THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 19 Apr 2024, 07:06
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 453934 times)

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #850 on: 15 Oct 2007, 18:42 »

That's what she said! *buh dum tshhhh*
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #851 on: 15 Oct 2007, 20:03 »



To go along with my helmet, I have gear!

Yeah...it looks like I gained a couple pounds...
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #852 on: 15 Oct 2007, 21:06 »

Myyyyy girlfriend is so pretttyyyy.


Also Lunchy if you get a facial piercing don't get anything so cliche as an eyebrow, please.
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #853 on: 15 Oct 2007, 22:44 »

I'm going to post several photos, because I am back from holidays with spiffy new hair!  my best friend and I took a 10 hour road trip to stay with my parents for a week way out west.  It was relaxing.

Here we are going out for dinner on our second night there

here we are back from going out again some time in the middle of the week

My awesome new hair!

Still my hair!

We are rocking out or something.

Im back guys hi!

Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #854 on: 16 Oct 2007, 08:10 »

Some friends and I leaving Six Flags Sunday night. The camera's shutter speed fucked up somehow, but I like the ghost effect.

Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #855 on: 16 Oct 2007, 08:15 »

G-G-G-GHOSTS!!!
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #856 on: 16 Oct 2007, 10:22 »

Logged

2.0

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #857 on: 16 Oct 2007, 10:54 »

Me in my work outfit.  Notice the shirt.  And don't use flash on someone when holding acid.
Logged

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #858 on: 16 Oct 2007, 11:07 »

ebony_willow, your hair is wonderful.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #859 on: 16 Oct 2007, 11:12 »

This is what happens when I'm bored.

Since nobody else is saying it, I'll just say that I think you're really cute.

Right, moving on!
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #860 on: 16 Oct 2007, 11:18 »

This is what happens when I'm bored.

Since nobody else is saying it, I'll just say that I think you're really cute.

Right, moving on!
(quote tunnels)

I didn't even see her picture. My internet is so slow lately sometimes pictures don't load at all. But, I agree!
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #861 on: 16 Oct 2007, 11:27 »





Two pretty decent pictures I took of myself.
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #862 on: 16 Oct 2007, 12:56 »

Keep the stubble, it should be attractive to people. If it isn't, then they are clearly our robot overlords.
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #863 on: 16 Oct 2007, 16:29 »

ebony_willow, your hair is wonderful.

I knew I could count on you blind double date buddy haha
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #864 on: 16 Oct 2007, 20:11 »

Logged

pilsner

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,449
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #865 on: 16 Oct 2007, 22:42 »



So . . . what are your opinions on merlot?

[img width= height=]http://www.vh1.com/sitewide/flipbooks/img/movies/people/g/giamatti_paul/51301280_10.jpg[/img]
Logged

BrittanyMarie

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,723
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #866 on: 16 Oct 2007, 22:47 »

I thought Paul Giamotti was Dave Matthews for a split second, and my only thought was YOU ASSHOLE!

Julia, I have to ask-that's a regular labret, right? I've been thinking about getting a vertical one but haven't sucked it up enough to actually go.
Logged
What about orgasmic chemistry.

I can expand the definition of that if anyone wants to roll around to my Fortress of Love.

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #867 on: 17 Oct 2007, 04:10 »



So I met the guitar player from my favorite band last night. We were both pretty pumped but decided "HEY SERIOUS PICTURE".
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

ImRonBurgundy?

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,233
  • "That's all," he added.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #868 on: 17 Oct 2007, 04:17 »

Is that Chris McCaughan?
Logged
You just came back to shit in my heart, didn't you Ryan?

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #869 on: 17 Oct 2007, 04:55 »

Indeed it is.
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

SusurrusIgnoramus

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Up yours, Mr. Bear!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #870 on: 17 Oct 2007, 06:58 »

So . . . what are your opinions on merlot?

IF ANYBODY ORDERS MERLOT, I'M LEAVING!!!!!
Logged
"Liquor doesn't punch holes in walls, you just hate your dad."

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #871 on: 17 Oct 2007, 07:22 »

I am not drinking any fucking merlot!!
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #872 on: 17 Oct 2007, 07:41 »

There is actually a really amusing bit of historical back story about california wine country and Merlot grapes that makes that scene much much funnier.

Or at least it makes it make sense.
Logged

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #873 on: 17 Oct 2007, 08:15 »

Kiff, your avatar photo is terrifyingly mesmerizing
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

SusurrusIgnoramus

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Up yours, Mr. Bear!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #874 on: 17 Oct 2007, 08:45 »

There is actually a really amusing bit of historical back story about california wine country and Merlot grapes that makes that scene much much funnier.

Or at least it makes it make sense.

care to share?
Logged
"Liquor doesn't punch holes in walls, you just hate your dad."

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #875 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:30 »

When wine grapes first started being grown in California, a lot of the major companies found out that they could grow Merlot grapes fairly quickly, and have them still be decent, and they wouldn't have to spend nearly as long waiting for the vines to mature as they would if they were growing Cab Sauv or Melbeck or the like. So within about 3 years, there was a huge flood of merlot on the market, and it was kind of looked at by wine people as a joke wine, since there was so much and it had all been run off so quickly and so easily. The stereotype has stuck, since Merlot is still incredibly easy to grow quickly and make an "okay" wine out of, and as a result California Merlot is kind of looked down on among wine snobs.

Also a picture I guess.




Y/N on piercing potentially?
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #876 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:36 »

I'm a fan of the spider bite going on one side or the other, don't like it in the middle like that. Symmetry is for squares, or circles, or starfish and various other objects and forms of life.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

SusurrusIgnoramus

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Up yours, Mr. Bear!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #877 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:41 »

Symmetry is for squares.

yeah, stop bein' so L7.  haha!

/cheese.
Logged
"Liquor doesn't punch holes in walls, you just hate your dad."

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #878 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:42 »

Hey man, don't front, humans are bilaterally symmetrical, just like those piercings. I give it a yay.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #879 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:45 »

I'm gonna have to agree with Boro. In my opinion, lip piercings look better to the side a bit. Something like this would look pretty sharp, I think.
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #880 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:46 »

I'm a fan of the spider bite going on one side or the other, don't like it in the middle like that. Symmetry is for squares, or circles, or starfish and various other objects and forms of life.

The entire definition of human beauty according to the golden ratio is based upon symmetry. Plus the side is so cliche.


Chrassator or whatever, you're the guy who thinks eyebrow piercings look good.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #881 on: 17 Oct 2007, 10:51 »

well I meant get the full spider bite on the side, so both of them on the same side.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #882 on: 17 Oct 2007, 11:01 »

Just for the record, I'm pretty much against all piercings sans lip/tongue/nose/ears.

The symmetric spider bite looks good, it's just that it gives a kinda metal/punk vibe(at least to me). The thing about a standard nose/lip/tongue piercing is that it doesn't make much of a statement at all.
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #883 on: 17 Oct 2007, 11:07 »

Yeah because what we should all strive for in piercings is to looks just like everyone else.

Also, less yappy more pictures of me holding kitties before I got my hair cut off.

Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #884 on: 17 Oct 2007, 11:08 »

If you guys dont shut up and post more pictures soon, I'll be forced to eat your souls:
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #885 on: 17 Oct 2007, 11:15 »

Jesus christ your pupils are dilated, Julia.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #886 on: 17 Oct 2007, 11:16 »

Plus the side is so cliche.

To be fair, facial piercings in general are entirely cliche at this point and either one is going to be conforming to noncomformity. I'd avoid picking one over the other for the sake of not following the pack as the second you get any facial piercing, you've pretty much applied for a Hot Topic frequent shoppers' card. Just go with whichever one you like the look of more yourself or whichever one women seem to like more in general as it's going to be a pain in the ass to care for either one and they're the ones that will be looking at you and creaming their jeans or vomitting in their mouth, dependant on their preference.
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #887 on: 17 Oct 2007, 12:22 »

julia nice hair color!

kieffer if you pierce it that way it will complement julia's, i think?

also sorry to be uninteresting but

Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #888 on: 17 Oct 2007, 15:35 »


I am standing in a field, wearing a brown suit and a colourful scarf. I am serene.

Kieffer, good call.

Julia, that is extra creepy combined with the eat your soul comment, because your outer shirt is coloured comparably to the other guy's shirt, meaning you look kind of like a disembodied soul-eater at first glance.

Ruyi I miss the days when you were a wholesome young girl. Now you are all 'trespassing' and 'vandalizing signs'. What happened?
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #889 on: 17 Oct 2007, 16:58 »

James' first words were, 'watch and learn, people.'
Logged

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #890 on: 17 Oct 2007, 17:46 »

As a followup to my responses about piercings, I do have some experience with them. Exhibit A, Jonathan at age 20:

Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Wild_Weasel87

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #891 on: 17 Oct 2007, 19:42 »

« Last Edit: 17 Oct 2007, 19:44 by Wild_Weasel87 »
Logged

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #892 on: 17 Oct 2007, 19:45 »

< a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank">< img src="http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa248/w119alt/n39514703_31890839_2323.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket">< /a>

just use [ img] [ /img] tags.  I for one can't see pics when you use html.
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

Katherine

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 459
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #893 on: 17 Oct 2007, 19:48 »



Not sure if this is going to work but if so, this is the latest picture of me, taken this past weekend.
Logged

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #894 on: 17 Oct 2007, 19:51 »

You look very much like my ex-sister-in-law,only younger.
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

sandysmilinstrange

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 296
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #895 on: 17 Oct 2007, 21:17 »

Sort of old, but I don't think I ever posted it here.


I wasn't ready to leave Boston and go back to the daycare yet.
Logged
"It's funny how you think I'm an asshole because I've got HIGH self esteem"

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #896 on: 18 Oct 2007, 00:55 »

I made my hair shorter:

Logged

Gryff

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,109
  • Summary sense... tingling!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #897 on: 18 Oct 2007, 05:09 »

HOLY SHIT RUYI YOUR HAIR

Also James, your getup there is way cool.

...

I don't have any real recent photos, but here's one you may not have seen that's not too old:



Remember me, guys?

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #898 on: 18 Oct 2007, 07:38 »

I love you, Gryff. Don't ever leave us, again. Also, gimme a muffin.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

2.0

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #899 on: 18 Oct 2007, 07:38 »

Melbeck

Malbec. There, i said it. And i've never even been to argentina.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 53   Go Up