THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 20 Apr 2024, 04:57
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

(Please read the post first) Where do think you fall on the bell-curve of 'normality'?

I'm probably a bit more sane than the people around me
- 10 (8.9%)
I'm pretty much normal but I like to indulge in crazy things/activities
- 33 (29.5%)
I'm on the fringe, I have wacky ideas and most people don't get it
- 52 (46.4%)
I'm off my rocker, I have trouble acting 'normal' in public
- 13 (11.6%)
I'm so alone I cut myself at night
- 4 (3.6%)

Total Members Voted: 82


Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: How "normal" do you think you are?  (Read 16689 times)

dennis

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 776
  • A sockful of quarters makes the medicine go down.
    • Lies! Truth!
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #100 on: 10 Jul 2008, 10:19 »

jhocking:
Oh, I think I misunderstood you the first time then. Thanks for correcting.

How can radiation be given off? At absolute 0, there is no energy, so the atom cannot emit radiation because it has no energy to spare.
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy05/phy05142.htm
Sorry if that's not a clickable link, I have no clue how to do those unless the forum has a system that does it for me.
Absolute zero isn't an attainable state, but yes if you *were* too cool an a material to 0K, you would see no radiation. However, realize that as long as there is a temperature differential, it's not a stable state.

In any case, the caesium isotope used in atomic clocks isn't radioactive, anyway.

The radiation they're talking about in an atomic clock are microwave frequency oscillations (i.e. electromagnetic, not nuclear) that are a fundamental property of caesium atoms. You can tune a matter circuit to those oscillations and it basically works like a pendulum in a grandfather clock or the quartz crystal in an electric clock. You still have to put energy into the clock itself.
Logged

StreetSpirit

  • Obscure cultural reference
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 130
  • "Type "cookie", you idiot."
    • Last.FM
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #101 on: 10 Jul 2008, 12:27 »

SCIENCE!
Logged
"Think you've seen it all? Think again. Outside those doors, we might see anything. We could find new worlds, terrifying monsters, impossible things. And if you come with me... nothing will ever be the same again!"
-The 10th Doctor (doctor who)

est

  • this is a test
  • Admin emeritus
  • Older than Moses
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,157
  • V O L L E Y B A L L
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #102 on: 10 Jul 2008, 17:04 »

Man, science is for nerds.
Logged

KvP

  • WoW gold miner on break
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,599
  • COME DOWN NOW
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #103 on: 10 Jul 2008, 17:09 »

Get 'em, Ogre!
Logged
I review, sometimes.
Quote from: Andy
I love this vagina store!
Quote from: Andy
SNEAKY
I sneak that shit
And liek
OMG DICK JERK

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #104 on: 10 Jul 2008, 18:46 »

Man, science is for nerds.

Blue Kitty

  • WoW gold miner on break
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,964
    • Twitter
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #105 on: 10 Jul 2008, 19:09 »

Thank you for using that one instead of this one
Logged

Dal

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #106 on: 10 Jul 2008, 20:35 »

Zero out of zero normal.

is that some SquidDNA in this thread?
Logged
"Did you just grab my ass? No? Why not?"

himynameisjulien

  • Guest
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #107 on: 10 Jul 2008, 21:29 »

something goes here (resized for readability)
Absolute zero isn't an attainable state, but yes if you *were* too cool an a material to 0K, you would see no radiation. However, realize that as long as there is a temperature differential, it's not a stable state.

In any case, the caesium isotope used in atomic clocks isn't radioactive, anyway.

The radiation they're talking about in an atomic clock are microwave frequency oscillations (i.e. electromagnetic, not nuclear) that are a fundamental property of caesium atoms. You can tune a matter circuit to those oscillations and it basically works like a pendulum in a grandfather clock or the quartz crystal in an electric clock. You still have to put energy into the clock itself.
Ah, ok then.
Something slightly off-topic: Do you happen to know how the radiation of this particular isotope of this particular element (caesium) was chosen to represent the second? There are millions, if not billions of other things which could have been chosen; people must have had to go through countless different methods/substances/etc. Was one just picked out of an educated guess and it happened to fit? Is the wavelength of this radiation so universally small that any element could be picked and still work, with an appropriately changed number of cycles?
Logged

Vendetagainst

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,250
  • Too orangey for crows
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #108 on: 12 Jul 2008, 20:54 »

Thank you for using that one instead of this one
I was almost sure that was a rickroll. I wonder if I should worry that I could totally see myself dressing like that on a whim.


Also, at the risk of sounding generic and whatnot I'd like to say that normality is a standard that, although very real, is very different from the "normality" that society holds as a standard. The slight social differentiations that people embrace are largely if not entirely arbitrary, regardless of societal reaction, and are not a valid reflection of a person's mental processes. People largely follow the same trains of thought in any given situation, and that they reach different conclusions is the result primarily of chance (such as in the "banality of evil"). I mean, yes I believe that each individual is unique, but I think that it is not because we think markedly differently but because each of our decisions is biased by it's predecessors and we gradually place ourselves in situations unique to ourselves.
Logged
Quote from: Sox
I think it's because your 'age' is really only determined by how exasperated you seem when you have to stand up.

Quote from: KharBevNor
PEW PEW PEW FUCK OFF SPACE

ThisIsOriginal

  • Guest
Re: How "normal" do you think you are?
« Reply #109 on: 28 Jul 2008, 21:00 »

somewhere between on the fringe and off my rocker.


I'll let you guys figure out where exactly that is.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up