THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 05:22
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448797 times)

normz

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1050 on: 29 Oct 2007, 08:52 »

awww why do no cool QC people ever decide to congregate in cairns..... we have pretty rainforest and beaches and uhhh stuff??

in any case this is my new haircut guys... this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)



excuse dodgy cameraphone
Logged

Kylos

  • Obscure cultural reference
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
    • Myspace?
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1051 on: 29 Oct 2007, 10:56 »

Gemmwah. Get rid of that tea towel this instant.
Also, army night.

Logged
I hope we mess things up in a huge and beautiful fashion.

Pernix takes the rat and uses it as a peen sock.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1052 on: 29 Oct 2007, 11:45 »

(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)

Hell yeah it will.

(for the record, if anybody else from here wants to show up, you're welcome to, but I can only promise RWS a place to stay, sorry guys)
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1053 on: 29 Oct 2007, 12:12 »

Gemmwah. Get rid of that tea towel this instant.
Also, army night.

[img]http://photos-329.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v143/217/21/286001329/n286001329_663663_3637.jpg[img]

Fuck, you. I kinda like it.

Also, you make a cute army girl.
Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1054 on: 29 Oct 2007, 16:19 »

I am really quite tiny, though, yes.
Are you an anime character? I didn't notice the first time I saw it, but in that pic you really look like an anime character, like a cute little girl who giggles while destroying tanks with her bare hands.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1055 on: 29 Oct 2007, 18:29 »



At a halloween party this last saturday.
Logged

Cartilage Head

  • Only pretending to work
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,182
  • Do Me Baby
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1056 on: 29 Oct 2007, 18:53 »

 A Jawa!
Logged
Hate, rain on me

ZJGent

  • Beyond Thunderdome
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
    • Night Talk at Harvey's
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1057 on: 29 Oct 2007, 19:51 »

More from the club with photobooth - awww yeah.





woop woop!
Logged
[02:29] Danosaur: I'd Spektor your Regina.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1058 on: 29 Oct 2007, 20:05 »

I was Medusa this weekend! Halloween is awesome.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1059 on: 29 Oct 2007, 20:19 »

Cameraman couldn't even stare into your eyes long enough to get a non-blurry picture. Good job.
Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1060 on: 29 Oct 2007, 21:41 »

awww why do no cool QC people ever decide to congregate in cairns..... we have pretty rainforest and beaches and uhhh stuff??

in any case this is my new haircut guys... this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)

[IMG], a fairly large one but certainly worth reposting in a quote

excuse dodgy cameraphone


If I had the time and the resources I would be right there. And that's a completely awesome haircut!
« Last Edit: 30 Oct 2007, 10:06 by muteKi »
Logged

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1061 on: 29 Oct 2007, 22:07 »

Aughhh picture quote. 

I was feeling pretty today.



And for some reason, whenever I look directly into the camera of my iMac, it photographs me looking right above it.  I think my camera is autistic. 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1062 on: 29 Oct 2007, 22:18 »

this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)

Pre-makeup suits you really, really well, normz.
Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1063 on: 29 Oct 2007, 22:39 »

MEMORANDUM:

TO: Jeph Jacques, Moderators, Forum Members at Large

FROM: Slick

DATE: October 30 2007

RE: Picture Thread

________________________________________________________________________________________

It would appear that recent postings indicate that Normz is in fact pretty. Since becoming apparent in the
picture thread, this fact has caused some problems with the smooth functioning of said thread.

Pretty as she may be, it is still unnecessary to quote pictures of her again in the thread, barring, of course,
exceptions for conspicuous awesomeness. No regular posting is to be discouraged, but quoting of pictures
is, as usual, to be frowned upon.

Additionaly, OH MY GOD THERE'S A FINGER UP MY NOSE. See attached.
________________________________________________________________________________________

Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1064 on: 29 Oct 2007, 23:00 »

Not that it was I who dunnit, but as a forum newbie I'm curious, is picture-quoting really that big of a deal if the quote ends up on a seperate page of posts from the initial pic?  It seems to me that should be a relevant factor...

Also, to Boro_Bandito and anyone other pedants who may have been at least temporarily tripped up in my "feudal" trap, I would just like to say:

Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1065 on: 29 Oct 2007, 23:06 »

Generally speaking it just isn't necessary. If you feel you need to reference a particular post then it is better to do it like so:

Standin' on a rock.

Dang dude, what is it with you and nature?
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1066 on: 29 Oct 2007, 23:14 »

Simple answer, I don't own a digital camera, but dated a girl who did.  We went on two dates that involved hiking.  I don't really have any other good digital pics of myself.
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1067 on: 30 Oct 2007, 00:56 »

SWM SEEKS FEM MUST OWN DIGITAL CAMERA

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1068 on: 30 Oct 2007, 01:31 »

... AND ENJOY RANDOM SPIDER FACTOIDS (aren't I a catch?)  :roll:
Logged

heather

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 56
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1069 on: 30 Oct 2007, 02:58 »

MY TRIUMPHANT RETURN TO PICTUREDOM

Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1070 on: 30 Oct 2007, 04:14 »

...bloody hell...
Logged

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1071 on: 30 Oct 2007, 06:19 »

HTHR!! Triumphant return...


and how!
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1072 on: 30 Oct 2007, 08:07 »

I've been rasberried by a hippy! OH NOES
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1073 on: 30 Oct 2007, 08:48 »

Should that pic go in the "Sea Creatures You Probably Should Be Aware Of" thread? The hthrcrab?
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1074 on: 30 Oct 2007, 15:25 »

WILL TURNER?!
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

onewheelwizzard

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Ha! Fool ...
    • http://www.livejournal.com/users/onewheelwizzard
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1075 on: 30 Oct 2007, 15:27 »

New theme: puppy piles!



Fall 2004.

Logged
also at one point mid-sex she asked me "what do you think about commercialism in art?"

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1076 on: 30 Oct 2007, 15:29 »

I don't think I even know that many people.
Logged

gmalivuk

  • Notorious N.U.R.R.
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • My website
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1077 on: 30 Oct 2007, 15:37 »

If you want to know what I actually look like now, go to the parent/child resemblance thread or just click here.

Below is a picture of me around Christmas of 1985 (when I was just about 2 years, 9 months old).  I uploaded this because I was looking for old Halloween pictures, and didn't have much luck, but I'm pretty sure I did later wear the bunny costume for trick or treating.

Logged
She had heard it said that humans are only supposed to use about a tenth of their brains, and that no one was very clear what the other nine-tenths were for, but she had certainly never heard it suggested that they were used for storing penguins.

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1078 on: 30 Oct 2007, 16:17 »

You'll shoot your eye out, kid!
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1079 on: 30 Oct 2007, 17:07 »

If we're doing some old photos, this one is circa 2004/senior year of HS (I was Mrs. Paroo in the Music Man):



WHUT?!
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1080 on: 30 Oct 2007, 17:23 »

I played her too! Unfortunately I only have one or two pictures of me in costume, and they're both at home.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1081 on: 31 Oct 2007, 11:35 »



Fucking metal.
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1082 on: 31 Oct 2007, 11:38 »

That is a surprisingly good CD.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1083 on: 31 Oct 2007, 12:54 »

One of my TAs from freshman year was in love with him, so we bought him Timberlake's cd at the time for Xmas.

I decided then I was better without.
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1084 on: 31 Oct 2007, 16:14 »



I have fairy wings and glasses. Hell yes for pictures taken during class.

edit: size...meh...photobucket...
« Last Edit: 31 Oct 2007, 16:57 by Runs_With_Scissors »
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1085 on: 31 Oct 2007, 16:53 »

Holy SHIT that is a big picture.



Me and a lady. I was going for my classic pose but I couldn't help smiling next to her.
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1086 on: 31 Oct 2007, 16:59 »

You're smiling?  :|
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1087 on: 31 Oct 2007, 17:26 »



Last night my friend had a low key Halloween party.  It was toooooo hot for costumes, so I just wore lots of clothing with skulls.  Also I have an expression akin to a bunny caught in headlights for some reason.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1088 on: 31 Oct 2007, 17:46 »

"This is really soft... WHAT ARE YOU DOING DON'T POINT THAT CAMER-- *flash!* Damnit."
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1089 on: 31 Oct 2007, 17:50 »

I liked the pretty cobwebs ^_^ they glowed in the dark.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1090 on: 31 Oct 2007, 17:54 »

Mail me your skirt, I want it.
Thank you.
At least tell me where you got it, if you don't want to pay postage.
Logged

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1091 on: 31 Oct 2007, 17:55 »

You're smiling?  :|
Ouch. Chuck, you have a cute smile. Smile more!

(I'm cheating by using one of lunchy's photos) Do you have any idea how hard it is to avoid looking at camera when there are three out at the same time?
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1092 on: 31 Oct 2007, 18:17 »

Mail me your skirt, I want it.
Thank you.
At least tell me where you got it, if you don't want to pay postage.

From Jay Jays...I dont know if you have them wherever you are from (I cant keep track of everyone's countries) but it's just a clothiong chain store.  It was $20.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

cupcakeonastick

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Balderdash!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1093 on: 31 Oct 2007, 19:56 »

This was taken ~2 years ago.

Logged
I've seen bears do things even a bear wouldn't do.

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1094 on: 31 Oct 2007, 19:58 »

How appropriate!
Logged
I like the way you work it.

cupcakeonastick

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Balderdash!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1095 on: 31 Oct 2007, 20:21 »

Right after that picture was taken, the cupcake was skewered completely through, sliding down to my hand.

It died in my arms.
Logged
I've seen bears do things even a bear wouldn't do.

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1096 on: 31 Oct 2007, 20:33 »

You're smiling?  :|
Ouch. Chuck, you have a cute smile. Smile more!
(I'm cheating by using one of lunchy's photos) Do you have any idea how hard it is to avoid looking at camera when there are three out at the same time?

See, I am not the only one who says it Chuck! Smile more! And hey, I am in that photo too, my hair looks WILD.
Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1097 on: 31 Oct 2007, 20:39 »

This is me 3 years ago. I have no idea what I was doing.



I probably didn't know at the time, either.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1098 on: 31 Oct 2007, 23:50 »

I've got a pretty good idea what you were doing.
Logged

Kylos

  • Obscure cultural reference
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
    • Myspace?
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1099 on: 01 Nov 2007, 05:22 »

circa 2003
Logged
I hope we mess things up in a huge and beautiful fashion.

Pernix takes the rat and uses it as a peen sock.
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 53   Go Up