THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 09:18
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448845 times)

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #450 on: 26 Sep 2007, 07:11 »

Julia:  HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET YOUR HAIR THAT COLOR?  the most my hair does when i try and make it purple is become a sorry shade of magenta.  anyways, your hair looks great (as usual) and shut up you always look hot.

and since this is the photo thread...


this it an awesomely classy painting that was on the wall of our new apartment.  we decided to keep it up because it is so sexy.


you don't have to wonder about what the rest of my face looks like because my nose is about the same size as Odds Bodkins' anyways.
Logged

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #451 on: 26 Sep 2007, 07:41 »

Mooface has amazing eyes. This is simply stating facts.
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

2.0

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #452 on: 26 Sep 2007, 08:32 »

Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what
Logged

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #453 on: 26 Sep 2007, 09:24 »

Yes.

Also: New haircut! (I apologize for the inferior quality of the pictures, but my webcam is the only option for me to take pictures at all, at the moment)

This is from the left, it's quite short there. What you can see here (at least where it's short) is my natural haircolour. I may or may not re-dye it.


From the right. It's pretty long here, still purple (unlike in the back). Also note that the fringe is cut that way, not combed to the right.

I'm quite happy with that, but I might change it a bit over the next weeks, I'll have to see how it looks as soon as it's grown out a little and/or re-dyed.
Logged

Bibliophile

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 55
  • <:3)~~
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #454 on: 26 Sep 2007, 09:57 »

Wait, wait! Is it too late to post a jesus picture?

Logged
If television is a babysitter, the internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up.

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #455 on: 26 Sep 2007, 10:08 »

Glasses are awesome. Actually, I have to get new ones because I can't see anymore. I has an appointment on Friday.

This picture's a couple years old, but I still have the same glasses.... I love them and don't really want to get new ones *pouts*

Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #456 on: 26 Sep 2007, 10:13 »

Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what


I have good vision! Glasses free, and the only one in my immediate family to not have any vision deficiencies!
Logged

LiterSize

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #457 on: 26 Sep 2007, 10:50 »

I see things:





and makeouts!


Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #458 on: 26 Sep 2007, 11:18 »

Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what
Nope. 20/20 vision uncorrected here.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #459 on: 26 Sep 2007, 11:49 »

I'm sitting on 20/18 eyes. I am one fifth of a person better than the rest of you 'perfect' suckers.

P.S. Uh, I would maybe delete this if I could.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #460 on: 26 Sep 2007, 12:03 »



20/20 BIZNATJIZZ!
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #461 on: 26 Sep 2007, 12:06 »

Do those earbuds ever leave your ears?
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #462 on: 26 Sep 2007, 12:07 »

I was going to comment on that, but I forgot. No, I have shitty speakers... So pretty much any time that I'm just relaxing, I relax with my earbuds!
Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #463 on: 26 Sep 2007, 12:32 »

He's under Cyber-control :P
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 12:37 by Mark7 »
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #464 on: 26 Sep 2007, 12:36 »

Bugger
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

ummmkay

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #465 on: 26 Sep 2007, 14:57 »



WOOOOOOO MAKIN' SOME LEMONADE.

Also my vision is 20/800 on a good day, according to my eye doctor. I'm not sure what the actual number is, because he wouldn't tell me. I think he thought it was going to make me depressed or something.
Logged

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #466 on: 26 Sep 2007, 15:03 »

HOLY SHIT
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #467 on: 26 Sep 2007, 15:07 »

You might want to get some Ruby Quartz glasses there.
Logged

big hair sam

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #468 on: 26 Sep 2007, 15:35 »



Me and my lady friend :-D
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 15:38 by big hair sam »
Logged

ummmkay

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #469 on: 26 Sep 2007, 15:47 »

You might want to get some Ruby Quartz glasses there.

Haha, yeah. If only. I'm not even a candidate for Lasik.  :|

Also here's the original picture, although this version is significantly less interesting.

Logged

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #470 on: 26 Sep 2007, 16:12 »

You look nicer without optic blasts blazing out of your eyes.
Logged

Silverback

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #471 on: 26 Sep 2007, 16:32 »

(Optic Blast Eyes pic)

WOOOOOOO MAKIN' SOME LEMONADE.
That was the funniest thing I have seen in a week.
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #472 on: 26 Sep 2007, 16:52 »

my kingdom for a delete button

fatty

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
    • the Notorious F.A.T.T.Y.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #473 on: 26 Sep 2007, 17:14 »

Bumming, napping, gabblying. Geeks represent.

Logged
est: she is basically an ass to everyone

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #474 on: 26 Sep 2007, 17:33 »

Looks fun.
Logged

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #475 on: 26 Sep 2007, 17:51 »

Wait, wait! Is it too late to post a jesus picture?

Long hair does not a Jesus make.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #476 on: 26 Sep 2007, 18:07 »

robes, a look of peace and tranquility and arm spreading do though when used in tandem.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #477 on: 26 Sep 2007, 18:34 »

I'm sitting on 20/18 eyes. I am one fifth of a person better than the rest of you 'perfect' suckers.

20/10, bizznatch. Sometimes I see so clearly it hurts me.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #478 on: 26 Sep 2007, 19:06 »



I cut my bangs...and I went to school looking like this. I wore my favorite outfit :D
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #479 on: 26 Sep 2007, 19:31 »

Someone as pretty as you should not spend as much time on a webforum. It's just wrong.
Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #480 on: 26 Sep 2007, 19:38 »

Pretty people are allowed here. Looks can be deceiving, people are not always what you expect, and sometimes there straight up just isn't a lot to do in Alaska.
Plus, just because they might intimidate some people, pretty people are not necessarily fearless or self-confident.

P.S. Theme?
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 20:17 by Slick »
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #481 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:09 »

i think he was just trying to emphasize how pretty she was.

also: i am some sort of bird now

Logged

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #482 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:16 »

Mute, we do not judge people here based on their looks. Looks can be deceiving, people are not always what you expect, and sometimes there straight up just isn't a lot to do in Alaska.
Plus, just because they might intimidate some people, pretty people are not necessarily fearless or self-confident.

Also he needs to wait like three years before his lustful ways are legal.
Logged

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #483 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:36 »

exactly. i won't stand for any child exploitation, the idea of it offends my being
Logged

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #484 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:40 »

Someone as pretty as you should not spend as much time on a webforum. It's just wrong.
I'm taking an online course at BYU so I spend lots of time procrastinating and pretending to do geometry. Once the hockey season starts though, forum time will be cut.Hockey is,like, the one thing to do in Alaska other than riding the polar bears and building igloos.

Also he needs to wait like three years before his lustful ways are legal.

2 years *cough*
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #485 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:49 »

Haha, you seem excited.

Also there is SO much more to do in Alaska than build igloos or ride polar bears or play hockey. YOU CAN SNOWSHOE and ICE FISH and shit!
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #486 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:55 »

Can we back up and mention what a nice profile Dan has? Just saying, maybe we should.
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

celticgeek

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,697
  • Linux Geek
    • The Celtic Geek
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #487 on: 26 Sep 2007, 20:59 »

Speaking of glasses.  I have worn glasses since I was thirteen years old, so that I could see distant things.

However, I am sort of in the middle/between glasses right now.  I still need them, but entirely different ones.  I will have a final eye check next month.

Thanks to the magic of cataract surgery, I now have new bionic eyes (not X-Ray vision, however, just bionic).  The new eyes are very nice.  Everything is much cleaner, brighter, newer and fresher looking than before.  Except for me, of course.  I can now see myself in the mirror, and I look OLD.  I asked my surgeon about this, and he pointed out (in paragraph three of the fine print, which I can now read) that this was a highly probable side effect.  He also said that he could not do anything about it, but he did give me the telephone number of his brother-in-law, the plastic surgeon.

To check the new eyes out, I have re-read all of the picture threads, and you people are even better looking than I thought. 

Iechyd Da!
Logged
a 'dèanamh nan saighdean airson cinneadh MacLeòid
We Wear Woad When We Write Code
Ní féidir liom labhairt na Gaeilge.
Seachd reultan, agus seachd clachan, agus aon chraobh geal.

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #488 on: 26 Sep 2007, 21:05 »

Daniel, I love that picture.  You seriously look like my grandfather. 

Yet I am angry!!!
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #489 on: 26 Sep 2007, 21:11 »



--edit--
IiG's post interrupted mine.
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 21:15 by mberan42 »
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #490 on: 26 Sep 2007, 21:21 »


also: i am some sort of bird now
*cute hair photo here*

I love love love it shaved now.  it looks a million better and almost makes me miss my mowhawk.  it was too much effort though, and so curly.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #491 on: 26 Sep 2007, 22:37 »

Yeah, srsly. I don't know how you can pull that off, Roo, but it totally does suit you. Quite a contrast to the 2-foot hairz of recent history.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #492 on: 26 Sep 2007, 23:24 »

also: i am some sort of bird now



Roo you have to stop this. Seriously, stop it. I cannot afford to give up my arduous pursuit of getting into I Is Grammar's pants, especially just to get chucked in the Big House. (This is beside the fact that I ultimately belong to Barfy anyway.)


Stop it.









Edit: Also, Dan, that picture would be perfect except for the Livestrong bracelet. Real Men from that era did not wear fancy schmancy-pants joo-ry, and that bracelet counts; my grandaddy said so.
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 23:26 by calenlass »
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #493 on: 26 Sep 2007, 23:34 »

Also, Dan, that picture would be perfect except for the Livestrong bracelet. Real Men from that era did not wear fancy schmancy-pants joo-ry, and that bracelet counts; my grandaddy said so.

Man I guess that means Sgt. Don Malarkey there isn't a real man.



One of us is going to have to break it to him.  I think it should be you.
« Last Edit: 26 Sep 2007, 23:43 by Daniel »
Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #494 on: 26 Sep 2007, 23:41 »

Dude, why would you wear two watches?















Oh wait.




Dude can keep his two watches.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #495 on: 26 Sep 2007, 23:43 »

I mean, his Bronze Star not withstanding, he is obviously wearing a bracelet of some sort so he must be some sort of girly man faggoty type.

Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #496 on: 26 Sep 2007, 23:48 »

Hey, man, I am just repeating what Gramps said about That Era.




When he said it, I did not point out that he was the only one of his buddies, even the married ones, to be wearing a wedding ring. I wonder if they thought he was a namby-pamby.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #497 on: 27 Sep 2007, 02:05 »

You know, while I was in Alaska this summer, a very rugged, manly-man fisherman came into work wearing a shirt with his wedding certificate screenprinted onto a white t-shirt. The reason, as I found out, was because he'd made a deal with his wife to wear the shirt on the boat instead of his wedding ring for safety reasons.

NO FRIGGIN' EXCUSES, JEWELRY IS NEVER ALLOWED.
« Last Edit: 27 Sep 2007, 03:41 by KimJongSick »
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #498 on: 27 Sep 2007, 06:05 »

Bah, if he was a real manly man he'd wear the ring and RIDE THE DANGER.
Logged

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #499 on: 27 Sep 2007, 06:52 »

Today's clothing forecast, partly hipster with a chance of nerdy

Better pack an umbrella
« Last Edit: 27 Sep 2007, 07:04 by redglasscurls »
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 53   Go Up