Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Dervish]

Sorry, it's a link to an article, but I had to mention that I made the usual mistake when I first read the headline: 'Great Tits also have age-related defects'

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110307130215.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29

[Tom]

Why here?

[Jimor]

I guess "CLIKC" as a sub-forum title could make it seem like a place to post links.

Edit: @Paul -- I think it's probably time for the semi-regular tit/booby thread anyway.

[pwhodges]

FWIW, it's slightly less out of place here, rather than CLIKC...

[imagist42]

Honestly this should have just been thrown to the wolves.

[Tom]

Do it.

[pwhodges]

Just let it die naturally; there's no reason actually to censor it.

[imagist42]

Shit that was my 1000th post? What a waste.

Just like every other post I've ever made, I guess.

[Tom]

It's not censorship, it's bloodsport.

[Dliessmgg]

[David_Dovey]

Just let it die naturally; there's no reason actually to censor it.

Putting it in QCD isn't censoring it? I mean, it's far more likely to actually spawn some sort of conversation in there.

[pwhodges]

All I mean is, I wouldn't delete or lock it without actual cause.  It has no relevance to either CLIKC or the QCD forum, and actually this is essentially the off-topic area.  To make it go away, just ignore it and don't post in it any more.