THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 27 Apr 2024, 06:54
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 456728 times)

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2350 on: 01 Jan 2008, 20:00 »

When grilling, I believe the expression is "under the grill".
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2351 on: 01 Jan 2008, 20:08 »

If you attempt cheese on toast with the heatsource below, won't you just burn the bread before the cheese melts?
Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2352 on: 01 Jan 2008, 20:10 »

Grilling was maybe a poor choice of words on my behalf, but I maintain that my two-stick method creates a rudimentary 'grill' and thus qualifies the sandwich as 'grilled cheese'. Toasted cheese might be more apt. If there is a thing you can call a grill and some heat, you can call it grilling.
Besides, what I made I made with culinary art, thus transcending the need for qualification in language. It was delicious.

And as for heat, as Harry said, heat radiates, then rises. In fact, heat doesn't even rise, but hot fluids/gasses do.
For the sake of a quick explanation on terminology, trust me when I say hotter gasses/liquids have a lower density than colder liquids/gasses of the same type. Thinking on that, and the 100 Km or so of cold air pushing down from all around you, it should be easy to see that 'heat rising' is actually more like oil mechanically separating from water than any heat flow.

Also, tin foil is cheating unless it is for potatoes.

P.S. No Darryl, not if you are skilled at what you do.

P.P.S. Picture of me looking smug in a hat with my brothers:


P.P.P.S It amuses me that I wrote a paragraph being picky about wordings involving physics concepts in a discussion that was spurred on by my use of an ambiguous cooking term.
« Last Edit: 01 Jan 2008, 20:17 by Slick »
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

McTaggart

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,416
  • Positive feedback.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2353 on: 01 Jan 2008, 21:26 »

Thankyou Slick, I was about to go off over that but it's on my list of things not to get in stupid arguments with non-physics types about.
Logged
One day ends and another begins and we're never none the wiser.

Kytt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2354 on: 01 Jan 2008, 21:53 »

Sometimes my eyebrows are awesome.



Really. Fucking. Awesome.

Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2355 on: 01 Jan 2008, 22:23 »

It's times like these where I wish I had a webcam so I could show the world how it is truly done. True masters never close their eyelids :B

(joking aside, it is pretty awesome to know that I'm not the only one in the world who can do that)
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Kytt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2356 on: 01 Jan 2008, 23:07 »

Actually I can do it without closing my eyelids, I was trying to have my eyes spin around as I did the eyebrow thing but it messed up.
Logged

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2357 on: 02 Jan 2008, 03:50 »



Happy New Years everyone!

Overdressed and underdressed, who's who?
Logged

Lummer

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,561
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2358 on: 02 Jan 2008, 04:12 »

Actually, the place I celebrated at was very much for the rock and metal crowd, so my attire was the norm. That, and some very sleazy-looking chicks.
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2359 on: 02 Jan 2008, 05:43 »

animated gif
Why is this not your avatar?

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2360 on: 02 Jan 2008, 07:05 »

I went hiking on what seems to have been the last mild day for the next three months... cold sucks, but our views are awesome.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

Kytt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2361 on: 02 Jan 2008, 12:35 »

Logged

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2362 on: 02 Jan 2008, 15:45 »

i dyed my hair blue, just to try something new.
[snip]

i liked the purple better.

I think the blue is awesome.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2363 on: 02 Jan 2008, 16:13 »




I wasn't really looking for a 'Bob' when I got the haircut...


oh my god oh my god oh my god

I gotta agree with the HPN dude.
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2364 on: 02 Jan 2008, 16:23 »

Here's what Katz and I were up to on New Year's:


Please notice the gin&tonic in my hand in the middle of a frozen lake.

DRAAAANK.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2365 on: 02 Jan 2008, 17:54 »

You must be at least this hot to hat this hat.
Logged

ZJGent

  • Beyond Thunderdome
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 561
    • Night Talk at Harvey's
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2366 on: 02 Jan 2008, 18:32 »

No. You must apologise for EVER.

also: shiggidy shiggidy shwah!

A really old, old picture of me. We are being swedish pornstars - it was a thing at the time, I think.
Logged
[02:29] Danosaur: I'd Spektor your Regina.

Lines

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,234
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2367 on: 02 Jan 2008, 20:47 »

So young!

Linds you are not rocking out hard enough. Tilt your guitar! Get down on one knee!

She got me at a weird moment, because I bounce around while playing bass and I was jumping on the couch when sang. I promise I was not boring like I, and especially the guys, look like in the pic!
Logged
:grumpypuss: :grumpypuss: :grumpypuss:

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2368 on: 02 Jan 2008, 21:48 »

Pardon the myspac'ey angle in this picture.



Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

StMonkey

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 201
  • *Comment of negligible importance*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2369 on: 02 Jan 2008, 23:02 »


I'm not sure why I looked at the picture taker with such loathing, I was really enjoying my new years.....
Logged
Carpe Gluteum
Quote
The bottom line is, if anyone is going to start playing pranks by stuffing large quantities of food in their mouths, be wary.

clockworkjames

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Grammar Nazi vs Illiterate Jew
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2370 on: 03 Jan 2008, 03:16 »

I went out with these people and these people these two clowns but there is no good group picture other than this one and I look like a tit in this one yay for mixxing drinks and concluding the bar staff gave you water in place of that sambuca/tequilla/Jägermeister/Goldschläger/glenmorangie dealie we did.
Logged
still new here, didn't wanna piss anyone off

hellion

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2371 on: 03 Jan 2008, 07:07 »

Pardon the myspac'ey angle in this picture.




You are quite attractive.
« Last Edit: 03 Jan 2008, 08:01 by hellion »
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2372 on: 03 Jan 2008, 07:10 »

As opposed to conciously being creepy you could have re-worded your post.
Logged

hellion

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2373 on: 03 Jan 2008, 08:02 »

As opposed to conciously being creepy you could have re-worded your post.

You'r right...

Maybe he wants to be the creepy guy.

Maybe it gets him off.

No this time.
Logged

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2374 on: 03 Jan 2008, 12:01 »

Hellion, stop mangling the English language, it's been through enough over the years.

We dreaded Chris's hair this past weekend... I hate it.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2375 on: 03 Jan 2008, 12:44 »

Oh...my.  The dreads make my brain hurt. 

Agh.  New page. 



Me and my friends on New Years.

« Last Edit: 03 Jan 2008, 12:47 by I is Grammar »
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2376 on: 03 Jan 2008, 12:49 »

Please tell me that Linkin Park shirt is ironic.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2377 on: 03 Jan 2008, 13:07 »

Look at the facial hair. You know it isn't.
Logged

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2378 on: 03 Jan 2008, 13:13 »

You've got to have a lot of hair for dreads.  Thick hair.  From previous pictures of Chris, it doesn't look like he has very thick hair.  I have a friend who can hide 2 ounces of pot in his dreads will lose drugs in his hair.
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2379 on: 03 Jan 2008, 13:17 »

I know, I think it's going to be a problem. His hair is fluffy, but really fine, and it doesn't make for very attractive dreads. He had them before, and they looked pretty bad then too. I figure I should just wait it out until he gets sick of them, he knows they look bad but wants to give them a fighting chance.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2380 on: 03 Jan 2008, 13:43 »

Every man knows that every once in a while he has to do something that disgusts his girlfriend, or she will think he is gay.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2381 on: 03 Jan 2008, 14:38 »

You're confusing me now - is she a pirate or a cowgirl?
Logged

Verergoca

  • Cthulhu f'tagn
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2382 on: 03 Jan 2008, 15:31 »

And you are complaining?
Logged
Quote from: Dr. Sidney Freeman
Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and slide on the ice.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2383 on: 03 Jan 2008, 15:58 »

We dreaded Chris's hair this past weekend... I hate it.

You should probably break up with him then.
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2384 on: 03 Jan 2008, 20:10 »

i made cutoffs!

Sam, you're my favourite. Just wanted to let you know.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2385 on: 03 Jan 2008, 21:13 »

Skib, I'm willing to bet that the womens lib. people who designed the image in your avatar would be distressed to know that all I can think of is fisting when I see it.
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2386 on: 03 Jan 2008, 21:20 »

Distressed... or intrigued?
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2387 on: 03 Jan 2008, 23:25 »

Intrigued. I know I am.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

CmonMiracle

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2388 on: 04 Jan 2008, 15:10 »

Hi guys.

I had a great Christmas break.

Logged

audacity

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2389 on: 04 Jan 2008, 15:14 »

Marry me.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2390 on: 04 Jan 2008, 15:15 »

Where did you go/what did you do/how did you look so good while doing it?

Nice to have you back!
Logged

ledhendrix

  • Vagina Manifesto
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 681
  • *poke*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2391 on: 04 Jan 2008, 15:37 »

Remember the summer? This is what i spent most of my time doing.





I can also levitate.

Logged
Get off my land

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2392 on: 04 Jan 2008, 15:52 »

Those leg muscles are huge! What do you do? Steroids into your calves?
Logged

ledhendrix

  • Vagina Manifesto
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 681
  • *poke*
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2393 on: 04 Jan 2008, 16:06 »

Trampoline, tricking, cycling, dunno. I know a guy that can't get wellies on because they won't go past his calfs.
« Last Edit: 08 Jan 2008, 07:33 by ledhendrix »
Logged
Get off my land

PretentiousYoungSuitors

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2394 on: 04 Jan 2008, 16:28 »

This is me. 


Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2395 on: 04 Jan 2008, 16:30 »

Skib, I'm willing to bet that the womens lib. people who designed the image in your avatar would be distressed to know that all I can think of is fisting when I see it.
Not if you were imagining two chicks doing it, hehe.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Chrasstor

  • Bizarre cantaloupe phobia
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 224
  • ?Four dollars and x amount of cents
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2396 on: 04 Jan 2008, 17:10 »

Trampoline scares me :(



That is seriously a killer picture CmonMiracle
PretentiousYoungSuitos, you kinda look like a lankier version of RGC(Amanda?)'s boyfriend in that picture :O
Logged

PretentiousYoungSuitors

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2397 on: 04 Jan 2008, 17:11 »

thanks maybe?
Logged

Ladybug

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 720
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2398 on: 04 Jan 2008, 18:34 »



New hair, after removing the gunk the hairdresser put in it, with a less depressed look. Guess it could go in the hair-thread, but ah well. Kinda wish it'd looked a bit more different, but I guess that's fixable later.
« Last Edit: 04 Jan 2008, 21:13 by Ladybug »
Logged

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2399 on: 04 Jan 2008, 22:53 »



Picture from the taste of chaos, 19th nov. This is, in effect, how my hair is now, except I've given up sticking product in it and backcombing the top layers, even though it looked pretty cool.
Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 53   Go Up