THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 23:09
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 449005 times)

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #800 on: 11 Oct 2007, 16:42 »

Why is that not posted in katie's timewarp thread?


Because that thread is unnecessary?
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #801 on: 11 Oct 2007, 16:47 »

that was unnecessary.
Logged

Wink

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #802 on: 11 Oct 2007, 18:06 »

something is unnecessary
Logged

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #803 on: 11 Oct 2007, 18:21 »

I'll tell you what's not unnecessary.

Your mom.
Logged

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #804 on: 11 Oct 2007, 18:29 »

That's not what you were saying last night...
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #805 on: 11 Oct 2007, 21:24 »

I just want to know what constitutes "necessary" in an off-topic forum.



Edit for photo.



This is my most recent sari purchase. I figured since I was already playing dress up because of my hair, I would do this too. I think I messed up the drape, though. Note too that I have to make a new choli to go with.


Edit Edit: Dude Harry I was busy uploading. Geeeez.
« Last Edit: 11 Oct 2007, 21:38 by calenlass »
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #806 on: 11 Oct 2007, 21:31 »

In this thread? I'd say a few photos would be necessary right about now . . .
Logged

Wink

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #807 on: 11 Oct 2007, 21:41 »

this is why we made him moderator

Logged

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #808 on: 11 Oct 2007, 22:30 »

Photo Booth picture!

<peeeeenk top!>

How do you get your Photo Booth pics to not look like grainy crap?
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

quietnow

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 159
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #809 on: 11 Oct 2007, 22:42 »

NEEDS MOAR KARI






[*EDIT* to say DAYUM RODDY, your most recent photo is TOASTY]
« Last Edit: 11 Oct 2007, 22:48 by quietnow »
Logged
Quote from: Sam
Anyone who doesn't have a crush on Kari is doing it wrong.

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #810 on: 12 Oct 2007, 00:09 »

Kari, I don't think I can hang out this weekend! I have a midterm.

Can we reschedule plz?
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

cheesepie

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 104
  • the limit as cool approaches awesome of myself
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #811 on: 12 Oct 2007, 00:51 »

I'm the guy with the long hair who now has short hair, remember? Here's a Hippo in Ukraine:

Logged
I'd rather be skiing.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #812 on: 12 Oct 2007, 01:21 »

kari i enjoy the eyewear!

on the way to hardly strictly bluegrass in sf.

Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #813 on: 12 Oct 2007, 04:23 »

phot

Where is this? I must live there.
Logged

Wink

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #814 on: 12 Oct 2007, 10:48 »

phot

Where is this? I must live there.

yeah it's pretty awesome

Logged

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #815 on: 12 Oct 2007, 10:51 »

Your posts are increasing my aggrivation that I can't get home from school to get my polaroid until next weekend:( Love the scenery though! The colors remind me of pictures of my parents when they were young and interesting in Alaska.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

ZJGent

  • Beyond Thunderdome
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
    • Night Talk at Harvey's
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #816 on: 12 Oct 2007, 23:09 »

DAYUM RODDY

Number #73 of things that make hot girls look hotter - super plastic frame specs.
Number #49 - tattoos.
Number #26 - semi-serious pouting.

Damn you kari! Why do you taunt me so!
(Also did you mean toasty as in warm temperature or toasty as in Rojo Caliente?)

PICTURE! KIND OF OLD! GOOFY SMILE!
Logged
[02:29] Danosaur: I'd Spektor your Regina.

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #817 on: 12 Oct 2007, 23:13 »

Drick, you are the Niels Bohr of knowing what makes girls hawt.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

ZJGent

  • Beyond Thunderdome
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
    • Night Talk at Harvey's
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #818 on: 12 Oct 2007, 23:35 »



where:
Ze = Ze Attractive Lady, Non?
n = Level of hotness
1 = Maximum hotness, aided by all possible items on list of what makes hot girls hotter.
2 = Medium hotness, utilising a wide range of items on list, but not all.
3 = Base hotness... man, this girl is going to have to have some good starting out hotness with no items. sometimes this can pulled off though, when the factor of Wench Sexiness (W/S) is combined with the diagram.

The wiggly red arrow indicates the hotness affecting manly men and lesbians in the surrounding area.
The writing below it is just there to make me look clever. It is something to do with french knickers.
Logged
[02:29] Danosaur: I'd Spektor your Regina.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #819 on: 12 Oct 2007, 23:47 »

I just got this picture from the summer. You can't see me very well, but I think it is an awesome shot from an ultimate frisbee match. I am the bald one on the right making the awesome catch while being charged down. Yeah.


And I appear to have only one leg. I am one-legged frisbee machine and I am still better than you!
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #820 on: 13 Oct 2007, 12:16 »

Okay, guys, I need some advice.

I'm consider a slight adjustment to my look. Ie. replacing my beloved sideburns with a beard.

so far it looks like this:



I am also cutting my hair tomorrow, to make it look like this:



So now, any suggestions about my facial hair are welcomed.
Logged

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #821 on: 13 Oct 2007, 12:19 »

i miss the sideburns!!!
Logged

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #822 on: 13 Oct 2007, 12:29 »

So far i can still return to them with ease, so no prob there.
Logged

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #823 on: 13 Oct 2007, 14:52 »



Hockey starts soon.I burned my tongue on my mouth guard...it said

'FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY" boil in water for 90 seconds, take out of water, put under cold tap for 1 second, put in mouth and bite down for 30 seconds'.

 Well, I followed carefully. AND THE DAMN THING WAS STILL HOT AFTER 1 SECOND UNDER COLD WATER! this is what I get for following instructions.
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Wink

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #824 on: 13 Oct 2007, 15:24 »

oooh yo play hockey? i want to make out with you wearing it

yeah
Logged

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #825 on: 13 Oct 2007, 16:17 »

Aye. This officially makes you one of the top awesome people I know, in real life or otherwise.
Logged

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #826 on: 13 Oct 2007, 19:55 »

Okay, guys, I need some advice.

I'm consider a slight adjustment to my look. Ie. replacing my beloved sideburns with a beard.

so far it looks like this:

picshur

I am also cutting my hair tomorrow, to make it look like this:

picshur

So now, any suggestions about my facial hair are welcomed.

Grow a Kilmister.  9 out of 10 scientists agree, its the best facialhair ever.

Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #827 on: 13 Oct 2007, 20:01 »

Lummer, imo grow a badass Monopolystache. You know the one.



Hair, it's grow time!
Logged

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #828 on: 14 Oct 2007, 01:52 »

Aye. This officially makes you one of the top awesome people I know, in real life or otherwise.

Oh boy! The sad part about girls hockey though...no checking. Though we just had one of our guy players partially paralyzed from an illegal back check. Not good at all. And uh...Wink...uh...you scare me just a teeny tiny bit.
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #829 on: 14 Oct 2007, 06:12 »

Wink, rule number 4 is 'do not be a creepy jerk.' That's not to say you can't call RWS cute or say you think makeouts with a mouthguard would be hot, but try to refrain from telling people that you want to do intimate things with them.

RWS you are cute and hockey is awesome!
Logged

est

  • this is a test
  • Admin emeritus
  • Older than Moses
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,157
  • V O L L E Y B A L L
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #830 on: 14 Oct 2007, 06:17 »

Please stop being a creepy jerk Wink
Logged

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #831 on: 14 Oct 2007, 15:53 »

Logged

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #832 on: 14 Oct 2007, 16:29 »

Wow Ruyi, what kind of camera do you own, and how much did it cost?


Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #833 on: 14 Oct 2007, 16:41 »

(ruyi's picture)

As Ruyi found to her cost, a student budget doesn't stretch very far.

No need to quote the actual picture when it's so close by. Thankyou! - Inlander
« Last Edit: 14 Oct 2007, 16:55 by Inlander »
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #834 on: 14 Oct 2007, 17:41 »

Chrasstor, you always look stunned in your pictures. Why is that?
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #835 on: 14 Oct 2007, 18:46 »

Hmm... I'm not sure XD

I guess I'm just not super photogenic or something. The camera flash is startling, and I'm not a super enthusiastic person by nature.
Logged

KTkat

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #836 on: 14 Oct 2007, 20:18 »



This is what happens when I'm bored.

Ruyi: I like the flowers!
« Last Edit: 14 Oct 2007, 20:30 by KTkat »
Logged
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."
~Oscar Wilde

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #837 on: 15 Oct 2007, 05:57 »

Because people talk too much in the picture thread. That is why.

I'm going to sleep.
Logged

Aimless

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Untss untss untss untss
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #838 on: 15 Oct 2007, 06:13 »





New pics at last! From one of my most fun nights out in god knows how long :) the paper thing is a rose I made out of a napkin, and it looked a lot better at the time. Not sure why it looks so huge in the pic!
Logged
Sometimes I think, sometimes I am

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #839 on: 15 Oct 2007, 12:32 »

Guys, Crayola named a product line after me. I feel so special.
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #840 on: 15 Oct 2007, 13:11 »

You're new? I thought I'd seen you before.

I'm doing it wrong.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #841 on: 15 Oct 2007, 15:54 »

Hey, QC! I got more face-metal! My piercer's the most adorable girl ever, she makes the pain worth it.


Different angle:


PS: I'm totally wearing Emilio's scarf <3
« Last Edit: 15 Oct 2007, 15:58 by Skibas_clavicle »
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #842 on: 15 Oct 2007, 16:21 »

I see! It looks good. The scarf I mean.The hunk of metal too I guess. But 'specially the scarf.


Logged

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #843 on: 15 Oct 2007, 16:52 »

I like the hunks of metal. I keep saying I will get bits of metal put in my face, then chickening out. Once I made it to the piercing parlour but the guy who did septums was on holiday. I am not sure if this is good or bad.
(Julia you are beautiful!)
Logged

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #844 on: 15 Oct 2007, 17:10 »

Curls!

Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

Aimless

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Untss untss untss untss
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #845 on: 15 Oct 2007, 17:19 »

there are two things I find prettier than almost anything on a lady, one is short hair and the other... big curls. awesome!!

lunchy my first thought was "omg no no no!!" but now that i've had some time to think about it i realise you'd look totally excellent with a piercing or two. like esp through an eyebrow!
Logged
Sometimes I think, sometimes I am

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #846 on: 15 Oct 2007, 17:42 »

Yeah, I used to be generally against all piercings save ear piercings... But, I'm starting to soften up on MOST facial piercings... They can look very cute, so long as they aren't crazy metal-core piercings.

Bottom lip, underlip and nose piercings are all cute. I think lunchy would look best with a nose-piercing!


Also, me trying to look more enthused, and less stunned for RWS :- P

Ack, forgot to mention. The curls look very pretty Princy!
Logged

E. Spaceman

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,630
  • The Sonics The Sonics The Sonics The Sonics
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #847 on: 15 Oct 2007, 18:13 »

scarves made for QC people: 7
scarves i own: 0
Logged
Quote
[20:29] Quietus: Haha oh shit Morbid Anal Fog
[20:29] Quietus: I had forgotten about them

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #848 on: 15 Oct 2007, 18:19 »

[EDITED FOR WOAH]

I got my dad's old polaroid camera! Hours of fun!

« Last Edit: 15 Oct 2007, 19:44 by redglasscurls »
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #849 on: 15 Oct 2007, 18:29 »

Julia Bee that is exactly precisely what I want. Except I think my mouth would explode into blood and exposed nerve endings if I actually got a hole poked into it. :(
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19 ... 53   Go Up