THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: Storel on 03 Jun 2018, 21:47

Title: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Storel on 03 Jun 2018, 21:47
Comic's already up and nobody else seems to have done a WCDT thread yet, so here's my first attempt at one. No, I had no idea what to ask for a poll question, so I punted.

(If anyone's wondering, every one of the possible answers is the punchline to a shaggy-dog story.)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: cesium133 on 03 Jun 2018, 21:50
Some people can't tell a joke what?  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Storel on 03 Jun 2018, 21:53
Also, yes, goddammit Dale.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: brasca on 03 Jun 2018, 22:48
Comic's already up and nobody else seems to have done a WCDT thread yet, so here's my first attempt at one. No, I had no idea what to ask for a poll question, so I punted.

(If anyone's wondering, every one of the possible answers is the punchline to a shaggy-dog story.)

Thought about starting a thread, but couldn’t think of a poll.

I don’t know who Marigold is talking about, but I probably saw her at Comic Fest last week.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 03 Jun 2018, 23:26
I doubt that any of this week's strips are going to be numbered - It's Guest Comic Week after all!

There is nothing about Dale and Marigold's relationship that isn't cute. They're both so bashful about themselves, their desires and how those desires affect the other. I particularly find Dale's reluctance to imply that he's disrespecting Marigold quite adorable.

We know that Marigold is into the lead character of Magical Love Gentleman. What does everyone else think Dale is into? Given his questions to Bubbles about being a mecha, I'm thinking that it's one of the ladies from Evangelon, Gundam Wing or Macross. I wouldn't be surprised because plug suits do seem to be very, very... er... form fitting.

That subject aside, I do find this guest strip nicely in-character for both of them. Yes, Dale is very nervous around Marigold to the point where I think it frustrates her sometimes. On the other hand, Marigold has this utterly wild side that hasn't ever been allowed out yet except in private around Dale. I wonder what would happen if she let it out more often and in other contexts!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Onionvolcano on 04 Jun 2018, 00:00
I would love to see Marigold and Dale objectify Marigold, just a little.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: oeoek on 04 Jun 2018, 00:40
Just go for it (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1613), Mari-Chan!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Dandi Andi on 04 Jun 2018, 02:51
So, Hatsune Miku, huh? Kinda playing against type, there.

(click to show/hide)

Now, there is absolutely nothing wrong with cosplay or sexy roleplay of a character with a different body type than one's own. A big part of cosplay and roleplay for many people is getting out of your own head and playing with the idea of being somebody else. But I do find it fascinating to see what kinds of characters people chose to play. Why Hatsune? She's rail-thin and has no character to speak of. I'd love to know what it is that makes Marigold look at her and think "that's someone sexy I'd want to dress up as in bed". Is it a body type she finds sexy? A type she thinks Dale would find sexy? Is it because Hatsune's lack of a defined character lets Marigold project whatever traits she wants onto her? I'd love to be able to ask her.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Jun 2018, 04:32
Of course, she's not just a game character - she's originally a vocaloid voicebank (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsune_Miku).  I wonder if Jeph has been using her in his music.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Inconsequential on 04 Jun 2018, 11:56
It's always so fun to see how other artists interpret QC characters, and Marigold and Dale are always endlessly entertaining.


Still., I think Danielle Corsetto set the unquestionable high bar for QC guest comics not long ago...
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3556
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicccccccccccceeeeeeee...
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 12:32
Haha that index fingers together thing! This person knows Jeph’s ladies too well.

Did Tai do that too when she asked Dora out? I can’t remember. I want to say she did.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 14:27
Danielle Corsetto killed it. Absolutely killed it with her comic. She's an evil genius. Haha.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jun 2018, 15:32
Danielle Corsetto killed it. Absolutely killed it with her comic. She's an evil genius. Haha.

There's a joke about that, over in the fan-fiction area, in the "QC Behind The Scenes" thread...
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: keithcurtis on 04 Jun 2018, 17:55
Excellent poll. I wanted to choose all of the above.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 04 Jun 2018, 19:54
New comic. And kids, that's why you need to take regular breaks during marathon sexing-up-sessions! If you're going to lose the feeling somewhere, it shouldn't be the legs!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 20:41
(https://i.imgur.com/S6WqYZ6.png)

hehehehe.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: awgiedawgie on 04 Jun 2018, 20:56
Haha that index fingers together thing! This person knows Jeph’s ladies too well.

Did Tai do that too when she asked Dora out? I can’t remember. I want to say she did.
Sort of? She put her fingers together, but it wasn't only her index fingers (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2246).
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 20:57
Try as they might, Bubbles and Faye will not be able to escape...
(https://i.imgur.com/5KEzyD4.png)
The Tai confetti pounce™
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 20:58
Haha that index fingers together thing! This person knows Jeph’s ladies too well.

Did Tai do that too when she asked Dora out? I can’t remember. I want to say she did.
Sort of? She put her fingers together, but it wasn't only her index fingers (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2246).

Meh. Same thing!  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: awgiedawgie on 04 Jun 2018, 21:06
Try as they might, Bubbles and Faye will not be able to escape...
...
The Tai confetti pounce™
That's actually something I expressed some concern about - for Tai's own safety. What would an ex-soldier and a compulsive puncher do if surprised by someone jumping out and throwing stuff at them?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 04 Jun 2018, 21:15
They're expecting it.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 04 Jun 2018, 22:50
But what if Tai is dressed as a Spanish Inquisitor. Nobody expects that.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 04 Jun 2018, 23:19
It's kind of in-character for this to happen, isn't it? I mean, Momo has complained about Dale and Marigold's 'enthusiastic' sex life and we know that the two of them disappeared pretty much for the day after they 'discovered' each other.

I still want to know what the costumes were, though!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Undrneath on 04 Jun 2018, 23:29
I really want this one to be actual canon.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 05 Jun 2018, 01:39
Did you read the text below the strip?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: brasca on 05 Jun 2018, 06:57
It's kind of in-character for this to happen, isn't it? I mean, Momo has complained about Dale and Marigold's 'enthusiastic' sex life and we know that the two of them disappeared pretty much for the day after they 'discovered' each other.

I still want to know what the costumes were, though!

I’d like to know if the costumes can still be worn after that marathon of love making.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: OldGoat on 05 Jun 2018, 08:37
Damn Karla draws May well!  I'd have thought it was Jeph himself.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Jun 2018, 08:44
Damn Karla draws May well!  I'd have thought it was Jeph himself.

It was bottom right panel (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3682) she did edit the eyes.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Storel on 05 Jun 2018, 11:35
I doubt that any of this week's strips are going to be numbered - It's Guest Comic Week after all!

Good point! Should I edit the topic title?

Although technically, they ARE still numbered because the link for today's strip (for example) is http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3757

Damn Karla draws May well!  I'd have thought it was Jeph himself.

It was bottom right panel (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3682) she did edit the eyes.

Wow, what a good memory you have! Thanks!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Roborat on 05 Jun 2018, 11:47
I liked this page.  Although when I first read it, I was disappointed, I thought she was setting up a: "that's what she said" joke.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Undrneath on 05 Jun 2018, 12:28
Wow, what a good memory you have! Thanks!

To be fair someone pointed it out on Patreon.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Wagimawr on 05 Jun 2018, 18:02
Of course, she's not just a game character - she's originally a vocaloid voicebank (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsune_Miku).  I wonder if Jeph has been using her in his music.

If Jeph doesn't have a Miku guitar pedal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aveUEZkcQno), he should! :D
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 05 Jun 2018, 18:30
Looking at these past comics, it's clear why Marigold and Faye never became friends. And why Marigold and mostly everyone but Hanners aren't friends.

I identify with Marigold the most. Jeez. People are so MEAN to her.

Totally makes sense she wouldn't want to befriend the girl who started dating her crush. Ever.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Onionvolcano on 05 Jun 2018, 20:16
I liked Alice Grove, but I'd also dig a Marigold/Dale spinoff.  Get sci-fi on it, put them in space, have them colonize Europa!  And have sex and complain, this is genius I'm telling you
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Thrudd on 05 Jun 2018, 20:28
So, Hatsune Miku, huh? Kinda playing against type, there.
(click to show/hide)
My niece cosplayed as her at Anime North this year ...
If you web search you might be lucky enough to find a pic - She is the very short, very cute, one with the costume complete with all the accessory bits sans onion only because I forgot to bring it [doh]
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: awgiedawgie on 05 Jun 2018, 20:40
Looking at these past comics, it's clear why Marigold and Faye never became friends. And why Marigold and mostly everyone but Hanners aren't friends.

I identify with Marigold the most. Jeez. People are so MEAN to her.
I think her not having many friends has a lot to do with her being a terrible introvert. She's also terribly insecure. The two are related. She'd rather sit in her apartment playing video games, or working on her Dad's website, or watching anime, than go out and be with people. She considers the whole crew - yes, even Faye - to be her "friends", but she hates crowds, so she doesn't spend time with anyone but Dale now that Hannelore is away. I can sympathize... I'm much the same. I have to force myself to get out and interact with people.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Theta9 on 05 Jun 2018, 20:43
I don't get Wednesday's strip. I can't figure out what's happening with any of it.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 05 Jun 2018, 20:50
I never got the impression that Faye and Marigold were friends. If they are, they sure have a strange "friendship." From what I can see her friends are Dale (duh), Momo, May, Hanners, and maybe Emily.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jun 2018, 20:50
What's happening is that Bubbles has gone from seeing everyone "normally" to seeing them "as anime".

Note how Faye's face changes from when she was at the workbench to her kawaii-ish view in the third panel?

(EDIT: Look at her nose in panel one, then in panel three... and five/six...)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 05 Jun 2018, 20:51
Seeing Pintsize's face like that is...unsettling.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: awgiedawgie on 05 Jun 2018, 20:51
So, Hatsune Miku, huh? Kinda playing against type, there.
(click to show/hide)
My niece cosplayed as her at Anime North this year ...
If you web search you might be lucky enough to find a pic - She is the very short, very cute, one with the costume complete with all the accessory bits sans onion only because I forgot to bring it [doh]
Miku is a pretty popular choice for young girls to dress up as, so there's probably only a couple thousand pictures to sift through...  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: awgiedawgie on 05 Jun 2018, 20:56
I never got the impression that Faye and Marigold were friends. If they are, they sure have a strange "friendship." From what I can see her friends are Dale (duh), Momo, May, Hanners, and maybe Emily.
That's why I put "friends" in quotes. I don't think she actually dislikes any of them - even Faye. She's not that type of person. And she has been made to feel welcome in their "inner circle". But she doesn't spend time with anyone but those select few.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Gyrre on 05 Jun 2018, 21:24
So, Hatsune Miku, huh? Kinda playing against type, there.

(click to show/hide)

Now, there is absolutely nothing wrong with cosplay or sexy roleplay of a character with a different body type than one's own. A big part of cosplay and roleplay for many people is getting out of your own head and playing with the idea of being somebody else. But I do find it fascinating to see what kinds of characters people chose to play. Why Hatsune? She's rail-thin and has no character to speak of. I'd love to know what it is that makes Marigold look at her and think "that's someone sexy I'd want to dress up as in bed". Is it a body type she finds sexy? A type she thinks Dale would find sexy? Is it because Hatsune's lack of a defined character lets Marigold project whatever traits she wants onto her? I'd love to be able to ask her.
Hmmm......
It could be a case of tabula rosa. That's the generally accepted reason as to why so many teen and tween girls were all "I'm Bella" in regards to the Twilight books.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: brasca on 05 Jun 2018, 22:37
If Pintsize’s chassis truly looks that way the military should’ve commissioned more.  A horde of those would be too disturbing to fight
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 05 Jun 2018, 23:30
I'm sort of wondering if Pintsize really is responsible for Bubbles' altered perceptions. He's never shown any interest in having more humanoid-seeming features (beyond opposable thumbs - he's always been big on having thumbs), I would have thought that any altered perceptions filter created by him would make Faye sparkle whenever she poses just right or make the AI automatically edit out humans clothing or something similar!

Either way, it's good that Pintsize is where he is because he's going to need Faye's help to be de-cubed and restored to something resembling his normal shape!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Gyrre on 06 Jun 2018, 02:06
Seeing Pintsize's face like that is...unsettling.
Pintsize reminds me of those little yellow aliens from Excel Saga.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Bad Superman on 06 Jun 2018, 02:30
I was just wondering...
Would Pintsize tampering with Bubbles' sensory input count as violation of the "sanctity of the mind (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3392)"?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Jun 2018, 02:49
More like the sanctity of the body.

It's sort of like a 'prankster' dropping an LSD or Ecstasy tab in someone's drink at a party. Very disturbing (and potentially quite harmful) for the victim but motivated more by ignorance, stupidity and a perverse sense of humour rather than the directed malice that is required for brainwashing and other types of mental abuse.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 06 Jun 2018, 05:23
That's why I put "friends" in quotes. I don't think she actually dislikes any of them - even Faye. She's not that type of person. And she has been made to feel welcome in their "inner circle". But she doesn't spend time with anyone but those select few.

Meh. I wouldn't say friends, with or without quotes. They were pretty mean to her at first, then super patronizing. Like when Dora was like "come on, all you need is a short skirt." or when Dora was like "I've been too busy HAVING A BOYFRIEND" pointedly. As someone with no romantic history, I've had people like that who really liked going for my jugular.

It sucks, but Marigold kind of brings out the shittiness in the other characters. You never knew they were so mean. I sometimes feel the same way. I'm an indicator for assholery. "Nice" people quickly show their true colors around me. Faye and Dora aren't bad people, per se, but they hadn't reached the maturity level required to treat Marigold decently.

And here's the really shitty part--Angus didn't even really like Marigold, and made fun of her too. When he called her a loser shut in or something. That was awful.

Now, with all that said, I think Marigold has a TON of growing and maturing to do herself, and still has many bad habits that I hope dissipate in time. Sure, she has Dale, but she still has a LOT of work to do on herself. I'm not letting her off the hook entirely. She is Jeph's favorite character, so I hope that he comes to to focus on her in time and these necessary changes happen. The time where she started to follow Sam home was pretty strange to me. At least Marigold realized it.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Theta9 on 06 Jun 2018, 06:45
Panel 2 indicates that Bubbles doesn't know a socket wrench from an open-end wrench.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Shteevie on 06 Jun 2018, 07:20
I'm... not sure I follow this comic at all. It feels like there are panels missing.

I hope it's not too offensive to ask if the writer is intending each pair of panels to represent a moment in a longer day? Or maybe the writer is not a native English speaker?

Oh, well. Domestic Faybles are just as nice now as old domestic Fayten used to be.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Jun 2018, 08:14
Okay, it works like this: It's just another day in Union Robotics when Bubbles realises (panel 3), that whenever Faye looks in her direction, she sees an animé cutie face of some description. She's blaming Pintsize. Since he suddenly has humanoid facial features, her theory that he somehow slipped a virus into her optical interpretation subsystem that does this seems good.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Welu on 06 Jun 2018, 08:29
I think if maybe panel 2 was split to show Bubble's having another reaction instead of just the speech bubble in panel 3, plus maybe sparkles or making the anime aspect more dramatic would help. Not being familiar with their art style, I didn't realise anything was meant to be off till the last panel where Bubble explains the situation.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Cattus on 06 Jun 2018, 10:44
Panel 2 indicates that Bubbles doesn't know a socket wrench from an open-end wrench.

Damn - I was about to post that too.  I'm sure Jeph is having a bit of a joke with us.  If anybody knows a socket from an open end wrench its gotta be Bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Cattus on 06 Jun 2018, 10:49
Lots of comments that resonate with me too.  This is an odd set of panels.  Hard to decipher, characters facing the wrong way, looking in the wrong way - too high or low.  Dialogue that could be a question or a statement.  Very odd indeed.  Very trippy.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: dutchrvl on 06 Jun 2018, 11:03
I never got the impression that Faye and Marigold were friends. If they are, they sure have a strange "friendship." From what I can see her friends are Dale (duh), Momo, May, Hanners, and maybe Emily.

AFAIK, Marigold has been completely taken up by the Marten/Faye/Dora group as a friend. Perhaps not as close as the core of Marten-Claire/Dora-Tai/Faye-Bubbles/Hanners, but still part of that group of friends. If anything we can now see a somewhat separate group of Dale-Marigold/Momo-May, with Hanners as the big link between the 2 groups and Emily and Clinton kind of swerving in between.
Anyway I wouldn't characterize Emily as being more befriended with Marigold than Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 06 Jun 2018, 11:06
Haha that index fingers together thing! This person knows Jeph’s ladies too well.

Did Tai do that too when she asked Dora out? I can’t remember. I want to say she did.
When Faye did that the other day, I found it to be one of the most adorable aspects of an overall adorable strip. As far as I've been able to determine, that was the first time she ever did that, yes?

Speaking of that gesture, I just noticed the other day that Dora did it in this strip.
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3144
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Theta9 on 06 Jun 2018, 12:28
Panel 2 indicates that Bubbles doesn't know a socket wrench from an open-end wrench.

Damn - I was about to post that too.  I'm sure Jeph is having a bit of a joke with us.  If anybody knows a socket from an open end wrench its gotta be Bubbles.
Jeph didn't write this strip. It's all on the guest artist.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 06 Jun 2018, 15:46

When Faye did that the other day, I found it to be one of the most adorable aspects of an overall adorable strip. As far as I've been able to determine, that was the first time she ever did that, yes?

Speaking of that gesture, I just noticed the other day that Dora did it in this strip.
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3144

Nice avatar! Haha! I can see you got a higher quality image than the one I got at online-image-editor.com.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Zebediah on 06 Jun 2018, 18:26
Comic’s up, and to quote George Takei, “Oh myyyyy!”
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 06 Jun 2018, 18:35
Nice avatar! Haha! I can see you got a higher quality image than the one I got at online-image-editor.com.

Hi! Funny you should mention that! Just yesterday I was lurking, and I saw yours, and I said "Oh crap, they probably think I copied them." I was going to offer to change it if you wanted, but then today I saw that you'd changed yours.

I made mine by saving the image from the main site and editing it in Paint.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Jun 2018, 18:44
I kinda want to see the rest of what Momo's reading...  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 06 Jun 2018, 19:22
Nice avatar! Haha! I can see you got a higher quality image than the one I got at online-image-editor.com.

Hi! Funny you should mention that! Just yesterday I was lurking, and I saw yours, and I said "Oh crap, they probably think I copied them." I was going to offer to change it if you wanted, but then today I saw that you'd changed yours.

I made mine by saving the image from the main site and editing it in Paint.

I might change it back. Maybe I should use photoshop this time.

Bah! You're hardly copying me. We both appreciate a beautiful moment.  :-)

My avatar now is more "cuddly." I hope to see a lot of them cuddling and snuggling in the future.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 06 Jun 2018, 20:49
I kinda want to see the rest of what Momo's reading...  :psyduck:

(https://i.imgur.com/Xv4ElSW.png)

Fweeeee!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Onionvolcano on 06 Jun 2018, 21:12
Very good comic!  And the fluids can be confusing to be sure.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 06 Jun 2018, 21:18
(https://i.imgur.com/AxASZb2.png)

Someone is eventually going to yell at me for continuing to make and post these.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Jun 2018, 21:19
My avatar now is more "cuddly." I hope to see a lot of them cuddling and snuggling in the future.

May it be so! They both have a lifetime to catch up on.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: brasca on 06 Jun 2018, 22:16
When I scrolled to the bottom I thought I'd see Bubbles and Faye discussing some ground rules.  But this works better. 
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Spider on 06 Jun 2018, 22:34
...boy was this some whiplash from being overjoyed with how this comic is going to being completely disappointing to see a guest comic by the gross as hell erika moen
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Dandi Andi on 06 Jun 2018, 23:21
...boy was this some whiplash from being overjoyed with how this comic is going to being completely disappointing to see a guest comic by the gross as hell erika moen

Whoa there! I happen to love Erika's work. Is there a particular problem you have with it? Or is it the explicit subject matter? I'm genuinely curious if I've missed something.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 06 Jun 2018, 23:23
Today's strip is both funny and terrifying at the same time. It's funny because of its intrinsic surreality and it's terrifying because it does suggest that the Melons and Droid-06s out there probably don't automatically understand some of the lessons about the fragility of the human form that Er1-KA is trying to teach!

That aside, given that Jeph wrote this strip, I'm considering it canon unless specifically told otherwise. My mental backstory is that Momo has been talking to Bubbles about her relationship with Faye. We know that Momo seems to be generally attracted to humans and is aroused by human erotica. I now find myself honestly wondering how long it will be (with the example of Bubbles and Faye in mind) before she actually tries to approach Sven and ask him out on a date!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Spider on 07 Jun 2018, 00:17
I don't want to write up a callout or anything but shes made some shitty stuff in the past like a comic fetishizing trans men (https://www.darcomic.com/2009/02/17/transmen/) (all links are NSFW) and has had some bad discussions on her sex ed comic like when she talked about cuckolding (https://www.dailydot.com/irl/oh-joy-sex-toy-cuckolding-racism/) or having a guest recommend sea sponges (https://www.ohjoysextoy.com/sponge/) which can be very dangerous (https://drjengunter.wordpress.com/2016/05/18/glamour-gives-risky-period-advice-recommends-dangerous-sea-sponges/).

idk I know she's apologized for most of that and I get why people like her, but personally I just don't trust her.

For real tho I'm up too late and I worded that post a bit harshly. I don't want to spark any more debates on what's problematic or not. Just my personal distaste.

ANYWAY I still love the comic tho but that's to be expected since it's Jeph's writing
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Dandi Andi on 07 Jun 2018, 00:56
For real tho I'm up too late and I worded that post a bit harshly. I don't want to spark any more debates on what's problematic or not. Just my personal distaste.

Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I was aware of her comic on cuckoldry and its... problems. I hadn't seen the comic about trans men (as I haven't read DAR) and I had no idea about the sea sponges. I was pretty shocked to see she wrote a trans man calling her out for her fetishism in the comic and then blew him off. That's very off putting.

I think if I had those experiences with her before the rest of her work, I would be more inclined to take your position and I certainly respect it. Given that my first experiences with her are very inclusive and sex positive, I'm a little more inclined to be forgiving. But I totally understand and respect if you don't feel that way.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: citizenfive on 07 Jun 2018, 01:55
But I totally understand and respect if you don't feel that way.

In case I haven't said it before here, I love how people can have reasonable, respectful, nuanced discussions here and come to an understanding over a topic! The internet appears to be lacking in that, and it's refreshing to see decent people.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 07 Jun 2018, 03:20
Bah! You're hardly copying me. We both appreciate a beautiful moment.  :-)

Indeed! I've gone back to that strip countless times since that day, and I don't know how many times I've teared up.

My avatar now is more "cuddly." I hope to see a lot of them cuddling and snuggling in the future.
"I concur" would be a Brobdingnagian understatement.

Um. Speaking of which... would it be OT to mention here that I wrote some Faybles fanfic and I'm not sure where to post it because the fanfic thread doesn't seem to be active? I just thought of it because I get the impression that you might enjoy it.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Thrillho on 07 Jun 2018, 04:56
Jeph wrote today's comic, so there's that at least.

It's a shame to find out the art was by somebody so problematic, because I thought today's comic was a hilarious razzing of the fanbase.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 07 Jun 2018, 05:22
So did the three-striped* "banner" remind anyone else of Aquafresh toothpaste? I thought of it immediately, and then I thought "Oh, I get it. A droid has sex with a human and accidentally squeezes their guts out like toothpaste from a tube." Did this occur to anyone else?

I don't know if there's a significant overlap between this forum and the Patreon. If there is, let me know, since I don't want to bore people by reposting stuff.

*Yeah, I see now that it's actually four colors, but at first glance I thought it was three.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 07 Jun 2018, 05:29
...boy was this some whiplash from being overjoyed with how this comic is going to being completely disappointing to see a guest comic by the gross as hell erika moen

Yikes...gross as hell? What did she do, exactly?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 07 Jun 2018, 05:33
Ah, yeah, pretty messed up that she realized while writing the comic that she shouldn't be doing it, and then she just blew him off.

Mistakes were definitely made by this one.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 07 Jun 2018, 05:46
Jeph wrote today's comic, so there's that at least.

It's a shame to find out the art was by somebody so problematic, because I thought today's comic was a hilarious razzing of the fanbase.

Would you care to explain what problems the artist poses, for those of us who are unfamiliar?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 07 Jun 2018, 05:48
I didn't cry...BUT...I wanted to. Because I honestly felt for Faye, she was crying because she honestly thought Bubbles had gone. The thought of losing Bubbles caused her to start crying right there.

I think it was only when she contemplated REALLY. LOSING. BUBBLES. FOREVER. that she realized what needed to happen, and how she really felt.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Thrillho on 07 Jun 2018, 05:58
Jeph wrote today's comic, so there's that at least.

It's a shame to find out the art was by somebody so problematic, because I thought today's comic was a hilarious razzing of the fanbase.

Would you care to explain what problems the artist poses, for those of us
who are unfamiliar?

It's further up in the thread, I didn't know about it either.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 07 Jun 2018, 06:05
Thanks, my bad. I thought I'd picked up where I'd left off, but no.

I admit I found the wording a bit... odd. I've never seen a person described as problematic before.

I can understand, anyway, losing trust in someone that has done some things in the past you've been critical of. But seriously, I am not sure what it means to say a person is problematic. It sounds like a weasel word in this context.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Thrudd on 07 Jun 2018, 06:52
Well I think the weasel word is an attempt to be diplomatic and avoid being crass and insulting.
Problematic - constituting or presenting a problem or difficulty.
In the case of people it usually refers to one aspect of their personality or behavior.
They may only do bad / questionable / squicky / inappropriate / dangerous things at certain points but you have no idea when or where it will happen or why and they are unphased by any negative repercussions.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jun 2018, 07:06
I don't know if there's a significant overlap between this forum and the Patreon. If there is, let me know, since I don't want to bore people by reposting stuff.

Plenty of people here are not on Patreon.  However, note that this means we do not allow discussions of things which Patreon members may have seen but which are not yet openly public.  A simple matter of not spoiling.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 07 Jun 2018, 07:16
Plenty of people here are not on Patreon.  However, note that this means we do not allow discussions of things which Patreon members may have seen but which are not yet openly public.  A simple matter of not spoiling.

Yup. That was the first lesson I picked up in the "Hi, I'm new" thread. I'm actually champing at the bit to discuss something about tonight's strip.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Jun 2018, 07:37
I know that feeling!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 07 Jun 2018, 15:04
Well I think the weasel word is an attempt to be diplomatic and avoid being crass and insulting.

I think it would be a lot less crass and insulting to be precise, honestly.

I have no problem with the word "problematic" if the precise thing you want to say is "constituting or presenting a problem or difficulty."

But it's not good communication to say something that could be interpreted anywhere between "has said some offensive things" and "an asshole."
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Storel on 07 Jun 2018, 15:21
I'm not sure I would recognize spinal fluid at first glance, honestly! And I've got a lot more of it than most AIs...
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Jun 2018, 17:09
But I totally understand and respect if you don't feel that way.

In case I haven't said it before here, I love how people can have reasonable, respectful, nuanced discussions here and come to an understanding over a topic! The internet appears to be lacking in that, and it's refreshing to see decent people.
Administrator Comment I thank the many many people who have made this possible.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 07 Jun 2018, 19:59
Ohhh!! Her pretty pink eyes and green hair! That's why she's called Melon. :D

I think her having the IQ of a melon is mostly an act...
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 07 Jun 2018, 20:19
Has it been confirmed that Pintsize went to poker night to tell the other AIs about Faye and Bubbles? Just curious.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: A small perverse otter on 07 Jun 2018, 20:36
Ohhh!! Her pretty pink eyes and green hair! That's why she's called Melon. :D

I think her having the IQ of a melon is mostly an act...
And her tunic is about the same color as a red watermelon's flesh.

I don't think she has the IQ of a watermelon...I think that's an insult to rocks.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Inconsequential on 07 Jun 2018, 21:00
The orange guy's name is "Arthur".
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3487

In case anyone else was cudgeling their brain like I was...  :-D

I had to go back to when we first met Melon - Arthur burst through the door carrying a sad and temporarily de-assed Melon.

Melon's eyes changed color from green to pink somewhere along the way, but maybe that's just... something she can do. I mean, if you have a detachable butt, you probably have other swappable features. And she either switched her ears around or took off some pink headphones, too.

Pink eyes and ears:
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3643
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: anuran on 07 Jun 2018, 21:04
I don't want to write up a callout or anything but shes made some shitty stuff in the past like a comic fetishizing trans men (https://www.darcomic.com/2009/02/17/transmen/) (all links are NSFW) and has had some bad discussions on her sex ed comic like when she talked about cuckolding (https://www.dailydot.com/irl/oh-joy-sex-toy-cuckolding-racism/) or having a guest recommend sea sponges (https://www.ohjoysextoy.com/sponge/) which can be very dangerous (https://drjengunter.wordpress.com/2016/05/18/glamour-gives-risky-period-advice-recommends-dangerous-sea-sponges/).

idk I know she's apologized for most of that and I get why people like her, but personally I just don't trust her.

For real tho I'm up too late and I worded that post a bit harshly. I don't want to spark any more debates on what's problematic or not. Just my personal distaste.

ANYWAY I still love the comic tho but that's to be expected since it's Jeph's writing

I've been following OJST since pretty much the beginning. I can't see what you "don't trust" about her or what she needs to "apologize" for. She talks about sex and talks about it honestly. All sorts of body types, preferences, likes, dislikes, and messiness. And she does it straight up, without pandering. Maybe that's why she's the one Planned Parenthood supports rather than, say, your work. Does she have personal preferences? Of course, and she's up front about that. So do you. So do I.

Her art style is quirky and idiosyncratic. Not everyone likes it, but the same can be said for any artist's work even, (say it ain't so) Jeph's.

Other commenters are correct. "Problematic" is a passive-aggressive weasel-word used to arbitrarily dismiss and silence while trying ineffectively to appear even-handed.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Dandi Andi on 07 Jun 2018, 22:00
I've been following OJST since pretty much the beginning. I can't see what you "don't trust" about her or what she needs to "apologize" for. She talks about sex and talks about it honestly. All sorts of body types, preferences, likes, dislikes, and messiness. And she does it straight up, without pandering. Maybe that's why she's the one Planned Parenthood supports rather than, say, your work. Does she have personal preferences? Of course, and she's up front about that. So do you. So do I.

Her art style is quirky and idiosyncratic. Not everyone likes it, but the same can be said for any artist's work even, (say it ain't so) Jeph's.

Other commenters are correct. "Problematic" is a passive-aggressive weasel-word used to arbitrarily dismiss and silence while trying ineffectively to appear even-handed.

I think you're being unfair to Spider. She explained why she doesn't care for Erika Moen with relevant links and it has nothing to do with style, preferences or the general nature of her content. The fetishization of trans men (https://www.darcomic.com/2009/02/17/transmen/), as far as I am concerned, is reason enough for Spider to be wary of her content. And suggesting that her partnership with Planned Parenthood invalidates Spider's concerns just because Spider isn't also a comic creator is just intellectually dishonest. If it were a valid argument, none of us could reasonably talk about QC because we aren't all successful artists like Jeph.

And to clarify because I've seen it a few times, Spider never called Moen problematic. She called Moen's work problematic (well, she said she didn't want to spark a debate about what's problematic and I interpret that as relating to the cited works). And I understand why "problematic" has become problematic in its own right, but Spider did provide links to three specific issues that she's had with Moen's work in the past. Moen created work in the past that Spider found hurtful or potentially dangerous and does not fully trust Moen not to do so again.

*addendum*
I see now that Thrillho did call Erika problematic, but I believe the use in this context remains valid as a criticism of her body of work.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Jun 2018, 22:35
Somewhere, maybe someplace in DISCUSS, I personally could really use a clarification of whether "problematic" means something that's a problem, in which case it's either mild or severe, or whether it's a polite word for "bigoted", or whether it means "You did an oops there".
Quote from: Google define:problematic
synonyms:   difficult, hard, taxing, troublesome, tricky, awkward, controversial, ticklish, complicated, complex, knotty, thorny, prickly, vexed; informalsticky
"the pest control in this building has gotten very problematic"
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Timemaster on 07 Jun 2018, 23:01
I'm not sure I would recognize spinal fluid at first glance, honestly! And I've got a lot more of it than most AIs...

I saw my own spinal fluid when I had a lumbal punctuation  because of a Lyme Borelliosis. It's basically a clear liquid, a bit opaque and a hint yellow-ish. It tastes kinda salty.

No, I'm joking here. At least with the salty part.  :-D

TM
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 07 Jun 2018, 23:19
You really do have to wonder where Melon's sense of reality is anchored sometimes. This isn't just Emily's 'marches to her own drums', this is out and out 'my world is not yours' in terms of how she reacts to the world around her! Melon is definitely sweet and innocent but I honestly worry that she'll get hurt (again) due to her difficultly with connecting with the universe around her!

That said... Am I the only one who thinks that Melon genuinely believes that the fruit was named after her?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Storel on 07 Jun 2018, 23:23
And we finish off the week with some quintessential Melon. Honestly, I don't see a resemblance either, even after Arthur made his changes, but her turnabout amuses me. :-D
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Dandi Andi on 07 Jun 2018, 23:57
I love the "ART" drawn on the wall with what is obviously crayon. It is arguably a reasonable deconstruction of art. I'd call it Dada, but it makes too much sense to be Dada.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: jesslc on 08 Jun 2018, 00:16
So was I the only one who expected Arthur to carve open the fruit to show the resemblance? If he had carved eyes in it, I'm not sure we would be able to tell the difference  :-P

Somewhere, maybe someplace in DISCUSS, I personally could really use a clarification of whether "problematic" means something that's a problem, in which case it's either mild or severe, or whether it's a polite word for "bigoted", or whether it means "You did an oops there".
The way I see it used most often these days as a "yellow flag" type warning about media. Which is great in my opinion because I personally like to know if I'm likely to encounter sexism/racism/homophobia/transphobia/other problematic things in a book/show/webcomic/etc so that I can make an informed decision about whether or not I want to read/watch it. For example: If I were to recommend QC to someone I would say (among other things) "It's good but some of the early strips are problematic". I would then elaborate more on the aspects that I see as problematic if requested.

It's not just for indicating bigotry but it's probably most frequently used for that. To give a (recently discussed) non-bigotry example: for some people, Faye's violence towards her friends and the way that has been depicted in QC, is a very problematic thing to see in media. Other people are not so affected by seeing that.

What I see as problematic and what someone else sees as problematic in the same piece of media is almost certainly not going to be exactly the same. Our different life experiences shape our views on these things but I think the word is still useful because it opens up the discussion. There are many things that I adore despite their problematic aspects (don't get me started!) but I recognize that for someone else the problematic aspects may outweigh the enjoyment they would get out of the thing and that's okay. It's about allowing people to make their own informed decision about things.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Thrillho on 08 Jun 2018, 00:24
People are reading WAY too much into my previous reply.

I have literally never heard of this artist. I don't even look up who does the guest strips.

I was literally using a word that applies to people having criticised them.

Problematic is a loaded word, particularly on here, but I meant it in a literal sense, not in a '18th century misogyny in a masterpiece of literature' sense.

She raised ire among some forumites. Others like her work. That is a problem. She is a problematic choice. I do not mean she is a problematic person. I don't even remember her name despite it being further up in the thread.

Man between Tova thinking I was the one originally listing the thing and reactions since, my post is getting an awful lot of traction on a topic I know nothing about.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 08 Jun 2018, 01:16
Sorry again for overlooking the original post and dragging you into (as it turned out) a protracted conversation over something in which you were only tangentially involved.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Zebediah on 08 Jun 2018, 03:41
“Why did you even pick the name Melon if you didn’t know what they were?”

“I just thought it was a cool word! How was I supposed to know they were a real thing? I mean, humans have words for all kinds of things that don’t really exist, like ‘rabbit’ and ‘tortellini’ and ‘misdemeanor’!”
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Jun 2018, 03:44
“Why did you even pick the name Melon if you didn’t know what they were?”

I'm wondering if she's an ex-AnthroPC Companion and 'Melon' was the weird name chosen for her by her first owner. She's kept it because she liked it but had never bothered to find out to what it was referring.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Zebediah on 08 Jun 2018, 03:54
If that’s the case, I just wonder who Gordon matched her with. When you have an AI with no grasp of consensual reality, do you match her with someone who is really grounded, or someone who is as far out there as she is?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 04:00
Has it been confirmed that Pintsize went to poker night to tell the other AIs about Faye and Bubbles? Just curious.

I seem to be the only one who takes Pintsize's words of that night at face value, which I still find a bit surprising. After all, the budding, and finally blossoming, relationship between Bubbles and Faye affected me like no other fictional characters ever have, and I'm not alone. That Pintsize could have been likewise touched seems authentic.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 04:40
I totally get what you mean. Faye and Bubbles' relationship is something I've found very moving, in a way I haven't found much else in a comic moving before. I am probably way too emotionally invested. Them kissing was an EXPERIENCE for me.

They actually met because of Pintsize, so maybe in some small way he feels proud of himself for having brought them together. Once he gets his pervy little speculations about their relationship out of his head (inevitable, this is PINTSIZE).
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Zebediah on 08 Jun 2018, 04:48
To address the other point: I don’t think Pintsize told the other robots about Faye and Bubbles. Whether that really was out of unprecedented decorum or a rare fit of self-preservation is open to question. But as far as we know he’s told no one, and only went to poker night to get out of the way.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 04:53
Oh!!!! Duh! I didn't even think about that.

He is a gentleman at the most unexpected of times.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 05:05
"For the first time in my existence I have chosen to exercise basic decorum."

WOW. I'm slow!!! I totally didn't understand what he was talking about at all!

Yikes...haha! I can't believe how that just went over my head. He was trying to get out of the way.

And probably wasn't surprised at all when they came home and...yeah. He was like "Welp, here it comes" and went on his way to the poker game.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Tova on 08 Jun 2018, 05:06
He may be a horrible little robot, but he's not an asshole. (https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3185)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 05:13
I think that deep down, Faye and Claire have some affection for the little perv. And Marten too, obviously.

I am not sure about Faye's mom. Yes, Bubbles is polite, and yes, southern women like politeness, but I'm not sure that's going to be enough to overcome the prejudices that she's certain to have.

I'm just not sure she's going to be on board with the whole "Faye and Bubbles" thing, and it's certain to cause tension between Bubbles and Faye and perhaps even a fight. Not looking forward to that!

We already know how Bubbles feels about Evie, so that's going to be fun too. /s
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 05:13
I totally get what you mean. Faye and Bubbles' relationship is something I've found very moving, in a way I haven't found much else in a comic moving before. I am probably way too emotionally invested. Them kissing was an EXPERIENCE for me.

Speaking only for myself, I am keenly aware that my obsession is unhealthy, or at least indicative of emotional imbalance. I've never been a shipper. I shipped those two at least an order of magnitude harder than I've ever shipped before. As with everything I've done with my spare time over the last two years, it is clearly a reflection of my desperate need to distract myself from general existential dread, and anxiety and sadness over personal losses.

Of course that does not detract from the source material. There are reasons why my mind latched into those two. Jeph has done extraordinary work in crafting two characters whose journey together resonates so profoundly in me.

to;dr: Just because I'm obsessed doesn't mean the thing I'm obsessed about isn't amazing.  :-)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 05:15
Yeah, I have it to an unhealthy degree too and I admit that.

I really never cared too much about the relationships in QC. I think this is the best job Jeph's ever done of building something. Building tension. Creating a compelling story for Bubbles.

I am invested in the Brun/Clinton thing. I really want them to happen. Besides them and Faye/Bubbles, I've never had feelings one way or the other about the couplings.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 05:39
To address the other point: I don’t think Pintsize told the other robots about Faye and Bubbles. Whether that really was out of unprecedented decorum or a rare fit of self-preservation is open to question. But as far as we know he’s told no one, and only went to poker night to get out of the way.

Agreed. I think he just left it with that single statement, since none of the other players seemed inclined to probe his meaning. I think he was genuinely touched. And that seems fitting to me.

This brings me to a question I've been wondering about for years. You know when an author writes a joke or some other form of payoff that depends on a release of tensions or expectations that they've spent years building up? Is there a word for that? The best example I know of is the Aubrey/Maturin novels. There are a dozen books full of Jack saying to an agonized Stephen "Come, there's not a moment to be lost!" and dragging him away from whatever precious botanizing he's engaged in. Then there's a scene where Stephen bursts in on Jack and says that exact thing, and it's hilarious because of all that stored-up tension. It's like the discharge of a literary capacitor, and the books are full of that sort of thing. It's amazingly impactful in the right hands.

I bring it up because Pintsize's reaction is one of the best examples of this I've ever seen. For all these years we've seen him refuse to be anything but an annoying little perv, and because of all that inertia, his quiet act against type is literally singular. That payoff has been coming for over a decade, and Jeph can never give us that payoff again. That he chose to discharge that once-in-a-lifetime literary capacitor for Bubbles and Faye seems perfect to me, because I can't imagine there ever being a better opportunity to touch us by way of Pintsize being touched.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 05:52
the discharge of a literary capacitor

Can I just say this is awesome. :)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 07:23
I have a noob question. Is there a shorthand for the following, or a general consensus on our assumptions in this regard?

"I am aware that the question I'm about to pose has an obvious real-world answer. If I have to preface everything I post with that acknowledgment, this is going to get really tedious. Yes, there are architectural reasons for x which usually boil down to 'It's easier for Jeph to draw x than y.' And. It's fun to talk about in-universe reasons, and that's what I would like to do here."

I ask because I'd like to talk about Arthur's face in this strip, and about AI faces in general
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Stoutfellow on 08 Jun 2018, 07:35
In some circles, a distinction is made between "Doylist" and "Watsonian" explanations. ("Why didn't they do this?" "It wasn't in the script!": Doylist. "They didn't know about this other thing.": Watsonian.) So what you're asking for is a Watsonian explanation of something that has an obvious Doylist explanation.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 07:41
In some circles, a distinction is made between "Doylist" and "Watsonian" explanations. ("Why didn't they do this?" "It wasn't in the script!": Doylist. "They didn't know about this other thing.": Watsonian.) So what you're asking for is a Watsonian explanation of something that has an obvious Doylist explanation.

Perfect! :-)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Bad Superman on 08 Jun 2018, 08:29
He may be a horrible little robot, but he's not an asshole. (https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3185)

So Pintsize is a Transhumanist (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism).
Or, at least, he likes some of its ideas (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphological_freedom). Who would have thought?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 09:08
OK, so here is my Watsonian question: Does Arthur have a tongue?

I believe he doesn't, because there is no visual distinction between his "tongue" and the other facial features of Pintsize, Punchbot, O'Malley... or heck, of *any* of the other AI's. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe we've ever seen any interior features of an AI's mouth, so we don't know whether they have interiors. As far as we know, there's nothing but a highly malleable colored surface layer over a white sub-layer that keeps foreign objects* and dust and grit out.

In strip 3304 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3304), May realized "I could fill my mouth with lube and let a dude go to town." So presumably at least that model has a space inside the head into which the inner layer could stretch.

Anyway, I think the "tongue" is no different than the eyes and mouths we've seen all along: a gap caused by stretching of the outer colored layer to expose the inner white layer.

I find this question fascinating because it speaks to the level of visual shorthand we comics readers have internalized. I've spent decades reading comic books and comics, so I've got all this wetware that extrudes visual elements such as mouths and tongues from simple two-dimensional shapes. I see stuff that's not there in the panels, and every once in a while I step back and realized that people who don't have that wetware must not have the slightest clue how anyone could, say, be moved to tears by a web comic about an ex-military AI in a gynoid battle droid body falling in love with a human woman.

In short, we've got a robust semiotics suite, and the implications are fascinating. For instance, two people on the Patreon forum asserted that that feature we see on Arthur's face is a tongue, though I believe they have no justification for this. But neither do I have any justification for my assertion. It speaks to the interplay between artist and audience, and I can't help but think that at least some of it is intentional on the part of the artist. I mean, Jeph's representation of human faces has changed radically over the years, but Pintsize's face has stayed more or less the same, so it's not unreasonable to ask—perhaps even from a Doylist perspective—whether Arthur has a tongue.

*Oh nuts. As I was writing this, I remembered that Punchbot swallowed his car keys, so that sort of throws my theory out the window. Drat. I mean, "brutal self-own, ell em ay oh." (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3552)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 09:26
I wonder if I run afoul of this forum by asking if AIs have tongues and if not, how the Faye/Bubbles kiss was with one person lacking a tongue. Several people have asked if Bubbles has lips.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Jun 2018, 10:46
It connects with the issue of how they speak. A voice synthesizer and speaker would be easier to implement than a tongue and vocal folds.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 08 Jun 2018, 11:49
Yep. But a tongue and vocal cords are the best way to simulate human speech.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 11:52
Heh. I didn't even want to get into this aspect, because my post was long-winded enough. But yeah, those last two posts represent my thoughts. Clearly chassis designers put a lot of effort into facial verisimilitude, which includes a moving jaw. And if you're going to have a moving jaw, then do you just go ahead and do a tongue, vocal cords, etc.?
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: dutchrvl on 08 Jun 2018, 12:50
Heh. I didn't even want to get into this aspect, because my post was long-winded enough. But yeah, those last two posts represent my thoughts. Clearly chassis designers put a lot of effort into facial verisimilitude, which includes a moving jaw. And if you're going to have a moving jaw, then do you just go ahead and do a tongue, vocal cords, etc.?

You have all posed very valid questions that I have also wondered myself.

While I know it's very unlikely considering the early chassis version that Winslow tried back in the day, I have come to think of the AIs in QC as slightly less progressed versions of the androids in the HBO show  'Westworld'.

For anyone who hasn't seen that show, basically androids in that show started out as mostly mechanical inner workings but always with highly sophisticated and near-perfect outside appearance/feel (including tongue/lips and other aspects), and later on are fabricated completely(I think) out of organic material pretty much indistinguishable from humans in every single way.

 So, in the QC universe, I personally prefer to imagine the androids as having mechanical/electrical inner workings, but having outside feel/appearance (including lips/tongue/hair) etc. more-or-less indistinguishable from humans. While I understand that there may be question marks as to why they would be developed that way, it kind of makes sense to foster widespread acceptance by the non-android population.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Jun 2018, 14:54
>acceptance

I wonder how many are being designed by people like Ambassador Momo to be bridges between inorganic and organic life forms.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: specter177 on 08 Jun 2018, 16:08
Heh. I didn't even want to get into this aspect, because my post was long-winded enough. But yeah, those last two posts represent my thoughts. Clearly chassis designers put a lot of effort into facial verisimilitude, which includes a moving jaw. And if you're going to have a moving jaw, then do you just go ahead and do a tongue, vocal cords, etc.?

I'd guess the moving mouth thing is more to keep them away from being too creepy looking. Human looking robots today even have moving mouths, despite using speakers, even if they're not quite as refined. Air over vocal chords seems like WAY more complexity than needed, especially since robots still sound, well, robotic-ish, based on how Jeph draws the text bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 08 Jun 2018, 17:00
Er. Faye called Bubbles’ voice “pretty,” which makes me think she doesn’t sound “robotic.”

Her voice must be very special, given she has a different font, and Faye and Marten imitated her voice.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 21:03
I'd guess the moving mouth thing is more to keep them away from being too creepy looking. Human looking robots today even have moving mouths, despite using speakers, even if they're not quite as refined. Air over vocal chords seems like WAY more complexity than needed, especially since robots still sound, well, robotic-ish, based on how Jeph draws the text bubbles.

That's a good point. I had the same thought about the appearance of the speech balloons, and promptly forgot about it until you mentioned it.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 08 Jun 2018, 21:16
Laughing my ass off. Here's why.

I was thinking about specter177 said about the speech balloons, and what fayelovesbubles said about her voice, and I was going to say that, because of the former, I imagine Bubbles as sounding noticeably—but probably not egregiously—synthesized. I was going to say maybe like GLaDOS, but warmer. Then I thought of Marten's early reactions to her, and I modified that to "like GLaDOS but warmer, and *much* more terrifying." And then it hit me. She could sound like anything. She could sound like ED-209.

You guys. Bubbles could sound like ED-209.

"You're so warm."
"YOU ARE TOO."
...
"WE STILL OUGHT TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION."
"Yeah."
"PERHAPS... LATER, THOUGH."
"Yeah."

I've been giggling over this off and on for hours, and will continue to do so.

Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: SilentSooYun on 09 Jun 2018, 02:46
“Why did you even pick the name Melon if you didn’t know what they were?”

“I just thought it was a cool word! How was I supposed to know they were a real thing? I mean, humans have words for all kinds of things that don’t really exist, like ‘rabbit’ and ‘tortellini’ and ‘misdemeanor’!”

Maybe it was a misspelling of "mellon", as in "Pedo mellon a mino"
So her name means Friend :)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: specter177 on 09 Jun 2018, 03:04
Er. Faye called Bubbles’ voice “pretty,” which makes me think she doesn’t sound “robotic.”

Her voice must be very special, given she has a different font, and Faye and Marten imitated her voice.

I should have said synthesized, not robotic. That's not exclusive with sounding "pretty," but I assume it sounds distinctly not exactly human.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Jun 2018, 08:46
I've thought about this.

Considering, roughly, the time that Bubbles "emerged", her voicebox could only be modeled after one person.






Angelina Jolie.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 09 Jun 2018, 10:10
Angelina Jolie doesn’t work for me...if this ever became an animated series which I’m sure it won’t.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: SpanielBear on 09 Jun 2018, 10:58
I've thought about this.

Considering, roughly, the time that Bubbles "emerged", her voicebox could only be modeled after one person.






Angelina Jolie.

Please.

Gina Torres, obviously.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 09 Jun 2018, 11:20
Tricky. Bubbles has such a particular combination of character traits: formal, gracious, somber, fierce, fiercely honorable... and adorably goofy. I've been wracking my brain, and so far I've thought of only one actress I'd trust with the role: Donna Murphy. She was one of the few good parts of the otherwise execrable "Star Trek: Insurrection" and she was an exquisite Abigail Adams in "Liberty: the American Revolution".

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0614220/
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 09 Jun 2018, 12:14
Never heard of her. I think there are a lot of actresses who could pull off Bubbles...imho.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 09 Jun 2018, 12:58
Tricky. Bubbles has such a particular combination of character traits: formal, gracious, somber, fierce, fiercely honorable... and adorably goofy.
You basically hit all the high points of Inara from Firefly/Serenity there, so what about Morena Baccarin? Just downshifted an octave or so.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Morituri on 09 Jun 2018, 13:01
FWIW, as far as Erica Moen:

I see her as somebody who did some mistaken things, learned that they were mistakes, and doesn't do them any more.   Everybody has learning experiences, right?  I don't have a problem with her, and consider some mistakes to have been pretty much inevitable and expected given the subject matter. 

She does straight-talk about sex and physical issues and relationships, pretty unfiltered.  And she tries to do it honestly, in a way that people just learning these things about themselves can relate to.

It's easy to avoid offending people if you use the formal conventions and make yourself sound like a lecturer that nobody will relate to or trust.  People ignore TONS of those sites, because they make everything sound boring and sound like lectures from distant people who have nothing at stake and don't give a damn.  Moen gets support from educators and even rights groups, and wins awards, because she does NOT engage at that arms-distance that makes all those other sites unrelatable and thus ignored.

But, face it, there's a reason for that arms-distance posture.  She writes (and draws) about sex.  If Moen stopped every time she was going to offend somebody, her work wouldn't exist.  If she stopped every time people told her she ought to stop, her work wouldn't exist.  She's really and truly not able to take anyone else's word about when to stop and where to draw the line, and still get anything done at all.  So she's on her own. A few mistakes are to be expected. 

I remember her being wrong once about how poly relationships worked, and being a little irked.  But within the next two or three strips, she corrected herself based on reader feedback and research from sources they'd brought her, and apologized and totally owned her mistake.  And there I forgave it, and she's never done it again.  Lesson learned, as far as I can see. That's what an honorable person does when they find out they've made a mistake.   But there are always going to be mistakes to learn from.

Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Undrneath on 09 Jun 2018, 13:50
Never heard of her. I think there are a lot of actresses who could pull off Bubbles...imho.

If she were still alive I'd say the first lady of computer voices Majel Barrett-Roddenberry.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 09 Jun 2018, 14:00
Tricky. Bubbles has such a particular combination of character traits: formal, gracious, somber, fierce, fiercely honorable... and adorably goofy.
You basically hit all the high points of Inara from Firefly/Serenity there, so what about Morena Baccarin? Just downshifted an octave or so.
Ooooh, good one. Can't believe I didn't think of her!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 09 Jun 2018, 16:22
I had a looong list of actresses to play Bubbles. Adding Morena Baccarin, her voice could work too.

Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Jun 2018, 18:07
From Hughyeman's signature,
Quote
"I would never leave unless you asked me to."
"I would never ask you to."

That was a commitment ceremony, without the ceremony. That's further than the other couples in the comic have gone.

They have cemented it in 3751 where they agreed to keep going in the face of mistakes and adversity.

If this falls short of a marriage it's only by a few inches and a couple of rings.

Faye's head is still going to explode when Bubbles proposes.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: HughYeman on 09 Jun 2018, 18:15
From Hughyeman's signature,
Quote
"I would never leave unless you asked me to."
"I would never ask you to."

That was a commitment ceremony, without the ceremony. That's further than the other couples in the comic have gone.

They have cemented it in 3751 where they agreed to keep going in the face of mistakes and adversity.

If this falls short of a marriage it's only by a few inches and a couple of rings.

Faye's head is still going to explode when Bubbles proposes.

My gosh, I still get a little quivery pre-tearing-up feeling when I think of it. There's so much packed into that panel.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Gyrre on 10 Jun 2018, 14:07
“Why did you even pick the name Melon if you didn’t know what they were?”

“I just thought it was a cool word! How was I supposed to know they were a real thing? I mean, humans have words for all kinds of things that don’t really exist, like ‘rabbit’ and ‘tortellini’ and ‘misdemeanor’!”

I think we now know Melon's full name; Melon Rabbit Tortellini von Misdemeanor.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fayelovesbubbles on 10 Jun 2018, 16:39
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuYYrb1SVxg

I keep thinking this song would be perfect if QC was an animated series, when Faye and Bubbles say "I would never leave unless you asked me to" "I would never ask you to" and then kiss. The chorus would play as they kissed.

Yeah, I keep hearing it at work and I think about this crap way too much.

I am weird. lol.

Edit: Yes, folks! Faye and Bubbles practically said vows with that.

I also feel like the episode should end with them kissing for the first time, and the next kiss would happen in the next episode. So the episode would end with that song and them kissing. So climactic!
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: Inconsequential on 10 Jun 2018, 17:40
"...And your courage is one of the things I admire most about you."
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3753

That's when I knew these two were gonna be fine. That's one hell of a solid foundation for a relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: fantasticalice on 13 Jun 2018, 02:22
(https://i.imgur.com/AxASZb2.png)

Someone is eventually going to yell at me for continuing to make and post these.  :-P

I would never!! If that ever happens just tell me who hurt you!!

I love it. I don't know why but I keep remembering Bill and Heather from Doctor Who. Maybe it's because I just had something come into my head about Bubbles watching series 10 for research.

What's most likely is it's the last time I was truly excited to see a romance play out. And as a big awkward girl I relate to Bubbles in lots of ways that doesn't normally happen with telly romance.

This is why representation is important. I will always get excited to see a well done queer romance on screen. But when there are enough of them we can fins ourselves in them. And having that representation also allows us to enjoy the romance we find most satisfying.

A little OT but I recently was reflecting on the show Torchwood. And it had so many different romamces in it I was able to fully engage and discover my favourite romance. Which just happened to be the only straight one. And it was because there were so many well written representative types of romance that I gravitated to one that personally resonated for me. I rarely get that kind of choice. It's also why Dora is my favourite character even though Faye and bubbles are my favourite romance.

I found this comic in a list of queer webcomics. I did several bits of research as the starting point was not what I expected. I even found some rather snide reddit posts criticising the comic for "Suddenly having so mamy lgbt characters! OMG I'm a judgemental twit!"

 He got rather owned but it helped me stick with it and I latched onto Dora. Despite identifying as a lesbian I have fallen in love with a trans bloke in the past and am frequently attracted to those who identify outside of whatever was typed on their birth certificate. Cismen are the only category I have never found myself attracted to except Captain Jack Harkness. Although I'm not sure Cis is even appropriate for him. I think he is his own unique gender his gender is Captain Jack. Alot has to do with a rare gentleness and compassion he shows.

But the point is I very rarely see bisexual characters done right. And Dora has always had this freeing self confidence about heraelf and who she is that I really like.

I guess my point is when representation is there you can experience your likes and dislikes naturally. Being able to say that  lgbt relationship 1C is not your favourite is just as empowering as saying Bubbles and Faye ia your new favourite relationship across all media.

Honestly it's why the only books I read are Doctor Who because I kmow as a whole I am represented and Doctor Who books are also not about romance. Fun OT Fact: if the show had not gone off the air Ace was going to be written as a lesbian. in 1990!

I would likely read a QC book though! As odd as a print adventure would be I would read it.

But I really love how this comic has so many different types of romance and presents them organically and not clunky. I like the favt that I like Faye and Bubbles because I identify with Bubbles and she's with another girl. There ars a wealth of romance in QC and queer characters and queer romance a plenty.

It's nice to enjoy a romance on its own merits. It's not something I get to do very often:)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: jwhouk on 13 Jun 2018, 07:41
QC is in book form. Mostly anime style, of course, but...
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: pwhodges on 13 Jun 2018, 08:42
s/anime/manga

;)
Title: Re: WCDT strips 3756-3760 (4th June to 8th June 2018)
Post by: anuran on 13 Jun 2018, 20:57
He may be a horrible little robot, but he's not an asshole. (https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3185)

But he still leaks hamburger juice