THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 29 Mar 2024, 05:40
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 449111 times)

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1200 on: 07 Nov 2007, 15:46 »

Did you dedicate it to me while you were shagging any of them like I asked?
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1201 on: 07 Nov 2007, 16:03 »

I also went to London with MaiAda -
GET YER HANDS OFF MY WOMAN



I mean, um...

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1202 on: 07 Nov 2007, 16:10 »

I enjoyed myself enormously over the last couple of weeks. Thank you to everyone on the forums who let me stay with them, introduced me to their friends, put up with my rambling bullshit, endured my constant whining. I am touched by how friendly everyone was to a relative stranger. Hooray for the QC Forums!

On the contrary Tommy, you are a cool dude and I'm glad I met you. Come back soon.

Also you are hilarious when jetlagged.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1203 on: 07 Nov 2007, 17:34 »

Edit: Apparently I missed the part where a new page started. Oops. /edit

Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.

I don't. This could be because I just honestly don't get how to put it on myself. I can do makeup for other people (I organized makeup crew when I did theatre), but I just can't do it on myself.

The only time I think makeup looks good is when you can't tell a person has makeup on in the first place.
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1204 on: 07 Nov 2007, 18:03 »

I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.

I've tried to t ryless gaudy eyeliner, but I have an issue with rubbing my eyes constantly.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1205 on: 07 Nov 2007, 18:15 »

I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1206 on: 07 Nov 2007, 18:19 »

When I got taught how to use make up the lady taught me a nifty trick. Instead of using an eyeliner pencil or the liquid stuff if you're not that confidant but want a nice smooth line, she (and now I) get a little angled make up brush, wet it, and wet an eyeshadow cake-thingy so it makes a paste and use that as eyeliner. I am trying to find a good photo that demonstrates is, but so far all I can find is this:

(I love eyeliner and eye make up)
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

KTkat

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1207 on: 07 Nov 2007, 18:20 »

You wore eyeliner once last year Eugene?
Logged
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."
~Oscar Wilde

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1208 on: 07 Nov 2007, 18:30 »



In my defense, this was the 31st of a certain fall month. However I did casually wear eyeliner and various neon colors of nail polish for a while last year.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

cupcakeonastick

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
  • Balderdash!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1209 on: 07 Nov 2007, 19:15 »

I miss when this was my work "uniform"

Logged
I've seen bears do things even a bear wouldn't do.

Shadic

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
    • Shadic's Website
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1210 on: 07 Nov 2007, 21:28 »

THIS IS ME WHEN I SHOULD BE SLEEPING.... PROBABLY A YEAR AGO.



OH, AND I BRING BACK THE CAPS LOCK.
Logged

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1211 on: 07 Nov 2007, 21:42 »

NABEGROMO UPDATE



Scruff is go!
Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1212 on: 08 Nov 2007, 00:43 »

i tried to figure out how to use cover up because london turned my face ugly and it was probably the saddest scene ever.  i finally had to have my friend do it for me after she she stopped laughing hysterically at my futile efforts.  i am never doing it again.  fuck you guys anyways, though, because i can't live without my eyeliner.

also, picture.



« Last Edit: 08 Nov 2007, 00:47 by mooface »
Logged

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1213 on: 08 Nov 2007, 00:49 »

THIS IS ME WHEN I SHOULD BE SLEEPING.... PROBABLY A YEAR AGO.

I KNEW I had seen you somewhere before, then I remembered that you are on xkcd too. I knew that avatar and face looked familiar.
Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1214 on: 08 Nov 2007, 01:07 »

Alas, I do not have pictures of [...] Katie

what


who the fuck is that
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

IronOxide

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,429
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1215 on: 08 Nov 2007, 02:12 »

I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.

Guys, I am so good at putting on eyeliner. Seriously, I got skills. Stage makeup FTW.
Logged
Quote from: Wikipedia on Elephant Polo
No matches have been played since February 2007, however, when an elephant, protesting a bad call by the referee, went on a rampage during a game, injuring two players and destroying the Spanish team's minibus

Elemental Poser

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1216 on: 08 Nov 2007, 04:00 »

I like my hat, though most of my friends don't.


Me at a friend's place... kicking ass at beer pong.


Different party.  Apparently I was about to lick my buddy in the face.  And... drunk girl I've driven home five times too many.  I'm such a good guy.
Logged
Live for something, or you'll die for nothing...

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1217 on: 08 Nov 2007, 06:46 »

Every girlfriend I've ever had has made it their life goal to get me to wear eyeliner. So far one of them has been successful, and only for about 3 hours.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1218 on: 08 Nov 2007, 06:56 »

These are some ambitious girls you've dated.

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1219 on: 08 Nov 2007, 07:52 »

Every girlfriend I've ever had has made it their life goal to get me to wear eyeliner. So far one of them has been successful, and only for about 3 hours.

Pffft. That's tame. I've had multiple girlfriends who wanted me to wear their pants...

To get it off the record, I did cave once. Never again after she got righteously upset with me when my ass looked better in them than hers did.
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1220 on: 08 Nov 2007, 08:46 »

[Daniela and MaiAda]

Daniela's eyes are freaking me out because you can't see the pupils.
Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1221 on: 08 Nov 2007, 09:29 »

To be fair you can't really see MaiAda's either
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1222 on: 08 Nov 2007, 10:41 »

Alas, I do not have pictures of [...] Katie
who the fuck is that

Katie who posts here under the name KTkat.



Though maybe she should be called QTkat?


THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1223 on: 08 Nov 2007, 14:02 »

i'm pretty sure there are like 20 on the forums dude.
also that katie is consistently one of the most popular names for girls in the us.

if you are really insistent on preserving your sense of individuality, we can give you an endearing nickname.
like "k-fed".
Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

Shadic

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
    • Shadic's Website
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1224 on: 08 Nov 2007, 14:12 »

I KNEW I had seen you somewhere before, then I remembered that you are on xkcd too. I knew that avatar and face looked familiar.
I think this is the first time I've been recognized from another board... And I just joined that one days ago. :(
Logged

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1225 on: 08 Nov 2007, 14:13 »

We pay close attention to photo threads here;)
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1226 on: 08 Nov 2007, 14:23 »

It validates our lives.
Logged

Ăśde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1227 on: 08 Nov 2007, 14:39 »

26 pages and equally long other threads don't happen by accident, you know.
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1228 on: 08 Nov 2007, 15:08 »

I would link to the Pointless Thread but I am too lazy, so me even mentioning it is not going to be funny.

Oh well lol
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Shadic

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
    • Shadic's Website
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1229 on: 08 Nov 2007, 15:15 »

We pay close attention to photo threads here;)
Not really, that was my only comment I got!  :roll:
Logged

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1230 on: 08 Nov 2007, 15:54 »

Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

KTkat

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 97
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1231 on: 08 Nov 2007, 16:18 »

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

You said that already.

Sorry you are not allowed to be a Katie.






THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

eph is right, it's really fucking common. (I was always one of 5+ in any group I joined in back in high school.)

I am known to some as Kikki though, how does that work?

Also: opening the photo thread and seeing myself twice when I didn't post either is kinda freaky.

Also also: Thanks Tommy!
Logged
"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."
~Oscar Wilde

godinpants

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 236
  • Jolly good show old bean.
    • Godinpants
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1232 on: 08 Nov 2007, 16:39 »

Guys, I got transformers on dvd yesterday.
IN A BOX THAT TRANSFORMS INTO OPTIMUS PRIME.


Thats the back of it with the disc part open.

the rest are here
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo6.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo7.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo8.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo9.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo10.jpg


Also, note my unshavenness.
The hair in my sideburns is a good 4cm long. Im gonna work my way into those old english burns.

Shadic

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
    • Shadic's Website
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1233 on: 08 Nov 2007, 17:06 »

Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Psh, notices are boring!
Logged

Scrambled Egg Machine

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 248
  • Of course you realize this means war.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1234 on: 08 Nov 2007, 18:09 »

I have no camera. Here is a photo of me in NYC, at Cold Spring Harbor labs. This is at the airport.

And this is at the lab.

I'm on the left. The guy on the right was my lab partner, and he is/was a total spaz.
Logged
Not so sure about these things anymore.

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1235 on: 08 Nov 2007, 18:12 »



?
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Scrambled Egg Machine

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 248
  • Of course you realize this means war.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1236 on: 08 Nov 2007, 18:15 »

Yeah, a little.We all feel sorry for him at school, though. He acts like he has some sort of mental problem. He's not a bad guy.Also, I need to gel my hair again. I have clearer skin now, though.
« Last Edit: 08 Nov 2007, 18:16 by Scrambled Egg Machine »
Logged
Not so sure about these things anymore.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1237 on: 08 Nov 2007, 22:13 »

the comic book effect in photobooth is interesting when you flood the image with light!

Logged

Verergoca

  • Cthulhu f'tagn
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1238 on: 08 Nov 2007, 23:23 »

Me coming off the boat (3 days sailing in the Whitsundays = bloody awesome!)

Logged
Quote from: Dr. Sidney Freeman
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

normz

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1239 on: 09 Nov 2007, 04:13 »

ok so I'm a bit late in the debate on the whole make-up thing, but i have to put in my 2 cents .... firstly i have to admit that i'm actually a counter manager for Clinique and free-lance make-up artist so yes the evil beauty industry is my job (well for now anyway im still in law school)... but it's not all bad . I have to admit the best part of my job is getting someone who looks average or ordinary to look stunning and sometimes it might just be a touch of concelear, some mascara and gloss that does it but make-up can truly make a difference in making a woman feel more attractive and confidant.  I've had arguments in the past with boyfriends over me wearing make-up because i HATE not having any makeup on and few people ever get to see me without it, hence alot of boyfriends get annoyed if i need 5 minutes to put makeup on before leaving the house because they argue that i look fine the way i am, but it makes me feel more attractive just like a pair of sexy heels or a flirty dress so whats wrong with it?

Anyway later i am going to dig out 2 photos of me with makeup on and me without for comparison so you guys can be the judge
Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1240 on: 09 Nov 2007, 04:22 »

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

You said that already.

Sorry you are not allowed to be a Katie.






THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

eph is right, it's really fucking common. (I was always one of 5+ in any group I joined in back in high school.)

I am known to some as Kikki though, how does that work?

Well, see it was weeks ago and in a completely different thread. How am I supposed to remember stuff like that? Sue me for not being original then.

I have to be Katie, because the only other option is going by Mary Katherine and that will just lead to all sorts of problems and I really don't want to be asked if I know the pope or "just how catholic are you" again.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1241 on: 09 Nov 2007, 05:07 »

While I agree that it's TOTALLY a Catholic-as-a-crucifix name, it's pretty awesome, I think.

We could just call you M-Kat and you can be gangsta.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

Spinless

  • Guest
S-K-E-L-E-T-O-N WARRIORS!
« Reply #1243 on: 09 Nov 2007, 07:21 »

Is that an Olsen twin, or one of Baron Dark's skeleton warriors?
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1244 on: 09 Nov 2007, 07:21 »

Both?
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1245 on: 09 Nov 2007, 07:27 »

Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Psh, notices are boring!

TO be fair, I totally didn't notice you.
Logged

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1246 on: 09 Nov 2007, 07:33 »

man, 6 posts on a new page of the photo thread and the only photo up is of one of the olsen twins?  you guys suck at this.

here is some cleavage for you guys.


ps. tommy i really wish i had forced you to put on one of those printed shirts.  this is so not fair.
Logged

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1247 on: 09 Nov 2007, 09:51 »

MaiAda,
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1248 on: 09 Nov 2007, 12:14 »

MaiAda,
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1249 on: 09 Nov 2007, 12:19 »

MaiAda,

Also, I dyed my hair.

Friend doing the coloring


The outcome (we attempted to straighten it and my hair went POOPH)


Edit: (I got better pictures, so I took out that bad one)
« Last Edit: 09 Nov 2007, 19:12 by Runs_With_Scissors »
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 53   Go Up