Topic: TIME WARP (Read 58870 times)

RedLion · « **Reply #200 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:17 »

Can women dress like this again, please?

redglasscurls · « **Reply #201 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:21 »

Only if they have different hair, those bangs should never exist

Liz · « **Reply #202 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:29 »

If I had a figure like hers I would totally wear that style of dress.

redglasscurls · « **Reply #203 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:33 »

Maybe it's just me, but I hate the no boobs/fat ass silhouette that was popular in the 20s. I like the swingy tomboy/pretty styles, but taping your bust flat??

Patrick · « **Reply #204 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:41 »

Am I the only guy who honestly doesn't really care all that much about boobs? I mean, sure, yeah, they look nice and all, but come on, world, get over it.

Liz · « **Reply #205 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:44 »

Most women don't really get the fuss about them either. They're little pouches of fat. There is nothing special going on there.

Lunchbox · « **Reply #206 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:54 »

Boobs are pretty fun but mine are hopeless as accessories.
Also not long ago I had a haircut just like that.

Elizzybeth · « **Reply #207 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 16:55 »

Personally, I don't get it--I mean, for me they're not even erogenous zones. But in theory, it makes a little bit of sense for guys not to be attracted to women who do not yet have evidence of secondary sexual characteristics and, thus, sexual maturity; that way they don't waste their time, energy, and valuable sperm on little girls who can't yet birth babies.

That doesn't explain, though, why boobs need to be the size of basketballs.

Patrick · « **Reply #208 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 17:03 »

Quote from: Elizzybeth on 12 Mar 2008, 16:55

But in theory, it makes a little bit of sense for guys not to be attracted to women who do not yet have evidence of secondary sexual characteristics and, thus, sexual maturity; that way they don't waste their time, energy, and valuable sperm on little girls who can't yet birth babies.

Yeah, I was thinking about putting something in my post about that. I mean it is an effective reminder, but it's not like you need a freakin' pyrotechnics display in front of a vegetable shop when a wood-frame posterboard sign will do the trick just fine.

calenlass · « **Reply #209 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 17:47 »

Boobs are not vegetables, dawg. They are made of meat.

Liz · « **Reply #210 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 17:51 »

They are not for vegetarians!

redglasscurls · « **Reply #211 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 18:17 »

Oh no! Do I have to return mine?

I don't really get the obsession with huge basketball-tits, but having something there to make clothing fit nice is good in my book.

calenlass · « **Reply #212 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 18:28 »

Well, according to a friend of mine, he has never had such a good lay as the one time his then-girlfriend suggested tittyfucking (she had huge boobs).

Liz · « **Reply #213 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 18:36 »

I just don't see how that could be attractive at all, for either party.

tania · « **Reply #214 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 18:55 »

my boobs are pretty small but i'm happy with them. i don't think i could ever deal with anything larger than what i already have.

one of my housemates, who is somewhat androgynous, has a bind that presses her boobs down that she wears pretty frequently. i have tried it on a couple of times out of curiosity. having a completely flat chest is really an amazing feeling. it is kind of hard to describe... like this enormous weight has suddenly been removed, or something. she's also told me that women in her family frequently have breast reduction surgery or, in some cases, their breasts removed entirely to reduce their chances of getting breast cancer later in life. it doesn't really faze them at all because to most of them, breasts just aren't that big a deal in the first place.

it's a pretty interesting topic. i guess what i am trying to say is i don't understand the big deal when it comes to huge boobs either.

pilsner · « **Reply #215 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 19:07 »

Don't believe everything you read in the porno mags, ladies, they're about as many guys out there who prefer basketball sized titties as there are ladies who prefer 12'' schlongs.

And you know what you call a 12" schlong.

calenlass · « **Reply #216 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 19:56 »

DONG

?

pilsner · « **Reply #217 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 19:57 »

excessive

Slick · « **Reply #218 on:** 12 Mar 2008, 23:42 »

Quote from: Lunchbox on 12 Mar 2008, 16:54

Boobs are pretty fun

Boobs are pretty fun!

LordNagash · « **Reply #219 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 01:18 »

Quote from: Patrick on 12 Mar 2008, 04:56

I don't think you'd have the organs necessary to survive if you had a waist like that.

It is totally possible, just not the best idea.

Spluff · « **Reply #220 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 02:51 »

She looks like she's in pain. Which I guess is fair enough, considering that dress.

axerton · « **Reply #221 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 03:56 »

Edit: Photo thread, Timewarp thread it's all the same to me.

Also that woman has to be photoshopped, that can not be possible.

Lunchbox · « **Reply #222 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 04:10 »

It is, they break their ribs and sometimes have to have their organs smallerised or rearranged. Katie has done a post on this before I think.

ampersandwitch · « **Reply #223 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 04:24 »

Quote from: Misconception on 12 Mar 2008, 18:36

I just don't see how that could be attractive at all, for either party.

Hey have you ever heard of this thing called the internet

jodizzle · « **Reply #224 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 04:39 »

Quote from: axerton on 13 Mar 2008, 03:56

Also that woman has to be photoshopped, that can not be possible.

It is completely possible. I have done lots of research on tighlacing for art projects. their organs shift around! woo! they wear their corsets 23 hours a day.

Doug S. Machina · « **Reply #225 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 05:23 »

Quote from: pilsner on 12 Mar 2008, 19:07

Don't believe everything you read in the porno mags, ladies, they're about as many guys out there who prefer basketball sized titties as there are ladies who prefer 12'' schlongs.

And you know what you call a 12" schlong.

A foot! And why would you want a foot there?

axerton · « **Reply #226 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 05:24 »

Quote from: Lunchbox on 13 Mar 2008, 04:10

It is, they break their ribs and sometimes have to have their organs smallerised or rearranged. Katie has done a post on this before I think.

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Why the hell would you do it though, it doesn't look in the slightest attractive. All I can think when I look at her is how easy it would be to actually break her in half.

Patrick · « **Reply #227 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 07:13 »

Corsets ain't so bad until you get into the whole "Let's use this to fucking squeeze myself into a barely-recognizable-as-human shape!" thing.

pilsner · « **Reply #228 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 07:15 »

It's almost as if tight-lacing is a fetish. Wait a second

Elizzybeth · « **Reply #229 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 08:56 »

Ugh. Okay, I retract my earlier statement about wanting a waist like that.

I'm perfectly happy with my waist as it is, ribs and organs intact.

calenlass · « **Reply #230 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 10:16 »

Right, so.

You guys, tightlacing takes years, especially for a waist that small, and this is something no one seems to understand. If you do it properly, it is neither uncomfortable nor does it break your ribs. It is body modification, and it is motivated by the same thing that inspires people to get 00-gauge plugs in their ears or full sleeve and back tattoos. The different corset silhouettes determine how much and what kind of changes you will make to your body. Hourglass corsets are the best in terms of leaving your insides in place and obtaining the largest difference in the measurements between bust/hip and waist. The Edwardian straight front (or S-curve) was originally marketed as a medical corset "designed to help women breathe freely", but then no one really thought about what effects it would have on spine and pelvis and it turned out to be a tremendously bad idea. The wasp corset does compress the floating ribs (and I'm sure that if you try to reduce too quickly or if you do it wrong, it could feasibly break them), but in my own personal opinion in terms of moderate reductions it creates the nicest shape.

I am tempted to embark on a tightlacing venture of my own just to prove a point, except I am not going to walk around in my corsets all summer in georgia and I haven't got any summer ones. If I remember when it is starting to get marginally less oppressively hot, I will work on knocking mine down from 25 to 21 inches just for the hell of it.

Edit: I just found this as I was GISing hourglass corsets. Clearly whoever drew that has never been party to properly fitted corsets.

Barmymoo · « **Reply #231 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 11:20 »

OK, here's a not-very-time-warpy picture of me in a dress that is older than me, therefore qualifies by the skin of its non-existant teeth. I'm also wearing sunglasses that remind me of Elton John (and not John Lennon as I originally thought).

[img width= height=]http://www.barmymoo.co.uk/dress.jpg[/img]

And here's a better one, Mrs Bedwin circa Dickensian times.

[img width= height=]http://www.barmymoo.co.uk/mrs-bedwin.jpg[/img]

Both quite old but I don't have a camera. Thanks calenlass, VLC media seems to be pretty useful.

calenlass · « **Reply #232 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 11:27 »

Use VLC media player and get a screenshot. Then use something better than paint.

RedLion · « **Reply #233 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 21:03 »

Quote from: calenlass on 13 Mar 2008, 10:16

You can look dangerously, shockingly thin without being anorexic, through the aid of psychotically shaped and applied corsets!

I guess I'm overlooking something, but why would someone want to look like the women in those pictures, aside from a fetish? I believe you when you say that it's not necessarily dangerous, but..well, Jesus, It can't be healthy.

Lunchbox · « **Reply #234 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 21:08 »

Yeah, I agree with you dude.
Although she is gorgeous, that picture of Dita makes me feel slightly ill. Human bodies are not supposed to do that.

calenlass · « **Reply #235 on:** 13 Mar 2008, 23:49 »

I am going to refrain from saying anything other than that Dita von Teese is a gorgeous lady.

Also that ~~most~~ lots of people who wear corsets are not fetishists and are not going for crazy reductions. Plus, some ladies are just tiny naturally, like Gina Lollobrigida or Vera-Ellen (although it is true she suffered from anorexia as well) or Salma Hayek.

I have never bothered going down to 21 inches because I do not think my proportions would look right with a waist that small, because I am pretty curvy as it is. I can get down to just over 22 for my historical dress-up things, but that is just playing.

Patrick · « **Reply #236 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 05:47 »

I'm not arguing against corsets altogether, but lol im in ur clothin, crushin ur guts corset-wearing is just plain nasty-looking.

Slick · « **Reply #237 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:17 »

Quote from: calenlass on 13 Mar 2008, 23:49

I am going to refrain from saying anything other than that Dita von Teese is a gorgeous lady.

NSFW NSFW ALERT ALERT

normz · « **Reply #238 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:24 »

it's dita von teese ..... did you REALLY expect it to be safe for work????

jhocking · « **Reply #239 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:26 »

Considering some of the avatars people have, I find the entire forum to be NSFW really.

normz · « **Reply #240 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:28 »

dammit why must you judge me joe? *sobs* just because i fell asleep on the beach and had a sand sex-change at the hands of some bored friends doesnt mean im a freak

jhocking · « **Reply #241 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:29 »

eh I wasn't referring to your av.

Lines · « **Reply #242 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:32 »

Corsets that do not greatly alter a woman's appearance are the best. Ones that give you a freakishly tiny waist, etc. scare me. They just look so unnatural and it weirds me out.

But I would like a corset that are like three of the ones Katie posted:

Quote from: calenlass on 13 Mar 2008, 23:49

Also that ~~most~~ lots of people who wear corsets are not fetishists and are not going for crazy reductions.

Slick · « **Reply #243 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 06:40 »

Cartoon furry squirrels with giant dongs I can explain away as being 'the internet', simple boobies, however, are a little harder to deal with.

Barmymoo · « **Reply #244 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 12:06 »

I wasn't aware that the internet was by definition a cartoon furry squirrel with a giant dong, maybe that's where I've been going wrong.

Verergoca · « **Reply #245 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 15:04 »

Quote from: jhocking on 14 Mar 2008, 06:29

eh I wasn't referring to your av.

What?

Patrick · « **Reply #246 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 16:48 »

Quote from: Slick on 14 Mar 2008, 06:40

simple boobies, however, are a little harder to deal with.

True story: was out at a restaurant tonight and on the news there was some footage of a doctor doing an ultrasound on a woman's tit.

She had a fantastic rack, just for the record.

Slick · « **Reply #247 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 17:13 »

Quote from: Barmymoo on 14 Mar 2008, 12:06

I wasn't aware that the internet was by definition a cartoon furry squirrel with a giant dong, maybe that's where I've been going wrong.

Quote from: Katie

Quote

Ã¶de · « **Reply #248 on:** 14 Mar 2008, 17:39 »

Quote from: Verergoca on 14 Mar 2008, 15:04

What?

Yours is art. I think it looks better with a little more contrast though!

Verergoca · « **Reply #249 on:** 15 Mar 2008, 01:53 »

Dude, stop fiddling with my butt!

THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Author Topic: TIME WARP (Read 58870 times)

LordNagash

normz

normz