Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM (Read 465048 times)

redglasscurls · « **Reply #2150 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 18:36 »

Costumes!

I am way too cheerful a drunk to be a convincing 300 Queen

I failed at Medusa for being too happy, too:P

Boro_Bandito · « **Reply #2151 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 18:47 »

Late again, photobucket wasn't working earlier.

Skibas_clavicle · « **Reply #2152 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 19:53 »

I'm back, babies.

FEMINISTS DO IT CORRECTLY.

Patrick · « **Reply #2153 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 20:30 »

My neck needed a good stretchin'

0bsessions · « **Reply #2154 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 20:38 »

I do not own a scanner.

I still have my NH license as the MA RMV has made it an epic fucking ordeal to actually transfer it over. I've been down there at least three times and logged about six hours of wasted time trying and had pretty much decided to stop caring until I got turned away at a MA liquor store a couple weekends ago for having an out of state ID.

fatty · « **Reply #2155 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 23:09 »

ummm....

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2156 on:** 20 Dec 2007, 23:12 »

So the bartender says " Why the long face!"

ruyi · « **Reply #2157 on:** 21 Dec 2007, 02:27 »

sitting in a window!

Cartilage Head · « **Reply #2158 on:** 21 Dec 2007, 08:40 »

You look very cute in that picture, Ali.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2159 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 14:10 »

I have a favor to ask the ladies of the board. If you could pose in poses that allow for photoshopping so that they will appear to be casting D&D spells. For examples,

All you have to do is pose, and I will cause photoshop to make you look bad ass as fucking hell.

You will be casting these spells at me, who will also be photoshopped into the picture.

Please help me dudettes, I need it to gain a level on the internet.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2160 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 14:12 »

Also Ruyi you look very cute in that picture.

est · « **Reply #2161 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 16:15 »

I am surprised by neither of these revelations.

Also, Kieffer I will look for/create one of those pics some time today.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2162 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 16:20 »

Est it only counts if you're a lady and or in drag.

Ozymandias · « **Reply #2163 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 16:33 »

Quote from: Dirk Hopeless on 22 Dec 2007, 14:10

I have a favor to ask the ladies of the board. If you could pose in poses that allow for photoshopping so that they will appear to be casting D&D spells. For examples,

[img]photoshopped nerds[img]

All you have to do is pose, and I will cause photoshop to make you look bad ass as fucking hell.

You will be casting these spells at me, who will also be photoshopped into the picture.

Please help me dudettes, I need it to gain a level on the internet.

Who is the lady in the middle? I would like to date her.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2164 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 16:52 »

Storm Rider · « **Reply #2165 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 16:57 »

Jesse makes an awesome wizard. I think it's the beard that makes it.

Skibas_clavicle · « **Reply #2166 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 18:33 »

Kieffer, is that Gabe? If so awwww.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2167 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 18:35 »

It is totally Gabe.

Patrick · « **Reply #2168 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 19:57 »

im in ur thread, rockin out on my rad axe

David_Dovey · « **Reply #2169 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 20:39 »

Did you get rid of the McDonald's sticker after all man?

Did you give in to peer pressure?

Jimmy the Squid · « **Reply #2170 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 20:48 »

Metal anybody?

est · « **Reply #2171 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 20:57 »

Quote from: Dirk Hopeless on 22 Dec 2007, 16:20

Est it only counts if you're a lady and or in drag.

Misandrist!

Lunchbox · « **Reply #2172 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 21:12 »

Is this right Kieffer?

Actually you said you wanted to shop yourself in so probably not.

Patrick · « **Reply #2173 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 21:27 »

You kindof look like the girl from that movie "Enchanted" in that shot. This is by every means a compliment, that girl is gorgeous in my opinion.

David_Dovey · « **Reply #2174 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 21:27 »

Love the hair, Lunchbox!

Dimmukane · « **Reply #2175 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 21:39 »

Quote from: David_Dovey on 22 Dec 2007, 21:27

Love the shirt, Lunchbox!

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2176 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 21:54 »

I was hoping for more aggressive and trying to destroy me with your magic, but you just look really cute in that picture so I can't really complain.

Lunchbox · « **Reply #2177 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 22:10 »

I did better ones!
Kind of!

Bigger size here
This was in the best spot but then some idiot wanted to park their car in their own parking space. Geez.

Bigger size here
Lunchbox: Battling for Everyone Else's Wet Washing

(PS: Lugging a tripod around the apartment complex and standing in front of it in a dumb pose for ten seconds is embarrassing.)
(PPS: Sorry, Photo Thread. I will post no more.)

Patrick · « **Reply #2178 on:** 22 Dec 2007, 22:12 »

Quote from: Lunchbox on 22 Dec 2007, 22:10

Sorry, Photo Thread. I will post no more.

If you didn't post anymore, then you would REALLY owe us an apology. [/smarm]

jhocking · « **Reply #2179 on:** 23 Dec 2007, 07:38 »

I found a great photo here at my mom's house, but her scanner isn't working so I'll have to wait until I get back to Chicago to post it.

Quote from: Lunchbox on 22 Dec 2007, 21:12

Actually you said you wanted to shop yourself in so probably not.

He could be magicked tiny and trapped in a glowy glass case on your hand.

Also I SEE LONDON I SEE FRANCE etc etc

vegkitkat · « **Reply #2180 on:** 23 Dec 2007, 14:58 »

Ally, your new hair is beautiful. So much so, that I am clearly scandalized by it.

Hairy Joe Bob · « **Reply #2181 on:** 23 Dec 2007, 15:43 »

You do look pretty scandalized.

Here is me in period costume looking disapproving!

(I am in the middle.)

Hairy Joe Bob · « **Reply #2182 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 06:35 »

Also, someone stuck a knife through my head. Ouch.

Owwwwww.

Mark7 · « **Reply #2183 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 06:59 »

Yay! It's Panto season!

Cinderella?

Drill King · « **Reply #2184 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 07:39 »

Really just wanted to show off my swanky new hat, and my awesome(my opinion) jacket pattern.

Oh, and body tricks.

Mark7 · « **Reply #2185 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 07:41 »

Lord Ernie · « **Reply #2186 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 12:47 »

Quote from: Hairy Joe Bob on 24 Dec 2007, 06:35

Also, someone stuck a knife through my head. Ouch.

(Knife)

Owwwwww.

You look mildly irritated!

StMonkey · « **Reply #2187 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 12:51 »

Quote from: Hairy Joe Bob on 24 Dec 2007, 06:35

Also, someone stuck a knife through my head. Ouch.

[knife]

Owwwwww.

That picture would not nearly be as great if the bar that holds it on your head were not so clearly visible.

audacity · « **Reply #2188 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 18:16 »

My friend came over tonight to drop off an early Christmas gift. A shirt. One I've been pining for.
Excuse the overly myspaced emo pose, I was trying to get my hair out of the way without putting it up (I refuse to accept defeat!)
Also, pardon the huge picture. I'm too lazy to resize.

Patrick · « **Reply #2189 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 18:32 »

Manda I refuse to be defeated by your anti-skinny jeans propaganda. I swear it's the hoodie that made these look bad on me.

in b4 "you have skinny arms, no t-shirts for you" from people (I'm looking at you, Joe and Kieffer)

EDIT: New page, fuck yeah, and an apology for the mirror shot making my shirt hard to read.

SeanBateman · « **Reply #2190 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 19:12 »

You either have a very oddly shaped body or those jeans are way too big for you.

Spinless · « **Reply #2191 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 19:15 »

Don't be a dick Kieffer, he can't eat shit because he lives in the third world. S'why all his clothes hang off.

Slick · « **Reply #2192 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 19:36 »

Patrick, straight up, those pants look bad. It's not because of the skinny, it's the taper that kills them. If they were a consistent skinny the whole length of the leg, they'd be great, but as is, they look bad due to the taper.

Patrick · « **Reply #2193 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 19:37 »

@Kieffer: Those are 28w 34l and they still aren't long enough, nor apparently are they small enough around the waist. I'm pretty much cursed to NEVER find jeans that actually fit, that's as good as I can do.

Edit 'cause I'm a fucking idiot and don't know which number goes to which dimension *headdesk*

Spinless · « **Reply #2194 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 19:38 »

I have super-tight jean that don't tape around the ankles.
But that's because they're a few sizes too small, but still fit in the length.

Skibas_clavicle · « **Reply #2195 on:** 24 Dec 2007, 22:23 »

Quote from: audacity on 24 Dec 2007, 18:16

My friend came over tonight to drop off an early Christmas gift. A shirt. One I've been pining for.
Excuse the overly myspaced emo pose, I was trying to get my hair out of the way without putting it up (I refuse to accept defeat!)
Also, pardon the huge picture. I'm too lazy to resize.

IMG SHURRT /IMG

I'm sure you're a lovely girl, but I hate that shirt more then you could possibly imagine.

Mark7 · « **Reply #2196 on:** 25 Dec 2007, 00:53 »

Quote from: KimJongSick on 24 Dec 2007, 19:37

@Kieffer: Those are 28l 34w and they still aren't long enough, nor apparently are they small enough around the waist. I'm pretty much cursed to NEVER find jeans that actually fit, that's as good as I can do.

You mean 28" l and 34cm w, right?

Cause no way are you fat enough for a 34" waist.

normz · « **Reply #2197 on:** 25 Dec 2007, 03:03 »

this safari suit is 41 years old.... SWEET!!!!!!!!!

jmrz · « **Reply #2198 on:** 25 Dec 2007, 04:07 »

I got a totally awesome recipe book for Christmas. It only has recipes for cookies. Cookies and cookies only. I want to make these ones in particular.

Mark7 · « **Reply #2199 on:** 25 Dec 2007, 04:17 »

Quote from: jmrz on 25 Dec 2007, 04:07

I got a totally awesome recipe book for Christmas. It only has recipes for cookies. Cookies and cookies only. I want to make these ones in particular.

Hello, it's not a fact I broadcast widely but I'm an inspector for the Cookie Standards Commission.

I'll need you to send me samples

THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM (Read 465048 times)

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

SeanBateman

Spinless

Spinless

normz