THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Gyrre on 26 Nov 2017, 02:39

Title: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 26 Nov 2017, 02:39
From an aesthetic standpoint, that is to say 'ignoring their actions and personalities'. I tried to list them in the order they showed up in the comic.

Anyways, the Tilly arc is probably wrapping up soon. Here's to hoping nothing too catastrophic happens. Maybe Tilly will even help Brun with a few things. (Yes, I know she's potentially getting that barback position, it's just a jab.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 26 Nov 2017, 02:46
BTW, it looks like Tilly has been added to the TV Tropes QC character page (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Characters/QuestionableContent).


EDIT: Also, I had to reset the poll results to zero so I could squeeze in Lydia.
EDIT: Last poll change, I swear.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hakko504 on 26 Nov 2017, 03:14
I think you're a week to late: the upcoming week is comic 3621-3625.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: jwhouk on 26 Nov 2017, 05:35
What do you mean? I've got the right subject on my post.

;)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 26 Nov 2017, 06:36
What do you mean? I've got the right subject on my post.

;)
Did I space out and forget to change the comic numbers? I could have sworn I changed them. Oh wel if I did. At least I got the dates right. And came up with a semi-original poll.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 26 Nov 2017, 18:34
Comic's up.

Tilly does not fuck around.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tyr on 26 Nov 2017, 18:36
I'm sorry... Tilly managed to get an actual REBATE out of the phone company on top of a replacement phone? not just nulling out the price... cash back?

She is the Harbinger. The Supernatural is confirmed to be real, and the Ghosts from Bedford are heading this way.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Case on 26 Nov 2017, 18:40
I cannot think of anyone more deserving of having Tilly unleashed upon them than mobile-phone companies, so I'm down with her plan.

It almost seems a little unfair, though ... well, almost.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 26 Nov 2017, 19:02
You know who could very much use someone with Tilly's particular set of skills?

Faye and Bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Jub3r7 on 26 Nov 2017, 19:19
You know who could very much use someone with Tilly's particular set of skills?

Faye and Bubbles.
I thought the same! There's even foreshadowing for it 2,388 pages back (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1233)!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: snufflebottoms on 26 Nov 2017, 19:20
Loving this arc even less now.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 26 Nov 2017, 19:22
I'm sorry... Tilly managed to get an actual REBATE out of the phone company on top of a replacement phone? not just nulling out the price... cash back?

She is the Harbinger. The Supernatural is confirmed to be real, and the Ghosts from Bedford are heading this way.

She's a highly skilled, ethically nullified person who is presumably trained as an executive tier PA. Such people are pretty much *wizards* at negotiating bureaucracy and administration, they just leave a bloody wake of entry level workers who are going to get written up and/or fired after being bullied into agreeing to really bad deals.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 26 Nov 2017, 19:56
You know who could very much use someone with Tilly's particular set of skills?

Faye and Bubbles.

I noted this at least a week ago as a way Hanners could potentially get Tilly out of her hair!

It's still possible. Maybe even more plausible now that they have some evidence she's actually friggin' good at whatever it is she's supposed to be doing with her phone magic, though it's seeming less and less like Hannelore feels an urgent need to get rid of her as time goes on. So if it goes this way now, it'll probably be less "Here, Tilly, go help them instead of me" and more "Cool, you helped me all I needed! Now help my frens plzkthx."
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TV4Fun on 26 Nov 2017, 20:27
I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like. It must be pretty scary, given Dora's reaction.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: citizenfive on 26 Nov 2017, 21:11
I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like. It must be pretty scary, given Dora's reaction.

The way I imagine dripping speech bubbles is like when I'm telling someone to f**k off with a murderous smile. Not sure how to imagine it with Hannelore's face though
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 26 Nov 2017, 23:19
This is me but I can't help but wonder how much of Tilly's achievement came from precisely the same set of malfunctions that we've all been complaining about in terms of her behaviour towards Hannelore: Relentless cheer and an utter inability to understand a negative response if it is not in line with her personal objectives. Basically, the customer service rep gave in to shut her up and get her off the line. I'm pretty sure that this works IRL and is the basis of the telesales industry.

Meanwhile, we learn that Beatrice is a very, very thorny subject with Hannelore. Some people just suck as parents and Beatrice (and John as well) definitely fit into that category. I'm not sure if it's malice, ignorance or a simple lack of the right social skills and behavioural instincts on both their parts.

I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like. It must be pretty scary, given Dora's reaction.

To me, the speaker's voice tone goes down two octaves and gets a gutteral subtone like they're gargling the words.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: gopher on 26 Nov 2017, 23:57
It just doesn't stop.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 26 Nov 2017, 23:58
This is me but I can't help but wonder how much of Tilly's achievement came from precisely the same set of malfunctions that we've all been complaining about in terms of her behaviour towards Hannelore: Relentless cheer and an utter inability to understand a negative response if it is not in line with her personal objectives. Basically, the customer service rep gave in to shut her up and get her off the line. I'm pretty sure that this works IRL and is the basis of the telesales industry.

Yes, that is precisely what I meant by saying that Tilly's type of "negotiation" leaves a bloody wake of entry level workers who are going to get written up and/or fired after being bullied into agreeing to really bad deals.

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 27 Nov 2017, 00:17
No Bubbles in the poll? I am disappoint.

Yay, Tilly is USEFUL!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Moggie on 27 Nov 2017, 00:44
I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like. It must be pretty scary, given Dora's reaction.

Makes me think of the way the Goa'uld sound in Stargate franchise. Hanners' eyes don't glow tho'.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 27 Nov 2017, 00:54
I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like.

Nothing - Hanners's thought and feeling is implanted directly into the recipient's brain together with a sense of doom.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 27 Nov 2017, 01:07
Bubbles isn't in the poll, but Pintsize is? Come on! Does anybody really think of Pintsize as "cute"?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 27 Nov 2017, 01:21
He was hella cute in the old days (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=60) tbh.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 27 Nov 2017, 02:44
No Bubbles in the poll? I am disappoint.

Bubbles isn't cute, she's awesome! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 27 Nov 2017, 02:58
No Bubbles in the poll? I am disappoint.



IAWTP

(Maybe just a foregone conclusion she'd be WAY out in front?)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 27 Nov 2017, 03:23
I cannot think of anyone more deserving of having Tilly unleashed upon them than mobile-phone companies, so I'm down with her plan.

It almost seems a little unfair, though ... well, almost.

Being that 2 of the them are part of the big 3 ISPs trying to get rid of net neutrality (Verizon and AT&T alongside Comcast), I approve of Tilly squeezing money out of them for a change.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TinPenguin on 27 Nov 2017, 03:26
I really want to know what the dripping speech bubble sounds like. It must be pretty scary, given Dora's reaction.

Completely measured and precise speech, except for a slight wobble that may be perceived as the pressure on the line between your life and death right now.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JimC on 27 Nov 2017, 04:04
I cannot think of anyone more deserving of having Tilly unleashed upon them than mobile-phone companies, so I'm down with her plan.

It almost seems a little unfair, though ... well, almost.
The only trouble with unleashing on mobile phone companies is the difficulty of getting hold of the executives who make the mind bogglingly customer hostile policies, and not the poor minimum wage peons who are IME clearly terrified they'll be booted for making the slightest variation from the script.  I had to sit in a shop for an hour and a half before they could get some one who had the authority to say, yes, they can swap a sim carrier over from another phone to replace the one they lost, and not make me wait two weeks and exchange the whole frigging phone...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Case on 27 Nov 2017, 04:05
This is me but I can't help but wonder how much of Tilly's achievement came from precisely the same set of malfunctions that we've all been complaining about in terms of her behaviour towards Hannelore: Relentless cheer and an utter inability to understand a negative response if it is not in line with her personal objectives. Basically, the customer service rep gave in to shut her up and get her off the line. I'm pretty sure that this works IRL and is the basis of the telesales industry.

Given that her skill set is precisely that of an excellent telemarketing phonedrone, her beating them at their own game might have the unintended side-effect of instigating the one or other minor religion.

We'll know when CoD is flooded with glazed-eyed, headset-wearing folk chanting Mahdi! and Lisan-al-Tilly ...!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 27 Nov 2017, 06:06
No Bubbles in the poll? I am disappoint.

Bubbles isn't cute, she's awesome! :-D

She somehow succeeded at being both, imo...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 27 Nov 2017, 06:09
He was hella cute in the old days (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=60) tbh.

That was before he got strange porn habits. Or maybe before we heard about them...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: cesium133 on 27 Nov 2017, 06:23
He was hella cute in the old days (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=60) tbh.

That was before he got strange porn habits. Or maybe before we heard about them...
You could argue we first heard about them in this one (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1).
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 27 Nov 2017, 07:42
I misread the comic initially as "fancier phone FOR $500" and was feeling very, "Dammit, Tilly!" till I reread it. Then I was more, "Dammit, Tilly!" in a good way.

For the posts about Tilly's work damaging entry level employees, definitely possible but I'd be hopeful that Tilly would be able to quickly get access to higher ups with the type of authority to okay those deals. In my experience, depending on the level you are/are dealing with, there is a hard line in what they can actually do, no matter how persistent the customer is being. Although that doesn't mean the higher up won't get into trouble either.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 27 Nov 2017, 09:53
For the posts about Tilly's work damaging entry level employees, definitely possible but I'd be hopeful that Tilly would be able to quickly get access to higher ups with the type of authority to okay those deals. In my experience, depending on the level you are/are dealing with, there is a hard line in what they can actually do, no matter how persistent the customer is being. Although that doesn't mean the higher up won't get into trouble either.

The sort of aggressive negotiation game Tilly plays involves escalating to higher-ups after already manipulating the entry level worker as far as possible, massively spinning what the previous person agreed to as a starting position, and then manipulating the next person as far as *they* can go. Rinse, repeat, and after three or four rounds you walk away with a spectacular deal while low-level workers are left holding the bag.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 27 Nov 2017, 17:35
Taffey is like storm-bringer - a powerful tool that is tempting to use, has lots of benefits but it comes at a price to use, is inherently evil and will corrupt you.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 27 Nov 2017, 17:40
No Bubbles in the poll? I am disappoint.



IAWTP

(Maybe just a foregone conclusion she'd be WAY out in front?)

Pretty much.
Also I had forsworn not to make any further amendments to the poll. Also, somehow I forgot about Gordon.


He was hella cute in the old days (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=60) tbh.

That was before he got strange porn habits. Or maybe before we heard about them...
I did specify that it was based on appearance alone with disreard to their actions and words.

EDIT: Forgot about Gordon.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: SotFX on 27 Nov 2017, 20:45
Well, at least the spider is fuzzy and not one with a health bar...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: brasca on 27 Nov 2017, 21:20
Tilly loses some indispensability points here.  Doing a job Hannelore can't would prove her worth, but in this instance she's more afraid to go into basement than her boss.

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 27 Nov 2017, 21:47
Well, at least the spider is fuzzy and not one with a health bar...

No, see, that’s worse. The fuzziness acts as an armour, negating damage and it’s got an invisible health bar, meaning you can’t see how much damage you’re doing! It’s the CoD version of Vagrant Story! Noooooooo!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: A Duck on 27 Nov 2017, 22:06
It's actually just Gordon's cousin.

He's fallen into some hard times.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 27 Nov 2017, 23:21
I think that Tilly is going to find today gives her an insight into a lifestyle and a set of experiences that she never previously knew existed!

I'm also broadly sure that the baseball bat is only because Hannelore is nervous about bugs. There isn't really large enough spiders that you'd need a weapon like that (unless Jeph has quietly moved the setting to Australia without mentioning it). No, this is Hannelore's neuroses talking and that's insightful in its own way. BTW, I do like the idea that part of Hannelore's coping strategy is that she's convinced herself that she's made a deal with the Queen Acromantula!

Oddly enough, I'm looking forward to Tilly loosing her temper about Hannelore not being able to remember her name, if it happens. I wonder if there is some kind of deeper strategy at work here and it would be interesting to see how that scene works out.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: gopher on 27 Nov 2017, 23:53
So much of the Tilly plot could have been done with Winslow.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TinPenguin on 28 Nov 2017, 02:26
So much of the Tilly plot could have been done with Winslow.

oh wow that would have been so much better.

Winslow wanting to make himself useful. Winslow wanting to be like Momo, only Hannelore isn't Marigold and she doesn't need a Momo.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Case on 28 Nov 2017, 03:50
I believe we've found Tilly's kryptonite heheSoSad...

... downside that it's also my kryptonite :shudder:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 28 Nov 2017, 07:02
So much of the Tilly plot could have been done with Winslow.

Pretty much!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Marco on 28 Nov 2017, 10:04
He was hella cute in the old days (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=60) tbh.

Even Faye thought he was cute back then. http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=5 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=5) That changed fast... http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=112 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=112)

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: blt on 28 Nov 2017, 12:44
So much of the Tilly plot could have been done with Winslow.

And not add a superfluous dorky quote-unquote cute female character?  What is wrong with you?  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 28 Nov 2017, 13:03
It's much better this way.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 28 Nov 2017, 15:37
You cannot negotiate with spiders.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: SotFX on 28 Nov 2017, 16:59
So much of the Tilly plot could have been done with Winslow.

oh wow that would have been so much better.

Winslow wanting to make himself useful. Winslow wanting to be like Momo, only Hannelore isn't Marigold and she doesn't need a Momo.

I'm waiting for the inevitable backlash to come out of this when Winslow starts feeling like he's being replaced with his various duties now being handled by the servant of the evil witch/bitch queen sent to corrupt Hanners...

And Pintsize deciding to exacerbate the situation by forming a fellowship to try casting Hannelore's mother into a volcano...or at least use the orbital pizza gun on her for the lulz while Winslow freaks out with Momo and May getting involved, perhaps with some of the other anthro PC's getting to pop up again along with some of the others. Perhaps prompting Spooky Bot to show up again in order to try figuring things out.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Storel on 28 Nov 2017, 18:43
For the posts about Tilly's work damaging entry level employees, definitely possible but I'd be hopeful that Tilly would be able to quickly get access to higher ups with the type of authority to okay those deals. In my experience, depending on the level you are/are dealing with, there is a hard line in what they can actually do, no matter how persistent the customer is being. Although that doesn't mean the higher up won't get into trouble either.

The sort of aggressive negotiation game Tilly plays involves escalating to higher-ups after already manipulating the entry level worker as far as possible, massively spinning what the previous person agreed to as a starting position, and then manipulating the next person as far as *they* can go. Rinse, repeat, and after three or four rounds you walk away with a spectacular deal while low-level workers are left holding the bag.

Or so you hear? :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 28 Nov 2017, 18:51
Comic’s up.

Today we learn what Hannelore’s favorite color is.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 28 Nov 2017, 19:41
The fact that the dossier got something that basic WRONG says depressing things about how well her Mom knows Hanners.

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 28 Nov 2017, 19:55
We already knew that Beatrice didn't know that much about Hanners, that she smoked, drank or had her ears repeated pierced.

But really, its a sign of how out of touch that Beatrice is with her own daughter, given that the dossier is out of date and possesses the wrong information.

But its also a sign of how desperate Tilly is to make a good first impression that she's based her enter strategy around wrong information. Which is kinda depressing...and a little pathetic...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tyr on 28 Nov 2017, 20:32
...I'm also broadly sure that the baseball bat is only because Hannelore is nervous about bugs. There isn't really large enough spiders that you'd need a weapon like that (unless Jeph has quietly moved the setting to Australia without mentioning it). ...

Are you forgetting the Library Spiders (http://"http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1210")? Marten and/or Claire may have inadvertently carried some eggs into Coffee of Doom.:-P
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 28 Nov 2017, 21:36
You cannot negotiate with spiders.
But some spiders can negotiate with mazes (http://www.americanarachnology.org/joa_free/joa_v35_n3/joa-35-3-487.pdf). These same spiders think ahead and make plans (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/01/160121-jumping-spiders-animals-science/).

the first link is a .pdf
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 28 Nov 2017, 21:38
We already knew that Beatrice didn't know that much about Hanners, that she smoked, drank or had her ears repeated pierced.

But really, its a sign of how out of touch that Beatrice is with her own daughter, given that the dossier is out of date and possesses the wrong information.

But its also a sign of how desperate Tilly is to make a good first impression that she's based her enter strategy around wrong information. Which is kinda depressing...and a little pathetic...

Honestly it puts pretty much all of her overly pushy/untrustworthy behavior in a somewhat better light. Not because her behavior is, itself, inherently any better, but because it was based on faulty information that probably was written on the assumption that Hanners is still as bad as/worse than she was when we first met her in QC, a state in which, really, she COULD have probably used an assistant just to help her stabilize her outside-of-the-apartment life.

That Tilly couldn't recognize that data was clearly way off within the first hour or so of meeting Hannelore is a pretty bad sign for her perception, though, so it's a wash overall.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Storel on 28 Nov 2017, 22:34
I thought Tilly said in one of her first strips that this dossier was 600 pages long -- or was it 900? If that little thing Hanners is holding is even 150 pages, I'll eat it.

Edit: Ah, my bad. It was Jeph's comment at the bottom of page 3618 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3618) that the dossier was 900 pages long. I guess that was just humorous exaggeration on his part. :-P
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 28 Nov 2017, 23:19
Okay, so now we know for what Jeph is intending to use Tilly: As the Dossier is incorrect, it is Tilly's duty to update it so that the information that the Company has on the Heir is accurate (for a variety of reasons, bureaucratic perfectionism being the most important). So, we're going to be witnessing Hannelore through her eyes - Her life, friends, enemies and preferences. Tilly is going to be learning about the real world outside of HQ through learning who Hannelore Ellicott-Chatham really is.

We will probably never know what horrors that they faced in the basement. Or, rather that Tilly faced. Hannelore, thanks to the power of acclimatisation and adaptation, is pretty blasé about the whole thing. :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 29 Nov 2017, 01:14
I don't have a favorite color. Is that weird?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 29 Nov 2017, 01:16
Not really. I'm not sure I have a 'favourite' colour. f I were pressed, I'd say: "Dunno... Green maybe?" I'm pretty sure it was red when I was a kid but these days, I don't know.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: gopher on 29 Nov 2017, 01:18
"I'm playing a long game with this story" So hopefully many, many jokes are being stored up.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 29 Nov 2017, 02:04
So...
Hanners is "Earth"
Tilly is "Ford Prefect"
The Dossier is "The Guide" ??

On a separate issue...
What's with Tilly's HEIGHT fluctuation!?
(I only really first noticed it yesterday, but today it's horrendous!)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: blt on 29 Nov 2017, 03:35
I think it's her standing on her toes (or levitating) when she gets excited.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hakko504 on 29 Nov 2017, 03:54
Hanners is "Earth"
Tilly is "Ford Prefect"
The Dossier is "The Guide" ??
You think Hannelore is going to explode?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Marco on 29 Nov 2017, 04:05
Not really. I'm not sure I have a 'favourite' colour. f I were pressed, I'd say: "Dunno... Green maybe?" I'm pretty sure it was red when I was a kid but these days, I don't know.

Me too. When I was a kid, the red crayon always diminished faster than the others (maybe because I drew fire and blood a lot - spaceships, dragons, dinosaur fights...) Now, if someone asks me my fave colour, I try to be really specific, going with greenish-blue. This usually suffice to change the subject of the conversation.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TinPenguin on 29 Nov 2017, 04:42
Everyone's favourite colour is green or blue, because we all feel the quiescent siren-song of the glassy sea calling us home.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 29 Nov 2017, 05:53
Hanners is "Earth"
Tilly is "Ford Prefect"
The Dossier is "The Guide" ??
You think Hannelore is going to explode?


Well, she's been pretty close to it the last handful of strips! :)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 29 Nov 2017, 07:17
Everyone's favourite colour is green or blue, because we all feel the quiescent siren-song of the glassy sea calling us home.
And that song is playued out by the gentle lapping of waves on the shoreline.
 DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM ...... [from the mind of a person who is terrified of drowning]

Colours here are Green and Gold, as in the colour of the forests in Spring, Summer and Autumn. The Winter's blacks, greys and whites are more melancholy unless there is some coniferous greens mixed in.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 29 Nov 2017, 07:49
Not really. I'm not sure I have a 'favourite' colour. f I were pressed, I'd say: "Dunno... Green maybe?" I'm pretty sure it was red when I was a kid but these days, I don't know.
I find favourite colours to be entirely situational. Like, I have a favourite hair colour but I wouldn’t wear clothes that colour, and my favourite colour of clothes would never end up on a wall I was decorating, and so on. The idea of a singular solitary colour that you favour at all times and in all situations seems silly to me.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Marco on 29 Nov 2017, 07:51
Everyone's favourite colour is green or blue, because we all feel the quiescent siren-song of the glassy sea calling us home.
And that song is playued out by the gentle lapping of waves on the shoreline.
 DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM DOOM ...... [from the mind of a person who is terrified of drowning]

Colours here are Green and Gold, as in the colour of the forests in Spring, Summer and Autumn. The Winter's blacks, greys and whites are more melancholy unless there is some coniferous greens mixed in.

Here is green all year long, the only grays in the clouds. With occasional yellow, purple and red in the trees in Spring.

(I think I digress... What is the subject of this forum again?)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: brasca on 29 Nov 2017, 10:32
Well this explains how Tilly could get so much about her boss wrong like that business suit she thought Hannelore wore to work.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 29 Nov 2017, 19:56
Comic's up and I guess that answers more than a few questions.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: chris73 on 29 Nov 2017, 20:01
Well after having left for awhile I thought I'd come back and check to see if theres been any improvement and of course Tilly/Taffy uses they/them pronouns
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Milayna on 29 Nov 2017, 20:15
I was wondering how long it would be till Hanners got Tilly's name right. The character's annoying, but that was jarringly rude.

Dunno about height differences, in every instance with comparable perspective they seem to be up to Hanners' nose? Seems fine to me.

I don't have a favorite color so much as a favorite combo...pink/black. Just goes so well together.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: snufflebottoms on 29 Nov 2017, 20:21
I  cannot wait for the Tilly arc to be over. Maybe now that the name thing is cleared up it will be for a while. Looks like Tilly will be joining the regular cast though, unfortunately.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: mikmaxs on 29 Nov 2017, 21:01
I find it... Odd that Tilly didn't mention their pronouns until now. This is the fourth person they've introduced themself too, and they didn't have any problem repeatedly insisting that their name was being said wrong, so... It just seems odd that they didn't mention it until now, but bring it up here without any sort of comment or reason for the change in behavior.

(Also: What is Hannelore looking at in the bottom left panel? Tilly's speech bubble?)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: brasca on 29 Nov 2017, 21:07
There is one other person who goes by the pronoun they.  I theorized before that this could be Spookybot assuming a different form and this could be a clue. 
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: lemonglamour on 29 Nov 2017, 21:08
I find it... Odd that Tilly didn't mention their pronouns until now. This is the fourth person they've introduced themself too, and they didn't have any problem repeatedly insisting that their name was being said wrong, so... It just seems odd that they didn't mention it until now, but bring it up here without any sort of comment or reason for the change in behavior.

(Also: What is Hannelore looking at in the bottom left panel? Tilly's speech bubble?)

speaking as a nonbinary person, it can be easier to correct new people on your name more than your pronouns. pronouns are gendered by nature, but names have more leeway, especially since nb folk tend to pick unisex names. and people who don't know you tend to easily accept being corrected on your name as "oh, I didn't know" whereas asking for different pronouns than they assumed turns it into a whole Thing.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hedgie on 29 Nov 2017, 21:17
There is one other person who goes by the pronoun they.  I theorized before that this could be Spookybot assuming a different form and this could be a clue.

I believe that in Spookybot's case, the "They" is plural.  In Tilly's case, I'm pretty sure that they are using the singular form.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 29 Nov 2017, 22:18
Man...I don't think I've ever been browing the WCDT threads during a new character introduction before.

Do they usually get this hostile? Like, I get it, Tilly's kinda obnoxious, but dang. Daaaang.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 29 Nov 2017, 22:34
Maybe not quite this hostile. There's airways some hostility.

It's interesting, I think, that Jeph has chosen to withhold Tilly's preferred pronouns until now. Playing the long game, eh?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Timemaster on 29 Nov 2017, 22:50
Hi Shijade & Tova,

I´m a bit disturbed by the hostile reactions too. That´s why I haven´t posted here for some time.

I think Tilly is hilarious and I love her a lot. In fact, in my oppinion she´s the most sympathetic character Jeph introduced for quite some time. I couldn´t relate to Brun or Renee, but Taffy is so much fun for me, I really love her and her unbreakable joyfulness. And I would really like to see her and Claire hitting it off. :laugh:

I sometimes think, some people are taking QC too seriously. I mean, this is comedy. Very good comedy with a sensible approach to gender and diversity, but still comedy. And Tiffy is a kind of classic screwball character. She is hilarious and good for a laugh at the end of every strip, every day. And thats what this comicstrip is all about, isn´t it?
If CQ were a movie, she would be played by a young Goldie Hawn.  :-D

Just a thought:
Timemaster
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 29 Nov 2017, 23:22
Man...I don't think I've ever been browing the WCDT threads during a new character introduction before.

Do they usually get this hostile? Like, I get it, Tilly's kinda obnoxious, but dang. Daaaang.

In my experience/perception, that happens a LOT when new characters are introduced. It still puzzles me and weirds me out, every single time it does happen.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: RomulusAug on 29 Nov 2017, 23:23
Everyone's favourite colour is green or blue, because we all feel the quiescent siren-song of the glassy sea calling us home.

What is dead may never die  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 29 Nov 2017, 23:29
Well, I've got the feeling that we've reached the end of the 'Introducing The New Big Thing' arc. Basically, it was a compressed version of the introduction of Claire, reducing it to less than 20 strips rather than the hundreds of strips it took to introduce a certain redhead.

I've got a feeling that we're going to be seeing a lot more of them in the future. They might even end up as a main cast member's significant other/very best friend and a member of the main cast, at least for a while. Jeph thinks they're cute, has made it clear that he likes writing them. I just wish that he wasn't being so clumsy about it!

Now, don't get me wrong. I've said before that QC has more in common with 'continuing' comedies and dramas like soap operas than most other web-comics. Because of this, the 'main cast' is always changing and the focus is slowly drifting across new characters as the writer runs out of material for the old ones (who metamorphose into secondary or even supporting roles). Because of this, the introduction of new characters who will take on major roles is inevitable.

I just want to emphasise something: I don't dislike or hate Tilly. If anything, I'm generally indifferent to them. Jeph has really failed in this arc to make me care about them and be interested in their arc in the way I am about, for example, Faye, Bubbles, Marten, Claire and even May and Momo. To me, they'll always be more a foil than a character in their own right so I guess that I've just got to shrug this one off and hope we move onto something interesting next week.

I'm glad that I was right on the nose about the 'Taffy' thing. Either Beatrice, like Veronica, is one of those people who, if she says something in that voice, other people tend to follow along. Or, and this is more likely, Hannelore was tired and a bit out-of-sorts when she spoke to first Tilly and then her mother and she got what the two of them said mixed up in her head.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JimC on 29 Nov 2017, 23:58
the 'main cast' is always changing and the focus is slowly drifting across new characters as the writer runs out of material for the old ones
Or, of course because that's simply what happens in real life...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: anahata on 30 Nov 2017, 00:35
I'm amused by the way so many  posters on this forum were deliberately calling Tilly Taffy while knowing that wasn't their correct name, but have uniformly jumped into line when told to use gender-neutral pronouns.
Is that more important than getting somebody's name right?

Also, as I've not knowingly met any non-binary people in real life, It never occurred to me some of them preferred they/them to he/him or she/her. It's obvious why, but it did make me think for a moment. Well done, Jeph.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hakko504 on 30 Nov 2017, 00:42
I find it... Odd that Tilly didn't mention their pronouns until now. This is the fourth person they've introduced themself too, and they didn't have any problem repeatedly insisting that their name was being said wrong, so... It just seems odd that they didn't mention it until now, but bring it up here without any sort of comment or reason for the change in behavior.
speaking as a nonbinary person, it can be easier to correct new people on your name more than your pronouns. pronouns are gendered by nature, but names have more leeway, especially since nb folk tend to pick unisex names. and people who don't know you tend to easily accept being corrected on your name as "oh, I didn't know" whereas asking for different pronouns than they assumed turns it into a whole Thing.
Welcome new poster :) Feel free to introduce you some more in the 'Hi I'm new' forum. :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 30 Nov 2017, 01:06
Sorry, I don't get the joke about pronouns. I guess that's the limit of my knowledge of the arcanes of english language...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 30 Nov 2017, 01:16
Sorry, I don't get the joke about pronouns. I guess that's the limit of my knowledge of the arcanes of english language...

There isn't a joke. Tilly is indirectly signalling that she's non-binary in her identified gender and doesn't consider either male or female pronouns to apply to her in an entirely correct way.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shaitan051 on 30 Nov 2017, 01:19
*shudder* pronouns  :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hakko504 on 30 Nov 2017, 01:23
Maybe not quite this hostile. There's airways some hostility.

It's interesting, I think, that Jeph has chosen to withhold Tilly's preferred pronouns until now. Playing the long game, eh?
And partly also because the only time someone has referred to Tilly using a pronoun was Dora in 3614 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3614), and at that point Tilly was preoccupied with not being killed to notice the error.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: sitnspin on 30 Nov 2017, 01:39
Sorry, I don't get the joke about pronouns. I guess that's the limit of my knowledge of the arcanes of english language...

There isn't a joke. Tilly is indirectly signalling that she's non-binary in her identified gender and doesn't consider either male or female pronouns to apply to her in an entirely correct way.

Them, not her. They, not she.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 30 Nov 2017, 02:29
I live in Sweden and I'm glad that we are starting to pick up a neutral pronoun "hen" (in contrast to han = he, and hon = she).***
I guess that's why the term they/them in singular confuses the hell out of me (on a purely linguistical way, mind you) because we already got a non-binary pronoun and leave the they/them for plurals only. :P




*** = Feel free to make any poultry jokes you like, cuz I can't come up with a single one.

Yeah... a singular would be a great addition to the language.
Y'see, I find this They/Them thing VERY difficult to take on, because for 50+ years I've been raised to think that calling someone THEY or THEM was unspeakably rude.

As far as Tilly/Taffy is concerned...
Not overjoyed at the possibility of 'main character-ness', other than it might mean we see a lot more of Hanners.

Taffy might (to Jeph) be 'cute', all I am seeing is 'annoying'.
But then I guess it would be a boring world if we all had the same opinions...

(Would make ordering Pizza MUCH easier though!)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 30 Nov 2017, 02:34
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 30 Nov 2017, 02:49
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

CLEARLY an abomination to life and all matters culinary.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: bhtooefr on 30 Nov 2017, 02:53
Yeah... a singular would be a great addition to the language.
Y'see, I find this They/Them thing VERY difficult to take on, because for 50+ years I've been raised to think that calling someone THEY or THEM was unspeakably rude.

AFAIK, "they"/"them" as singular gender-neutral animate pronouns is actually the safest one to use when gender is unknown or the subject is non-binary. Note that there are some constructs like "ze"/"zir" - newly-coined singular gender-neutral animate pronouns - that some non-binary people prefer, though, but I don't think I've personally seen a single case where such a person found "they"/"them" to be unacceptable.

It's "it"/"its" that are rude, because those pronouns, while actually singular and gender-neutral, are inanimate.

(Would make ordering Pizza MUCH easier though!)

Remember that Hannelore has the power (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3046) to summon orbital pizza bombardment at the push of a button.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 30 Nov 2017, 03:00
Maybe not quite this hostile. There's airways some hostility.

It's interesting, I think, that Jeph has chosen to withhold Tilly's preferred pronouns until now. Playing the long game, eh?
And partly also because the only time someone has referred to Tilly using a pronoun was Dora in 3614 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3614), and at that point Tilly was preoccupied with not being killed to notice the error.

Also Hanners used "she" earlier (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3621) but Tilly was on the phone. They were given an opportunity to do a gentle correction when Hanners was introducing them to Marten. It's a common way a lot of nonbinary people introduce their pronoun because, "Hi I use They/She/He" isn't still a common thing in most spaces.

Also there are other additions like ze/xe and more (https://genderneutralpronoun.wordpress.com/tag/ze-and-zir/) but a lot of people get uppity about "inventing words".
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: blt on 30 Nov 2017, 03:05
I'm amused by the way so many  posters on this forum were deliberately calling Tilly Taffy while knowing that wasn't their correct name, but have uniformly jumped into line when told to use gender-neutral pronouns.
Is that more important than getting somebody's name right?

Pretty simple explanation, getting their name wrong was presented as a recurring joke multiple times in the comic so the forums picked up on it. The pronouns weren't.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2017, 03:27
Note, there's now a thread in Discuss! (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,33936.0.html) in which discussion of gender in language is happening.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: snufflebottoms on 30 Nov 2017, 05:09
I honestly feel like Jeph made Tilly non-binary in an attempt to make them less vulnerable to hate. Like, I'm going to make them a giant asshole but then I'm going to add in this part as their hook and ignore the fact that this character is just amazingly grating.

Then over time, the character will become more likable. But not so much because we know them more but because they have stopped the bad behavior. Idk, meh.

And I do not find them cute. Maybe in the first introduction but then they kept talking lol.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 30 Nov 2017, 05:22
I honestly feel like Jeph made Tilly non-binary in an attempt to make them less vulnerable to hate. Like, I'm going to make them a giant asshole but then I'm going to add in this part as their hook and ignore the fact that this character is just amazingly grating.

That was my concern at first but, looking back on this arc, there has been hints in the character design from the outset that they're non-binary and several forum members both here and on the Subreddit picked up on this at the time. The real problem here is that Jeph chose to introduce them and their self-identification in a very clumsy way at a time and place when it feels like an attempt to slap a band-aid on an unpopular character, even though it actually isn't.

This may be a controversial position but, in my opinion, giving Tilly a free pass for all their mis-steps and outright agency-denials with Hannelore just because they're from a minority gender identity would be just as great a disservice than hating them for no other reason than said identity.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Nov 2017, 05:55
Tilly could have been an interesting character, with a story that could have worked well in the QC-verse.

Unfortunately, first impressions linger far longer than we would like and Tilly's was less than stellar. Her introduction was somewhat clumsy and got rather tired rather quickly. Not only that, but it presented a long established character in a rather out of character manner for much of the arc. Add in the fact that this story has gone on for the best part of a month and I think this might be an arc we'll all try to pretend never happened, both for the reaction of the forum and the arc itself.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Cornelius on 30 Nov 2017, 06:09
That's exactly how I feel about it, as well, though perhaps more for the reaction than the arc itself.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 30 Nov 2017, 06:15
Yeah... a singular would be a great addition to the language.
Y'see, I find this They/Them thing VERY difficult to take on, because for 50+ years I've been raised to think that calling someone THEY or THEM was unspeakably rude.

AFAIK, "they"/"them" as singular gender-neutral animate pronouns is actually the safest one to use when gender is unknown or the subject is non-binary. Note that there are some constructs like "ze"/"zir" - newly-coined singular gender-neutral animate pronouns - that some non-binary people prefer, though, but I don't think I've personally seen a single case where such a person found "they"/"them" to be unacceptable.

It's "it"/"its" that are rude, because those pronouns, while actually singular and gender-neutral, are inanimate.

(Would make ordering Pizza MUCH easier though!)

Remember that Hannelore has the power (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3046) to summon orbital pizza bombardment at the push of a button.

IT / Its is certainly worse...
But you should probably be aware that, in the far-flung wilds of Scotland, even using he or she can be viewed as rude if you know the person's name.
(More often than not the feminine side)
Hence the impenetrable phrase "SHE'S the cat's mother!" when talking about someone (female) and calling them "she"...

(No - I dunno where it comes from either!)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Marco on 30 Nov 2017, 08:17
It's getting worse. Now people are abandoning either "Tilly" or "Taffy" and calling Tilly "them" instead. I always have to read it a second time to be sure that "them" do not refer to more than one person. I used to like English because it's less dubious then my native language...

Anyway, here in Brasil, the few non-binary people I know pick a pronoum of their preference or just don't care if they're called "he" or "she". As far as I know, there is no spoken new pronoum for them, altough there were a few atempts in print (none of them really catch up).
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Nepiophage on 30 Nov 2017, 09:24
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

There used to be a  Pizza place opposite our main maternity hospital. They did an "Expectant Mothers' Special" -- tuna and pineapple pizza.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 30 Nov 2017, 10:26
I've moved the unambiguously pronoun-centred posts to the thread I pointed at earlier (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,33936.0.html), since the two threads are having much the same discussion.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 30 Nov 2017, 12:18
That's exactly how I feel about it, as well, though perhaps more for the reaction than the arc itself.

I fully admit that this is my own personal bias/pet peeve. So in the spirit of the forums, I'll call it my head canon.

I reckon Jeoh has done this in an attempt to make you all think about the folly of leaping from an initial impression to instant character judgement.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: ChipNoir on 30 Nov 2017, 12:50
I still stand by the sentiment that comedy is pain, and now that Tilly is showing they're not quite as invulnerable as they initially seemed, I feel like I can grow to like them. Up till the last couple, the comedy has been that Tilly is the source of pain, and now we're seeing that they're capable of fear, mistakes (However rare) and are in general, well, human with the best intentions gone entirely to hell so far.

And no, I didn't want Winslow to go this route. Winslow is evolving into a character I actually like, and to have him backslide into annoying illintentioned twee-mode would make me hate him far more than I'd ever hate Tilly, simply because he's made so much progress.

No, I wanna see where Tilly goes with this stuff. And I wanna see Hannelore live up to what she was talking about: She has a LOT of privilege as the defacto heir to two insane legacies. Her parents are no spring chickens, especially not her dad. Within 10-15 years, either or both the company and the space station would fall under her responsibility. And if she can't handle one problematic PA, she'd better make sure her parents leave their legacy in more capable hands, or step up to the plate like she's already made allusions towards doing.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Nov 2017, 13:17
I'm amused by the way so many  posters on this forum were deliberately calling Tilly Taffy while knowing that wasn't their correct name, but have uniformly jumped into line when told to use gender-neutral pronouns.
Is that more important than getting somebody's name right?

I'll leave that question to the gender-variant people here but I'm prepared to believe a "yes" answer.

Think about the relative abjectness of the apologies you make when you misgender someone versus getting their name wrong.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: ChipNoir on 30 Nov 2017, 13:36
I'm amused by the way so many  posters on this forum were deliberately calling Tilly Taffy while knowing that wasn't their correct name, but have uniformly jumped into line when told to use gender-neutral pronouns.
Is that more important than getting somebody's name right?

I'll leave that question to the gender-variant people here but I'm prepared to believe a "yes" answer.

Think about the relative abjectness of the apologies you make when you misgender someone versus getting their name wrong.

Names don't have connotation, at least not first names. It's apart of the identity, but you can't look at a Tilly and project anything from that except perhaps maybe that their parents really liked 1980-1990's NYC type names. And even that doesn't tell you about the person.

Gender projects A LOT. I don't think I need to go into it, but there's a reason transgender and non binary people exist. We project a lot into other and ourselves based on the pronoun used. People prefer to have as few wrong things assumed about them within that brief first impression as is possible.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 30 Nov 2017, 15:22
We already knew that Beatrice didn't know that much about Hanners, that she smoked, drank or had her ears repeated pierced.

But really, its a sign of how out of touch that Beatrice is with her own daughter, given that the dossier is out of date and possesses the wrong information.

There's no evidence at all that Beatrice was involved in creating the dossier, as opposed to Little Creepazoid Stalker being sloppy at "research".

Quote
But its also a sign of how desperate Tilly is to make a good first impression that she's based her enter strategy around wrong information. Which is kinda depressing...and a little pathetic...

I think it's more giving us further evidence that Tilly is overall incompetent at their purported job. So far, the only thing they've shown themselves competent at is 1) obeying unethical orders without hesitation and 2) bullying customer service reps into a bad deal. The actual PA functions? Zero for three.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 30 Nov 2017, 16:43
Negotiation is a PA function, surely.

The bullying idea, while not out of the question, is conjecture.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Nov 2017, 16:50
We already knew that Beatrice didn't know that much about Hanners, that she smoked, drank or had her ears repeated pierced.

But really, its a sign of how out of touch that Beatrice is with her own daughter, given that the dossier is out of date and possesses the wrong information.

There's no evidence at all that Beatrice was involved in creating the dossier, as opposed to Little Creepazoid Stalker being sloppy at "research".

1. You don't send a new employee to compile a dossier on their new supervisor, that's just asking for problems.
2. Beatrice is the kind of woman who would have a dossier for everyone she could see as someone she can use.
3. Beatrice still doesn't know that much about her daughter, just look at the last time she appeared in the comic. Par for the course if you ask me.
4. Name calling? Seriously? Look, we get the fact you don't like Tilly, I'm certainly not their biggest fan, but come on, their a fictional character, name calling isn't going to do anything to them, but it will make you look foolish.

Quote
But its also a sign of how desperate Tilly is to make a good first impression that she's based her enter strategy around wrong information. Which is kinda depressing...and a little pathetic...

I think it's more giving us further evidence that Tilly is overall incompetent at their purported job. So far, the only thing they've shown themselves competent at is 1) obeying unethical orders without hesitation and 2) bullying customer service reps into a bad deal. The actual PA functions? Zero for three.

Yes, Tilly has been a rather poor PA, but then again the entire profile they were working with was quite inaccurate.
1. Tilly is in something of a Catch 22 situation, damned if they do, damned if they don't. Their employer is Beatrice Ellicott-Chatham, a woman whose management style reads like a villain from a James Bond film, who doesn't like failure. And Tilly failing here would certainly ruin her job prospects with the company.
2. We have seen no evidence that Tilly bullied any service rep. I have never heard of a rep giving someone $500 over the phone. If anything, Tilly probably dropped Hanners name, or her mother's and used that to get to talk to a manager or supervisor in order to get that money authorised. In the sense of getting Hanners a new phone, Tilly was surprisingly successful and saved their boss the hassle of getting a new phone, so in that regard score one for Tilly.

Look, you don't like Tilly, I certainly don't like them. But at the same time, is there really any need to be foaming at the mouth and chomping at the bit to show your dislike? At the end of the day, the storyline was an attempt to introduce a new character and there is some debate as to whether or not that introduction was successful. Some believed it fell flat, others believe that Tilly has proven to be interesting. That's really all that should matter. We can't judge this whole arc from a day to day basis, but only on the whole when it is completed. And it does seem that the arc might be winding down. Let's just see what happens before someone breaks out the torches and pitchforks.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: ChipNoir on 30 Nov 2017, 16:54
The problem is that they had totally accurate information on Winslow.  So there's some logic issues here. How is the Hannelore profile so off point, but Tilly has Winslow's schedule down to a T, especially with the latter info being so much more obscure than knowing Hanner's favorite color?   

And no, this doesn't say they're bad at their job, so much as they are only good as the tools they work with. Having spent no time with their 'boss' she of course won't have their preferences figured out. I don't think Tilly picked out this information themselves. Someone at the company screwed up.

(Oh lordy is non-binary a workout on my writing. I've never had a non-binary friend so this is taking some getting used to in correcting)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 30 Nov 2017, 17:19
It's "it"/"its" that are rude, because those pronouns, while actually singular and gender-neutral, are inanimate.

Didn't stop E. Nesbit from using them for people. I suspect that other authors of the 1890's may have done the same.
When I meet a they/them character in a book, I cannot help visualizing a set of conjoined twins.

-----

And now I need to know what the deal is with Hannelore and tapirs. (Me, I can take them or leave them alone.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 30 Nov 2017, 17:32
The way Tilly talks about the dossier, "Oh. Yes. Right. That was in the dossier. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3618)" And "... The dossier led me to believe. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3623)" Strongly suggests they did not write it. So when they say they've done the research (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3608), they probably mean that they read the document someone else compiled and told them to read.

Moderator Comment Also as a nonbinary person who also happens to be one of the mods of this forum, on a personal and mod level I really appreciate everyone's quick transition to respectfully using they/them pronouns as appropriate to our new character. Some have mentioned this is new and will take getting used to for them and I sincerely appreciate the effort.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Smallest on 30 Nov 2017, 19:22
I honestly feel like Jeph made Tilly non-binary in an attempt to make them less vulnerable to hate. Like, I'm going to make them a giant asshole but then I'm going to add in this part as their hook and ignore the fact that this character is just amazingly grating.

Then over time, the character will become more likable. But not so much because we know them more but because they have stopped the bad behavior. Idk, meh.

And I do not find them cute. Maybe in the first introduction but then they kept talking lol.

I think Jeph knows better than to do that. Especially since people, including people who accept binary trans people like Claire, fucking hate non binary people* (and those identified as other similar terms eg genderqueer), so it would be a useless idea even if it wasn't a creepy and weird way to treat Tilly's gender.

Also, people have been guessing Tilly was NB from the beginning. It's not surprising that they actually are NB. Also, there have been a ton of tweets and whatnot where Jeph specifically does not gender Tilly leading up to this, instead using their name, even in places where it sounds a little clunky. There might be exceptions (that is, I don't feel like scouring Jeph's twitter right now), but this has been pretty visibly coming since Tilly was introduced.

*speaking from observation as a non binary trans man
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 30 Nov 2017, 20:13
Tilly could have been an interesting character, with a story that could have worked well in the QC-verse.

Unfortunately, first impressions linger far longer than we would like and Tilly's was less than stellar. Her introduction was somewhat clumsy and got rather tired rather quickly. Not only that, but it presented a long established character in a rather out of character manner for much of the arc. Add in the fact that this story has gone on for the best part of a month and I think this might be an arc we'll all try to pretend never happened, both for the reaction of the forum and the arc itself.

If I stuck with my first impression of Questionable Content, I wouldn't be reading it now.

That people tend to remember first impressions so strongly doesn't mean holding on to them is something you should strive to do.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 30 Nov 2017, 20:33
Of course, but the fact remains that those first impressions can and do linger, sometimes colouring our view of a character long after they were introduced.

Even before Tilly's revelation about themself, they were disliked by a number of people for being somewhat pushy, didn't listen to their new boss and placed themself in Hanners' life without discussing the situation beforehand. Even when realising they was working with incorrect information, Tilly is still somewhat intrusive. It just feels as though Tilly is superfluous to the needs of the comic, especially considering that there were other characters that could have fitted in the role and perhaps been a better fit for the story; such as Winslow (to pay back Hanners for the new chassis), May (to serve as PA/Bodyguard for Hanners. I mean, just imagine May in a situation like this (https://youtu.be/4oplJi8XCBA?t=2m) or Marigold or even Brun.

I said before that Tilly could have, and could still be, an interesting character, but their introduction has fallen flat. The story also feels a lot like a wasted opportunity and I think its going to haunt the character for a while. Its like telling a joke, you trip up at the beginning and you've lost the humour.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hedgie on 30 Nov 2017, 21:26
Hopefully later on, Jeph can roll an author saving throw on this one, but should sideline Tilly for a while.  They are *really* annoying in this current arc, but there is still a chance of redemption.  Hells, I still didn't like Claire even for some while after she came out, and I'm pretty sure that I wasn't the only one.  She evolved beyond irritating girl-Clin-ton, so I think that there's hope for Tilly as well.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: brasca on 30 Nov 2017, 21:47
Of course, but the fact remains that those first impressions can and do linger, sometimes colouring our view of a character long after they were introduced.

Even before Tilly's revelation about themself, they were disliked by a number of people for being somewhat pushy, didn't listen to their new boss and placed themself in Hanners' life without discussing the situation beforehand. Even when realising they was working with incorrect information, Tilly is still somewhat intrusive. It just feels as though Tilly is superfluous to the needs of the comic, especially considering that there were other characters that could have fitted in the role and perhaps been a better fit for the story; such as Winslow (to pay back Hanners for the new chassis), May (to serve as PA/Bodyguard for Hanners. I mean, just imagine May in a situation like this (https://youtu.be/4oplJi8XCBA?t=2m) or Marigold or even Brun.

I said before that Tilly could have, and could still be, an interesting character, but their introduction has fallen flat. The story also feels a lot like a wasted opportunity and I think its going to haunt the character for a while. Its like telling a joke, you trip up at the beginning and you've lost the humour.

Winslow could've asked Hannelore about being more use to her as personal assistant, but she would've told him that she's still trying to push herself to handle mundane tasks and that would've been that.  He wouldn't have pushed it.  Hannelore doesn't really need a bodyguard and if she did Bubbles would be at the of the list.
 Moreover, May lacks a lot of the diplomatic skills a good personal assistant has.  As intrusive as Tilly has been I'd prefer her company over May's any day of the week. 

I'm interested in seeing where this story is going and perhaps Tilly is the catalyst for Hannelore doing something with her life.  She's come a long way, but the only reason she works at Coffee of Doom is to improve her interaction with people and everyday life.  If she somehow gained control over her mother's company it could definitely be a force for good with her at the helm, but she has to be mentally prepared for such a task. 
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Bleeds_Daylight on 30 Nov 2017, 21:48
Anyway, here in Brasil, the few non-binary people I know pick a pronoum of their preference or just don't care if they're called "he" or "she". As far as I know, there is no spoken new pronoum for them, altough there were a few atempts in print (none of them really catch up).

There aren't really any neutral pronouns in my native French either (so it's much like it is in Portuguese I guess) and I'm not fond of being called they/them in English.  Yes, it is technically a singular form when you are ignorant of gender but it doesn't feel right to me as a single known individual.  Makes me want to crack jokes about being a collective entity (cue Star Trek Borg jokes).  I'm am totally cool with using it for someone else if that's their comfort zone but it isn't my own pronoun preference. 

I prefer either he/him or she/her equally in both languages, so long as they're said politely.  No pronoun sounds comfortable if said mockingly.  Most folks tend to label me based on my sex since I don't have a naturally androgynous physique and I'm kind of blasé about it.  My gender identity is kind of a personal matter to me and not something I get political about. I get why misgendering would hurt but pronouns don't affect me much unless there's malice behind them.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Zemyla on 30 Nov 2017, 22:07
To be honest, I think Beatrice is being a lot more deliberate about this than most people think. This could be a sort of trial by fire for both Hannelore and Tilly. Can Hannelore handle having responsibility over someone without freaking out and retreating to her room (like she used to when she was a teenager)? Can Tilly cope with being thrown head-first into a situation with inaccurate information and no way to back out of it without severe loss of face?

On the dossier's accuracy, I'm somewhere between "it was compiled from old and incomplete information" and "it was made wrong deliberately as a test". I assume Hannelore's mom remembered them, and called them "Taffy" deliberately.

As for the reason? Well, I assume she has a favored right-hand minion who can be trusted with both dirty work and (some) secrets, so she wants her daughter to have a minion as well. Plus, it's good practice for when Hannelore eventually has to take over for her mom. Plus, Tilly's cheeriness probably grates on her nerves and she feels Hanners and her friends can handle them better.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Bleeds_Daylight on 30 Nov 2017, 22:09
I'm amused by the way so many  posters on this forum were deliberately calling Tilly Taffy while knowing that wasn't their correct name, but have uniformly jumped into line when told to use gender-neutral pronouns.
Is that more important than getting somebody's name right?

I'll leave that question to the gender-variant people here but I'm prepared to believe a "yes" answer.

Think about the relative abjectness of the apologies you make when you misgender someone versus getting their name wrong.

Names don't have connotation, at least not first names. It's apart of the identity, but you can't look at a Tilly and project anything from that except perhaps maybe that their parents really liked 1980-1990's NYC type names. And even that doesn't tell you about the person.

Gender projects A LOT. I don't think I need to go into it, but there's a reason transgender and non binary people exist. We project a lot into other and ourselves based on the pronoun used. People prefer to have as few wrong things assumed about them within that brief first impression as is possible.

I think I'm probably an NB outlier but I am constantly being driven up the wall by people getting my name wrong (because they bizarrely assume it must be a different name because of my ethnicity... Even when I spell it out they write it down wrong...  Think about the Simpsons in Australia episode with "coffee" and "beer").  My name is gender neutral in English but an alternate spelling of it in English is the exact same (but pronounced totally different) as a clearly male name in French... So people call me by that different male name all the time, assuming I'm using some backwards logic translated pronunciation.  Names do carry connotations because they reflect cultural and ethic identity and in my case, that's what people screw up and dismiss all the time.

Meanwhile, I am indifferent about my gendered pronouns mostly.  He or she, tomayto/tomahto.  Not keen on they because of the more common plural meaning.  Just one of me.  Probably because of my own flexible pronoun preferences, I don't happen to get rubbed the wrong way about it like I do with the name thing.  Never had anyone be a jerk about it before.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 30 Nov 2017, 22:49
I have a name with an unusual spelling, so it is prone to misspelling.

I also have a high voice, so people sometimes mistake me as female over the phone (which can be a real problem when trying to establish that you are who you say you are).

I find the latter more annoying, but maybe because that is rarer.

On a different topic: is a comic with an annoying character a bad comic?

Bonus points for including Star Trek in your answer. ;)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Timemaster on 30 Nov 2017, 22:53
New comic. Tilly still trying to be helpful. Oh god, they're so hilarious, I love them.
And even if I'm the only one here who thinks so, I'm so grateful Jeph introduced them. This arc is the most fun I had with QC in a long time. This is comedy gold!  :laugh:

In a good mood:
Timemaster

EDIT:
Trying to get used to the "them". Feels weird first, languagewise, but is easier than I thought. I'll try to stick to it.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: BenRG on 30 Nov 2017, 23:19
All I can say is that, after all he has been through, Marten really, really ought to know better than to enable someone like Tilly. I mean, they're cute in their eagerness to succeed in this job but there has to be a line and Marten should be intuitive enough to have picked up on Hannelore's view of the situation.

Personally, I'd be more than a little worried about anyone who gets joy out of being someone's petty servant but maybe that's me.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 30 Nov 2017, 23:32
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

CLEARLY an abomination to life and all matters culinary.

*rolls eyes*

You have to add jalapeños or habaneros. It ties it all together quite nicely.

EDIT: Also, bell peppers help.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: USS Martenclaire on 30 Nov 2017, 23:48
I find it hard to understand to understand the dislike for Tilly.


They seem nice.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 01 Dec 2017, 00:03
Tilly knows how to sell themselves if nothing else.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JimC on 01 Dec 2017, 00:09
I think it's more giving us further evidence that Tilly is overall incompetent at their purported job.

How good would you say you normally are at a new job on your first day doing it? Personally (and I've done an awful lot of quite different jobs) it always takes me a little while to bed down and find my feet. Typically when a job has a trial period its a week or a month simply because its difficult to judge how someone is going to shape up after 4 hours.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 01 Dec 2017, 00:27
In the sense of getting Hanners a new phone, Tilly was surprisingly successful and saved their boss the hassle of getting a new phone, so in that regard score one for Tilly.

OTOH, just recall why Hanners required a new phone at all.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TinPenguin on 01 Dec 2017, 00:35
All I can say is that, after all he has been through, Marten really, really ought to know better than to enable someone like Tilly. I mean, they're cute in their eagerness to succeed in this job but there has to be a line and Marten should be intuitive enough to have picked up on Hannelore's view of the situation.

As much as a lot of my dislike for Tilly is probably rooted in defensiveness towards Hannelore, it is apparent that Hannelore, being a Good Person, is now making an effort to be nice to them, even going out of her way to memorise their name. She's also got used to their presence by now, even if it is still unwanted. And while Tilly is still being obsessively earnest, it is not currently at the creepily intrusive level that warrants fetching the sword.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 01 Dec 2017, 00:55
In the sense of getting Hanners a new phone, Tilly was surprisingly successful and saved their boss the hassle of getting a new phone, so in that regard score one for Tilly.

OTOH, just recall why Hanners required a new phone at all.

Nothing to do with Tilly...
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: traroth on 01 Dec 2017, 00:56
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

CLEARLY an abomination to life and all matters culinary.

*rolls eyes*

You have to add jalapeños or habaneros. It ties it all together quite nicely.

I had a rug once which tied my living room together quite nicely, too.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 01 Dec 2017, 01:20
OTOH, just recall why Hanners required a new phone at all.

Nothing to do with Tilly...

Not personally, I suppose - but still because Beatrice foisted them on her.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 01 Dec 2017, 01:33
Yes. What I should have said is that it doesn't reflect on Tilly's ability as a PA.

I agree with Timemaster, btw. I'm enjoying this arc. It has all been played for laughs (see sig).
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: gopher on 01 Dec 2017, 01:37
Please, please put Tilly on the bus to Mandyville to live with Raven, Gabbie and Angus.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 01 Dec 2017, 02:14
That's exactly how I feel about it, as well, though perhaps more for the reaction than the arc itself.

I fully admit that this is my own personal bias/pet peeve. So in the spirit of the forums, I'll call it my head canon.

I reckon Jeoh has done this in an attempt to make you all think about the folly of leaping from an initial impression to instant character judgement.

Depends on what you mean by "character".
Because whether male, female or insert-appropriate-descriptor-here - Tilly's still an annoying bugger.

Today's strip has not helped. The character is being presented as both a hive of useless Hanners Trivia, with some apparent insane genius level negotiation skills... but also acts like a three year old... (Climbing over counter, standing on head.)

So, what's next?
"Oh Tilly's ON THE SPECTRUM! So you can't be annoyed at ...them...."

(I'm sorry that just SCREAMS grammatical curses at me.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Moggie on 01 Dec 2017, 02:26
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

CLEARLY an abomination to life and all matters culinary.

NO! I will have my Hawaii pizza!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Moggie on 01 Dec 2017, 02:31
I live in Sweden and I'm glad that we are starting to pick up a neutral pronoun "hen" (in contrast to han = he, and hon = she).***
I guess that's why the term they/them in singular confuses the hell out of me (on a purely linguistical way, mind you) because we already got a non-binary pronoun and leave the they/them for plurals only. :P




*** = Feel free to make any poultry jokes you like, cuz I can't come up with a single one.

Yeah... a singular would be a great addition to the language.
Y'see, I find this They/Them thing VERY difficult to take on, because for 50+ years I've been raised to think that calling someone THEY or THEM was unspeakably rude.
<snip>

Finnish is handy in that, we only have one singular 3rd person pronoun, "Hän". Altho' the colloquial use of "Se", which originally means "It", is sadly getting more approval.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 01 Dec 2017, 02:34
Don't get me started on pizza and pineapple

CLEARLY an abomination to life and all matters culinary.

NO! I will have my Hawaii pizza!

(click to show/hide)

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Timemaster on 01 Dec 2017, 02:43
I agree with Timemaster, btw. I'm enjoying this arc. It has all been played for laughs (see sig).

Yay, this makes us two already. Let‘s do a Tilly fanclub. Anyone else want‘s to join?  :-D

And Pizza with Tuna and Pineapple is fine with me. And it gets me a table for myself, whenever I order it.

Swimming against the stream:
Timemaster
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Tova on 01 Dec 2017, 02:55
I would not order such a thing myself, but your conviction has won my admiration. :D
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: tiercel on 01 Dec 2017, 03:02
You know what does not make me want to be gracious about respecting someone’s wishes when it comes to personal pronouns?

When the very first thing that person does by way of introduction is pointedly disregard someone else’s personal wishes (and on a matter arguably more substantial than pronoun usage).

This arc feels to me like being lectured at, as if not liking Taffy, much less not using Taffy’s desired pronoun, would be crimethink.

Perhaps I don’t “get the joke” of this arc because I have low tolerance for “practical joke” alleged-humor, especially when it is extended (short slapstick sequences are more endurable for me when they are short/when the perpetrator suffers an ironic rejoinder).  This sequence feels to me painfully overextended, uninteresting, and as if I’m being forceably “playfully” elbowed to the effect of “this wacky new character sure is loveable for such an unwanted annoyance right RIGHT especially because TOLERANCE right RIGHT?!?!”
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 01 Dec 2017, 03:27
Would you ever consider not respecting a cis person's pronouns because you didn't like them? That tends to be something only even thought of for nonbinary and trans people.

You're not obligated to like anyone, not even if they have a minority status. However it is not okay to hold that status over their head as something only worthy of respecting if they behave the right way.

Disagree. Call out shitty behaviour. Don't put up with someone disrespecting you. However you should not invalidate or threaten to invalidate anyone's identity and personhood in the process.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Marco on 01 Dec 2017, 03:42
I have a name with an unusual spelling, so it is prone to misspelling.

I also have a high voice, so people sometimes mistake me as female over the phone (which can be a real problem when trying to establish that you are who you say you are).


Both for me. Try to spell your name over the phone with a unusual variant of the first name, plus a last name with two phonemes unexistant in my language, while being called "ma'm" all the time in spite of said first name being obsviously masculine. Ad that most phone companies' people just don't get my southern accent...

Man I hate phone companies. Tilly would be of help to get even with them.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Meilu on 01 Dec 2017, 04:16
You know what does not make me want to be gracious about respecting someone’s wishes when it comes to personal pronouns?
They aren't wishes. They just are. Everyone's pronouns just are what they are. If you don't use them, you're an asshole. Full stop. It doesn't matter if you like them, or like what they do or how they act. You have a choice to use someone's minority status against them (like a bigot) or not. They don't have a choice in pronouns. Not really. Not like you think.

This sequence feels to me painfully overextended, uninteresting, and as if I’m being forceably “playfully” elbowed to the effect of “this wacky new character sure is loveable for such an unwanted annoyance right RIGHT especially because TOLERANCE right RIGHT?!?!”
Not everyone is going to like every character. Showing different types of people isn't pushing some nefarious agenda about "tolerance". You sure seem worked up about this. Have you considered reading a comic that's got nothing but straight white men in it so you can be comfortable again?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Y on 01 Dec 2017, 05:38
Finnish is handy in that, we only have one singular 3rd person pronoun, "Hän". Altho' the colloquial use of "Se", which originally means "It", is sadly getting more approval.
In dutch we have zij/hen/hun  (she & they / them & chick / their), so that's what I kept in mind when I was questioning being non-binary.

About today's comic, is this Hanners punishing herself for calling their name wrong, Bart Simpson style?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 01 Dec 2017, 05:45
About today's comic, is this Hanners punishing herself for calling their name wrong, Bart Simpson style?

I'm assuming this is between that and her trying to repeat it enough times to form an association strong enough that she doesn't keep automatically going for the wrong name.

Sort of a "listening to a song on a loop to get another song out of your head" type of situation.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: lawoot on 01 Dec 2017, 05:47
If you call me "cisgender", then I am offended. I do not accept this silly term, as it is one that was applied to me without my consent.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 01 Dec 2017, 05:50
If you call me "cisgender", then I am offended. I do not accept this silly term, as it is one that was applied to me without my consent.

It's your right to be offended by anything, I suppose, but the description is factually correct (assuming you ARE cisgender). You might say you get offended by being called a human, but the term is not inherently offensive, nor can it be interpreted as such...

Or, to put it another way, a straight person might say they're offended by someone describing them as "heterosexual", but it doesn't change the fact that they, y'know, ARE heterosexual.

If you're not cisgender and identify as something else, that's a different matter, of course. Do you?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Y on 01 Dec 2017, 06:06
Or, to put it another way, a straight person might say they're offended by someone describing them as "heterosexual", but it doesn't change the fact that they, y'know, ARE heterosexual.

I would suppose, that a straight person could be offended to be called "a heterosexual" as if that's all they are, however if they're called "a heterosexual person" that wouldn't be the case. (feel free to change "heterosexual" with anything)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: lawoot on 01 Dec 2017, 06:10
My point is that the term"cisgender" didn't exist until recently, and the people that started using it were NOT the "cisgendered" themselves. I Identify as male (an asexual male, but a male nonetheless).
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 01 Dec 2017, 07:10
A quick Google says that cis in terms of gender (https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/cis-) was originally used in German in 1914 by a cis man (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Burchard) and then in English in the 90s. My quick look at the prominent names on the Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender) turn up one person openly identifying as trans of the five mentioned. Cis, the term itself has been used in other contexts and is originally Latin for "on this side of". Trans as well. These words existed and had usage before being applied to gender. Similar to hetero and homo before sexuality. Not that they need to be invented by the Official Word Board to be valid.

That said, I wonder how recently, relative to the use of cis, and if it was trans people who first started calling themselves trans or an outside group (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Oliver_Cauldwell). Hmm.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Dec 2017, 07:18
@Bleeds_Daylight, Welcome new person!

Global Moderator Comment The issue of what to call people whose hypothalamus matches their bits has come up before. We're going to continue with "cis" and "cisgender" because our research says they are practical and neutral. Most of the time it will never come up because there are only a few places on the forum where gender identity is relevant to anything.

(I find "cisgender" too useful to be "silly". )
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: oddtail on 01 Dec 2017, 07:28
Or, to put it another way, a straight person might say they're offended by someone describing them as "heterosexual", but it doesn't change the fact that they, y'know, ARE heterosexual.

I would suppose, that a straight person could be offended to be called "a heterosexual" as if that's all they are, however if they're called "a heterosexual person" that wouldn't be the case. (feel free to change "heterosexual" with anything)

Good point. It's like calling a gay person "a gay". It just sounds a bit off.

(speaking of which, because it's related: in English "gay" is by default an adjective. The Polish equivalent is a noun and only a noun. And there's not really a short, simple word to use as an adjective without sounding semi-offensive or kinda weird.

I've long wondered how that impacts the perception of a person "being a certain way" vs a person "being something", and whether the difference actually impacts how people in Poland view gay people, at least in a minor way.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Jakk Frost on 01 Dec 2017, 09:33
On the "cisgender" debate:  It's like the term "negro" which is considered offensive - these days at least - when all it really is, is the Spanish word for black.  And there was a time it was considered the politically correct thing to say, hence the formation of the United Negro College Fund.  Then it was "black" that was the PC thing to say, then that became a racist term and the new thing was "African American", except now that's not PC, because many black people don't come from Africa, and visiting Africans take offense to being called "African American, and the proper term is once again "black".

The point is, offense can only be taken, not given.  Most SJW-types deliberately try to use "cis" and "cisgender" as pejoratives, ie "woman-hating, rape-apologizing, incest-supporting, cis pieces of s**t scum!". (While ironically not realizing that the term also applies to homosexual people).  Therefore I choose not to take offense, because that's exactly what those kind of people want.

On today's page:  Bad Tilly, bad!  That's not standing on your head, that's a handstand! 
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 01 Dec 2017, 10:26
Marten should be intuitive enough to have picked up on Hannelore's view of the situation.
As an intuition-challenged person I find this offensive.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: USS Martenclaire on 01 Dec 2017, 10:32
Ummm.....I vaguely recall this forum being a fairly chill place for peoples of all identities. Where did all the hostility come from? D:
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: swapna on 01 Dec 2017, 10:33
I presume that not calling Tilly by their name was okay was a) because it was a running gag and b) they're  not actually that likable as a character. Which made them the Other, the corporate drone,  Beatrices brainwashed leash sicced on Hannelore - less than human. When they asked for their  correct name? Fuck them, they didn't deserve it. 

Tilly asking for the correct pronouns,  however, makes them human to a lot of people here. Suddenly, the first time someone uses the wrong ones they get corrected.

It is hilarious, though,  and hypocritical. I still think the arc/character aren't great, and Tilly isn't sympathetic to me, but that was/is hilarious to watch.

Of course refusing someone their name is just as dehumanising as denying them their pronouns, if not more so; it is their identity, after all.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 01 Dec 2017, 10:44
Would you ever consider not respecting a cis person's pronouns because you didn't like them? That tends to be something only even thought of for nonbinary and trans people.
Clearly you were:
(PE coaches do it, too, or at least did when I was in junior high.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 01 Dec 2017, 10:45
I presume that not calling Tilly by their name was okay was a) because it was a running gag and b) she's not actually that likable as a character. Which made her the Other, the corporate drone,  Beatrices brainwashed leash sicced on Hannelore - less than human. When they asked for their  correct name? Fuck them, they didn't deserve it. 

Tilly asking for the correct pronouns,  however, makes them human to a lot of people here. Suddenly, the first time someone uses the wrong ones they get corrected.

It is hilarious, though,  and hypocritical. I still think the arc/character aren't great, and Tilly isn't sympathetic to me, but that was/is hilarious to watch.

Of course refusing someone their name is just as dehumanising as denying them their pronouns, if not more so; it is their identity, after all.

It is also about respect. Respect is one of those human qualities where you don't have to like someone but you can still show respect. It costs nothing, it hurts no one and its still the right thing to do.

Tilly might not be a particularly popular character, but the instant they say what pronouns they would like people to use, respect that request. Yes, they might be a fictional character, but it is still a good habit to develop. We have a number of non-binary people on the forum, and misgendering people shows them disrespect as well, which frankly riles me up more than Tilly has.

People don't ask for a lot in life, just a little respect and it goes a long way. Those who are quite aggressive in the forum are the exception, not the rule and hopefully things will calm down in the next couple of days and hopefully they will remember that respect goes both ways. If they can't show it, they won't get it.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: swapna on 01 Dec 2017, 11:04
I presume that not calling Tilly by their name was okay was a) because it was a running gag and b) they're not actually that likable as a character. Which made them the Other, the corporate drone,  Beatrices brainwashed leash sicced on Hannelore - less than human. When they asked for their  correct name? Fuck them, they didn't deserve it. 

Tilly asking for the correct pronouns,  however, makes them human to a lot of people here. Suddenly, the first time someone uses the wrong ones they get corrected.

It is hilarious, though,  and hypocritical. I still think the arc/character aren't great, and Tilly isn't sympathetic to me, but that was/is hilarious to watch.

Of course refusing someone their name is just as dehumanising as denying them their pronouns, if not more so; it is their identity, after all.

It is also about respect. Respect is one of those human qualities where you don't have to like someone but you can still show respect. It costs nothing, it hurts no one and its still the right thing to do.

Tilly might not be a particularly popular character, but the instant they say what pronouns they would like people to use, respect that request. Yes, they might be a fictional character, but it is still a good habit to develop. We have a number of non-binary people on the forum, and misgendering people shows them disrespect as well, which frankly riles me up more than Tilly has.

People don't ask for a lot in life, just a little respect and it goes a long way. Those who are quite aggressive in the forum are the exception, not the rule and hopefully things will calm down in the next couple of days and hopefully they will remember that respect goes both ways. If they can't show it, they won't get it.
Holy crap I used her a few times. Not on purpose though; I'll change it up right away, but that was a mistake.

And I agree on the respect thing, which is why it annoyed me so much when people kept calling them different names, especially since in-comic they corrected Hanners more than once. Why would you see misnaming as okay?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Dec 2017, 12:11
Few people and maybe none thought it was OK for Hannelore to get Ms. Birch's name wrong when we thought it might be deliberate.

Mis-naming her on the forum was part of the comic's running gag, but "OK" was too strong a word for something that made so many people uncomfortable.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Thrudd on 01 Dec 2017, 12:24
Is the character, that seems to irritate a number of people like the high pitched whine of a mosquito in the room, getting shorter?
Standing on her hands with arms extended she is as long tall as Marten is tall [double checks spelling]
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: NemesisDancer on 01 Dec 2017, 12:44
Then it was "black" that was the PC thing to say, then that became a racist term and the new thing was "African American", except now that's not PC, because many black people don't come from Africa, and visiting Africans take offense to being called "African American, and the proper term is once again "black".

I once encountered someone who said he'd been told off by someone online for referring to himself as "black" and not "African American". He was British. :P

Is the character, that seems to irritate a number of people like the high pitched whine of a mosquito in the room, getting shorter?
Standing on her hands with arms extended she is as long tall as Marten is tall [double checks spelling]

I was thinking that Marten looks as though he's shrunk a bit - his waist and legs seem shorter than usual.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Bad Superman on 01 Dec 2017, 13:55
Hello, and greetings from Germany.
I'm sorry, but my first post here will be a rather negative one...


I don't like Tilly, and I don't see that I ever will. Here's why:

1.: Tilly is a comic relief character... and bad one at that
Tilly follows the "stupid and/or incompetent and/or clumsy and/or annoying = funny" formula, and frankly, I hate characters like that. Especially when they are designed to "fail upwards", meaning that they can say or do stuff that just makes you want to scream at the screen "NO, you stupid fuck!", and, through sheer luck or several inches of plot armor, still come out on top. I call it "the Jar Jar Binks Syndrome". Let me explain:

When we first meet him, Jar Jar has been exiled by his own people because of his clumsiness and stupidity! Yet he "wins" the battle against the robot army on Naboo and becomes a war hero, even though he should have been the first one to go down with the first shot fired. The only reason he survived is, that in the mind of George Lucas he was "the Chewbacca for a new generation! Oh, the fans will love Jar Jar!" Later Jar Jar even becomes a Representative in the Galactic Senate. How? What does he know about being a diplomat? What knowledge does he possess in this highly complex (and sometimes dangerous) field of work?

Sure, we have seen Tilly showing some mad negotiating skills, but "skilled" does not equal "competent". Jar Jar was skilled at foraging in the wilderness. He could have survived on his own. But overall he was a stupid and incompetent character that was protected by the plot. Like Tilly.

A competent Tilly would not have forced themselves into Hannelores private life the way they did. A competent Tilly would have done their homework better, by maybe doing more than just reading a dossier. A competent Tilly would have shown basic empathy towards another human being! I mean, come on, they have been specifically told to disregard Hannelores objections, even when threatened with being removed by the police (or murdered), and they agree with that??? No... Just no!

2.: Tilly adds nothing to the QC universe
Tilly is a plot device. A MacGuffin. A simple catalyst for other characters (mainly Hannelore) to become active in some way or another. Nothing more. This could have been achieved in many other ways. What if Winslow was starting to act weird? Maybe there's something wrong with his new chassis... What if Hanners had fallen down some stairs and both of her arms get broken. Now she's suddenly forced out of her comfort zone. Maybe the others try to take care of her while constantly working around her many OCDs. What happens when Mom and Dad get the news that "the heiress" is injured?
Tillys non-binary-ness is the only thing that make them stand out, but it really adds nothing to them. Go back an read the whole arc from the beginning, now that you know about Tillys preferred pronouns. Does it make any difference? Does it, in retrospect, make Tilly more likeable, or their behaviour any less outrageous?

3.: The QC cast is already big enough as it is.
The QC Wiki lists 138 pages for characters alone. This includes the ones that may have only shown up once and/or played a miniscule role - Doras cat Mieville has its own page - but nonetheless. Even if we say that only 10% of those are really part of the main cast, that would still leave us with ~14 characters to write stories for. Make that 15% and you have ~20 characters. One would think this is more than enough. Why not flesh out an already introduced character instead of adding yet another one to the QC universe?


TL;DR: Tilly reminds me of an overtly exited puppy, especially with them trying to climb over the counter and their almost insane eagerness to please Hannelore, even in the face of severe opposition. I'm sure this was done to make them look cute, but for me it did exactly the opposite. This character is broken. Even if they show some redeeming qualities in the future, I don't think I could warm up to them.
I just want Tilly gone.

Regards
Bad Supes


PS: This them/they stuff really needs some getting used to. It feel like I'm being intentionally rude to someone. Also, in german this would make no sense grammatically. The plural form of almost everything uses the female pronoun “die” (Die Gruppe = the group), with only very few male and neutral exceptions (Der Schwarm = the swarm; Das Quartett = the quartet). And with neutral I mean the plural form of "it".
I don't know how german non-binary people go about this stuff. I would assume that most of them just use the gendered pronoun they feel more comfortable with, but that is nothing more than speculation on my part. Also, the topic of sexuality, gender identity or sexual orientation is something that just doesn't come up much in an ordinary conversation. It's more of a private thing.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 01 Dec 2017, 14:06
in german this would make no sense grammatically. The plural form of almost everything uses the female pronoun “die” (Die Gruppe = the group), with only very few male and neutral exceptions (Der Schwarm = the swarm; Das Quartett = the quartet). And with neutral I mean the plural form of "it".
I don't know how german non-binary people go about this stuff. I would assume that most of them just use the gendered pronoun they feel more comfortable with, but that is nothing more than speculation on my part.

You will find our German and Dutch members discussing this in a thread on the subject (https://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,33936.0.html).
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Dec 2017, 16:20
Welcome, new person!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: snufflebottoms on 01 Dec 2017, 17:11
Would you ever consider not respecting a cis person's pronouns because you didn't like them? That tends to be something only even thought of for nonbinary and trans people.

It's disrespectful, but still a common way to insult people, especially calling a boy a girl (though calling a girl a boy happens too as an insult). Sometimes calling a non-transgender person trans is also used as an insult which gets points for being mean to trans folks and insulting to the person you are misgendering by fact of simply misgendering them. 

No one in the comic has done this with Tilly though. Their name was said wrong but it was because Hanners wasn't hearing the corrections (not surprising considering they were done in a softer voice). Also, Tilly is very grating, so it's likely Hanners was tuning her out a bit too. She did apologize for doing it, so I don't think Hanners is in the wrong anymore.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 01 Dec 2017, 18:06
The way Tilly talks about the dossier, "Oh. Yes. Right. That was in the dossier. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3618)" And "... The dossier led me to believe. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3623)" Strongly suggests they did not write it. So when they say they've done the research (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3608), they probably mean that they read the document someone else compiled and told them to read.

That's a fair point, but there's still no evidence at all for other poster's aggressive insistence that Beatrice personally must have wrote the dossier and that therefore it proves this, that, and the other about Beatrice; it would be essentially unheard-of for a top-ranking executive to spend so much time on a "grunt" task like that as opposed to directing their staff to do it.

Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Zebediah on 01 Dec 2017, 18:15
You know, I just thought of an obvious candidate for the author of the dossier. Someone who knows Hannelore from childhood, who would have no trouble churning out 900 pages of trivia about her, and who would not be above including a number of deliberate errors in order to troll Beatrice.

That person is Station.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: DesiArxxy on 01 Dec 2017, 18:31
You know, I just thought of an obvious candidate for the author of the dossier. Someone who knows Hannelore from childhood, who would have no trouble churning out 900 pages of trivia about her, and who would not be above including a number of deliberate errors in order to troll Beatrice.

That person is Station.

Yes, but Station wouldn't have detailed information on the other people around Hannelore. On the other hand, Station could totally have been one of the sources that Tilly and/or Beatrice's staff consulted in making the dossier.

Station probably legitimately doesn't understand human social mores about privacy, and would thus probably answer very comprehensively to a relatively legitimate request for  so, "Hey, can we have some information about Hannelore so we can choose a good assistant for her?"
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 01 Dec 2017, 21:30
My first response to Tilly was "we are supposed to ship this with Winslow?"

My second response was to see this as a a learning experience for Hannelore.

And now I wonder about the verge escapement.  Don't hold back Brün -- tell us what you really think.

"
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Storel on 01 Dec 2017, 21:51
On today's page:  Bad Tilly, bad!  That's not standing on your head, that's a handstand!

Thank you! I was going to say that if no one else had yet.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 01 Dec 2017, 22:29
"The verge escapement was a triumph of mechanism. Robust and reliable, it performed its function admirably.
Yet, looking deeper, there were undeniable flaws. And room for improvement. A major issue with the verge escapement was the necessity for the gear train to be briefly driven backwards as the balance oscillated, contributing to wear and inaccuracy. The verge escapement predates the hairspring, although later versions of the verge escapement did use a hairspring with increased accuracy."


Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: pwhodges on 01 Dec 2017, 22:32
My first response to Tilly was "we are supposed to ship this with Winslow?"

"This" => "them" as already discussed. 

Or are you saying that in your mind you initially really did see Tilly as neuter, in which case what does shipping even mean?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 01 Dec 2017, 23:10
Was I thinking about such a thing?  No, not really. Tilly? Tilly! I saw as a creation of Jeph as a  partner for the new Winslow.  Whose preferred pronoun is ??  (waydaminnit)

I mean no offense to anyone  here.  I  commend the mods for their diligence.


Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 02 Dec 2017, 07:31
I have a name with an unusual spelling, so it is prone to misspelling.

I also have a high voice, so people sometimes mistake me as female over the phone (which can be a real problem when trying to establish that you are who you say you are).

I find the latter more annoying, but maybe because that is rarer.

On a different topic: is a comic with an annoying character a bad comic?

Bonus points for including Star Trek in your answer. ;)
IDK, let's ask Ensign Sue. ;)

On the note of name frustrations, I get to deal with the Daniel-David conflation. And despite my name being over 4000 years old, some people still say it wrong. I get that there's a dozen or so variations but either missing all of them or completely ignoring the one I'm using gets really irritating. "dan-yuh l" not "dah-niel", "dah-nile", and especially not "dan-yel". The last one happens to fall under the 'gender connotations in names' thing here, state-side.

Would you ever consider not respecting a cis person's pronouns because you didn't like them? That tends to be something only even thought of for nonbinary and trans people.
*points at my name in proceeding response*

It happens more than you think. Usually by someone being an asshole or a bully. Being that the feminine version has been used commonly in the English speaking world as a girl's name for just over 100 years, how often do you think that happens? I'll give you a hint: from 1981 to 1996, it was in the top 10nmost popular names in the USA, and it hasn't dipped below #55 in the USA for the last 140 years.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 02 Dec 2017, 07:32
All hail Hanners, Queen of Cuteness!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: bhtooefr on 02 Dec 2017, 08:06
Yeah, misgendering (at least against boys) as a method of bullying was definitely a thing when I was growing up.

Considering that my name has a feminine version with the addition of only one letter/syllable... yeah.

(Funnily enough, a trans friend of mine once decided to try to illustrate to me what misgendering feels like, by doing it to me with a completely different feminine name... I stopped her because I didn't need that illustrated, knowing full well what it was like (and actually I had previously hypothesized on these forums that maybe that's something that might be illustrative, funnily enough), and if she was going to do that, at least use the obvious wrong name.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: shanejayell on 02 Dec 2017, 08:43
Tilly is growing on me, at least.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Welu on 02 Dec 2017, 09:58
The difference with the most of the examples people have given in response to my post is that the context is, "I'm calling you what you're not to insult you." Which is shitty for multiple reasons in itself. They're also specifically nouns and name calling.
Some people have mentioned what are genuine errors that happen with frequency due to societal assumptions. Which again are sucky.

The specific instance I was replying to:

You know what does not make me want to be gracious about respecting someone’s wishes when it comes to personal pronouns?

And generally when trans and nonbinary people are misgendered, specifically with pronoun use, is the implication that, "I'm calling you what I think you actually are and to call you what you want is at best a misguided courtesy  (which I will only do if I feel like it) and at worst is indulging a delusion."
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 02 Dec 2017, 10:05
Tilly is growing on me, at least.  :-D
Yeah, like ringworm.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 02 Dec 2017, 10:09
In re Pronouns - "They" in its various forms is too useful as a plural to dilute by using it as a singular.  I've been using as a neuter singular it in writing for 30 years and still find it awkward.  English needs a new neuter singular pronoun.  So, why not nominate one?

Strips like QC really are on the bleeding edge of change as far as how language is used.  Maybe Claire can be the person to say, "'They' is too confusing.  Use '[German|Dutch|Finnish|etc word]' instead."  She has the right standing and she'll be approaching it strictly as a matter of practicality.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: snufflebottoms on 02 Dec 2017, 10:15
Tilly is growing on me, at least.  :-D
Yeah, like ringworm.

I enjoyed that
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Case on 02 Dec 2017, 11:35
In re Pronouns - "They" in its various forms is too useful as a plural to dilute by using it as a singular.  I've been using as a neuter singular it in writing for 30 years and still find it awkward.  English needs a new neuter singular pronoun.  So, why not nominate one?

Strips like QC really are on the bleeding edge of change as far as how language is used.

Quote
The singular they had emerged by the 14th century and is common in everyday spoken English, but its use has been the target of criticism since the late 19th century. Its use in formal English has increased with the trend toward gender-inclusive language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

Bleeding softly, that edge ...

Tilly is growing on me, at least.  :-D
Yeah, like ringworm.

Or fungus.

(https://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/original/0/6247/1059751-speng.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: bhtooefr on 02 Dec 2017, 11:55
Bleeding softly, that edge ...

If I read OldGoat's post correctly, they're not saying that singular they is on the cutting edge, but rather that Questionable Content is on the cutting edge (but it's more than just that, QC isn't on the cutting edge, it's slightly behind it, and therefore has more mainstream exposure) and could maybe be used to push a neologism or a loanword for a gender neutral pronoun.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Gyrre on 02 Dec 2017, 16:30
The difference with the most of the examples people have given in response to my post is that the context is, "I'm calling you what you're not to insult you." Which is shitty for multiple reasons in itself. They're also specifically nouns and name calling.
Some people have mentioned what are genuine errors that happen with frequency due to societal assumptions. Which again are sucky.

The specific instance I was replying to:

You know what does not make me want to be gracious about respecting someone’s wishes when it comes to personal pronouns?

And generally when trans and nonbinary people are misgendered, specifically with pronoun use, is the implication that, "I'm calling you what I think you actually are and to call you what you want is at best a misguided courtesy  (which I will only do if I feel like it) and at worst is indulging a delusion."

Pronoun use specifically, no. But, I had a year and a half where I was cat-called by a bunch of idiots in a truck every other time I walked to work. At some point one of them must have finally spotted my beard (I don't have a mustache due to psoriasis) because the last time they shouted anything at me as they passed was "Fuckn' trap!" Pretty sure I've mentioned this before.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Stoutfellow on 02 Dec 2017, 19:13
In the general area of modes of address and reference: is anyone else bothered by Tilly's referring to "Miss" Ellicott-Chatham?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Dec 2017, 19:35
In the general area of modes of address and reference: is anyone else bothered by Tilly's referring to "Miss" Ellicott-Chatham?

No, but then again in the context of the situation, "Miss" is an honorific to use if one is not already used, such as "Doctor" or "Dame". And it is short for "Mistress", traditionally a term used for an employer or for all women in general, while "Ms." inferred that a lady was unmarried.

Traditionally in the States, you would use "Miss" to address a woman under the age of 30 and with whom you weren't particularly familiar with. Not to mention that in business "Miss" would have the same connotation as it would with "Mr.", largely due to neither being marital specific.

So Tilly is using a term that is usually respectful towards an employer, if Hanners found offence, she would have told Tilly. As Tilly hasn't been corrected (yet), we can infer that Hanners doesn't mind being called "Miss"
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Dec 2017, 20:37
Station probably legitimately doesn't understand human social mores about privacy, and would thus probably answer very comprehensively to a relatively legitimate request for  so, "Hey, can we have some information about Hannelore so we can choose a good assistant for her?"

That's a fascinating question.

We know Station has audio pickups all over including bathrooms.

On the other hand he did ask "Are you decent?" before projecting himself in Hannelore's room.

He does know enough about human expectations to put a hologram sock on a doorknob when the people inside are being intimate.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: badbum61 on 03 Dec 2017, 19:33
In the general area of modes of address and reference: is anyone else bothered by Tilly's referring to "Miss" Ellicott-Chatham?

Taff...uh, Tilly's repeated addressing of Hanners as "ma'am" has me wondering - are they the Marcie to Hanners' Peppermint Patty?
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Shjade on 03 Dec 2017, 20:04
He does know enough about human expectations to put a hologram sock on a doorknob when the people inside are being intimate.
But not enough to know it was inappropriate to publicize an employee's exhibitionist exploits at work without being chastised for it after the fact.

I'd call Station's social perspective "undependable."
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JimC on 03 Dec 2017, 22:49
And there was a time it was considered the politically correct thing to say...

It might be interesting to consider how fast politically correct language changes and mutates - as it clearly does -  and especially consider the relationship with slang. But its ironic that there would be a definite risk of reaching conclusions that might not be considered politically correct, which arguably makes it a very unsafe area of study in the current academic environment.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 04 Dec 2017, 02:58
Then it was "black" that was the PC thing to say, then that became a racist term and the new thing was "African American", except now that's not PC, because many black people don't come from Africa, and visiting Africans take offense to being called "African American, and the proper term is once again "black".

I once encountered someone who said he'd been told off by someone online for referring to himself as "black" and not "African American". He was British. :P

Is the character, that seems to irritate a number of people like the high pitched whine of a mosquito in the room, getting shorter?
Standing on her hands with arms extended she is as long tall as Marten is tall [double checks spelling]

I was thinking that Marten looks as though he's shrunk a bit - his waist and legs seem shorter than usual.

I mentioned this a few days ago...

Tilly's height is all over the place!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: OldGoat on 04 Dec 2017, 09:51
He does know enough about human expectations to put a hologram sock on a doorknob when the people inside are being intimate.
But not enough to know it was inappropriate to publicize an employee's exhibitionist exploits at work without being chastised for it after the fact.

I'd call Station's social perspective "undependable."
True of lots of people who have (allegedly) been human all their lives.  ;)

Considering the swarm of high intellect/low social skill human nerds he works with, Station may have been basing his behavior on a composite profile of a number of them.

(Please note I am not bashing high intellect/low social skill nerds - I think I'd like it up there, even though I'd be the slow one.)
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: hedgie on 04 Dec 2017, 09:58
You just want spathe ham.
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: JoeCovenant on 04 Dec 2017, 09:58
You just want spathe ham.

SO SAY WE ALL!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Dec 2017, 12:07
In the general area of modes of address and reference: is anyone else bothered by Tilly's referring to "Miss" Ellicott-Chatham?

Taff...uh, Tilly's repeated addressing of Hanners as "ma'am" has me wondering - are they the Marcie to Hanners' Peppermint Patty?

STOP CALLING ME SIR!
Title: Re: WCDT 3621 to 3625 (27th November to 1st December 2017)
Post by: Storel on 04 Dec 2017, 17:53
In the general area of modes of address and reference: is anyone else bothered by Tilly's referring to "Miss" Ellicott-Chatham?

Taff...uh, Tilly's repeated addressing of Hanners as "ma'am" has me wondering - are they the Marcie to Hanners' Peppermint Patty?

STOP CALLING ME SIR!


And don't call me Shirley, either!  :wink:

I always thought that "Honey" (in Doonesbury) looked like Marcie grown up.