THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 16:11
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448928 times)

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #300 on: 19 Sep 2007, 10:06 »

I suppose I should put my hideous pic up ;)

Logged

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #301 on: 19 Sep 2007, 11:29 »

anditsdiscontents, I tried very hard to find a picture of a young John Cusack in sunglasses from Better Off Dead, but I was unable to.
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #302 on: 19 Sep 2007, 12:51 »

Matt, I kept thinking of a young Mike Myers.  I couldn't find a decent picture of Nancy Travis from So I Married An Axe Murder to 'shop in though.
Logged

Kai

  • ASDFSFAALYG8A@*& ^$%O
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,847
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #303 on: 19 Sep 2007, 17:58 »

What is the girl behind you doing (the one with the belt around her shirt)


probably removing gels from a light

this is in a theater, understand
Logged
but the music sucks because the keyboards don't have the cold/mechanical sound they had but a wannabe techno sound that it's pathetic for Rammstein standars.

Joseph

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,822
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #304 on: 19 Sep 2007, 18:08 »

This is the "band" I was briefly in this summer.  We performed one song only once, which happened to be a cover of Animal Collective's "We Tigers."  The room we were in was almost completely dark, with only a few candles for light, but the flash on the camera ruins that.



Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #305 on: 19 Sep 2007, 18:13 »

A good fantasy pirate will always have the perfect seasonal accessories.




and also a fucking kickass corset.

« Last Edit: 19 Sep 2007, 18:26 by calenlass »
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #306 on: 19 Sep 2007, 19:05 »

Drool.

And in keeping with the whole picture thing...



Me looking pretentious on the steps of my beach house.
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #307 on: 19 Sep 2007, 19:21 »



OMNOMNOMNOM  Pink tim tams, helping cure breast cancer one delicious snack at a time.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #308 on: 19 Sep 2007, 21:37 »

In my head, tim tams sound like a slang term for breasts, so it make sense.
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

3Z3VH

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 319
  • WoSaT
    • http://www.everlan.net
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #309 on: 19 Sep 2007, 21:38 »

I would buy them by the CASE !
Logged
With every small decision: if you change a heart, you change the world.

Ernest

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,471
  • Buy my book!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #310 on: 19 Sep 2007, 21:42 »

This is how I look, you guys

there are no disclaimers

this is what you get

like it or not


Logged
Where I come from, we usually just shorten that to "yee-haw!"

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #311 on: 19 Sep 2007, 21:59 »

A good fantasy pirate will always have the perfect seasonal accessories.




Thats a Legacy Forge (Starfire) dagger is it not?
Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #312 on: 19 Sep 2007, 22:01 »

No.



Dirk. So yes. Except it has a bit of an edge now, because I have mad patience.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #313 on: 19 Sep 2007, 22:06 »

Right, dirk. Anyways its nice, but that voids the warrenty from Legacy. :(

I really like the small blades from Legacy.
Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #314 on: 19 Sep 2007, 22:10 »

Who needs a warranty? Their shit is top-notch. I am fully confident it's got pretty much perfect composition as a blade, and I won't be using it for combat or whatever insofar as I know, and well, I am aware the warranty was voided so I guess if anything happens I knew better.


I, too, adore their small blades.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #315 on: 19 Sep 2007, 22:15 »

Well the warrenty is less for combat (you dont wanna hit edge to edge anyways), more for people who attack cars, so I can see your point. I have destroyed many a furniture 'monster' with my Legacy Axe. Fun times.
Logged

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #316 on: 19 Sep 2007, 22:18 »

KITCHEN PIKSHUR



(Katie you look smashing xxx)
Logged

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #317 on: 19 Sep 2007, 23:19 »

Guys I think Lunchy is too pretty to be as good at taking pictures as she is; the two combined sort of blow my fuses.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

3Z3VH

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 319
  • WoSaT
    • http://www.everlan.net
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #318 on: 20 Sep 2007, 00:47 »

Her kitchen is too clean, it screams "psycho."
Logged
With every small decision: if you change a heart, you change the world.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #319 on: 20 Sep 2007, 04:03 »

Australian Psycho (Summer '08).
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #320 on: 20 Sep 2007, 07:37 »

KITCHEN PIKSHUR



(Katie you look smashing xxx)




?
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #321 on: 20 Sep 2007, 07:52 »

Her kitchen is too clean, it screams "psycho."

lunchbawks == hannelore

???

carnivoracious

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #322 on: 21 Sep 2007, 11:43 »


Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him we- wait a minute this is a cell phone.  I'm supposed to have a skull.  Props mistress...
Logged

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #323 on: 21 Sep 2007, 12:37 »

OM NOM NOM (etc.)


SALAD




SALAD GIVES PRETTY EYES


Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #324 on: 21 Sep 2007, 14:15 »

Those eyes are only slightly pretty.
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #325 on: 21 Sep 2007, 15:01 »

I would need a better picture to make an informed decision.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #326 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:12 »

wow lummer you really like yourself don't you
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

onewheelwizzard

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Ha! Fool ...
    • http://www.livejournal.com/users/onewheelwizzard
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #327 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:22 »

I can't tell if David_Dovey is making a comment about Lummer's post directly, or about Kieffer and Misconception's replies.  I think my irony radar might need a rest.
Logged
also at one point mid-sex she asked me "what do you think about commercialism in art?"

Yogurt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #328 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:41 »



This is my best friend. His name is Pablo, and I made him out of popcorn left overs.
Don't laugh! I bet he's tastier than your best friend!

Logged

Yogurt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #329 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:45 »



I think I'm trying to practice hypnosis through my eyes.
Now, look deep, deep into my needlessly wide eyeballs.
Logged

Yogurt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #330 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:47 »

On second thought....I just look like I'm confused, or a pedophile.
Logged

ZJGent

  • Beyond Thunderdome
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
    • Night Talk at Harvey's
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #331 on: 21 Sep 2007, 19:48 »

Triple posting is baaaaad.
See what you did? You went and turned a respected (har har) forum member into an androgynous talking sheep. By triple posting. That's what triple posting does.
Logged
[02:29] Danosaur: I'd Spektor your Regina.

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #332 on: 21 Sep 2007, 20:21 »

I think Lummer has prettier lips than eyes.
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #333 on: 21 Sep 2007, 20:57 »

This is how you show off eyes:

Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #334 on: 21 Sep 2007, 21:20 »

dang, you have nicely articulated stroma
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #335 on: 21 Sep 2007, 21:21 »

I think Lummer has prettier lips than eyes.
This might be true, barring a better picture. Take a cue from Something Witty- get right up close there!
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #336 on: 21 Sep 2007, 21:27 »

That's actually a crop from a full head+shoulders shot(that I have since lost), I was using one fucking hell of a professional grade digital camera at the time.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #337 on: 21 Sep 2007, 21:29 »

Didn't we do this one time? Or was that somewhere else?


Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #338 on: 21 Sep 2007, 21:35 »

I think we've done it both places, I was just showing how to do it right.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #339 on: 22 Sep 2007, 00:55 »

Witty, that is not how you do eyes right. That is how you do eyes scary. That is way too close and it looks like your eyelashes are the limbs of a spider-eye-beast from my nightmares that is going to eat everyone after climbing out of their computer screens.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #340 on: 22 Sep 2007, 02:29 »

wow lummer you really like yourself don't you

Yes. Most likely a little too much. It takes an awful lot of restraint for me to not post in this thread every five minutes  :|
Logged

Rizzo

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,192
  • R'lyeh City Hardcore
    • Riding the failboat
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #341 on: 22 Sep 2007, 05:15 »

This is my dresser. It's covered in junk.

Logged
Quote from: Jimmy the Squid
Sometimes I feel like everyone around me is some sort of statistical/mathematical genuis and I'm hitting a gazelle in the head with a rock and screaming at the sky when there's a storm.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #342 on: 22 Sep 2007, 05:17 »

Is that a tiny guitar?
Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #343 on: 22 Sep 2007, 07:33 »

What the fresh hell is going on in this thread?

Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #344 on: 22 Sep 2007, 07:56 »

I'm goin' zombie huntin'. Someone's gotta save us all.

Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #345 on: 22 Sep 2007, 08:26 »

Seriously, you win at life.
Logged

TheBoredOne

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 297
  • Boop.
    • The Church of Boredom Forums!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #346 on: 22 Sep 2007, 11:26 »

Just don't hunt the things from "Feast". Heroes don't fare well against them.
Logged
Boredom Makes You Cool.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #347 on: 22 Sep 2007, 11:52 »

That is how you do eyes scary.

Like I said.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #348 on: 22 Sep 2007, 13:23 »




I look 12ish, but I'm actually going to be 16 in 3 months, ha...
Logged

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #349 on: 22 Sep 2007, 13:53 »

At my age, twelve and sixteen are basically the same, so don't worry too much about it.

Obsessions, that is a pretty badass picture. Nicely done.


I was told by a youth that my tank top was skanky. Am I showing too much arm?
« Last Edit: 22 Sep 2007, 13:56 by sandysmilinstrange »
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 53   Go Up