THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 10:34
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448863 times)

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1350 on: 14 Nov 2007, 21:40 »

Joe, back in high school you looked like Tom Cruise if he were slightly more Asian.

Wait. You mean he's not the older dude in the sunglasses?
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1351 on: 14 Nov 2007, 21:43 »

jhocking, it looks like you went to school in Irvine, California.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1352 on: 14 Nov 2007, 22:20 »

Joe, back in high school you looked like Tom Cruise if he were slightly more Asian.

Also, dashing in a suit.

I think he looks kinda like Bill-and-Ted's-era Keanu. Might just be the hair, though.
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

Mnementh

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1353 on: 14 Nov 2007, 22:23 »

Stop insulting Joe guys.  It's not very nice of you.
Logged

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1354 on: 15 Nov 2007, 02:18 »

Stop insulting Joe guys.  It's not very nice of you.

Silly Dan. Everyone knows Asians don't have feelings.
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1355 on: 15 Nov 2007, 06:57 »

How much did the plain-clothes security guard to your immediate left cost anyhow, Joe?
hee hee he kinda does look like he's talking into a secret service-style earpiece.

I better post another picture to make up for all this chatter:

This was from a trip to Amsterdam a few years ago. In every single picture of me from that trip, I am leaning to the left. Apparently I hunch to the left when it is bitterly cold.

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1356 on: 15 Nov 2007, 08:16 »

Where did everyone go?
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1357 on: 15 Nov 2007, 08:24 »

It was cold, they all went inside.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1358 on: 15 Nov 2007, 08:52 »

I think everyone in the entire country was at the anti-war rally. This was right around when Bush decided to attack Iraq. Nobody paid any attention to me, but my gf and her friend had colorful Land's End-style jackets that screamed American tourist and they got jeered a lot. Every time we got within a block of the marchers, I pretended not to know them.


Okay that last sentence isn't true, but I kept joking about it.
« Last Edit: 15 Nov 2007, 08:54 by jhocking »
Logged

StMonkey

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
  • *Comment of negligible importance*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1359 on: 15 Nov 2007, 09:25 »



This was me earlier this year from prom. I rocked that zoot suit like nobodies mother. Not really, but I wanted to use the hat and chain.



This is probably the best picture I have of me from anytime in the last five years. And it still looks rather not like me. The girl is, obviously, my date.
Logged
Carpe Gluteum
Quote
The bottom line is, if anyone is going to start playing pranks by stuffing large quantities of food in their mouths, be wary.

Aimless

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Untss untss untss untss
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1360 on: 15 Nov 2007, 12:08 »

Being a hermit sucked, so I went into the common room to get some human company!



That'll do for a couple of weeks. Or until I find a pic of me with Roderick Mckinnon and JM Coetzee in a frock-coat and HUGE lambchops :|

Btw Jamie your hair looks AMAZING there! Whatever it cost, however long it took... SO worth it. IMO but I have no hair.
Logged
Sometimes I think, sometimes I am

Jenter888

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1361 on: 15 Nov 2007, 12:28 »

This is what my hair looked like after I took out all the pins holding it in place. Once I scan in the professional photos from my formal, I will post them up.





you are to cute for the internet
Logged

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1362 on: 15 Nov 2007, 14:39 »

I rocked that zoot suit like nobodies mother. Not really, but I wanted to use the hat and chain.

That's the tightest-fitting zoot suit I've ever seen . . .
Logged

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1363 on: 15 Nov 2007, 15:48 »

I think a bit of shag suits you Sam...

I'm not gay, so you'd have to get a lady's opinion-but a yay from me.
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1364 on: 15 Nov 2007, 16:13 »

Tommy, here is your confirmation: Sam, you look pretty darn good with two weeks of stubbly.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1365 on: 15 Nov 2007, 16:28 »

I agree, Sam. Hot shit that beard is.

This makes me wonder what you'd look like with short hair.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1366 on: 15 Nov 2007, 16:43 »

Sam, shave your hair. I guarantee 1000x sexy.
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1367 on: 15 Nov 2007, 17:04 »

Sam, I shouldn't ever feel even slightly attracted to you. That picture made me dislike myself a little bit. Maybe you should shave your beard.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1368 on: 15 Nov 2007, 17:08 »

I don't mean bald, just a grade 2 or 3. Much sexy!
Logged

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1369 on: 15 Nov 2007, 17:36 »

Man, maybe I should've participated in NaBeGroMo.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1370 on: 15 Nov 2007, 17:52 »

Sam should not shave his head. Sam is rocking the ever living shit out of the awkward comedian look and it suits him quite well. Stop fucking with a good thing you cock-knockers.

Sam, keep the scruff. It works.
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Unosuke

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1371 on: 15 Nov 2007, 17:57 »

I am in need of a new do (and possibly a shave) any suggestions?

Logged
Jeph: I think I like drunken baking. It has a sense of danger that you just don't get when you're sober.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1372 on: 15 Nov 2007, 18:14 »

Uno, shave
Sam, stop being underage plz
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1373 on: 15 Nov 2007, 18:20 »

The Ducks are now #2 in the BCS!!!

(pictar)

I'm serious.

Somebody had better make a damn awesome shop of this.
So is this not gonna happen?  I was looking forward to seeing the results...
Logged

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1374 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:04 »

Are you seriously asking this? That shit was days ago. Move on.



Guys, I am not making my usual face in this. Also, it was not my birthday. I just wanted to try to bite the balloon. (They wouldn't let me...)
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1375 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:11 »

sam, hot. i'm glad you're underage.
Logged

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1376 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:13 »

I just wanted to try to bite the balloon.

Oh sure, "I wanted to bite the balloon" he says. Sure thing, Chuck. Don't listen to him desperately trying to keep up his curmudgeonly image, guys. He was actually staring at the colours with child-like glee. His mouth is open with awe-inspired delight.
Logged

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1377 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:15 »





Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1378 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:36 »

Welp, there goes my chance of ever finding a woman...
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

StMonkey

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
  • *Comment of negligible importance*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1379 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:51 »

(close-ups of Chucks face)

Is that a look of sheer terror or uncontrolable lust?
Logged
Carpe Gluteum
Quote
The bottom line is, if anyone is going to start playing pranks by stuffing large quantities of food in their mouths, be wary.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1380 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:55 »

Genius work with the file names.
Logged

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1381 on: 15 Nov 2007, 19:57 »

Yeah, I see totally amazed by the pretty colors and largeness of the balloon.

And Sam, no, you should not cut your hair and, yes, the scruff works for you. (I can't say much else without feeling really really creepy.)
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1382 on: 15 Nov 2007, 20:24 »

Damn Sam, you're a fox.

And I am growing a fucking beard.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

squawk

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,351
  • if it has a toothpick in it, it's free!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1383 on: 15 Nov 2007, 20:30 »

I'm older than Sam by about a month, I believe. Neato.

Recently I have been honing my skills with these:


and why can't i resist the urge to give a thumbs up in every friggin' picture
Logged
it's time to stop posting

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1384 on: 15 Nov 2007, 21:02 »

The thumbs up thing is awesome, actually.

I'm either older or younger than Sam by a month but keep forgetting which it is. April 18th?
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1385 on: 16 Nov 2007, 00:31 »

This is my brother and I at my formal (he was not my date guys).  Look at me, a pretty nerd princess with braces. awww.  I took two dates (a boy and a girl) and made them dress as pirates.  I have photos somewhere, shall endevour to find.

This is me and a friend at her formal last year...no, year before.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Felix_

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1386 on: 16 Nov 2007, 00:40 »

me, at the camping area of the worlds most awesome brutal death metal & grindcore festival ever





Nice Atheist shirt.
Logged

godinpants

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 236
  • Jolly good show old bean.
    • Godinpants
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1387 on: 16 Nov 2007, 03:15 »

Recently I have been honing my skills with these:

I have the same keyboard. Im making music with mine right now.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1388 on: 16 Nov 2007, 04:11 »

This is my brother and I at my formal (he was not my date guys).
holy shit your family is skinny

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1389 on: 16 Nov 2007, 05:42 »

Those keyboards look awesome.

I took two dates (a boy and a girl) and made them dress as pirates.

Victory.
Logged

CmonMiracle

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1390 on: 16 Nov 2007, 08:19 »

Summary of the last few pages: Everyone is hot!

Picture to not be a yapper.

Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1391 on: 16 Nov 2007, 11:03 »

A+ Would look again.



HOORAY I bought a new old Olympus Pen EE-2.
« Last Edit: 16 Nov 2007, 11:22 by öde »
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1392 on: 16 Nov 2007, 11:40 »

My hair is getting awkward so here is a facial expression to match it!

ALSO, I just found this picture! I was blowing a bubble, my teeth aren't actually blue.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1393 on: 16 Nov 2007, 11:49 »

You justify Kieffer's ego.
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1394 on: 16 Nov 2007, 12:55 »

Aw you say the sweetest things.
Logged

a pack of wolves

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,604
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1395 on: 16 Nov 2007, 12:56 »

I suppose this is also a report on NaBeGroMo progress since I haven't shaved since Halloween, even though I wasn't *planning* on participating.

Accidental seasonal beard growth has also occurred to me.

Before:


Now:


I am unsure as to whether this is an improvement or not, but I do have warmer cheeks and it definitely goes with this hat and shirt.
Logged
Quote from: De_El
Next time, on QC Forums: someone embarrassingly reveals that they are a homophobe! Stay tuned to find out who!

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1396 on: 16 Nov 2007, 15:45 »

From what I can see, I'd say improvement.
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

Katherine

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 459
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1397 on: 16 Nov 2007, 16:20 »

I colored my hair last night, here are the before and after pictures.  I'm still not sure I like the color.  Its a bit darker than I was expecting, I may have to throw some highlights in shortly.
Before:

After:
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1398 on: 16 Nov 2007, 17:30 »

I am unsure as to whether this is an improvement or not, but I do have warmer cheeks and it definitely goes with this hat and shirt.

In the second photo, you look a little like Cillian Murphy, or some other dashing rogue Englishman.

Maybe Ewan Mcgregor.

But I think it is the angle.
Logged

a pack of wolves

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,604
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1399 on: 16 Nov 2007, 17:44 »

I can pretend it's not though. At the very least it's geographically correct.
Logged
Quote from: De_El
Next time, on QC Forums: someone embarrassingly reveals that they are a homophobe! Stay tuned to find out who!
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 53   Go Up