THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Gyrre on 25 Jun 2017, 02:51

Title: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 25 Jun 2017, 02:51
Hurray for visiting family and sleeping super weird hours!
*falls face first into next meal*


EDIT: Tweaked the number of poll votes to 3. Sorry if anyone already voted.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 25 Jun 2017, 05:05
I only voted for two options, mostly because I have no idea what a 'T-cog' is supposed to be.

FWIW, I can see Brun accepting invitations on a date from both Elliott and Clinton and doing both simultaneously for a 'real-time comparison of my options'.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 25 Jun 2017, 05:15
Google turns up a couple of results for "t-cog". One is "The Church of God", which probably isn't relevant. The other is a "Transformation Cog (http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Transformation_cog)" from Transformers, which apparently is what allows a Transformer to transform.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 25 Jun 2017, 08:34
Google turns up a couple of results for "t-cog". One is "The Church of God", which probably isn't relevant. The other is a "Transformation Cog (http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Transformation_cog)" from Transformers, which apparently is what allows a Transformer to transform.
I hadn't any idea of it being used to refer to  'The Church of God', and I keep forgetting what failures Hasbro's European branches are at marketing.
Might I recommend the comic book More Than Meets The Eye (frequently abbreviated MTMTE)?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 25 Jun 2017, 14:08
Just imagine Faye handing May a propeller beanie when she asks how she's supposed to fly without a jetpack.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Storel on 25 Jun 2017, 15:49
I was also wondering what a t-cog was. Thanks, Zebediah!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 25 Jun 2017, 15:57
I'm actually surprised there isn't more crossover between Transformers and CQ fans.

Well, ignoring the movies. They suck....
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 25 Jun 2017, 16:06
Clinton goes on date with Brun, they run into Emily and somehow wind up on a triple date (Clinton, Brun, Emily)

Hilarity and Universe bending (thanks to Emily) ensues
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 25 Jun 2017, 19:37
Comic's up!

The way this is going, Clinton and Elliot may yet end up in a duel over who is worthier of Brun - with each insisting it is the other ...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: blt on 25 Jun 2017, 20:02
"No."

Lots of things made me smile in this strip.  And I'm on Renee's side for once too!

And hopefully Elliot doesn't do anything drastic, like wanting his own robot hand.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Larm Hargraven on 25 Jun 2017, 20:10
Renee really just grates against a fundamental part of me and I think it's reaching a point I've gotta express that frustration. I get having screen time, I get being an unlikable character for the added depth of having a character that can be generally seen as a bother, and I even get that she has redeeming qualities. All of that doesn't matter to me anymore seeing her do a quick turn around Elliot. She's gone from a slightly negative person to straight up demeaning in today's strip with little reason to turn on Elliot like that. In fact, for a friend who's self-conscious, she seems to really like to hit them while they're down. Every bit of dialogue of hers denotes some level of venom or toxicity whilst driving to stir up drama or be overall ugly on the inside and is starting to happen so often that I'm not enjoying the comic. Worse yet, I'm feeling there's hints that she ended out of a very toxic relationship and that her attitude is all justified through it and when it's revealed it'll turn to "oh man that sucks, Renee, I feel bad for you."

Except if that does happen, I still don't think I'll ever end up enjoying her in any of the comic. At this point I genuinely get disinterested in anything she has to say or do and am almost glazing over her dialogue. Like I said, I get character complexity, but if you're a generally dislikable character, readership may go down. Now, this is just a personal opinion so I obviously can't state that Renee will cause readership to go down, but I've seen in the other WCDTs that there is a shared consensus on her being an all around downer on whatever's happening on the strip.

In the end, I guess all I hope for is that there's some sort of comeuppance for her behavior towards even straight up strangers or at the very least her realizing that she's not exactly all that hot-shit and witty as she thinks she is. Perhaps it's slight jealousy? Her friends seem to attract people while she is just there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: War Sparrow on 25 Jun 2017, 20:24
I enjoy that "He might not be a total asshole" translates into "nice" for Elliot. Apparently he is very accustomed to Renee.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: QuestionableIntentions on 25 Jun 2017, 21:18
Calling it now, Clinton and Elliott will hook up.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 25 Jun 2017, 21:48
I'm actually surprised there isn't more crossover between Transformers and CQ fans.

Well, ignoring the movies. They suck....

The new one somehow involves King Arthur, apparently. I kind of want to see Stanley Tucci as Merlin, but not enough to sit through the rest of a Michael Bay Transformers movie.
TJOmega had actually asked for games that Transformers might do a crossover back in January, and I jokingly suggested Dark Souls. I was not at all expecting King Arthur. Though, apparently there was a G1 episode also involving King Arthur, and Dark of the Moon supposedly mashes up two diffferent G1 story arcs.


BTW, "That's just prime." was Optimus Primal's (Maximal leader in Beast Wars) catchphrase.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: brasca on 25 Jun 2017, 22:33
Well the jury may be out on Clinton, but I think they tendered their verdict on Renee months ago. 

There's certainly some sitcom hijinks in that Clinton thinks Brun would prefer Elliot because he's a big alpha male caveman and Elliot thinks Brun would prefer Clinton because he looks cool and smart.  In the end both may conclude they don't have a chance and ultimately Brun will have to make the first move. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 25 Jun 2017, 22:35
Elliot kinda rivals Marten in sheer Nice Guy-ness. It's amusing.

You might consider that Renee is pretty much Faye before she hit bottom and bounced....  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 25 Jun 2017, 23:15
In some ways, I do understand Renee here. Like her, I'm not wonderful with social matters or even emotional empathy. She wanted a relaxing social drink. She didn't want to have to deal with Elliot's angst (which triggers off too easily really) and maybe hold his hand as he deals with it. Additionally, although her words are insulting, there is a message there: She's telling Elliot not to talk himself down when he has a rival for what he wants.

Oddly enough, Clinton is saying more-or-less the same  things to Brun but in his own way!

FWIW, I'm thinking that at least some of Renee's anger is her new knowledge of her attraction to Elliot and the fact that he is clearly fixated on Brun and won't view her in that way.

Finally, I seem to remember that Brun tends to get aggressive when drunk. I'm thinking that she may end up starting a fight with someone and getting ejected. Something tells me that it may be Renee if her room-mate insists on being nasty about Clinton. Heck she may even be trying to defend Elliot, as bizarre as that sounds!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 25 Jun 2017, 23:31
Calling it now, Clinton and Elliott will hook up.


Well.......

This is Questionable Content after all ..............................
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrillho on 26 Jun 2017, 01:31
I find a proposal unlikely given that in-universe their relationship is incredibly young.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 26 Jun 2017, 03:13

Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...

Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.

Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

(Or... you know... something else entirely!)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: anahata on 26 Jun 2017, 04:00
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Jun 2017, 05:03
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!
That's because he was clocked upside the head by Renee and he's now passed out on the floor.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jun 2017, 05:32
I agree with Brun, that’s a terrible suggestion. What is wrong with you, Clinton? :parrot:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tub on 26 Jun 2017, 06:28
Calling it now, Clinton and Elliott will hook up.
As implausible as it sounds, it's the only logical conclusion by process of elimination.

Brun doesn't seem ready for romance, at least not in the way the guys would want from her. I doubt any advances would go well. At least she doesn't seem to carry her harpoon.
Renee is still using her personality as a contraceptive.
While Claire is intent on sabotaging her relationship by invading Martens privacy (remember, this is what caused Marten and Dora to break up), there's no imminent breakup, thus no imminent new hookups by either of them.
Everyone else at the bar is either an unnamed extra, or Clinton and Elliot.

q.e.d.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 26 Jun 2017, 06:49
Quote from: Larm Hargraven
Renee really just grates against a fundamental part of me and I think it's reaching a point I've gotta express that frustration.

It's been fascinating to see how many times a QC character will dredge up a forum member's worst experiences and offend the member's most fundamental values.

I think objectivity would agree with you about Renee's character, or at least about her personality.

Quote from: Larm Hargraven
straight up demeaning in today's strip with little reason to turn on Elliot like that. In fact, for a friend who's self-conscious, she seems to really like to hit them while they're down. Every bit of dialogue of hers denotes some level of venom or toxicity whilst driving to stir up drama or be overall ugly on the inside

"Practically a PhD in belittling people" is how I remember Angus describing her.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 26 Jun 2017, 06:57
"Practically a PhD in belittling people" is how I remember Angus describing her.

Yeah - Faye may be 'abrasive' to the point of 'excessively exasperating', and certainly not one to shy away from applying 'tough love' on occasion, but there's an underlying hint of cruelty in Renee that I haven't sensed in Faye so far.

Come to think of it: If memory serves, Jeph hasn't yet written a completely unsympathetic character. Maybe Renee is QC's equivalent to Candy (http://www.girlswithslingshots.com/cast) from Danielle Corsetto's 'Girls with Slingshots' (http://www.girlswithslingshots.com/)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 26 Jun 2017, 08:16
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!

OMG !!!

I MEANT CLINTON !!!  NOT Elliott!!!

!!!!!!

(That's Weird, huh??!)

Oh, and.. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   ;)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Sullivan on 26 Jun 2017, 09:06
I don't find Renee all that bad. And without her presence in the strip we might never have heard the phrase "bullshit sad-sack inverse dick-measuring contest".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 09:47
In some ways, I do understand Renee here. Like her, I'm not wonderful with social matters or even emotional empathy. She wanted a relaxing social drink. She didn't want to have to deal with Elliot's angst (which triggers off too easily really) and maybe hold his hand as he deals with it. Additionally, although her words are insulting, there is a message there: She's telling Elliot not to talk himself down when he has a rival for what he wants.

This is exactly the sort of thing that someone would call Marten on.  Renee is the only one available to do the job.

Finally, I seem to remember that Brun tends to get aggressive when drunk. I'm thinking that she may end up starting a fight with someone and getting ejected. Something tells me that it may be Renee if her room-mate insists on being nasty about Clinton. Heck she may even be trying to defend Elliot, as bizarre as that sounds!

Is this the bar at which Eliot is a bouncer?  Even if not, I see a potential conflict between professional and person interestes for Elliot.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 09:56
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!

OMG !!!

I MEANT CLINTON !!!  NOT Elliott!!!

So, what is the best way to tell a drunk girl that you would gladly kiss her once she's sober?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 26 Jun 2017, 10:24
Is this the bar at which Eliot is a bouncer?

Presumably; why else would he have asked Clinton for his ID when they arrived?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: larn on 26 Jun 2017, 11:13
Is it normal for bouncers to wear a shirt with a different business' logo?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Jun 2017, 11:21
Is it normal for bouncers to wear a shirt with a different business' logo?

I imagine that as long as a bouncer isn't advertising the competition, the bar wouldn't really care. Just as long as it looks tidy.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 26 Jun 2017, 11:51
Well, Clinton, I guess what goes around (https://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2325) comes around.

Still, he's grown so much from that hyper-awkward nerd he was when he started out I can't help but be happy for him.

As for Elliot... Poor dude can't seem to NOT be in weird love-triangle situations.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: blt on 26 Jun 2017, 13:19
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!

OMG !!!

I MEANT CLINTON !!!  NOT Elliott!!!

So, what is the best way to tell a drunk girl that you would gladly kiss her once she's sober?

(https://68.media.tumblr.com/7f5a82ab5eea1e07be4ade7cce523e44/tumblr_n3cy2cRyso1sar7k2o2_1280.png)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: DannyboyTheDane on 26 Jun 2017, 14:45
I'm starting to agree on Renee; in the beginning she just seemed like your typical, snarky QC lass, particularly in contrast to Brun's bluntness, but then she started to turn abrasive, and now she just seems outright mean-spirited. With Faye, it was all in good spirit, you could feel the heart beneath it, whereas Renee is becoming outright unlikeable at this point. It does match Angus's description of her, though, which I'd forgotten all about - I'd completely blanked on the fact that we'd even heard about her before we met Brun.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: DashaBlade on 26 Jun 2017, 15:18
Oh... wait wait wait wait. Isn't this bar the Horrible Revelation? If so, I predict that fancy costumes will occur, due to the overwhelming awkwardness.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 15:21
Oh... wait wait wait wait. Isn't this bar the Horrible Revelation? If so, I predict that fancy costumes will occur, due to the overwhelming awkwardness.

Furthermore, Elliot can't ask Brun out tonight, because he is on the clock.  They would have to have some fairly strict rules about that for bouncers, wouldn't they?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 15:23
Bubbles, Momo, Winslow, Punchbot, Melon, & Arthur find themselves as stars for a documentary on the everyday lives of A.I.

Not a documentary--a reality show!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 15:28
I'm starting to agree on Renee; in the beginning she just seemed like your typical, snarky QC lass, particularly in contrast to Brun's bluntness, but then she started to turn abrasive, and now she just seems outright mean-spirited.

I get why people don't like Renee, but consider her dialogue in this particular strip (#3511):  If I pasted an image of Faye over Renee in panels 3 and 4, would her lines seem at all out of place?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 26 Jun 2017, 15:42
That is a poor argument/excuse. It is never about a single line. Near anything can be misinterpreted if taken out of context or people can say things that are not typical for them. Renee has shown time and again that she is not a nice person. Even to people she considers friends. It goes well beyond being prickly or snarky and often into the outright mean spirited. And something can be both true, and nasty. Renee's final comment is an example, and rather self centered, making it about her and her desires, instead of Elliot. Maybe she is a friend to Brun and Elliot, but most of the time she sure isn't nice to them.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Jun 2017, 15:54
We've seen bits of Renee's personality, especially in her more recent appearances. Abrasive she might be, but at the same time, Renee seems to be quite thin-skinned and easily offended by small things.

Now, it might be we're just seeing an (extremely) overly-protective side of her concerning Brun, but some of what she says leaves me feeling a little wary.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Mehre on 26 Jun 2017, 18:14
For one, dont forget she has crush on Elliot(that was tested by extremely elaborate experiment). And now that they are at bar, he frets over her friend. Is  her reaction so surprising given that?
Secondly, remember her first reaction when Brun told her about fire&apartment&Clinton? She certainly shown her friendship by worrying about her(i suspect we will never learn just what was she referencing back then).
Thirdly, for other people, well estabilished relationships can look quite weird or even hostile.

That all being said, she... I dont know, i wouldnt say she is mean or anything like that yet, but she may have that vibe? Certainly her actions make her seem better person than what impression she does.

Edit: Also, its  probably not our favourite anachronistic bar. Look at a painting in background. That doesnt look like something from HR.
Edit2: Hm, but Elliot is bouncer here, so maybe it is.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Larm Hargraven on 26 Jun 2017, 19:44
The issue with her bringing Brun in after the fire was that she was quick on the draw to accuse Clinton of being a straight up monster, even though Brun described him and his actions as friendly and compassionate. There's being worried about your friend being taken advantage of, and then there's what Renee did, which was project a vile archetype on Clinton, a person she had not met and knew nothing about other than being the guy who helped Brun after her bar burned down. This became even worse when she started dictating a lifestyle on Brun without thinking, though I'll give her the credit that she did relent after being confronted on it.

The problem is that in context or out of context, Renee has left an impressionable distaste in my opinion of her and it's hard for me to think of ways where that opinion would change.

I saw some say that it's like Faye without the heart involved, which is true. Faye's snark and all around attitude always ends on a note of wanting to see her friends be ok, or at least is compassionate to them under all of it. While I don't want to see a Faye 2.0 or knock-off or anything in Renee, her character archetype is just plain dislikable in and out, and I mean this from an in-comic perspective and as a reader. You can have a vile, unlikable person and still have them enjoyable to read in a comic, while Renee is downright not enjoyable to read and detracts from my personal enjoyment of the comic since I feel her place in the comic has no reasoning other than to be the insult-generator. Fun for a short, brief time, but seeing as she's gotten so much screen time in the last few months of the strip, I'm personally burnt out and done with the character.

EDIT: But let me mention that today's strip is definitely wonderful with Brun and Clinton. It's a magical thing to see two drunk people yell-agree with eachother
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 26 Jun 2017, 20:04
Comic!

With Clinton and Brun hitting it off, I have a feeling Renee might suddenly decide to follow up on her attraction for Elliot.

I hope so, too. That way nobody is left alone.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jun 2017, 20:12
Are confections not candy? Or is he saying it's bullshit because he thinks marshmallows are not candy? That being said, how could they not be candy?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 26 Jun 2017, 20:20
The definition of candy in the uk is quite specific, I believe - boiled lollies essentially. Confectionary is a sweet more generally. The terms are synonymous in North America.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 26 Jun 2017, 20:24
boiled lollies
...why would you boil a lollipop?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 26 Jun 2017, 20:28
Are confections not candy? Or is he saying it's bullshit because he thinks marshmallows are not candy? That being said, how could they not be candy?

My uncle used to work for a well known chocolate company and if I remember correctly you have two fairly broad categories as to what confectionery actually is.

Bakers' confectionery usually includes sweet pastries, cakes and other baked goods.

Sugar confectionery includes sweets, candy, candied nuts, chocolate, sweetmeats and so on.

Sweets, lollies and candy would be the commonly used terms for types of sugar confectionery in Britain and Ireland, Australia and New Zealand and the US and Canada respectively.

So Marshmallows would probably be classed as sugar confectionery due to how they consist of sugar, water and gelatin.

boiled lollies
...why would you boil a lollipop?
Again, lolly is usually an Australian/New Zealand term and in this instance, a boiled lolly is a boiled sweet which is hard candy.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: War Sparrow on 26 Jun 2017, 20:33
Because that's how candy is made, essentially. You boil sugar and water until it reaches soft crack (like a caramel, sugar is pliable), or hard crack (like a lollipop, sugar is hard and do NOT make fun sugar spikes with it because they will cut you and it will bleed and hurt)

I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: tumpus on 26 Jun 2017, 20:46
anti-jeph cast away the Clinton and the Elliot and show me the forbidden  B r u n n e l o r e
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 26 Jun 2017, 21:24
Because that's how candy is made, essentially. You boil sugar and water until it reaches soft crack (like a caramel, sugar is pliable), or hard crack (like a lollipop, sugar is hard and do NOT make fun sugar spikes with it because they will cut you and it will bleed and hurt)

Exactly. This, incidentally, is why candy thermometers exist.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 26 Jun 2017, 21:27
anti-jeph cast away the Clinton and the Elliot and show me the forbidden  B r u n n e l o r e
They work together to clean an apartment. No sex, romance, or other hookup-like activity is involved. It either turns into the most or least popular slipshine comic ever.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 26 Jun 2017, 21:38
I forgot to add to my last post. To paraphrase Jeph: candy is science for people with a sweet tooth.   :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 26 Jun 2017, 23:09
Comic!

With Clinton and Brun hitting it off, I have a feeling Renee might suddenly decide to follow up on her attraction for Elliot.

I hope so, too. That way nobody is left alone.

Why do you hate Elliot?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 26 Jun 2017, 23:21
Gosh, Renee sure is winning hearts and minds around here.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 26 Jun 2017, 23:23
Well, if nothing else, Brun and Clinton have in common that they are loud, argumentative drunks. Or, more specifically, Brun is loud and argumentative whilst Clinton basically tends to get sucked into the current and follow her lead.

FWIW, I'm with Elliott on this one: Brun may be his friend but sanity is a finite resource and I can't blame him for not wanting to spend some of his dealing with Brun's drunken train of thought. Brun's thought processes are hard enough to deal with as they are; add onto them the lubricant and reality-relaxant of alcohol and they become nearly psychedelic!

Anyway, I don't think anything can now stop Clinton and Brun ending up in bed together, neither remembering how or what they may have done (they were drunk enough that they may have just blacked out the moment their heads hit the pillow). They then have the traditional next-day dilemma of working out whether this has ruined their friendship or not and what the hell they do next!

On the meta level, I think that it says a lot about this forum that so many contributors want to take Brun's question as a serious topic for debate. :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Storel on 26 Jun 2017, 23:25
I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

They're practically pure sugar, how can they not be candy?

Edit: What would you classify them as, then?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: anahata on 26 Jun 2017, 23:30
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...
C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!

OMG !!!

I MEANT CLINTON !!!  NOT Elliott!!!


Clinton's reaction would have been the same.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 26 Jun 2017, 23:33
I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

They're practically pure sugar, how can they not be candy?

It's all in the terminology. To me, 'candy' is based around hard, crystallised sugar.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Storel on 26 Jun 2017, 23:35
I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

They're practically pure sugar, how can they not be candy?

It's all in the terminology. To me, 'candy' is based around hard, crystallised sugar.

So "candy bars" are not candy to you? Odd.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 26 Jun 2017, 23:37
It's all in the terminology. To me, 'candy' is based around hard, crystallised sugar.

So "candy bars" are not candy to you? Odd.

We don't even use the term 'candy bars' here in the UK. They're usually called 'chocolate bars', even if the main constituent is biscuit or caramel.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 27 Jun 2017, 00:11
... Brun's thought processes are hard enough to deal with as they are; add onto them the lubricant and reality-relaxant of alcohol and they become nearly psychedelic! ...

And now you've made me contemplate tipsy Emily...

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Penquin47 on 27 Jun 2017, 00:21
My brain: "it's sugar, it's a component of some candies, it's sweet and used in desserts and not good for you to eat five million of."
My heart and gut: "They're not candy."

Marshmallows are breakfast food.  Or dessert.  Candy is not eaten at meals.  It's the only defense I can come up with.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 27 Jun 2017, 00:30
Marshmallows are breakfast food.

People eat marshmallows for breakfast? That's a scary thought...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: brasca on 27 Jun 2017, 00:40
Marshmallow Peeps are candy, but they don't keep as long as chocolate or hard candy.  Perhaps the determining factor is the rate of decay.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 27 Jun 2017, 00:45
I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

They're practically pure sugar, how can they not be candy?

Edit: What would you classify them as, then?

Confectionery. :)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Jun 2017, 02:41
Drunk Brun straight up asks Elliot to kiss her...
Elliott... knowing she is drunk - won't.
Hilarity ensues as Brun falls into a depression as no-one actually likes her...

C'mon, you missed out Clinton's part in all that!

OMG !!!

I MEANT CLINTON !!!  NOT Elliott!!!

So, what is the best way to tell a drunk girl that you would gladly kiss her once she's sober?

There is no best way, they are all horrible...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Jun 2017, 02:59

I dunno why I'm feeling all predict at the moment, but...

Panel one: Cut to next day.
Bedroom, dishevelled bed, random pieces of clothing scattered hither and yon.

Panel two: Elliott and Brun's heads appear above the covers - clearly naked (waist up at least)
Elliot (with his blush on!): Oh my god... Oh... I'm so sorry... Did ... did we...?
Brun (with her hard-thinking stare): I do not recall the events of last night. But I would assume we have confirmed we do find each other attractive?

Panel three: The both look at each other askance, shy, a little embarrassed.

Panel four: They throw themselves at each other!

(Awh come on.... )
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 27 Jun 2017, 03:15
Okay, I'll take up that gauntlet Joe.

Panel 1 - Full-width
Sleeping MARTEN and CLAIRE (with MARTEN as the big spoon); both are smiling

Panel 2 - Full-width
Sleeping FAYE with BUBBLES (n recharge mode) sitting beside her bed. BUBBLES' hand is reaching up to hold FAYE's hand.

Panel 3 - Full-width
CLINTON and BRUN in bed, facing, wide-eyed, with the sheets pulled up to their armpits and very obviously naked and somewhat tangled together; the absence of drunk bubbles indicating the degree to which realisation sobered them

((First pair of speech bubbles at top of panel))
CLINTON: "So."

BRUN: "So."

((Second set of speech bubbles at bottom of panel))
CLINTON: "Was this a mistake?"

BRUN: "... I don't know."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Jun 2017, 03:26
Okay, I'll take up that gauntlet Joe.

Panel 1 - Full-width
Sleeping MARTEN and CLAIRE (with MARTEN as the big spoon); both are smiling

Panel 2 - Full-width
Sleeping FAYE with BUBBLES (n recharge mode) sitting beside her bed. BUBBLES' hand is reaching up to hold FAYE's hand.

Panel 3 - Full-width
CLINTON and BRUN in bed, facing, wide-eyed, with the sheets pulled up to their armpits and very obviously naked and somewhat tangled together; the absence of drunk bubbles indicating the degree to which realisation sobered them

((First pair of speech bubbles at top of panel))
CLINTON: "So."

BRUN: "So."

((Second set of speech bubbles at bottom of panel))
CLINTON: "Was this a mistake?"

BRUN: "... I don't know."

BUZZ KILLINGTON INDA HOOOOWWWSSS!!!!

:)

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: DannyboyTheDane on 27 Jun 2017, 03:57
I get why people don't like Renee, but consider her dialogue in this particular strip (#3511):  If I pasted an image of Faye over Renee in panels 3 and 4, would her lines seem at all out of place?

Hence the very next sentence in my post, in which I specifically call out what I feel distinguishes her from Faye: Faye has heart and dishes out the snark in a way that clearly shows the underlying affection, even in as simple a way as smiling her snarky smile while doing it (Has Renee ever actually smiled? Probably, but I do find it telling that I find it hard to picture it. Oh, wait, never mind, I just found an example - when she gleefully wants to knowingly dish out second-hand info to Claire about the Marten/Padma situation ...); I'd actually argue Faye's snark is a major way in which she expresses affection towards her friends, and it shows.

Consider, in contrast, Renee in yesterday's comic: Her entire comment in the last panel revolves around herself and how she doesn't want to have to listen to Elliot's worries; she shows absolutely no sympathy towards his obvious insecurities - on the contrary, she outright belittles them. I propose that had it indeed been Faye in that position, she would have called out Elliot's bullshit, pointing out how he doesn't actually know anything about Clinton, how his impression of him is actually fuelled more so by his own insecurities, and how he is a great guy with great qualities whom Brun already likes. Of course she'd be snarky about it, but it'd be constructive, showing that she actually cares; Renee is simply complaining and doesn't seem to care at all. (Though I suspect she actually does - she is just utterly terrible at interpersonal relationships.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: War Sparrow on 27 Jun 2017, 04:23
I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!

They're practically pure sugar, how can they not be candy?

Edit: What would you classify them as, then?

Well, I had never thought of it. I guess a baking item, but I think I'll start using confectionary.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 27 Jun 2017, 05:28
Renee is still using her personality as a contraceptive anaphrodisiac.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Jun 2017, 05:32
Because that's how candy is made, essentially. You boil sugar and water until it reaches soft crack (like a caramel, sugar is pliable), or hard crack (like a lollipop, sugar is hard and do NOT make fun sugar spikes with it because they will cut you and it will bleed and hurt)

I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!


http://www.tangerineuk.net/our-brands/princess/

(They also come chocolate coated... If that doesn't meet the US definition of *candy* then I dunno what does!)

In a nutshell.... marshmallows are sweeties!!!

:)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BryanP on 27 Jun 2017, 05:33
Well that's just dumb.  Switchblades aren't suitable for throwing, and they're generally pretty crappy knives in any case. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 27 Jun 2017, 05:52
A more important question for the 'Brun and Clinton wake up naked in bed together and don't remember how they got there'.

So.... who's bed is this?

Brun sleeps on Renee's couch. Clinton lives in a dorm. Generally not known for large beds and privacy.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 27 Jun 2017, 05:56
A more important question for the 'Brun and Clinton wake up naked in bed together and don't remember how they got there'.

So.... who's bed is this?

Brun sleeps on Renee's couch. Clinton lives in a dorm. Generally not known for large beds and privacy.

The most obvious answer is that it's the nearest overnight motel's bed, most likely. Maybe even (for added irony and narrative completion) the hotel where Brun stayed after the destruction of her apartment and most of her belongings. I know some motels have a strong 'no guests' policy for their rooms but so long as Clinton and Brun look legit, I don't think that the night staff would raise too much of a ruckus.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 27 Jun 2017, 06:19
Marshmallows. [from the wiki]
A marshmallow is a sugar-based confection that, in its modern form, typically consists of sugar, water and gelatin which is whipped to a spongy consistency, molded into small cylindrical pieces, and coated with corn starch.
(click to show/hide)

As to the term candy bar used in the states and some parts of the canadas - that term was at one time reserved for any bar confection not made from chocolate but might have a coating but today even the coatings are not really chocolate to begin with. So in most common usage Chocolate Bar is reserved for bars of mostly chocolate or a close facsimile thereof - ie what you see in most grocery store candy isles and beside checkout counters. Usually cheap analogues like Hershey or imports from Eastern Europe to overpriced flat designer slabs touting their cocoa content on their labels.

My chocolate preferences is something like Schwarze Herren Schokolade that I always bugged relatives to bring over with them from Germany or Mozartkugel which, thanks to Ferraro opening shops nearby, I can be tempted on a daily basis with FRESH chocolates.
I personally favor as a candy McIntosh Toffee or Marzipan, if I could find either, as great examples of a candy bar with Eatmore on my list, which even I don't know why I like it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 27 Jun 2017, 06:45

I dunno why I'm feeling all predict at the moment, but...

Panel one: Cut to next day.
Bedroom, dishevelled bed, random pieces of clothing scattered hither and yon.

Panel two: Elliott and Brun's heads appear above the covers - clearly naked (waist up at least)
Elliot (with his blush on!): Oh my god... Oh... I'm so sorry... Did ... did we...?
Brun (with her hard-thinking stare): I do not recall the events of last night. But I would assume we have confirmed we do find each other attractive?

Panel three: The both look at each other askance, shy, a little embarrassed.

Panel four: They throw themselves at each other!

(Awh come on.... )
Elliot is on duty.  He will remain stone cold sober the entire evening.  I can picture him putting a drunk girl to bed, but not getting into bed with one.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 27 Jun 2017, 07:08
Poor Elliot.  :-D :laugh: :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Jun 2017, 10:07

I dunno why I'm feeling all predict at the moment, but...

Panel one: Cut to next day.
Bedroom, dishevelled bed, random pieces of clothing scattered hither and yon.

Panel two: Elliott and Brun's heads appear above the covers - clearly naked (waist up at least)
Elliot (with his blush on!): Oh my god... Oh... I'm so sorry... Did ... did we...?
Brun (with her hard-thinking stare): I do not recall the events of last night. But I would assume we have confirmed we do find each other attractive?

Panel three: The both look at each other askance, shy, a little embarrassed.

Panel four: They throw themselves at each other!

(Awh come on.... )
Elliot is on duty.  He will remain stone cold sober the entire evening.  I can picture him putting a drunk girl to bed, but not getting into bed with one.

OMG I'VE DONE IT AGAIN !!!!!

I meant CLINTON !!!!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: oeoek on 27 Jun 2017, 11:13
OMG I'VE DONE IT AGAIN !!!!!
I meant CLINTON !!!!

Clearly your subconscious is shipping another boat :lol:

I am very much hoping Renee pulls up her socks and does something about her stowed away Eliotism.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Oenone on 27 Jun 2017, 12:51
I think Brun is going to attempt to ineptly match make Renee and Elliot.  :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 27 Jun 2017, 14:37
A more important question for the 'Brun and Clinton wake up naked in bed together and don't remember how they got there'.

So.... who's bed is this?

Brun sleeps on Renee's couch. Clinton lives in a dorm. Generally not known for large beds and privacy.
Elliot's, obviously.
I would prefer to see them wake up fully clothed with hangovers and no memory of what they did the night before...but the available evidence would indicate it was something bizarre involving clocks, robotics, and marshmallows. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: War Sparrow on 27 Jun 2017, 16:23
Because that's how candy is made, essentially. You boil sugar and water until it reaches soft crack (like a caramel, sugar is pliable), or hard crack (like a lollipop, sugar is hard and do NOT make fun sugar spikes with it because they will cut you and it will bleed and hurt)

I don't consider marshmallows candy. I just realized that. And I want to make some with actual marsh mallow. Hook me up, Brits!


http://www.tangerineuk.net/our-brands/princess/

(They also come chocolate coated... If that doesn't meet the US definition of *candy* then I dunno what does!)

In a nutshell.... marshmallows are sweeties!!!

:)

I think Americans, and some southern Canadians, use the term candy bar, and all brightly coloured sugar based foods are candy. I am not an American or southern Canadian, so I do not abuse the term in such blase fashion.
I can agree on sweeties, but I refuse to use the term.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 27 Jun 2017, 17:09
If these two don't end up having Drunk Sex, it'll be quite surprising.


Then  again, considering how they're  drinking, they'll probably end up passed out on the floor before things get that far..
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 27 Jun 2017, 17:51
You guys on the northern hemisphere seem to spend a lot of time arguing semantics for candy.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 27 Jun 2017, 17:57
You guys on the northern hemisphere seem to spend a lot of time arguing semantics for candy.

They're sweets!

Also, this forum spends a lot of time arguing discussing anything and everything.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 27 Jun 2017, 18:04
Well, that is the purpose of a forum. I'm happy at least some of them have survived being consumed into reddit.

I'm here thinking Elliot will end up having to help drunk Clinton and Brun. That should be fun.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 27 Jun 2017, 18:51
Been on the road a couple of days, playing catch-up here.

They're usually called 'chocolate bars', even if the main constituent is biscuit or caramel.
Biscuit?  Oh!  You mean a cookie!   :evil:

As for Renee's behavior the last several strips, she really needs to be wearing one of these.
(https://img1.etsystatic.com/161/0/15049294/il_340x270.1244615401_izcr.jpg)

Faye and Renee are a lot alike, but Faye isn't a mean drunk.
 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 27 Jun 2017, 19:22
Instant Volatile   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Larm Hargraven on 27 Jun 2017, 20:04
ELLIOT. THOSE HANDS DON'T GROW ON TREES.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 27 Jun 2017, 20:08
I am so glad today is not friday.

I guess Faye and Bubbles just got some work to do.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: War Sparrow on 27 Jun 2017, 20:08
Well damn Elliot, that's either a very strong grip, or Clinton needs to evaluate his hand manufacturers quality control. I hope it's still under warranty.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 27 Jun 2017, 20:09
Well then....that just answers so many questions.

And raises more.

Also, I wonder if Elliot should use his superhuman strength for good or for evil?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 27 Jun 2017, 20:11
"So Faye, how would you fix it?"
"Uh... retractable spikes?"  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 27 Jun 2017, 20:12
Well then....that just answers so many questions.

And raises more.

Also, I wonder if Elliot should use his superhuman strength for good or for evil?

Elliot is a lawful good dude if I've ever seen one.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 27 Jun 2017, 20:15
Awkward Good
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Welu on 27 Jun 2017, 20:21
Clinton's face in the first panel is brilliant and combined with Brun's yelling and the crush, this is an A* strip from Jeph.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 27 Jun 2017, 20:26
Clearly this is why Renee is so mean to Elliot: deep down she knows he's destructive and will only bring doom to those around him.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: brasca on 27 Jun 2017, 20:35
New comic is up.

Well, it looks like we know who Faye and Bubbles' next customer is.

Hope they know how to handle cyborgs.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 27 Jun 2017, 20:36
Well, it looks like we know who the next customer at Union Robotics is.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: blt on 27 Jun 2017, 20:47
Shouty drunk.  The worst kind.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 27 Jun 2017, 20:48
It's all in the terminology. To me, 'candy' is based around hard, crystallised sugar.

So "candy bars" are not candy to you? Odd.

We don't even use the term 'candy bars' here in the UK. They're usually called 'chocolate bars', even if the main constituent is biscuit or caramel
Weird, 'confection' seems to be an overarching term with candy as a subset of confection along with preserves. Maybe marshmellows fall under a similar subset to preserves and aren't considered candy after all.

Also, the Brits derive their term 'biscuit' from French, whereas Americans derive the term 'cookie' from Dutch. Both refer to the same thing.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: DaiJB on 27 Jun 2017, 20:56
Clinton buys new hand - upgrades to a heavy-duty variant: "OK Elliot...NOW let's shake..."

Seriously though - I hate shaking hands! Who else can't tell how much "firmness" you're supposed to put into a handshake?! Too hard, not hard enough...jeez... :-\
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 27 Jun 2017, 21:02
General rule I've found is the handshake you give should be as firm as the one you are receiving and the wrist should have a small bit of flexibility, not too locked and not too floppy. Otherwise. Just don't crush the hands of other people.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 27 Jun 2017, 21:34
By what standard is metal-crushing pressure 'a firm handshake'?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: MrNumbers on 27 Jun 2017, 22:05
I presume, when you've never shaken a robot hand before, you go for the firmness you expect a robot hand to appreciate.

Unfortunately, robot hand was more hand than robot.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Magniras on 27 Jun 2017, 22:22
Hands are stronger than that robot hand.

 Though, actually, now that I think about it, robo-metal seems to be a bit on the destructible side.  EG, pre-metalworking faye putting a dent in Pintsize's chassis, and Marigold doing the same thing.

So that could have been a normal handshake.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TRenn on 27 Jun 2017, 23:00
Panel 2 of this Freefall strip seems on point.

(http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff1500/fv01457.gif)

(Link to the strip's page: http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff1500/fv01457.htm (http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff1500/fv01457.htm) )
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 27 Jun 2017, 23:16
Something tells me that Elliot's Id took over here and did things with his body that his Superego wouldn't approve of. Even if Clinton's hand is a cheap aluminium and plastic structure, that was still a remarkable feat of strength! Meanwhile, I think I now know how Brun will be thrown out of the bar: She's going to pick a fight with Elliot about this mishap.

Okay, I predict that, probably some time next week from our perspective, Clinton will go to Union Robotics for a cheap repair; that's how Brun will get talking to Faye and Bubbles about the receptionist job. Meanwhile, I suspect that it will take much effort on Bubbles' part to dissuade Faye from 'upgrading' Robo-hand with such delights as a rotary multi-tool socket in the index finger and a mini-laser in the forefinger.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 27 Jun 2017, 23:59
It'll be awhile before Faye and Bubbles will be busy enough to need (let alone afford) a receptionist, I think.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 28 Jun 2017, 04:25
Wow, yet another thing that that Elliot and I have in common: overestimating the strength of metal.

It looks nice and strong, but the second you apply what seems an ok amount of force, the head of the bolt breaks off, or the casing cracks, or the threads strip out, or you slip on a bit of oil, grab on to a door, and rip the hinges off...




Marshmallows are breakfast food.

People eat marshmallows for breakfast? That's a scary thought...
(https://immawondering.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/luckycharms1.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Mehre on 28 Jun 2017, 04:46
I would suspect that as Clinton's family aint that wealthy, that prosthesis was probably paid by insurance or by themselves. In any case it would be cheaper model. And truth to be said, CS student doesnt need heavy duty or military grade prosthesis. And for comfort it should be as light as real thing(which is quite light). So i would assume, even if it is not total crap-hand, that it indeed is quite easy to destroy(same as our phones, even more expensive ones are quite flimsy, even if they are largely metal).

And yeah he will totally go to UR for repairs. Could this be start of another friendship, rivalry or even hostility? Will Elliot have problems from his employer? After all he damaged patron without him doing anything(except shouting maybe). Will Clinton defend him before his boss? True, its good it is not friday yet.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jun 2017, 05:15
Shouty drunk.  The best kind.
:parrot:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 28 Jun 2017, 05:19
Hm - one potential problem with taking Clinton's hand to Union Robotics is that it would be classified as a medical prosthesis and therefore subject to FDA regulations. (Yes, I know it's neither a food nor a drug, but the FDA is responsible for medical devices too.) And Faye and Bubbles aren't licensed to work on FDA-regulated products.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 28 Jun 2017, 05:21
@ Zebediah,

That has the feel of something no-one would think of until it was too late to do anything about it. Alternately, Robo-hand could be out-of-warranty, leaving Clinton with no choice but to go to a local chop-shop or go without his dominant hand.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 28 Jun 2017, 05:30
@ Zebediah,

That has the feel of something no-one would think of until it was too late to do anything about it. Alternately, Robo-hand could be out-of-warranty, leaving Clinton with no choice but to go to a local chop-shop or go without his dominant hand.

Except Bubbles would probably be aware of such regulations.

As for repair costs, I imagine that Elliot would be decent (and horrified) enough to foot the bill for a repair or replacement. Or who knows, Hanners might step in with a replacement.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 28 Jun 2017, 06:56
From panels 3-5, it looks to me like Clinton started the squeeze-contest and Elliot was more like "Meh ... okaaayyyyYYYYY!"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Mehre on 28 Jun 2017, 07:04
Oh yeah, Hanners will step in and after week of truly gruesome comics, QC will be renamed.

Deus Ex: Northampton Divided. (or Clinton Revolution, or Creepy War)

Good point with FDA regs. Guess it may be point of few days worth of comic.

Edit: But knowing Hanners his augments would be full of cleaning equipment.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 28 Jun 2017, 08:42

Surely, if that had been a *real* hand... Clinton would be in the ER right now?

"Not cool, Elliott!"

(And minus brownie points from Brun... maybe leaving the field open for Clinton to cruise home)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: blt on 28 Jun 2017, 09:26
Shouty drunk.  The best kind.
:parrot:
Ironically I wrote this while shouty drunk.  I stand by what I said though.  :meh:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: sitnspin on 28 Jun 2017, 14:25
Shouty drunk.  The worst kind.
I posit that mean fighty drunks are far worse.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 28 Jun 2017, 15:02
Fun fact: One current way to measure records in human hand grip strength (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grip_strength) is closing a Captains of Crush Grippers No.4 torsion-spring grippers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captains_of_Crush_Grippers) - equivalent to 365 lb of 'force' (*). Average (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3101655/) 'western' human male still manages a respectable 110 lb.

Not really a crocodile's jaws, but still quite remarkable for an instrument that can assemble mechanical watches or play a concert piano ...

(*) Imagine here a small, prickly rant about peoples' tendency to 'measure' force in units of mass ...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 28 Jun 2017, 15:33
(*) Imagine here a small, prickly rant about peoples' tendency to 'measure' force in units of mass ...

Meh - first-term school physics stuff, that.  For lasting fun you need to go to the conflict between es and em systems of units (with its ratios based on c2 just to keep the numbers friendly!):

http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Workshop/advice/coils/unit_systems/ (http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Workshop/advice/coils/unit_systems/)

My uni physics course changed its electricity teaching from CGI to MKS in the middle of the time I was doing it.  Oh what fun that was!  We all had to go out and buy the new edition of Bleaney and Bleaney (https://archive.org/details/ElectricityMagnetism2ndEd).



Trivia I didn't know: designation of the letter c for the speed of light is from the word celerity: quickness, or rapidity of motion. Its Latin root also gives accelerate.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 28 Jun 2017, 16:10
Oh, that's quite simple: For your thesis, choose a theoretical physics supervisor with an "Units are what happens to other people"-attitude.

(Real fun starts when your supervisor is one of those guys who start every paper with "Throughout, we set e=c=hbar=1" and then changes back to MKS halfway through ...)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 28 Jun 2017, 16:25
(Real fun starts when your supervisor is one of those guys who start every paper with "Throughout, we set e=c=hbar=1" and then changes back to MKS halfway through ...)

(click to show/hide)

* Coulomb's constant (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_constant)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 28 Jun 2017, 16:36
I have a feeling Elliot would be the "I love you all" type of drunk.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 28 Jun 2017, 16:40
Everyone except that duck over there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 28 Jun 2017, 16:42
*raises hand*  Nope.

Poor Clinton. Again.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 28 Jun 2017, 16:43
Lets all give a big hand for all these terrible jokes--

Oops, sorry Clinton.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 28 Jun 2017, 16:46
Everyone except that duck over there.

Ducks are more practical beings, so I have an engineering degree.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Undrneath on 28 Jun 2017, 16:48
But parsecs are a measurement of distance.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 28 Jun 2017, 16:50
Only about half I think emsilly  :claireface:




That was certainly a crushing blow to Clintons ego as well as Elliott loosing his grip on his subconscious I would assume as well.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 28 Jun 2017, 16:50
Everyone except that duck over there.

Ducks are more practical beings, so I have an engineering degree.

Oh, you're not a medical doctor?  :claireface:

(Computer science degree here)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 28 Jun 2017, 16:56
Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P

I lied when I mentioned my physics course - I actually did Engineering (which kind? you ask - all of them! I reply*), but we shared some lectures with the physicists.  Alongside lectures on the quantum structure of matter, I also had lectures on mixing concrete and designing motorway embankments (what slope is optimal to minimise snow deposits on the carriageway in a blizzard?).  Dimensional analysis in Fluid Dynamics was a personal favourite of mine, alongside Mohr diagrams for graphical analysis of structure deformation.

*
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 28 Jun 2017, 17:36
Okay, I predict that, probably some time next week from our perspective, Clinton will go to Union Robotics for a cheap repair; that's how Brun will get talking to Faye and Bubbles about the receptionist job. Meanwhile, I suspect that it will take much effort on Bubbles' part to dissuade Faye from 'upgrading' Robo-hand with such delights as a rotary multi-tool socket in the index finger and a mini-laser in the forefinger.
The fore finger is the same as the index finger (unless each refers to handedness). Would it be more appropriate to put the laser in the middle finger or the thumb?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 28 Jun 2017, 17:49
Everyone except that duck over there.

Ducks are more practical beings, so I have an engineering degree.

Oh, you're not a medical doctor?  :claireface:

(Computer science degree here)

Computer engineering, to be more precise =D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 28 Jun 2017, 17:58
Computer science with a minor in classical history myself, because I was told it couldn't be done. (Not that it wasn't allowed, just that there was no way I could handle a history course while majoring in computer science. My advisor was an asshole.)

The fore finger is the same as the index finger (unless each refers to handedness). Would it be more appropriate to put the laser in the middle finger or the thumb?

The thumb is where you put the pneumatic hammer. So laser in the middle finger.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Storel on 28 Jun 2017, 18:14
Fun fact: One current way to measure records in human hand grip strength (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grip_strength) is closing a Captains of Crush Grippers No.4 torsion-spring grippers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captains_of_Crush_Grippers) - equivalent to 365 lb of 'force' (*). [...]

(*) Imagine here a small, prickly rant about peoples' tendency to 'measure' force in units of mass ...

Technically, that would be "peoples' tendency to conflate mass and weight", which has resulted in "pound" being considered both a unit of force (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)) and a unit of mass (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(mass)), depending on which system you're using. So saying "365 pounds of force" is completely legitimate and you can leave off the sarcasm quotes around "force", TYVM.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 28 Jun 2017, 18:18
I had never noticed this before, but my phone's browser interprets Storel's user text (1-800-SCABIES) as a phone number and tries to call it if you click on it.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 28 Jun 2017, 18:50
But does anyone answer?  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: jwhouk on 28 Jun 2017, 19:06
Someone at the Nashville Jail, perhaps.

I'm just a psychology major.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 28 Jun 2017, 19:33
Comic!

Clinton navigated this situation like a champ, despite being drunk! I'm impressed!
Any tension that was expressed in the handshake is certainly gone now.

Cry it out, Elliot. It'll be ok.

Also, Brun seems to be crashing a little bit.

Noooo BSc (comp) would be more precise. :P
My current job title is software engineer, though.
I am definitely not a *computer* engineer.
I don't think anyone *is* a computer engineer. The fact no one has a clue what a computer engineer does was a running joke in my class.
I'm a game developer, though. The degree is just there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 28 Jun 2017, 19:55
Aww, that was nice, Clinton.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 28 Jun 2017, 20:04
What's the "pretext" you can order for $7.50?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 28 Jun 2017, 20:09
Noooo BSc (comp) would be more precise. :P
My current job title is software engineer, though.
I am definitely not a *computer* engineer.
I don't think anyone *is* a computer engineer. The fact no one has a clue what a computer engineer does was a running joke in my class.
I'm a game developer, though. The degree is just there.

Wow, that was quick. I typed out the post, had a sudden thought that I'd misinterpreted you, deleted it, but apparently not quickly enough.  :lol:

Anyway, comic! I think Clinton and Elliot will be friends, now.


What's the "pretext" you can order for $7.50?

Ha ha. It's hard to read, but I think it says "Pretzel." Is pretzel some kind of pretext? You be the judge.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 28 Jun 2017, 21:43
Eh, $7.50 is a lot to pay for meaning in my life. I think I'll go to CoD and get the serrano mocha instead.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 28 Jun 2017, 22:43
And Good Guy Clinton strikes again.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 28 Jun 2017, 23:13
From what Elliot said, I think that Clinton did get into a hand-squeezing war with him, expecting Robo-hand to be a sure winner; important lesson learned, I think! No, Clinton doesn't need a first aid kit; a ball-peen hammer and a monkey wrench though?

As others have said, Clinton has further established his 'nice guy' credentials with everyone here, especially Brun. Brun seems to be watching everything with this assessing gaze that suggests to me that, drunk or not, she's drawing conclusions about everything she sees. It will be interesting to see how she decides to react to these events! He's remarkably chill about this to the point where I wonder if this may have happened before and he has a spare lying around somewhere.

Poor Elliot thought! How infrequently do people do nice things for him, I wonder? He's just a sweet little boy in a huge bear's body and, in that, he's a walking, talking trope! That said, one wonders if he might have previous for causing clumsy damage; previous enough that he's lost a few jobs over it? As for tonight, maybe he'll end up sitting next to Renee, sniffling whilst she clumsily tries to comfort him (and I mean 'clumsily'; she's got very limited previous experience in compassion, after all).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: ElsaStegosaurus on 28 Jun 2017, 23:40
Aw, Clinton's buzz totally evaporated in panels 3 and 4.  Get that man another beer!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: neurocase on 29 Jun 2017, 00:14
Aw, Elliot. You're so hopeless.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Doc on 29 Jun 2017, 02:01
I will beer you?

You will be beered!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 29 Jun 2017, 02:10
Back in the early 1990s, stand-up comedian Harry Enfield sometimes played a drunk thug called 'Buggerallmoney'. He wore a tattered tee-shirt with the legend: "I Drink Beer Me"; Jeph may have based the shirt worn by the boss of the Horrible Revelation on this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 29 Jun 2017, 02:46
But parsecs are a measurement of distance.

Unless you're Han Solo...

And you're NOT Han Solo..... *I'M Han Solo!!!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 29 Jun 2017, 03:05
Also, gutter slope optimisation problems have taught me to say "60 degrees" and not even bother to justify my answer.  8-)

See, a physics postgrad must be capable of answering "60 degrees, for reasons of symmetry" with the hauteur of a member of the court of Louis XIV - especially when picked out of an optimized gutter ...

(M.Sc., PhD in physics, solid state theory specialization (which explains the e=c=hbar=1, because how else would you freak out the particle physicists poaching in your field?))


No, no, the $7.50 just gets you the idea. No guarantee of actual meaning being found is provided.

So a damp napkin with a partially legible "42" scribbled on it? How retro ...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Jun 2017, 04:51
Also, gutter slope optimisation problems have taught me to say "60 degrees" and not even bother to justify my answer.  8-)

See, a physics postgrad must be capable of answering "60 degrees, for reasons of symmetry" with the hauteur of a member of the court of Louis XIV - especially when picked out of an optimized gutter ...

(M.Sc., PhD in physics, solid state theory specialization (which explains the e=c=hbar=1, because how else would you freak out the particle physicists poaching in your field?))

60 degrees... FAHRENHEIT. *dodges thrown tomatoes*

I'm atomic/molecular physics. People outside physics tend to confuse it with particle physics, but it's not quite the same thing... our experiment fits on a table.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrillho on 29 Jun 2017, 06:11
Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P

Christ, no. My degree is a wet liberal arts subject and I'm a teacher in my day job.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 29 Jun 2017, 07:10
Poor Elliot. *lol*

I DO imagine they'll head to Faye and Bubbles for help. I don't think Clinton is loaded and the girls probably would be cheap....  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: brasca on 29 Jun 2017, 07:58
Elliot will probably chip in seeing as how Clinton just saved his job and he's already broken up about it enough to sob. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 29 Jun 2017, 08:02
Aw, Clinton's buzz totally evaporated in panels 3 and 4.  Get that man another beer!
Based on past experience, that would be a very bad idea:
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2936
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 29 Jun 2017, 08:20
I DO imagine they'll head to Faye and Bubbles for help. I don't think Clinton is loaded and the girls probably would be cheap....  :-P

Well, cheaper than going through the manufacturer.  That's kind of the point. 

Come to think of it, $75 for a new robot ass does sound pretty cheap.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Roxtar on 29 Jun 2017, 08:50
But parsecs are a measurement of distance.

Unless you're Han Solo...

And you're NOT Han Solo..... *I'M Han Solo!!!

some of the (now non-canon) books explained this. the "Kessel run" was a dangerous path through an asteroid field and a black-hole cluster. reducing the distance meant skimming close to the black holes, thus messing with time and other stuff and you had to be fast enough to escape the pull.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: themacnut on 29 Jun 2017, 09:21
I fail to understand how someone as obviously gentle and kind as Elliot could be a bouncer. We're talking about a job that occasionally requires you to, at the very least, be mean to people, and every now and then you may actually have to use force against them. Did Elliot break down in tears the first time he had to toss a belligerent drunk out of an employer's establishment?

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 29 Jun 2017, 09:42
I fail to understand how someone as obviously gentle and kind as Elliot could be a bouncer. We're talking about a job that occasionally requires you to, at the very least, be mean to people, and every now and then you may actually have to use force against them. Did Elliot break down in tears the first time he had to toss a belligerent drunk out of an employer's establishment?

Elliot is a big bloke, intimidating to look at and he has proven that he is quite strong and able to take a hit (during Emily and Clinton's date and taking a bottle to the face around the time Brun lost her job, respectively). As it is, I imagine that Elliot is quite the fighter when he needs to be, its just most of the time he'd prefer to be Elliot. So working at the Horrible Revelation might be okay for him - most of his job is probably just checking IDs if needs be. If he does need to remove someone from the Horrible Revelation, well even the fightiest drunk isn't going to try and take on someone like Elliot.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 29 Jun 2017, 09:50
I fail to understand how someone as obviously gentle and kind as Elliot could be a bouncer. We're talking about a job that occasionally requires you to, at the very least, be mean to people, and every now and then you may actually have to use force against them. Did Elliot break down in tears the first time he had to toss a belligerent drunk out of an employer's establishment?

I think I'd feel like 500% safer somewhere with a bouncer like Elliot. He's likely not the typical bouncer, but I'd say he's the PERFECT bouncer. I'd count for such a person to not go overboard, regardless of the situation.

And maybe when he's working, he's more firm, because he can distance himself emotionally for the sake of being professional, or something.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: themacnut on 29 Jun 2017, 09:54
If he does need to remove someone from the Horrible Revelation, well even the fightiest drunk isn't going to try and take on someone like Elliot.

From what I've seen, that isn't always true, sadly. Alcohol is called "liquid courage" for good reason, and enough of it can make someone stupidly courageous. Enough to think they can take someone like Elliot. At which point Elliot would no doubt have to forcefully prove them wrong.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 29 Jun 2017, 10:03
If he does need to remove someone from the Horrible Revelation, well even the fightiest drunk isn't going to try and take on someone like Elliot.

From what I've seen, that isn't always true, sadly. Alcohol is called "liquid courage" for good reason, and enough of it can make someone stupidly courageous. Enough to think they can take someone like Elliot. At which point Elliot would no doubt have to forcefully prove them wrong.

In which case, Elliot will have proven he does deserve his job. Let's put it this way, would the Horrible Revelation have kept him on for so long if he wasn't able to do his job?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 29 Jun 2017, 11:03
I fail to understand how someone as obviously gentle and kind as Elliot could be a bouncer. We're talking about a job that occasionally requires you to, at the very least, be mean to people, and every now and then you may actually have to use force against them. Did Elliot break down in tears the first time he had to toss a belligerent drunk out of an employer's establishment?

I think I'd feel like 500% safer somewhere with a bouncer like Elliot. He's likely not the typical bouncer, but I'd say he's the PERFECT bouncer. I'd count for such a person to not go overboard, regardless of the situation.

And maybe when he's working, he's more firm, because he can distance himself emotionally for the sake of being professional, or something.

An visually imposing wall of flesh, a gentle giant, an inexorable force of nature is exactly what you want for a bouncer.  As one of the cadets said about Hightower in the first Police Academy movie, "If all cops looked like him there would be no crime at all.  Sure, the occasional person too drunk to know better may actually try to take him on, and when that happens Elliot is better equipped than most people to simply toss them out onto the street, but most of the time people will not cross him.

And keeping his cool around unreasonable people serves him well in his day job.  Not something that you would normally associate with bakeries, but the people working at that particular bakery make it necessary.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Doc on 29 Jun 2017, 11:15
Predictive can be I?

'Cause I don't think Brun likes winers, not even if they're big and nice.
A smart and protective guy on the other hand ... (even when he's already drunk).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 29 Jun 2017, 11:21
Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P
Nope - just a graduate here - don't ask me to do any of the math  :-P
Also Electronics Eng followed up with getting my CQE while employed in consumer product manufacturing QCQA.
Now a Validation Engineer in the Pharma Industry.
It has been a weird road that I have traveled.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You were already late to the game and may wish to abandon your post.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Undrneath on 29 Jun 2017, 11:25
I agree that I don't exactly think Brun and Elliot are a good match, though I'm not sure who is at this point. Clinton needs a bit of growth before he gets there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: sitnspin on 29 Jun 2017, 12:54
One could just as easily argue that Brun needs growth first, too
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 29 Jun 2017, 13:57
One could just as easily argue that Brun needs growth first, too
I'm sure Brun would have some growing pains to go trough if she was in a relationship, but nothing that couldn't be solved
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Undrneath on 29 Jun 2017, 14:12
One could just as easily argue that Brun needs growth first, too

True, my point was that Clinton (much like Marten at the beginning) is too worried about finding a girl than knowing what to do next.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 29 Jun 2017, 14:19
Do we know if Clinton has ever dated anyone? Even briefly?

I don't think we ever got any mention of his past love life.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 29 Jun 2017, 14:32
If he does need to remove someone from the Horrible Revelation, well even the fightiest drunk isn't going to try and take on someone like Elliot.

From what I've seen, that isn't always true, sadly. Alcohol is called "liquid courage" for good reason, and enough of it can make someone stupidly courageous. Enough to think they can take someone like Elliot. At which point Elliot would no doubt have to forcefully prove them wrong.

There's no doubt Elliot is capable of mayhem (https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2937) if duty calls for it, but he always affords the other person the opportunity to respond in an appropriate manner.  No doubt he as squished misbehaving bar patrons before, but in each and every prior instance said squishing was richly and unquestionably deserved.  He's appalled at what he's just done because he's violated his own code of conduct. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Mehre on 29 Jun 2017, 15:04
Software engineer here with area of expertise in neural networks(actually just come back from admission exams on Phd.).

Its not like Dale and Marigold didnt need any growth and their relationship is quite fine.  And their dating history wasnt exactly rich as well.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: St.Clair on 29 Jun 2017, 15:45
Do we know if Clinton has ever dated anyone? Even briefly?

I don't think we ever got any mention of his past love life.

He went on a date with Emily, as the link in OldGoat's post just above reminded me.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 29 Jun 2017, 16:27
And we once again have proof that Clinton's basically a nice guy -even when drunk and that, at heart, Elliott's just a big softie..
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 29 Jun 2017, 16:43
He went on a date with Emily, as the link in OldGoat's post just above reminded me.
I mean, before he entered the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 29 Jun 2017, 18:48
Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P

Christ, no. My degree is a wet liberal arts subject and I'm a teacher in my day job.

And I'm a Grease Monkey (auto repair technician)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Undrneath on 29 Jun 2017, 18:56
I'm a cook. Though I do own a nearly complete set of the Harvard Classics.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 29 Jun 2017, 19:03
Wait, is anyone here a physicist?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 29 Jun 2017, 19:05
Hang on, let's found out.

Ahem...

Pi is exactly 3!

And now we wait.

And me? I'm a smartass. Also a social media and PR manager.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: celticgeek on 29 Jun 2017, 19:07
BS in Physics, minor in Mathematics
MS in Physics, minor in Mathematics
Second BS in Information Technology
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Jun 2017, 19:10
(https://frinkiac.com/gif/S12E16/1111277/1113154.gif?b64lines=UGkgaXMgZXhhY3RseSB0aHJlZSEKKGdhc3Ap)

I wish I was a physicist. Or anything interesting, really.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 29 Jun 2017, 19:16
Wait, is anyone here a physicist?

Depends - any kets around?

Hang on, let's found out.

Ahem...

Pi is exactly 3!

And now we wait.

And me? I'm a smartass. Also a social media and PR manager.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Jun 2017, 19:19

I wish I was a physicist. Or anything interesting, really.
Being a physicist isn't that interesting.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 29 Jun 2017, 19:20
Compared to working in a call center?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: wlewisiii on 29 Jun 2017, 20:20
Wait, is anyone here a physicist?

How about a philosophy and English literature double major?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 29 Jun 2017, 20:47
BS in general biology (my adviser sucked)
Someone at the Nashville Jail, perhaps. Im just a psychology major.
With as many psych classes as I took, I might as well have minored in psych.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 29 Jun 2017, 20:55
Ok, so we have a physicist, at the very least.

Also, comic! Elliot clearly is a very...experienced... bouncer.

I highly approve of the possibility of a Clinton-Elliot "bromance".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: sitnspin on 29 Jun 2017, 20:57

Wait, is anyone here a physicist?
I used to date an astrophysicist, but that's just vicarious physics.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 29 Jun 2017, 20:57
I'm not a physicist, I'm a spider. Or so my avatar says.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Welu on 29 Jun 2017, 21:12
Dammit, I'm a doctor*, not a physicist!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Sullivan on 29 Jun 2017, 22:21
Elliot: That [one patron threatens to punch another] happens like once a week.

Brun: I want to work here.

*grin*  Brun...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: St.Clair on 29 Jun 2017, 22:24
Oh hey, it's the thing that happened in the comic that was just linked.  Nice.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 29 Jun 2017, 23:09
Heh; such is the life of bar security. You haven't been at work if you haven't stopped at least one fight from breaking out or forcibly ejected at least one increasingly antagonistic drunk! Yeah, there's no particular reason that Elliot should remember Clinton. However, I hope that he feels better knowing that Clinton remembers him. It's always a nice moment when  someone remembers something you did as part of your everyday job so positively.

Meanwhile, something tells me that Brun desperately wants to work in a rough bar. Remember how positively she reacted to the news that the Horrible Revelation got to the regional finals of the Bar Fight competition?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 29 Jun 2017, 23:14
Compared to working in a call center?
That depends on which region you're calling. Lots of colorful language and ignorance of the exemptions to the NDNCL combined with "I no speak English" with a fake accent when calling California.  It's easier to complete surveys when calling New York City!

EDIT: Not sure how I forgot to mention National Do Not Call List exemptions ignorance.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Penquin47 on 29 Jun 2017, 23:24
Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P

Christ, no. My degree is a wet liberal arts subject and I'm a teacher in my day job.

I'm a biology major, but I teach high school physics, is that close enough?
(I learned more physics my first year teaching it than I did in my high school and college classes...)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Zog on 29 Jun 2017, 23:47
Compared to working in a call center?
That depends on which region you're calling. Lots of colorful language combined with "I no speak English" with a fake accent when calling California.  It's easier to complete surveys when calling New York City!

I called people in southern California for about 15 months, then they switched me to calling nationally. I was astonished at how much easier it was.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrillho on 30 Jun 2017, 01:04
Ah, call centre jobs. They are the fucking worst. I've worked in several, and one of them was comfortably the worst job I've ever had in my life.

I used to date an astrophysicist, but that's just vicarious physics.

My degree is in vicarious physics!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: JimC on 30 Jun 2017, 01:22
You haven't been at work if you haven't stopped at least one fight from breaking out or forcibly ejected at least one increasingly antagonistic drunk!
Hopefully if you're good enough and have a reasonable clientele you can head it off before it gets to that stage.  However it may be that the choice is between unreasonable clientele and no clientele.

The physical side was never my task (or ability) but I do recall one time telling someone to sit down, shut up and behave and being conscious of less than the usual level of support from my colleagues. Anyway, the chap did what he was asked, so no problem, then my colleagues said, "err, Jim, you do know he's just come back from 5 years in the French Foreign legion don't you..."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: St.Clair on 30 Jun 2017, 02:41
"A professor once told me, 'Astronomers are geologists with clean hands and a squint'."
-- Ludger Brink, The Dig (Lucasarts)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: brasca on 30 Jun 2017, 03:25
If there were any openings at the Horrible Revelation and Brun got the job would she have to provide her own 19th century clothing or would the bar cover that? 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 30 Jun 2017, 03:29
I'm pretty sure that it would be defined as 'work uniform'. Typically, the employer will provide it but you may have to cover wear and tear.

IIRC, the Horrible Revelation has a large wardrobe for customers so they can dress up if they want to. Marten and Steve look quite dapper in period costume!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 30 Jun 2017, 05:00
I'm pretty sure that it would be defined as 'work uniform'. Typically, the employer will provide it but you may have to cover wear and tear.

IIRC, the Horrible Revelation has a large wardrobe for customers so they can dress up if they want to. Marten and Steve look quite dapper in period costume!

Yabbut I think she would need her own set of clothes that actually fit if it were a regular gig.  I don't see Brun tending bar wearing period women's clothing, so she would probably want a version of the male period bartender outfit that we saw Angus wearing, and that would not be standard or easy to find in her size.

I am certain that a place like Northhampton has people who could make or alter such clothing, but it would not be cheap.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 30 Jun 2017, 05:59
Come to think of it, there were women tending bar in the 1890's, weren't there?  I'm sure they wore something more practical than the women's garb I stereotypically associate with the period.  Still, traditional women's clothes have to fit, moreso than men's.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 30 Jun 2017, 06:26
With today's strip I'm reminding that even 'nice' bars have their share of idiots. Especially in a college town. I do question the assumption that it is a nice bar though, since they have a bouncer who's job is to look intimidating and deal with people who just looking intimidating isn't enough. Other bars don't have bouncers on staff. They just trust the bartenders and police to deal with any problems. Like in the one that Brun used to work. She was pretty quick with the harpoon, so I'm guessing it's at hand for quick use.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Akima on 30 Jun 2017, 06:45
With today's strip I'm reminding that even 'nice' bars have their share of idiots. Especially in a college town. I do question the assumption that it is a nice bar though, since they have a bouncer who's job is to look intimidating and deal with people who just looking intimidating isn't enough. Other bars don't have bouncers on staff. They just trust the bartenders and police to deal with any problems.
I agree. The only pubs or clubs I've been to that went to the expense of having bouncers, had them for a reason. And Elliot's reaction seems to confirm that the bar where he works has a reason for employing him. For Clinton it was a drama, but for Elliot "it was Tuesday".

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 30 Jun 2017, 06:51
I am now picturing Elliot dressed up as M.Bison... and Clinton as Chun-Li.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Jakk Frost on 30 Jun 2017, 07:21
So apparently Clinton isn't familiar with the concept of why bars need to hire bouncers in the first place...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Jun 2017, 07:26
With today's strip I'm reminding that even 'nice' bars have their share of idiots. Especially in a college town. I do question the assumption that it is a nice bar though, since they have a bouncer who's job is to look intimidating and deal with people who just looking intimidating isn't enough. Other bars don't have bouncers on staff. They just trust the bartenders and police to deal with any problems.
I agree. The only pubs or clubs I've been to that went to the expense of having bouncers, had them for a reason. And Elliot's reaction seems to confirm that the bar where he works has a reason for employing him. For Clinton it was a drama, but for Elliot "it was Tuesday".

Having lived in a college town and known a couple of bouncers, most of the time their job is to check the IDs of people coming in or to turn away drunks. Only rarely would a bouncer have to toss someone out. Honestly, the worst places weren't the bars, but the small fast food places near them.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 30 Jun 2017, 07:43
Ok, so we have a physicist, at the very least.


But do you know how fast they are?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Nepiophage on 30 Jun 2017, 08:25
Come to think of it, there were women tending bar in the 1890's, weren't there?  I'm sure they wore something more practical than the women's garb I stereotypically associate with the period.  Still, traditional women's clothes have to fit, moreso than men's.
http://www.shafe.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/manet_a_bar_at_the_folies-bergere_1881.jpg
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2017, 08:31
Ok, so we have a physicist, at the very least.

But do you know how fast they are?

How many physicists do you need to get a de Broglie wave going?
ℏ/2
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 30 Jun 2017, 08:42
Has anyone else noticed a discrepency between the number of the comic as given in the image, and the number that appears in the URL?  For example, "Number 3267: Smartasserole" is http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3272  Now, it makes sense that filler strips or something could cause that, but I see that the current strips (like 3515) are in synch.  That means that somewhere in between the URL numbers held still or backed up and let the strip numbers catch up.    Does this mess with the Wiki entries, that refer to strips by number?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 30 Jun 2017, 09:00
Come to think of it, there were women tending bar in the 1890's, weren't there?  I'm sure they wore something more practical than the women's garb I stereotypically associate with the period.  Still, traditional women's clothes have to fit, moreso than men's.
http://www.shafe.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/manet_a_bar_at_the_folies-bergere_1881.jpg

Oh, My.  Yes, that is definately a dress that Has To Fit.  I would love to see Faye in that outfit.  I don't know if Brun would be willing to wear it, but having one made to fit her would not be cheap.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: DSL on 30 Jun 2017, 09:06
I see that garment as less "fitting" and more "constricting."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Jun 2017, 09:22
I see that garment as less "fitting" and more "constricting."

(https://i.imgflip.com/1rs4wn.jpg) (https://imgflip.com/i/1rs4wn) (https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: flondrix on 30 Jun 2017, 11:07
Going through some old strips, I see now that we've already seen what Elliiot imagines Brun would be wearing if she worked there, and he would have a more accurate idea than any of us.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3287
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 30 Jun 2017, 11:42
Ok, so we have a physicist, at the very least.
But do you know how fast they are?
Or where they are exactly?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Akima on 30 Jun 2017, 15:48
Yes.

and Clinton as Chun-Li.
The Street Fighter movie Chun-Li???  :-o
(http://cineplex.media.baselineresearch.com/images/278130/278130_full.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Jun 2017, 16:04
That movie doesn't exist.

There is no Jean Claude Van Damme as Guile Street Fighter movie.

Nope, no such thing.

(although Raul Julia was a delight)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Tova on 30 Jun 2017, 16:56
So apparently Clinton isn't familiar with the concept of why bars need to hire bouncers in the first place...

Well, given that the first time we saw Clinton in a bar, he intended to simply wait for a bus and not order a drink at all, it's probably safe to say that he's not exactly a regular.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Storel on 30 Jun 2017, 18:07
Actually, Clinton, this IS a nice bar... for a college town. College town bars tend to be full of people who haven't yet learned how to handle their liquor very well.

Is everyone here a physicist?  :-P

Christ, no. My degree is a wet liberal arts subject and I'm a teacher in my day job.

I'm a biology major, but I teach high school physics, is that close enough?
(I learned more physics my first year teaching it than I did in my high school and college classes...)

Computer programmer here... when I'm employed.

Meanwhile, something tells me that Brun desperately wants to work in a rough bar. Remember how positively she reacted to the news that the Horrible Revelation got to the regional finals of the Bar Fight competition?

Well, yeah. She likes brandishing her harpoon, remember? You don't get too many opportunities to do that at a nice bar...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 30 Jun 2017, 18:24
It is a nice Bar

It only happens once a week.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: retrosteve on 30 Jun 2017, 18:49
Meanwhile, something tells me that Brun desperately wants to work in a rough bar. Remember how positively she reacted to the news that the Horrible Revelation got to the regional finals of the Bar Fight competition?

It's too bad that CW's robot fighting ring is down for the count; I think Brun would really have enjoyed it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: jwhouk on 30 Jun 2017, 20:40
Where I work, dealing with drunks would be a step (or five) down.

That said, when I retire I do NOT plan on becoming a bouncer.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: retrosteve on 02 Jul 2017, 09:55
You might consider that Renee is pretty much Faye before she hit bottom and bounced....  :-P

Disagree. Faye was abrasive and mean at time, but it was petty and had no spite or fear behind it.  At worst, Faye was alcoholic and ultra-defensive about it, but never mean-spirited. Faye was, even when being mean, doing it out of a twisted sense of humor.

Renee appears to be just as mean deep down as she is on the surface. She appears to really hate and distrust men, to the point where even a man she's never seen, who has been mentioned secondhand as a helpful guy, is presumed evil. And not just for laughs. Renee hasn't said anything funny that I can recall. She's just a misanthrope, possibly with previous trauma that she's obviously not going to try to work through. A seething victim.  Not my favorite sort of person.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 02 Jul 2017, 11:03
I think Renee is just a perfect opportunity to reintroduce Angus to the story. He is her ex, too, after all.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Jul 2017, 11:22
Doubtful, considering that if we were to believe Angus, their break up was even worse than his and Faye's and so that bridge has long since burned down and swept away by the river.

Not to mention that Angus probably has more of a friendly connection with Marten (ex-girlfriend's best friend) and Marigold (friends enough to be roommates). So he were to come back, it would probably be through them.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Kugai on 02 Jul 2017, 17:03
I doubt we'll see Angus again anyway since he was sent to Za'ha'dum



 ;D    :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Jul 2017, 17:35
... I thought he was on the Colbert Report?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Case on 02 Jul 2017, 17:38
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Jul 2017, 20:36
I think it was The Nightly Show.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3511 to 3515 (26 June to 30 June 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 03 Jul 2017, 11:30
So not the Corbett Report? He would seem somewhat suited for the oft sarcasm of The New World Next Week podcast.