THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 18:14
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448952 times)

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1150 on: 05 Nov 2007, 06:23 »

PAGE 25!
MONUMENTAL MILESTONE TWENTY-FIFTH PAGE SUPER NOSE POST
« Last Edit: 05 Nov 2007, 06:40 by Slick »
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

pen

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 782
  • Spaghetti!!!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1151 on: 05 Nov 2007, 06:45 »

Slick, I think I love you.
Logged
Cross-dressing national monuments are always exciting.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1152 on: 05 Nov 2007, 06:50 »

Inlander, army surplus is cool because it is ridiculously durable, not all prissy, and comes in the greys/greens that seem to make up most of my wardrobe. if your wear army stuff ironically enough, it's not say 'woo go army'.
It's all about style y'see;)
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

supersheep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,263
  • you'll have to speak up, i'm a fish and lack ears
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1153 on: 05 Nov 2007, 07:25 »

But it signals a willingness to be associated with an organisation that is by its very definition violent. Furthermore it suggests that that organisation, and by extension the violence it perpetuates, is cool.

Unless it's Japanese Army surplus, I guess.

By this token then, those kheffiyeh-scarf thingies that everyone (and their dog) is wearing mean that you support the killing of Israeli people? I think fashion is dissociated from the things it symbolises, to be honest. I don't see kheffiyeh and go "He likes Hamas," I see kheffiyeh and go "You are wearing a thing that everyone else is wearing, silly."

This, of course does not go for Manda cos wearing it as a top is way cool.
Logged
DJ Weight Problem: if you think semantics isn't that important maybe you should just can dig four banana nine jenkins razor blade dinosaur

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1154 on: 05 Nov 2007, 11:28 »

I consider myself a pacifist. But i regularly wear this:

It's an original German Bundeswehr parka from the 80s or something. As military as it gets. It's really warm, heavy, ugly and was hella cheap. Does that make me less of a pacifist? I don't think so.
Logged

Misereatur

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,839
  • Quicksand my butt
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1155 on: 05 Nov 2007, 11:58 »

All of the pacifists I know serve in the army.

Hell,
Logged
FREE JAZZ ISN'T FREE!

I am a music republican.

supersheep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,263
  • you'll have to speak up, i'm a fish and lack ears
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1156 on: 05 Nov 2007, 12:55 »

This is me with a beard. I am at a fancy party. I was wearing a cravat. I think I had lost it by this point.



EDIT: Only now do I realise quite how inebriated I look.
« Last Edit: 07 Nov 2007, 06:18 by supersheep »
Logged
DJ Weight Problem: if you think semantics isn't that important maybe you should just can dig four banana nine jenkins razor blade dinosaur

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1157 on: 05 Nov 2007, 14:53 »

I have to wear a cravat as part of my school uniform. I hate those things. Whenever I move my neck, it feels like I'm being choked.
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1158 on: 05 Nov 2007, 15:01 »

Three sisters all fancied up for our cousin's wedding. Bain is freaking short.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1159 on: 05 Nov 2007, 15:06 »

There are three of you?  :?  :-o

And, GB, are you at Eton or something?   :|
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1160 on: 05 Nov 2007, 15:11 »

EDIT: I'm gonna delete my whole post, cuz it's not such a good idea in retrospect. Sorry to anyone who got to read it before I fixed it.
« Last Edit: 05 Nov 2007, 15:18 by thegreatbuddha »
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1161 on: 05 Nov 2007, 15:16 »

Sorry. You're not my type
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

cheesepie

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 104
  • the limit as cool approaches awesome of myself
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1162 on: 05 Nov 2007, 17:01 »

I was visiting my sister in Kyiv, Ukraine.. and she took a picture of me as I was playing guitar on her balcony in the morning...... It's one of my favourites!

Logged
I'd rather be skiing.

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1163 on: 05 Nov 2007, 17:05 »

God damn that's a fantastic picture. 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1164 on: 05 Nov 2007, 18:27 »

Agreed. Nice tattoo, btw.
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Bearer

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 364
  • The Corgi Commands Awesome
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1165 on: 05 Nov 2007, 20:30 »

me in my most excellent Utility-Kilt:
Logged
Therefore, I cast aside my useless dick-broom, and I let the ocean come.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1166 on: 06 Nov 2007, 15:30 »

Channeling the Fonz
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1167 on: 06 Nov 2007, 16:20 »

I believe everyone has said that at least once.  We are a good looking gang. 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1168 on: 06 Nov 2007, 16:51 »

Manda why in the holy hell would you use a curling iron on your naturally wavy hair? It's beautiful as it is, why heat-damage it, heh.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1169 on: 06 Nov 2007, 17:10 »

I didn't it just dried weird that day. My mom was drunk at the reception and kept coming up behind me to floof my hair because she was sad it was so flat. What a confidence booster mom, thanks.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

cupcakeonastick

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Balderdash!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1170 on: 06 Nov 2007, 17:11 »

Behold the human slinky stair:




EDIT: Sorry about that. It opens resized on my computer, so I'd forgotten how big it actually was.
« Last Edit: 06 Nov 2007, 17:32 by cupcakeonastick »
Logged
I've seen bears do things even a bear wouldn't do.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1171 on: 06 Nov 2007, 17:12 »

HOLY EFFING LARGE BATMAN
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

chupones

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 92
  • A mystery wrapped in an enigma stuck in suburbia.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1172 on: 06 Nov 2007, 19:16 »



Unfortunately, you can't really see my brown-striped suit under the coat.
Logged
I may not be a Flintstone, but I'll certainly make your bed rock. - Phil Ken Sebben

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1173 on: 06 Nov 2007, 19:17 »

Sir, your avatar is amazing.
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1174 on: 06 Nov 2007, 21:12 »

Ahh no makeup!  I like this picture.  Minus the tube top, I look quite innocent.  Muahahah.

Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1175 on: 06 Nov 2007, 22:03 »

Ahh no makeup!  I like this picture.  Minus the tube top, I look quite innocent.  Muahahah.

This very well may have broken Katie.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Napoleon the Clown

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59
  • Worriesome
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1176 on: 06 Nov 2007, 23:12 »

Human Slinky Stairs...  Awesome.


And I Is Grammar, you look just fine sans make-up.  Not many women can make that claim, so you should be happy.


Work was a bit tiring today.  Everybody but me was doing the drama thing.  So yeah...
Logged
Scaring the shit outta Hannelore since...  God knows when. (T-shirt reference FTW)

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1177 on: 06 Nov 2007, 23:19 »

Not many women can make that claim

No offense, but fuck that thought. People look fine.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1178 on: 07 Nov 2007, 00:22 »

Seriously.
Logged

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1179 on: 07 Nov 2007, 02:20 »

I rarely wear makeup. I'm not looking forward to putting the crap on for my wedding. I only wear makeup when I'm in a play. Which isn't often.

I say that makeup is the silliest invention ever. Way to make ladies feel insecure.

Also, I haven't been around in a while,so here is my Halloween pumpkin. I know, I'm a bit late and it isn't a picture of me, but meh. I'm behind the pumpkin, but you can't see me. Yeeeees. That's it.

Fuck you if you say it looks like Jesus with an apple.



And Napoleon: For a moment there, I thought you had an Alfalfa-esque cow lick going on there.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

ummmkay

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 292
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1180 on: 07 Nov 2007, 06:02 »

I'm with Slick and Caiphana on the makeup thing. I don't own any makeup and I don't plan to. Women who wear a lot of makeup may look different without it, but not necessarily bad!

Also, Daniel, you are a good-lookin' dude!

I can't remember if I've posted this here or not...oh well. I am a NINJA with an AWESOME SCARF! This is about three years ago, I think.

Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1181 on: 07 Nov 2007, 08:20 »

I seriously hate the "UGH I LOOK TERRIBLE WITHOUT MAKEUP" mentality. One of the best-looking girls I've ever met is in Peace Corps and gets paid like $5 a day and she doesn't wear makeup 'cause she just plain can't afford it. And you know what? It works.

That's my 2¢.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Orbert

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 870
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1182 on: 07 Nov 2007, 09:28 »

Another vote for no make-up. True, some people can benefit from a little help, but I think the vast majority of women (and men for that matter, ha!) look fine with clean hair and a nice smile.

Tube tops = not innocent? I must've missed the memo.

Manda, your mom must be totally gorgeous. Or maybe your dad, I guess. Either way, there are some high-quality genes in your family.
Logged
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not.

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1183 on: 07 Nov 2007, 09:35 »

Beard update:
stuuuuuuubble

Is that all you got?
Bitch, please.

DAY 1:


DAY 7:
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1184 on: 07 Nov 2007, 10:13 »

Son, I started this on Saturday morning.  I'm two full days behind you.
Logged

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1185 on: 07 Nov 2007, 10:15 »

two days should be nothing for a real man of hair growth!
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1186 on: 07 Nov 2007, 10:36 »

Quote from: people
makeup jazz

I generally don't wear all that much makeup.  Too much of it, to me, is extremely uncomfortable.  I see so many women with 4 inches of makeup slapped on their faces, and it looks pretty trashy.  I just wear makeup to accentuate, not to cover up. 

Hey, picture!  I got new glasses today. 

 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1187 on: 07 Nov 2007, 10:48 »

I wear make up daily, but just because I'm still growing out of the awkward teenage acne phase. I have other stuff that I bust out for special occasions and Halloween and such, but usually I just do a little. It makes me a lot more confident just to have a little help.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1188 on: 07 Nov 2007, 11:44 »

Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.


(applied judiciously, and not if you have white-blonde eyelashes)
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1189 on: 07 Nov 2007, 11:46 »

Personally I think I look kinda funny with eyeliner, but that's probably just because I never use it.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

pen

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 782
  • Spaghetti!!!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1190 on: 07 Nov 2007, 11:51 »

Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.


(applied judiciously, and not if you have white-blonde eyelashes)

Even those with white-blonde lashes look good in a lighter brown liner.  Nothing too dark, but enough to definitely accentuate. 
Logged
Cross-dressing national monuments are always exciting.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1191 on: 07 Nov 2007, 12:27 »

This one dude I worked with this summer came from Romania and he had some really thick eyelashes. That dude was always getting hell from a bunch of 6th grade boys who we eventually got b& from both the restaurants he was working at. I'll take pictarz when we can hang out again, we're supposed to hang sometime after the new year anyway.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1192 on: 07 Nov 2007, 12:50 »

Beard City!

Logged

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1193 on: 07 Nov 2007, 13:05 »

Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.

i disagree!
makeup is like one of the great wonders of the world for me or something. i just can't wrap my head around it. i've worn it maybe twice in my life and i think both occasions were for my sister's weddings. it's something i don't ever plan on doing.
if you think about it it's actually kind of scary how makeup has become such a huge industry and daily norm for many people that no one even thinks to question how utterly absurd it is to buy products to put on your face every single day because you don't like how it naturally looks. am i weird? that's really weird, isn't it?

oh and uh i guess i'll post a picture so as to not break the theme of this thread. here's one i like that tommy took when he was visiting.


Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1194 on: 07 Nov 2007, 13:10 »

On a scale of 1-10, how much sex did you guys have.
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1195 on: 07 Nov 2007, 13:16 »

$10 says OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAANNNDD
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1196 on: 07 Nov 2007, 13:34 »

FIRST PIC ON PAGE!!!!! :O



I don't clearly remember this picture being taken, but here I am with arguably the world's greatest female singer. Srsly.

www.myspace.com/stellablackrose

Anyway. Re: Facial hair:

I am very much considering to just not shave for ten days or so. I am going to see High On Fire on the 16th, so I guess facial hair is pretty mandatory, given the utter manliness of High On Fire's music.
Logged

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1197 on: 07 Nov 2007, 13:45 »

That's a pretty impressive voice.

The cool thing is, she's been a fixture in my small-town circle of friends for like... forever, and now all of a sudden her band is poised to really go somewhere. They've played like... Four gigs, and now they're booked to open for THIN FUCKIN' LIZZY!! :O
They have hardly even existed for a year. This could become fairly big, actually.

Our little Rebecca. We're all so proud of her <3
Logged

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1198 on: 07 Nov 2007, 15:13 »

my roommates will probably argue that they heard noises coming out of my room, but what they do not realize was that those were actually the sounds of me beating tommy to within an inch of his life every time he did something to piss me off.

so i guess on the beating scale that'd be a 10.
Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1199 on: 07 Nov 2007, 15:18 »

This is me having breakfast! In my cow jammies and with my hello kitty cup.  I'm still 7 at heart.

Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 53   Go Up