Jeph Jacques's comics discussion forums

  • 17 Jan 2022, 08:33
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Exciting Sequel News  (Read 24362 times)

TheFuriousWombat

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,551
    • WXBC Bard College Radio Online
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #100 on: 26 Jun 2008, 19:35 »

Are you kidding? Lazenby is absolutely atrocious. He's easily the worst.
Logged
I punched all the girls in the face on the way to the booth to vote for Hitler.

Hollow Press (my blog)

Kugai

  • CIA Handler of Miss Melody Powers
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11,503
  • Crazy Kiwi Shoujo-Ai Fan
    • My Homepage
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #101 on: 26 Jun 2008, 19:38 »

Actually, the original Italian Job film was supposed to have a sequal which would have seen Caine and the crew trying to get the money back off the mob after the bus finally goes over the cliff.
Logged
James The Kugai 

You can never have too much Coffee.

Sox

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,425
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #102 on: 28 Jun 2008, 07:00 »

Let's play Rank!

  • Connery
  • Craig
  • Dalton
  • Lazenby
  • Brosnan
  • Moore

This is easy. You work by track record. Good to bad movies ratio in their simplest forms and turned into into a scale. It works like this.
Craig
Dalton
Lazenby
Brosnan
Connery
Moore

There's waffles. Of course, there's always waffles. You had good Bonds in movies filled with bullshit, and bad Bonds in decent movies. This method is based on consistency, so it favours actors that had the fewest movies. This perhaps puts Lazenby a little higher than he should be, I can't be sure, I haven't seen his movie in years.
Logged

Surgoshan

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,807
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #103 on: 28 Jun 2008, 08:28 »

That method doesn't favor the actors with fewer films; if Lazenby's one movie had sucked balls, he'd be at the bottom of the list.  It all works out.
Logged

TheFuriousWombat

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,551
    • WXBC Bard College Radio Online
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #104 on: 28 Jun 2008, 21:39 »

Lazenby's Bond was clumsy, oafish, unattractive, and the antithesis of suave. In other words, he's no Bond.
Logged
I punched all the girls in the face on the way to the booth to vote for Hitler.

Hollow Press (my blog)

Surgoshan

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,807
Re: Exciting Sequel News
« Reply #105 on: 28 Jun 2008, 23:22 »

Lazenby's Bond was clumsy, oafish, unattractive, and the antithesis of suave. In other words, he's no Bond.

On the other hand, you might recall the fat, ugly dumbass who tripped on a vagina.

Sometimes fiction upsets us... perhaps THE AUTHOR wanted us to appreciate random bullshit.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up