THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 02:33
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448759 times)

dennis

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 776
  • A sockful of quarters makes the medicine go down.
    • Lies! Truth!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1850 on: 06 Dec 2007, 01:08 »


there's a hair in your cake.
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1851 on: 06 Dec 2007, 02:16 »

Chunky peanut butter is the work of Satan.

Hey I like that stuI WILL EAT YOUR INFANTS
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1852 on: 06 Dec 2007, 03:38 »

I like penut butter as well.

Logged

StMonkey

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
  • *Comment of negligible importance*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1853 on: 06 Dec 2007, 08:36 »

Then why do you look so glum?
Logged
Carpe Gluteum
Quote
The bottom line is, if anyone is going to start playing pranks by stuffing large quantities of food in their mouths, be wary.

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1854 on: 06 Dec 2007, 09:06 »

The power of Jif compels him.  The power of Jif compels him.  The power of Jif compels him.
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1855 on: 06 Dec 2007, 12:19 »

I am so much more excited about my peanut butter than the rest of y'alls.

Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1856 on: 06 Dec 2007, 13:45 »



I win, Liz.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1857 on: 06 Dec 2007, 13:53 »

ur doin it wrong.
Logged

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1858 on: 06 Dec 2007, 14:22 »

Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.

More pictures!

I put a skunky patch in my hair. I plan to dye it turquoise. Good/bad idea?
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1859 on: 06 Dec 2007, 14:24 »

meh
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1860 on: 06 Dec 2007, 14:24 »

Leave it the way it is! It r hawt!

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1861 on: 06 Dec 2007, 14:44 »

My vote goes to 'no'. I had a roomie this summer who did that, and every time I saw him with it (and believe me, he changed it frequently just to make it more noticeable) I wanted to shave his head with an electric razor and then stab him in the throat with it.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1862 on: 06 Dec 2007, 15:31 »

Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.


That's interesting, because it also used to be a household cleaner here until some of our lamo European friends decided that Cif (pronounced with a soft c) was easier to say (I guess in most European tongues Jif sounds like "Yiff"... And we don't want to go there)
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1863 on: 06 Dec 2007, 17:35 »

Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.


I was in Dresden, visiting friends!
Logged

Ally

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1864 on: 06 Dec 2007, 17:43 »

We're reading a translation. It is a quality book in any language!
Logged

IronOxide

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,429
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1865 on: 06 Dec 2007, 17:49 »

I did an english paper on Voltaire's Candide once, and we're doing Inferno right now.

It doesn't have quite the quality in prose that it used to, but it's still good.
Logged
Quote from: Wikipedia on Elephant Polo
No matches have been played since February 2007, however, when an elephant, protesting a bad call by the referee, went on a rampage during a game, injuring two players and destroying the Spanish team's minibus

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1866 on: 06 Dec 2007, 18:20 »

Look at all the highfalutin readers in these parts.

Well, I read too, guys:



(Also: New shoes. You're all jealous because they are more comfortable than any pair of shoes any of you have ever owned, unless you own the same shoes)
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1867 on: 06 Dec 2007, 21:26 »

Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.


I was in Dresden, visiting friends!

Pretty european girls! Ooo La La!
Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1868 on: 06 Dec 2007, 21:51 »

Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.

Because you can translate his works and pretend he's American!
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1869 on: 06 Dec 2007, 22:56 »

It's what we do best. (Sadly.)
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1870 on: 06 Dec 2007, 23:14 »

So guys my little sister made me this totally righteous hat for chanukkah.



Also I am dropping out of college to become a longshoreman.
Logged

dennis

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 776
  • A sockful of quarters makes the medicine go down.
    • Lies! Truth!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1871 on: 07 Dec 2007, 00:50 »

Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.

More pictures!

I put a skunky patch in my hair. I plan to dye it turquoise. Good/bad idea?
T...Turquoise?

Sure! Do it!
Logged

thegreatbuddha

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 343
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1872 on: 07 Dec 2007, 01:00 »

Man, I have been hopelessly addicted to Jif ever since I went to America when I was eleven. Sadly, chunky peanut butter is impossible to find in Norway, so I have to rely on my dad's business trips. Which kind of sucks.

@ ANyways: Cut peanuts up and put them in creamy JIF. Toast them in an oven (300-325F) for around 8-10 minutes first. When they start to turn darker, take themout of the oven and either shock them in ice water or throw themstraight into the JIF, since the residual hest will probably burn them.

@Lunchbox: dunno bout the turquoise. I think it will hide the color of your eyes, which is a kind of pale crystal blue? They are awesome eyes, and you should do nothing to detract from them
Logged
I want to be able to tell my kids about the days when the internet was an uncontrolled haven for outlaws such as myself.
Kind of like the old west but with keyboards and nobody is having sex.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1873 on: 07 Dec 2007, 01:08 »

I think it will hide the color of your eyes, which is a kind of pale crystal blue
"crystal blue" sounds like a designer drug.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1874 on: 07 Dec 2007, 01:37 »

Tried it, it's not that great.

Foxy Methoxy is better.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1875 on: 07 Dec 2007, 01:49 »

Pretty european girls! Ooo La La!

Either the German exchange students at my college were picked for their attractiveness or they're just superior.




And that's how WWII started!
Logged

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1876 on: 07 Dec 2007, 05:01 »

I can neither comfirm nor deny that. Although some of the girl from my school who participated in an exchange with a school in Norfolk, Virgina weren't all that attractive. But we can still blame that on the teacher's bad taste.

I realized that it is a translation that you're reading, but as i said, it doesn't make much sense to me. It's like reading a translation of Shakespeare in German class.
Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1877 on: 07 Dec 2007, 05:05 »

Generally speaking, in English speaking countries (the UK, US, Australia, Canada etc...) English may also simply refer to Literature since basic grammar and spelling would be attended to during primary school. Basically what I am saying is that it is not that uncommon to read translated Western texts for English classes.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1878 on: 07 Dec 2007, 05:24 »

basic grammar and spelling would be attended to during primary school.

Ha.

HAH!
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1879 on: 07 Dec 2007, 05:30 »

Either the German exchange students at my college were picked for their attractiveness or they're just superior.

I am pretty sure that's just how most German chicks look. Or maybe the good-lookin' ones are all in downtown Trier and scattered on the road from the Luxembourgish-German border to the gates outside of Bitburg AFB.

I swear going through that gate was like going from a steady whiskey buzz to COMPLETE SOBRIETY.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1880 on: 07 Dec 2007, 05:48 »

Jimmy, I didn't know that. Makes more sense now. It's different here.

The girls in Trier are quite okay, as far as i can remember from my time there, but as most of them go to University there, they are not necessarily from Trier or the region. I must say, though, that Trier is a dead place on a tuesday night. I was there this week and there was nothing going on at all. And all the pretty girls were hiding or something.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1881 on: 07 Dec 2007, 10:15 »

Here is an image where is is hard to see my hair properly because apparently it is getting a bit thin.

Logged

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1882 on: 07 Dec 2007, 12:13 »

crime and punishment is an excellent novel! i wish i had read it for english in high school. i think we had the hobbit/lotr trilogy instead.
Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1883 on: 07 Dec 2007, 12:39 »

Durr hurr i c ur wet hair drillz, is awsum.
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1884 on: 07 Dec 2007, 12:45 »

don't write like that.
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1885 on: 07 Dec 2007, 13:03 »

He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1886 on: 07 Dec 2007, 14:30 »

He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.

POST OF THE YEAR
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1887 on: 07 Dec 2007, 14:55 »

I never got pics that look like your were accidentally in them.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1888 on: 07 Dec 2007, 15:27 »

IT'S ART.
Logged

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1889 on: 07 Dec 2007, 17:07 »

Funny thing is, actually accidently in it. Was just trying to take a normal picture, but I'm a retard and cannot do it.
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1890 on: 07 Dec 2007, 17:31 »

He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.

On second thought, to keep you from being creeped the fuck out, write like that ALL the time.

I mean srsly, *I* would be creeped out if I knew Kieffer was gettin' his fap on to MY picture.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1891 on: 07 Dec 2007, 17:52 »

Ahaha, I don't think I'll worry about it too much.



So who else has snow and still goes out in it?
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1892 on: 07 Dec 2007, 18:28 »

Lucky, i never get snow.
Logged

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1893 on: 07 Dec 2007, 20:54 »

Guys, I normally don't do this, but...

Before:



After:

Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1894 on: 07 Dec 2007, 20:57 »

I mean srsly, *I* would be creeped out if I knew Kieffer was gettin' his fap on to MY picture.

Dude I would be honoured.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1895 on: 07 Dec 2007, 21:40 »

Would be? I've seen the pictures man.

You're like, #4 in my daily wankfodder.
Logged

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1896 on: 08 Dec 2007, 00:36 »


Hanging out in the trash cans is what the cool kids do, right?


English class...oh boy! (I'm the one in the back giving kisses)
« Last Edit: 08 Dec 2007, 00:39 by Runs_With_Scissors »
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

LordNagash

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1897 on: 08 Dec 2007, 01:25 »

So who else has snow and still goes out in it?

I will go out in the snow as long as it is not in my car. Snow is great.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1898 on: 08 Dec 2007, 06:48 »

Before:
After:

Nice haircut Ben!
Logged

mfpole

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 152
  • Whats it going to be, eh?
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1899 on: 08 Dec 2007, 07:06 »

Oh god I'm late, but You Shall Know our Velocity! is such a good book.

I'm reading this:


My dog is too.
Logged
i am the operator with my pocket calculator
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 53   Go Up