It's a comedy and drama, populated with characters who have clear and realistic personalities, which is represented as a cartoon. Discussion of the behavior of fictional characters is something you can get a degree in: dismissing doing so because "it's just a cartoon" is a prejudiced refusal to acknowledge that a comic strip is a valid storytelling medium.
Realistic? The people and events in your world must be a
lot more interesting than the ones I know. Part of the reason I read QC is the way Jeph combines fantasy and reality, with each heightening the other. A world filled with flying vacuum-cleaners, sentient robots, samurai squirrel-duels, roaming kung-fu monks, James Bond-style supervillains, pocket-sized laser cannnon, private space-stations, and mysterious scarred Russian vamps is not realistic. As for the characters, does anyone
honestly imagine that Hanners is a
realistic depiction of an OCD sufferer? Or that Faye's violent, drunken
tsundere is a realistic depiction of, well, anyone? Faye's consequence-free violence is as much cartoon fantasy as her ability to catapult a grown man out of the CoD and into the street by the power of her scorn. It's a standard part of the QC
schtick. Faye does something rude, violent, or abusive and
hilarity ensues.
I absolutely reject the idea that cartoons cannot be taken seriously as a story-telling medium.
Maus: A Survivor's Tale in comics (and it's a
furry comic, no less!), and
Grave Of The Fireflies in animated films are evidence enough for me. But, especially in the case of the latter, I probably wouldn't want a dose every day. For that, QC's fantasy-realism suits me very nicely.
Having said all that, I thought today's strip was very nicely drawn and written, but maybe a little lacking in the punch-line department. Actually, I'm not sure if it needed a punch-line, but... *shrug*