THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 29 Mar 2024, 05:22
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 449108 times)

SusurrusIgnoramus

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Up yours, Mr. Bear!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #400 on: 24 Sep 2007, 07:41 »

trust me man, it ain't abnormally large.

also, i really like this new picture of me with my girlfriend...

Logged
"Liquor doesn't punch holes in walls, you just hate your dad."

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #401 on: 24 Sep 2007, 08:20 »

(People posted, but this was to Inlander's response.) Srsly. And I think red's bf looks more like James McAvoy than Pippin.
I didn't know who James McAvoy was before, but a GIS makes me agree with you, at least about the face. Now Mr. McAvoy just needs giant curly hair and to get a little more built!
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #402 on: 24 Sep 2007, 10:53 »

Hooping practice

I wish I'd captured it when I was halfway through bringing it over my head. That makes more sense of the awkward way I'm standing.
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

normz

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #403 on: 24 Sep 2007, 10:55 »

ok im back and i wish i got to wear hats/fascinators out in public more often

Logged

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #404 on: 24 Sep 2007, 11:32 »

I certainly overran her Maginot Line...

That one only works in this context if he's the fascist.  "I'll push through to her Siegfried Line" would work better.
Logged

Misereatur

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,839
  • Quicksand my butt
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #405 on: 24 Sep 2007, 11:51 »

I never even saw 300.

Keep up the good work.
Logged
FREE JAZZ ISN'T FREE!

I am a music republican.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #406 on: 24 Sep 2007, 13:03 »

sandy, i think that's a perfect moment.

my new avatar:

Logged

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #407 on: 24 Sep 2007, 14:15 »

The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.
Logged

carnivoracious

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #408 on: 24 Sep 2007, 20:21 »



I agree, the concentration of sexy seems unnatural.
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #409 on: 24 Sep 2007, 20:40 »

I swear we should actually go through with Darryl's "what would it look like if QCers bred?" experiment. This may or may not be directly related to the fact that I'd like to make out with everybody here.

EVERYBODY.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #410 on: 24 Sep 2007, 20:41 »

Yes.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #411 on: 24 Sep 2007, 21:15 »

The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.

It's true, ugly people can't laugh.
Logged

Ohnoitseric

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #412 on: 24 Sep 2007, 21:28 »

My life would be complete if I could have a beard like Inlander's
Logged

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #413 on: 24 Sep 2007, 21:30 »

His name isn't HARRY for nothin'!
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #414 on: 24 Sep 2007, 22:11 »

It's true, ugly people can't laugh.

I can laugh just fine...
Logged

clockworkjames

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Grammar Nazi vs Illiterate Jew
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #415 on: 24 Sep 2007, 23:12 »

The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.
Perhaps selective breeding could make a race of super pretty people with awesome senses of humour...

Or inbreeding leading to retardation. I dunno.

Let's not try that.
Logged
still new here, didn't wanna piss anyone off

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #416 on: 24 Sep 2007, 23:48 »

ok im back and i wish i got to wear hats/fascinators out in public more often




TITTAYS!
Logged

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #417 on: 25 Sep 2007, 00:18 »

I believe in polite society they're known as "NormzNorks".
Logged

Napoleon the Clown

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Worriesome
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #418 on: 25 Sep 2007, 01:21 »

Why then are you putting it [an embarrassing pic you hate] on the internet, where everyone can see it??
My guess is he's fishing for compliments.
Logged
Scaring the shit outta Hannelore since...  God knows when. (T-shirt reference FTW)

clockworkjames

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Grammar Nazi vs Illiterate Jew
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #419 on: 25 Sep 2007, 08:39 »

Why then are you putting it [an embarrassing pic you hate] on the internet, where everyone can see it??
My guess is he's fishing for compliments.

Heh, if only. Just it made my friend lisa laugh ALOT and even if it is at my expense I like to amuse people, that picture is my bane.
If I was fishing for compliments I would post a naked pic.
Logged
still new here, didn't wanna piss anyone off

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #420 on: 25 Sep 2007, 08:51 »

We're waiting.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Joey JoJo

  • Plantmonster
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30
    • http://www.myspace.com/punchthedj
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #421 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:13 »



Me at Pride. Good times.
Logged
When I asked my doctor why it hurt when I urinate, he pointed out that my penis was on fire.  I guess that's why he's the doctor.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #422 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:32 »

Why Jesus, what sporty sunglasses you have!
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #423 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:33 »

Far too pale skinned, wrong nose.
Logged

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #424 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:36 »

Girl in the yellow outfit behind Jesus,
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #425 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:43 »

Rookie mistake: Until you have seen their face, you cannot tell if a person is attractive. I can't tell you how many times I've been walking behind someone and thought they were attractive right up until they look to the side or something and I glimpse their face.

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #426 on: 25 Sep 2007, 09:45 »

But she is so shiny.
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Logged

supertankguy

  • Plantmonster
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29
  • o hai
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #428 on: 25 Sep 2007, 12:54 »

If I was fishing for compliments I would post a naked pic.

You wouldn't catch many keepers with such a small worm.

Oh snap!

Sorry, setups like that one don't come along often.

Logged

Ăśde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #429 on: 25 Sep 2007, 13:43 »

They do when tommy posts plenty.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #430 on: 25 Sep 2007, 13:52 »



LESS YAPPY MORE SNAPPY
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #431 on: 25 Sep 2007, 14:52 »

Rookie mistake: Until you have seen their face, you cannot tell if a person is attractive. I can't tell you how many times I've been walking behind someone and thought they were attractive right up until they look to the side or something and I glimpse their face.

"Good from far, far from good."
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #432 on: 25 Sep 2007, 16:36 »

Me looking not like me (aka hot):


AND...me looking like me (aka goofy and slightly awkward):
Logged
I like the way you work it.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #433 on: 25 Sep 2007, 16:52 »

You look very nice in both of the pictures.
Logged

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #434 on: 25 Sep 2007, 16:57 »

Yeah, fuckin' pervert.
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #435 on: 25 Sep 2007, 17:13 »

:/
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #436 on: 25 Sep 2007, 18:20 »

Heh. I think she's fishing for compliments, myself.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

notselfcreated

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 107
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #437 on: 25 Sep 2007, 18:30 »

I come out of lurking, to post THIS.


Also, in the spirit of OM NOM NOM



Also, Sandy is my favorite.
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #438 on: 25 Sep 2007, 20:46 »


OMNOMNOMNOM

This is me and my lunch!  mmm cherry yoghurt with fresh strawberrys.  then I ruined the healthy with pringles..yay!

I'm teaching my kitty that its time for his dinner when I say OMNOMNOMNOM.  He almost has it.  it's awesome.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

made from ribs

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #439 on: 25 Sep 2007, 21:04 »

introducing: frozen chicken frisbey with john kerry!
"CATCH IT JOHN KERRY!"

FAIL.

(no john kerrys were hurt in the making of this picture, though i cant say much for the chicken.)

PS: unintentional kitty grope!
Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #440 on: 25 Sep 2007, 21:06 »

That was not unintentional.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

made from ribs

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #441 on: 25 Sep 2007, 21:08 »

it was too!
he was trying to get at the camera.
Logged

Mnementh

  • Guest
Logged

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #443 on: 25 Sep 2007, 22:27 »

This is what I looked like at school today. I had black short shorts on too, I figured I needed some colour.
Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #444 on: 25 Sep 2007, 23:38 »

pikshurs

Your hair is an awesome color.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Verergoca

  • Cthulhu f'tagn
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #445 on: 26 Sep 2007, 00:37 »



Guess who had a haircut?
Logged
Quote from: Dr. Sidney Freeman
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #446 on: 26 Sep 2007, 00:54 »

Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what this 'KimJongSick' asshole looks like" syndrome.

EDIT: Okay I'm just going to make these stupid things into URLs so you don't have to endure the whole "OH GOD IT'S HUEG" thing.

Here you see me with an awesome shirt:
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7159/img2448ig7.jpg

And here you see my new guitar with my beloved amp (sorry, I can't take a photo of myself playing, as I'm still figuring this bloody camera out):
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6789/img2444dj5.jpg

MOCK MY DORKINESS NOW, MISTER JOE HOCKING! MUAHAHAhahah--oh hell who am I kidding.
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 05:25 by KimJongSick »
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #447 on: 26 Sep 2007, 06:27 »

Also, Sandy is my favorite.

Huzzah!
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #449 on: 26 Sep 2007, 07:07 »

Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what this 'KimJongSick' asshole looks like" syndrome.

You know, at first I read that as

Quote
Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what KimJongSick's asshole looks like" syndrome.

And, in short, I was afraid  :-o
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 53   Go Up