safety-related, confidence.

Everything else has been hesitant or self-disciplined ("I hate being reasonable").

EDIT: Let's make the duvet fort the new forum headcanon.

(How would an anxious person embarking on her first relationship feel if her makeout partner fell asleep?)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 05 Feb 2015, 00:29
To be fair, that one struck me as a bit rushed, too  :wink:

See, I really don't mind if people are at least consistent with their judgements about when it's too soon to hop into bed with someone. I mean if that's what works for you, and even if you feel that that's how other people should act as well, then that's awesome, no judgements here (as long as you're just as respectful of other people's choices anyway). The main reason that this whole thing with Claireten irked me is because the number of people who seem concerned about how quickly they might get into bed together seems to be significantly larger than the number of people who were concerned about any other couple/pairing. I mean it may just be (on these forums anyway) that more people care about Claire and Marten than Marigold and Dale for example, but based on some of the comments that I've seen, not just on these forums, but elsewhere on the web as well, it's pretty obvious that there's another reason for that concern beyond just the sheer size of each character's fanbase. And that reason is why I got my back up.

Ultimately, I honestly don't care if people want to discuss whether or not you should hop into bed with someone after being in a relationship with, or even just knowing them for a few days. I mean I still don't feel that it's any of their business, or mine for that matter, but as long as they're respectful and just stating an opinion without being forceful or judgemntal about it, then it's whatever. Trans* status is different though, it's far more personal than simple matters of perceived propriety, and not something that should be discussed by anyone other than the trans* person themselves, and/or anyone they choose to discuss it with. (She repeats yet again. lol)

... Yay for another needlessly long and repetitive post. Sorry, I guess I'm in a bit of a ranty mood tonight. haha

Hannah, you do have forum rules acknowledging the same things you've said: https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,27423.msg1205549.html#msg1205549 . Among other things, my post there was an attempt to short-circuit some of the Far Too Frequently Asked Questions that even the ambassadorial types get tired of seeing.

Please do PM with suggestions for any changes you see as necessary or advisable.

I'll keep that in mind, thank you. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: McH on 05 Feb 2015, 00:35
She doesn't look that happy approaching the door and after that it's hard to know since she's all obscured by make-outs.

She's in a new relationship. Her first relationship. Her boyfriend just went through this thing with Faye nearly drinking herself to death, and cancelled their date for that. I read Claire's face as worried, foremost. Worried about Marten, about what mood he might be in with that kind of stress and responsibility, whether he would be receptive to her. What is she supposed to do - barge in the door smooch-first? Not very logical. Ensuing make-outs once they've connected - yeah, those are logical and a lot more healthy than getting drunk to dealing with the stress of it.

I like today's strip. Also: squeee. :)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: anahata on 05 Feb 2015, 00:38
To soon/Finally: I think that kind if intimacy between them is usual at that point, though I would have preferred it if Claire had the initiative. She doesn't look that happy approaching the door and after that it's hard to know since she's all obscured by make-outs.

How do we know that she didn't take the initiative (or at least consent willingly) in turning up at Marten's place?
I think her "unhappy" look is more nervousness at the prospect of possibly venturing into uncharted waters, but it's pretty clear from previous comics (like the "ice cream" incident) what she wants.
Anyway, as others have said, we don't really know what they are going to do, and at some level of detail we don't need to.

Also nobody's mentioned yet that Claire and Marten have had a planned date interrupted by Faye's hospital incident, so there's some frustration and a bit of catching up to do.

I read Claire's face as worried, foremost. Worried about Marten, about what mood he might be in with that kind of stress and responsibility, whether he would be receptive to her.

Yes, that too.

Edited to add:
Look at Claire's body language in panels 2 and 3. Someone commented on her hands in panel 2 - she's maybe not quite sure how happy Marten is to see her, and he's the one that made the first move. Followed by panel 3: arms thrown round his neck as nervous Claire relaxes, reassured that he wants her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 05 Feb 2015, 00:50
Still, I guess Jeph will be careful drawing or describing Claire/Marten in a sexual context (like he did with Sven/Faye (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1198) or Sven/Gina Riversmith (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1334)). I guess Claire and Marten are fully clothed if we get a peek behind the bedroom door, but the most probable scenario is Marten and Claire coming out of the same bedroom door, encountering Faye for breakfast in tomorrow's strip. Whatever happened behind that door, will remain hidden. Faye should make pancakes (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2637). Claire's face will be redder than Grade A Dark Amber maple syrup.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 05 Feb 2015, 01:03
BOW CHICKA BOW BOWWWWWW

I see that type of kiss all the time in comics, but never in real life. Like, it's an awkward way to kiss someone.

That must vary, because I'm a glasses wearer and my girlfriend is an occasional glasses wearer and we kiss like that all the time, brah.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 05 Feb 2015, 01:36
Alternative Friday strip: Yelling Bird! But I would prefer to know what happened to Pintsize. This scenario from last week is just brilliant:
Look like we're being set up for the typical "Friday comis relief" strip tomorrow...

Personally, I'd like to see the Pintsize equivalent of Faye's intermittent blackout sequence from earlier this week:

Black screen... Panicked Winslow... Black screen... examined by Marigold... black screen... trying to grab Momo's behind... black screen... being punched by May... black screen... hand plugged to some kind of device... black screen...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 05 Feb 2015, 01:39
It would be kind of cool if friday's strip is Faye turning Pintsize back on, followed by the two of them awkwardly trying to have a conversation while ignoring the obvious sex sounds coming from Marten's room...  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 05 Feb 2015, 01:44
It would be kind of cool if friday's strip is Faye turning Pintsize back on, followed by the two of them awkwardly trying to have a conversation while ignoring the obvious sex sounds coming from Marten's room...  :-D
Pintsize ignoring sex sounds? In your dreams...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 05 Feb 2015, 01:50
To soon/Finally: I think that kind if intimacy between them is usual at that point, though I would have preferred it if Claire had the initiative. She doesn't look that happy approaching the door and after that it's hard to know since she's all obscured by make-outs.

How do we know that she didn't take the initiative (or at least consent willingly) in turning up at Marten's place?
I think her "unhappy" look is more nervousness at the prospect of possibly venturing into uncharted waters, but it's pretty clear from previous comics (like the "ice cream" incident) what she wants.
Anyway, as others have said, we don't really know what they are going to do, and at some level of detail we don't need to.
I'm not questioning her consent. Both of them have shown (or said) that they want. This comic would have benefited from a few words, since I can't imagine showing up at my partner's house after such an incident and not asking about their and their friend's well-being, and this comic rushes through - open door/make-outs/disappearing in a bedroom.


Also nobody's mentioned yet that Claire and Marten have had a planned date interrupted by Faye's hospital incident, so there's some frustration and a bit of catching up to do.

I read Claire's face as worried, foremost. Worried about Marten, about what mood he might be in with that kind of stress and responsibility, whether he would be receptive to her.

Yes, that too.

Edited to add:
Look at Claire's body language in panels 2 and 3. Someone commented on her hands in panel 2 - she's maybe not quite sure how happy Marten is to see her, and he's the one that made the first move. Followed by panel 3: arms thrown round his neck as nervous Claire relaxes, reassured that he wants her.

Saw it. That's why I assumed Marten had the initiative.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 05 Feb 2015, 01:53
Sometimes a couple just..... clicks.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 02:00
It's my feeling that Claire may have initiated this.

I can't read Jeph's mind but it's my guess that Claire went to Marten's apartment to offer support for him after what was undoubtedly a stressful 24 hours. Did, as I stated in my previous post, she also want to take some action to avoid being sidelined whilst Marten was focussed on Faye's recovery? In her insecurity, had she decided to seduce him to make sure of her place in his life? Perhaps. However, I don't think that was the driver of what we see in this strip.

In terms of interpreting what happens between panels 1 and 2, the problem is that we can't see Marten's expression. We can see Claire is trying to show empathy to Marten but we can't see his initial response. It's my guess that, as well as the expected sadness, Claire also saw that he was glad to have her there; that he needed her there. Seeing that welcome, Claire just responded near-instinctively. From that point on, they were just both doing what they felt right, somehow navigating the lounge whilst in lip-lock and then into Marten's bedroom.

I hope that Faye has some earplugs because it's been established that she can hear Marten talking in his room so louder noises will be easily audible. :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 02:16
They forgot the hoodie on the doorknob.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 05 Feb 2015, 02:21
Honestly, I don't think they're having sex. If they are, it's going to be pretty passive on Marten's part, I think.

It's been hinted for a while that Claire wants to push the relationship in that direction (but has anxiety about whether it's too fast), but I don't think Marten is in the mood for sex right now. (Note that I didn't say that he's not in the mood for sex with Claire right now, but that he's not in the mood for it period.) He's exhausted both physically and emotionally, after all. Claire's good at picking up on this sort of thing, too, and I think she'll hold back upon noticing it.

Now, in the morning, when he wakes up, with Claire snuggled tightly against him, awake but not wanting to let him go? (Or, after she makes breakfast for him, and then returns to bed.)

Pretty sure that's when the Arbor Day 2003 banner can be brought out. (Also, to be honest, I think they're going to want to talk about things, and that conversation might happen while they're doing those things, but it'll need Marten to be alert, I think.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: maxh on 05 Feb 2015, 02:34
akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates
Has anyone ever actually tested how tortoises respond to barbiturates?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dalillama on 05 Feb 2015, 02:35


Well, you're not Claire. She takes it slow - she didn't kiss Marten because he was drunk, she obviously wanted make-outs but went for Ice-cream..
That had nothing to do with taking it slow per se; it was (legitimate) concern for his ability to give consent given his intoxicated state. 

I'm firmly in the woo category, regardless of what they're getting up to in there (I think sexytimes ensue, personally).   I'm pretty much categorically in favor of sexytimes between consenting adults, of whatever flavour(s) those involved prefer, although it's not my place to judge when and under what circumstances any particular individual does or doesn't consent, only to respect same and ensure that others do as well.  As far as too fast, or too slow,  different strokes for different folks and all that. in my first relationship the sexytimes preceded the first date (and all but one of the ones after. That time the shared meal with conversation came first, albeit by a narrow margin.) and all that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 05 Feb 2015, 02:37
akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates
Has anyone ever actually tested how tortoises respond to barbiturates?

I would watch the shit out of that on youtube. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 02:43
akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates

Has anyone ever actually tested how tortoises respond to barbiturates?

Probably not well. I understand that reptiles and sedatives go badly together and there is a high probability of fatal side-effects. If I remember correctly, vets consider surgery on a reptile as a last resort.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 05 Feb 2015, 02:46
I definitely think todays comic was way too wordy !!! :meh: :angel: Less is more !!!

 
Also, the end is near. :oops: Theres a "LIKE" Button in this forum now.  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 03:14
akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates
Has anyone ever actually tested how tortoises respond to barbiturates?

It got ripped out of one of Charles Darwin's journals when the Creationists tired to suppress Evolution, and got it wrong.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 03:33

Sometimes a couple just..... clicks.

"And that's all I gotta sat about that."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: anahata on 05 Feb 2015, 04:05
This comic would have benefited from a few words, since I can't imagine showing up at my partner's house after such an incident and not asking about their and their friend's well-being, and this comic rushes through - open door/make-outs/disappearing in a bedroom.

Fair point, but  we still don't really know how much time has elapsed since Faye's collapse: they could have talked about all that on the phone, depiction of which wouldn't have made interesting comic material, other than giving us a clue about what's going on in their minds. If that had happened, no words would be needed now.

I'm sticking with the theory of hastily catching up with lost time after an interrupted (never even started) date.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 05 Feb 2015, 04:08
It's been hinted for a while that Claire wants to push the relationship in that direction (but has anxiety about whether it's too fast), but I don't think Marten is in the mood for sex right now. (Note that I didn't say that he's not in the mood for sex with Claire right now, but that he's not in the mood for it period.)

Frankly, after an experience as emotional as what Marten went through, sex would be EXACTLY what I'd want. Relationship dependent, sex or masturbation would be my go-to for after an emotional experience like that. Endorphins, adrenaline, lots of good stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 05 Feb 2015, 04:15
I guess different people are wired differently - I'd want sleep first.

Granted, having a girlfriend cuddling me during said sleep would be very, very nice, but ultimately, I'd want sleep.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 04:16
Hell, I had sex while my spine was still broken (it was only kinda broken, NBD GUYS), just because someone is beaten or bruised (physically or emotionally) does not mean that they don't want to have sex.

But it's all personal preference really.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 05 Feb 2015, 04:21
Alternative Friday strip: Yelling Bird!

I have to admit, I was thinking the same thing. I'm guessing it won't happen, so I figured I'd indulge in some lousy fanfiction instead, suggesting how such a strip might have gone:

(http://i.imgur.com/W5bODiO.png) (http://imgur.com/W5bODiO)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 05 Feb 2015, 04:28
This comic would have benefited from a few words, since I can't imagine showing up at my partner's house after such an incident and not asking about their and their friend's well-being, and this comic rushes through - open door/make-outs/disappearing in a bedroom.
I think we can take it that Marten has phoned Claire off-screen, judging by her expression in the first panel.

And another blue dress! No white piping though.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 04:48
You know, I'm against the lo-words thing Jeph's been doing because it slows down the pacing and introduces a lot of ambiguity. But I'm totally for the recent no-words strips. I think they work just fine.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bartman on 05 Feb 2015, 04:56
my guess is that it is the same day as he might have been stopping at home during his lunch break or only working a half day.

If that were so then why would Marten have bags under his eyes? I'm thinking Faye did a full overnight at the hospital, and was probably not released until the following afternoon. (I've been in hospital; they are not that swift at releasing you once you've been admitted.) Assuming the schism happened on a Friday morning, then this is Saturday evening.

I think Faye must have been in for 18 or even 24 hours or so.
Right now, Marten is probably physically and emotionally shattered, and has expanded a lot of energy on worrying about and taking care of his best friend. What he needs right now and what I'm sure Claire is delivering is just some comfort for his own stress and hurt from this experience. Doesn't mean that something is happening behind that door that will require Pintsize to round up a brown chicken and a brown cow... doesn't mean that isn't happening either of course but I think this is about Claire comforting Marten after Marten's bad experience with seeing his friend hurt.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 05 Feb 2015, 05:01
That's probably true, and frankly, whatever the two do to relieve that stress is none of our business, unless Jeph decides otherwise.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 05 Feb 2015, 05:34
You know, I'm against the lo-words thing Jeph's been doing because it slows down the pacing and introduces a lot of ambiguity. But I'm totally for the recent no-words strips. I think they work just fine.

I wasn't a fan when the pace was slower but the pace has been way faster of late.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 05:36
I'm firmly in the cuddles camp.  I think we'll see something similar to the wedding arch with one of them waking and seeing their clothed partner cuddled tight around them, smile and go back to sleep.

I also suspect Faye was in the hospital 24-36 hours.  It takes a while to get through the red tape of admission and release.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 05 Feb 2015, 06:07
Also, the end is near. :oops: Theres a "LIKE" Button in this forum now.  :-\
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts? Also, can we have a "DISLIKE" button, please?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 05 Feb 2015, 06:41
Sorry to break the plot twist chain, I just wanted to comment in response to some of the people who are musing about it being "too soon" for Claire and Marten to do.. whatever they might be doing.

It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met.

There's something else that I'd like to add as well, speculating about whether or not they should get together based on the stage that they're at in their relationship is one thing (although it's still no one's business but Claire and Marten's), but the comments about Claire's trans* status, and whether or not it should affect what's about to happen behind that door really bother me. The only people who are in any place to make decisions based on that are Claire herself, and by extension Marten, if indeed they are going further than cuddles. Other people discussing it just seems a little bit too close to a direct discussion about Claire's body, which if I'm not mistaken, is not allowed on these forums, since it's not only rude, but also potentially offensive to trans* people who may be reading the comments (and no, as has been stated over and over, just because Claire is fictional does not make it okay).

Well, there are a lot more people in WCDT at the moment. When there is drama in the comic (and I mean drama as in Faye drinking herself into the hospital) people tend to flock to the discussion thread. So... yeah, a lot more people are commenting on this than on Dale/Marigold, Dora/Tai, Marten/whatsherface, or Marten/Padma simply because there are more people posting and reading the WCDT in general.

I do think most people, as Omega said, are more concerned because Claire is a virgin, and she is with an experienced partner, as opposed to Dale/Marigold, who were both virgins.

I don't quite know where to draw the line here... so here is where I am drawing it. I won't discuss Claires body, nor what specific sexual activites she might prefer. But I don't see a problem with discussing Claire's trans* status as it relates to how it might affect other attitudes she has in the rest of the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Feb 2015, 06:43
Also, the end is near. :oops: Theres a "LIKE" Button in this forum now.  :-\
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts? Also, can we have a "DISLIKE" button, please?

No. 

There's discussion of this (the why's, wherefores and workings of the like button) in another thread in this section.  Take a look, the reasoning's pretty clear. 


If you really dislike something, you'll have to tell us why.  Within the decency rules of the forum, of course. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 05 Feb 2015, 06:46
Also, the end is near. :oops: Theres a "LIKE" Button in this forum now.  :-\
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts? Also, can we have a "DISLIKE" button, please?
I should note that I liked your post to show how you can tell if anyone liked your post, not to agree with the suggestion for a "dislike" button.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 05 Feb 2015, 06:48
Also, the end is near. :oops: Theres a "LIKE" Button in this forum now.  :-\
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts? Also, can we have a "DISLIKE" button, please?
Carl-E answered the second question - you can tell if someone liked your post in the same place the message is for people liking other people's posts.  I liked yours to show you.

If you're all "DUH, I KNEW THAT" then I'll remove the like.   :mrgreen:

Warning - while you were typing, somebody did that already and you don't have to like anything now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 07:09
The over-analysis about the latest comic and
lack of Squeeeeeeeee in this topic disturbs me.

(http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/darth-vader-malcolm-porter.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 05 Feb 2015, 07:15
Okay, then:
Squeeeeeeee! I love me some Marteclaire lovin'! Yaaaaaay!

Better?  :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 05 Feb 2015, 07:18
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts?

It'll say when you look at the post, just like it does with other people's posts.  You just don't get a button.  I can see that Carl liked my post (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30442.msg1299959.html#msg1299959), for example.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: drewdane on 05 Feb 2015, 07:21
Sorry to break the plot twist chain, I just wanted to comment in response to some of the people who are musing about it being "too soon" for Claire and Marten to do.. whatever they might be doing.

It occurs to me that no where near the same number of people seemed to be as critical or concerned about Marten having a one night stand a while back with Tai's friend, nor were there as many complaints about him hooking up with Padma so soon after they'd met. This makes me wonder why, exactly, Claire and Marten doing whatever is such a big kerfuffle in comparison in some people's minds. When it comes right down to it, Claire is 24, Marten is 26, and whatever they want to do, or how soon they want to do it is up to them to decide as consenting, sober adults.

There's something else that I'd like to add as well, speculating about whether or not they should get together based on the stage that they're at in their relationship is one thing (although it's still no one's business but Claire and Marten's), but the comments about Claire's trans* status, and whether or not it should affect what's about to happen behind that door really bother me. The only people who are in any place to make decisions based on that are Claire herself, and by extension Marten, if indeed they are going further than cuddles. Other people discussing it just seems a little bit too close to a direct discussion about Claire's body, which if I'm not mistaken, is not allowed on these forums, since it's not only rude, but also potentially offensive to trans* people who may be reading the comments (and no, as has been stated over and over, just because Claire is fictional does not make it okay).

Case and point, I'm trans*, and those comments are offending me, since frankly, how I navigate my love life around, or in regards to my own body are my own business, and I would certainly not be pleased if a bunch of people I didn't know felt that it was their right to discuss what I should or shouldn't be doing at any point in time. I doubt that Claire would feel any differently.


And I know that some of you are well meaning, but believe me, it is still possible to be offensive even if you're coming from a place of concern. I mean it's sweet that you care, I guess, but again, it isn't, and shouldn't be anyone's business, nor concern what or when Claire does whatever she does with whoever she chooses to do it with, other than Claire herself. :/

Speaking of offensive...

Case in point!  CASE IN POINT!!!

Gaaah!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Feb 2015, 07:25
Yes, but how can I tell if anybody likes my own posts?

You can see the count when they do (click it to see who). 

Also, can we have a "DISLIKE" button, please?

The "Dislike" button is labelled "Report to moderator"  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 07:41
I'm of the opinion that the "click" of the door locking in panel 4 is a sign that we will never, ever be told what went on inside that bedroom. Did they or didn't they? It's Schroedinger's Bedroom; they both did and didn't.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 05 Feb 2015, 07:53
I'm of the opinion that the "click" of the door locking in panel 4 is a sign that we will never, ever be told what went on inside that bedroom. Did they or didn't they? It's Schroedinger's Bedroom; they both did and didn't.

Let's face it, though, if they are having sex, Claire's absolutely going to rub it in Clinton's face that she lost her virginity before he lost his.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lepetitfromage on 05 Feb 2015, 08:01
Claire's "puppy-dog" expression, raised eyebrows, and body language says to me, in the context of this strip:
    "I've decided that you're the guy for me.  Here I am.  Will you take me?  Whatever you want to do is fine."

On the other hand, if I received that expression from a woman in real life, I'd be concerned that there was something wrong that had gobsmacked her, and I'd want to find how I could help her.

See, I read that expression as "Is everything ok?". It looks concerned to me and it feels as though Marten is letting Claire know that he is indeed alright but could use some comforting (aka kisses). I can't say for certain that it's NOT going to happen, but I don't feel like this is the setup we're going to get if/when Marten and Claire reach that level of intimacy.



Re: Too Soon- I think there are two crucial things to consider when we look at how soon is too soon. First is that while Marten is fairly experienced, Claire is not only a virgin but has never been in a relationship before. I see Marten being supportive of whatever Claire feels that she needs and taking things slow if need be. The second piece is their age- while Claire doesn't have experience, I'm sure she's been wanting to experience a physical relationship for a while now! Virginity is something that most of us took seriously in one sense or another- either that we wanted to give it to someone special or that we wanted to dive into sexual experiences asap (or both :-P). Honestly? I was pretty young when I lost mine but I was with my boyfriend at the time for over a year. The fact that Claire is older might make up for the short timeframe of their relationship. (And really...is it that short? Does anyone know about how long they've been "official"?)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 08:08
(And really...is it that short? Does anyone know about how long they've been "official"?)

They've been 'official' for about a week (or a few days more) in-comic time. However, this has to be offset by the fact that they've been co-workers and friends for two months. It isn't as if this is a 'blind date' scenario where they only met on their first date; they've been obviously feeling their way towards a relationship from as far back as Marten's dads' wedding. In fact, several fairly significant events in their relationship occurred before Marten threw caution to the wind and decided to see if the attraction that came out in the 'skritch' incident had any deeper foundation.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 08:09
The time frame of them being "official" is pretty short, yes. Remember, Faye's crisis caused the cancellation of what was supposed to be their second date.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 08:10
akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates

Has anyone ever actually tested how tortoises respond to barbiturates?

Probably not well. I understand that reptiles and sedatives go badly together and there is a high probability of fatal side-effects. If I remember correctly, vets consider surgery on a reptile as a last resort.
My relationship tortoise really -was- fed too many downers, then. That would certainly explain the decade-old corpse that is my love life :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SeaWoodStage on 05 Feb 2015, 09:04
What I like most about this strip is that it shows a) how much Marten is in need of a joyful influence, and b) that he's getting that joyful influence.
Sometimes when reading this comic, I've felt weird about how little is actually happening to Marten, or rather, how little we've seen of him reacting to the things in his own life. I don't mean that he's passive as a character, just that maybe due to his position in the comic he's become more passive by comparison.
It's wonderful, therefore, to see him truly interacting with two of the most important people in his life. The conversation with Faye was great, and now we have the intimacy with Claire. I don't mean to sound like too much of an optimist, but I honestly think these two most recent strips demonstrate how much Marten has grown up on the sly.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BrusselSprouts on 05 Feb 2015, 09:13
I think it's worth mentioning that the Proposed Second Date did sound a lot more cozy than the first. Idk I've never been in a relationship but there's something a lot more intimate sounding when you invite someone over to your (presumably empty) house, rather than meeting in public. One could speculate that Claire had planned on going farther already
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SeaWoodStage on 05 Feb 2015, 09:25
Wait. what was the second date? For some reason I had it in my head that they were going to the movies or something. I've gone back about thirty strips and then got lazy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 09:28
There is no second date.

Only Zuul.

They were going to meet at Claire's house and watch a movie.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 09:29
Wait. what was the second date?

Claire invited Marten over to her house to watch a movie (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2877) in a very cute, round-about way that clearly indicated how nervous the situation made her.

Yes, she invited her boyfriend over to her family home. Given Clinton's protective and interventionist attitude towards his sister and the embarrassing lack of boundaries displayed by her mother, I think she chose a night when they'd both be away from home. So it's reasonable to think that she intended things to go further than just a movie and popcorn whilst snuggled up together on the couch.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 05 Feb 2015, 09:36
Some say that the best time to have sex is the first date. No wondering how he or she is in bed, no long sexual tension period.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Cattus on 05 Feb 2015, 09:42
I'm of the opinion that the "click" of the door locking in panel 4 is a sign that we will never, ever be told what went on inside that bedroom. Did they or didn't they? It's Schroedinger's Bedroom; they both did and didn't.

Let's face it, though, if they are having sex, Claire's absolutely going to rub it in Clinton's face that she lost her virginity before he lost his.

I don't agree at all.  I think that her intimate relationship will remain private...Period!  She is too sweet and kind to use sexual prowess or experience as a weapon even if only to bug her brother.  That would be totally out of character IMHO.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SeaWoodStage on 05 Feb 2015, 09:46
Thanks, ReindeerFlotilla and especially BenRG.

BenRG, I wouldn't necessarily describe it as an embarrassing lack of boundaries though? (pause to read comics again) Yeah OK, I just re-read the comic I assume you're talking about, and I suppose it is pretty off the cards. I was just so taken up with the romance aspect of the storyline at the time, that the weirdness of a mother inviting a potential suitor over without consulting her child the suitee (is that a word) never occurred to me. In short, I see your point.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 05 Feb 2015, 09:48
I'm honestly surprised by how many people here have complained about Claire and Marten's "saccharine" relationship.

It's a different kind of relationshio Marten's ever had, yes. I say let the man be happy, I don't think we've ever seen him in a relationship that good. Neither has he ever started another relationship without major drama (Dora and Padma). This time, the problem is elsewhere.

In a similar, although MUCH smaller, situation of Marten helping Faye, Dora freaked out. Claire is giving him complete support. That right there is what an awesome relationship is.

And what happens behind closed doors is their business only.

I have to say, today's comic left me smiling like an idiot.

On a completely different note... IF the rumored timeskip in fact does happen, it's either tomorrow or (more likely) tuesday. Everything is more or less wrapped up enough for that to happen now. I predict pintsize tomorrow.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 05 Feb 2015, 10:03
People are surprised that a mother shows low awareness of boundaries regarding her adult children?

My family, for one, would astound you.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Cattus on 05 Feb 2015, 10:14
Some say that the best time to have sex is the first date. No wondering how he or she is in bed, no long sexual tension period.

Yes some people would say that.  However not any intelligent ones I know.  Fact is that until you actually "KNOW" a person and their motivation and psyche, having sex with them could be risky, especially when you are younger.  You never know how your 'relationship' will be used against you if you break it off after one date.  Also, then you base your relationship on whether the sex was good rather than if the person was good.  Sex can improve as partners get to know one another but a scumbucket will always be a scumbucket.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 05 Feb 2015, 10:22
On the timeskip note, I think we have Marten and Faye wrapped up pretty well. I do think however we need a bit of info on Sven and Dora. We have both the Svenectomy and the "I love you" bomb waiting on the back burners and I for one would like to see them played out
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 05 Feb 2015, 10:31
In a similar, although MUCH smaller, situation of Marten helping Faye, Dora freaked out. Claire is giving him complete support. That right there is what an awesome relationship is.

This is an excellent assessment of the situation that bears repeating.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SeaWoodStage on 05 Feb 2015, 10:34
Some say that the best time to have sex is the first date. No wondering how he or she is in bed, no long sexual tension period.

Yes, but then why bother at all, unless you think sex is the most important thing in a relationship? (No judgment here by the way, you might well think that, and why not). ETA: I may have come up with the worst-constructed sentence in history.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 05 Feb 2015, 10:47
FWIW, I'm not sure I'd want my first time with anyone, let alone a virgin, to be when I was dead tired.  Both because I'd prefer to be at "peak performance" as it were, and I'd be concerned that falling asleep immediately after deflowering would be a faux pas. 

Maybe I overthink things more than Marten, but I think we're pretty similar in a lot of ways actually.  I don't think he'd be axious per-se, but he would be beside himself with the desire to make things "go right." 

So yeah, put me in the it was makeouts only camp.  I think Jeph would give fuckin more of a buildup than this.  That is, unless he decided the way to deal with how sensitive some people are about the sex lives of trans characters was to basically never say one way or another if Marten and Claire are actually doin it. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 05 Feb 2015, 10:56
I was referring to 'too soon', in comparison to my own personal pace (which is akin to that of a tortoise on barbituates), not as any overt criticism. To each their own.

...and there went my coffee.  :laugh:

(How would an anxious person embarking on her first relationship feel if her makeout partner fell asleep?)

Depends on the circumstances. Given that he's clearly pretty tired, I don't think she'd take it personally, but she'd probably tease him mercilessly afterwards.

This comic would have benefited from a few words, since I can't imagine showing up at my partner's house after such an incident and not asking about their and their friend's well-being, and this comic rushes through - open door/make-outs/disappearing in a bedroom.

Sometimes the look on someone's face was enough to let me know they could really use a hug. Comfort first, conversation after. But maybe that's just me.

FWIW, I'm not sure I'd want my first time with anyone, let alone a virgin, to be when I was dead tired. <snip>

For a first time, maybe. But don't sleep on tired sex (pun only partly intended).

My prediction for tomorrow is that its the following morning. We see Marten kiss Claire goodbye at the door and we have no idea whether they slept together, kissed and cuddled or built a duvet fort together. :p

My money's on the duvet fort, though given recent discussion, someone will probably complain that it's too soon. :P

This comic would have benefited from a few words, since I can't imagine showing up at my partner's house after such an incident and not asking about their and their friend's well-being, and this comic rushes through - open door/make-outs/disappearing in a bedroom.

Fair point, but  we still don't really know how much time has elapsed since Faye's collapse: they could have talked about all that on the phone, depiction of which wouldn't have made interesting comic material, other than giving us a clue about what's going on in their minds. If that had happened, no words would be needed now.

I'm sticking with the theory of hastily catching up with lost time after an interrupted (never even started) date.

Besides, the not-knowing is likely to drive Clinton more crazy than knowing will; she'd keep a lid on it for that reason alone. One could also substitute "the forum" and "Jeph would" into the sentence above and have a good indication of how things are going to play out.  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 05 Feb 2015, 10:57
I dunno if they'll have sex, but I don't think it's that unlikely. I mean, it's 50/50 to me now, they could be going to the bedroom for a hug and kiss and talk session, or just going to make out, or decide not to have sex at the last minute, but I don't think sex is that surprising. I don't know a ton about Marten's inner workings, but a lot of the time, once a stressful situation is resolved (and sometimes before), fucking seems like a great idea. I don't think Marten's really an angry sex (using this as shorthand for self serving and detached, as well as hard) kind of guy (since I know that's how some of my wording could be interpreted), but I really think he could be at a moment where he's combining a need for an outlet for the stress, 'here is this girl that I think is great,' and, probably subconsciously, the reasoning that something loving and happy right now would be really, really good for a change. Again, that doesn't only mean sex, it could be a number of other options, but I definitely wouldn't rule sex out based on it having been a stressful or hard night.

Regarding tiredness, he probably got his second wind around the time Faye went to bed and he realized he could go to sleep.

Some say that the best time to have sex is the first date. No wondering how he or she is in bed, no long sexual tension period.

Yes, but then why bother at all, unless you think sex is the most important thing in a relationship? (No judgment here by the way, you might well think that, and why not).

While definitely not the most important thing, sex can certainly be a dealbreaker. I'm too STD paranoid to have sex on first dates if I was really dating (vs happened to start seeing someone more organically when not really looking, and also vs being monogamously married), but reasonably it's something I'd want to do.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mojo on 05 Feb 2015, 11:19
I missed something?


Damn.


Wait, what?  Was there a different version of 2890, or was it just posted early?  I hate missing things.


My thoughts though, wander into some other territory.  I am forced to wonder where this is going to go (and yes, a part of me wishes there was a Slipshine episode, if only to understand the mechanics of this).  I worry that this could become a turning point.  I mean, up until now, Claire's... equipment... hasn't been an issue.  This is the point at which it COULD become one.  On the other hand, considering Marten's upbringing, chances are he's far more open minded about that kind of thing.

It will be interesting to see how this develops.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 05 Feb 2015, 11:23
It's worth noting that Word of Jeph is that that's never going to be brought up in comic, and the forum rules prohibit discussion of that, for what it's worth.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 05 Feb 2015, 11:37
I do believe the discussion of what specifically those two are doing is rather pointless. It's a couple being happy, that'll all we need.

Even the fact that Marten finally had sex with Dora way back was glossed over and only told in retrospect, despite the fact that he never had sex being a running gag in early comics.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 11:39
Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy? It really doesn't matter. Claire and Marten are both intelligent enough to figure out something that is mutually satisfactory for both of them. What exactly that might be is not the point. The point is that they feel secure enough with each other to have a sexual relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 05 Feb 2015, 12:04
Even the fact that Marten finally had sex with Dora way back was glossed over and only told in retrospect, despite the fact that he never had sex being a running gag in early comics.

I dont' think Marten was a virgin. I thought he'd had sex with whatsherface, whom he moved to NoHam for.

Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy? It really doesn't matter.

agreed. Honestly, not to be crude, but all anyone needs to engage in sex with anyone else is a mouth and hands.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: A Duck on 05 Feb 2015, 12:08
He wasn't. I meant "never had" as in "since a somewhat long time before the comic began, he hadn't had sex"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 12:09
Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy? It really doesn't matter. Claire and Marten are both intelligent enough to figure out something that is mutually satisfactory for both of them. What exactly that might be is not the point. The point is that they feel secure enough with each other to have a sexual relationship.

If there's one thing I know it's that people are really good at figuring out how to make sex at each other.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 12:11
Marten promised Claire he would cope with anything related to her being trans. She asked. That answers all the legitimate questions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 12:17
Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy? It really doesn't matter.

Whether it matters or not is the wrong question. Does any of this matter? Not really. It's pictures being drawn by a guy and posted to the internet.

It's a question. The question is unanswered. People want to know about unanswered questions. All of human achievement and failure can be traced back to that. There's a certain point where it becomes obvious that making value judgments about that is both pointless and hypocritical. But everyone's a hypocrite, so I guess that last is also pointless.

Human societies generally have dangerous hangups about the sex tackle most of us are carrying around. It really isn't an important bit of information, so logically it shouldn't matter if someone asks or doesn't. Lives are not at stake. But the hangups are there. They are omnipresent. People aren't comfortable with having their equipment discussed.

At the same time, because of the hangups, people get a certain thrill out of discussing the equipment of others. It could be the taboo aspect, it could be the subject's rarity (http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120708040933/mlp/images/d/d0/Canterlot_Castle_Rarity_4.png). People be people.

Claire is an avatar of sorts for some people in these parts. Also, people say stupid shit, on most any subject. It's the principal method humans have for learning not to say stupid shit (failure and observing the failures of others). The board's policy is not to go there. Wondering why people who generally don't know the policy are motivated to ask is probably as pointless as wondering what's in Claire's pants.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 05 Feb 2015, 12:20
The problem with the whole "not discussing graphic sexual things" regarding Claire within the strip is Pintsize.  It would be totally OOC for him not to say or do some sort of well-meaning but totally inappropriate thing when he finds out.  Like I could totally see him getting Marten and Claire matching friendship-bracelets, and then when they are both horrified, ask if he picked out the wrong sizes.

Global Moderator Comment I could def. see P-size giving them friendship bracelets but maybe Jeph would think twice about writing it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 05 Feb 2015, 12:30
I'm of the opinion that the "click" of the door locking in panel 4 is a sign that we will never, ever be told what went on inside that bedroom. Did they or didn't they? It's Schroedinger's Bedroom; they both did and didn't.

Exactly. The point of that "click" is that what they do and how they do it (if at all) is no one's business. I see it as in the same vein as the sticky post about not being nosy about people's private parts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 05 Feb 2015, 12:34
The problem with the whole "not discussing graphic sexual things" regarding Claire within the strip is Pintsize.  It would be totally OOC for him not to say or do some sort of well-meaning but totally inappropriate thing when he finds out.  Like I could totally see him getting Marten and Claire matching friendship-bracelets and then when they are both horrified, ask if he picked out the wrong sizes.
Well, I suppose that could be a possible reason Marten apparently hasn't rebooted Pintsize yet...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 05 Feb 2015, 12:34

agreed. Honestly, not to be crude, but all anyone needs to engage in sex with anyone else is a mouth and hands.

I've had the same conversation about The Little Mermaid.

EDIT: And The Doctor.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 12:35
And honestly, can we really get mad at people for asking? Yes, it's incredibly impolite to ask real people about their sexbits, but these are fictional characters and Claire does represent - however unfairly - the trans figure for a lot of people. I know I personally never really thought about trans issues until this comic at all and is one of the reasons why I joined the forums - I want to learn more about aspects of life I haven't really considered up to this point.

Having said that, I don't really care too much what's going on sex wise - cause like I said earlier, people have this great ability to find ways to do each other - but if I ever were to have a relationship with someone like Claire (I admit that I'd probably have some hang ups, but they don't seem nearly as much a concern after learning more these past few months) then I can see how showing this conversation (verbally or non-verbally) that Marten and Claire must be having would help.


I guess I'm saying that I don't see anything wrong with the intrigue, but the way people go about it is kinda rude sometimes. For instance, don't do this:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 05 Feb 2015, 12:36
I have to say, today's comic left me smiling like an idiot.

On a completely different note... IF the rumored timeskip in fact does happen, it's either tomorrow or (more likely) tuesday. Everything is more or less wrapped up enough for that to happen now. I predict pintsize tomorrow.

Same here, luckily I stopped giggling before I left the house.

For tomorrows comic it might be a sleeping (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1328) montage (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2554), be interesting how/if Dora and Faye sleep and Claireten snuggles. Though I've never been right in calling the next comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Feb 2015, 12:52
I think we've had one to two Timeskips already since Marten found Faye passed out on the couch.

I'm guessing that a minimum of 24 hours, maybe 48 since then.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 05 Feb 2015, 13:09
Sometimes the look on someone's face was enough to let me know they could really use a hug. Comfort first, conversation after. But maybe that's just me.
It's not just you.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 13:10

agreed. Honestly, not to be crude, but all anyone needs to engage in sex with anyone else is a mouth and hands.

I've had the same conversation about The Little Mermaid.

EDIT: And The Doctor.

Jack Harkness. And frankly, he'd find a way even if there weren't mouths or hands.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 13:21
And honestly, can we really get mad at people for asking? Yes, it's incredibly impolite to ask real people about their sexbits, but these are fictional characters and Claire does represent - however unfairly - the trans figure for a lot of people.

(Disclaimer: This comment is not directed at you, I am just using it as a jumping board of sorts for an explanation to others.)

What one does have to keep in mind, of course, that there are a lot of trans people here (indeed, we had a huge influx of them after Claire came out to Marten). Imagine you are a trans person and you keep getting asked those questions in real life (not really in a much different manner than the comic you posted, I imagine). It hurts. Then you get online, reading your favorite comic, go to the forum...and there are people of all sorts asking all the same questions, and seeing nothing wrong with it.  As you said, Claire does unwillingly represent trans people - also to trans people.

(Second disclaimer: I am not trans and thus cannot adequately represent the experiences and viewpoints of trans people).

We used to have to ban ten people per day (or so, I didn't keep count) when Claire snuggled up next to Marten back in the hotel.
This is why I codified the rule regarding private parts (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html) back then when I was still a mod. It is really just an aspect of Jeph's ultimate rule: "don't be an asshole".

This forum has really become a better place in that regard, and I am proud of its users.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 13:29
I wasn't around for all of that, was it really that bad (that would explain the myriad of crossed off names I see on the forums...)? All I have to go off of is news articles with comments sections about people being dicks to trans people over the internet, although to be fair they're also dicks to everyone else who's even kind of different.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 13:33
And honestly, can we really get mad at people for asking?

Yes. There is talking about it because it is relevant to your reading of the character's emotional state, and there is talking about it just to talk about it. This thread is going off-course.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 05 Feb 2015, 13:46
The problem with the whole "not discussing graphic sexual things" regarding Claire within the strip is Pintsize.  It would be totally OOC for him not to say or do some sort of well-meaning but totally inappropriate thing when he finds out.  Like I could totally see him getting Marten and Claire matching friendship-bracelets, and then when they are both horrified, ask if he picked out the wrong sizes.

Global Moderator Comment I could def. see P-size giving them friendship bracelets but maybe Jeph would think twice about writing it.

I figure there are some things Jeph won't say or do even in the guise of pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 13:46
Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy? It really doesn't matter.

Because it "got put out there by Jeph" and it piqued people's interest. You can't exactly tell people not to gawk when they've already been hooked in. I know it's rude to some folks, but human nature is one of those things people need to understand that it will happen period. You can only tell people not to do it and ban folks before you just need to accept this fact of life.

I know i'm probably gonna get flack for it, but I think it needs to be said: Instead of feeling offended by other peoples actions, it would be better if people would be a tad forgiving and educate folks on such things. And not in a negative manner. Be positive about it, because people are showing interest in it. Guide them into the right direction without making it look like it's a pain. Ah fuck it, like I will change anything with this malarkey......
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 05 Feb 2015, 13:48
There, there. Check out the DISCUSS forum for a better place to sound out these ideas.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 05 Feb 2015, 13:50
https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,28457.0.html
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 05 Feb 2015, 13:54
To get from that back on track - god, I'm yearning for some Pintsize. Just one crude dick joke, some insightful cleaning advice, running dildo shenanigans with Winslow, Marigod repairing  him and Pintsize and May bonding over who does the best insults.. Anything but more of Claire/Marten.

cesariojpn: that blew up another few WCDTs, and moderators and forumites are touchy... I see your good intentions, but it's no good asking people around here when you didn't read their bazillion links about the topic. In talking about that you're probably better off looking somewhere else or educating yourself :(
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 05 Feb 2015, 14:11
I do not think she struggles to remember, but she might be a bit embarrassed letting Marten access her underwear drawer. As for the booby-trap, it obviously is not lethal (or Pintsize would be dead by now), but I would guess it involves copious use of duct tape. With Faye's proven engineering skills, I guess it is very advanced.

I'd say it's highly likely her drawer contains something (in addition to underwear) whose discovery by another would have made some people embarrassed, if not shamed and mortified.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1381

But I'm certain Marten wouldn't care, and Faye knows him well enough not to care either. It speaks well of their friendship if that's the case.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 05 Feb 2015, 14:14
Nothing wrong with how Marten/Claire are becoming ... more than friends/co-workers. It's just that Tai/Dora got itself an extra serving of greatness when Tai stepped out of her clumsy-puppy-love persona to try to kick down some of Dora's insecurity wall. In the vernacular of The Site That Will Ruin Your Life, that in my mind was Tai's Moment of Awesome.

This one? (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePage) :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 14:21
There, there. Check out the DISCUSS forum for a better place to sound out these ideas.

That seems to me more of sweeping the issue under the rug metaphorically rather than addressing it outright. If Jeph really wants to be this progressive, then the forums should be encouraging such debate in a ready forum, not shunting it elsewhere.

In talking about that you're probably better off looking somewhere else or educating yourself :(

Don't make such comments without knowing the situation at hand.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 05 Feb 2015, 14:29
In talking about that you're probably better off looking somewhere else or educating yourself :(

Don't make such comments without knowing the situation at hand.

I am sorry, cesariojpn, I didn't mean to imply that you're not educated about the topic (non-native speaker.. sometimes things just come out wrong ;). I just meant asking people here is not going to help any matters, so if you're interested, other sources are more helpful.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 14:38
Cesario: Yes. We are encouraging discussion in the DISCUSS forum (although I am a bit hazy on the rules of that particular thread). It is not the responsibility of others to educate you about their life, nor could we make them in any case. Some people like ZoeB still sometimes take their time for it - but they do it on a voluntary basis. I imagine trans people also want to chill and read their comic, not be pestered by questions. I am sure there is plenty of information on the Internet on any particular aspect you may be interested in - in fact I believe some are linked in the thread I mentioned - and you can be more certain the authors actually wanted to educate you, opposed by being asked about the issues on a forum they frequent, which may be too close to home for most.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 05 Feb 2015, 14:39
There, there. Check out the DISCUSS forum for a better place to sound out these ideas.

That seems to me more of sweeping the issue under the rug metaphorically rather than addressing it outright. If Jeph really wants to be this progressive, then the forums should be encouraging such debate in a ready forum, not shunting it elsewhere.

What? No, that doesn't make any sense. Get your butt over to the DISCUSS forum eg. to the specific thread I linked to if you're interested in learning more or even just getting some feedback on what you know and believe. Are you afraid of discussion? No? Good, take it to DISCUSS. Sheesh.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 14:40
That seems to me more of sweeping the issue under the rug metaphorically rather than addressing it outright. If Jeph really wants to be this progressive, then the forums should be encouraging such debate in a ready forum, not shunting it elsewhere.

Think clearly about exactly what it is you want to talk about, and post it where it will be on topic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 14:44
There, there. Check out the DISCUSS forum for a better place to sound out these ideas.

That seems to me more of sweeping the issue under the rug metaphorically rather than addressing it outright. If Jeph really wants to be this progressive, then the forums should be encouraging such debate in a ready forum, not shunting it elsewhere.

In talking about that you're probably better off looking somewhere else or educating yourself :(

Don't make such comments without knowing the situation at hand.

Who said Jeph wanted to be progressive? I believe the term Jeph used was "Inclusive."

The world would be a better place if the poeple with information made time to to give that information to others. Of course, the world would be better place if the people with money made time to give that money to others.

We can admire and thank people who the latter. But we can't require everyone to do it. So it goes with the former. Welcome to Earth.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 14:50
Of course, the world would be better place if the people with money made time to give that money to others.

ARE YOU ONE OF DEM BLOODY COMMIES
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Honkytonk on 05 Feb 2015, 14:57
I'm worried about Pintsize in all this. Will he feel guilty about Faye drinking herself to oblivion after turning him off? Will he feel angst that perhaps he should have stopped her from turning him off so he could have warned Marten or got her to the hospital quicker? That could be interesting, even if it's sounded off of Winslow or Momo because Pintsize is, well... Pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 05 Feb 2015, 14:59
 I know it was a mod edit, but I like the idea of Pintsize getting them friendship bracelets.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 05 Feb 2015, 15:08
That's a lot of tongue in panel 2

#andnowforsomethingcompletelydifferent
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 15:34
Of course, that's completely ignoring the obvious issue of Claire being a ginger.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Feb 2015, 15:52
OK, back to the comic.  I wanted to address some of the comments about what people are - or think they are- seeing, and my interpretation, FWIW. 

Panel one; I think that's been pretty well established.  It's a mix of uncertainty on Claire's part, and a reflection of concern for what she's seeing in Marten's face - exhaustion, worry for Faye, and delight that she's come by. 

Panel two - someone mentioned (probably a few pages back) that there's too much space between them.  But you'll notice that Claire's hands are on Marten's chest, not around him.  After seeing what's in his face, she came towards him, and putting her hands on his chest, angled her head up to give him a much needed (by both of them) kiss. 

Marten's hands are on her upper arms, drawing her in for said kiss.  It's not too much space, it's space that's still being diminished. Claire's hands move, her arms reaching up and encircling Marten's neck and shoulders, as we see in the third panel. 

Panel three - not only have Claire's arms and hands moved (quite naturally) on Marten, but his have moved down and around her back.  They have pivoted - almost a pirouette, moving out slightly into the hall. 

This is where I disagree with many of the other posters.  I'm pretty sure that's the front door to the apartment.  The hinges and knob agree, the point of view has changed to the view from the hallway.  Faye's gone to bed, they have the place to themselves, and I think he's just "welcomed" her in. 

The makeouts, I'm sure, continue.  And the move to the bedroom may well happen in fairly short order.  But I don't think that's what was drawn. 

I wanted to consult Jeph's twitter in case had commented, but I see the twitter feed's been removed from the comic site?  Or am I just having trouble with it? 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 15:58
I wasn't around for all of that, was it really that bad (that would explain the myriad of crossed off names I see on the forums...)?

Yes. There were posts that were deleted within seconds of the first moderator reading them and which got the perpetrators banned permanently on their first post. I will bring back no report of them to trouble the light of day.

There are pointers to trans*-related educational resources in the Notes for New Members thread, and early on in the trans discussion thread in Discuss. Several people here have volunteered educational time that should more than satisfy any reasonable need.

"That offended me" is an educational statement.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 05 Feb 2015, 16:00
Of course, that's completely ignoring the obvious issue of Claire being a ginger.

I hope Marten has his medical insurance up to date, I seem to recall him being a bleeder.

 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 16:01
I'm thinking more from a story telling perspective: there wasn't a lot of lead up. I kinda found it jarring.
...You have read through the archives, right? Like, the first 511 strips?
"Lead up" may appear to be jarring, but it's actually because it tends to be glacial. When one of the icebergs finally fall off the ice shelf, that's when we notice it.
But this - this has kinda been building for a while. We just haven't seen it since the two of them were off holding hands.

Yeesss... I binge-read this comic a year back from the beginning and have reading ever since. Still doesn't change my opinion; the timing in relation to everything else in the story makes it feel a bit jarring. Today's comic feels completely disconnected from the first few comics earlier this week. How could that have been made better? Perhaps dialogue... not even a lot of dialogue. If Claire asked "Are you okay?" in the first frame and the rest of it stayed exactly the same, I think it would have felt much less jarring to me as a reader.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 05 Feb 2015, 16:03
OK, back to the comic.  I wanted to address some of the comments about what people are - or think they are- seeing, and my interpretation, FWIW. 

I wanted to consult Jeph's twitter in case had commented, but I see the twitter feed's been removed from the comic site?  Or am I just having trouble with it?

With the exception of the interpretation of the door, we're in complete agreement, and I like your explanation of the panels (enough to tell you vice just hitting the button  :-D).

I'm not seeing the twitter feed, either.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 05 Feb 2015, 16:05

I'm not seeing the twitter feed, either.

Nothing on the twitter feed to warrant discussion really.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 16:27
Sigh... Why do people focus so much on Claire's anatomy?

Because we have active (and dirty) imaginations?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 16:47
This is where I disagree with many of the other posters.  I'm pretty sure that's the front door to the apartment.  The hinges and knob agree, the point of view has changed to the view from the hallway.  Faye's gone to bed, they have the place to themselves, and I think he's just "welcomed" her in. 

As I said in an earlier post (with included reference shots https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30442.msg1299958.html#msg1299958 ):

The hallway does not have chair rail, the hinges and handle on Marten's door are on the right and left respectively just as the door shown in panel 3 and 4 of the comic. (Faye's door on the other hand, swings the other way).

By the art, the only possible explanation is that is his bedroom door. Or possibly another door in their small apartment that we have never seen (I don't think we've ever seen the wall the the left of the couch), but that option seems unlikely. (maybe its the rumpus room).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 05 Feb 2015, 17:06
By the art, the only possible explanation is that is his bedroom door. Or possibly another door in their small apartment that we have never seen (I don't think we've ever seen the wall the the left of the couch), but that option seems unlikely. (maybe its the rumpus room).
(https://queenbookbuff.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/where-the-wild-things-are1.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 05 Feb 2015, 17:10
I'm honestly surprised by how many people here have complained about Claire and Marten's "saccharine" relationship.

It's a different kind of relationshio Marten's ever had, yes. I say let the man be happy, I don't think we've ever seen him in a relationship that good. Neither has he ever started another relationship without major drama (Dora and Padma). This time, the problem is elsewhere.

In a similar, although MUCH smaller, situation of Marten helping Faye, Dora freaked out. Claire is giving him complete support. That right there is what an awesome relationship is.

As part of the minority who has expressed that opinion, I'll try to elaborate, though I obviously can't speak for my fellow posters who do hold similar views.

I don't disagree that the relationship is different. I think that it makes perfect sense, is true to the characters and the situation, and it's nice to see these two characters happy. No argument here.

What I'm referring to is my tastes as a reader. I don't like to think of myself as jaded, and I can appreciate some cuteness and heartwarming moments as much as the next person, but in the case of the date arc...it was just a bit too much. Too cutesy-poo, a bit too corny and saccharine. I'm not saying it's wrong or that others can't enjoy that, but it's a matter of taste, and for some of us, it Tastes Like Diabetes (to borrow the title TV Tropes has coined).

It's not about not wanting Marten to be happy, or thinking that it's inappropriate, or anything like that. I can certainly appreciate the context and why the arc was like that, but I still found it off-putting because it was just too cutesy for me. AprilArcus also used the word "tedious", and I'd be inclined to agree with that, too. Like I said, not every conversation has to be deep, not every arc needs to be serious and dramatic, but that arc - which ran for over a week - seemed to eschew any meaningful character development or humour in favour of cute picture after cute picture. And a lot of people loved that, so fair enough. I acknowledge that I'm in the minority here. But nevertheless, it was too much cutesy for my tastes.

To sum up, it's not about the relationship itself, but the presentation and storytelling, and personal tastes/preferences as a reader. It's the same as other readers not liking the Yelling Bird strips, or being more annoyed than amused by Pintsize's antics, or having an aversion to Faye and/or Dora. While I enjoy the fact that comedic works can be heartwarming, profound, and provide interesting commentary in addition to being funny, there needs to be balance and above all, humour should be used to cut through the treacle lest it become too sappy. For me, the date arc ended up feeling too sappy and (to borrow April's word once again), tedious. Not because it didn't make sense or because it dared to show the characters being happy, but because the way it played out didn't suit my tastes as a reader.

For the majority who loved it, fantastic. By all means love the hell out of it. For those of us who it didn't appeal to or wanted something more substantial, it wasn't our favourite arc. Can't please everyone.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 17:13
I think that I'm finally willing to properly weigh-in on whether or not they're "moving too fast".  Granted, when they got together, they said that they'd be taking it slow, and one or both may have hesitation as to it being Claire's first time.  But really, they have the right to change their minds, same as any real people. 

Now, there would be some amusement if Pintsize hung the "Happy Arbor Day" banner prematurely, but I just hope that the next time we see them, there is either squee, or character-growth, or both.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 05 Feb 2015, 17:21
Likewise not speaking for everyone on the forum who liked it, but at least for me their relationship rings true in some respects. I've had relationships where I fell irrationally hard for people I knew probably about as well as Claire and Marten know each other (and some where I fell for someone I knew much less than that). In the early going, sometimes it is saccharine, because you're still at the stage where there's things you don't know, and the things that will eventually drive you nuts are still endearingly quirky. They'll have their bumps in the road soon enough, I'd wager. But just like couples in my day-to-day life -- whether they've just gotten together and are still in the honeymoon phase, or they've been together for donkey's years but still haven't forgotten what they love about each other and can still be silly/saccharine/dopey around each other from time to time -- if I see somebody who's happy where they are, with whomever makes 'em happy, I figure why not roll with the punches? Life's too damn short to be serious all the time, or to begrudge someone else whatever happiness, joy, or simple contentment they can find.

Just my $.02 worth.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 05 Feb 2015, 17:25
Likewise not speaking for everyone on the forum who liked it, but at least for me their relationship rings true in some respects. I've had relationships where I fell irrationally hard for people I knew probably about as well as Claire and Marten know each other (and some where I fell for someone I knew much less than that). In the early going, sometimes it is saccharine, because you're still at the stage where there's things you don't know, and the things that will eventually drive you nuts are still endearingly quirky. They'll have their bumps in the road soon enough, I'd wager. But just like couples in my day-to-day life -- whether they've just gotten together and are still in the honeymoon phase, or they've been together for donkey's years but still haven't forgotten what they love about each other and can still be silly/saccharine/dopey around each other from time to time -- if I see somebody who's happy where they are, with whomever makes 'em happy, I figure why not roll with the punches? Life's too damn short to be serious all the time, or to begrudge someone else whatever happiness, joy, or simple contentment they can find.

Just my $.02 worth.

Absolutely, and I don't dispute the realism of the situation. I just have a different take on whether that arc was enjoyable to read, based on my personal taste.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 05 Feb 2015, 17:31
I may be stating the obvious here, and it's probably been stated before, but:

Jeph Jacques  is a goddamn genius storyteller. He can  get people so involved in his stories and his characters that they get into arguments (or at least vigorous discussions) about them. As a storyteller myself*, I am truly in awe.



*ten novels, five traditionally published and five self published. Im also the father of a trans kid, so I won't identify myself any further until they say it's okay.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 05 Feb 2015, 18:06
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 18:06
I think the way he develops characters is a lot better than his storytelling. Not saying his storytelling is bad or anything, but the strength of QC has always been about the characters to me. They seem real and they're relate-able. When I think about the comic I think, "I can't wait to see what the characters do next" not, "I can't wait to see where the story is going." It's a subtle difference for sure and ultimately leads to Jeph being great at what he does regardless, but I just wanted my opinion on that to be shown (don't throw rocks at me).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 18:14
I don't like any of the purely happy, uncomplicated relationships in the strip. Dale/Marigold or Dora/Tai or Penny/Will either. Marten/Faye, Marten/Dora, Faye/Sven, Faye/Angus, even the mostly offscreen Tai/Experiments-in-non-monogamy all feel more interesting to me, because there is both attraction and conflict; push and pull. Witness:
These are dynamic relationships. There are two forces in conflict, both strongly felt, and not easily resolved. They produce a lot of interest and drama whenever they are on-panel. Whereas...
These just don't hold up. They are one-note; there are no layers or contradictions or anything to dig through as a reader.

Marten and Claire were on the first list from strip 2205 to strip 2808. There was a lot to talk about! Marten was Zen and Claire was firey. Claire was driven and Marten was a slacker. Marten was musical and Claire didn't really appreciate his taste. Claire was way into Marten physically and terrified to make a move. Marten was experimenting with casual sex and being miserable about it. They seemed like a good fit on some levels and a bad fit on others, and so it seemed like there was some dramatic potential.

Since 2808, all the tension has gone out of the relationship. Claire seems to have lost most of her personaity. All pull, no push. I don't object to the relationship on principal because I don't think it needs to be written that way, but that's what we're getting so far.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 18:19
There's nothing from preventing any of these relationships from going sideways.  Clinton would obviously be a potential thorn in the the side of Claireten, and with Dora/Tai, it still may be in the "honeymoon period".   Dora still has her control issues, even if she's working on them.

I think the way he develops characters is a lot better than his storytelling. Not saying his storytelling is bad or anything, but the strength of QC has always been about the characters to me. They seem real and they're relate-able. When I think about the comic I think, "I can't wait to see what the characters do next" not, "I can't wait to see where the story is going." It's a subtle difference for sure and ultimately leads to Jeph being great at what he does regardless, but I just wanted my opinion on that to be shown (don't throw rocks at me).

It's a slice of life comic, so the characters and world-building tend to *make* the story, rather than some epic plot.  It's like I could probably outline the whole plot of "Totoro" in one sentence, but it'd be seriously selling the film short.  It's the character interactions, and the world that really create the piece.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 18:25
Yeah, I wanted to use the phrase slice-of-life but haven't gotten around to it. Also, everyone keeps telling me to watch that, but I never have as of yet.

And as far as the relationships go I agree with what Hedgie was alluding to. Just because things haven't gone bad does not mean they won't. Also, there's only so much you can put into the story, lots of characters have basically been written out because there's already too little time to go around.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 18:26
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Pretty sure that's the floor, a piece of molding, and the back wall of the hallway, judging by the ceiling line.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 18:32
Just because things haven't gone bad does not mean they won't.

I don't want things to go badly for Claire and Marten, I want to see their relationship illuminate something new about them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 18:32
Of course, that's completely ignoring the obvious issue of Claire being a ginger.

I hope Marten has his medical insurance up to date, I seem to recall him being a bleeder.

 :-D

What a cutting remark.  How spicy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 05 Feb 2015, 18:46
Marten and Claire were on the first list from strip 2205 to strip 2808. There was a lot to talk about! Marten was Zen and Claire was firey. Claire was driven and Marten was a slacker. Marten was musical and Claire didn't really appreciate his taste. Claire was way into Marten physically and terrified to make a move. Marten was experimenting with casual sex and being miserable about it. They seemed like a good fit on some levels and a bad fit on others, and so it seemed like there was some dramatic potential.
$10 says this comes back with a vengeance at some point.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 05 Feb 2015, 18:46
I don't like any of the purely happy, uncomplicated relationships in the strip. Dale/Marigold or Dora/Tai or Penny/Will either. Marten/Faye, Marten/Dora, Faye/Sven, Faye/Angus, even the mostly offscreen Tai/Experiments-in-non-monogamy all feel more interesting to me, because there is both attraction and conflict; push and pull. Witness:
  • Faye wants Marten but misses her chance with him because she can't get over her fear of rejection and abandonment.
  • Dora wants Marten but can't convince herself that he wants her back.
  • Marten likes Dora but can't cope with her hot personality and is sort of just going with the flow instead of actively seeking out what he wants.
  • Faye craves Sven physically but can't stand his personality.
  • Faye establishes a connection with Angus that is superficially pleasurable and emotionally distant enough to be in her comfort zone, but not actually safe or fulfilling in any way.
  • Sven falls for Faye in a way that completely contradicts everything he knows about his role in relationships.
  • Tai craves monogamy, but pushes herself to be in open relationships because it's the cultural norm she's immersed in.
These are dynamic relationships. There are two forces in conflict, both strongly felt, and not easily resolved. They produce a lot of interest and drama whenever they are on-panel. Whereas...
  • Wil wants Penny and he just needs to get over himself and ask her out.
  • Penny wants Wil but doesn't respect him unless he has a job, so he gets a job, and now she respects him.
  • Marigold wants Dale and Dale wants Marigold and Momo sets them up and they fucked like rabbits.
  • Tai wants Dora. Tai asks Dora out. They have a lot in common and get along great.
These just don't hold up. They are one-note; there are no layers or contradictions or anything to dig through as a reader.

Marten and Claire were on the first list from strip 2205 to strip 2808. There was a lot to talk about! Marten was Zen and Claire was firey. Claire was driven and Marten was a slacker. Marten was musical and Claire didn't really appreciate his taste. Claire was way into Marten physically and terrified to make a move. Marten was experimenting with casual sex and being miserable about it. They seemed like a good fit on some level and a bad fit on others, and so it seemed like there was some dramatic potential.

Since 2808, all the tension has gone out of the relationship. Claire seems to have lost most of her personaity. All pull, no push. I don't object to the relationship on principal because I don't think it needs to be written that way, but that's what we're getting so far.

On the other hand, Claire and Marten really haven't been together that long, and are likely still in the "OH MY GOD THIS NEW RELATIONSHIP IS SO NEW AND AMAZING AND NEW" stage, so it's not surprising that everything still seems to be rainbows for them. As for Claire's perceived personality changes (I personally don't see them, but I guess other people do), she's probably trusting Marten to navigate the ship out of the port, so to speak, and so is letting up on the "push" part, at least for a while. I suspect that if/when we ever do see friction between Claire and Marten for whatever reason, she'll be all kinds of assertive, and possibly a little bratty, which will no doubt collide with Marten's chillness. (For now though, I'm quite happy with the squee inducing material thank you very much.) :P

Tai and Dora aren't necessarily a no drama couple either. We haven't seen what's going to happen between them with the whole Sven thing yet. We don't know how Tai will feel about that, and chances are that it may very well be their first major fight. We shall just have to wait and see.

As for Maridale.. well they just seem made for each other, literally. Most people know at least one perfect match couple in their lives, who if they fight, never fight for long, or over anything truly significant. I suspect that that's the case with Maridale. Their insecurities and hobbies alike all fit so perfectly together, that it's hard for friction to develop. They're also not really main characters, and much like Penny and Wil, we haven't seen much of them beyond the occasional sighting of Dale at CoD, or Marigold with Hanners. Frankly, we don't really need to see very much of them. Short of major drama, they're simply not important enough that Jeph needs to display every single little tiff or disagreement that they have.

In short, just give it time, you'll get your character conflict eventually. I think that a lot of people tend to forget that even though it's been months for us in real time, it's only really been a few days for the characters of QC, so if there's a lack of drama, or cuteness, or whatever, the drought will feel a lot longer than it actually is. Plus, we've been getting all the drama we need already from the Faye/Angus ark for the last.. oh wow, around 80 pages, with the occasional interlude for Claireten cuteness. Additional conflict would have just made things overly complicated imo. I suspect now that the Fangus fallout seems to be nearing its end though, next up will be Faye/Sven, and/or Dora telling Tai about her decision about Sven, and Tai's reaction. Heck, we may even get Claireten drama (though I sincerely doubt it this soon into their blossoming relationship that Jeph has clearly been setting up since the wedding ark, at the very least).

For now though, all that we can really do is wait, and remember that not everything has to be love triangles, polyamory struggles, and/or sexual cravings all the time for it to be interesting. :P
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 18:52
Well-put.  You expanded on the point that I was trying to make, and said it better, and more in-depth.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Feb 2015, 18:59
Quite frankly, I think a lot of you here are trying to overanalise things.

Sometimes, life just happens - good or bad.  Yes, we try to control things as much as possible, and most of the time it works out, but sometimes things sneak up on you without you realising it and smack you right in the face.

Nothing wrong with that, nothing right.  Just the way things go sometimes

Why shouldn't things in Jephs fictional world, which is for all intents and purposes, a 'Slice o' Life' comic at its most basic level happen the same way as well.



OK, Philosophical Rant over with.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 19:02
Some of us who have seen the comic early got bored and started navel-gazing?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 19:04
Quite frankly, I think a lot of you here are trying to overanalise things.

Why, I never! :-o
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 05 Feb 2015, 19:04
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 05 Feb 2015, 19:05
Marten and Claire were on the first list from strip 2205 to strip 2808. There was a lot to talk about! Marten was Zen and Claire was firey. Claire was driven and Marten was a slacker. Marten was musical and Claire didn't really appreciate his taste. Claire was way into Marten physically and terrified to make a move. Marten was experimenting with casual sex and being miserable about it. They seemed like a good fit on some levels and a bad fit on others, and so it seemed like there was some dramatic potential.
$10 says this comes back with a vengeance at some point.
Yeah, I'd like for them to be happy and to gain something positive from this relationship, but at the same time, I just can't see them lasting.

Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to travel back in time and eliminate the competition
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 19:09
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 19:09
Quite frankly, I think a lot of you here are trying to overanalise things.

That's what bandicoots do best!  :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 05 Feb 2015, 19:16
Quite frankly, I think a lot of you here are trying to overanalise things.

I apparently have the self control of a monk not to make a bad spelling pun here...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 19:16
I thought that bandicoots were canonically best at transporting people through hell.

Edit:  And the fun thing is the spelling pun works both in US and Commonwealth English.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 19:20
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Pretty sure that's the floor, a piece of molding, and the back wall of the hallway, judging by the ceiling line.
Yep.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 19:25
I think the way he develops characters is a lot better than his storytelling. Not saying his storytelling is bad or anything, but the strength of QC has always been about the characters to me. They seem real and they're relate-able. When I think about the comic I think, "I can't wait to see what the characters do next" not, "I can't wait to see where the story is going." It's a subtle difference for sure and ultimately leads to Jeph being great at what he does regardless, but I just wanted my opinion on that to be shown (don't throw rocks at me).

BOO - HISS! *throws rocks*  :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Feb 2015, 19:26
I thought that bandicoots were canonically best at transporting people through hell.

No, that's just a hobby.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 19:34
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P

I can understand and appreciate this when it comes casual interactions... but when it comes to dealing with the public at a professional capacity, complicated can turn hair gray.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 19:40
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P

I can understand and appreciate this when it comes casual interactions... but when it comes to dealing with the public at a professional capacity, complicated can turn hair gray.
Forget gray hair. It's 'break out the anti-anxiety meds and anti-depressants' for me  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 19:44
Same here.  I tend to take a rather big cocktail of both, +mood stabilisers.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 19:50
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P

I can understand and appreciate this when it comes casual interactions... but when it comes to dealing with the public at a professional capacity, complicated can turn hair gray.
Forget gray hair. It's 'break out the anti-anxiety meds and anti-depressants' for me  :psyduck:

In my case it's cause for hermitism
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 05 Feb 2015, 19:58
There's nothing from preventing any of these relationships from going sideways.  Clinton would obviously be a potential thorn in the the side of Claireten, and with Dora/Tai, it still may be in the "honeymoon period".   Dora still has her control issues, even if she's working on them.

I think the Tai and Dora drama seeds have been planted when she didn't tell her about Sven. Tai being a escape from her life instead of part of it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 20:04
I think the Tai and Dora drama seeds have been planted when she didn't tell her about Sven. Tai being a escape from her life instead of part of it.

It's been a hundred strips since then! I'm ready for the other shoe to drop.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 05 Feb 2015, 20:06
I think the Tai and Dora drama seeds have been planted when she didn't tell her about Sven. Tai being a escape from her life instead of part of it.

It's been a hundred strips since then! I'm ready for the other shoe to drop.

The Shoe of Damocles?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Coffee_Kaioken on 05 Feb 2015, 20:14

 I suspect that if/when we ever do see friction between Claire and Marten for whatever reason, she'll be all kinds of assertive, and possibly a little bratty, which will no doubt collide with Marten's chillness.

The first thing coming to mind is her seriousness about working in a library vs. Marten's attitude of "It's a job, I'm just going with it". I'd worry if someone just as passionate about libraries walked in one day.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:15
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

...Didn't I say that about three pages back?  :?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 20:17
Claire's a library nerd, Marten's a music nerd.  Sometimes *not* having some things in common at the basic level is healthier for relationships.  If two people for whom "it's just like fucking a mirror" get together (personality-wise, not looks), it tends to exacerbate certain flaws.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 05 Feb 2015, 20:17
Comic's up, and there's nakedness!  Man that girl is freckly.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 20:19
Well buddy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:20
Comi...

Oh.

Uhm, well.

Yeah.

Nice use of hair and panel framing.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:22
...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vforvancouver on 05 Feb 2015, 20:23
What happened to Claire's eyes in panel 2?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 05 Feb 2015, 20:23
Eerie flashbacks to my first time.

Also, she was wearing pink shorts under her dress?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 05 Feb 2015, 20:24
I.....uh.....oh screw it.  AWWWWWWWWW that is to damn sweet and adorable. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 05 Feb 2015, 20:25
Cue the deafening by squee In three, two, one
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Ph2 on 05 Feb 2015, 20:25
Heh, butts.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 20:25
Gawds, nudity and sexy times and it won't fucking load?  Whyyyyyyyyy?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:26
...

Uhm.

Wow.

Yeah.

I do notice that Marten's eyes never leave hers.

(Oh, and she's looking down in panel 2...)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:27
Gawds, nudity and sexy times and it won't fucking load?  Whyyyyyyyyy?

Tasteful nudity. This strip is PG-13, not NC-17.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 20:28
Eerie flashbacks to my first time.

Also, she was wearing pink shorts under her dress?

What?  I wear shorts under skirts.  Wind is a might foe.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 20:28
Someone saw this and is already drawing it without the censors.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 20:30
woah.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 05 Feb 2015, 20:31
It took every single ounce of my willpower to keep my squee internal. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 20:32
Also, this is by far her best befuddled face. (befuddled? nervous? you know what I mean).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 20:33
Well, that answers the question on whether or not sexy times were ensuing.  Good for them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 20:33
Also notice the little hair twirl in panel four.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Daniel Patrick Moynihan on 05 Feb 2015, 20:34
I love the trembliness of her lips in panel 4, it expresses her mood and the catch in her voice really well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 05 Feb 2015, 20:36
Also notice the little hair twirl in panel four.

I though that added to her immense adorableness, being all cute and nervous.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: tragic_pizza on 05 Feb 2015, 20:37
Damn.

Jeph.

Damn.

Well done, sir.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HeavyP on 05 Feb 2015, 20:37
1) Butts!  Redhead butts (which are even better than normal butts)!
2) Good Lord, she IS all kinds of freckly!
Most importantly....
3) This is more squee-worthy than any interaction thus far.  This is someone who has many reasons to keep shielded dropping all their armor and trusting implicitly in their partner.  It's WAY beyond physical nudity.  And Marten proves that, for the flaws that can be identified in him, he is a good man.  That's the perfect response, and you can read the warmth and love in his eyes.  Little Miss, I don't think you could have picked a better person to let inside your walls. 

*thumbsup*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 20:38
Nows not a good time to bring things down but.... what if they forgot protection? And all the stores are closed?

OOOOHHHH NOOOOOOO.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 20:38
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P
I can understand and appreciate this when it comes casual interactions... but when it comes to dealing with the public at a professional capacity, complicated can turn hair gray.
Forget gray hair. It's 'break out the anti-anxiety meds and anti-depressants' for me  :psyduck:
In my case it's cause for hermitism

Have the meds... Somehow managed to keep my faith in humanity.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 20:40
Egads!! That is some warrior woman hair in panel five. Me likey!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 05 Feb 2015, 20:42
I'm not sure if it's unhealthy to be jealous of a fictional character or a testament to the character (and the writer) that it is possible to jealous of said character in the first place.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 20:42
Nows not a good time to bring things down but.... what if they forgot protection? And all the stores are closed?

OOOOHHHH NOOOOOOO.

*Throws more rocks*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: grez on 05 Feb 2015, 20:43
My heart really went out to Claire in today's strip. So brave :cry:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 20:43
Nows not a good time to bring things down but.... what if they forgot protection? And all the stores are closed?

OOOOHHHH NOOOOOOO.

*Throws more rocks*

One of these days I'll stop saying things.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 20:43
My reply to the strip...  :-D (Pun?)

And Martin is classy as always.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 20:45
Sometimes, especially when I'm tired || drunk, I stare at the texturing to the bathroom walls.  There's one bit that looks a *lot* like Claire holding a sword aloft, which I believe, the comic has addressed her holding a sword and feeling "powerful".  Then again, the shape looks more like Nausicaä than Xena, but it's still pretty awesome, especially with the floofy "hair".

And I suspect that I'm not the only one who is only here in order to keep posting/reading, until I actually got the comic that I was anticipating.  I'm sure that if Marten doesn't have protection available (who knows what, if any VDs Marten has), I'm sure that Pintsize has plenty.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 20:46
I'm just... dah... um...

Yeah, I got nothin'.

Well, not nothing, I guess.  Marten's Good Guy personality all but ensures protective measures are at hand. 

and that ... HAIR....

Warning - while you were typing the collective internet collapsed under the weight of squee.  There is no antidote.

Oh for heaven's sake...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 05 Feb 2015, 20:47
Nows not a good time to bring things down but.... what if they forgot protection? And all the stores are closed?

OOOOHHHH NOOOOOOO.
There's plenty they can do without any protection. As well as that most guys (and quite a few women) these days usually have a box or something in their rooms. It's not like stores sell contraceptives one at a time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 05 Feb 2015, 20:48
Eerie flashbacks to my first time.

Also, she was wearing pink shorts under her dress?

Gotta play it safe. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2392)

Or Jeph forgot she was wearing the dress.

I'll forgive it if he did though. I was expecting just waking up cuddling under the sheets. And until yesterday I didn't think that would happen until we hit the 3000 comic milestone. But he went all out.

Just 9 new replies were posted while I was typing?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 05 Feb 2015, 20:48
Warning - while you were reading 3 new fists have punched the sky. You may wish to review your own.

Fantastic strip!  :claireface:

My only regret is technically being in a public place. Imagine the awkwardness if someone were to be poking around this room at the time and saw me looking at the comic.  :-o

Warning - while you were typing 3 more fists have punched the sky. You may wish to attempt "the wave".
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 05 Feb 2015, 20:49
How that last panel could have gone down.

Quote
M:  Uh, maybe this was a mistake.

Quote
M:  Would you be opposed to losing 10 pounds?

Quote
M:  Listen, I gotta go.
C:  This is your apartment!
M:  Yeah, but Faye made me ditch the booze.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 05 Feb 2015, 20:50
Perspective on Marten in panel five is kind of confusing me but I don't care because I really like it.

The whole thing, I mean, not just panel 5.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 20:51
How that last panel could have gone down.
Quote
M:  Uh, maybe this was a mistake.
Quote
M:  Would you be opposed to losing 10 pounds?
Quote
M:  Listen, I gotta go.
C:  This is your apartment!
M:  Yeah, but Faye made me ditch the booze.

Could of gone that way... If it did, I would have been disappointed.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 05 Feb 2015, 20:54
I know there are words out there to express how awesome this is.  I just can't find them.  Claire's nerves, Marten's respectfulness... just awesome.  And Claire is beautiful.  I seriously want her hair.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 05 Feb 2015, 20:55
Hopefully Monday's strip isn't Claire and Marten being interrupted by some horrible Faye noise indicating they didn't remove all the booze.  Or some horrible Pintsize noise, because Pintsize.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 05 Feb 2015, 20:55
...
...
...
...
...
...
We're sorry, Hannah is far too busy running around and flailing in delight at the moment to type a coherent comment about the latest page. Please leave a reply after the SQUEE, and she might get back to you once she's calmed down and stopped fangirling.

SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 05 Feb 2015, 20:55
Eerie flashbacks to my first time.

Also, she was wearing pink shorts under her dress?

Gotta play it safe. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2392)


Thank you. THAT was freaking funny.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 20:56
As a fortyish man I feel no shame in unleashing a SQUEE for today's comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 20:56
I am so happy on her behalf that her courage was rewarded and that she's getting an enthusiastically accepting boyfriend.

Squee!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ardisian on 05 Feb 2015, 20:56
Wow.  That was really, really well done. 

You managed to make me worried about the feelings of these comic strip characters.  The sense of relief at Marten's reaction was ... wow.  Marten may not be a perfect person, but he made me want to be as good a guy as he is, right now in my real life. 

That is really powerful stuff. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 20:58
 :-o

 :-)

 :lol:

 :laugh:

 :-D
 :-D
 :-D
 :-D
 :-D
 :-D


Warning - while you were staring in shock and squeeee, 32 new replies have been squeeed. You may wish to squeeeeeeee your SQUeEEEEeeEEE post.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: celticgeek on 05 Feb 2015, 21:00
Careful!  There are admins and mods here, on the lookout for excessive squeeing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:01
No such thing in this case.

I used to think Hannelore was the bravest character. I'm no longer sure about that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Taigan on 05 Feb 2015, 21:01
Anyone else looking at that picture of Claire from behind with her hair down and thinking she could do an AWESOME Cosplay of Starfire from Teen Titans?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 21:02
Careful!  There are admins and mods here, on the lookout for excessive squeeing.

What are they gonna do? They'll get rid of one and then two more will take it's place.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 21:02
You know, I almost hope that they don't actually shag right now.  Not for any reason that has been brought up before, but because I still fondly remember a night with a former gf, one of the earlier ones we spent together, where she and I slept together nekkid (it was before my "first time", sex-wise), there was plenty of snogging and fondling, but it was something I will always remember fondly.  I kinda want this to be similar, where they're just completely close with each other.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 21:02
The depiction of Claire here is evocative of Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, at least to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jmucchiello on 05 Feb 2015, 21:02
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Pretty sure that's the floor, a piece of molding, and the back wall of the hallway, judging by the ceiling line.
The floor? It's above Claire's hip. It would have to be very far away or the camera angle would have to be from the ceiling above Marten's head.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 05 Feb 2015, 21:03
Careful!  There are admins and mods here, on the lookout for excessive squeeing.

squee?  :oops:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 05 Feb 2015, 21:04
Anyone else looking at that picture of Claire from behind with her hair down and thinking she could do an AWESOME Cosplay of Starfire from Teen Titans?

I keep thinking Merida, from Brave. How do you feel about tartan, Claire?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dalillama on 05 Feb 2015, 21:06


Well, not nothing, I guess.  Marten's Good Guy personality all but ensures protective measures are at hand. 


It's established that he had some around while with Dora, there's no reason to suppose it's not still there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 05 Feb 2015, 21:07
This. I like this much more than the previous date Marten/Claire sequences.

This has risk, substance, closure, and moves the plot forward.

and I am jealous of Claire's freckles!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 21:08
You know, I almost hope that they don't actually shag right now.  Not for any reason that has been brought up before, but because I still fondly remember a night with a former gf, one of the earlier ones we spent together, where she and I slept together nekkid (it was before my "first time", sex-wise), there was plenty of snogging and fondling, but it was something I will always remember fondly.  I kinda want this to be similar, where they're just completely close with each other.

Not to interrupt the dawwws and squeees (as if I could halt that tsunami), but I guess this is what is actually going to happen, solely going by Marten's eyes in the last panel.
There will naked sleeping, but no sexy shenanigans. (At least not this night)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 21:08

Well, not nothing, I guess.  Marten's Good Guy personality all but ensures protective measures are at hand. 

It's established that he had some around while with Dora, there's no reason to suppose it's not still there.

Pintsize got to them and made balloons
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Feb 2015, 21:08
The depiction of Claire here is evocative of Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, at least to me.

I thought I recognized it from somewhere. Well spotted.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 21:11
Someone saw this and is already drawing it without the censors.

I'll go check 4chan......
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:11
You know, I almost hope that they don't actually shag right now.  Not for any reason that has been brought up before, but because I still fondly remember a night with a former gf, one of the earlier ones we spent together, where she and I slept together nekkid (it was before my "first time", sex-wise), there was plenty of snogging and fondling, but it was something I will always remember fondly.  I kinda want this to be similar, where they're just completely close with each other.

Not to interrupt the dawwws and squeees (as if I could halt that tsunami), but I guess this is what is actually going to happen, solely going by Marten's eyes in the last panel.
There will naked sleeping, but no sexy shenanigans. (At least not this night)

I hope they build a duvet fort.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kingy_who on 05 Feb 2015, 21:11
I hoped I wouldn't be weirded out when this happened but I did. :-(
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 05 Feb 2015, 21:13
Welp, my curiosity got the best of me.  Self-imposed month-long QC hiatus lasted two weeks, but I think I came back at the right time.  On one hand, I found the time to read all of Dumbing of Age to distract myself.  On the other...where the hell did these "like" buttons come from?

Eh, whatever.  Happy Arbor Day 2003, everyone!  Although, did Marten even remember to revive Pintsize?  Someone else is going to have to get the banner...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CasAttack on 05 Feb 2015, 21:13
I know this strip is adorable and all, and I'm gonna let it finish-

-But what in the Blue Man Group Hell is that room? Is that a pillow on the FLOOR? I don't know why but I noticed this right away and wanted to scream at Marten to get some mood lighting or something.

Also I agree with what folks are saying, Marten looks super tired.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:13
Welcome, new person!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Estron on 05 Feb 2015, 21:13
As a fortyish man I feel no shame in unleashing a SQUEE for today's comic.

As a late-fiftyish man, I didn't either.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 21:14
I'm getting a strong urge to post that xkcd where a woman builds a pillow fort, and is accused by her friend for being "juvenile", but said friend points out that her boyfriend was in there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 21:14
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Pretty sure that's the floor, a piece of molding, and the back wall of the hallway, judging by the ceiling line.
The floor? It's above Claire's hip. It would have to be very far away or the camera angle would have to be from the ceiling above Marten's head.
If it was chair rail on the hallway wall, it would be higher up than the chair rail you can see on the left side of the interior in that frame due to the perspective. It is lower, that is baseboard.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 05 Feb 2015, 21:14
Welp, my curiosity got the best of me.  Self-imposed month-long QC hiatus lasted two weeks, but I think I came back at the right time.  On one hand, I found the time to read all of Dumbing of Age to distract myself.  On the other...where the hell did these "like" buttons come from?

Eh, whatever.  Happy Arbor Day 2003, everyone!  Although, did Marten even remember to revive Pintsize?  Someone else is going to have to get the banner...
I think he pointedly remembered to 'forget' to power Pintsize back up until later.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 21:14
I'm getting a strong urge to post that xkcd where a woman builds a pillow fort, and is accused by her friend for being "juvenile", but said friend points out that her boyfriend was in there.
I had that same thought, but we may have been posting that comic too often.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 21:15
On all the discussions of building a duvet fort... Do you really think Marten is the type of dude to own a duvet?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Feb 2015, 21:16
I think he pointedly remembered to 'forget' to power Pintsize back up until later.

Just like with Padma. (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=2057)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 05 Feb 2015, 21:16
On all the discussions of building a duvet fort... Do you really think Marten is the type of dude to own a duvet?
Yes. Probably gifted to him by Veronica.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 21:16
Much like Nietzsche quotes, xkcd is *always* relevant to any matter.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: grez on 05 Feb 2015, 21:16
Marten might want to think about getting a gym membership tho, bruh has a body like a rubber band could be an extra in a Gumby movie is straight up stuck together bits of taffy right now.  :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:16
https://xkcd.com/219/
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 21:17
On all the discussions of building a duvet fort... Do you really think Marten is the type of dude to own a duvet?
Yes. Probably gifted to him by Veronica.

Sheets and blankets are an acceptable substitute.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 21:18
On all the discussions of building a duvet fort... Do you really think Marten is the type of dude to own a duvet?
Yes. Probably gifted to him by Veronica.
That I can buy.

He just seems like the guy who would be still using the same comforter for the last 10 years because meh. Its probably as old as his black hoodie.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 21:18
https://xkcd.com/219/

WE DID IT ANYWAYSSSSS!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: sluthy on 05 Feb 2015, 21:19
How that last panel could have gone down.

Quote
M:  Uh, maybe this was a mistake.

Quote
M:  Would you be opposed to losing 10 pounds?

Quote
M:  Listen, I gotta go.
C:  This is your apartment!
M:  Yeah, but Faye made me ditch the booze.


Quote
M:  Wow, carpet DOES match the drapes. Just...wow.
Warning - while you were typing 40 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CasAttack on 05 Feb 2015, 21:20
But there's pillow forts...

...And then there's a single pillow weeping itself to sleep on a mattress laying on the floor of a blue room...

I kid I kid. Anywho, why do I love this couple so much?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Meilu on 05 Feb 2015, 21:22
Wonderful. Portraying every dream I've had of a decent sexual encounter with a guy...

Kind of bittersweet. Certainly a meritorious comic, as opposed to the overly drawn-out date that quickly seemed like a gratuitous self-congratulatory episode... or I'm just becoming a sour sort of person.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 05 Feb 2015, 21:23
A lot more risque than we're used to.

Actually, Jeph seems to have had a little bit of trouble with the art. Panels 3, 5 and 6 are distressingly wrong. Marten's face is wickedly asymmetrical, Claire's positioning and dimensions (panel three doesn't look hunched over, it makes her look like a pubescent midget, and the expression doesn't help) panel five Marten looks like he's levitating into a greenscreen

Panels  1, 2 and 4, though, are, much like Claire herself, absolutely beautiful.

Warning - while you were typing 3 people were more forgiving than you were. You monster.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 21:24
Perspective on Marten in panel five is kind of confusing me but I don't care because I really like it.

The whole thing, I mean, not just panel 5.
I think Jeph forgot to finish drawing the bed.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 05 Feb 2015, 21:25
And then the forums exploded.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 05 Feb 2015, 21:25
Food for thought:  a canopy bed is just a blanket fort for grownups.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Feb 2015, 21:26
*Brain explodes*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 05 Feb 2015, 21:26
Food for thought:  a canopy bed is just a blanket fort for grownups.

Lots of things can be grownup stuff if you use them the right way.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 05 Feb 2015, 21:27
Dord.  Dord.  Dord-dee-dord-dee-dord...

(click to show/hide)

Today's comic has struck me dumb under several different definitions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 21:27
The hallway does not have chair rail,
Panel 1, behind Claire is a chair rail and I'm pretty sure she's standing in the hallway outside the apartment.
Pretty sure that's the floor, a piece of molding, and the back wall of the hallway, judging by the ceiling line.
The floor? It's above Claire's hip. It would have to be very far away or the camera angle would have to be from the ceiling above Marten's head.

And yet, the ceiling line says otherwise. Eh. I still stand by what I said before.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 21:28
And then the forums exploded.

Nah, this is more like the start of a runaway nuclear reaction, the explosion will happen some time Saturday.

Along with many many first time posters.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:30
Global Moderator Comment Thanks to everyone for taking the discussion in good directions.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 21:31
They're cute together.  Most new couples are, sometimes to an obnoxious degree.  Jeph is handling this well, as far as I'm concerned, even though it's early on.  Claire has a dirtier mind (anyone who wants to do an archive trawl can show instances) than people think she has.  And like Hanners, and several other characters, she's perfectly willing to fight against the things that might frighten her.  Since she's on Lorazepam (Ativan), she obviously has anxiety issues.  She's not the type to seek out a "Dr. Feel-good".  And between this arc, and the whole Faye nearly drinking herself into oblivion, I think that this makes characters more "real".  Love, loss, depression, all parts of the human condition, and the important thing is how they end up evolving.

Now I'll need some sleep soon, but by the time I reload this thread, I'll put a beer on it being at least 15 pages.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 05 Feb 2015, 21:31
And yet, the ceiling line says otherwise. Eh. I still stand by what I said before.

I'm honesty not sure why both of us have continued in this line of making sure that there is no handrail out there, considering its now been proven that the second door was almost certainly his bedroom door and we were right.

I guess its that desire to be right on the internet. Because being wrong on the internet is the worst :P.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Accountancy on 05 Feb 2015, 21:32
It took every single ounce of my willpower to keep my squee internal.

^^^^^
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Truec on 05 Feb 2015, 21:32
On the other...where the hell did these "like" buttons come from?

I've wanted to ask this same question.

How that last panel could have gone down.

Quote
M:  Uh, maybe this was a mistake.

Quote
M:  Would you be opposed to losing 10 pounds?

Quote
M:  Listen, I gotta go.
C:  This is your apartment!
M:  Yeah, but Faye made me ditch the booze.

You forgot this one:

Quote
M: Damn, you are really freckly!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrClef on 05 Feb 2015, 21:33
Welp. They're frick fracking.

Kinda wish they weren't. :| Marten's not in a good headspace to be banging right now.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 05 Feb 2015, 21:33
This. I like this much more than the previous date Marten/Claire sequences.

This has risk, substance, closure, and moves the plot forward.

Agreed. It's a very bold move on Jeph's part, when he could have left things ambiguous, and danced around the issue. Instead, I think he's done something very positive here, not just in terms of the characters and their story, but in choosing to tell the story (and in particular, this part of the story) in a way that's tasteful and respectful. There's a genuine sweetness to this that doesn't feel over the top or corny, so I too really like it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 05 Feb 2015, 21:35
Welp. They're frick fracking.

Kinda wish they weren't. :| Marten's not in a good headspace to be banging right now.

How do you know that?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: CMGeorge on 05 Feb 2015, 21:36
A lot more risque than we're used to.

Actually, Jeph seems to have had a little bit of trouble with the art. Panels 3, 5 and 6 are distressingly wrong. Marten's face is wickedly asymmetrical, Claire's positioning and dimensions (panel three doesn't look hunched over, it makes her look like a pubescent midget, and the expression doesn't help) panel five Marten looks like he's levitating into a greenscreen

Panels  1, 2 and 4, though, are, much like Claire herself, absolutely beautiful.

Warning - while you were typing 3 people were more forgiving than you were. You monster.

I didn't notice any of that. What I did wonder was why Claire was wearing pink slacks under her blue dress. Odd choice, that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 21:39
And yet, the ceiling line says otherwise. Eh. I still stand by what I said before.

I'm honesty not sure why both of us have continued in this line of making sure that there is no handrail out there, considering its now been proven that the second door was almost certainly his bedroom door and we were right.

I guess its that desire to be right on the internet. Because being wrong on the internet is the worst :P.
You should see me at work, when a customer tries to futilely argue about specifications of products we sell, based on what the guy who happened to work in the electronics section of Walmart that day told them :-D It's like I'm OCD about shit like that - incapable of letting it go  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrClef on 05 Feb 2015, 21:40
Welp. They're frick fracking.

Kinda wish they weren't. :| Marten's not in a good headspace to be banging right now.

How do you know that?

"My best friend nearly killed herself getting drunk and threw up all over my couch. Meanwhile her relationship with her former boss, my ex-girlfriend, is damaged beyond repair. My circle of friends is falling apart like a house of cards. Oh yeah, baby. Let's get some loving going on."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 21:41
A lot more risque than we're used to.

Actually, Jeph seems to have had a little bit of trouble with the art. Panels 3, 5 and 6 are distressingly wrong. Marten's face is wickedly asymmetrical, Claire's positioning and dimensions (panel three doesn't look hunched over, it makes her look like a pubescent midget, and the expression doesn't help) panel five Marten looks like he's levitating into a greenscreen

Panels  1, 2 and 4, though, are, much like Claire herself, absolutely beautiful.

Warning - while you were typing 3 people were more forgiving than you were. You monster.

I didn't notice any of that. What I did wonder was why Claire was wearing pink slacks under her blue dress. Odd choice, that.
The art itself just seems rushed in a lot of the panels.

As for the pants - I own shirts that go down beyond the hips, that are designed to be worn with pants/capris. It could very well be that kind of outfit.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 05 Feb 2015, 21:47
There's a genuine sweetness to this that doesn't feel over the top or corny, so I too really like it.

Sweetness and vulnerability, she's never been naked like this (and I don't mean the lack of clothes), if Marten had rejected her at this moment, it would've shattered her, she knew that and she still did it.

Cheers for Claire for being brave.
Cheers for Marten for being a great guy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 05 Feb 2015, 21:49
Happy to say I was not at all surprised by how well Jeph did this.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:49
It was not empty words when he promised to handle whatever happened.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 21:50
I'm still not completely sure if that is exhaustion in Marten's eyes or tenderness. I want to believe tenderness but the argument can be made.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 21:51
Why not both?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 21:53
Both is a valid option as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 05 Feb 2015, 21:53
Welp. They're frick fracking.

Kinda wish they weren't. :| Marten's not in a good headspace to be banging right now.

You know people handle stuff differently.  Just because Marten is ready to pursue sexy times with Claire doesn't mean he's not thinking about the shit storm that just happened, it just means that he's not letting that dominate his thoughts right now.  I think there was a time when a mopey Marten would have had no interest in make outs at this point, but he's come a long way. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ManateeGag on 05 Feb 2015, 21:56
Long time reader, first time poster, etc...

I would not have expected anything less from Marten.  Claire is really nervous about being accepted and she found the right person to do that.  I'm just glad her brother didn't screw things up for her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 05 Feb 2015, 21:58
Thoughts at random:


You forgot this one:
Quote
M: Damn, you are really freckly!

After Marten's "modification" of Dora's tattoo, I wonder if he might try something similar with Claire's freckles. I can just picture Monday's strip showing the two of them talking at the library... Emily walks over and wonders why Claire has Orion on one shoulder and Ursa Major on the other.  :claireface:

Warning: While you were typing, eleventy billion new posts were posted. You may wish to... oh, never mind.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 05 Feb 2015, 22:00
It's "connect the dots".  Then again, Claire has a *lot* of being mottled.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrClef on 05 Feb 2015, 22:00
Welp. They're frick fracking.

Kinda wish they weren't. :| Marten's not in a good headspace to be banging right now.

You know people handle stuff differently.  Just because Marten is ready to pursue sexy times with Claire doesn't mean he's not thinking about the shit storm that just happened, it just means that he's not letting that dominate his thoughts right now.  I think there was a time when a mopey Marten would have had no interest in make outs at this point, but he's come a long way.

That does kinda bug me too. I mean, Marten has done a complete turnaround of personality from mopey, somewhat self-centered, and socially awkward to this suave guy who knows exactly what to say and do in his new relationship to make her swoon and feel comfortable, and the only real change seems to be that he's now dating Claire. As happy as I was to see Marten and Claire get together, at this point this is less feeling like a genuine relationship between the two characters, and more like something I would have seen on fanfiction.net.

I mean, the reason why I wanted to see Marten and Claire date was for the happy chuckles I could get out of seeing the perpetual foot-in-mouther Marten stumble his way towards happiness with the pun queen herself. This is way too smooth. Has no roughness or character to it.

But that's just my opinion.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 05 Feb 2015, 22:00
Fascinating.

Has no one noticed that the date arc was effectively filler? Perhaps filler is the wrong word. Let's call it padding.

Jeph established the romance. He then disestablished Faye and Angus. He then established Faye's depression. Then hinted that she was drinking too much. Each jump to Marten and Claire spaced out the progression from Sad panda to plastered panda.

I don't mean to suggest that the date arc was meaningless. I suspect things that happened will be important in hindsight. But it is in keeping with the way Jeph always done the comic. The issue isn't that Marten and Claire have no foundation for a relationship. It's not that they are unjustifiably happy. The issue is the Jeph is doing the opposite of too many words.

I think he's effectively communicated the feel of the relationship. I would like more details. But I don't assume that Jeph not providing those details means those details don't exist. Jeph's asking us to infer a lot. This comic being a prime example. All other things being equal, I suspect most of it will always be inference.

If you gotta complain, I figure complain about the way he's drawing Marten's eye's lately. Just round the damn things off! He's getting positively creepy. I mean, he rounds them off today, except the last panel. And the last is trip to the uncanny valley. The uncanny valley is worse than LA.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 22:03
Thoughts at random:

  • Not that I'd have expected this to be played for laughs, I'm glad that Jeph sqeeeeee -- ahem, squeezed -- some emotional heft into this one, between Claire's vulnerability and trust, and Marten's bleary-eyed acceptance.
  • Speaking of XKCD, if the last panel had been Marten's room as a ball pit, that would've been just about perfect.
  • What's up with Marten's face in a couple of those panels? Those are faces Marty Feldman would look at and go, "What the fuck?"
  • I'll say it again: Claire is simply adorable.

You forgot this one:
Quote
M: Damn, you are really freckly!

After Marten's "modification" of Dora's tattoo, I wonder if he might try something similar with Claire's freckles. I can just picture Monday's strip showing the two of them talking at the library... Emily walks over and wonders why Claire has Orion on one shoulder and Ursa Major on the other.  :claireface:

Warning: While you were typing, eleventy billion new posts were posted. You may wish to... oh, never mind.

As a "Damn, you are really freckly!" ginger myself I'm sure a lot of people of the freckly persuasion have played connect the dots I know I have.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 05 Feb 2015, 22:03
QUESTION:  What mood music (assuming he'd put on some mood music) would Marten choose for this encounter?  Some older indie that might help Claire get at ease I'm thinking.  Cat Power?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 22:03
Emily walks over and wonders why Claire has Orion on one shoulder and Ursa Major on the other.

Ursa Major would be because Claire needed a bear too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BrusselSprouts on 05 Feb 2015, 22:04
Looks like Marten's tamper proof seal (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2433) is about to be broken


Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 22:07
That strip was one of several examples of Marten being awkward around Claire. If things seem to have gone un-Martenesquely smoothly, that may be because he's finally dating someone compatible.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 05 Feb 2015, 22:07
Told you  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30442.msg1299954.html#msg1299954)Claire would not be needing her glasses.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Indicible on 05 Feb 2015, 22:14
Oh well... I'm gonna be like this all day long... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VDgOXVsosg)

It's adorable. No other word.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 22:17
She is even freckly in my favorite spot on a woman, the indent above the bottom below the back.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 05 Feb 2015, 22:23
QUESTION:  What mood music (assuming he'd put on some mood music) would Marten choose for this encounter?  Some older indie that might help Claire get at ease I'm thinking.  Cat Power?

Fumbling Towards Ecstasy
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 05 Feb 2015, 22:23
Fascinating.

Has no one noticed that the date arc was effectively filler? Perhaps filler is the wrong word. Let's call it padding.

Jeph established the romance. He then disestablished Faye and Angus. He then established Faye's depression. Then hinted that she was drinking too much. Each jump to Marten and Claire spaced out the progression from Sad panda to plastered panda.

To be fair, it's been hinted - most of the time, outright commented on - that Faye drinks to much, probably a dozen times or more throughout the comic's run. Unless you're only referring to the breakup in general?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SugarSparkle on 05 Feb 2015, 22:24
Trigger-warning, just in case.

Just wanted to say I'm a trans-chick and I think the pace could be realistic. I personally was quick to have sex after transitioning, because I felt I had been 'deprived' for so long, not being previously comfortable with my body. Making up for lost time I suppose would be fairly accurate. I was 27 though, and Claire seems quite a bit younger, but I can still understand there being some urgency there. And on top of that, having someone to be comfortable with like Claire is comfortable with Marten could be a big confidence booster. It all seems rather believable to me. Just hope she doesn't shack up with Marten just as quickly. I jumped into my first relationship with a guy waaay too quickly, and sure learned my lesson...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 05 Feb 2015, 22:25
QUESTION:  What mood music (assuming he'd put on some mood music) would Marten choose for this encounter?  Some older indie that might help Claire get at ease I'm thinking.  Cat Power?

Fumbling Towards Ecstasy

This could easily be its own thread (with a spinoff thread of what was playing for various forumites' first times).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 05 Feb 2015, 22:25
I am NOT going to cry.

OK, I lied.

This probably belongs on DISCUSSIONS - TRANS - but this is the way things are supposed to happen.

Not the "4th Trans woman murdered this week" of reality.

Things like this do happen in reality though, it's just, well, rare.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: maxh on 05 Feb 2015, 22:36
I was 27 though, and Claire seems quite a bit younger
She's 24.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SugarSparkle on 05 Feb 2015, 22:44
I was 27 though, and Claire seems quite a bit younger
She's 24.

Ah, thanks. I just get the impression she's a few years younger, like 21 or 22. But that sort of reaffirms my point. There's just a lot of pressure to have sex when you're young. Now that she may feel more comfortable with her body, it's understandable she'd want to at least show it off. And I shouldn't assume they're going to have sex right now since we don't know yet, but whatever she's doing still seems like it could be appropriately paced to me. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 22:57
Welcome, new person!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: USS Martenclaire on 05 Feb 2015, 22:57
On the one hand, I'm a little disappointed that Jeph didn't decide to keep us all guessing about what was going on. On the hand, Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee <3
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ibanix on 05 Feb 2015, 22:59
We're rapidly getting close to comic 2900, and comics divided by 100 seem to often have some major plot development....

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 05 Feb 2015, 22:59
This was really beautifully done, and quite a bit more revealing than I would have expected. Great job, Jeph!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kingy_who on 05 Feb 2015, 23:10
We're rapidly getting close to comic 2900, and comics divided by 100 seem to often have some major plot development....

Like we haven't had enough of those recently.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Natswash on 05 Feb 2015, 23:11
A: Go Marten!
B:Thank you Jeph for actually confirming what happens (while it's still kinda a letdown to actually know and all)
C: Now THIS is probably the most risque thing he's ever drawn

Initiating squee in T-minus...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 23:13
Meh.
It may be because I read the comic right after waking up and am thus a bit cranky, but I don't really like it.
Like, I can totally see where Jeph was going with this, but to me the comic seems to focus on an issue which I feel would better be solved by the "fade to black" so famously discussed on the forum yesterday amd by the two appearing obviously happy in the morning.
That said, apparently the trans folks are happy, so who am I to judge :3
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: efrumttr on 05 Feb 2015, 23:20
I don't know. On the one hand, squeeeeeeeeeeeee! On the other hand, I just don't find today's panel realistic at all. Yeah sure, it's every transwoman's (mine included) dream scenario where you find someone you have feelings for and they can instantly accept you physically, but this scene? I mean, maybe Claire doesn't have dysphoria to the extent that I do, but I can never ever ever ever ever (x47^8) picture myself doing what Claire did here, no matter how much I trusted the person I was with. "This is me?" I just think it's cringey. So far I've loved Clarten because it's had the sweetness factor but with that necessary dose of realism, where Claire's insecurities (do we need to talk about this, this, and this?) and Martin's enthusiasm have been a nice blend.  But this strip is a little too sunshine and rainbows for me to swallow.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 05 Feb 2015, 23:27
I think I like this?

Marten's shirt is off in panel 1, and Claire is still fully dressed. Did she undress him? His facial expression is unreadable. Blinding lust? Is he pulling her into bed while she pushes him away? Was he trying to escalate? Or is it spiritual exhaustion? Is she pushing him into bed while he prevaricates about escalating?

And then this totally, intensely awkward record-scratch where she stops the flow of foreplay and suddenly they are having a completely different conversation entirely. Why does she choose to undress herself in this kind of prosaic, unsexy way instead of inviting him to undress her?

It is fascinating that Marten makes her feel confident enough to do something this bold, but not so confident that she feels like she doesn't have to. Weird, tender, shaky-new-relationship excitement and terror. His face is agog in panel 5; "She just stripped in front of me?" And then panel 6, those bags under his eyes, it's like he is so tired and barely dealing with any of this.

It's so strange and awkward and unsexy. It feels like it could be true for a 24 year old virgin, but it feels so far from my experience I barely know how to relate to any of it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 05 Feb 2015, 23:29
This is definitely more risque than I was expecting Jeph to go, but personally I think that's a good thing. After all, he's shown plenty of other characters in similarly revealing situations, so it would send kind of a weird message if Marten and Claire's relationship was always this chaste, behind closed doors thing. This way, he puts it on an equal footing with any of the other relationships that he's shown while at the same time maintaining the position that Claire's private parts should remain private. Basically, this is about as well as I could imagine it being handled. As far as realism, I don't really have the personal experiences to be able to say, but it seems to me that Claire is pretty in character here as far as being both nervous and uncertain but also brave, which is one of the things that I like about her as a character.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SugarSparkle on 05 Feb 2015, 23:38
I don't know. On the one hand, squeeeeeeeeeeeee! On the other hand, I just don't find today's panel realistic at all. Yeah sure, it's every transwoman's (mine included) dream scenario where you find someone you have feelings for and they can instantly accept you physically, but this scene? I mean, maybe Claire doesn't have dysphoria to the extent that I do, but I can never ever ever ever ever (x47^8) picture myself doing what Claire did here, no matter how much I trusted the person I was with. "This is me?" I just think it's cringey. So far I've loved Clarten because it's had the sweetness factor but with that necessary dose of realism, where Claire's insecurities (do we need to talk about this, this, and this?) and Martin's enthusiasm have been a nice blend.  But this strip is a little too sunshine and rainbows for me to swallow.

Marten is clearly a very accepting and caring person. And Claire is very passable. She may not be very dysphoric, it's entirely possible. In my experience, the trans-community doesn't focus on smooth transitions and happy endings very much. I think some sunshine and rainbows are a welcome thing. Since when are optimism and hope bad or unrealistic? I welcome any positive portrayals of trans-people over all the negative or depressing stories, or comedic stereotypes. I find Claire and her situation to be more relatable to me than not.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dragonsreach on 05 Feb 2015, 23:39
This is just what I needed today, a simple 'loving' end to a week.
Thanks Jeph!
:claireface: Totally appropriate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Feb 2015, 23:42
Awkward and unsexy kind of epitomizes Claire at that moment, but in a baring my soul leaving myself vulnerable kind of way. It seems to me that she is saying "here I am" emotionally even more than she is saying it physically. And as Marten says in that moment even being awkward and unsexy she is beautiful.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 05 Feb 2015, 23:44
The feel when Claire and Marten are the perfect OTP.

 :psyduck:

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 05 Feb 2015, 23:47
Awkward and unsexy? Are we reading the same comic? She seems wonderfully confident, considering her background, and she carries herself very well, IMO. And this particular comic isn't really about "sexy" anyway.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Feb 2015, 23:54
It's hard to overstate just how much courage that Claire needed to do this. No matter what her feelings, it's been clear since the lake party that her body is a source of embarrassment for her and something about which she is very defensive. To basically surrender herself to Marten's judgement like that? It's an enormous step in her own journey.

Marten's response was perfect all the more for its clear sincerity. I think that this is the significance of his being tired: He's too tired to lie, dissemble or even just be tactful. In his eyes, she's beautiful; that's his gut reaction the first moment that he could get his voice working.

Congratulations to Jeph for handling this so well. The workmanlike way Claire stripped and her body language in panel 4 well communicated her nervousness and fear. Marten's wonderful reaction sweeps away any doubt that he sees Claire as completely natural. Finally, by making Claire look so normal, rather than excessively perfect or different, he answers the prurient without sacrificing her privacy or dignity.

I would argue that this goes in his top ten strips.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 05 Feb 2015, 23:56
Nah, I am a bit of being with AprilArcus on this one.

What is she doing at panel 2? Unmaking her hair and her bra one-handedly, at the same time?
If so, mad props to her for her coordination - I know I couldn't do this without an extensive amount of training.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Feb 2015, 23:56
And then this totally, intensely awkward record-scratch where she stops the flow of foreplay and suddenly they are having a completely different conversation entirely. Why does she choose to undress herself in this kind of prosaic, unsexy way instead of inviting him to undress her?

It's consistent with Claire being still afraid of rejection, and taking charge of the situation so that if she was rejected at least it would be on her own terms. I'm not explaining this well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 05 Feb 2015, 23:59
IMHO, as usual, a lot of people are overanalyzing this.

Have a nice weekend, everybody !

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 06 Feb 2015, 00:00
What is she doing at panel 2? Unmaking her hair and her bra one-handedly, at the same time?
If so, mad props to her for her coordination - I know I couldn't do this without an extensive amount of training.
Some women undo bra straps that way. I prefer to do the hands-around-the-sides method. -I- can't personally pull of that move, but then again, I've got some bigger boobs going on (inevitably leading to the clasp being farther down my back), and I'm not as flexible as I used to be.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 06 Feb 2015, 00:02
It's consistent with Claire being still afraid of rejection, and taking charge of the situation so that if she was rejected at least it would be on her own terms. I'm not explaining this well.

For what its worth, I think this is a great explanation.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Feb 2015, 00:04
Quote from: Jeph long ago
I don't care if people overanalyze things. I mean, I think it's stupid, and they're wrong 99% of the time, but that's kind of what forums are FOR.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 06 Feb 2015, 00:13
This way, he puts it on an equal footing with any of the other relationships that he's shown while at the same time maintaining the position that Claire's private parts should remain private.

Jeph never shows private parts when he shows characters having sex. I don't think this is really a sex scene at all. It like, deliberately pivots out of sexy mode before showing us nudity. It's not one of these:

(http://i.imgur.com/OirxMP1.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/6Xu2z9l.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/2REpqsa.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/2JuRV2x.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/5VywRLW.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/wfwEcB3.png)

It's one of these:

(http://i.imgur.com/gByTviN.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/8wGmToM.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/D9qGyrt.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 00:15
Am I the only one that thinks a girl (or anyone I guess, I just happen to like girls) acting like that is kinda sexy? Am I the weird one? Everyone seems to be saying that it's not, however cute they think it is.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 06 Feb 2015, 00:17


It's consistent with Claire being still afraid of rejection, and taking charge of the situation so that if she was rejected at least it would be on her own terms. I'm not explaining this well.

Yes you are.  This is perfectly consistent with having body issues. 

Being undressed by someone else is shameful.  Like the phantom having his mask ripped off.

Undressing herself, assuring herself at each step that it was her own choice is different.  In the last moment she's still _naked_ rather than nude but every step up to that point was hers alone.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 06 Feb 2015, 00:21
Jeph never shows private parts when he shows characters having sex. I don't think this is really a sex scene at all. It like, deliberately pivots out of sexy mode before showing us nudity.

I didn't say that Jeph was reaffirming that private parts are not an issue because I thought that he had shown private parts at other times. It's because Marten's reaction  to that issue is no longer a mystery, and so people can no longer use the excuse that "I'm not asking about Claire's private parts because I'm curious about her private parts, I'm just asking because I want to know what Marten thinks." We now know exactly what Marten thinks. I'm also not sure how this can be interpreted as anything other than a sex scene, although if you find it unsexy that's a valid opinion.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bartman on 06 Feb 2015, 00:21
That does kinda bug me too. I mean, Marten has done a complete turnaround of personality from mopey, somewhat self-centered, and socially awkward to this suave guy who knows exactly what to say and do in his new relationship to make her swoon and feel comfortable, and the only real change seems to be that he's now dating Claire.

It may be a little bit saccharine, to re-use a word used earlier in this thread, but it can happen that a relationship with one particular person brings the best out of you. It may be that having pursued more assertive women in the past, Marten realises he needs to take a bit more control this time round to help a very nervous Claire.

Just wanted to say I'm a trans-chick and I think the pace could be realistic. I personally was quick to have sex after transitioning, because I felt I had been 'deprived' for so long, not being previously comfortable with my body. Making up for lost time I suppose would be fairly accurate.


Well this is the thing with the "it's too soon" theory - there isn't a book somewhere with a timetable you have to stick to. When it feels right to both people in a relationship to do something it probably is right. And I say that as someone who usually prefers "slow and steady wins the race" in their own relationships.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 00:23
You know, you could say that it's a kind of equality that Jeph handles Claire sexytimes the same way he handles everyone else's sexytimes. 

Also, we need a word that combines squee and daaaaaaaaang, but I can't figure out a portmanteau that doesn't sound really weird.   
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 06 Feb 2015, 00:23
Am I the only one that thinks a girl (or anyone I guess, I just happen to like girls) acting like that is kinda sexy? Am I the weird one? Everyone seems to be saying that it's not, however cute they think it is.

I agree, so if you are weird, I'm weird as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 06 Feb 2015, 00:27
You know, you could say that it's a kind of equality that Jeph handles Claire sexytimes the same way he handles everyone else's sexytimes. 

Thank you for saying what I was trying to say much better.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: greywolfe on 06 Feb 2015, 00:28
You know, you could say that it's a kind of equality that Jeph handles Claire sexytimes the same way he handles everyone else's sexytimes. 

Also, we need a word that combines squee and daaaaaaaaang, but I can't figure out a portmanteau that doesn't sound really weird.

'Squang' just doesn't have the right feel to it...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 06 Feb 2015, 00:30
Deeeee?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 06 Feb 2015, 00:30
Am I the only one that thinks a girl (or anyone I guess, I just happen to like girls) acting like that is kinda sexy? Am I the weird one? Everyone seems to be saying that it's not, however cute they think it is.

I agree, so if you are weird, I'm weird as well.

There's definitely a certain appeal to how she's 'baring all' in this strip. And I'm not just talking about physically, here.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Shjade on 06 Feb 2015, 00:34
I try not to comment on character relationships in this comic too often, but threads like these...baffle me.

Marten's been anxious about dealing with interns at his job since they showed up, but he's gradually come to terms with both that situation and, in his personal life, who he is and what he wants from a relationship. He still has his awkward moments - he hasn't become "suave" all of a sudden. Hell, he isn't suave. He's just less high strung than he used to be.

You'd be amazed how smooth and cool and smart you can sound when, really, all you're doing is being honest and not constantly second-guessing yourself about what you should say or how you should say it. Assuming, of course, you're a chill person underneath the neuroses in the first place.

This didn't come out of nowhere. It's always been there, hinted at here and there, sometimes taking center stage for short skips of time before he got all unsure of himself again.

We know substantially less about Claire, so there's much less to look at there, but for Marten? As far as I'm concerned there's nothing strange about his behavior here.

He's growing up. That's all it is.


Addendum: the combination of "squee" and "dang" is "Gosh."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dark Matter on 06 Feb 2015, 00:35
There's definitely a certain appeal to how she's 'baring all' in this strip. And I'm not just talking about physically, here.

I agree, I don't think that its weird or unsexy at all. I think also from a character perspective its important that the way she undresses here is more about her needs than his, which is something that I know some people felt was lacking from the previous comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 06 Feb 2015, 00:39
Also, she was wearing pink shorts under her dress?
That was my first thought too. Or Jeph forgot that she was wearing a dress in the previous strip. As for the bra-removal technique, I think Jeph's idea definitely is that she is doing it one-handed while also undoing her hair. Claire has a lot of hair... The whole strip is very nicely drawn. Claire's body-language is spot-on, I think. And look how exhausted-Marten in the first panel becomes inspired-Marten by the last (though he has bags under his eyes, which oddly he does not in the first).

With regard to the comments earlier in thread about relationships that are too bland for development, I think one needs to consider the focus of the strip. For some time Jeph's been focussing on Marten and Clair, and Faye's problems. I think it is natural for readers to assume that "nothing is happening" in relationships that are off-screen.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 06 Feb 2015, 00:40
Being undressed by someone else is shameful.  Like the phantom having his mask ripped off.

Undressing herself, assuring herself at each step that it was her own choice is different.  In the last moment she's still _naked_ rather than nude but every step up to that point was hers alone.

I'm also not sure how this can be interpreted as anything other than a sex scene, although if you find it unsexy that's a valid opinion.

It's really different from anything else Jeph has written or drawn. Deep, deep emotional intimacy. Nudity without titillation. I think it's tasteful and it sheds a lot of light on who Claire is and how she does. And I'm certainly spending a while thinking about it. It's really good.

I think also from a character perspective its important that the way she undresses here is more about her needs than his, which is something that I know some people felt was lacking from the previous comic.

HELL YES. How didn't I see that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 00:42
Two things (I think. we'll see if this gets longer or is just one thing split up when I'm done typing).

Re: Whether or not fade to black would have bee better: I say no. This bit here, this is basically an extension of the original relationship conversation, and I think, when reading the story as a whole rather than day by day, it flows well and is necessary. The comic wouldn't be ruined by a fade to black, of course, but whether or not we need to know how physically intimate they get, I think portraying the emotional intimacy and great caring between the characters like this was incredibly important (although I can't say that for certain until I see, oh, the next 8 months or so of comics). To me, this shows a lot about both characters in one comic- Claire's nervousness, both of their affection for each other, Marten's caring (and not caring, about whatever Claire did expect to bother him), etc. Even if it wasn't important, I'd think this was a good comic just for how much it shows in little details, eg Marten's eyes (the expression, not the kind of oddly arted), Claire's bra fumbling and stepping out of her panties awkwardly, body language in general, etc.

That said, while a huge fan of today's comic, not a huge fan of panel 5 (as mentioned), or panel 3 (height proportions what?) art wise. I wish he had re adjusted them just slightly even.

Re: realism: I usually refer to myself as gendersomething as I have issues finding the right thing on the spectrum, but anyway, reference point, I'm not cis, but I'm not transitioning.

Claire's reaction: She was nervous, but she also took things into her own hands. Both seem understandable with a fear of rejection (or perhaps the unknown, or just generally being nervous). Plus, Claire has been pretty strong willed about things (library work, cheating), so her wanting to show Marten herself herself seems to fit for me- and again, this doesn't contradict nervousness, which is pretty apparent from her facial expressions and posture (she's pretty much wincing when she takes off her bottoms). Also, I think it is realistic to a lot of other adult women, wanting to have it on their own terms and, even if they do so nervously say 'hey, this is me.' (which is more relevant in Claire's case).

Marten's reaction: There's a lot less to go off, but anyway- as I said before, this seems like a natural step from the first serious conversation (although I do not think the between dates were filler- while not super useful, they served to show that Marten and Claire had steps in between 'okay, date' and now). Ignoring the details I wrote about 'why is this comic necessary,' since it would all be repetition, I'll leave it at: he has been shown to really like Claire, and also has always been fairly charming, if awkward more early on. Even if he was slightly unsure what he'd see or startled, I'm not surprised that he got over it before really having time to react. Not sure if true to life ever, but I'd definitely call it realistic to his character.

(click to show/hide)

I'm going to bed, if I accidentally speculated genitalia or talked about sex too much, I'm sorry, but I'm just warning you that I won't see any critique or mod edits 'til morning, and it's not me avoiding it. I don't think I did either of those things, but just in case.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 00:44

Why does she choose to undress herself in this kind of prosaic, unsexy way instead of inviting him to undress her?



Had to stop catching up on the thread to respond to this.

You already know why, silly.

The old, cold Shadow is upon us, the shrieking and buzzing of a thousand killing doubts, an ocean of fear to again blot out the sun.

'W-well, this- this is me.'

The Beast dissipates, torn and scattered by the light. It will return, but in that moment? Victory.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 06 Feb 2015, 00:45
Example of possible outfit involving a 'dress' and pants':

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 06 Feb 2015, 00:47
I like today's strip. Also: squeee. :)

Squee, as well.  Some moments are magical when done correctly.  Kudos to Jeph on this one.

Warning - while you were reading 3 other people are squee-ing as well. At this rate you'd better just quit previewing and hit Post or you'll never get it done.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 06 Feb 2015, 00:49
Today's strip may be my favourite QC of all time.

Sidenote: describing anything as being 'unsexy' is just dumb. Disregarding the experience factor, sexy is in the eye of the beholder in looks, activities, personality and everything else in between.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: NilsO on 06 Feb 2015, 00:51
Still, I guess Jeph will be careful drawing or describing Claire/Marten in a sexual context (like he did with Sven/Faye (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1198) or Sven/Gina Riversmith (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1334)). I guess Claire and Marten are fully clothed if we get a peek behind the bedroom door, but the most probable scenario is Marten and Claire coming out of the same bedroom door, encountering Faye for breakfast in tomorrow's strip. Whatever happened behind that door, will remain hidden. Faye should make pancakes (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2637). Claire's face will be redder than Grade A Dark Amber maple syrup.
Dang. I was wrong again :facepalm:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 00:57
Sidenote: describing anything as being 'unsexy' is just dumb. Disregarding the experience factor, sexy is in the eye of the beholder in looks, activities, personality and everything else in between.

I just thought it was wrong here, because for one, I found it sexy.... and no, not because she got naked, but the way she went about it. The personality and and mood that's behind a girl acting like that (i.e. flustered, embarrassed, but not incredibly so, etc) has always been attractive to me and I've dated girls who acted very much like that and I always liked it.

It just seems odd the inordinate amount of people commenting that the way she went about this can't be construed as "sexy".
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 00:58
In their defense, they're probably looking for the word 'sensual', not 'sexy'. An easy mistake to make, as we sometimes use them interchangeably.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 00:59
Actually, before bed, were there any comments yet about Paradise by the Dashboard Lights yet? Because ever since my first read of Claire's first line it's been stuck in my head.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 06 Feb 2015, 01:00
And just like that, this thread is awesome.

THOUGH IT'S COLD AND LONELY IN NORTHAMPTON TONIIIIIGHT
I CAN SEE PARADIIIIISE FROM THE ANTHROPC'S LIIIIIGHT
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 01:03
I don't know what you two are talking about, but I sang that to the beat of Fat Bottomed Girls by Queen and it worked out, so that's neat.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: techkid on 06 Feb 2015, 01:04
This is just... too beautiful. Marten and Claire have both found a Good ThingTM within themselves and each other.

Claire first exposed her heart to Marten back at the lake house party, and he was cool about it. He walked into this relationship knowing full well that Claire was a trans-woman, and he didn't even bat an eyelid. And now she has exposed herself in the literal sense, and his response of "You're beautiful" has sent my own mind in loops because 1) it just wants this moment to last forever, 2) it wishes that its meatsack owner was so brave to say that to a couple of past someones that I let slip by, and 3) that more people were as chilled and relaxed as Marten so that people would more understand that life and living are things to be enjoyed rather than graded and judged

Warning - while you were having a brain fail 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to contact a neurosurgeon.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 01:06
Last one.

Sidenote: describing anything as being 'unsexy' is just dumb. Disregarding the experience factor, sexy is in the eye of the beholder in looks, activities, personality and everything else in between.

I just thought it was wrong here, because for one, I found it sexy.... and no, not because she got naked, but the way she went about it. The personality and and mood that's behind a girl acting like that (i.e. flustered, embarrassed, but not incredibly so, etc) has always been attractive to me and I've dated girls who acted very much like that and I always liked it.

It just seems odd the inordinate amount of people commenting that the way she went about this can't be construed as "sexy".

- To the non-quoted ones about it being unsexy, I highly doubt sexy was the point. As well as this not being a titillating webcomic, I think she was more concerned with revealing herself to Marten than with making a sexy strip tease.

- A lot of people like more awkward undressing and find it sexy. The nervousness can be a bit of a rush, or the intimacy of knowing someone's letting you be there when they are nervous and that they trust you, or, if one's used to porn/movies/sexy sexy one night stands, the reminder that this person is really human and really there and not an airbrushed, unattainable thing can be sexy indeed too. I do cam modelling and sell some videos, usually custom, and my clients, especially regulars, love candidness, whether it's an awkward undress or giggling a bit or whatever.

So, the people saying it's unsexy/unsensual are, in my mind wrong on two counts, because it is not supposed to be sexy, and at the same time, many people would consider it sexy (do Marten and Claire? no idea, don't care as long as they're happy next comic).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 01:09
I don't know what you two are talking about, but I sang that to the beat of Fat Bottomed Girls by Queen and it worked out, so that's neat.

Meatloaf song. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmPMMitJDYg)

Relevant part: (http://youtu.be/SmPMMitJDYg?t=4m27s)
"STOP RIGHT THERE!
I gotta know right now-
Before we go any further

do you love me,
and will you love me forever?"

Also like, the funnest thing to sing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 01:14
Oh okay, yes then. I am glad I am part of this now.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mojo on 06 Feb 2015, 01:21
Alright, question answered!

Well done, Jeph.  Handled with grace and maturity.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 01:28
Also, we need a word that combines squee and daaaaaaaaang, but I can't figure out a portmanteau that doesn't sound really weird.

"Squuuaaang", whilst reading weird actually sounds like a guitar chord. This means that it can either by typed or you can add a sound clip of a dramatic electric chord.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: badbum61 on 06 Feb 2015, 01:32
14 PAGES BY FR....wait, never mind.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 01:54
I just saw the comic again.  Did Jeph go back and color in her eyes in panel 2 after the comic was up? 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Doc on 06 Feb 2015, 01:55
Because nipples are terrorists.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 06 Feb 2015, 01:55
I just saw the comic again.  Did Jeph go back and color in her eyes in panel 2 after the comic was up? 

No, your colour blindness was cured by the squeee!  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 02:02
I just saw the comic again.  Did Jeph go back and color in her eyes in panel 2 after the comic was up? 

No, your colour blindness was cured by the squeee!  :-D

That must be it.  Praise be to the squeeee.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 06 Feb 2015, 02:14
Well, dang. I didn't think Jeph would go there.

There are plenty of things they can do safely without condoms, so that's not an issue.

Also, I'm seeing some parallels between 2891 and... Hanako's sex scene in Katawa Shoujo, oddly enough. (However, something tells me that whatever Claire and Marten are going to do next, it's going to go far, far better than that.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 02:27
Okay, time for my Next Week Strips I'd Like to See!

MONDAY
A 'couples in bed' strip:
PANEL 1 - PENNY and WIL - They're on separate pillows, not hugging or cuddling but PENNY turned towards WIL in a comfortable way. For some reason, WIL is wearing a hairnet over his moustache;
PANEL 2 - DALE and MARIGOLD in a spoon cuddle;
PANEL 3 - Close up of the side of FAYE's face, staring sleeplessly up at the ceiling with tear-tracks on her cheek
PANEL 4 - DORA, curled up with her knees to her chest, crying, teeth clenched; TAI is hugging DORA from behind and stroking her hair;
PANEL 5 (full width) - MARTEN and CLAIRE under rumpled sheets; CLAIRE tucked up tight under Marten's right arm as he strokes her face with his left hand.

TUESDAY
PANEL 1 - MARTEN and CLAIRE, hand-in-hand (CLAIRE in a spare TEH-Shirt) standing in the door of the kitchen; FAYE is sipping her coffee with PINTSIZE sitting on the counter.
PINTSIZE: (fake horror) "The Banshees! The Banshees are amongst us!"
FAYE: "Quiet, or I'll turn you off again!"
PANEL 2 - Close up on MARTEN and CLAIRE smiling at each other
FAYE (off-panel): So, you two are a thing-thing now?"
MARTEN: "Yeah, we kind of clicked last night."
CLAIRE: "I think we're gonna try for the long run."
PANEL 3 - FAYE gesturing with her coffee cup; her expression is teasing
FAYE: "Good. Just one thing: I'm all for the free expression of love, y'know."
PANEL 4 - MARTEN and CLARE are looking at each other and blushing. FAYE, in extreme foreground, is drinking some of her coffee with an expression of righteousness
FAYE: "Just try not to express it for four goddamn loud hours next time!"

WEDNESDAY
PANEL 1 - KITCHEN - FAYE and MARTEN are drinking coffee whilst CLAIRE has a glass of orange juice
FAYE: "Claire, gotta be adults. Marty here has had a lot of shitty relationships. Some of it has been him and some of it has been the girl. The point is that he's the best guy in the world and he don't deserve the drama he's had in his love life. He deserves a girl who's crazy about him and will make him happy!"
PANEL 2 - FAYE is pointing at a frantically-nodding CLAIRE
FAYE: "And if you hurt him because of some dumb-ass neuroses of yours, I'll rip out your hair, weave a noose with it and strangle you, GOT THAT?"
PANEL 3 - FAYE is now in MARTEN's face
FAYE: "Marten, it doesn't take a genius to figure that you're Red's first serious thing. She's a good kid and she's put a lot of trust in you. This means that you've got to stop this passive shit! She needs you to step up, take her by the hand and be a driving force, not a passenger!"
PANEL 4 - FAYE is holding the front of MARTEN's tee-shirt; MARTEN is nodding frantically
FAYE: "And if you hurt her because you can't do that, then I'll rip them off and make you eat them before I wring your neck like one of Gramma's chickens back home! GOT THAT?"
PANEL 5 - MARTEN and CLAIRE are looking at each other, more surprised than afraid. FAYE is, again, sipping the coffee of the righteous. PINTSIZE is standing in between them.
FAYE: "Good. I'm glad we had this little talk. Have fun, kiddies!"
PINTSIZE: "She's been rehearsing that all night; I talked her out of the visual aids."

THURSDAY
I'm thinking a filler; maybe Mrs A telling Clinton that Claire has gone to spend the night with Marten and threatening unspecified retribution if he interferes or responds in any way. Clinton is all huffy and 'phones Emily to tell her that his mother doesn't understand him and is she still on for the movie tonight?

FRIDAY
PANEL 1 - Marten and Claire standing in front of the checking-back counter at the Library, TAI behind the counter, leaning on her palm, elbow braced on the counter, and smiling knowingly.
TAI: "Morning, kiddies! Good to see you!"
PANEL 2 - CLAIRE has an armful of books and TAI is with her.
TAI: "So, get enough sleep last night?"
CLAIRE: "We both did! I mean... we both slept... I mean... Marten fell asleep first...!"
PANEL 3 - A smug TAI has her arm around a beet-red CLAIRE's shoulder
CLAIRE: "I... I... Oh... God!"
TAI: "Don't be embarrassed kiddo; it was obvious the minute you walked in! You've got the 'I got some last night' glow and Marten is strutting the 'I've made love to the most beautiful girl in town' strut!"
PANEL 4 - CLAIRE is even redder and covering her mouth with one hand, whilst TAI is grinning.
CLAIRE: "After last night, I'm surprised that either of us can even walk... OHMIGOD! I can't believe I said that!"
TAI: "Oh... dooo tell!"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Honkytonk on 06 Feb 2015, 03:01
Claire's face in panel 4 is the happiest we've ever seen her.

I think that says all that needs to be said really.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 03:37
You know, you could say that it's a kind of equality that Jeph handles Claire sexytimes the same way he handles everyone else's sexytimes. 

Also, we need a word that combines squee and daaaaaaaaang, but I can't figure out a portmanteau that doesn't sound really weird.

'Squang' just doesn't have the right feel to it...

I don't know, I think "squang" might have the most perfect feel of any portmanteau/neologism ever.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 04:29
I'm going to more or less skip the post I've been composing in my head since this comic went up, a post that basically asks "Did Jeph just lampshade the shit out of our September/October debates about the propriety of discussing Claire's anatomy?" That was the gist of it, anyway. The head-composition was ridiculously long, and may or may not have quoted Judith Butler and Lauren Berlant.

But to get to the more human, less snarky side of things: This is so bold of Claire. To simply undress in front of someone - someone you like and respect and are deeply attracted to - for the first time and basically say, "Well, here's what you're getting"...that takes guts for anyone. For Claire, given all that we know about her personality and lack of a history of physical intimacy...it's downright heroic. What a great strip.

And to throw my hat into the "sexy/unsexy ring, I think this moment would be sexy as hell, regardless of what the body in question looks like. The gesture is sexy, if nothing else.

ETA: I didn't mean to suggest that I wanted to be snarky about the Somewhat Delicate Topic. Just that discussing narrative devices like lampshading tends to head into snarky territory rather quickly, regardless of the lampshading's subject matter.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 06 Feb 2015, 04:59
What's wrong with over analyzing? Making simple things complicated can be a ton o' fun sometimes. :P

Did we used to date?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 05:13
The Beast dissipates, torn and scattered by the light. It will return, but in that moment? Victory.

The comic made me smile. 

That line made me tear up.

Good job.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 06 Feb 2015, 05:13
Okay, time for my Next Week Strips I'd Like to See!

MONDAY
A 'couples in bed' strip:
PANEL 1 - PENNY and WIL - They're on separate pillows, not hugging or cuddling but PENNY turned towards WIL in a comfortable way. For some reason, WIL is wearing a hairnet over his moustache;
PANEL 2 - DALE and MARIGOLD in a spoon cuddle;
PANEL 3 - Close up of the side of FAYE's face, staring sleeplessly up at the ceiling with tear-tracks on her cheek
PANEL 4 - DORA, curled up with her knees to her chest, crying, teeth clenched; TAI is hugging DORA from behind and stroking her hair;
PANEL 5 (full width) - MARTEN and CLAIRE under rumpled sheets; CLAIRE tucked up tight under Marten's right arm as he strokes her face with his left hand.

(snip)


Hey! I already called that (although I thought it was going to be today...)

I'm a bit surprised that he spelled it out this far and wasn't subtle about it; it's a very delicate subject, easy to get wrong and in this thread about half of the people jump on that and half defend it (a minority tend to go well off topic and into Monty Python). However I think most people would agree that it's very well written and very artistically drawn, so Kudos to you Jeph  8-).

Although quite recently Marten's eyes have sometimes looked a bit off, can't put my finger on why that is.

Also squee.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: katharsys on 06 Feb 2015, 05:30
I rarely post here, but I just wanted to put this out there...

Damn you Jeph for making me cry!

-signed: person who has been there with a very, very opposite reaction from the other person.

Also, squeeee
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Drostan on 06 Feb 2015, 05:46
In a straight-ish guy, maybe a little flexible, I dunno. I have done really good trans gaming buddies, and their awesome, and I just want to say I wish more guys would accept trans chicks. Every time I see another fucking horror story in the news, I feel bad that I didn't meet her first. There's no reason not to love a girl.

I do have other male friends who are trans friendly. It disappoints me that they "don't know" if they'd date a trans girl, but I'm happy threes guys that wouldn't freak out if their girlfriend was trans. It's a step in the right direction, I guess.

In not very good with words so please don't sandblast me to hard. tl;dr: I'd totally date a trans girl no problem, my male friends are at the very least trans friendly, just don't know many trans girls
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Drostan on 06 Feb 2015, 05:54
I rarely post here, but I just wanted to put this out there...

Damn you Jeph for making me cry!

-signed: person who has been there with a very, very opposite reaction from the other person.

Also, squeeee


Also double post sarry.
In so sorry you experienced that, you and the other trans ladies are why I posted, because it's hard out there, and I want to spread some real hope, because there are decent dudes out there, and I hope all you ladies find one (or another lady if you swing that way)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 06 Feb 2015, 05:58
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 06 Feb 2015, 06:13
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.

Would you call that a blow drive-by comment?  :claireface:

...

(K, one hell of a stretch but something called out for a pun. Probably the mention of Claire)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2015, 06:14
I don't know what you two are talking about, but I sang that to the beat of Fat Bottomed Girls by Queen and it worked out, so that's neat.
You poor, poor child.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 06:15
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.

Would you call that a blow drive-by comment?  :claireface:

...

(K, one hell of a stretch but something called out for a pun. Probably the mention of Claire)

[AFTERGLOW]
Claire:   Well, I guess you're not a bicycle.
Marten:  Huh?
Claire:   You weren't too tired.
 :clairedoge:

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 06:22
[AFTERGLOW]
Claire:   Well, I guess you're not a bicycle.
Marten:  Huh?
Claire:   You weren't too tired.
 :clairedoge:

I can actually see that as the first three panels. Panel 4 is Faye banging on the dividing wall and shouting at them to stop laughing like lunatics.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vforvancouver on 06 Feb 2015, 06:33
I just saw the comic again.  Did Jeph go back and color in her eyes in panel 2 after the comic was up?

Yes. Yes, he did. I noticed her eyes were white on Panel 2 when he uploaded the comic; he fixed them a little bit later. Now I can concentrate on the issue of why Claire would use pink shorts with a blue dress, because when you mix blue and pink you get either purple, baby clothes or a song. Or all three at the same time.

And now, taking it from the idea of baby clothes, I still expect they have a reasonable number of babies. Mr. John Ellicott-Chatham, sir, you better hurry up with that technology. Some of us in the real world will benefit from it too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 06 Feb 2015, 06:36
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.

Would you call that a blow drive-by comment?  :claireface:

...

(K, one hell of a stretch but something called out for a pun. Probably the mention of Claire)

[AFTERGLOW]
Claire:   Well, I guess you're not a bicycle.
Marten:  Huh?
Claire:   You weren't too tired.
 :clairedoge:

Oh, nice one. I'd suggest we pun in tandem but I lack the wit to do that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 06:37
Count me as one of the ones offput by Marten's new "soulful" eyes.  I think part of it is Jeph is now more into showing his characters staring directly at the *fourth wall," whereas in the past they were usually in profile or looking away.  But either way, Martin gives me the creeps whenever we get a closeup of his eyes now. 

Which brings me to the one problem with the strip.  Marten doesn't take his eyes off of Claire's face, from what we can see, in the last two panels. 

Claire is looking for acceptance of her body, not her face, since Marten knows her face already.  This includes her bits, or she wouldn't have taken off her panties.  Any straight dude, if he sees his GF naked for the first time, is going to scan her whole body (whether she's trans or cis) and just take it all in. 

Marten may have done this off-panel.  Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO). 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 06:37
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.

Would you call that a blow drive-by comment?  :claireface:

...

(K, one hell of a stretch but something called out for a pun. Probably the mention of Claire)

[AFTERGLOW]
Claire:   Well, I guess you're not a bicycle.
Marten:  Huh?
Claire:   You weren't too tired.
 :clairedoge:

Oh, nice one. I'd suggest we pun in tandem but I lack the wit to do that.

Don't backpedal on me now!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Thrillho on 06 Feb 2015, 06:39
Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO).

Really? Seriously?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ChrisSayer on 06 Feb 2015, 06:41
Okay, time for my Next Week Strips I'd Like to See!

Well, I've just got to say, BenRG's "Strips I'd Like to See!" posts are most happy-making.

Rather like getting two Questionable Content Universes for the price of one.

Merci beaucoup!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: shrike1978 on 06 Feb 2015, 06:43
Marten may have done this off-panel.  Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO).

Maybe this is cynicism talking, but if that had been shown, we'd have a bunch of people complaining about how all he could do was ogle her bits.  The way it was done, it was implied (to me anyway), and more tasteful.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jimwormmaster on 06 Feb 2015, 06:46
Anyone else looking at that picture of Claire from behind with her hair down and thinking she could do an AWESOME Cosplay of Starfire from Teen Titans?

I keep thinking Merida, from Brave. How do you feel about tartan, Claire?

Well then.  Honestly I'm thinking she could do either one, now that you guys mention it.  As for today's strip, Claire's face is adorable in panel 4.  The kind of nervous look, the hair twirl, it really sells the mood.  And gotta hand it to Good Guy Marten for knowing just what to say.  I feel no shame in adding to the sea of squee on this one.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 06 Feb 2015, 06:55
Martin gives me the creeps whenever we get a closeup of his eyes now.

[...]

Claire is looking for acceptance of her body, not her face, since Marten knows her face already.  This includes her bits, or she wouldn't have taken off her panties.  Any straight dude, if he sees his GF naked for the first time, is going to scan her whole body (whether she's trans or cis) and just take it all in. 

Marten may have done this off-panel.  Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO).

I have to admit this post --^ gives me the creeps much more than Marten's creepy eyes do. Just pretend he ogled the shit out of her between panels or something if that's your thing. Next week on QC we may have a strip where someone goes to the loo but we don't get a closeup of the toilet between wiping and flushing. Or maybe less really is more sometimes?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 06 Feb 2015, 07:04
As for today's strip, Claire's face is adorable in panel 4.  The kind of nervous look, the hair twirl, it really sells the mood.  And gotta hand it to Good Guy Marten for knowing just what to say.  I feel no shame in adding to the sea of squee on this one.

I actually don't think it's a case of Marten "knowing what to say". BenRG pointed this out a bit upthread, but it bears repeating - Marten is tired. Marten is close to exhausted. He doesn't have the physical or mental energy to be suave or calculating. Whatever enters his head is what is going to come out of his mouth. He's too tired to be anything but utterly honest. So this isn't some attempt on his part to say the right thing - he says exactly what he thinks, and it happens to be exactly the right thing. Which is why he's Good Guy Marten.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 06 Feb 2015, 07:11
Well, he's not wrong after all. Claire is beautiful. (squee)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 06 Feb 2015, 07:15
Go on, Claire.  Break the Internet.

ALso, it's obvious why she wanted to remove her clothes first.  She wanted to avoid the sock gap.

http://vimeo.com/93428207 (http://vimeo.com/93428207)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 06 Feb 2015, 07:18
Nothing like Jeff from Coupling to put things in perspective.

Also, let me second the "Squee"ing.  SQUEE!

Er... third.  Fourth?  Twentieth?  What are we up to at this point?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 07:18
And just like that, this thread is awesome.

THOUGH IT'S COLD AND LONELY IN NORTHAMPTON TONIIIIIGHT
I CAN SEE PARADIIIIISE FROM THE ANTHROPC'S LIIIIIGHT

Meatloaf just made a buck off you this morning.

*puts headphones on*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 07:20
Really? Seriously?

Yes seriously.

I never had a trans GF, but I did have ones who were overweight/uncomfortable with their body in the past.  I'm sure they didn't want me to stare at their body for long periods of time when the first disrobed, but I'm also sure they would be offput if I just looked at their face and avoided looking at their body. 

To be honest, I don't think I would have made this comment if someone else had said how great it was that "Marten's eyes never left hers."  That made me think about it, and realize it was actually kinda wrong. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 06 Feb 2015, 07:21
http://vimeo.com/93428207 (http://vimeo.com/93428207)

That's.....actually good advice.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 06 Feb 2015, 07:26
Claire's face in panel 4 is the happiest we've ever seen her.

I think that says all that needs to be said really.

Not happy. You might be able to make an argument for giddy or nervous and resolved. Maybe a bit crazy, as in holy s#!t did I just do THAT? She just went all-in and there's nothing to do but look hopeful, be hopeful and see how the cards flop.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: anahata on 06 Feb 2015, 07:28
To be honest, I don't think I would have made this comment if someone else had said how great it was that "Marten's eyes never left hers."  That made me think about it, and realize it was actually kinda wrong.

It may not be true though, as others have suggested.
And wherever Marten looked immediately before that panel, it is good that he looked Claire in the eyes while speaking to her.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Halloween Jack on 06 Feb 2015, 07:34
 :-o

Wow. Go you two!

And WRT the close analysis of whether Marten actually dared to look at Claire's genitals: for fuck's sake, literally. It's like the overanalysis of Faye's rolling blackout in the ER.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: anahata on 06 Feb 2015, 07:42
Not happy. You might be able to make an argument for giddy or nervous and resolved. Maybe a bit crazy, as in holy s#!t did I just do THAT? She just went all-in and there's nothing to do but look hopeful, be hopeful and see how the cards flop.

Also Marten's response perhaps refers not (only) to her physical appearance, but also her courage in doing that the way she did.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Soulsynger on 06 Feb 2015, 07:43
My heart LITERALLY skipped a beat when I caught the first glimpse of the comic a few minutes ago. (NOT figuratively, literally.)

Gotta hand it to Jeph for showing exactly the right amount of (mis-/) information and omitting the right things in a way that doesn't in the least interfere with the rhythm of panel-to-panel reading.
I believe there is an exact calculation at work here to evoke the reaction we see on the forum right now. Discussion, constructive/destructive analysis, a back and forth exchange of opinion about what we've seen and not seen. Brilliant!  :claireface:


[ ... ]

PANEL 3 - FAYE gesturing with her coffee cup; her expression is teasing
FAYE: "Good. Just one thing: I'm all for the free expression of love, y'know."
PANEL 4 - MARTEN and CLARE are looking at each other and blushing. FAYE, in extreme foreground, is drinking some of her coffee with an expression of righteousness
FAYE: "Just try not to express it for four goddamn loud hours next time!"

[ ... ]
Try as I might, I can NOT see either Marten or Claire being very loud during... °O

I'm with Zebediah on why Marten said what he said. The moment, atmosphere and buildup over the last few comics fits very well with it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lightsabermario on 06 Feb 2015, 07:45
As for today's strip, Claire's face is adorable in panel 4.  The kind of nervous look, the hair twirl, it really sells the mood.  And gotta hand it to Good Guy Marten for knowing just what to say.  I feel no shame in adding to the sea of squee on this one.

I actually don't think it's a case of Marten "knowing what to say". BenRG pointed this out a bit upthread, but it bears repeating - Marten is tired. Marten is close to exhausted. He doesn't have the physical or mental energy to be suave or calculating. Whatever enters his head is what is going to come out of his mouth. He's too tired to be anything but utterly honest. So this isn't some attempt on his part to say the right thing - he says exactly what he thinks, and it happens to be exactly the right thing. Which is why he's Good Guy Marten.

Honestly, I fully disagree.  The reason is that there was no hesitation. Not even a pause to process what was or wasn't down there.  He would have said that regardless.  He may have even avoided looking downwards entirely to avoid contaminating his answer with hesitation.  The lack of looking downwards wasn't an oversight, it was a clue!  Anyone dating someone whose private bits are in question and has deliberately not pressed the question would have known that this moment was coming and prepared for it.  The fact that he never pressed the question is a sign that he is being super considerate and respectful, and a super respectful person would plan for this moment and have a thoughtful response, like "You are beautiful" planned in advance, just in case he was worried he might blurt out something offensive or surprised.  Preparation like that isn't that disingenuous, it's just being super careful that you don't accidentally hurt someone with your immediate response.  The fact that he was exhausted during this merely speaks to his dedication to not hurting her.

Honestly, considering everything, particularly given what he's just gone through, in my mind Marten is starting to change from Good Guy Marten to Unrealistically Good Guy Marten.  He's not all the way to Marty Stu or Sainthood-level Marten, but he is definitely starting to bridge the gap of believability.  I mean when is the last time he's done anything selfish or or wrong or non-heroic in any way?  All of our other QC characters have character flaws, but I have yet to see Marten demonstrate any.  In fact, the very reason he and Dora broke up was because he "had to be on his best behavior at all times" and he wasn't getting the same respect.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 06 Feb 2015, 07:47
:-o

Wow. Go you two!

And WRT the close analysis of whether Marten actually dared to look at Claire's genitals: for fuck's sake, literally. It's like the overanalysis of Faye's rolling blackout in the ER.

That's what the forum does though. It over analyzes everything. Especially on a Friday strip. That's part of why I regret this comic... I was afraid to come into the thread. I was afraid the mods would have to be swinging the ban hammer like crazy. But people have been respectful and on point. Still, I would have been happy if they had left 'behind closed door' just that. And had Friday Faye coming out into the main room to see Marten and Claire having pancakes. And Marten saying 'You know.. She's right. Your mom's pancakes are much better.'
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: katharsys on 06 Feb 2015, 07:57
Still, I would have been happy if they had left 'behind closed door' just that. And had Friday Faye coming out into the main room to see Marten and Claire having pancakes. And Marten saying 'You know.. She's right. Your mom's pancakes are much better.'

I for one am extremely happy that Jeph decided to put this up... There is something sweetly wonderful about showing that trepidation, excitement, and courage in the face of the fear of rejection. This is something more than just a Claire and Martin moment, but more a human moment - something that many people, no matter whether they are cis or trans, have experienced in the course of their lives.

To show them just eating pancakes the morning after would have been the easy way out, and maybe just a hint too saccharine.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 08:02
Honestly, considering everything, particularly given what he's just gone through, in my mind Marten is starting to change from Good Guy Marten to Unrealistically Good Guy Marten.  He's not all the way to Marty Stu or Sainthood-level Marten, but he is definitely starting to bridge the gap of believably.  I mean when is the last time he's done anything selfish or or wrong or non-heroic in any way? 

Padma.

Marty has historically had flaws.  The thing is, the flaws really didn't do anything except hurt him.  He was a "nice guy" in the way that a lot of "nice guys" conceive of themselves, but aren't actually.  Now he's just a "good guy." 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lepetitfromage on 06 Feb 2015, 08:04
I think the fact that he maintained eye contact is appropriate given the medium- in a comic, you get a few snapshots of time and the in-between moments are suggested. Had there been a panel of Marten with his eyes cast downward, it would have given that moment more weight (making it feel like a longer moment in time) and I don't think it was necessary. She's disrobed and that is enough for the way that Jeph tells his stories (which is brilliantly, I might add).


I was firmly planted in the "not too early, but I doubt they are going to" camp and now I find that my previous stance is irrelevant. We don't know for sure what is coming next, but we're in a good place right now.

Re: Marten and Claire's relationship-

I think an important distinction to make is that while Claire tends to be very assertive about certain things and Marten could be a bit of a pushover, they reverse these roles in regards to physical and emotional relationships. If memory serves me correctly, most of his partners have been more experienced or had roughly the same amount of experience he has. Claire has never had a relationship and is a virgin. In this sense, Marten is taking on the role of teacher and helping Claire discover what it is like to embark on this emotional journey. Throughout their interactions, Marten has proved to her that he is trustworthy and that has given her more confidence in the relationship area to open herself up further. These steps are showing Marten that he is dealing with tender subjects in an acceptable way and gives him the confidence that he needs to know that this relationship is going in the right direction- additionally, it is proving to him that he CAN make good decisions. They are setting up a mutual respect and learning from one another. The foundation of any successful relationship. I am excited and ready for wherever Jeph takes us on this journey. Buckle up, folks!


All of our other QC characters have character flaws, but I have yet to see Marten demonstrate any.  In fact, the very reason he and Dora broke up was because he "had to be on his best behavior at all times" and he wasn't getting the same respect.

Marten's main character flaw is that he is directionless and not assertive in any way. I think this arc is allowing him to take the lead on guiding Claire through something that he is fairly knowledgeable about- being in relationships. I think this could be mutually beneficial.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 08:08
I kind of have an issue with how the whole story with Claire has gone. What makes the Martin-Claire relationship edgy/gutsy/controversial/interesting/etc is that trans people face a lot of problems that they shouldn't have to. At least in real life they do. I guess what bothers me is that Claire's existence in this comic, so far, is like a fairy-tale reality for trans people. Everything seems to be going the way that most trans people would want but few actually see (everyone she wants to be friends with accepts her, her family accepts her, the guy she pursues accepts her). Is this fair to the trans community? I am not trans or any other part of the LGBTQ spectrum, so I'm approaching this completely from the outside, but if I were to instead consider a different group that I belong to that is discriminated against (although I won't pretend it's anywhere near to the degree what trans people face), I would have a problem with a story about another character identified as being in that group and where the story basically wiped away all the struggles that members of that group face. By creating a story (again, I'd refer to it as almost being a fairy-tale) where a trans character never is shown having to actually deal with the kinds of injustices that real trans characters face, doesn't that cheapen those struggles?

I guess in the bigger picture of the comic, it seems like Jeph mainly creates characters that he likes and would want to be friends with. Homophobia, transphobia, racism... these things are essentially absent from the world of QC simply by the fact that they don't appear in any of the comic strips. Has there ever even been a single background character that didn't appear to be accepting of other ethnic groups or gender types? I can understand why he would want to create characters that he himself genuinely likes, but it kind of detracts from the whole idea that Claire or this relationship is particularly special, and makes her brother's reaction about her telling Martin about her gender type kind of silly. Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 08:14
Has there ever even been a single background character that didn't appear to be accepting of other ethnic groups or gender types?
Oddly enough, when Jeph wants to have discrimination in his comic, he usually parodies it by directing it at AIs (a fictional group that generally will get the reader's sympathy). By doing this, his objective seems to be to pose the question: "If you oppose discrimination against AIs, why do you accept or even support discrimination against [group] in real life?"

I would add that Clinton's protective behaviour implies that, even though it has happened off-panel, transgender people still face some discrimination, violence and exploitation and he is hyper-aware of how vulnerable Claire is to this.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 06 Feb 2015, 08:15
There's also Peter Bianchi, and his dismissal of Dora's bisexuality as a phase... not actually gender type discrimination, but...

And, Meena had some off-screen discrimination as well, for racial discrimination.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Feb 2015, 08:16
And then Marten wakes up from his years long coma, having fallen down the stairs going to the bar in the first comic.
The previous 2890 comics have been Marten attempting to get back to the land of the living.






What? Sometimes I like to live up to the Evil part of my name.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lepetitfromage on 06 Feb 2015, 08:20
Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

Because this particular group of friends is an open-minded, generally respectful group with decent morals. We don't see the assholes because they don't hang out with them- doesn't mean they don't exist.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 06 Feb 2015, 08:23
That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

We just had a harrowing story arc with depression, heartbreak, alcoholism and a self-destructive slide into near-death. And you think Jeph should go darker?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 08:41
Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

Because this particular group of friends is an open-minded, generally respectful group with decent morals. We don't see the assholes because they don't hang out with them- doesn't mean they don't exist.

They live in a liberal college town in Western Mass, it might not be totally super 100% progressive but odds are likely that in a tight knit group like theirs, racist, homophobic, misogenyst dbags can more readily be avoided than elsewhere in the U.S
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 06 Feb 2015, 08:49
Re: Realism. In other words, the "Unrealistic Good Guy Marten", "Where's the struggle?", etc.

Marten first. I'm splitting this into two. "Unrealistic character growth" and "Unrealistic that anyone would be so perfect for this situation". With the latter, the bare existence of one such person would contradict it. We've seen people claim to be a-ok with the possibility of not letting it get in the way of understanding, attraction, and dare I say love? I suspect there is a sizable number of such people trawling this forum. If it's unrealistic that such a person should meet such a situation, I tell you to never underestimate the power of self-sorting. People find people who welcome them. As to unrealistic character growth, it's been months since Claire came out to Marten. He's had ample time to turn things over in his head and get over internalized shit as best he could. First for the sake of a friend, who he knew was no different because he's goddamn reasonable. Then, for deeper reasons more recently. Perhaps the wedding cuddle caused him to turn additional things over in his head some time before they started going out? What I'm saying is Marten's the sort of "think-before-I-act" person who would overanalyze shit to such a degree, it'd make half this thread blush as they see themselves in him.

And struggle? That gets back to self-sorting. They're in Northampton, she works at SMIF's library, and they frequent a coffee shop owned by Marten's bi ex-goth ex. They run in accepting circles in one of the most liberal parts of the country. If we get any information about struggle, it'll be a flashback or a retelling. She chooses who she associates with carefully by this point. A story about struggle would, by necessity, be a story about the past.

Holy hell. I didn't set out to write an essay, I swear.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 08:53
Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

Because this particular group of friends is an open-minded, generally respectful group with decent morals. We don't see the assholes because they don't hang out with them- doesn't mean they don't exist.
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that. If it were that easy you could just tell every trans person "don't hang out with transphobic people and your problems are all solved." It's great that the main cast here is all open-minded but they will still inadvertently encounter close-minded people in their lives.

Also, I argue that it would make for a more compelling story where close-minded characters exist, are seen interacting with the rest of the characters, and learn to change how they see the people that they had previously been bigoted against. There's something kind of ironic about saying that you refuse to communicate with someone else that isn't as open-minded as you are.
That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

We just had a harrowing story arc with depression, heartbreak, alcoholism and a self-destructive slide into near-death. And you think Jeph should go darker?
I think he handles the alcoholism issues fairly well, or at least better than the trans issues, I'll give him that. Although it's really not that dark of a story, as Faye immediately has friends that want to help her recover and she has pretty much zero denial after waking up in the hospital, while in real life many alcoholics are literally on their own because nobody cares if they live or die, and they don't even want to listen to the ones that do care, and they drink away the remainder of their lives because of that. Yes, personal experience here...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: efrumttr on 06 Feb 2015, 08:53
That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

We just had a harrowing story arc with depression, heartbreak, alcoholism and a self-destructive slide into near-death. And you think Jeph should go darker?

I think you missed his point competely. Think about it like this: why did Jeph create Claire? Why did he introduce a transgender character into the comic? Just because? If that's the case, then okay. But if Jeph is trying to send a larger message about trans acceptance or to raise awareness of transgender issues (which I at least think it's obvious that he is), then to portray Claire's life as we've seen it so far is more questionable. No, we don't need super dark comics where super bad things happen to Claire. But this is what I was trying to put my finger on in my post yesterday: it's been too easy. It's not representative of what life is like for the majority of transgender people. The question then arises as to whether that's helpful to his larger goals, because if people who don't have any experience with transgender people or the transgender community read this comic, they don't even get a hint of those issues.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 06 Feb 2015, 09:01
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that.

Heaven forbid we should seek something other (and/or 'better') than life and gritty realism in our fiction.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: efrumttr on 06 Feb 2015, 09:06
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.

What the hell? Nobody in this thread is saying anything close to that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 06 Feb 2015, 09:09
There is a place for aspirational stories as well as realistic stories. Look, we all know the world sucks. But every once in a while it's nice to be reminded that the world doesn't have to suck and could, in fact, be made to suck less than it does. Because if we can't imagine the world being a better place, it never will be.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 09:11
I think you missed his point completely. Think about it like this: why did Jeph create Claire? Why did he introduce a transgender character into the comic? Just because? If that's the case, then okay. But if Jeph is trying to send a larger message about trans acceptance or to raise awareness of transgender issues (which I at least think it's obvious that he is), then to portray Claire's life as we've seen it so far is more questionable. No, we don't need super dark comics where super bad things happen to Claire. But this is what I was trying to put my finger on in my post yesterday: it's been too easy. It's not representative of what life is like for the majority of transgender people. The question then arises as to whether that's helpful to his larger goals, because if people who don't have any experience with transgender people or the transgender community read this comic, they don't even get a hint of those issues.

I think this is a difficult tightrope to walk however.  On one hand, it's true that if you excised a few coming out strips, along with like two strips since they started dating, there has been nothing to signify that Claire isn't cis in the comic.  This could be seen as problematic, the same way that putting a black character whose blackness is just an arbitrary assignment of race to a character* would be.  On the other hand Claire should be her own person, and her trans status should not define everything about her.  She doesn't have to speak for all trans people everywhere.

*  Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HeavyP on 06 Feb 2015, 09:14
And then Marten wakes up from his years long coma, having fallen down the stairs going to the bar in the first comic.
The previous 2890 comics have been Marten attempting to get back to the land of the living.

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF........

Alternate Response: "Is this the real life?  Is this just fantasy?"

Edit: I have you one-upped.  This is the last strip of QC.  The next will be Alice from Alice Grove sitting bolt upright in bed and saying "That....was the most bizarre dream I have EVER had!  No more five alarm chili before bed."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 09:15
Marten may have done this off-panel.  Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO).

Or he doesn't want to make her feel self-conscious—or he just doesn't care, or he's more concerned with being present with her than checking out her naughty bits. Given they live in a world that has robots who are citizens and body parts that can be effortlessly replaced with cyborg implants, I really wouldn't be surprised if being trans is as huge of a deal as it is in our own world.

And honestly, I really don't care to analyze it beyond that. It is a beautiful strip either way—and that is probably what Jeph intended (though none of us will know unless he wants to talk about it or we can read minds ;) ).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 06 Feb 2015, 09:19
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.

What the hell? Nobody in this thread is saying anything close to that.

But it's real, isn't it?  It's true.  It's "life".  And we should acknowledge that, and never forget it, and remind people of it whenever anyone tries to say different, or is in an inappropriately good mood about anything.

[/sarcasm]
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 06 Feb 2015, 09:22
I like the fact that if someone came into this not knowing Claire was trans, the comic today would still work. Clearly we have a girl getting nervous in front of a guy for the first time, hoping for his approval, with a hint that she is nervous about her body. That's a universal thing, not a transgender thing. "I hope my partner likes/accepts me." It could just as easily be nervousness about all her freckles, or or small breasts, or that giant mole on her butt the shape of Abraham Lincoln, who knows? The comic still works.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 09:24
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that.

Heaven forbid we should seek something other (and/or 'better') than life and gritty realism in our fiction.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.
Of course not. But this is a comic that has developed into exploring the foibles of human interaction, primarily in relationships, and in most cases it seems the writer wants to try to represent "issues" that people deal with in real life that might not be written about as much in other fiction. So it's reasonable to ask for those issues to be relevant to the struggles real people face.
There is a place for aspirational stories as well as realistic stories. Look, we all know the world sucks. But every once in a while it's nice to be reminded that the world doesn't have to suck and could, in fact, be made to suck less than it does. Because if we can't imagine the world being a better place, it never will be.
I want the world to be a better place, too. But that doesn't mean it needs to happen easily.

Look at it this way... What story would make Claire a more inspirational, brave character? One where she is never actually shown facing transphobia or even talking about having faced it, and everyone accepts her automatically, and she gets the relationship she always dreamed of with basically little effort at all? Or one in which she explains that some bad things have happened in her past regarding her gender type, where she has to deal with a friend who isn't completely accepting once that friend finds out, and where her boyfriend that she puts all her trust in exhibits some symptoms of having some suppressed issues with her gender that he doesn't want to hurt her with talking about, but in spite of all that she perseveres and gets enough of what she wants that she's generally happy with her life?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 06 Feb 2015, 09:24
You also have to remember that very very few people know. Marten, Emily, Clinton, and Claire-Mom are the only people we KNOW in the comic actually know.

So, I'm a bisexual man. Yes, bisexuals do not face the same amount of discrimination, but we do face it. But I'm also married to a woman and have kids. I "pass" as a straight man, and most people don't even know I'm bi. I'm not secretive about it, but I don't generally talk about it unless something brings it up.

The area I live in is pretty blue (though not as blue as Northampton), but well... I don't tend to really face much discrimination. At worst I hear people occasionally say something that erases bisexuality, but I just respond to it and move on. Almost nothing is actually directed at me, because, well, most people just don't know.

I feel its pretty realistic for someone who is in a group that is discriminated against, with only a very select group of people they trust knowing, who lives in a massively liberal area, to not face much direct discrimination.

That being said, just the fact that I feel that hiding it leads to less trouble, is pretty shitty in and of itself. And I think about that in my own life. But... Its just easier not to be vocal about it if I don't need to. It sucks, but its practical.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 06 Feb 2015, 09:26
Yeah but come, life doesn't work like that.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.

What the hell? Nobody in this thread is saying anything close to that.

But it's real, isn't it?  It's true.  It's "life".  And we should acknowledge that, and never forget it, and remind people of it whenever anyone tries to say different, or is in an inappropriately good mood about anything.

[/sarcasm]

Many people do say grace before a meal. It is a way of acknowledging that you could be much worse off and to be thankful for what you have. So in a way, yes, many people do.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 06 Feb 2015, 09:27
I like the fact that if someone came into this not knowing Claire was trans, the comic today would still work. Clearly we have a girl getting nervous in front of a guy for the first time, hoping for his approval, with a hint that she is nervous about her body. That's a universal thing, not a transgender thing. "I hope my partner likes/accepts me." It could just as easily be nervousness about all her freckles, or or small breasts, or that giant mole on her butt the shape of Abraham Lincoln, who knows? The comic still works.

I'm a guy, but I still feel this way. I gained a bit of weight around my midsection when I went from doing a construction job to a job where I work at home. I get nervous about having my shirt off around people, like swimming, etc.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 06 Feb 2015, 09:29
I like the fact that if someone came into this not knowing Claire was trans, the comic today would still work. Clearly we have a girl getting nervous in front of a guy for the first time, hoping for his approval, with a hint that she is nervous about her body. That's a universal thing, not a transgender thing. "I hope my partner likes/accepts me." It could just as easily be nervousness about all her freckles, or or small breasts, or that giant mole on her butt the shape of Abraham Lincoln, who knows? The comic still works.

That's how I read it.  Hell, if I was in her situation I'd feel exactly the same say since it's been a loooooooong time since I've been naked in front of another person. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 06 Feb 2015, 09:31
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 06 Feb 2015, 09:32
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

All we know is that she's been on HRT.  I don't think this is something we will ever know.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 09:35
That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

We just had a harrowing story arc with depression, heartbreak, alcoholism and a self-destructive slide into near-death. And you think Jeph should go darker?

I think you missed his point competely. Think about it like this: why did Jeph create Claire? Why did he introduce a transgender character into the comic? Just because? If that's the case, then okay. But if Jeph is trying to send a larger message about trans acceptance or to raise awareness of transgender issues (which I at least think it's obvious that he is), then to portray Claire's life as we've seen it so far is more questionable. No, we don't need super dark comics where super bad things happen to Claire. But this is what I was trying to put my finger on in my post yesterday: it's been too easy. It's not representative of what life is like for the majority of transgender people. The question then arises as to whether that's helpful to his larger goals, because if people who don't have any experience with transgender people or the transgender community read this comic, they don't even get a hint of those issues.

With that logic, Jeph is also a terrible author for not making Dale get pulled over by cops and treated like differently by a number of the white character, because how dare he include black character and not make a social statement of the injustices of African Americans. And why does he even include robots? They are just machines!

It's a fictional comic set in the future...or at least a different Earth than that of our own. If we can have robot citizens and cybernetic implants, it is easy to believe the society would be more accepting of *human* people. I'm actually happy to see minority characters that are being used for MORE than making political/societal statements.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 09:36
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 09:37
Has there ever even been a single background character that didn't appear to be accepting of other ethnic groups or gender types?
  • The clothing store manager who refused to even interview May on the ground that she was an AI and he doesn't give jobs to robots;
  • The preacher who upset Momo by loudly declaring that AIs are not people because they have no 'souls'.
Oddly enough, when Jeph wants to have discrimination in his comic, he usually parodies it by directing it at AIs (a fictional group that generally will get the reader's sympathy). By doing this, his objective seems to be to pose the question: "If you oppose discrimination against AIs, why do you accept or even support discrimination against [group] in real life?"

I would add that Clinton's protective behaviour implies that, even though it has happened off-panel, transgender people still face some discrimination, violence and exploitation and he is hyper-aware of how vulnerable Claire is to this.

WRT the AI discrimination, that seems simply non-comparable to me. AI Rights aren't a real thing and Jeph has never really hinted that they're meant as an allegory for real-world struggles. And even within the comic's diegesis, AI is essentially a manmade phenomenon (mostly courtesy of Hannerdad), a non-organic arrangement of sophisticated circuitry, whereas race, ethnicity, sexuality, gender identity et al. are engrained human traits.

I don't necessarily think all minority or typically-discriminated-again/non-privileged groups have to experience bigotry in-comic in order for the comic to be believable - I agree with the person who pointed out the thin line between social realism and tokenism - but if those AI incidents are the only counterexamples to Technetium's observation, then I think Technetium is on solid ground.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 06 Feb 2015, 09:38
REAL
BROWN
GRIMDARK

wanting to spend time in a world that's nicer than the one on all the newschannels is WRONG and needs to be CORRECTED
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 09:39
It's pretty easy to get caught up in examination of how the story is told, the framing for a particular situation, the artwork, etc., and I think everyone (including me) has a take on how the story should go or be told/presented, but in the end it's because of the way that Jeph tells it and presents it that keeps me clicking the link in my browser in the morning (or repeatedly pressing F5 in the evening, depending).

Side note:  am I the only person who feels socially awkward as hell referring to 'Jeph' when we don't know each other at all?

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 09:39
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?

Should it? and Would it? are super different questions. It seems not to matter to Marten, and that's cool.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 09:43
Quote
With that logic, Jeph is also a terrible author for not making Dale get pulled over by cops and treated like differently by a number of the white character, because how dare he include black character and not make a social statement of the injustices of African Americans. And why does he even include robots? They are just machines!

But Dale's race, whatever it might be, has never been so much as acknowledged, whereas Claire's trans status is an extremely important character detail and Jeph, via Word of God Newspost, has even said that he planned her character for a long time, is committed to doing it right, etc. That isn't to say I think there's any right or wrong to how he IS doing it. I like this arc just fine as it. But I totally understand the criticism.

[I never get the quote thing right, sorry](mod edit -- put in the missing tag for you)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 06 Feb 2015, 09:43
It's pretty easy to get caught up in examination of how the story is told, the framing for a particular situation, the artwork, etc., and I think everyone (including me) has a take on how the story should go or be told/presented, but in the end it's because of the way that Jeph tells it and presents it that keeps me clicking the link in my browser in the morning (or repeatedly pressing F5 in the evening, depending).

Side note:  am I the only person who feels socially awkward as hell referring to 'Jeph' when we don't know each other at all?

It feels more weird calling him Jeph because my natural instict is to autocorrect it mentally to Jeff, which happens to be my name as well. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 06 Feb 2015, 09:44
Apparently, the only way to know if Claire is trans is for her to tell someone, and she doesn't tell anyone she doesn't already trust. Which is probably why we don't see a lot of transphobia directed at her.

Either that, or, as has been pointed out elsewhere, these characters live in a better world than we do.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 09:46

So, I'm a bisexual man. Yes, bisexuals do not face the same amount of discrimination, but we do face it. But I'm also married to a woman and have kids. I "pass" as a straight man, and most people don't even know I'm bi. I'm not secretive about it, but I don't generally talk about it unless something brings it up.

Actually, the big difference with us and others in the LGBTQ community is we can blend in where ever we want, and it's usually easier to keep our orientation under the radar. But when we are out with people about being bi, we face as much or even more discrimination. You get people (gay and straight) who mistakenly assume we are in the closet, seeking attention, "confused" about our sexuality and/or the gay people who feel we are betraying the LGBTG community. Then there's the nutty people who believe that all bis are poly or want "one of each." This may be true for some people who are bi, but many of us. Even Dan Savage didn't *get* that being bi is a real thing for a long time—and he has admitted this. And *don't* get me started on platonic friends we come out to. Some of them are really cool, but a few that I've told (mostly gay/bi women, but some bi/straight dudes, too) seem to think it's an invitation to try to hook up with me.

So, I'm actually really discreet who I tell about my orientation in RL. I let people know on a need-to-know basis (close friends, family members, etc...).

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mad Cat on 06 Feb 2015, 09:46
Strategic locks of hair are strategic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 09:48
Apparently, the only way to know if Claire is trans is for her to tell someone, and she doesn't tell anyone she doesn't already trust. Which is probably why we don't see a lot of transphobia directed at her.

Either that, or, as has been pointed out elsewhere, these characters live in a better world than we do.

I think it's the former - Remember after the Post-Wedding Party snuggle, Claire tells Clinton that she is well aware of just how much danger she potentially may be in when 'coming out' to someone. Jeph just buried it in a joke about phobia of city buses.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 09:50


Side note:  am I the only person who feels socially awkward as hell referring to 'Jeph' when we don't know each other at all?

No, I totally get that... But it's like do we say "the author" instead or use a last name or what. When you look at art of any kind—including comics—it's only natural to wonder what the artist/author intends and refer to them. It does feel weird to do on a first-name basis, though...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lepetitfromage on 06 Feb 2015, 09:51
Of course not. But this is a comic that has developed into exploring the foibles of human interaction, primarily in relationships, and in most cases it seems the writer wants to try to represent "issues" that people deal with in real life that might not be written about as much in other fiction. So it's reasonable to ask for those issues to be relevant to the struggles real people face.

Let us not forget that in the time frame of QC, Claire's character and her relationship with Marten is still VERY new. There are plenty of opportunities for the subjects to be discussed, but I enjoy the fact that we are slowly and surely being introduced to Claire as a human being. Her struggles due to being in a smaller sub-set of human beings might need some more time to develop. When we met Faye, we knew she had some troubles. We didn't find out about her Dad until later. We meet the characters and learn about them as time goes on. Jeph has a wonderful way of introducing and resolving conflict by way of a slow and steady build up. I don't see Claire's situation being any different than that of other characters.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: gprimr1 on 06 Feb 2015, 10:15
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?

Well aside from the practical implications (since they are about to have sex it looks like) it would be interesting to know to learn something about Martin.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Consilium on 06 Feb 2015, 10:16


Side note:  am I the only person who feels socially awkward as hell referring to 'Jeph' when we don't know each other at all?

No, I totally get that... But it's like do we say "the author" instead or use a last name or what. When you look at art of any kind—including comics—it's only natural to wonder what the artist/author intends and refer to them. It does feel weird to do on a first-name basis, though...

I think a big part of it, is that Jeph doesn't put himself on a pedestal or anything. He seems like a relatively humble guy, from what I can tell. So I don't really feel weird about calling him by his first name, but then again I've never been much for formalities.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Y on 06 Feb 2015, 10:18
I'm not sure how to read panel 5. He seems to look fazed, like how some things still can startle you regardless of knowing it in advance. Well as long that moment didn't last too long. Or he's just tired. But other than that I really liked this comic, so I almost was late to work trying to read all the posts.

When you sit down to a meal with friends and/or family, do you take time to remind them that, you know, many people around the world are starving and miserable and homeless and at risk of getting killed, raped, maimed, etc etc?  To put the occasion in the proper perspective.
Well my mom always lectured about kids starving in Biafra when I didn't empty my plate fully. I finally looked it up once and it turned out that country stopped existing 45 years ago.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: doglion on 06 Feb 2015, 10:23
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

I don't think so. Claire has mentioned hormone treatments (hence the boobs), but gender reassignment surgery has never come up.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 10:27
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Side note:  am I the only person who feels socially awkward as hell referring to 'Jeph' when we don't know each other at all?

That's why I often use the term "Benevolent Comic Overlord."  Also because I think it's hilarious. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Xader on 06 Feb 2015, 10:40
There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Wow, Thought Police sure were earning their pay that day...  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MooskiNet on 06 Feb 2015, 10:41
That's why I often use the term "Benevolent Comic Overlord."  Also because I think it's hilarious.

Actually, that works really well for me as well.  Mind if I borrow it?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 10:41
There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Wow, Thought Police sure were earning their pay that day...  :-\

It was...complicated.

Also, more like a week and a half than a day.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Feb 2015, 10:49
There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Wow, Thought Police sure were earning their pay that day...  :-\

Not quite, basically there was quite a few people who joined around the time Claire told Marten she was trans*. While the vast majority were pretty calm, some on both sides were pretty.....what might be the right word.....militant? Fervent? I suppose saying having strong feelings on the subject was something of an understatement.

I do remember one chap insisting on referring to Claire by male pronouns, because that was what she was assigned at birth, despite several different people and sources explaining why that was wrong.

What you call "Thought Police", either jokingly or disparagingly, are a group of people who have worked very hard to make sure that this forum doesn't turn into a cesspit like so many other "social sites" on the net. They've had to drop the hammer quite a few times, but in the end, this place is far better than a lot of other forums and sites I used to frequent.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 06 Feb 2015, 10:51
There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Wow, Thought Police sure were earning their pay that day...  :-\

Not quite, basically there was quite a few people who joined around the time Claire told Marten she was trans*. While the vast majority were pretty calm, some on both sides were pretty.....what might be the right word.....militant? Fervent? I suppose saying having strong feelings on the subject was something of an understatement.

I do remember one chap insisting on referring to Claire by male pronouns, because that was what she was assigned at point, despite several different people and sources explaining why that was wrong.

What you call "Thought Police", either jokingly or disparagingly, are a group of people who have worked very hard to make sure that this forum doesn't turn into a cesspit like so many other "social sites" on the net. They've had to drop the hammer quite a few times, but in the end, this place is far better than a lot of other forums and sites I used to frequent.

Holy crap on a cracker, there was someone insisting on male pronouns? I don't remember that part of it. What a dick. There's having a different perspective and there's just trying to be hurtful.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 06 Feb 2015, 10:53
Well my mom always lectured about kids starving in Biafra when I didn't empty my plate fully. I finally looked it up once and it turned out that country stopped existing 45 years ago.

My mum once told her mum that she'd parcel it up and send it if (my) grandma paid the postage.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 10:56
There's a rule  (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)against discussing things like that.  Last time people asked which bits she had, a shit-ton of people got banned. 

Wow, Thought Police sure were earning their pay that day...  :-\
We are guests here.  I would kick someone out of my residence if they were talking like that, after being given a metric fuckton of warnings, and it wouldn't be "thought policing".  Jeph and by proxy, the mods have every right to do the same.

Oblig:  http://xkcd.com/1357/

Edit: Fixed grammar.  I hate when I'm not paying attention and fuck it up.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 10:56
That's why I often use the term "Benevolent Comic Overlord."  Also because I think it's hilarious.

Actually, that works really well for me as well.  Mind if I borrow it?

Go right ahead.  I dunno what our Benevolent Comic Overlord thinks of the title Benevolent Comic Overlord, but I would imagine that he'd laugh, if he read it.  From what I understand, he doesn't read the forums often. 

Oblig:  http://xkcd.com/1357/

The alt text on that one is possibly the most insightful input on free speech I've ever heard. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 10:57
With that logic, Jeph is also a terrible author for not making Dale get pulled over by cops and treated like differently by a number of the white character, because how dare he include black character and not make a social statement of the injustices of African Americans. And why does he even include robots? They are just machines!

While Dale was pretty clearly meant to be black in his first appearance, Jeph has altered his appearance (both his facial features as well as his hair) to such a degree that I don't think it's clear if he's black.  He could be South Asian, dark-skinned Latino, or something else.  Honestly it probably matters as little as Claire's bits, and there's no reason for it to ever be explored unless we see his family.  But in terms of the strip, Dale's pretty clearly just a dude with dark skin, but perhaps not black. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Feb 2015, 11:04
We are guests here.  I would kick you someone of my residence if they were talking like that, after being given a metric fuckton of warnings, and it wouldn't be "thought policing".  Jeph and by proxy, the mods have every right to do the same.

Hedgie, that alone deserved a like!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 06 Feb 2015, 11:05
Jeph stated unambiguously that Dale was African American in QA Dump #14 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11940736839/qa-dump-14)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Cyril on 06 Feb 2015, 11:06
WRT the AI discrimination, that seems simply non-comparable to me. AI Rights aren't a real thing and Jeph has never really hinted that they're meant as an allegory for real-world struggles. And even within the comic's diegesis, AI is essentially a manmade phenomenon (mostly courtesy of Hannerdad), a non-organic arrangement of sophisticated circuitry, whereas race, ethnicity, sexuality, gender identity et al. are engrained human traits.

I don't necessarily think all minority or typically-discriminated-again/non-privileged groups have to experience bigotry in-comic in order for the comic to be believable - I agree with the person who pointed out the thin line between social realism and tokenism - but if those AI incidents are the only counterexamples to Technetium's observation, then I think Technetium is on solid ground.

Depiction of bigotry doesn't need to have a specific real-world allegory or need to be a stand in for a particular flavor of RL behavior in order for it to show a general awareness. Where it's not thematically appropriate, even a rare mention does the job of showing that things aren't perfect out there - and I would put some of the aforementioned conversations between Claire and Clinton (and others) into that category of 'awareness without focus.' Generally speaking, QC is absolutely a 'better' world than the one we live in, without any desire or need to justify why that's the case. It's simply enough to show a mildly fantastic setting (as certain conversations allude, the entire world might not be that much better, only this little slice of it) without significant biases that are close to ubiquitous RL (and without the defensive structures that arise in the face of those biases) and posit that hey, everything is still pretty wonderful.

It's a pretty common argument that the best way for a creator of fiction (writer/director/artist/whatever) to 'improve' social conditions is to create art that acts as if these problems weren't problems and instead be inclusive (feature these types of people) and accepting (don't feature them in a way that draws undue attention to how they are 'different'). The goal, of course, being to normalize and add a positive spin to the way interactions are depicted between various sorts of people; the exact converse of certain types of cultural biases being reinforced by media depictions. This is in contrast to the argument that one should depict the conflict. QC takes one angle and it's one I like quite a lot.

In the same sense, some of the topics that aren't welcomed around here would potentially also show up in the QC setting without any judgement and only innocent curiosity as motivators. In theory, the questions - aside from some of the general shyness that surrounds much broader concepts like 'why we wear clothes' - could be asked (by appropriately nosy characters) and answered (or not) without a judgmental attachment. To some extent, that's what is being expected in every thread when someone brings up how Pintsize or (insert character prone to blurting things out here) might handle the situation if/when it arises. At some point we start to reach a level of fantasy that is a bit scenario-breaking, though. While QC is an attractively better world, it's still designed to be recognizable. Completely erasing every ingrained taboo/norm relating to privacy could easily stretch that verisimilitude to the breaking point.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HeavyP on 06 Feb 2015, 11:09
That's why I often use the term "Benevolent Comic Overlord."  Also because I think it's hilarious.

I prefer "Jephzibah" - I don't even remember where it came from.  "Our Glorious Trollmaster" is also a good one.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 11:24
Jeph stated unambiguously that Dale was African American in QA Dump #14 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11940736839/qa-dump-14)

Okay.  I don't read the QA dumps unless I'm linked to them, so thanks.  He doesn't "read" as black to me because of the hair texture.  But it could be straightened, or he could just have "good" hair naturally I suppose. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 06 Feb 2015, 11:30
Oh god, either it's my  Marten/Claire fatigue or.. I don't know. I'm turning into a grumpy old person.

That comic felt very artificial to me. Like, that's textbook how it's supposed to be - a few people made references to Marten becoming a Marty Stu, but I think that's only part of why this just doesn't ring true to me. People, especially in Claire's position, are vulnerable, but to expose herself like that (open to judgement or whatever the hell that's supposed to be) is like... It feels scripted, corny, artificial, plastic (especially since she had to stop the making out to do it) It doesn't 'feel' like people, which is pretty jarring considering Jeph usually is good at writing people and their personalities, but that exchange.. predictable. Not even heart-warming or anything.

I'd have preferred after-sexytimes-banter, a lot.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 11:30
We are guests here.  I would kick you someone of my residence if they were talking like that, after being given a metric fuckton of warnings, and it wouldn't be "thought policing".  Jeph and by proxy, the mods have every right to do the same.

Hedgie, that alone deserved a like!
Thanks.  And your reply was enough to make me back and realise that I had screwed up the grammar when I was editing it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 06 Feb 2015, 11:31
On Monday we find that Pintsize has been switched to his 'Alternate Backup Personlity'


The world is in trouble
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 06 Feb 2015, 11:35
That's why I often use the term "Benevolent Comic Overlord."  Also because I think it's hilarious.

I prefer "Jephzibah" - I don't even remember where it came from.  "Our Glorious Trollmaster" is also a good one.

Jephzibah came from here (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,28754.msg1138388.html#msg1138388) - Masterpiece's autocorrect switched "Jeph" to "Hephzibah", and it just kind of snowballed from there. As things tend to do around here.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 11:47
That comic felt very artificial to me. Like, that's textbook how it's supposed to be - a few people made references to Marten becoming a Marty Stu, but I think that's only part of why this just doesn't ring true to me. People, especially in Claire's position, are vulnerable, but to expose herself like that (open to judgement or whatever the hell that's supposed to be) is like... It feels scripted, corny, artificial, plastic (especially since she had to stop the making out to do it) It doesn't 'feel' like people, which is pretty jarring considering Jeph usually is good at writing people and their personalities, but that exchange.. predictable. Not even heart-warming or anything.

I think part of the jarring difference in writing between the different arcs in the comic is when Jeph is writing from his own experience (suitably altered) and when he is writing something fairly alien to him.  I think every character represents an aspect of Jeph's personality tweaked somewhat over time.  Faye's descent into alcoholism was pretty openly alluding to his own experience, which is why it was so emotionally powerful. 

In contrast, I get the idea with Marten/Claire Jeph really wants to please his audience, but because he doesn't quite speak the language, it's not unfurling completely naturally.  Hence why it can seem a bit scripted and weird.  He's telling a story, but it isn't his story, it's someone elses. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Isyrion on 06 Feb 2015, 11:59

So, I'm a bisexual man. Yes, bisexuals do not face the same amount of discrimination, but we do face it. But I'm also married to a woman and have kids. I "pass" as a straight man, and most people don't even know I'm bi. I'm not secretive about it, but I don't generally talk about it unless something brings it up.

Actually, the big difference with us and others in the LGBTQ community is we can blend in where ever we want, and it's usually easier to keep our orientation under the radar. But when we are out with people about being bi, we face as much or even more discrimination. You get people (gay and straight) who mistakenly assume we are in the closet, seeking attention, "confused" about our sexuality and/or the gay people who feel we are betraying the LGBTG community. Then there's the nutty people who believe that all bis are poly or want "one of each." This may be true for some people who are bi, but many of us. Even Dan Savage didn't *get* that being bi is a real thing for a long time—and he has admitted this. And *don't* get me started on platonic friends we come out to. Some of them are really cool, but a few that I've told (mostly gay/bi women, but some bi/straight dudes, too) seem to think it's an invitation to try to hook up with me.

So, I'm actually really discreet who I tell about my orientation in RL. I let people know on a need-to-know basis (close friends, family members, etc...).

I hear you on that, as a bisexual man.  I VERY careful about who I come out to and so far only a small handful really know about my orientation (4 people to be exact).   I can't even come out to my own family due to my father hating (and yes I mean real hate as in kill them for being gay or bi) anyone gay or bi (or anything else other than what he considers normal).

Anyways lets get on a more cheerful topic, I bet the reactions of the QC cast to Marten and Claire getting it on are gonna be rather Epic.  Whats the bet on Tai literally squeeing so hard she passes out?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SugarSparkle on 06 Feb 2015, 12:02
I kind of have an issue with how the whole story with Claire has gone. What makes the Martin-Claire relationship edgy/gutsy/controversial/interesting/etc is that trans people face a lot of problems that they shouldn't have to. At least in real life they do. I guess what bothers me is that Claire's existence in this comic, so far, is like a fairy-tale reality for trans people. Everything seems to be going the way that most trans people would want but few actually see (everyone she wants to be friends with accepts her, her family accepts her, the guy she pursues accepts her). Is this fair to the trans community? I am not trans or any other part of the LGBTQ spectrum, so I'm approaching this completely from the outside, but if I were to instead consider a different group that I belong to that is discriminated against (although I won't pretend it's anywhere near to the degree what trans people face), I would have a problem with a story about another character identified as being in that group and where the story basically wiped away all the struggles that members of that group face. By creating a story (again, I'd refer to it as almost being a fairy-tale) where a trans character never is shown having to actually deal with the kinds of injustices that real trans characters face, doesn't that cheapen those struggles?

I guess in the bigger picture of the comic, it seems like Jeph mainly creates characters that he likes and would want to be friends with. Homophobia, transphobia, racism... these things are essentially absent from the world of QC simply by the fact that they don't appear in any of the comic strips. Has there ever even been a single background character that didn't appear to be accepting of other ethnic groups or gender types? I can understand why he would want to create characters that he himself genuinely likes, but it kind of detracts from the whole idea that Claire or this relationship is particularly special, and makes her brother's reaction about her telling Martin about her gender type kind of silly. Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

But why should trans-issues be highlighted in everything? Not all trans-people have those issues. And I think it doesn't help those that choose to transition to see every single problem they may potentially face be focused on in every medium, as if that's how it will go. That's why many people are scared to do anything about their gender issues. I would love to see movies, shows, or read books or comics that have trans-characters that are 'normal' and blend in and aren't focused on because they're trans. This is what most trans-people want; to just transition and blend in. Most of us don't want to stick out. I also feel that expressing the need to see trans characters struggle and face problems merely perpetuates stereotypes. Not all of us have the issues you may think we do. I personally have had a smooth transition, my family has been accepting, all my friends have been accepting, in fact people from my past that I've contacted since have been supportive. I'm not only completely passable everywhere I go, but I'm also quite attractive (or so I've been told quite often). I know I got lucky in a lot of ways, but I think a lot of other trans-people have been in my situation. Many pass and blend in (or go 'stealth'), but you don't hear about that very much. Even in the trans-community, those in my position are often shunned or we're swept under the rug and not talked about. I like Claire and her story so far because it's more relatable to my life than most other trans-themed tales that I've heard or seen. I think it's completely fair that optimistic stories be told alongside the tragic or difficult stories. Smooth transitions aren't just fairytales, just as passability and acceptance aren't myths.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 06 Feb 2015, 12:10

- A lot of people like more awkward undressing and find it sexy. The nervousness can be a bit of a rush, or the intimacy of knowing someone's letting you be there when they are nervous and that they trust you, or, if one's used to porn/movies/sexy sexy one night stands, the reminder that this person is really human and really there and not an airbrushed, unattainable thing can be sexy indeed too. I do cam modelling and sell some videos, usually custom, and my clients, especially regulars, love candidness, whether it's an awkward undress or giggling a bit or whatever.

So, the people saying it's unsexy/unsensual are, in my mind wrong on two counts, because it is not supposed to be sexy, and at the same time, many people would consider it sexy (do Marten and Claire? no idea, don't care as long as they're happy next comic).

Not sure if this is going to make sense, but here goes nothin'. For me, the part that I've bolded gets to what makes it sexy (to me). It can be hard to be that vulnerable with someone, no matter what your gender identity or sexual orientation or whatever. Maybe just speaking for myself here, but when you're in Marten's position -- someone isn't just offering consent, but putting themselves all the way out there, with all the trust and vulnerability that implies -- is a humbling experience. At that point, you've got a lot to live up to, because the implicit challenge of being on the receiving end of that kind of trust and openness (unless you're a colossal asshole) isn't just the acceptance of that person; it's meeting them from a similar place of trust, and putting as much of yourself into it as they are.

Like I said, not sure if that makes sense... just kinda how I've been looking at it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Bodolza on 06 Feb 2015, 12:18
Looks like Marten's tamper proof seal (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2433) is about to be broken

Dude. <mod snip>

Dude. - Mod.</mod>

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BrusselSprouts on 06 Feb 2015, 12:23
I totally agree SuperSparkle. Implying that every trans character needs to have their transition be the focus, or even directly mentioned at all. Its the same with Gay characters. You don't need to focus on their struggles with their sexuality, they can just be characters who happen to be gay. Claire is it implied to have had some problems in the past, at least enough for Clinton to be protective of her. And there's elements of her character that could be traced to her being trans (being a bit of a  later bloomer,  having to work up the courage to have her ears pierced etc)  but that's not the focus. An LGBT character's job should be to be a character, not just to show people the struggles people in the community face. Not that there's anything wrong with those kinds of stories,  they are stories that need to be told, but limiting LGBT characters to exclusively have that role is... limiting I guess.

Sorry for the long rambling post that may or may not make sense.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 06 Feb 2015, 12:34
Looks like Marten's tamper proof seal (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2433) is about to be broken

Dude. <mod snip>

Dude. - Mod.</mod>

Times like this it'd be nice to have a "like" button for the moderation. :D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 12:37
Looks like Marten's tamper proof seal (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2433) is about to be broken

Dude. <mod snip>

Dude. - Mod.</mod>

What happened? Explicit wants to know and is talking in the third person for no reason at all.

Times like this it'd be nice to have a "like" button for the moderation. :D

EDIT - How the hell did I make this mistake? What was I doing?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 06 Feb 2015, 12:38

So, I'm a bisexual man. Yes, bisexuals do not face the same amount of discrimination, but we do face it. But I'm also married to a woman and have kids. I "pass" as a straight man, and most people don't even know I'm bi. I'm not secretive about it, but I don't generally talk about it unless something brings it up.

Actually, the big difference with us and others in the LGBTQ community is we can blend in where ever we want, and it's usually easier to keep our orientation under the radar. But when we are out with people about being bi, we face as much or even more discrimination. You get people (gay and straight) who mistakenly assume we are in the closet, seeking attention, "confused" about our sexuality and/or the gay people who feel we are betraying the LGBTG community. Then there's the nutty people who believe that all bis are poly or want "one of each." This may be true for some people who are bi, but many of us. Even Dan Savage didn't *get* that being bi is a real thing for a long time—and he has admitted this. And *don't* get me started on platonic friends we come out to. Some of them are really cool, but a few that I've told (mostly gay/bi women, but some bi/straight dudes, too) seem to think it's an invitation to try to hook up with me.

So, I'm actually really discreet who I tell about my orientation in RL. I let people know on a need-to-know basis (close friends, family members, etc...).

Can I just tell you I love you for this clarification?  Because I do.  This is everything I've been thinking this whole thread exactly. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 12:41
I'm only skimming, but regarding Claire's friendships and stuff being realistic or no- as far as I remember just Marten and Emily know? So if other characters are shitty (although they're a liberal gang, and I hope not because if it wasn't the springboard for character development and maybe even if it was, that would make me hate someone), they haven't had the opportunity to act on it yet. Also, I mean, Claire probably felt with both Emily and Marten, before she came out, that they would be okay. It's not like she came out randomly to people she didn't know (like Becky in DoA, although of course that's different)- there hasn't been a lot of space for people to reject her based on her trans-ness. And Marten has known Claire was trans for quite a while now, and had an idea what she had done to transition (she said at the lakehouse that she had HRT starting a couple years ago. Also, Marten has a better idea than us, probably, of what a level of transitioning would mean in fiction Northhampton).

So, anyway, that all in account, I don't really see how likely it would be for Marten to reject her. There is some amount- he could discover that, in fact, he wasn't sexually attracted to her, but he's Marten, so he wouldn't be a huge douche about it even if he fumbled. I don't really see how anyone else would reject her, because there's just Emily, and Emily is a fairy who is nice to everyone.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 06 Feb 2015, 12:43
In regards to the "having gay/trans* issues be the focus vs not having gay/trans* issues be the focus (i.e., characters that happen to be gay/trans)" argument, I think it's pretty polarizing, and not everyone's going to be happy no matter how it's handled. Where some will be upset that a portrayal is unrealistic if their struggles -aren't- front and center (which, imo, if not handled properly runs the risk of becoming a constant undercurrent of whatever media it's being portrayed in), there's also those that will be upset if a gay/trans* character is more defined by their status, rather than that which really -makes- them a character - the myriad factors (personality, likes, dislikes, appearance, beliefs) that makes them a full, well-fleshed-out person to whom the viewer can relate. Not that their status shouldn't be a part of what defines them, but it should be a small portion of the greater whole, and not the central focus.

So while I do agree with some aspects in regards that issues should be portrayed if not realistically, with some hint that they do exist, I also think that a character should be a character first, with their gay/trans* status being a part of that character rather than a gay/trans* character also happen to be a human/AI/alien/giant purple people eater.

Sorry if this doesn't make sense. Sometimes it's hard to get the ideas to extract from my brain properly. In other words, in like with what BrusselSprouts was saying.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Baphomet on 06 Feb 2015, 13:06
I think you missed his point competely. Think about it like this: why did Jeph create Claire? Why did he introduce a transgender character into the comic? Just because? If that's the case, then okay. But if Jeph is trying to send a larger message about trans acceptance or to raise awareness of transgender issues (which I at least think it's obvious that he is), then to portray Claire's life as we've seen it so far is more questionable. No, we don't need super dark comics where super bad things happen to Claire. But this is what I was trying to put my finger on in my post yesterday: it's been too easy. It's not representative of what life is like for the majority of transgender people. The question then arises as to whether that's helpful to his larger goals, because if people who don't have any experience with transgender people or the transgender community read this comic, they don't even get a hint of those issues.

In regards to Jeph's point in creating Claire, not necessarily speaking to you in particular:

Obviously I can't speak for Jeph, and am not claiming to. But I think that just having a trans person as an important character in a piece of (relatively) popular media is enough of a point. Especially in a relationship with the protagonist(?). Obviously trans people in real life face serious discrimination. But a lot of what's helped curb that discrimination against other historically discriminated-against groups has been representation.  Discrimination isn't a binary state, it's a scale. There are people who are active in it, and those who have a negative reaction simply because of cultural norms but haven't ever really thought about it. Just having trans people show up in a public, positive way helps slide that scale a little bit farther. The more a person in the "shallow" end encounters the idea of trans people just existing and not being crazed deviants, the more they're likely to overcome their cognitive dissonance when, say, a friend comes out as being a trans person later. Then that's one more person publicly having the idea that being trans is okay, and potentially one more incident of exposure for another person down the road. Over time, progress is made.

Obviously this is a sensitive issue, and there's also the problem of tokenism. That problem is compounded because it comes from "the other side" from discrimination. If you want to find a reason to be offended, you probably can regardless on where you stand re: trans people. I am no expert on the subject, but my gut feeling is you need a certain degree of cultural saturation before including a trans person becomes tokenism. Focus on the struggle for an issue so out of the public eye might even be counterproductive. I don't know where that line is or how to judge when we've reached it, but I don't feel like we have yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Feb 2015, 13:12
Global Moderator Comment Claire has never said whether she's had bottom surgery. She doesn't exist, but respecting her privacy is a good way to practice being decent toward real trans people. So, since she hasn't said, we shouldn't ask.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Endellion on 06 Feb 2015, 13:13
I just want to comment on how excellence has been goddamn achieved with Claire's hair. And then move along.

Would you call that a blow drive-by comment?  :claireface:

...

(K, one hell of a stretch but something called out for a pun. Probably the mention of Claire)

[AFTERGLOW]
Claire:   Well, I guess you're not a bicycle.
Marten:  Huh?
Claire:   You weren't too tired.
 :clairedoge:

Oh, nice one. I'd suggest we pun in tandem but I lack the wit to do that.

Don't backpedal on me now!

I'll try wheel hard to keep up.

(fever riddled brain equals long delay)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 13:14
I kind of have an issue with how the whole story with Claire has gone. What makes the Martin-Claire relationship edgy/gutsy/controversial/interesting/etc is that trans people face a lot of problems that they shouldn't have to. At least in real life they do. I guess what bothers me is that Claire's existence in this comic, so far, is like a fairy-tale reality for trans people. Everything seems to be going the way that most trans people would want but few actually see (everyone she wants to be friends with accepts her, her family accepts her, the guy she pursues accepts her). Is this fair to the trans community? I am not trans or any other part of the LGBTQ spectrum, so I'm approaching this completely from the outside, but if I were to instead consider a different group that I belong to that is discriminated against (although I won't pretend it's anywhere near to the degree what trans people face), I would have a problem with a story about another character identified as being in that group and where the story basically wiped away all the struggles that members of that group face. By creating a story (again, I'd refer to it as almost being a fairy-tale) where a trans character never is shown having to actually deal with the kinds of injustices that real trans characters face, doesn't that cheapen those struggles?

I guess in the bigger picture of the comic, it seems like Jeph mainly creates characters that he likes and would want to be friends with. Homophobia, transphobia, racism... these things are essentially absent from the world of QC simply by the fact that they don't appear in any of the comic strips. Has there ever even been a single background character that didn't appear to be accepting of other ethnic groups or gender types? I can understand why he would want to create characters that he himself genuinely likes, but it kind of detracts from the whole idea that Claire or this relationship is particularly special, and makes her brother's reaction about her telling Martin about her gender type kind of silly. Why would her brother explode with that kind of over-protection if the characters live in a world where everyone is accepting?

That said, I like this comic and a happy ending like this can be nice in a kind of sugary way, I just wish sometimes the comic would approach these issues in a more challenging way.

But why should trans-issues be highlighted in everything? Not all trans-people have those issues. And I think it doesn't help those that choose to transition to see every single problem they may potentially face be focused on in every medium, as if that's how it will go. That's why many people are scared to do anything about their gender issues. I would love to see movies, shows, or read books or comics that have trans-characters that are 'normal' and blend in and aren't focused on because they're trans. This is what most trans-people want; to just transition and blend in. Most of us don't want to stick out. I also feel that expressing the need to see trans characters struggle and face problems merely perpetuates stereotypes. Not all of us have the issues you may think we do. I personally have had a smooth transition, my family has been accepting, all my friends have been accepting, in fact people from my past that I've contacted since have been supportive. I'm not only completely passable everywhere I go, but I'm also quite attractive (or so I've been told quite often). I know I got lucky in a lot of ways, but I think a lot of other trans-people have been in my situation. Many pass and blend in (or go 'stealth'), but you don't hear about that very much. Even in the trans-community, those in my position are often shunned or we're swept under the rug and not talked about. I like Claire and her story so far because it's more relatable to my life than most other trans-themed tales that I've heard or seen. I think it's completely fair that optimistic stories be told alongside the tragic or difficult stories. Smooth transitions aren't just fairytales, just as passability and acceptance aren't myths.
This was definitely interesting to read. I have always gotten the impression that the trans community is essentially "the most discriminated against minority group" currently. Similar to the #yesallwomen thing that was going around a while ago, I would have had no problem believing a #yesalltrans meme that said that virtually all trans people have faced extensive discrimination. Quite interesting to hear that that's not the case.

Alright.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 13:16
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Feb 2015, 13:18
(regular user)
Someone asked Jeph if it was really OK to jump straight to a first-name basis with him. He pointed out that, after all, "Jeph" is his user name.

Claire undressing wasn't meant to be foreplay, it was negotiation. "Before we go any further" heralds something necessary coming up, for example the health talk. It was just like her asking earlier whether Marten was OK with her being trans, except moving it from theoretical to something emotionally immediate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 06 Feb 2015, 13:21
Sup comic thread I have a video some of you may like :) :)

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 13:22
An error occurred, please try again later? I don't like this at all
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 06 Feb 2015, 13:23
No, no, it's even more ominous than that :o
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 13:28
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Laser eyes would put her at an advantage above Pintsize, since his was dismantled.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 06 Feb 2015, 13:29
Sup comic thread I have a video some of you may like :) :)

Wut? How is that relevant?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrClef on 06 Feb 2015, 13:29
I'm a Clairten shipper, but even I'd rather go back to the old days when the two of them were just friends and their relationship was mostly hanging out and reading books and making horrible puns.

This Marten doesn't have any of the flaws and rough edges that bounced off of Claire's rough edges and flaws so well. This is an AnthroPC Marten-Bot running "I AM A PERFECT BOYFRIEND.EXE" v. 2.0.

I like that a comic is handling a trans relationship well and giving a nice play-by-play of what we wish that everyone who has ever dated a trans person could be like. But Questionable Content has always been about flawed individuals doing the best they can and having some fun along the way. Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Feb 2015, 13:31
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Laser eyes would put her at an advantage above Pintsize, since his was dismantled.

There might be some legal issues, though, once she sets Tai on fire for throwing another rave at the library.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 06 Feb 2015, 13:33
Sup comic thread I have a video some of you may like :) :)

Your avatar was headbanging to the entire video. I giggled like a schoolgirl.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 06 Feb 2015, 13:35
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Laser eyes would put her at an advantage above Pintsize, since his was dismantled.

There might be some legal issues, though, once she sets Tai on fire for throwing another rave at the library.

Claire could become the Library Enforcer, superhero defender of BOOKS!

Together with Pizza Girl they could totally start up some kind of QCverse Justice League.

Warning - while you were reading more people got laser eyes.  You may wish to duck.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 06 Feb 2015, 13:40
As an author of a trans character, I can say that there's no political statement involved. I can't imagine Jeph was trying to make a political statement with Claire.

It's not that I'm unaware of the implicit political statement, just like I don't doubt that Jeph is fully aware of most of the implications of things he's done with Claire. But I'm sure--based on what Jeph's said--the he and are on the same page as far as this. The politics are not why we made the character.

Writers are the superior form of the artist with a sketch book drawing strangers. Superior in terms of being less creepy. If some state of real humanity catches our interest, we'll start doing sketches in our heads. Creating a mental state that fills in the blanks about the why and how of the behavior we witnessed. At some point, for some reason, we find that the information we have isn't enough to do the job, so we dig for information from science and the experience of others. Which turns into a feedback loop. I can't tell you how many times I've read an experimental design and thought "what made them think of doing that?" Down the rabbit hole of mental modeling.

Maybe it is the concept that fascinates. Maybe it's the person we've invented that drives us. But, for the most part, a well written trans character doesn't exist for the statement. They exist because we like them. Just like any other character. And some part of us wants you to like them. Not because of what they are. Because of who.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 06 Feb 2015, 13:42
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: akujin on 06 Feb 2015, 13:43
From a trans perspective, technetium's heart is in the right place with their concerns, and for that reason it may be beneficial to include a *little* more reference to the unique difficulties of being trans.  But sugarsparkle is also right - we aren't fully represented by the drama, which is usually all that's depicted.  And only showing the dark side of being trans can breed severe pessimism and insecurity, especially among young people coming to terms with a trans identity.  Sometimes the best thing we can do is provide positive role models.

I do agree with swapna that this scene feels a little artificial, because what Claire is doing is scary to ANYone the first time, and in Claire's case, completely terrifying.  Just coming out to my best friend as trans (post transition - she never knew me any other way) gave me tremors from the emotional minefield that it was.  Would she see me differently?  Would it affect how she feels about me?  Would it change our dynamic??  In the real world you would have to wonder, too, if Marten's reaction is derived from being put on the spot by Claire's vulnerability, or if it is sincere.  Those are certainly the kind of thoughts that would go through my mind. 

But it bears repeating sugarsparkle's point that we CAN lead boring, banal lives like everyone else.  I think I lost a job once for being trans (after my old name came up with my social) but I can't be positive.  My dad threatened to slit his wrists when I told him, but it was just talk.  Sure I have stories, but so does everyone, and they aren't the main theme of my life.  My dad eventually accepted me, along with his christian-conservative family.  My one outlying uncle came around after he divorced and remarried.  My brother and I are actually closer than ever, and my relationships with all of the family are more authentic.  I've also been accepted by my friends, new and old, including white girls from liberal california and staight black dudes from the south.  As we say in the trans community, I have "original plumbing" - the only residual giveaway to my former life.  But I've had sexual relations with both straight women and gay men (I am a bisexual male) with partners who were genuinely unconcerned with my genitals.  I've also been rejected on that basis, but rejection is part of everyone's life and the point is that genitalia aren't the holy grail of sexual attraction that media make it out to be - standards of attraction vary greatly.

Being trans is about being different, and being different challenges people unaccustomed to or not expecting differences.  More than anything, being different illustrates the best and the worst of humanity.  It shows how horrible we can be, and how wonderful.  The horrors are usually irreversible and thus intensely horrific.  But the wonderful people are actually the majority.  They just fly under the radar by treating people *normally*.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Feb 2015, 13:44
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.
I work with lasers on a daily basis, and I wear glasses. I have no plans to get lasik surgery...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 06 Feb 2015, 13:45
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Laser eyes would put her at an advantage above Pintsize, since his was dismantled.

What.

Wait, THAT'S Lasik?  And I've been turning it down?  I've been so blind...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Feb 2015, 13:49
I've been so blind...

Obviously, if you've had the option for Lasik.
....
....
....
....
 :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 13:52
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Laser eyes would put her at an advantage above Pintsize, since his was dismantled.

There might be some legal issues, though, once she sets Tai on fire for throwing another rave at the library.

Claire could become the Library Enforcer, superhero defender of BOOKS!

Together with Pizza Girl they could totally start up some kind of QCverse Justice League.

Warning - while you were reading more people got laser eyes.  You may wish to duck.

Hopefully she wouldn't do it at the library, that would be misguided.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Feb 2015, 13:53
Welcome, akujin! That was a great first post. Please stick around.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 13:54
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

What's 'the surgery'?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 06 Feb 2015, 13:55
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

What's 'the surgery'?

It's when they take you into the hospital and perform a medical procedure on you, usually under anesthetic. And no, I don't think Claire has ever mentioned having her appendix out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 13:56
I like that a comic is handling a trans relationship well and giving a nice play-by-play of what we wish that everyone who has ever dated a trans person could be like. But Questionable Content has always been about flawed individuals doing the best they can and having some fun along the way. Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.

It would actually be a cool twist, a year or so from now in comic time, if Claire dumps Marten for being "too perfect."   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 13:57
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

What's 'the surgery'?

It's when they take you into the hospital and perform a medical procedure on you, usually under anesthetic. And no, I don't think Claire has ever mentioned having her appendix out.

Aw, I was way off. I thought it was laser insertion.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 13:58
What's 'the surgery'?

Claire was born with six toes on both her feet.  Jeph tastefully decided to not put her feet in the shot, so we'll never know one way or another if they were taken off. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Feb 2015, 13:59
I like that a comic is handling a trans relationship well and giving a nice play-by-play of what we wish that everyone who has ever dated a trans person could be like. But Questionable Content has always been about flawed individuals doing the best they can and having some fun along the way. Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.

It would actually be a cool twist, a year or so from now in comic time, if Claire dumps Marten for being "too perfect."   :-D
I mean, 20 hours a week feeding homeless people is a bit much. Couldn't he cut it back to 15?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Feb 2015, 13:59
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

What's 'the surgery'?

Also a general name for a GP's office. "Just heading off to the Doctor's surgery for this cough, Mum." "Okay dear."
It's also the name of BBC Radio 1 show, usually on from 9pm to 10pm on Wednesdays.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 14:00
I like that a comic is handling a trans relationship well and giving a nice play-by-play of what we wish that everyone who has ever dated a trans person could be like. But Questionable Content has always been about flawed individuals doing the best they can and having some fun along the way. Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.

It would actually be a cool twist, a year or so from now in comic time, if Claire dumps Marten for being "too perfect."   :-D

Then Marten could date Meena and her husband?

Also, I don't think he's that perfect. He hasn't screwed up (yet), but that's just normal, isn't it? They haven't really had any big conflicts, but it's not just because Marten has magically averted them all- nothing has come up yet. Although I harped on them knowing each other quite a while in one of my last posts, they haven't been dating that long. It's still the beginning honeymoon period.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 14:01
Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel, got into a motorcycle wreck, and needed ankle surgery.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 06 Feb 2015, 14:05
I hated the strips with M & C hanging out that were just Claire worrying and Marten being Zen, because those just felt formulaic and flat, but the last few--and these last two in particular--have felt just right. I love 'em.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 14:10
I hated the strips with M & C hanging out that were just Claire worrying and Marten being Zen, because those just felt formulaic and flat, but the last few--and these last two in particular--have felt just right. I love 'em.

I actually had that problem more post-breakup with Dora and Sven (I know one panel is her saying 'have I ruined my life?' and him talking/hugging).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Paulina on 06 Feb 2015, 14:11
While I was reading today's comic , I imagined "God Damn, You're Beautiful" by Chester Lee playing in the background. I feel like it fits the current scene nicely.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOupdSJbjw8
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WanderNotAimless on 06 Feb 2015, 14:11
I'm a Clairten shipper, but even I'd rather go back to the old days when the two of them were just friends and their relationship was mostly hanging out and reading books and making horrible puns.

This Marten doesn't have any of the flaws and rough edges that bounced off of Claire's rough edges and flaws so well. This is an AnthroPC Marten-Bot running "I AM A PERFECT BOYFRIEND.EXE" v. 2.0.

I like that a comic is handling a trans relationship well and giving a nice play-by-play of what we wish that everyone who has ever dated a trans person could be like. But Questionable Content has always been about flawed individuals doing the best they can and having some fun along the way. Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.

This resonates strongly with me. Ever since this relationship, it's almost like a completely different character from the fumbling, bumbling, over-analyzing Marten that I recall up to this point.

On another point... this seems sort of like it came outta left field? We go from Faye drama right into, what I assume to be, the first sexual encounter of a relatively new and unique relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 14:13
Anyway, hopefully my last contribution to this thread (let you other kids do all the fun overanalyzing parts):

Waaah, waaah, there's not enough drama in this relationship pie, it is too sweet while I prefer a bitter taste. Like Marten's relationship with Dora, that I totally forget was mostly hunky-dory from the beginning because I have all this hindsight regarding the fights and problems they ended up having *later* in said relationship. OH wait......



But seriously guys, you're silly. We already can (and have) pointed to personality clashes that will come up more and more as this cheese ages. I can't begin to guess why some of you seem to not be aware of New Relationship Energy (or whatever you want to call it), but I'll be lenient and not accuse you of holding Claire and Marten to a different standard than you held Marten and Dora, or Tai and Dora, or Faye and Angus, or Marigold and Dale, etc. etc.

Srsly tho, New Relationship Energy can be great and help smooth out a lot of things, for better and worse. Maybe you don't experience it for some reason, but nothing here is so far off-base that it's pinging my bullshit meter, at any rate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Feb 2015, 14:14
This resonates strongly with me. Ever since this relationship, it's almost like a completely different character from the fumbling, bumbling, over-analyzing Marten that I recall up to this point.

It's easy to forget that, post-Padma and especially in the run up to the Skritch Incident, Marten was making a deliberate attempt to change his approach to romantic interactions. So, in a very real way, this is a v.2.0 we're seeing run... or at very least a v.2.0 beta.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 06 Feb 2015, 14:15
So was the attempt with Delilah the v2.0 alpha test? It's fitting, it crashed and burned pretty hard....
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 14:23
You know, I think now that my original post in this thread might actually be a moot point, because the more I look at this, it looks like Martin's expression in the 2nd-to-last frame is like a deer in headlights. Like he's thinking "uhhhhhhh, oh shit I wasn't ready for this after all", and it makes the seeming flatness of his comment in the last frame actually make more sense, in that it may be an insincere comment. Like, he doesn't want to hurt her feelings so he's stuck now.

Or maybe not. Maybe I'm just an anti-shipper and I get a kick of the relationships in this story failing. I dunno.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 06 Feb 2015, 14:28
From a trans perspective, technetium's heart is in the right place with their concerns, and for that reason it may be beneficial to include a *little* more reference to the unique difficulties of being trans.  But sugarsparkle is also right - we aren't fully represented by the drama, which is usually all that's depicted.  And only showing the dark side of being trans can breed severe pessimism and insecurity, especially among young people coming to terms with a trans identity.  Sometimes the best thing we can do is provide positive role models.

<snip>

Being trans is about being different, and being different challenges people unaccustomed to or not expecting differences.  More than anything, being different illustrates the best and the worst of humanity.  It shows how horrible we can be, and how wonderful.  The horrors are usually irreversible and thus intensely horrific.  But the wonderful people are actually the majority.  They just fly under the radar by treating people *normally*.

I get the impression that a bunch of people want a trans "The Laramie Project," while another wants a trans "Will and Grace". The problem is that storytelling about any individual -- much less any group of individuals -- ends up being like the blind men and the elephant; no matter how hard you try, you can only tell so much of the story. Something gets left out, or de-emphasized, only to be taken up (or forgotten) later, but you're never going to get the whole thing... even if it's your story you're telling.

Maybe (and I'm saying "maybe" because I'm not trans*, so I can't claim insider knowledge on this one) ordinary is a good thing, because ordinary leaves the door open for a hell of a lot more complexity in the end than rendering someone as a saint, sinner, or freak show (which seem to be the go-to options when portraying people outside the cis/het/white "norm"). If nothing else, it makes it a hell of a lot harder to marginalize someone when you realize their life's every bit as quotidian and pedestrian as yours 99% of the time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 06 Feb 2015, 14:30

What's 'the surgery'?

It's when they take you into the hospital and perform a medical procedure on you, usually under anesthetic. And no, I don't think Claire has ever mentioned having her appendix out.

Aw, I was way off. I thought it was laser insertion.

Well, yeah. They have to take something out to make room for the laser.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dalillama on 06 Feb 2015, 14:32

 Perfect Boyfriend Marten stands out like a sore thumb.
I'm not seeing it; Marten is chill and laid back, in relationships as with anything else.  He was chill, supportive, and laid back about Dora's insecurities and anxieties (Up to a point, admittedly, but it took quite a lot to get to that point), and Faye's too, although they weren't dating, why would he be any different with Claire?  (Also, I get a little annoyed by all the 'oh he's too perfect' on a personal level, since I actually have a very similar approach to relationships as Marten, and I get a little sick of people going on about how unrealistic I apparently am).

I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.
I can't.  I tried putting them in one time, and my eye felt like it was on fire for the next several hours, even after I got the damn thing back out.
Regarding Lasik, I personally possess an unholy (and irrational) terror regarding surgeries of literally any sort whatsoever (except dental surgery, for some peculiar reason), even down to such exceedingly minor procedures as pierced earlobes (I am one of two people I know who have no tattoos or piercings of any sort, and the other one is deciding what tattoo to get when he has some spare cash).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 06 Feb 2015, 14:36
The problem is that storytelling about any individual -- much less any group of individuals -- ends up being like the blind men and the elephant; no matter how hard you try, you can only tell so much of the story. Something gets left out, or de-emphasized, only to be taken up (or forgotten) later, but you're never going to get the whole thing... even if it's your story you're telling.

This, exactly. We only have so many words. Our attention is finite. Sometimes we get lucky and capture so much of the "elephant" with one statement, it looks complete. People give praise, laud our genius, pat us on the back. But it was purely luck that our attention happened to fall on part of subject that covered so much. In the end, it still turns out we missed more than we captured.

In the internet age, there's going to be someone who will point out every detail we left out.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 06 Feb 2015, 14:41
Yeah, chill out, gang.  There's lots of time for drama to unfold with this relationship.  At least one of the characters will say something stupid or inappropriate when they find out Claire's history.  (Cosette would be a an obvious choice, if only because she has such bad luck.)  We already know Claire has dad issues, and as I read the latest posts here today the thought came to mind that her dad may have rejected her after she decided to transition.  If so that's sure to come up sooner or later.  Clinton may not react well to the change in their relationship, as he isn't exactly a fan of Marten's.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Feb 2015, 14:41
Marten may simply have been too tired to get in his own way. Once he's rested enough to be over-analytical, he may start foot-eating again.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 14:50
It would actually be a cool twist, a year or so from now in comic time, if Claire dumps Marten for being "too perfect."   :-D

So, in about 20 years real-time?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 06 Feb 2015, 15:02
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Nooooo.

The half of the cast that doesn't wear glasses should get surgery so that they need them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 15:03
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Nooooo.

The half of the cast that doesn't wear glasses should get surgery so that they need them.

I mostly just don't like her glasses, the large, pink frame makes me upset... much more upset than it has any right to.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 06 Feb 2015, 15:08
"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Smallest on 06 Feb 2015, 15:13
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

Nooooo.

The half of the cast that doesn't wear glasses should get surgery so that they need them.
Yesss

"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)
YASSSS

I can't.  I tried putting them in one time, and my eye felt like it was on fire for the next several hours, even after I got the damn thing back out.
Regarding Lasik, I personally possess an unholy (and irrational) terror regarding surgeries of literally any sort whatsoever (except dental surgery, for some peculiar reason), even down to such exceedingly minor procedures as pierced earlobes (I am one of two people I know who have no tattoos or piercings of any sort, and the other one is deciding what tattoo to get when he has some spare cash).

I have no problem touching my eyes (why do I touch my eyes? Why don't you?), but I don't have contacts because my mom accidentally poisoned me against them and I haven't gotten over it. She prefers them, but she had a ripple on her eye from surgery in the 80s (helped a bit by recent surgery) and it made soft contacts not stay in right and hard contacts painful and I spent my childhood watching her struggle with them and it still feels like they'd be more of a pain than they're worth, even though she, my younger cousin who I'm close with, my husband, and various other people I know well much prefer them to glasses.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 15:16
I've had them for 15 years now so they never bother me. They are annoying when all you want to do is pass out though, "sigh, I have to take these fuckers out". Me switching to Oasis contacts was magical.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 15:21
"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)
After seeing that, ex-biker Claire is now head-canon rather than an off the cuff remark.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 15:22
I LIED here's a thing

(http://i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u656/Lowqualityhappenstance/you_and_eye_zpsartshh2x.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 15:26
"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)

I desperately want this to be a real thing.
Title: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Feb 2015, 15:46
Actual Quote:

"For future reference, if you're trying to divine some overarching moral standpoint from my comic: the moral of my comic is that people should try to be nice to each other." - Jeph Jacques
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 06 Feb 2015, 15:55
So was the attempt with Delilah the v2.0 alpha test? It's fitting, it crashed and burned pretty hard....

It was Steam Early Access
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SJCrew on 06 Feb 2015, 16:04
Oh yeah, it's sexy time. Proud of Marten for being proactive in not missing an opportunity to grab that ass.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SomeCanadianWeirdo on 06 Feb 2015, 16:26
"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)

I desperately want this to be a real thing.

Unfortunately it's more likely to be Clinton who will turn up dressed like that.  Not that it won't be funny of course.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 06 Feb 2015, 16:41
Also, I argue that it would make for a more compelling story where close-minded characters exist, are seen interacting with the rest of the characters, and learn to change how they see the people that they had previously been bigoted against.
My emphasis added to what, in my experience, is at least as unrealistic as anything about the QC cast...

Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer.
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? Suggesting that somehow Dale doesn't "act black" enough? I was born in China, and yet here I am communicating in fluent, correct written English. Does that change my race? If I were a comic character, what would I have to do to be "authentically Asian"? Speak broken English with a "flied lice" accent? Wear a qipao all the time? What should Dale be  doing? Saying "dawg" every other sentence?

Word-of-Jeph is that Dale is African-American (http://jephjacques.com/post/11940736839/qa-dump-14). I don't think his first appearance (http://www.questionablecontent.net/1640) or last (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2874) contradicts that. Let's leave it at that, shall we?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 06 Feb 2015, 16:55

Whats the bet on Tai literally squeeing so hard she passes out?

$5 on her squeeing until her lungs turn inside out!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: starkruzr on 06 Feb 2015, 17:09
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?
Wait, what?

It doesn't matter for us and the story. Claire is completely "allowed" in a narrative context to be private about this with respect to the audience. It doesn't matter to us at all. What matters is her relationship with Marten. We do not know Claire's surgical status, and I would be willing to bet you nearly any amount of money that we never will, which is fine.

But like, inside the story? Of course it matters. They've almost certainly had a conversation about this off-panel; like, of course they have, this is an intimate detail adults need to deal with. Lots and lots of people are not going to be sexually attracted to people whose genitals are in a certain configuration. That is entirely understandable and completely fine.

I can't tell which "should" you were referring to here -- the audience-related one or the story-related one.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: eschaton on 06 Feb 2015, 17:38
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? Suggesting that somehow Dale doesn't "act black" enough? I was born in China, and yet here I am communicating in fluent, correct written English. Does that change my race? If I were a comic character, what would I have to do to be "authentically Asian"? Speak broken English with a "flied lice" accent? Wear a qipao all the time? What should Dale be  doing? Saying "dawg" every other sentence?

It has nothing to do with his behavior.  It's because Dale began being drawn with straight (but poofy) hair.  As I said, I just didn't "read" him as being black because of this, but some tall, dark-skinned guy of unknown ethnicity (South Asian, Hispanic, etc). 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrBear on 06 Feb 2015, 17:42
There is only one thing that could top this, and I hope we see it Monday...

The Marten-Claire booty dance  http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=300 (http://The Marten-Claire booty dance  http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=300)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Oenone on 06 Feb 2015, 17:46
Jeph stated unambiguously that Dale was African American in QA Dump #14 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11940736839/qa-dump-14)

Okay.  I don't read the QA dumps unless I'm linked to them, so thanks.  He doesn't "read" as black to me because of the hair texture.  But it could be straightened, or he could just have "good" hair naturally I suppose.

I thought he had twists when introduced which had now grown into dreds.

Also I think it's seriously gross you're getting into stuff like his hair texture to determine Dales ethnicity. Are we going to pull out cuatro paintings next?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 06 Feb 2015, 17:53
Just so. The "pencil test (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pencil_test_%28South_Africa%29)" and similar things have very ugly antecedents.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 17:58
Jeph stated unambiguously that Dale was African American in QA Dump #14 (http://jephjacques.com/post/11940736839/qa-dump-14)

Okay.  I don't read the QA dumps unless I'm linked to them, so thanks.  He doesn't "read" as black to me because of the hair texture.  But it could be straightened, or he could just have "good" hair naturally I suppose.

I thought he had twists when introduced which had now grown into dreds.

Also I think it's seriously gross you're getting into stuff like his hair texture to determine Dales ethnicity. Are we going to pull out cuatro paintings next?

Agreed, that conversation can get really uncomfortable really quickly, especially for people like myself who are CONSTANTLY being asked "So, what are you really?"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 06 Feb 2015, 18:26
Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer.
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? <snip>

Woah, woah, woah... I think you are misreading what Eschaton is saying here. I took it to mean that how Dale was drawn had changed in such a way that it now suggests a different ethnicity. He may have chosen his words poorly, but it's clear to me that he didn't mean what you seem to think he meant.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Technetium on 06 Feb 2015, 18:26
Also, I argue that it would make for a more compelling story where close-minded characters exist, are seen interacting with the rest of the characters, and learn to change how they see the people that they had previously been bigoted against.
My emphasis added to what, in my experience, is at least as unrealistic as anything about the QC cast...
Even people with the worst bigoted views have within themselves the capability to become better people.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ex-westboro-baptist-church-member-show-love-article-1.1898579
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 18:29
Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer.
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? <snip>

Woah, woah, woah... I think you are misreading what Eschaton is saying here. I took it to mean that how Dale was drawn had changed in such a way that it now suggests a different ethnicity. He may have chosen his words poorly, but it's clear to me that he didn't mean what you seem to think he meant.

It's still opening the conversation to "what Black really looks like", and frankly I don't think this forum needs to be having that right now. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 06 Feb 2015, 18:31
I really like this comic. This is the first story I've experienced where a trans* person is treated like a person, and not like a curiosity. To be fair, I haven't sought out too many trans* focused stories because the ones I had seen were so violent and depressing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 06 Feb 2015, 18:42
Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer.
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? <snip>
Woah, woah, woah... I think you are misreading what Eschaton is saying here. I took it to mean that how Dale was drawn had changed in such a way that it now suggests a different ethnicity. He may have chosen his words poorly, but it's clear to me that he didn't mean what you seem to think he meant.
It's still opening the conversation to "what Black really looks like", and frankly I don't think this forum needs to be having that right now.

Part of the reason why controversial subjects are controversial is because we (people) don't talk about them and don't listen to each other. This may not be the time or place for this conversation, but, really when is a good time? Where is a good place? If what someone said was unintentionally hurtful, explaining why will get you further than outrage. With outrage, you just alienate the other person and shut down communication; controversial subjects stay controversial and no one learns.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DillyDolly on 06 Feb 2015, 18:50
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?
Wait, what?

It doesn't matter for us and the story. Claire is completely "allowed" in a narrative context to be private about this with respect to the audience. It doesn't matter to us at all. What matters is her relationship with Marten. We do not know Claire's surgical status, and I would be willing to bet you nearly any amount of money that we never will, which is fine.

But like, inside the story? Of course it matters. They've almost certainly had a conversation about this off-panel; like, of course they have, this is an intimate detail adults need to deal with. Lots and lots of people are not going to be sexually attracted to people whose genitals are in a certain configuration. That is entirely understandable and completely fine.

I can't tell which "should" you were referring to here -- the audience-related one or the story-related one.

I ask why, because do genitals really make you a man or a woman? Also, if she is post, does it make her less "trans"? To me, the answer is no—and therefore it does not matter what her plumbing looks like. We are more than our body parts (even beyond genitals).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zalder on 06 Feb 2015, 18:50
Dale was arguably black when he was first introduced, but I'm pretty sure he isn't any longer.
Wow! Conflating race and, what, behaviour? Are we seriously going to go down that path? <snip>
Woah, woah, woah... I think you are misreading what Eschaton is saying here. I took it to mean that how Dale was drawn had changed in such a way that it now suggests a different ethnicity. He may have chosen his words poorly, but it's clear to me that he didn't mean what you seem to think he meant.
It's still opening the conversation to "what Black really looks like", and frankly I don't think this forum needs to be having that right now.

Part of the reason why controversial subjects are controversial is because we (people) don't talk about them and don't listen to each other. This may not be the time or place for this conversation, but, really when is a good time? Where is a good place? If what someone said was unintentionally hurtful, explaining why will get you further than outrage. With outrage, you just alienate the other person and shut down communication; controversial subjects stay controversial and no one learns.

Subjects as controversial as the accepted perceived physical traits of various ethnic groups, if they're going to be discussed, should be kept within more guided moderated places, such as academic settings. Even then you're  gonna come across people who just don't know how to be civil and end up being intentionally/unintentionally racist and hurtful (believe me I've had horror scenarios break out in classes I've taught).  As far as having those discussions on public online forums, you're really just asking for one group to feel attacked an alienated.  I hear what you're saying and I'm not advocating censorship, just some damn common sense. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 18:51
Part of the reason why controversial subjects are controversial is because we (people) don't talk about them and don't listen to each other. This may not be the time or place for this conversation, but, really when is a good time? Where is a good place? If what someone said was unintentionally hurtful, explaining why will get you further than outrage. With outrage, you just alienate the other person and shut down communication; controversial subjects stay controversial and no one learns.

I would say that in many cases, many subjects that are considered controversial because people tend to do more talking than listening.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 06 Feb 2015, 18:54
Part of the reason why controversial subjects are controversial is because we (people) don't talk about them and don't listen to each other. This may not be the time or place for this conversation, but, really when is a good time? Where is a good place? If what someone said was unintentionally hurtful, explaining why will get you further than outrage. With outrage, you just alienate the other person and shut down communication; controversial subjects stay controversial and no one learns.

I would say that in many cases, many subjects that are considered controversial because people tend to do more talking than listening.

I can agree with that....
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 06 Feb 2015, 19:04
Yo. Black guy here. I had no idea Dale was supposed to be black.

Just sayin'. If that's what Jeph was going for, he missed. I don't happen to care that much, but Dale came across as generically ethnic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ischaemia on 06 Feb 2015, 19:09
The only surgery I care about her getting is lasik, because she's cuter without glasses. I guess contacts work, but apparently they're scary. (I can't find the page, it's in there somewhere)

I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.
It's not that bad, and they give you a Percocet before you're barely cognizant of what's going on! The trade-off for me was losing my SUPER CLOSE (like centimetres away from my eye close) vision but being able to see things at a distance is quite nice. My right eye reverted a little, but my left eye is at 20/10 or something. I was 20/300 or worse in both before!

I did contacts sometimes in the past for first dates and stuff, and wearing colored   ones is fun! That said, it can also get a little costly, so I didn't do it daily or anything.
It took me thirty minutes to get then in the first time, heh.

Oh, and with lasik there was also the part where I looked like an otherworldly abomination for about a month. Got these gnarly "eye hickeys" (my optometrist's words) where the suction was. Oh, yeah, there's a part where they suck your eye a little bit out of the socket to hold it steady for the flap cutting and cornea reshaping. Didn't hurt. Mostly pretty cool!! Probably the Percocet that made me think so. The whole thing smells like singed hair. Also, I got it while in Army so I didn't have to pay for it (well, other than in time, I guess) which was a huge incentive to enlist in the first place. ANYWAY, it's not that bad, I promise!!

Slightly on topic, I imagine Dale's hair is something like this dude's: http://youtu.be/PZuWg5M2ukQ also I feel like Jeph is kind of bad at drawing hair on a consistent model, perhaps. I have hypothesized that's why everyone has short hair eventually, like it's some kind of weird curse. I feel like Claire's hair in panel 4 could have been executed so much better.

Also, why is Claire's left arm so high when she's taking off her bra, there's totally nothing up there unless it's some weird racerback/clasp/cup thing?? Also WHY WOULD YOU WEAR A PLAIN WHITE SET TO SOMETHING LIKE THIS, GIRL SHOW OFF YOUR GOODS YOU'RE NOT GETTING MARRIED...yet
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 06 Feb 2015, 19:13
She's holding her hair back and doing the bra one handed.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 06 Feb 2015, 19:25
I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.

I have keratoconus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keratoconus) (weird corneas; the wiki link includes a photo as example), and although my optometrist recommended contacts I refused to wear them for several years because I had the same eye-poking issues.  But then my glasses broke and I had to confront the fact that my vision was really fucked up and no new pair of glasses could possibly correct it, so I finally gave it and started wearing the contacts.  Horribly uncomfortable at first, but once I found the proper fit I got used to them.

Then I lost the lens for my left eye and had to get a corneal transplant, but that's another story.  True fact: once you've had a surgeon stitch a dead person's cornea onto your eyeball, then later remove each stitch one by one with a tiny needle, poking yourself in the eye is really no big deal.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 19:27


Even people with the worst bigoted views have within themselves the capability to become better people.

Shit, I can't help but post this, considering I was just talking about this with some other people.

Since you're linking ex-Westboro, if you want to be depressed you should look up the history of Fred Phelps for things going the other way. Man was a goddamned hero, once.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: weisbm on 06 Feb 2015, 19:31
You know, I've read this entire thread, and was wondering if Martin's reaction might just be purely good enough at face value.  He's looking at Claire, and she is beautiful!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 06 Feb 2015, 19:35


Even people with the worst bigoted views have within themselves the capability to become better people.

Shit, I can't help but post this, considering I was just talking about this with some other people.

Since you're linking ex-Westboro, if you want to be depressed you should look up the history of Fred Phelps for things going the other way. Man was a goddamned hero, once.

Yeppers... sad.

For everyone else, see the Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TomFoolery on 06 Feb 2015, 19:40
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?
Wait, what?

It doesn't matter for us and the story. Claire is completely "allowed" in a narrative context to be private about this with respect to the audience. It doesn't matter to us at all. What matters is her relationship with Marten. We do not know Claire's surgical status, and I would be willing to bet you nearly any amount of money that we never will, which is fine.

But like, inside the story? Of course it matters. They've almost certainly had a conversation about this off-panel; like, of course they have, this is an intimate detail adults need to deal with. Lots and lots of people are not going to be sexually attracted to people whose genitals are in a certain configuration. That is entirely understandable and completely fine.

I can't tell which "should" you were referring to here -- the audience-related one or the story-related one.

I ask why, because do genitals really make you a man or a woman? Also, if she is post, does it make her less "trans"? To me, the answer is no—and therefore it does not matter what her plumbing looks like. We are more than our body parts (even beyond genitals).

Regardless of sex identification, body parts can play a major role in attraction.  Someone attracted to men may not be attracted to fat men.  Someone attracted to women may not be attracted to women with male features, especially such prominently male features such as male genitalia.

Granted, Martin was aware of this and is presumably aware of her pre/post op status, so he probably doesn't mind one way or another.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lightsabermario on 06 Feb 2015, 20:06
A compelling plot desperately needs conflict.  Someone was saying, we just had a bunch of drama, and you want to add more? and I respond, YES.  For once, we had what this strip desperately needed to get the ball rolling, and do you know what that was?  A bad influence.  Pintsize.  If it wasn't for Pintsize, this wouldn't have escalated nearly as high as it needed to.  Now take the Marten/Claire storyline.  Where is the conflict?  We go straight from storybook beginning, with a loving mother and a protective brother, to storybook ending, with pure-of-heart boyfriend Marten.  Even the internal conflicts have been barely touched on or expressed through actions.  Someone else here said it perfectly, this is a fairy-tale for Claire, and it is so dissonant with the realities that most trans people face.  Sure, it's really nice, but is it SATISFYING?  No, because there were no obstacles to overcome.  Certainly none for Claire (that we have been present for), and if there were any for Marten, we didn't see them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 06 Feb 2015, 20:13
It's quite easy for Clinton to interfere, or maybe Amir thinks that Claire is Deathmøle's Yoko Ono, which messes with the band.  There may be personality friction.  It's far too soon to tell, and honestly, I'm happy to have a bit of a breather after the Faye meltdown. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 06 Feb 2015, 20:24
Apparently, not even in fiction are LGBT people allowed to have nice things.

Also, really, I can't be the only person who has seen the Marten and Claire strips as breathers. They are stuck in between a lot of other drama strips. If their relationship was super drama too, the whole comic would just be DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA GRIMDARK.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 06 Feb 2015, 21:16
Question:

Has it ever been established if Claire had the surgery? I seem to remember her saying she did, but I"m not 100%.

Here's a better question... Should it matter? Why?
Wait, what?

It doesn't matter for us and the story. Claire is completely "allowed" in a narrative context to be private about this with respect to the audience. It doesn't matter to us at all. What matters is her relationship with Marten. We do not know Claire's surgical status, and I would be willing to bet you nearly any amount of money that we never will, which is fine.

But like, inside the story? Of course it matters. They've almost certainly had a conversation about this off-panel; like, of course they have, this is an intimate detail adults need to deal with. Lots and lots of people are not going to be sexually attracted to people whose genitals are in a certain configuration. That is entirely understandable and completely fine.

I can't tell which "should" you were referring to here -- the audience-related one or the story-related one.

I ask why, because do genitals really make you a man or a woman? Also, if she is post, does it make her less "trans"? To me, the answer is no—and therefore it does not matter what her plumbing looks like. We are more than our body parts (even beyond genitals).

Regardless of sex identification, body parts can play a major role in attraction.  Someone attracted to men may not be attracted to fat men.  Someone attracted to women may not be attracted to women with male features, especially such prominently male features such as male genitalia.

Granted, Martin was aware of this and is presumably aware of her pre/post op status, so he probably doesn't mind one way or another.

*ahem*

Guys... On discussion of private parts (sticky) (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30194.0.html)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 06 Feb 2015, 21:37
Patience, my friends. There has been drama before. There will be drama again.  Some story arcs begin with what looks like the protagonist getting their  HAE (Happily Ever After)  and then  having that threatened--or worse, yanked away entirely.  There are plenty of ways to threaten Claireten's happiness, but the happiness has to be established first.

Trust the Jeph.  The Jeph is wise. The Jeph will lead us to good story.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: lepetitfromage on 06 Feb 2015, 21:38

This Marten doesn't have any of the flaws and rough edges that bounced off of Claire's rough edges and flaws so well. This is an AnthroPC Marten-Bot running "I AM A PERFECT BOYFRIEND.EXE" v. 2.0.

I think this is another thing we keep forgetting- Marten and Claire aren't boyfriend and girlfriend yet, are they? Its possible that Marten is on his best behavior because he wants to be Boyfriend.exe.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 06 Feb 2015, 21:56
Pretty sure they were officially together after the chat the morning after the Scritch Incident.  At least everyone in the QCverseseemed to think so. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 06 Feb 2015, 21:57

This Marten doesn't have any of the flaws and rough edges that bounced off of Claire's rough edges and flaws so well. This is an AnthroPC Marten-Bot running "I AM A PERFECT BOYFRIEND.EXE" v. 2.0.

I think this is another thing we keep forgetting- Marten and Claire aren't boyfriend and girlfriend yet, are they? Its possible that Marten is on his best behavior because he wants to be Boyfriend.exe.

Sure they are. We established one night stands aren't for Marten and he knows they're not for her either. He wouldn't be doing this if he weren't serious about her.

On boyfriend.exe though, it certainly was important character development for Marten to be more assertive and taking the lead after moping and whining about not doing that for 2800 strips. But there is room for balance. Now that we've established that it's ok for Marten to be a bit more Marteny as long as he doesn't completely stop being assertive.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 22:14


Regardless of sex identification, body parts can play a major role in attraction.  Someone attracted to men may not be attracted to fat men.  Someone attracted to women may not be attracted to women with male features, especially such prominently male features such a penis.



Fixed that for you.

Also, it's nitpicky, but he's Marten.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Skawronska on 06 Feb 2015, 22:20
Agreed, that conversation can get really uncomfortable really quickly, especially for people like myself who are CONSTANTLY being asked "So, what are you really?"

Funny, the few times I've been asked that, I simply replied, "A dick," and that apparently was good enough for them.

Sometimes simplicity is appropriate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 06 Feb 2015, 22:21
Claire's existence in this comic so far, is like a fairy-tale reality for trans people. Everything seems to be going the way that most trans people would want but few actually see

Which makes exactly one depiction of that in any medium, film, tv show, cartoon, or even book that I know of.

One.

I think.. we deserve that fairy-tale just once. And it does happen like that in reality, sometimes, just as some girls are princesses (which I suspect is over-rated).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 06 Feb 2015, 22:35

Regardless of sex identification, body parts can play a major role in attraction.  Someone attracted to men may not be attracted to fat men.  Someone attracted to women may not be attracted to women with male features, especially such prominently male features such a penis.


Fixed that for you.

Also, it's nitpicky, but he's Marten.

For some reason, I kept thinking about the Seinfeld episode with the Man Hands.


A compelling plot desperately needs conflict.  Someone was saying, we just had a bunch of drama, and you want to add more? and I respond, YES.  For once, we had what this strip desperately needed to get the ball rolling, and do you know what that was?  A bad influence.  Pintsize.  If it wasn't for Pintsize, this wouldn't have escalated nearly as high as it needed to.  Now take the Marten/Claire storyline.  Where is the conflict?  We go straight from storybook beginning, with a loving mother and a protective brother, to storybook ending, with pure-of-heart boyfriend Marten.  Even the internal conflicts have been barely touched on or expressed through actions.  Someone else here said it perfectly, this is a fairy-tale for Claire, and it is so dissonant with the realities that most trans people face.  Sure, it's really nice, but is it SATISFYING?  No, because there were no obstacles to overcome.  Certainly none for Claire (that we have been present for), and if there were any for Marten, we didn't see them.

One thing that the "Y U No Drama?" crowd seems to overlook, though, is that in much the same way that music is every bit as much present in the spaces between the notes, storytelling needs contrasts. When all you've got is one note -- whether that's comedy or drama -- you need to keep piling more and more on to get the desired effect, until you've reached a point where it's both draining and frankly ludicrous. When there's something for it to contrast against, whether it's drama coming amid comedy (the TV series MASH did this well in its early days, for instance, and in QC, the arc that started with strip 500 would also be a good example) or a bit of comedic relief amid the drama, the effect is heightened.

And life, by the way, is also like that. If you've ever been to a funeral for someone you really loved and missed, for example -- you  know, the ones where you cry 'til you laugh 'til you cry -- you know that those pauses, and changes, and all they bring with them, are grace notes in the everyday ebb and flow of life.

Also, "no obstacles to overcome"? When did you start reading QC, exactly? Without doing an archive binge, I can think of several things: for Marten they'd include his habitual passivity, his poor communication skills in some of his relationships, being an occasional emotional doormat, and trying to figure out exactly what he wanted from a relationship. For Claire, you've got everything that goes with her transition (good and bad), plus anxiety, trust issues, and inexperience -- some of which we've already seen manifest in her interactions with Marten. And I'm sure that if we all thought about it, we could add a shit-ton of items to both their lists... many of which remain unresolved. In good time, some will be. It just hasn't been that time yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Truec on 06 Feb 2015, 22:43
Apparently, not even in fiction are LGBT people allowed to have nice things.

Also, really, I can't be the only person who has seen the Marten and Claire strips as breathers. They are stuck in between a lot of other drama strips. If their relationship was super drama too, the whole comic would just be DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA GRIMDARK.

It is no coincidence that a person who styles themselves as the Emperor has, by saying QC shouldn't be grimdark, made it painfully obvious to me that QC needs more grimdark.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 06 Feb 2015, 23:38
Oh you~

'No Humanity, I'm not a god, you don't need gods!'
'ALL HAIL THE EMPEROR, GOD OF MANKIND!'

etc etc

I see what you did there!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 06 Feb 2015, 23:47
Claire undressing wasn't meant to be foreplay, it was negotiation.
+1 Insightful
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 06 Feb 2015, 23:48
"Before she became the rather quiet (but assertive when needed) Claire we know today, and was still figuring herself out, she was a teen rebel..."

 (http://i.imgur.com/BK6dw9M.jpg)

I desperately want this to be a real thing.

Unfortunately it's more likely to be Clinton who will turn up dressed like that.  Not that it won't be funny of course.


Clinton shows up dressed as Claire, dressed in biker clothes?  :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 06 Feb 2015, 23:52
Nah Reaver, Clinton ain't no badass. That's all Claire, through and through.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 06 Feb 2015, 23:57
Nah Reaver, Clinton ain't no badass. That's all Claire, through and through.

Claires the Claire that Clinton could be if he could be a Claire?


So I have a question if Claire is covered in chocolate

does that make her an...Eclaire?  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 07 Feb 2015, 00:10
I was born in China, and yet here I am communicating in fluent, correct written English. Does that change my race?
It makes you mildly unusual for Australian.
Not the "where you were born" bit, I mean the correct English. Knowing you, your Mandarin is probably just as polished. Great way to make me feel ignorant, for while I can speak a few phrases of Cantonese with a decent HK accent, my students have to be really tolerant of my fumbling attempts to go past "Xie xie" in Mandarin.

Over half have Mandarin as their first language, though for some, it's second after Hokla or another dielect. So it helps teacher/student bonding to learn a bit of their language. My Arabic's improving too, but I'm completely illiterate in that still.

Akima, I'm sorry you get so much crap. It's just so... brain-dead. The whole Bogan racist thing. Not just evil, bloody idiotic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: USS Martenclaire on 07 Feb 2015, 00:50
Nah Reaver, Clinton ain't no badass. That's all Claire, through and through.

Claires the Claire that Clinton could be if he could be a Claire?


So I have a question if Claire is covered in chocolate

does that make her an...Eclaire?  :claireface:

I think you're confusing her with the Anthro-PC version of her: the e-Claire.

What we have at the moment, a Claire having her first sexy time experience, is the Eeeeeeee-Claire. Hope this claire-ifies things a little.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Y on 07 Feb 2015, 01:21
I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.

I have keratoconus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keratoconus) (weird corneas; the wiki link includes a photo as example), and although my optometrist recommended contacts I refused to wear them for several years because I had the same eye-poking issues.  But then my glasses broke and I had to confront the fact that my vision was really fucked up and no new pair of glasses could possibly correct it, so I finally gave it and started wearing the contacts.  Horribly uncomfortable at first, but once I found the proper fit I got used to them.

Then I lost the lens for my left eye and had to get a corneal transplant, but that's another story.  True fact: once you've had a surgeon stitch a dead person's cornea onto your eyeball, then later remove each stitch one by one with a tiny needle, poking yourself in the eye is really no big deal.

I have Keratoconus too. None of the glasses they tried actually work, so I had hard contact lenses when I was a kid, the kind you have to remove with a plunger. They sometimes moved away from the iris, so when that happened I always got terrified it was going behind my eyeball cutting the optical nerve. So then when I was 15 I got a corneal transplant, but one stitch was on the wrong side so it hurt opening they eye so they operated on me again after staying in the hospital for a weekend. I guess the person I received the cornea from must have had bad eye sight too as I don't see much improvement in my left eye.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Almateria on 07 Feb 2015, 02:14
I absolutely refuse to get contact lenses.  Sure, glasses are a pain in the ass to deal with sometimes but the thought of poking something that you normally don't poke day after day is just unnerving.  Also the thought of someone carving out my corneas with a laser is enough to send me into full heebie jeebie mode.  I like Claire better with her glasses, but I just happen to find people more attractive with glasses more so than not.

I have keratoconus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keratoconus) (weird corneas; the wiki link includes a photo as example), and although my optometrist recommended contacts I refused to wear them for several years because I had the same eye-poking issues.  But then my glasses broke and I had to confront the fact that my vision was really fucked up and no new pair of glasses could possibly correct it, so I finally gave it and started wearing the contacts.  Horribly uncomfortable at first, but once I found the proper fit I got used to them.

Then I lost the lens for my left eye and had to get a corneal transplant, but that's another story.  True fact: once you've had a surgeon stitch a dead person's cornea onto your eyeball, then later remove each stitch one by one with a tiny needle, poking yourself in the eye is really no big deal.

I have Keratoconus too. None of the glasses they tried actually work, so I had hard contact lenses when I was a kid, the kind you have to remove with a plunger. They sometimes moved away from the iris, so when that happened I always got terrified it was going behind my eyeball cutting the optical nerve. So then when I was 15 I got a corneal transplant, but one stitch was on the wrong side so it hurt opening they eye so they operated on me again after staying in the hospital for a weekend. I guess the person I received the cornea from must have had bad eye sight too as I don't see much improvement in my left eye.
Wow. When you killed your brother, did you talk just... LIKE... THIS?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 07 Feb 2015, 02:47
Apparently, not even in fiction are LGBT people allowed to have nice things.

Also, really, I can't be the only person who has seen the Marten and Claire strips as breathers. They are stuck in between a lot of other drama strips. If their relationship was super drama too, the whole comic would just be DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA GRIMDARK.

It is no coincidence that a person who styles themselves as the Emperor has, by saying QC shouldn't be grimdark, made it painfully obvious to me that QC needs more grimdark.

The name "Emperor Norton" has historical significance... and it's actually quite funny.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 07 Feb 2015, 03:23
Apparently, not even in fiction are LGBT people allowed to have nice things.

Also, really, I can't be the only person who has seen the Marten and Claire strips as breathers. They are stuck in between a lot of other drama strips. If their relationship was super drama too, the whole comic would just be DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA GRIMDARK.

It is no coincidence that a person who styles themselves as the Emperor has, by saying QC shouldn't be grimdark, made it painfully obvious to me that QC needs more grimdark.

The name "Emperor Norton" has historical significance... and it's actually quite funny.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Norton

Thank you, this is one of the best things I've read all week. There's an Emperor Norton on two of my favorite forums and in all these years I never once thought the name may be a reference to a real person :)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 07 Feb 2015, 04:54
Looks like Marten's tamper proof seal (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2433) is about to be broken

Dude. <mod snip>

Dude. - Mod.</mod>

Since Marten's tamper proof seal is equivalent to bottom-grabbing, I saw nothing wrong with it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 07 Feb 2015, 05:04
Let's just say that there was something there that the moderators deleted, and there was something wrong with it. I'm actually surprised the whole post and the poster didn't get nuked from orbit.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 07 Feb 2015, 06:41
It's the only way to be sure, after all.

Honestly, I sadly did expect to see a fusillade of flying ban-hammers after the last couple of comics.  Either the mods have reacted far faster than I could see, or people have behaved far better than they have in the past.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 07 Feb 2015, 06:52
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bartman on 07 Feb 2015, 07:50
Marten may have done this off-panel.  Indeed, I'm expecting he did, and the lack of his eyes traveling downward is an oversight by Jeph.  But it does make his "You're beautiful" come across as a bit disingenuous to me.  Not that he doesn't think she's beautiful, but as if he's saying it to be supportive and reassuring.  That his eyes not traveling south signals he's either uncomfortable to some degree, or worried she'd be uncomfortable with him doing so (which is a misread, IMHO).

The implication of what you're saying here is that if you didn't see it explicitly happen then it never happened at all, which is clearly nonsense as we've not had strip after strip of each character using the toilet in awful, explicit detail, and they're not all in hospital with kidney. bladder or bowel problems.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Emperor Norton on 07 Feb 2015, 08:05
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.

See, I at least get this (I don't agree, in that, it personally was amusing to me, to each their own), but at least it makes sense to me.

Rather than: Its not realistic unless she faces horrible because she is a trans woman. We need drama because Marten is being perfect (he's just being Marten, laid back and generally chill, there hasn't been anything that came up that personally threatened him in any way!). Etc. etc.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2015, 08:10
Remember what Marten saw growing up....
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 07 Feb 2015, 08:33
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 07 Feb 2015, 08:40
With great care.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheRedMaiden on 07 Feb 2015, 08:47
There's also Peter Bianchi, and his dismissal of Dora's bisexuality as a phase... not actually gender type discrimination, but...

And, Meena had some off-screen discrimination as well, for racial discrimination.

I'm skipping like four pages of posts to phone in on this one, but I'd also like to point out Penelope's immediate belittlement of Wil's spiritual views, and her tirade in the comic following against anyone and anything religious. It's not gender/ethnic/AI discrimination, but it's still blatant hate/unacceptance of a group of people. Hatred does exist in this comic, and in some instances within the main characters (like Penelope). We just don't get the focus on them all the time because I don't think it quite fits Jeph's purpose in the comic to have them any other time than when he specifically wants to have the conversation about people who hate rather than people who accept.

Also, I really hate how much the term "Mary Sue" is thrown around. Not speaking specifically about this forum, but it seems to be rampant IRL about any character, which baffles me because I honestly don't see what's so bland about most of the characters it's applied to. It makes perfect sense to me that Marten is immediately accepting of Claire. Afterall, look at the people who raised him. His mother was open about her career and never tried to hide it as something particularly taboo to Marten (see little Marten holding a dildo pic). And I can't remember when Marten said his father came out, but it was either early enough in his life that it taught him that's just how life works, or he had no reason to see it as particularly unusual because of exposure to other things like his mom's career. I'd like in particular to point out the scene at his dad's wedding where Mrs. Reed was doing upskirt photos for her friend and Marten responded to being told to "be a good boy and look away" with an annoyed "Yes, mom," not necessarily embarrassed by his mother, but more childlike annoyance at something that was routine for him as a child. Marten was introduced to sexuality in a very different, unconventional way than most children are, so for him to be appalled by Claire rather than accepting seems like it would be more out of character for me. He was raised in a way that taught sexuality to be something very, very diverse, and coupled with the full knowledge of Claire's transition before even entering a relationship with her, there's absolutely no reason this part of the comic should have gone any differently. Him looking at her face rather than her body isn't an oversight, it's deliberate and moreover it's important because it's irrelevant to Marten, because he already knew about her and still entered the relationship because of who Claire is. He already thought Claire was beautiful and doesn't need to look at the rest of her body because nothing physical is going to change how he feels about the person inside of it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HeavyP on 07 Feb 2015, 09:36
Aish.  I think I'm going to have to stop reading the forums for a while, and I'm going to try to remember to make that a precedent when major plot events happen.

For what it's worth, I read this webcomic (and most of the thirty-odd others on my bookmarks tab) as a counter to reality.  It's a silly little story about friends doing their best to live their lives and be happy.  There are good and bad moments, but I don't argue when story lines are "unrealistic."  I like my media (books, movies, games, etc) with happy endings for the same reason.  It's not that I don't like to be "challenged" or that I can't "handle" serious, darker work, it's that I don't WANT to.  The world we live in is a maelstrom of injustice, hate, and general horror, with a few times and people that stand opposite that as bright islands in a black ocean. 

They're not my characters, it's not my story, and as one of an endless mob of readers, I have no more rights than anyone else.  That being admitted, I'm still going to say this: don't wish evil upon these happy figments of one man's imagination.  If you want to smile, then join me in cheering on our laid-back musician and the little red haired librarian in their modern fairy tale.  If you want darkness and grit, open your door and walk outside - you'll find more than enough of it in our real world.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 09:42
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.
I think it was the 'Ice cream kisses!' comic that made me roll my eyes so hard that I nearly gave my optic nerves torsion damage. It seemed... ridiculously juvenile, more in line with what a junior high relationship would be. Then again, I despise PDAs (they weird me out, big time), and it's likely a side effect of me being well on my way to being an old cat lady.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 07 Feb 2015, 09:49
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.
I think it was the 'Ice cream kisses!' comic that made me roll my eyes so hard that I nearly gave my optic nerves torsion damage. It seemed... ridiculously juvenile, more in line with what a junior high relationship would be. Then again, I despise PDAs (they weird me out, big time), and it's likely a side effect of me being well on my way to being an old cat lady.

This might be an absolutely ridiculous POV since I've never had a relationship, but after knowing what happened to a friend in his first fumbled attempt at relationship (he was 20 at the time) and scared of what would happen in mine... It looks normal. Yes, it looks junior high. Turns out that Claire's date-fu might probably be at that "age", experience or however you want to call it (remember it's her first serious relationship), and it makes perfect sense to look like that.

At least to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TinPenguin on 07 Feb 2015, 09:53
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:

Why, with music and scented candles (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1719), of course.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 09:55
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.
I think it was the 'Ice cream kisses!' comic that made me roll my eyes so hard that I nearly gave my optic nerves torsion damage. It seemed... ridiculously juvenile, more in line with what a junior high relationship would be. Then again, I despise PDAs (they weird me out, big time), and it's likely a side effect of me being well on my way to being an old cat lady.

This might be an absolutely ridiculous POV since I've never had a relationship, but after knowing what happened to a friend in his first fumbled attempt at relationship (he was 20 at the time) and scared of what would happen in mine... It looks normal. Yes, it looks junior high. Turns out that Claire's date-fu might probably be at that "age", experience or however you want to call it (remember it's her first serious relationship), and it makes perfect sense to look like that.

At least to me.
Oh, I'm not saying that it doesn't make sense. I just don't like that kind of super-sweet interaction. I have enough cavities as it is.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 07 Feb 2015, 09:59
That I can understand. Happens with the part that went well of said fumbled attempt at relationship (It's a bit more complicated than "dude asks dudette, dudette tells him to fok off m9"). Dude has changed sport allegiances and everything. Started playing WoW...

I tend to troll a bit on their twitter interactions because sometimes I can't handle the sugar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Orkboy on 07 Feb 2015, 10:12
In response to everyone who hates it when comic characters are happy:

Do you hate puppies too? 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 10:15
Did I say I hated it when they're happy? No. I said I hate it when they essentially fall just short of putting me into a diabetic coma.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 07 Feb 2015, 10:15
In response to everyone who hates it when comic characters are happy:

Do you hate puppies too?

Strongly depends on the puppy. Some of them I want to kick so far away they write a Dragonforce song.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 07 Feb 2015, 10:19
In response to everyone who hates it when comic characters are happy:

Do you hate puppies too?
I'm more of a cat person.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Cyril on 07 Feb 2015, 10:26
Claire's existence in this comic so far, is like a fairy-tale reality for trans people. Everything seems to be going the way that most trans people would want but few actually see

Which makes exactly one depiction of that in any medium, film, tv show, cartoon, or even book that I know of.

One.

I think.. we deserve that fairy-tale just once. And it does happen like that in reality, sometimes, just as some girls are princesses (which I suspect is over-rated).

That's kind of what I was going with before. I mean, sure, there will inevitably be 'normal' relationship drama, but drawing attention to how unrealistic a good beginning is only underlines how a minor change in the setting 'people are accepting and react in a less than catastrophic way after being given ample and explicit warning' creates the appearance of a massively unrealistic outcome.

On the other hand the trajectory of the relationship to date has been one that should either be an epilogue (i.e. not part of the actual story, and is summed up by 'and they lived happily ever after') or be the sort of thing that happens to minor characters where you just don't care about the little drama bits. Except for Claire's identity, the whole thing is very saccharine and flat -- by no means unrealistic for the way the first stages of a courtship reads to the rest of the world, but no more interesting for all that. I think a lot of us who've been reading this forever are pretty happy to get a 'victory' arc for Marten but I can totally see being a little bit done with hitting the same note over and over again (which is so odd to say since the Faye arc is all the counterpoint we should need right now).
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheRedMaiden on 07 Feb 2015, 10:30
I like my media (books, movies, games, etc) with happy endings for the same reason.  It's not that I don't like to be "challenged" or that I can't "handle" serious, darker work, it's that I don't WANT to.

Yes! That's the exact reason for the things I read, too. It doesn't make me immature for not "being able to handle" the darker stuff, but I'm not going to actively partake of a media I know is only going to depress me, when I can be happy an amused instead. That's why I watch Disney and comedies rather than movies who are setup to make you feel sad. Incidentally, that's also why I feel the "kill the dog" tactic in a lot of movies and stories is a cheap shot for directors and writers who can't think of something to earn genuine emotion out of audiences, and the same goes for jump scares in horror movies.

But I digress. As already stated, I'm glad the comic went this way, and I don't think the challenges for trans people are dismissed at all, but there's no reason for it to be shown in these circumstances, because the only people Claire could face that from is the people she tells, and she's extremely careful about that, too. Notice she's only told Marten and Emily. And while she's given Marten permission to tell others if they happen to ask, I think she also trusts him to have a similar judge of character to hers where he'll be selective with who he actually answers truthfully.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 10:52
It's the only way to be sure, after all.

Honestly, I sadly did expect to see a fusillade of flying ban-hammers after the last couple of comics.  Either the mods have reacted far faster than I could see, or people have behaved far better than they have in the past.

Given what Friday's strip implies, I was surprised how long this thread went without going there. It is a very clever bit of writing around the subject--almost too clever, but not quite. It implies exactly what you think it does. If two of you disagree, there's nothing to validate one position over the other. Between n00bs and trolls I expected a ban-splosion, or perhaps even a banopocalypse.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 11:12
In response to everyone who hates it when comic characters are happy:

Do you hate puppies too?

There's a difference between being happy and Wilford Brimley doing an advert about Diabetes because they've so sickeningly sweet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 07 Feb 2015, 11:30
We could give you Brimley's The Thing performance instead, but that really goes a bit back into that stupid edit I posted earlier if we're not careful.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 07 Feb 2015, 11:30
Marten was introduced to sexuality in a very different, unconventional way than most children are, so for him to be appalled by Claire rather than accepting seems like it would be more out of character for me. He was raised in a way that taught sexuality to be something very, very diverse, and coupled with the full knowledge of Claire's transition before even entering a relationship with her, there's absolutely no reason this part of the comic should have gone any differently.

This is a really good point that had not occurred to me. Thanks for that.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 07 Feb 2015, 11:30
I hate puppies. I hate how cute and awesome they are. They make me want to vomit rainbows.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 07 Feb 2015, 11:31
Between n00bs and trolls I expected a ban-splosion, or perhaps even a banopocalypse.

Bannerdammerung?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 11:32
Between n00bs and trolls I expected a ban-splosion, or perhaps even a banopocalypse.

Bannerdammerung?
Ragbanrok?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 07 Feb 2015, 11:33
They make me want to vomit rainbows.

Cool! You can actually do that?!? *Runs off to OD on puppies*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 07 Feb 2015, 11:58
They make me want to vomit rainbows.

Cool! You can actually do that?!?

Sure you can. Skittles and Ipecac.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Loki on 07 Feb 2015, 12:14
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2015, 12:56
Global Moderator Comment Now that you mention it, this went much much better than when Marten and Claire started dating. Many thanks to all the new people for being decent.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 07 Feb 2015, 13:02
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:

I imagine she gets a daily colonic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: HannahRose on 07 Feb 2015, 13:08
The last few pages of this thread are why I stayed away from the forums for so long. Apparently, at least according to many of the people commenting here, a story can't be good unless everything is blowing up in everyone's faces all the damn time. I mean seriously, why the hell do so many people seem to have a problem with Claire actually finding somebody who DOESN'T make a big deal out of her being trans*? Why can't she just enjoy herself for at least a few days (yeah, they've only officially been dating for like 4 days) before people start whining about how horrible happiness is?

As far as I'm concerned, Jeph has done a great job of *not* making Claire a series of issues, and letting her develop as her own character without being a mouth piece for a single issue. That's rare to see, even in comics written by trans* people, about trans* people. If you people want to read about trans* drama, then go read one of those, but please stop complaining about Claire, reading about her is like an oasis in a desert of hard times, and no, sadly I am not exaggerating.

Ugh... Note to self: The next time I'm happy about something that happens in this comic, avoid reading the comments in these forums for at least a week afterward. They're just chock full of people who apparently can't stand a little bit of optimism, or for a trans* character's life to be filled with anything other than misery and hard times.



Edit: Before I try to avoid the forums for the next week, I should clarify that my little rant was about the people who are complaining that the situation between Claire and Marten isn't "realistic", or about how they apparently feel that this was a wasted opportunity to showcase something trans* people deal with a lot (rejection). It was not about the people who are just complaining about a lack of drama in the comic in general (Claireten's date was "too sweet" or something along those lines), although frankly I also think that those people are just as wrong, since the SS Fangus hitting a freakin' iceberg in the middle of the arctic ocean should have been more than enough to satisfy, but I digress. This kind of thing does happen, albeit rarely, and it's nice to see it portrayed in such a popular webcomic, happening to a prominent character that so many people hold dear.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 07 Feb 2015, 13:53

Now that you mention it, this went much much better than when Marten and Claire started dating. Many thanks to all the new people for being decent.


Great, now I have to start acting like an asshole. You did this.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 07 Feb 2015, 14:50
For my next order of business I will now deviously insult you all.

Man this thread sure is smelly, what with all the smelly people here.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 07 Feb 2015, 14:53
For my next order of business I will now deviously insult you all.

Man this thread sure is smelly, what with all the smelly people here.
*sob* We learned it from you! We learned it from YOU!

;)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 14:58
Between n00bs and trolls I expected a ban-splosion, or perhaps even a banopocalypse.

Bannerdammerung?
Ragbanrok?

Gentle-persons, you win. I proudly present you one internet. Each. Use it wisely.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 15:05
For my next order of business I will now deviously insult you all.

Man this thread sure is smelly, what with all the smelly people here.

*Sniffs the air* Well I found the biggest source of the stench, for they who started it, farted it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 07 Feb 2015, 15:07
You take that back, I'll follow you home after work and poop in your driveway!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 07 Feb 2015, 15:07
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:

I imagine she gets a daily colonic.

I imagine that there's exactly one transporter device on Dr. Ellicott-Chatham's space station, and it's probably set aside for Hanners' personal use.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 07 Feb 2015, 15:14
For my next order of business I will now deviously insult you all.

Man this thread sure is smelly, what with all the smelly people here.
This thread has no nose!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 15:20
The last few pages of this thread are why I stayed away from the forums for so long. Apparently, at least according to many of the people commenting here, a story can't be good unless everything is blowing up in everyone's faces all the damn time.

A story can't be good unless something blows up. No plot = no story. Plot = character + conflict. No conflict = no plot = no story.

Everything, OTOH, doesn't have to blow up. Conflict doesn't have to signal the dissolution of the relationship. Mad About You did this well. There is a certain point where tension becomes melodrama. This point is best avoided (unless you are writing for CSI or Law and Order).

Claire showed Marten something. What that thing was doesn't matter. What matters is the showing was emotionally difficult. Claure felt something was at risk.

Claire = character.
Claire's desire to go "any further" + Claire's perception that going further was a risk = conflict.
Claire + Claire's desire/risk = plot.

The problem I'm hearing is that the plot did not grow into a deeper conflict. It could have. Marten could have said something well meaning but using poorly chosen words for example. Instead, the plot had a happy ending.

This is not CSI.

Jeph had 4 drama balls in the air. He just put a very dramatic one down. There's a potentially dramatic one still spinning. The other two are both romantic. One has the potential for absurd hijinks. Logically, injecting more absurd into the remaining one is probably a bit much. There's no need for overt conflict at this point. (Keep in mind that in laying the Faye's drinking issue down, Jeph created a new drama ball he hasn't picked up yet. And nothing says he's resolved this one. It's not in the air at the moment.)

Given that QC isn't really about overt conflict, that seems about right.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 07 Feb 2015, 15:36
I imagine that there's exactly one transporter device on Dr. Ellicott-Chatham's space station, and it's probably set aside for Hanners' personal use.

"Station, beam $waste directly from me and into the sun.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DrClef on 07 Feb 2015, 16:00
I don't want things to blow up all the time. I want Marten to act like Marten. I want him to be a little snarky and playful. I want him to make dumb jokes and goof around a bit. I want the Marten who decided to scritch Claire's hair and back and make her go all *_*.  You know. Not necessarily Marten at his worst. Marten at his best.

Strip 2808 comes to mind. Like 2891, Marten is LITERALLY reading off of the "how a guy dating a trans woman is supposed to act" handbook. Hell, 2808 is even structured like a, "POP QUIZ, MARTEN! YOUR NEW TRANS GIRLFRIEND ASKED YOU HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT DATING A TRANS LADY! DO YOU PICK. . ." 2891 feels like just another test to see if Marten passes the "AM I THE PERFECT BOYFRIEND FOR CLAIRE" test.

Which is a shame because there's no reason why Marten couldn't be just as open and understanding about the relationship while still being Martenish. Instead, the author seems to devoted to making sure that Marten haandles this perfectly that he's filed off all the interesting bits from his main character and ended up with a perfect reflective sphere that does nothing but bounce back the audience's hopes and wishes.

But the end result doesn't feel heartwarming or cute for me. It feels fake. And that's sad.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 07 Feb 2015, 16:05
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Fig on 07 Feb 2015, 16:08
For my next order of business I will now deviously insult you all.

Man this thread sure is smelly, what with all the smelly people here.
There are four lights!
This thread has no nose!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 16:10
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

Really? I'm more surprised it didn't happen sooner.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 07 Feb 2015, 16:17
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

Really? I'm more surprised it didn't happen soon.

I'm not surprised it happened, just surprised I lit the fuse.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2015, 16:33
Here's a random thought about happy stories.

C.S. Lewis once said something to the effect "What kind of person finds escapism bad? A jailer."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 07 Feb 2015, 16:38
Here's a random thought about happy stories.

C.S. Lewis once said something to the effect "What kind of person finds escapism bad? A jailer."

I loled :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 07 Feb 2015, 16:39
I don't want things to blow up all the time. I want Marten to act like Marten. I want him to be a little snarky and playful. I want him to make dumb jokes and goof around a bit. I want the Marten who decided to scritch Claire's hair and back and make her go all *_*.  You know. Not necessarily Marten at his worst. Marten at his best.

Strip 2808 comes to mind. Like 2891, Marten is LITERALLY reading off of the "how a guy dating a trans woman is supposed to act" handbook. Hell, 2808 is even structured like a, "POP QUIZ, MARTEN! YOUR NEW TRANS GIRLFRIEND ASKED YOU HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT DATING A TRANS LADY! DO YOU PICK. . ." 2891 feels like just another test to see if Marten passes the "AM I THE PERFECT BOYFRIEND FOR CLAIRE" test.

While I agree that Marten's answer in 2808 was kinda bland (in my opinion, a playful nudge and a "Do you think I would be here now if I wasn't comfortable with you?" would've felt a bit more natural), I think he gave the right response in 2891.  There is a time for playful snark, and your significant other (who may or may not have body issues) stripping down in front of you to gauge your reaction and comfort level is definitely not one of them.  Save it for the pillow talk later, I say.

(Granted, I'm celibate, so you'll have to take my sexytimes advice with a massive dose of salt.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 16:55
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

Really? I'm more surprised it didn't happen soon.

I'm not surprised it happened, just surprised I lit the fuse.

No one expects discussion of Hanners's poop. Its chief weapon is surprise.

And fear.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ASB84 on 07 Feb 2015, 16:59
ok, from my perspective, as one of the people where the sugary Marten/Claire strips did nothing for them, it wasn't about drama, or a need for the characters to suffer, or anything like that. It simply is that I like to have a strip that interests me in some way. Either a joke, plot progression, something moving.

Jephs depiction of Marten and Claire's first date just felt like a repeat of the same strip, over and over, with small changes.

I've liked the last two strips because they are something DIFFERENT, something interesting. When Marten asked Claire out, that was interesting.
I think it was the 'Ice cream kisses!' comic that made me roll my eyes so hard that I nearly gave my optic nerves torsion damage. It seemed... ridiculously juvenile, more in line with what a junior high relationship would be. Then again, I despise PDAs (they weird me out, big time), and it's likely a side effect of me being well on my way to being an old cat lady.

Agreed, I found it just a bit too sappy. From a narrative standpoint, there wasn't much said or done across the breadth of those strips that couldn't have been done in two or three, tops. To me it kind of felt like padding or filler, just cutesy imagery instead of engaging storytelling.

Frankly, I feel like this point of view is being harshly misrepresented or misinterpreted, with these exaggerated accusations of us being crybabies who don't want to see the characters happy, "do you hate puppies", and other such rhetoric. It's not about that at all; it's about feeliing engaged with the story and interested in the proceedings. It's about personal taste when it comes to cuteness; mileage will vary from reader to reader as to how much is too much before it's sappy and off-putting. It's the same as anyone who feels that Pintsize's antics are more annoying than amusing, or everyone's individual threshold for tolerating the more divisive character traits that Dora and Faye display. Personal taste and preference.

As TRVA said, for some of us, the cute imagery wasn't enough, it wasn't gripping. You could compare it to Dora and Tai's first date, in which there were cute and heartwarming moments, but also story, backstory, witty lines, jokes...stuff happening. Some of us would've liked to have seen more of that happening in Marten and Claire's date, especially because Claire is being elevated in the cast and needs to be expanded as a character. I don't think anyone is suggesting they want to see the characters unhappy all the time, or nothing but drama and conflict all the time; some of us just wanted a bit more storytelling and character exploration, something beyond moments that had - for some of us - become too sappy and saccharine. Because once again, mileage may vary.

On the subject of fiction being better than reality...I'm not against that, I think there's a need for that. I do think that we as readers, viewers, and so forth can get too wrapped up in the idea that "dark and gritty" is better, when it can obviously be as trite and cliche as the other extreme. At the same time though, there needs to be balance. A work without any kind of conflict or complication - even a comedic complication, where the characters are put in a funny situation and react to it in an amusing way - will get boring after a while, because nothing's happening. Make things too perfect, and the work runs the risk of being difficult to relate to.

The other issue you potentially run into if your story and setting is too utopian is that it can end up coming off a bit preachy. If everyone in the work shares the views and politics of the author and most of the audience, and everything runs smoothly as a result, it can come off as being a bit smug. That's why, despite being a filthy left-wing atheist myself, I sometimes find Bill Maher off-putting; "clappy humour" doesn't really appeal to me, because of the smugness that's usually involved and the joke being more about "let's laugh at those people who are clearly idiots because they don't hold the same views". Fortunately, QC is nothing like that, I'm just saying that it can become an issue when it comes to a work having a certain political slant, and the setting, characters, and storylines feel too perfect.

That's what I really liked about the latest strip. For the sake of full disclosure, I'm a white, heterosexual, cisgender male, so I want to tread very carefully because I don't have insight into the realism of the situation, and it's obviously not a trigger for me if there are any issues. However, this I do know: because ignorance and bigotry still exists, when you choose to introduce a character who belongs to a group who is discriminated against and portray them positively, you are making a statement, whether you intend to or not. And I think that's important, and all the better when the message isn't obnoxiously shoved in the audience's face. Obviously, I'm not qualified to say whether Claire is a good representative of people who are trans or of trans issues, but given my politics, her positive portrayal, and the generally positive reaction from readers who are trans, I'll hazard a guess and suggest that she is, and that her story is being told respectfully and tastefully.

Of course, given the situation, there are aspects of the story that Jeph understandably doesn't want to get into too much, out of respect for trans individuals in his audience, and the subject matter at large. At the same time, if it's completely glossed over, if the elephant in the room is completely ignored, then the underlying statement is less powerful, and Claire becomes more of a token character; a way of confronting or acknowledging an issue in society without really getting into it. By touching on some of the issues in a way that is respectful and tasteful, without crossing any lines or being offensive - as I believe the latest strip achieved - Claire remains a proper character, and a powerful, positive statement is made in a way that isn't heavy handed or preachy. It did what the more sugary strips did not (at least in my view), advancing the plot, exploring the characters, and touching on certain issues as much as they need to be touched upon, while still being genuinely sweet and heartwarming.

As for where Claire and Marten go from here...well, it certainly doesn't need to be straight to drama and conflict. By all means, they should be happy, and the relationship should continue to be explored. However, I also want to see meaningful and engaging story arcs, funny moments, witty punchlines, character exploration, comedic mishaps, GLORIOUS PUNS...more than just cute moments and imagery.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 07 Feb 2015, 16:59
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

Really? I'm more surprised it didn't happen soon.

I'm not surprised it happened, just surprised I lit the fuse.

No one expects discussion of Hanners's poop. Its chief weapon is surprise.

And fear.

It's TWO chief weapons are surprise, fear, and an almost fanatical obsession with handwashing.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 07 Feb 2015, 17:04
Enough! Cardinal Fang! Fetch the ... Comfy chair! With the hole! And fetch the two-ply!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vforvancouver on 07 Feb 2015, 18:12
After reading all this thread, I think I finally understand why George R. R. Martin is hated and loved at the same time by the same group of people. If you read A Song of Ice and Fire you may choose one side: those who like how Martin writes, and those who hate how Martin writes. Those who are like "meh" don't discuss the writing at all, so they don't count. Alrighty then; here it's happening too. At a minor scale, if you like, but it's happening nonetheless.

So people may like how Jeph writes, or hate how our Glorious Leader writes, but at the end, if people sticks around the webcomic, it is because they love the comic and its story. I, for one, like how Jeph, that magnificent bastard, writes his webcomic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Feb 2015, 18:17
Claire lives in fear for her safety and has to hide a piece of history that contributed to who she is today.

It's an exceptionally good life she's got but not a treacly fantasy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 07 Feb 2015, 18:28
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

There is a whole subredit dedicated to Hannerpoop... :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 07 Feb 2015, 18:33
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:

 The answer at 1719 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1719).

 (http://i.imgur.com/XLxyKWc.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 07 Feb 2015, 18:47
Speaking of poop i've always been curious as to how Hanners handles the bathroom..... :psyduck:

 The answer at 1719 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1719).

 (http://i.imgur.com/XLxyKWc.jpg)

Why did you do that?! You ruined the mystique of Hannerpoop!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 07 Feb 2015, 18:51
Because if my math is right that comic is over 4 years old. According to rapper Mike Jones (aka "Big Wax"), that comic could now have dreams that kept it warm when it was cold.

Come to think of it, that subreddit mentioned earlier might be that dream.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 07 Feb 2015, 19:02
Why did you do that?! You ruined the mystique of Hannerpoop!

 (http://i.imgur.com/tdSBeC2.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 19:05
I was not expecting so much  discussion of Hannerpoop :-P

Really? I'm more surprised it didn't happen soon.

I'm not surprised it happened, just surprised I lit the fuse.

No one expects discussion of Hanners's poop. Its chief weapon is surprise.

And fear.
NO ONE EXPECTS THE POOPQUISITION!!!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 19:16
Because if my math is right that comic is over 4 years old.

Yeah....but that's like three weeks QC time. :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: osaka on 07 Feb 2015, 19:28
Because if my math is right that comic is over 4 years old.

Yeah....but that's like three weeks QC time. :roll:

Setting aside the fact that at that particular point in time Angus and Faye had just started dating more or less, so it has to be more comic time, it's really no excuse not to know that piece of info in the Real World (tm). The intel's been out there.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 19:38
Don't bring Intel into this! Maybe they hadn't had enough Java to get their inner Oracle running. You can't expect everyone to Google everything, Mac.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 07 Feb 2015, 19:43
Don't bring Intel into this! Maybe they hadn't had enough Java to get their inner Oracle running. You can't expect everyone to Google everything, Mac.

This forum tends to overanalyze things. Remember the argument over the alignment of Marten's ARM (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2269)? That was some high-class nit-PICking. A real Arduinous debate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 19:49
Because if my math is right that comic is over 4 years old.

Yeah....but that's like three weeks QC time. :roll:

Setting aside the fact that at that particular point in time Angus and Faye had just started dating more or less, so it has to be more comic time, it's really no excuse not to know that piece of info in the Real World (tm). The intel's been out there.

I refer you to the rolling eyes emote I added to the end of my post.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 19:50
The rolling eye gathers no moss.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2015, 19:55
After reading all this thread, I think I finally understand why George R. R. Martin is hated and loved at the same time by the same group of people. If you read A Song of Ice and Fire you may choose one side: those who like how Martin writes, and those who hate how Martin writes. Those who are like "meh" don't discuss the writing at all, so they don't count. Alrighty then; here it's happening too. At a minor scale, if you like, but it's happening nonetheless.

So people may like how Jeph writes, or hate how our Glorious Leader writes, but at the end, if people sticks around the webcomic, it is because they love the comic and its story. I, for one, like how Jeph, that magnificent bastard, writes his webcomic.


...Ohmigod, you're RIGHT.

Jeph IS the G.R.R. Martin of webcomic creators! :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 07 Feb 2015, 19:56
(http://rlv.zcache.com/i_prefer_my_puns_intended_candy_jar-r172f498450414acd9447354f250ebc46_2ih7l_8byvr_324.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2015, 19:57
Why did you do that?! You ruined the mystique of Hannerpoop!

 (http://i.imgur.com/tdSBeC2.jpg)

I just realized that this comic is old enough that we realistically could reply to comments by just posting quotes from panels in the archives.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 07 Feb 2015, 19:58
Oh, and Jeph's no G.R.R.M. If he were, the wedding arc would have been far deadlier than it was.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Feb 2015, 19:59
"Sven Bianchi sends his regards."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 07 Feb 2015, 20:01
As one of his shitty country songs is played in the background.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Feb 2015, 20:03
"You know nothing, Raven Pritchard!"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 07 Feb 2015, 20:04
As one of his shitty country songs is played in the background.

That would get dark quick.
"I Murdered Her Because She Looked Like You"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 07 Feb 2015, 20:05
As one of his shitty country songs is played in the background.
"I Can't Get the Blood of You Out of My Tux"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 20:09
Why did you do that?! You ruined the mystique of Hannerpoop!

 (http://i.imgur.com/tdSBeC2.jpg)

I just realized that this comic is old enough that we realistically could reply to comments by just posting quotes from panels in the archives.

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-t782zwC4wY0/VNbhJFkVa3I/AAAAAAAAB20/7qCE--sQHFc/s800/comment.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 07 Feb 2015, 20:14
As one of his shitty country songs is played in the background.
"I Can't Get the Blood of You Out of My Tux"

Or his memorable re-imagining of a Willie Nelson classic: "Mamas Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up."
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Stanistani on 07 Feb 2015, 20:15
What you call "Thought Police", either jokingly or disparagingly, are a group of people who have worked very hard to make sure that this forum doesn't turn into a cesspit like so many other "social sites" on the net. They've had to drop the hammer quite a few times, but in the end, this place is far better than a lot of other forums and sites I used to frequent.
Hear Hear! I say this as a forum moderator for another forum full of roughnecks. The ones here are stellar.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: K1dmor on 07 Feb 2015, 20:32
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-t782zwC4wY0/VNbhJFkVa3I/AAAAAAAAB20/7qCE--sQHFc/s800/comment.png)

 (http://i.imgur.com/okSOnHO.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Caspain on 07 Feb 2015, 20:46
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-t782zwC4wY0/VNbhJFkVa3I/AAAAAAAAB20/7qCE--sQHFc/s800/comment.png)

 (http://i.imgur.com/okSOnHO.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/8xdCT3W.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 07 Feb 2015, 20:51

 (http://i.imgur.com/okSOnHO.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/8xdCT3W.jpg)
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-g_oIwrkWZw8/VNbrJBCx6jI/AAAAAAAAB3M/XUwVOb_m51k/s800/comment.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2015, 21:37
(http://imageshack.com/a/img909/7526/f7iLuM.png)
I shouldn't have told her, should I? (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9AJYQpA8CKFcUJtWlJvUGhzbDA/view?usp=sharing)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Feb 2015, 21:39
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/6YJkqBx83Q2XU1oC8BZJRh7li-NFg_-WRpDv8c7eqpz8JrSE646fk4-i1-Toz8-dPGpP0g8ixP0=w1342-h537)
Fixed that for ya
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Feb 2015, 21:41
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/6YJkqBx83Q2XU1oC8BZJRh7li-NFg_-WRpDv8c7eqpz8JrSE646fk4-i1-Toz8-dPGpP0g8ixP0=w1342-h537)
Fixed that for ya

Okay, how exactly did I go from the Google Drive thing to that?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bucky_2300 on 08 Feb 2015, 00:20
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 08 Feb 2015, 00:46
How exactly does being a straight man preclude him from dating a trans* woman?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 01:11
Relllaaaaaaxxxxxxx guyyyyyyyyy
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 08 Feb 2015, 01:38
This thread has no nose!

OK, I'll do the traditional thing.

"No nose? Then how does it smell?"
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 08 Feb 2015, 01:46
I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person

CLANG!

See http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Drop+a+clanger
Quote
To say something innocent in an unfortunate context that causes it to become hurtful or otherwise controversial.

Just to explain. He's straight. He's now dating... (drum roll).... a girl.

A girl who happens to be trans. Also straight too, she's attracted to boys.

Now please remember it's not actually possible to die of embarassment. Moreover, everyone here is human, so makes mistakes too. Slack will be cut, because that's what we do here. Be kind to one another, as I'm sure you've noticed.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TinPenguin on 08 Feb 2015, 01:58
A story can't be good unless something blows up.

Which is why Michael Bay is recognised as the greatest storyteller of our age.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 08 Feb 2015, 01:59
It's not that I don't like to be "challenged" or that I can't "handle" serious, darker work, it's that I don't WANT to.  The world we live in is a maelstrom of injustice, hate, and general horror, with a few times and people that stand opposite that as bright islands in a black ocean.

Jeph's handled that - but in another context, and with another character.

(http://i.imgur.com/GiMVZ.jpg)

It's an archepelago. And sea levels are dropping. Now I better get back to the pumps....

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 02:23
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.

Also, this is wrong. As in counter factual. As in this description of Marten is not accurate.

"Straight" is a construct. What defines straight really depends on who you ask. I'm sure there's a bi person somewhere who finds the application of that fact terribly hypocritical. So, what straight means to Marten is up to... Marten. (Well, Jeph. But I repeat myself.)

I said elsewhere that Friday's strip would imply whatever the reader wanted it to imply. You jumped right to implication. The mechanics of whatever they get up to was not implied by Jeph. That something "not straight by your definition" might be going down is your headcanon. Nothing in the strip demands it.

Whatever's going down can be straight by whatever definition Marten uses. (As an aside, I found this comment no less clangy than those implying Marten might be fluid because of his mom's job. I didn't just make up this stuff about the artifice of straight for this comment, so the idea that Marten's personal view on the matter needs a justification is kind of a drop... on the head.)

Oh, and all that pontification up there isn't why you are wrong. This is (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1024).

A story can't be good unless something blows up.

Which is why Michael Bay is recognised as the greatest storyteller of our age.

Metaphor is apparently a dying art.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 08 Feb 2015, 03:18
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.

A) Sexuality exists along a spectrum: it's called the Kinsey Scale: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale/ ... However, even this does not completely represent the full complexity of human sexuality. It's not straight or gay, or even straight, bi, or gay; it just is.

B) Simplicity is more emotionally evocative than flowery language. Ernest Hemingway once said "Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words? He thinks I don’t know the ten-dollar words. I know them all right. But there are older and simpler and better words, and those are the ones I use.”

C) Empty Pandering? When did web comics become a pissing contest for hipsters? Do I get bonus points for saying "I was trans* friendly before it was cool?" Come on!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 08 Feb 2015, 03:29
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-t782zwC4wY0/VNbhJFkVa3I/AAAAAAAAB20/7qCE--sQHFc/s800/comment.png)

You know, I wonder if this was foreshadowing for something. Were the "mistakes" being actions that sent Faye even deeper into her slide, or were the "mistakes" something that we haven't seen on screen yet?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 08 Feb 2015, 04:39
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.

A) Sexuality exists along a spectrum: it's called the Kinsey Scale: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale/ ... However, even this does not completely represent the full complexity of human sexuality. It's not straight or gay, or even straight, bi, or gay; it just is.

[Edited for length]
True, and at the moment, Marten seems very comfortable with his sexuality, but it's not always been displayed that way. A few months prior, while he was still dating Dora, he was certainly not OK with dating a transgendered Person: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)
Even in jest, that's a very hurtful comment to make, and for Marten it's just been a few months (I've scanned AprilArcus' wonderful timeline, and as far as I can see, it's maybe 6+ months). This is not the only time he displayed discomfort with people who's visible gender might not always be the same: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=457
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 08 Feb 2015, 04:59
People's opinions on that can change, too, you know. Surprisingly quickly, if there's the right catalyst.

It's also worth noting that Tai was a student at Smif at least as of 1933, which was an end-of-semester party. (Or, 726 at the very least, because Tai was still living in the dorms then.) She graduated a year prior to 2787. This means that it's quite a long longer than 6 months - even longer than a year, actually - since Marten made that comment to Dora in 615.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 08 Feb 2015, 05:14
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-t782zwC4wY0/VNbhJFkVa3I/AAAAAAAAB20/7qCE--sQHFc/s800/comment.png)

You know, I wonder if this was foreshadowing for something. Were the "mistakes" being actions that sent Faye even deeper into her slide, or were the "mistakes" something that we haven't seen on screen yet?

I'm fairly certain this was just a punch line.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Gladstone on 08 Feb 2015, 05:31
Gosh, how dare Marten grow and change and mature as a person, and adapt as he learns new information about himself and others.  It just ain't right.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 08 Feb 2015, 05:46
He may. I was just pointing out why coming to the conclusion that he did completely change his mind without outside indication is a little out of character.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Feb 2015, 06:15
You know, I wonder if this was foreshadowing for something. Were the "mistakes" being actions that sent Faye even deeper into her slide, or were the "mistakes" something that we haven't seen on screen yet?

It's possible to over-interpret that moment. In any case, to me, Claire was worried that a drunk Marten and a drunk Faye might do something stupid in a moment of loneliness when their defences were weak. I'm pretty sure that is why she went back to the apartment with them - to act as a chaperone. She never expected that the person Marten was going to try to seduce was her! Of course, in her defence, I'm not even sure Marten knew that at that point.

He may. I was just pointing out why coming to the conclusion that he did completely change his mind without outside indication is a little out of character.

Really, that was just a laddish quip, offered on the spur of the moment when ignorant. However, he now knows a trans* and that naturally should be expected to have altered his perceptions on the whole issue, especially as he's clearly been wrestling with an affection for her since the Post-Wedding Snuggle.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2015, 06:50
Jeph's handled that - but in another context, and with another character.
(http://i.imgur.com/GiMVZ.jpg)

Actually, that's pretty much a summary of what Jeph's screed was about.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 08 Feb 2015, 06:56
C) Empty Pandering? When did web comics become a pissing contest for hipsters? Do I get bonus points for saying "I was trans* friendly before it was cool?" Come on!

Well it is all popular now. That's why I'm anti-trans, that way no one can accuse me of being trendy.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: de_la_Nae on 08 Feb 2015, 07:12
Damned straight, transmissions are the devil!

That's what we're talking about right?

p.s. 'just as it's gaining traction in social justice' blah blah blah I've been in the trenches of the Internet too long to readily take him at arguing in good faith with that sentence.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 08 Feb 2015, 07:22
For all we know, Quantifiable Concerns (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2316) had an arc where Clarissa came out as trans, and Marten got an education from the forums, which then resulted in him re-evaluating everything, especially after he realized that he might like Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Mr. Black Licorice on 08 Feb 2015, 07:53
C) Empty Pandering? When did web comics become a pissing contest for hipsters? Do I get bonus points for saying "I was trans* friendly before it was cool?" Come on!

Well it is all popular now. That's why I'm anti-trans, that way no one can accuse me of being trendy.

You are so behind the curve; post anti-trans is the thing now... and don't make me explain it to you - you wouldn't understand.  :parrot:
*snaps in a z formation*
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Feb 2015, 08:05
At this stage in the thread, I'm currently at:
(http://2damnfunny.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/The-Simpsons-Grandpa-Shocked-Bart-Works-At-Brothel.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 08:57
True, and at the moment, Marten seems very comfortable with his sexuality, but it's not always been displayed that way. A few months prior, while he was still dating Dora, he was certainly not OK with dating a transgendered Person: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)
Even in jest, that's a very hurtful comment to make, and for Marten it's just been a few months (I've scanned AprilArcus' wonderful timeline, and as far as I can see, it's maybe 6+ months). This is not the only time he displayed discomfort with people who's visible gender might not always be the same: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=457

My timeline doesn't go back that far yet; my guess is that 615 is set something like 18 months before the current strips. I made a long post about the gradual queering of Marten's cultural baseline (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,30235.msg1277848.html#msg1277848) back in October that I think is still a good read for the Marten-is-too-straight-for-Claire skeptics.

I talked to a few of my IRL friends about the whole Claire-stripping-in-front-of-Marten thing and we all agree that it feels really off-key and totally unlike how we relate to relaxed, friendly, Marten-ish boys in practice.

The only way I can get my head around it is by reminding myself that Claire is not very much like me — she's a virginal mess of stress and anxiety and frustration, and this strip is (maybe?) taking place in the way-less-trans-friendly mid-2000s. So maybe I could imagine it happening? In any case, the drama of her heightened emotions present a weird contradiction that forces me to be a little creative in my reading of the character, which isn't terrible.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: kerky on 08 Feb 2015, 09:13
This is an AnthroPC Marten-Bot running "I AM A PERFECT BOYFRIEND.EXE" v. 2.0.

Hm, maybe Marten never came back from the Space Station? Maybe just an Anthro-PC lookalike of him came back to Earth from that trip, they are keeping him in permanent stasis up there because the blood samples Hannelore had analyzed have lead the scientists to find out that due to a peculiar genetic constellation he will be the only human that will survive time-travelling into the past to warn Dr. Ellicot-Chatham that him developing AI to a whole new level will eventually destroy all of humanity?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Feb 2015, 09:29
The only way I can get my head around it is by reminding myself that Claire is not very much like me — she's a virginal mess of stress and anxiety and frustration...

I think that this is a key point: Claire seems to have been generally under-socialised at the point she started out as an Intern. She has no friends out side of the Library/CoD circles that we know about. Lacking previous close friendships means that she, at best, can sometimes only guess about appropriate behaviour based on others' actions. I suspect that she probably doesn't have anyone fully reliable to turn to in romance issues (not with the possible exception of her mother). Because of  this, her behaviours will sometimes be eccentric to the objective eye.

In any case, I still think that her key motivator was her body image issues. She isn't confident in her appearance and she had to get this out of the way and on her own terms.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 09:39
I think that this is a key point: Claire seems to have been generally under-socialised at the point she started out as an Intern. She has no friends out side of the Library/CoD circles that we know about. Lacking previous close friendships means that she, at best, can sometimes only guess about appropriate behaviour based on others' actions. I suspect that she probably doesn't have anyone fully reliable to turn to in romance issues (not with the possible exception of her mother). Because of  this, her behaviours will sometimes be eccentric to the objective eye.

How much of that do we chalk up to her having a difficult, socially isolating transition during her freshman/sophomore years, and how much to other factors? It's hard to imagine making it through four years of college (and a couple years of grad school?) without making at least a few close friends. Clinton definitely seems a little bit ASD; I wonder if Claire has some of those traits too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 08 Feb 2015, 09:48
It's pretty hard to tell. I have always been a pretty quiet and reserved person with not that many friends my entire life, long before I realized I was trans, or had any idea that being transgender was a thing. Body image issues, which I did have as a teen, can only explain some of that. A large part was my upbringing... Moving around a lot I was always the outsider in school. My emotionally and mentally abusive father is another, possibly the biggest factor in my lack of confidence in dealing with other people. We can't say these sorts of things apply to Claire. And are probably over thinking things anyway. (On this forum? Say it isn't so...) But we have seen that she doesn't have any friends outside of the group and her family. In the beginning she was really wound up tight. Since she's started hanging out with the cast she's mellowed out quite a bit... but old issues just don't go away. And yes, for most trans people that I've known the 'getting naked first time with your partner' is a big thing, even if they already know and have said they are okay with it.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Feb 2015, 09:51
I think that this is a key point: Claire seems to have been generally under-socialised at the point she started out as an Intern. She has no friends out side of the Library/CoD circles that we know about.

How much of that do we chalk up to her being trans and how much to other factors? It's hard to imagine making it through four years of college (and a couple years of grad school?) without making at least a few close friends. Clinton definitely seems a little bit ASD; I wonder if Claire has some of those traits too.

I'd only be guessing but it is possible to spend years around people and only develop acquaintances rather than friendships. Some of it, at least, would be due to he trans status and possible fears for her safety. However, as a resident of Northampton, it is possible that she was never a resident student at Smif, enabling her to have less close interaction with her classmates that would have been if she'd been living in the halls of residence. This would inadvertently probably somewhat inhibit her making peer group connections.

(BTW - I know that some colleges insist that freshmen live in college dorms and then lets them make their own choices from sophomore year onwards but I don't know if it is the case with Smith/Smif.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 09:59
If Smif is Smith, she couldn't have been an undergrad there (let alone a resident), since she started her transition during her first year of college and wouldn't have had her paperwork in order as a high school senior to matriculate at a women's college. Her brother is a student at UMass; she probably was too.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 08 Feb 2015, 10:03
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.

Also, this is wrong. As in counter factual. As in this description of Marten is not accurate.

"Straight" is a construct. What defines straight really depends on who you ask. I'm sure there's a bi person somewhere who finds the application of that fact terribly hypocritical. So, what straight means to Marten is up to... Marten. (Well, Jeph. But I repeat myself.)

<snip>
Whatever's going down can be straight by whatever definition Marten uses. (As an aside, I found this comment no less clangy than those implying Marten might be fluid because of his mom's job. I didn't just make up this stuff about the artifice of straight for this comment, so the idea that Marten's personal view on the matter needs a justification is kind of a drop... on the head.)

<further snip>

Bucky:
GET A GRIP, MAN!

(You may, if you'd like, read the preceding in the voice of Powdered Toast Man)

RF: Okay, maybe not fluidity, since you find that "clangy". How about openness, at the very least? Various... possibilities have been hinted around on the forums, to varying degrees of tact, for quite some time now. It seems to me to be a bit silly that those same things wouldn't already have occurred to Marten, and that he wouldn't have thought them through. Having thought them through, he may also have decided that he doesn't quite give a shit, and will take things as they come... an attitude, as we've seen a million or so times before in QC, that's far from being out of character. Does it need clarification? Not particularly. What he and Claire do or don't get up to is their business, not ours. But it seems a bit off somehow to think that the straightness you've already acknowledged as a construct is somehow more valid than the possibility that he's either decided that construct has outlived its usefulness, or that he'll just go and construct his own construct.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 08 Feb 2015, 10:25
I think that this is a key point: Claire seems to have been generally under-socialised at the point she started out as an Intern. She has no friends out side of the Library/CoD circles that we know about. Lacking previous close friendships means that she, at best, can sometimes only guess about appropriate behaviour based on others' actions. I suspect that she probably doesn't have anyone fully reliable to turn to in romance issues (not with the possible exception of her mother). Because of  this, her behaviours will sometimes be eccentric to the objective eye.

How much of that do we chalk up to her having a difficult, socially isolating transition during her freshman/sophomore years, and how much to other factors? It's hard to imagine making it through four years of college (and a couple years of grad school?) without making at least a few close friends. Clinton definitely seems a little bit ASD; I wonder if Claire has some of those traits too.

I made it through 4 years of high school and 5 and a half years of college without making any close friends.  I am not trans*, but I do have serious body image issues and moderate to severe anxiety and depression.  I don't think Claire has depression, but we know she has anxiety.  Between the transition and the anxiety, I can see her not keeping in touch with high school friends and not making college friends pretty easily.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Skewbrow on 08 Feb 2015, 10:32
In any case, I still think that her key motivator was her body image issues. She isn't confident in her appearance and she had to get this out of the way and on her own terms.

I agree with this - as do apparently very many of us. I'm unable do any kind of deep analysis on it so I won't even try.

I would like to compare the approaches the two characters with severe body/self image issues took to their first times getting intimate with someone else. Marigold more or less opted to dive in. Head first. Pancakes and syrup for dessert. Here we have Claire with her special interlude.

Clearly both of them wanted to proceed on their own terms. I also think both of them planned events ahead of time. May be not a detailed script but a general plan was there.  Marigold's forwardness may have taken some by surprise, but my guess is that she was planning on it, which is why she war so nervous that the hives broke out (sorry about acting Capt'n obvious here - I am slow). Also both had have very little social experience. Romantic in particular.

Differences between them? Relatively little I think? May be the characters in Jeph's head told him that this is how they will act?

Afterwards Marigold turned to Momo to reflect on her second thoughts. Who will Claire turn to?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 10:50
Afterwards Marigold turned to Momo to reflect on her second thoughts. Who will Claire turn to?

Emily, of course. I see real potential for Claire/Hanners and Claire/Tai (oh god) to be interesting character dynamics, but for whatever reason Jeph hasn't developed them yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 08 Feb 2015, 11:36
Here's a really wild thought that's going to melt a lot of heads: Wait and see what Jeph does with the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 08 Feb 2015, 11:36
Here's a really wild thought that's going to melt a lot of heads: Wait and see what Jeph does with the comic.
That seems morbid.

edit -- Well, this makes a lot less sense after you corrected the typo.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 08 Feb 2015, 11:38
Yeah, I saw that just as I hit post.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vforvancouver on 08 Feb 2015, 11:51
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person[...]

[Edited for length]
True, and at the moment, Marten seems very comfortable with his sexuality, but it's not always been displayed that way. A few months prior, while he was still dating Dora, he was certainly not OK with dating a transgendered Person: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)
Even in jest, that's a very hurtful comment to make, and for Marten it's just been a few months (I've scanned AprilArcus' wonderful timeline, and as far as I can see, it's maybe 6+ months). This is not the only time he displayed discomfort with people who's visible gender might not always be the same: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=457

Curiously, in http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615) the relevant part for Marten is:
Quote
No, see, the way my life works is you'd wait until after we had sex to tell me that. You know, let me get the full afterglow going before you shatter my mind.
For him, it is not knowing things beforehand what is wrong. He knew about Claire being trans, processed that fact with pancakes, and then he decided he still wanted to have a relationship. Or at least try.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: kerky on 08 Feb 2015, 12:19
Hello all,

I hope this is OK and not out of place in the WCDT, else would the mods be so kind as to move it to the "T"-thread. I also donŽt know what the banmageddon was all about, but I will stick to what *I* see in the latest comic.

I personally think panel 3 gets as close as possible to answering "Teh Question That Must Not Be Asked"

Please, and this again goes for the mods and also people who read this forum and who I know have special sensitivity issues around this subject: I am not making a statement how things are supposed to be, or, behold, of right or wrong. I am just giving my personal opinion and reading of ClaireŽs expression in that panel which is, after all, part of the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 13:27
Panel 3 was a deft touch on Jeph's part. It answered the legitimate plot questions of "How will Claire handle anxiety?" and "Is Marten as open-minded as he thinks he is?". It scrupulously avoided all the things we have to learn not to ask about trans people.

If this has been a story of Marten overcoming a hangup, that's in character for Marten, consistent with some of the major themes of the strip, and inspiring.

(The rain of tungsten rods from orbit a while back was to deal with people who made "assume good faith" untenable. Honest mistakes will be treated as honest mistakes.)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 13:28
RF: Okay, maybe not fluidity, since you find that "clangy".

I don't find applying labels to Marten clangy. I find the need to justify his choices by appealing to his childhood clangy. As in, nobody is appealing to Faye's childhood to justify her straightness.

If there's nothing special, on a fundamental level, about being trans--if there's nothing special about being attracted to and romantically engaged with a trans person--then there's no more need to appeal to explanation with regard to Marten's sexuality than there is for Dora's, or Tai's, or Steve's, or Faye's...

Hello all,

I hope this is OK and not out of place in the WCDT, else would the mods be so kind as to move it to the "T"-thread. I also donŽt know what the banmageddon was all about, but I will stick to what *I* see in the latest comic.

I personally think panel 3 gets as close as possible to answering "Teh Question That Must Not Be Asked"

Please, and this again goes for the mods and also people who read this forum and who I know have special sensitivity issues around this subject: I am not making a statement how things are supposed to be, or, behold, of right or wrong. I am just giving my personal opinion and reading of ClaireŽs expression in that panel which is, after all, part of the comic.

It's probably not Kosher, but that's not going to stop it happening. I said earlier that Jeph implies the answer to the question here, but the implication is not an answer. No matter what the truth is, Claire's actions and reactions make sense. What you think the implications are is just a matter of your own head canon. Nothing in the strip supports one interpretation over another.

The fact that the strip can be legitimately read to mean whatever the reader wants was the reason I expected a bannedammerung to follow.

I'm pleasantly surprised by this and the lack of outright hate.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 08 Feb 2015, 13:40
I think the first few rounds of bannings from earlier arcs probably got all the people who were going to go that route.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 08 Feb 2015, 13:54
I think the first few rounds of bannings from earlier arcs probably got all the people who were going to go that route.

Indeed. Claire coming out to Marten probably caught people who have issues with trans people off guard. And as I remember about that time the comic made a bit of news because of Claire's coming out. So that would draw in people who feel the need to troll anything trans positive. At this point now, it's a well established fact, so it wouldn't draw as much attention and anybody who's still here has accepted at least the fact that Claire is trans and she and Marten are dating. So not a big a reaction for this event.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 08 Feb 2015, 14:16
True, and at the moment, Marten seems very comfortable with his sexuality, but it's not always been displayed that way. A few months prior, while he was still dating Dora, he was certainly not OK with dating a transgendered Person: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)
Even in jest, that's a very hurtful comment to make, and for Marten it's just been a few months (I've scanned AprilArcus' wonderful timeline, and as far as I can see, it's maybe 6+ months). This is not the only time he displayed discomfort with people who's visible gender might not always be the same: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=457

Do you think perhaps Jeph may have changed a lot in the time since that comic was written? Do you think Jeph's changes may in some way influence Marten's character and the way the comic is written?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aimless on 08 Feb 2015, 14:18
I personally think panel 3 gets as close as possible to answering "Teh Question That Must Not Be Asked"

Please, and this again goes for the mods and also people who read this forum and who I know have special sensitivity issues around this subject: I am not making a statement how things are supposed to be, or, behold, of right or wrong. I am just giving my personal opinion and reading of ClaireŽs expression in that panel which is, after all, part of the comic.

I dunno. If you're saying what I think you're saying, I think you're reading too much into the artwork in that panel. If you mean something else, then maybe :o
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 14:22
I mean, he didn't seem completely against the idea (the drag queen part could be cause they were a lot older than him and the Dora page would have been more extreme surprise than anything else).

But people can change over time, Marten didn't have to be okay with it a year ago, he can grow as a person. For instance, I was completely against the idea of dating a transgender person but now it doesn't seem so far-fetched anymore. Because, you know, learning. Learning is great.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 08 Feb 2015, 14:24

I can't.  I tried putting them in one time, and my eye felt like it was on fire for the next several hours, even after I got the damn thing back out.
Regarding Lasik, I personally possess an unholy (and irrational) terror regarding surgeries of literally any sort whatsoever (except dental surgery, for some peculiar reason), even down to such exceedingly minor procedures as pierced earlobes (I am one of two people I know who have no tattoos or piercings of any sort, and the other one is deciding what tattoo to get when he has some spare cash).

I also lack any piercings or tattoos.  I'm very indecisive.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Cochise on 08 Feb 2015, 14:26
Yeah, I hate puppies. 
And like all western narrative, I think a story needs conflict (not suffering, but conflict). So at this moment I'm more interested in Faye than Claire and Marten.
I wish them luck, (I'm not a heartless bastard) but the more catching story now is not about these two.

I can see Sven trying to hit Faye now, and I can't see Faye and Angus patching up what was done. The Coffee of Doom will never be the same.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 08 Feb 2015, 14:42
RF: Okay, maybe not fluidity, since you find that "clangy".

I don't find applying labels to Marten clangy. I find the need to justify his choices by appealing to his childhood clangy. As in, nobody is appealing to Faye's childhood to justify her straightness.

If there's nothing special, on a fundamental level, about being trans--if there's nothing special about being attracted to and romantically engaged with a trans person--then there's no more need to appeal to explanation with regard to Marten's sexuality than there is for Dora's, or Tai's, or Steve's, or Faye's...

Second point first: I don't think it necessarily needs to be explained (as I mentioned). That's their business, not ours. To your first point... No, you wouldn't look to Faye's childhood for clues about her approach to her sexuality. But if you were talking about her trust issues? Her alcoholism? At least one, maybe two, suicide attempts? Her casual disrespect for boundaries? The (thankfully toned down) violence? It'd be silly not to. Ditto, say, Hanners' issues, or Dora's complicated relationship with her brother and her parents (among other things). In other words, when a character's perception, attitudes and actions are clearly influenced by their past, it can be useful to examine that past and how it colors the present, and that's something that isn't in any way exclusive to sexuality. If we were talking about, say, Marten's taste in beer, then I'd agree with you that it's silly (unless there's some heretofore unexplored link between a spanking and a ten-minute IPA, in which case I take that back). But we're not, and to think that he'd have grown up around the kinds of people he did would have no impact on how he thinks about Claire seems to me a bit short-sighted.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: swapna on 08 Feb 2015, 15:04
True, and at the moment, Marten seems very comfortable with his sexuality, but it's not always been displayed that way. A few months prior, while he was still dating Dora, he was certainly not OK with dating a transgendered Person: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=615)
Even in jest, that's a very hurtful comment to make, and for Marten it's just been a few months (I've scanned AprilArcus' wonderful timeline, and as far as I can see, it's maybe 6+ months). This is not the only time he displayed discomfort with people who's visible gender might not always be the same: http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=457

Do you think perhaps Jeph may have changed a lot in the time since that comic was written? Do you think Jeph's changes may in some way influence Marten's character and the way the comic is written?

Yeah, probably he did. (Good thing, too). And while that's certainly the reason why Marten's so educated and reasonable right now, Marten's reasons don't show up in the narrative. Yes, you don't have to show everything, but we got like 10 strips of cutesy ice-cream-eating Marten/Claire. There would have been enough room.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 08 Feb 2015, 15:20
I'd argue we've been watching mopey Marten grow into this Marten for the whole run of the comic. I've seen plenty of development.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 15:22
RF: Okay, maybe not fluidity, since you find that "clangy".

I don't find applying labels to Marten clangy. I find the need to justify his choices by appealing to his childhood clangy. As in, nobody is appealing to Faye's childhood to justify her straightness.

If there's nothing special, on a fundamental level, about being trans--if there's nothing special about being attracted to and romantically engaged with a trans person--then there's no more need to appeal to explanation with regard to Marten's sexuality than there is for Dora's, or Tai's, or Steve's, or Faye's...

Second point first: I don't think it necessarily needs to be explained (as I mentioned). That's their business, not ours. To your first point... No, you wouldn't look to Faye's childhood for clues about her approach to her sexuality. But if you were talking about her trust issues? Her alcoholism? At least one, maybe two, suicide attempts? Her casual disrespect for boundaries? The (thankfully toned down) violence? It'd be silly not to. Ditto, say, Hanners' issues, or Dora's complicated relationship with her brother and her parents (among other things). In other words, when a character's perception, attitudes and actions are clearly influenced by their past, it can be useful to examine that past and how it colors the present, and that's something that isn't in any way exclusive to sexuality. If we were talking about, say, Marten's taste in beer, then I'd agree with you that it's silly (unless there's some heretofore unexplored link between a spanking and a ten-minute IPA, in which case I take that back). But we're not, and to think that he'd have grown up around the kinds of people he did would have no impact on how he thinks about Claire seems to me a bit short-sighted.

I didn't say anything about no impacts. You seem to be having an argument with someone who isn't here.

What I said was, right or wrong, bucky's questioning of Marten's sexuality was no more  or less clangy than people looking for a reason to justify Marten's sexuality. I'm not saying putting two and two together and getting "fluid," is verboten. But then neither was buckys POV verboten. Just factually incorrect.

All things being equal, given what we know, questions about what Claire has in her pants are valid by your logic. That two and two are present doesn't justify adding them. If Marten represented as a person historically oppressed for his sexuality, discussion about how his mom's job made him queer would definitely be considered bad taste.

My argument is not for "equal rights for straight people."  My argument is that the discussion boils down to "What turned Marten queer?" just using different labels. Given the history of oppression that line of thinking has created, I find the discussion to be in bad taste.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 08 Feb 2015, 15:23
and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on [snip] This is just empty pandering.

I don't think Jeph panders to social justice, because he's been for it before it was really a thing. Way back when Tai would bind her chest Marten asked if he was using the right pronouns. The strip was just a few years old then. Granted there may have been jokes he wouldn't tell today (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1300), but on the whole he's been pro lgbt long before it was really a thing that could get him website hits. Even Claire's introduction was probably ahead of that curve.

I don't think he's pandering. But if he *is* it's to the shippers rather than social justice.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 15:26
Are you suggesting there won't be any more penis jokes in the comic? That's it, it was fun guys, but I'm out.

There will still be butt jokes right? Okay I'm back in.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 08 Feb 2015, 15:34
I don't think he's pandering. But if he *is* it's to the shippers rather than social justice.

In the case of Marten x Claire? Specific story elements, maybe, but I suspect that some relationship between her and a character was going to happen the moment that she was introduced, really, and not for social justice reasons, but because Jeph doesn't seem to want to constantly crap on any character - not even Marten. And, really, who else was it going to be? There's not many male characters in the comic (and Claire's not been depicted as anything other than straight), adding one just to be Claire's love interest would be a bit screwy, and Marten was, I believe, the only single one.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: demency on 08 Feb 2015, 15:49
I feel like I need to mention, as a trans woman - regardless of what genital configuration Claire may currently have, and regardless of whether or not she plans to some day have bottom surgery - which is, of course, none of our business - she is a *woman*. A man who sleeps with a trans woman in no way, shape, or form stops being straight, *regardless* of the genital configuration of that woman. Whatever she has downstairs, they're a *woman's* genitals, and last I checked, when a man and a woman have sex, that's usually considered pretty straight. Whatever Claire and Marten get up to, unless they invite a third person, it will be straight sex.

Sorry for the whole big speech, I just didn't see anybody getting this point across, and it was really important to me. I get a little militant on that point, because too many men are shamed by their friends and peers, and have their heterosexuality and identity questioned or mocked, if they date or sleep with a trans woman. It not only keeps too many of my sisters cold on lonely nights, it can also be a major driver for violence against us.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 08 Feb 2015, 16:07
Could Marten get any more empty as a character? I mean, the guy's been presented as a straight man (as in the archetype) and a straight man (as in the sexuality) for the entirety of the comic, and now he's suddenly down with dating a transgendered person, which happens to come right around the time that trans* issues are gaining real traction in the social justice community? Come on. I've dated a trans*person in the past, and the first time we got naked, it was treated with much more dignity and care than it was given here. "You're beautiful"? I'll take Things That a 16 Year Old Says When Losing His Virginity for $200, Alex. This is just empty pandering.

So what are you saying, that a straight man can't find a trans woman attractive? Or that a trans woman isn't really a woman, then?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 16:18
I feel like I need to mention, as a trans woman - regardless of what genital configuration Claire may currently have, and regardless of whether or not she plans to some day have bottom surgery - which is, of course, none of our business - she is a *woman*. A man who sleeps with a trans woman in no way, shape, or form stops being straight, *regardless* of the genital configuration of that woman. Whatever she has downstairs, they're a *woman's* genitals, and last I checked, when a man and a woman have sex, that's usually considered pretty straight. Whatever Claire and Marten get up to, unless they invite a third person, it will be straight sex.

Sorry for the whole big speech, I just didn't see anybody getting this point across, and it was really important to me. I get a little militant on that point, because too many men are shamed by their friends and peers, and have their heterosexuality and identity questioned or mocked, if they date or sleep with a trans woman. It not only keeps too many of my sisters cold on lonely nights, it can also be a major driver for violence against us.

That only works if everyone uses your definition of straight. Not that the world wouldn't be a better place if that was the only definition of straight, but it isn't.

The best metaphor I have right now is if you label a hand gun as a weapon of mass destruction. You might really believe it is just that, but you shouldn't be surprised when the UN Security Council doesn't offer you a permanent seat because you've got one.

Of course, the metaphor breaks down because there's a real, practical difference between a hand gun and a WMD. Where the differences between what straight means to you and the next person are only artifacts of your thought processes. They aren't any more real than the label "straight" is really a thing.

Identity is personal. It's next to meaningless to the rest of the world. This really issue isn't a matter of how you define "woman." I'd say writing it off so simply is unfair to do define their sexuality by genital structure. It suggests that there is something wrong with their sexuality. A person with (literally) no interest is dick isn't going to suddenly gain an interest because a dick's owner identifies as a woman. The same goes for pussy and identification as a man. There are limits.

The issue is, ultimately, that everyone tends to think that their definition of "straight" (Lesbian, gay, bi, queer, trans) is THE definition. Everyone is wrong. There is no one definition. Just seven billion identities in conflict with a handful of false culutral norms.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 08 Feb 2015, 16:31
I don't think he's pandering. But if he *is* it's to the shippers rather than social justice.

[...] but because Jeph doesn't seem to want to constantly crap on any character - not even Marten.

Didn't Jeph say early on that Marten will never be allowed to be happy? Was this akin to a sort of 'mission statement' for the comic, or more of a reflection of his own personal emotional state and how he relates (related?) to Marten as a character?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 08 Feb 2015, 16:37
It seems that Marten's and Faye's happinesses are inversely related. For Marten to be happy, Faye must be sad, and vice versa. We should get Hannelore to instruct us on how to solve the Fourier-Goldman Equation for this situation.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 16:39
I crunched the numbers and I keep coming back to puppies and/or kittens.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: demency on 08 Feb 2015, 16:41
Identity is personal. It's next to meaningless to the rest of the world. This really issue isn't a matter of how you define "woman." I'd say writing it off so simply is unfair to do define their sexuality by genital structure. It suggests that there is something wrong with their sexuality. A person with (literally) no interest is dick isn't going to suddenly gain an interest because a dick's owner identifies as a woman. The same goes for pussy and identification as a man. There are limits.

The issue is, ultimately, that everyone tends to think that their definition of "straight" (Lesbian, gay, bi, queer, trans) is THE definition. Everyone is wrong. There is no one definition. Just seven billion identities in conflict with a handful of false culutral norms.

That's... literally totally not relevant to what I was saying. No where was I attempting to state that anyone *has* to want to sleep with the owner of any particular set of genitals - in fact, you're coming at it from 180 degrees in the opposite direction. I have no interest in getting involved in the politics of *that* discussion, except to say that I consider it perfectly reasonable for someone to say, about their own preferences only, "I have no interest in X type of genitals". There's nothing oppressive about that.

What I said is that if a straight man is attracted to a straight trans woman, that straight man does not become bisexual or queer, simply if the straight trans woman has a penis. That is the only point I was making. Regardless of what genitals Claire has, if Marten is straight now, he will be just as straight in the morning, if they make love.

edit: I apologize if this comes across as overly confrontational or argumentative, that's not necessary. It's just a little frustrating, because when I try to make this point in other places, it almost always, as it did here, invariably goes straight to "you can't tell someone to be attracted to X genitals or Y genitals!" No, of course not, and I'm not *trying* to. And yet, that's almost always the first, immediate response.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 08 Feb 2015, 16:53
I'm pretty sure that was a joke. And, that's why I said constantly crap on any character - it's far more brutal to ruin happiness by not actually giving Marten any lasting happiness, just fleeting chances at it, than just keeping him constantly down.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 16:55
I feel like I need to mention, as a trans woman - regardless of what genital configuration Claire may currently have, and regardless of whether or not she plans to some day have bottom surgery - which is, of course, none of our business - she is a *woman*. A man who sleeps with a trans woman in no way, shape, or form stops being straight, *regardless* of the genital configuration of that woman. Whatever she has downstairs, they're a *woman's* genitals, and last I checked, when a man and a woman have sex, that's usually considered pretty straight. Whatever Claire and Marten get up to, unless they invite a third person, it will be straight sex.

(regular user)Well said.(/)
Administrator Comment That's the official position of forum management as well.
(regular user)Was this all just a poor choice of words? Marten has in fact been pretty whitebread in his sexuality, judging from his porn collection and what Dora said. Of course he's in a het relationship now. It is also one that imposed on him a duty to be open-minded in a way that was not foreshadowed in the first couple of thousand strips.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 08 Feb 2015, 17:16
I crunched the numbers and I keep coming back to puppies and/or kittens.
I'm pretty sure the correct solution is:

(http://i.imgur.com/95Vu5cW.png)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Silverzippo on 08 Feb 2015, 17:38
(Funny how this last update got people to register, huh? :) Yeah I'm one of those people.)

Note that the below is my opinion, not what I want changed, not what I believe should be different and not a message telling anyone they're wrong.

Since genuine AI's are part of the comic universe, Marten being so open minded is not exactly pushing my suspension of disbelief, but it does get a bit confusing when so much of the comic is relatable to what's going on in the real world, at least socially.
Were it in real life, I'd say he's being open minded to a fault, where he prioritizes the opinions of others over his own self. I'd say this is definitely one of his faults, but I can't give an example off-hand. Basically, it's not super believable but I'm okay with it.

From my own experience as a bisexual (pansexual for those who feel the distinction is necessary), I had a few moments of doubt and more than a bit of awkwardness when I was with a pre-op transwoman for the first time. Marten just being cool with it seems... off.
I guess you could chalk it up to being confident or truly accepting, but I really think that for him it's another sign of low confidence where he just goes with the flow and suppresses what he might really feel.

On another note, I would've found it more interesting if he chickened out then and there. For one, it would make him more interesting and second, it's okay to admit that you've made a mistake (as in telling Claire that he's been cool with it, when he's not, but not knowing until that moment).

Either way, it's been a nice development that I've enjoyed a lot. At the very least it's an interesting topic to discuss!

-

Since I don't know much about Jeph; Is Marten an extension of himself?
I don't know if this is a thing or not, I'm curious.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 08 Feb 2015, 17:46
I'm still wondering why Marten's orientation, much less anyone else's in the strip, matters. 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Aziraphale on 08 Feb 2015, 17:51
RF: Okay, maybe not fluidity, since you find that "clangy".

I don't find applying labels to Marten clangy. I find the need to justify his choices by appealing to his childhood clangy. As in, nobody is appealing to Faye's childhood to justify her straightness.

If there's nothing special, on a fundamental level, about being trans--if there's nothing special about being attracted to and romantically engaged with a trans person--then there's no more need to appeal to explanation with regard to Marten's sexuality than there is for Dora's, or Tai's, or Steve's, or Faye's...

Second point first: I don't think it necessarily needs to be explained (as I mentioned). That's their business, not ours. To your first point... No, you wouldn't look to Faye's childhood for clues about her approach to her sexuality. But if you were talking about her trust issues? Her alcoholism? At least one, maybe two, suicide attempts? Her casual disrespect for boundaries? The (thankfully toned down) violence? It'd be silly not to. Ditto, say, Hanners' issues, or Dora's complicated relationship with her brother and her parents (among other things). In other words, when a character's perception, attitudes and actions are clearly influenced by their past, it can be useful to examine that past and how it colors the present, and that's something that isn't in any way exclusive to sexuality. If we were talking about, say, Marten's taste in beer, then I'd agree with you that it's silly (unless there's some heretofore unexplored link between a spanking and a ten-minute IPA, in which case I take that back). But we're not, and to think that he'd have grown up around the kinds of people he did would have no impact on how he thinks about Claire seems to me a bit short-sighted.

I didn't say anything about no impacts. You seem to be having an argument with someone who isn't here.

What I said was, right or wrong, bucky's questioning of Marten's sexuality was no more  or less clangy than people looking for a reason to justify Marten's sexuality. I'm not saying putting two and two together and getting "fluid," is verboten. But then neither was buckys POV verboten. Just factually incorrect.

All things being equal, given what we know, questions about what Claire has in her pants are valid by your logic. That two and two are present doesn't justify adding them. If Marten represented as a person historically oppressed for his sexuality, discussion about how his mom's job made him queer would definitely be considered bad taste.

My argument is not for "equal rights for straight people."  My argument is that the discussion boils down to "What turned Marten queer?" just using different labels. Given the history of oppression that line of thinking has created, I find the discussion to be in bad taste.

Lemme try this again, since A: I don't seem to be making myself very clear, and B: each of us seems to be talking somewhat past the other. I know that isn't my intention, and I don't think it's yours either.

Not going to bite on the "what makes someone (fill in the blank)". I come down pretty firmly on the side of nature, not nurture. If you want to discuss that further, this probably isn't the best place for that (and I'll let you know in advance that you're not likely to change my mind on that point). But then, that wasn't my point.

Neither was my point that we should speculate on Claire's genitalia. As you'll no doubt have noticed in my previous two postings on this, and which I'll repeat a third time for emphasis, that's between Marten and Claire.

I'm not arguing "equal rights for straight people," either. We've already got plenty, thanks, and the larger issue, I still think, is getting everyone else to a point where they have the same rights I've already got, whether it's marriage or the simple right to exist without risk of physical harm (or worse) on the basis of their mere existence.

I'm also not looking, or asking, for some kind of "justification" of anyone's sexual expression. Here, as elsewhere, as long as it's among consenting adults and everybody respects everybody else's boundaries, it's all good.

And at the same time, I'm not arguing for Marten's suddenly having become pan, bi or queer (absent Word of Jeph). Yeah, he's straight, period. But as we've already seen on the forums (and as I'm sure you've seen outside them, same as I have), and as we could reasonably infer from the comic, people do tend to think about sex. A lot. Like, a lot a lot. It wouldn't be unreasonable, then, to figure that Marten's thought, or is thinking through, some of the possibilities as far as where things are going with Claire, as well as the impact of that on both their lives. Also, for as much of a non-issue as Claire's trans-ness apparently is to Marten, we'd have reason to believe -- based on repeated and frankly dismaying real-life evidence, as well as allusions in-comic by Clinton -- that it may not be quite as much a non-issue to those Marten knows, and that may also factor into his thinking. While I'd wager most of his friends would be as accepting as he is, all it takes is one person to fuck things up for everybody.

Hope this clarifies things somewhat.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: wlewisiii on 08 Feb 2015, 17:55
I crunched the numbers and I keep coming back to puppies and/or kittens.
I'm pretty sure the correct solution is:

(http://i.imgur.com/95Vu5cW.png)

And here I thought the solution to that equation _had_ to be 42...  8-)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 08 Feb 2015, 17:56
Since I don't know much about Jeph; Is Marten an extension of himself?
I don't know if this is a thing or not, I'm curious.

He said once that he used to be, but that he's grown into a different person than Marten over time.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Silverzippo on 08 Feb 2015, 18:25
I'm still wondering why Marten's orientation, much less anyone else's in the strip, matters. 

So while I can't answer this on behalf of others, I'll give you my reason.

It's nice to know if you (like me) are relating to the character. As I wrote above, this is much different from my reaction to a similar situation, so there's obviously some discord between the character and my own experience.

I sort of get why you wrote what you did, because in a perfect world there's no reason to put people into boxes or label them as anything. We have a big pride parade in my city every year and personally I find it sort of distasteful, mostly because I don't relate to the garish colors and over-the-top celebration of everything "gay", when my wish in life is to be just accepted as another human being, not a token stereotype (which some people happen to fit, which is fine, but not a good representation of all of us).
There's no harm in discussing it though, especially if it breeds understanding between people :)

Someone wrote that their sexuality is none of our business, which I absolutely do not understand. They're fictional characters, there for us to discuss and relate to. Unless they are direct representations of real people that Jeph knows, there is no harm in asking about any of it.

Discouraging debate seems very counter productive to me.
I do not understand why anyone would take offense at this, but I'd like to.

He said once that he used to be, but that he's grown into a different person than Marten over time.

Thank you :D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Feb 2015, 18:48
Parts of all of his characters are autobiographical, to a certain point.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TieDyeKat on 08 Feb 2015, 18:50
Fair enough... it may simply be a matter of different views on the subject, personal upbringing or whatever.  I think Marten's a chill frood and his "buh" Good Guy Marten personality combined with his upbringing pretty much cancels out the need to tick a particular box for his sexuality.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 08 Feb 2015, 18:54
I'm still wondering why Marten's orientation, much less anyone else's in the strip, matters. 

Someone wrote that their sexuality is none of our business, which I absolutely do not understand. They're fictional characters, there for us to discuss and relate to. Unless they are direct representations of real people that Jeph knows, there is no harm in asking about any of it.

Discouraging debate seems very counter productive to me.
I do not understand why anyone would take offense at this, but I'd like to.

I think that while yes, they are fictional characters that don't -specifically- represent specific people, they do, in a way, become a relatable representation for some people. So while the characters themselves are fictional, the emotions that people attach to them are very real, and so react poorly when the character's sense of propriety and privacy is potentially violated, which in turn makes them feel violated by proxy. When they see people discussing things that would be rude if it was in regards to real people, the feelings and emotions of those who have attached emotions to a character and qualities that they find similar and can relate to are often just as offput when those same discussions are had about said character.

I probably explained that poorly.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Silverzippo on 08 Feb 2015, 19:13

I think that while yes, they are fictional characters that don't -specifically- represent specific people, they do, in a way, become a relatable representation for some people. So while the characters themselves are fictional, the emotions that people attach to them are very real, and so react poorly when the character's sense of propriety and privacy is potentially violated, which in turn makes them feel violated by proxy. When they see people discussing things that would be rude if it was in regards to real people, the feelings and emotions of those who have attached emotions to a character and qualities that they find similar and can relate to are often just as offput when those same discussions are had about said character.

I probably explained that poorly.

It makes sense, thanks. It's sort of when a person criticizes someones brand of [item] and they take it personally because it reflects on them.
Eventually it happens to everyone in one way or another, but I get that this can be more delicate than discussing iphones and androids :D

This is sort of a bad cycle issue. I can say that I mean no offense, but I could also take offense at someone accusing me of being intentionally or unintentionally offensive.
It's generally easier to assume that people mean well and at worst ignorant. It's impossible to take responsibility for what others feel or to expect others to put the same values on those feelings.

Either way, I respect that it might be the case. I just hope people show the same courtesy and agree to disagree.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 19:18
>It's nice to know if you (like me) are relating to the character.

Fair enough, but I can relate to the characters no matter who they fall in love with.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Silverzippo on 08 Feb 2015, 19:39
>It's nice to know if you (like me) are relating to the character.

Fair enough, but I can relate to the characters no matter who they fall in love with.

Alright, that's an aspect I hadn't considered; Love conquers all, including sexual preference or identity. Sure, why not. Love is certainly a powerful element.
(Some would take offense at this though, and might feel that it cheapens their identity. It can be seen as the "choose to be [insert sexuality]" argument. I'm not trying to put words into your mouth here though, that's just one way of looking at it.)

I'm not entirely convinced that this is love. It might as well that Marten is trying to live up to his idealization of a relationship between them.
It just occurred to me that I could be projecting, since I've experienced a few occasions where I've lied to myself about who I am, in order to make a relationship work.

Regardless, until there's an official statement (if ever) I'd say most guesses are valid and we'll just see what happens :D
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 19:45
Hope this clarifies things somewhat.

Nope. Not at all.

Not one thing I said has anything to do with the things you just said. Which raises the question of why addressed any of this as reply to my comments at all. I stated that to discuss the causes of Marten's current sexuality was clangy. You defended it as not clangy. I illustrated exactly why there's an issue. To repeat, if a queer person's sexuality were given the same treatment it would be problematic at best.

If you aren't going to discuss what makes someone's orientation--which I just pointed as being THE problem--why defend that discussion?
Who said your point was discussion of Claire's genitals? I said you were defending a point using logic that could be applied to Claire. If it doesn't justify a discussion of Claire, it doesn't justify a discussion of the causes of Marten's sexuality. Goose v. Gander, et al.

I could go on, but I won't. Talking past doesn't begin to capture the situation. If anything I'd said could reasonably be construed to run counter to anything you've said in this post, I guess there might be a point.

Whether people like to think about sex is irrelevant. The link I posted in response to Bucky says all that needs saying on the subject--assuming the subject even applies to Marten. http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1024

Just because it's fun to think about doesn't mean it's a proper subject of discussion--especially vis-a-vis Marten's childhood. Marten has as much stated everything anyone needs to know to understand anything that might be relevant, if there's anything relevant.


That's... literally totally not relevant to what I was saying.

You said:
I get a little militant on that point, because too many men are shamed by their friends and peers, and have their heterosexuality and identity questioned or mocked, if they date or sleep with a trans woman. It not only keeps too many of my sisters cold on lonely nights, it can also be a major driver for violence against us.

To define, or attempt to redefine "straight" in the manner you suggest creates exactly the issue I pointed out. It leads, ultimately, to situation where those who don't conform to that definition are open to being mocked or otherwise shat upon for something that isn't in their control.

I did not say you advocated anything. I pointed out the consequences of the idea.

The problem is not in how whatever label you choose is defined. The problem is that people feel justified in using emotional and physical violence when someone fails to fit into their personal definitions of what those labels mean. Frankly, no one has any right to question anyone else's sexuality. If Marten being straight--which isn't something I recall him actually saying--is an issue for someone, given how little we actually know, I'd say that someone has a personal problem and should keep it personal. First, Marten isn't real. Second, if he were, it's no one's business what he gets up to except for the consenting adults he gets up to it with.

If we knew something that made the question of penes that are not part of Marten Reed relevant, it's still no one's business, and anyone having issue with whether Marten continued to label himself straight would be doing so out butthurt that Marten wasn't using their definition.

That's kinda pathetic. But it's patheticness isn't exactly the point. The point is, it's that butthurt that leads to the negative consequences you describe.

There's no slippery slope argument about a world where people with hetero-genital attraction are vilified and have to hide in closets. That's not the point I'm making. The point I'm making is that what is attracted to, and how a person goes about defining that attraction is pretty much individual to that person. I pointed out the issue of interest in the equipment in order to show how the idea expressed fell short of the intent. I then expressed a different idea--namely that everyone should mind their own damned business about sexual orientation--which I believe doesn't fall short.

I don't expect anyone to mind their own business. I'm a realist. But the fact that people don't costs lives. And that's a terrible thing.

Of course, the list of terrible things is long, and the general obstinance of humanity in clinging to that list makes me want to slit my fucking wrists. But that's not really on topic.

Someone wrote that their sexuality is none of our business, which I absolutely do not understand. They're fictional characters, there for us to discuss and relate to. Unless they are direct representations of real people that Jeph knows, there is no harm in asking about any of it.

Discouraging debate seems very counter productive to me.

Claire's private parts are fictional. It is the policy of this board that they aren't open for discussion. Claire is, to our knowledge, not a representation of any real person.

There are reasons Claire's equipment list is topic non-grata. I'm not going into them. But those reasons do apply to discussions relating to why a person's sexual orientation is what it is. They probably apply more deeply, but I've only been talking about that part of it, so that's the part I'm going to stick with.

There's a long and storied history of terrible things being done because people believe sexuality can be traced back to root cause. That belief is a bad thing.

I see no issue is wonder IF Marten is straight or bi or something else, at least until Marten unequivocally chooses a label. At that point I see no isse in wondering and discussing what that label means to Marten. But I see a fairly large issue in trying to define why Marten is whatever Marten is, unless Marten opens the door for that discussion.

Why give a fictional character that level of agency? Practice. How you treat a fictional character influences how you treat real people. We aren't talking about something as black and white as murder. Most of us know that killing the video game character is not practice for killing real people. Most of us have strong counter urges against murdering people. But respecting the sexuality of others doesn't have the same level of internal rejection. It's not something we practice. Given that the majority of (basically) heterosexual people is so vast, many of us will not get a lot of real world practice. But fiction let's us meet different kinds of people than we might otherwise. It's just good policy to practice on them.

Especially when that fiction puts you in a forum of fans, because odds are people who are like those fictional people will be party to your discussions. Whether people who are trans "should" take discussion of Claire's equipment personally or not is beside the point. They are here, and they do. The same applies to anyone else who might find one of the characters representative.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 19:48
Hmm! Worth thinking about.

Marten's as vulnerable to self-deception as any human, but it's noteworthy that "You're beautiful" came out when he was tired out, wrung out, and probably speaking directly from his gut.

Also Jeph seems to be pursuing themes of acceptance and inclusion. It's more in line with his apparent goals if he has Marten being sincere.

EDIT for clarity: this was in reply to Silverzippo's "It might as well that Marten is trying to live up to his idealization of a relationship between them. "
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 20:25
It is also [a relationship] that imposed on him a duty to be open-minded in a way that was not foreshadowed in the first couple of thousand strips.

What?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 08 Feb 2015, 20:40
There are good reasons that Marten simply said that Claire was beautiful.  He's no wordsmith.  He's awkward as hell, even though he has a large comfort-zone.  All he knows right now is that that he's into her, she's into him, and they care for each other very much.  As readers, what do we need to know beside him and Claire breaking out of the comfy space and into new territory?  Nothing, save what we see.  This ship has been a while in building, and is probably strong, even if icebergs end up showing up along the road.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 20:47
It is also [a relationship] that imposed on him a duty to be open-minded in a way that was not foreshadowed in the first couple of thousand strips.

What?

We didn't know that he was going to be trans-positive. Now he has to be, both to be a decent human being and to return Claire's love.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 20:51
Strip 1024 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1024) makes it absolutely clear that Marten doesn't have a problem sleeping with penis-havers, he has a problem sleeping with men. In other words, his particular flavor of straightness has nothing to do with genitals and everything to do with gender presentation. Claire x Marten may seem to be forced for a lot of reasons, but contradicting Marten's on-panel statements about his sexuality is absolutely not one of them.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Silverzippo on 08 Feb 2015, 20:53
Someone wrote that their sexuality is none of our business, which I absolutely do not understand. They're fictional characters, there for us to discuss and relate to. Unless they are direct representations of real people that Jeph knows, there is no harm in asking about any of it.

Discouraging debate seems very counter productive to me.

Claire's private parts are fictional. It is the policy of this board that they aren't open for discussion. Claire is, to our knowledge, not a representation of any real person.

There are reasons Claire's equipment list is topic non-grata. I'm not going into them. But those reasons do apply to discussions relating to why a person's sexual orientation is what it is. They probably apply more deeply, but I've only been talking about that part of it, so that's the part I'm going to stick with.

There's a long and storied history of terrible things being done because people believe sexuality can be traced back to root cause. That belief is a bad thing.

I see no issue is wonder IF Marten is straight or bi or something else, at least until Marten unequivocally chooses a label. At that point I see no isse in wondering and discussing what that label means to Marten. But I see a fairly large issue in trying to define why Marten is whatever Marten is, unless Marten opens the door for that discussion.

Why give a fictional character that level of agency? Practice. How you treat a fictional character influences how you treat real people. We aren't talking about something as black and white as murder. Most of us know that killing the video game character is not practice for killing real people. Most of us have strong counter urges against murdering people. But respecting the sexuality of others doesn't have the same level of internal rejection. It's not something we practice. Given that the majority of (basically) heterosexual people is so vast, many of us will not get a lot of real world practice. But fiction let's us meet different kinds of people than we might otherwise. It's just good policy to practice on them.

Especially when that fiction puts you in a forum of fans, because odds are people who are like those fictional people will be party to your discussions. Whether people who are trans "should" take discussion of Claire's equipment personally or not is beside the point. They are here, and they do. The same applies to anyone else who might find one of the characters representative.

Alright, board policy is board policy. Thank you for the explanation.

I find some of your reasoning flawed:
It bears the assumption that certain people deserve unmitigated respect regardless of their character and only based on certain aspects of them (gender, sexuality, race, political orientation or what have you), to the point where it can discourage something as simple as asking a question.
It breeds ignorance, which is the biggest problem we have when it comes to discrimination. It discourages personal responsibility and it promotes treating people like victims, which is ultimately detrimental to people with low self esteem.

I will afford people common courtesy, but I will not grant them the luxury of special privilege based on potentially hurt feelings. This is unacceptable to me and a shallow, worthless gesture that ultimately pays them no respect.

-

On a lighter note, it seems the continuation of the comic lays most of my questions to rest.

I'd like to thank the people who responded to me and answered the few questions I had, but I'll move on. Skimming some of the content I've realized that this forum is not for me :)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Dalillama on 08 Feb 2015, 21:11

I see no issue is wonder IF Marten is straight or bi or something else, at least until Marten unequivocally chooses a label. At that point I see no isse in wondering and discussing what that label means to Marten. But I see a fairly large issue in trying to define why Marten is whatever Marten is, unless Marten opens the door for that discussion.
He bloody well has.  He's a dude, he's into ladies, he's not into dudes.  There's a word for dudes like that.  That word is heterosexual (or, to use the modern* slang, 'straight').

* I specify modern because straight has had other meanings in the past, such as 'not a user of recreational drugs' and 'not a member of the counterculture'.

Fair enough... it may simply be a matter of different views on the subject, personal upbringing or whatever.  I think Marten's a chill frood and his "buh" Good Guy Marten personality combined with his upbringing pretty much cancels out the need to tick a particular box for his sexuality.
Marten is straight/heterosexual.  He is a dude, he is into ladies, he is not into dudes.  That is what straight means for a dude.


From my own experience as a bisexual (pansexual for those who feel the distinction is necessary), I had a few moments of doubt and more than a bit of awkwardness when I was with a pre-op transwoman for the first time. Marten just being cool with it seems... off.

Speaking as another bisexual, I'm afraid that's your personal hangup, not a matter of orientation per se.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 08 Feb 2015, 21:23
Why would he have made a move on her if he had any lingering doubts about whether he'd be okay with her body? He knew she was trans. He had months to consider whether it would be an issue before they got undressed, and they only got there after he (1) invited her home, (2) made a move, (3) asked her to date him, (4) explicitly told her he was okay with her being trans after she gave him a chance to bail out, (5) invited her over again, (6) threw himself at her, and (7) took her into his bedroom?

I don't see how you could actually read the strip and still have the slightest degree of suspense over whether he would chicken out at the last minute, unless you are coming from the position that trans bodies are so weird and alienating that they would scare off any self-declared straight boy, even after he had made every possible indication over thousands of strips that he did not give the tiniest fuck.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 08 Feb 2015, 21:38
Given the content on the current strip, I hope that they both gave a mutual *really good* fuck.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Half Empty Coffee Cup on 08 Feb 2015, 21:38
Why would he have made a move on her if he had any lingering doubts about whether he'd be okay with her body? He knew she was trans. He had months to consider whether it would be an issue before they got undressed, and they only got there after he (1) invited her home, (2) made a move, (3) asked her to date him, (4) explicitly told her he was okay with her being trans after she gave him a chance to bail out, (5) invited her over again, (6) threw himself at her, and (7) took her into his bedroom?

I don't see how you could actually read the strip and still have the slightest degree of suspense over whether he would chicken out at the last minute, unless you are coming from the position that trans bodies are so weird and alienating that they would scare off any self-declared straight boy, even after he had made every possible indication over thousands of strips that he did not give the tiniest fuck.
(http://media.giphy.com/media/kS1aph1nPE1lm/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 08 Feb 2015, 22:03
Alright, board policy is board policy. Thank you for the explanation.

I find some of your reasoning flawed:
It bears the assumption that certain people deserve unmitigated respect regardless of their character and only based on certain aspects of them (gender, sexuality, race, political orientation or what have you), to the point where it can discourage something as simple as asking a question.
It breeds ignorance, which is the biggest problem we have when it comes to discrimination. It discourages personal responsibility and it promotes treating people like victims, which is ultimately detrimental to people with low self esteem.

Just to note, this forum does have a space for those kind of discussions, it is just not the WCDT. It is the Trans* thread in Discuss. In fact, there are three trans threads at this point, take your pick. But we are also not interested in going in conversation circles, so please at least skim the beginning of the thread, I would be surprised if your questions aren't answered.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 22:15
He bloody well has.  He's a dude, he's into ladies, he's not into dudes.  There's a word for dudes like that.  That word is heterosexual (or, to use the modern* slang, 'straight').

That's your word for Marten's whatever. Marten might choose "taco." What are you gonna do about it? Send a strongly worded letter?

You make my point for me. What label you choose and what label Marten might choose aren't necessarily the same thing. In the end, it doesn't matter. Unless you want to make something of it.

Seriously. Marten could label his sexuality God-Emperor and it wouldn't actually change anything beyond a bunch of people who are hell bent on being able to define straight being left with nothing to hate on or applaud. My point being that if people weren't so hung up on labels, there'd be a lot less conflict over who is fucking whom. Which is one of the dumbest thing in the world for life-ending conflicts.

It bears the assumption that certain people deserve unmitigated respect regardless of their character and only based on certain aspects of them (gender, sexuality, race, political orientation or what have you), to the point where it can discourage something as simple as asking a question.
It breeds ignorance, which is the biggest problem we have when it comes to discrimination. It discourages personal responsibility and it promotes treating people like victims, which is ultimately detrimental to people with low self esteem.

I don't see the link between "don't ask questions about private stuff unless the subject opens the door" and breeding ignorance. There's plenty of information out there for people who bother to look. There are people here willing to address the roots of some questions. Indeed, there's a whole internet. Most of the questions that crop up in the WCDT could have been answered by google, with a lot less typing and far less waiting. Those that can't actually have a place.

But there are some questions that are indistinguishable from troll bait. Sure you could be honestly curious. Or you could be visiting from 4chan. Who's to know?

I fail to see anything personally responsible about an attitude that says "my curiosity is more important than anyone else's feelings." In fact, it strikes me as exactly the opposite of personal responsibility. Nobody has been banned, shamed, or attacked for asking questions here. Just told whether the question was appropriate given the "mission" of this section of the forums and the rules for acceptable topics. I doubt it's going to happen. Most folks will either guide to answers, or explain the issues behind the question. Those that won't generally say nothing. But the fundamental reason Claire's bits are not an acceptable topic is to protect people's feelings based on gender. If you can't get behind that, you're in the wrong forum.

Even barring flamebait, there's nothing responsible about demanding answers when people don't want to give them. That's just entitlement. Rather than going somewhere the question is welcome, what justifies making some kind of stand or something to try to force people to give you what you want? This is the first time I've seen anyone ever make that out to be for the greater good.

Sure, the world would be a better place if all the activists of any stripe were open to educating every n00b who wandered along with a question they've heard 10,000 times--assuming the n00bs actually listened to and absorbed the answers. But the activists aren't always willing. And you can't force them to be. But you can't put that unwillingness down as the root of discrimination. The root of discrimination is people feeling entitled to be assholes. Pure and simple. If people didn't feel the need to make others suffer in order to boost their own self esteem, there'd be few--if any--problems.

Edit: typos
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 08 Feb 2015, 22:52
Why would he have made a move on her if he had any lingering doubts about whether he'd be okay with her body? He knew she was trans. He had months to consider whether it would be an issue before they got undressed, and they only got there after he (1) invited her home, (2) made a move, (3) asked her to date him, (4) explicitly told her he was okay with her being trans after she gave him a chance to bail out, (5) invited her over again, (6) threw himself at her, and (7) took her into his bedroom?

I don't see how you could actually read the strip and still have the slightest degree of suspense over whether he would chicken out at the last minute, unless you are coming from the position that trans bodies are so weird and alienating that they would scare off any self-declared straight boy, even after he had made every possible indication over thousands of strips that he did not give the tiniest fuck.

Marten is clearly the kind of guy who's not going to freak out over it. And we're after the fact now and it's obviously worked out between them fine. But I don't know if you can answer the question of compatibility beforehand. Like, if it were me. Can I find a transgirl attractive? Yes, absolutely. Would things work in the bedroom? I have no idea. None. And I wouldn't be able to figure it out with introspection. I'd hope so, especially if it was someone I cared about. But the only way for me to know with certainty is to try and see.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Feb 2015, 23:07
Quote from: Silverzippo
I will afford people common courtesy, but I will not grant them the luxury of special privilege based on potentially hurt feelings.

OK, but then you have to figure out what constitutes common courtesy in uncommon situations. Usually it includes not knowingly hurting people's feelings.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 08 Feb 2015, 23:15
Why would he have made a move on her if he had any lingering doubts about whether he'd be okay with her body? He knew she was trans. He had months to consider whether it would be an issue before they got undressed, and they only got there after he (1) invited her home, (2) made a move, (3) asked her to date him, (4) explicitly told her he was okay with her being trans after she gave him a chance to bail out, (5) invited her over again, (6) threw himself at her, and (7) took her into his bedroom?

I don't see how you could actually read the strip and still have the slightest degree of suspense over whether he would chicken out at the last minute, unless you are coming from the position that trans bodies are so weird and alienating that they would scare off any self-declared straight boy, even after he had made every possible indication over thousands of strips that he did not give the tiniest fuck.

Marten is clearly the kind of guy who's not going to freak out over it. And we're after the fact now and it's obviously worked out between them fine. But I don't know if you can answer the question of compatibility beforehand. Like, if it were me. Can I find a transgirl attractive? Yes, absolutely. Would things work in the bedroom? I have no idea. None. And I wouldn't be able to figure it out with introspection. I'd hope so, especially if it was someone I cared about. But the only way for me to know with certainty is to try and see.

Somebody once said the most profound thing I've ever encountered about sexuality. Basically, this guy said he didn't know if he was bi. He'd never met a man he wanted to have sex with, but he couldn't rule the possibility out just because it hadn't happened yet. It was profound, to me, because it has to be true of everyone who is A) capable of engaging in sex, B) not experienced in certain combinations, and C) not dead (which is really just a special case of A).

I'm not saying everyone should abandon their labels.  I'm not ever sure I agree with the logic. But the conclusion is fascinating. It raises the issue of how much of attraction is representation. I've heard the odd story from women who experimented and found that they couldn't manage to go all the way. This strikes me as the inverse of the profound statement. By their own words the attraction was there, the idea was exciting, but the act wasn't in their power or didn't live up to their imagination.

On the filpside, it all worked out for our heroes.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Feb 2015, 00:36
Quote from: Silverzippo
to the point where it can discourage something as simple as asking a question.

Not all questions are created equal. "How do trans people know whether reassignment surgery is right for them?" is an intelligent question. Some other questions I can imagine would be prurient or even harassment.

There is a wealth of answers here and also links to far more. If you remember that you're talking to and in front of real people who experience real pain, everything should work out OK.

Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: DSL on 10 Feb 2015, 07:14
Quote from: Silverzippo
I will afford people common courtesy, but I will not grant them the luxury of special privilege based on potentially hurt feelings.

OK, but then you have to figure out what constitutes common courtesy in uncommon situations. Usually it includes not knowingly hurting people's feelings.

Yes, but it seems as though anyone can claim hurt feelings, and Great Sky Daddy (sorry: "Parental unit") help you if you try to defend -- for example (another forum), the use of "Body English" instead of "Body language," which took a special snowflake "five minutes to process," it was so ... traumatic? I dunno. End result of such processing was to compare me to a female hygiene product, which took me a nanosecond to process (O! the trauma![/sarcasm]) and conclude courtesy was out the window, along with any interest in my part in the conversation.

Global Moderator Comment It's not a rules violation or anything, but I would like to ask that people not risk restarting arguments from other forums on this one. -- IICIH
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 10 Feb 2015, 07:26
I'm not saying everyone should abandon their labels.  I'm not ever sure I agree with the logic. But the conclusion is fascinating. It raises the issue of how much of attraction is representation.

I think that it's been established (from when Marten was helping Tai with her report on human sexuality) that Marten is at least hypothetically bi. Specifically, he has no particular hang-ups in engaging in a sexual activity with a male body but that he didn't think that he could have sex with a man with stereotypically male personality traits. This has the interesting consequence of meaning that he wouldn't have a problem having sex with a man so long as they guy didn't act like a man.

This really answers the question that is really being asked by most questioners, which is: is Jeph making Marten OOC by having him okay with Claire being potentially pre-op? The answer is thus 'no'. It is established that, whilst Marten is not attracted to those who are behaviourally male (and is thus 'Straight' by most definitions of the word), his definition of 'maleness' does not necessarily run into the details of anatomy. His concept of gender is more based on personality and behaviour rather than body equipment.

Thus, Claire's transition status is irrelevant to Marten. In his eyes, Claire is a woman, irrespective of the details of her body.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 10 Feb 2015, 07:35
And then your "behaviourally male" comment then brings a behavioral axis (or maybe more) into the measurement of sexuality, in addition to mechanical axes and the gender axis... sounds like it's time for a DISCUSS thread?
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: valkygrrl on 10 Feb 2015, 07:57
And then your "behaviourally male" comment then brings a behavioral axis (or maybe more) into the measurement of sexuality, in addition to mechanical axes and the gender axis... sounds like it's time for a DISCUSS thread?

In this case the behavioral is nothing other than gender performance. That's still 2 axises 
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 10 Feb 2015, 09:58
Strip 1024 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1024) makes it absolutely clear that Marten doesn't have a problem sleeping with penis-havers, he has a problem sleeping with men. In other words, his particular flavor of straightness has nothing to do with genitals and everything to do with gender presentation.

^This ^

Marten is straight, but he is certainly not narrow.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 10 Feb 2015, 11:40
Oh wow. That's the best turned phrase I've seen in weeks and it completely answers every question people have had. Be proud!

--------------

In the particular example of whether to wonder out loud about Claire's medical history, it was a long line of people who reported being hurt, including quite a few we knew only said things like that when it was real and important, culminating with ZoeB, which is the point at which policy changed. It was seriously counter-intuitive to me and I had to learn some things.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: AprilArcus on 10 Feb 2015, 12:08
What particularly baffles me about all this "what's she got down there" nonsense is that QC has told us over and over again. It is perhaps right and proper that people who refuse to take the effort to parse out the subtext should be doomed to live in mystery.

Quote
Readers: omg what is the story with Claire's stuff we need to knowwwwwwwww
Jeph: alludes with dialogue
Readers: what?
Jeph: alludes with body language
Readers: huh?
Jeph: come on you guys
Readers: but we can't HEAR you unless you say it OBVIOUSLY and TASTELESSLY!
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 10 Feb 2015, 12:24
http://thepunchlineismachismo.com/archives/comic/every-rose-has-its-thorn

Let us all bow to the wisdom of Commander Badass Re: Other peoples bits.

According to Jeph's Tumblr, he has no intention of flat out saying. Which is fine by me.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: vforvancouver on 10 Feb 2015, 12:43
Since I don't know much about Jeph; Is Marten an extension of himself?
I don't know if this is a thing or not, I'm curious.
Parts of all of his characters are autobiographical, to a certain point.

I believe that, to be considered a good writer, there is always a part of you in every character you write. Jeph is no exception. There is a difference, however, in giving a part of you to tour characters, and writing a Mary Sue or a Marty Stu. So far, I don't find anything that I may consider a Mary Sue in Jeph's work. But there are a lot of experiences he has had in his daily common life we can get, at least as a reference, in his work: Faye's drinking, Marten and Dora's breakup, Deathmole's songs, Ardent's regrowing tail... you name it, perhaps, perhaps it is reflected in comic. I didn't notice that fact until last November. I wrote a short story and developed it as a novel, and at certain point, when my character (whom I decided should be a rugby player to settle a bet: that I could write a story with a rugby player) had to play a rugby match at old age (for a rugby player), I wrote that match like the matches I've played. But, damn, my player was a wonderful player, while I was a bad one, mediocre at best. Also, my player was married; I'm single and probably would be for life. Yet, somehow, my friends who read that story liked it. I think it's not half bad, taken into account I wrote it in ten days. But I digress. What I was trying to say is that even if Jeph's characters aren't real, we're still following their adventures and we tend to think of them as if they were real people, so we like to analyze them based in our own experiences.

For me, that's the important and relevant part of this discussion: we think (at least I think) of them as people. Real people. Not webcomic people. XKCD's characters are not people. I like that about this webcomic and its community. I came here as an escape from reality and found a new virtual reality. One where we are discussing minute information and facts with as much effort as Mexican women discuss telenovelas.

Now wish me luck. I'm entering rehab today, and I hope I won't need a hip replacement soon. How I miss the times I could play rugby...
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 10 Feb 2015, 13:09
What particularly baffles me about all this "what's she got down there" nonsense is that QC has told us over and over again. It is perhaps right and proper that people who refuse to take the effort to parse out the subtext should be doomed to live in mystery.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Yes, I hit the like button.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Jynto on 10 Feb 2015, 13:21
It is also [a relationship] that imposed on him a duty to be open-minded in a way that was not foreshadowed in the first couple of thousand strips.

What?

No one in the comic is saying he has to be open-minded about this, except perhaps the narrative of the comic itself. No one could blame him if he got weirded out about Claire's body and decided not to take the relationship any further. Even Claire would probably understand - relationships have been ended over much less. But since this is a comic, he'd lose the audience's sympathy if he did that, and they would turn on him with pitchforks and projectile muffins.

It's precisely because of the fact that this relationship is put on a pedestal in a way that real relationships are not, partly because it's between fictional characters, but also because one of them is notably transgender. They have become a flagship for healthy transgender relationships. All aboard the S.S. Claireten, flying the rainbow flag!

For better or worse (and for real transgender people it tends to be worse), it means that Claire is a representative of transgenderism as a whole, due to being both fictional* and transgender. Marten, by association with Claire, is also a representative of how one should aspire to act in this situation. In real life, a straight-cis-white-dude like him would not usually be under this kind of scrutiny. Claire shouldn't be either, but the real world is not all there yet.

*The same arguments could be made for celebrity relationships, but for a different audience.

Strip 1024 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1024) makes it absolutely clear that Marten doesn't have a problem sleeping with penis-havers, he has a problem sleeping with men. In other words, his particular flavor of straightness has nothing to do with genitals and everything to do with gender presentation. Claire x Marten may seem to be forced for a lot of reasons, but contradicting Marten's on-panel statements about his sexuality is absolutely not one of them.

Well found! But I think that that shows my point further, as in real life it would not be possible to hold a person to something they said years ago. Real people change over time too, so he could have said something and meant it, and then not followed through with it later on and he'd still be being honest/true to himself. In fiction however, people don't tend to change unless it's part of their character arc.
Title: Re: WCDT 2887-2891 (2-6 February 2015)
Post by: Akima on 10 Feb 2015, 13:48
I will afford people common courtesy, but I will not grant them the luxury of special privilege based on potentially hurt feelings.
Someone makes a statement like this and claims that other people are claiming privilege... :roll:

What is "common courtesy" if not a consideration of other people's feelings? On what basis do we decide that consideration of another person's feelings is "special privilege" rather than "common courtesy"? Just who allocates to any individual the right to decide that consideration of their feelings is "common courtesy", but consideration of someone else's is "special privilege"? And to demand that other people accept that their decision about "common courtesy" vs. "special privilege" has some sort of authority or legitimacy?

Personally, I do not believe one should demand from others what one is not asked for oneself. If you don't have to handle intrusive questions about the precise configuration of your genitals, your dietary habits, religion etc. you should consider whether anybody else's are any of your business. Also, I think everyone should think about whatever is the sharpest burr under their own saddle, before declaring someone else's feelings to be invalid, and consideration of them "special privilege". As forum regulars know, I am prickly about racism, because I am a member of a minority ethnic group in Australia that has lower status than the majority. Racism is not the same as prejudice against trans people, and I'm certainly not going to get into Oppression Olympics, but I always ask myself, when I observe how people react to trans people, or depictions of them, how I would feel it "trans" were replaced with "Asian". Anything I don't like, I should not inflict on others. If I expect privacy, I should offer it to others.

the use of "Body English" instead of "Body language," which took a special snowflake "five minutes to process,"
I don't know the context, but on the face of it, that seems silly. However, native English-speakers, or even people like me who've been using English for a long time, should consider just how "slangy" we should be in forums where ESL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_as_a_second_or_foreign_language) people hang out. On the other hand ESL people should take the opportunity to improve our colloquial English, without slipping into sloppy expression ourselves, of course. :lol:

"Why do you gotta"...  All those years learning your bizarre language, aspiring to speak it "like a native"... Wasted.  :-D