THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 08 Nov 2024, 16:42
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Art change?  (Read 22247 times)

Storel

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,080
Re: Art change?
« Reply #50 on: 26 Oct 2014, 01:19 »

Do we need to send in the peacekeeping forces here?



(click to show/hide)

That was what TVTropes would call one of Hanners's "Crowning Moments of Glory".
Logged

Zebediah

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,278
  • I'm a bandicoot!
Re: Art change?
« Reply #51 on: 26 Oct 2014, 07:36 »

The actual trope is Crowning Moment of Awesome. Or it used to be, until they renamed it.  :facepalm:
Logged
"It CAN'T be a bad decision, it resulted in CARROT CAKE!"

Carl-E

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,346
  • The distilled essence of Mr. James Beam himself.
Re: Art change?
« Reply #52 on: 26 Oct 2014, 18:00 »

AprilArcus,

I'm willing to call a truce if you are. 

We really don't need an angry Hanners all up in our business. 



That sounds a lot worse than I meant it to...   :-P
Logged
When people try to speak a gut reaction, they end up talking out their ass.

Half Empty Coffee Cup

  • Psychopath in a hockey mask
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 609
Re: Art change?
« Reply #53 on: 26 Oct 2014, 19:21 »



You really don't want Hanners all up in your business.
Logged
Mistakes, ahoy!

NemoX

  • Balloon animal serial killer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 86
  • Lonely nobody
Re: Art change?
« Reply #54 on: 26 Oct 2014, 22:25 »

The actual trope is Crowning Moment of Awesome. Or it used to be, until they renamed it.  :facepalm:

wait what? when did this happen? I haven't gone on a tvtropes wikiwalk in a couple months but last I was there it was still CMOA...  :psyduck:
Logged
"Wit is educated insolence" - Aristotle

Zebediah

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,278
  • I'm a bandicoot!
Re: Art change?
« Reply #55 on: 27 Oct 2014, 04:29 »

It is very recent. It seems that too many people were sticking just any old ordinary moment of awesome into Crowning Moment of Awesome, so the tvtropes mods responded with nukes.
Logged
"It CAN'T be a bad decision, it resulted in CARROT CAKE!"

ReindeerFlotilla

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,339
  • All Your Marriage Are Belong to Everyone
    • Singular Blues
Re: Art change?
« Reply #56 on: 28 Oct 2014, 23:05 »

It is very recent. It seems that too many people were sticking just any old ordinary moment of awesome into Crowning Moment of Awesome, so the tvtropes mods responded with nukes.

I figured it had to be something like this. I mean, you can only have one Crowning Moment of Awesome. Like new Battlestar Galactica. When Galactica jumps to New Caprica during the break out, proving that--unlike most modern SciFi spaceships, battlestars can not fly. Now, one can debate if this was THE CMoA for the series, but if it's not, it's not. You can break it down by character, but you can still only have one per character.

Or Rebuild of Evangelion. Lots of truly awesome stuff, and plenty of characters to have their own CMoA. Focus on Shinji. Here's a guy who is anti-(as in "not at all")heroic that there's at least one whole youtube series devoted to making fun of him. He really is kinda pathetic. In all fairness, he's supposed to be the kid off the street, thrown into an impossible situation. He's just more realistic than that trope usually is. So, during Evangelion 2.0 when Shinji restarts his power depleted EVA by sheer force of will, and proceeds to (rather casually) kick the shit out of the most powerful angel faced so far, then proceeds (Again, basically by will alone) to initiate 4th Impact... that's a CROWNING Moment of Awesome.

I'm going to stand behind that one as not something you can argue with.

But there's someone--maybe on this forum--who would argue. And that's why a CMoA page, with examples, on a wiki is just not possible.

ReindeerFlotilla

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,339
  • All Your Marriage Are Belong to Everyone
    • Singular Blues
Re: Art change?
« Reply #57 on: 29 Oct 2014, 00:11 »

img

You really don't want Hanners all up in your business.

Also, THIS may be Hannelore's CMoA. Jeph says in the news post "She yelled so hard Faye sobered up and Angus didnt need glasses anymore"

I checked. Angus never wears glasses again.

Storel

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,080
Re: Art change?
« Reply #58 on: 29 Oct 2014, 00:40 »

img

You really don't want Hanners all up in your business.

Also, THIS may be Hannelore's CMoA. Jeph says in the news post "She yelled so hard Faye sobered up and Angus didnt need glasses anymore"

I checked. Angus never wears glasses again.

 :-o  Wow...
Logged

AprilArcus

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 381
  • adoxographical exegete
Re: Art change?
« Reply #59 on: 29 Oct 2014, 00:47 »

BenRG

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,861
  • Boldly Going From The Back Seat!
Re: Art change?
« Reply #60 on: 29 Oct 2014, 02:14 »

img

You really don't want Hanners all up in your business.

Also, THIS may be Hannelore's CMoA. Jeph says in the news post "She yelled so hard Faye sobered up and Angus didnt need glasses anymore"

I checked. Angus never wears glasses again.

I'm wondering if Hannelore made some comment about Angus's glasses that so hurt him, emotionally, that he HAD to use contacts from that day forward for his self-image's sake!  :-o
Logged
~~~~

They call me BenRG... But I don't know why!

DSL

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,097
    • Don Lee Cartoons
Re: Art change?
« Reply #61 on: 29 Oct 2014, 02:48 »

The glasses vaporized and Angus's corneas spontaneously reshaped.
Logged
"We are who we pretend to be. So we had better be careful who we pretend to be."  -- Kurt Vonnegut.

ReindeerFlotilla

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,339
  • All Your Marriage Are Belong to Everyone
    • Singular Blues
Re: Art change?
« Reply #62 on: 29 Oct 2014, 21:00 »

img

You really don't want Hanners all up in your business.

Also, THIS may be Hannelore's CMoA. Jeph says in the news post "She yelled so hard Faye sobered up and Angus didnt need glasses anymore"

I checked. Angus never wears glasses again.

I'm wondering if Hannelore made some comment about Angus's glasses that so hurt him, emotionally, that he HAD to use contacts from that day forward for his self-image's sake!  :-o

No, no, no. Angus, in panel four, is holding his glasses, looking stunned. If she hurt his feelings over them, I would assume he'd be looking at the glasses not the windows. Since he has them in hand they weren't vaporized.

The word of god is in the news post. Hanners's intimidate roll was so high it shocked Faye sober and corrected Angus's vision. Then she made a soothing cup of herbal tea.

Hannelore is not to be trifled with.

DSL

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,097
    • Don Lee Cartoons
Re: Art change?
« Reply #63 on: 29 Oct 2014, 21:42 »

The lenses vaporized. I'm going to stand with my headcannon to the end.
Logged
"We are who we pretend to be. So we had better be careful who we pretend to be."  -- Kurt Vonnegut.

ReindeerFlotilla

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,339
  • All Your Marriage Are Belong to Everyone
    • Singular Blues
Re: Art change?
« Reply #64 on: 29 Oct 2014, 21:45 »

He's got half rims. If the vaporized her wouldn't have his thumb against the right lens... because it wouldn't be there.

The recoil on those things is a bitch.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up