I think that Clinton gets the misused version of the word 'creepy' - but, then again, it probably is a little creepy to have someone go all fanboy about one of your parents.
I still consider him harmless, but maybe Hanners just inadvertently started the android/robot revolution, and they will begin assimilating our planet now...
You just never can tell.
I don't see Clinton as creepy so much as I feel he is a crazed weirdo. Yes, there is a difference, I think.
Creepy implies, to me, stalking or some other sort of inappropriate sexual connotation paired with personal infringement, whereas
crazed weirdo simply means he's stuck on one particular subject, thinks far too much about it, and his brain gets overheated whenever it comes up
but there's noting remotely personal about it. Clinton could probably care less about Hanners as a person or a female, I suspectbut as a cult of the EC object, she's 'worthy' of his maniac attention. He's pretty clearly gone off the deep end in his subject area. I know some poeple who are like this about various thingscars, bands, Walt Whitman. (I kid you not; one person I know was a fearful Whitman scholar/fanatic, in that we were all afraid of him. You did
not want to get him on the subject, and god help us all if some relative of Whitman's had ever made his/her connection known is his presence.)
Kazukagii, I think you've already won the "how hard"* contest via your sheer willingness to go into that place where all who are decent should not: Punland, the country next to that festering hellhole known as Coupleportmanteausia. I give you half of one of my internets, the other half being reserved because, of course, you went to Punland, you evil wretch. Shame on you.
*If anyone begins reading the thread at this point and wonders what we're talking about, rest assured it's not only what you think, but far, far worse. Save yourself!