THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 23:01
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 449003 times)

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1700 on: 29 Nov 2007, 15:43 »

I have selective hearing, I only hear what I want to hear.
And sure, I'll get the oil, but you have to supply the scented candles.
Logged

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1701 on: 29 Nov 2007, 16:45 »

Man, Liz, you just went up like 10 points in my book. Seriously, you just keep getting cooler and cooler.
Dude, sweet. What else have I done to gain points?

Since we have not had a photo in a while, here I am with my sister. We are often mistaken for twins, which I do not understand.

Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Ally

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1702 on: 29 Nov 2007, 16:46 »

celticgeek: my friend's dad dated Lisa Randall for a while

I is grammar: I use the same biology textbook but sixth edition!
Logged

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1703 on: 29 Nov 2007, 19:04 »

I'm afraid with all the work I've had to do lately, my book is a little boring:



Well, boring to you, anyways.
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1704 on: 29 Nov 2007, 19:07 »

That is one of the most specific topics I have ever seen.
Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1705 on: 29 Nov 2007, 20:10 »

Hannah and CelticGeek, I've read your books and loved them! My totally unnecessary approval is granted!

Linds, you have no idea how much I want to read that book now. What on earth kind of work do you do which requires that??
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1706 on: 29 Nov 2007, 21:01 »





We stayed after school again. I raped a trash can and was scaring people by jumping out of lockers. It was great fun.
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1707 on: 29 Nov 2007, 21:22 »

Our lockers could barely hold a cat, let alone a person.

Lucky.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

celticgeek

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,697
  • Linux Geek
    • The Celtic Geek
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1708 on: 29 Nov 2007, 21:41 »

celticgeek: my friend's dad dated Lisa Randall for a while

I have pointed out Lisa Randall as a "hot lady physicist" in the past, on these forums.

Does your friend's dad agree?

redglasscurls:  I accept your totally unnecessary approval.  It is a fun book.  And approval is always good.

Happy reading, all.
Logged
a 'dèanamh nan saighdean airson cinneadh MacLeòid
We Wear Woad When We Write Code
Ní féidir liom labhairt na Gaeilge.
Seachd reultan, agus seachd clachan, agus aon chraobh geal.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1709 on: 29 Nov 2007, 22:00 »

oh hey look linds is cute.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1710 on: 29 Nov 2007, 22:02 »

want to go dancing sometime?
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1711 on: 29 Nov 2007, 22:03 »

Our lockers could barely hold a cat, let alone a person.

Lucky.

We have to share, so they have to be a bit bigger. The freshman fit quite nicely into the lockers too. Almost like they were made to hold them.
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1712 on: 29 Nov 2007, 22:34 »

I figured new page + needed context + interesting tidbit + not very large image would be alright. My apologies if it wasn't.

Old-ish picture of me reading a book by a locker. Two categories at once, bitches. If my memory serves me right, it was a sex trivia book that the girl to my right told me to read.



Also better photo of my face but worse book photo.

Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

humanoftheyear

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
    • dur
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1713 on: 29 Nov 2007, 22:53 »



i'm going to be so glad to be done with james joyce at the end of the semester.
Logged
A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession.
Albert Camus

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1714 on: 29 Nov 2007, 23:00 »

I was glad to be done with James Joyce this semester also, and I only had to read Portrait.  I got an A in the course though, winner!
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1715 on: 29 Nov 2007, 23:13 »

We have to share
My immediate reaction: "You have to share lockers?" Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1716 on: 30 Nov 2007, 01:12 »

pic with obscure book

Wow. Except for your hair color, you look like my sister.
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1717 on: 30 Nov 2007, 02:57 »

Hey QC, you totally know all these people.




By posting the two I have a higher chance of having a bad shot of everyone, right?
Logged

KickThatBathProf

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,973
  • hey there
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1718 on: 30 Nov 2007, 03:03 »

J'adore le T-shirt, Lunchbox!
Logged
dumplings are the answer because the foreskin boys

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1719 on: 30 Nov 2007, 03:14 »

Why however did you guess
Logged

humanoftheyear

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
    • dur
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1720 on: 30 Nov 2007, 03:14 »

I was glad to be done with James Joyce this semester also, and I only had to read Portrait.

i actually kind of enjoyed portrait. i'm glad we read it and didn't just jump straight into ulysses. portrait is like the astroglide to a nice big ulysses buttfuck.


kudos on the A!
Logged
A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession.
Albert Camus

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1721 on: 30 Nov 2007, 03:19 »

You think I would let a stranger get his filthy mitts on my lovely camera?
I trusted that stair. That stair was not going anywhere.


SUPER BONUS HOTTIE SHOT

Logged

IronOxide

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,429
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1722 on: 30 Nov 2007, 03:39 »

The first of those two pictures makes me think y'all should be starring in a sitcom.
Logged
Quote from: Wikipedia on Elephant Polo
No matches have been played since February 2007, however, when an elephant, protesting a bad call by the referee, went on a rampage during a game, injuring two players and destroying the Spanish team's minibus

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1723 on: 30 Nov 2007, 06:36 »

Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?

Because it's different to live with somebody than to share a locker with somebody. When you live with somebody, you can manage to build up trust through person-to-person communication. With a locker, it's a hell of a lot harder, because you only ever see the person if you're already friends/you actually make an effort, so you wind up only being able to communicate via notes and other shit.

      I over-explain things to gain a sense of self-worth.
    /
 :-D
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1724 on: 30 Nov 2007, 08:58 »

Linds, you have no idea how much I want to read that book now. What on earth kind of work do you do which requires that??

I'm taking an art history course about 17th century paintings from the Netherlands. We got to chose the topic of our final paper, and I chose marriage portraits! I am kind of glad someone else thinks the topic doesn't sound boring, because I actually kind of like reading about it.
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

Peet

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 260
  • The Second Gabber
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1725 on: 30 Nov 2007, 09:26 »

Logged
Quote from: Slick
I think Astaldo should be the next Dr. Who

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1726 on: 30 Nov 2007, 10:05 »

What the hell language IS that, Pete?
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Peet

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 260
  • The Second Gabber
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1727 on: 30 Nov 2007, 10:19 »

Logged
Quote from: Slick
I think Astaldo should be the next Dr. Who

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1728 on: 30 Nov 2007, 10:31 »

HOLY SHIT GUYS THE GROUP FINALLY HAS A GUY WHO CAN SPEAK DRACONIAN, HELL YEAH NOW MAYBE OUR DM WILL LET US GET COOL LOOT
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1729 on: 30 Nov 2007, 12:59 »

since i don't know what you are talking about, here's an extremely long picture.
notice the gymnastics equipment in the background. my job is awesome.

Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1730 on: 30 Nov 2007, 13:25 »

Is your avatar made from something you did at work then?
Logged

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1731 on: 30 Nov 2007, 13:29 »

yeah, during my "lunch break."
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1732 on: 30 Nov 2007, 14:10 »

I like how your photo is made from multiple images  :-D
Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1733 on: 30 Nov 2007, 14:36 »

This is who I spent a good portion of yesterday with. Good times.





There are other pictures, but I have yet to resize them and such.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1734 on: 30 Nov 2007, 15:17 »

Guys. I bought this beer to try it out, and it is NOT GOOD!
It's crappy, actually.


I should have stuck with this:



or this:



Yes, I really like import beer. I am not a connoiseur yet, but I'm workin' on it.
Logged

Verergoca

  • Cthulhu f'tagn
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1735 on: 30 Nov 2007, 15:33 »

To: All Ozzies

Plz stop having so much fun with me on the other side of the world. Plz come here!
Logged
Quote from: Dr. Sidney Freeman
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1736 on: 30 Nov 2007, 15:54 »

I'll sign that petition, man.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1737 on: 30 Nov 2007, 16:09 »

[$4.00 Lunchbox]

I'll pay 10. Plus a camaro. (Camaro may require new transmission, which will be provided)
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1738 on: 30 Nov 2007, 17:11 »

Sold. She's yours. Where do I get my goddamn car?
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1739 on: 30 Nov 2007, 18:39 »

'Sup?

Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1740 on: 30 Nov 2007, 18:48 »

Dear Sam,

Please turn 18 soon.

Thank you,
Liz
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1741 on: 30 Nov 2007, 19:01 »

We have to share
My immediate reaction: "You have to share lockers?" Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?

It's kind of weird, because our school assigns the partners. So you usually don't even know the person. Not very fun.
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Tyler

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 804
  • SKULLTOPUS
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1742 on: 30 Nov 2007, 19:31 »



Late to the book party. Thats what I read this week.



And thats what not shaving for a week has done to me.
Logged
Quote from: Lunchbox
It is not wussy. There are orifices being assaulted all over the shop.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1743 on: 30 Nov 2007, 19:53 »

I just popped out for some lunch and on my way to this little Indian restaurant near my flat I came across this little gem sitting in an antique shop. The Indian place was closed but I still managed to pick up something I am much happier with.

Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1744 on: 30 Nov 2007, 20:02 »

on the bus back from model UN:
i think it's time to shave.


You have one more day! Be strong, Sam!
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1745 on: 30 Nov 2007, 22:15 »

Nice pictures guys.  :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Logged

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1746 on: 30 Nov 2007, 23:54 »



Gabbly + Cookie Dough Ice Cream = Good times
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1747 on: 01 Dec 2007, 00:00 »

Not fucking fair.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Caiphana

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • WHOOSH
    • dA
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1748 on: 01 Dec 2007, 00:13 »

Goddamn, that guy in the middle back could be Jack Thompson's twin.
*goes off to GIS Jack Thompson*
I like how one of the first ones is a PA strip. *love* Anyway, yeah. A little close. Except the guy in my picture (Joel) is a video game developer, not a stupid lawyer. You know that game... The Godfather? Yeah. He worked on that one.

Oh, and here are some more wedding pictures.




I love my daddy. I'm just a geek making weird faces. Cuz I can.
Logged
..so long as the word "cookie" is in your country's vocabulary, it's an okay place to be.

Those who forget the past may be doomed to repeat it, but those who refuse to learn from the past and move on are fucking idiots.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1749 on: 01 Dec 2007, 00:21 »

Are you sure you're a geek? Because the Geek Show at carnivals is usually a hobo who bites the heads off of live animals.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 53   Go Up