THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 18 Apr 2024, 12:19
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 453627 times)

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1950 on: 11 Dec 2007, 05:52 »

I am! You all thought I'd mess it up horribly, but you were wrong!
Logged

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1951 on: 11 Dec 2007, 05:52 »

I really did think you'd mess it up horribly, and I have never been more happy to be proved wrong. Well done you.
Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1952 on: 11 Dec 2007, 07:00 »

Good jerb! The left side looks like you've gelled/stuck it up a bit weird, if you pull it forward it'll look less weird/like a bald patch.
Logged

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1953 on: 11 Dec 2007, 08:39 »

Darryl, that looks great!  I'm definitely impressed. 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1954 on: 11 Dec 2007, 11:27 »

I am debating whether or not I should declare "LESS YAPPY MORE SNAPPY" and post a pic, thus allowing myself to break the "2 per page" guideline, or whether I should just wait until the next page + 5 more photos.

Fuck it, I'll just have somebody take my picture (and hopefully not camera) in Munich tomorrow and post when I get to CA. Stormy, PM me.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1955 on: 11 Dec 2007, 11:39 »

Some of you read already, that I got my haircut in three easy steps.

1) Go to a good hairdressers
2) Scissors+Head
3) Pay and leave

Only, I skipped steps 1 and 3.
Yeah, I cut my hair myself for the first time going on a week ago. It was pretty fun.

Good job! I want to encourage more people to do this... It's not THAT hard.
EDIT: SNAPPY SINCE THIS IS THE NEW PAGE OF A PICTURE THREAD

Should i destroy fascists? this is going to take some thinking.
« Last Edit: 11 Dec 2007, 11:46 by Chrasstor »
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1956 on: 11 Dec 2007, 12:09 »

Actually, I suggest that you don't cut your own hair, unless you want a cut like mine, or, if your hair is long, the 'Edward Scissorhands' look.
As a rule, if you cut you own hair, it will NEVER be even.
Logged

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1957 on: 11 Dec 2007, 12:43 »

THAT IS THE SECOND BIGGEST GUITAR I'VE EVER SEEN
Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1958 on: 11 Dec 2007, 12:45 »

i think it's a bass?

also: foreshortening!
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1959 on: 11 Dec 2007, 12:57 »

Is that Scottish shortbread on your dresser? Want plz
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1960 on: 11 Dec 2007, 13:53 »

there's nothing wrong with cutting your own hair. i've always cut my own hair. i haven't actually paid for a hair cut since i was a toddler. and obviously my parents paid for it then.


new shoes!

[img width= height=]http://a434.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/115/l_e5044595c3d2a5be31013845b2df7709.gif[/img]
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

Dissy

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 459
  • The only asshole in the internets
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1961 on: 11 Dec 2007, 14:15 »

Whoa!  The picture is dancing.  I feel like I'm watching a portrait in Hogwarts
Logged
Quote from: Tommy on Gabbly
i'm not paying for your boob jon
Quote from: Darryl
I fuck at typos
Quote from: Squiddy
but you haven't sig quoted me yet kevin
Quote from: Darryl on meebo
9 inches is pathetic by today's standard

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1962 on: 11 Dec 2007, 14:21 »

yeah, since i'm white i have to create the illusion of rhythm through animated GIFs.
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1964 on: 11 Dec 2007, 19:45 »

I cut my own hair, but since mine is long and curly it's not really a big deal.

Also, Joe, please feature that facial expression in every photo you taken of you from now on. It made me chuckle.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1965 on: 11 Dec 2007, 20:21 »

peanut butter update



i'm never keeping one of these in my room ever again.
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1966 on: 11 Dec 2007, 20:43 »

I still prefer my method of eating peanut butter.

Also what kind of America-hating communist are you? Eating Skippy like that... you ought to be ashamed, young lady.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1967 on: 11 Dec 2007, 22:18 »

Some of you read already, that I got my haircut in three easy steps.

1) Go to a good hairdressers
2) Scissors+Head
3) Pay and leave

Only, I skipped steps 1 and 3.

You can't tell from this image, but my fringe still touches the bottom of my nose at it's longest point.




Dude what the hell are you doing for New Year's? You never told me. Come to Brighton, you fucking wanker.





Also I Is Grammar: I have no words. I am sorry for this. I really am.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Hat

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,536
  • bang bang a suckah MC shot me down
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1968 on: 12 Dec 2007, 03:48 »

Obviously, I have not read the rules of the photo thread? So here is the most important and best quality photo from my little spamming session, which is the place where I shit.



« Last Edit: 12 Dec 2007, 14:30 by Hat »
Logged
Quote from: Emilio
power metal set in the present is basically crunk

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1969 on: 12 Dec 2007, 07:50 »

You have been here long enough to know that that post does not at all fit into the rules of this thread.
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1970 on: 12 Dec 2007, 08:23 »

Yeah, that is one crazy large post.


Katie, I have no plans for Christmas or New Years, but at the same time, I also have no money. Again. I'm paying off £300 debt I have to my grandfather.
Logged

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1971 on: 12 Dec 2007, 10:46 »

I still prefer my method of eating peanut butter, that is to say I like to eat peanut butter off the genitals of homeless men.
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

Aimless

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Untss untss untss untss
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1972 on: 12 Dec 2007, 11:19 »

I am rough with roughnecks:



Got the rings from my best mates today as an early christmas presents. I love them :D there's a story behind them, and I feel I am like the phantom in mny ways, despite looking like hell in tights.
Logged
Sometimes I think, sometimes I am

pen

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 782
  • Spaghetti!!!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1973 on: 12 Dec 2007, 11:22 »

I am rough with roughnecks

I read that first as "I am rough with rednecks."
Logged
Cross-dressing national monuments are always exciting.

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1974 on: 12 Dec 2007, 12:23 »

As did I.
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1975 on: 12 Dec 2007, 16:40 »

Just to state what people are saying about cutting your own hair. Plz don't(even though I usually do), put food on my table(my mother is a hairstylist).
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1976 on: 12 Dec 2007, 18:26 »

I remember a Charlie Brown strip I read when I was a kid where Charlie and another character are sitting around discussing how things are getting more expensive.

other dude: My dad is even cutting my hair to save money.
Charlie: I hope he cuts your ears off.               note - charlie brown's dad is a barber

I always thought that was a little dark for Peanuts.

onewheelwizzard

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Ha! Fool ...
    • http://www.livejournal.com/users/onewheelwizzard
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1977 on: 12 Dec 2007, 19:09 »

http://gallery.mac.com/kraz/100013/sortinghat5/web.jpg

Harry Potter Day at the UPenn Anthropology and Archeology Museum.  I was the voice of the Sorting Hat.  My professor was organizing the event, so the whole class participated for credit.

Ack!  Too big.  How do I resize?
Logged
also at one point mid-sex she asked me "what do you think about commercialism in art?"

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1978 on: 12 Dec 2007, 19:21 »

Charlie: I hope he cuts your ears off.

isn't charlie brown like 8 years old? wow.
Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

MobyDickhole

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 115
  • I'd rather be procrastinating
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1979 on: 12 Dec 2007, 20:12 »



It's Official.
I know nothing.
Logged
And without further ado, I am done typing.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1980 on: 12 Dec 2007, 20:28 »

The first thing I thought on seeing that photo was not that it was odd to put a Hello Kitty hat on a cat, but that it had included the whisker lines, seeing how cats supply their own.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1981 on: 12 Dec 2007, 20:49 »

yeah, what are those whisker lines there for?

maybe the hat is intended for babies...or a different animal? i don't know. accesories for animals/babies are stupid.
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1982 on: 12 Dec 2007, 21:14 »

Hey, I did not know cats posted on this board! Hello, MobyDickhole! It is good to see that felines are finally starting to understand computers, instead of walking haphazardly over keys! Or is that not a picture of you? Hm.

ANYWAY:

IN THIS PICTURE I LOOK LIKE A GIGANTIC LOSER



BUT DON'T TRY TO TELL ME YOU DON'T WANT HUGS
Logged

squawk

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,351
  • if it has a toothpick in it, it's free!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1983 on: 12 Dec 2007, 21:30 »

Want!
Logged
it's time to stop posting

est

  • this is a test
  • Admin emeritus
  • Older than Moses
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,157
  • V O L L E Y B A L L
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1984 on: 12 Dec 2007, 21:36 »

Ally!  I will hug you!

Although, I have been at home sick the last couple of days so you may wish to take a raincheck until I am well.  This is what an est looks like when he is sick at home, cooking steak for late lunch:



The steak is delicious, by the way (om nom nom nom)
Logged

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1985 on: 12 Dec 2007, 23:10 »

Awesome apron. Do want.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1987 on: 12 Dec 2007, 23:31 »

It's the stubble that did it for me. Rrrow!
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1988 on: 12 Dec 2007, 23:46 »

NO TIME FOR HUGS, BUSY STRIKING POSES WITH SLEDGEHAMMERS.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1990 on: 13 Dec 2007, 01:44 »



Too much burger for my mouth. Homf
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1991 on: 13 Dec 2007, 02:19 »

Dear Slick,


I don't know what it is, but you are pretty cute.

Take care,
Emaline
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

onewheelwizzard

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,558
  • Ha! Fool ...
    • http://www.livejournal.com/users/onewheelwizzard
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1992 on: 13 Dec 2007, 03:59 »

HUGS

I'm pretty sure this is the most attractive picture of anyone I've ever seen.  I think there's a pretty substantial potential for creepiness in that comment, so I'll clarify by saying that this isn't a picture that makes me want to limit my typing to one hand.  It's a picture that makes me want to go out and make life more enjoyable for everyone I possibly can, and I can't think of a better thing for anyone to inspire me to do.

On the other hand, it also reminds me that it's been easily at least a week or two since I was able to give someone a really good hug and that sorta makes me sad.

Anyway, my compliments to Lunchy for a virtually perfect image.
Logged
also at one point mid-sex she asked me "what do you think about commercialism in art?"

Ladybug

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 720
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1993 on: 13 Dec 2007, 05:11 »


Semi-new shoes! The laces are kinda grey-ish, though, so I'm considering getting some navy blue laces, but I'm not sure yet.
Logged

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1994 on: 13 Dec 2007, 05:20 »

Then you wouldn't be able to see 'em! Get light blue laces, maybe?
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Ladybug

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 720
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1995 on: 13 Dec 2007, 07:34 »

Nah, I think I'll go with either new white ones or navy ones. They'll look cleaner that way, I think.
Logged

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1996 on: 13 Dec 2007, 08:05 »


Semi-new shoes! The laces are kinda grey-ish, though, so I'm considering getting some navy blue laces, but I'm not sure yet.


Are those knock off Chukkas?
Logged

Ladybug

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 720
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1997 on: 13 Dec 2007, 08:12 »

No, they're real Chukkas. Why?

ETA: Why as in why'd you assume they were fake?
« Last Edit: 13 Dec 2007, 09:49 by Ladybug »
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1998 on: 13 Dec 2007, 08:18 »

He has a shoe fetish.



I am make the effort, you guys!
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1999 on: 13 Dec 2007, 09:58 »

Beautiful people!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 53   Go Up